Hubbry Logo
ElaphrosaurusElaphrosaurusMain
Open search
Elaphrosaurus
Community hub
Elaphrosaurus
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Elaphrosaurus
Elaphrosaurus
Elaphrosaurus
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Elaphrosaurus
Temporal range: Late Jurassic (Kimmeridgian to Tithonian), 155–145 Ma
Holotype skeleton mounted (skull, hands and other elements speculative and likely outdated), Natural History Museum of Berlin
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Reptilia
Clade: Dinosauria
Clade: Saurischia
Clade: Theropoda
Family: †Noasauridae
Subfamily: †Elaphrosaurinae
Genus: †Elaphrosaurus
Janensch, 1920
Species:
†E. bambergi
Binomial name
†Elaphrosaurus bambergi
Janensch, 1920

Elaphrosaurus (/ɛˌlɑːfroʊˈsɔːrəs/ el-AH-froh-SOR-əs) is a genus of ceratosaurian theropod dinosaur that lived approximately 155 to 145 million years ago during the Late Jurassic Period in what is now Tanzania in Africa. Elaphrosaurus was a medium-sized but lightly built member of the group that could grow up to 6.2 m (20 ft) long. Morphologically, this dinosaur is significant in two ways. Firstly, it has a relatively long body but is very shallow-chested for a theropod of its size. Secondly, it has very short hindlimbs in comparison with its body. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that this genus is likely a ceratosaur. Earlier suggestions that it is a late surviving coelophysoid have been examined but generally dismissed. Elaphrosaurus is currently believed to be a very close relative of Limusaurus, an unusual beaked ceratosaurian which may have been either herbivorous or omnivorous.

Discovery

[edit]
Skeletal restoration of elements recovered from 1920 to 1925

The type specimen of Elaphrosaurus bambergi HMN Gr.S. 38–44 was recovered in the Middle Dinosaur Member of the Tendaguru Formation of Lindi Region in Tanzania. The specimen was collected by Werner Janensch, I. Salim, H. Reck, and Parkinson in 1910 in gray, green, red, sandy marl that was deposited during the Kimmeridgian stage of the Jurassic period, approximately 157 to 152 million years ago. This specimen is housed in the collection of the Natural History Museum of Berlin, Germany.

Elaphrosaurus was described and named by Werner Janensch in 1920 and the type species is Elaphrosaurus bambergi. The genus name Elaphrosaurus is derived from the Greek words elaphros (ελαφρός) meaning "light to bear" as in "light-footed", a reference to its presumed high running speed and "sauros" (σαῦρος) meaning "lizard";[1] thus, "light-footed lizard". The specific name honours the industrialist Paul Bamberg for his financial support of the Tendagaru expeditions.[2]

HMN Gr.S. 38–44 consists of 18 presacral vertebrae, 5 sacral vertebrae, 20 caudal vertebrae, a pelvic girdle, a nearly complete left hindlimb (missing only some phalanges), several isolated metacarpals, and a humerus. In 1925, Janesch referred two rib fragments, dorsal vertebrae, and a manual phalanx he believed to be phalanx II-2. However, the referred vertebrae has been lost and the manual phalanx (now considered to be phalanx I-1) cannot be evaluated as belonging to Elaphrosaurus. In 1929, he also referred to Elaphrosaurus both scapulocoracoids, two more rib fragments, and a radius (although the radius, being proportionally long and from a different stratigraphic horizon, likely does not belong to this species). Many bones were damaged by calcite encrustation and reconstructed with plaster, although only the left scapulocoracoid was significantly deformed.

A related animal, perhaps the same genus, was found in stratigraphic zones 2–4 of the Morrison Formation.[3][4] Few theropod skeletons have been found, most discoveries being fragments.

Dinosaur footprints from the Niger Republic and from Beit Zayit were attributed to Elaphrosaurus.[5][6] This assignment is considered inconclusive.

