Wikipedia
Luftwaffe
View on Wikipedia
| Luftwaffe | |
|---|---|
Emblem of the Luftwaffe in silver | |
| Founded | 1935 |
| Disbanded | 1946[N 1] |
| Country | |
| Allegiance | |
| Type | Air force |
| Role | Aerial warfare |
| Size | Aircraft: 119,871[3] (total production) Personnel: 3,400,000 (total in service at any time for 1939–45)[4] |
| Part of | Wehrmacht |
| Engagements | Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) World War II (1939–1945) |
| Commanders | |
| OKL | See list |
| Inspector of Fighters | See list |
| Inspector of Bombers | See list |
| Notable commanders | Hermann Göring Robert R. von Greim |
| Insignia | |
| Balkenkreuz | |
| Balkenkreuz (alternate) | |
| Hakenkreuz | |
| Aircraft flown | |
| List of German WWII planes | |


The Luftwaffe[N 2] (German pronunciation: [ˈlʊftvafə] ⓘ) was the aerial-warfare branch of the Wehrmacht before and during World War II. Germany's military air arms during World War I, the Luftstreitkräfte of the Imperial Army and the Marine-Fliegerabteilung of the Imperial Navy, had been disbanded in May 1920 in accordance with the terms of the 1919 Treaty of Versailles, which banned Germany from having any air force.[7]
During the interwar period, German pilots were trained secretly in violation of the treaty[8] at Lipetsk Air Base in the Soviet Union. With the rise of the Nazi Party and the repudiation of the Versailles Treaty, the Luftwaffe's existence was publicly acknowledged and officially established on 26 February 1935, just over two weeks before open defiance of the Versailles Treaty through German rearmament and conscription would be announced on 16 March.[9][10] The Condor Legion, a Luftwaffe detachment sent to aid Nationalist forces in the Spanish Civil War, provided the force with a valuable testing ground for new tactics and aircraft. Partially as a result of this combat experience, the Luftwaffe had become one of the most sophisticated, technologically advanced, and battle-experienced air forces in the world when World War II began on 1 September 1939.[11] By the summer of 1939, the Luftwaffe had twenty-eight Geschwader (wings). The Luftwaffe also operated a paratrooper force known as the Fallschirmjäger.
The Luftwaffe proved instrumental in the German victories across Poland 1939 and Western Europe in spring 1940. Although the Luftwaffe inflicted severe damage to the RAF's infrastructure during the Battle of Britain and devastated many British cities during the subsequent Blitz, it failed to force the British into submission. In 1941 (Invasion of Yugoslavia, German invasion of Greece and since June 1941 against the Soviet Union, the Luftwaffe was very successful.
From 1942, Allied bombing campaigns gradually destroyed the Luftwaffe's fighter arm. From late 1942, the Luftwaffe used its surplus ground support and other personnel to raise Luftwaffe Field Divisions. In addition to its service on the Western front, the Luftwaffe operated over the Soviet Union, North Africa, and Southern Europe. Despite its belated use of advanced turbojet and rocket-propelled aircraft for the destruction of Allied bombers, the Luftwaffe was overwhelmed by the Allies' superior numbers and improved tactics, and a lack of trained pilots and aviation fuel. In January 1945, during the closing stages of the Battle of the Bulge, the Luftwaffe made a last-ditch effort to win air superiority, and met with failure. With rapidly dwindling supplies of petroleum, oil, and lubricants after this campaign, and as part of the entire combined Wehrmacht military forces as a whole, the Luftwaffe ceased to be an effective fighting force.
After the defeat of Nazi Germany, the Luftwaffe was disbanded in 1946. During World War II, German pilots claimed roughly 70,000 aerial victories, while over 75,000 Luftwaffe aircraft were destroyed or significantly damaged. Of these, nearly 40,000 were lost entirely. The Luftwaffe had only two commanders-in-chief throughout its history: Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring and later Generalfeldmarschall Robert Ritter von Greim for the last two weeks of the war.
The Luftwaffe was deeply involved in Nazi war crimes. By the end of the war, a significant percentage of aircraft production originated in concentration camps, an industry employing tens of thousands of forced laborers.[N 3] The Luftwaffe's demand for labor was one of the factors that led to the deportation and murder of hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews in 1944. The Luftwaffe frequently bombed non-military targets, the Oberkommando der Luftwaffe organised Nazi human experimentation, and Luftwaffe ground troops committed massacres in Italy, Greece, and Poland.
History
[edit]Origins
[edit]
The Imperial German Army Air Service was founded in 1910 with the name Die Fliegertruppen des deutschen Kaiserreiches, most often shortened to Fliegertruppe. It was renamed the Luftstreitkräfte on 8 October 1916.[12] The air war on the Western Front received the most attention in the annals of the earliest accounts of military aviation, since it produced aces such as Manfred von Richthofen, Ernst Udet, Oswald Boelcke, and Max Immelmann. After the defeat of Germany, the service was dissolved on 8 May 1920 under the conditions of the Treaty of Versailles, which also mandated the destruction of all German military aircraft.
Since the Treaty of Versailles forbade Germany to have an air force, German pilots trained in secret. Initially, civil aviation schools within Germany were used, yet only light trainers could be used in order to maintain the façade that the trainees were going to fly with civil airlines such as Deutsche Luft Hansa. To train its pilots on the latest combat aircraft, Germany solicited the help of the Soviet Union, which was also isolated in Europe. A secret training airfield was established at Lipetsk in 1924 and operated for approximately nine years using mostly Dutch and Soviet, but also some German, training aircraft before being closed in 1933. This base was officially known as the 4th squadron of the 40th wing of the Red Army. Hundreds of Luftwaffe pilots and technical personnel visited, studied, and were trained at Soviet Air Force schools in several locations in Central Russia.[13] Roessing, Blume, Fosse, Teetsemann, Heini, Makratzki, Blumendaat, and many other future Luftwaffe aces were trained in the USSR in joint Soviet-German schools that were set up under the patronage of Ernst August Köstring.
The first steps towards the Luftwaffe's formation were undertaken just months after Adolf Hitler came to power. Hermann Göring, a World War I ace, became National Kommissar for aviation with former Luft Hansa director Erhard Milch as his deputy. In April 1933, the Reich Aviation Ministry (Reichsluftfahrtministerium or RLM) was established. The RLM was in charge of the development and production of aircraft. Göring's control over all aspects of aviation became absolute. On 25 March 1933, the German Air Sports Association absorbed all private and national organisations, while retaining its 'sports' title. On 15 May 1933, all military aviation organisations in the RLM were merged, forming the Luftwaffe; its official 'birthday'.[14] The National Socialist Flyers Corps (Nationalsozialistisches Fliegerkorps or NSFK) was formed in 1937 to give pre-military flying training to male youths, and to engage adult sport aviators in the Nazi movement. Military-age members of the NSFK were drafted into the Luftwaffe. As all such prior NSFK members were also Nazi Party members, this gave the new Luftwaffe a strong Nazi ideological base in contrast to the other branches of the Wehrmacht (the Heer (army) and the Kriegsmarine (navy)). Göring played a leading role in the buildup of the Luftwaffe in 1933–36, but had little further involvement in the development of the force after 1936, and Milch became the "de facto" minister until 1937.[15]
The absence of Göring in planning and production matters was fortunate. Göring had little knowledge of current aviation, had last flown in 1922, and had not kept himself informed of the latest events. Göring also displayed a lack of understanding of doctrine and technical issues in aerial warfare which he left to others more competent. The Commander-in-Chief left the organisation and building of the Luftwaffe, after 1936, to Erhard Milch. However, Göring, as a part of Hitler's inner circle, provided access to financial resources and materiel for rearming and equipping the Luftwaffe.[16]
Another prominent figure in German air power construction this time was Helmuth Wilberg. Wilberg later played a large role in the development of German air doctrine. Having headed the Reichswehr air staff for eight years in the 1920s, Wilberg had considerable experience and was ideal for a senior staff position.[17] Göring considered making Wilberg Chief of Staff (CS). However, it was revealed Wilberg had a Jewish mother. For that reason, Göring could not have him as CS. Not wishing his talent to go to waste, Göring ensured the racial policy of Nazi Germany did not apply to him. Wilberg remained in the air staff, and under Walther Wever helped draw up the Luftwaffe's principle doctrinal texts, "The Conduct of the Aerial War" and "Regulation 16".[18][19]
Preparing for war: 1933–1939
[edit]Wever years, 1933–1936
[edit]
The German officer corps was keen to develop strategic bombing capabilities against its enemies. However, economic and geopolitical considerations had to take priority. The German air power theorists continued to develop strategic theories, but emphasis was given to army support, as Germany was a continental power and expected to face ground operations following any declaration of hostilities.[20]
For these reasons, between 1933 and 1934, the Luftwaffe's leadership was primarily concerned with tactical and operational methods. In aerial terms, the army concept of Truppenführung was an operational concept, as well as a tactical doctrine. In World War I, the Fliegertruppe's initial, 1914–15 era Feldflieger Abteilung observation/reconnaissance air units, each with six two-seater aircraft apiece, had been attached to specific army formations and acted as support. Dive bomber units were considered essential to Truppenführung, attacking enemy headquarters and lines of communications.[21] Luftwaffe "Regulation 10: The Bomber" (Dienstvorschrift 10: Das Kampfflugzeug), published in 1934, advocated air superiority and approaches to ground attack tactics without dealing with operational matters. Until 1935, the 1926 manual "Directives for the Conduct of the Operational Air War" continued to act as the main guide for German air operations. The manual directed OKL to focus on limited operations (not strategic operations): the protection of specific areas and support of the army in combat.[21]
