Hubbry Logo
Bahariya FormationBahariya FormationMain
Open search
Bahariya Formation
Community hub
Bahariya Formation
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bahariya Formation
Bahariya Formation
Bahariya Formation
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Bahariya Formation (also transcribed as Baharija Formation) is a fossiliferous geologic formation dating back to the early Cenomanian, which outcrops within the Bahariya depression in Egypt, and is known from oil exploration drilling across much of the Western Desert where it forms an important oil reservoir.[1][3][4]

Key Information

Extent

[edit]
Geological map

The Bahariya Formation forms the base of the depression, the lower part of the enclosing escarpment and all of the small hills within.[5] The type section for the formation is found at Gebel El-Dist, a hill at the northern end of the Bahariya depression.[6]

Stratigraphy and sedimentology

[edit]

Four depositional sequences have been recognised in the Bahariya Formation in the Bahariya depression, separated by three sub-aerial unconformities. The formation was deposited during a period of relative rise in sea level, with each unconformity representing a relative fall in sea level.[1] Each of the individual sequences contains sediments deposited under fluvial, shoreline and shallow marine conditions.

Microfauna and Meiofauna

[edit]

Foraminifera

[edit]
Foraminifera of the Bahariya Formation
Genus Species
Charentia C. cuvillieri
Favusella F. washitensis
Mayncina M. orbignyi
Rotalipora R. cushmani
R. reicheli
Thomasinella T. aegyptia
T. fragmentaria
T. punica
Whiteinella W. archaeocretacea

Other microorganisms

[edit]
Other microorganisms of the Bahariya Formation
Genus Species Images
Botryococcus
Botryococcus
Pediastrum

Scenedesmus
Coronifera C. oceanica
Cyclonephelium C. edwardsii
C. vannophorum
Dynopterigium D. cladoides
Exochosphaeridium
Florentinia F. cooksoniae
F. mantlii
Kallosphaeridium
Mudrongia M. simplex
Palaeoperidinium P. cretaceum
Pediastrum
Pseudoceratium P. anaphrisum
P. securigerum
Scenedesmus
Spiniferites
Subtilisphaera S. perlucida
S. senegalensis
Xiphophoridium X. alatum

Invertebrates

[edit]

Molluscs

[edit]
Molluscs of the Bahariya Formation
Genus Species Notes Images
Baculites A heteromorph ammonite with a nearly straight shell.
Baculites.
Cardium A cockle.
Exogyra A reef-forming true oyster associated with solid substrates and warm temperatures.
Gastrochaena A saltwater clam.
Neolobites N. vibrayeanus A typical rolled ammonite.
Nucula A small saltwater clam.
Ostrea O. flabeata An edible oyster.

Crustaceans (Ostracoda)

[edit]
Crustaceans of the Bahariya Formation
Genus Species Notes Images
Amphicytherura A. sexta
Anticythereis A. gaensis
Bairdia B. bassiounii
B. elongata
Brachycythere B. ledaforma porosa
Bythoceratina B. avnonensis
B. tamarae
Bythocypris B. eskeri
Cythereis C. algeriana
C. bicornis levis
C. canteriolata
Cytherella C. ovata
C. paenovata
C. parallela
C. sulcata
Fabanella
Looneyella L. sohni
Loxoconcha L. clinocosta
L. fletcheri
Metacytheropteron M. berbericum
Ovocytheridea O. caudata
O. producta
O. reniformis
Paracypris P. acutocaudata
P. angusta
P. mdaouerensis
P. triangularis
Pterygocythere P. raabi
Veeniacythereis V. jezzineensis
Xestoleberis X. obesa

Insects

[edit]

Direct fossils are sparse, though plant leaves with extensive damage from folivorous insects have been documented.

Vertebrates

[edit]

Cartilaginous fish

[edit]
Color key
Taxon Reclassified taxon Taxon falsely reported as present Dubious taxon or junior synonym Ichnotaxon Ootaxon Morphotaxon
Notes
Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; crossed out taxa are discredited.
Chondrichthyes of the Bahariya Formation
Genus Species Abundance Notes Images
Aegyptobatus A. kuehnei A sclerorhynchiform.
Modern Gymnura.

Onchopristis tooth.

Modern Rhinoptera.

Scapanorhynchus

Squalicorax
Modern Squatina.
Asteracanthus A. aegyptiacus A hybodont shark.
Baharipristis B. bastetiae A sclerorhynchiform.
Cretodus C. longiplicatus A shark.
Cretolamna C. appendiculata A mackerel shark.
Distobatus D. nutiae A sclerorhynchiform.
Gymnura G. laterialata A butterfly ray.
Haimirichia H. amonensis A shark previously classified in the genera Odontaspis, Serratolamna, and Carcharias.
Isidobatus I. tricarinatus A sclerorhynchiform.
Marckgrafia M. lybica A sclerorhynchiform.
Onchopristis O. numida One complete cranium and associated vertebrae. A sclerorhynchid rajoid.
Peyeria P. libyca A sclerorhynchiform.
Ptychotrygon P. henkeli A sclerorhynchiform.
Renpetia R. labiicarinata A sclerorhynchiform.
Rhinoptera A batoid ray.
Scapanorhynchus S. subulatus A mitsukurinid similar to the modern goblin shark.
Schizorhiza S. stromeri Specimens are actually from the younger Ain Giffara Formation.
Squalicorax S. baharijensis A large shark.
Squatina An angelshark.
Tribodus T. aschersoni A hybodont.

Bony fish

[edit]
Color key
Taxon Reclassified taxon Taxon falsely reported as present Dubious taxon or junior synonym Ichnotaxon Ootaxon Morphotaxon
Notes
Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; crossed out taxa are discredited.
Osteichthyes of the Bahariya Formation
Genus Species Abundance Notes Images
Bawitius B. bartheli A giant bichir.
Ceratodus

Enchodus

Lepidotes

Mawsonia

Neoceratodus

Saurodon
Concavotectum C. moroccensis Possibly synonymous with Paranogmius doederleini.
Ceratodus A lungfish.
Coelodus A pycnodontid.
Enchodus One tooth. A predatory fish.
Lepidotes Isolated scales. Possibly misidentified from Bawitius bartheli.
Mawsonia M. lybica Considered a "signature taxon" of the formation. A giant freshwater coelacanth. Species assignation deemed provisional due to the lack of neotype.
Neoceratodus N. africanus A lungfish related to the living Australian species.
Obaichthys O. africanus An obaichthyid lepisosteiform. Remains formerly attributed to "Stromerichthys".[7]
Palaeonotopterus P. greenwoodi Nomen conservandum of the two Plethodus species previously described.
Paranogmius Paranogmius doederleini One vertebra. Holotype lost in World War II. Could be synonymous with Concavotectum moroccensis.
Plethodus P. libycus
P. tibniensis 		Holotypes destroyed in World War II, but now believed to have been misidentified Palaeonotopterus greenwoodi.
Retodus R. tuberculatus A lungfish species identified from remains previously assigned to Neoceratodus.
Saurodon Identified by Stromer in 1936, but now rejected due to this genus appearing only in post-Cenomanian Europe and North America. Now listed as Ichthyodectidae incertae sedis.
Stromerichthys S. aethiopicus A fish initially identified as a bowfin relative, but now thought to be a chimera consisting of remains assignable to Bawitius, Obaichthys, and others.[8]

Testudines

[edit]
Testudines of the Bahariya Formation
Genus Species Abundance Notes Images
Apertotemporalis A. baharijensis A small pleurodiran turtle, likely belonging to Bothremydidae. Other unnamed species are also present.
cf. Araripemydidae[9] indeterminate
cf. Bothremydidae[9] indeterminate
cf. Chelonioidea[9] indeterminate

Squamates

[edit]
Squamates of the Bahariya Formation
Genus Species Abundance Notes Images
Simoliophis Abundant First known sea snake, with functional hind legs. Now believed to include elements from different species and at least one of a different, unnamed genus.

