Hubbry Logo
First Council of the LateranFirst Council of the LateranMain
Open search
First Council of the Lateran
Community hub
First Council of the Lateran
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
First Council of the Lateran
First Council of the Lateran
from Wikipedia
First Council of the Lateran
Date1123
Accepted byCatholic Church
Previous council
Fourth Council of Constantinople
Next council
Second Council of the Lateran
Convoked byPope Callixtus II
PresidentPope Callixtus II
Attendance300–1000
TopicsInvestiture Controversy
Documents and statements
Pope's right to invest bishops, condemnation of simony, "Truce of God" (war allowed only Monday–Wednesday, and only in the summer and fall), 22 canons
Chronological list of ecumenical councils

The First Council of the Lateran was the 9th ecumenical council recognised by the Catholic Church. The first ecumenical council to be held in Western Europe and the first since the Great Schism of 1054, it was convoked by Pope Callixtus II in December 1122, immediately after the Concordat of Worms. The council sought to bring an end to the practice of the conferring of ecclesiastical benefices by people who were laymen, free the election of bishops and abbots from secular influence, clarify the separation of spiritual and temporal affairs, re-establish the principle that spiritual authority resides solely in the Church and abolish the claim of the Holy Roman Emperor to influence papal elections.

The council was significant in size: 300 bishops and more than 600 abbots assembled at Rome's Lateran Palace in March 1123, and Callixtus II presided in person. During the council, the decisions of the Concordat of Worms were read and ratified. Various other decisions were promulgated.

Background

[edit]

The First Lateran Council was called by Pope Callixtus II whose reign began on 1 February 1119. It demarcated the end of the Investiture Controversy, which had begun before the time of Pope Gregory VII. The issues had been contentious and had continued with unabated bitterness for almost a century. Guido, as he had been called before his elevation to the papacy,[1] was the son of William I, Count of Burgundy.[1] He was closely connected with nearly all the royal houses of Europe on both sides of his family. He had been named the papal legate to France by Pope Paschal II. During Guido's tenure in this office, Paschal II yielded to the military threats of Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor, and was induced to issue the Privilegium in 1111. By that document, the Church gave up much of what had been claimed and subsequently attained by Pope Gregory VII and his Gregorian Reforms.[1]

The concessions did not bring the expected peace but were received with violent reactionary opposition everywhere. Europe had come to expect an end to the Investiture Controversy and was not willing to return to the old days, when the Holy Roman Emperor named the pope.[1] The greatest resistance was seen in France and was led by Guido, who still held the office of the papal legate.[1] He had been present in the Lateran Synod of 1112 which had proclaimed the Privilegium of 1111. On his return to France, Guido convoked an assembly of the French and Burgundian bishops at Vienne (1112). There, the lay investiture of the clergy (the practice of the king, especially the Holy Roman Emperor, of naming bishops and the Pope) was denounced as heretical.[1] A sentence of excommunication was pronounced against Henry V, who had extorted through violence from the Pope the concessions documented in the Privilegium. The agreement was deemed to be opposed to the interests of the Church.[1] The decrees from the assembly of Vienne which denounced the Privilegium were sent to Paschal II with a request for confirmation. Pope Paschal II confirmed them, which were received in general terms, on 20 October 1112.[1]

Guido was later created cardinal by Pope Paschal II.[2][3][4][5][6] The latter did not seem to have been pleased with Guido's bold and forward attacks upon Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor.[2][3][4][5][6] On the death of Paschal II, 21 January 1118, Gelasius II was elected pope.[2][3][4][5][6] He was immediately seized by the Italian allies of Henry V and on his liberation by the populace, he fled to Gaeta, where he was crowned.[2][3][4][5][6] Henry V demanded the confirmation of the Privilegium and received no satisfactory reply. He then set about naming Burdinus, the archbishop of Braga, as his own pope, who assumed the name Gregory VIII but came to be known as Antipope Gregory VIII. Burdinus had already been deposed and excommunicated because he had crowned Henry V as the Holy Roman Emperor in Rome in 1117.

The excommunication of Burdinus was reiterated in Canon 6 of the document produced by Lateran I. Gelasius II promptly excommunicated the antipope Gregory VIII and Henry V. Gelasius was forced to flee under duress from the army of Henry V and took refuge in the monastery of Cluny, where he died in January 1119.[2][3][4][5][6] On the fourth day after the death of Gelasius II, 1 February 1119, mainly by the exertions of Cardinal Cuno, Guido was elected pope and assumed the title of Callixtus II. He was crowned Pope at Vienne on 9 February 1119.[2][3][4][5][6]

Because of his close connection with the great royal families of Germany, France, England and Denmark, Callixtus II's papacy was received with much anticipation and celebration throughout Europe. There was a real hope throughout the Continent that the Investiture Controversy might be settled once and for all.[2][3][4][5][6] In the interest of conciliation, even the papal embassy was received by Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor, at Strasburg. However, it soon became clear that Henry was not willing to concede his presumed and ancient right to name the pope and the bishops within his kingdom. Perhaps to demonstrate conciliation or because of political necessity, Henry withdrew his support for Antipope Gregory VIII.

