Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Dentures
View on WikipediaThis article may incorporate text from a large language model. (September 2025) |
This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2007) |
| Dentures | |
|---|---|
A maxillary denture | |
| MeSH | D003778 |

Dentures (also known as false teeth) are prosthetic devices constructed to replace missing teeth, supported by the surrounding soft and hard tissues of the oral cavity. Conventional dentures are removable (removable partial denture or complete denture). However, there are many denture designs, some of which rely on bonding or clasping onto teeth or dental implants (fixed prosthodontics). There are two main categories of dentures, the distinction being whether they fit onto the mandibular arch or on the maxillary arch.
Medical uses
[edit]Dentures can help people via:
- Mastication: chewing ability is improved by the replacement of edentulous (lacking teeth) areas with denture teeth.
- Aesthetics: the presence of teeth gives a natural appearance to the face, and wearing a denture to replace missing teeth provides support for the lips and cheeks and corrects the collapsed appearance that results from the loss of teeth.
- Pronunciation: replacing missing teeth, especially the anteriors, enables patients to speak better, enunciating more easily sibilants and fricatives in particular.
- Self-esteem: improved looks and speech boost confidence in patients' ability to interact socially.
Complications
[edit]Stomatitis
[edit]Denture stomatitis is an inflammatory condition of the skin under the dentures.[1] It can affect both partial and complete denture wearers, and is most commonly seen on the palatal mucosa. Clinically, it appears as simple localized inflammation (Type I), generalized erythema covering the denture-bearing area (Type II) and inflammatory papillary hyperplasia (Type III). People with denture stomatitis are more likely to have angular cheilitis.[2] Denture stomatitis is caused by a mixed infection of Candida albicans (90%) and a number of bacteria such as Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Fusobacterium and Bacteroides species.[3] Acrylic resin is more susceptible for fungal colonization, adherence and proliferation. In poor fitting dentures, these inflammations can be identified and referred to as a common sore of the mouth and are dependent on the severity of the inflammation.[4]
It's crucial to acknowledge that denture stomatitis ranks among the most prevalent conditions affecting denture wearers, affecting approximately 70% of this population.[5] Early recognition of the signs and symptoms of denture stomatitis is vital for prompt treatment. Some of these symptoms include oral white or red patches, sore throat, pain or discomfort when swallowing, or sores in mouth.[6] Common risk factors for denture stomatitis include denture trauma, poor denture hygiene and nocturnal denture wear. Additionally, systemic risk factors such as nutritional deficiencies, immunosuppression, smoking, diabetes, use of steroid inhalers, and xerostomia play a significant role. Therefore, it's important to conduct thorough examinations to detect any underlying systemic diseases.
Precautions denture wearers should take care improving the fit of ill-fitting dentures to eliminate any dental trauma. Stress on the importance of good denture hygiene including cleaning of the denture, soaking the dentures in disinfectant solution and not wearing it during sleeping at night is the key to treating all types of denture stomatitis. Topical application and systemic use of antifungal agents can be used to treat denture stomatitis cases that fail to respond to local conservative measures.[2]
Ulceration
[edit]Mouth ulceration is the most common lesion in people with dentures. It can be caused by repetitive minor trauma like poorly fitting dentures including over-extension of a denture. Pressure-indicating paste can be used to check the fitting of dentures.[7] It allows the areas of premature contact to be distinguished from areas of physiologic tissue contact.[8] Therefore, the particular area can be polished with an acrylic bur. Leaching of residual monomer methyl methacrylate from inadequately cured denture acrylic resin material can cause mucosal irritation and hence oral ulceration as well. Patients are advised to use warm salt water mouth rinses and a betamethasone rinse which can heal such ulcers.[9] Review of persisting oral ulcerations for more than 3 weeks is recommended.[10]
Tooth loss
[edit]People can become entirely edentulous for many reasons, the most prevalent being removal due to dental disease, which typically relates to oral flora control, i.e., periodontal disease and tooth decay. Other reasons include pregnancy, tooth developmental defects caused by severe malnutrition, genetic defects such as dentinogenesis imperfecta, trauma, or drug use.
Periodontitis is defined as an inflammatory lesion mediated by host-pathogen interaction that results in the loss of connective tissue fiber attachment to the root surface and ultimately to the alveolar bone. It is the loss of connective tissue to the root surface that leads to teeth falling out. The hormones associated with pregnancy increases the risk of gingivitis and vomiting.
Hormones released during pregnancy softens the cardia muscle ring that keeps food within the stomach. Hydrochloric acid is the acid involved in gastric reflux, also known as morning sickness. This acid, at a pH of 1.5-3.5, coats the enamel on the teeth, mainly affecting the palatal surfaces of the maxillary teeth. Eventually the enamel is softened and easily wears away.
Dental trauma refers to trauma (injury) to the teeth and/or periodontium (gums, periodontal ligament, alveolar bone). Strong force may cause the root of the tooth to completely dislocate from its socket, mild trauma may cause the tooth to chip.
Types
[edit]
Removable partial dentures
[edit]Removable partial dentures are for patients who are missing some of their teeth on a particular arch. Fixed partial dentures, also known as "crown and bridge" dentures, are made from crowns that are fitted on the remaining teeth. They act as abutments and pontics, and are made from materials resembling the missing teeth. Fixed bridges are more expensive than removable appliances but are more stable.
Another option in this category is the flexible partial, which takes advantage of innovations in digital technology. Flexible partial fabrication involves only non-invasive procedures. Dentures can be difficult to clean and can affect oral hygiene.[11]
Complete dentures
[edit]Complete dentures are worn by patients who are missing all of the teeth in a single arch—i.e. the maxillary (upper) or mandibular (lower) arch—or, more commonly, in both arches. The full denture is removable because it is held in place by suction. They are painful at first and can take some time to get used to. There are two types of full dentures: immediate dentures and conventional dentures.[12]
Copy dentures
[edit]Copy dentures can be made for either partial, but mainly complete denture patients. These dentures require fewer visits to make and usually are made for older patients, patients who would have difficulty adjusting to new dentures, would like a spare pair of dentures or like the aesthetics of their dentures already. This requires taking an impression of the patient's current denture and remaking it.[13]
Materials
[edit]Dentures are mainly made from acrylic due to the ease of material manipulation and likeness to intra-oral tissues, i.e. gums. Most dentures are composed of heat-cured acrylic polymethyl methacrylate and rubber-reinforced polymethyl methacrylate.[14] Coloring agents and synthetic fibers are added to obtain the tissue-like shade, and to mimic the small capillaries of the oral mucosa, respectively.[15] However, dentures made from acrylic can be fragile and fracture easily if the patient has trouble adapting neuromuscular control. This can be overcome by reinforcing the denture base with cobalt chromium (Co-Cr). They are often thinner (therefore more comfortable) and stronger (to prevent repeating fractures).
History
[edit]

As early as the 7th century BC, Etruscans in northern Italy made partial dentures out of human or other animal teeth fastened together with gold bands.[17][18] The Romans had likely borrowed this technique by the 5th century BC.[17] A text by Martial (c. AD 40-103) referenced Cascellius, who extracted or repaired painful teeth. H. L. Strömgren (1935), postulated that by repairing it was meant tooth replacement and not tooth filling.[19]
Wooden full dentures were invented in Japan around the early 16th century.[16] Softened beeswax was inserted into the patient's mouth to create an impression, which was then filled with harder bees wax. Wooden dentures were then meticulously carved based on that model. The earliest of these dentures were entirely wooden, but later versions used natural human teeth or sculpted pagodite, ivory, or animal horn for the teeth. These dentures were built with a broad base, exploiting the principles of adhesion to stay in place. This was an advanced technique for the era; it was not replicated in the West until the late 18th century. Wooden dentures continued to be used in Japan until the Opening of Japan to the West in the 19th century.[16]
In 1728, Pierre Fauchard described the construction of dentures using a metal frame and teeth sculpted from animal bone.[16] The first porcelain dentures were made around 1770 by Alexis Duchâteau. In 1791, the first British patent was granted to Nicholas Dubois De Chemant, previous assistant to Duchateau, for "De Chemant's Specification":
... a composition for the purpose of making of artificial teeth either single double or in rows or in complete sets, and also springs for fastening or affixing the same in a more easy and effectual manner than any hitherto discovered which said teeth may be made of any shade or colour, which they will retain for any length of time and will consequently more perfectly resemble the natural teeth.[20]
He began selling his wares in 1792, with most of his porcelain paste supplied by Wedgwood.[21][22]
17th century London's Peter de la Roche is believed to be one of the first 'operators for the teeth', men who advertized themselves as specialists in dental work. They were often professional goldsmiths, ivory turners or students of barber-surgeons.[23]
In 1820, Samuel Stockton, a goldsmith by trade, began manufacturing high-quality porcelain dentures mounted on 18-carat gold plates. Later dentures from the 1850s onwards were made of Vulcanite, a form of hardened rubber into which porcelain teeth were set. In the 20th century, acrylic resin and other plastics were used.[24] In Britain, sequential Adult Dental Health Surveys revealed that in 1968 79% of those aged 65–74 had no natural teeth; by 1998, this proportion had fallen to 36%.[25]
George Washington
[edit]George Washington (1732–1799) suffered from problems with his teeth throughout his life, and historians have tracked his experiences in great detail.[26] He lost his first adult tooth when he was twenty-two and had only one left by the time he became president.[27] He had several sets of false teeth made, four of them by a dentist named John Greenwood. None of the sets, contrary to popular belief, were made from wood or contained any wood.[28] The set made when he became president were carved from hippopotamus and elephant ivory, held together with gold springs.[29] Prior to these, he had a set made with real human teeth,[30] likely ones he purchased from "several unnamed Negroes, presumably Mount Vernon slaves" in 1784.[31]
Manufacturing
[edit]Modern dentures are most often fabricated in a commercial dental laboratory or by a denturist using a combination of tissue shaded powders polymethyl methacrylate acrylic (PMMA). These acrylics are available as heat-cured or cold-cured types. Commercially produced acrylic teeth are widely available in hundreds of shapes and tooth colors.
The process of fabricating a denture usually begins with an initial dental impression of the maxillary and mandibular ridges. Standard impression materials are used during the process. The initial impression is used to create a simple stone model that represents the maxillary and mandibular arches of the patient's mouth. This is not a detailed impression at this stage. Once the initial impression is taken, the stone model is used to create a 'custom impression tray', which is then used to take a second and much more detailed and accurate impression of the patient's maxillary and mandibular ridges. Polyvinyl siloxane impression material is one of several very accurate impression materials used when the final impression is taken of the maxillary and mandibular ridges. A wax rim is fabricated to assist the dentist or denturist in establishing the vertical dimension of occlusion. After this, a bite registration is created to marry the position of one arch to the other.
