Hubbry Logo
Names of the Romani peopleNames of the Romani peopleMain
Open search
Names of the Romani people
Community hub
Names of the Romani people
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Names of the Romani people
Names of the Romani people
Names of the Romani people
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Part of a series on
Romani people
Flag of the Romani people
Romani people by sub-group
Romani diaspora by country

The Romani people are known by a variety of names, mostly as Gypsies, Roma, Romanies, Tsinganoi, Bohémiens, and various linguistic variations of these names. There are also numerous subgroups and clans with their own self-designations, such as the Sinti, Kalderash, Boyash, Manouche, Lovari, Lăutari, Machvaya, Romanichal, Romanisael, Calé, Kale, Kaale, Xoraxai, Xaladytka, Romungro, Ursari, and Sevlengere. In English, the word Gypsy is most common.

In some regions, Roma is the primary term used in political contexts to refer to the Romani people as a whole.[1][2] Because all Roma use the word Romani as an adjective, Romani began to be used as an alternative noun for the entire ethnic group.[3] It is used by organizations such as the United Nations and the US Library of Congress.[4] However, the World Roma Congress, the Council of Europe and other organizations use the term Roma to refer to Romani people around the world, and recommend that Romani be restricted to the language and culture: Romani language, Romani culture.[5][6][7][8]

In the English language (according to the Oxford English Dictionary), Rom (with the plural Roma or Roms) and Romany (with the plural Romanies) are singular nouns. Both Rom and Romany have been in use in English since the 19th century as an alternative for Gypsy.[9]

Sometimes, Rom and Romani are spelled with a double r, i.e., Rrom and Rromani, particularly in Romania in order to distinguish from the Romanian endonym (români), to which it has no relation. This is well established in Romani itself, since it represents a phoneme (/ʀ/ also written as ř and rh) which in some Romani dialects has remained different from the one written with a single r.[4]

Etymology

[edit]

The demonyms of the Romani people, Lom and Dom share the same etymological origin,[10][11] reflecting Sanskrit ḍoma "a man of low caste, living by singing and music."[12][13]

The ultimate origin of the Sanskrit term ḍoma (perhaps from Munda or Dravidian) is uncertain.[14] Its stem, ḍom, is connected with drumming, linked with the Sanskrit verbal root ḍam- 'to sound (as a drum)', perhaps a loan from Dravidian, e.g. Kannada ḍamāra 'a pair of kettle-drums', and Telugu ṭamaṭama 'a drum, tomtom'.[15]

The shift from Doma to Roma/Romani is believed to have been influenced by the Greek word Romaios, during the Romanies’ arrival and settlement in the Balkans during the Byzantine period. The Byzantine Empire was referred to by its inhabitants as Romanía. This is where the Romanies are believed to have “crystallised into a cohesive people”.[16][17]

Gypsy and Gipsy

[edit]

The English term Gypsy or Gipsy[18] is commonly used to indicate Romani people.[19] Use of the word in modern-day English is pervasive (and is a legal term under English law—see below), and some Romani organizations use it in their own organizational names, particularly in the United Kingdom. In the UK, the word Gypsy forms part of the Gypsy, Roma and Traveller designation, to represent Romani people from groups who have resided in the UK since the 16th century, as opposed to Roma, who are understood to be linked to more recent migrations.[20][21]

The word, while sometimes positively embraced by Romani persons, is sometimes rejected by other Romani persons and considered a racial slur with a pejorative connotation implying illegality and irregularity,[22] and some modern dictionaries either recommend avoiding use of the word gypsy entirely or give it a negative or warning label.[23]

A British House of Commons Committee parliamentary inquiry, as described in their report "Tackling inequalities faced by Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities" (published 2019),[24] stated about their findings in the United Kingdom that: "We asked many members of the Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities how they preferred to describe themselves. While some find the term "Gypsy" to be offensive, many stakeholders and witnesses were proud to associate themselves with this term and so we have decided that it is right and proper to use it, where appropriate, throughout the report."

The Oxford English Dictionary states a 'gipsy' is a

member of a wandering race (by themselves called Romany), of Indian origin, which first appeared in England about the beginning of the 16th c.