It also known from the Upper dinosaur member of the Tendaguru formation.[7]

Description

[edit]
Size comparison of Elaphrosaurus with a human

Elaphrosaurus was long and slender, with a long neck. What is known about Elaphrosaurus mostly comes from a single nearly complete skeleton and no skull has been found. It was distinctive among theropods for being short-legged for its length. Paul (1988) noted that this was the longest-bodied and shallowest-chested theropod that he had examined.[3] Elaphrosaurus was about 6–6.2 m (19.7–20.3 ft) long, 1.46 m (4.8 ft) tall at the hip, and weighed about 200–210 kg (440–460 lb).[3][8] The tibia (shin bone) of Elaphrosaurus, measured 608 mm was considerably longer than its femur (thigh bone) that measured 520 mm, and the metatarsals were 74% the length of the femur. These proportions, also shared by some ornithomimosaurs, likely indicate cursorial habits.[9] Its long tail ended with a rare downward bend which may be unrelated to taphonomy. Although the neck of Elaphrosaurus was long, the thin zygapophyses and a lack of epipophyses on the cervical vertebrae indicate that it was much less flexible than those of other theropods and that it may have only supported a rather small skull. These traits argue against Elaphrosaurus being a predator of large prey, and it was possibly omnivorous or herbivorous due to its close relation with Limusaurus.[10]

Restoration of Elaphrosaurus with head and hands based on the related Limusaurus

A diagnosis is a statement of the anatomical features of an organism (or group) that collectively distinguish it from all other organisms. Some, but not all, of the features in a diagnosis are also autapomorphies. An autapomorphy is a distinctive anatomical feature that is unique to a given organism. According to Rauhut (2000), Elaphrosaurus can be distinguished based on the following characteristics: the cervical vertebrae possess thin latero-ventral laminae, bordering the posterior pleurocoel ventrally, the cervical vertebrae are strongly concave ventrally, with the ventral margin arching above the mid-height of the anterior articular facet at its highest point, the brevis fossa of the ilium is extremely widened, so that the brevis shelf forms an almost horizontal lateral flange, the distal end of the ischium is strongly expanded into a triangular boot.

An emended diagnosis in Rauhut and Carrano's 2016 study added that Elaphrosaurus could uniquely be distinguished by pronounced ventrolateral laminae at the posterior ends of the cervical vertebrae, no cervical epipophyses (especially unique among abelisauroids), the distal end of metacarpal II offset ventrally from its shaft by a distinct step, the proximal end of metatarsal IV almost 2.5 times deeper anteroposteriorly than wide transversely, and a very short ascending process of the astragalus (if identified correctly).[10]

Classification

[edit]
Cervical vertebrae of the holotype
Hind limbs of the holotype

Elaphrosaurus was first described by Janensch as a coelurosaurian.[2] At the time, Coelurosauria was a wastebasket taxon for small theropods. Then, Elaphrosaurus was placed in the family Ornithomimidae by Franz Nopcsa in 1928 because of its light frame and the fact that its humerus is straight and slender, with a low deltopectoral crest.[11] Janensch himself rejected this assignment, believing any resemblances could plausibly be explained by convergent evolution. By the middle of the twentieth century, Elaphrosaurus was usually seen as a member of the Coeluridae. However, Nopcsa's hypothesis was revived by Dale Alan Russell in 1972,[12] and confirmed by Peter Malcolm Galton in 1982.[13] In 1988 Gregory S. Paul remarked that upon closer examination its limbs approximate those of Coelophysis and suggested a position in the Coelophysidae.[3] Nevertheless, in 1990 Barsbold, Teresa Maryańska and Osmólska and other researchers still classified it as an ornithomimid.[14] More recent work by Carrano and Sampson (2008) and Carrano et al. (2012) assign Elaphrosaurus to the Ceratosauria.[15][16] A re-study of the known fossil material, published in 2016, concluded that, due to characteristics of the scapulocoracoid and metatarsals, Elaphrosaurus was actually an early member of the Noasauridae within Ceratosauria, and that it formed a distinct group with certain Asian noasaurids, which was named the Elaphrosaurinae.[10]

The following cladogram is based on the phylogenetic analysis conducted by Rauhut and Carrano in 2016, showing the relationships of Elaphrosaurus among the noasaurids:[10]