With an effective tactical-operational concept,[22] the German air power theorists needed a strategic doctrine and organisation. Robert Knauss, a serviceman (not a pilot) in the Luftstreitkräfte during World War I, and later an experienced pilot with Lufthansa,[23] was a prominent theorist of air power. Knauss promoted the Giulio Douhet theory that air power could win wars alone by destroying enemy industry and breaking enemy morale by "terrorising the population" of major cities. This advocated attacks on civilians.[24] The General Staff blocked the entry of Douhet's theory into doctrine, fearing revenge strikes against German civilians and cities.[25]
In December 1934, Chief of the Luftwaffe General Staff Walther Wever sought to mold the Luftwaffe's battle doctrine into a strategic plan. At this time, Wever conducted war games (simulated against France) in a bid to establish his theory of a strategic bombing force that would, he thought, prove decisive by winning the war through the destruction of enemy industry, even though these exercises also included tactical strikes against enemy ground forces and communications. In 1935, "Luftwaffe Regulation 16: The Conduct of the Air War" was drawn up. In the proposal, it concluded, "The mission of the Luftwaffe is to serve these goals."[26][27]
Historian James Corum states that under this doctrine, the Luftwaffe leadership rejected the practice of "terror bombing" (see Luftwaffe strategic bombing doctrine).[28] According to Corum, terror bombing was deemed to be "counter-productive", increasing rather than destroying the enemy's will to resist.[29] Such bombing campaigns were regarded as diversion from the Luftwaffe's main operations; destruction of the enemy armed forces.[30]
Nevertheless, Wever recognised the importance of strategic bombing. In newly introduced doctrine, The Conduct of the Aerial Air War in 1935, Wever rejected the theory of Douhet[31] and outlined five key points to air strategy:[32]
- To destroy the enemy air force by bombing its bases and aircraft factories, and defeating enemy air forces attacking German targets
- To prevent the movement of large enemy ground forces to the decisive areas by destroying railways and roads, particularly bridges and tunnels, which are indispensable for the movement and supply of forces
- To support the operations of the army formations, independent of railways, i.e, armoured forces and motorised forces, by impeding the enemy advance and participating directly in ground operations
- To support naval operations by attacking naval bases, protecting Germany's naval bases and participating directly in naval battles
- To paralyze the enemy armed forces by stopping production in the armaments factories
Wever began planning for a strategic bomber force and sought to incorporate strategic bombing into a war strategy. He believed that tactical aircraft should only be used as a step to developing a strategic air force. In May 1934, Wever initiated a seven-year project to develop the so-called "Ural bomber", which could strike as far as into the heart of the Soviet Union. In 1935, this design competition led to the Dornier Do 19 and Junkers Ju 89 prototypes, although both were underpowered. In April 1936, Wever issued requirements for the 'Bomber A' design competition: a range of 6,700 kilometres (4,200 mi) with a 900 kilograms (2,000 lb) bomb load. However, Wever's vision of a "Ural" bomber was never realised,[33] and his emphasis on strategic aerial operations was lost.[34] The only design submittal for Wever's 'Bomber A' that reached production was Heinkel's Projekt 1041, which culminated in the production and frontline service as Germany's only operational heavy bomber, the Heinkel He 177, on 5 November 1937, the date on which it received its RLM airframe number.[35]
In 1935, the military functions of the RLM were grouped into the Oberkommando der Luftwaffe (OKL; "Air Force High Command").
Following the untimely death of Wever in early June 1936 in an aviation-related accident, by the late 1930s the Luftwaffe had no clear purpose. The air force was not subordinated to the army support role, and it was not given any particular strategic mission. German doctrine fell between the two concepts. The Luftwaffe was to be an organisation capable of carrying out broad and general support tasks rather than any specific mission. Mainly, this path was chosen to encourage more flexible use of air power and offer the ground forces the right conditions for a decisive victory. In fact, on the outbreak of war, only 15% of the Luftwaffe's aircraft were devoted to ground support operations, counter to the long-held myth that the Luftwaffe was designed for only tactical and operational missions.[36]
Change of direction, 1936–37
[edit]
Wever's participation in the construction of the Luftwaffe came to an abrupt end on 3 June 1936 when he was killed along with his engineer in a Heinkel He 70 Blitz, ironically on the very day that his "Bomber A" heavy bomber design competition was announced. After Wever's death, Göring began taking more of an interest in the appointment of Luftwaffe staff officers. Göring appointed his successor Albert Kesselring as Chief of Staff and Ernst Udet to head the Reich's Air Ministry Technical Office (Technisches Amt), although he was not a technical expert. Despite this Udet helped change the Luftwaffe's tactical direction towards fast medium bombers to destroy enemy air power in the battle zone rather than through industrial bombing of its aviation production.[26]
Kesselring and Udet did not get on. During Kesselring's time as CS, 1936–1937, a power struggle developed between the two as Udet attempted to extend his own power within the Luftwaffe. Kesselring also had to contend with Göring appointing "yes men" to positions of importance.[37] Udet realised his limitations, and his failures in the production and development of German aircraft would have serious long term consequences.[38]
The failure of the Luftwaffe to progress further towards attaining a strategic bombing force was attributable to several reasons. Many in the Luftwaffe command believed medium bombers to be sufficient power to launch strategic bombing operations against Germany's most likely enemies; France, Czechoslovakia, and Poland.[39] The United Kingdom presented greater problems. General der Flieger Hellmuth Felmy, commander of Luftflotte 2 in 1939, was charged with devising a plan for an air war over the British Isles. Felmy was convinced that Britain could be defeated through morale bombing. Felmy noted the alleged panic that had broken out in London during the Munich crisis, evidence he believed of British weakness. A second reason was technical. German designers had never solved the issues of the Heinkel He 177A's design difficulties, brought on by the requirement from its inception on 5 November 1937 to have moderate dive-bombing capabilities in a 30-meter wingspan aircraft. Moreover, Germany did not possess the economic resources to match the later British and American effort of 1943–1944, particularly in large-scale mass production of high power output aircraft engines (with output of over least 1,500 kW (2,000 hp)). In addition, the OKL had not foreseen the industrial and military effort strategic bombing would require. By 1939 the Luftwaffe was not much better prepared than its enemies to conduct a strategic bombing campaign,[40] with fatal results during the Battle of Britain.[41]
The German rearmament programme faced difficulties acquiring raw materials. Germany imported most of its essential materials for rebuilding the Luftwaffe, in particular rubber and aluminum. Petroleum imports were particularly vulnerable to blockade. Germany pushed for synthetic fuel plants but still failed to meet demands. In 1937 Germany imported more fuel than it had at the start of the decade. By summer 1938, only 25% of the requirements could be covered. In steel materials, industry was operating at barely 83% of capacity, and by November 1938 Göring reported the economic situation was serious.[42] The Oberkommando der Wehrmacht (OKW), the overall command for all German military forces, ordered reductions in raw materials and steel used for armament production. The figures for reduction were substantial: 30% steel, 20% copper, 47% aluminum, and 14% rubber.[43] Under such circumstances, it was not possible for Milch, Udet, or Kesselring to produce a formidable strategic bombing force even had they wanted to do so.[40]
The development of aircraft was now confined to the production of twin-engined medium bombers that required much less material, manpower, and aviation production capacity than Wever's "Ural Bomber". German industry could build two medium bombers for one heavy bomber and the RLM would not gamble on developing a heavy bomber which would also take time. Göring remarked, "the Führer will not ask how big the bombers there are, but only how many there are."[44] The premature death of Wever, one of the Luftwaffe's finest officers, left the Luftwaffe without a strategic air force during World War II, which eventually proved fatal to the German war effort.[26][45][46]
The lack of strategic capability should have been apparent much earlier. The Sudeten Crisis highlighted German unpreparedness to conduct a strategic air war (although the British and French were in a much weaker position), and Hitler ordered the Luftwaffe be expanded to five times its earlier size.[47] The OKL badly neglected the need for transport aircraft; even in 1943, transport units were described as Kampfgeschwadern zur besonderen Verwendung (Bomber Units on Special Duties, KGzbV).[48] and only grouping them together into dedicated cargo and personnel transport wings (Transportgeschwader) during that year. In March 1938, as the Anschluss was taking place, Göring ordered Felmy to investigate the prospect of air raids against Britain. Felmy concluded it was not possible until bases in Belgium and the Netherlands were obtained and the Luftwaffe had heavy bombers. It mattered little, as war was avoided by the Munich Agreement, and the need for long-range aircraft did not arise.[49]
These failures were not exposed until wartime. In the meantime, German designs of mid-1930s origin such as the Messerschmitt Bf 109, the Heinkel He 111, the Junkers Ju 87 Stuka, and the Dornier Do 17, performed very well. All first saw active service in the Condor Legion against Soviet-supplied aircraft. The Luftwaffe also quickly realised the days of the biplane fighter were finished, the Heinkel He 51 being switched to service as a trainer. Particularly impressive were the Heinkel and Dornier, which fulfilled the Luftwaffe's requirements for bombers that were faster than 1930s-era fighters, many of which were biplanes or strut-braced monoplanes.