The first usage of the word in English found by the OED was 1514, with several more usages in the same century, and both Edmund Spenser and William Shakespeare used this word.[25]

This exonym is sometimes written with a capital letter, to show that it designates an ethnic group.[26] The Spanish term gitano, the French term gitan and the Basque term ijito have the same origin.[27]

During the 16th and 17th centuries, the name was written in various ways: Egipcian, Egypcian, 'gypcian. The word gipsy/gypsy comes from the spellings which had lost the initial capital E, and that is one reason that it is often spelled with the initial g in lowercase.[28] As time elapsed, the notion of "the gipsy/gypsy" altered to include other associated stereotypes such as nomadism and exoticism.[29] John Matthews in The World Atlas of Divination refer to gypsies as "Wise Women".[30] Colloquially, gipsy/gypsy is used refer to any person perceived by the speaker as fitting the gypsy stereotypes.[31]

Use in English law

[edit]

The term gipsy has had several overlapping meanings under English Law. In the Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act 1960, gipsies (not capitalised) were defined as "persons[32] of nomadic habit of life, whatever their race or origin, but does not include members of an organised group of travelling showmen, or persons engaged in travelling circuses, travelling together as such".[33] This particular definition included non-Romani groups as Irish Travellers.[34][32] However, it is commonly understood that the term is etymologically an exonym.[35] It originates from Egyptian (a historical name for Romani people in Britain).[36]

Romani "gipsies" have been a recognised ethnic group for the purposes of Race Relations Act 1976 since Commission for Racial Equality v Dutton 1989, as have Irish Travellers in England and Wales since O'Leary v Allied Domecq 2000 (having already gained recognition in Northern Ireland in 1997).[34][37]

List of names

[edit]

Gypsy/Gipsy

[edit]

In several countries, Romani people were thought to come from Egypt.

Tsinganoi

[edit]

In much of continental Europe, they are known by names related to the Greek term τσιγγάνοι (tsinganoi):

The name originates with Byzantine Greek ἀτσίγγανοι (atsinganoi, Latin adsincani) or ἀθίγγανοι (athinganoi, literally "untouchables"), a term applied to the sect of the Melchisedechians.[42][43][44] The Adsincani appear in an 11th-century text preserved in Mt Athos, The Life of Saint George the Athonite (written in the Georgian language), as "a Samaritan people, descendants of Simon the Magician, named Adsincani, who were renowned sorcerers and villains". In the text, emperor Constantine Monomachos employs the Adsincani to exterminate wild animals, who were destroying the game in the imperial park of Philopation.[45]

An intriguing Sogdian occurrence of the adjective tājīgāne (arguably to be pronounced as tāžīgāne) in a Manichaean hymnal from Turfan of about the year 1000, may supply the missing link between Middle Persian tāzīg ‘Arab’ and Turkic/New Persian tāzik, tāžik ‘Persian’. The word resonates with Saʿdi’s later tājikāna cited above, with prior Sogdian attestations in documents from Mt. Mugh of the early eighth century (tāzīkānak, and its base tāzīk, both meaning indisputably ‘Arab’), and with slightly later occurrences of tāžīgāne, which “may still have meant ‘Arab’ or ‘Moslem’ in a more general sense,” since a “Persian general” (pārsīk) is mentioned in the same context (Sundermann, pp. 167-68). Problems with the Sogdian reflex of that vexatious middle consonant lead Sundermann to revise Schaeder’s interpretation and argue for a Parthian origin of Sogdian ž in this case (idem, p. 169: pointing out [p. 171] that the Ṭayyiʾ were established as allies of the Parthian Arsacid dynasty before they served the Sasanians). He argues finally that the tāžīg referred to here are Iranians, distinguished from the Sogdians as being speakers of New Persian (tāžīk, ‘the Muslim language’ for Sogdians—which Persians at that time called dari—as distinct from parsīk, which is Middle Persian), but that they are of course fellow Manichaeans, not Muslims. The Muslim Turks who were soon to rule the region (some of whose kinsmen were Manichaeans, too) thus took their designation of the local Persian population from the Sogdians. This definition of Tājik, if correct, would correspond quite closely to the modern one, in which language and location are fundamental, and religion is incidental. However, it would realign the modern Tajik view of the Sogdians as their ancestors, casting them rather as ‘the Other’ who bestowed the ethnonym Tājik in its definitive sense.[46]

Bohémiens

[edit]

Because many Roma living in France had come via Bohemia, they were referred to as Bohémiens.[47] This term would later be adapted by the French to refer to a particular artistic and impoverished lifestyle of an individual, known as Bohemianism.

  • Basque: buhame (in the Northern dialects)[48][49]

Roma

[edit]

Other

[edit]
  • Albanian: Arixhi (handler of bears)
  • Arabic: غجر ghájar
  • Azerbaijani: Qaraçı
  • Estonian: mustlased (from the word "must" meaning dark(-skinned), black or dirty, and "-lane" denoting belonging to a group)
  • Finnish: mustalaiset (from "musta" and "-lainen" analogously to Estonian above)
  • Georgian: ბოშები bošebi
  • Hebrew: צוענים‎ tsoʿănim (from the city Soan in Egypt)
  • Kurdish قەرەچی, qaraçı (from Turkish); دۆم, dom
  • Mingrelian: ჩაჩანეფი çaçanephi
  • Spanish: calé[50]

In the English-speaking world, Romani people are commonly known as Gypsies, Romanies, Romani, Romani Gypsies and Romany Gypsies.

