Community hub
Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Hall-effect thruster
View on Wikipedia
In spacecraft propulsion, a Hall-effect thruster (HET, sometimes referred to as a Hall thruster or Hall-current thruster) is a type of ion thruster in which the propellant is accelerated by an electric field. Based on the discovery by Edwin Hall, Hall-effect thrusters use a magnetic field to limit the electrons' axial motion and then use them to ionize propellant, efficiently accelerate the ions to produce thrust, and neutralize the ions in the plume. The Hall-effect thruster is classed as a moderate specific impulse (1,600 s) space propulsion technology and has benefited from considerable theoretical and experimental research since the 1960s.[1]
Hall thrusters operate on a variety of propellants, the most common being xenon and krypton. Other propellants of interest include argon, bismuth, iodine, magnesium, zinc and adamantane.
Hall thrusters are able to accelerate their exhaust to speeds between 10 and 80 km/s (1,000–8,000 s specific impulse), with most models operating between 15 and 30 km/s. The thrust produced depends on the power level. Devices operating at 1.35 kW produce about 83 mN of thrust. High-power models have demonstrated up to 5.4 N in the laboratory.[2] Power levels up to 100 kW have been demonstrated for xenon Hall thrusters[citation needed].
As of 2009,[update] Hall-effect thrusters ranged in input power levels from 1.35 to 10 kilowatts and had exhaust velocities of 10–50 kilometers per second, with thrust of 40–600 millinewtons and efficiency in the range of 45–60 percent.[3] The applications of Hall-effect thrusters include control of the orientation and position of orbiting satellites and use as a main propulsion engine for medium-size robotic space vehicles.[3]
History
[edit]Hall thrusters were studied independently in the United States and the Soviet Union. They were first described publicly in the US in the early 1960s.[4][5][6] However, the Hall thruster was first developed into an efficient propulsion device in the Soviet Union. In the US, scientists focused on developing gridded ion thrusters.
Soviet designs
[edit]Two types of Hall thrusters were developed in the Soviet Union:
- thrusters with wide acceleration zone, SPT (Russian: СПД, стационарный плазменный двигатель; English: SPT, Stationary Plasma Thruster) at Design Bureau Fakel
- thrusters with narrow acceleration zone, DAS (Russian: ДАС, двигатель с анодным слоем; English: TAL, Thruster with Anode Layer), at the Central Research Institute for Machine Building (TsNIIMASH).
The SPT design was largely the work of A. I. Morozov.[7][8] The first SPT to operate in space, an SPT-50 aboard a Soviet Meteor spacecraft, was launched December 1971. They were mainly used for satellite stabilization in north–south and in east–west directions. Since then until the late 1990s 118 SPT engines completed their mission and some 50 continued to be operated. Thrust of the first generation of SPT engines, SPT-50 and SPT-60 was 20 and 30 mN respectively. In 1982, the SPT-70 and SPT-100 were introduced, their thrusts being 40 and 83 mN, respectively. In the post-Soviet Russia high-power (a few kilowatts) SPT-140, SPT-160, SPT-200, T-160, and low-power (less than 500 W) SPT-35 were introduced.[9]
Soviet and Russian TAL-type thrusters include the D-38, D-55, D-80, and D-100.[9]
Non-Soviet designs
[edit]Soviet-built thrusters were introduced to the West in 1992 after a team of electric propulsion specialists from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Glenn Research Center, and the Air Force Research Laboratory, under the support of the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization, visited Russian laboratories and experimentally evaluated the SPT-100 (i.e., a 100 mm diameter SPT thruster). Hall thrusters continue to be used on Russian spacecraft and have also flown on European and American spacecraft. Space Systems/Loral, an American commercial satellite manufacturer, now flies Fakel SPT-100's on their GEO communications spacecraft.
Since in the early 1990s, Hall thrusters have been the subject of a large number of research efforts throughout the United States, India, France, Italy, Japan, and Russia (with many smaller efforts scattered in various countries across the globe). Hall thruster research in the US is conducted at several government laboratories, universities and private companies. Government and government funded centers include NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA's Glenn Research Center, the Air Force Research Laboratory (Edwards AFB, California), and The Aerospace Corporation. Universities include the US Air Force Institute of Technology,[10] University of Michigan, Stanford University, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton University, Michigan Technological University, and Georgia Tech. In 2023, students at the Olin College of Engineering demonstrated the first undergraduate designed steady-state hall thruster.[11] A considerable amount of development is being conducted in industry, such as IHI Corporation in Japan, Aerojet and Busek in the US, Safran Spacecraft Propulsion in France, LAJP in Ukraine, SITAEL in Italy, and Satrec Initiative in South Korea.
The first use of Hall thrusters on lunar orbit was the European Space Agency (ESA) lunar mission SMART-1 in 2003.
Hall thrusters were first demonstrated on a western satellite on the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) STEX spacecraft, which flew the Russian D-55. The first American Hall thruster to fly in space was the Busek BHT-200 on TacSat-2 technology demonstration spacecraft. The first flight of an American Hall thruster on an operational mission, was the Aerojet BPT-4000, which launched August 2010 on the military Advanced Extremely High Frequency GEO communications satellite. At 4.5 kW, the BPT-4000 is also the highest power Hall thruster ever flown in space. Besides the usual stationkeeping tasks, the BPT-4000 is also providing orbit-raising capability to the spacecraft. The X-37B has been used as a testbed for the Hall thruster for the AEHF satellite series.[12] Several countries worldwide continue efforts to qualify Hall thruster technology for commercial uses. The SpaceX Starlink constellation, the largest satellite constellation in the world, uses Hall-effect thrusters. Starlink initially used krypton gas, but with its V2 satellites swapped to argon due to its cheaper price and widespread availability.[13]
The first deployment of Hall thrusters beyond Earth's sphere of influence was the Psyche spacecraft, launched in 2023 towards the asteroid belt to explore 16 Psyche.[14]
Indian designs
[edit]Research in India is carried out by both public and private research institutes and companies.
In 2010, ISRO used Hall-effect ion propulsion thrusters in GSAT-4 carried by GSLV-D3. It had four xenon powered thrusters for north-south station keeping. Two of them were Russian and the other two were Indian. The Indian thrusters were rated at 13 mN. However, GSLV-D3 did not make it to orbit.