It was agreed that Henry and Pope Callixtus II would meet at Mousson.[2][3][4][5][6] On 8 June 1119, Callixtus II held a synod at Toulouse to proclaim the disciplinary reforms he had worked to attain in the French Church. In October, 1119, he opened the council at Reims. Louis VI of France and most of the barons of France attended this council, along with more than 400 bishops and abbots.[2][3][4][5][6] The Pope was also to meet with Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor at Mousson. However, Henry showed up with an army of 30,000 men. Callixtus II left Reims for Mousson, but upon learning of the warlike stance of Henry quickly retreated to Reims. There, the Church dealt with issues of simony and concubinage of the clergy.

It was clear by now that Henry was in no mood to reconcile, and a compromise with him was not to be had. The conclave at Reims considered the situation and determined, as an entire Church, to formally excommunicate both Henry V and the antipope Gregory VIII. This occurred on October 30, 1119. While at Reims, Callixtus II tried to effect a settlement with Henry I of England and his brother Robert, which also met with failure.

Callixtus II was determined to enter Rome, which was occupied by the German forces and Antipope Gregory VIII. There was an uprising by the population, which forced Gregory to flee the city. After much political and military intrigue in Rome and the southern Italian states, Gregory was formally deposed and Callixtus II was generally recognised as the legitimate Pope in 1121. Having become the established power in Italy, Callixtus II now returned the conflict with Henry V over the issue of lay investiture. Henry had been the recipient of great pressure from many of his barons in Germany over his conflict with the pope. Some had entered into open rebellion. Henry was forced by circumstances to seek a peace with Callixtus. Initial negotiations were conducted in October 1121 at Würzburg. Lambert, the Cardinal of Ostia, was dispatched to convoke a synod at Worms, which began on 8 September 1122. By 23 September, the Concordat of Worms, also called the Pactum Calixtinum, was concluded. On his side, the emperor gave up his claim to investiture with ring and crosier and granted the freedom of election to the episcopal sees.

The elections of bishops could be witnessed by the emperor or his representatives. Callixtus II obtained the right to name bishops throughout Germany, but still did not have that power in much of Burgundy and Italy.[7][8][9][10][11][12]

The First Lateran Council was convoked to confirm the Concordat of Worms. The council was most representative with nearly three hundred bishops and six hundred abbots from every part of Catholic Europe being present. It convened on 18 March 1123. Decrees were also passed directed against simony, concubinage among the clergy, church robbers, and forgers of Church documents; the council also reaffirmed indulgences for Crusaders.[2][3][4][5][6] The Council ruled that the crusades to the Holy Land and the Reconquista of Spain were of equal standing.[13]

In the remaining few years of his life, Callixtus II attempted to secure the status of the Church as it had existed at the end of the reign of Pope Gregory VII. He reorganized and reformed the churches around Rome, canonized Conrad of Constance, condemned the teaching of Peter de Bruis, confirmed the Bishop Thurston of York against the wishes of Henry I of England and affirmed the freedom of York from the see of Canterbury. Callixtus II died on December 13, 1124, and was succeeded by Pope Honorius II.

Callixtus II was a strong figure who brought a relative, if tentative, peace between Germany and the Church. The Concordat of Worms and the First Lateran Council changed forever the belief in the divine right of kings to name the pope and bishops and reshaped the nature of church and state forever.[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]

Text of the council

[edit]
Henry IV ceding his rule of the Holy Roman Empire to his son, Henry V.

Texts of the First Lateran Council may vary in both wording and numbering of the canons depending on source. In this translation,[22] the precepts of the Concordat of Worms are codified in Canons 2, 4 and 10.

CANON I

Summary. Ordinations and promotions made for pecuniary considerations are devoid of every dignity.

Text. Following the example of the holy fathers and recognizing the obligation of our office, we absolutely forbid in virtue of the authority of the Apostolic See that anyone be ordained or promoted for money in the Church of God. Has anyone thus secured ordination or promotion in the Church, the rank acquired shall be devoid of every dignity.

CANON 2

Summary. Only a priest may be made provost, archpriest, and dean; only a deacon may be archdeacon.

Text. No one except a priest shall be promoted to the dignity of provost, archpriest, or dean; and no one shall be made archdeacon unless he is a deacon.

CANON 3

Summary. Priests, deacons, and subdeacons are forbidden to live with women other than such as were permitted by the Nicene Council.

Text. We absolutely forbid priests, deacons, and subdeacons to associate with concubines and women, or to live with women other than such as the Nicene Council (canon 3) for reasons of necessity permitted, namely, the mother, sister, or aunt, or any such person concerning whom no suspicion could arise.

CANON 4

Summary. Lay persons, no matter how pious they may be, have no authority to dispose of anything that belongs to the Church.

Text. In accordance with the decision of Pope Stephen, we declare that lay persons, no matter how devout they may be, have no authority to dispose of anything belonging to the Church, but according to the Apostolic canon the supervision of all ecclesiastical affairs belongs to the bishop, who shall administer them conformably to the will of God. If therefore any prince or other layman shall arrogate to himself the right of disposition, control, or ownership of ecclesiastical goods or properties, let him be judged guilty of sacrilege.

CANON 5

Summary. Marriages between blood-relatives are forbidden.

Text. We forbid marriages between blood-relatives because they are forbidden by the divine and secular laws. Those who contract such alliances, as also their offspring, the divine laws not only ostracize but declare accursed, while the civil laws brand them as infamous and deprive them of hereditary rights. We, therefore, following the example of our fathers, declare and stigmatize them as infamous.

CANON 6

Summary. Ordinations by Burdinus and the bishops consecrated by him are invalid.

