Hubbry Logo
LaughterLaughterMain
Open search
Laughter
Community hub
Laughter
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Laughter
Laughter
Laughter
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A child in Laos laughing
Audio of a woman laughing

Laughter is a typically pleasant physical reaction and emotion consisting usually of rhythmical, usually audible contractions of the diaphragm and other parts of the respiratory system. It is a response to certain external or internal stimuli. Laughter can rise from such activities as being tickled,[1] or from humorous stories, imagery, videos or thoughts.[2] Most commonly, it is considered an auditory expression of a number of positive emotional states, such as joy, mirth, happiness or relief. On some occasions, however, it may be caused by contrary emotional states such as embarrassment, surprise, or confusion such as nervous laughter or courtesy laugh. Age, gender, education, language and culture are all indicators[3] as to whether a person will experience laughter in a given situation. Other than humans, some other species of primate (chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans) show laughter-like vocalizations in response to physical contact such as wrestling, play chasing or tickling.

Laughter is a part of human behavior regulated by the brain, helping humans clarify their intentions in social interaction and providing an emotional context to conversations. Laughter is used as a signal for being part of a group—it signals acceptance and positive interactions with others. Laughter is sometimes seen as contagious and the laughter of one person can itself provoke laughter from others as a positive feedback.[4][5][6][7]

The study of humor and laughter, and its psychological and physiological effects on the human body, is called gelotology.

Nature

[edit]
A young girl from Laos laughing while hugging her dog

Laughter might be thought of as an audible expression or appearance of excitement, an inward feeling of joy and happiness. It may ensue from jokes, tickling, and other stimuli completely unrelated to psychological state, such as nitrous oxide. One group of researchers speculated that noises from infants as early as 16 days old may be vocal laughing sounds or laughter.[8] However, the weight of the evidence supports the appearance of such sounds at 15 weeks to four months of age.

Laughter researcher Robert Provine [es] said: "Laughter is a mechanism everyone has; laughter is part of universal human vocabulary. There are thousands of languages, hundreds of thousands of dialects, but everyone speaks laughter in pretty much the same way." Babies have the ability to laugh before they ever speak. Children who are born blind and deaf still retain the ability to laugh.[9]

Provine argues that "Laughter is primitive, an unconscious vocalization." Provine argues that it probably is genetic. In a study of the "Giggle Twins", two happy twins who were separated at birth and only reunited 43 years later, Provine reports that "until they met each other, neither of these exceptionally happy ladies had known anyone who laughed as much as they did." They reported this even though they had been brought together by their adoptive parents, who they indicated were "undemonstrative and dour". He indicates that the twins "inherited some aspects of their laugh sound and pattern, readiness to laugh, and maybe even taste in humor".[10]

Scientists have noted the similarity in forms of laughter induced by tickling among various primates, which suggests that laughter derives from a common origin among primate species.[11][12]

The spotted hyena, another species of animal, was also known as the laughing hyena because of the way it sounds when it communicates.

A very rare neurological condition has been observed whereby the sufferer is unable to laugh out loud, a condition known as aphonogelia.[13]

Brain

[edit]
A woman laughing
A man laughing

Neurophysiology indicates that laughter is linked with the activation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, that produces endorphins.[14] Scientists have shown that parts of the limbic system are involved in laughter. This system is involved in emotions and helps us with functions necessary for humans' survival. The structures in the limbic system that are involved in laughter are the hippocampus and the amygdala.[15]

The December 7, 1984, Journal of the American Medical Association describes the neurological causes of laughter as follows:

"Although there is no known 'laugh center' in the brain, its neural mechanism has been the subject of much, albeit inconclusive, speculation. It is evident that its expression depends on neural paths arising in close association with the telencephalic and diencephalic centers concerned with respiration. Wilson considered the mechanism to be in the region of the mesial thalamus, hypothalamus, and subthalamus. Kelly and co-workers, in turn, postulated that the tegmentum near the periaqueductal grey contains the integrating mechanism for emotional expression. Thus, supranuclear pathways, including those from the limbic system that Papez hypothesised to mediate emotional expressions such as laughter, probably come into synaptic relation in the reticular core of the brain stem. So while purely emotional responses such as laughter are mediated by subcortical structures, especially the hypothalamus, and are stereotyped, the cerebral cortex can modulate or suppress them."

Some drugs are well known for their laughter-facilitating properties (e. g. ethanol and cannabis), while the others, like salvinorin A (the active ingredient of Salvia divinorum), can even induce bursts of uncontrollable laughter.[16]

A research article was published December 1, 2000, on the psycho-evolution of laughter (Panksepp 2000).[17]

Health

[edit]

A link between laughter and healthy function of blood vessels was first reported in 2005 by researchers at the University of Maryland Medical Center with the fact that laughter causes the dilatation of the inner lining of blood vessels, the endothelium, and increases blood flow.[18] Drs. Michael Miller (University of Maryland) and William Fry (Stanford) theorize that beta-endorphin-like compounds released by the hypothalamus activate receptors on the endothelial surface to release nitric oxide, thereby resulting in dilation of vessels. Other cardioprotective properties of nitric oxide include reduction of inflammation and decreased platelet aggregation.[19]

Laughter has various proven beneficial biochemical effects. It has been shown to lead to reductions in stress hormones such as cortisol and epinephrine. When laughing, the brain releases endorphins that can relieve some physical pain.[20] Laughter also boosts the number of antibody-producing cells and enhances the effectiveness of T-cells, leading to a stronger immune system.[21] A 2000 study found that people with heart disease were 40 percent less likely to laugh and be able to recognize humor in a variety of situations, compared to people of the same age without heart disease.[22]

Anecdotally, journalist and author Norman Cousins developed in 1964 a treatment program for his ankylosing spondylitis and collagen disease consisting of large doses of Vitamin C alongside laughter induced by comic films, including those of the Marx Brothers. "I made the joyous discovery that ten minutes of genuine belly laughter had an anesthetic effect and would give me at least two hours of pain-free sleep," he reported. "When the pain-killing effect of the laughter wore off, we would switch on the motion picture projector again and not infrequently, it would lead to another pain-free interval."[23][24]

Communication

[edit]

Laughter is often social and functional. A number of studies using methods of conversation analysis and discourse analysis have documented the systematic workings of laughter, for example in casual conversations, interviews, meetings, and therapy sessions.[25][26] By closely examining recorded interactions, researchers have created detailed transcripts that indicate not only the presence of laughter but also features of its production and placement.

An example of overlapped laughter in American English conversation

These studies challenge several widely held assumptions about the nature of laughter. Contrary to notions that it is spontaneous and involuntary, research documents that laughter is sequentially organized and precisely placed relative to surrounding talk, and, in the common case of overlapped laughter, relative to the laughter bouts of the conversation partner. Far more than merely a response to humor, laughter often works to manage delicate and serious moments. More than simply an external behavior "caused" by an inner state, laughter is highly communicative and helps accomplish actions and regulate relationships.[27]

Causes

[edit]
Laughter is a common response to tickling.
See also: Theories of humor

Common causes for laughter are sensations of joy and humor; however, other situations may cause laughter as well.

A general theory that explains laughter is called the relief theory. Sigmund Freud summarized it in his theory that laughter releases tension and "psychic energy". This theory is one of the justifications of the beliefs that laughter is beneficial for one's health.[28] This theory explains why laughter can be used as a coping mechanism when one is upset, angry or sad.

Philosopher John Morreall theorizes that human laughter may have its biological origins as a kind of shared expression of relief at the passing of danger. Friedrich Nietzsche, by contrast, suggested laughter to be a reaction to the sense of existential loneliness and mortality that only humans feel.

