Hubbry Logo
Gender of GodGender of GodMain
Open search
Gender of God
Community hub
Gender of God
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Gender of God
Gender of God
Gender of God
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The gender of God can be viewed as a literal or as an allegorical aspect of a deity.

In polytheistic religions, gods often have genders which would enable them to sexually interact with each other, and even with humans.

Abrahamic religions worship a single God, which in most interpretations of Yahweh, God the Father, and Allah, is not believed to have a physical body. In Christian traditions with the concept of the Trinity, Jesus, who is male, is believed to be the physical manifestation of the pre-existent God the Son.

Abrahamic religions

[edit]

In the Hebrew and Christian Bible, God is usually described in male terms in biblical sources,[1] with female analogy in Genesis 1:26–27,[i][2] Psalm 123:2-3,[ii] and Luke 15:8–10;[iii] a mother in Deuteronomy 32:18,[iv] Isaiah 66:13,[v] Isaiah 49:15,[vi] Isaiah 42:14,[vii] Psalm 131:2;[viii] and a mother hen in Matthew 23:37[ix] and Luke 13:34,[x] although never directly referred to as being female.

Judaism

[edit]
Main article: Gender of God in Judaism

Although the gender of God in Judaism is referred to in the Tanakh with masculine imagery and grammatical forms, traditional Jewish philosophy does not attribute the concept of sex to God.[a] At times, Jewish aggadic literature and Jewish mysticism do treat God as gendered. The ways in which God is gendered have also changed across time, with some modern Jewish thinkers viewing God as outside of the gender binary. Guillaume Postel (16th century), Michelangelo Lanci [it] (19th century), and Mark Sameth (21st century) theorize that the four letters of the personal name of God, YHWH, are a cryptogram which the priests of ancient Israel would have read in reverse as huhi, "heshe", signifying a dual-gendered deity.[3][4][5][6]

Christianity

[edit]
Main article: Gender of God in Christianity
God the Father, Cima da Conegliano, c. 1510–1517

Most Christian groups conceive of God as Triune, believing that God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit are distinct persons, but one being that is wholly God.[7][8]

God the Son (Jesus Christ), having been incarnated as a human man, is masculine. Classical western philosophy believes that God lacks a literal sex as it would be impossible for God to have a body (a prerequisite for sex).[9][10] However, Classical western philosophy states that God should be referred to (in most contexts) as masculine by analogy; the reason being God's relationship with the world as begetter of the world and revelation (i.e. analogous to an active instead of receptive role in sexual intercourse).[11] Others interpret God as neither male nor female.[12][13]

The Catechism of the Catholic Church, Book 239, states that God is called "Father", while his love for man may also be depicted as motherhood. However, God ultimately transcends the human concept of sex, and "is neither man nor woman: He is God."[14][15]

In contrast to most Christian denominations, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) teaches that God the Father, God the Son, and the Holy Spirit are physically distinct while being one in purpose.[16][17] LDS Church members also believe that God the Father is married to a divine woman, referred to as "Heavenly Mother."[18] Humans are considered to be spirit children of these heavenly parents.[19]

The Holy Spirit

[edit]
Main article: Gender of the Holy Spirit

The New Testament refers to the Holy Spirit as masculine in a number of places, where the masculine Greek word "Paraclete" occurs, for "Comforter", most clearly in the Gospel of John, chapters 14 to 16.[20] These texts were particularly significant when Christians were debating whether the New Testament teaches that the Holy Spirit is a fully divine person, or some kind of "force." All major English Bible translations have retained the masculine pronoun for the Spirit, as in John 16:13, although it has been noted that in the original Greek, in some parts of John's Gospel, the neuter Greek word pneuma is also used for the Spirit.[21]

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints

[edit]

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (LDS) doctrine teaches that God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit are three distinct and separate beings. In LDS teachings, God has a physical body, and thus is not only identified as being a man, but is physically male.[22] The same is for Jesus, but not for the Holy Spirit, which has a spiritual form.[22] God is also married to Heavenly Mother, who also has a physical body.[23]

Islam

[edit]
Main article: God in Islam
Further information: Heavenly Quran

Islam teaches that God (Allah) is beyond any comparison, transcendent, and thus God is beyond any gender attributes.[24] Arabic only possesses gendered pronouns ("he" and "she") but does not have gender neutral pronouns ("it"), and "he" is typically used in cases where the subject's gender is indeterminate. Thus, Allah is typically referred to as "He", despite not having any gender attributes.[25]

The Baháʼí Faith

[edit]

In the Baháʼí Faith, Baha'u'llah uses the Mother as an attribute of God: "He Who is well-grounded in all knowledge, He Who is the Mother, the Soul, the Secret, and the Essence".[26] Baha'u'llah further writes that "Every single letter proceeding out of the mouth of God is indeed a Mother Letter, and every word uttered by Him Who is the Well Spring of Divine Revelation is a Mother Word, and His Tablet a Mother Tablet."[27] The Primal Will of God is personified as the maid of heaven in the Baháʼí writings.

Indian religions

[edit]
See also: Indian religions

Hinduism

[edit]
Main article: God and gender in Hinduism

In Hinduism, there are diverse approaches to conceptualizing God and gender. Many Hindus focus upon impersonal Absolute (Brahman) which is genderless. Other Hindu traditions conceive God as androgynous (both female and male), alternatively as either male or female, while cherishing gender henotheism, that is without denying the existence of other Gods in either gender.[28][29]

The Shakti tradition conceives of God as a female. Other Bhakti traditions of Hinduism have both male and female gods. In ancient and medieval Indian mythology, each masculine deva of the Hindu pantheon is partnered with a feminine who is often a devi.[30]

The oldest of the Hindu scriptures is the Rigveda (2nd millennium BC). The first word of the Rigveda is the name Agni, the god of fire, to whom many of the vedic hymns are addressed, along with Indra the warrior. Agni and Indra are both male divinities.

The Rigveda refers to a creator (Hiranyagarbha or Prajapati), distinct from Agni and Indra. This creator is identified with Brahma (not to be confused with Brahman, the first cause), born of Vishnu's navel, in later scriptures. Hiranyagarbha and Prajapati are male divinities, as is Brahma (who has a female consort, Saraswati).