Text. The ordinations made by the heresiarch Burdinus after his condemnation by the Roman Church, as also those made by the bishops consecrated by him after that point of time, we declare to be invalid.

CANON 7

Summary. No one is permitted to arrogate to himself the episcopal authority in matters pertaining to the cura animarum and the bestowal of benefices.

Text. No archdeacon, archpriest, provost, or dean shall bestow on another the care of souls or the prebends of a church without the decision or consent of the bishop; indeed, as the sacred canons point out, the care of souls and the disposition of ecclesiastical property are vested in the authority of the bishop. If anyone shall dare act contrary to this and arrogate to himself the power belonging to the bishop, let him be expelled from the Church.

CANON 8

Summary. Military persons are forbidden under penalty of anathema to invade or forcibly hold the city of Benevento.

Text. Desiring with the grace of God to protect the recognized possessions of the Holy Roman Church, we forbid under pain of anathema any military person to invade or forcibly hold Benevento, the city of St. Peter. If anyone act contrary to this, let him be anathematized.

CANON 9

Summary. Those excommunicated by one bishop, may not be restored by others.

Text. We absolutely forbid that those who have been excommunicated by their own bishops be received into the communion of the Church by other bishops, abbots, and clerics.

Canons 2, 4 and 10 ended the practice of the Holy Roman Emperor naming bishops and the pope.

CANON 10

Summary. A bishop consecrated after an uncanonical election shall be deposed.

Text. No one shall be consecrated bishop who has not been canonically elected. If anyone dare do this, both the consecrator and the one consecrated shall be deposed without hope of reinstatement.

CANON 11

Summary. To those who give aid to the Christians in the Orient is granted the remission of sins, and their families and possessions are taken under the protection of the Roman Church.

Text. For effectively crushing the tyranny of the infidels, we grant to those who go to Jerusalem and also to those who give aid toward the defense of the Christians, the remission of their sins and we take under the protection of St. Peter and the Roman Church their homes, their families, and all their belongings, as was already ordained by Pope Urban II. Whoever, therefore, shall dare molest or seize these during the absence of their owners, shall incur excommunication. Those, however, who with a view of going to Jerusalem or to Spain (that is, against the Moors) are known to have attached the cross to their garments and afterward removed it, we command in virtue of our Apostolic authority to replace it and begin the journey within a year from the coming Easter. Otherwise we shall excommunicate them and interdict within their territory all divine service except the baptism of infants and the administration of the last rites to the dying.

CANON 12

Summary. The property of the porticani dying without heirs is not to be disposed of in a manner contrary to the wish of the one deceased.

Text. With the advice of our brethren and of the entire Curia, as well as with the will and consent of the prefect, we decree the abolition of that evil custom which has hitherto prevailed among the porticani, namely, of disposing, contrary to the wish of the one deceased, of the property of porticani dying without heirs; with this understanding, however, that in future the porticani remain faithful to the Roman Church, to us and to our successors.

CANON 13

Summary. If anyone violates the truce of God and after the third admonition does not make satisfaction, he shall be anathematized.

Text. If anyone shall violate the truce of God he shall be admonished three times by the bishop to make satisfaction. If he disregards the third admonition the bishop, either with the advice of the metropolitan or with that of two or one of the neighboring bishops, shall pronounce the sentence of anathema against the violator and in writing denounce him to all the bishops.

CANON 14

Summary. Laymen are absolutely forbidden to remove offerings from the altars of Roman churches.

Text. Following the canons of the holy fathers, we absolutely and under penalty of anathema forbid laymen to remove the offerings from the altars of the churches of St. Peter, of The Savior (Lateran Basilica), of St. Mary Rotund, in a word, from the altars of any of the churches or from the crosses. By our Apostolic authority we forbid also the fortifying of churches and their conversion to profane uses.

CANON 15

Summary. Counterfeiters of money shall be excommunicated.

Text. Whoever manufactures or knowingly expends counterfeit money, shall be cut off from the communion of the faithful (excommunicated) as one accursed, as an oppressor of the poor and a disturber of the city.

CANON 16

Summary. Robbers of pilgrims and of merchants shall be excommunicated.

Text. If anyone shall dare attack pilgrims going to Rome to visit the shrines of the Apostles and the oratories of other saints and rob them of the things they have with them, or exact from merchants new imposts and tolls, let him be excommunicated till he has made satisfaction.

CANON 17

Summary. Abbots and monks may not have the cura animarum.

Text. We forbid abbots and monks to impose public penances, to visit the sick, to administer extreme unction, and to sing public masses. The chrism, holy oil, consecration of altars, and ordination of clerics they shall obtain from the bishops in whose dioceses they reside.

CANON 18

Summary. The appointment of priests to churches belongs to the bishops, and without their consent they may not receive tithes and churches from laymen.

Text. Priests shall be appointed to parochial churches by the bishops, to whom they shall be responsible for the care of souls and other matters pertaining to them. They are not permitted to receive tithes and churches from laics without the will and consent of the bishops. If they act otherwise, let them be subject to the canonical penalties.

CANON 19

Summary. Taxes paid to bishops by monks since Gregory VII must be continued. Monks may not by prescription acquire the possessions of churches and of bishops.

Text. The tax (servitium) which monasteries and their churches have rendered to the bishops since the time of Gregory VII, shall be continued. We absolutely forbid abbots and monks to acquire by prescription after thirty years the possessions of churches and of shops.

