Hubbry Logo
HansonismHansonismMain
Open search
Hansonism
Community hub
Hansonism
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hansonism
Hansonism
Hansonism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

This article is part of
a series about
Pauline Hanson
Look up Hansonism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Part of a series on
Far-right politics
in Australia
Principles
History
Active organisations
Defunct organisations
People
Related topics
Part of a series on
Conservatism in Australia
Ideologies
Principles
Intellectuals
Jurists
Commentators
Politicians
Parties
Active
Defunct
Organisations
Active
Defunct
Think tanks
Media
Active
Defunct
Related topics

In Australian politics, Hansonism is the political ideology of Pauline Hanson, the leader of One Nation, and those that follow her. The term has been used since 1998,[1] and was added to The Australian National Dictionary in 2018.[2]

Ideology

[edit]

Hansonism has been described as a form of right-wing populism. A common theme within Hansonism is the idea that the "multiculturalist elite" are manipulating "hardworking Australians" into supporting certain policies, such as Indigenous land rights and welcome to country ceremonies.[3][4] Hansonism believes that such rights for minority groups, such as for Indigenous Australians, are forms of reverse racism and are anti-equality.[3]

Another key feature of Hansonism is support of economic nationalism and opposition to economic rationalism.[5] Hanson has supported the re-introduction of tariffs, establishing government-run banks, renewing local manufacturing, and is critical of multinational corporations.[5]

In 1998, Kukathas and Maley identified two strands of Hansonism: Soft Hansonism, and Hard Hansonism.[1] Hard Hansonism refers to the policies directly supported by Hanson, such as anti-Asian sentiment, an attachment to the White Australia Policy, criticism of multiculturalism, and the populist view that these policies are associated with "the people".[1] Soft Hansonism is associated with Hansonist policies that take a milder form or are promoted by non-One Nation members, such as staunch opposition to asylum seekers, with the views of Graeme Campbell being cited as an example of the latter type.[1]

Critical reception

[edit]

Academic Tod Moore interprets Hansonism as a reaction against the rise of neoliberalism and globalism, inspired by both fear and anger, and that it has been adopted by blue-collar and middle class Australians due to the acceptance of neoliberalism by the Australian Labor Party. However, Moore critiqued Hansonism as contradictory as the policies would ultimately lead to policies he believes as harmful to those groups, such as "smaller government, fewer public amenities, more financial deregulation, weaker unions, and greater wealth inequality".[5]

Milton Osborne, in 1999, noted that research found that Hanson's initial supporters did not find Asian immigration a major reason for their support, but instead they were most concerned about economic deregulation and unemployment. Osborne also argues that her support of substantial tax cuts undermined support for Hansonism, leading to her initially leaving parliament.[6]

Pauline Hanson, who Hansonism is named after.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Hansonism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Hansonism denotes the and associated policy framework championed by , the founder and enduring leader of , an Australian established in 1997 to represent concerns over , economic pressures, and inefficiencies. Central to Hansonism is the advocacy for substantially reducing immigration intake to mitigate strains on , , and opportunities, while emphasizing Australian ownership of key resources such as farmland, fisheries, and water assets to foster self-sufficiency. The critiques as divisive, promoting instead a unified national culture grounded in traditional Australian values, alongside demands for stricter foreign regulations and opposition to globalist influences perceived to undermine , including certain international treaties and supranational agendas. Originating from Hanson's 1996 in federal parliament, where she highlighted issues of , preferential treatment in indigenous policies, and the socioeconomic impacts of rapid Asian , Hansonism gained traction amid perceptions of elite detachment from regional and working-class realities. One Nation's platform extends to practical reforms in areas like water infrastructure development through dam , family-oriented relief, and bolstering with zero-tolerance approaches to , reflecting a commitment to and accountability in public spending. Notable achievements include securing seats in 2016 and 2019, enabling influence over legislative balances, and achieving significant vote shares in elections, such as 22% in 1998, which pressured major parties to address voter disaffection with and cultural shifts. Controversies have centered on Hanson's forthright critiques of , usage in public spaces, and climate policies deemed economically burdensome without proven benefits, positions that have drawn legal challenges under racial vilification laws but also sustained a loyal base by articulating empirically observable integration challenges and resource competitions.

Origins and Development

Pauline Hanson's Early Career and Rise to Prominence

Pauline Hanson was born on May 27, 1954, in , , into a working-class family; her parents owned a fish-and-chip shop, and she left school at age 15 to enter the workforce. She held various jobs before establishing small businesses, including a potato chip processing operation and a firm, and in the late , after her second marriage ended, she opened a fish-and-chip shop in , which she operated until 1997. This period coincided with economic pressures in regional , where and faced contraction due to , tariff reductions, and rising competition, fostering grievances among owners and rural communities over job losses and perceived government neglect. Hanson's experiences as a single mother running a local enterprise amid these challenges shaped her critique of economic policies disconnected from regional realities. In the lead-up to the 1996 federal election, Hanson joined the Liberal Party and was preselected as its candidate for the electorate of Oxley, a traditionally safe Labor seat in outer suburban and regional . Her candidacy gained attention after she wrote a letter to the editor of the Queensland Times questioning government privileges extended to , prompting the Liberal Party to disendorse her just weeks before polling day on March 2, 1996, citing the remarks as inflammatory. Despite the disendorsement, her name remained on the ballot as a Liberal, and she campaigned as an independent, capitalizing on local discontent with high —around 10-12% in Oxley—and in the region; she unexpectedly won the seat with 42% of the primary vote, defeating the Labor incumbent. On September 10, 1996, in her to the , Hanson articulated concerns rooted in her observations of regional economic decline, declaring that was "in danger of being swamped by Asians" and criticizing as divisive, alongside assertions that received undue welfare and privileges that disadvantaged other disadvantaged groups, including working-class whites. She argued that government policies favored minorities over the broader population, exacerbating unemployment and social fragmentation in areas like , and called for a reevaluation of levels to prioritize economic . The speech ignited immediate controversy, with mainstream media outlets denouncing it as racist and Prime Minister John Howard distancing the government, yet it resonated widely among voters in provincial Australia facing similar hardships. Public response included a surge of supportive correspondence to MPs and media, with reports of thousands applauding her forthrightness on unspoken frustrations. Contemporary polls underscored underlying agreement on immigration curbs: a 1996 AGB McNair survey found about 65% of respondents believed intake levels were too high, while data from the Australian Election Study indicated 60-70% opposition to elevated migration amid economic concerns in the late 1990s. This polarization highlighted a divide between urban elites and regional battlers, propelling Hanson as a voice for the latter and laying groundwork for her subsequent political movement.

Formation and Initial Launch of One Nation Party

Pauline Hanson established Pauline Hanson's One Nation on April 11, 1997, at the Civic Hall in Ipswich, Queensland, as a direct response to the economic grievances of rural and regional Australians amid the liberalization policies and globalization pressures of the 1990s, including tariff reductions and industry restructuring that contributed to farm closures and job losses. The party's formation addressed perceptions of major party indifference to these communities, where structural adjustments under successive Labor and Coalition governments exacerbated declines in sectors like agriculture and manufacturing. Co-founders David Ettridge and David Oldfield assisted in organizing the launch, emphasizing a platform to amplify voices sidelined by urban-centric politics. Early organizational efforts prioritized , with the party rapidly expanding its membership base to channel discontent from areas hit hard by the , during which regional unemployment rates in and similar locales peaked at approximately 11 percent. This surge reflected empirical strains from shocks, such as the collapse of protected industries, prompting One Nation to position itself as an alternative to the perceived elite consensus on and . The initial policy manifesto, developed for the , highlighted targeted responses to regional vulnerabilities, including a proposal for zero net until infrastructure and services could accommodate , justified by environmental limits and strain on public resources. It also called for opposition to the 1996 National Firearms Agreement's gun restrictions following the Port Arthur massacre, arguing they unduly burdened law-abiding rural owners, and advocated welfare reforms to phase out certain programs deemed to foster dependency amid fiscal pressures. These elements tied directly to voter concerns over in high-unemployment zones, where rates in affected rural electorates often surpassed 10 percent into the late . One Nation's launch culminated in its debut electoral performance at the June 1998 Queensland poll, securing 11 seats in the by capturing protest votes from regions bearing the brunt of economic dislocation. This outcome underscored the party's success in institutionalizing Hansonism as a vehicle for addressing tangible grievances, though subsequent internal challenges would test its cohesion.

