Hubbry Logo
Lop NurLop NurMain
Open search
Lop Nur
Community hub
Lop Nur
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Lop Nur
Lop Nur
Lop Nur
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Lop Nur
Satellite picture of the Basin of the former sea of Lop Nur; the concentric shorelines of the vanished lake are visible.
Lop Nur is in the southeast of China’s
Lop Nur is in the southeast of China’s
Lop Nur
class=notpageimage|
Location of Lop Nur within Xinjiang
Lop Nur is in the southeast of China’s
Lop Nur is in the southeast of China’s
Lop Nur
Lop Nur (China)
Chinese name
Traditional Chinese羅布泊
Simplified Chinese罗布泊
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinLuóbù Pō
Wade–GilesLo2-pu4 P'o1
IPA[lwǒpû pʰwó]
Alternative Chinese name
Traditional Chinese羅布淖爾
Simplified Chinese罗布淖尔
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinLuóbù Nào'ěr
Wade–GilesLo2-pu4 Nao4-'erh3
IPA[lwǒpû nâʊàɚ]
Mongolian name
Mongolian Cyrillicᠯᠣᠪ ᠨᠠᠭᠤᠷ
Лоб Нуур
Uyghur name
Uyghurلوپنۇر‎
Transcriptions
Latin YëziqiLopnur
Yengi YeziⱪLopnur
Siril YëziqiЛопнур

Lop Nur or Lop Nor (Uyghur: لوپنۇر, Oirat: ᠯᠣ᠊ᠫ
ᠨᡇᡇᠷ, romanized: Lob nuur, from an Oirat Mongolic name meaning "Lop Lake", where "Lop" is a toponym of unknown origin[1]) is a now largely dried-up salt lake formerly located within the Lop Depression in the eastern fringe of the Tarim Basin in the southeastern portion of the Xinjiang Autonomous Region, northwestern China, between the Taklamakan and Kumtag deserts. Administratively, the lake is in Lop Nur town (Chinese: 罗布泊镇; pinyin: Luóbùpō zhèn), also known as Luozhong (罗中; Luózhōng) of Ruoqiang County, which in its turn is part of the Bayingolin Mongol Autonomous Prefecture.

The lake system, into which the Tarim River and Shule River drain from the west and east respectively, is the last remnant of the historical post-glacial Tarim Lake, which once covered more than 10,000 km2 (3,900 sq mi) in the Tarim Basin but had progressively shrunk throughout the Holocene due to rain shadowing by the Tibetan Plateau. Lop Nur is hydrologically endorheic, it is landbound and has no outlet, and has relied largely on meltwater runoffs from the Tianshan, Kunlun and the western Qilian Mountains. The lake measured 3,100 km2 (1,200 sq mi) in 1928, but has dried up due to construction of reservoirs which dammed the flow of water feeding into the lake, and only small seasonal lakes and salt marshes may form. The dried-up Lop Nur Basin is covered with a salt crust ranging from 30 to 100 cm (12 to 39 in) in thickness.

An area to the northwest of Lop Nur has been used as a nuclear testing site.[2] Since the discovery of potash at the site in the mid-1990s, it is also the location of a large-scale mining operation.[3] There are some restricted areas under military management and cultural relics protection points in the region, which are not open to the public.[4]

History

[edit]
Map of Lop Nur by Folke Bergman, 1935. Kara-Koshun where the terminal lake was found in 1867 is located to the south-west of Lop Nor, and the lake had shifted back to Lop Nor by the time this map was drawn. Taitema Lake was a smaller transit lake and located to the west of Kara-Koshun.

From around 1800 BC until the 9th century the lake supported a thriving Tocharian culture. Archaeologists have discovered the buried remains of settlements, as well as several of the Tarim mummies, along its ancient shoreline. Former water resources of the Tarim River and Lop Nur nurtured the kingdom of Loulan since the second century BC, an ancient civilisation along the Silk Road, which skirted the lake-filled basin. Loulan became a client state of the Chinese empire in 55 BC, renamed Shanshan. Faxian went by the Lop Desert on his way to the Indus valley (395–414),[5] followed by later Chinese pilgrims. Marco Polo in his travels passed through the Lop Desert.[6] In the 19th century and early 20th century, the explorers Ferdinand von Richthofen, Nikolai Przhevalsky, Sven Hedin and Aurel Stein visited and studied the area.[7] It is also likely that Swedish soldier Johan Gustaf Renat had visited the area when he was helping the Zunghars to produce maps over the area in the eighteenth century.[8]

The lake was given various names in ancient Chinese texts.[9] In Shiji it was called Yan Ze (鹽澤, literally Salt Marsh), indicating its saline nature, near which was located the ancient Loulan Kingdom.[10] In Hanshu it was called Puchang Hai (蒲昌海, literally Sea of Abundant Reed) and was given a dimension of 300 to 400 li (roughly 120–160 km) in length and breadth,[11] indicating it was once a lake of great size. These early texts also mentioned the belief, mistaken as it turns out, that the lake joins the Yellow River at Jishi through an underground channel as the source of the river.[11][12]

The lake was referred to as the "Wandering Lake" in the early 20th century due to the Tarim River changing its course, causing its terminal lake to alter its location between the Lop Nur dried basin, the Kara-Koshun dried basin and the Taitema Lake basin.[13] This shift of the terminal lake caused some confusion amongst the early explorers as to the exact location of Lop Nur. Imperial maps from the Qing dynasty showed Lop Nur to be located in similar position to the present Lop Nur dried basin, but the Russian geographer Nikolay Przhevalsky instead found the terminal lake at Kara-Koshun in 1867. Sven Hedin visited the area in 1900–1901 and suggested that the Tarim river periodically changed its course to and from between its southbound and northbound direction, resulting in a shift in the position of the terminal lake. The change in the course of the river, which resulted in Lop Nur drying up, was also suggested by Hedin as the reason why ancient settlements such as Loulan had perished.[14]

In 1921, due to human intervention, the terminal lake shifted its position back to Lop Nur. The lake measured 2400 km2 in area in 1930–1931. In 1934, Sven Hedin[15] went down the new Kuruk Darya ("Dry River") in a canoe. He found the delta to be a maze of channels and the new lake so shallow that it was difficult to navigate even in a canoe. He had previously walked the dry Kuruk Darya in a caravan in 1900.