Once the relative position of each arch to the other is known, the wax rim can be used as a base to place the selected denture teeth in correct position. This arrangement of teeth is tested in the mouth so that adjustments can be made to the occlusion. After the occlusion has been verified by the dentist or denturist and the patient, and all phonetic requirements are met, the denture is processed.
Processing a denture is usually performed using a lost-wax technique whereby the form of the final denture, including the acrylic denture teeth, is invested in stone. This investment is then heated, and when it melts the wax is removed through a spruing channel. The remaining cavity is then either filled by forced injection or pouring in the uncured denture acrylic, which is either a heat-cured or cold-cured type. During the processing period, heat cured acrylics—also called permanent denture acrylics—go through a process called polymerization, causing the acrylic materials to bond very tightly and taking several hours to complete. After a curing period, the stone investment is removed, the acrylic is polished, and the denture is complete. The end result is a denture that looks much more natural, is much stronger and more durable than a cold-cured temporary denture, resists stains and odors, and will last for many years.
Cold-cured or cold-pour dentures, also known as temporary dentures, do not look as natural, are less durable, tend to be highly porous and are only used as a temporary expedient until a more permanent solution is found. These types of dentures tend to cost much less due to their quick production time (usually minutes) and composition of low-cost materials. It is not suggested that a patient wear a cold-cured denture for a long period of time, as they are prone to cracks and can break rather easily.
Prosthodontic principles
[edit]Support
[edit]Support is the principle that describes how well the underlying mucosa (oral tissues, including gums) keeps the denture from moving vertically towards the arch in question during chewing, and thus being excessively depressed and moving deeper into the arch. For the mandibular arch, this function is provided primarily by the buccal shelf, a region extending laterally from the back or posterior ridges, and by the pear-shaped pad (the most posterior area of keratinized gingival formed by the scaling down of the retro-molar papilla after the extraction of the last molar tooth). Secondary support for the complete mandibular denture is provided by the alveolar ridge crest. The maxillary arch receives primary support from the horizontal hard palate and the posterior alveolar ridge crest. The larger the denture flanges (that part of the denture that extends into the vestibule), the better the stability (another parameter to assess fit of a complete denture). Long flanges beyond the functional depth of the sulcus are a common error in denture construction, often (but not always) leading to movement in function, and ulcerations (denture sore spots).
Stability
[edit]Stability is the principle that describes how well the denture base is prevented from moving in a horizontal plane, and thus sliding from side to side or front to back. The more the denture base (pink material) is in smooth and continuous contact with the edentulous ridge (the hill upon which the teeth used to reside, but now only residual alveolar bone with overlying mucosa), the better the stability. Of course, the higher and broader the ridge, the better the stability will be, but this is usually a result of patient anatomy, barring surgical intervention (bone grafts, etc.).
Retention
[edit]Retention is the principle that describes how well the denture is prevented from moving vertically in the opposite direction of insertion. The better the topographical mimicry of the intaglio (interior) surface of the denture base to the surface of the underlying mucosa, the better the retention will be (in removable partial dentures, the clasps are a major provider of retention), as surface tension, suction and friction will aid in keeping the denture base from breaking intimate contact with the mucosal surface. It is important to note that the most critical element in the retentive design of a maxillary complete denture is a complete and total border seal (complete peripheral seal) in order to achieve 'suction'. The border seal is composed of the edges of the anterior and lateral aspects and the posterior palatal seal. The posterior palatal seal design is accomplished by covering the entire hard palate and extending not beyond the soft palate and ending 1–2 mm from the vibrating line.
Prosthodontists use a scale called the Kapur index to quantify denture stability and retention.
Implant technology can vastly improve the patient's denture-wearing experience by increasing stability and preventing bone from wearing away. Implants can also aid retention. Instead of merely placing the implants to serve as blocking mechanism against the denture's pushing on the alveolar bone, small retentive appliances can be attached to the implants that can then snap into a modified denture base to allow for tremendously increased retention. Available options include a metal "Hader bar" or precision ball attachments.
Fit, maintenance and relining
[edit]Generally speaking, partial dentures tend to be held in place by the presence of the remaining natural teeth and complete dentures tend to rely on muscular co-ordination and limited suction to stay in place. The maxilla very commonly has more favorable denture-bearing anatomy, as the ridge tends to be well formed and there is a larger area on the palate for suction to retain the denture. Conversely, the mandible tends to make lower dentures much less retentive due to the displacing presence of the tongue and the higher rate of resorption, frequently leading to significantly resorbed lower ridges. Disto-lingual regions tend to offer retention even in highly resorbed mandibles, and extension of the flange into these regions tends to produce a more retentive lower denture. An implant supported lower denture is another option for improving retention.
Dentures that fit well during the first few years after creation will not necessarily fit well for the rest of the wearer's lifetime. This is because the bone and mucosa of the mouth are living tissues, which are dynamic over decades. Bone remodeling never stops in living bone. Edentulous jaw ridges tend to resorb progressively over the years, especially the alveolar ridge of the lower jaw. Mucosa reacts to being chronically rubbed by the dentures. Poorly fitting dentures hasten both of those processes compared to the rates with well-fitting dentures. Poor fitting dentures may also lead to the development of conditions such as epulis fissuratum. In addition, the occlusion (chewing surfaces of the teeth) tends to wear away over time, which reduces chewing efficacy and decreases the vertical dimension of occlusion (the "openness" of the jaws and mouth).
Costs
[edit]In countries where denturism is legally performed by denturists, it is typically a denturist association that publishes the fee guide. In countries where it is performed by dentists, it is typically a dental association that publishes the fee guide. Some governments also provide additional coverage for the purchase of dentures by seniors.[32] Typically, only standard low-cost dentures are covered by insurance and because many individuals would prefer to have a premium cosmetic denture or a premium precision denture they rely on consumer dental patient financing options.
A low-cost denture starts at about $300–$500 per denture, or $600–$1,000 for a complete set of upper and lower dentures. These tend to be cold-cured dentures, which are considered temporary because of the lower quality materials and streamlined processing methods used in their manufacture. In many cases, there is no opportunity to try them on for fit before they are finished. They also tend to look artificial and not as natural as higher quality, higher priced dentures.
A mid-priced (and better quality) heat-cured denture typically costs $500–$1,500 per denture, or $1,000–$3,000 for a complete set. The teeth look much more natural and are much longer-lasting than cold-cured or temporary dentures. In many cases, they may be tried out before they are finished to ensure that all the teeth occlude (meet) properly and look esthetically pleasing. These usually come with a 90-day to two-year warranty and in some cases a money-back guarantee if the customer is not satisfied. In some cases, the cost of subsequent adjustments to the dentures is included.
Premium heat-cured dentures can cost $2,000–$4,000 per denture, or $4,000–$8,000 or more for a set. Dentures in this price range are usually completely customized and personalized, use high-end materials to simulate the lifelike look of gums and teeth as closely as possible, last a long time and are warrantied against chipping and cracking for 5–10 years or longer. Often the price includes several follow-up visits to fine-tune the fit.
In the United Kingdom, as of 13 March 2018, an NHS patient must pay £244.30 for a denture to be made. This is a flat rate and no additional charges may be made regarding material used or appointments needed.[33] Privately, the cost can lie upwards of £300.
Care
[edit]Daily cleaning of dentures is recommended. Plaque and tartar can build up on false teeth, just as they do on natural teeth.[34] Cleaning can be done using chemical or mechanical denture cleaners. Dentures should not be worn continuously, but rather taken out of the mouth during sleep.[35] This is to give the tissues a chance to recover: wearing dentures at night is likened to sleeping in shoes. The main risk is the development of fungal infections, especially denture-related stomatitis. Dentures should also be removed while smoking, as the heat can damage the denture acrylic, and overheated acrylic can burn the soft tissues.
Deposits such as microbial plaque, calculus and food debris can accumulate on the dentures, which may lead to issues such as angular stomatitis, denture stomatitis, undesirable odors and tastes as well as staining. These deposits can also quicken the degradation of some of the denture materials.[36] Due to the presence of these deposits, there is an increased risk of the denture wearer and other people around them developing a systemic disease by organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA),[37] but research shows that denture cleaners are effective against MRSA.[38][39][40] Therefore, denture cleaning is imperative for the overall health of the denture wearers as well as for the health of people they come into contact with.[41]
Brushing
[edit]After receiving dentures, the patient should brush them often with soap, water and a soft nylon toothbrush which has a small head, as this will enable the brush to reach into all the areas of the denture surface. The bristles must be soft in order for them to easily conform to the contours of the dentures for adequate cleaning: stiff bristles will not conform well and are likely to cause abrasion of the denture acrylic resin. If a patient finds it difficult to utilize a toothbrush, e.g. a patient with arthritis, a brush with easy-grip modifications may be used.[42]
Disclosing solutions can be used at home to make less obvious plaque deposits more visible to ensure thorough cleaning of plaque. Food dyes can be utilized as a disclosing solution when used correctly.[42]
Instead of brushing their dentures with soap and water, patients can use pastes designed for dentures or conventional toothpaste to clean their dentures.[42] However, the American Dental Association advises against using toothpaste as it can be too harsh for cleaning dentures.[43]
Immersion
[edit]Patients should combine the brushing of their dentures with soaking them in an immersion cleaner from time to time as this combined cleaning strategy has been shown to control denture plaque.[44] Due to microbial invasion, the lack of use of immersion cleaners and inadequate denture plaque control will cause rapid deterioration of the soft linings of the denture.[45]
Cleansers and methods
[edit]Liquid cleansers that dentures can be immersed in include: bleaches e.g. sodium hypochlorite; effervescent solutions e.g. alkaline peroxides, perborates and persulfates; acid cleaners.[42]
Sodium hypochlorite cleansers
[edit]Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) cleansers have a disinfectant action and remove non-viable organisms and other deposits from the surface, but they are weak for eliminating calculus from the denture surface. Immersing dentures in a hypochlorite solution for more than 6 hours occasionally will eliminate plaque and staining. Furthermore, as microbial invasion is prevented, the deterioration of the soft lining material does not occur.[42] Corrosion of cobalt chromium has occurred when hypochlorite cleansers have been used, and they may also result in the fading of the acrylic and silicone lining, but the softness or elastically of the linings are not greatly changed.[46]
Effervescent cleansers
[edit]Effervescent cleansers are the most popular immersion cleansers and include alkaline peroxides, perborates and persulfates. Their cleansing action occurs by the formation of small bubbles which displace loosely-attached material from the surface of the denture. They are not very effective as cleansers and have a restricted ability to eliminate microbial plaque. Moreover, they are safe for use and do not cause deterioration of the acrylic resin or the metals used in denture construction.[42] Despite this, they are able to cause rapid damage to some short-term soft lining.[47] Discoloration of the acrylic resin to a white denture often occurs; however, this can be due to the use of very hot water with cleaning agents against manufacturer instructions.[48][49]
Acid cleansers
[edit]Sulfamic acid is a type of acid cleanser that is used to prevent the formation of calculus on dentures. Sulfamic acid has a very good compatibility with many denture materials, including the metals used in denture construction.[42] 5% hydrochloric acid is another type of acid cleanser. In this case, the denture is immersed in the hydrochloric cleanser to soften the calculus so that it can be brushed away. The acid can cause damage to clothes if accidentally spilt, and can cause corrosion of cobalt-chromium or stainless steel if immersed in the acid often and for long periods of time.[42]
Other denture cleaning methods
[edit]Other denture cleaning methods include enzymes, ultrasonic cleansers and microwave exposure.[42] A Cochrane Review found that there is weak evidence to support soaking dentures in effervescent tablets or in enzymatic solutions, and while the most effective method for eliminating plaque is not clear, the review shows that brushing with paste eliminates microbial plaque better than inactive methods. There is a need for studies to provide reports about the cost of materials and the negative effects that may be associated with their use, as these factors could affect the acceptability of such materials by patients which will in turn affect their effectiveness in a daily setting in the long term. Putting dentures into a dishwasher overnight can be a useful shortcut when away from home. Additionally, further studies comparing the different methods of cleaning dentures are needed.[50]
Broken dentures
[edit]Dentures sometimes break, often during eating or when dropped during cleaning. A repair or replacement should be sought as soon as possible to restore function and aesthetics; the continued wearing of a broken denture results in unnecessary intra-oral tissue irritation, which may result in an increased risk of infection and other pathologies including malignancies.[51]
References
[edit]- ^ Ireland, Robert IrelandRobert (2010), Ireland, Robert (ed.), "Denture stomatitis", A Dictionary of Dentistry, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acref/9780199533015.001.0001, ISBN 978-0-19-953301-5, retrieved 2019-03-08
- ^ a b Puryer, James (2016-07-02). "Denture stomatitis – a clinical update". Dental Update. 43 (6): 529–535. doi:10.12968/denu.2016.43.6.529. hdl:1983/24b346f4-6246-40cd-9974-b05bda307e98. ISSN 0305-5000. PMID 29148646. S2CID 4248603.