CANON 20

Summary. Churches and their possessions, as well as the person and things connected with them, shall remain safe and unmolested.

Text. Having in mind the example of our fathers and discharging the duty of our pastoral office, we decree that churches and their possessions, as well as the persons connected with them, namely, clerics and monks and their servants (conversi), also the laborers and the things they use, shall remain safe and unmolested. If anyone shall dare act contrary to this and, recognizing his crime, does not within the space of thirty days make proper amends, let him be cut off from the Church and anathematized.

CANON 21

Summary. Clerics in major orders may not marry, and marriages already contracted must be dissolved.

Text. We absolutely forbid priests, deacons, subdeacons, and monks to have concubines or to contract marriage. We decree in accordance with the definitions of the sacred canons, that marriages already contracted by such persons must be dissolved, and that the persons be condemned to do penance.

CANON 22

Summary. The alienation of possessions of the exarchate of Ravenna is condemned, and the Ordinaries made by the intruders are invalid.

Text. The alienation that has been made especially by Otto, Guido, Jerome, and perhaps by Philip of possessions of the exarchate of Ravenna, we condemn. In a general way we declare invalid the alienations in whatever manner made by bishops and abbots whether intruded or canonically elected, and also the ordinations conferred by them whether with the consent of the clergy of the Church or simoniacally. We also absolutely forbid any cleric in any way to alienate his prebend or any ecclesiastical benefice. If he has presumed to do this in the past or shall presume to do so in the future, his action shall be null and he shall be subject to the canonical penalties.

Results of the council

[edit]

Lateran I was the first of four Lateran Councils between the years 1123–1215. The first was not very original in its concept, nor one called to meet a pressing theological question. For the most part, Pope Callixtus II summoned the council to ratify the various meetings and concords which had been occurring in and around Rome for several years. The most pressing issue was that of the Investiture Controversy which had consumed nearly a century of contention and open warfare. At the heart of the question was the ancient right of the Holy Roman Emperor to name the pope as well as bishops and priests. These would be invested with some secular symbol such as a sword or scepter and the spiritual authority represented by a ring, miter and crosier. To an illiterate population, it appeared the bishop or abbot was now the king's inferior and owed his position to the king. This issue came to the fore in the first part of the eleventh century when Rome and the pope sought autonomy from the Holy Roman Emperor. It had been a central issue in the reign of Pope Gregory VII and his battles with Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor.[23] The issue was never settled. Years of teaching by Roman trained priests and bishops in Germany had led to an educated generation which rejected the idea of divine right of kings.

Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor died leaving his kingdom in a much weakened condition.

The Third Lateran Council and the Fourth Lateran Council are generally considered to be of much greater significance than Lateran I. However, Lateran I marked the first time a general and large Council had been held in the West. All previous Councils had been in the East and dominated by Greek theologians and philosophers.[24] In the struggle between Stephen of England and Matilda, the daughter of Henry I of England, the English Church slipped away from the close control the Normans had exercised. Stephen was forced to make many concessions to the Church to gain some element of political control. Historians have largely considered his rule to be a disaster, calling it The Anarchy.[25]

Because of political necessity, the Holy Roman Emperors were restrained from directly naming bishops in the kingdom. In practicality, the process continued to a certain extent. The issue of separation of church and state was simply recast in a different direction. Of all the Gregorian Reforms which were embodied by Lateran I, celibacy of the clergy was the most successful. Simony was curtailed. As time progressed, secular interference into the politics of the Church was seen to continue, albeit in different ways from that of the Investiture Controversy.

It has been argued by some historians that the Concordat of Worms and its reiteration by Lateran I were little more than face saving measures by the Church. Henry V, Holy Roman Emperor continued to name bishops within his kingdom. His control over the papacy was definitely abated.[26] At the time, the Concordat of Worms was proclaimed as a great victory for Henry V inside the Holy Roman Empire. It did serve to constrain much of the most recent warfare in and outside the empire. In the end, Henry V died the monarch of a much diminished kingdom.[27]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The First Council of the Lateran was the ninth recognized by the , convened by and held from 18 March to 6 April 1123 in the in . It assembled approximately 300 bishops and over 500 other prelates, marking one of the largest gatherings of churchmen up to that time, primarily to ratify the and address longstanding abuses in clerical discipline. The council's central achievement was the confirmation of the , negotiated in 1122 between and Emperor Henry V, which resolved the by prohibiting lay of bishops with ring and crosier—symbols of spiritual authority—while permitting secular rulers to receive feudal homage from prelates for temporal possessions following free canonical elections. This compromise curtailed imperial interference in ecclesiastical appointments, reinforcing in spiritual matters and curbing the divine-right claims of monarchs over the church hierarchy. In addition to endorsing the concordat, the council issued around 22 canons that reiterated and expanded prior reforms, condemning —the buying or selling of ecclesiastical offices—and mandating severe penalties for clerical incontinence, including deposition for married or concubinary priests. Other decrees required annual and communion for the faithful, prohibited clerics from bearing arms or engaging in , and barred them from secular administrative roles to prevent corruption. These measures aimed to restore moral rigor within the and , building on Gregorian reforms while adapting to the post-controversy ecclesiastical landscape. The council's outcomes solidified the church's independence from secular control, fostering a period of papal ascendancy in medieval , though enforcement of the canons varied regionally due to entrenched local customs and noble influences. Its decrees on , later universalized, underscored the tension between ideals of clerical purity and practical realities of inheritance and among the priesthood.