In 1952 the terminal lake then shifted to Taitema Lake when the Tarim River and Konque River were separated through human intervention, and Lop Nur dried out again by 1964. In 1972, the Daxihaizi Reservoir was built at Tikanlik, water supply to the lake was cut off, and all the lakes for the most part then dried out, with only small seasonal lakes forming in local depressions in Taitema.[13] The loss of water to the lower Tarim River Valley also led to the deterioration and loss of poplar forests and tamarix shrubs that used to be extensively distributed along the lower Tarim River Valley forming the so-called "Green Corridor". In 2000, in an effort to prevent further deterioration of the ecosystem, water was diverted from Lake Bosten in an attempt to fill the Taitema Lake.[16] The Taitema Lake however had shifted 30 to 40 kilometres (19 to 25 mi) westwards during the past 40 years due in part to the spread of the desert.[17] Another cause of the destabilization of the desert has been the cutting of poplars and willows for firewood; in response, a restoration project to reclaim the poplar forests was initiated.[18][19]

The Kara-Koshun dried basin may be considered part of the greater Lop Nur.[13]

On 17 June 1980, Chinese scientist Peng Jiamu disappeared while walking into Lop Nur in search of water. His body was never found, and his disappearance remains a mystery. On 3 June 1996, the Chinese explorer Yu Chunshun died while trying to walk across Lop Nur.[20]40°10′N 90°35′E / 40.167°N 90.583°E / 40.167; 90.583

Nuclear weapons test base

[edit]
Further information: China and weapons of mass destruction and List of nuclear weapons tests of China
Mushroom cloud of the first Chinese nuclear weapon test, Project 596, at Lop Nur in 1964.

Lop Nur, situated in the arid Xinjiang region of China's far west, serves as an extensive military base. This location was selected for nuclear testing due to its desolate and isolated nature, devoid of any permanent inhabitants, though the broader Xinjiang region is home to the Uyghurs, a predominantly Muslim ethnic group that has historically faced widespread detentions and stringent security measures in the Xinjiang conflict. The Uyghurs have persistently voiced concerns regarding the health risks posed by the towering mushroom clouds and the release of radioactive fallout.[21]

China established the Lop Nur Nuclear Test Base on 16 October 1959 with Soviet assistance in selection of the site, with its headquarters at Malan Air Base (马兰, Mǎlán), about 125 kilometres (78 mi) northwest of Qinggir.[2] The first Chinese nuclear bomb test, codenamed "Project 596", occurred at Lop Nur on 16 October 1964. China detonated its first hydrogen bomb on 17 June 1967. Until 1996, 45 nuclear tests were conducted. These nuclear tests were conducted by dropping bombs from aircraft, mounted on towers, launching missiles, detonating weapons underground and in the atmosphere.[22]

On 29 July 1996, China conducted its 45th and final nuclear test at Lop Nor, and issued a formal moratorium on nuclear testing the following day, although further subcritical tests were suspected.[23] In 2012, China announced plans to spend US$1 million to clean up the Malan nuclear base in Lop Nor to create a red tourism site.[24]

In December 2023, a report emerged indicating that China was making preparations to resume nuclear tests in a remote desert. Satellite imagery provided evidence of these preparations, revealing the presence of a drilling rig that had created a deep vertical shaft. This shaft was believed to be designed to contain the destructive power of radiation resulting from large nuclear explosions.[21]

Further analysis of the satellite images since 2017 also uncovered the development of new infrastructure at the site. This included the construction of new roads, power lines, an electrical substation, and a support area with multiple buildings. What was once a modest site with only a few buildings had transformed into a modern and sophisticated complex, complete with security fences. One of the new structures was a bunker that was fortified with earthen berms and lightning arresters, indicating its suitability for handling high explosives. Tests on miniaturization of missiles and warheads can also be possibly carried out at this site. However, the Chinese Foreign Ministry has dismissed the report and its "utterly irresponsible" claims. China has denied any nuclear testing plans on the site.[21]

Ecology

[edit]

Lop Nur is home to the wild Bactrian camel, which is a separate species from the Bactrian camel. The camels have continued to breed naturally despite the nuclear testing. China signed the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty in 1996 but did not ratify it.[25] Subsequently, the camels were classified as an endangered species on the IUCN Red List.[26] Since the cessation of nuclear testing at Lop Nur, human incursions into the area have caused a decline in the camel population.[26][27][28] Wild Bactrian camels have been classified as critically endangered since 2002[26] and approximately half of the 1400 remaining wild Bactrian camels live on the former Lop Nur test base, which has been designated the Lop Nur Wild Camel National Nature Reserve.

Transportation

[edit]

A highway from Hami to Lop Nur (Xinjiang Provincial Highway 235) was completed in 2006.[29]

The Hami–Lop Nur Railway, which runs 374.83 kilometres (232.91 mi) north to Hami, along the same route, opened to freight operations in November 2012. The railway is used to transport potassium-rich salt mined at the lake to the Lanzhou–Xinjiang railway.[29]

It is also served by the Hotan–Ruoqiang railway, which loops around the south and west side of the Tarim Basin, part of the Taklimakan Desert railway loop, joined together with sections of the Golmud–Korla railway, Kashgar–Hotan railway, and Southern Xinjiang railway.[30]

Archaeological sites

[edit]
Mask from second millennium BCE

Given the extreme dryness and resulting thin population, remains of some buildings survived for a significant period of time. When ancient graves - some a few thousand years old - were opened, the bodies were often found to be mummified and grave goods well preserved. The earliest sites are associated with an ancient people of indigenous Siberian origin.[31]

Loulan

[edit]
Main article: Loulan Kingdom

Loulan or Kroran was an ancient kingdom based around an important oasis city already known in the 2nd century BCE on the north-eastern edge of the Lop Desert.[citation needed] It was renamed Shanshan after Chinese took control of the kingdom in 1st century BCE. It was abandoned some time in the seventh century. Its location was discovered by Sven Hedin in 1899, who excavated some houses and found a wooden Kharosthi tablet and many Chinese manuscripts from the Jin dynasty (266–420).[14] Aurel Stein also excavated at the site in the beginning of the 20th century, while Chinese archaeologists explored the area in the latter part of the 20th century. A mummy called the Beauty of Loulan was found at a cemetery site on the bank of Töwän River.

Xiaohe Cemetery

[edit]

The Xiaohe Cemetery is located to the west of Lop Nur. This Bronze Age burial site is an oblong sand dune, from which more than thirty well preserved mummies have been excavated. The entire Xiaohe Cemetery contains about 330 tombs, about 160 of which have been violated by grave robbers.[32]

A local hunter guided the Swedish explorer and archeologist Folke Bergman to the site in 1934. An excavation project by the Xinjiang Cultural Relics and Archaeology Institute began in October 2003. A total of 167 tombs have been dug up since the end of 2002 and excavations have revealed hundreds of smaller tombs built in layers, as well as other precious artifacts. In 2006, a valuable archeological finding was uncovered: a boat-shaped coffin wrapped in ox hide, containing the mummified body of a young woman.[33]

Qäwrighul

[edit]
Main article: Qäwrighul culture

In 1979, some of the earliest of the Tarim mummies were discovered in burial sites at Qäwrighul (Gumugou), which is located to the west of Lop Nur, on the Könchi (Kongque) river. Forty-two graves, most of which dated from 2100 to 1500 BC, were found. There were two types of tomb at the site, belonging to two different time periods. The first type of burial featured shaft pit graves, some of which had poles at either end to mark east and west. Bodies were found extended, usually facing east, and sometimes were wrapped in wool weavings and wearing felt hats. Artifacts found included basketry, wheat grains, cattle and sheep/goat horns, bird bone necklaces and bracelets, nephrite beads, and fragments of copper (or bronze), although no pottery was discovered.