For example: a joke creates an inconsistency and the audience automatically tries to understand what the inconsistency means; if they are successful in solving this 'cognitive riddle' and they realize that the surprise was not dangerous, they laugh with relief. Otherwise, if the inconsistency is not resolved, there is no laugh, as Mack Sennett pointed out: "when the audience is confused, it doesn't laugh." This is one of the basic laws of a comedian, referred to as "exactness". It is important to note that sometimes the inconsistency may be resolved and there may still be no laugh.[citation needed] Because laughter is a social mechanism, an audience may not feel as if they are in danger, and the laugh may not occur. In addition, the extent of the inconsistency (and aspects of its timing and rhythm) has to do with the amount of danger the audience feels, and how hard or long they laugh.

Laughter can also be brought on by tickling. Although most people find it unpleasant, being tickled often causes heavy laughter, thought to be an (often uncontrollable) reflex of the body.[29][30]

Two laughing men by Hans von Aachen, circa 1574

Structure and anatomy

[edit]

The forms of laughter are highly varied. Many laughs consist of sequences of bursts, such as ha-ha-ha or ho-ho-ho-ho. In extended laughter, several such bouts (burst sequences) may occur, often interleaved with loud inhalations. Recent research has detailed aspects of the phonetic structure of laughter, especially as it occurs in interaction.[31] While produced using the same vocal tract anatomy as speech, the phonetics and prosody of laughter differs from that of speech in many ways, such as usually having higher pitch.[32] Laughed speech is also common, as in the example at right.

An illustration of laughing while speaking

Not every imaginable laugh actually occurs. It is unnatural, and one is physically unable, to have a laugh structure of "ha-ho-ha-ho". The usual variations of a laugh most often occur in the first or final note in a sequence- therefore, "ho-ha-ha" or "ha-ha-ho" laughs are possible. Normal note durations with unusually long or short "inter-note intervals" do not happen due to the result of the limitations of our vocal cords. This basic structure allows one to recognize a laugh despite individual variants.[33]

It has also been determined that eyes moisten during laughter as a reflex from the tear glands.[21]

Negative aspects

[edit]

Laughter is not always a pleasant experience and is associated with several negative phenomena. Excessive laughter can lead to cataplexy, and unpleasant laughter spells, excessive elation, and fits of laughter can all be considered negative aspects of laughter. Unpleasant laughter spells, or "sham mirth", usually occur in people who have a neurological condition, including patients with pseudobulbar palsy, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease. These patients appear to be laughing out of amusement but report that they are feeling undesirable sensations "at the time of the punch line".

Excessive elation is a common symptom associated with bipolar disorder psychoses and mania/hypomania. Those with schizophrenic psychoses seem to experience the opposite—they do not understand humor or get any joy out of it. A fit describes an abnormal time when one cannot control the laughter or one's body, sometimes leading to seizures or a brief period of unconsciousness. Some believe that fits of laughter represent a form of epilepsy.[34]

Therapy

[edit]

Laughter has been used as a therapeutic tool for many years because it is a natural form of medicine. Laughter is available to everyone and it provides benefits to a person's physical, emotional, and social well being. Some of the benefits of using laughter therapy are that it can relieve stress and relax the whole body.[35] It can also boost the immune system and release endorphins to relieve pain.[36] Additionally, laughter can help prevent heart disease by increasing blood flow and improving the function of blood vessels.[37] Some of the emotional benefits include diminishing anxiety or fear, improving overall mood, and adding joy to one's life. Laughter is also known to reduce allergic reactions in a preliminary study related to dust mite allergy sufferers.[38]

Laughter therapy also has some social benefits, such as strengthening relationships, improving teamwork and reducing conflicts, and making oneself more attractive to others. Therefore, whether a person is trying to cope with a terminal illness or just trying to manage their stress or anxiety levels, laughter therapy can be a significant enhancement to their life.[39][40]

Ramon Mora-Ripoll in his study on The Therapeutic Value Of Laughter In Medicine, stated that laughter therapy is an inexpensive and simple tool that can be used in patient care.[41] It is a tool that is only beneficial when experienced and shared. Care givers need to recognize the importance of laughter and possess the right attitude to pass it on. He went on to say that since this type of therapy is not widely practiced, health care providers will have to learn how to effectively use it. In another survey, researchers looked at how Occupational Therapists and other care givers viewed and used humor with patients as a means of therapy.[42] Many agreed that while they believed it was beneficial to the patients, the proper training was lacking in order to effectively use It.[42] Even though laughter and humor has been used therapeutically in medical conditions, according to Mora-Ripoll, there was not enough data to clearly establish that laughter could be used as an overall means of healing. It did suggest that additional research was still needed since "well-designed randomized controlled trials have not been conducted to date validating the therapeutic efficacy of laughter."[41]

In 2017, an institution in Japan conducted an open-label randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of laughter therapy on quality of life in patients with cancer.[43] The study used laughter yoga, comedy, clown and jokes. The result showed that laughter therapy was helpful in improving quality of life and cancer symptoms in some areas for cancer survivors. Improvements were seen in the area of depression, anxiety and stress levels. There were limited harmful side effects. Laughter therapy should be used in conjunction with other cancer treatment.[43]

Research and philosophy

[edit]
Main article: Gelotology
Late 19th-century or early 20th-century depiction of different stages of laughter on advertising cards

Laughter in literature, although considered understudied by some,[44] is a subject that has received attention in the written word for millennia. The use of humor and laughter in literary works (for example the homeric laughter (ἄσβεστος γέλως, ásbestos gélōs, "unceasing laughter") in Greek epics like the Iliad and Odyssey) has been studied and analyzed by many thinkers and writers, from the Ancient Greek philosophers onward. Henri Bergson's Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic (Le rire, 1901) is a notable 20th-century contribution.

Ancient

[edit]

Herodotus

[edit]

For Herodotus, laughers can be distinguished into three types:[45]

  • Those who are innocent of wrongdoing, but ignorant of their own vulnerability
  • Those who are mad
  • Those who are overconfident

According to Donald Lateiner, Herodotus reports about laughter for valid literary and historiological reasons. "Herodotus believes either that both nature (better, the gods' direction of it) and human nature coincide sufficiently, or that the latter is but an aspect or analogue of the former, so that to the recipient the outcome is suggested."[45] When reporting laughter, Herodotus does so in the conviction that it tells the reader something about the future and/or the character of the person laughing. It is also in this sense that it is not coincidental that in about 80% of the times when Herodotus speaks about laughter it is followed by a retribution. "Men whose laughter deserves report are marked, because laughter connotes scornful disdain, disdain feeling of superiority, and this feeling and the actions which stem from it attract the wrath of the gods."[45]

Modern

[edit]
See also: Theories of humor
Comedian Harold Lloyd laughing

There is a wide range of experiences with laughter. A 1999 study by two humor researchers asked 80 people to keep a daily laughter record, and found they laughed an average of 18 times per day. However, their study also found a wide range, with some people laughing as many as 89 times per day, and others laughing as few as 0 times per day.[46]

Hobbes

[edit]

Thomas Hobbes wrote, "The passion of laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden conception of some eminency in ourselves, by comparison with the infirmity of others, or with our own formerly."[citation needed]

Schopenhauer

[edit]

Philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer devotes the 13th chapter of the first part of his major work, The World as Will and Representation, to laughter.