Despite the participation of these aircraft (mainly from 1938 onward), it was the venerable Junkers Ju 52 (which soon became the backbone of the Transportgruppen) that made the main contribution. During the Spanish Civil War Hitler remarked, "Franco ought to erect a monument to the glory of the Junkers Ju 52. It is the aircraft which the Spanish revolution has to thank for its victory."[50]
Dive-bombing
[edit]
Poor accuracy from level bombers in 1937 led the Luftwaffe to grasp the benefits of dive-bombing. The latter could achieve far better accuracy against tactical ground targets than heavier conventional bombers. Range was not a key criterion for this mission. It was not always feasible for the army to move heavy artillery over recently captured territory to bombard fortifications or support ground forces, and dive bombers could do the job faster. Dive bombers, often single-engine two-man machines, could achieve better results than larger six or seven-man aircraft, at a tenth of the cost and four times the accuracy. This led to Udet championing the dive bomber, particularly the Junkers Ju 87.[51]
Udet's "love affair" with dive-bombing seriously affected the long-term development of the Luftwaffe, especially after Wever's death. The tactical strike aircraft programmes were meant to serve as interim solutions until the next generation of aircraft arrived. In 1936 the Junkers Ju 52 was the backbone of the German bomber fleet. This led to a rush on the part of the RLM to produce the Junkers Ju 86, the Heinkel He 111, and the Dornier Do 17 before a proper evaluation was made. The Ju 86 was poor while the He 111 showed the most promise. The Spanish Civil War convinced Udet (along with limited output from the German munitions industry) that wastage was not acceptable in munition terms. Udet sought to build dive-bombing into the Junkers Ju 88 and conveyed the same idea, initiated specifically by the OKL for the Heinkel He 177, approved in early November 1937. In the case of the Ju 88, 50,000 modifications had to be made. The weight was increased from seven to twelve tons. This resulted in a speed loss of 200 km/h. Udet merely conveyed the OKL's own dive-bombing capability request to Ernst Heinkel concerning the He 177, who vehemently opposed such an idea, which ruined its development as a heavy bomber.[52] Göring was not able to rescind the dive-bombing requirement for the He 177A until September 1942.[53]
Mobilisation, 1938–1941
[edit]By the summer of 1939, the Luftwaffe had ready for combat nine Jagdgeschwader (fighter wings) mostly equipped with the Messerschmitt Bf 109E, four Zerstörergeschwader (destroyer wings) equipped with the Messerschmitt Bf 110 heavy fighters, 11 Kampfgeschwader (bomber wings) equipped mainly with the Heinkel He 111 and the Dornier Do 17Z, and four Sturzkampfgeschwader (dive bomber wings) primarily armed with the iconic Junkers Ju 87B Stuka.[54] The Luftwaffe was just starting to accept the Junkers Ju 88A for service, as it had encountered design difficulties, with only a dozen aircraft of the type considered combat-ready. The Luftwaffe's strength at this time stood at 373,000 personnel (208,000 flying troops, 107,000 in the Flak Corps, and 58,000 in the Signals Corps). Aircraft strength was 4,201 operational aircraft: 1,191 bombers, 361 dive bombers, 788 fighters, 431 heavy fighters, and 488 transports. Despite deficiencies, it was an impressive force.[55]
However, even by the spring of 1940, the Luftwaffe still had not mobilised fully. Despite the shortage of raw materials, Udet had increased production through introducing a 10-hour working day for aviation industries and rationalising production. During this period 30 Kampfstaffeln and 16 Jagdstaffeln were raised and equipped. A further five Zerstörergruppen ("Destroyer groups") were created (JGr 101, 102, 126, 152 and 176), all equipped with the Bf 110.[56]
The Luftwaffe also greatly expanded its aircrew training programmes by 42%, to 63 flying schools. These facilities were moved to eastern Germany, away from possible Allied threats. The number of aircrew reached 4,727, an increase of 31%. However, the rush to complete this rapid expansion scheme resulted in the deaths of 997 personnel and another 700 wounded. 946 aircraft were also destroyed in these accidents. The number of aircrew completing their training was up to 3,941, The Luftwaffe's entire strength was now 2.2 million personnel.[57]
In April and May 1941, Udet headed the Luftwaffe delegation inspecting the Soviet aviation industry in compliance with the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. Udet informed Göring "that Soviet air forces are very strong and technically advanced." Göring decided not to report the facts to Hitler, hoping that a surprise attack would quickly destroy the USSR.[58] [page needed]Udet realised that the upcoming war with the USSR might cripple Germany. Udet, torn between truth and loyalty, suffered a psychological breakdown and even tried to tell Hitler the truth, but Göring told Hitler that Udet was lying, then took Udet under control by giving him drugs at drinking parties and hunting trips. Udet's drinking and psychological condition became a problem, but Göring used Udet's dependency to manipulate him.[59][page needed]
Luftwaffe organisation
[edit]Luftwaffe commanders
[edit]
Throughout the history of Nazi Germany, the Luftwaffe had only two commanders-in-chief. The first was Göring, with the second and last being Generalfeldmarschall Robert Ritter von Greim. His appointment as commander-in-chief of the Luftwaffe was concomitant with his promotion to Generalfeldmarschall, the last German officer in World War II to be promoted to the highest rank. Other officers promoted to the second highest military rank in Germany were Kesselring, Hugo Sperrle, Milch, and Wolfram von Richthofen.
At the end of the war, with Berlin surrounded by the Red Army, Göring suggested to Hitler that he take over leadership of the Reich.[60] Hitler ordered his arrest and execution, but Göring's SS guards did not carry out the order, and Göring survived to be tried at Nuremberg.[61]
Sperrle was prosecuted at the OKW trial, one of the last twelve of the Nuremberg trials after the war. He was acquitted on all four counts. He died in Munich in 1953.
Organisation and chain of command
[edit]At the start of the war the Luftwaffe had four Luftflotten (air fleets), each responsible for roughly a quarter of Germany. As the war progressed more air fleets were created as the areas under German rule expanded. As one example, Luftflotte 5 was created in 1940 to direct operations in Norway and Denmark, and other Luftflotten were created as necessary. Each Luftflotte would contain several Fliegerkorps (Air Corps), Fliegerdivision (Air Division), Jagdkorps (Fighter Corps), Jagddivision (Air Division), or Jagdfliegerführer (Fighter Air Command). Each formations would have attached to it a number of units, usually several Geschwader, but also independent Staffeln and Kampfgruppen.[62] Luftflotten were also responsible for the training aircraft and schools in their operational areas.[63]
A Geschwader was commanded by a Geschwaderkommodore, with the rank of either major, Oberstleutnant (lieutenant colonel) or Oberst (colonel). Other "staff" officers within the unit with administrative duties included the adjutant, technical officer, and operations officer, who were usually (though not always) experienced aircrew or pilots still flying on operations. Other specialist staff were navigation, signals, and intelligence personnel. A Stabschwarm (headquarters flight) was attached to each Geschwader.[62]
A Jagdgeschwader (hunting wing) (JG) was a single-seat day fighter Geschwader, typically equipped with Bf 109 or Fw 190 aircraft flying in the fighter or fighter-bomber roles. Late in the war, by 1944–45, JG 7 and JG 400 (and the jet specialist JV 44) flew much more advanced aircraft, with JG 1 working up with the Heinkel He 162 "emergency fighter" at war's end. A Geschwader consisted of groups (Gruppen), which in turn consisted of Jagdstaffel (fighter squadrons). Hence, Fighter Wing 1 was JG 1, its first Gruppe (group) was I./JG 1, using a Roman numeral for the Gruppe number only, and its first Staffel (squadron) was 1./JG 1. Geschwader strength was usually 120–125 aircraft.[62]
Each Gruppe was commanded by a Kommandeur, and a Staffel by a Staffelkapitän. However, these were "appointments", not ranks, within the Luftwaffe. Usually, the Kommodore would hold the rank of Oberstleutnant or, exceptionally, an Oberst. Even a Leutnant (second lieutenant) could find himself commanding a Staffel.