The following year in 2014, ISRO was pursuing development of 75 mN & 250 mN SPT thrusters to be used in its future high power communication satellites. The 75 mN thrusters were put to use aboard the GSAT-9 communication satellite.[15]
By 2021 development of a 300 mN thruster was complete. Alongside it, RF-powered 10 kW plasma engines and krypton based low power electric propulsion were being pursued.[citation needed]
With private firms entering the space domain, Bellatrix Aerospace became the first commercial firm to bring out commercial Hall-effect thrusters. The current[when?] model of the thruster uses xenon as fuel. Tests were carried out at the spacecraft propulsion research laboratory in the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru. Heaterless cathode technology was used to increase the system's lifespan and redundancy. Bellatrix Aerospace had previously developed the first commercially available microwave electrothermal thruster, for which the company received an order from ISRO.[16] The ARKA-series of HET was launched on PSLV-C55 mission. It was successfully tested on POEM-2.[17]
Principle of operation
[edit]The essential working principle of the Hall thruster is that it uses an electrostatic potential to accelerate ions up to high speeds. In a Hall thruster, the attractive negative charge is provided by an electron plasma at the open end of the thruster instead of a grid. A radial magnetic field of about 100–300 G (10–30 mT) is used to confine the electrons, where the combination of the radial magnetic field and axial electric field cause the electrons to drift in azimuth thus forming the Hall current from which the device gets its name.
A schematic of a Hall thruster is shown in the adjacent image. An electric potential of between 150 and 800 volts is applied between the anode and cathode.
The central spike forms one pole of an electromagnet and is surrounded by an annular space, and around that is the other pole of the electromagnet, with a radial magnetic field in between.
The propellant, such as xenon gas, is fed through the anode, which has numerous small holes in it to act as a gas distributor. As the neutral xenon atoms diffuse into the channel of the thruster, they are ionized by collisions with circulating high-energy electrons (typically 10–40 eV, or about 10% of the discharge voltage). Most of the xenon atoms are ionized to a net charge of +1, but a noticeable fraction (c. 20%) have +2 net charge.
The xenon ions are then accelerated by the electric field between the anode and the cathode. For discharge voltages of 300 V, the ions reach speeds of around 15 km/s (9.3 mi/s) for a specific impulse of 1,500 s (15 kN·s/kg). Upon exiting, however, the ions pull an equal number of electrons with them, creating a plasma plume with no net charge.
The radial magnetic field is designed to be strong enough to substantially deflect the low-mass electrons, but not the high-mass ions, which have a much larger gyroradius and are hardly impeded. The majority of electrons are thus stuck orbiting in the region of high radial magnetic field near the thruster exit plane, trapped in E×B (axial electric field and radial magnetic field). This orbital rotation of the electrons is a circulating Hall current, and it is from this that the Hall thruster gets its name. Collisions with other particles and walls, as well as plasma instabilities, allow some of the electrons to be freed from the magnetic field, and they drift towards the anode.
About 20–30% of the discharge current is an electron current, which does not produce thrust, thus limiting the energetic efficiency of the thruster; the other 70–80% of the current is in the ions. Because the majority of electrons are trapped in the Hall current, they have a long residence time inside the thruster and are able to ionize almost all of the xenon propellant, allowing mass use of 90–99%. The mass use efficiency of the thruster is thus around 90%, while the discharge current efficiency is around 70%, for a combined thruster efficiency of around 63% (= 90% × 70%). Modern Hall thrusters have achieved efficiencies as high as 75% through advanced designs.
Compared to chemical rockets, the thrust is very small, on the order of 83 mN for a typical thruster operating at 300 V and 1.5 kW. For comparison, the weight of a coin like the U.S. quarter or a 20-cent euro coin is approximately 60 mN. As with all forms of electrically powered spacecraft propulsion, thrust is limited by available power, efficiency, and specific impulse.
However, Hall thrusters operate at the high specific impulses that are typical for electric propulsion. One particular advantage of Hall thrusters, as compared to a gridded ion thruster, is that the generation and acceleration of the ions takes place in a quasi-neutral plasma, so there is no Child-Langmuir charge (space charge) saturated current limitation on the thrust density. This allows much smaller thrusters compared to gridded ion thrusters.
Another advantage is that these thrusters can use a wider variety of propellants supplied to the anode, even oxygen, although something easily ionized is needed at the cathode.[18]
Propellants
[edit]Xenon
[edit]Xenon has been the typical choice of propellant for many electric propulsion systems, including Hall thrusters.[19] Xenon propellant is used because of its high atomic weight and low ionization potential. Xenon is relatively easy to store, and as a gas at spacecraft operating temperatures does not need to be vaporized before usage, unlike metallic propellants such as bismuth. Xenon's high atomic weight means that the ratio of energy expended for ionization per mass unit is low, leading to a more efficient thruster.[20]
Krypton
[edit]Krypton is another choice of propellant for Hall thrusters. Xenon has an ionization potential of 12.1298 eV, while krypton has an ionization potential of 13.996 eV.[21] This means that thrusters utilizing krypton need to expend a slightly higher energy per mole to ionize, which reduces efficiency. Additionally, krypton is a lighter ion, so the unit mass per ionization energy is further reduced compared to xenon. However, xenon can be more than ten times as expensive as krypton per kilogram, making krypton a more economical choice for building out satellite constellations like that of SpaceX's Starlink V1, whose original Hall thrusters were fueled with krypton.[19][22]
Argon
[edit]SpaceX developed a new thruster that used argon as propellant for their Starlink V2 mini. The new thruster had 2.4 times the thrust and 1.5 times the specific impulse as SpaceX's previous thruster that used krypton.[13] Argon is approximately 100 times less expensive than Krypton and 1000 times less expensive than Xenon.[23]
Comparison of noble gasses
[edit]| Gas | Symbol | at wt (g/mol) | ionization potential (eV) [21] | unit mass per ionization energy | reference price[24] | cost / m³ (€) | density (g/l) | cost / kg (€) | relative to cheapest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xenon | Xe | 131.29 | 12.13 | 10.824 | 25 € / l | 25000 | 5.894 | 4241.60 | 1905 |
| Krypton | Kr | 83.798 | 14.00 | 5.986 | 3 € / l | 3000 | 3.749 | 800.21 | 359 |
| Argon | Ar | 39.95 | 15.81 | 2.527 | $0.12 / ft³ | 3.97 | 1.784 | 2.23 | 1 |
| Neon | Ne | 20.18 | 21.64 | 0.933 | €504 / m³ | 504 | 0.9002 | 559.88 | 251 |
| Helium | He | 4.002 | 24.59 | 0.163 | $7.21 / m³ | 6.76 | 0.1786 | 37.84 | 17 |
Variants
[edit]As well as the Soviet SPT and TAL types mentioned above, there are:
Cylindrical Hall thrusters
[edit]
Although conventional (annular) Hall thrusters are efficient in the kilowatt power regime, they become inefficient when scaled to small sizes. This is due to the difficulties associated with holding the performance scaling parameters constant while decreasing the channel size and increasing the applied magnetic field strength. This led to the design of the cylindrical Hall thruster. The cylindrical Hall thruster can be more readily scaled to smaller sizes due to its nonconventional discharge-chamber geometry and associated magnetic field profile.[25][26][27] The cylindrical Hall thruster more readily lends itself to miniaturization and low-power operation than a conventional (annular) Hall thruster. The primary reason for cylindrical Hall thrusters is that it is difficult to achieve a regular Hall thruster that operates over a broad envelope from c.1 kW down to c. 100 W while maintaining an efficiency of 45–55%.[28]
External discharge Hall thruster
[edit]Sputtering erosion of discharge channel walls and pole pieces that protect the magnetic circuit causes failure of thruster operation. Therefore, annular and cylindrical Hall thrusters have limited lifetime. Although magnetic shielding has been shown to dramatically reduce discharge channel wall erosion, pole piece erosion is still a concern.[29] As an alternative, an unconventional Hall thruster design called external discharge Hall thruster or external discharge plasma thruster (XPT) has been introduced.[30][31][32] The external discharge Hall thruster does not possess any discharge channel walls or pole pieces. Plasma discharge is produced and sustained completely in the open space outside the thruster structure, and thus erosion-free operation is achieved.