Historical Context

The Investiture Controversy

The originated in the 1070s as a power struggle between the papacy and secular rulers over the appointment of high-ranking church officials, particularly bishops who held both spiritual and temporal authority. (r. 1073–1085) articulated the papal position in the of 1075, a series of 27 statements asserting the Roman Church's exclusive right to invest clergy with spiritual symbols like the ring and staff, prohibiting lay interference in ecclesiastical elections and depositions. This document reflected Gregory's reform agenda to curb and while centralizing papal control, challenging longstanding imperial traditions where Holy Roman Emperors granted to secure loyal vassals controlling vast church lands. The conflict escalated under King Henry IV of (r. 1056–1105), who viewed papal claims as encroachments on . In response to Gregory's decrees, Henry convened a at Worms in January 1076, declaring the pope deposed and prompting Gregory's excommunication of the king on February 14, 1076, which unleashed civil unrest in by absolving subjects from allegiance. Temporary reconciliation occurred at in January 1077, where Henry performed public penance, but hostilities resumed; Henry invaded , captured in June 1084, and enthroned , forcing Gregory to flee under Norman protection, where he died in exile in 1085. Henry's son, Henry V (r. 1099–1125), perpetuated the strife, capturing in 1111 and coercing the Privilegium conceding imperial rights, though Paschal later repudiated it under pressure from reformers. Resolution came through negotiations culminating in the , signed on September 23, 1122, between (r. 1119–1124) and Henry V. The mandated free canonical elections for bishops in the emperor's presence, followed by spiritual via ring and staff by church authorities, with subsequent lay using the scepter for temporal goods only after the oath of —effectively bifurcating authority while allowing imperial oversight in German territories and variations in and . This compromise addressed core grievances by affirming in spiritual matters and imperial influence in secular ones, though tensions over interpretation persisted, setting the stage for further papal assertions of independence.

Ecclesiastical Reforms and Abuses

Simony, the purchase or sale of ecclesiastical offices or spiritual privileges, had become endemic in the Western Church by the early , often facilitated by lay rulers who treated bishoprics and abbacies as hereditary fiefs to be auctioned or granted for political loyalty rather than spiritual merit. This practice eroded the hierarchical integrity of the Church, as unqualified individuals ascended through , leading to mismanagement of dioceses and dilution of . Reformers like decried as a "poison" corrupting the priesthood's divine calling, documenting cases where bishops paid vast sums—equivalent to thousands of gold solidi—for appointments, drawing from empirical observations in Italian sees during the . Such abuses were causally linked to the broader entanglement of secular and sacred powers, prioritizing fiscal gain over doctrinal fidelity and sacramental purity. Clerical incontinence, encompassing , , and other violations of vows, further undermined the Church's moral authority, with priests openly maintaining households that blurred clerical and familial roles, often resulting in hereditary clerical dynasties and the inheritance of church revenues by lay kin. Peter Damian's Liber Gomorrhianus (c. 1051) provided stark evidence of this crisis, cataloging widespread unchastity among Italian clergy, including bishops who tolerated or participated in sexual irregularities, arguing that such failings invalidated the sacraments administered by impure hands and provoked divine judgment. Empirical reports from reform synods, such as those under (1073–1085), confirmed the scale, with estimates suggesting over half of lower clergy in regions like lived in open unions, fostering and diverting tithes to secular ends. Alienation of church properties to laymen exacerbated these internal corruptions, as bishops and abbots, often indebted from simoniacal purchases, mortgaged or sold lands—comprising vast estates yielding annual incomes in the hundreds of talents—to nobles, thereby diminishing resources for charitable works and liturgical support. Concurrently, monastic exemptions from episcopal oversight, proliferating since the through papal privileges, encroached on bishops' jurisdictional rights, allowing abbeys like to amass independent territories and challenge diocesan discipline, which reformers viewed as fragmenting unity and enabling unchecked abuses within monastic houses. These practices collectively threatened the Church's foundational principle of undivided spiritual allegiance, as lay encroachments and internal laxity prioritized temporal security over evangelical and hierarchical order.

Papal Election and Political Landscape

Guy of Burgundy, born around 1065 as the son of Count William I of and a member of Europe's high , served as Archbishop of Vienne from 1088 onward, aligning himself with the movement opposed to , clerical incontinence, and lay interference in episcopal elections. Following the death of on January 28, 1119, at , nine cardinals present there elected Guy as his successor on February 2, 1119, bypassing the majority of the in due to the pope's amid imperial pressures; he took the name Callixtus II and was crowned on February 9, 1119, at Vienne. This selection underscored Callixtus's reform credentials, as he promptly convened a synod at Reims later that year to reiterate bans on lay investiture and reinforce papal oversight of ecclesiastical appointments. The election unfolded during the protracted schism of the , with Henry V backing antipope Gregory VIII (Maurice Bourdin) since 1118, which had forced Gelasius into flight and perpetuated dual papal claims. Callixtus II, drawing on his familial ties to French and imperial nobility, consolidated support in and , entering on June 3, 1120, after expelling imperial garrisons with local aid. Culminating negotiations at Worms yielded the on September 23, 1122, whereby Henry V conceded canonical election and spiritual investiture to the Church alone, retaining only secular investiture rights in Germany (via oath of ) but none in or ; this accord dismantled the antipope's legitimacy and neutralized acute threats to papal autonomy. This resolution stabilized the papacy's position, enabling Callixtus to convoke a general without fear of imperial veto or invasion, as Henry V's resources waned from prior conflicts and oaths of . In , enduring papal-Norman pacts, rooted in the 1059 treaty with and extended under , furnished military buffers in the south against potential northern incursions, preserving Roman access and territorial integrity. Across , residual crusading momentum from the First Crusade's 1099 triumphs—manifest in ongoing reinforcements to Levantine principalities and papal privileges for pilgrims—reinforced the Holy See's moral authority to summon prelates continent-wide, framing the as a unifying endeavor amid Christendom's expansionist ethos.