- ^ Pinelli, L. A. P.; Montandon, A. A. B.; Corbi, S. C. T.; Moraes, T. A.; Fais, L. M. G. (2013-02-26). "Ricinus communistreatment of denture stomatitis in institutionalised elderly". Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 40 (5): 375–380. doi:10.1111/joor.12039. ISSN 0305-182X. PMID 23438045.
- ^ Mark, Anita (August 2020). "Common oral sores and infections". PlumX Metrics. 151 (8): 640. doi:10.1016/j.adaj.2020.05.020. PMID 32718494 – via JADA.
- ^ "Prevalence of Denture Stomatitis Among Complete Denture Patients - A Retrospective Study". Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government. 27 (2). 2021-03-02. doi:10.47750/cibg.2021.27.02.267. ISSN 2204-1990.
- ^ "Prevalence of Denture Stomatitis Among Complete Denture Patients - A Retrospective Study". Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government. 27 (2). 2021-03-02. doi:10.47750/cibg.2021.27.02.267. ISSN 2204-1990.
- ^ "Traumatic Ulcers" (PDF). NHS.
- ^ "Kent Express: Pressure Indicating Paste (PIP)". www.kent-express.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2021-02-05. Retrieved 1 February 2021.
- ^ M. Millwaters; Bhamrah, G. (September 2008). "Denture ulcerations". British Dental Journal. 205 (6): 297. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.815. ISSN 1476-5373. PMID 18820611.
- ^ "Head and Neck Cancers". NHS Scotland Primary Care Cancer Referral Guidelines. Retrieved 2019-03-08.
- ^ Milward, P.; Katechia, D.; Morgan, M. Z. (November 2013). "Knowledge of removable partial denture wearers on denture hygiene". British Dental Journal. 215 (10): E20. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.1095. ISSN 1476-5373. PMID 24231889. S2CID 6267154.
- ^ "What are dentures? | Appleton Dental :: Family & Cosmetic Dentistry Whitby". Family & Cosmetic Dentistry - Appletondental.ca. 2020-03-04. Retrieved 2021-11-19.
- ^ Mitchell, David A.; Mitchell, Laura; Brunton, Paul (2005). Oxford handbook of clinical dentistry (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-852920-0. OCLC 58598367.
- ^ Sakaguchi, Ronald L.; Powers, John M. (2012). Craig's Restorative Dental Materials (13th ed.). Elsevier/Mosby. ISBN 978-0-323-08108-5.
- ^ Chalifoux, Paul R. (2015). "Acrylic and other resins: Provisional restorations". Acrylic and other resins: Provisional restorations - Esthetic Dentistry (Third Edition) - 10. pp. 197–230. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-09176-3.00019-X. ISBN 978-0-323-09176-3.
- ^ a b c d Moriyama, N.; Hasegawa, M. (1987). "The history of the characteristic Japanese wooden denture". Bulletin of the History of Dentistry. 35 (1): 9–16. PMID 3552092.
- ^ a b Donaldson, J. A. (1980). "The use of gold in dentistry" (PDF). Gold Bulletin. 13 (3): 117–124. doi:10.1007/BF03216551. PMID 11614516. S2CID 137571298.
- ^ Becker, Marshall J. (1999). Ancient "dental implants": a recently proposed example from France evaluated with other spurious examples (PDF). International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 14.1.
- ^ Nicklisch, Nicole; Knipper, Corina; Nehlich, Olaf; Held, Petra; Roßbach, Anne; Klein, Sabine; Schwab, Roland; Häger, Tobias; Wolf, Martin; Enzmann, Frieder; Birkenhagen, Bettina; Alt, Kurt W. (2019). "A Roman-period Dental Filling Made of a Hard Tissue Compound? Bioarchaeological and Medical-historical Investigations Carried out on a Roman-period Burial from Oberleuken-Perl (Lkr. Merzig-Wadern / D)". Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt. 49 (3): 371–391. doi:10.11588/ak.2019.3.78027. ISSN 2364-4729.
- ^ British Journal of Dental Science, Volume 4. Vol. IV. London: John Churchill. August 1861. p. 208. Retrieved March 15, 2017.
- ^ "Dental art: A French dentist showing his artificial teeth". British Dental Association. 30 June 2010. Archived from the original on 6 November 2011.
- ^ "The Henry J. McKellops Collection in Dental Medicine".
- ^ John Woodforde, The Strange Story of False Teeth, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968
- ^ Eden, S. E.; Kerr, W. J. S.; Brown, J. (2002). "A clinical trial of light cure acrylic resin for orthodontic use". Journal of Orthodontics. 29 (1): 51–55. doi:10.1093/ortho/29.1.51. PMID 11907310.
- ^ Murray, J. J. (November 2011). "Adult dental health surveys: 40 years on". British Dental Journal. 211 (9): 407–8. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.903. PMID 22075880.
- ^ Van Horn, Jennifer (2016). "George Washington's Dentures: Disability, Deception, and the Republican Body". Early American Studies. 14 (1): 2–47. doi:10.1353/eam.2016.0000. S2CID 147542950.
- ^ Lloyd, John; Mitchinson, John (2006). The Book of General Ignorance. New York: Harmony Books. p. 97. ISBN 978-0-307-39491-0. Retrieved July 3, 2011.
- ^ Earls, Stephanie (22 February 2014). "Re-enactor brings George Washington to life". The Washington Times. Retrieved 21 March 2014.
- ^ Glover, Barbara (Summer–Fall 1998). "George Washington—A Dental Victim". The Riversdale Letter. Retrieved June 30, 2006.
- ^ "Dentures, 1790–1799". Archived 2014-04-13 at the Wayback Machine, George Washington's Mount Vernon Estate, Museum and Gardens
- ^ Mary V. Thompson, "The Private Life of George Washington's Slaves", Frontline, PBS
- ^ "Alberta Seniors Benefit program". Archived from the original on 2013-06-07. Retrieved 2013-09-14.
- ^ Choices, NHS. "What is included in each NHS dental band charge? - Health questions - NHS Choices". www.nhs.uk. Retrieved 2018-03-13.
- ^ "Denture Care" Canadian Dental Association http://www.cda-adc.ca/en/oral_health/cfyt/dental_care_seniors/dental_care.asp>
- ^ "Ask Denturist Darryl" Denture Health http://www.denturehealth.com/question/should-i-take-my-denture-out-at-night-or-when-i-go-to-sleep/>
- ^ Basker, R M; Davenport, J C; Thomason, J M (2011). Prosthetic Treatment of the Edentulous Patient (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 214–217.
- ^ Glass, R; Goodson, L; Bullard, J; Conrad, R (2001). "Comparison of the effectiveness of several denture sanitizing systems". Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry. 22 (12): 1093–6.
- ^ Lee, D; Howlett, J; Pratten, J; Mordan, N; McDonald, A; Wilson, M; Ready, D (2009). "Susceptibility of MRSA biofilms to denture-cleansing agents". FEMS Microbiology Letters. 291 (2): 241–6. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01463.x. PMID 19146578.
- ^ Maeda, Y; Kenny, F; Coulter, W; Loughrey, A; Nagano, Y; Goldsmith, C; Millar, B; Dooley, J; James, S; Lowery, C; Rooney, P; Matsuda, M; Moore, J (2007). "Bactericidal activity of denture-cleaning formulations against planktonic healthcare-associated and community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus". American Journal of Infection Control. 35 (9): 619–22. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2007.01.003. PMID 17980242.
- ^ Murakami, H; Mizuguchi, M; Hattori, M; Ito, Y; Kawai, T; Hasegawa, J (2002). "Effect of denture cleaner using ozone against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli T1 phage". Dental Materials Journal. 21 (1): 53–60. doi:10.4012/dmj.21.53. PMID 12046522.
- ^ Basker, R M; Davenport, J C; Thomason, J M (2011). Prosthetic Treatment of the Edentulous Patient (5th ed.). John & Wiley Sons Ltd, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 214–217.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Basker, R M; Davenport, J C; Thomason, J M (2011). Prosthetic Treatment of the Edentulous Patient. John & Wiley Sons Ltd, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 214–217.
- ^ "American Dental Association - Removable Partial Dentures". www.mouthhealthy.org. Retrieved 2018-12-17.
- ^ Paranhos, H; Silva-Lovato, C; Souza, R; Cruz, P; Freitas, K; Peracini, A (2007). "Effect of mechanical and chemical methods on denture biofilm accumulation". Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 34 (8): 606–12. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01753.x. PMID 17650171.