Applications
[edit].jpg)
Hall thrusters have been flying in space since December 1971, when the Soviet Union launched an SPT-50 on a Meteor satellite.[33] Over 240 thrusters have flown in space since that time, with a 100% success rate.[34] Hall thrusters are now routinely flown on commercial LEO and GEO communications satellites, where they are used for orbital insertion and stationkeeping.
The first[failed verification] Hall thruster to fly on a western satellite was a Russian D-55 built by TsNIIMASH, on the NRO's STEX spacecraft, launched on 3 October 1998.[35]
The solar electric propulsion system of the European Space Agency's SMART-1 spacecraft used a Snecma PPS-1350-G Hall thruster.[36] SMART-1 was a technology demonstration mission that orbited the Moon. This use of the PPS-1350-G, starting on 28 September 2003, was the first use of a Hall thruster outside geosynchronous Earth orbit (GEO). Like most Hall thruster propulsion systems used in commercial applications, the Hall thruster on SMART-1 could be throttled over a range of power, specific impulse, and thrust.[37] It has a discharge power range of 0.46–1.19 kW, a specific impulse of 1,100–1,600 s and thrust of 30–70 mN.
Early small satellites of the SpaceX Starlink constellation used krypton-fueled Hall thrusters for position-keeping and deorbiting,[22] while later Starlink satellites used argon-fueled Hall thrusters.[13]
Tiangong space station is fitted with Hall-effect thrusters. Tianhe core module is propelled by both chemical thrusters and four ion thrusters,[38] which are used to adjust and maintain the station's orbit. Hall-effect thrusters are created with crewed mission safety in mind with effort to prevent erosion and damage caused by the accelerated ion particles. A magnetic field and specially designed ceramic shield was created to repel damaging particles and maintain integrity of the thrusters. According to the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the ion drive used on Tiangong has burned continuously for 8,240 hours without a glitch, indicating their suitability for the Chinese space station's designated 15-year lifespan.[39] This is the world's first Hall thruster on a human-rated mission.[40]
The Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) granted exclusive commercial licensing to Apollo Fusion, led by Mike Cassidy, for its Magnetically Shielded Miniature (MaSMi) Hall thruster technology.[41] In January 2021, Apollo Fusion announced they had secured a contract with York Space Systems for an order of its latest iteration named the "Apollo Constellation Engine".[42]
The NASA mission to the asteroid Psyche utilizes xenon gas Hall thrusters.[43] The electricity comes from the craft's 75 square meter solar panels.[44]
NASA's first Hall thrusters on a human-rated mission will be a combination of 6 kW Hall thrusters provided by Busek and NASA Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) 12.5 kW Hall thrusters manufactured by Aerojet Rocketdyne,[45] an L3Harris Technologies company. They will serve as the primary propulsion on Maxar's Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) for the Lunar Gateway under NASA's Artemis program.[46] The high specific impulse of Hall thrusters will allow for efficient orbit raising and station keep for the Lunar Gateway's polar near-rectilinear halo orbit.
In development
[edit]The highest power Hall-effect thruster in development (as of 2021[update]) is the University of Michigan's 100 kW X3 Nested Channel Hall Thruster. The thruster is approximately 80 cm in diameter and weighs 230 kg, and has demonstrated a thrust of 5.4 N.[47]
Other high power thrusters include NASA's 40 kW Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS), meant to propel large-scale science missions and cargo transportation in deep space.[48]
References
[edit]- ^ Hofer, Richard R. (June 2004). Development and Characterization of High-Efficiency, High-Specific Impulse Xenon Hall Thrusters. NASA Technical Reports Server (Report). hdl:2060/20040084644. NASA/CR – 2004-21309.
- ^ "Ion Thruster Prototype Breaks Records in Tests, Could Send Humans to Mars". space.com. 13 October 2017. Archived from the original on 20 March 2018. Retrieved 27 April 2018.
- ^ a b Choueiri, Edgar Y. (2009). "New Dawn for Electric Rockets". Scientific American. 300 (2): 58–65. Bibcode:2009SciAm.300b..58C. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0209-58. PMID 19186707.
- ^ Janes, G.; Dotson, J.; Wilson, T. (1962). Momentum transfer through magnetic fields. Proceedings of third symposium on advanced propulsion concepts. Vol. 2. Cincinnati, Ohio. pp. 153–175.
- ^ Meyerand, R. G. (1962). Momentum Transfer Through the Electric Fields. Proceedings of Third Symposium on Advanced Propulsion Concepts. Vol. 1. Cincinnati, Ohio. pp. 177–190.
- ^ Seikel, G. R. (1962). Generation of Thrust – Electromagnetic Thrusters. Proceedings of the NASA-University Conference on the Science and Technology of Space Exploration. Vol. 2. Chicago, Illinois. pp. 171–176.