Plesiosaurs

[edit]
Color key
Taxon Reclassified taxon Taxon falsely reported as present Dubious taxon or junior synonym Ichnotaxon Ootaxon Morphotaxon
Notes
Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; crossed out taxa are discredited.
Plesiosaurs of the Bahariya Formation
Genus Species Abundance Notes Images
Leptocleidus L. capensis A small plesiosaur that visited brackish or fresh water systems. Though known from both South Africa and England, the Egyptian material lacks diagnostic traits of the genus and is now referred as Polycotylidae incertae sedis.
Leptocleidus

Crocodyliformes

[edit]
Color key
Taxon Reclassified taxon Taxon falsely reported as present Dubious taxon or junior synonym Ichnotaxon Ootaxon Morphotaxon
Notes
Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; crossed out taxa are discredited.
Crocodyliformes of the Bahariya Formation
Genus Species Abundance Notes Images
Aegyptosuchus A. peyeri A poorly known, possibly stomatosuchid crocodile.
Hamadasuchus

Stomatosuchus
Hamadasuchus H. rebouli A terrestrial, dog-like peirosaurid. It is possible that some material previously attributed to Libycosuchus actually belongs to this species.
Libycosuchus L. brevirostris A terrestrial crocodile of uncertain affinities, possibly related to Notosuchus.
Stomatosuchus S. inermis A complete cranium A large, flat-headed stomatosuchid with multiple small conical teeth, and possibly a pelican-like throat pouch. The only remains were destroyed in World War II.
Stromerosuchus S. aegyptiacus Fragmentary remains Nomen dubium assigned to material found in 1911, that were badly damaged in 1922 while being shipped to Germany for study. Some material may belong to Aegyptosuchus and other to Stomatosuchus.

Pterosaurs

[edit]
Color key
Taxon Reclassified taxon Taxon falsely reported as present Dubious taxon or junior synonym Ichnotaxon Ootaxon Morphotaxon
Notes
Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; crossed out taxa are discredited.
Pterosaurs of the Bahariya Formation
Genus Species Material Notes Images
Pterosauria indet.[10] Indeterminate Left first wing phalanx A medium-sized pterosaur. The first record of a pterosaur from Egypt.

Dinosaurs

[edit]

Sauropods

[edit]
Color key
Taxon Reclassified taxon Taxon falsely reported as present Dubious taxon or junior synonym Ichnotaxon Ootaxon Morphotaxon
Notes
Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; crossed out taxa are discredited.
Sauropods of the Bahariya Formation
Genus Species Material Notes Images
Aegyptosaurus[3] A. baharijensis[3] Partial postcranial skeleton[11] A titanosaur of about 15 meters. All remains were destroyed in World War II.
Aegyptosaurus

Dicraeosaurus


Paralititan
Dicraeosaurus D. hansemanni Isolated scapula and vertebra Identified by Stromer in 1932. Subsequently considered a rebbachisaurid, or a third, unnamed titanosaur.
Paralititan[3] P. stromeri[3] Partial postcranial skeleton[12] One of the largest titanosaurs of the Cretaceous, with a 1.69 meters long humerus and an estimated total length of 26 meters.

Theropods

[edit]
Color key
Taxon Reclassified taxon Taxon falsely reported as present Dubious taxon or junior synonym Ichnotaxon Ootaxon Morphotaxon
Notes
Uncertain or tentative taxa are in small text; crossed out taxa are discredited.
Theropods of the Bahariya Formation
Genus Species Abundance Notes Images
Abelisauridae indet.[13] Indeterminate "MUVP 477, an isolated caudal (tenth) cervical vertebra" A medium-sized abelisaurid, estimated around 5.77 meters (~18.9 feet) long. The first unambiguous abelisaurid known from the Bahariya Formation.
Abelisauridae indet.

Bahariasaurus

Tameryraptor

Spinosaurus
Bahariasaurus B. ingens[3] A medium-sized theropod of uncertain affinities. Possibly a megaraptoran, a relative of Deltadromeus, or both.
Deltadromeus Deltadromeus agilis A likely noasaurid, originally identified from Morocco. Remains not part of the holotype of Bahariasaurus have been referred to Deltadromeus. [14][15]
Ceratosauria?
Elaphrosaurus E. bambergi or aff Material now considered to be indeterminate theropod remains.[3]
Erectopus? Erectopus sauvagei?
Sigilmassasaurus[3] S. brevicollis Previously considered a species of Spinosaurus, or a synonym of S. aegyptiacus.
Spinosaurus S. aegyptiacus Most common dinosaur of the formation. A large spinosaurid.
Tameryraptor[16] T. markgrafi A large carcharodontosaurid theropod, originally assigned to Carcharodontosaurus

In addition, there are isolated theropod teeth disputedly assigned to dromaeosaurids, or to abelisaurids.

Flora

[edit]

Thirty different genera are known from Bahariya, including megaflora. Much of the material is yet to be described.[17][18] Other taxa include Sapindales, Piperaceae, Lauraceae, Platanaceae, Magnoliopsida, Nymphaeaceae, Cornaceae, Proteaceae and Vitaceae not identified at genus level; and miospore and pollen species.[19][20]

Vascular Plants
Genus Species Abundance Notes Images
Agathis[21] A/W spp. Few Specimens An Araucarian conifer, now restricted to Australasia.
Cladophlebis
Sapindopsis
Weichselia
Araliaephyllum?[17][19] Indeterminate ("Morphotype-14") Few Specimens Suggested to be related with Lauraceae
Cladophlebis[17][19] C. spp. Few Specimens Fern Laflets
Cornophyllum[17][19] C. distense Few Specimens Suggested to be related with Cornaceae
Cinnamophyllum?[17][19] Indeterminate ("Morphotype-12") Few Specimens Suggested to be related with Lauraceae
Eucalyptolaurus/"Myrtophyllum"(?)[19][20] Indeterminate ("Morphotype-08") Few Specimens Specimens of the family Lauraceae
Laurophyllum[17][19] L. africanum Few Specimens Specimens of the family Lauraceae
Liriophyllum[17][19] L. farafraense Few Specimens Specimens of the family Magnoliaceae
Marsilea[21] aff. Marsilea spp. Few Specimens Water fern.
Magnoliid[19][20]
  • "Morphotype-01"
  • "Morphotype-04"
  • "Morphotype-09"
  • "Morphotype-11"
  • "Morphotype 21"?
  • "Morphotype 24"?
 Few Specimens Shows festooned brochidodromous venation
Magnoliaephyllum[19]
  • M. auriculatum
  • M. bahariyense
  • M. isbergiana
 Few Specimens Possible affinities with Lauraceae
Monocotyledon[22] "Morphotype 26" Few Specimens Flowering Plant
Nelumbites[19][20]
  • N. schweinfurthi
  • N. giganteum
 Common occurrence in the lower shale bed Typical leaves of the faimily Nelumbonaceae
Nymphaeales[22] Indeterminate ("Morphotype-22") Few Specimens Aquatic Flowering Plant
Paradoxopteris[17][19] P. stromeri Co-Dominant plant Xerophytic tree fern suggestive of a dry tropical climate.
Plumafolium?[19][20] Indeterminate ("Morphotype-18") Few Specimens A Monocot, probably related with Liliopsida
Podozamites?[22] Indeterminate ("Morphotype-27") Few Specimens Coniferophyte
Pteridophyte[22] Indeterminate ("Morphotype-28") Few Specimens Fern clearly distinct from Weichselia
Rodgersia[17][19] R. longifolia Few Specimens Likely lobes of a much bigger leaf of Sapindopsis type
Trochodendroides?[22] Indeterminate ("Morphotype-23") Few Specimens Probably related to Cercidiphyllaceae
Typhaephyllum[17][19] cf. T. sp. Few Specimens Interpreted as a monocot, probably related to Typhaceae
Vitiphyllum[17][19] V. aff. multifidum Few Specimens Some similarities with Pabiania of the family Lauraceae
Weichselia[17] W. reticulata Dominant plant Xerophytic tree fern suggestive of a dry tropical climate.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bahariya Formation