Nietzsche

[edit]

Friedrich Nietzsche distinguishes two different purposes for the use of laughter. In a positive sense, "man uses the comical as a therapy against the restraining jacket of logic, morality and reason. He needs from time to time a harmless demotion from reason and hardship and in this sense laughter has a positive character for Nietzsche."[47] Laughter can, however, also have a negative connotation when it is used for the expression of social conflict. This is expressed, for instance, in The Gay Science: "Laughter – Laughter means to be schadenfroh, but with clear conscience."[48]

"Possibly Nietzsche's works would have had a totally different effect, if the playful, ironical and joking in his writings would have been factored in better."[49]

Bergson

[edit]

In Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic, French philosopher Henri Bergson, renowned for his philosophical studies on materiality, memory, life and consciousness, tries to determine the laws of the comic and to understand the fundamental causes of comic situations.[50] His method consists in determining the causes of the comic instead of analyzing its effects. He also deals with laughter in relation to human life, collective imagination and art, to have a better knowledge of society.[51] One of the theories of the essay is that laughter, as a collective activity, has a social and moral role, in forcing people to eliminate their vices. It is a factor of uniformity of behaviours, as it condemns ludicrous and eccentric behaviours.[52]

Ludovici

[edit]

Anthony Ludovici developed the thoughts of Hobbes even further in The Secret of Laughter. His conviction is that there's something sinister in laughter, and that the modern omnipresence of humour and the idolatry of it are signs of societal weakness, as instinctive resort to humour became a sort of escapism from responsibility and action. Ludovici considered laughter to be an evolutionary trait and he offered many examples of different triggers for laughter with their own distinct explanations.[53]

Bellieni

[edit]

Carlo Bellieni examined laughter in an essay published in New Ideas in Psychology.[54] He wrote we can strip back laughter to a three-step process. First, it needs a situation that seems odd and induces a sense of incongruity (bewilderment or panic). Second, the worry or stress the incongruous situation has provoked must be worked out and overcome (resolution). Third, the actual release of laughter acts as an all-clear siren to alert bystanders (relief) that they are safe.[55]

Other animals

[edit]
Further information: Emotions in animals § Vocalizations

Several non-human species including rats, apes and dolphins demonstrate vocalizations that sound similar to human laughter.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Laughter

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Laughter is a universal physiological and emotional response in humans, characterized by rhythmic, involuntary contractions of the diaphragm and other respiratory muscles, producing audible vocalizations and often accompanied by expressions such as smiling or grinning. It typically arises from stimuli like humor, , or physical sensations such as , serving as a nonverbal signal of positive affect and shared understanding. This response is distinct from other vocalizations, involving rapid bursts of and laryngeal activity that differentiate it from speech or . Physiologically, laughter triggers a cascade of bodily changes, including increased oxygenation through deeper , stimulation of the heart, lungs, and muscles, and the release of and other neurotransmitters that promote feelings of . These effects can lower , enhance immune function, and reduce levels of stress hormones like , contributing to short-term relaxation and pain relief. For instance, studies have shown that laughter increases and while decreasing oxygen consumption during the activity. Psychologically, it fosters emotional resilience by alleviating anxiety and depression, often through the activation of reward pathways in the similar to those involved in social bonding. From an evolutionary perspective, laughter likely originated as a preadaptation in , gradually evolving into a sophisticated tool for social cohesion among early humans. It functions as a form of chorusing that synchronizes group interactions, triggering endorphin release to strengthen bonds and facilitate , particularly as hominin group sizes expanded. This social role underscores laughter's prevalence in interpersonal contexts, where over 80% of instances occur in response to others rather than solitary thoughts. Culturally, laughter manifests in diverse forms, from spontaneous guffaws to polite chuckles, reflecting its adaptability across societies while retaining core biological underpinnings.

Definition and Characteristics

Physical and Vocal Aspects

Laughter manifests through a combination of s, vocalizations, and bodily movements that are universally recognizable across human cultures. The primary facial expression associated with genuine laughter is the Duchenne smile, characterized by the contraction of the , which elevates the corners of the mouth, and the , which raises the cheeks and produces crow's feet wrinkles around the eyes. This distinguishes it from a mere social smile, as the eye involvement signals authentic positive . These facial changes occur rapidly, often within milliseconds of the laughter trigger, enhancing the expressiveness of the response. Vocalizations form the audible core of laughter, produced by the vibration of the vocal folds without the articulation of words, resulting in a series of rhythmic, vowel-like bursts such as "ha-ha" or "he-he." Acoustically, these sounds feature short notes averaging about 75 milliseconds in duration, repeated in sequences, with fundamental frequencies typically ranging from 100 to 700 Hz, with means around 200 Hz for males and 400 Hz for females, and ranges showing overlap but generally higher values for females. The voicing arises from pulsed airflow through adducted vocal folds, creating a noisy yet periodic quality distinct from speech, and can include unvoiced or mixed elements in some variants. Bodily movements accompany these vocal efforts, including spasmodic contractions of the diaphragm and chest muscles, leading to shoulder shaking, head tilting, and intermittent gasping as air is expelled in bursts following a deep initial inspiration. These physical actions engage the abdominal and , producing visible tremors that amplify the overall display. Episodes of laughter vary in duration and intensity, generally lasting about 1 to 3 seconds per bout, with intensity influenced by the number of vocal repetitions and the force of contractions. Softer laughter may involve subtle movements and lower-volume vocalizations, while intense episodes feature prolonged shaking and louder, more frequent bursts, reflecting the emotional level.

Types and Variations

Laughter manifests in diverse forms, classified primarily by , emotional basis, and social . Genuine laughter, also known as spontaneous or Duchenne laughter, arises from authentic or and is characterized by involuntary, heartfelt responses to humorous stimuli. In contrast, social laughter serves affiliative or polite functions, often occurring in conversational settings to build or signal agreement, even when the trigger lacks inherent humor. functions as a de-escalative mechanism, providing from anxiety or tension during awkward or stressful situations. Cruel laughter, rooted in derision or , expresses dominance or amusement at others' misfortune, often diminishing social bonds. Simulated laughter, or forced laughter, is deliberately produced to conform to social expectations, such as in performative or obligatory scenarios. Cultural norms significantly influence the expression of laughter, leading to variations in volume, visibility, and restraint. In many Western cultures, laughter tends to be vocal and expressive, aligning with values of high emotional and . Conversely, in some East Asian contexts, such as those influenced by Confucian principles emphasizing harmony and modesty, laughter is often more subdued, sometimes covered with the hand or expressed silently to avoid drawing undue attention or disrupting group equilibrium. Developmentally, laughter emerges in human infants around 3 to 4 months of age, initially as simple vocalizations in response to playful social interactions like or peek-a-boo games, marking an early milestone in emotional and communicative growth. By 5 to 7 months, these responses become more frequent and differentiated, with infants laughing sooner and more robustly in the presence of encouraging parental cues, laying the foundation for the complex, context-dependent varieties observed in adulthood. Rare variants include pathological laughter, which occurs involuntarily and disproportionately to emotional context, as seen in conditions like where episodes of uncontrollable laughing arise without genuine mirth.