Convocation and Participants

Papal Summons and Preparation

Pope Callixtus II issued a letter of convocation on 25 June 1122 to Bishop Baldric of Dol, summoning a general Roman council to address various important matters of the Church, including the resolution of ongoing disputes and reforms. This initial summons preceded the Concordat of Worms, signed on 23 September 1122, which resolved the Investiture Controversy by limiting imperial influence over ecclesiastical appointments. The agreement's ratification became a central purpose of the gathering, prompting further papal communications to align ecclesiastical leaders with its implementation. Preparatory efforts involved dispatching summons to bishops throughout , emphasizing the council's role in confirming the and enacting disciplinary reforms against abuses such as and clerical incontinence. These diplomatic overtures aimed to secure broad participation from the , distinguishing the assembly as the first general council convened in the West since the Great Schism of 1054, though its lack of Eastern delegates led some to question full ecumenicity despite its designation as "general" in Callixtus's decrees. The sessions were set for the Lateran Basilica, opening on 18 March 1123 and concluding before 6 April.

Attendance and Composition

The First Council of the Lateran, convened in from March 18 to March 27, 1123, drew approximately 300 bishops alongside more than 600 abbots and additional priests and deacons, forming a substantial assembly of Western leaders. These participants hailed predominantly from regions across , with strong representation from —owing to the council's location in the papal city—followed by prelates from and the German territories of the . The absence of any notable imperial delegation from Emperor Henry V underscored the post-Concordat of Worms resolution of disputes, shifting focus to internal church governance rather than direct secular negotiation. Eastern participation was negligible, with no documented bishops or delegates from the attending, including the Patriarch of , John IX Glykys, whose non-presence highlighted the council's exclusively Latin orientation amid ongoing since 1054. This composition emphasized a consolidation of papal within the Western , prioritizing consensus among Latin rite hierarchs over broader Christendom-wide involvement. While papal legates occasionally relayed positions from remote sees, the gathering's demographic reflected Rome's strategic emphasis on proximate, compliant Western clergy to enact reforms efficiently.

Proceedings

Opening and Sessions

The First Council of the Lateran convened on 18 March 1123 in the in , with presiding over the assembly. This venue, as the pope's official residence and a symbol of ecclesiastical primacy, highlighted the restoration of papal control in the city after decades of instability stemming from the and prior schisms. The proceedings adhered to established Roman synodal practices, wherein bishops and abbots gathered under papal leadership to deliberate collectively, with affirmations typically expressed through rather than formal . The opening ritual followed customary liturgical norms for such gatherings, commencing with a to invoke divine guidance, after which the addressed the attendees on the imperatives of ecclesiastical unity and the rectification of longstanding abuses within the Church. Callixtus II emphasized reconciliation following the recent , framing the council as a pivotal moment for consolidating reforms and healing divisions between secular and spiritual powers. This initial session set a tone of authoritative papal direction, distinguishing the event as the first general council held in the West with the in personal attendance. Subsequent sessions extended over at least two principal meetings, with the council concluding before 6 April 1123, likely on or around 27 March. Logistical flow prioritized efficiency, drawing on precedents from earlier local synods, where discussions progressed from introductory addresses to preparatory reviews of agendas before advancing to substantive matters. The structure ensured broad representation while maintaining hierarchical oversight, as evidenced by the pope's central role in guiding the agenda and endorsing outcomes.

Deliberations on Key Issues

The primary deliberations at the First Lateran Council affirmed the , negotiated on September 23, 1122, between and Emperor Henry V, to restrict lay involvement in the election and investiture of bishops and abbots. Discussions emphasized preventing imperial interference in spiritual authority, stipulating free elections for Italian and Burgundian sees, while allowing elections in the emperor's presence for German territories without the transfer of ring or crosier—symbols of . This settlement, building on the 1111 Wormser Vertrag's failures, prioritized church independence in spiritual matters, with delegates debating its implications for ongoing church-state tensions. Internal disciplinary issues dominated remaining sessions, with focused debates on combating simony through prohibitions against purchasing ordinations or promotions, coupled with demands for verifiable accountability to uproot entrenched practices. Clerical continence enforcement was another key topic, as participants addressed widespread and marriages among priests, deacons, and subdeacons, advocating penalties and separation from partners to override regional customs that had tolerated such unions. These discussions privileged documented compliance over leniency, reflecting reformist pressures from prior synods like (1119). Contention remained limited across the two main sessions from March 18 to 27, 1123, due to pre-council diplomatic alignments, though vocal opposition emerged on specifics like German episcopal elections occurring under imperial oversight, as noted by attendee Gerhoh of Reichersberg. Complex jurisdictional disputes, such as those over between and , were delegated to sub-commissions of cardinals and bishops to expedite resolutions without prolonging plenary debates. Gerhoh also proposed broader clerical reforms, including communal living for canons, but these faced rejection amid the council's narrower focus on and moral discipline.