In England, Romani people are commonly known as Gypsies or Romanies, or Romanichal in Angloromani. In Scandinavia, they are commonly known as Romer or Tater, or Romanisael in Scandoromani. In German-speaking Europe, the self-designation is Sinti, in France Manush, while the groups of Spain, Wales, and Finland use Calé, Kalé and Kaale (from kalo meaning "black" in Romani language). Following the first World Romani Congress in 1971, usage of the Romani terms Rom (singular) and Roma (plural) became increasingly widespread in Central and Eastern Europe.[8][51]

While many Romani people feel compelled to hide their identity in fear of persecution,[52] some people of Romani heritage do not identify as or consider themselves to be Romani.[53]

In Bulgaria, a number of people of Romani heritage identify as Turks or Bulgarians and some identify as Romanians.[54]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Names of the Romani people

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The names of the Romani people designate an Indo-Aryan ethnic group that migrated westward from northern to between the 9th and 14th centuries CE, encompassing self-appellations like Roma or Romani—derived from the term ṛom meaning "man" or "person," indicative of their shared linguistic heritage with —and numerous exonyms coined by European societies upon encounter. The English exonym Gypsy (or Gipsy) originated in the medieval misconception that the group hailed from , a notion persisting from their initial arrivals in around the 15th century, while continental variants such as Zigeuner (German), Tsigane (French), and Cigány (Hungarian) trace etymologically to the Byzantine Greek Atsínganoi, denoting a nomadic, heretical perceived as socially marginal. Subgroups within the broader Romani population employ distinct self-designations reflecting regional histories and dialects, including among Central and Western European communities (potentially linked to the region of ancient migration routes), (or Calé) in the , , and , (or Manush) in and parts of , and in Britain, alongside others like and differentiated by traditional occupations such as or . These internal divisions underscore the heterogeneity of Romani identity, with not all subgroups adopting the umbrella term Roma, some preferring localized ethnonyms to preserve distinct cultural lineages. Nomenclature debates have intensified since the 1971 , where delegates endorsed Roma as a unifying self-identifier to counter pejorative connotations historically attached to exonyms amid centuries of exclusion and , yet empirical usage reveals persistent vernacular attachment to terms like Gypsy in English-speaking Romani communities and resistance to imposed standardization among certain factions wary of diluting subgroup specificities. This tension highlights causal factors in naming, including linguistic evolution, migratory adaptations, and societal interactions that favored exonyms associating the group with otherness or vagrancy, rather than deference to institutional preferences for terminological reform.

Linguistic and Historical Origins

Indo-Aryan Etymology and Migration Influence

The belongs to the branch of the Indo-European family, with its core lexicon and grammatical structure deriving from early medieval dialects of northern , particularly those akin to and influenced by . Comparative linguistic analysis, beginning in the late with scholars identifying systematic correspondences between Romani vocabulary and , established this heritage through shared innovations such as the retention of retroflex consonants and specific verb conjugations absent in Iranian or Armenian tongues. This places the proto-Romani speech form's divergence from its Indian matrix around the 6th to 10th centuries CE, prior to westward expansion. The primary endonym 'rom', denoting a Romani man or person, traces etymologically to an Indo-Aryan root *ḍom- or *jāṭi-, linked to ḍomba, a term for members of hereditary or artisan castes in ancient Indian . This semantic shift from occupational or caste designation to ethnic self-reference reflects internal social organization preserved during migration, as evidenced by phonological matches (e.g., Romani /rɔm/ paralleling /ɖɔmba/) and absence of European substrate influences in the core term. Early attestations in Romani oral traditions and 18th-century glossaries confirm 'rom' as a foundational identifier, undifferentiated by until later dialectal divergence. Historical migration from northwestern , dated linguistically to approximately 1000–1100 CE via progressive layers (Persian by the , Armenian by the 10th, and Byzantine Greek thereafter), shaped name stability by embedding Indo-Aryan endonyms amid exonymic overlays from host societies. Records of initial contacts, such as 11th-century Byzantine references to Atsinganoi groups performing artisanal roles, indicate that migrating cohorts retained self-appellations rooted in Indian caste nomenclature, adapting only superficially to local phonologies without altering semantic cores. corroborates this timeline, showing a founder around 30–50 generations ago (circa 900–1200 CE) with Y-chromosome H1a-M82 and autosomal affinities to Punjabi-speaking groups, confirming a single exodus from the rather than diffuse dispersals. These multidisciplinary markers refute non-Indian provenances, attributing name persistence to cultural insularity during transit through Persia and .