Rigveda

There are many other gods in the Rigveda.[31] They are "not simple forces of nature," and possess "complex character and their own mythology."[31] They include goddesses of water (Āpaḥ) and dawn (Uṣas), and the complementary pairing of Father Heaven and Mother Earth.[31] However, they are all "subservient to the abstract, but active positive 'force of truth' [Ṛta]...which pervades the universe and all actions of the gods and humans."[31] This force is sometimes mediated or represented by moral gods (the Āditya, e.g. Varuṇa) or even Indra.[31] The Āditya are male and Ṛta is personified as masculine in later scriptures (see also Dharma).

In some Hindu philosophical traditions, God is depersonalized as the quality-less Nirguna Brahman, the fundamental life force of the universe. However, theism itself is central to Hinduism.[32]

While many Hindus focus upon God in the neutral form,[citation needed] Brahman being of neuter gender grammatically, there are prominent Hindu traditions that conceive God as female, even as the source of the male form of God, such as the Shakta denomination. Hinduism, especially of the Samkhya school, views the creation of the cosmos as the result of the play of two radically distinct principles: the feminine matter (Prakṛti) and the masculine spirit (Purusha). Prakṛti is the primordial matter which is present before the cosmos becomes manifest. Prakṛti is seen as being "the power of nature, both animate and inanimate. As such, nature is seen as dynamic energy" (Rae, 1994). Prakriti is originally passive, immobile and pure potentiality by nature . Only through her contact with the kinetic Purusha she unfolds into the diverse forms before us. The idea of Prakṛti/Purusha leads to the concept of the Divine Consort. Almost every deva of the Hindu pantheon has a feminine consort (devi).[30]

Sikhism

[edit]
Main article: Gender of God in Sikhism

The scripture of Sikhism is the Guru Granth Sahib. Printed as a heading for the Guru Granth, and for each of its major divisions, is the Mul Mantra, a short summary description of God, in Punjabi. Sikh tradition has it that this was originally composed by Guru Nanak (1469–1539), the founder of Sikhism.

Punjabi: ੴ ਸਤਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਕਰਤਾ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨਿਰਭਉ ਨਿਰਵੈਰੁ ਅਕਾਲ ਮੂਰਤਿ ਅਜੂਨੀ ਸੈਭੰ ਗੁਰ ਪ੍ਰਸਾਦਿ ॥
ISO 15919: Ika ōaṅkāra sati nāmu karatā purakhu nirabha'u niravairu akāla mūrati ajūnī saibhaṃ gura prasādi.
English: One Universal God, The Name Is Truth, The Creator, Fearless, Without Hatred, Image Of The Timeless One, Beyond Birth, Self-Existent, By Guru's Grace.
According to Sikhi, God has "No" Gender. Mool Mantar describes God as being "Ajuni" (lit. not in any incarnations) which implies that God is not bound to any physical forms. This concludes: the All-pervading Lord is Gender-less.[33]

ਸੁੰਨ ਮੰਡਲ ਇਕੁ ਜੋਗੀ ਬੈਸੇ ॥ ਨਾਰਿ ਨ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਕਹਹੁ ਕੋਊ ਕੈਸੇ ॥ ਤ੍ਰਿਭਵਣ ਜੋਤਿ ਰਹੇ ਲਿਵ ਲਾਈ ॥ ਸੁਰਿ ਨਰ ਨਾਥ ਸਚੇ ਸਰਣਾਈ ॥

Sunn mandal ik Yogi baiseh. Naar nuh purakhu kahahu kou kaiseh. Tribhavan joth raheh liv laaee. Suri nar naath sacheh saranaaee

The Yogi, the Primal Lord, sits in the Realm of Absolute Stillness (state free of mind's wanderings or Phurne). (Since God) is neither male nor female; how can anyone describe Him? The three worlds center their attention on His Light. The godly beings and the Yogic masters seek the Sanctuary of this True Lord.

— SGGS. Ang 685

However, the Guru Granth Sahib consistently refers to God as "He" and "Father" (with some exceptions), typically because the Guru Granth Sahib was written in north Indian Indo-Aryan languages (mixture of Punjabi and Sant Bhasha, Sanskrit with influences of Persian) which have no neutral gender. English translations of the teachings may eliminate any gender specifications. From further insights into the Sikh philosophy, it can be deduced that God is, sometimes, referred to as the Husband to the Soul-brides, in order to make a patriarchal society understand what the relationship with God is like. Also, God is considered to be the Father, Mother, and Companion.[34]

Other

[edit]

Unificationism

[edit]

Unificationism views God, the Creator, as having dual characteristics of masculinity and femininity. Since an artist, like God, can only express that which is within the boundaries of their own nature, and according to Genesis 1:27, "So God created mankind in his own image, male and female he created them", indicating that God's image includes both male and female attributes.

Due to the more active role of masculinity, mankind typically portrays God as male, but the more receptive or supportive and nurturing role within God's characteristics is less emphasized or even neglected or ignored in writings and in art.[35]

Yoruba religion

[edit]
Main article: Ọlọrun § Gender

In Yoruba religion, God (Ọlọrun) is viewed as an entirely spiritual entity, who has no physical forms, images and no gender.[36]

Animist religions

[edit]

Animist religions are common among oral societies, many of which still exist in the 21st century. Typically, natural forces and shaman spiritual guides feature in these religions, rather than fully-fledged personal divinities with established personalities. It is in polytheism that such deities are found. Animist religions often, but not always, attribute gender to spirits considered to permeate the world and its events. Polytheistic religions, however, almost always attribute gender to their gods, though a few notable divinities are associated with various forms of epicene characteristics—gods that manifest alternatingly as male and female, gods with one male and one female "face", and gods whose most distinctive characteristic is their unknown gender.[37]

Feminist spirituality

[edit]

In her essay "Why Women Need the Goddess", Carol P. Christ argues the notion of there having been an ancient religion of a supreme goddess.[38] The essay was first presented in the spring of 1978 as a keynote address for the "Great Goddess Re-emerging" conference at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Christ also co-edited the classic feminist religion anthologies Weaving the Visions: New Patterns in Feminist Spirituality (1989) and Womanspirit Rising (1979/1989), the latter of which include her 1978 essay.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Gender of God

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The gender of pertains to theological and philosophical inquiries into whether the divine possesses attributes akin to human biological sex, with orthodox positions in monotheistic traditions asserting that , as incorporeal spirit, transcends entirely. This view stems from scriptural affirmations such as "God is spirit" in the Christian , emphasizing immateriality over bodily form. Despite this transcendence, —, —employ predominantly masculine pronouns, titles like "Father" or "," and anthropomorphic imagery to convey relational authority and paternal care, reflecting ancient Semitic linguistic conventions rather than literal sexuality. In these faiths, divine serves pedagogical purposes, as seen in God's self-revelation through male prophets and, in , the incarnate , without implying in the . Controversies emerge in modern reinterpretations, including feminist theologies advocating feminine divine imagery to counter perceived patriarchal biases, though such efforts often conflict with traditional prioritizing scriptural fidelity over cultural . By contrast, polytheistic systems like attribute genders to deities—such as male or female —while ultimate remains nirguna, beyond dualities including sex. Philosophically, gender as tied to and embodiment cannot apply to an eternal, uncreated being, rendering ascriptions metaphorical accommodations to human cognition.