Decrees and Canons

Ratification of the Concordat of Worms

The First Lateran Council ratified the on 18 March 1123, confirming the agreement of 23 September 1122 between and Emperor Henry V that ended the by separating spiritual investiture—conferral of ecclesiastical office via ring and staff—from temporal investiture of feudal rights via scepter. The concordat mandated free canonical elections without : in , conducted in the emperor's presence with his if needed; in and , without imperial intervention, followed by investiture of regalia only after consecration and homage. This ratification asserted church primacy in spiritual matters, prohibiting lay conferral of benefices or use of sacramental symbols, while conceding secular oversight limited to temporal fiefs. Reinforcing canons, including Canon 8, declared laypersons incompetent to dispose of business, deeming such acts sacrilegious and subjecting violators to . The council's endorsement, despite some opposition, codified these terms ecumenically, empirically easing schisms through subsequent papal-imperial accords and reduced disputes over appointments until Henry V's death in 1125.

Disciplinary Measures Against Simony and Clerical Abuses

The First Lateran Council issued decrees condemning , the practice of purchasing offices or ordinations, as a grave corruption that undermined the spiritual integrity of the Church. Canon 1 explicitly prohibited any promotion to dignity, office, or for money, stipulating that violators forfeit their positions and incur divine condemnation, while affirming that simoniacal ordinations were null and void. This measure extended prior Gregorian reforms by enforcing deposition for offenders and invalidating both past and future alienations of church property through simony, aiming to sever the causal chain linking financial transactions to appointments, which had fostered dependency on secular powers and moral laxity. Complementing anti-simony efforts, the council targeted clerical incontinence as a parallel abuse eroding priestly authority and sacramental efficacy. Canons 7 and 21 banned priests, deacons, subdeacons, and monks from cohabiting with wives or concubines, declaring such unions invalid and mandating separation under penalty of and deprivation of office until compliance. These provisions reinforced the obligation of continence post-, rooted in the doctrinal principle that unchaste profane the Eucharist and sacraments, as impure hands could not worthily handle —a realist assessment prioritizing purity over accommodations for human frailty. Offenders in higher orders, including those contracting after , faced degradation to lay status if unrepentant, underscoring the council's intent to restore clerical discipline by linking personal moral failings directly to institutional decay.

Provisions on Monasticism and Church Property

The First Lateran Council issued several canons aimed at reinforcing monastic discipline and safeguarding ecclesiastical property from unauthorized claims or transfers. Canon 16 mandated that monks remain subject to their diocesan bishops, requiring obedience in all matters while prohibiting them from performing public masses, visiting the sick, administering anointings, or hearing confessions outside their monastic calling. This restriction sought to prevent monks from encroaching on parochial functions, thereby promoting stricter adherence to contemplative and communal religious observance as essential to spiritual efficacy. Priests serving in monastic churches were required to be ordained by the local bishop and accountable to him for pastoral duties, underscoring episcopal oversight to maintain order without allowing monastic autonomy to devolve into independence from diocesan authority. To curb episcopal overreach into monastic affairs, Canon 19 upheld the traditional servitium services rendered by monasteries to bishops and churches—fixed at levels established under in 1078, while barring abbots and monks from claiming episcopal or parochial possessions through long-term prescription (thirty years' possession). This provision protected monastic independence by limiting bishops' financial exactions to historical precedents, avoiding escalations that could undermine religious houses' viability amid feudal pressures. Regarding church property, Canon 20 extended papal protection to all ecclesiastical assets, including those of monasteries, declaring clerics, , lay brothers, pilgrims, and their offerings inviolable under threat of and ecclesiastical banishment for violators who failed to make amends within thirty days. Complementing this, Canon 22 explicitly forbade the alienation of church lands or goods to laypersons without requisite consent, such as from bishops or chapters, to preserve sacred holdings from feudal encroachments and secular dilutions. These measures collectively reinforced the inalienability of ecclesiastical patrimony, prioritizing its perpetual dedication to divine worship over temporal .

Outcomes and Implementation

Immediate Canonical Effects

The canons promulgated by the First Lateran Council on 18 March 1123 were disseminated shortly thereafter via papal authority under , who explicitly described the assembly as a "general" in his letters and decrees, thereby affirming their binding force across the . This dissemination facilitated their integration into emerging compilations, with nine full canons (1, 3–4, 6, 9, 12, 14, 16B, 19–22B) and portions of two others (8 and 18B) incorporated into Gratian's Decretum by circa 1140, evidencing their swift recognition as authoritative precedents despite the collection's slightly later compilation date. The disciplinary canons, particularly those targeting (Canon 1, imposing automatic on buyers and sellers of offices), prompted immediate enforcement actions against clerical abuses in the ensuing years. In and , papal legates and local synods applied these provisions to investigate and penalize offenders, resulting in depositions of bishops and priests convicted of simoniacal practices or related , as part of the broader Gregorian reform's momentum codified at the council. These measures aimed to purify the episcopate and priesthood, with excommunications serving as a primary tool to deter persistence in forbidden transactions. Canons 3 and 4 further entrenched papal appellate jurisdiction by mandating strictly elections for bishops and prohibiting consecrations of irregularly elected candidates, under penalty of deposition for both consecrator and consecratee; this channeled disputed elections and ordinations to Roman , enhancing the pope's oversight in resolving conflicts over appointments in the short term. Such provisions immediately curtailed local irregularities, fostering greater uniformity in church governance while subordinating metropolitan and provincial authorities to ultimate papal review.