Derivation of Core Endonym 'Rom'

The core endonym rom in the functions as a masculine denoting "man" or "," with its form roma extending to refer collectively to members of the ethnic group, as documented in early linguistic compilations of Romani vocabulary. This semantic shift from individual male kinship role to broader ethnic self-designation aligns with patterns in , where terms for adult males often generalize to in-group identity, reflecting the language's origins in northwestern rather than imposed external labels. Historical records of Romani speech, including glossaries compiled in the early by European scholars interacting with migrant communities, consistently attest rom in this dual sense, predating modern standardization efforts. Linguistically, rom derives from the ḍombā- or equivalents, originally denoting a low-status occupational associated with music, metalworking, and itinerant trades—groups ancestral to Romani speakers based on comparative and genetic migration evidence tracing Romani origins to the around the 5th–10th centuries CE. This Indo-Aryan root, involving a retroflex ḍ that shifted phonologically through Persian and Armenian contact en route to , bears no causal relation to Latin Romanus or its Romanian derivative român, despite folk etymologies positing a Roman imperial link; such claims falter against the distinct Romance-language evolution of Romanian from post-3rd century CE, unconnected to the eastward-to-westward Romani migration path documented in Byzantine records from the . The unrelated etymologies underscore independent developments: Romani as an Indo-Aryan isolate in , Romanian as a Balkan Romance tongue, with superficial phonetic resemblance arising coincidentally via divergent sound changes rather than shared ancestry. Dialectal variations in pronunciation, such as to rrom (with a lengthened or uvular /ʀ/), occur prominently in Vlax Romani subgroups, which comprise dialects spoken by communities historically in and since the , as analyzed in phonological surveys of Romani varieties. This emphatic articulation, absent in non-Vlax branches like Balkan or dialects, stems from substrate influences during prolonged settlement in Romanian principalities, where uvular fricatives from local Slavic or Turkic contacts reinforced Romani's inherent , without altering the term's core semantics. Such phonological evidence, derived from comparative rather than prescriptive reforms, highlights the organic evolution of rom across migratory branches, preserving its function as an unmarked ethnic marker.

Major Exonyms and Their Developments

Tsigani and Byzantine Greek Roots

The term Tsigani, an early exonym for the Romani people in southeastern Europe, derives from the Byzantine Greek atsínganoi (ἀτσίνγανοι) or athínganoi (ἀθίνγανοι), attested in sources from the 9th to 11th centuries CE. This designation originally applied to a heretical Christian sect in Phrygia, characterized as "untouchables" (a-thíganoi, implying those not to be touched in ritual or social contexts) and associated with practices like fortune-telling, which were viewed as heterodox by Orthodox authorities. The term was not inherently ethnic but descriptive of occupational or religious nonconformity, predating direct association with migrating groups from India. Upon the Romani people's arrival in the Byzantine around the 9th to 11th centuries CE—likely via routes from and Persia—the label atsinganoi was transferred to them, possibly due to perceived similarities in itinerant lifestyles and skills like or , which echoed the sect's reputed activities. By the , Byzantine canonist Theodore Balsamon explicitly linked the name to Romani performers of , solidifying its application without initial ethnic specificity. Historical records indicate this adoption occurred amid broader migrations, with Romani groups documented in and before 1200 CE, integrating into Byzantine society as artisans or entertainers rather than as a predefined ethnic category. The exonym evolved into Slavic forms like Cigani by the 13th century, appearing in chronicles such as a 1260 CE document referencing their presence in the region, and further variants including German Zigeuner. In Ottoman administrative records from the 16th century onward, equivalents such as Çingene or Kıpti denoted Romani populations neutrally for taxation and settlement purposes, as in Sultan the Magnificent's 1530 CE decree organizing their communities in without connoting inherent derogation. Archival evidence shows consistent bureaucratic usage for census and labor allocation, lacking indications of widespread Romani objection until 20th-century reinterpretations; earlier texts reflect pragmatic identification tied to trades, not systematic stigmatization. This historical neutrality counters claims of primordial offensiveness, as no pre-modern sources document universal rejection by the groups themselves, suggesting modern sensitivities arise from later sociopolitical contexts rather than originary intent.

Gypsy/Gipsy and Western Misattributions

The exonym "Gypsy," along with its variant spelling "Gipsy," originated in English from the erroneous association of the with , based on their darker skin tones, itinerant habits, and claims by early migrant groups of hailing from "Little ," a purported region in the or further east. This derivation traces to gypcian, a contraction of Egipcien ("Egyptian"), with the modern form "Gipsy" emerging around as a phonetic adaptation that dropped the initial "e," while "Gypsy" solidified later through standardized spelling shifts. Early attestations in English texts from the 1530s refer to Romani arrivals as "Egyptians," reflecting contemporary perceptions of their provenance rather than actual Indian origins confirmed by linguistics and genetics in the 18th and 19th centuries. These groups often presented papal letters or pilgrimage narratives linking them to Egyptian territories, reinforcing the misattribution across Western Europe where similar terms like French Gitans evolved from Égyptiens. The term's adoption spread through , migration records, and literary depictions, embedding it in Western vernaculars despite emerging scholarly corrections; for instance, 19th-century Romantic frequently portrayed "Gypsies" as enigmatic nomads embodying and , as in works by authors like , which popularized the image without challenging the Egyptian etymology. This cultural fixation persisted due to entrenched linguistic patterns and the fragmented nature of Romani communities, which lacked a centralized push for alternative until post-World War II efforts.