Abelisauroidea

Formerly assigned species

[edit]

The following material was assigned to Elaphrosaurus over the years, but further study revealed that these assignments were dubious:

  • Elaphrosaurus iguidiensis, was described by Albert-Félix de Lapparent in 1960,[17] and the material was collected in Algeria, Libya and Niger in Early Cretaceous sediments. The material consists of over forty teeth, a manual ungual, eight caudal vertebrae, a distal femur fragment, and a complete tibia measuring 350 mm. These specimens originated in three different localities and do not appear to belong to the same species.
  • Elaphrosaurus gautieri, was first described by de Lapparent in 1960,[17] and the material was collected at the Tiouraren Formation in Niger in Middle-Late Jurassic sediments. This material, a partial skeleton, has since been renamed Spinostropheus gautieri by Sereno et al. (2004).[18]
  • Elaphrosaurus philtippettensis, subsequently Elaphrosaurus philtippettorum, was erected by Stephan Pickering[19][20] in 1995 based on USNM 5737, which consists of a tibia, a humerus, some metatarsals, and the distal portion of a fragmentary pubic bones recovered from the Morrison Formation of Colorado. Research by Carpenter et al. (2005) concluded that these fossils are not ceratosaurian and are likely referable to the coelurid theropod Tanycolagreus. It is named after visual effects supervisor Phil Tippett.
  • Elaphrosaurus agilis, was a renaming by Dale Russell in 1980 of Coelurus agilis, originally named by Othniel Charles Marsh in 1884.[21] The species is based on a pair of fused pubic bones that were by Marsh believed to represent a much larger version of the type species Coelurus fragilis. John Ostrom (1980) confirmed Charles Whitney Gilmore's earlier position that Coelurus agilis was synonymous with Coelurus fragilis. This means that Elaphrosaurus agilis is actually the same animal as Coelurus fragilis, its junior synonym.
  • Elaphrosaurus sp. USNM 8415, was discovered in 1883 and first referred to the ornithopod Dryosaurus. It was later referred to Elaphrosaurus by Galton in 1982, based on remains recovered at the Morrison Formation of Colorado. This material, which is clearly ceratosaurian, does not bear any morphology that specifically ties it to Elaphrosaurus. Current knowledge limits the placement of this material to Ceratosauria incertae sedis.[22]
  • Elaphrosaurus sp. DMNH 36284, was referred to this genus by Chure[23] in 2001, based on the proximal portion of a fragmentary right tibia from the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation. Phylogenetic analysis by Carrano and Sampson (2008) showed that it was not basal ceratosaurian, but instead resembled the leg bone of an abelisauroid theropod that has yet to be formally described.[22]

Paleobiology

[edit]
Holotype mount from the front

Paul (1988) noted that Elaphrosaurus bambergi was too small to prey on the sauropods and stegosaurs present in its paleoenvironment, and suggested instead that it likely hunted the small and swift ornithopod herbivores.[3] However, newer studies support the idea that Elaphrosaurus was a herbivore or omnivore, owing to its close relation with Limusaurus and a neck which is much less flexible than those characteristic of carnivorous theropods.[10]

Paleoecology

[edit]
See also: Tendaguru Formation § Depositional environment

Studies suggest that the paleoenvironment of the Tendaguru Formation was a marginal marine environment with both non-marine faunal and floral content. The Middle Dinosaur Member of the Tendaguru Formation has yielded the sauropods Giraffatitan, Australodocus, Janenschia, Tornieria and Dicraeosaurus, theropods similar to Allosaurus and Ceratosaurus, the carcharodontosaurid Veterupristisaurus, the stegosaurid Kentrosaurus and the iguanodontian Dysalotosaurus. Dinosaurs shared this paleoenvironment with pterosaurs like Pterodactylus and Rhamphorhynchus, as well as with early mammals.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Elaphrosaurus