The second type of burial, from a later period, also consisted of shaft pit graves, surrounded by seven concentric circles of poles. Six male graves were found, in which the bodies were extended on their backs, and facing towards the east. Few artifacts were found, except for some traces of copper, or bronze.[34]

Miran

[edit]
Main article: Miran (Xinjiang)

Miran is located to the south-west of Lop Nur. Buddhist monasteries were excavated here, and murals and sculptures showed artistic influences from India and Central Asia, with some showing influences from as far as Rome.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Lop Nur

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Lop Nur is a large, salt-encrusted playa and former lake basin located at the eastern end of the in Uyghur Autonomous Region, northwestern China, encompassing a remote desert area that has largely desiccated due to diversions of the Tarim River for irrigation. Historically recognized as a dynamic, shifting body of water—earning the moniker of the "wandering lake"—it played a role in ancient trade routes and hosted settlements like the before environmental changes and human interventions led to its shrinkage by the early . In modern times, the site gained notoriety as China's principal nuclear weapons testing facility, established on October 16, 1959, with initial Soviet aid in site selection; the conducted its inaugural atomic detonation there on October 16, 1964, under , followed by 44 additional tests—both atmospheric and underground—through July 1996. The expansive, isolated terrain, roughly equivalent in size to the U.S. state of , facilitated these operations amid the Lop Desert's harsh conditions, though the program's legacy includes environmental contamination and restricted access enforced by military bases such as Malan. Recent expansions of testing infrastructure, observed via satellite from 2020 to 2024, suggest ongoing preparations potentially at odds with international non-proliferation norms, including China's signature of the in 1996.

Geography and Geology

Location and Physical Characteristics

Lop Nur is situated in the eastern within the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of northwest China, at the eastern margin of the . Its coordinates span approximately 39°40′ to 41°20′ N latitude and 90°00′ to 91°30′ E longitude, placing it in Ruoqiang County near the lowest elevation point of the at about 780 meters above . The site encompasses a vast, largely dried-up salt lake basin that transitioned from a freshwater lake system to a hyper-arid playa by the late 1960s. Physically, Lop Nur consists of a flat, expansive salt flat covered by a crust of salts ranging from 10 to 100 cm in thickness, forming polygonal patterns several meters across due to cracking. The is extremely barren, with minimal topographic , surrounded by shifting sand dunes reaching heights of up to 200 meters and prone to frequent dust storms. The former lake basin, once covering around 3,000 km², now appears as a white, encrusted depression with upper shorelines preserved at elevations up to 792 meters, marking remnants of higher water levels. This environment reflects severe , with no perennial water bodies and annual below 20 mm in the surrounding Lop region.

Formation, Hydrology, and Desertification Processes

Lop Nur occupies a tectonic depression at the eastern terminus of the , an endorheic inland drainage system in , , where it historically served as the primary sink for rivers originating from the surrounding , Kunlun, and Altun Mountains. The basin's formation traces to tectonic subsidence driven by the India-Eurasia collision, creating a sediment-filled lowland that facilitated episodic lacustrine development during periods of enhanced meltwater inflow. Hydrologically, inflows from the Tarim River (primarily) and Konqi River sustained lake levels during phases, with the system's closed nature promoting salt accumulation through evaporation exceeding precipitation in this hyper-arid region, where mean annual rainfall measures less than 50 mm and potential evapotranspiration exceeds 3,000 mm. Paleolimnological records reveal lake-level fluctuations tied to regional climate variability, including a relatively highstand phase from approximately 2.4 to 1.8 ka BP, when strengthened influences and glacial melt supported expanded water bodies, followed by progressive desiccation around 1.8 ka BP. This mid- decline coincided with reduced river discharge, possibly amplified by early agricultural water withdrawals for oasis irrigation in the , marking an early instance of anthropogenic hydrological alteration. By the late , explorer documented shifting lake positions due to Tarim River avulsions, which episodically redirected flows away from the Lop Nur core, initiating salt marsh formation. Twentieth-century desertification accelerated post-1960, with Lop Nur's complete drying attributed to upstream , including the 1960s Daxihaizi on the , which diverted water for and , reducing inflows by over 90%. These interventions, combined with natural trends evidenced in 40,000-year cores showing intensified deposition and aeolian activity, exposed vast playas, fostering salinization, deflation of fine particles, and mobilization across the Lop . The resultant landscape features cracked salt crusts, yardangs, and hyper-saline soils, with levels dropping below 20 m, limiting ecological recovery despite recent managed recharge efforts that raised them modestly since 2015.

Historical Context

Ancient Lake and Early Human Settlement

Lop Nur functioned as a prominent paleolake during the , situated in the lowest depression of the eastern and sustained by inflows from rivers including the Tarim and Cherchen. Geological records from sediment cores reveal a dynamic water body with levels fluctuating in response to regional shifts, expanding during wetter intervals of the early to mid- climatic optimum around 8,000–4,000 years . The lake's shoreline morphology evolved with alternating arid and humid phases, forming extensive lacustrine deposits that preserved evidence of its former vitality. Human activity in the Lop Nur vicinity traces to the , prior to 11,700 years ago, as demonstrated by a grinding stone embedded in lacustrine sediments, likely used for processing food resources near episodic water sources. This artifact points to transient by groups exploiting paleoenvironments amid a hyper-arid setting punctuated by wetter pulses. Sustained occupation emerged in the early , with the earliest dated site in the eastern calibrated to 7,000–7,600 years , coinciding with heightened precipitation that enlarged the paleolake and attracted migrants via riverine corridors. These early inhabitants practiced lifestyles, leveraging lake-margin oases for hunting, gathering, and possibly rudimentary processing, though archaeological evidence indicates intermittent rather than permanent settlements due to environmental instability. Post-optimum after approximately 4,000 years contracted the lake, prompting cycles of abandonment and reoccupation tied to oasis formation and . By late times, the paleolake's shrinkage to under 12,000 square kilometers around 1,600–1,500 years ago foreshadowed further decline, limiting viable habitation to shrinking riparian zones.