Bohemian and Other Regional Variants

In 15th-century , the exonym Bohémiens was applied to Romani groups arriving via Central European routes, reflecting assumptions of Bohemian (modern Czech) origins amid migrations following the Hussite conflicts of 1419–1434. Early records note Romani presence near by 1419, with the term appearing in administrative contexts by the 1420s as groups sought safe passage through French territories. This designation persisted into later centuries, diverging from broader European labels by emphasizing perceived Czech ties over Eastern derivations. In , the term Gitano—derived from egipciano, an archaic form denoting "Egyptian"—gained prevalence from the onward, rooted in medieval misconceptions linking Romani migrants to despite their documented entry into the around 1425. Archival evidence from the period shows local adaptations framing them as exotic wanderers, influencing legal and cultural references distinct from northern variants. French usage also includes Manouche for Sinti-affiliated Romani communities, a regional tied to 19th–20th-century settlements in and surrounding areas, with roots in cross-border movements from and . This term, while echoing Romani linguistic elements for "person," functions as a localized exonym in French contexts, highlighting subgroup distinctions without implying uniformity across . These variants underscore the heterogeneity of exonyms shaped by local migration histories and folk etymologies, such as pharaonic or Bohemian associations, rather than any centralized nomenclature, with no verifiable among them based on historical primacy.

Endonyms, Subgroups, and Self-Identification

Primary Self-Designations: Roma and Romani

The term Roma serves as a primary endonym among many Romani communities, deriving from the Romani word rom (masculine singular for "man" or "husband"), with Roma functioning as the plural form denoting "men," "people," or "the group." This linguistic root traces to Indo-Aryan origins, where it parallels terms for human or caste-related identities, but its collective application as an ethnic self-designation gained prominence only in the mid-20th century through organized rather than universal pre-existing usage. The widespread adoption of Roma as a unifying plural noun accelerated at the First World Roma Congress held in from April 8–12, 1971, where approximately 200 delegates from 14 European countries formalized it as the preferred international term to promote solidarity and supplant exonyms. This event marked a pivotal shift toward pan-Romani political identity, including the adoption of a and , yet ethnographic accounts note that prior to the 1970s, self-reference often remained localized to subgroups or dialects without broad consensus on Roma as an overarching label. The adjectival form Romani in English contexts stems from the Romani language's romanō (masculine) or romani (feminine), meaning "pertaining to the Roma" or "of the group," initially describing the language (Romani čhib) and extending to cultural or ethnic attributes. Oral traditions preserve variable pronunciations and spellings, such as Romany in variants, reflecting dialectal diversity, though standardized Romani emerged in scholarly and activist discourse post-1971 to denote the adjective consistently. Adoption of these terms exhibits regional and subgroup variation, with higher self-identification as Roma among Balkan-origin groups like Vlax Roma, per surveys in showing 70–90% endorsement in some communities, contrasted by resistance among (preferring Sinti for their Central European lineage) and (favoring Kale or Gitano in Iberian contexts), who often view Roma as an imposed umbrella lacking full historical resonance. Ethnographic underscores this uneven uptake, attributing it to distinct migration paths and cultural autonomies, with only partial alignment under Roma in international policy despite its activism-driven amplification.

Subgroup-Specific Names and Variations

The internal among Romani subgroups reveals a pattern of diversification driven by geographic dispersal following medieval migrations from the westward and endogamous marriage practices that reinforced clan-specific identities and dialectal divergences. These endonyms often incorporate occupational, regional, or descriptive elements, preserving variations in Romani dialects that differ from standardized forms associated with broader "Roma" usage. In , the employ the endonym "," with linguistic analysis indicating it functions as a European in Romani, exhibiting inflectional patterns (e.g., plural "Sinte," feminine "Sintica") atypical of inherited Indo-Aryan lexicon and possibly deriving from "sint" (journey or wayfarer), reflecting semi-nomadic lifestyles. Earlier hypotheses linked it to the region in northwest , based on 18th-century attestations like "Sende" in historical lists, though modern scholarship favors the Germanic borrowing due to phonological and morphological evidence. communities explicitly reject alignment with the "Roma" designation, maintaining subgroup autonomy amid dialectal influences from German. Vlax subgroups, tracing to (modern ) as evidenced by shared Romanian substrate in their dialects, form an umbrella for endogamous units distinguished by occupational qualifiers..pdf) The , for instance, derive their name from Hungarian "ló" (), denoting traditional horse-dealing roles, with historical records confirming this profession-based in Eastern European migrations. Similarly, the self-identify via Romanian "urs" (), tied to bear-training practices documented in 19th-century Balkan accounts, underscoring endogamy's role in isolating such specialized clans from intermixing. The (or Calé in Iberian variants) use an endonym from Romani "kalo" (black or absorbing light), a descriptive term adopted across northern and western European contexts, including and , where it supplanted earlier exonyms while aligning with dialectal phonology. In the , communities—descended from early arrivals—predominantly self-identify as "Gypsy" or "Traveller" in official data, with the 2021 census recording approximately 71,400 under "Gypsy or Irish Traveller" in , distinct from a smaller "Roma" category, reflecting resistance to pan-European "Roma" framing in favor of localized heritage. European surveys from the 2010s, including those by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency, document variable self-identification, with subgroup preferences persisting due to historical distrust and cultural insularity, often prioritizing or occupational ties over unified ethnic labels.