Evolution of the Ideology Post-1997

Following the initial launch of party in 1997, its ideology transitioned from spontaneous public addresses to more structured policy documents by the early , with formal statements on migration released in emphasizing protectionist measures to address domestic pressures. This evolution incorporated empirical correlations, such as (ABS) data indicating that net overseas migration contributed to exceeding completions, with an estimated 19,570-unit shortfall in 2024 alone driven by rapid influxes outpacing supply. Hanson's platform argued these dynamics strained infrastructure without proportional economic benefits, prioritizing causal analyses of immigration's local impacts over broader multicultural frameworks. In the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis, Hansonism integrated critiques of and climate policies, denouncing agreements for eroding national self-reliance and UN-linked initiatives for infringing . One Nation's formalized stance rejected anthropogenic climate change as unsubstantiated, attributing environmental concerns to fearmongering rather than verifiable human causation, while advocating continued research unbound by international consensus bodies like the IPCC. Hanson specifically targeted UN treaties, such as the 2024 Global Digital Compact, as vehicles for external and loss, warning that provisions on could suppress domestic dissent against global agendas. By the 2020s, the ideology refined its focus on individual liberties amid pandemic responses, opposing mandates and lockdowns as disproportionate measures with negligible mortality reductions but substantial collateral harms, drawing on analyses like the 2022 Johns Hopkins-affiliated review finding lockdowns ineffective against case spread while amplifying economic and psychological costs. One Nation pushed for a into these policies, citing patterns inconsistent with official narratives and advocating exit from the to reclaim policy autonomy. This phase also emphasized digital freedoms, with Hanson voting against national digital ID systems and framing them as tools for overreach, consistent with broader anti-globalist defenses.

Core Principles

Nationalism and Sovereignty

Hansonism emphasizes the preservation of national borders and cultural homogeneity as essential foundations for social trust and cohesive , positing that unchecked diversity erodes the interpersonal bonds required for a functioning . , including Robert Putnam's analysis of over 30,000 U.S. respondents, demonstrates that higher ethnic diversity in communities correlates with reduced trust not only between groups but also within them, leading to lower , , and neighborly interactions. This "hunkering down" effect, observed across multiple metrics, underscores the causal link between homogeneity and the social that sustains national , a Hansonism applies to advocate limiting factors that dilute Australian cultural unity. Central to this framework is staunch opposition to supranational entities and agreements that subordinate Australian decision-making to external authorities, viewing them as direct threats to . One Nation policy explicitly calls for reasserting against the and other unaccountable foreign bodies that interfere in domestic affairs, prioritizing constitutional defenses over globalist integration. Similarly, Hanson critiqued multilateral trade pacts like the for embedding mechanisms—such as investor-state dispute settlement—that cede control over laws and regulations to international tribunals, expressing grave concerns over losses in deals and welcoming the U.S. withdrawal in 2017 as a model for bilateral alternatives. To safeguard , Hansonism promotes democratic tools like binding plebiscites on transformative issues, ensuring elite-driven policies align with the electorate's will rather than supranational or bureaucratic impositions. Following One Nation's 2016 Senate breakthrough, Hanson advocated plebiscites as a means to empower citizens on matters affecting , exemplified by support for public votes on social reforms to prevent unilateral parliamentary overrides. This approach reinforces causal realism in governance, where trumps abstracted international norms, fostering accountability grounded in empirical public consent.

Populism and Anti-Elitism

Hansonism positions itself as a bulwark against elite-driven orthodoxies, critiquing political correctness as a suppressive orthodoxy enforced by media and academic establishments to maintain class signaling and control discourse on contentious issues like immigration and national identity. Pauline Hanson has repeatedly framed political correctness not as benign etiquette but as a barrier to forthright public debate, arguing it prioritizes elite sensitivities over practical realities faced by average citizens. This stance reflects a causal understanding that institutional biases—prevalent in left-leaning media and academia—amplify certain narratives while marginalizing dissenting empirical observations, such as localized strains from rapid demographic shifts. Empirical indicators of public alienation from consensus bolster this anti-elitist core, with Australian surveys revealing deep-seated : a 2025 Bond University poll found only 16% of respondents trusted politicians, while an Ipsos survey indicated 60% viewed the economy as rigged toward elites. On specifically, despite prevailing positive assessments of diversity, nearly half (46%) of Australians in the 2024 Lowy Institute Poll believed migrant intake levels were excessively high, signaling skepticism toward unchecked elite-endorsed globalization narratives that overlook wage suppression and housing pressures in regional and working-class areas. These data points, drawn from representative samples, highlight a causal disconnect where policy formulation by urban-centric institutions ignores voter priorities, fostering resentment Hansonism channels into populist mobilization. In response to perceived top-down , Hansonism promotes democratic tools like citizens' initiated referenda, enabling voters to bypass party machines and force plebiscites on pivotal matters such as constitutional changes or major expenditures. This mechanism contrasts sharply with the major parties' reliance on parliamentary whips and closed-door negotiations, aiming to restore agency to the electorate and counteract of agenda-setting. One Nation's policy platform explicitly commits to such reforms, positioning them as essential for aligning with public will rather than insulated bureaucratic or lobbyist interests. The ideology's populist efficacy stems from Hanson's cultivated image as an unpolished "everywoman," resonating with working-class demographics alienated by policies favoring coastal metropolises over inland economies. Voter analyses show One Nation support mirroring traditional Labor bases in union density and economic insecurity metrics, appealing to those experiencing stagnant and cultural displacement amid elite-favored trade liberalization. This anti-elitist authenticity, unadorned by polished , has sustained loyalty among rural and blue-collar cohorts, who polls indicate prioritize tangible over abstract cosmopolitan ideals.

Economic Nationalism and Self-Reliance

Hansonism emphasizes protectionist trade measures to shield Australian and from the adverse effects of and agreements, which have been associated with significant job displacement. Proponents argue that s on key imports would revive domestic production, pointing to the decline in manufacturing employment from approximately 1.1 million workers in the late to around 850,000 by the mid-2000s, a loss exceeding 250,000 jobs amid rising import competition post-tariff reductions in the 1990s. has endorsed such approaches, including support for U.S.-style tariffs to prioritize national industries over unrestricted global trade, as evidenced by her 2025 statements backing Donald Trump's tariff policies as a model for safeguarding local jobs against foreign undercutting. Central to this self-reliance is the push for resource and investment in primary industries, particularly in rural areas historically underserved by federal policies favoring urban centers. One Nation advocates expanding domestic production in sectors like and to achieve self-sufficiency, such as through increased plantations and restrictions on of farmland and water rights, aiming to retain economic value within rather than exporting raw resources for processing abroad. This counters the urban-rural funding imbalance, where rural infrastructure spending has lagged despite these regions generating a disproportionate share of export earnings, promoting localized processing to bolster regional economies and reduce vulnerability to global supply disruptions. On welfare, Hansonism rejects expansive dependency programs in favor of reforms that enforce work requirements and time limits for able-bodied recipients, drawing on evidence that prolonged correlate with higher long-term joblessness rates, as seen in Australia's persistent in deindustrialized areas. Policies include mandating a four-week waiting period for payments and capping benefits for those under 50 to incentivize workforce re-entry, positioning as a cultural and economic imperative over indefinite state support.

Policy Positions

Immigration and Border Control

Hansonism advocates for a temporary suspension of non-essential to prioritize Australian citizens' welfare, as articulated in Pauline Hanson's 1996 to , where she called for a halt to further immigration until domestic issues like among the unskilled could be addressed. This stance evolved into support for a skills-based with significantly reduced volumes, exemplified by One Nation's 2025 policy to cap annual visas at 130,000, a reduction of over 570,000 from recent Labor-era levels, to alleviate strains on and labor markets. Economically, Hansonist positions draw on evidence that high levels of low-skilled depress wages for native low-skilled workers, with George Borjas estimating a 5-10% reduction for such groups due to increased labor supply . Borjas' analyses, based on U.S. data but applicable to similar dynamics in , highlight how influxes of unskilled migrants exacerbate job scarcity and downward pressure on earnings for comparable native workers, justifying restrictions to protect vulnerable domestic labor markets. On border security, Hansonism emphasizes robust enforcement to deter unauthorized maritime arrivals, a priority intensified after the 2001 MV Tampa incident, where One Nation's advocacy aligned with the government's subsequent policies of offshore processing and turnbacks, resulting in zero illegal boat arrivals by 2002. These measures demonstrably curtailed people-smuggling operations, reducing arrivals from peaks of over 4,000 in 2001 to near elimination for several years. In 2025, Hansonist critiques focus on how record net overseas migration—exceeding 1 million from 2022 to 2024—has intensified the , correlating with national rental price increases of approximately 18% over that period amid stagnant supply. One Nation attributes this to policy-driven population surges outpacing housing construction, advocating cuts to restore affordability for Australians.