Role in Trade Routes and Exploration

The Lop Nur region functioned as a vital nexus on ancient Silk Road trade networks, particularly during the Han Dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE), where it represented the primary conduit for overland commerce linking China with Central Asia and beyond through the Tarim Basin. As a junction facilitating east-west exchanges of goods such as silk, horses, and precious metals, the area's oases and shifting watercourses supported caravan relays, though the Lop Nur basin itself often posed navigational hazards due to its variable hydrology. The Loulan Kingdom, centered near Lop Nur, exerted control over these passages, extracting tolls and securing routes against nomadic threats until its decline around the 3rd century CE amid environmental desiccation. Silk Road itineraries typically skirted the Lop Nur depression via northern and southern branches around the , with a central variant traversing closer to the basin's fringes before routes shifted due to silting rivers and aridity. Archaeological from sites like Loulan attests to sustained mercantile activity, including Han-era garrisons and waystations that mitigated the perils of dust storms and water scarcity, underscoring Lop Nur's strategic yet precarious position in Eurasian dynamics. European exploration of Lop Nur intensified in the late amid quests to map Central Asia's "blank spots" and verify classical accounts of wandering lakes. Russian geographer pioneered surveys of the Tarim Basin's lower reaches in 1876–1877, hypothesizing Lop Nur's location based on indigenous reports and rudimentary , though its migratory nature confounded precise charting. Swedish explorer advanced this work during 1893–1896 and 1900–1901 expeditions, documenting the lake's positional shifts—spanning over 300 kilometers—and unearthing relics, which illuminated ancient trade waypoints. British archaeologist Aurel Stein's 1900–1901 and subsequent forays yielded manuscripts and artifacts from Lop Nur-adjacent dunes, confirming the basin's role in facilitating cross-continental despite its environmental volatility. These efforts, often rivalrous and imperial in motive, resolved longstanding geographical enigmas but highlighted Lop Nur's enduring inaccessibility, with later 20th-century surveys like Folke Bergman's 1934 mapping refining understandings of its topographic instability.

Archaeological Heritage

Key Excavation Sites

The Loulan ruins, located approximately 20 km west of Lop Nur, represent one of the primary excavation sites in the region, first identified by Swedish explorer in 1900 and systematically excavated by British archaeologist in 1901, with further work in 1906 and 1914. These efforts uncovered wooden structures, a tablet dated to the CE, and artifacts indicative of a oasis settlement flourishing from the 2nd century BCE to the CE. Chinese archaeologists conducted additional explorations in the late , revealing evidence of climatic shifts contributing to the site's abandonment. The Miran site, situated south of Lop Nur at the edge of the Altun Shan mountains, was excavated by in the early , yielding Buddhist stupas, murals including depictions of winged figures, and artifacts from the 2nd to 5th centuries CE associated with a monastic complex along the . Subsequent Chinese excavations expanded the uncovered area to nearly 2000 m², confirming diverse cultural influences through , textiles, and architectural remains. Xiaohe Cemetery, positioned about 170 km northwest of Lop Nur, was initially located by Swedish archaeologist Folke Bergman in 1934 during expeditions in the Lop Nor region, with comprehensive excavations by the Xinjiang Cultural Relics and Archaeology Institute commencing in October 2003 and completing by 2005, unearthing 167 intact tombs from a total of approximately 330 burials dating 2000–1500 BCE. Additional significant digs include Bergman's 1934–1935 discoveries of graves in the Lop Nor desert, revealing prehistoric burials with wooden artifacts and human remains preserved by the arid environment. In 2017, Chinese teams identified and began excavating a new ancient city ruins 57.5 km southeast of Loulan, supplementing earlier findings with evidence of pre-6th century settlements. These sites collectively highlight the region's role as a crossroads of ancient migrations and , with excavations constrained by the harsh desert conditions and restricted access.

Loulan Kingdom Artifacts and Significance

Archaeological excavations at the Loulan site, particularly those led by during his 1900–1901 expedition, unearthed key artifacts linked to the , which flourished from approximately the 2nd century BCE to the CE along the northern edge of the Lop Desert. These include numerous wooden documents, such as Chinese-inscribed slips and tablets numbering over 100, alongside rarer Kharosthi-script examples, which record administrative functions, taxation, agricultural yields, and military logistics from the (25–220 CE) onward. The documents, preserved in refuse heaps and structures, reveal a bureaucratic system aligned with Han imperial oversight following the kingdom's conquest and vassalage in 77 BCE, as detailed in primary historical sources like the Hanshu. Architectural and utilitarian artifacts further highlight technological and artistic sophistication, including carved wooden beams and capitals adorned with Hellenistic motifs such as acanthus leaves and florets, dated to the 3rd–4th centuries CE. These elements, derived from Greco-Roman and Gandharan traditions, indicate diffusion via overland trade networks rather than direct Mediterranean contact, consistent with the kingdom's position as an intermediary oasis. Iron artifacts, comprising at least 14 items collected by Stein—such as arrows, knives, nails, and tools—demonstrate local metallurgical capabilities, with metallographic analysis confirming the use of (producing phosphorous-rich refined to malleable forms) alongside processes, active from the kingdom's Han-era phase. Supplementary finds like fragments, textiles, and bronze implements underscore involvement in trans-Eurasian commerce, including raw materials and finished goods exchanged for Chinese staples. The artifacts' significance stems from their empirical validation of Loulan's function as a nexus, where Indo-European-speaking locals (evidenced by Krorainic linguistic remnants in documents) integrated with Chinese governance, fostering hybrid cultural expressions without evidence of coercive assimilation beyond administrative records. This —manifest in eastern scripts on western-inspired carvings—counters narratives of isolated spheres, instead supporting causal chains of diffusion driven by economic incentives and oasis hydrology. The kingdom's abandonment correlates with Tarim avulsions around 300 CE, inducing salinization and of Lop Nur, as traced through sedimentary cores and artifact , independent of political factors alone. These finds, preserved in institutions like the , provide primary data for reconstructing pre-modern Central Asian , emphasizing in historical collapses over ideological interpretations.