Similarly, a bomber wing was a Kampfgeschwader (KG), a night fighter wing was a Nachtjagdgeschwader (NJG), a dive bomber wing was a Stukageschwader (StG), and units equivalent to those in RAF Coastal Command, with specific responsibilities for coastal patrols and search and rescue duties, were Küstenfliegergruppen (Kü.Fl. Gr.). Specialist bomber groups were known as Kampfgruppen (KGr). The strength of a bomber Geschwader was about 80–90 aircraft.[62]
Personnel
[edit]| Forces | Personnel strength |
|---|---|
| Flying units | 500,000 |
| Anti-aircraft units | 500,000 |
| Air signal units | 250,000 |
| Construction units | 150,000 |
| Landsturm (militia) units | 36,000 |
The peacetime strength of the Luftwaffe in the spring of 1939 was 370,000 men. After mobilisation in 1939 almost 900,000 men served, and just before Operation Barbarossa in 1941 personnel strength had reached 1.5 million men.[64] The Luftwaffe reached its largest personnel strength during the period November 1943 to June 1944, with almost three million men and women in uniform; 1.7 million of these were male soldiers, 1 million male Wehrmachtsbeamte and civilian employees, and almost 300,000 female and male auxiliaries (Luftwaffenhelfer).[65] In October 1944, the anti-aircraft units had 600,000 soldiers and 530,000 auxiliaries, including 60,000 male members of the Reichsarbeitsdienst, 50,000 Luftwaffenhelfer (males age 15–17), 80,000 Flakwehrmänner (males above military age) and Flak-V-soldaten (males unfit for military service), and 160,000 female Flakwaffenhelferinnen and RAD-Maiden, as well as 160,000 foreign personnel (Hiwis).[66][67]
Spanish Civil War
[edit]
The Luftwaffe's Condor Legion experimented with new doctrine and aircraft during the Spanish Civil War. It helped the Falange under Francisco Franco to defeat the Republican forces. Over 20,000 German airmen gained combat experience that would give the Luftwaffe an important advantage going into the Second World War. One infamous operation was the bombing of Guernica in the Basque country. It is commonly assumed this attack was the result of a "terror doctrine" in Luftwaffe doctrine. The raids on Guernica and Madrid caused many civilian casualties and a wave of protests from abroad. It has been suggested that the bombing of Guernica was carried out for military tactical reasons, in support of ground operations, but the town was not directly involved in any fighting at that point in time. It was not until 1942 that the Germans started to develop a bombing policy in which civilians were the primary targets, although the Blitz on London and many other British cities involved indiscriminate bombing of civilian areas,[28] 'nuisance raids' which could even involve the machine-gunning of civilians and livestock.[68]
World War II
[edit]
When World War II began in 1939, the Luftwaffe was one of the most technologically advanced air forces in the world. During the Polish Campaign that triggered the war, it quickly established air superiority, and then air supremacy. It supported the German Army operations which ended the campaign in five weeks. The Luftwaffe's performance was as the OKL had hoped. The Luftwaffe rendered invaluable support to the army,[69] mopping up pockets of resistance. Göring was delighted with the performance.[70] Command and control problems occurred, but flexibility and improvisation in both the army and the Luftwaffe solved these problems. The Luftwaffe was to have in place a ground-to-air communication system, which played a vital role in the success of 1940's Fall Gelb.[71]
In the spring of 1940 the Luftwaffe assisted the Kriegsmarine and Heer in the invasion of Norway. Flying in reinforcements and winning air superiority, the Luftwaffe contributed decisively to the German conquest.[72]
In May and June 1940, the Luftwaffe contributed to the unexpected German success in the Battle of France. It destroyed three Allied Air Forces and helped secure the defeat of France in just over six weeks.[73] However, it could not destroy the British Expeditionary Force at Dunkirk despite intense bombing. The BEF escaped to continue the war.[74]
During the Battle of Britain in summer 1940, the Luftwaffe inflicted severe damage on Britain's Royal Air Force, but did not achieve the air superiority that Hitler had demanded for the proposed invasion of Britain, which was postponed and then canceled in December 1940.[75] The Luftwaffe ravaged British cities during the Blitz of 1940–1941, but failed to break British morale, and the RAF shot down German planes by over a two to one ratio. Hitler had already ordered preparations for Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union.
In spring 1941 the Luftwaffe helped its Axis partner, Italy, secure victory in the Balkans Campaign and continued to support Italy or the Italian Social Republic in the Mediterranean, Middle East and African theaters until May 1945.
In June 1941, Germany invaded the Soviet Union. Despite destroying thousands of Soviet aircraft,[76] the Luftwaffe failed to destroy the Red Air Force altogether. Lacking strategic bombers (the very "Ural bombers" that Wever had asked for six years before) the Luftwaffe could not strike at Soviet production-centres regularly or with the needed force.[77] The Axis and Soviet air operations during Operation Barbarossa consumed vast numbers of men and planes. As the war dragged on, the Luftwaffe was eroded in strength. German defeats at the Battle of Stalingrad in 1942 and in the Battle of Kursk in 1943 ensured the gradual decline of the Wehrmacht on the Eastern Front.
British historian Frederick Taylor asserts that "all sides bombed each other's cities during the war. Half a million Soviet citizens, for example, died from German bombing during the invasion and occupation of Russia. That's roughly equivalent to the number of German citizens who died from Allied raids."[78]
The Luftwaffe defended German-occupied Europe against the growing offensive power of RAF Bomber Command and, starting in the summer of 1942, the steadily building strength of the United States Army Air Forces. The mounting demands of the Defence of the Reich campaign gradually destroyed the Luftwaffe's fighter arm. Despite its belated use of advanced turbojet and rocket-propelled aircraft for bomber-destroyer duties, it was overwhelmed by Allied numbers and a lack of trained pilots and fuel. A last-ditch attempt, known as Operation Bodenplatte, to win air superiority on 1 January 1945 failed. After the Bodenplatte effort, the Luftwaffe ceased to be an effective fighting force.

German day- and night-fighter pilots claimed more than 70,000 aerial victories during World War II.[79] Of these, an estimated 745 victories were attributed to Messerschmitt Me 262 jet fighters.[80] Flak shot down 25,000–30,000 Allied planes. Broken down according to the different Allied forces, about 25,000 were American planes,[81] about 20,000 British, 46,100 Soviet,[82] 1,274 French,[83][page needed] 375 Polish,[84] and 81 Dutch as well as aircraft from other Allied nationalities.
The highest-scoring day-fighter pilot was Erich Hartmann with 352 confirmed kills, of which all but 7 were on the Eastern front against the Soviets. The leading aces in the west were Hans-Joachim Marseille with 158 kills (most of which were against British Commonwealth forces in the Desert campaign), and Georg-Peter Eder with 56 kills of aircraft from the USAAF (of a total of 78). The most successful night-fighter pilot, Heinz-Wolfgang Schnaufer, is credited with 121 kills. 103 German fighter pilots shot down more than 100 enemy aircraft for a total of roughly 15,400 aerial victories. Roughly a further 360 pilots claimed between 40 and 100 aerial victories for round about 21,000 victories. Another 500 fighter pilots claimed between 20 and 40 victories for a total of 15,000 victories. Part of the reason German pilots scored such high victory totals was that they were in combat for the duration of the war-unlike the Allies, who rotated their flyers out of combat after a certain amount of time to recuperate or to impart their skills in training other pilots - German pilots flew until they were killed, captured, or too badly wounded to keep flying. It is relatively certain that 2,500 German fighter pilots attained ace status, having achieved at least five aerial victories.[85][86] These achievements were honored with 453 German single and twin-engine (Messerschmitt Bf 110) day-fighter pilots receiving the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross. Intense personal rivalry may have played an important role in motivating high-performing aces (who scored the vast majority of aerial victories). Public recognition in the form of medals and mentions in the army bulletin spurred efforts of peers who had previously flown with award-winners[87] . 85 night-fighter pilots, including 14 crew members, were awarded the Knight's Cross.[88] Some bomber pilots were also highly successful. Stuka and Schlachtflieger pilot Hans-Ulrich Rudel flew 2,530 ground-attack missions and claimed the destruction of more than 519 tanks and a battleship, among others. He became the most highly decorated German serviceman of the Second World War. Bomber pilot Hansgeorg Bätcher flew more than 658 combat missions, destroying numerous ships and other targets.
Luftwaffe losses, on the other hand, were high as well. The estimated total number of destroyed and damaged for the war totalled 76,875 aircraft. Of these, about 43,000 were lost in combat, the rest in operational accidents and during training.[89][page needed] By type, losses totalled 21,452 fighters, 12,037 bombers, 15,428 trainers, 10,221 twin-engine fighters, 5,548 ground attack craft, 6,733 reconnaissance planes, and 6,141 transports.[90]
According to the General Staff of the Wehrmacht the losses of the flight personnel until February 1945 amounted to:[91][page needed]
| Officers | Enlisted | |
|---|---|---|
| Killed in action | 6,527 | 43,517 |
| Wounded in action | 4,194 | 27,811 |
| Missing in action | 4,361 | 27,240 |
| Total | 15,082 | 98,568 |
According to official statistics, total Luftwaffe casualties, including ground personnel, amounted to 138,596 killed and 156,132 missing through 31 January 1945.[92]
Omissions and failures
[edit]Lack of aerial defence
[edit]The failure of the Luftwaffe in the Defence of the Reich campaign was a result of a number of factors. The Luftwaffe lacked an effective air defence system early in the war. Hitler's foreign policy had pushed Germany into war before these defences could be fully developed. The Luftwaffe was forced to improvise and construct its defences during the war.