- ^ "Hall thrusters". 14 January 2004. Archived from the original on 28 February 2004.
- ^ Morozov, A.I. (March 2003). "The conceptual development of stationary plasma thrusters". Plasma Physics Reports. 29 (3). Nauka/Interperiodica: 235–250. Bibcode:2003PlPhR..29..235M. doi:10.1134/1.1561119. S2CID 122072987.
- ^ a b "Native Electric Propulsion Engines Today" (in Russian). Novosti Kosmonavtiki. 1999. Archived from the original on 6 June 2011.
- ^ "AFIT SPASS Lab Achieves '(AF) Blue Glow'". Air Force Institute of Technology. 13 November 2007. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014.
- ^ "A year of firsts for electric propulsion". Aerospace America. 1 December 2023. Archived from the original on 11 November 2024. Retrieved 11 November 2024.
- ^ "Aerojet Rocketdyne's Modified XR-5 Hall Thruster Demonstrates Successful On-Orbit Operation" (Press release). Aerojet Rocketdyne. 1 July 2015. Archived from the original on 9 July 2015. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
- ^ a b c Foust, Jeff (28 February 2023). "SpaceX Launches First Upgraded Starlink Satellites". SpaceNews. Retrieved 5 December 2023.
- ^ Lewis, Briley (17 October 2023). "NASA's Psyche spacecraft will blaze an unusual blue trail across the solar system". Popular Science. Archived from the original on 17 October 2023. Retrieved 17 October 2023.
- ^ "ISRO to Test Electric Propulsion on Satellites". The New Indian Express. 30 November 2015. Archived from the original on 18 November 2023. Retrieved 17 February 2024.
- ^ Gautam, Kushagr (28 May 2021). "Spacetech Startup Bellatrix Aerospace Test Fires India's First Privately Built Hall Thruster". Archived from the original on 18 November 2023. Retrieved 18 November 2023.
- ^ "Space startup Bellatrix to test electric propulsion for satellites on-board PSLV". The Economic Times. 21 April 2023. ISSN 0013-0389. Archived from the original on 24 January 2025. Retrieved 17 October 2024.
- ^ "Hall-Effect Stationary Plasma thrusters". Electric Propulsion for Inter-Orbital Vehicles. Archived from the original on 17 July 2013. Retrieved 16 June 2014.[1] Archived 10 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ a b "Krypton Hall effect thruster for spacecraft propulsion". ScienceDaily. Archived from the original on 28 April 2021. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
- ^ "Hall Thruster Project". w3.pppl.gov. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
- ^ a b "The elements of the periodic table sorted by ionization energy". www.lenntech.com. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 28 April 2021.
- ^ a b "Starlink Press Kit" (PDF). SpaceX. 15 May 2019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 May 2019. Retrieved 12 November 2019.
- ^ Shuen-Chen Hwang; Lein, Robert D.; Morgan, Daniel A. (2005). "Noble Gases". Kirk Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. Wiley. pp. 343–383. doi:10.1002/0471238961.0701190508230114.a01. ISBN 978-0-471-23896-6.
- ^ "Chemical elements by market price". Archived from the original on 24 October 2023. Retrieved 17 September 2023. Using the Reference Price column, as the cost per unit weight values are inconsistent. The table provides dates that appear to be when quotes were obtained, but has links only to generic supplier websites.
- ^ Raitses, Y.; Fisch, N. J. "Parametric Investigations of a Nonconventional Hall Thruster" (PDF). Physics of Plasmas, 8, 2579 (2001). Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 May 2010.
- ^ Smirnov, A.; Raitses, Y.; Fisch, N. J. "Experimental and theoretical studies of cylindrical Hall thrusters" (PDF). Physics of Plasmas 14, 057106 (2007). Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 May 2010.
- ^ Polzin, K. A.; Raitses, Y.; Gayoso, J. C.; Fisch, N. J. (25 July 2010). Comparisons in Performance of Electromagnet and Permanent-Magnet Cylindrical Hall-Effect Thrusters. 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference. NASA Technical Reports Server. hdl:2060/20100035731.
- ^ Polzin, K. A.; Raitses, Y.; Merino, E.; Fisch, N. J. (8 December 2008). Preliminary Results of Performance Measurements on a Cylindrical Hall-Effect Thruster with Magnetic Field Generated by Permanent Magnets. 3rd Spacecraft Propulsion Subcommittee (SPS) meeting/JANNAF Interagency Propulsion Committee. NASA Technical Reports Server. hdl:2060/20090014067.
- ^ Goebel, Dan M.; Jorns, Benjamin; Hofer, Richard R.; Mikellides, Ioannis G.; Katz, Ira (2014). "Pole-piece Interactions with the Plasma in a Magnetically Shielded Hall Thruster". 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference. doi:10.2514/6.2014-3899. ISBN 978-1-62410-303-2.
- ^ Karadag, Burak; Cho, Shinatora; Oshio, Yuya; Hamada, Yushi; Funaki, Ikkoh; Komurasaki, Kimiya (2016). "Preliminary Investigation of an External Discharge Plasma Thruster". 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference. doi:10.2514/6.2016-4951. ISBN 978-1-62410-406-0.
- ^ "Numerical Investigation of an External Discharge Hall Thruster Design Utilizing Plasma-lens Magnetic Field" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 August 2017.
- ^ "Low–voltage External Discharge Plasma Thruster and Hollow Cathodes Plasma Plume Diagnostics Utilising Electrostatic Probes and Retarding Potential Analyser". Archived from the original on 29 August 2017.
- ^ Turner, Martin J.L. (2008). Rocket and Spacecraft Propulsion: Principles, Practice and New Developments. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 197. ISBN 978-3-540-69203-4. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
- ^ Meyer, Mike; et al. (April 2012). "In-space propulsion systems roadmap" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022.
- ^ "National Reconnaissance Office Satellite Successfully Launched" (PDF). Naval Research Laboratory (Press Release). 3 October 1998. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 November 2011.
- ^ Cornu, Nicolas; Marchandise, Frédéric; Darnon, Franck; Estublier, Denis (2007). PPS1350 Qualification Demonstration: 10500 hrs on the Ground and 5000 hrs in Flight. 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. Cincinnati, Ohio. doi:10.2514/6.2007-5197.
- ^ "Ion engine gets SMART-1 to the Moon: Electric Propulsion Subsystem". ESA. 31 August 2006. Archived from the original on 29 January 2011. Retrieved 25 July 2011.