Theological and Philosophical Foundations

Divine Transcendence and Gender Attribution

In theological discourse, divine transcendence denotes God's radical otherness from creation, existing beyond spatial, temporal, and categorical limitations of the material universe. This attribute implies that God, as pure actuality without potentiality or composition, cannot be circumscribed by creaturely distinctions such as biological sex, which arises from the differentiation of matter and form in embodied beings. Classical theism, particularly in Abrahamic traditions, affirms God's as foundational to transcendence. , in the Summa Theologica (I, q. 3, a. 1), demonstrates that God lacks a body, as corporeality entails parts, motion, and dependency—qualities antithetical to divine immutability and self-sufficiency. , rooted in reproductive dimorphism and somatic structure, thus holds no literal application to an immaterial . Similarly, in rigorously denies corporealism, arguing that any ascription of physical traits to God, including those implying sex, constitutes idolatrous and contradicts rational demonstrations of divine unity and eternity. Divine simplicity reinforces this non-gendered ontology: God's essence is identical with His attributes, admitting no real distinctions or accidents like , which would imply composition or limitation. Yet, human cognition, constrained by analogical reasoning, necessitates gendered attribution for relational and pedagogical purposes. Scriptural texts predominantly employ masculine —such as "" in sources—to analogize God's authoritative initiation of creation and covenantal fidelity, evoking transcendence over without conflating divine paternity with biological generation. This metaphorical gendering acknowledges the inadequacy of language to capture transcendence while guarding against univocal predication; masculine imagery prevails historically to counter surrounding polytheistic feminizations of deities, emphasizing rather than sexuality. Theological consensus holds that such attributions are accommodative, not constitutive, preserving God's amid human projection.

Anthropological and Psychological Explanations for Gendering Deity

Anthropological explanations posit that the gender attribution to deities frequently reflects prevailing social structures, particularly systems and hierarchies of . In patrilineal societies, where descent and trace through male lines, greater emphasis is placed on male deities compared to ones, as these systems prioritize paternal roles in social organization and power. This pattern suggests a projection of human social arrangements onto the divine, where deities embody idealized or dominant roles within the culture; for example, a strong paternal figure aligns with societies valuing male in governance and lineage. analyses indicate that while deities often associate with and in agrarian contexts, high gods in complex, stratified societies tend toward male gendering, potentially reinforcing patriarchal norms through and mythology. Psychological theories, drawing from of religion, emphasize —the attribution of -like qualities to non- entities—as a core mechanism for gendering deities. evolved cognitive biases favoring agency detection, leading to interpretations of ambiguous phenomena (such as natural events or existential unknowns) in familiar terms, including , which is a salient biological and social category. Stewart Guthrie's framework argues that systematically anthropomorphizes the world, with gods conceived as agents bearing traits like and because perceivers prioritize conspecific (-like) explanations for salience and relevance; for instance, even secular objects receive gendered labels via analogous projection. Empirical studies confirm that individuals attribute biological properties, including , to concepts, varying by personal ideology but rooted in intuitive mental representations of agency. These processes operate independently of theological , explaining persistent gendering despite divine transcendence claims in many traditions.

Abrahamic Traditions

Judaism

In Jewish theology, God is conceived as utterly transcendent, incorporeal, and without physical form or attributes that could be categorized by human biological categories such as gender. This view stems from scriptural prohibitions against idolatry and anthropomorphism, as articulated in texts like Deuteronomy 4:15-19, which emphasize that God has no visible likeness. Medieval philosopher Maimonides, in his Guide for the Perplexed (circa 1190 CE), rigorously argued for God's absolute incorporeality, asserting that any attribution of bodily qualities—including gender—constitutes a misunderstanding of divine unity and perfection, as such traits imply limitation and composition foreign to the eternal Creator. The consistently employs masculine , pronouns, and verb forms when referring to (e.g., as masculine plural used singularly, and titles like Adonai), a convention dictated by the Hebrew language's binary gender system, which lacks a neuter option for nouns or abstract concepts. This linguistic choice does not imply literal maleness, as evidenced by occasional feminine metaphors for divine attributes, such as likened to a nursing mother in 49:15 or a comforting parent in Isaiah 66:13, though these are sparse and symbolic rather than defining. , including the (compiled circa 500 CE), reinforces that such language serves pedagogical purposes to convey relational dynamics between and Israel, not ontological gender; for instance, the (Berakhot 7:3) mandates masculine formulations in prayer to align with scriptural precedent, while affirming 's transcendence beyond creation. In Kabbalistic mysticism, emerging in the 12th-13th centuries CE with texts like the , the Shekinah represents the indwelling , often depicted with feminine qualities symbolizing , exile, and redemption—such as a yearning for unification with the masculine aspect. However, this sefirotic framework portrays these as emanations or modalities of the singular, genderless (Infinite), not dual gendered entities; traditional Kabbalists like (16th century) viewed such imagery as allegorical tools for contemplating divine unity, cautioning against literal dualism that could veer into . Orthodox interpretations maintain that God encompasses all perfections without division, rendering gender attributions metaphorical at best and theologically imprecise. Modern Jewish thinkers, while sometimes exploring feminine imagery for inclusivity, generally uphold the classical consensus that God's essence defies human binaries, prioritizing scriptural and philosophical evidence over cultural reinterpretations.