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Elaphrosaurus is a genus of lightly built ceratosaurian theropod dinosaur that lived during the Late Jurassic epoch, approximately 154 to 151 million years ago, in what is now Tanzania. The type and only species, Elaphrosaurus bambergi, is known from a single nearly complete postcranial skeleton (holotype MB.R.4960) discovered in the Tendaguru Formation, which includes presacral and caudal vertebrae, elements of the shoulder girdle, partial forelimbs (humeri, radius, and ulna), pelvis, and hindlimbs, but lacks the skull and manus. Named by German paleontologist Werner Janensch in 1920, the genus name derives from Greek words meaning "light(-built) lizard," reflecting its slender build. Measuring around 6 meters (20 feet) in length and weighing approximately 210 kilograms, Elaphrosaurus was a medium-sized adapted for speed, with elongated hindlimbs where the exceeded the in length, low neural spines on the vertebrae, and a long, flexible neck indicated by constricted . Its classification has evolved over time; initially considered a coelurosaur or ornithomimosaur due to its gracile form, recent analyses place it as a basal member of within Abelisauroidea, forming the clade Elaphrosaurinae with related Jurassic Asian taxa and highlighting the early diversification of ceratosaurs in . This positioning makes Elaphrosaurus significant for understanding the evolutionary history of abelisauroids, extending their origins back by about 50 million years from previously known records. The , a major site yielding diverse dinosaur fauna including sauropods like , provided the context for Elaphrosaurus's discovery during early 20th-century German expeditions, with the excavated from the Middle Saurian Beds representing a marginal marine environment. Notable features include an expansive , a small ilium with a laterally flared postacetabular blade, and modified pelvic elements such as a peg-and-socket articulation between the ilium and pubis, which distinguish it from other theropods. A possible second specimen from the in has been tentatively referred to Elaphrosaurus, suggesting a wider distribution, though this remains debated.

Discovery and Naming

Initial Discovery

The holotype specimen of Elaphrosaurus bambergi, designated MB.R. 4960, was discovered in 1910 during the German Tendaguru Expedition (1909–1913) led by paleontologist Werner Janensch in the Lindi District of southeastern Tanzania. The expedition, organized by the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, aimed to excavate vertebrate fossils from the Late Jurassic deposits of the region, yielding over 230 tons of material overall. The specimen was recovered from the Middle Dinosaur Member (Mittel Saurier Schicht) of the , dating to the late stage, approximately 155–151 million years ago. Although the quarry site produced other theropod remains, the Elaphrosaurus fossils were found in isolation, with no articulated associations to other individuals or taxa. Upon discovery, the fossils represented a partial postcranial of a subadult or adult individual, comprising 16 presacral vertebrae (including cervicals), 6 sacral vertebrae, 18 caudal vertebrae, chevrons, , the right , a nearly complete pelvic (including ilia, pubes, and ), and elements of the hind limbs including both femora, tibiae, fibulae, astragalus, calcaneum, and several pedal phalanges, but lacking the and most forelimb elements beyond the . The remains were prepared and shipped to the Museum für Naturkunde in , where they remain housed today.

Description and Naming

Elaphrosaurus bambergi was formally described and named in 1920 by German paleontologist Werner Janensch in a brief initial publication based on a partial recovered from the in what is now . The genus name Elaphrosaurus derives from the Greek words elaphros, meaning "light" or "light-footed," and sauros, meaning "lizard," referring to the animal's slender, lightweight build suggestive of agility; the specific epithet bambergi honors Paul Bamberg, a financial supporter of the German Tendaguru expedition. The type specimen, housed at the Museum für Naturkunde in under collection number MB.R. 4960, comprises a nearly complete but disarticulated postcranial lacking the and manual elements. It includes 16 presacral vertebrae (including cervicals), 6 sacral vertebrae, 18 caudal vertebrae, chevrons, ribs, the right , a nearly complete (both ilia, pubes, and ), both femora, tibiae, and fibulae, the astragalus, calcaneum, and several pedal phalanges. This material was discovered during the 1910 field season of the German Tendaguru expedition led by Janensch himself. In his initial analysis, Janensch estimated the total body length of E. bambergi at approximately 5.3–6 meters, based on the proportions of the preserved hindlimb elements, with the femur measuring about 520 mm and the tibia 608 mm. He classified the taxon as a coelurosaur, tentatively aligning it with ornithomimosaurs due to the slender limb bones and elongated vertebrae, while noting morphological similarities in the vertebral column and pelvic girdle to the North American theropod Ornitholestes. These early observations emphasized the dinosaur's gracile morphology, adapted for speed rather than robust predation.