Physiological Mechanisms

Neurological Processes

Laughter involves coordinated activation across multiple brain regions, reflecting its hybrid nature as both an emotional and motor response. The (PAG) in the plays a central role in , gating the initiation of laughter vocalizations and integrating sensory inputs for reflexive expressions. The contributes to emotional integration, modulating affective states that drive laughter through connections to the and influencing autonomic responses. Meanwhile, the , particularly the ventromedial and medial regions, processes social context, enabling the interpretation of laughter's communicative intent and its alignment with interpersonal dynamics. Neural circuitry underlying laughter encompasses reward pathways and mechanisms for . Activation of the mesolimbic , including release in the , occurs during mirthful laughter, reinforcing its pleasurable aspects similar to other rewarding stimuli. Contagious laughter, where hearing others laugh triggers one's own response, implicates networks in the and premotor areas, which facilitate imitation of observed or auditory emotional expressions. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and (EEG) studies reveal distinct patterns of activation, underscoring laughter's rapid emotional-motor integration. fMRI data show hybrid responses with early onset in the —including the and —for emotional processing, followed by motor areas like the and frontal operculum for execution. EEG complements this by capturing temporal dynamics, such as pre-laughter preparatory activity in the approximately two seconds prior to vocalization. Recent up to 2025 highlights hemispheric asymmetries, with greater right-hemisphere connectivity observed during positive laughter and social smiling in infants, suggesting early lateralization for prosocial emotional processing. Advanced fMRI techniques further indicate that positive laughter engages more bilateral reward and motor networks, while negative or pathological forms show right-hemisphere dominance linked to .

Anatomical Involvement

Laughter's physical manifestations arise from coordinated actions across multiple anatomical systems, primarily involving the respiratory, muscular, and vocal structures. The respiratory system plays a central role through rapid, rhythmic contractions of the diaphragm, the primary muscle of respiration, which force air out of the lungs in irregular bursts. These diaphragmatic spasms, occurring at frequencies of 3 to 8 Hz, reduce lung volume suddenly across all compartments, producing the heaving quality of laughter and the associated audible exhalations. Accompanying intercostal and abdominal muscles further modulate this process, enhancing the expulsion of air and contributing to the overall convulsive rhythm. Facial and skeletal musculature provides the visible expressions of laughter, with key involvement from specific muscles in the face and . The , extending from the to the corners of the mouth, contracts to pull the mouth upward into a broad , while the around the eyes tightens to create the characteristic crinkling or "Duchenne" marker of genuine amusement. In vigorous laughter, abdominal muscles such as the rectus abdominis, internal obliques, and transverse abdominis engage in powerful, repetitive contractions, driving the diaphragm's action and producing the bodily convulsions or "doubling over" often observed. These muscular activations resemble those in moderate , temporarily increasing and oxygen demand. The vocal tract generates laughter's distinctive sounds through specialized mechanics at the and beyond. Rhythmic glottal pulses—brief openings and closures of the vocal folds—produce a series of unpitched, pulsed excitations at rates similar to the diaphragmatic contractions, resulting in the staccato bursts like "ha-ha-ha." Unlike speech, which relies on sustained and precise articulation, laughter's vocal output features abrupt, less modulated airflow through the and oral cavity, often with minimal shaping to emphasize the raw, repetitive quality. Laughter episodes trigger rapid hormonal responses that amplify its pleasurable effects. , the body's natural opioids, are released immediately from the and , binding to receptors in the to induce and relief. In social laughter, oxytocin levels also rise, fostering trust and bonding by acting on pathways, though this response is more pronounced in group settings. These releases occur within seconds of onset, linking the anatomical output to broader emotional rewards.

Evolutionary and Biological Perspectives

Origins in Human Evolution

Laughter is believed to have originated as an from the play vocalizations of ancestors, evolving from rhythmic, labored breathing patterns observed during that signaled non-threatening, cooperative interactions. This adaptation likely served to indicate safety and reduce tension in social encounters, transforming a physiological response to physical play into a broader communicative tool that fostered group bonding among early humans. Evolutionary biologists propose that such vocalizations provided an adaptive advantage by promoting affiliation and coordination in increasingly complex social groups, distinguishing human laughter from mere play signals through its ritualized form and emotional expressiveness. Fossil and comparative anatomical evidence suggests that proto-laughter emerged in early hominids around 2.5 million years ago, coinciding with the rise of the genus and the development of larger social networks that demanded enhanced cohesion for survival. This timeline aligns with archaeological indicators of increased , where laughter-like vocalizations may have reinforced trust and cooperative behaviors essential for , , and defense against predators. While direct genetic markers specific to laughter remain elusive, phylogenetic analyses of vocal tract point to shared ancestry with great ape play calls, underscoring laughter's role in maintaining social harmony during pivotal stages of human ancestry. In terms of , human laughter is thought to predate the evolution of by millions of years, functioning as a pre-verbal mechanism for emotional signaling and social synchronization. This ancient vocalization likely facilitated rudimentary communication in proto-human groups, allowing individuals to convey shared positive affect without words, and serving as a foundational element for later linguistic developments. Recent phylogenetic studies, including those post-2020, reinforce this view by reconstructing laughter's trajectory through hominid lineages, highlighting its persistence as a universal, non-linguistic bond-strengthener that predates complex and semantics.

Laughter in Non-Human Animals

Laughter-like vocalizations have been observed in various non-human primates during social play, providing comparative insights into the evolutionary roots of such behaviors. In chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), distinct play vocalizations, often described as breathy pants or laughter-like calls, occur predominantly during rough-and-tumble interactions, accompanied by open-mouth play faces that mirror human expressions of amusement. These vocalizations are elicited by physical contact in both gentle and vigorous play, suggesting a role in signaling non-threatening intent and prolonging playful engagement. Similarly, bonobos (Pan paniscus) produce breathy, chuckling calls during play chases and tickling, characterized by vocal cord vibrations that resemble the rhythmic panting in human laughter. A 2025 study found that bonobos exhibit increased optimism after hearing conspecific laughter, providing experimental evidence of emotional contagion and positive affective responses in great apes. These sounds in great apes highlight shared acoustic features with human laughter, potentially linked to common reward pathways in the brain. Among , laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus) emit ultrasonic chirps at approximately 50 kHz during and , interpreted as an analogue to laughter due to their association with positive affective states. These vocalizations are elicited by manual stimulation mimicking conspecific play, and their production correlates with increased release in the , a key region for reward processing. Notably, administration of dopamine blockers, such as those targeting D2 receptors, abolishes these 50 kHz calls, underscoring the neurochemical basis of this response and its similarity to mechanisms underlying . Evidence of laughter-like behaviors extends to other mammals, including canids and cetaceans. Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) produce rapid, forced panting sounds, termed "play pants," during interactive play bouts, often paired with play bows to invite continued engagement and reduce . Playback of these vocalizations has been shown to calm shelter dogs, eliciting pro-social responses and decreasing stress-related behaviors. In bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), pulsed burst sounds—short, high-frequency clicks combined with whistles—emerge during play-fighting, distinguishing them from aggressive signals and serving to maintain affiliative interactions in social groups. These findings have sparked ethical debates on in animal research, with scholars advocating for critical, evidence-based attributions to avoid over-interpreting human-like qualities while acknowledging observable behavioral parallels, as seen in studies of chirps and play vocalizations. Recent research as of 2025 has also confirmed laughter-like vocalizations in birds, such as high-pitched calls in the (Nestor notabilis), suggesting an even broader phylogenetic distribution across mammals and birds.