Christianity

In Christian theology, God is described as spirit without a physical body or biological sex, transcending human categories of gender, as articulated in John 4:24: "God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth." This view holds that divine essence lacks the material attributes associated with male or female sexuality. Despite this transcendence, the Bible consistently employs masculine pronouns and titles for God, such as "Father," reflecting the relational revelation given by Jesus Christ, who addressed God as "Abba, Father" in Mark 14:36. The further shapes this understanding: the and the Son (, incarnate as male) are denoted with masculine language, while the receives masculine pronouns in the Greek (e.g., John 16:13), though the Hebrew term ruach is grammatically feminine in the . Theologians maintain that such gendered language is analogical, accommodating divine reality to human comprehension rather than implying literal maleness, as God encompasses perfections beyond . Catholic doctrine affirms God as neither male nor female in essence but reveals Himself as to emphasize paternal and covenantal , rejecting efforts to equate divine imagery with motherhood as diminishing this biblical emphasis. Traditional Protestant and Eastern Orthodox perspectives similarly uphold masculine referential language as scripturally mandated, viewing attempts to adopt gender-neutral or feminine terms for as deviations from revealed truth, often linked to modern cultural pressures rather than doctrinal fidelity. For instance, Reformed theologians argue that while is not biologically gendered, the consistent masculine depiction in Scripture—spanning over 90% of anthropomorphic references—warrants its retention in and to preserve the integrity of biblical . This stance contrasts with progressive reinterpretations that prioritize inclusivity, which critics attribute to anthropological projections rather than . Overall, posits 's "gender" as a matter of relational disclosure, not ontological limitation, with masculine attribution serving to convey , provision, and intimacy as modeled in the .

Islam

In Islamic , Allah is conceived as wholly transcendent, beyond all human categories including , with no or attributes or physical form. The Qur'an articulates this in Surah Al-Ikhlas (112:3-4), affirming that Allah "neither begets nor is born, Nor is there to Him any equivalent," explicitly negating reproductive functions tied to biological sex. Similarly, Surah Ash-Shura (42:11) states, "There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the Hearing, the Seeing," emphasizing divine incomparability to created beings, which possess gendered duality. Surah Ya-Sin (36:36) further declares, "Exalted is He who created all pairs—from what the grows and from themselves and from that which they do not know," positioning as a feature of creation alone, not the Creator. The Qur'an's use of the masculine huwa (translated as "He") for stems from 's grammatical structure, where nouns like "" are classified as masculine by convention, requiring matching pronouns; this default masculine form applies to inanimate or transcendent referents without connoting sex or . lacks a dedicated neutral third-person singular pronoun, rendering the masculine the standard for unspecified or divine entities, distinct from feminine forms reserved for explicitly female subjects. Islamic scholars, drawing on this linguistic necessity, stress that such pronouns serve communicative purposes within human limitations, not to imply gendered essence, aligning with the doctrine of tanzih (God's absolute dissimilarity to creation). This approach reinforces (divine oneness), prohibiting any attribution of partners, offspring, or human-like traits to , as seen in orthodox Sunni and Shia traditions. Visual or literal is rejected, with no canonical depictions of God, preserving the non-corporeal, agendered reality beyond linguistic approximations. Contemporary attempts to employ feminine pronouns, often from progressive or feminist reinterpretations, diverge from classical and are not reflective of mainstream Islamic consensus.

Baháʼí Faith

In the , founded by Bahá'u'lláh in , God is conceived as an unknowable, transcendent essence utterly beyond human comprehension and attributes such as , form, or physicality. Bahá'u'lláh's writings portray God as the impersonal source of all creation, devoid of anthropomorphic qualities, with knowledge of the divine limited to reflections through successive Manifestations like Abraham, , , Muḥammad, and Bahá'u'lláh himself. This transcendence precludes any literal attribution, as God exists independent of dualistic human categories like male or female. Masculine pronouns appearing in English translations of Baháʼí scriptures, such as "He" in references to the divine, stem from grammatical conventions in Persian and originals rather than implying maleness; the term often denotes Manifestations as proxies for 's will, not the essence itself. Abdu'l-Bahá, Bahá'u'lláh's appointed successor and interpreter of his teachings, explicitly affirms: "That which we imagine, is not the Reality of ; He, the Unknowable, the Unthinkable, is far beyond the highest conception of man." Attributing gender to would constitute , which Baháʼí doctrine rejects as a distortion of the divine reality. The observed genders of Manifestations—historically male—relate solely to their human embodiments and societal contexts, serving as mirrors reflecting divine perfections without conveying God's inherent nature. Baháʼí texts occasionally employ feminine imagery metaphorically, such as Bahá'u'lláh's vision of as the "Maid of Heaven," to evoke spiritual qualities, but these do not gender the unknowable . This genderless conception underpins the faith's advocacy for human equality of sexes, viewing both as complementary expressions of unified divine potential, yet distinct from God's absolute otherness.

Dharmic Traditions

Hinduism

In Hindu philosophy, particularly within the Vedanta tradition, the ultimate reality known as is characterized as nirguna, or without qualities, transcending all dualities including gender. The employ the method of ("not this, not that") to describe , negating attributes such as maleness or femaleness to emphasize its formless, infinite nature beyond human categorizations. This conception aligns with the identity of the individual soul (atman) with , rendering the soul inherently genderless, as it shares the attributeless essence of the supreme reality. While Brahman remains impersonal and gender-transcendent, Hindu devotional practices () and Puranic literature depict the divine in saguna (with attributes) forms as personal deities exhibiting gendered characteristics to facilitate worship and relational engagement. Male deities such as , the preserver, and , the destroyer, are paired with female consorts like and , respectively, illustrating complementary principles of consciousness () and energy (prakriti). Female deities, revered in as manifestations of or the supreme power (), such as or , embody dynamic creative forces, yet scriptures stress their spiritual equivalence to male counterparts, with both halves contributing to the wholeness of the divine. The iconography of , a composite form where Shiva's right half represents the male principle and Parvati's left half the female, underscores the theological inseparability of these polarities for cosmic manifestation and equilibrium. This form, detailed in texts like the , symbolizes not a literal of the divine but the interdependent unity of static awareness and active potency required for creation, preservation, and dissolution. Traditional interpretations, as in Shaiva theology, view this as an affirmation that the divine essence operates through balanced polarities without being confined to either, reinforcing Brahman's transcendence while accommodating anthropomorphic devotion.