Description

Overall Morphology

Elaphrosaurus was a slender, lightweight theropod , with estimates indicating an adult body length of 6–6.2 m, a hip height of 1.46 m, and a body mass of 200–210 kg based on scaling from femoral measurements and volumetric modeling approaches developed in the . These dimensions reflect a subadult specimen, suggesting potential for slightly larger mature individuals, though no additional complete specimens are known to confirm growth beyond this size. The overall body plan featured an elongated neck composed of strongly constricted , some reaching up to approximately 11–12 cm in length, paired with a relatively short trunk that contributed to a low-slung posture. The s were gracile and notably elongated, with individual length from hip to foot approximately 1.5 m, and the measuring about 80% of the length ( ~520 mm, ~608 mm), proportions consistent with adaptations for enhanced speed and agility. The forelimbs were reduced and modified, while the emphasized lightness through thin neural arches and minimal pneumaticity. No skin impressions or direct evidence of soft tissue preservation exists for Elaphrosaurus, but the lightweight construction is inferred from the low and gracile morphology of the preserved bones, supporting an overall frame optimized for rapid movement rather than robustness. Due to the reliance on a single specimen, no evidence of has been identified. The absence of cranial material further limits understanding of head structure, though the postcranial skeleton provides a clear picture of its lithe, bipedal form.

Postcranial Skeleton

The postcranial skeleton of Elaphrosaurus bambergi is represented by the specimen MB.R.4960, a subadult individual preserving elements of the , (including , , and ), pelvic girdle, and hindlimbs from the Upper in . The includes 16 preserved presacral vertebrae characterized by low neural spines throughout. The are notably elongated and flexible, with biconcave , fused ribs, and deep pleurocoels. Dorsal vertebrae exhibit hyposphene-hypantrum articulations for enhanced rigidity, along with ventral keeling in some . The caudal series comprises 18 preserved vertebrae that taper rapidly distally, accompanied by chevrons that articulate with haemal arches. The consists of six fused vertebrae, including a dorsosacral. The pelvic girdle features a tall and narrow ilium that is elongate and strongly fused to the , with a pronounced supraacetabular crest. The pubis is slender proximally, expanding distally into a boot-like structure typical of ceratosaurs. The is straight and rod-like, with a reduced obturator process and a distal expansion forming a shoe-shaped end. Hindlimb elements include a straight with a prominent fourth positioned distally on the shaft. The is longer than the , slender, and bears an ascending on the astragalus. The metatarsus is slender overall, with the third metatarsal being the longest and pinched proximally, while the pedal phalanges are reduced in number and size. The preserved shoulder girdle includes a slender and elements of the and , indicating reduced s adapted for lightweight construction, though distal forelimb elements are absent. A single partial middle is preserved, but no additional dorsal or cervical ribs or are known, which restricts understanding of the ventral thoracic region. The preserved postcranial elements reflect an overall slender build that would have contributed to a lightweight body.