- ^ Jones, Andrew (28 April 2021). "Three Decades in the Making, China's Space Station Launches This Week". IEEE. Archived from the original on 25 December 2024. Retrieved 31 July 2024.
- ^ Chen, Stephen (2 June 2021). "How China's space station could help power astronauts to Mars". Archived from the original on 22 June 2021. Retrieved 22 June 2021.
- ^ 张 (Zhang), 保淑 (Baoshu) (21 June 2021). "配置4台霍尔电推进发动机 "天宫"掀起太空动力变革". 中国新闻网 (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 6 July 2021. Retrieved 18 July 2021.
- ^ Foust, Jeff (7 May 2019). "Apollo Fusion obtains Hall thruster technology from JPL". Spacenews.com. Retrieved 27 January 2021.
- ^ Foust, Jeff (27 January 2021). "Apollo Fusion wins electric propulsion order from York Space Systems". spacenews.com. Retrieved 27 January 2021.
- ^ "Psyche's Hall Thruster". NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Archived from the original on 8 March 2022. Retrieved 8 March 2022.
- ^ "Up Close With a Solar Panel on Psyche". NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved 8 March 2022.
- ^ "NASA, Aerojet Rocketdyne Put Gateway Thruster System to the Test". NASA Glenn. 12 July 2023. Archived from the original on 6 July 2025. Retrieved 17 July 2025.
- ^ Sands, Kelly (30 March 2021). "We're Fired Up! Gateway's Propulsion System Passes First Test". NASA. Archived from the original on 25 April 2021. Retrieved 27 April 2021.
- ^ "X3 – Nested Channel Hall Thruster". Plasmadynamics & Electric Propulsion Laboratory, University of Michigan. Archived from the original on 29 April 2021. Retrieved 27 April 2021.
- ^ Daniel A. Herman, Todd A. Tofil, Walter Santiago, Hani Kamhawi, James E. Polk, John S. Snyder, Richard R. Hofer, Frank Q. Picha, Jerry Jackson and May Allen. "Overview of the Development and Mission Application of the Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS)" Archived 2 August 2020 at the Wayback Machine (PDF). NASA; NASA/TM–2018-219761. 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference. Atlanta, Georgia, 8–12 October 2017. Retrieved 27 July 2018.
Further reading
[edit]- Edgar, Y. (2009). New Dawn for Electric Rockets Archived 18 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine
- "How the Hall Effect Still Reverberates". IEEE Spectrum. 28 January 2022.
External links
[edit]- SITAEL S.p.A. (Italy) Archived 21 January 2021 at the Wayback Machine—Page presenting Hall effect thruster products & data sheets
- Electric Propulsion Sub-Systems Archived 7 January 2014 at the Wayback Machine (PDF)
- Stationary plasma thrusters (PDF)
- ESA page on Hall thrusters
- Apollo Fusion
| Concepts | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical propulsion | |||||||||
| Chemical propulsion |
| ||||||||
| Electrical propulsion |
| ||||||||
| Nuclear propulsion |
| ||||||||
| External power | |||||||||
| Related concepts | |||||||||
Hall-effect thruster
View on GrokipediaPhysics and Principles
The Hall Effect
The Hall effect, discovered by American physicist Edwin Hall in 1879 during his doctoral research at Johns Hopkins University, describes the generation of a transverse voltage across a conductor carrying an electric current when subjected to a perpendicular magnetic field. This phenomenon arises from the Lorentz force acting on the charge carriers—typically electrons in metals—deflecting them toward one side of the conductor, creating a buildup of charge and an opposing electric field that eventually balances the magnetic deflection. Hall's original experiment involved a thin gold foil strip with current flowing longitudinally and a magnetic field applied perpendicularly, resulting in a measurable potential difference across the width of the strip.[8][9] The mathematical formulation of the Hall voltage derives from the equilibrium between the Lorentz force and the resulting Hall electric field. For a conductor of thickness in the direction of the magnetic field , with current flowing perpendicular to both and the measurement direction, the drift velocity of electrons (where is the electron density, is the elementary charge, and is the width) leads to a magnetic force balanced by , yielding: This expression highlights the inverse dependence on carrier density and thickness , and its derivation incorporates the cyclotron motion of electrons under the magnetic field, where the radius of gyration (with as electron mass) influences the transverse deflection. The effect's sign depends on the charge carrier type, negative for electrons and positive for holes in semiconductors./University_Physics_II_-Thermodynamics_Electricity_and_Magnetism(OpenStax)/11%3A_Magnetic_Forces_and_Fields/11.07%3A_The_Hall_Effect)[10] In plasma physics, the Hall effect plays a crucial role in scenarios involving crossed electric () and magnetic () fields, where it enables electron confinement through the azimuthal drift velocity . This drift arises because electrons, with their high mobility and low mass, gyrate tightly around magnetic field lines with a small cyclotron radius, effectively trapping them in closed orbits perpendicular to both fields and restricting axial motion. In contrast, ions—due to their much higher mass and correspondingly lower gyrofrequency (where )—experience weaker confinement, remaining largely unmagnetized and able to traverse the field more freely along the electric field direction. This differential behavior underpins plasma dynamics in magnetized environments, such as controlled fusion or space plasmas.[11] The Hall effect's relevance to propulsion concepts began to emerge in early 20th-century theoretical explorations of plasma acceleration, where researchers linked the magnetic deflection and confinement of charged particles to potential mechanisms for generating directed momentum in ionized gases. Pioneering ideas around electric propulsion, dating back to the 1910s, drew on these principles to conceptualize systems harnessing Lorentz forces for thrust, though practical implementations remained speculative until mid-century advances in plasma technology.[1]Operational Mechanism
In a Hall-effect thruster, neutral propellant is injected into an annular discharge channel, where it encounters electrons emitted from an external hollow cathode. These electrons are accelerated axially toward a positively biased anode at the channel base by a strong electric field, while a radial magnetic field, typically produced by electromagnets, confines the electrons to azimuthal drift orbits, forming the characteristic Hall current. This electron trapping reduces axial electron mobility, prolonging their residence time in the channel and promoting ionizing collisions with neutral atoms to generate a quasi-neutral plasma. The process relies on the crossed electric and magnetic fields to sustain a closed-drift configuration, where the azimuthal electron motion (E × B drift) dominates, enabling efficient ionization with minimal electron loss to the anode.[3][4] The resulting ions, largely unaffected by the magnetic field due to their higher mass-to-charge ratio, experience primarily electrostatic acceleration in the axial electric field, gaining directed velocity as they traverse the channel and exit through a diverging magnetic nozzle. This ion exhaust produces thrust via reaction momentum transfer to the thruster structure. Downstream of the channel exit, electrons from the cathode are drawn into the ion beam to neutralize its charge, preventing spacecraft potential buildup and beam spreading. The overall mechanism thus couples electromagnetic confinement for ionization with electrostatic acceleration for propulsion, achieving high exhaust velocities in a compact design.[3][2] Key performance metrics are defined by fundamental equations. Thrust is expressed aswhere is the propellant mass flow rate and is the ion exhaust velocity. Specific impulse , a measure of propulsion efficiency, is