- ^ Basker, R M; Davenport, J C; Thomason, J M (2011). Prosthetic Treatment of the Edentulous Patient. John & Wiley Sons Ltd, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 214–217.
- ^ Davenport, J C; Wilson, H J; Spence, D (1986). "The compatibility of soft lining materials and denture cleansers". British Dental Journal. 161 (1): 13–17. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4805880. PMID 3460611. S2CID 10488614.
- ^ Harrison, A; Basker, R M; Smith, I (1989). "The compatibility of temporary soft materials with immersion denture cleansers". International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2 (3): 254–8. PMID 2634412.
- ^ Crawford, C A; Lloyd, C M; Newton, J P; Yemm, R (1986). "Denture bleaching: a laboratory simulation of patients' cleaning procedures". Journal of Dentistry. 6 (3): 239–46. doi:10.1016/0300-5712(78)90249-x. PMID 279578.
- ^ Robinson, J G; McCabe, J F; Storer, R (1987). "Denture bases: the effects of various treatments on clarity, strength and structure". Journal of Dentistry. 15 (4): 159–65. doi:10.1016/0300-5712(87)90143-6. PMID 3478378.
- ^ De Souza, Raphael Freitas; De Freitas Oliveira Paranhos, Helena; Lovato da Silva, Claudia H; Abu-Naba'a, Layla; Fedorowicz, Zbys; Gurgan, Cem A (7 October 2009). "Interventions for cleaning dentures in adults". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (4) CD007395. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007395.pub2. PMID 19821412.
- ^ "Broken Dentures And How To Treat Them". Emergency Dental 365. 2016-03-07. Retrieved 2021-05-02.
External links
[edit]
The dictionary definition of dentures at Wiktionary
Media related to Category:Prosthodontics at Wikimedia Commons
Dentures
View on GrokipediaDefinition and Purpose
What Are Dentures
Dentures are removable prosthetic devices designed to replace missing teeth and the surrounding oral tissues, restoring both function and appearance to the mouth.[8] They are custom-fabricated appliances that fit over the gums and mimic the natural dentition, allowing individuals to maintain oral health after tooth loss.[9] Typically constructed from materials such as acrylic, metal, or flexible polymers, dentures provide a practical solution for edentulous or partially edentulous patients.[8] The basic structure of dentures includes a supportive base that resembles the gums and a set of artificial teeth attached to it. The base, often made from acrylic resin or a metal framework, covers the alveolar ridges and palate to provide stability.[8] Artificial teeth, crafted from porcelain or acrylic, are positioned to align with the opposing jaw for effective occlusion. For partial dentures, additional attachments like clasps secure the device to remaining natural teeth.[9] Dentures serve essential functional roles by enabling mastication, improving speech, and supporting facial contours. They facilitate chewing of a varied diet, which promotes better nutrition and overall health.[8] By filling the spaces left by missing teeth, dentures enhance articulation and pronunciation, reducing speech impediments. Additionally, they prevent facial sagging by providing structural support to the lips, cheeks, and soft tissues.[9] In terms of anatomy, dentures interact closely with the gums, alveolar ridges, and hard palate to achieve retention and stability without invasive fixation. The base rests directly on these soft and bony structures, distributing forces during use to avoid undue pressure on the underlying mucosa. Variations such as partial and complete dentures adapt to different extents of tooth loss while adhering to this foundational interaction.[8]Medical Indications
Dentures are primarily indicated for patients experiencing edentulism, the complete loss of teeth in one or both arches, which often results from advanced caries, periodontal disease, or trauma.[10][8] Partial dentures are prescribed for individuals with multiple missing teeth due to similar etiologies, such as decay or gum disease, where remaining teeth are insufficient to support fixed restorations.[10] These indications aim to rehabilitate oral function when tooth loss impairs mastication, speech, and aesthetics.[11] Therapeutically, dentures restore chewing efficiency to approximately 20-30% of natural dentition levels, enabling better food breakdown and reducing dietary restrictions common in edentulous patients.[12] This improvement supports enhanced nutritional intake, as edentulous individuals without prostheses often consume fewer fruits, vegetables, and proteins due to masticatory limitations; prosthetic rehabilitation has been shown to increase nutrient variety and overall diet quality.[13][14] While conventional dentures provide some soft tissue support to maintain facial contours, they do not effectively prevent ongoing alveolar bone resorption, which continues post-tooth loss.[15] Contraindications for denture therapy include active oral infections, such as untreated periodontal abscesses or candidiasis, which can compromise fit and healing.[16] Severe undercuts in the alveolar ridges may hinder proper seating and retention, necessitating alternative treatments.[17] Psychological factors, including patient anxiety or unreadiness for adaptation to removable appliances, also contraindicate immediate placement, as non-compliance can lead to poor outcomes.[18] Prior to denture fabrication, prosthodontists conduct a thorough assessment of ridge form and height to ensure adequate support and stability, alongside evaluation of occlusion to achieve balanced forces.[16] Systemic health conditions, such as uncontrolled diabetes, are reviewed due to their impact on wound healing and infection risk following extractions or adjustments.[19][20] This multidisciplinary evaluation helps tailor the prosthesis to the patient's needs, optimizing long-term success.[21]Causes of Tooth Loss
Common Etiologies
The primary etiologies of tooth loss, which often necessitate dentures, are dental caries and periodontal disease. Dental caries, or tooth decay, accounts for approximately 40-50% of tooth extractions leading to tooth loss, as untreated decay progresses to involve the pulp and surrounding structures, ultimately requiring removal to prevent infection.[22][23] Periodontal disease, characterized by chronic inflammation and destruction of supporting bone and tissues, is responsible for about 30% of cases, making it the leading cause among older adults.[22][24] Trauma contributes to approximately 5-10% of tooth loss, particularly in younger individuals from accidents or injuries,[25] while congenital absence (hypodontia or anodontia) accounts for a smaller proportion, affecting 3-10% of the population with one or more missing permanent teeth from birth.[26] Orthodontic extractions contribute to 10-15% of cases, primarily in adolescents for alignment purposes.[27] Several risk factors exacerbate these etiologies and increase the likelihood of tooth loss. Advancing age is a major contributor, with prevalence rising sharply after 65 years due to cumulative exposure to oral diseases; for instance, about 1 in 10 adults over 65 have lost all teeth.[28] Smoking doubles the risk of periodontal disease and subsequent tooth loss by impairing gum healing and promoting bacterial growth.[28] Poor oral hygiene accelerates both caries and periodontal progression, while systemic conditions like diabetes heighten susceptibility by impairing immune response and salivary flow, leading to higher extraction rates.[29] Globally, untreated dental caries affects approximately 2.5 billion people with permanent teeth, often culminating in extractions and tooth loss, according to the World Health Organization's assessment from the Global Burden of Disease Study.[30] Rates are disproportionately higher in low- and middle-income regions, where limited access to preventive care and fluoride exacerbates caries and periodontal burdens.[31] Historical trends show a significant decline in tooth loss over the 20th century, largely attributable to widespread water fluoridation, which reduced caries incidence by 20-50% depending on age group and study in fluoridated communities.[32] However, edentulism remains persistent among elderly populations, with older cohorts experiencing higher rates due to lifelong exposures before modern preventive measures became standard.[33] These etiologies can contribute to broader health impacts, such as nutritional deficits from altered chewing ability.[28]Oral Health Impacts
Untreated tooth loss leads to immediate reductions in oral function, including a substantial decrease in bite force. In edentulous individuals, maximum bite force is reduced by approximately 20-50% compared to those with natural dentition, impairing the ability to masticate tough foods effectively.[34] Additionally, missing teeth, particularly anterior ones, can cause speech impediments such as lisping or sigmatism, as the absence disrupts articulation of sibilant sounds like "s" and "z," affecting clarity in phonation.[35] Over the long term, tooth loss triggers significant alveolar bone resorption due to the lack of functional stimuli from teeth. Following extraction, vertical bone height loss averages 11-22% within the first six months, with up to 25% total height reduction occurring in the initial year, accelerating facial aesthetic alterations.[36] This resorption contributes to a collapsed facial profile, including sunken cheeks, formation of jowls from soft tissue sagging, and a prominent or ptotic chin appearance often termed "witch's chin" due to mentalis muscle hyperactivity and loss of vertical support.[37] Systemically, untreated tooth loss exacerbates risks through impaired chewing efficiency, which promotes malnutrition by limiting intake of nutrient-dense foods; this is linked to a 15-24% higher all-cause mortality risk in edentulous elderly compared to those with intact dentition.[38] Furthermore, progression of underlying gum disease, a common precursor to tooth loss, elevates cardiovascular disease risk, with periodontal conditions associated with odds ratios of 1.11-1.22 for events like coronary heart disease independent of sex.[39] Psychologically, edentulism carries social stigma, often leading to embarrassment and reduced social engagement, which correlates with elevated depression rates—edentulous individuals under 50 years exhibit 1.57 times higher odds of depression compared to dentate peers.[40]Types of Dentures
Partial Dentures
Partial dentures, also known as removable partial dentures (RPDs), are prosthetic devices designed to replace one or more missing teeth in a partially edentulous arch while utilizing the remaining natural teeth for support and stability. These appliances typically consist of artificial teeth and gingival-colored acrylic bases connected to a framework that engages the abutment teeth through clasps for retention, rests for support, and connectors for rigidity.[41] The framework can be fabricated from acrylic resin for simpler designs or cast metal alloys, such as cobalt-chrome, for enhanced durability in more complex cases.[42] RPD designs are classified using the Kennedy system, which categorizes partially edentulous arches into four classes based on the location and number of edentulous areas: Class I for bilateral distal extension edentulism posterior to the remaining teeth, Class II for unilateral distal extension, Class III for tooth-bounded edentulous spaces flanked by teeth on both sides, and Class IV for anterior edentulism crossing the midline with no posterior involvement.[43] Indications for RPDs include partial edentulism with one or more missing teeth, particularly when preserving abutment teeth and avoiding extensive preparations is desired, such as in cases with multiple missing teeth where fixed prostheses may not be feasible.[44] Unlike fixed bridges, which necessitate significant enamel reduction and crown preparation on adjacent teeth, RPDs offer advantages through minimal or no tooth preparation, reducing the risk of pulpal irritation and preserving tooth structure.[45] This approach is particularly beneficial for patients with adequate abutment health, as it supports occlusal function, aesthetics, and speech while distributing forces to both teeth and mucosa.[46] Fabrication of RPDs begins with surveying diagnostic casts to determine the optimal path of insertion, ensuring the prosthesis can be seated without interference and minimizing stress on abutments. This process identifies undercuts for clasp placement and guiding planes to control tooth contacts, while strategic rest positioning helps distribute occlusal loads evenly to prevent tipping or torquing of the remaining teeth.[47] Proper surveying also facilitates the design of connectors that link components without impinging on soft tissues, promoting long-term stability.[48] Clinical success rates for RPDs, defined by continued use without replacement, range from 70% to 80% at 5 years when patients adhere to proper maintenance and follow-up care.[49] Factors such as oral hygiene, abutment vitality, and design accuracy significantly influence outcomes, with metal-framework RPDs demonstrating higher longevity compared to acrylic-only versions.[50]Complete Dentures