The daylight actions over German-controlled territory were sparse in 1939–1940. The responsibility of the defence of German air space fell to the Luftgaukommandos (air district commands). The defence systems relied mostly on the "flak" arm. The defences were not coordinated and communication was poor. This lack of understanding between the flak and flying branches of the defence would plague the Luftwaffe throughout the war.[93] Hitler, in particular, wanted the defence to rest on anti-aircraft artillery as it gave the civilian population a "psychological crutch" no matter how ineffective the weapons.[94]
Most of the battles fought by the Luftwaffe on the Western Front were against the RAF's "Circus" raids and the occasional daylight raid into German air space. This was a fortunate position since the Luftwaffe's strategy of focusing its striking power on one front started to unravel with the failure of the invasion of the Soviet Union. The "peripheral" strategy of the Luftwaffe between 1939 and 1940 had been to deploy its fighter defences at the edges of Axis occupied territory, with little protecting the inner depths.[95] Moreover, the front line units in the West were complaining about the poor numbers and performance of aircraft. Units complained of lack of Zerstörer aircraft with all-weather capabilities and the "lack of climbing power of the Bf 109".[95] The Luftwaffe's technical edge was slipping as the only formidable new aircraft in the German arsenal was the Focke-Wulf Fw 190. Milch was to assist Udet with aircraft production increases and the introduction of more modern types of fighter aircraft. However, they explained at a meeting of the Reich Industrial Council on 18 September 1941 that the new next-generation aircraft had failed to materialise, and production of obsolete types had to continue to meet the growing need for replacements.[95]
The buildup of the Jagdwaffe ("Fighter Force") was too rapid and its quality suffered. It was not put under a unified command until 1943, which also affected the performance of the nine Jagdgeschwader fighter wings in existence in 1939. No further units were formed until 1942, and the years of 1940–1941 were wasted. The OKL failed to construct a strategy; instead, its command style was reactionary, and its measures not as effective without thorough planning. This was particularly apparent with the Sturmböck squadrons, formed to replace the increasingly ineffective twin-engined Zerstörer heavy fighter wings as the primary defence against USAAF daylight raids. The Sturmböcke flew Fw 190A fighters armed with heavy 20mm and 30mm cannon to destroy heavy bombers, but this increased the weight and affected the performance of the Fw 190 at a time when the aircraft were meeting large numbers of equal if not superior Allied types.[96]
Daytime aerial defence against the USAAF's strongly defended heavy bomber forces, particularly the Eighth Air Force and the Fifteenth Air Force, had its successes through the calendar year of 1943. But at the start of 1944, Eighth AF commander Jimmy Doolittle made a major change in offensive fighter tactics, which defeated the Luftwaffe's day fighter force from that time onwards. Steadily increasing numbers of the superlative North American P-51 Mustang single-engine fighter, leading the USAAF's bombers into German airspace defeated first the Bf 110 Zerstörer wings, then the Fw 190A Sturmböcke.
Development and equipment
[edit]
In terms of technological development, the failure to develop a long-range bomber and capable long-range fighters during this period left the Luftwaffe unable to conduct a meaningful strategic bombing campaign throughout the war.[97] However, Germany at that time suffered from limitations in raw materials such as oil and aluminum, which meant that there were insufficient resources for much beyond a tactical air force: given these circumstances, the Luftwaffe's reliance on tactical mid-range, twin-engined medium bombers and short-range dive-bombers was a pragmatic choice of strategy.[98][99] It might also be argued that the Luftwaffe's Kampfgeschwader medium and heavy bomber wings were perfectly capable of attacking strategic targets, but the lack of capable long-range escort fighters left the bombers unable to carry out their missions effectively against determined and well-organised fighter opposition.[100]
The greatest failure for the Kampfgeschwader, however, was being saddled with an aircraft intended as a capable four-engined heavy bomber: the perpetually troubled Heinkel He 177, whose engines were prone to catch fire in flight. Of the three parallel proposals from the Heinkel engineering departments for a four-engined version of the A-series He 177 by February 1943, one of these being the Heinkel firm's Amerikabomber candidate, only one, the He 177B, emerged in the concluding months of 1943. Only three airworthy prototypes of the B-series He 177 design were produced by early 1944, by which point the Avro Lancaster, the most successful RAF heavy bomber, was already in widespread service.

Another failure of procurement and equipment was the lack of a dedicated naval air arm. Felmy had already expressed a desire to build a naval air arm to support Kriegsmarine operations in the Atlantic and British waters. Britain was dependent on food and raw materials from its Empire and North America. Felmy pressed this case firmly throughout 1938 and 1939, and, on 31 October 1939, Großadmiral Erich Raeder sent a strongly worded letter to Göring in support of such proposals. The early-war twin-engined Heinkel He 115 floatplane and Dornier Do 18 flying boat were too slow and short-ranged. The then-contemporary Blohm & Voss BV 138 Seedrache ("seadragon") flying boat became the Luftwaffe's primary seaborne maritime patrol platform, with nearly 300 examples built; it had a 4,300 km (2,700 mi) maximum range. Another Blohm und Voss design of 1940, the enormous, 46-meter wingspan Blohm & Voss BV 222 Wiking maritime patrol flying boat was capable of a 6,800 km (4,200 mi) range at maximum endurance. The Dornier Do 217 would have been ideal as a land-based choice but suffered production problems.[citation needed] Raeder also complained about the poor standard of aerial torpedoes, although their design was the responsibility of the Kriegsmarine, even considering production of the Japanese Type 91 torpedo used in the Attack on Pearl Harbor as the Lufttorpedo LT 850 by August 1942.[a][101]
Without specialised naval or land-based, purpose-designed maritime patrol aircraft, the Luftwaffe was forced to improvise. The Focke-Wulf Fw 200 Condor – developed as a civilian airliner – lacked the structural strength for combat maneuvering at lower altitudes, making it unsuitable for use as a bomber in maritime patrol duties. The Condor lacked speed, armor and bomb load capacity. Sometimes the fuselage literally "broke its back" or a wing panel dropped loose from the wing root after a hard landing. Nevertheless, it was adapted for the long-range reconnaissance and anti-shipping roles and, between August 1940 and February 1941, Fw 200s sank 85 vessels for a claimed total of 363,000 GRT. Had the Luftwaffe focused on naval aviation – particularly maritime patrol aircraft with long range, Germany might well have been in a position to win the Battle of the Atlantic.[citation needed] However, Raeder and the Kriegsmarine failed to press for naval air power until the war began, mitigating the Luftwaffe's responsibility. At the same time Göring regarded any other branch of the German military developing its own aviation as an encroachment on his authority and continually frustrated the navy's attempts to build its own airpower.[100]
The absence of a strategic bomber force for the Luftwaffe, following Wever's death in 1936 and the end of the Ural bomber programme was not addressed until the authorisation of the "Bomber B" design competition in July 1939, which sought to replace the medium bomber force with which the Luftwaffe would begin the war, and the partly achieved Schnellbomber high-speed medium bomber concept with more advanced, twin-engined high-speed bomber aircraft fitted with pairs of relatively "high-power" engines of 1,500 kW (2,000 hp) and upwards as a follow-on to the earlier Schnellbomber project, that would also be able to function as shorter-range heavy bombers.

The spring 1942 Amerikabomber programme sought to produce strategic bomber designs for the Luftwaffe to directly attack the United States from Europe or the Azores. Inevitably, both the Bomber B and Amerikabomber programmes were victims of the continued emphasis of the Wehrmacht combined military's insistence for its Luftwaffe air arm to support the Heer as its primary mission, and the damage to the German aviation industry from Allied bomber attacks.