Multiculturalism and Cultural Integration

Pauline and One Nation have consistently critiqued official policies as promoting cultural fragmentation by prioritizing ethnic retention over national unity, arguing instead for a strict assimilation model where immigrants fully adopt Australian values, , and customs. In her 2016 , Hanson asserted that Australians were never consulted on transitioning to a "multi-racial ," framing as an elite-imposed experiment that erodes shared identity without democratic mandate. One Nation policy documents emphasize migrant acceptance into the "mainstream of the Australian community" with "undivided loyalty," rejecting state support for separate cultural institutions that hinder integration. This position favors mandatory English-language proficiency and civic knowledge tests as prerequisites for , modeled on Australia's pre- assimilation framework for post-World War II European migrants, which required language classes and cultural to foster homogeneity. Under that era's policies, from the to the early , migrant integration succeeded through enforced , evidenced by rapid declines in non-English home language use—from over 20% in the 1950s to under 10% by the among second-generation Europeans—and high intermarriage rates exceeding 50% by the 1960s, contributing to social stability without parallel enclaves. Hanson contrasts this with contemporary , which she claims sustains divisions by subsidizing ethnic separatism, leading to policy proposals for abolishing funding and enforcing assimilation benchmarks. Empirical indicators support concerns over eroded cohesion under ; the Scanlon Foundation's 2024 Mapping Social Cohesion report records Australia's index at , below the long-term average of 82 since , with rising unease over population pressures straining trust and belonging. Public surveys within the Scanlon series reveal persistent worries about cultural incompatibility, with approximately 40% of respondents in 2021-2023 iterations citing high as risking social division, though overall support for remains at 85% amid these tensions. Hanson opposes the formation of parallel societies, contending they impose disproportionate welfare burdens and elevate risks due to non-integration; she has linked welfare overpayments exceeding $4.4 billion annually partly to unassimilated communities reliant on segregated support systems. Data from parliamentary inquiries indicate overseas-born youth (aged 10-17) generate higher alleged offender incidents per capita than Australian-born peers, correlating with lower assimilation in culturally insular groups. One Nation advocates dismantling such structures through assimilation incentives, arguing causal links between cultural isolation and elevated social costs, including family violence offender rates 381 per 100,000 in diverse but non-integrated demographics.

Indigenous Policy and Welfare Reform

Hansonism critiques the provision of separate legal rights and entitlements for , arguing that such measures perpetuate disadvantage rather than resolve it, and advocates for treating all citizens equally under the with assistance based solely on need regardless of . This position extends to opposition against initiatives like constitutional recognition of or dedicated bodies such as the Voice to Parliament, which are viewed as racially divisive and ineffective in improving outcomes. Proponents cite persistent failures in programs like , launched in 2008 to address Indigenous disparities, where the 2020 annual report indicated that only three of the original seven targets—early childhood mortality, attainment, and reading, writing, and numeracy skills—were on track, with others including employment and showing no progress or regression. Central to this critique is the concept of an "Aboriginal industry," referring to bureaucracies, activists, and organizations that allegedly profit from Indigenous issues without delivering tangible improvements, consuming billions in public funds amid ongoing high rates of Indigenous and social dysfunction. Hanson has highlighted mismanagement and in Indigenous corporations, estimating waste up to $30 billion annually, and called for audits of grants and abolition of inefficient agencies like the to redirect resources toward practical needs-based support. In line with this, Hansonism supports ending native title claims grounded in unverified cultural assertions and phasing out policies like mandatory instruction or in schools, favoring assimilation into mainstream society to foster . On , Hansonism emphasizes breaking cycles of passive dependency through measures promoting personal responsibility, such as income management and work incentives, drawing on the 2007 Northern Territory Intervention's partial successes where increased policing and welfare quarantining correlated with initial reductions in and reports in affected communities. High Indigenous unemployment rates—12% overall for ages 15-64 in the 2021 Census, rising to over 20% in remote areas compared to the national average of around 4%—are attributed to disincentives from unconditional welfare, which undermine and stability. Reforms proposed include equalizing benefits across all Australians in need, eliminating ethnicity-based privileges, and enforcing mutual obligations to transition from welfare to work, aiming for fiscal and long-term outcome improvements grounded in of dependency's harms.

Trade and Globalization Critiques

and One Nation have consistently opposed major agreements, arguing they exacerbate job losses in and while compromising national through investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms that prioritize foreign corporations over domestic interests. This stance stems from observations of , with Australia's manufacturing employment share declining from 13.5% of total employment in 1990 to 6.4% by 2020, a trend attributed in part to import competition from low-wage economies post-liberalization. A focal point of critique is the 2015 China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA), which Hanson has labeled a "dodgy" deal enabling theft and unbalanced favoring Chinese state-backed firms. In 2020, as the agreement neared renewal, she advocated scrapping it entirely, citing risks of economic dependency and exploitation amid escalating bilateral tensions, including China's imposition of non-tariff barriers on Australian exports like and wine starting in 2020. Despite Australia's overall goods surplus with averaging AUD 20-30 billion annually post-ChAFTA through 2019—driven by resource exports—Hansonism emphasizes vulnerabilities in non-resource sectors, such as offshoring, where bilateral deficits in exceeded AUD 40 billion yearly by 2018. Hansonism favors bilateral negotiations over multilateral frameworks like the , contending the latter dilute Australia's bargaining power and expose industries to asymmetric concessions, akin to U.S. experiences under NAFTA where and auto sectors faced import surges leading to 850,000 job losses from 1994-2010. In Australia, analogous pressures appeared in , where ChAFTA's reductions on select imports—phased to zero by 2030—coincided with farmgate prices falling 25% from 2015-2019 amid global oversupply and processor dominance, prompting One Nation calls for protective s to safeguard processors and farmers from subsidized foreign competition. The , disrupting global supply chains in 2020-2022 with shortages in pharmaceuticals and electronics due to over-reliance on Chinese , reinforced Hansonist arguments for reshoring critical production to mitigate geopolitical risks and enhance . Hanson urged boycotts of Chinese goods and "smart tariffs" to rebuild domestic industries, echoing post-WWII protectionist policies that sustained Australian growth until the 1970s shift. This approach prioritizes verifiable gains, as evidenced by U.S. reshoring incentives under the 2022 CHIPS Act, which spurred AUD-equivalent investments reversing trends.

Law and Order Priorities

Hansonism advocates for robust law and order policies centered on deterrence through harsher penalties, enhanced police powers, and swift removal of non-citizen offenders to safeguard communities. One Nation's framework promotes zero-tolerance policing with discretionary application, combining prevention, education, and punitive measures to address recidivism, which affects approximately 59% of sentenced prisoners returning to custody within two years according to Australian Institute of Criminology analyses. This approach prioritizes empirical outcomes over rehabilitative leniency, arguing that softer reforms fail to curb repeat victimization as evidenced by persistent high reoffending rates post-release. Central to these priorities is the demand for mandatory of foreign-born criminals convicted of serious offenses, positioning it as an extension of national and border integrity. Hanson has consistently pressed for prioritizing Australian victims by expelling non-citizen perpetrators, criticizing judicial reluctance to enforce removals even after sentences, as seen in cases where violent offenders evade due to appeals or residency claims. This stance integrates with controls, contending that unchecked entry facilitates criminal networks and undermines public safety, supported by federal data on immigration-related detentions involving offenders. Regarding youth offending, Hansonism rejects progressive models in favor of mechanisms like parental fines, curfews for repeat offenders, and boot camp-style interventions to instill discipline and reduce . In , where Hanson has highlighted escalating community impacts, policies call for "tough love" including remote rehabilitation and stricter charging for serious juvenile crimes, countering perceived failures in diversion programs amid victimization surveys indicating sustained public concern over property and violent incidents. These measures aim to break cycles of reoffending, drawing on evidence that early punitive interventions correlate with lower long-term criminality compared to unchecked leniency.