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Bahariya Formation is a Lower Cenomanian (early Late Cretaceous) geological unit exposed in the Bahariya Oasis of Egypt's Western Desert, spanning approximately 27°48′–28°30′N and 28°32′–29°10′E, and renowned for yielding one of the richest vertebrate fossil assemblages in Afro-Arabia, including type specimens of iconic dinosaurs such as Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, Carcharodontosaurus saharicus, and Bahariasaurus ingens. The formation represents a second-order depositional sequence formed over about 3–6 million years within a Jurassic–Cenomanian passive continental margin, with a thickness of 90–100+ meters, and is unconformably underlain by pre-Cenomanian rocks and overlain by the Upper Cenomanian El Heiz Formation (sometimes including its upper member) or the Lower–Middle Eocene Naqb Formation. It is subdivided into three informal members from base to top: the Gebel Ghorabi Member (fluvial-deltaic sandstones), the Gebel Dist Member (coastal and shallow-marine deposits), and the El Heiz Member (lagoonal dolomites, sandy dolomites, calcareous grits, and shales; sometimes considered the basal part of the separate El Heiz Formation). Composed predominantly of white to pink, medium- to coarse-grained sandstones interbedded with siltstones, mudstones, claystones, glauconitic shales, and ferruginous concretions, the Bahariya Formation records a range of depositional environments from fluvial (braided and meandering rivers on a delta plain) to marginal marine (beaches, shorefaces) and open shelf settings, reflecting transgressive-regressive cycles driven by relative sea-level changes. These associations are organized into four third-order sequences bounded by unconformities and wave-ravinement surfaces, with incised valleys indicating lowstand systems tracts. Paleoenvironmentally, the formation preserves evidence of a warm, humid with periodic wildfires, diverse (including ferns and ), and a complex supporting large theropod dinosaurs, sauropods, crocodyliforms, pterosaurs, , and like crabs. Beyond its paleontological value, the Bahariya Formation serves as a significant hydrocarbon reservoir in the Western Desert basins, particularly in the Abu Gharadig Basin, due to its porous sandstones and structural traps formed during the Late Cretaceous Syrian Arc tectonism, which influenced the oasis's depression. Recent studies continue to refine its biostratigraphy and paleoecology, highlighting its role in understanding mid-Cretaceous Gondwanan terrestrial ecosystems and North African tectonics.

Geological Setting

Location and Extent

The Bahariya Formation primarily outcrops within the Bahariya Oasis, a large oval-shaped depression oriented northeast-southwest in the north-central part of Egypt's Western Desert, spanning latitudes 27°48′ to 28°30′ N and longitudes 28°32′ to 29°10′ E. The oasis depression covers approximately 100 km in length by 40 km in width, with a surface area of about 2,200 km², and the formation forms the base of this depression, the lower escarpment, and isolated hills within it. The type locality of the Bahariya Formation is at Gebel El-Dist in the northern part of the oasis, where it exhibits its most complete exposure. Additional surface exposures occur in areas such as Gebel Ghorabi to the south, Gebel Dist, and the El Heiz region, representing key sections of the formation's lower Cenomanian strata. In the subsurface, the Bahariya Formation extends across broader basins of the Western Desert, serving as a major oil and gas reservoir, with equivalent units identified in areas like the Khalda concession and other northern fields. Its thickness varies from 100 to 300 meters regionally, reaching a maximum of 173.5 meters at the type section in Gebel El-Dist.

Stratigraphy and Age

The Bahariya Formation is assigned to the early stage of the , spanning approximately 100 to 95 million years ago. This geochronological constraint is derived primarily from , featuring index species such as Neolobites that mark early Cenomanian horizons, and foraminiferal biozonation, including assemblages associated with the Rotalipora zone. In 1985, Dominik formalized the stratigraphic subdivision of the Bahariya Formation into three members based on lithofacies variations observed in outcrops across the (note that the El Heiz Member is sometimes treated as a distinct Upper formation overlying the Bahariya). The basal Gebel Ghorabi Member comprises roughly 40 meters of cross-bedded sandstones representing initial fluvial to shallow marine transitions. The overlying Gebel Dist Member, the thickest unit at about 100 meters, consists of variegated shales, siltstones, and sandstones reflecting cyclic alternations in depositional energy. The upper El Heiz Member, approximately 30 meters thick, consists of lagoonal , sandy , and fossiliferous calcareous grits, signaling a shift toward more restricted marine conditions. This tripartite division totals around 170 meters in maximum preserved thickness and provides a framework for regional mapping. More recent work (as of 2025) proposes a two-member subdivision (Gebel Ghorabi and Gebel Dist), treating the El Heiz separately. Sequence stratigraphic analysis reveals the Bahariya Formation as a second-order depositional encompassing four third-order parasequences, delimited by three major sequence boundaries and associated unconformities. These boundaries reflect episodic eustatic sea-level falls that incised valleys and generated ravinement surfaces, influencing the stacking patterns of highstand and transgressive systems tracts across the continental shelf. The formation lies unconformably atop the Nubia Sandstone, marking a significant hiatus due to pre-Cenomanian , and is regionally correlated with the coeval Qusseir and Taref formations in southern and eastern , which share similar fluvio-marine signatures. Broader correlations extend to Albian-Cenomanian equivalents across , including the Tarfaya Formation in , highlighting a shared transgressive history along the Tethyan margin.

Sedimentology

Lithology and Facies

The Bahariya Formation is predominantly composed of siliciclastic rocks, including sandstones, siltstones, and mudstones, with subordinate conglomerates and limestones. The sandstones are mainly quartzarenites, subarkoses, and glauconitic arenites, characterized by poorly to moderately sorted, subangular to subrounded grains, often interbedded with polymictic pebble conglomerates and sandy mudstones. bands and lenses are common, contributing to the formation's distinctive ferruginous character, while minor iron-rich oolites occur within these deposits. Sedimentary facies associations reflect a range of clastic-dominated environments. Fluvial facies include cross-bedded sandstones with planar and trough cross-stratification, climbing ripples, and mud cracks, indicative of braided and meandering channel systems. Deltaic facies feature coal-bearing shales and interbedded siltstones with plant remains and slump structures. Shallow marine facies comprise bioclastic limestones and associated oyster banks, often with glauconitic sands. Tidal facies are represented by variegated clays, tidal flat deposits, and channel fills with herringbone cross-bedding and drapes. Diagenetic features include early and cementation, leading to compaction and the formation of authigenic minerals such as and in restricted intervals. is prevalent in marine-influenced layers, often replacing early blocky cements during exposure. crusts, interpreted as late diagenetic products, overprint primary lithologies along discontinuities, with evidence of selective replacement by ferric oxides. The formation is divided into three members with distinct lithologies. The basal Gebel Ghorabi Member consists primarily of fluvial sandstones, including friable, cross-bedded, variegated, micaceous, and gypseous varieties, with hard ferruginous concretions. The middle Gebel Dist Member features mixed fluvial-marine deposits, such as silty shales, claystones, siltstones, mudstones, and sandstones, partially and glauconitic, with bands, fragments, and minerals like and . The upper El Heiz Member consists of lagoonal , sandy , and fossiliferous grits.