Complete dentures, also known as full dentures, are removable prosthetic devices designed to replace all missing teeth in an edentulous arch, restoring masticatory function, speech, and facial aesthetics for patients with total tooth loss.[51] They are indicated primarily for individuals experiencing complete edentulism due to extractions or other causes of tooth loss, where no natural teeth remain to support alternative restorations.[52] The maxillary (upper) complete denture typically covers the palate, providing enhanced stability through greater surface area contact with the oral mucosa, while the mandibular (lower) denture relies more on the alveolar ridge for support but faces challenges from tongue movements that can displace it during function.[51] Balanced occlusion is established during setup to ensure even distribution of forces across both arches, promoting stability and reducing uneven wear.[53] The primary indication for complete dentures is total edentulism resulting from extractions, often due to advanced periodontal disease, caries, or trauma, leading to the need for full arch replacement.[54] In the mandibular arch, challenges arise from tongue interference, which can compromise retention and stability, particularly in patients with prominent lingual anatomy or reduced ridge height.[55] These prostheses are fabricated using heat-cured acrylic resin for the base to ensure durability and biocompatibility.[51] Esthetic considerations in complete denture design focus on providing adequate lip support through the labial flange of the maxillary prosthesis, which helps maintain facial contour and prevent a collapsed appearance.[56] Restoration of the vertical dimension of occlusion is critical to achieve a freeway space of 2-4 mm at rest, ensuring natural facial proportions, comfortable speech, and efficient mastication without excessive muscle strain.[57] Patients typically experience an adaptation period of 1-3 months, during which initial soreness, mucosal irritation, and discomfort from altered oral dynamics resolve as neuromuscular coordination improves.[58] Many patients report achieving functional satisfaction with complete dentures after this period, with positive outcomes in chewing efficiency and overall quality of life.[59]Specialized Variants
Immediate dentures are prosthetic devices inserted immediately after tooth extractions to restore aesthetics, phonetics, and function while soft tissues heal and prevent a period of complete edentulism.[60] These appliances are fabricated based on pre-extraction impressions and require careful planning to account for anticipated ridge changes. Due to the unpredictable post-extraction alveolar bone resorption and soft tissue remodeling, immediate dentures typically necessitate relining or rebasing approximately 6-8 months after placement to ensure proper fit and comfort.[60] Frequent adjustments are often needed to manage ongoing tissue adaptation, highlighting the importance of close patient follow-up in the initial healing phase. Copy dentures, also known as duplicate dentures, are replicas of a patient's existing complete dentures created to facilitate relining, rebasing, or upgrades without requiring entirely new clinical impressions.[61] This technique preserves the original denture's fit, occlusion, and aesthetics while allowing modifications for improved stability or material enhancements. Fabrication involves scanning or molding the existing denture to produce a refractory investment cast, upon which the duplicate is processed using heat-cured acrylic resin or similar materials for precision and durability.[61] The process is efficient, often completed in three appointments, and is particularly beneficial for elderly patients or those with limited adaptability to new prostheses. Overdentures are removable prostheses designed to cover and rest on retained natural tooth roots or endosseous implants, offering enhanced retention and stability compared to conventional complete dentures.[62] By preserving select roots, typically the canines or anterior teeth, these dentures maintain sensory feedback and proprioception, improving masticatory efficiency and patient satisfaction. A key advantage is the substantial reduction in alveolar bone resorption; for instance, studies demonstrate approximately 50% less bone height loss in the first year compared to immediate complete dentures (0.9 mm versus 1.8 mm in mandibular canine regions).[63] When supported by implants, overdentures further minimize ridge atrophy while distributing occlusal forces more evenly. Implant-supported dentures represent an advanced variant, either fixed (such as full-arch bridges) or removable (overdentures), anchored to 2-6 strategically placed endosseous implants to replace edentulous arches with superior biomechanics and longevity.[64] The All-on-4 concept, for example, utilizes four implants—two axial and two tilted—to support a fixed prosthesis, maximizing bone utilization in atrophic jaws and often eliminating the need for bone grafting. These systems achieve high implant survival rates of 90-95% over 10 years, with cumulative success exceeding 95% in well-selected cases, attributed to osseointegration and modern attachment mechanisms.[65] Implants are commonly fabricated from titanium for biocompatibility and corrosion resistance.[64]Materials
Denture bases are primarily constructed from acrylic resins, such as polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), which is valued for its biocompatibility, ease of processing, and aesthetic qualities that mimic oral tissues. PMMA exhibits a density of approximately 1.18-1.20 g/cm³, providing a lightweight yet durable structure that resists deformation under occlusal forces.[66] For enhanced flexibility in partial dentures, alternatives like nylon-based thermoplastics are employed, offering superior adaptation to mucosal contours without the rigidity of traditional acrylics. Artificial teeth in dentures are typically made from either porcelain or acrylic materials, each selected based on durability, aesthetics, and clinical handling. Porcelain teeth provide exceptional wear resistance and natural translucency but are prone to brittleness and fracture upon impact. In contrast, acrylic teeth offer greater impact resistance, simpler polishing, and reduced risk of chipping, though they may exhibit higher wear rates over time. Hybrid composite resins have emerged as a compromise, combining the aesthetic fidelity of porcelain with the toughness of acrylics for improved longevity. Frameworks for removable partial dentures often utilize cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloys due to their high strength-to-weight ratio and corrosion resistance in the oral environment, with a density around 8.3 g/cm³ enabling thin, rigid designs. Titanium alloys serve as hypoallergenic alternatives, particularly for patients with metal sensitivities, providing comparable mechanical properties while minimizing adverse reactions. Recent advancements in denture materials include the incorporation of antimicrobial additives, such as silver nanoparticles, which can significantly reduce biofilm formation by pathogens like Candida albicans, thereby lowering the incidence of denture-related stomatitis.[67] Additionally, 3D-printable resins have gained traction for their ability to enable precise customization and rapid prototyping, improving fit and patient comfort without compromising material integrity.History
Early Developments
The earliest evidence of dentures originates from ancient civilizations, where rudimentary prosthetic devices were crafted to address tooth loss. Around 700 BCE, the Etruscans in what is now northern Italy created some of the first known dental prosthetics, using gold bands to fasten ivory or animal teeth into the mouth, often as fixed bridges for elite individuals.[68] These appliances, discovered in archaeological sites, demonstrate advanced metallurgical skills but were limited to partial replacements and primarily served aesthetic or functional purposes for the upper classes.[69] In ancient Egypt, dating back to approximately 1500 BCE, mummies have yielded examples of prosthetic teeth, including wooden dentures and human teeth secured with gold wire, reflecting early attempts at oral rehabilitation amid prevalent dental wear from abrasive diets.[70] Such devices, though primitive, highlight a conceptual understanding of tooth replacement long before formalized dentistry. From the medieval period through the Renaissance, denture fabrication remained sporadic and fraught with challenges, relying heavily on sourced human and animal teeth bound by wires or metal frames. These materials, often obtained from graveyards or markets, frequently resulted in treatment failures due to infections, tissue rejection, and rapid deterioration, limiting their use to the wealthy despite persistent demand driven by poor oral hygiene and disease.[71] A pivotal advancement occurred in 1728 with Pierre Fauchard's publication of Le Chirurgien Dentiste, the first comprehensive dental treatise, which described the use of wax models to sculpt and fit dentures more precisely to the oral cavity, shifting toward removable partial prosthetics anchored by lingual and buccal bars.[72] This innovation improved accuracy over earlier trial-and-error methods, though materials like bone and ivory still dominated, and full sets remained cumbersome with spring mechanisms for retention.[73] The 19th century marked a transition to more practical and accessible dentures, driven by material innovations that addressed prior limitations in durability and cost. In 1817, Antoine Plantou introduced porcelain teeth to the United States, offering a hygienic, esthetic alternative to natural teeth or ivory that resisted wear and discoloration while allowing separate fabrication from the base.[74] Charles Goodyear's discovery of vulcanization in 1839, patented in 1844, enabled the production of hard rubber (vulcanite) bases by the 1850s, which were lightweight, moldable, and inexpensive compared to metal or gutta-percha alternatives, democratizing denture access beyond the elite.[75] Gutta-percha, a natural latex, emerged around 1848 as a temporary base material for impressions and prosthetics, prized for its plasticity but ultimately supplanted by vulcanite due to instability; this era also saw a broader shift from fixed gold bridges to fully removable appliances, enhancing patient comfort and adjustability.[76] Early innovators like George Washington exemplified this transitional phase, employing ivory-and-metal precursors in the late 18th century.[77]Modern Advancements
In the 20th century, the introduction of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) acrylic resins in 1937 marked a significant advancement in denture fabrication, replacing vulcanite and improving hygiene by reducing porosity and bacterial adhesion.[78] This material allowed for lighter, more durable, and aesthetically superior dentures that were easier to clean and less prone to odor retention compared to earlier rubber-based bases.[78] By the 1940s, acrylic resins became the dominant denture base material, comprising over 95% of productions due to their biocompatibility and processability.[79] The 1950s saw further progress with the popularization of precision attachments for removable partial dentures, which enhanced retention and stability by connecting prostheses to natural teeth via concealed mechanisms.[80] These attachments, refined through efforts by innovators like Steiger and Boilet, reduced visible clasps, improved aesthetics, and distributed occlusal forces more evenly, minimizing abutment tooth stress.[80] This development bridged fixed and removable prosthetics, offering patients more functional and discreet options for partial edentulism.[81] Post-2000 innovations in computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) revolutionized denture production by enabling digital scanning, virtual modeling, and milling, which reduced laboratory fabrication time by approximately 50% compared to conventional methods.[82] This workflow streamlined processes, minimized errors in tooth arrangement and fit, and allowed for precise customization based on intraoral scans.[82] By 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved biocompatible resins for 3D printing denture prototypes and bases, facilitating rapid prototyping and on-site adjustments while maintaining mechanical strength equivalent to traditional acrylics.[83] As of 2025, artificial intelligence (AI)-integrated occlusion scanning has emerged to optimize denture bite alignment, automatically positioning teeth for balanced contact and reducing manual adjustments during fabrication.[84] Bioactive materials, such as surface-modified titanium alloys for implant-supported overdentures, promote osseointegration by enhancing bone-implant bonding and protein adsorption, leading to faster healing and improved long-term stability.[85] Post-COVID-19, telemedicine has facilitated remote denture fittings and adjustments through video consultations and digital impressions, expanding access for patients in underserved areas while minimizing in-person visits.[86] Ongoing research trends focus on nanotechnology for self-cleaning denture surfaces, where nano-ceramic coatings create superhydrophobic properties that repel biofilms and reduce microbial adhesion without compromising aesthetics.[87] Additionally, stem cell integration holds promise for tissue regeneration in edentulous patients, with dental mesenchymal stem cells enabling repair of alveolar ridges and soft tissues to support better denture retention.[88]Notable Historical Figures