Usage in Law, Culture, and Policy

In , the Egyptians Act of 1530 (22 Hen. 8 c. 10) targeted "outlandish people calling themselves ," requiring their departure within one month or facing penalties including banishment and forfeiture of goods, reflecting early perceptions of the Romani as foreign fortune-tellers and vagrants originating from . Subsequent statutes, such as the Egyptians Act of 1554 (1 Mar. c. 12), extended prohibitions to those born in or entering via , imposing fines on accomplices and emphasizing expulsion to curb perceived criminality. By 1562–1563, legislation evolved to address "vagabonds calling themselves Egyptians," criminalizing their presence and associating the group with imposture and disorder, with punishments including whipping, enslavement, or execution for under the Act for the Punishment of Vagabonds (5 Eliz. 1 c. 20). The Tudor era saw multiple reinforcing laws—spanning at least a dozen acts from to —routinely employing "Gypsy" or "Egyptian" to denote itinerant groups subject to controls, such as the 1597 Vagabonds Act (39 Eliz. 1 c. 4), which mandated ear-boring for offenders and framed the terms pragmatically for enforcement against unlicensed wandering. On the Continent, 16th-century Holy Roman Empire edicts, building on Maximilian I's late-15th-century decrees, used "Zigeuner" to mandate expulsion or regulation, portraying the group as spies or thieves warranting imperial bans across territories like the Habsburg lands. In the Ottoman Empire, the Romani were designated "Çingene" in administrative records from the 16th century onward, subjecting them to poll taxes and corvée labor as reaya (taxable subjects), integrating the term into fiscal codes without the expulsion focus seen in Western Europe. Post-Enlightenment British laws, such as the Commons Act 1876, referenced "Gypsy" encampments on residual common lands, facilitating their removal amid enclosure movements that privatized grazing areas traditionally used for halting, thereby embedding the exonym in statutes governing land access and sedentarization pressures. These references prioritized administrative utility—targeting mobility and resource use—over ethnic typology, as evidenced in primary parliamentary texts devoid of modern interpretive lenses.

Modern Official and International Terminology

Since the 1990s, international organizations including the and the have adopted "Roma" as an umbrella term encompassing subgroups such as , , and related Eastern groups like Dom and Lom, alongside some Travellers, to facilitate policy coordination across Europe. This standardization reflects institutional efforts to promote inclusion amid persistent marginalization, though it sometimes overlays diverse self-identifications with a policy-oriented label. The formalized this approach in its 2011 Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies up to 2020, which employs "Roma" to denote the targeted for anti-discrimination and integration measures, extended in the 2020 EU Roma Strategic Framework for Equality, Inclusion and Participation. The Agency for (FRA) aligns with this in its surveys, such as the 2024 Roma Survey across 13 member states, defining respondents as self-identified Roma or Travellers while tracking progress on EU goals like and . These frameworks prioritize "Roma" for and funding allocation, yet empirical data indicate uneven adoption, with low rates—around 20% among adults in earlier FRA assessments and persisting gaps—constraining community engagement with such terminology-driven policies. National implementations reveal variances from this international norm. In the , the explicitly protects "Gypsies or Travellers"—covering Romany Gypsies and —as distinct ethnic groups under race discrimination provisions, retaining "Gypsy" in legal contexts despite EU influences. In the , the Bureau permits self-identification without mandating "Roma," resulting in undercounts; only about 16,000 reported Romani ancestry in data, often subsumed under broader categories due to stigma and preference for national or subgroup labels like Romanichel. These discrepancies highlight how official standardization clashes with localized self-ascription and administrative practices, potentially limiting the efficacy of top-down terminological uniformity.