Depositional Environments

The Bahariya Formation records a series of transgressive-regressive cycles that transitioned from a to a shallow epicontinental environment, with significant fluvial input from southern sources. These cycles reflect fluctuations in relative , driven by eustatic changes and local , leading to stacked parasequences bounded by unconformities. The depositional system evolved vertically and laterally, incorporating terrigenous sediments from systems into increasingly marine-influenced settings. Four main depositional sequences characterize the formation. Sequence 1 represents a fluvial-alluvial environment dominated by braided rivers, featuring fining-upward cycles of cross-bedded sandstones and conglomerates indicative of high-energy channel deposits. Sequence 2 shifts to deltaic-estuarine conditions, with mixed fluvial and tidal influences evident in heterolithic sandstones and mudstones, reflecting progradation and shoreline retreat. Sequence 3 marks a shallow marine shelf setting, characterized by glauconitic sands and shell lags that suggest open marine deposition under low-energy wave and tidal regimes. Sequence 4 indicates lagoonal-tidal flat environments, with thick shales, dolomitic sandstones, and oyster banks pointing to restricted, low-energy coastal lagoons. The progression of these sequences was strongly influenced by transgressions of the Neo-Tethys Sea, which flooded the northern margins of the Western Desert during the Early Cenomanian, creating a broad, low-gradient epicontinental seaway. Salinity variations are documented through mixed freshwater-marine inputs, as seen in palynofacies and geochemical signatures, with evidence of suboxic to oxic conditions in proximal settings. Tectonically, the formation accumulated on the stable Saharan platform, with minor syndepositional faulting confined to the Bahariya depression, facilitating localized accommodation space without major structural disruption.

History of Research

Early Discoveries (1900-1940s)

The initial geological explorations of the Bahariya Oasis in the early 1900s were led by British geologists John Ball and Hugh J. L. Beadnell, who conducted surveys under the Egyptian Survey Department starting in 1901. Their work focused on topographic mapping and basic stratigraphic descriptions of the oasis region, identifying Cretaceous sandstones and shales that would later form the basis for recognizing the Bahariya Formation, though without formal nomenclature at the time. Paleontological interest in the area intensified with the expeditions of German paleontologist Ernst Freiherr von Stromer, who first visited the Bahariya Oasis during his 1910–1911 fieldwork in Egypt's Western Desert, initially seeking early mammals but quickly noting abundant vertebrate fossils in the exposed Cretaceous beds. Stromer returned for additional seasons in 1912 and 1913–1914, leading systematic excavations that uncovered significant dinosaur and reptile remains from these strata. In 1914, he informally designated the fossil-bearing horizon as the "Baharije-Stufe" (Bahariya Stage) in preliminary reports, recognizing its lower Cenomanian age and distinct lithology of sandstones, clays, and ironstones. These German expeditions yielded several type specimens of iconic taxa, including the holotype of the theropod described by Stromer in 1915 based on material collected in 1912, the crocodyliform Stomatosuchus inermis named in 1925 from 1912–1913 finds, and the sauropod Aegyptosaurus baharijensis established in 1932 from specimens gathered during the 1913–1914 season. Stromer's detailed publications from 1914 to 1936 provided the foundational descriptions of the Bahariya's vertebrate assemblage, emphasizing its importance for understanding terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems in . The formal naming of the Bahariya Formation occurred later, in 1962, when Egyptian geologist Rushdi Said elevated Stromer's "Baharije-Stufe" to formation status in his synthesis of the Western Desert's stratigraphy, integrating earlier mapping by and with Stromer's paleontological data to define its boundaries and type section near the oasis. Tragically, most of Stromer's original specimens, housed in Munich's Paläontologisches , were destroyed during the Allied bombing of the city on April 25, 1944, leaving only photographs, drawings, and plaster casts for subsequent study.

Modern Expeditions (1980s-Present)

In the 1980s and 1990s, efforts by the Egyptian Geological Survey and petroleum companies conducted extensive surface mapping and subsurface seismic surveys in the Western Desert, revealing the broader subsurface extent of the Bahariya Formation beyond its surface exposures in the Bahariya Depression. These investigations, driven by oil and gas exploration, identified the formation's continuity under horst and fault blocks, aiding regional tectonic interpretations and highlighting its potential as a hydrocarbon reservoir. The late 1990s marked a resurgence in paleontological fieldwork with the , a collaboration between American and Egyptian researchers, which rediscovered several of Stromer's early 20th-century quarry sites in 1999 and 2000. These expeditions recovered new vertebrate fossils, including additional remains attributable to , contributing to later reconstructions of the . Subsequent analyses, incorporating these finds with Stromer's descriptions, informed the 2014 description of a unique tail structure in , suggesting semiaquatic adaptations. From the through the , multidisciplinary projects expanded site documentation across the formation, with the Vertebrate Paleontology Center (MUVP) leading efforts to prospect new localities and recover diverse vertebrate assemblages, including archosaurs, reptiles, and fishes. These initiatives emphasized systematic surveys and institutional capacity-building in Egyptian . Post-2020 research has yielded significant updates, including a 2022 MUVP expedition that uncovered the first definitive abelisaurid remains from the formation: an isolated tenth cervical vertebra (MUVP 477) from a medium-sized theropod. In 2025, a detailed reappraisal of Stromer's carcharodontosaurid specimens from Bahariya resulted in the erection of the new and Tameryraptor markgrafi, refining understandings of allosauroid diversity and phylogeny in .

Microfauna and Meiofauna

Foraminifera

The foraminiferal assemblages of the Bahariya Formation, from the early Cenomanian, include both planktonic and benthic forms that contribute to biostratigraphic and paleoecological interpretations in the regional Tethyan context. Planktonic foraminifera are known from early Cenomanian strata in North Africa, enabling correlations across Tethyan sections during this transgressive phase. These taxa are particularly abundant within shallow marine deposits, reflecting incursions of oxygenated waters onto the shelf. Benthic are present in the marginal marine of the Bahariya Formation, recovered from siliciclastic and sediments, indicating adaptability to proximal shelf environments. Paleoecologically, the assemblages provide insights into depositional dynamics, with planktonic signaling depth increases during transgressions and benthic forms helping infer stability and bottom- conditions. Co-occurring ostracods reinforce interpretations of marine conditions.

Other Microorganisms

The Bahariya Formation preserves a variety of non-foraminiferal microfossils that provide insights into local ecological conditions and depositional dynamics. Colonial green algae, including forms akin to Botryococcus braunii, occur in lacustrine and deltaic shales, where their hydrocarbon-rich colonies indicate periodic freshwater influx into brackish or marine settings. These algae contributed to organic-rich layers, enhancing source rock potential in fluvio-deltaic facies. Dinoflagellate cysts are documented in marginal marine deposits, reflecting salinity gradients from deltas to inner shelf environments. Dinoflagellates, such as Subtilisphaera spp., Coronifera oceanica, and Cyclonephelium vannophorum, dominate marine-influenced intervals, comprising a significant portion of palynomorph assemblages and signaling nearshore, moderate-energy conditions with occasional foraminiferal co-occurrences. Research on and meiofauna in the Bahariya Formation remains limited, with most studies focusing on and macrofossils; further work is needed to refine understandings of these assemblages.