Challenges in directly addressing combat pilots' issues
[edit]The RLM's apparent lack of a dedicated "technical-tactical" department, that would have directly been in contact with combat pilots to assess their needs for weaponry upgrades and tactical advice, had never been seriously envisioned as a critically ongoing necessity in the planning of the original German air arm.[102] The RLM did have its own Technisches Amt (T-Amt) department to handle aviation technology issues, but this was tasked with handling all aviation technology issues in Nazi Germany, both military and civilian in nature, and also not known to have ever had any clear and actively administrative and consultative links with the front-line forces established for such purposes. On the front-line combat side of the issue, and for direct contact with the German aviation firms making the Luftwaffe's warplanes, the Luftwaffe did have its own reasonably effective system of four military aviation test facilities, or Erprobungstellen located at three coastal sites – Peenemünde-West (also incorporating a separate facility in nearby Karlshagen), Tarnewitz and Travemünde – and the central inland site of Rechlin, itself first established as a military airfield in late August 1918 by the German Empire, with the four-facility system commanded later in World War II by Oberst Edgar Petersen. However, due to lack of co-ordination between the RLM and the OKL, all fighter and bomber development was oriented toward short-range aircraft, as they could be produced in greater numbers, rather than quality long-range aircraft, something that put the Luftwaffe at a disadvantage as early as the Battle of Britain.[102] The "ramp-up" to production levels required to fulfill the Luftwaffe's front-line needs was also slow, not reaching maximum output until 1944.[102]
Production of fighters was not given priority until the Emergency Fighter Program was begun in 1944; Adolf Galland commented that this should have occurred at least a year earlier.[102] Galland also pointed to the mistakes and challenges made in the development of the Messerschmitt Me 262 including the protracted development time required for its Junkers Jumo 004 jet engines to achieve reliability. German combat aircraft types that were first designed and flown in the mid-1930s had become obsolete, yet were kept in production, in particular the Ju 87 Stuka, and the Bf 109, because there were no well-developed replacement designs.[102]
Production failures
[edit]The failure of German production was evident from the start of the Battle of Britain. By the end of 1940, the Luftwaffe had suffered heavy losses and needed to regroup. Deliveries of new aircraft were insufficient to meet the drain on resources; the Luftwaffe, unlike the RAF, was failing to expand its pilot and aircraft numbers.[103] This was partly owing to production planning failures before the war and the demands of the army. Nevertheless, the German aircraft industry was being outproduced in 1940. In terms of fighter aircraft production, the British exceeded their production plans by 43%, while the Germans remained 40% "behind" target by summer 1940. In fact, German production in fighters fell from 227 to 177 per month between July and September 1940.[103] One of the many reasons for the failure of the Luftwaffe in 1940 was that it did not have the operational and material means to destroy the British aircraft industry,[104] something that the much-anticipated Bomber B design competition was intended to address.
The so-called "Göring programme", had largely been predicated on the defeat of the Soviet Union in 1941. After the Wehrmacht's failure in front of Moscow, industrial priorities for a possibility in increasing aircraft production were largely abandoned in favor to support the army's increased attrition rates and heavy equipment losses.[105] Milch's reforms expanded production rates. In 1941 an average of 981 aircraft (including 311 fighters) were produced each month.[105] In 1942 this rose to 1,296 aircraft of which 434 were fighters.[105] Milch's planned production increases were initially opposed. But in June, he was granted materials for 900 fighters per month as the average output. By the summer of 1942, the Luftwaffe's operational force had recovered from a low of 39% (44% for fighters and 31% for bombers) in the winter of 1941–1942, to 69% by late June (75% for fighters and 66% for bombers) in 1942. However, after increased commitments in the east, overall operational ready rates fluctuated between 59% and 65% for the remaining year.[106] Throughout 1942 the Luftwaffe was out produced in fighter aircraft by 250% and in twin-engine aircraft by 196%.[107]
The appointment of Albert Speer as Minister of Armaments increased production of existing designs and the few new designs that had originated from earlier in the war. However, the intensification of Allied bombing caused the dispersion of production and prevented an efficient acceleration of expansion. German aviation production reached about 36,000 combat aircraft for 1944. However, by the time this was achieved the Luftwaffe lacked the fuel and trained pilots to make this achievement worthwhile.[108]
The failure to maximise production immediately after the failures in the Soviet Union and North Africa ensured the Luftwaffe's effective defeat in the period of September 1943 – February 1944. Despite the tactical victories won, they failed to achieve a decisive victory. By the time production reached acceptable levels, as so many other factors had for the Luftwaffe – and for the entire Wehrmacht's weapons and ordnance technology as a whole – late in the war, it was "too little, too late".[108]
Engine development
[edit]
By the late 1930s, airframe construction methods had progressed to the point where airframes could be built to any required size,[109] especially in Germany with aircraft like the Dornier Do X flying boat and the Junkers G 38 airliner. However, powering such designs was a major challenge. Mid-1930s aero engines were limited to about 600 hp and the first 1000 hp engines were just entering the prototype stage – for Nazi Germany's then-new Luftwaffe air arm, this meant liquid-cooled inverted V12 designs like the Daimler-Benz DB 601.[110]
Nazi Germany's initial need for substantially more powerful aviation engines originated with the private venture Heinkel He 119 high-speed reconnaissance design, and the Messerschmitt Me 261 for maritime reconnaissance duties. To give enough power in each engine installation, Daimler-Benz coupled two DB 601 engines as single "power system" with the propeller gear reduction housing across the front ends of the two engines. The combined powerplant, known as the DB 606, gave 2,700 metric horsepower (2,000 kW) maximum output in February 1937, for a total weight of around 1.5 tonnes.[111]
Daimler-Benz's was at the same time developing a 1,500 kW class X-configuration engine design resulting in the twenty-four cylinder Daimler-Benz DB 604 (four banks of six cylinders each). Possessing essentially the same displacement of 46.5 litres (2,840 in3) as the initial version of the liquid-cooled Junkers Jumo 222 multibank engine, six banks of four inline cylinders apiece instead; coincidentally, both the original Jumo 222 design and the DB 604 each weighed about a third less (at some 1,080 kilograms or 2,380 pounds of dry weight) than the DB 606. The DB 604's protracted development was diverting valuable German aviation powerplant research resources, and with more development of the "twinned-DB 605" based DB 610 coupled engine (itself initiated in June 1940 with a top output level of 2,950 PS (2,170 kW),[111] and brought together in the same way – with the same all-up weight of 1.5 tonnes – as the DB 606 had been) giving improved results at the time, the Reich Air Ministry stopped all work on the DB 604 in September 1942.[112] Such "coupled powerplants" were the exclusive choice of power for the Heinkel He 177A Greif heavy bomber, mistasked from its beginnings in being intended to do moderate-angle "dive bombing" for a 30-meter wingspan class, heavy bomber design – the twin nacelles for a pair of DB 606s or 610s did reduce drag for such a combat "requirement", but the poor design of the He 177A's engine accommodations for these twin-crankcase "power systems" caused repeated outbreaks of engine fires, causing the "dive bombing" requirement for the He 177A to be cancelled by mid-September 1942.[113]
BMW worked on what was essentially an enlarged version of its highly successful BMW 801 design from the Focke-Wulf Fw 190A. This led to the 53.7-litre displacement BMW 802 in 1943, an eighteen-cylinder air-cooled radial, weighing 1,530 kg (3,370 lb) matching that of the 24-cylinder liquid-cooled inline DB 606; and the even larger, 83.5-litre displacement BMW 803 28-cylinder liquid-cooled radial, which from post-war statements from BMW development personnel were each considered to be "secondary priority" development programmes at best.[citation needed] This situation with the 802 and 803 designs led to the company's engineering personnel being redirected to place all efforts on improving the 801 to develop it to its full potential.[114] The BMW 801F radial development, through its use of features coming from the 801E subtype, was able to substantially exceed the over-1,500 kW output level.[115]
The twinned-up Daimler-Benz DB 601-based, 1,750 kW output DB 606, and its more powerful descendant, the 2,130 kW output DB 605-based DB 610, weighing some 1.5 tonnes apiece, were the only 1,500 kW-plus output level aircraft powerplants to ever be produced by Germany for Luftwaffe combat aircraft, mostly for the Heinkel He 177A heavy bomber. Even the largest-displacement inverted V12 aircraft powerplant built in Germany, the 44.52-litre (2,717 cu. in.) Daimler-Benz DB 603, which saw widespread use in twin-engined designs, could not exceed 1,500 kW output without more development. By March 1940, even the DB 603 was being "twinned-up"[111] as the 601/606 and 605/610 had been, to become their replacement "power system": this was the strictly experimental, approximately 1.8-tonne weight apiece, twin-crankcase DB 613; capable of over 2,570 kW (3,495 PS) output, but which never left its test phase.[citation needed]