Political Trajectory

1990s Breakthrough and Backlash

Pauline Hanson's political breakthrough began with her independent victory in the federal on March 2, 1996, where she secured 55.9% of the amid widespread discontent in regional over economic restructuring and globalization's impacts on and rural industries. Following her controversial on September 10, 1996, criticizing and welfare policies, she founded party on April 11, 1997, tapping into grievances over job losses and perceived cultural displacement. The party's surge culminated in the state election on June 13, 1998, where One Nation captured 11 seats in the 89-member and achieved primary vote shares exceeding 20% statewide, reaching up to 23% in select electorates like Tablelands and Burnett, fueled by opposition to national competition policy reforms that exacerbated regional economic pressures. At the federal election on , 1998, One Nation polled 8.4% of the national primary vote for the , securing one seat for Len Harris in and influencing the Liberal-National Coalition's strategy under Prime Minister . Hanson's emphasis on reducing levels and prioritizing border security pressured Howard to harden his rhetoric on unauthorized arrivals, with analysts noting that One Nation's performance compelled the government to adopt elements of its platform to recapture disaffected voters in key states like and . This electoral impact occurred against a backdrop of intensifying debates over the proposed Tax (GST), which One Nation vehemently opposed as burdensome on working families, aligning with broader anxieties over fiscal centralization and the erosion of state autonomy in revenue-sharing. The breakthrough provoked swift institutional backlash, including coordinated media portrayals framing Hanson as promoting , which led to informal boycotts by major outlets limiting her access to platforms beyond initial sensational coverage. Protests organized by groups frequently disrupted One Nation events, while legal challenges targeted the party's registration; in late 1997, allegations of fraudulent membership practices under electoral laws resulted in court proceedings by 1999, culminating in temporary deregistration and convictions for Hanson and party officials David Ettridge and David Oldfield on technical charges. Despite these efforts, public opinion polls in consistently recorded One Nation support at 20-25% through 1998, reflecting sustained resonance among voters prioritizing economic self-reliance over elite consensus on . This resilience underscored a causal disconnect between institutional condemnation and grassroots appeal rooted in tangible regional hardships, such as manufacturing contractions from tariff reductions averaging 5-10% annually in the mid-1990s.

2000s Dormancy and Internal Strife

Following the breakthrough, party entered a period of electoral dormancy at the federal level, securing under 5% of the primary vote in the 2001 and 2004 elections amid widespread factionalism and leadership instability. Internal divisions intensified after Hanson's loss of her federal seat in 1998, with key defections among elected MPs and disputes over party direction eroding organizational cohesion. By 2002, Hanson had distanced herself from the party to contest legal matters, leading One Nation to remove her name from official materials, further fragmenting its base. Hanson's 2003 conviction for , which resulted in a three-year sentence alongside co-founder David Ettridge, exacerbated the party's internal strife and contributed to its operational paralysis, though the ruling was later quashed on appeal. These events, compounded by ongoing splits, prevented One Nation from capitalizing on its earlier momentum, reducing it to marginal status in subsequent ballots. Despite the party's weakness, polls revealed underlying continuity in voter sentiments aligned with Hansonism's core positions, such as support for reduced levels, with consistent minorities—around 10-15% in targeted surveys—favoring stricter controls even as overall party preference waned. This persistence indicated that grievances over cultural and economic pressures endured beneath surface-level quiescence. Australia's robust economic expansion throughout the , characterized by average annual GDP growth of over 3%, unemployment rates below 6%, and a resources-driven boom, masked these latent populist undercurrents until the 2008 Global Financial Crisis began exposing vulnerabilities in employment and wages. The decade's prosperity, with inflation averaging 2.8%, deferred widespread mobilization on issues like and border that had fueled earlier Hansonist appeal.

2010s Resurgence and Senate Victories

One Nation's revival in the 2010s drew on widespread economic unease following the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, including stagnant wages and housing pressures amid high immigration, which resonated with voters seeking alternatives to the major parties' policies. announced her political return in September 2014 and registered federally in 2015, emphasizing direct communication via social media platforms like to engage supporters alienated by coverage. This strategy bypassed traditional gatekeepers, allowing the party to mobilize sentiment against and for stricter border controls. The 2016 federal election, called as a double dissolution under Section 57 of the Constitution to resolve Senate gridlock, lowered the effective quota for Senate seats to approximately 7.7% of the vote due to the full renewal of 76 positions. Reforms to Senate preferential voting, implemented in 2016, eliminated optional preferential group voting tickets and required voters to number at least six parties above the line, directing preferences more transparently to parties with concentrated primary support like One Nation. In Queensland, Hanson secured 593,013 first-preference votes, equating to 9.02%—enough to win a seat outright without relying heavily on preferences from eliminated candidates. Nationally, One Nation elected four senators: Hanson in Queensland, Malcolm Roberts in Queensland (initially), Brian Burston in New South Wales, and Rod Culleton in Western Australia (later replaced by Fraser Anning), forming a significant crossbench bloc. This breakthrough mirrored international populist advances, occurring shortly after the United Kingdom's referendum on June 23, 2016, and preceding Donald Trump's U.S. presidential victory in November 2016, amid shared themes of national and anti-elite backlash. data underscored domestic anti-globalist shifts; a 2016 Essential poll revealed 49% support for One Nation's call to ban Muslim immigration, highlighting concerns over integration and security post-Paris attacks and domestic incidents. In the , One Nation's presence amplified influence on contentious issues, notably endorsing a plebiscite for as a democratic mechanism over parliamentary vote, aligning with Hanson's advocacy for public input on social changes. Hanson voted for the enabling on November 7, 2016, contributing to its passage amid crossbench negotiations, which paved the way for the 2017 national plebiscite where 61.6% favored legalization.

2020s Developments and Alliances

In the early 2020s, positioned itself as a leading voice against stringent and compulsory policies, contending that such measures eroded and inflicted severe economic damage while yielding questionable benefits. The party repeatedly introduced bills to prohibit based on vaccination status, with one 2021 proposal gaining cross-party support from five senators before rejection. One Nation advocated for a to scrutinize pandemic responses, emphasizing mandates' unconstitutionality and long-term harms, including workforce disruptions and fiscal burdens estimated in independent analyses at tens of billions annually from reduced output and consumption. This stance aligned with Hanson's early warnings against coercive policies, framing them as overreach amid emerging data on policy side effects like excess non-COVID mortality in restricted jurisdictions. Electorally, One Nation underperformed in the 2022 federal poll, garnering under 5% of the national primary vote, yet retained its two Senate positions—held by Hanson and Malcolm Roberts—via preference flows in and other states. At the state level, the party sustained a foothold in 's parliament with one MP following the 2020 election setbacks, focusing on regional grievances without major seat expansions in or elsewhere during the decade's initial years. By the May 2025 federal election, however, One Nation surged, securing four Senate seats overall through victories in (Warwick Stacey) and (Tyron Whitten), effectively doubling its federal upper-house presence and enhancing its influence amid a fragmented crossbench. Post-election polling from January 5-6, 2026, by DemosAU showed One Nation's primary vote reaching 23% nationally, tying with the Liberal-National Coalition and reflecting a significant increase since the May 2025 election, indicating continued resurgence in voter support. In parliamentary maneuvering from 2023 to 2025, One Nation pursued pragmatic alliances with the on select resource and priorities, including support for expedited approvals to bolster exports amid global demand, contrasting Labor's environmental constraints. These votes reflected shared interests in , though tensions arose over labor protections in extractive industries. The party also aligned with figures against expansive regulatory frameworks, notably contributing to the defeat of a 2024 misinformation bill perceived as curtailing speech, and scrutinizing expansions that risked overbroad application. Such cross-aisle deals underscored One Nation's role as a pivotal , trading support for concessions on and anti-regulatory measures while maintaining independence on core populist issues.