Invertebrate Fossils

Molluscs

The molluscan assemblage of the Bahariya Formation represents a diverse group of macroinvertebrates dominated by bivalves, gastropods, and cephalopods, which collectively signal varying degrees of marine influence in the early depositional system. These fossils occur in siliciclastic and , providing insights into paleoecological conditions ranging from shallow subtidal to intertidal zones. Bivalves are particularly prominent, with Ostrea flabeata forming dense oyster banks in shallow marine settings, where they colonized soft substrates in low-energy, lagoonal environments conducive to gregarious settlement. In contrast, Exogyra species and the gastropod-like Nerinea are associated with reefal structures, indicating higher-energy, carbonate-dominated habitats that supported epifaunal encrustation and bioherm development. Gastropods, including Turritella and Cerithium, are characteristic of tidal flat deposits, where their coiled shells reflect adaptation to fluctuating salinities and periodic exposure in marginal marine settings. Cephalopods in the formation are less common but significant for , featuring ammonites such as species and Sciponoceras, which help delineate zonal boundaries within the stage; belemnites occur rarely, likely due to offshore transport limitations in the nearshore paleoenvironment. Taphonomic features, including concentrated shell beds and bioerosional borings on valves, suggest deposition along high-energy shorelines subject to wave reworking and predatory or scavenging activity, with shells often fragmented and abraded prior to burial.

Crustaceans

Ostracods represent the predominant group in the Bahariya Formation, serving as key indicators of paleosalinity due to their sensitivity to environmental changes in depositional settings. Several species have been documented from the formation, spanning genera such as Cytherella, Cythereis, Dolocytheridea, and Bairdia, reflecting a diverse assemblage adapted to shallow marine to outer shelf environments. These ostracods exhibit adaptations, particularly in lagoonal and tidal flat deposits, where assemblages dominated by robust, salinity-tolerant forms like those in the Cytherellidae family thrive amid fluctuating conditions. For instance, Cytherella ovata is recorded in strata of the formation, associated with low-energy, nearshore settings that suggest transitions from brackish to normal marine salinities. Such distributions enable paleosalinity reconstructions, with low signaling hypersaline episodes and higher diversity indicating open marine influences. Decapod remains, including rare fragments such as chelae and pereiopod claws, are sporadically preserved in deltaic shales of the lower Bahariya Formation. These elements, often attributed to brachyuran like those in the Necrocarcinidae, occur in mangrove-influenced tidal flat with detrital plant debris and co-occurring molluscan shell beds, highlighting a coastal . Their scarcity underscores the challenges of preservation in high-energy, organic-rich shales.

Insects

Insect fossils from the Bahariya Formation are extremely rare, with no body fossils of reported to date. The limited evidence for comes primarily from trace fossils, such as extensive folivory damage on leaves collected from fluvial and coastal deposits, indicating the presence of herbivorous in the terrestrial and riparian environments during the early . This damage, documented on angiosperm foliage, suggests diverse folivorous activity but provides no direct morphological details about the taxa involved. The scarcity of remains may reflect the formation's predominantly fluvial and marginal marine depositional settings, which favored preservation of larger vertebrates and aquatic over delicate terrestrial arthropods, potentially disrupted by seasonal flooding. Associated debris in these further supports a vegetated habitat conducive to life, though direct preservation remains elusive.

Vertebrate Fossils

Cartilaginous Fishes

The Bahariya Formation preserves a diverse elasmobranch assemblage, dominated by and ray remains that attest to top marine predators in coastal and deltaic settings. Fossils primarily consist of isolated teeth, rostral spines, and denticles, with over 15 species documented, highlighting niche partitioning among piscivorous and durophagous forms. Sharks are the most abundant, including lamniform taxa with serrated teeth adapted for cutting flesh, indicating diets centered on and scavenging opportunities in nearshore habitats. Onchopristis numidus, a sclerorhynchoid , is represented by robust rostral spines and denticles from the Gebel Dist Member, suggesting it used its serrated rostrum to slash prey in shallow, mangrove-influenced waters. Squalicorax baharijensis teeth, often concentrated in bone beds, feature broad crowns with fine serrations suited for grasping and tearing, pointing to opportunistic predation on schooling and carcasses. Other sharks, such as Cretolamna appendiculata and Carcharias amonensis, contribute to this predatory diversity through similar preserved in fluvial-deltaic sands. Rays, though less common, include sclerorhynchoid and rajiform taxa with rare thornback remains—such as thorny dermal denticles and spines—embedded in shallow marine limestones, evidencing benthic dwellers in lagoonal environments. Species like Ptychotrygon henkeli and Baharipristis bastetiae are known from partial and oral teeth, adapted for crushing molluscs and crustaceans on soft substrates. Taphonomic patterns reveal concentrations of elasmobranch teeth in lag deposits at erosion surfaces, attributable to storm winnowing that selectively accumulated durable elements while finer sediments were removed, often alongside co-occurring scales. These assemblages underscore a dynamic where elasmobranchs filled apex roles amid high productivity.

Bony Fishes

The bony fish assemblage of the , dating to the early stage of the , is dominated by sarcopterygian and actinopterygian taxa that reflect a transition between freshwater and brackish environments along the northern margin of . These fishes occupied mid-trophic levels in coastal and fluvial systems, with remains primarily consisting of disarticulated bones, scales, teeth, and tooth plates preserved in paralic sediments. The diversity and preservation suggest a productive influenced by riverine inputs into nearshore lagoons, where fluctuations supported species capable of tolerating varied water conditions. Sarcopterygians are represented by and lungfishes, with the giant coelacanth Mawsonia libyca being particularly notable for its abundance and size, reaching up to several meters in length based on fragmentary cranial and postcranial elements. This species, characterized by robust dentaries and angular bones, inhabited brackish to freshwater settings, indicating adaptations that allowed it to navigate gradients in deltaic and lagoonal habitats. Lungfishes (dipnoans) are known from isolated tooth plates attributed to genera such as , Neoceratodus africanus, and Retodus tuberculatus, which feature grinding surfaces adapted for crushing shelly prey in shallow, vegetated waters. These remains, often found in fine-grained shales, underscore the role of sarcopterygians as opportunistic bottom-dwellers in the formation's fluvial-marine interface. Actinopterygians form the bulk of the ichthyofauna, with ray-finned fishes like Enchodus sp. and Lepidotes sp. documented through vertebrae, scales, and isolated dentition preserved in deltaic shales indicative of low-energy depositional settings. Enchodus, a predatory aulopiform, is identified from fang-like teeth and skeletal fragments suggesting active swimming in open lagoons, while Lepidotes scales—rhomboidal and enamelled—point to semionotiform fishes grazing on aquatic vegetation or invertebrates in sheltered coastal areas. The assemblage includes hundreds of specimens overall, highlighting high productivity, with otolith remains further evidencing occupation of coastal lagoons by teleost-like forms tolerant of brackish conditions. Some bones bear rare evidence of predation, such as isolated shark bite marks, illustrating interactions within the food web.

Turtles

The turtle assemblage of the Bahariya Formation encompasses both pleurodiran and cryptodiran taxa, reflecting a range of marine, estuarine, and fluvial habitats during the early . Remains include shell fragments, peripheral bones, humeri, and partial skeletal elements, primarily from the Gebel Dist Member's estuarine and lower fluvial units. These fossils indicate a diverse community adapted to varying salinities, with pleurodirans dominating inland settings and cryptodirans linked to coastal marine influences. Bothremydid pleurodirans are represented by Apertotemporalis baharijensis, a originally described by Stromer in from the type locality at Gebel Dist in the marine-influenced upper part of the formation. This taxon, known from a lost skull and referred postcranial elements such as a distal (CGM 81190) and costal/neural plates (CGM 84536), exhibits features consistent with bothremydid morphology, including a robust shell estimated at around 1 m in length. The estuarine of Gebel Dist suggests adaptations to brackish waters, such as thickened shell margins for against osmotic stress and predation. Terrestrial or freshwater forms include possible podocnemidoid pleurodirans, tentatively allied with araripemydids based on referred materials like a cervical centrum, , and costal plate (CGM 81182) from fluvial units. These specimens, with shells approximately 20 cm long, point to side-necked suited to riverine environments, potentially including long-necked adaptations for in shallow waters. Shell fragments from these units display surface textures indicative of abrasion in low-energy fluvial settings, further supporting habitat diversity. A marine cryptodiran, referred to , is evidenced by a costal plate (CGM 81191) suggesting a large shell up to 2 m, consistent with leatherback-like adaptations for pelagic life. Overall, the assemblage comprises at least three genera across Araripemydidae, Bothremydidae, and , with fragmented shells and bones showing and occasional bite marks from co-occurring crocodylomorphs, highlighting trophic interactions. These remains co-occur with squamate vertebrae, underscoring the formation's rich reptilian diversity.