Xiaohe Cemetery and Tarim Basin Mummies

The Xiaohe Cemetery, situated in the eastern Tarim Basin approximately 100 kilometers northwest of Lop Nur, represents one of the earliest and most intact Bronze Age burial complexes in the region, dating primarily from 1980 BCE to 1490 BCE based on radiocarbon analysis of over 30 well-preserved mummies and associated organic remains. Initially documented by Swedish archaeologist Folke Bergman during his 1934 expedition, who uncovered 12 graves and about 200 artifacts including wooden boats and textiles, the site was rediscovered in 2000 and systematically excavated between 2002 and 2005 by the Xinjiang Institute of Cultural Relatives and Archaeology, yielding 353 tombs across five stratigraphic layers. These burials featured distinctive inverted boat-shaped coffins crafted from Populus euphratica wood, often topped with cattle hides and marked by vertical oar-shaped poles or timber frames protruding above the surface, suggesting ritualistic symbolism tied to navigation or fertility. The mummies, naturally desiccated by the arid, saline desert environment, exhibit Europoid physical traits such as light-colored hair (blond or red), high cheekbones, and elongated skulls, with notable examples including the "Beauty of Xiaohe," a female mummy from around 1800 BCE buried in a woolen hat, skirt, and cloak, alongside baskets of wheat and barley. Accompanying grave goods underscore a mixed agropastoral economy: emmer wheat and barley grains imported from Southwest Asia, foxtail millet of East Asian origin, domesticated sheep and goats evidenced by wool textiles and milk proteins in dental calculus, and recently identified cheese residues—derived from a unique bacterial culture—wrapped around some individuals, indicating early ruminant dairy processing around 1600 BCE. Mitochondrial DNA analyses from 13 Xiaohe individuals reveal maternal haplogroups spanning West Eurasian (U7, H, K), East Eurasian (B, C, D), and Siberian (Z) lineages, pointing to diverse female ancestries potentially from multiple source populations. Whole-genome sequencing of 13 mummies, including five from Xiaohe dated 2100–1700 BCE, demonstrates an isolated genetic profile most closely resembling Ancient North Eurasians from sites like in around 17,000 years ago, with no detectable admixture from (e.g., ) or Indo-European-associated markers like R1a Y-chromosome haplogroups. This profile, characterized by ancestry and adaptations for high-altitude living such as EPAS1 alleles shared with Tibetans, refutes earlier hypotheses of Indo-European migration as the source of the mummies' physical and cultural traits, instead supporting autochthonous continuity from local Pleistocene hunter-gatherers who adopted Western Asian crops and pastoralism via rather than . The broader mummy corpus, encompassing over 500 individuals from sites like Gumugou and Beifang near Lop Nur, shares this genetic isolation, with phenotypic similarities (fair features, tartan-patterned clothing) likely resulting from or selection in the oasis environments rather than recent Western influx, challenging narratives over-reliant on linguistic Indo-European expansion models without genomic corroboration. These findings highlight Xiaohe's role in evidencing a culturally hybrid yet genetically discrete population, bridging East-West exchanges in the Tarim without implying demographic replacement.

Other Discoveries and Interpretations

In addition to the prominent Loulan and Xiaohe sites, the Qäwrighul (also known as Gumugou) cemetery, located in the eastern near Lop Nur, yielded over 40 mummified burials dating to approximately 1900–1700 BCE during excavations in the late 1970s and 1980s. These remains, preserved by the arid environment, featured individuals with light hair, Caucasian-like physical traits, and including woolen textiles, boats, and ephedra twigs used in ritual bundles, indicating pastoralist practices and possible shamanistic beliefs. The site's radial grave layout, with burials oriented toward a central wheel-like , suggests symbolic alignments with solar or cosmological motifs. The Miran site, an oasis settlement at the edge of Lop Nur dating from the 2nd to 4th centuries CE, revealed a fortified complex with monasteries, stupas, and murals depicting Greco-Buddhist influences, such as "winged angel" figures in frescoes blending Central Asian and Indian artistic styles. Excavations uncovered sun-dried brick structures, diverse artifacts including and textiles, and evidence of trade, positioning Miran as a key intercultural hub before the lake's . Paleolithic evidence includes a grinding stone artifact recovered from lacustrine sediments in the Lop Nur region, radiocarbon-dated to approximately 13,000 calibrated years , marking one of the earliest confirmed instances of human activity in this hyper-arid area during the . Archaeogenetic analyses of mummies from Qäwrighul and nearby sites indicate an indigenous population with predominant ancestry—linked to Siberians—lacking significant admixture from Bronze Age Steppe pastoralists or Iranian farmers, contrary to prior migration hypotheses based on phenotypic similarities to Europeans. This genetic profile, combined with stable data showing a millet-wheat diet sourced locally and from afar, supports autochthonous development of these groups, potentially ancestral to Tocharian speakers, while highlighting Lop Nur's role in prehistoric east-west without implying large-scale population replacements. Such findings underscore the basin's isolation fostering unique genetic continuity amid environmental shifts.

Nuclear Weapons Testing Program

Strategic Establishment and Development (1960s)

In the early , as part of its strategic nuclear weapons program amid escalating tensions with the and the , the accelerated development of the Lop Nur site in as a dedicated nuclear base. The remote desert location, characterized by its isolation and minimal population, was deemed ideal for containing blast effects and fallout while enabling comprehensive . Initial infrastructure, including monitoring stations, access roads, and a at Malan Base, was constructed to support experimental preparations, drawing on earlier completed in late 1959. Project 596, the codename for China's crash effort to develop an atomic bomb, culminated in the site's operational debut with the detonation of a 22-kiloton implosion-type fission device on , 1964, at 07:00 GMT. This test, conducted atop a 100-meter tower, marked China's entry as the fifth acknowledged and validated indigenous plutonium production and bomb assembly capabilities achieved despite the 1960 , which ended foreign technical aid. Post-test evaluations confirmed the device's functionality, with seismic and radiological data gathered via on-site instruments informing rapid iterations in design and delivery systems. Throughout the mid-1960s, Lop Nur underwent further expansion to accommodate escalating test frequencies and complexity, including the construction of additional towers, underground shafts for later experiments, and enhanced logistical support for personnel and equipment transport across the harsh terrain. By , the site hosted a 220-kiloton thermonuclear device test on , incorporating a "" fusion-fission hybrid design, which advanced China's capabilities toward full hydrogen bomb development realized in 1967. These efforts solidified Lop Nur's role as the cornerstone of China's nuclear deterrence strategy, with over a dozen atmospheric tests by decade's end enabling for missile warheads.

Major Tests and Technological Milestones (1964–1996)

China's nuclear testing at Lop Nur commenced with Project 596 on October 16, 1964, detonating a 22-kiloton uranium-235 implosion fission device atop a 100-meter tower, establishing the People's Republic as the fifth nuclear-armed state. This atmospheric test validated domestically developed fissile material production and implosion technology after Soviet assistance ended in 1960. Rapid iteration followed, with three additional low-yield fission tests by late 1965 refining designs for boosted fission and delivery systems. A pivotal milestone occurred on , 1966, when a DF-2 launched from carried a live nuclear warhead to an impact zone at Lop Nur, confirming integration of nuclear payloads with missile technology. This preceded China's thermonuclear breakthrough on June 17, 1967, an air-dropped 3.3-megaton two-stage device from a Hong-6 , achieved in under three years post-fission test—a pace unmatched among nuclear powers, driven by parallel theoretical and experimental efforts despite limited testing . Yields escalated in subsequent atmospheric tests, reaching up to 4 megatons by the mid-1970s, incorporating advanced fusion staging and boosting techniques. The program shifted to underground testing on September 29, 1969, with a shaft-contained minimizing fallout while enabling higher-yield experiments up to 200 kilotons initially, later scaling to megaton-class events. Through the and , 23 atmospheric and 22 underground tests refined warhead , features like insensitive high explosives, and compatibility with submarine-launched and MIRV-capable missiles, culminating in the final underground test on July 29, 1996, just before the moratorium. These s, totaling 45, prioritized empirical validation of designs under resource constraints, yielding a credible deterrent arsenal by the period's end.