Functions and Roles

Health and Physiological Benefits

Laughter has been empirically linked to several physiological benefits, enhancing overall health through mechanisms that support immune function, cardiovascular health, pain modulation, and stress reduction. These effects stem from laughter's ability to trigger neurochemical changes, such as the release of beneficial hormones and peptides, which promote and resilience in the body. One key benefit is the boost to the , where laughter increases secretory (sIgA) levels, a primary that defends mucosal surfaces against pathogens. Studies have shown that exposure to humorous stimuli leading to mirthful laughter elevates sIgA concentrations, potentially enhancing mucosal immunity. Additionally, laughter augments natural killer (NK) cell activity, which plays a crucial role in surveilling and destroying virally infected or cancerous cells. In controlled experiments, participants engaging in laughter sessions exhibited significantly higher NK compared to participants watching a neutral video, indicating improved immune surveillance. In terms of cardiovascular effects, laughter contributes to lowered blood pressure and improved vascular function. Systematic reviews of interventional studies reveal that laughter interventions consistently reduce both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in pre-post measurements, with effects persisting across diverse populations. This is partly mediated by enhanced endothelial function, where laughter promotes vasodilation through the release of nitric oxide, a potent vasodilator produced by endothelial cells. Research demonstrates that viewing comedic content induces a measurable improvement in flow-mediated dilation, a marker of vascular health, by up to 22%, akin to the effects of moderate physical activity. Laughter also facilitates pain reduction via endorphin-mediated analgesia. Social laughter triggers the endogenous release of opioids in brain regions like the and anterior insula, which bind to mu-opioid receptors and elevate pain thresholds. Experimental data indicate that increases significantly following laughter episodes, with effects comparable to those from mild due to similar endorphin elevations. This analgesia is particularly relevant for management, as humor-induced endorphin surges help mitigate discomfort without pharmacological intervention. Regarding , laughter reduces levels, providing stress relief by counteracting the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity. Meta-analyses of spontaneous laughter interventions show a substantial 36.7% average reduction in salivary , outperforming neutral activities and supporting physiological stress recovery. Furthermore, as an adjunct therapy for depression, laughter-based programs demonstrate efficacy in alleviating symptoms, with randomized controlled trials indicating moderate to large effect sizes in reducing depressive mood when combined with standard treatments. Meta-analyses confirm these benefits, highlighting laughter's role in enhancing emotional and , though effects may vary by , such as showing no significant impact on depression in students.

Social and Communicative Functions

Laughter serves as a key mechanism for signaling affiliation and fostering social bonds within groups, often described as a "" that lightens interactions and promotes receptivity among participants. By facilitating endorphin release during shared laughter, it enhances perceptions of group membership and trust, thereby supporting behaviors without necessarily extending to prosocial actions toward outsiders. This function is particularly evident in conversational settings, where laughter punctuates exchanges to build and reinforce in-group cohesion. The contagious nature of laughter further amplifies its communicative role, spreading through social interactions via neural mechanisms that heighten . Mirror neurons in the auditory-motor system activate when individuals hear laughter, mimicking the emotional response and prompting reciprocal laughter that strengthens interpersonal connections. This process is linked to , where higher empathy traits correlate with better detection and replication of authentic laughter, facilitating synchronized group responses during conversations. Such contagion not only synchronizes moods but also builds collective , making laughter a powerful tool for emotional alignment in social contexts. Gender dynamics influence laughter's signaling patterns, with women typically laughing more frequently than men, especially in mixed-sex interactions, as a cue reflecting power and status hierarchies. In group discussions, women laugh at men's humor at higher rates—up to 71% in some observations—compared to responses to speakers, signaling or in status-driven environments. This asymmetry underscores laughter's role in navigating social power structures, where it reinforces relational bonds while subtly acknowledging dominance cues. Across diverse societies, the ability to recognize genuine laughter demonstrates remarkable universality, allowing individuals to discern spontaneous from volitional laughter with accuracies ranging from 56% to 69%, well above chance levels. This cross-cultural consistency highlights laughter's innate communicative potency, enabling global understanding of authentic affiliation signals regardless of linguistic or cultural barriers.

Causes and Triggers

Psychological and Emotional Drivers

Laughter often arises from the perception of incongruity, where an unexpected mismatch between expectation and reality is resolved in a non-threatening manner. According to incongruity theory, this resolution triggers amusement by highlighting that is ultimately benign, such as in puns or situational ironies where the surprise element dissipates harmlessly. A modern refinement, the benign violation theory, posits that humor emerges when a situation simultaneously violates norms (creating tension) and appears benign (ensuring safety), explaining laughter at events like awkward accidents or wordplay. Historically, superiority theory suggested that laughter stems from a of triumph over others' misfortunes or shortcomings, as articulated by , who described it as a "sudden glory" arising from recognizing one's superiority. Similarly, relief theory, advanced by , viewed laughter as the release of pent-up psychic energy, particularly from repressed sexual or aggressive impulses, allowing emotional . Modern critiques argue that superiority theory fails to account for self-deprecating or neutral humor without comparative judgment, rendering it overly narrow for diverse laughter triggers. Relief theory, meanwhile, is criticized for overemphasizing libidinal tensions and neglecting cognitive or social elements in non-conflictual laughter, such as spontaneous joy. Psychologically, laughter is elicited by a spectrum of positive emotions, primarily and , which activate reward pathways in the , but also surprise when it leads to playful resolution rather than alarm. Additionally, it serves as a mechanism for tension release in states of anxiety or stress, where humorous reframing distances individuals from distress and restores emotional equilibrium. Individual differences in laughter frequency are linked to traits, with extraversion showing a positive , as extraverted individuals exhibit higher rates of laughter and smiling due to greater reward sensitivity and . Studies using tools like the Situational Humor Response Questionnaire confirm this association, indicating that extraverts respond more robustly to humorous stimuli across contexts.

Cultural and Contextual Factors

Laughter's expression and interpretation are profoundly influenced by cultural norms and social contexts, which dictate when and how it is deemed appropriate. In many formal settings, such as environments or religious ceremonies, laughter is often suppressed to maintain and focus. For instance, cultural tightness—characterized by strong norms and low tolerance for deviation—has been shown to reduce humor production and laughter in constrained social situations, as individuals prioritize over spontaneous expression. Similarly, in certain religious traditions, laughter faces taboos rooted in spiritual ; early Christian monastic communities, influenced by the of the , viewed excessive laughter as a that distracted from , leading to rules enforcing and restraint in monastic life. Cultural variations also manifest in preferred humor styles that elicit laughter, reflecting societal values on communication and interpersonal dynamics. Anglo-Saxon or Anglophone cultures frequently employ as a humorous device, where irony and serve to bond groups through subtle critique, differing markedly from other traditions. In contrast, Japanese humor often relies on puns known as dajare, which exploit phonetic similarities and for light-hearted , fostering amusement without direct and aligning with values of indirectness and . These styles shape laughter's role: sarcastic humor in Western contexts may provoke knowing chuckles among insiders, while dajare in elicits collective, gentle laughter to reinforce social cohesion. The digital age has amplified media's influence on laughter through comedy formats like memes, which adapt cultural contexts for viral sharing. Studies from the 2020s highlight how memes induce laughter by blending incongruity with relatable scenarios, particularly among younger users; for example, humorous memes on social platforms trigger positive emotional responses and engagement, such as shares and comments, in Generation Z cohorts. This digital comedy often mirrors cultural nuances, with meme styles varying by region—satirical in individualistic societies and more affiliative in collectivist ones—to evoke context-specific amusement. Gender and age further modulate laughter within these frameworks, influenced by societal expectations. Adolescents, especially in peer groups, exhibit heightened laughter as a tool for bonding and identity formation, with studies showing that middle-schoolers use humor more frequently during interactions to navigate social hierarchies and affirm friendships. Cross-national surveys reveal variations tied to cultural orientation: in collectivist societies like those in East Asia, laughter tends to emphasize harmony and group affiliation, with individuals laughing more to support relational balance rather than individual wit, contrasting with individualistic cultures where self-enhancing humor prevails. These patterns underscore how context shapes laughter as a socially adaptive behavior.