Squamates

The squamate fossil record from the Bahariya Formation is limited, characterized by low diversity with only 1-2 taxa represented primarily by isolated vertebrae, reflecting small body sizes based on microvertebrae morphology. The dominant group is snakes, with Simoliophis sp. (, Simoliophiidae) being the most common and best-documented , known from multiple specimens across the formation's marine-influenced deposits. These vertebrae indicate a semi-aquatic lifestyle, with the snake likely inhabiting coastal and brackish environments; the type material from shows affinities to early ophidians, and Egyptian specimens are chimeric but assigned to this genus pending further study. Lizard remains are rare and indeterminate, possibly including anguimorph-like forms, but no formal taxa have been described, suggesting terrestrial or paleosol-associated niches where preserved. Preservation occurs mainly in fluvial sands and coprolites, hinting at insectivorous diets for the smaller squamates, though direct evidence is sparse. Overall, the assemblage underscores a depauperate squamate community compared to contemporaneous formations like the .

Plesiosaurs

remains from the Bahariya Formation are rare and fragmentary, representing the only known plesiosaurian occurrences in the formation and highlighting their scarcity relative to more abundant terrestrial and coastal vertebrates. These remains have been tentatively identified as belonging to , though earlier suggestions include affinities to Leptocleidus (Leptocleididae), indicating uncertainty in pending further study. The finds are concentrated in the El Heiz Member, a unit dominated by tidal flat and channel deposits that reflect episodic marine incursions into the .

Crocodylomorphs

The Bahariya Formation has yielded remains of both neosuchian and notosuchian crocodyliforms, reflecting adaptations to the formation's deltaic and nearshore environments during the stage of the . Neosuchians are represented primarily by inermis, known from a type discovered in 1911 and described by in 1912. This taxon exhibits a distinctive elongate, flattened cranium with small, conical teeth arranged in a manner suggestive of filter-feeding, where the upper bore marginal while the lower may have been largely toothless or supported soft tissues for straining prey from . The , measuring nearly 2 meters in length, indicates a body size up to approximately 10 meters, positioning S. inermis among the larger crocodyliforms of the formation. Notosuchians in the Bahariya Formation include Libycosuchus brevirostris, based on cranial material including a partial and articulated dentaries collected in the early 2000s, supplementing Stromer's original 1914 description. This features a short, robust with labiolingually compressed, ziphodont-like teeth suited for terrestrial or semi-terrestrial of vertebrates. The dentition's morphology, with slightly serrated carinae, contrasts with the aquatic adaptations of neosuchians and highlights niche partitioning within the assemblage. Over 20 crocodyliform specimens have been reported from the Bahariya Formation, including isolated osteoderms, vertebrae, and partial skeletons primarily from deltaic such as mangrove-influenced coastal deposits. These remains, often preserved in fine-grained sandstones and organic-rich shales, indicate amphibious lifestyles tolerant of brackish conditions, with some evidence from associated suggesting opportunistic predation, including rare bite marks on shells. Stable isotope analyses of from related North African crocodyliforms support diets incorporating brackish-water resources, consistent with the formation's transitional .

Pterosaurs

Pterosaur remains from the Bahariya Formation are rare and fragmentary, primarily consisting of isolated skeletal elements that indicate the presence of medium-sized flying reptiles in the early Cenomanian ecosystem of northern Africa. These fossils provide evidence of pterodactyloid pterosaurs occupying aerial niches, likely interacting with the formation's coastal and fluvial environments. The most significant specimen is an isolated, three-dimensionally preserved left first wing phalanx (manual phalanx IV-1, specimen MUVP 507) of a medium-sized ornithocheirid pterosaur, representing the first definitive record of Pterosauria from Egypt. Recovered from the lower Cenomanian strata in the Bahariya Oasis, Western Desert, this bone features a fused proximal extensor tendon process with a shallow open saddle, large cotyles with a posterior process for tight articulation to metacarpal IV, a subrectangular extensor tubercle, and a prominent pneumatic foramen, suggesting affinities to the anhanguerid subfamily within Ornithocheiridae. The morphology indicates an osteologically mature individual, and comparisons with contemporaneous ornithocheirids from the nearby Kem Kem Group in Morocco imply a potential wingspan of approximately 3-5 meters, consistent with medium-sized pterodactyloids adapted for coastal foraging. Additional pterodactyloid fragments, including possible phalangeal elements from the Gebel Dist Member, have been noted but remain undescribed in detail, with some exhibiting features reminiscent of azhdarchid-like proportions such as elongate and robust elements. These sparse remains, often preserved in three dimensions without significant distortion, suggest occasional deposition in low-energy settings like tidal flats or river margins, where pterosaurs may have engaged in quadrupedal locomotion during feeding or resting. Trackways attributed to pterosaurs, rare in the formation, occur in fine-grained tidal flat sediments and display typical quadrupedal gait patterns with narrow trackways and subequal manus and pes impressions. Preservation of these fossils frequently involves encasement in iron-rich concretion nodules, which protected elements from weathering but occasionally show bite marks or associated fish scales indicative of predation by bony fishes shortly after death. Such taphonomic evidence underscores the vulnerability of pterosaur carcasses in the dynamic, fish-abundant coastal waters of the Bahariya paleoenvironment.

Dinosaurs

The dinosaurian fauna of the Bahariya Formation, dating to the Cenomanian stage of the Late Cretaceous, is characterized by a diverse assemblage of theropod and sauropod taxa, reflecting a terrestrial ecosystem influenced by nearby marine and fluvial environments. No ornithischian dinosaurs have been reported from the formation, highlighting a predominance of predatory and herbivorous saurischian forms. Fossils are primarily preserved in bone beds within fluvial channel deposits, suggesting accumulation through seasonal flooding and rapid burial in river systems that facilitated the preservation of large-bodied taxa. Sauropods from the Bahariya Formation are represented by titanosaurian taxa, which indicate the presence of massive herbivores adapted to the region's lush, coastal vegetation. Paralititan stromeri, described from a partial including a massive measuring 1.6 in , is among the largest dinosaurs known from and estimated to have reached a total body of about 25 and a mass exceeding 20 tons. This taxon, named in 2001, underscores the scale of sauropod in North African ecosystems during the mid-Cretaceous. Another titanosaurian, Aegyptosaurus bahariensis, was established in 1932 based on a partial comprising vertebrae, ribs, and limb elements recovered from the lower exposures, providing evidence of a more gracile form compared to Paralititan. These sauropods likely played a key role as primary consumers, browsing on conifer-dominated forests near paleoshorelines. Theropod diversity in the Bahariya Formation is notably high, dominated by large carnivores that occupied top predatory niches. Spinosaurus aegyptiacus, first described in 1915 from a nearly complete skeleton including the iconic neural spines forming a dorsal sail up to 1.8 meters tall, represents a semiaquatic spinosaurid reaching lengths of 15 meters and exhibiting adaptations like a crocodile-like snout and conical teeth for piscivory alongside terrestrial hunting. Carcharodontosaurus saharicus, named in 1931 from cranial and postcranial remains, is a carcharodontosaurid theropod estimated at 12 meters long, characterized by serrated teeth exceeding 20 centimeters and robust build suited for scavenging and predation on large prey. Bahariasaurus ingens, described in 1934 from fragmentary vertebrae and limb bones, is tentatively classified as an allosauroid theropod, potentially rivaling Carcharodontosaurus in size based on a tibia suggesting a body length over 11 meters. More recent discoveries include an indeterminate abelisaurid from a cervical vertebra (MUVP 477) reported in 2022, marking the first evidence of this southern theropod clade in the Bahariya Formation and indicating broader Gondwanan affinities. In 2025, Tameryraptor markgrafi was named from a partial skeleton including vertebrae and limb elements, representing a new carcharodontosaurid that adds to the understanding of theropod morphological variation in the region. Bone histology studies reveal rapid growth rates in these theropods, with annual lines of arrested growth indicating maturity within 15-20 years, consistent with high metabolic demands in a warm, resource-rich environment. Ecologically, theropods such as and functioned as apex predators, preying on juvenile sauropods and other large vertebrates in habitats, while sauropods like Paralititan contributed to vegetation dynamics through herbivory in coastal forests of ferns, cycads, and gymnosperms. Evidence of interactions includes crocodylomorph bite marks on some bones, suggesting occasional scavenging or predation by contemporaneous archosaurs.