Decommissioning and Comparative Assessment

China conducted its final nuclear test at Lop Nur on July 29, 1996, with an underground explosion estimated at 85–110 kilotons, marking the end of its 45-test program spanning 1964–1996. Within hours, the declared the program concluded and expressed readiness to participate in a comprehensive test ban, leading to 's signature of the (CTBT) in September 1996, though ratification remains pending. No formal decommissioning process, such as site dismantling or radiological cleanup, has been documented or independently verified for Lop Nur, unlike partial remediation efforts at some Western sites; the facility transitioned to a low-activity status post-Cold War but saw infrastructure expansion after 2012, including new tunnels potentially for subcritical experiments or test resumption preparedness. Environmental monitoring and remediation at Lop Nur remain opaque, with no access granted to international inspectors; fallout from the 23 atmospheric tests (1964–1980) has contaminated soils with isotopes detectable downwind in , contributing to elevated in southeastern Abai , though causation from Lop Nur versus other sources requires further soil analysis. The site's vast scale—over 100,000 km² across four zones—exacerbates challenges, and persistent radionuclides from both atmospheric and 23 underground tests pose long-term risks without evident . Recent indicates ongoing construction, such as a sixth , signaling sustained utility rather than abandonment. Comparatively, Lop Nur's 45 tests pale against the U.S. Nevada Test Site's 928 or the Soviet Semipalatinsk's 456, yet its 51% atmospheric detonations (versus 's ~15% post-1963) amplified global fallout dispersion, with total yields estimated at 20–25 megatons akin to scaled-down equivalents of larger programs. Remediation contrasts sharply: U.S. sites underwent partial cleanup under the 1992 moratorium and CTBT adherence, including soil removal and groundwater treatment, while Semipalatinsk saw limited post-1991 efforts amid health crises; Lop Nur lacks such initiatives, with secrecy hindering assessments of or epidemiological data, potentially understating impacts on local populations relative to transparently studied sites like (, 11 tests, remediated 1990s).
Test SiteTotal TestsAtmospheric/Underground SplitKey Remediation StatusNotable Impacts
Lop Nur ()45 (1964–1996)23/22None documented; ongoing infrastructureFallout in neighboring regions; no independent health data
(U.S.)928 (1951–1992)~150/778Partial cleanup (e.g., excavation, monitoring)Localized ; studied downwinder effects
Semipalatinsk (/)456 (1949–1989)116/340Limited post-1991; abandoned polygonsHigh rates; transboundary fallout
This table highlights Lop Nur's relative restraint in test volume but underscores disparities in transparency and response, where empirical data gaps at Chinese sites contrast with peer-reviewed studies elsewhere, potentially masking equivalent or disproportionate per-test ecological persistence due to arid failures.

Ecology and Environmental Dynamics

Native , , and Salt Flat Ecosystems

The salt flat ecosystems of Lop Nur, situated in the hyper-arid eastern , feature expansive crusts formed from the desiccation of a former saline lake, with annual below 100 mm and exceeding 3,000 mm, supporting only extremophile-adapted biota. These environments host microbial halophiles in remnants alongside sparse macro-vegetation dominated by salt-tolerant halophytes and xerophytes, which stabilize soils but succumb rapidly to hydrological shifts, as evidenced by widespread herbaceous die-off following the lake's mid-20th-century drying. relies on ephemeral wetlands and desert fringes, with biodiversity constrained by salinity, aridity, and historical human pressures, though protected areas have preserved relict populations. Native flora comprises approximately 36 drought- and salt-resistant species, primarily shrubs and grasses from 13 families including Chenopodiaceae and , such as Suaeda salsa thriving in hypersaline soils via osmotic adjustment mechanisms. Key halophytes include tamarisks ( spp.), oleaster (), wolfberry (), and Lop hemp (Poacynum pictum), while riparian relics like Euphrates poplar (), common reed (), and southern cattail () persist near rare freshwater seeps, providing limited forage and structural habitat. Pollen records indicate historical dominance of chenopods, , Ephedra, and Artemisia, reflecting steppe-desert transitions under Pleistocene . Fauna inventories from expeditions document 127 species, including 23 mammals, 91 birds, 7 reptiles, and 1 , adapted to scarcity through nomadism and dietary flexibility. Mammals feature endangered wild Bactrian camels (Camelus ferus), serving as for conservation, alongside Gobi bears (Ursus arctos), wild asses (Equus hemionus), sheep (Ovis ammon), and black-tailed gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa), which forage on salt flats' fringes despite radiation legacies. Avifauna includes migratory waterfowl like ducks and geese in residual wetlands, plus raptors such as golden eagles and whooper swans, totaling over 40 in protected marshes. Reptiles like sand exploit thermoregulatory niches, while extinct locals such as Caspian tigers highlight anthropogenic declines. These ecosystems exhibit low trophic interconnectivity, with anchoring sparse detrital food webs supporting herbivores and , yet vulnerability to salinization pulses—exacerbated by upstream damming—has reduced herbaceous cover, favoring resilient perennials over diverse . Conservation in the Lop Nur Wild Camel National mitigates fragmentation, preserving genetic refugia amid ongoing .

Causal Factors in Ecological Changes

The primary causal factor in the 20th-century of Lop Nur was the drastic reduction in inflow from its major tributaries, the Tarim and Konqi Rivers, driven by upstream human water management practices. Extensive for and of reservoirs in the diverted water that previously sustained the lake, leading to progressive shrinkage. By the mid-20th century, these interventions had diminished the lake's surface area significantly, with complete drying occurring around 1972 after the Tarim River was dammed at the Daxihaizi Reservoir, severing downstream flow. Natural climatic aridity in the exacerbated these anthropogenic effects, but hydrological analyses indicate that human activities were the dominant driver of the lake's disappearance, overriding periodic natural fluctuations in precipitation and river avulsion. Historical records show Lop Nur's area measured approximately 3,100 square kilometers in , but unsustainable water extraction accelerated salt flat formation and aeolian deposition, transforming the region into a hyper-arid . Paleolimnological evidence from sediment cores confirms that while long-term trends existed, the rapid 20th-century changes correlate directly with intensified agricultural demands in . Subsequent ecological shifts, including and increased dust activity, stem from this , with the exposed basin promoting expansion and reduced . Nuclear testing from 1964 onward introduced radioactive contaminants, potentially impacting sparse microbial and faunal communities, though quantitative assessments of radiation's role in ongoing changes remain limited compared to hydrological disruption. Restoration efforts have been deemed infeasible due to persistent and entrenched salinization.

Resource Extraction and Infrastructure

Potash Mining Operations

The Lop Nur deposit, identified in the mid-1990s, consists primarily of sulfate-type liquid potassium salt brines, making it China's largest such resource and the second-largest overall source after the . Commercial extraction began in 2000 under the state-owned SDIC Lop Nur Co., Ltd., which holds the rights and employs solar methods to process brines from subsurface aquifers in the Luobupo area. The process involves pumping potassium-rich brines into large evaporation ponds, where solar heat concentrates the salts for harvesting as , with visible pond arrays spanning tens of kilometers in . Initial production targeted 200,000 tons annually, but capacity expanded rapidly; the first phase, operational on December 18, 2008, achieved 1.2 million tons per year of . By 2013, output reached 1.3 million tons annually, with an additional 1.7 million tons under construction, supporting further scaling toward 2.5 million tons per year in ongoing expansions. Cumulative production exceeded 9.2 million tons by 2016 and surpassed 18 million tons by September 2021, accounting for approximately 45% of China's domestic fertilizer supply and establishing Lop Nur as the world's largest potassium sulfate production base. These operations have reduced China's reliance on potash imports, which historically filled gaps between domestic output (e.g., 4.3 million tons total in 2014) and consumption exceeding 10 million tons annually.