Reception and Analysis

Empirical Support for Key Claims

Analyses of labour market data indicate that influxes of low-skilled migrants have exerted downward pressure on wages for similarly skilled Australian-born workers, particularly in regional and entry-level sectors. For instance, the period from 2022 to 2025 saw net migration exceed 500,000 annually, coinciding with real wage growth for low-skilled occupations averaging below 1% amid productivity stagnation. This aligns with econometric models from the Productivity Commission, which have identified short-term displacement effects where temporary low-skilled visas reduce employment probabilities for native low-skilled males by up to 2-3 percentage points in affected localities. Household-level surveys reveal correlations between elevated ethnic diversity and diminished social trust, supporting concerns over integration challenges in multicultural settings. Data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, spanning multiple waves, demonstrate that a one-standard-deviation increase in neighbourhood ethnic fractionalisation corresponds to a 12% standard-deviation decline in local interpersonal trust. Complementary findings link higher ethnic diversity to reduced generalized trust as a mediator for socioeconomic vulnerabilities, with trust levels dropping in high-diversity suburbs where immigrant concentrations exceed 30%. These patterns have intensified since the 2010s, as rapid demographic shifts outpaced assimilation metrics like language proficiency and intermarriage rates, which remain below 50% for recent cohorts in urban enclaves. Critiques of bilateral free trade agreements, such as the (AUSFTA) effective from 2005, find substantiation in widened bilateral goods deficits and accelerated contraction. Australia's goods trade deficit with the expanded to $26.9 billion in 2024, up from pre-AUSFTA levels, driven by import surges in machinery and vehicles outpacing export growth in resources. value-added fell 9% from 2010 to 2020, with employment in the sector dropping 25% post-2005 amid heightened competition in autos and textiles, contributing to regional economic hollowing in states like Victoria and where factory closures displaced over 200,000 workers by 2017. effects further eroded diversification, as AUSFTA redirected Australian commerce toward the at the expense of Asian partners, limiting resilience to global shocks.

Supporter Demographics and Motivations

Supporters of Hansonism exhibit distinct demographic profiles, concentrated in regional and rural , among blue-collar workers, and individuals facing economic vulnerability. Data from the 1998 Australian Election Study indicate that One Nation voters were disproportionately drawn from non-metropolitan electorates, manual labor occupations, and lower-income households, mirroring patterns in Labor's traditional base but diverging in attitudinal priorities. These characteristics align with electoral outcomes, such as the 2019 federal election, where shifts from Labor to One Nation were pronounced in regional towns like Gladstone and Mackay, reflecting localized grievances over employment and industry decline. Core motivations stem from economic self-interest amid globalization's disruptions, including job losses in and , coupled with aspirations for cultural continuity and . Empirical of 1998 election data links One support to heightened perceptions of personal job insecurity from trade liberalization and economic restructuring, positioning the movement as a bulwark against policies perceived to prioritize international markets over domestic workers. Supporters also express preferences for immigration restrictions to safeguard resource distribution and social cohesion, viewing unchecked inflows as exacerbating for jobs and welfare in strained communities. Contrary to characterizations emphasizing educational deficits, agreement with Hansonist positions on trade protectionism and identity preservation extends across socioeconomic strata, including emerging youth cohorts engaged via digital platforms. Post-2022 polling reveals growing endorsement among voters under 30, exemplified by first-time participants citing family-influenced priorities on and as rational counters to perceived elite detachment. This broadening appeal underscores issue-based resonance over demographic determinism, with surveys affirming that policy alignments—rather than isolated pathologies—drive affiliation.

Criticisms and Opponent Perspectives

Critics from the Australian Labor Party (ALP) and the Greens have characterized Hansonism as divisive and extremist, often framing its opposition to high immigration levels and as "" that undermines social cohesion. For instance, in response to Pauline Hanson's September 10, 1996, —where she argued that excessive Asian was "swamping" Australia and criticized affirmative action for Aboriginal communities—opponents including ALP figures condemned her views as inflammatory, leading to her disendorsement by the Liberal Party and calls for parliamentary . This perspective portrays Hansonism's emphasis on prioritizing Australian-born citizens for welfare and jobs as fostering ethnic tensions, with Greens leader in the late 1990s describing One Nation's platform as a threat to Australia's multicultural fabric. Mainstream academic and media analyses, often aligned with progressive institutions, echo this by labeling Hansonism as xenophobic that erodes trust in and promotes nostalgia for a homogeneous past, ignoring purported benefits of diversity. Such critiques posit an elite consensus where is treated as an ethical imperative, with dissent viewed as morally suspect; however, this overlooks empirical data on integration strains, including studies showing elevated welfare reliance and criminality rates among select migrant cohorts from non-Western backgrounds, which Hansonism highlights as causal risks to economic and . Opponents like ALP Indigenous Affairs Minister have extended this to recent symbolic acts, decrying One Nation's rejection of traditional acknowledgments as "childish" and disrespectful, reinforcing narratives of Hansonism as culturally regressive. Some internal and conservative-leaning detractors question Hansonism's consistency, arguing that policy pivots—such as softening on certain trade protections amid electoral —betray its anti-globalization , rendering it opportunistic rather than principled. These views, voiced by former One Nation affiliates, suggest adaptations dilute core nationalist tenets, though contextualized by the need to navigate Australia's trade-dependent economy and shifting voter priorities. Despite such points, left-leaning sources predominate in amplifying charges, with limited engagement from peer-reviewed work on Hansonism's alignment with observable socioeconomic pressures like shortages exacerbated by .

Controversies and Debates

Racism and Xenophobia Allegations

Allegations of racism and xenophobia leveled against Pauline Hanson and her political movement stem largely from her September 10, 1996, maiden speech to the Australian House of Representatives, in which she warned that the nation risked being "swamped by Asians" amid high immigration levels and critiqued welfare policies fostering dependency among Aboriginal populations. Mainstream media outlets and political figures swiftly branded the address as racially inflammatory, with then-Prime Minister Paul Keating and others decrying it as promoting division. These interpretations framed Hanson's remarks as targeting ethnic groups inherently rather than addressing causal factors like rapid demographic shifts straining infrastructure and job markets. Hanson countered that her concerns derived from observable socioeconomic disparities and the need for cultural cohesion, emphasizing in the speech that "the majority of Aboriginals do not want handouts" as welfare perpetuated disadvantage, a view echoed in subsequent public discourse on . Polling data from the era revealed broad resonance with elements of her critique; surveys indicated that a majority of favored reviewing policies to prioritize assimilation and economic over unchecked inflows. By , despite elite condemnation labeling her positions as xenophobic, Hanson reiterated support for lawful migration contingent on migrants integrating into Australian values, stating that those rejecting assimilation should depart. Persistent accusations have been amplified by institutions exhibiting systemic biases toward , often conflating policy advocacy on and with , while empirical indicators such as stagnant hate crime statistics in regions with One Nation support suggest motivations rooted in pragmatic rather than animus. Hanson's defenders argue that such labels serve to delegitimize dissent against elite-driven demographic changes, with public opinion data consistently showing her voter base prioritizing housing affordability and employment pressures over ethnic exclusion. This framing overlooks first-hand accounts from migrants endorsing assimilation requirements as essential for social harmony. In August 2003, Pauline Hanson and One Nation co-founder David Ettridge were convicted in the Queensland District Court of electoral fraud for improperly registering over 500 party members to qualify for public funding, with each sentenced to three years' imprisonment. Hanson served 71 days in jail before being released on bail pending appeal. The convictions stemmed from allegations that the pair dishonestly enrolled individuals as members without their full awareness or payment of fees, thereby fraudulently obtaining approximately $500,000 in electoral reimbursements. On 6 November 2003, the Court of Appeal unanimously quashed the convictions and entered acquittals, ruling that the trial judge had misdirected the on the legal requirements for membership under the Electoral Act and that there was insufficient of dishonest intent or deception toward the Electoral Commission. The court determined that signed enrollment forms sufficed for membership validity, regardless of fee payment, exposing flaws in the prosecution's interpretation of registration rules and highlighting procedural overreach in targeting One Nation's unconventional structure. This outcome vindicated Hanson, who had maintained the prosecution was politically motivated to derail her influence following One Nation's 1998 electoral gains. Hanson has pursued and defended multiple actions, often prevailing on against initial adverse rulings. In 2022, Federal Court Justice Robert Bromwich ordered her to pay former senator Brian Burston $250,000 for statements implying his workplace misconduct, including allegations. However, in August 2023, the Full Federal Court overturned the decision, finding Hanson's comments substantially true given evidence of Burston's admitted of staff, thus absolving her of liability and costs. Such reversals underscore appellate scrutiny correcting lower-court interpretations that may overlook contextual evidence in politically charged disputes. From 2021 onward, One Nation faced probes into disclosures and related practices, including (AEC) inquiries into disclosure compliance and Queensland police charges against a party financial administrator for alleged election . These investigations, prompted by disclosures of U.S. donor contacts and internal financial handling, yielded no charges against Hanson personally and were either dropped or resolved without , despite intense media and opposition scrutiny. Critics noted compared to major parties' larger-scale irregularities, such as unreported donations exceeding millions, which often evaded equivalent probes, suggesting against minor parties challenging norms.