with as standard gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/s²). Overall thruster efficiency is
where is the total input power. Typical values for mature Hall-effect thrusters include of 1500–2500 s and of 50–60%, reflecting effective conversion of electrical power to directed kinetic energy despite losses from wall interactions and plume divergence.[1][4] The plasma in the discharge channel exhibits characteristic properties that support stable operation: electron temperatures range from 10–30 eV, discharge voltages are 200–500 V, and radial magnetic field strengths are 0.01–0.1 T. These parameters ensure sufficient electron energy for ionization while maintaining magnetic confinement without excessive ion losses. However, the system often displays low-frequency breathing mode oscillations (5–30 kHz), driven by coupled fluctuations in neutral density, ionization rate, and plasma potential, which can modulate discharge current by up to 50% and influence stability, though they generally do not preclude efficient performance.[3][12][13] Hall-effect thruster performance scales with input power, spanning 0.1–100 kW, which corresponds to thrusts of 10–500 mN through adjustments in channel size, flow rate, and field strength. At lower powers, compact designs prioritize efficiency for small satellites, while higher powers enable greater thrust densities via enhanced ionization and acceleration, though challenges like increased wall erosion arise. This scaling allows adaptation across mission profiles while preserving core operational principles.[6][14]
Design and Components
Propellant Selection
Hall-effect thrusters primarily utilize noble gases as propellants due to their chemical inertness, which minimizes erosion of thruster components, and their favorable ionization properties that enhance plasma generation efficiency. Xenon is the most commonly selected propellant, with an atomic mass of 131 atomic mass units (u) and a first ionization energy of 12.1 electron volts (eV), allowing for efficient ionization at lower power levels and providing high storage density in compressed form, which optimizes spacecraft mass budgets.[15][16] Krypton serves as a cost-effective alternative, featuring an atomic mass of 84 u and ionization energy of 14.0 eV, though it requires slightly higher power for ionization compared to xenon.[15][17] Argon, with an atomic mass of 40 u and ionization energy of 15.8 eV, offers the lowest cost but results in reduced performance due to its lighter mass and higher energy barrier for ionization.[15][18] Emerging non-noble propellants include iodine, a solid at room temperature that simplifies storage and reduces tank volume requirements compared to gaseous options, though it poses challenges from corrosive iodine vapor that can degrade thruster materials without protective coatings.[19][20] Metal propellants such as zinc, magnesium, and bismuth are under investigation for their high atomic masses, which could enhance thrust density, and potential for in-situ resource utilization, but they face hurdles in vaporization control and compatibility with thruster cathodes.[21][22][23]| Propellant | Atomic Mass (u) | Ionization Energy (eV) | Cost per kg (USD, approximate) | Storage Volume (relative, at STP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xenon | 131 | 12.1 | 5,000–12,000 | Low (high density) |
| Krypton | 84 | 14.0 | 2,100–4,800 | Medium |
| Argon | 40 | 15.8 | 7–15 | High (low density) |
| Iodine | 127 | 10.5 | 10–400 | Very low (solid) |
Thruster Variants
Hall-effect thrusters primarily feature cylindrical or annular designs, characterized by coaxial electrodes and a radial magnetic field that confines electrons within an acceleration channel. In this standard configuration, propellant gas is injected through an annular anode at the base of the channel, where it is ionized by electrons drifting azimuthally due to the crossed electric and magnetic fields. The ions are then accelerated axially toward the exit by the electric field, producing thrust. This architecture allows for efficient plasma generation and ion acceleration while minimizing propellant utilization losses.[3] Key subtypes of the cylindrical design include the Stationary Plasma Thruster (SPT) and the Thruster with Anode Layer (TAL). The SPT employs dielectric walls, typically boron nitride (BN), throughout the channel, with the magnetic field peaking near the channel exit and an external cathode positioned downstream. This setup promotes ionization along most of the channel length, enhancing efficiency but exposing walls to prolonged plasma contact, which can lead to erosion. In contrast, the TAL features metallic channel walls and positions the magnetic field maximum near the anode, confining the acceleration region to a thin layer adjacent to the anode. This reduces wall exposure to high-energy ions, potentially extending lifetime, though it may result in slightly lower ionization efficiency compared to SPTs. Performance differences arise from these geometric and material choices: SPTs often achieve thrust efficiencies above 50% at powers of 1-5 kW, while TALs excel in higher voltage operations with reduced plume divergence.[26][29] External discharge variants address channel wall erosion by shifting ionization and acceleration outside the physical channel boundaries, thereby minimizing ion bombardment on walls. In wall-less Hall thrusters, for instance, the plasma is generated in an open volume using a magnetic topology that employs mirroring effects to trap electrons without enclosing walls, allowing ions to accelerate in a divergent field. This design reduces sputtering rates significantly, as ions do not impinge on channel surfaces, and supports higher power operations by avoiding thermal constraints of enclosed channels. Magnetic mirror configurations further enhance this by creating field lines that converge and diverge to focus the plasma plume, improving beam collimation and thrust vector control. These variants have demonstrated thrust levels comparable to traditional designs but with significantly reduced erosion rates.[30][31] Other notable variants include low-power miniature Hall thrusters, scaled to operate below 100 W for small satellites like CubeSats, and high-power clustered systems exceeding 10 kW. Miniature versions, such as the LpHet-100, utilize compact permanent magnet circuits and reduced channel sizes to fit within volume constraints of 1-3U spacecraft, providing specific impulses around 1,000-1,500 s for attitude control and orbit adjustments. High-power systems often cluster multiple thruster units to achieve total powers over 10 kW, enabling rapid orbital maneuvers for larger platforms, though this introduces challenges like inter-thruster interactions and uniform power distribution. Scaling across power levels highlights persistent issues, particularly wall erosion from ion sputtering, which limits operational lifetimes to 1,000-10,000 hours in unshielded designs; magnetically shielded variants mitigate this by diverting erosive ions away from walls, extending life by up to an order of magnitude. An example of a low-power magnetically shielded miniature Hall thruster is the MaSMi-60, developed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which operates in the 200-1500 W range and achieves thrust up to 68.6 mN, specific impulse up to 1940 s, and total efficiencies up to 38%.