The proposed over-1,500 kW output subtypes of German aviation industry's existing piston aviation engine designs—which adhered to using just a single crankcase that were able to substantially exceed the aforementioned over-1,500 kW output level—were the DB 603 LM (1,800 kW at take-off, in production), the DB 603 N (2,205 kW at take-off, planned for 1946) and the BMW 801F (1,765 kW (2,400 PS) engines. The pioneering nature of jet engine technology in the 1940s resulted in numerous development problems for both of Germany's major jet engine designs to see mass production, the Jumo 004 and BMW 003 (both axial flow designs), with the more powerful Heinkel HeS 011 never leaving the test phase.[116]
Personnel and leadership
[edit]The bomber arm was given preference and received the "better" pilots. Later, fighter pilot leaders were few in numbers as a result of this. As with the late shift to fighter production, the Luftwaffe pilot schools did not give the fighter pilot schools preference soon enough. The Luftwaffe, the OKW argued, was still an offensive weapon, and its primary focus was on producing bomber pilots. This attitude prevailed until the second half of 1943.[102] During the Defence of the Reich campaign in 1943 and 1944, there were not enough commissioned fighter pilots and leaders to meet attrition rates;[102] as the need arose to replace aircrew (as attrition rates increased), the quality of pilot training deteriorated rapidly. Later this was made worse by fuel shortages for pilot training caused by the Allied strategic bombing campaign against German oil production. Overall this meant reduced training on operational types, formation flying, gunnery training, and combat training, and a total lack of instrument training.[102]
At the beginning of the war, commanders were replaced with younger commanders too quickly. These younger commanders had to learn "in the field" rather than entering a front-line post fully qualified. Training of formation leaders was not systematic until 1943, which was far too late, with the Luftwaffe already stretched. The Luftwaffe thus lacked a cadre of staff officers to set up new combat units with carefully selected and skilled combat personnel, and pass on experience.[102]
Moreover, Luftwaffe leadership from the start poached the training command, which undermined its ability to replace losses,[63] while also planning for "short sharp campaigns",[117] which did not pertain. Moreover, no plans were laid for night fighters.[117] In fact, when protests were raised, Hans Jeschonnek, Chief of the General Staff of the Luftwaffe, said, "First we've got to beat Russia, then we can start training!"[118]
Luftwaffe ground forces
[edit]The Luftwaffe was unusual among contemporary independent air forces in possessing an organic paratrooper force called Fallschirmjäger. Established in 1938, they were deployed in parachute operations in 1940 and 1941 and participated in the Battle of Fort Eben-Emael and the Battle for The Hague (alongside the German Army's 22nd Air Landing Division) in May 1940, and en masse during the Battle of Crete in May 1941. However, more than 4,000 Fallschirmjäger were killed during the Crete operation.[119] The associated losses of aircraft and the belief that paratroops no longer enjoyed the advantage of surprise led to reduction in airborne operations. Afterwards, although continuing to be trained in parachute delivery, paratroopers were only used in a parachute role for smaller-scale operations, such as the rescue of Benito Mussolini in 1943. Fallschirmjäger formations were mainly used as light infantry in all theatres of the war. Their losses up to February 1945 were 22,041 killed, 57,594 wounded and 44,785 missing.[91]
During 1942 surplus Luftwaffe personnel was used to form Luftwaffe Field Divisions, standard infantry divisions that were used chiefly as rear echelon units to free up front line troops. From 1943, the Luftwaffe also had an armoured division called Fallschirm-Panzer Division 1 Hermann Göring, which was expanded to a Panzerkorps in 1944.[120]
Ground support and combat units from the Reichsarbeitsdienst (RAD), the Luftschutzpolizei (LSP), the National Socialist Flyers Corps (NSFK), and the National Socialist Motor Corps (NSKK) were also put at the Luftwaffe's disposal during the war. In 1942 56 RAD companies served with the Luftwaffe in the West as airfield construction troops. In 1943 420 RAD companies were trained as crews of anti-aircraft artillery (AAA) and posted to existing Luftwaffe AAA battalions in the homeland. At the end of the war, these units were also fighting Allied tanks. Beginning in 1939 with a transport regiment, the NSKK had in 1942 a complete division-sized transportation unit serving the Luftwaffe, the NSKK Transportgruppe Luftwaffe serving in France and at the Eastern front. The overwhelming number of its 12,000 members were Belgian, Dutch, and French collaborators.[121]
War crimes
[edit]Forced labour
[edit]
In 1943 and 1944, aircraft production was moved to concentration camps in order to alleviate labour shortages and to protect production from Allied air raids. The two largest aircraft factories in Germany were located at Mauthausen-Gusen and Mittelbau-Dora concentration camps.[122] Aircraft parts were also manufactured at Flossenbürg, Buchenwald, Dachau, Ravensbrück, Gross-Rosen, Natzweiler, Herzogenbusch, and Neuengamme.[123][124] In 1944 and 1945, as many as 90,000 concentration prisoners worked in the aviation industry, and were about one tenth of the concentration camp population over the winter of 1944–45.[125][N 3] Partly in response to the Luftwaffe's demand for more forced labourers to increase fighter production, the concentration camp more than doubled between mid-1943 (224,000) and mid-1944 (524,000).[134] Part of this increase was due to the deportation of Hungarian Jews; the Jägerstab programme was used to justify the deportations to the Hungarian government. Of the 437,000 Hungarian Jews deported between May and July 1944, about 320,000 were gassed on arrival at Auschwitz and the remainder forced to work. Only 50,000 survived.[135][136]
Almost 1,000 fuselages of the jet fighter Messerschmitt Me 262 were produced at Gusen, a subcamp of Mauthausen and a brutal labour camp,[137][138] where the average life expectancy was six months.[139] By 1944, one-third of production at the crucial Regensburg plant that produced the Bf 109, the backbone of the Luftwaffe fighter arm, originated in Gusen and Flossenbürg alone.[137] Synthetic oil was produced from shale oil deposits by prisoners of Mittlebau-Dora as part of Operation Desert directed by Edmund Geilenberg in order to make up for the decrease in oil production due to Allied bombing. For oil production, three subcamps were constructed and 15,000 prisoners forced to work in the plant. More than 3,500 people died.[140] Vaivara concentration camp in Estonia was also established for shale oil extraction;[141] about 20,000 prisoners worked there and more than 1,500 died at Vaivara.[142]

Luftwaffe airfields were frequently maintained using forced labour. Thousands of inmates from five subcamps of Stutthof worked on the airfields.[143] Airfields and bases near several other concentration camps[N 4] and ghettos[N 5] were constructed or maintained by prisoners. On the orders of the Luftwaffe, prisoners from Buchenwald and Herzogenbusch were forced to defuse bombs that had fallen around Düsseldorf[153] and Leeuwarden respectively.[154]
Thousands of Luftwaffe personnel worked as concentration camp guards. Auschwitz included a munitions factory guarded by Luftwaffe soldiers;[155] 2,700 Luftwaffe personnel worked as guards at Buchenwald.[156] Dozens of camps and subcamps were staffed primarily by Luftwaffe soldiers.[N 6] According to the Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos, it was typical for camps devoted to armaments production to be run by the branch of the Wehrmacht that used the products.[130] In 1944, many Luftwaffe soldiers were transferred to concentration camps to alleviate personnel shortages.[157]
Massacres
[edit]
Luftwaffe paratroopers committed many war crimes in Crete following the Battle of Crete, including the Alikianos executions,[158] the Massacre of Kondomari,[159] and the Razing of Kandanos.[160] Several Luftwaffe divisions, including the 1st Parachute Division,[161] 2nd Parachute Division,[162] 4th Parachute Division,[163] 19th Luftwaffe Field Division,[164] 20th Luftwaffe Field Division[165] and the 1st Fallschirm-Panzer Division,[166] committed war crimes in Italy, murdering hundreds of civilians.
Luftwaffe troops participated in the murder of Jews imprisoned in ghettos in Eastern Europe. For example, they assisted in the murder of 2,680 Jews at the Nemirov ghetto,[167] participated in a series of massacres at the Opoczno ghetto,[168] and helped to liquidate the Dęblin–Irena Ghetto by deporting thousands of Jews to Treblinka extermination camp.[169] Between 1942 and 1944, two Luftwaffe security battalions were stationed in the Białowieża Forest for Bandenbekämpfung[N 7] operations.[170] Encouraged by Göring, they murdered thousands of Jews and other civilians.[171] Luftwaffe soldiers frequently executed Polish civilians at random with baseless accusations of being "Bolshevik agents", in order to keep the population in line,[172] or as reprisal for partisan activities.[173] The performance of the troops was measured by the body count of people murdered.[174] 10,000 Luftwaffe troops were stationed on the Eastern Front for such "anti-partisan" operations.[175]
Human experimentation
[edit]Throughout the war, concentration camp prisoners were forced to serve as human subjects in testing Luftwaffe equipment. Some of these experiments were carried out by Luftwaffe personnel and others were performed by the SS on the orders of the OKL.