Paleobotany

Macroflora

The macroflora of the Bahariya Formation, preserved primarily as compressions and impressions in the early Cenomanian deposits of Egypt's Western Desert, provides evidence of a diverse coastal vegetation dominated by early angiosperms, with subordinate ferns and gymnosperms. These plant remains occur in fine-grained sandstones, siltstones, and claystones associated with deltaic and marginal marine environments, reflecting a humid, tropical setting along the southern Neo-Tethys margin. Fossils are typically fragmentary, with well-preserved venation patterns due to rapid burial in low-energy depositional settings. Ferns represent a minor component of the assemblage, including Weichselia reticulata and a new morphotype (Morphotype-28), suggestive of and mangrove-like habitats. This species features large, pinnate fronds reaching up to 1 m in length, with alternate, dichotomous pinnules exhibiting reticulate venation; fragments are commonly found in deltaic shales and gypsiferous clays. Weichselia reticulata charcoals, preserving three-dimensional anatomical details, further attest to its presence in fire-prone coastal ecosystems. Other fern remains, such as rachides attributed to Paradoxopteris stromeri, co-occur and suggest a hygrophilous . Gymnosperms are less abundant, with limited representation including a Podozamites-like leaf morphotype (Morphotype-27), pointing to components of the in coastal woodlands. These taxa likely formed part of the canopy in sheltered environments, with low diversity compared to contemporaneous European assemblages. Angiosperms exhibit early diversification and dominate the assemblage, with leaves such as Magnoliaephyllum (ovate to elliptical, 40–150 mm long, with entire margins and actinodromous venation) and cf. Nelumbium (peltate, orbicular forms suggesting aquatic habits) among the identified morphotypes. A 2025 reappraisal from the Bahariya Formation documents 14 morphotypes across ferns, gymnosperms, and angiosperms (12 angiosperm, including 7 new), highlighting a shift toward angiosperm-led communities in overbank and paludal . This assemblage underscores the rapid radiation of and monocots in northern Gondwanan lowlands during the . Pollen records show correlations with these leaves, such as Afropollis grains linking to magnolialean forms. A 2023 study from the upper Bahariya unit further documents 9 angiosperm morphotypes, reinforcing angiosperm dominance. Taphonomic studies reveal that macrofossils are mostly impressions coated in iron oxides, with occasional charcoalified remains indicating recurrent wildfires that affected the vegetation. Charcoals, up to several millimeters in size, are concentrated in six distinct levels within fine-grained sands and shales, preserving fern and gymnosperm tissues and evidencing seasonal aridity amid humid conditions. This preservation mode favors delicate structures like pinnules and leaf laminae, providing a snapshot of the coastal flora's response to environmental stresses.

Palynoflora

The palynoflora of the Bahariya Formation, preserved in early Cenomanian sediments of the Western Desert, Egypt, is characterized by a diverse assemblage of pollen grains, spores, and cuticles that reflect a dynamic terrestrial ecosystem at the southern margin of the Neo-Tethys Ocean. These microfossils, recovered from various depositional settings including fluvial sandstones, swampy claystones, and siltstones, provide insights into reproductive strategies of Late Cretaceous vegetation and regional biogeography. The assemblages belong to the Albian-Cenomanian phytogeographic province of the Neo-Tethys margin, showing affinities with floras from West Africa and South America. Angiosperm pollen dominates the palynoflora, with diverse tricolpate forms indicating early diversification of . Notable examples include Tricolpites sp., Retitricolpites sp., and bombacaceous types such as Bombacacidites sp., which suggest the presence of tropical to subtropical trees adapted to humid conditions. These tricolpates, often exceeding 30% in fluvial microfacies, highlight angiosperms' role in canopy and reproduction, with normapolles-like taxa adding to the provincial character. Gymnosperm pollen constitutes approximately 20% of the total palynomorphs across studied sections, featuring contributions from Bennettitales (e.g., Cycadopites sp.) and (e.g., Classopollis spp., Araucariacites australis), alongside significant Gnetales (e.g., Ephedripites spp. at 7-12%). These elements, more prominent in swampy claystone microfacies (up to 6.8% for conifers), indicate resilient, drought-tolerant shrubs and trees in a mixed setting. Fern spores, also around 20-30% (e.g., 21.9-28.3%), are dominated by forms like Cyathidites australis and Cicatricosisporites minutaestriata from families such as Schizaeaceae and Matoniaceae, reflecting ferns thriving in moist, shaded habitats. The varied microfacies—fluvial sandstones with dicot-dominated , swamp claystones rich in aquatics and monocots, and siltstones associated with taxa like Weichselia reticulata—reveal partitioning and transport dynamics within a . High abundances of mesophyllous and spores, alongside aquatic indicators, point to warm, wet conditions with seasonal supporting high . Evidence of periodic is preserved in charred particles, including fern-derived macro-charcoal up to 15 mm in size from multiple horizons, suggesting as a recurring ecological factor in this vegetated landscape.

Paleoecology

Depositional and Climatic Conditions

The Bahariya Formation was deposited under a warm and humid climate during the early , characterized by a tropical to subtropical environment, as inferred from palynological assemblages dominated by spores and mesophyllous angiosperm . Sedimentological evidence, including and horizons, further supports these warm and humid conditions, reflecting enhanced and vegetation cover along the southern Neo-Tethys margin. Seasonal variations likely influenced the region, promoting wet-dry cycles that supported diverse fluvial and coastal ecosystems while contributing to aggradation. A significant sea-level rise associated with the transgression of the Neo-Tethys Ocean shaped the depositional gradients, transitioning from deltaic fluvial systems in proximal areas to shallow marine environments with water depths of 0–50 m in distal settings. This eustatic event, driven by global tectonic and climatic factors, facilitated the influx of marine influences into the region, resulting in mixed siliciclastic-carbonate sedimentation. Evidence of recurrent paleo-wildfires is preserved in the formation, including layers within sandstones, attributed to periodic dry spells interrupting the prevailing humid regime. These fire events, linked to seasonal , oxidized organic matter and contributed to the maturation of soils, as seen in and horizons. Tectono-climatic drivers played a key role, with the African plate positioned at approximately 10–15°S latitude, placing the deposition site under the influence of equatorial circulation patterns and the southern Neo-Tethys seaway. This paleogeographic configuration enhanced moisture transport from the Tethys, fostering humid conditions despite occasional arid interruptions, and controlled the overall basin subsidence and sediment supply.