Sikhism

In Sikh theology, the divine is conceived as , the formless () and timeless (Akal) reality that transcends all human attributes, including gender. The foundational in the declares God as "" (One Universal Creator), emphasizing unity and formlessness without reference to male or female characteristics. This portrayal rejects anthropomorphic depictions prevalent in other traditions, asserting that exists beyond shape, color, or physical form, as manifestations in creation are merely reflections of the divine essence rather than its inherent nature. Scriptural references in the frequently employ masculine pronouns such as "He" or terms like "Purakh" (personified being) in Punjabi, reflecting linguistic conventions of the era and rather than ontological . However, these are not prescriptive of literal maleness; the text also invokes feminine imagery, such as the divine as mother or nurturing force, underscoring as the core tenet. Sikh scholars interpret such language poetically, arguing that assigning fixed contradicts the explicit of , where the divine encompasses and surpasses binary distinctions. This formless conception aligns with Sikhism's emphasis on direct experiential realization of the divine through meditation on Naam (divine name), bypassing gendered intermediaries or idols. Liturgical practices, including recitation from the , reinforce this by addressing without ritual ing, promoting equality among devotees irrespective of sex. Attempts to impose human on are viewed as reductive, potentially stemming from cultural influences rather than scriptural fidelity.

Polytheistic and Indigenous Traditions

Animism and Shamanistic Beliefs

In traditions, spirits are conceptualized as animating forces inherent in natural elements, animals, , and landscapes, often personified with human-like attributes including to reflect observed biological or cultural associations. For example, fertility-related entities such as or spirits are frequently depicted as , embodying nurturing qualities, while storm or hunt-related spirits may be male, symbolizing power or aggression; this attribution mirrors human roles and ecological observations rather than a unified divine . Such gendering varies across societies—evident in Hmong communities where nature spirits influence daily rituals and are tied to gendered human-spirit interactions—but lacks a singular "" figure, with spiritual agency distributed among myriad entities without hierarchical dominance. Shamanism, frequently intertwined with , involves practitioners engaging these gendered spirits through , possession, or journeying to address community needs like or . Spirits invoked in rituals often possess defined genders, with shamans embodying or allying with them; in Nepalese shamanic practices, for instance, both shamans channel deities or ancestral spirits during ceremonies, where the spirits' genders align with their mythological roles in creation or . Similarly, in some East Asian indigenous contexts, spirit mediums—predominantly female—interact with male or female entities, empowering women through possession by authoritative spirits that transcend everyday gender constraints. This mediation highlights causal interactions between human gender and spiritual efficacy, where mismatched or fluid gender dynamics can signify shamanic calling or ritual potency, as seen in Northern Thai spirit involving gender-duet embodiments. While binary gender predominates in spirit attributions—facilitating relational analogies to human society—some shamanic traditions incorporate androgyny or gender transformation, positioning the shaman as a bridge beyond corporeal limits. In certain Siberian-derived practices, the principal tutelary spirit may oppose the shaman's gender to enable ecstatic union, underscoring a functional rather than essentialist view of divine gender. These conceptions prioritize empirical spirit-human reciprocity over abstract theology, with gender serving practical roles in rituals rather than defining an overarching divine essence.

Ancient Near Eastern and Classical Polytheisms

In ancient Mesopotamian religions, spanning from the Sumerian period around 3500 BCE to the Neo-Babylonian era circa 539 BCE, deities were anthropomorphically gendered, with a pantheon featuring prominent male sky and storm gods alongside female figures associated with fertility and war. Anu, the Sumerian sky god, was depicted as male and paternal, heading god lists as father of the pantheon, while Enlil embodied executive kingship as a male wind deity; Enki, god of wisdom and water, was likewise male. In contrast, Inana/Ištar represented a powerful female goddess of love, sex, and conflict, often engaging in myths involving gender transgression among her cultic servants, such as the gala priests who adopted feminine roles, though the goddess herself was fundamentally female. These gendered divine interactions, including sacred marriages between male and female deities to ensure cosmic fertility, reflected societal structures where gods mirrored human familial and reproductive dynamics. Ancient Egyptian mythology, documented from the Old Kingdom (c. 2686–2181 BCE) onward, similarly assigned sexes to most deities, with male creator gods like Ra, the sun deity, and Osiris, lord of the underworld, paired with female counterparts such as Isis, goddess of magic and motherhood. Min, an early fertility god linked to male virility, exemplified phallic worship, while goddesses like Hathor embodied feminine nurturing and protection. Exceptions included rare androgynous depictions, such as Amun occasionally merging male and female traits in later periods to symbolize totality, but core myths portrayed deities in sexually dimorphic roles, with unions producing offspring and maintaining cosmic order (maat). Afterlife beliefs sometimes invoked gender fluidity for humans, like reversal in sarcophagi art, yet gods retained distinct genders tied to natural cycles and royal legitimacy. Canaanite and Ugaritic traditions (c. 1500–1200 BCE), evidenced by texts from Ras Shamra, featured a gendered pantheon led by El, the male creator-father, and his consort , the mother goddess, with storm god (male) and warrior (female) in dynamic, often violent interactions. These myths emphasized divine sexuality and , where female deities held authority but operated within male-dominated assemblies, influencing rituals that paralleled human kingship and . In classical Greek polytheism, crystallized by the Archaic period (c. 800–480 BCE) in Homeric epics, the Olympian gods exhibited clear sexes, with as patriarchal male ruler, as his jealous wife, and as male sea lord, while females like (wisdom, warfare) and (love) wielded influence through distinct domains. Myths depicted gods in heterosexual unions, adulteries, and births—such as Athena's virgin emergence from 's head—reinforcing gendered , though rare hybrids like Hermaphroditus blended traits. Roman adaptations, from the (509 BCE) to Empire (27 BCE onward), mirrored this with (male sky father) and Juno (female ), often in balanced male-female pairs like Mars-Venus, where deities' sexes underscored state cults, , and imperial propagation. Across these systems, divine genders facilitated etiological explanations for and social phenomena, with male deities typically dominating and females , absent the monotheistic abstraction of a singular, unsexed divine essence.