Party Infighting and Leadership Disputes

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, experienced significant internal factionalism stemming from tensions between centralized leadership under Hanson and ambitions for greater autonomy among key figures. Following the party's strong performance in the , disputes arose over control of party direction and resources, culminating in the October 2000 expulsion of David Oldfield, a co-founder and member elected in 1999, whom Hanson accused of disloyalty and attempting to undermine her authority. This split, involving Oldfield and advisor David Ettridge, led to the formation of breakaway groups like the City-Country Alliance, as factions demanded conditions for reconciliation that prioritized their influence over Hanson's ideological vision. The conflicts highlighted growing pains in a rapidly expanded organization, where rapid recruitment fostered competing power bases rather than unified . Subsequent leadership battles reinforced Hanson's dominance, as seen in 2002 when party directors Ettridge and Oldfield expelled Hanson herself from One Nation, prompting her to establish a rival entity and pursue legal challenges that ultimately restored her control after her 2003 conviction was overturned on appeal in 2004. Later disputes, such as the 2017 fallout with senator Burston—who left after Hanson withdrew support amid disagreements over policy loyalty versus personal health claims—and the 2019 expulsion of for unauthorized extreme statements, underscored recurring clashes between Hanson's insistence on ideological alignment and members' pushes for independent action. These events often revolved around control mechanisms, with Hanson prioritizing retention of core populist principles over decentralized factional autonomy, which risked diluting the party's stance. Despite recurrent exits, One Nation demonstrated internal resilience under Hanson's leadership, maintaining operational continuity in foundational states like and , where membership and branch structures endured post-split purges. Empirical patterns of retention—evident in the party's ability to reregister and contest elections after deregistrations tied to internal strife, such as Queensland's 2005 issues—illustrate the risks of in movements, yet also the stabilizing effect of a singular figure enforcing coherence amid ideological versus power-oriented rifts. Hanson's unchallenged position as of 2025 reflects this dynamic, with no successful leadership coups despite periodic defections.

Influence and Outcomes

Electoral Achievements and Setbacks

Pauline Hanson's One Nation achieved its most significant electoral breakthrough in the , securing 11 seats in the 89-seat Legislative Assembly and holding the balance of power. The party captured approximately 23% of the statewide primary vote, drawing support from rural and regional voters disillusioned with major parties. Federally, One Nation experienced a resurgence in the election, garnering 4.3% of the national primary vote in the while winning four positions, including Hanson's own seat in . These outcomes positioned the party as a key crossbench player in the . Subsequent federal elections marked notable setbacks, with One Nation's national primary vote consistently falling below 5% after 2004. In the 2004 federal election, the party received just 1.1% of the vote, failing to secure any seats. This decline has been attributed by analysts to the co-option of One Nation's key issues, such as restrictions, by the major parties, reducing the appeal of its distinct platform. Despite limited seat gains, One Nation has exerted disproportionate influence through preferential voting systems, particularly in . Preference flows from One Nation voters have overwhelmingly favored conservative parties, with rates exceeding 70% to the Liberal National Party (LNP) in recent state and federal contests. For instance, in elections, these flows have reached around 80% to the LNP, aiding conservative victories in tight races and amplifying the party's role beyond its raw vote share.

Policy Impacts on Australian Politics

The rise of in the late 1990s, which garnered 8.4% of the national vote in the federal , amplified public concerns over unauthorized boat arrivals and high levels, pressuring the Liberal-National to adopt a harder line on border security. This electoral pressure correlated with policy shifts, as evidenced by the government's response to the MV Tampa crisis on August 26, 2001, when 438 asylum seekers were rescued; Prime Minister refused entry and announced border protection measures on August 29, 2001. These culminated in the , formalized on September 6, 2001, which excised Australian territory from the migration zone, enabled boat turnbacks, and established offshore processing centers in and Papua New Guinea's , deterring arrivals that had reached 12,781 by boat in 2001 alone. The policy's implementation, amid One Nation's peak influence in where it won 11 seats in the state , helped secure a narrow victory in the November 10, 2001, federal by appealing to voters skeptical of softer Labor approaches. One Nation's longstanding critiques of , including among Indigenous communities—echoed in Hanson's 1996 decrying "Aboriginal welfare" as enabling dysfunction—influenced the framing of mainstream interventions. This rhetoric presaged the National Emergency Response (NT Intervention), launched June 21, 2007, by the following the Anderson-Wild report on in remote communities; the policy suspended parts of the , imposed compulsory income management via the BasicsCard (quarantining 50% of welfare payments), restricted alcohol and , and linked welfare to and community work. While directly triggered by the report's findings of widespread , the Intervention's paternalistic measures aligned with One Nation's demands for over "passive welfare," which Hanson had popularized amid the party's 23% primary vote in the 1998 election, normalizing tougher conditional welfare in national discourse. In the 2020s, One Nation's advocacy for migration reductions amid housing shortages—coupled with its gains, holding four seats post-2022 election—coincided with the Labor government's policy reversals. overseas migration, peaking at 528,000 in 2022–23 due to post-COVID and temporary visa inflows, prompted the December 2023 Migration Strategy to target a halving to 260,000 annually by 2024–25, including tighter skilled visa criteria and reduced family reunions. This included an initial cap of 270,000 international places for 2025, announced August 2024, prioritizing while addressing infrastructure strain, though later adjusted upward to 295,000 amid economic backlash. One Nation's rising support, doubling to record highs in 2025 polls as debates intensified, reflected and reinforced these shifts, compelling even Labor to cap inflows despite prior expansions. Similarly, One Nation's net-zero skepticism, rejecting 43% emissions cuts by 2030 as economically ruinous, has pressured internals, with 2025 debates seeing Nationals and Liberals echo calls to abandon targets amid energy cost concerns, mainstreaming doubts once marginalized.

Long-Term Legacy and Future Prospects

Hansonism's enduring legacy lies in its role in mainstreaming discussions on levels and national sovereignty, topics once marginalized as fringe or xenophobic in Australian political discourse. By persistently challenging high policies since the , Hanson's advocacy has shifted public parameters, as evidenced by a October 2025 Resolve Political Monitor poll showing 58% of Australians supporting a significant reduction in immigration intake. Similarly, the Poll in 2025 found 53% viewing migrant numbers as too high, reflecting a normalization of scrutiny over demographic pressures that were previously . This shift has compelled major parties to engage more directly with restrictionist arguments, contributing to policy adjustments like the 2025 cap on visas amid strains. Economic realities, including a supply deficit exacerbated by net overseas migration exceeding 500,000 annually in recent years, have amplified these views, with polls linking population growth to affordability crises. Older demographics, in particular, attribute shortages to surges, sustaining demand for Hansonist positions. Looking ahead, One Nation's primary vote reached 12% in October 2025 Roy Morgan polling, signaling potential for expansion through alliances or defections from disaffected members, as seen in discussions involving former Nationals leader . Post-2025 federal election fatigue with Labor's majority and infighting has driven conservative voters toward such alternatives, with One Nation's surge attributed to anxieties over migration and net-zero policies. Internal factionalism remains a , yet the salience of unresolved issues—such as aging strains and persistent undersupply projected to worsen without migration curbs—bolsters resilience. Demographic trends, including a median age rising toward 40 by 2030 amid low birth rates, could further entrench support for sovereignty-focused platforms if major parties fail to address causal links between intake levels and resource pressures.