[32][33][34][36][12] Common design parameters across variants include channel dimensions, materials, and magnetic circuits tailored to performance needs. Typical annular channels have outer diameters of 20-200 mm and lengths of 20-100 mm, with the aspect ratio influencing plasma confinement and efficiency—shorter channels favor higher thrust densities but risk incomplete ionization. Walls are predominantly BN ceramics for their low sputtering yield in SPTs, while TALs may use metals like stainless steel for cost and conductivity; electrodes are often molybdenum or graphite to withstand high temperatures. Magnetic circuits employ either electromagnets for adjustable fields (up to 200 G) in high-power units or permanent magnets (e.g., samarium-cobalt) in low-power designs for simplicity and reduced mass, with topologies optimized to achieve radial fields of 50-300 G across the channel. These parameters directly impact thrust-to-power ratios, typically 40-70 mN/kW, and overall system reliability.[3][37]Historical Development
Soviet Pioneering Work
The pioneering work on Hall-effect thrusters in the Soviet Union began with theoretical foundations laid in the 1950s by physicist Alexey I. Morozov at the Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy (now the National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"). Morozov's early research explored plasma acceleration in crossed electric and magnetic fields, with his seminal 1957 paper "On Plasma Acceleration by Magnetic Field" introducing concepts of electron confinement and ion acceleration in azimuthal drifts, predating similar Western efforts.[38] These ideas formed the basis for closed-drift accelerators, emphasizing prolonged acceleration zones to enhance efficiency in plasma propulsion systems. By the early 1960s, Morozov led a team at the institute to develop the stationary plasma thruster (SPT) concept, focusing on quasi-neutral plasma beams for spacecraft applications.[4] The first practical SPT prototype emerged in 1964 at the OKB Fakel Experimental Design Bureau in Kaliningrad, under the direction of engineers like N. Maslennikov, building directly on Morozov's theoretical framework. This prototype demonstrated stable operation with xenon propellant, utilizing a radial magnetic field to trap electrons and enable axial ion acceleration. Milestone developments followed, including the SPT-50 in 1967, which operated at approximately 300-400 W input power, producing up to 20 mN of thrust with xenon flow rates around 1-2 mg/s, achieving specific impulses near 1100 s.[39] By 1971, the SPT-100 was tested on the ground for integration into Meteor meteorological satellites, scaling to 1.35 kW power with 80-83 mN thrust and specific impulses up to 1600 s, marking a significant advancement in thrust-to-power ratios for orbital applications.[40] These prototypes addressed initial challenges such as plasma instabilities through optimized channel geometries and magnetic field configurations. Initial space testing commenced in late 1971 with an SPT-50 aboard the Meteor-1-10 satellite, with in-orbit operation demonstrated in 1972 for primary propulsion tasks.[41] Over the 1970s and 1980s, cumulative testing exceeded 1000 hours per unit in ground facilities, resolving issues like cathode erosion—initially a limiting factor due to high electron currents—by adopting hollow cathodes with emissive inserts for improved longevity and reduced wear.[42] Institutions such as the Research Institute of Applied Mechanics and Electrodynamics (RIAME) at Moscow Aviation Institute collaborated with OKB Fakel and the Keldysh Research Center on refinements, including life-testing engineering models that passed 1000-hour endurance benchmarks by the mid-1980s. By the late 1980s, more than 70 SPT units had been built and flown successfully on Soviet satellites, with production scaling to support geostationary missions, though strict export controls limited international access until the 1990s.[43]Global Adoption and Advances
Following the end of the Cold War, Hall-effect thruster technology proliferated beyond the Soviet Union, with significant research and development in the United States beginning in the 1990s at NASA's Glenn Research Center, which investigated both thruster-with-anode-layer (TAL) and stationary plasma thruster (SPT) configurations to adapt Russian designs for Western applications.[44] This work laid the groundwork for higher-power systems, including the High Power Prototype (HiPP) Hall thruster developed in the 2010s, which demonstrated operation up to 55 kW and informed subsequent programs like the 12.5 kW-class HERMeS thruster.[45] Industry leaders such as Aerojet Rocketdyne advanced these efforts through partnerships with NASA, qualifying 1.5 kW-class systems like the D-55 for flight in the early 2000s and contributing to the Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS), a 12 kW Hall thruster entering qualification testing in 2025.[46] In Europe, the French space agency CNES has been involved in Hall-effect thruster development since 1994, collaborating with companies like Safran Aircraft Engines (formerly Snecma) on advanced models such as the PPS-1350 and PPS-5000.[47] The European Space Agency (ESA) established flight heritage for Hall-effect thrusters in the 1990s through the PPS-1350, developed by French firm Snecma (now Safran Aircraft Engines), which powered the SMART-1 lunar mission in 2003 and supported station-keeping on geostationary platforms.[48] German Aerospace Center (DLR) contributions included ground-testing and design optimizations for efficiency, while 2020s efforts have emphasized scalable variants using krypton propellant to reduce costs for small satellite applications.[49] Asian space agencies have also integrated Hall-effect thrusters into their programs, with India's ISRO beginning integration of Hall-effect thrusters in the 2000s, using ~300 W units on the GSAT-4 satellite in 2010 for station-keeping, though the launch failed. By the 2020s, ISRO advanced indigenous development, including a 1.5 kW magnetic-shielded Hall thruster, while private firms like Bellatrix Aerospace tested the Arka low-power HET in 2021.[50][51] Japan's JAXA has adapted Hall thruster technology for deep-space missions, progressing from breadboard models to 6 kW prototypes by the 2010s, though early asteroid missions like Hayabusa relied on alternative ion engines.[52] In China, progress includes 1-5 kW Hall thrusters developed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences for lunar exploration, such as those integrated into the Tianhe core module of the Tiangong space station in 2021.[53] Key advances in the 2000s included commercialization efforts, such as Busek Co.'s BHT-series Hall thrusters, which enabled integration into U.S. satellites for orbit raising and station-keeping.[54] By 2025, innovations like magnetic shielding—pioneered in U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) and NASA collaborations—have extended operational lifetimes beyond 5,000 hours by reducing wall erosion, as demonstrated in high-power density designs like the H10 thruster.[55] International efforts, including NASA's Hall Thruster Qualification Campaign, have standardized testing protocols for 12 kW-class systems like AEPS, facilitating broader adoption through shared qualification data.[56] The global market for Hall-effect thrusters reached approximately $1.0 billion in 2025, driven by demand from small satellite constellations for efficient propulsion in low-Earth orbit deployments.[57]Applications