George Washington, the first President of the United States, suffered from severe dental issues throughout his life, culminating in the use of multiple sets of dentures, including a notable pair crafted by his dentist John Greenwood in 1789.[89] This set featured a spring-loaded mechanism made of gold and ivory (likely from elephant tusks) to connect the upper and lower parts, with human teeth for the front and carved ivory for others, designed to address his near-total edentulism by inauguration.[89] The device caused significant discomfort, as Washington noted in correspondence that it made his lips bulge unnaturally and required frequent adjustments due to poor fit on his shrinking ridges.[89] Contrary to popular myth, Washington's dentures were not made of wood but rather a combination of ivory, metal, and natural teeth, a misconception arising from the darkened appearance of preserved specimens.[89] Pierre Fauchard, often hailed as the "Father of Modern Dentistry," made foundational contributions to prosthetic dentistry through his comprehensive 1728 treatise Le Chirurgien Dentiste, which systematically described denture construction and techniques still influential today.[72] In the work, Fauchard advocated for removable partial dentures anchored by lingual and buccal bars, using materials like ivory from hippopotamus or elephant tusks and human teeth secured with gold wire and waxed thread.[72] He introduced early wax try-in methods, employing softened beeswax to capture impressions of the gums and alveolar ridges, allowing for more accurate modeling before final fabrication—a practice that evolved into modern wax try-ins for verifying fit and aesthetics.[72] Fauchard's emphasis on scientific observation and patient-specific prosthetics elevated dentistry from empirical trade to a medical discipline.[72] Dr. Charles English, a pioneering prosthodontist in the late 20th century, advanced implant-supported overdentures by adapting mini dental implants to enhance retention and stability for edentulous patients, influencing contemporary designs that preserve ridge anatomy. His work emphasized immediate loading protocols and prosthodontic principles for mini implants, allowing overdentures to clip onto small titanium fixtures placed subperiosteally, thereby improving function and reducing bone resorption compared to conventional complete dentures. English's contributions, including educational efforts through institutes like the Midwest Implant Institute, helped popularize accessible implant options for overdentures in general practice.[90]Manufacturing
Clinical Procedures
The clinical procedures for denture fabrication begin with a thorough initial examination to assess the patient's oral health and establish a foundation for prosthodontic treatment. This involves comprehensive clinical evaluation, including intraoral and extraoral assessments, to identify any remaining teeth, soft tissue conditions, and potential anatomical challenges such as ridge resorption or undercuts. Radiographic imaging, such as panoramic radiographs or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), is routinely performed to evaluate bone density, identify pathologies, and plan for implant-supported options if applicable. Preliminary impressions of the edentulous arches are then taken using alginate or similar materials to create diagnostic casts, allowing for preliminary assessment of arch form and space requirements. Bite registration follows to determine the vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO), typically using a wax-based record to capture the patient's centric relation and ensure proper jaw positioning. These steps are essential for accurate planning and are supported by guidelines from the American College of Prosthodontists, emphasizing the need for precise VDO to prevent complications like discomfort or altered speech. Following the initial exam, the try-in stages allow for iterative evaluation and refinement before final processing. Wax rims are fabricated on the preliminary casts and tried in the patient's mouth to verify esthetics, including lip support, midline alignment, and tooth shade selection in collaboration with the patient. Occlusal checks are performed using articulating paper to assess contacts in centric occlusion and excursive movements, ensuring balanced articulation to support retention and stability. Speech and jaw movement tests are conducted during this phase, where the patient reads aloud or performs functional movements to evaluate adaptation and phonetics, with adjustments made to optimize comfort and natural appearance. These try-in appointments, often spanning multiple visits, incorporate principles of retention by confirming border seal and tissue adaptation without delving into biomechanical details. At insertion, the completed dentures are delivered to the patient after laboratory processing, with immediate chairside adjustments to address any discrepancies. Pressure spots are identified and relieved using articulating paper and pressure-indicating paste, targeting areas of discomfort from uneven occlusal contacts or overextended borders. Instructions on insertion, removal, and initial care are provided to facilitate adaptation. Post-insertion reviews are scheduled at 24 hours to assess acute issues like sore spots, followed by a one-week appointment to evaluate overall fit, occlusion, and any need for further refinements, with studies indicating that 70-80% of patients require adjustments within the first month to achieve optimal function. Digital integration has transformed these clinical procedures, particularly in impression-taking and try-in phases, by 2025. Intraoral scanners, such as those from iTero or TRIOS systems, are increasingly used as an alternative to traditional alginate impressions for edentulous arches, offering accuracy around 50-70 microns and enabling immediate digital bite registration through CAD/CAM workflows. This shift reduces patient discomfort and error rates, with clinical trials demonstrating improved precision in VDO recording and esthetic previews via virtual try-ins.[91]Laboratory Fabrication
Laboratory fabrication of dentures begins with the creation of accurate dental stone casts from patient impressions, a process known as model pouring. Impressions are filled with Type III or IV dental stone, which is vibrated to eliminate air bubbles and achieve precise replication of oral tissues. The stone sets within 30-45 minutes, forming rigid models that serve as the foundation for subsequent steps. These models are then articulated on a semi-adjustable articulator to simulate the patient's jaw movements and establish proper occlusion, ensuring the dentures align correctly during function.[92] Following model preparation, the wax-up phase involves setting artificial teeth into a wax base on the casts. Teeth are selected and arranged in wax according to esthetic and functional criteria, with the wax contoured to mimic natural tissue contours—such as rounded peripheries for the upper denture and concave lingual surfaces for the lower. This wax try-in is verified for fit and bite before proceeding. The assembly is then flasked by investing the waxed denture and cast in a three-part metal flask using dental plaster for the lower portion and stone for the upper, allowing the mold to set firmly around the structure.[93] After flasking, the wax is removed through dewaxing, where the flask is heated in boiling water for about 4 minutes to soften and eliminate the wax, followed by thorough cleaning of the mold cavity. Heat-cured acrylic resin is then mixed at a 3:1 polymer-to-monomer ratio and packed into the mold under pressure to form the denture base, with trial closures to remove excess material and prevent voids. The packed flask undergoes curing in a water bath, typically at 74°C for 8 hours or longer to polymerize the acrylic fully, sometimes followed by a higher temperature boil at 100°C for 1 hour to enhance strength; slow cooling follows to minimize warpage.[93][94] Deflasking separates the denture from the investment material using an ejector tool, after which excess flash and stone are carefully trimmed with carbide burs. The denture is finished by smoothing contours and polished with progressively finer abrasives, such as pumice and acrylic polish, to achieve a glossy, hygienic surface. Quality checks include visual and microscopic inspection for porosity, with minimal porosity to avoid bacterial harboring and ensure durability, as excessive porosity can lead to material weakness.[95] Advanced laboratory techniques incorporate digital technologies to enhance precision. Computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) enable 3D milling of metal frameworks for partial dentures from cobalt-chromium blocks, with trueness deviations typically around 100 µm or less, which minimizes fit errors compared to traditional casting. Stereolithography (SLA) printing produces surgical guides from biocompatible resins for implant-supported dentures, allowing accurate placement planning with layer-by-layer resolution under 100 µm. These methods reduce human-induced errors associated with conventional workflows, improving overall accuracy. By 2025, fully digital workflows, including 3D printing of denture bases from biocompatible resins, have gained significant adoption in over 60% of leading dental laboratories, reducing production time and enhancing precision.[96][97][98][99]Prosthodontic Principles
Support Mechanisms
Support for dentures primarily derives from the mucosal coverage over the alveolar ridges and related oral structures, known as the basal seat or denture foundation area, which resists vertical masticatory forces by distributing occlusal loads to the underlying tissues.[100] This area includes the residual ridges, hard palate in the maxilla, and buccal shelf in the mandible, providing a foundational base for the denture. The typical basal seat area measures approximately 24 cm² in the maxilla and 14 cm² in the mandible, allowing for broader load distribution in the upper arch compared to the lower.[101] The quality of support depends on the types of mucosa involved: keratinized mucosa, found on ridge crests and the hard palate, offers firm, resilient resistance to pressure due to its thicker epithelial layer, while non-keratinized mucosa in areas like the retromolar pad is more displaceable and requires selective relief in the denture base to prevent trauma.[102] Effective stress distribution directs forces toward these resistant, keratinized regions and underlying cortical bone, minimizing localized pressure that could lead to mucosal ulcers or accelerated ridge resorption.[102] Key factors influencing support include ridge height, with severely resorbed ridges (e.g., less than 10-15 mm in some classifications) compromising load distribution by increasing pressure per unit area, often requiring surgical augmentation if below surgical minima like 15-20 mm for vestibuloplasty.[103] Saliva contributes through lubrication, facilitating smooth tissue-denture interface and reducing friction during function.[104] Overdentures enhance support by retaining natural tooth roots, which preserve alveolar bone via periodontal ligament stimulation and offer direct abutment for the prosthesis base.[105] Assessment of ridge adequacy for support often employs Atwood's classification, which categorizes residual ridge resorption into six classes based on height and form to predict prosthodontic challenges, with Class I indicating minimal resorption for adequate support and higher classes for severe resorption requiring modifications.[100] This foundational support serves as the base for overall denture stability against horizontal movements.Stability Factors