References

  1. https://www.onenation.org.au/about
  2. https://www.onenation.org.au/issues
  3. https://www.onenation.org.au/pauline-hanson
  4. https://www.senatorhanson.com.au/pauline-hanson-senate-website/
  5. http://cpds.apana.org.au/Documents/Crisis_in_GQ/Articles/buying_industry.htm
  6. https://doubledialogues.com/article/please-explain/
  7. https://theconversation.com/pauline-hanson-built-a-political-career-on-white-victimhood-and-brought-far-right-rhetoric-to-the-mainstream-134661
  8. https://moadoph.gov.au/explore/stories/history/seven-politicians-that-famously-switched-sides
  9. https://australianpolitics.com/1996/09/10/pauline-hanson-maiden-speech.html/
  10. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/pauline-hansons-1996-maiden-speech-to-parliament-full-transcript-20160915-grgjv3.html
  11. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/from-the-archives-1996-the-lesson-in-pauline-s-perils-20200903-p55ryo.html
  12. https://katharinebetts.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/immigration-public-opinion-1996.pdf
  13. https://tapri.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/v10n4_4betts.pdf
  14. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Pauline-Lee-Hanson
  15. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-10/timeline-rise-of-pauline-hanson-one-nation/7583230
  16. https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2011/sep/1.html
  17. https://www.qhatlas.com.au/content/dividing-queensland-pauline-hanson%25E2%2580%2599s-one-nation-party
  18. https://australianpolitics.com/1998/07/01/one-nation-immigration-policy.html/
  19. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:78118/UQ78118_OA.pdf
  20. https://www.policyforum.net/hostage-hansons-migration-myths/index.html
  21. https://ipa.org.au/publications-ipa/research-note/analysis-of-migration-induced-housing-shortfall-since-2022
  22. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10357718.2025.2515394?src=
  23. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/hanson-denies-humans-behind-climate-change-blames-fearmongering/2y23ihwxy
  24. https://www.onenation.org.au/climate
  25. https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/a-threat-to-australian-sovereignty-pauline-hanson-criticises-quiet-signing-of-un-pact-5736167
  26. https://www.city-journal.org/article/no-benefit-many-costs
  27. https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2022/what-to-know-about-a-study-on-lockdowns-and-covid-19-deaths-by-economists-affiliated-with-johns-hopkins/
  28. https://www.onenation.org.au/covid
  29. https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/pauline_hanson/policies/335
  30. https://www.onenation.org.au/one-nation-exit-who-trump-support
  31. https://www.wcfia.harvard.edu/publications/downside-diversity
  32. https://www.ppesydney.net/content/uploads/2020/05/Unintended-consequences-One-nation-and-Neoliberalism-in-contemporary-Australia.pdf
  33. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/hanson-welcomes-americas-exit-from-tpp/9qyoju5wk
  34. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-29/same-sex-marriage-plebiscite-explainer/7794070
  35. https://www.onenation.org.au/
  36. https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/items/01085eaf-5362-4e76-afa7-536a0e54aa6e
  37. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8500.1998.tb01283.x
  38. https://bond.edu.au/news/trust-politics-at-record-lows-survey
  39. https://www.ipsos.com/en-au/half-australians-believe-society-broken
  40. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/how-australians-feel-about-migration-and-multiculturalism/uwtixn56i
  41. https://www.onenation.org.au/citizen-initiated-referenda
  42. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/mar/27/looking-back-and-angry-what-drives-pauline-hansons-voters
  43. https://www.news.com.au/world/no-australian-carve-out-from-trump-tariffs/news-story/2a7c62130a57b8e20e7c6426cf2137c8
  44. https://www.onenation.org.au/forestry
  45. https://www.crikey.com.au/2022/04/19/pauline-hanson-national-ownership-natural-resources/
  46. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Rsl-IHAVjI
  47. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-27/pauline-hanson-backs-four-week-wait-for-the-dole/7879540
  48. https://www.facebook.com/PaulineHansonAu/videos/pauline-hanson-calls-for-welfare-reform-and-cuts-to-foreign-workers/3253115108160817/
  49. https://www.onenation.org.au/immigration
  50. https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/john-howard-knows-his-2001-policies-following-tampa-were-controversial-but-stands-by-them/news-story/5b87d5a1f2c847f589fc5c24b9418fde
  51. https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/offshore-processing-facts/2/
  52. https://www.realestate.com.au/news/housing-crisis-what-new-migration-data-reveals-about-australia/
  53. https://www.onenation.org.au/hanson-mass-migration
  54. https://academic.oup.com/policyandsociety/article-pdf/13/1/167/42632324/10349952.1997.11876664.pdf
  55. https://www.onenation.org.au/lee-hanson-migrant-english
  56. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/sep/14/pauline-hanson-first-speech-senate-calls-for-immigration-ban
  57. http://www.workingwithindigenousaustralians.info/content/History_5_Assimilation.html
  58. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64it4eAQjnk
  59. https://scanloninstitute.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Mapping-Social-Cohesion-2024-Report.pdf
  60. https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/2762080/mapping-social-cohesion-national-report-2021.pdf
  61. https://cass.anu.edu.au/news/aussie-social-cohesion-steady-strained-cost-living-pressures
  62. https://www.facebook.com/PaulineHansonAu/videos/welfare-waste-rorts-and-overpayments/547557165448600/
  63. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Migration/settlementoutcomes/Report/section?id=committees%252Freportjnt%252F024098%252F25141
  64. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/crime-and-justice/recorded-crime-offenders/latest-release
  65. https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/tandi117.pdf
  66. https://www.onenation.org.au/end-indigenous-claims
  67. https://www.onenation.org.au/aboriginal-voice-to-parliament
  68. https://www.niaa.gov.au/sites/default/files/reports/closing-the-gap-2020/
  69. https://lens.monash.edu/%40politics-society/2020/08/13/1381030/one-nation-and-the-threat-of-far-right-welfare-chauvinism-in-australia
  70. https://www.facebook.com/OneNationParty/posts/pauline-hanson-slams-indigenous-corporation-mismanagement-and-palestinian-recogn/1064184169235679/
  71. https://www.onenation.org.au/cut-niaa-waste
  72. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14529307/Pauline-Hanson-announcement-one-nation.html
  73. https://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/10-impacts-of-the-nt-intervention/vzia753tx
  74. https://www.indigenoushpf.gov.au/measures/2-07-employment
  75. https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/a203ee1e-5283-4b28-b4d0-d1b674e37734/aihw-ihw-294-ch8-economic-participation.pdf
  76. https://qld.onenation.org.au/pauline-hanson-advocates-for-transparency-and-reform-in-native-title-claims
  77. https://australiainstitute.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/P349-Is-PHON-still-anti-Asian-FINAL.pdf
  78. https://www.facebook.com/PaulineHansonAu/videos/why-pauline-hanson-was-right-about-the-dodgy-china-australia-free-trade-deal/221493589854770/
  79. https://m.facebook.com/OneNationParty/videos/563363044303589/
  80. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Former_Committees/freetrade/report/final/phon
  81. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10357718.2025.2515394
  82. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8992453/One-Nations-Pauline-Hanson-urges-Australians-boycott-Chinese-products-Christmas.html
  83. https://x.com/PaulineHansonOz/status/1900079382993264766
  84. https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/rpp080.pdf
  85. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4828770/Pauline-Hanson-angry-Green-criminal-deportations.html
  86. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/battle-of-the-senators-pauline-vs-sarah-on-deporting-foreign-born-criminals/m07snlakl
  87. https://www.facebook.com/PaulineHansonAu/posts/imagine-this-you-have-lost-a-loved-one-to-a-violent-criminal-justice-is-served-t/1189222619237925/
  88. https://qld.onenation.org.au/crime
  89. https://www.onenation.org.au/addressing-youth-crime
  90. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/hanson-wants-curfews-fines-and-bush-camps-for-repeat-youth-offenders/18ci5g5gs
  91. https://australianpolitics.com/1998/06/13/queensland-1998-state-election-results.html
  92. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14662043.2022.2054567
  93. https://insidestory.org.au/one-nations-warning/
  94. https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AltLawJl/2003/83.html
  95. https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/confs/2000/pdf/conf-vol-2000.pdf
  96. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-06-15/pauline-hanson-one-nation-history-of-losing-elected-mps/9869814
  97. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/nsw/losing-one-nation-mps-is-pauline-hanson-s-special-skill-20230823-p5dyr4.html
  98. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/aug/20/australia.thefarright
  99. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/please-explain-the-history-of-pauline-hansons-one-nation-party/bpt8rxpxn