Esoteric and Modern Movements

Unificationism

In Unification theology, as articulated in the Divine Principle—the foundational text revealed by and first published in Korean in 1957—God is characterized by dual essential attributes of yang (masculine) and yin (feminine), representing a harmonious unity rather than a singular gender. These attributes manifest in creation, where yang encompasses elements such as man, mountains, daytime, and the sun, while yin includes woman, valleys, nighttime, and the moon, illustrating God's internal nature as the origin of all polarized pairs. This duality underscores God's essence as the "harmonized oneness of masculinity and femininity," enabling the creation of human beings as complementary male-female pairs in God's image. The posits that 's infinite love and energy incorporate both paternal and maternal qualities, with neither dominating the other; instead, they form a balanced whole essential for divine purpose and human restoration. This view contrasts with anthropomorphic depictions of as exclusively masculine, emphasizing instead a transcendent that humans, through the ideal family and messianic fulfillment, are meant to emulate and restore after the Fall disrupted complementarity. Unification texts describe as the "Heavenly Parent," evoking both fatherly and motherly dimensions, though traditional references often retain "Heavenly Father" while affirming the integrated feminine aspect theologically. Subsequent interpretations within the movement, particularly by Hak Ja Han Moon after Sun Myung Moon's death in 2012, have highlighted a "gender-balanced" perspective, portraying God and the messianic role as encompassing both male and female elements to address historical imbalances in religious traditions. This evolution aligns with core principles but introduces tensions, as some adherents note scriptural emphasis on God's unity of dual characteristics over separate "Heavenly Mother" personifications. Overall, Unificationism rejects assigning God a fixed biological gender, viewing such limitations as incompatible with divine perfection and the purpose of creation.

New Age and Syncretic Interpretations

In spirituality, the divine is typically conceptualized as an impersonal, universal energy or consciousness that transcends human gender categories, drawing from monistic or pantheistic frameworks where all existence emanates from a singular, non-anthropomorphic source. This view rejects traditional theistic personifications of God as male or female, instead portraying the ultimate reality as a formless principle accessible through personal , , and energy work, without inherent sexual attributes. Influential precursors like , founded by in 1875, reinforced this by describing the divine as infinite and absolute, incapable of being limited by gender, with spiritual masters depicted as androgynous entities embodying balanced polarities rather than fixed sexes. Syncretic interpretations within New Age contexts often merge elements from Eastern philosophies, indigenous traditions, and , resulting in depictions of the divine as an androgynous archetype that integrates masculine and feminine principles for holistic unity. For instance, blending with Tantric concepts yields the "divine androgyne" as a spiritual ideal, symbolizing the recombination of primordial dualities into a transcendent whole, as seen in practices emphasizing inner alchemical marriage. Such syntheses, popularized in 20th-century works like those of on the syzygy (divine couple), portray not as gendered but as a dynamic equilibrium of opposites, fostering personal transformation without dogmatic assignment of sex to the divine essence. Critics note that while these views claim neutrality, they sometimes selectively amplify feminine aspects from syncretized sources to address perceived patriarchal imbalances in Abrahamic traditions, though empirical analysis reveals no unified doctrine, with variability across practitioners. In practice, New Age syncretism manifests in rituals invoking a "Great Mystery" or "Source" beyond binary gender, as in channeled teachings from figures like Jane Roberts' Seth material (1970s), which describes reality's core as non-sexed vibrational essence manifesting through human polarities. This approach prioritizes experiential verification over scriptural authority, aligning with the movement's emphasis on individual gnosis, though source credibility varies, with many claims rooted in subjective revelations rather than verifiable historical or empirical data.

Contemporary Debates and Reinterpretations

Feminist Theology and Gender Neutrality Advocacy

Feminist theology, emerging prominently in the 1960s and 1970s amid second-wave feminism, critiques traditional religious language portraying God in masculine terms as reinforcing patriarchal structures within Abrahamic faiths. Proponents contend that exclusive male imagery for the divine, such as "Father" or "He" in Christian and Jewish scriptures, perpetuates cultural subordination of women by associating ultimate authority with maleness. Mary Daly, in her 1973 book Beyond God the Father, argued that "if God is male, then the male is God," positing that such language entrenches androcentric theology rather than reflecting divine essence. Advocates for gender neutrality emphasize God's incorporeal nature as spirit, transcending biological sex, while selectively highlighting metaphorical feminine biblical imagery—such as God as a comforting mother in Isaiah 66:13 or a midwife in Psalm 22—to support inclusive reinterpretations. Elizabeth A. Johnson, in She Who Is (1992), promotes "neutral" or feminine descriptors like "Sophia" (Wisdom) to counteract perceived male bias in doctrinal formulations, asserting that rigid masculine pronouns limit theological imagination and contribute to women's marginalization in religious institutions. Similarly, Rosemary Radford Ruether's works, including Sexism and God-Talk (1983), call for reconstructing divine imagery to embody both maternal and paternal qualities, viewing traditional male dominance in theology as a historical construct amenable to revision for justice. This advocacy extends to liturgical reforms, urging denominations to adopt gender-neutral hymns and prayers; for instance, some Protestant groups since the have experimented with alternatives like "Creator" or "" in place of "." Jewish feminist theologians, such as Judith Plaskow, similarly challenge anthropomorphic male depictions in texts like the , proposing androgynous or fluid language to align divinity with egalitarian ideals. Empirical surveys of female clergy, such as a 2011 study of Protestant leaders, reveal varied perceptions, with some endorsing androgynous naming to integrate male and female divine aspects, though adherence remains contested within orthodox circles. Critics within note that these efforts often impose modern ideological priorities over scriptural precedents, where ' invocation of "Abba" (Father) in the Gospels (e.g., Mark 14:36) and consistent masculine grammar in Hebrew and Greek texts suggest deliberate, non-interchangeable usage rather than . Academic sources advancing feminist views frequently emanate from institutions with documented progressive leanings, potentially amplifying reinterpretations that diverge from primary textual .