Enforcement Challenges and Secular Responses

In the , enforcement of the , ratified at the council on March 18, 1123, faced resistance from bishops embedded in imperial administrative structures, who delayed restoration of church properties seized during the investiture struggle and clung to traditional lay influences over elections. responded by dispatching legates, such as Cardinal John of Crema, to in 1124–1125 to compel compliance, though full adherence remained uneven until Henry V's death on May 23, 1125, shifted dynamics under successor Lothair III. Secular rulers outside the empire exhibited more acquiescence; , having secured a favorable settlement with Anselm in 1107 that mirrored papal demands on , viewed the council's decrees neutrally or supportively, as they reinforced anti-imperial precedents without disrupting his realm's ecclesiastical order. Similar alignment occurred in under Louis VI, who enforced anti-simony provisions locally without overt conflict. Disciplinary canons against (Canon 1) and clerical incontinence (Canons 3–7) yielded partial results: reformist sees, such as those influenced by Cluniac or Cistercian networks, documented fewer simoniacal ordinations by the 1130s, but incontinence persisted regionally, particularly in rural German and Italian dioceses where episcopal oversight was weak, necessitating repeated condemnations at subsequent synods. This variability underscored the limits of conciliar authority absent robust secular cooperation and local enforcement mechanisms.

Significance and Legacy

Strengthening Papal Authority

The First Lateran Council, convened by from December 1122 to March 1123, fortified papal authority through its ratification of the on March 27, 1123, which resolved the by reserving spiritual investiture—symbolized by ring and crosier—for ecclesiastical officials under papal oversight, while allowing secular rulers limited influence over temporal aspects in certain regions. This decree, enshrined in Canon 1, explicitly banned lay investiture of clerics, thereby curtailing imperial interference in bishoprics and abbacies that had previously engendered rival claimants and antipopes, as seen in the schisms under Emperors Henry IV and V. By mandating free canonical elections subject to papal and in disputed cases, the council shifted contested appointments from bilateral emperor-pope negotiations to a centralized Roman process, empirically evidenced by the decline in investiture-related antipapal factions immediately following the assembly, where approximately 300 bishops and 500 abbots endorsed the reforms. Additional canons further entrenched this supremacy by imposing uniform disciplinary norms, including Canon 2's invalidation of simoniacal ordinations and Canon 3's prohibition of clerical or , with penalties enforced via papal legates, thus overriding divergent local practices and binding the episcopate to Roman directives for consistent governance. These measures cultivated cohesion, linking papal centralization to the church's capacity to withstand fragmentation from regional autonomies or lay encroachments.

Impact on Church-State Relations

The First Lateran Council's ratification of the in 1123 marked a pivotal resolution to the , prohibiting lay rulers from conferring spiritual investiture upon bishops through the symbols of ring and crosier, while permitting temporal investiture via scepter in exchange for homage. This separation of spiritual and secular authority established a legal framework that curtailed direct imperial control over ecclesiastical elections, affirming the Church's autonomy in appointing its spiritual leaders. By endorsing these terms, the council set a for papal diplomacy securing concessions from secular powers, as evidenced by Emperor Henry V's renunciation of spiritual rights across the and parts of and . In , elections required imperial oversight but free processes, reducing instances of outright lay appointment; historical records indicate a decline in contested episcopal sees immediately following , with fewer excommunications tied to disputes in the subsequent decade compared to the prior Gregorian era. This shift diminished lay over church offices, prioritizing independence in doctrinal and sacramental matters over unfettered temporal alliances. While the offered mutual accommodations—preserving some imperial influence in temporal lands—it fundamentally favored spiritual , enabling the papacy to assert greater leverage against future encroachments without compromising core religious functions. Enforcement varied regionally, yet the council's decrees reinforced a normative boundary that weakened the Holy Roman Empire's traditional dominance in church governance, fostering a model of negotiated coexistence rather than subordination.

Influence on Later Ecclesiastical Developments

The canons promulgated at the First Council of the Lateran in 1123, particularly those addressing simony, clerical incontinence, and monastic discipline, were systematically incorporated into early medieval canon law compilations, including Gratian's Decretum circa 1140, which served as the foundational text for the Corpus Juris Canonici. This inclusion preserved the council's prohibitions as enduring legal precedents, mandating the invalidation of simoniacal ordinations and the deposition of married clergy, thereby embedding reformist principles into the evolving structure of ecclesiastical jurisprudence. Subsequent synods, such as the Second Lateran Council of 1139, explicitly built upon these foundations by reiterating and expanding bans on and lay , treating the 1123 decrees as authoritative models for ongoing discipline. The First Lateran's framework for convoking ecumenical assemblies to enforce uniformity likewise influenced later gatherings, providing a template for centralized papal oversight in canon-making that prioritized scriptural and patristic over localized customs or tolerated irregularities. In the broader 12th-century renewal of ecclesiastical governance, the council's legacy manifested in sustained campaigns against , as regional synods invoked its canons to purge abuses and restore clerical standards, fostering a of rigorous verification in matters of and office that resisted normalization of deviations like the Nicolaitan practices it condemned. This approach prefigured the anti-heretical measures of councils like the Third in 1179, where evidentiary standards for echoed the 1123 emphasis on tangible over rhetorical accommodation.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.