Negative Dimensions

Potential Health Risks

While laughter is generally benign, intense or prolonged episodes can occasionally lead to cardiovascular strain in vulnerable individuals. , a rare form of fainting, occurs due to vasovagal mechanisms where increased intrathoracic pressure from vigorous laughing reduces venous return to the heart, triggering a reflex drop in and . This phenomenon has been documented in case reports, including a 2025 instance involving a patient with who experienced syncope during laughter. More severe events include rare cardiac complications such as arrhythmias or even rupture, as seen in extreme laughing fits that mimic the physiological stress of a . Additionally, positive emotional triggers like laughter have been linked to , or "broken heart ," where acute stress causes transient left ventricular dysfunction, as reported in cases of recurrent episodes precipitated by mirth. Respiratory risks arise primarily in individuals with pre-existing swallowing disorders, or , where laughter can disrupt coordinated swallowing and lead to aspiration of food or liquids into the airways. During laughter, the sudden closure of the vocal folds and altered patterns may cause momentary loss of airway protection, increasing the chance of and subsequent in at-risk patients. Clinical guidelines recommend avoiding laughter or talking during meals for those with to mitigate this hazard. Musculoskeletal strain from laughter typically manifests as transient discomfort, such as side stitches—sharp pains in the or flank—resulting from diaphragm spasms or irritation of the peritoneal lining during repetitive contractions. Prolonged laughing can also induce jaw fatigue or pain, particularly in those with (TMJ) disorders, where sustained mouth opening and facial muscle engagement exacerbate soreness or spasms. Case studies, including reports from 2022, highlight laughter as a potential trigger in susceptible individuals, possibly due to transient vascular changes like cerebral blood flow alterations during the physiological response. Case studies describe "laugh headaches," reproducible episodes of severe head pain immediately following intense laughter, often resembling auras or attacks without structural abnormalities on . These events underscore the need for caution in migraine-prone patients during social situations involving humor.

Social and Psychological Drawbacks

Derisive laughter, characterized by mockery and ridicule, serves as a tool for bullying that reinforces social hierarchies and leads to exclusion. In interpersonal dynamics, such laughter amplifies the emotional impact of insults, making victims feel more humiliated and isolated within groups. For instance, research demonstrates that the presence of an audience laughing in response to an insult prolongs and intensifies negative emotional processing in the brain, heightening perceptions of rejection and vulnerability. This form of laughter not only signals derision but also cues social exclusion, triggering physiological responses akin to rejection, such as heart rate deceleration indicative of a "freezing" state in affected individuals. Consequently, repeated exposure to derisive laughter in bullying contexts fosters long-term social withdrawal and diminished self-esteem among targets. Nervous laughter often emerges as an involuntary response to mask underlying discomfort, tension, or in awkward social situations. While it functions as a short-term defense mechanism to diffuse anxiety by discharging emotional energy, this avoidance strategy can inadvertently exacerbate the underlying distress over time. By suppressing genuine emotional expression, prevents resolution of the discomfort, potentially reinforcing cycles of heightened anxiety and social unease in future interactions. Studies suggest that such laughter ties into broader patterns of , where individuals struggling with anxiety use it to cope but find it hinders deeper and relational authenticity. Inappropriate laughter in solemn or sensitive contexts, such as funerals or discussions of , can provoke offense and erode social bonds due to its misalignment with expected emotional norms. Laughter's meaning is profoundly context-dependent; when it occurs amid gravity, it may be interpreted as insensitivity or , leading to interpersonal conflict or exclusion from the group. Cultural variations further complicate this, as what one society views as a neutral release of tension might be seen as disrespectful in another, amplifying relational discord. For example, unreciprocated or untimely laughter disrupts shared emotional , fostering resentment and perceptions of emotional ineptitude. Gelotophobia, defined as the pervasive fear of being laughed at, represents a significant psychological drawback, manifesting as to potential ridicule and avoidance of social settings involving humor. This condition, assessed via scales like GELOPH<15>, affects approximately 10-20% of individuals in population surveys, with higher rates in certain cultures such as the (around 14%). It stems from early experiences of or , leading to misinterpretation of neutral laughter as derisive, which perpetuates anxiety, low , and . Affected individuals often exhibit elevated trait anxiety and reduced , underscoring gelotophobia's role in impairing interpersonal trust and emotional .

Therapeutic and Applied Uses

Laughter Therapy Techniques

, developed by Indian physician Madan Kataria in 1995, is a structured practice that induces laughter through simulated exercises rather than relying on humor or jokes. The protocol typically begins with warm-up activities such as rhythmic clapping, chanting "ho ho ha ha ha," and deep breathing exercises to prepare participants physically and mentally. Participants then engage in a series of simulated laughter exercises, including "milk shaking" (pretending to shake until it turns into butter while laughing) and "lion laughter" (sticking out the tongue and roaring with laughter), often performed in pairs or groups to foster interaction. These exercises combine elements of yoga, like breathing, with childlike playfulness, gradually transitioning simulated laughter into genuine outbursts through prolonged physical simulation. Clown therapy, also known as medical clowning, employs professional clowns trained in therapeutic techniques to deliver humor in environments, particularly for pediatric patients. Key methods include games such as spontaneous scenarios, where clowns interact with children using exaggerated expressions, props, and absurd to elicit laughter and from medical procedures. Techniques emphasize non-verbal communication, like mirroring patient movements or creating playful "magic" tricks with everyday objects, to build and reduce anxiety without requiring verbal responses. Sessions are typically short, lasting 10-20 minutes per patient interaction, and are conducted by pairs of clowns to enhance dynamic . Group laughter therapy sessions, often modeled after laughter yoga protocols, are formatted to last 20-30 minutes and prioritize collective engagement to amplify the therapeutic effect. Participants form circles to maintain , which promotes trust and , while incorporating synchronized exercises like alternate breathing to regulate oxygen intake and sustain laughter. The structure includes an initial warm-up with gentle stretches and clapping, followed by 15-20 minutes of laughter exercises, and concludes with relaxation techniques such as laughter meditation, where participants lie down and allow residual giggles to subside naturally. Evidence-based adaptations of have incorporated (VR) since the early 2020s to enable remote or individualized induction. One such program, the Embodied system developed in 2025, immerses users in a virtual theater with simulated audiences that respond to with multimodal laughter cues, including audio and haptic feedback, to trigger genuine laughter. Another example is a mobile VR self-management program for postpartum women, which integrates laughter therapy modules with guided exercises viewed through headsets, demonstrating feasibility for home-based use. These VR tools adapt traditional techniques by using interactive avatars and to personalize laughter prompts, ensuring for those unable to attend in-person sessions.

Clinical and Wellness Applications

In dementia care, particularly for patients with , humor-based interventions have demonstrated efficacy in reducing agitation through randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The Sydney Multisite Intervention of LaughterBosses and ElderClowns (SMILE) study, a cluster RCT involving 189 nursing home residents with , found that weekly sessions with professional humorists—such as clowns and comedians—resulted in a 20% reduction in agitation behaviors compared to standard care, an effect comparable to antipsychotic medications without their side effects. This improvement was measured using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, highlighting laughter's role as a non-pharmacological option to manage behavioral symptoms in settings. For cancer laughter has shown promise in alleviating chemotherapy-related side effects. An RCT of 60 patients with gynecological cancer undergoing revealed that a structured program, conducted in groups for 20-30 minutes weekly over eight weeks, significantly reduced severity and overall symptom burden, with participants reporting lower Rhodes Index of Nausea scores post-intervention. Similarly, another RCT involving cancer patients (majority with ) demonstrated that sessions decreased pain intensity and fatigue during treatment cycles, improving health-related as assessed by standardized scales like the EORTC QLQ-C30. These findings support the integration of group-based laughter into care to mitigate treatment toxicities. Workplace wellness programs incorporating laughter have been linked to reduced burnout and enhanced , as evidenced by recent studies. A 2022 RCT on 101 nurses found that eight weeks of sessions lowered burnout scores by approximately 21% on the , alongside decreased perceived stress. Broader evidence from a 2012 of positive humor in the confirmed that it is associated with enhanced work performance, satisfaction, and coping effectiveness, while mitigating stress across professions. These programs, often delivered via short group sessions, foster resilience in high-stress environments like healthcare. Despite these outcomes, clinical applications of laughter face limitations, including the scarcity of long-term longitudinal studies tracking sustained effects beyond 12 weeks and insufficient representation of diverse populations, such as ethnic minorities or low-income groups, as highlighted in systematic reviews. Future research should prioritize larger, multi-site RCTs to address these gaps and validate generalizability.