Traditionalist Scriptural Defenses Against Revisionism

In , traditionalists defend the masculine depiction of primarily through ' explicit revelation of as "Father" in the , as in the : "Our Father in heaven" (Matthew 6:9). This self-disclosure, they argue, is not arbitrary but reflects divine intent, countering revisionist efforts to adopt gender-neutral terms like "" which dilute the relational intimacy and authority conveyed by paternal imagery. The consistent use of masculine pronouns for throughout Scripture—over 4,000 instances of "He" in reference to deity in the original languages—further underscores this, with traditional exegetes like those at maintaining that female imagery, while occasionally metaphorical (e.g., Isaiah 66:13), never overrides the dominant masculine revelation, as chose male self-portrayal to align with Christ's incarnation as male. Against feminist theology's claim that masculine language perpetuates , traditionalists invoke first-century context where God-as-Father evoked covenantal kingship without implying biological maleness, yet reject neutral substitutions as that prioritizes cultural over textual fidelity; for instance, GotQuestions.org notes the Bible's rejection of as literally male but affirms the theological necessity of retaining revealed masculine terms to preserve distinctions like Father and Son. This stance is reinforced by patristic writers such as Augustine, who in De Trinitate (c. 400-416 CE) interpreted paternal imagery as eternally fitting for the First Person of the , predating modern revisionism by over a . In , Orthodox scholars emphasize the Torah's grammatical masculinity for —using male verb forms and pronouns like hu (he)—as intentional, evident in passages such as Exodus 15:3 ("The Lord is a ") and Deuteronomy 32:18 ("You were unmindful of the Rock that bore you"), which traditional commentaries like (1040-1105 CE) interpret as underscoring protective, initiating attributes akin to fatherhood without anthropomorphic limitation. Revisionist pushes for gender-neutral , such as in some circles, are critiqued by traditionalists at My Jewish Learning for ignoring the siddur's () exclusive male references, which reflect God's transcendence beyond gender yet deliberate choice of masculine expression to mirror Israel's covenantal history. Islamic traditionalism upholds the Qur'an's use of the masculine pronoun (he) for in nearly all divine references, as in Al-Ikhlas 112:1 ("Say: He is , the One"), arguing this linguistic convention—rooted in where "" is a masculine noun—conveys majesty and unity without implying , per Institute analyses that defend it against Western gender critiques as a safeguard of (divine oneness). Scholars like those at Al Jumuah Magazine counter revisionist neutralizations by noting the Qur'an's rejection of progeny or partners ( 112:3), rendering feminine or neutral shifts as (innovation) that erode the text's inimitable style, historically affirmed in works like Ibn Kathir's (d. 1373 CE). Across these traditions, traditionalists contend that scriptural masculinity serves pedagogical purposes—fostering , dependence, and order—substantiated by pre-modern exegeses uninfluenced by contemporary , while revisionism often stems from sources with documented ideological biases, such as academic feminisms prioritizing equity over .

Cultural and Liturgical Implications of Gender Debates

In progressive Christian denominations, debates over God's gender have prompted revisions to liturgical language, substituting masculine pronouns like "He" and titles such as "" with gender-neutral alternatives like "Creator" or "Parent" to emphasize God's transcendence beyond human sex. For instance, the mandated in 2017 that avoid masculine descriptors for God, favoring neutral phrasing to align with contemporary inclusivity norms, though this coincided with ongoing membership declines from 6.6 million in 2000 to about 5.5 million by 2020 without direct causal attribution to linguistic shifts. Similarly, the debated in 2023 authorizing gender-neutral terms in authorized , following petitions, but ultimately deferred formal changes pending further review, preserving "" in core Trinitarian formulas while permitting exploratory usage in some contexts. These alterations carry liturgical implications, including potential doctrinal ambiguity in sacraments and hymns where paternal imagery evokes biblical motifs of divine authority and covenantal relationship, as Jesus employed "Abba" (Father) in prayer (Mark 14:36). Traditionalist critiques argue such neutralizations disrupt the relational intimacy of scriptural revelation, where God's self-disclosure uses masculine grammar over 90% of the time in Hebrew and Greek texts, fostering a homogenized worship that prioritizes cultural accommodation over fidelity to revelation. In the United Church of Christ, inclusive policies since the 1980s incorporate female metaphors like "Mother" alongside neutrals, aiming to recover underrepresented imagery but risking Trinitarian confusion by blurring distinctions between the persons of Father and Son. Culturally, these debates reflect tensions between scriptural anthropology—rooted in God's creation of humanity as male and female (Genesis 1:27)—and secular paradigms, leading to congregational divisions where traditional members perceive revisions as concessions to ideological pressures rather than theological depth. Surveys indicate resistance; for example, 71% of U.S. Catholics in 1993 opposed broadening "man" to neutral terms even for humanity, signaling broader wariness toward de-gendering that could erode perceptions of ordered complementarity in and . In response, conservative bodies like the reaffirm masculine liturgical terms as non-literal analogies preserving ' usage, warning that neutrality may alienate worshippers by abstracting God from the incarnational concreteness that grounds against prevailing . Empirical studies on religious discourse show can enhance perceived accessibility for some but correlates with lower retention among those valuing historical continuity, exacerbating schisms in denominations like Anglicanism.