Classification and Systematics

Historical Classifications

Upon its initial description, Elaphrosaurus was tentatively classified within Coelurosauria as incertae sedis by Charles W. Gilmore, who noted similarities in its slender postcranial skeleton to the North American theropods Ornitholestes and Coelurus, particularly in limb proportions and overall gracility. This placement was influenced by the absence of cranial material, which limited comparisons and led to reliance on postcranial features alone for early assessments. During the 1930s to 1960s, Elaphrosaurus was frequently grouped with ornithomimids due to its lightweight build, elongated limbs, and lack of preserved skull elements, which evoked similarities to the ostrich-like theropods such as . Alfred S. Romer, in his influential 1956 osteological compendium, reinforced this association by including Elaphrosaurus within a broader that encompassed ornithomimids, emphasizing shared bipedal adaptations and reduced robustness compared to more massive theropods. The absence of dentition and cranial data continued to drive these alignments, often resulting in misinterpretations that aligned it more closely with derived coelurosaurs than its actual affinities. In the 1970s, taxonomic revisions introduced alternative views, with Ralph E. Molnar suggesting possible affinities with allosaurids based on certain pelvic and features, while others proposed it as a basal theropod outside more derived clades. These debates highlighted the challenges posed by incomplete specimens, as postcranial-only comparisons frequently led to alignments with carnosaurs like , despite discrepancies in size and morphology. By the late , a tentative shift toward affinities emerged in some analyses. Prior to 2010, the consensus positioned Elaphrosaurus generally within but with significant uncertainty regarding its precise placement, owing to ongoing debates over its slender morphology and the persistent lack of material.

Modern Phylogeny

In modern phylogenetic analyses, Elaphrosaurus is classified within , specifically as a member of Abelisauroidea > > Elaphrosaurinae. This placement is supported by shared synapomorphies with other noasaurids, including extremely elongated and constricted , inferred reduced forelimbs based on the gracile overall build, and other lightweight features typical of the clade. Phylogenetically, Elaphrosaurus is positioned as the sister taxon to within Elaphrosaurinae, forming part of the basal ceratosaur radiation during the . This resolves earlier debates that had tentatively placed it among coelurosaurs due to its slender morphology. The clade Elaphrosaurinae is defined to include and Elaphrosaurus, with potential extension to related African and Asian forms based on fragmentary material. Recent studies in the 2020s, incorporating detailed vertebral comparisons, have reaffirmed its noasaurid affinity without significant revisions. As of 2025, no major updates to this phylogeny have emerged.

Synonymy and Dubious Species

The genus Elaphrosaurus is monotypic, with only the type species E. bambergi considered valid; it is based on the holotype specimen (MB.R.4960), a nearly complete postcranial skeleton from the Upper Jurassic Tendaguru Beds of Tanzania. Two additional species have been proposed within the genus, but both are now regarded as nomina dubia owing to inadequate preservation and absence of diagnostic characters sufficient for confident referral. E. iguidiensis, named by Lapparent in 1960 based on fragmentary postcranial elements (including vertebrae and limb bones) from the Early Cretaceous Continental Intercalaire of Niger, cannot be distinguished from more general theropod morphology and is classified as Theropoda indet. The proposed species E. gautieri, also named by Lapparent in 1960 based on an assortment of isolated postcranial bones (primarily vertebrae and a partial pelvis) from the Early Cretaceous Tiourarén Formation in northwestern Niger, was later reassigned to the separate genus Spinostropheus gautieri (Sereno et al., 2004), considered a basal ceratosaur. Referrals of North American material to Elaphrosaurus remain tentative and debated. In the of the , an isolated (USNM 31851) was tentatively assigned to the by Galton (1982), and a proximal was referred to Elaphrosaurus by Chure (2001) based on morphological similarities, though limited overlap in preserved elements leaves the assignment uncertain and best regarded as indeterminate theropod remains by some analyses. No further have been validly referred to Elaphrosaurus since 1960.