Historical and Philosophical Explorations

Ancient Views and Thinkers

In ancient Greek philosophy, Plato expressed ambivalence toward laughter, viewing it as potentially beneficial but often harmful when excessive. In the Republic, he cautioned against allowing guardians to indulge in uncontrolled laughter, arguing that it leads to a loss of self-control and undermines the soul's rational order, likening it to a violent emotional upheaval that disrupts harmony. In the Philebus, Plato further analyzed laughter as a form of scornful pleasure, arising from the perception of others' ignorance or misfortune, which mixes pain with delight and can foster malice rather than virtue. Aristotle, building on such ideas, regarded laughter as a distinctive human trait that elevated civilization. In History of Animals, he observed that humans alone among creatures laugh, attributing this to the capacity for reflective emotion and physiological differences such as the structure of the heart and respiratory system that enable such responses, setting humanity apart from animals in a way that underscores rational and social sophistication. In the Poetics, he positioned laughter within comedy as an imitation of human flaws, portraying it as a civilized art form that invites gentle ridicule of the worse aspects of character without descending into vulgarity. Herodotus incorporated laughter into his historical narratives to illustrate cultural clashes and . In the Histories, he recounted how the Persian king Cambyses mocked and laughed at the sacred Egyptian Apis bull during a , wounding the animal in derision and questioning the divinity of such fleshly forms, an act the Egyptians interpreted as inviting madness and eventual punishment from the gods. Similarly, the Ethiopian king laughed at Persian envoys' jewelry, mistaking it for feeble restraints, highlighting laughter's role in underscoring superiority and foreign misunderstandings. Biblical perspectives emphasized the timeliness of laughter as part of divine order. The advises that a cheerful , akin to timely laughter, acts as for the soul, promoting health while a broken spirit withers it. reinforces this by declaring a for laughter amid life's rhythms, balanced against weeping and to reflect in moderation. In Eastern thought, Confucian teachings promoted restraint in laughter to uphold social decorum. The Analects describe the ideal as one who laughs only when genuinely happy, ensuring his mirth remains measured and endearing without excess, thus preserving and in interactions. This approach contrasts with unchecked expression, aligning laughter with ritual propriety rather than impulsive emotion.