Controversies and Terminology Debates

Claims of Pejorative Connotations vs. Reclamation

Claims that exonyms such as "Gypsy" carry inherent pejorative connotations gained traction in post-World War II Romani advocacy, often associating the term with Nazi-era persecutions during the Porajmos, where German authorities used "Zigeuner" to label and target for internment and extermination. This linkage, while highlighting historical trauma, overlooks earlier usages decoupled from malice; for instance, 19th-century British author employed "Gypsy" in works like The Zincali (1841) to romantically depict Romani customs, language, and itinerant life based on his direct interactions, portraying them as enigmatic yet admirable figures rather than derogatory stereotypes. Evidence of reclamation appears in self-identification practices among certain subgroups, such as UK Romanichal communities, where the term "Gypsy" is integrated into cultural expressions without reported aversion; organizations supporting these groups, including Friends, Families and Travellers, document participants self-categorizing as "Gypsy/Rroma/Traveller" during identity-focused consultations, indicating acceptance for internal use despite external stereotypes. A 2020 Harvard-affiliated report on Romani Americans similarly reveals divergent views, with only 35% of respondents citing "Gypsy" as a racial slur when discussing term preferences, suggesting a substantial portion views it neutrally or reclaims it amid broader ethnic identification options like "Roma" or "Romani." No empirical consensus exists across Romani subgroups on the term's offensiveness, as subgroup-specific inquiries—such as those involving or US-based Romani—show varied tolerances tied to local histories rather than uniform rejection; causal analysis attributes ongoing exonym use to practical utility in communication and cultural continuity, where arise from behavioral patterns or socioeconomic factors rather than lexical malice alone, undermining blanket framing unsupported by universal self-reported harm.

Divergent Preferences Among Romani Communities

Surveys indicate significant variation in preferred self-designations among Romani subgroups, influenced by regional histories and subgroup identities. In the United States, a 2020 survey of 3,000 Romani Americans revealed that 39% strongly or somewhat preferred "Romani," 8% favored "Gypsy," and 53% expressed no preference between the terms, highlighting a lack of consensus even within communities. Similarly, in the , English and Welsh Gypsy families frequently self-identify with pride as "Romani Gypsies" or simply "Gypsies," distinguishing themselves from Eastern European Roma groups. Regional divides are pronounced, with Balkan Romani communities more likely to adopt "Roma" as a unifying term post-1989, amid efforts by international Romani organizations to foster pan-ethnic solidarity after decades of communist-era assimilation policies that suppressed distinct identities. In contrast, advocacy bodies representing British Romani groups, such as those aligned with traditional Gypsy councils, continue to employ "Gypsy" in public statements and campaigns during the 2020s, reflecting cultural attachment to historical endonyms over externally imposed alternatives. Irish Travellers, often administratively grouped with Romani in policy contexts despite distinct Celtic origins, overwhelmingly reject the "Roma" label, with Irish government and EU reports treating them as separate ethnic categories to respect self-perception. These divergent preferences impact policy implementation, as mismatched terminology contributes to undercounts in official data collection. The 2021 census, which introduced a separate "Roma" category alongside "Gypsy or Irish Traveller," recorded only 71,400 individuals in the latter—0.1% of the population in —despite estimates suggesting higher numbers, with experts attributing part of the discrepancy to community reluctance to self-identify under unfamiliar or contested labels. Such inaccuracies hinder targeted interventions, as evidenced by ongoing demographic studies noting that self-identification rates for "Roma" remain far below activist estimates of 6 million EU-wide, with census figures closer to 1.3 million.