Transportation and Access Developments

The construction of a highway from to Lop Nur provided the initial modern overland access to the site's potash deposits, operational by 2006 as the region's sole external link prior to rail development. This supported early activities in the hyper-arid area, where extreme temperatures and lack of had previously limited operations. The –Lop Nur railway, extending 374.8 kilometers, commenced commercial operations on November 29, 2012, following construction initiated in 2009 at a cost of 3.28 billion yuan. Designed primarily for freight, the line facilitates the transport of salts from Lop Nur's estimated reserves to broader networks, with capacity for 30 million tons annually and per-ton cost reductions of 80 yuan compared to road haulage. It includes nine intermediate stations and commuter services for personnel, marking a shift from isolation to integrated resource logistics. These developments have underpinned production growth, with 2012 projections targeting at least 200,000 tons annually within five to ten years to lessen China's import reliance. Ongoing projects, such as the 298.8-kilometer Lop Nur–Ruoqiang railway with a 7.7 billion yuan investment, advanced through feasibility approval in 2023, aim to further enhance access and extraction efficiency in the .

Controversies and Contemporary Issues

Documented Health and Radiation Effects

China conducted 45 nuclear tests at Lop Nur from , 1964, to July 29, 1996, including 23 atmospheric and shaft tests that produced radioactive fallout affecting downwind populations in Uyghur Autonomous Region and adjacent areas of . Fallout included fission products such as cesium-137, , and , leading to both external gamma exposure and internal contamination via and . Residual radioactivity persists in the region, with harmful isotopes detectable decades after cessation of testing. Electron spin resonance (ESR) dosimetry studies on tooth enamel from residents of Kazakh border villages (Makanchi, Urdzhar, and Taskesken) documented cumulative excess radiation doses of 49–64 mGy on average (up to 118–123 mGy maximum) from Lop Nor fallout between 1964 and 1981. These doses were calculated by subtracting natural background radiation (approximately 0.8 mGy/year) from measured signals in samples collected in 2008–2009 from 30 adults born before 1981. Soil analyses in the same areas revealed spikes in total beta activity, reaching ~10⁶ Bq kg⁻¹ within 8–13 days after thermonuclear tests on June 17, 1967, and June 27, 1973, far exceeding pre-test baselines of 994–1,120 Bq kg⁻¹ in 1963. Cesium-137 and strontium-90 levels fluctuated between <50 and ~5 × 10³ Bq kg⁻¹ post-tests. These exposures correlate with documented elevations in cancer mortality rates in affected Kazakh populations during the mid-1980s to 1990s, as reported in regional health surveys attributing risks to fallout deposition. Similar patterns of increased cancer incidence, including and cancers, have been modeled for residents, with estimates suggesting tens to hundreds of thousands of excess deaths from acute and long-term radiation effects, though direct epidemiological confirmation is constrained by limited public data. No verified cases of among test site workers have been publicly documented, likely due to military secrecy, but chronic exposure risks remain inferred from global analogs of nuclear testing programs. Comprehensive long-term health monitoring in is absent, hindering precise attribution of effects like birth defects or genetic mutations to testing fallout versus other environmental factors.

Geopolitical Debates and Recent Site Activities

International observers have raised concerns over China's compliance with the (CTBT), which it signed in 1996 but has not ratified, amid evidence of renewed infrastructure development at Lop Nur suggesting preparations for nuclear experimentation. analyzed by experts indicates significant expansions between 2020 and 2024, including the construction of new tunnels—potentially the first vertical shafts since 1996—along with expanded rail lines, roads, and support facilities, fueling debates on whether these activities presage subcritical tests or full-yield detonations that could undermine global non-proliferation norms. Such developments have prompted calls for public discourse within arms-control communities, as any explosive test would violate China's moratorium pledge following its 45th and final declared test on July 29, 1996. Geopolitical tensions are exacerbated by documented transboundary radiation effects from historical tests, with soil samples from southeast Kazakhstan's Abai oblast showing elevated beta activity attributable to fallout from Lop Nur detonations, particularly atmospheric tests in the 1960s and 1970s. These findings, corroborated by studies on plutonium isotopes in northern Xinjiang, highlight causal links between test emissions and environmental contamination extending beyond China's borders, contributing to bilateral frictions with Kazakhstan and broader Central Asian security dialogues. Critics, including U.S. and Indian analysts, frame these activities within China's nuclear arsenal expansion, viewing Lop Nur's modernization as a signal of assertive deterrence strategy amid U.S.-China rivalry, though Beijing maintains all post-1996 work adheres to subcritical, zero-yield parameters permitted under CTBT interpretations. Post-1996 site activities have centered on and alleged subcritical experimentation, with independent confirming erosion patterns and usage consistent with low-yield hydrodynamic tests as early as 2009, though no seismic events exceeding CTBT thresholds have been verified prior to recent claims. On February 17, 2026, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Arms Control and Nonproliferation Christopher Yeaw stated that the U.S. detected a 2.75 magnitude seismic event near China's Lop Nur nuclear test site on June 22, 2020, assessed as a supercritical nuclear detonation by China, violating its testing moratorium. Recent enhancements include a sixth system, interpreted by some experts as enabling repeated subcritical trials to refine designs without explosive yields, alongside and monitoring stations to support ongoing operations in the restricted zone. Access remains tightly controlled by the , with rare foreign inspections—such as a 1980s visit by U.S. experts under bilateral agreements—yielding limited transparency, perpetuating suspicions of opaque activities amid China's nuclear modernization drive. As of 2025, no resumption of full-scale testing has occurred, but the site's revitalization underscores enduring geopolitical stakes in verifying non-proliferation commitments.