Modern Theories and Researchers

In the 17th century, English philosopher Thomas Hobbes articulated one of the earliest modern theories of laughter, framing it as an expression of "sudden glory" derived from a perceived superiority over others. In his treatise Human Nature (1650), Hobbes defined laughter as "nothing else but sudden glory arising from some sudden conception of some eminency in ourselves, by comparison with the infirmity of others, or with our own formerly," positioning it as a fleeting recognition of personal advantage that underscores human competitiveness and social hierarchy. This superiority theory, elaborated further in Leviathan (1651), portrayed laughter not merely as amusement but as a manifestation of power dynamics, influencing subsequent philosophical and psychological interpretations of humor as a tool for self-affirmation amid vulnerability. Hobbes's view marked a shift from earlier moralistic accounts, emphasizing laughter's mechanistic and egoistic roots in post-Enlightenment thought. Building on such foundations, French philosopher offered a contrasting perspective in Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic (1900), where he theorized laughter as a response to "mechanical inelasticity" in . Bergson contended that emerges when vital, flexible life encounters rigidity—like a person's actions mimicking a machine's automatism—failing to adapt to fluid social or physical contexts, and laughter acts as a societal corrective to restore elasticity and vitality. He illustrated this through examples of repetitive gestures or social , arguing that such inelasticity disrupts the expected harmony of living organisms, prompting detached, corrective mirth to enforce communal norms without direct confrontation. Bergson's framework, emphasizing laughter's role in humanizing the mechanical, has enduringly shaped humor studies by highlighting its corrective function in modern, industrialized societies. Friedrich Nietzsche extended these ideas into a metaphysical in works such as (1872) and later writings, contrasting Dionysian laughter as ecstatic release with Apollonian restraint. For Nietzsche, Dionysian laughter embodies uninhibited joy and dissolution of the self, a vital affirmation of life's chaos and suffering through exuberant, boundary-dissolving exuberance, as seen in the revelry of rites. In opposition, Apollonian elements impose form, , and sober illusion, tempering laughter's wildness to channel it into structured art or philosophy, preventing total . This duality positions laughter as a bridge between instinctual excess and rational order, essential for cultural vitality and personal overcoming, with Nietzsche advocating its Dionysian form as a counter to nihilistic resignation. Immanuel Kant, in Critique of Judgment (1790), proposed that laughter arises from the sudden transformation of a strained expectation into nothing, highlighting the play between imagination and understanding. Arthur Schopenhauer further developed the incongruity theory, arguing in The World as Will and Representation (1818) that laughter results from the frustration of a concept by reality, revealing the inadequacies of abstract thought. The 20th century saw significant empirical advancements in the scientific study of laughter, known as , with Willibald Ruch contributing foundational models from the . Ruch's work, including his research on humor appreciation styles (e.g., affiliative vs. aggressive) and temperamental dispositions like cheerfulness, differentiated laughter from smiling and explored its role in , cognitive processing, and social bonding. This approach bridged earlier theories, such as Hobbes's superiority and Bergson's social correction, with measurable outcomes in . In the 2020s, gelotological insights have converged with , theorizing laughter as a key enhancer of resilience by buffering stress and amplifying adaptive . Researchers have demonstrated that interventions promoting laughter, such as structured exercises, elevate positive affect and emotional regulation, fostering resilience in high-stress contexts like healthcare during pandemics. For instance, has been shown to mitigate anxiety and bolster psychological fortitude, aligning with 's emphasis on strengths like to counteract adversity. This integration reframes laughter not just as reactive mirth but as a proactive mechanism for building enduring well-being, extending Nietzsche's Dionysian release into evidence-based practices for modern . Feminist critiques have illuminated the gendered underpinnings of laughter, revealing how theories like superiority and inelasticity often overlook patriarchal biases in its expression and reception. Scholars argue that women's laughter is disproportionately scrutinized or weaponized, reinforcing stereotypes of hysteria or frivolity, while male laughter asserts dominance unchecked. For example, Hélène Cixous's posits laughter as a subversive, bodily revolt against phallocentric restraint, disrupting linear, Apollonian narratives with joyful excess akin to Dionysian liberation. These analyses extend Bergson's social corrective to how gendered laughter perpetuates inequality, yet also empowers resistance through ironic or humor that challenges norms. Emerging 2020s research on AI-generated humor probes laughter's philosophical mechanics through computational lenses, testing whether machines can replicate superiority, inelasticity, or Dionysian elements. Studies find AI capable of crafting jokes eliciting laughter comparable to human efforts in controlled settings, such as meme creation, but faltering on contextual nuance and emotional depth. This work highlights gaps in AI's grasp of laughter's social elasticity, as theorized by Bergson, and its resilient, affirmative role in positive psychology, suggesting hybrid human-AI models may enrich future gelotological theories.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4255480/
  2. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/stress-management/in-depth/stress-relief/art-20044456
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6125057/
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8496883/
  5. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/498281
  6. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2021.0176
  7. https://www.americanscientist.org/article/laughter
  8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8210476/
  9. https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:1873/fulltext.pdf
  10. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10339-023-01168-8
  11. http://labrosa.ee.columbia.edu/~dpwe/papers/BickH92-laugh.pdf
  12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2809699/
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12084325_Respiratory_dynamics_during_laughter
  14. http://graphics.cs.uh.edu/yding/papers/2014-ICMI-YuDing.pdf
  15. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-022-03485-1
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0885230813000545
  17. https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/8dc8c28a-c58b-48fb-9dc3-bf2e94b1b60b/download
  18. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9489280/
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5381435/
  20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5048456/
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4424150/
  22. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/pseudobulbar-affect/symptoms-causes/syc-20353737
  23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31848572/
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6847157/
  25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14659102/
  26. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8891493/
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12464472/
  28. https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/126/10/2121/314497
  29. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11247945/
  30. https://www.news-medical.net/health/The-Health-Implications-of-Laughter-From-Ab-Workouts-to-Stress-Reduction.aspx
  31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493209/
  32. https://apnews.com/article/lifestyle-exercise-09cffdccdc234d67bb4309b3f3b8cd06
  33. https://www.findapsychologist.org/the-physiological-effects-of-laughter-by-lindsay-wilson-barlow/
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0885230814000783
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6596504/
  36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35667481/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2889984/
  38. https://theconversation.com/the-evolutionary-origins-of-laughter-are-rooted-more-in-survival-than-enjoyment-57750
  39. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/laughter-and-humor-101/202305/the-search-for-laughters-evolutionary-origins
  40. http://gabryant.bol.ucla.edu/Evolution_Laughter_HCB_2020.pdf
  41. https://www.utne.com/science-and-technology/the-evolution-of-laughter/
  42. https://www.sciencefocus.com/the-human-body/whats-the-point-of-laughter
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11005796/
  44. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0127337
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9489294/
  46. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/laughter-and-humor-101/202306/when-apes-laugh-they-offer-a-window-into-human-evolution
  47. https://news.iu.edu/college/live/news/46113-iu-study-shows-that-apes-are-more-optimistic-after
  48. https://www.wired.com/2009/06/evolutionlaughter/
  49. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10996405/
  50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23399995/
  51. https://www.nature.com/articles/npp2011258
  52. https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1164&context=anthro_facpubs
  53. https://phys.org/news/2005-12-dog-aposlaughapos-silences-dogs.html
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228355003_An_Acoustic_Play-Fight_Signal_in_Bottlenose_Dolphins_Tursiops_truncatus_in_Human_Care
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374373356_MAJA_BIALEK_THE_NEW_ANTHROPOMORPHISM_DEBATE_AND_RESEARCHING_NON-HUMAN_ANIMAL_EMOTIONS_A_KANTIAN_APPROACH
  56. https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/article/can-animals-laugh
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2686627/
  58. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12652882/
  59. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2021-0111/html
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1860773/
  61. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/37/25/6125
  62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3267132/
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2989702/
  64. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286260
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331845980_A_meta-analysis_of_randomized_controlled_trials_of_laughter_and_humour_interventions_on_depression_anxiety_and_sleep_quality_in_adults
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1471595325002665
  67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8362988/
  68. https://www.jneurosci.org/content/26/50/13067
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6261327/
  70. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1993.tb00478.x
  71. https://interruptions.net/literature/Robinson-SF01.pdf
  72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618778235
  73. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30044711/
  74. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797610376073
  75. https://leeds-faculty.colorado.edu/mcgrawp/pdf/mcgraw.warren.2010.pdf
  76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2709204
  77. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2299&context=fac_journ
  78. https://thesis.eur.nl/pub/52397/Pooja-Jadoenath-BL.pdf
  79. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0408457102
  80. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/dacherkeltner/docs/keltner.laughter.jpsp.1997.pdf
  81. https://www.academia.edu/3567288/Do_extraverts_like_to_laugh_An_analysis_of_the_Situational_Humor_Response_Questionnaire_SHRQ
  82. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41100261/
  83. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/12/1093
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374021000406
  85. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236634942_Japanese_Puns_Are_Not_Necessarily_Jokes
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11081069/
  87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3033820
  88. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00123/full
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3736168/
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12528538/
  91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3898427/
  92. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304784715_The_idiom_laughter_is_the_best_medicine_is_not_always_true_Takotsubo_Cardiomyopathy_precipitated_by_positive_emotion_recurrence_in_the_patient_Understanding_the_facts_and_review_of_literature_J_Pharm_
  93. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/322091
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8930452/
  95. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17470919.2016.1162194
  96. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/psyp.12259
  97. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24689333/
  98. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/evolution-the-self/202108/why-we-laugh-when-were-nervous
  99. https://www.waldenu.edu/online-bachelors-programs/bs-in-psychology/resource/nervous-laughter-explained
  100. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150320-why-do-we-laugh-inappropriately
  101. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/inappropriate-laughter
  102. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/gelotophobia-no-laughing-matter/
  103. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21572237/
  104. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9660430/
  105. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11520822/
  106. https://www.laughteryoga.org/
  107. https://www.laughteryoga.org/media/download_files/info-booklet.pdf
  108. https://positivepsychology.com/laughter-yoga/
  109. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4991052/
  110. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10497323221139781
  111. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17482631.2023.2238989
  112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4928740/
  113. https://celestegreenelaughs.com/tips-to-get-the-most-out-of-your-zoom-laughter-yoga-session/
  114. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706599.3719755
  115. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7915744/
  116. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/3/1/e002072
  117. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24814320/
  118. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10784676/
  119. https://bmccomplementmedtherapies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12906-023-04028-2
  120. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9254653/
  121. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0021943611434799
  122. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1161703/full
  123. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0168%3Abook%3D3%3Asection%3D388e
  124. https://academic.oup.com/book/34912/chapter/298490308
  125. https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0066%3Abook%3D9%3Asection%3D1
  126. http://classics.mit.edu/Herodotus/history.3.iii.html
  127. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs+17%3A22&version=NIV
  128. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ecclesiastes+3%3A4&version=NIV
  129. https://www.acmuller.net/con-dao/analects.html
  130. https://open.ocolearnok.org/whatsfunny/chapter/thomas-hobbes-human-nature/
  131. https://pluto.huji.ac.il/~msheyd/files/Hobbes_laughter.pdf
  132. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4352/4352-h/4352-h.htm
  133. https://salford-repository.worktribe.com/OutputFile/1487395
  134. https://aeon.co/essays/for-henri-bergson-laughter-is-what-keeps-us-elastic-and-free
  135. https://philarchive.org/archive/HATLIN-2
  136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27541653
  137. https://dsc.duq.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2145&context=etd
  138. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/humor/
  139. https://www.psychology.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:00000000-38b5-2dd4-0000-0000361752b1/93_p_2008_Ruch.pdf
  140. https://www.psychology.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:00000000-38b5-2dd4-ffff-ffffadc9e4e7/56_m_1998_Ruch_Koehler.pdf
  141. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37023316/
  142. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12211802/
  143. https://philarchive.org/archive/MARFPO-5
  144. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00497878.2024.2443100
  145. https://online.ucpress.edu/fmh/article/7/2/110/117178/Affect-Theory-in-the-Throat-of-LaughterFeminist
  146. https://aclanthology.org/2025.chum-1.8.pdf
  147. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/can-artificial-intelligence-learn-the-nuances-of-human-humor-180987052/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.