Stability refers to the resistance of a complete denture to displacement in the horizontal plane, particularly against lateral, anteroposterior, and rotational forces generated during functional activities such as mastication, deglutition, and speech. This dynamic control prevents rocking or tipping of the prosthesis on its supporting tissues, distinguishing it from vertical support mechanisms. Proper stability ensures the denture remains under the patient's muscular control, minimizing discomfort and enhancing overall prosthetic performance.[106][51] Occlusal balance significantly influences stability, with schemes like canine guidance disengaging posterior teeth during lateral excursions to reduce horizontal displacing forces on the denture base. In contrast to bilateral balanced occlusion, canine guidance has been shown to enhance mandibular denture stability by promoting even force distribution and limiting parafunctional loading. Key elements contributing to horizontal resistance include the contour of polished surfaces, which are shaped to minimize friction and leverage facial muscles—such as the buccinator and orbicularis oris—to convert lateral pressures into vertical seating forces through concave buccal and labial flanges. Additionally, border seals achieved via muscle control position the denture peripheries within the neutral zone, utilizing the functional dynamics of lips, cheeks, and tongue to maintain peripheral integrity without interference.[107][108][106] The lower denture presents unique challenges to stability due to the smaller basal seat area—approximately 50% that of the maxilla—and the tongue's mobility, which can disrupt the lingual border seal and induce displacement during movement. Tongue retraction or improper positioning further compromises the sublingual space, leading to instability that is exacerbated in cases of resorbed ridges or neuromuscular conditions. Quantification of stability often involves evaluating the functional depth of the vestibular sulcus during border molding; depths less than 5-6 mm may indicate inadequate extension, correlating with poorer outcomes.[51][108][109] Implant-retained overdentures markedly enhance stability, with patient satisfaction scores rising from 5.8 to 9.2 out of 10 compared to conventional designs, reflecting improved resistance to functional forces. Recent digital tools, such as intraoral scanners, enhance precision in assessing basal seat and sulcus depth for better stability (as of 2025).[110][111] Common failures in denture stability arise from uneven occlusal contacts, which create fulcrum points and induce rotational movements around the working side, resulting in tipping and lateral shunting of the prosthesis. These discrepancies often stem from inaccuracies in maxillomandibular registration or settling over time, underscoring the need for balanced articulation to mitigate such issues.[106][51]Retention Techniques
Retention in dentures refers to the ability to resist dislodging forces along the path of insertion and removal, primarily achieved through physical and mechanical means that secure the prosthesis to the oral tissues or supporting structures. Primary retention relies on interfacial forces between the denture base and the mucosa, facilitated by saliva, which creates adhesion and cohesion. Adhesion occurs as the attractive force between the saliva and dissimilar surfaces of the denture base and mucosal tissues, while cohesion involves the molecular attraction within the saliva itself. These forces are enhanced by the surface tension of the salivary film, which maintains a thin layer (typically 0.1-0.15 mm thick) between the denture and tissues, with saliva exhibiting a surface tension of approximately 45-70 dyn/cm (0.045-0.07 N/m).[112][108] The border seal, another primary mechanism, is established by contouring the denture borders in harmony with the surrounding musculature and soft tissues, preventing air ingress and maintaining the salivary seal around the periphery. This functional molding ensures the denture edges adapt to muscle movements, such as those of the tongue and cheeks, thereby optimizing retention without compromising comfort.[113][114] In partial dentures, mechanical retention is provided by clasps that engage undercuts on abutment teeth. Circumferential clasps, also known as Akers clasps, encircle the tooth from the buccal or labial aspect, offering robust retention through direct engagement of the buccal undercut while a reciprocal arm stabilizes from the lingual side. I-bar clasps, a type of bar clasp, approach the tooth from the gingival margin in an I-shaped configuration, minimizing tooth coverage and stress on the abutment while providing effective retention in moderate undercuts, particularly suitable for distal extension bases.[115][116] Precision attachments enhance mechanical retention in both partial and complete dentures by incorporating interlocking components. The Locator system, a widely used resilient attachment, consists of a metal housing on the root or implant and nylon male inserts that provide controlled retention forces ranging from 1.5 to 5 lbs per attachment, with options up to 10 lbs in extended configurations, allowing for easy insertion and replacement to maintain retention over time.[117][118] Secondary retention for maxillary complete dentures leverages atmospheric pressure, created by a partial vacuum beneath the prosthesis, particularly through the posterior palatal seal. This seal, located at the junction of the hard and soft palates, compresses the soft tissues to form a groove in the denture base, compensating for polymerization shrinkage and tissue rebound while excluding air to sustain the pressure differential.[119][108] Denture adhesives serve as a supplementary retention aid, forming a viscous layer that augments adhesion and cohesion. Following health warnings in 2010 regarding excessive zinc intake from overuse leading to neurological risks like copper deficiency, manufacturers shifted to zinc-free formulations, which rely on polymers such as carboxymethylcellulose for safe, temporary enhancement of retention without systemic absorption concerns.[120][121] For enhanced retention in implant-supported overdentures, clips or attachments on bars or individual abutments provide superior hold. Systems using clips on milled bars or resilient attachments like Locator can achieve total retention forces up to 20 lbs across multiple implants (typically 2-4), significantly improving stability and patient satisfaction compared to conventional dentures, with retention aiding in resisting lateral displacing forces.[122][123]Fit and Adjustments
Achieving proper fit in dentures requires intimate contact between the denture base and the underlying mucosa without any rocking or movement, ensuring even distribution of forces during function.[124] This is evaluated using pressure-indicating paste applied to the intaglio surface; after seating the denture and having the patient perform functional movements, high-pressure areas appear as white spots, which are selectively reduced until uniform contact is achieved without rocking.[124] Additionally, relief areas, such as 1-2 mm on buccal slopes or stress-bearing regions, are incorporated to prevent excessive pressure on mobile tissues and promote long-term adaptation.[125] Relining involves adding a layer of material, typically acrylic, to the denture base to restore adaptation as the residual ridge resorbs over time.[126] This procedure compensates for bone loss in edentulous patients, which occurs at an average rate of approximately 0.2 mm per year in the mandible after the initial post-extraction period.[127] Relining is generally recommended every 2-5 years, though frequency varies based on individual resorption rates and clinical signs of looseness, with cumulative incidence rates reaching 20-23% within 2-3 years.[128] Chairside relining allows immediate processing using self-curing materials for quick adjustments, while laboratory relining provides more precise results with heat-cured acrylic for durability; hard liners are preferred for permanent restorations, whereas soft liners offer temporary cushioning for sensitive tissues.[129][130] Ongoing maintenance through periodic rebasing—replacing the entire base material while retaining the denture teeth—helps address progressive loose fit caused by continued bone resorption, which can lead to discomfort and reduced retention if unaddressed.[131] Rebasing is typically performed in a laboratory setting for optimal fit and is advised when relining alone cannot restore stability, often every few years alongside regular professional evaluations.[132] For patients with atrophic ridges, advanced soft liners made of silicone provide enhanced comfort by conforming to irregular tissues and distributing pressure more evenly.[133] These liners, applied at a thickness of about 0.5-1 mm, reduce ridge resorption compared to conventional hard bases and are particularly beneficial for non-resilient mucosa or bony undercuts.[134][135]Care and Maintenance
Daily Cleaning Routines
Daily cleaning of dentures is essential to remove food debris, plaque, and stains, preventing bacterial buildup and maintaining oral health. Dentures should be removed from the mouth for cleaning at least once daily, typically after meals and before bedtime, to allow oral tissues to rest and reduce the risk of irritation. A standard routine involves rinsing, brushing, and brief soaking, performed over a soft surface or folded towel to minimize damage from accidental drops, which account for a significant portion of fractures—studies indicate accidental falls cause approximately 28% of complete denture breaks.[136] Brushing forms the core of the daily routine, using a soft-bristled toothbrush or specialized denture brush with a non-abrasive cleanser to gently scrub all surfaces, including the fitting side and junctions between the base and teeth. This should last about 2 minutes to ensure thorough coverage without applying excessive pressure, which could scratch the acrylic surface. Regular toothbrushes can be used but are less effective than denture-specific brushes due to their harder bristles; avoid toothpaste, as its abrasives may damage the material. Hot water must be avoided during cleaning, as it can cause warping in acrylic dentures, which have a glass transition temperature around 105°C.[137][138][139][140] For enhanced cleaning, ultrasonic devices can be incorporated into the routine, where dentures are placed in a solution and exposed to high-frequency sound waves for 3 minutes, achieving significant plaque removal—up to substantial reductions in biofilm compared to manual methods alone. After brushing or ultrasonic treatment, dentures should be rinsed thoroughly and soaked overnight in water or a mild solution to relax oral tissues and prevent dehydration of the material. Proper handling during these steps is crucial to avoid drops, a leading cause of damage.[140][137][136]Soaking and Cleansers
Soaking dentures overnight in water or a mild, pH-neutral solution is essential to maintain their shape and prevent drying, warping, or cracking of the acrylic material.[141][142] Prolonged exposure to harsh chemicals can erode the acrylic surface, increasing roughness and microbial adherence, so neutral solutions are recommended to minimize such damage.[143] Denture cleansers for soaking fall into several categories, each targeting disinfection and debris removal through immersion. Sodium hypochlorite-based solutions, typically at 0.5% concentration (diluted household bleach), provide strong antimicrobial action by killing a high percentage of bacteria and fungi on dentures, though they may discolor metal components in partial dentures.[144][145] Effervescent cleansers, often peroxide-based with agents like sodium perborate or sodium bicarbonate, dissolve in water to release oxygen bubbles that mechanically dislodge plaque and biofilm while chemically oxidizing stains.[146][147] Acidic cleansers, such as those containing citric acid, effectively dissolve calculus and mineralized deposits without causing significant harm to oral tissues or the denture base, making them suitable for targeted stain removal.[148][149] Usage guidelines emphasize soaking dentures for 15-30 minutes daily in the chosen cleanser solution, followed by thorough rinsing, to balance efficacy and material safety.[150][151] Users should select a single cleanser type appropriate for their denture material—avoiding, for instance, hypochlorite with metals—and never mix solutions to prevent chemical reactions that could damage the prosthesis.[138] Enzymatic cleansers, which use enzymes to break down organic matter, and eco-friendly formulations have seen increased adoption for their gentle action and reduced environmental impact.[152] These soaking methods demonstrate high efficacy in biofilm management, with certain denture cleansers reducing denture biofilm biomass by over 90% after short immersion periods, thereby lowering the risk of associated oral infections.[153] Integrating soaking into daily routines enhances overall hygiene when combined with brushing, as recommended by dental authorities.[2]Repairs and Professional Care
Denture repairs address structural damage to prolong usability, with midline fractures in lower complete dentures being a frequent issue due to the thin acrylic base and occlusal forces causing flexure along the midline.[154] These fractures are often repaired by sectioning the denture, realigning components, and reinforcing with autopolymerizing acrylic resin or fiber mesh to restore strength and prevent recurrence.[155] In partial dentures, clasp failures commonly occur from distortion during removal or accidental drops, leading to breakage of cast or wrought-wire arms.[156] The repair process typically involves sending the denture to a laboratory, where fractured acrylic components are bonded using self-cure or heat-cure resins, while metal clasps may require laser welding or soldering for precise reattachment.[156] Turnaround time for such repairs is generally 24 to 48 hours, allowing patients temporary use of adhesives if needed.[157] Costs for these procedures range from $100 to $300, depending on the extent of damage and materials used.[158] Professional maintenance is essential for denture longevity, with annual examinations recommended to evaluate fit, occlusion, and supporting tissues for signs of resorption or irritation.[159] During these visits, dentists perform relines to adapt the denture base to changing oral contours and conduct occlusal checks to ensure proper bite alignment and even pressure distribution.[159] Tissue condition is monitored closely to detect early inflammation or lesions, enabling timely interventions like adjustments.[159] Patients should seek professional help promptly if dentures exhibit a loose fit, cause pain or soreness, or show visible cracks, as these indicate potential structural compromise or ill adaptation.[2] With consistent professional oversight and care, dentures typically last 5 to 7 years before requiring replacement.[2]Complications