References

  1. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40333-021-0099-9
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367860285_A_study_on_historical_location_and_evolution_of_Lop_Nor_in_China_with_maps_and_DEM
  3. https://hibakusha-worldwide.org/en/locations/lop-nor
  4. https://atomicphotographers.com/atomic-sites/project-596-lop-nur/
  5. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10736700.2025.2497201
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581822000155
  7. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/51039/lop-nur-xinjiang-china
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-geographical-location-of-Lop-Nur_fig1_254449703
  9. https://www.mindat.org/loc-123473.html
  10. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/17/1/012140/pdf
  11. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-23462-9
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379116302505
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5327390/
  14. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/hydr/23/8/JHM-D-21-0217.1.xml
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277379118310424
  16. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2003JD003787
  17. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00343-022-1341-9
  18. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11430-017-9257-3
  19. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/quaternary-research/article/earliest-welldated-archeological-site-in-the-hyperarid-tarim-basin-and-its-implications-for-prehistoric-human-migration-and-climatic-change/EAFEADD1A7F465B085D5E30A16AF90E2
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1040618224001186
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338532589_Human_mobility_in_the_Lop_Nur_region_during_the_Han-Jin_Dynasties_a_multi-approach_study
  22. https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/10.3828/whp.eh.63830915903600
  23. https://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/exhibit/trade/essay.html
  24. https://dsr.nii.ac.jp/rarebook/06/index.html.en
  25. https://review.gale.com/2021/10/12/explorers-in-inland-asia/
  26. https://www.silkroadtravel.com/blog/ancient-city-loulan.html
  27. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/radiocarbon/article/radiocarbon-dating-the-ancient-city-of-loulan/7DB307FECF64F08D9EB6B3155163C0DA
  28. https://www.facebook.com/100045238313388/posts/miran-is-an-ancient-oasis-town-located-on-the-southern-rim-of-the-taklamakan-des/581334879039917/
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Satellite-images-of-Miran-a-Miran-and-nearby-area-b-ancient-dendritic-canals-around_fig2_364446764
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280020118_The_rediscovery_and_complete_excavation_of_Ordek%27s_Necropolis
  31. http://english.cssn.cn/skw_culture/CULTURE_Horizontal/202304/t20230420_5653912.shtml
  32. https://www.samorini.it/doc1/alt_aut/ad/bergman-newly-discovered-graves-in-the-lop-nor-desert.pdf
  33. http://en.people.cn/n3/2017/0330/c90000-9197099.html
  34. https://www11.ihp.sinica.edu.tw/storage/w2_file/1349GiPnRAW.pdf
  35. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Loulan_kharosthi_document.jpg
  36. https://sino-platonic.org/complete/spp274_iranian_hellenistic_chinese_art.pdf
  37. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/arcm.13103
  38. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep43102
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1040618220308508
  40. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/A_MAS-722
  41. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04052-7
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4495690/
  43. https://www.science.org/content/article/enigmatic-mummy-western-china-was-swathed-cheese
  44. https://www.mpg.de/17737592/the-surprising-origins-of-the-tarim-basin-mummies
  45. https://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/the-mummies-of-east-central-asia/
  46. https://musaeumscythia.substack.com/p/physical-anthropology-of-xinjiang-faceshtml
  47. http://sciencythoughts.blogspot.com/2024/02/understanding-orientation-of-graves-in.html
  48. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09596836221126131
  49. https://idp.bl.uk/miran/
  50. https://www.science.org/content/article/western-china-s-mysterious-mummies-were-local-descendants-ice-age-ancestors
  51. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2018/ph241/buchanan1/
  52. https://thechinaproject.com/2021/10/13/the-story-of-chinas-first-atomic-bomb/
  53. https://www.atomicarchive.com/resources/timeline/timeline1960.html
  54. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/nuclear-vault/2014-10-16/chinas-first-nuclear-test-1964-50th-anniversary
  55. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202410/1321317.shtml
  56. https://www.atomicarchive.com/media/photographs/testing/chinese/project-596-3.html
  57. https://www.atomicarchive.com/history/cold-war/page-12.html
  58. https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/history/chinese-nuclear-program/
  59. https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article/61/9/47/413439/The-Chinese-nuclear-tests-1964-1996A-combination
  60. https://irp.fas.org/nic/china_wmd.html
  61. https://thebulletin.org/2024/04/the-short-march-to-chinas-hydrogen-bomb/
  62. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/nuclear-testing-tally
  63. https://large.stanford.edu/courses/2018/ph241/buchanan1/
  64. https://nuke.fas.org/guide/china/nuke/index.html
  65. https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/china/lop_nor.htm
  66. https://media.nti.org/pdfs/china_nuclear.pdf
  67. https://unidir.org/files/publication/pdfs/unfinished-business-the-negotiation-of-the-ctbt-and-the-end-of-nuclear-testing-346.pdf
  68. https://www.ourchinastory.com/en/12358/China%27s-last-nuclear-test
  69. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/12/20/science/china-nuclear-tests-lop-nur.html
  70. https://ceobs.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Harvard_IHRC_CEOBS_Facing_Fallout_2022.pdf
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11753833/
  72. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep12262
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1350448711000321
  74. https://archivedproceedings.econference.io/wmsym/1998/html/sess06/06-01/06-01.htm
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4165831/
  76. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0265931X19305296
  77. https://www.ippnw.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/IPPNW_Report_Nuclear_Tests_EN.pdf
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10895719/
  79. https://www.wildcamels.com/what-we-do/lop-nur-nature-reserve/
  80. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40333-018-0002-5
  81. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254449703_Vegetation_and_climate_of_the_Lop_Nur_area_China_during_the_past_7_million_years
  82. https://english.news.cn/20230903/c92861e8e11d4f1fbfc9e4d4cf39594c/c.html
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9633776/
  84. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00343-017-6079-4
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S001282521100167X
  86. http://www.china.org.cn/english/environment/106693.htm
  87. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-25993-6
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7870849/
  89. https://fire.biol.wwu.edu/alles/PotashMineLopNur.pdf
  90. http://www.sinofert.com/i/5631-15036-47993.html
  91. https://www.saltworkconsultants.com/quaternary-potash/
  92. https://en.people.cn/n3/2016/0114/c98649-9003979.html
  93. https://govt.chinadaily.com.cn/s/202201/10/WS637f14f3498ea274927a96d6/xinjiang-sea-of-death-fertilizes-farms-nationwide.html
  94. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2012-11/30/content_15973018.htm
  95. http://english.cctv.com/20090617/105978.shtml
  96. http://www.china.org.cn/china/2012-07/23/content_25982956.htm
  97. https://us.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zt/wrd/201211/t20121129_4911872.htm
  98. https://www.seetao.com/details/220399.html
  99. https://www.nuclear-risks.org/en/hibakusha-worldwide/lop-nor.html
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3709679/
  101. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/did-chinas-nuclear-tests/
  102. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/environmental-health-challenges-xinjiang
  103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0269749120306187
  104. https://academic.oup.com/jrr/article/66/1/24/7954235
  105. https://nuclearnetwork.csis.org/parading-chinas-nuclear-arsenal-out-of-the-shadows/
  106. https://bharatshakti.in/lop-nur-and-beyond-chinas-nuclear-legacy-and-indias-alternate-path/
  107. https://www.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/202239/subcritical-testing-at-lop-nor/
  108. https://www.rferl.org/a/us-russia-nuclear-start-treaty/33680877.html
  109. https://www.spf.org/spf-china-observer/en/document-detail042.html
  110. https://www.lanl.gov/media/publications/national-security-science/0720-behind-the-bamboo-curtain
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.