Paleoecology

Geological Setting

Elaphrosaurus fossils were recovered from the in southeastern , a major to sedimentary sequence located within the Mandawa Basin of the broader system. The formation spans an age range from the middle Oxfordian to the Valanginian-Hauterivian stages, approximately 163 to 130 million years ago, though the dinosaur-bearing horizons relevant to Elaphrosaurus date to the late to stages, roughly 155 to 145 million years ago. This stratigraphic interval reflects a period of tectonic activity associated with the initial breakup of , influencing the basin's development through rifting and subsidence. The type specimen of Elaphrosaurus bambergi was found in the Middle Dinosaur Member of the , consisting of sandy marls and siltstones that indicate a environment with lagoonal and estuarine influences. Additional material has been attributed to the overlying Upper Dinosaur Member, characterized by fine-grained sandstones and argillaceous deposits formed in tidal flats, small fluvial channels, and shallow-water lagoons. These members represent cyclic driven by third-order transgressive-regressive sequences, with sandstone-dominated units signaling marginal marine conditions and finer clastics pointing to more terrestrial, tidal-influenced settings. Taphonomic evidence suggests that Elaphrosaurus remains accumulated in channel lags within fluvial systems, where rapid burial in riverine or estuarine deposits preserved the skeletons amid periodic tidal incursions. The paleoclimate was warm and seasonal, with arid to semi-arid conditions punctuated by episodic rainfall, as inferred from sedimentary structures like cross-bedding and the presence of xerophytic conifer fossils. Stratigraphically, the Tendaguru Formation correlates with the Morrison Formation of North America, sharing a similar Late Jurassic timeframe and faunal elements that highlight Gondwanan-Laurasian connections.

Associated Fauna

The of southeastern yielded a diverse assemblage of vertebrates, dominated by large herbivorous dinosaurs that likely formed the bulk of the terrestrial biomass in a forested environment. Sauropods were particularly abundant and varied, including the brachiosaurid Giraffatitan brancai, which reached lengths of up to 23 meters and featured an elongated neck adapted for high browsing, as well as the titanosaurs Janenschia robusta and indeterminate forms with robust limb bones suggesting a wide-bodied build. Dicraeosaurids such as Dicraeosaurus hansemanni and D. sattleri represented medium-sized sauropods with short necks and elongated necks in diplodocids like Tornieria africana and Australodocus bohetii, the latter known from fragmentary cervical vertebrae indicating a slender, long-necked morphology. Ornithischian herbivores complemented the sauropod-dominated landscape, with the stegosaur Kentrosaurus aethiopicus notable for its paired tail spikes (caudal ) used potentially for defense, and the bipedal ornithopod (or Dysalotosaurus) representing smaller, more agile grazers reaching about 3-4 meters in length. Theropod diversity included large predators resembling , such as the carcharodontosaurid with its deep caudal neural spines, alongside smaller ceratosaurs, abelisauroids, and coelurosaurs; a possible megalosauroid suggests the presence of spinosaurid-like forms adapted to semi-aquatic niches. Non-dinosaurian vertebrates added to the ecosystem's complexity, with small mammals from three genera indicating early diversification of mammaliaforms, crocodylomorphs such as teleosaurids inhabiting aquatic habitats, and pterosaurs contributing to aerial niches, though remains are fragmentary. This high faunal diversity reflects a dynamic riparian setting with coniferous forests and seasonal rivers, where large herbivores like sauropods and stegosaurs exerted significant ecological influence through their and behaviors. The Tendaguru fauna shares broad similarities with the contemporaneous of , including comparable large theropods and ornithopods, but exhibits greater sauropod taxonomic variety, particularly in dicraeosaurids and diplodocids, without evidence of direct competitors occupying the mid-sized carnivorous niche of Elaphrosaurus.

Paleobiology

Locomotion and Behavior

Elaphrosaurus was a bipedal theropod , with locomotion centered on its powerful hindlimbs, which exhibit pronounced adaptations. The hindlimbs are notably elongate and slender, featuring long femora, , and metatarsals, along with a small ascending process of the astragalus fused to the , features that enhanced and speed for traversing open landscapes. These proportions, unique among theropods and shared with close relatives like Kiyacursor and , reflect improved ability, positioning noasaurids as some of the fastest-running non-avian theropods, surpassed only by advanced ornithomimosaurs. The are extremely elongated and constricted, conferring significant neck flexibility that likely facilitated visual scanning of surroundings during movement or prey pursuit. In contrast, the forelimbs appear to have played a minimal role in locomotion; their strongly modified structure and expansive , typical of noasaurids, suggest primary use in other functions rather than or propulsion. The overall lightweight and gracile postcranial , including a reduced ilium, supports an energy-efficient bipedal gait optimized for sustained running rather than short bursts, well-suited to the habitats of the . While skeletal evidence implies agile predatory habits, no direct fossils indicate social behaviors such as pack hunting or nesting. Correlations with theropod trackways from Tendaguru remain tentative and unconfirmed for Elaphrosaurus specifically.