Inflammatory Conditions
Denture stomatitis, also known as chronic atrophic candidiasis, is a common inflammatory condition affecting the oral mucosa in denture wearers, primarily resulting from overgrowth of Candida albicans.[160] This fungal overgrowth occurs in biofilms on the denture surface and underlying mucosa, leading to erythematous (reddened) changes in the palate or other denture-bearing areas.[161] The prevalence among complete and partial denture wearers ranges from 20% to 67% globally, with higher rates observed in elderly or institutionalized populations.[161] The condition is classified using Newton's system, which ranges from type 0 (normal mucosa with no visible inflammation) to type 4 (severe, generalized inflammatory papillary hyperplasia involving the entire denture-bearing area).[162] Type 1 presents as localized pinpoint hyperemia, type 2 as more diffuse erythema covering part or all of the mucosa in contact with the denture, type 3 as nodular or papillary hyperplasia in localized areas, and type 4 as extensive papillary changes across the palate.[163] This classification aids in assessing severity and guiding treatment, with types 2-4 indicating more widespread involvement often linked to microbial factors.[160] Key causes include poor oral and denture hygiene, which allows Candida colonization; continuous or overnight denture wear, reducing mucosal recovery; and ill-fitting dentures that cause trauma and trap microorganisms.[164] These factors create an environment conducive to fungal proliferation, with C. albicans isolated in up to 90% of cases, though it is a commensal in 45-65% of healthy individuals.[165] The resulting inflammation manifests as erythematous mucosa directly beneath the denture, sometimes accompanied by soreness or a burning sensation.[161] Treatment focuses on eliminating the fungal infection and addressing contributing factors through improved hygiene education, such as nightly denture removal and thorough cleaning.[166] Antifungal agents like nystatin lozenges or pastilles are commonly prescribed, applied topically to the denture and mucosa for 1-2 weeks to reduce Candida load.[167] Microwave disinfection of dentures at 650 W for 3 minutes has been shown to achieve sterilization, eliminating Candida species effectively and serving as a comparable alternative to pharmacological therapy.[168] Risk factors exacerbating denture stomatitis include xerostomia (dry mouth), often induced by medications such as antihistamines or antidepressants, which reduces salivary antimicrobial defenses, and immunosuppression from conditions like diabetes or HIV, impairing immune clearance of Candida.[169] These systemic issues increase susceptibility, particularly when combined with local denture-related factors.[170]Tissue and Structural Issues
Traumatic ulceration represents a common mechanical complication associated with denture wear, arising from overextension of the denture flange or sharp edges that irritate the oral mucosa.[171] These sores occur in 10-20% of denture wearers.[172] Prompt adjustment of the denture typically promotes healing within 7-10 days, as the removal of the traumatic source allows mucosal recovery.[173] Epulis fissuratum, also known as denture-induced fibrous hyperplasia, develops as a response to chronic pressure from poorly adapted dentures, leading to hyperplastic tissue growth along the vestibular sulcus.[174] This benign proliferation forms a firm, nodular lesion that can cause discomfort and interfere with denture retention if left unaddressed.[174] Conservative management involves denture relining or adjustment to alleviate pressure; however, persistent cases require surgical excision to remove the excess tissue and prevent recurrence.[174] Structural failures in dentures often manifest as cracks due to flexural stresses on the acrylic base, particularly in areas of high occlusal load or material fatigue over time.[175] Such fractures are generally repairable if they involve less than half of the denture structure, using acrylic reinforcement techniques to restore integrity without compromising function.[175] In partial dentures, abutment tooth overload from unbalanced forces can accelerate periodontal breakdown and contribute to premature tooth loss, emphasizing the need for balanced occlusal design.[176] Diagnosis of these tissue and structural issues begins with a thorough visual and tactile examination to identify ulcers, hyperplasias, or fractures, supplemented by patient history of denture fit and symptoms.[177] For chronic or atypical lesions, biopsy is essential to rule out malignancy, as prolonged irritation carries a low but notable risk of progression to squamous cell carcinoma.[177] These ulcers may occasionally exacerbate underlying inflammatory conditions like stomatitis through secondary irritation.[171]Long-Term Risks
One of the primary long-term risks associated with denture wear is continuous alveolar bone resorption, also known as residual ridge atrophy, which occurs due to the lack of functional stimuli from natural teeth. In complete denture wearers, the mandible experiences an average resorption rate of approximately 0.4 mm per year over extended periods, such as 25 years, resulting in a total loss of 9-10 mm in ridge height.[178] This progressive atrophy leads to a deteriorating fit of the dentures, exacerbating instability and discomfort over time. While the process is inevitable without intervention, dental implants can significantly mitigate bone loss by preserving ridge volume through osseointegration and load distribution.[179] Denture use can also contribute to nutritional deficiencies, particularly in elderly individuals, due to challenges in mastication and food selection. Studies indicate that edentulous adults wearing complete dentures experience a significant reduction in calorie intake compared to dentate peers, often stemming from avoidance of tougher or fibrous foods.[180] This diminished intake is linked to broader nutritional imbalances, including lower protein and micronutrient consumption, which heighten the risk of sarcopenia—a condition characterized by progressive muscle mass and strength loss in older adults.[181] Poor oral function from ill-fitting dentures thus indirectly promotes frailty and metabolic decline over years of use.[182] Chronic irritation from prolonged denture wear, especially with ill-fitting prostheses, poses a modest but elevated risk for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Meta-analyses report that individuals with recurrent sores from dentures face a 3-4 times higher odds of developing OSCC compared to those without such trauma, attributed to persistent mucosal inflammation and potential cellular changes.[183] Regular oral screening, including visual examinations and biopsies for suspicious lesions, is recommended to detect early precancerous changes in at-risk wearers.[184] Recent concerns highlight allergic reactions to residual monomers in acrylic denture bases, affecting 0.7-2% of patients and manifesting as contact stomatitis or dermatitis.[185] Additionally, psychological adaptation failures contribute to a notable abandonment rate among new wearers, often due to persistent discomfort, social stigma, or unmet expectations, leading to non-use and further health deterioration.[186] Bone resorption may also indirectly accelerate additional tooth extractions in partially edentulous cases by destabilizing remaining structures.[178]Economics and Access
Cost Factors
The cost of dentures varies based on the type, with complete dentures typically ranging from $1,000 to $3,000 per arch in the United States, depending on the materials and fabrication method used.[187][188] Partial dentures generally cost between $500 and $1,500 per arch, reflecting the fewer teeth replaced and simpler construction compared to full sets.[189] Implant-supported dentures, which require surgical placement, start at $3,000 to $5,000 per implant fixture, excluding the prosthetic itself.[190][191] Several variables influence these base prices. The choice of materials plays a significant role; premium options like porcelain teeth or high-impact acrylic bases can increase costs by 20% to 50% over standard acrylic, due to enhanced durability and aesthetics.[192] Geographic location also affects pricing, with urban U.S. areas often 50% higher than comparable services in many European countries, such as Spain where complete dentures average €600 to €800 (approximately $650 to $870).[193][194] The expertise of the provider further impacts expenses, as prosthodontists specializing in complex cases charge more than general dentists, reflecting advanced training and customization.[195] Additional procedures contribute to overall expenses. Preliminary impressions for fitting dentures typically cost $100 to $200, covering the initial molding process.[196] Relines, needed every 2 to 5 years to adjust for gum changes, range from $300 to $500 per arch, with soft relines being less invasive but temporary.[197] Emerging digital fabrication techniques, such as 3D printing, can reduce production costs by 20% to 65% through lower material and labor needs, making entry-level dentures more affordable.[198][199] Post-2020 economic trends have resulted in varying inflation rates for dental care expenditures, typically around 2% to 5% annually, influenced by supply chain disruptions and rising material prices, though often lagging behind general inflation; 3D printing adoption has offset some increases for basic models.[200]Insurance and Alternatives
In the United States, Original Medicare (Parts A and B) does not cover routine dentures, though limited exceptions exist for medically necessary cases integral to other covered treatments, such as prior to organ transplants or certain surgeries. Medicare Advantage (Part C) plans, however, often include dental benefits, with coverage typically reimbursing 50% of costs after deductibles, subject to annual maximums ranging from $1,000 to $2,000. Private dental insurance plans vary widely, offering 50-80% reimbursement for dentures depending on the policy, though coverage is frequently capped and may require pre-authorization. As alternatives to traditional insurance, dental discount or savings plans are membership-based programs that provide immediate discounts on dental procedures, including dentures, at participating providers, without waiting periods or annual maximums; these are not insurance but offer fee-based access to reduced fees. Examples include Careington and Aetna Vital Savings.[201][202][203][204] Globally, access to denture care differs significantly by region. In the United Kingdom, the National Health Service (NHS) subsidizes basic acrylic dentures as a band 3 treatment, costing £326.70 in 2025 for eligible adults, with free provision for children under 18, pregnant individuals, and those on low incomes or receiving certain benefits. The World Health Organization is advancing efforts to include oral health in universal health coverage by 2030, though coverage in low-income countries remains limited, often below 50% for essential services as of 2025. In developing countries, disparities are stark, with average oral health coverage at about 48.5% and prosthetic services like dentures reaching far fewer people—often under 20% in low-income areas—due to limited infrastructure, high out-of-pocket costs, and workforce shortages.[205][206][207][208] Alternatives to traditional dentures provide options for tooth replacement, each with distinct cost and longevity profiles. Dental implants, which involve surgically placing titanium posts into the jawbone to support prosthetic teeth, cost $3,000 to $5,000 per tooth initially but offer long-term savings of 20-30% over 10 years compared to dentures, as they rarely require replacement and prevent bone loss. Fixed dental bridges, suitable for one or a few missing teeth, range from $2,000 to $5,000 and last 5-15 years, though they necessitate altering adjacent healthy teeth. Opting for no treatment remains common in resource-limited settings but risks nutritional issues, shifting bite, and accelerated bone resorption.[209][210][211] As of 2025, trends in denture care emphasize accessibility through innovations like tele-dentistry, which enables virtual consultations for fittings and adjustments, reducing initial visit costs by 10-30% via eliminated travel and overhead. Patients can also choose between generic basic acrylic dentures, which are affordable but may offer less precise fit, and premium custom options using advanced materials like flexible resins or digital milling for improved comfort and durability, though at 2-3 times the price.[212][213]References
- https://medlineplus.gov/dentures.html