  100. https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/confs/2011/pdf/conf-vol-2011.pdf
  101. https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/2011/2011-07/overview-decade.html
  102. https://australianpolitics.com/parties/one-nation/
  103. https://results.aec.gov.au/20499/website/SenateStateFirstPrefs-20499-QLD.htm
  104. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/aug/04/pauline-hansons-one-nation-wins-four-seats-in-new-look-senate
  105. https://australianpolitics.com/2016/08/04/qld-senate-results-finalised.html/
  106. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/dec/28/australia-in-2016-the-year-leaders-flailed-as-populism-sailed
  107. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/hanson-says-shed-vote-for-gay-marriage/eosqtllaf
  108. https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/pauline_hanson/policies/129
  109. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/nov/22/one-nation-anti-vaccine-mandate-bill-rejected-despite-support-from-five-coalition-senators
  110. https://www.onenation.org.au/victory-and-vindication-on-vaccines
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8794621/
  112. https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/federal/2022/results/senate
  113. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/may/29/pauline-hansons-one-nation-scores-surprise-boost-as-tyron-whitten-wins-senate-seat-in-wa
  114. https://theconversation.com/shock-nsw-senate-result-as-one-nation-beats-labor-to-win-final-seat-257888
  115. https://demosau.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/DemosAU-Australian-Federal-Poll-Jan-5-6-2026.pdf
  116. https://meu.org.au/one-nation-doesnt-care-about-mineworkers/
  117. https://www.onenation.org.au/kill-misinformation-bill
  118. https://www.unitedaustraliaparty.org.au/betrayed-hanson-voters-urged-to-join-united-australia-party/
  119. https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/australia-s-low-skilled-migration-addiction-is-killing-productivity-20250815-p5mn8p
  120. https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/confs/2019/pdf/christian-dustmann.pdf
  121. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2708357
  122. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140988320300025
  123. https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/australias-trade-united-states-america
  124. https://australiainstitute.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/A-Fair-Share-for-Australian-Manufacturing-WEB.pdf
  125. https://www.aigroup.com.au/resourcecentre/research-economics/economics-intelligence/2025/hard-times-in-australian-manufacturing/
  126. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281930422_The_economic_impact_of_the_Australia-US_free_trade_agreement
  127. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-20/election-2019-towns-that-turned-on-labor/11128384
  128. https://australianelectionstudy.org/wp-content/uploads/Mughan-Bean-McAllister-Economic-Globalization-2002.pdf
  129. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-15/why-is-one-nation-surging-in-the-polls/105891732
  130. https://www.robertsimms.org.au/perils_of_dealing_with_one_nation
  131. https://redflag.org.au/article/how-we-beat-pauline-hanson-1990s
  132. https://academic.oup.com/policyandsociety/article/16/1/1/6427926
  133. https://www.cis.org.au/publication/the-last-refuge-hard-and-soft-hansonism-in-contemporary-australian-politics/
  134. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/jul/24/labor-greens-condemnation-one-nation-acknowledgment-of-country-pauline-hanson-malarndirri-mccarthy
  135. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-20/sarah-game-departure-leaves-one-nation-in-limbo-in-sa/105308712
  136. https://australiainstitute.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/NL16_8.pdf
  137. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-20/pauline-hanson-maiden-speech-annotated/7852522
  138. https://speakola.com/political/pauline-hanson-maiden-speech-1996
  139. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-14/pauline-hanson-maiden-speech-asian-immigration/7645578
  140. https://www.onenation.org.au/pauline-hanson-media-bias-immigration-sky-news
  141. https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/radionational-breakfast/one-nation-pauline-hanson-polls-support-migration/105897844
  142. https://www.sbs.com.au/language/punjabi/en/article/pauline-hanson-wants-assimilation-test-before-migrants-are-given-permanent-visas/qzhvd15af
  143. https://documents.parliament.qld.gov.au/tp/2004/5104T2.pdf
  144. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/nov/07/australia
  145. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-11-06/hanson-thanks-supporters-after-jail-release/1505162
  146. https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AltLawJl/2003/93.pdf
  147. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-11-14/hanson-backs-prosecution-inquiry/1509222
  148. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/oct/19/pauline-hanson-ordered-to-pay-250000-damages-for-defaming-brian-burston
  149. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-16/pauline-hanson-wins-defamation-appeal-against-brian-burston/102735200
  150. https://www.theage.com.au/national/pauline-hanson-will-not-have-to-pay-damages-to-sexual-harasser-court-rules-20230815-p5dwsj.html
  151. https://www.smh.com.au/national/pauline-hanson-in-hot-water-with-electoral-commission-again-20210830-p58naj.html
  152. https://www.indailyqld.com.au/news/archive/2021/12/16/one-nation-financial-administrator-charged-over-election-funding-fraud
  153. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-02/one-nation-staffer-reported-to-corruption-watchdog-over-referral/105241574
  154. https://www.aec.gov.au/About_AEC/compliance-investigations.htm
  155. https://www.smh.com.au/national/one-nations-david-oldfield-to-go-it-alone-20041229-gdkec6.html
  156. https://www.theage.com.au/national/the-rise-and-fall-of-pauline-hanson-20030821-gdw80v.html
  157. http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/alliance/phon2.htm
  158. https://theconversation.com/hanson-gets-the-band-back-together-can-she-make-an-impact-34747
  159. https://www.onenation.org.au/hanson-one-nation-leadership
  160. https://australianpolitics.com/1998/06/13/queensland-1998-state-election-results.html/
  161. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-36971996
  162. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43481859_The_Rise_and_Fall_of_One_Nation
  163. https://insidestory.org.au/from-whom-the-preferences-flow/
  164. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-15/preference-flows-at-the-2016-federal-election/9388826
  165. https://www.nma.gov.au/defining-moments/resources/tampa-affair
  166. https://www.latrobe.edu.au/news/articles/2019/opinion/issues-that-swung-elections
  167. https://australianpolitics.com/1996/09/10/pauline-hanson-maiden-speech.html
  168. https://figshare.mq.edu.au/articles/thesis/Political_attitudes_policies_and_the_radical_right_has_the_emergence_of_a_radical_right_party_mainstreamed_radical_right_discourse_and_attitudes_in_Australia_/19432328/1/files/34527530.pdf
  169. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c207kgd4l22o
  170. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australia-lifts-foreign-student-cap-295000-prioritises-southeast-asia-2025-08-04/
  171. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/oct/01/australians-back-labor-albanese-emissions-target-while-one-nation-support-doubles-guardian-essential-poll
  172. https://www.onenation.org.au/net_zero_common_sense
  173. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/oct/20/coalition-net-zero-policy-speculation-more-could-quit-sussan-ley
  174. https://www.reddit.com/r/aussie/comments/1o6813l/58_of_people_support_a_significant_reduction_in/
  175. https://gettingdownunder.com/poll-reveals-vast-majority-of-australians-including-greens-want-immigration-cuts/
  176. https://poll.lowyinstitute.org/themes/immigration-and-refugees/
  177. https://thenightly.com.au/politics/australia/australians-too-polite-to-blame-immigration-for-housing-shortages-population-expert-c-20046139
  178. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/feb/04/australians-want-less-migration-but-oppose-cutting-international-student-numbers-study-finds
  179. https://australianpropertyupdate.com.au/apu/the-missing-link-between-migration-and-housing-policy
  180. https://theconversation.com/most-australians-agree-theres-a-housing-crisis-but-they-differ-on-whats-causing-it-and-how-to-fix-it-267963
  181. https://www.realestate.com.au/news/migration-poll-reveals-big-shift-in-aussie-views-amid-home-shortages/
  182. https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/9948-federal-voting-intention-october-2025
  183. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/oct/20/barnaby-joyce-one-nation-possible-defection-pauline-hanson
  184. https://theconversation.com/why-has-support-for-one-nation-surged-since-the-2025-federal-election-267115
  185. https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/pauline-hanson-may-change-party-name-but-she-s-not-going-anywhere-yet-20251021-p5n42m
  186. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-27/have-the-political-winds-shifted-on-high-immigration-australia/105573530
  187. https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/10021-australian-perceptions-of-immigration-september-2025
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.