References

  1. https://uscatholic.org/articles/202303/does-god-have-a-gender/
  2. https://au.thegospelcoalition.org/article/does-god-have-gender/
  3. https://www.gotquestions.org/Holy-Spirit-gender.html
  4. https://www.thetorah.com/article/the-gender-of-god
  5. https://philpapers.org/archive/NOUCGB.pdf
  6. https://www.hinduamerican.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/HinduConceptsoftheFeminine_0.pdf
  7. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/essay/divine-transcendence-immanence/
  8. https://www.ccel.org/ccel/aquinas/summa.FP_Q3_A1.html
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7273633/
  10. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/maimonides-conception-of-god/
  11. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/essay/divine-simplicity/
  12. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/divine-simplicity/
  13. https://biblehub.com/q/why_use_masculine_pronouns_for_god.htm
  14. https://www.johnspencerwrites.com/blog-posts/christian-sexuality-2/why-is-god-expressed-principally-as-masculine-in-the-bible-godly-sexuality/
  15. https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/11397/is-god-male-and-female
  16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/640216
  17. https://academic.oup.com/book/12514/chapter/162250804
  18. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2021-20329-004
  19. https://philpapers.org/rec/ELLFIT-4
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6095990/
  21. https://sacred-texts.com/jud/gfp/gfp045.htm
  22. https://aish.com/48924072/
  23. https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/feminine-images-of-god
  24. https://aish.com/divine_gender/
  25. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-divine-feminine-in-kabbalah-an-example-of-jewish-renewal/
  26. https://www.chabad.org/search/keyword_cdo/kid/2473/jewish/Shechinah-feminine-aspect-of-the-Divine.htm
  27. https://firstthings.com/003-god-and-gender-in-judaism/
  28. https://www.jtsa.edu/torah/the-gender-of-god/
  29. https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=8279
  30. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/reviews/christianity-masculine-feel/
  31. https://www.catholic.com/audio/cot/is-god-a-her-and-dangerous-feminist-theology
  32. https://catholicphilly.com/2016/11/catholic-spirituality/when-referring-to-god-his-and-hers-has-no-meaning/
  33. https://www.opc.org/qa.html?question_id=151
  34. https://seminary.bju.edu/theology-in-3d/gender-questions-part-1/
  35. https://yaqeeninstitute.org/read/post/why-is-allah-referred-to-as-he-in-the-quran
  36. https://www.alhakam.org/opinion-god-is-beyond-any-gender-understanding-limitations-of-language/
  37. https://www.basiraeducation.org/blog/why-do-we-refer-to-god-using-the-masculine-pronoun
  38. https://therevealer.org/the-muslim-women-using-feminine-pronouns-for-allah/
  39. https://www.bahai.org/beliefs/god-his-creation/revelation/unknowable-god
  40. https://bahaiteachings.org/god-and-gender/
  41. https://www.bahai.org/beliefs/universal-peace/articles-resources/the-equality-men-women
  42. https://iep.utm.edu/upanisad/
  43. https://ses-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/SES-Journal-Special-Issue-on-Gender-and-Culture-June-2024-Article-2-1.pdf
  44. https://www.dollsofindia.com/library/ardhanarishvara-symbolism/
  45. https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/ardhanarishvara
  46. https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/God_in_Sikhism
  47. https://www.sikhnet.com/news/status-women-sikh-theology
  48. https://sikhri.org/videos/in-the-sikh-faith-is-god-a-man
  49. https://wlv.openrepository.com/server/api/core/bitstreams/d15045ba-81d5-41b0-aadf-fa3f6cf63e25/content
  50. https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/animism
  51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354204107_Animistic_Relations_in_Nature_Spirits_in_the_Natural_World_and_the_Underlying_Process_and_Worldview_that_Influence_Daily_Life_in_Contemporary_Hmong_Society
  52. https://www.laostudies.org/system/files/subscription/DeSantiago.pdf
  53. https://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/among-spirits-and-dietiesdiverse-shamanisms-nepal
  54. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ac530cff2e6b1f8c1cee361/t/5f4441c1767067360c68ee11/1598308801845/Speaking%2Bto%2Bthe%2BSpirits%2B-%2BThinking%2BComparatively%2Babout%2BWomen%2Bin%2BAsian%2BIndigenous%2BBeliefs%2Bby%2BBarbara%2BWatson%2BAndaya.pdf
  55. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26895269.2025.2575103
  56. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/1/17
  57. https://www.academia.edu/1478932/An_Anthropology_of_Animism_and_Shamanism
  58. https://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/129784/1/9788491682387%2520%28Creative%2520Commons%29.pdf
  59. https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/gender-and-religion-gender-and-ancient-near-eastern-religions
  60. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/amgg/listofdeities/inanaitar/
  61. https://webhelper.brown.edu/joukowsky/courses/riseofstate/files/1994979.pdf
  62. https://etana.org/sites/default/files/coretexts/20625.pdf
  63. https://www.academia.edu/27683315/Gender_and_the_Religion_of_Ancient_Egypt
  64. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/andr.12599
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378033962_On_lustful_deities_and_the_ontological_turn_in_the_archaeology_of_ancient_Egypt
  66. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ojur/vol1/iss1/2/
  67. https://debrareeves.com/the-goddesses-of-canaan/
  68. https://www.academia.edu/17673397/Violence_and_Gender_The_Ugaritic_Violent_Female_Tradition_and_the_Story_of_Deborah_in_Judges_4
  69. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1022&context=aujh
  70. https://kategough.com/2012/05/18/gender-in-greek-mythology/
  71. http://www.veritablehokum.com/comic/the-roman-god-family-tree/
  72. https://www.britishmuseum.org/blog/gods-and-goddesses-greek-and-roman-pantheon
  73. https://www.tparents.org/UNews/Unws0206/dp_1_2.htm
  74. https://www.facebook.com/groups/250464075369584/posts/2353656268383677/
  75. https://www.facebook.com/groups/250464075369584/posts/1438788076537172/
  76. https://journals.uts.edu/volume-x-2009/93-heavenly-mother
  77. https://journals.uts.edu/volume-xxiii-2022/344-ontological-significance-of-god-as-heavenly-parent
  78. https://appliedunificationism.com/2017/07/31/battle-of-the-sexes-in-the-unification-movement/
  79. https://learn.ligonier.org/articles/field-guide-on-false-teaching-new-age-spirituality
  80. https://blavatskytheosophy.com/the-impersonal-divine/
  81. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/edcoll/9789004235977/B9789004235977-s018.pdf
  82. https://theblogofbaphomet.com/2017/07/06/divine-androgyne-part-2-androgyny-as-spiritual-ideal/
  83. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/victorian-literature-and-culture/article/universal-divine-principle-the-spiritual-androgyne-and-the-new-age-in-sarah-grands-the-heavenly-twins/721B985AA4CDF9CE462E266CBC3CC533
  84. https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/the-feminine-principle-an-evolving-idea
  85. https://www.dailytheosophy.net/05-religions/05-0religions-general-2/the-personal-god/
  86. https://polytheist.com/speaking-of-syncretism/2015/06/30/gender-and-syncretism-rarely-the-twain-doth-meet/
  87. https://theconversation.com/a-feminist-theologian-says-our-father-is-not-the-only-way-of-referring-to-god-200141
  88. https://cbmw.org/2023/01/18/should-we-call-god-mother/
  89. https://www.holytroublemakers.com/blog/god-in-feminine-form
  90. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-feminist-critique-of-god-language/
  91. https://scholarspace.library.gwu.edu/downloads/jq085k08p?locale=en
  92. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/themelios/article/feminist-theology-as-critique-and-renewal-of-theology/
  93. https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/81300/what-is-the-biblical-basis-for-rejecting-feminist-christian-theology-which-says
  94. https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/does-the-bible-support-the-feminist-goddess-12316
  95. https://www.gotquestions.org/feminist-theology.html
  96. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/gods-gender-a-traditionalist-view/
  97. https://www.aljumuah.com/why-is-allah-he-rather-than-she-part-1/
  98. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/themelios/article/the-hermeneutics-of-feminism/
  99. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/is-god-is-beyond-gender-swedish-church-challenges-traditional-perception
  100. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/07/church-of-england-to-consider-use-of-gender-neutral-terms-for-god
  101. https://www.npr.org/2023/02/10/1155792333/god-gender-pronouns-church-of-england
  102. https://www.catholic.org.nz/about-us/bishops-statements/gender-inclusive-language/
  103. https://www.ucc.org/what-we-do/justice-local-church-ministries/mesa/ministers/ministers_local-church-leaders/worship_inclusive-language/
  104. https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/the-abolition-of-man
  105. https://sites.comminfo.rutgers.edu/kgreene/wp-content/uploads/sites/28/2011/06/jlsp91thesis.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.