References

  1. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2015/04/roma-in-europe-11-things-you-always-wanted-to-know-but-were-afraid-to-ask/
  2. https://rm.coe.int/factsheets-on-romani-culture-1-7-romani-group-names/1680aac36b
  3. https://travellermovement.org.uk/gypsy-roma-and-traveller-history-and-culture
  4. https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/roma-gypsies-in-prewar-europe
  5. https://sfi.usc.edu/education/roma-sinti/en/conosciamo-i-roma-e-i-sinti/chi-sono/un-mondo-di-mondi/rom-sinti-kale-manouches-romaniche.php
  6. https://www.sintiundroma.org/en/introduction/sinti-and-roma/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3018485/
  8. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02965202/document
  9. https://blogg.sh.se/romstuduni/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/03-Origin-of-Roma-Michael-Benisek.pdf
  10. https://altalang.com/beyond-words/determining-what-roma-speak/
  11. http://www.asiainstitutetorino.it/indologica/volumes/vol03-04/vol03-04_art33_Pobozniak.pdf
  12. https://www.kratylos.org/~raphael/romani/downloads/2/Matras_Mystification.pdf
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9690732/
  14. https://www.scribd.com/document/401629371/Gypsies-in-the-Byzantine-Empire-and-the-Balkans-in-the-Late-Middle-Ages-George-Soulis-The-pdf
  15. https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1008417
  16. https://www.etymonline.com/word/Romany
  17. http://www2.arnes.si/~eusmith/Romany/glossary.html
  18. https://limbaromana.org/en/etymology-words-tigan-gypsy-rromthe-etymology-words-tigan-gypsy-rrom-romany/
  19. https://yaronmatras.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/27.2leggio_matras-copy.pdf
  20. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4298394
  21. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/an-eastern-christian-sect-the-athinganoi/A56EC55ECAF12F28BE6F16FADFD6E558
  22. https://www2.umbc.edu/MA/index/number11/seeman/see_5.htm
  23. https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/education/roma/source/fs2/2.0_arrival-europe_english.pdf
  24. https://rroma.org/roma-history/byzantine-history/
  25. https://www.errc.org/roma-rights-journal/the-perception-of-gypsies-in-turkish-society
  26. https://books.openedition.org/obp/2236?lang=en
  27. https://www.etymonline.com/word/Gypsy
  28. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Gypsy
  29. https://www.ourmigrationstory.org.uk/oms/romani-gypsies-in-16th-century-britain
  30. https://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/674416f118e1c.pdf
  31. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/features/travellers-under-open-skies-writers-artists-and-gypsies
  32. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/representations-of-the-gypsy-in-the-romantic-period-9780198719472
  33. https://eefc.org/wp-content/uploads/Roma-FAQs-CS.pdf
  34. https://www.medievalists.net/2011/01/the-gypsies-and-their-impact-on-fifteenth-century-western-european-iconography/
  35. https://www.romarchive.eu/en/roma-civil-rights-movement/emergence-roma-civil-rights-movement-france/
  36. https://personal.us.es/dlagunas/uploads/dlagunas/publicaciones/73.romanistudies.pdf
  37. https://gazules.blogspot.com/2020/08/spains-final-solution-1749-how-they.html
  38. https://www2.umbc.edu/MA/index/number2/rom/rom1ide.htm
  39. https://gypsyjazzuk.wordpress.com/gypsy-jazz-uk-home/djangos-birth-and-early-childhood/django-manouche-gypsy/
  40. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v45/n21/celia-donert/invention-of-the-trickster
  41. https://rm.coe.int/factsheets-on-romani-culture-1-0-romani-culture-an-introduction/1680aac363
  42. https://fxb.harvard.edu/blog/2019/04/25/london-1971-the-first-world-roma-congress/
  43. https://www.romarchive.eu/en/terms/roma/
  44. https://rm.coe.int/institutionalisation-and-emancipation-factsheets-on-romani-history/16808b1c61
  45. https://encyclopaedia-gsr.eu/lemma/roma-en-1-0/?oes-language-switch=language1
  46. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/romani
  47. https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/521588.pdf
  48. https://childrenofprisoners.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Glossary_Roma_18May2012_CoE.pdf
  49. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369183032000170204
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248979085_Construction_of_Roma_identity_in_Eastern_and_Central_Europe_Perception_and_self-identification
  51. https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/10.3828/rost.2023.8
  52. https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/10.3828/rs.2013.3
  53. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10063/
  54. https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2021-roma-travellers-survey-technical-report_en.pdf
  55. https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2021-11-03/debates/C812A832-4031-4295-8313-365B3839C249/PoliceCrimeSentencingAndCourtsBill
  56. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/historical-journal/article/trouble-with-gypsies-in-early-modern-england/D93181E028BCC1C2E2D8962C6B607552
  57. https://vlex.co.uk/vid/egyptians-act-1562-861245546
  58. https://iwaponline.com/washdev/article/14/10/976/104872/UK-legislative-discrimination-and-the-impact-on
  59. https://www.errc.org/cikk.php?cikk=1844
  60. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004392427/brill-9789004392427_008.xml
  61. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/128771/1/wp_222.pdf
  62. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/713697750
  63. https://www.un.org/en/fight-racism/vulnerable-groups/roma-sinti-travellers
  64. http://rm.coe.int/09000016805a2ae4
  65. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0173:FIN:EN:PDF
  66. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/roma-eu/roma-equality-inclusion-and-participation-eu_en
  67. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2025/roma-survey-2024
  68. https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2014_roma-survey_education_tk0113748enc.pdf
  69. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8083/
  70. https://content.sph.harvard.edu/wwwhsph/sites/2464/2020/11/Romani-realities-report-final-11.30.2020.pdf
  71. https://www.census.gov/about/our-research/race-ethnicity/standards-updates.html
  72. https://irr.org.uk/article/remembering-the-roma-holocaust/
  73. https://www.britannica.com/biography/George-Borrow
  74. https://www.gypsy-traveller.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/whoweare.pdf
  75. https://crs.ceu.edu/index.php/crs/article/download/62/51/1413
  76. https://www.gov.wales/anti-racist-wales-evidence-report-romani-cultural-and-arts-company-html
  77. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-10063/CBP-10063.pdf
  78. https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/10.3828/rost.2024.24
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.