Diet and Ontogeny

The absence of cranial remains in the known specimen of Elaphrosaurus bambergi precludes of its diet, leaving inferences reliant on postcranial morphology and phylogenetic relationships within . As a member of and the clade Elaphrosaurinae, Elaphrosaurus is the sister taxon to inextricabilis, a ceratosaurian that underwent extreme changes, including a dietary shift from omnivory in toothed juveniles to herbivory in toothless adults, supported by stable carbon isotope signatures and gastroliths in mature individuals. This suggests Elaphrosaurus juveniles may have been carnivorous or omnivorous, targeting small prey, while adults potentially transitioned toward plant-based feeding, though no (such as gastroliths or isotopic data) confirms such a shift in Elaphrosaurus itself, making this interpretation hypothetical. The lightly built postcranial of Elaphrosaurus, approximately 6 meters in length with an estimated of 200 to 400 kilograms, indicates it was ill-suited for hunting large prey such as contemporaneous sauropods in the . Instead, its gracile form and elongated imply adaptations for pursuing small vertebrates or , or possibly browsing low vegetation, aligning with the inferred omnivorous tendencies observed in other noasaurids such as . The specimen exhibits fused neurocentral sutures and other indicators of skeletal maturity, representing an adult individual likely at or near maximum size. Feeding mechanics remain speculative without dentition, but the slender build suggests ground-foraging behaviors rather than active predation on sizable animals. Recent phylogenetic analyses in the 2020s, including the identification of elaphrosaurine remains from , highlight the clade's potential for dietary flexibility, favoring interpretations of transitional omnivory across in basal ceratosaurs like Elaphrosaurus. Uncertainties persist due to the incomplete record, particularly the lack of skulls, rendering the precise nature of its debated among researchers.

References

  1. https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/dino-directory/elaphrosaurus.html
  2. https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/laelaps/paleo-profile-elaphrosaurus-bambergi/
  3. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301600282_The_theropod_dinosaur_Elaphrosaurus_bambergi_Janensch_1920_from_the_Late_Jurassic_of_Tendaguru_Tanzania
  4. https://pup-assets.imgix.net/onix/images/9780691250212/9780691250212.pdf
  5. https://www.museumfuernaturkunde.berlin/en/research/virtual-access-fossil-and-archival-material-german-tendaguru-expedition-1909-1913
  6. https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/178/3/546/2667468
  7. https://naturalhistory.si.edu/sites/default/files/media/translated_publications/Janensch_25.pdf
  8. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/125786
  9. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/zoj.12425
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313761929_Second_record_of_a_site_with_dinosaur_skeletal_remains_in_Libya_Northern_Africa
  11. https://theropoddatabase.github.io/Neotheropoda.htm
  12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285786191_The_second_record_of_the_African_theropod_Elaphrosaurus_Dinosauria_Ceratosauria_from_the_Western_Hemisphere
  13. https://fr.copernicus.org/articles/12/141/2009/fr-12-141-2009.pdf
  14. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/mmng.20020050103
  15. https://fr.copernicus.org/articles/2/25/1999/fr-2-25-1999.pdf
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232686232_Revision_of_the_Tendaguru_sauropod_dinosaur_Tornieria_africana_FRAAS_and_its_relevance_for_sauropod_paleobiogeography
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307776201_Taxonomy_of_Late_Jurassic_diplodocid_sauropods_from_Tendaguru_Tanzania
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235907181_Theropod_dinosaurs_from_the_Late_Jurassic_of_Tendaguru_Tanzania
  19. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2023/3747-bamboo-corsets-from-tendaguru
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230321334_Palaeoecology_and_depositional_environments_of_the_Tendaguru_Beds_Late_Jurassic_to_Early_Cretaceous_Tanzania
  21. https://rainbow.ldeo.columbia.edu/courses/v1001/14.html
  22. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/424577
  23. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.0537
  24. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(16)31269-6
  25. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-28154-x
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X20301234
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.