Biotic Assemblage and Interactions

The biotic assemblage of the Bahariya Formation reflects a complex, interconnected community dominated by terrestrial, freshwater, and marginal marine taxa during the early , with flora serving as the primary energy base for a multifaceted . Basal producers included diverse vegetation such as angiosperm-dominated forests and ferns, alongside in aquatic settings, which supported primary consumers like herbivorous titanosaurs (e.g., Paralititan and ) that browsed on leafy angiosperms and in and coastal environments. Insects and turtles acted as additional primary consumers, with evidence of herbivory manifesting as damage traces on leaves, indicating active plant-animal interactions within these humid, tropical ecosystems. Higher trophic levels featured piscivorous predators, including spinosaurid theropods like Spinosaurus aegyptiacus that targeted abundant fish such as Mawsonia libyca, and polycotylid plesiosaurs that occupied similar aquatic niches in riverine and deltaic habitats. Apex predators, primarily theropods such as Carcharodontosaurus saharicus and other large carnivores, occupied the top of the , with niche partitioning among six theropod species helping to balance predator-prey dynamics and prevent overexploitation. Scavenging played a key role in nutrient recycling, facilitated by crocodylomorphs, sharks, gastropods, and crabs that fed on carcasses and organic debris, particularly in nutrient-rich coastal zones. Crustaceans formed a foundational trophic base in these interactions, supporting both detritivores and higher-level consumers. Diversity hotspots occurred in deltaic and coastal freshwater-marine transition zones, where mixed terrestrial-aquatic biota thrived due to influx from extensive networks, fostering high faunal and floral richness. Low characterized the assemblage, as the formation's ecosystems were part of broader North Eastern Gondwanan connections, allowing faunal exchange with contemporaneous North African sites and reducing localized . Disturbance ecology was shaped by periodic flood events from fluvial systems, which dispersed bones into bone beds and mixed terrestrial remains with aquatic fossils, enhancing taphonomic preservation while disrupting local communities. These floods, combined with nutrient overload leading to algal blooms, influenced community stability and contributed to turnover in the biota. Herbivory traces, including damage on foliage, further highlight dynamic plant-herbivore interactions amid these disturbances, as evidenced in recent analyses of the formation's vegetation.

References

  1. https://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1682072225862022
  2. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gpl/geoarabia/article/8/1/91/566877/Structural-setting-and-tectonic-evolution-of-the
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0037073806001357
  4. https://sjpp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13358-025-00387-0
  5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40948-023-00673-6
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309508851_A_reconstruction_of_the_palaeoecology_and_environmental_dynamics_of_the_Bahariya_Formation_of_Egypt
  7. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019JPalG...8...28E/abstract
  8. https://egjg.journals.ekb.eg/article_216373_3f832063526803e3a3908668aa6bc475.pdf
  9. https://www.ohio.edu/news/2022/06/bizarre-meat-eating-dinosaur-joins-rogues-gallery-giant-predators-classic-fossil-site
  10. https://www.wuestenschiff.de/dateien/bahariya.pdf
  11. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/6962
  12. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13358-025-00387-0
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0037073820302372
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222420391_Sequence_stratigraphy_of_the_Lower_Cenomanian_Bahariya_Formation_Bahariya_Oasis_Western_Desert_Egypt
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9886267/
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1464343X07002026
  17. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S092041051100012X
  18. https://taec.journals.ekb.eg/article_11936_53721cca9dc21ded3671a4280f300733.pdf
  19. https://www.academia.edu/30525772/Biostratigraphy_and_Paleoecology_of_the_Late_Cretaceous_Early_Tertiary_Sequence_in_Wasif_Area_Safaga_District_Eastern_Desert_Egypt_By
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248346311_Sedimentology_of_the_fluvial_and_fluvio-marine_facies_of_the_Bahariya_Formation_Early_Cenomanian_Bahariya_Oasis_Western_Desert_Egypt
  21. https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2018/pdf/1266.pdf
  22. http://www.ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas/2008/243-251.pdf
  23. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110062117304208
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0731724783800172
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1464343X14003355
  26. http://www.ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas/553-560.pdf
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392843225_Facies_Analysis_and_Depositional_Environments_of_the_Lower_Cenomanian_Bahariya_Formation_North_Western_Desert_Egypt
  28. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/8/1/91/5441097/mustafa.pdf
  29. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/73366
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228733136_New_information_regarding_the_holotype_of_Spinosaurus_aegyptiacus_Stromer_1915
  31. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/04/060405175650.htm
  32. https://muvp.mans.edu.eg/index.php/en/research/research-projects/177-cenomnian-vertebrates-from-the-bahariya-oasis-of-the-western-desert-of-egypt
  33. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.220106
  34. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0311096
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195667123000824
  36. https://www.geologia-croatica.hr/index.php/GC/article/view/GC.2012.09
  37. https://peerj.com/preprints/2470v1.pdf
  38. https://www.bu.edu.eg/portal/uploads/Science/Geology/3523/publications/Mohamed%20K%20Zobaa_Zobaa%20et%20al.%2C%202008.pdf
  39. https://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/bahariya/images/bahsml.pdf
  40. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-023-11389-y
  41. https://egjg.journals.ekb.eg/article_216326_cc4d83ede1206079842d3d010bf95d72.pdf
  42. https://www.[jstor](/page/JSTOR).org/stable/1485780
  43. https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijres/v4-i2/2.pdf
  44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1485780
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235708859_Mangrove-dwelling_crabs_Decapoda_Brachyura_Necrocarcinidae_associated_with_dinosaurs_from_the_Upper_Cretaceous_Cenomanian_of_Egypt
  46. https://peerj.com/preprints/2470v1/
  47. https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~mlyon/research.html
  48. https://shark-references.com/species/view/Onchopristis-numidus
  49. https://shark-references.com/species/view/Squalicorax-baharijensis
  50. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Berliner%20Geowissenschaftliche%20Abhandlungen&title=Oberkretazische%20Osteichthyes%20(Knochenfische)%20aus%20dem%20Bereich%20von%20Bahariya%20und%20Kharga&author=S%20Schaal&volume=53&publication_year=1984&pages=1-79
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355683177_New_record_of_Testudines_and_Aves_fossils_from_Bahariya_Formation_Cenomanian_Bahariya_Depression_Egypt
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1464343X25002535
  53. http://paleopolis.rediris.es/cg/03/A01/CG2003_A01_uk.pdf
  54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105310
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221804119_A_New_Eusuchian_Crocodyliform_with_Novel_Cranial_Integument_and_Its_Significance_for_the_Origin_and_Evolution_of_Crocodylia
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264042847_New_material_of_Libycosuchus_brevirostris_from_the_Cenomanian_Bahariya_Formation_of_Egypt
  57. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.211254
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11952657_A_Giant_Sauropod_Dinosaur_from_an_Upper_Cretaceous_Mangrove_Deposit_in_Egypt
  59. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7017436/
  60. https://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiolink1682072225862022
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344722122_NEW_DINOSAUR_PTEROSAUR_AND_CROCODYLIFORM_FOSSILS_FROM_THE_UPPER_CRETACEOUS_CENOMANIAN_BAHARIYA_FORMATION_OF_THE_BAHARIYA_OASIS_EGYPT
  62. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12542-022-00642-6
  63. https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/4754/
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950117223000067
  65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13358-025-00387-0
  66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-019-0042-6
  67. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281008
  68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105554
  69. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0281008
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1464343X20301953
  71. https://journalofpalaeogeography.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42501-019-0042-6
  72. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2470v1
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.