Current Space Missions
Hall-effect thrusters have been integral to satellite applications, particularly for station-keeping and orbit raising in geostationary telecommunications satellites, where their high efficiency enables extended operational lifetimes with reduced propellant mass. The Russian-developed SPT-100 Hall thruster, licensed and produced as the Snecma PPS-1350 in Europe, has accumulated extensive flight heritage on commercial platforms, with over 100 units deployed on missions such as the Arabsat and Astra series since the late 1990s, demonstrating reliable performance in orbital environments.[58] Northrop Grumman's xenon-fueled Hall thruster systems, including the 1 kW-class NGHT variants, have supported station-keeping on Intelsat satellites, contributing to precise orbit maintenance and fuel savings in geosynchronous operations. In deep space missions, Hall-effect thrusters have proven effective for primary propulsion over long durations. The European Space Agency's SMART-1 mission, launched in 2003, utilized the PPS-1350-G Hall thruster as its sole propulsion system to spiral from low Earth orbit to lunar orbit, achieving a total delta-v of approximately 3 km/s with 59 kg of xenon propellant and validating the technology for interplanetary transfers.[58] This success highlighted the thruster's ability to operate continuously for over 5,000 hours in space, with measured efficiencies around 50-55% under varying power levels from 0.7 to 1.3 kW.[59] NASA's Psyche mission, launched in October 2023, employs four Solar Electric Propulsion Hall thrusters operating at up to 28 kW each for its multi-year journey to the metal-rich asteroid Psyche, providing thrust for orbit insertion and trajectory adjustments while achieving specific impulses over 2,800 seconds.[60] For small satellite applications, including CubeSats, low-power Hall-effect thrusters are increasingly adopted for precise attitude control and orbit adjustments. Busek's miniature Hall-effect designs, such as low-power models like the BHT-100 adapted for nano-scale operations, have been integrated into CubeSat missions since 2019, supporting constellation deployments and technology demonstrations with thrust levels in the millinewton range.[54] As of 2025, Hall-effect thrusters have extensive flight heritage, with thousands of units deployed in satellite constellations and deep-space missions, accumulating tens of millions of operational hours, underscoring their maturity and erosion-resistant designs that extend lifetimes through magnetic shielding and material advancements.[61] In-orbit performance data from these missions confirms Hall-effect thrusters achieve efficiencies of 55-65%, depending on power throttling and propellant flow, while challenges such as integrating power conditioning units with solar arrays have been addressed through robust electronics that handle voltage fluctuations up to 400 V.[62] Lifetime extensions via erosion mitigation, including boron nitride channel walls and optimized magnetic topologies, have enabled operations beyond 10,000 hours per unit without significant degradation. Recent updates include the Starlink constellation, where as of 2025, over 6,000 satellites employ argon Hall-effect thrusters for rapid orbit raising from low Earth orbit, inter-satellite maneuvering, and controlled deorbit at end-of-life, marking the largest-scale operational use of the technology with thrust outputs of approximately 170 mN per unit.[63]Emerging and Future Developments
Ongoing research in high-power Hall-effect thrusters focuses on scaling to 100 kW and beyond to enable efficient cargo transport to Mars and other deep-space targets. NASA's Collaborative High-Ampere Medium-Power Solar Electric Propulsion (CHAMPS) studies have emphasized low-power, high-throughput Hall-effect thrusters optimized for such missions, demonstrating potential for enhanced performance in the 2020s. Similarly, the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory's (AFRL) collaboration on the X3 nested-channel thruster achieved a record of over 100 kW power processing with 5.4 N thrust in tests conducted through 2017, which achieved 102 kW operation in 2017 on xenon, with subsequent iterations tested on krypton and other propellants.[64][65][66] Efforts to improve efficiency through alternative propellants include iodine for its high vapor pressure and potential cost savings over xenon, with NASA advancing prototypes that achieve comparable thrust-to-power ratios in laboratory settings. Air-breathing concepts for low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites are under investigation, incorporating mixtures like argon with carbon dioxide or nitrogen-oxygen to utilize atmospheric gases, thereby reducing onboard propellant mass. For small satellites, krypton offers a viable alternative due to its lower cost—approximately 50% less than xenon—while maintaining operational viability; the Polish Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion (IFPiLM) developed a krypton-based Hall thruster in 2025, demonstrating thrust efficiencies suitable for CubeSat applications.[67][68][69] Advanced features such as magnetic shielding are extending thruster lifetimes by diverting ion bombardment from channel walls, with tests on a 1.35 kW shielded Hall thruster confirming operation beyond 10,000 hours without significant erosion. Integration with nuclear electric propulsion systems is progressing, as seen in NASA's Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS) derivatives, which pair 12 kW Hall thrusters with fission reactors for sustained deep-space missions, targeting cislunar and beyond operations.[70][71] Qualification efforts include the 2025 acceptance testing of AEPS units under AIAA-guided protocols for system-level vacuum performance and endurance, ensuring reliability for future missions. Commercialization is driven by demand from satellite constellations, with the global electric propulsion satellite market projected to reach $30.31 billion by 2032, fueled by Hall thrusters' role in station-keeping and orbit raising.[72][73] Key research challenges encompass managing startup transients, where voltage and current oscillations can lead to instability and increased erosion; real-time machine learning controls are being developed to mitigate these by perturbing discharge parameters. Plume interactions with solar arrays pose risks of arcing and potential degradation, as laboratory data show floating potential variations affecting array efficiency in Hall thruster environments. Ongoing EU-JAXA collaborations target lunar and asteroid missions, with JAXA advancing Hall thruster prototypes for precise maneuvering in 2025 tests.[74][75][76] A notable 2025 innovation involves phase-space embedding techniques to predict thruster stability during transients, using time-dependent discharge current data to track breathing mode oscillations and enable proactive control, as demonstrated in dynamics-based studies at Georgia Tech.[77]References
- https://ntrs.[nasa](/page/NASA).gov/api/citations/20000025489/downloads/20000025489.pdf