In 1941, experiments with the intent of discovering how to prevent and treat hypothermia were carried out for the Luftwaffe, which had lost aircrew to immersion hypothermia after ditchings.[176] The experiments were conducted at Dachau and Auschwitz. Sigmund Rascher, a Luftwaffe[176] doctor based at Dachau, published the results at the 1942 medical conference entitled "Medical Problems Arising from Sea and Winter".[177] Of about 400 prisoners forced to participate in cold-water experiments, 80 to 90 were killed.[176]
In early 1942, prisoners at Dachau were used by Rascher in experiments to perfect ejection seats at high altitudes. A low-pressure chamber containing these prisoners was used to simulate conditions at altitudes of up to 20,000 metres (66,000 ft). It was rumored that Rascher performed vivisections on the brains of victims who survived the initial experiment.[178] Of the 200 subjects, 80 died from the experimentation,[176] and the others were executed.[177] Eugen Hagen, head doctor of the Luftwaffe, infected inmates of Natzweiler concentration camp with typhus in order to test the efficacy of proposed vaccines.[179]
Aerial bombing of non-military targets
[edit]
No positive or specific customary international humanitarian law with respect to aerial warfare existed prior to or during World War II.[180] This is also why no Luftwaffe officers were prosecuted at the post-World War II Allied war crime trials for the aerial raids.[181]
The bombing of Wieluń was an air raid on the Polish town of Wieluń by the Luftwaffe on 1 September 1939. The Luftwaffe started bombing Wieluń at 04:40, five minutes before the shelling of Westerplatte, which has traditionally been considered the beginning of World War II in Europe. The air raid on the town was one of the first aerial bombings of the war.[182] About 1,300 civilians were killed, hundreds were injured, and 90 percent of the town centre was destroyed. The casualty rate was more than twice as high as Guernica.[182] A 1989 Sender Freies Berlin documentary stated that there were no military or industrial targets in the area,[183][184] except for a small sugar factory in the outskirts of the town. Furthermore, Trenkner stated that German bombers first destroyed the town's hospital.[184] Two attempts, in 1978 and 1983, to prosecute individuals for the bombing of the Wieluń hospital were dismissed by West German judges when prosecutors stated that the pilots had been unable to make out the nature of the structure due to fog.[185][186]
Operation Retribution was the April 1941 German bombing of Belgrade, the capital of Yugoslavia. The bombing deliberately targeted the killing of civilians as punishment and resulted in 17,000 civilian deaths.[187] It occurred in the first days of the German-led Axis invasion of Yugoslavia. The operation commenced on 6 April and concluded on 7 or 8 April, resulting in the paralysis of Yugoslav civilian and military command and control, widespread destruction in the centre of the city and many civilian casualties. Following the Yugoslav capitulation, Luftwaffe engineers conducted a bomb damage assessment in Belgrade. The report stated that 218.5 metric tons (215.0 long tons; 240.9 short tons) of bombs were dropped, with 10 to 14 percent being incendiaries. It listed all the targets of the bombing, which included: the royal palace, the war ministry, military headquarters, the central post office, the telegraph office, passenger and goods railway stations, power stations, and barracks. It also mentioned that seven aerial mines were dropped and that areas in the centre and northwest of the city had been destroyed, comprising 20 to 25 percent of its total area. Some aspects of the bombing remain unexplained, particularly the use of aerial mines.[188] In contrast, Pavlowitch states that almost 50 percent of housing in Belgrade was destroyed.[189] After the invasion, the Germans forced between 3,500 and 4,000 Jews to collect rubble that was caused by the bombing.[190]
The biggest attacks at civilian targets occurred in the Battle of Britain when the Luftwaffe attacked the British Isles and primarily hit non military targets. This resulted in over 22,000 civilians being killed and over 30,000 being wounded.
Trials
[edit]Several prominent Luftwaffe commanders were convicted of war crimes, including General Alexander Löhr[191] and Field Marshal Albert Kesselring.[192]
See also
[edit]- Der Adler, Luftwaffe's propaganda magazine
- Emergency Fighter Program
- German Air Fleets in World War II
- List of flags of the Luftwaffe (1933–45)
- List of German aircraft projects, 1939–45
- List of German World War II jet aces
- List of German World War II night fighter aces
- List of Luftwaffe personnel convicted of war crimes
- List of weapons of military aircraft of Germany during World War II
- List of World War II aces from Germany
- List of World War II military aircraft of Germany
- Luftwaffe serviceable aircraft strengths (1940–45)
- Luftnachrichten Abteilung 350 – the Luftwaffe signal intelligence organization
- Military Ranks of the Luftwaffe (1935–45)
- Milch Trial
- Uniforms of the Luftwaffe (1935–45)
References
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Official dissolution of the Wehrmacht, including the Luftwaffe, began with Proclamation No. 2 of the Allied Control Council on 20 September 1945 and was not complete until Order No. 34 of 20 August 1946.[1]
- ^ Luftwaffe is also the generic term in German-speaking countries for any national military aviation service, and the names of air forces in other countries are usually translated into German as "Luftwaffe" (e.g. Royal Air Force is often translated as "britische Luftwaffe").[5] However, Luftstreitkräfte, or "air armed force", is also sometimes used as a translation of "air force" for post-World War I air arms, as it was used as the first word of the official German name of the former East German Air Force. Since German Luft translates into English as "air", and "Waffe" may be translated into English as either "weapon" or "arm", "Air Arm" may be considered the most literal English translation of Luftwaffe (cf. Fleet Air Arm).[6]
- ^ a b In January 1944, Messerschmitt and contractors were using 7564 concentration camp prisoners, Heinkel and subsidiaries employed a further 9724, and Junkers used 1571.[123] Heinkel used forced labor at Mielec[126] and the Mauthausen subcamps Wien-Floridsdorf,[127] Hinterbrühl,[128] and Schwechat.[129] Junkers had factories at Wiener Neudorf (also a subcamp of Mauthausen);[130] and operated factories at Buchenwald subcamps Mühlhausen,[131] Stempeda[132] and Harzungen.[133]
- ^ Buchenwald,[144] Dachau,[145] Flossenbürg,[146] Gross-Rosen,[147] Herzogenbusch,[148] and Hinzert[149]
- ^ Krewo ghetto,[150] Baranowicze ghetto,[151] and Stołpce ghetto[152]
- ^ See Luftwaffe guards at concentration camps for a full list.
- ^ Literally "bandit fighting", the word referred to ethnic cleansing and genocide under the guise of anti-partisan warfare.
Citations
[edit]- ^ "Control Council Law No. 34, Resolution of the Wehrmacht of 20 August 1946" (in German). Archived 30 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine Official Gazette of the Control Council for Germany, 1 May 2004 – 7 June 2004, p. 172.
- ^ "German Military Oaths". Holocaust Encyclopedia.
- ^ Tom Philo. "WWII production figures". Taphilo.com. Archived from the original on 26 March 2017. Retrieved 26 April 2014.
- ^ Jason Pipes (2008). "Statistics and Numbers". Feldgrau.com. Retrieved 26 April 2014.
- ^ "Entry in German dictionary Duden". Archived from the original on 24 February 2016. Retrieved 16 February 2016.
- ^ Stedman 2012, p. 3
- ^ § 198. It begins with the sentence The armed forces of Germany must not include any military or naval air forces.
- ^ § 179
- ^ Fischer 1995, p. 408
- ^ Gesetz für den Aufbau der Wehrmacht 16 March 1935.
- ^ Killen 2003, p. 93
- ^ Blumberg 2014, p. 39
- ^ Stein 1962, pp. 54–71
- ^ Hooton 2007a, p. 30
- ^ Hooton 2007a, p. 31
- ^ Corum 1997, pp. 124–125
- ^ Corum 1997, p. 125
- ^ Corum 1997, p. 127
- ^ Hooton 2010, pp. 20–21
- ^ Murray 1983, p. 1
- ^ a b Corum 1997, p. 129
- ^ Corum 1997, p. 130
- ^ Corum 1997, p. 132
- ^ Corum 1997, p. 133
- ^ Corum 1997, pp. 133–134
- ^ a b c Hooton 2007a, p. 34
- ^ Hooton 2010, p. 28
- ^ a b Corum 1997, p. 7
- ^ Corum 1997, pp. 143–144
- ^ Corum 1997, p. 146
- ^ Corum 1997, p. 143
- ^ Corum 1997, p. 138
- ^ Hooton 2007a, p. 33
- ^ Corum 1997, p. 224
- ^ Griehl & Dressel1998, p. 9.
- ^ Buckley 1998, pp. 85–86
- ^ Corum 1997, p. 225
- ^ Corum 1997, p. 227
- ^ Murray 1983, p. 10
- ^ a b Murray 1983, p. 11
- ^ Overy 1980, p. 31
- ^ Murray 1983, p. 2
- ^ Murray 1983, p. 3
- ^ Homze 1976, p. 125
- ^ Dressel & Griehl 1994, p. 176.
- ^ Bergström 2007, pp. 129–130
- ^ Ketley & Rolfe 1996, p. 3.
- ^ Ketley & Rolfe 1996, p. 7.
- ^ Hooton 2007a, p. 77
- ^ Hooton 2007a, p. 51
- ^ Hooton 2007a, p. 38
- ^ Murray 1983, p. 14
- ^ Griehl & Dressel 1998, p. 53.
- ^ Hooton 2007a, p. 79
- ^ Corum 1997, p. 271
- ^ Hooton 2007a, p. 23
- ^ Hooton 2007a, p. 24
- ^ "Боевые операции люфтваффе", Москва 2008 г., изд. Яуза-пресс, по "Rise and fall of the German Air Force", Лондон 1948 г., пер. П.Смирнов, ISBN 978-5-9955-0028-5
- ^ Who is who in the Third Reich (Кто был кто в Третьем рейхе. Биографический энциклопедический словарь. М., 2003)
- ^ Killen 2003, p. 291
- ^ Killen 2003, p. 300
- ^ a b c d "High Command of the Luftwaffe". feldgrau.com. Retrieved 26 September 2012.
- ^ a b Ketley & Rolfe 1996, p. 4
- ^ a b Zentner 1963, p. 325
- ^ Richhardt 2002, p. 258
- ^ Der Einsatz von Behelfspersonal bei der Flak Archived 21 September 2016 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 September 2016.
- ^ Die Deutsche Luftwaffe in der Ostmark Archived 26 April 2017 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 15 September 2016.
- ^ Neitzel & Weltzer 2012, pp. 57–58
- ^ Hooton 2007b, p. 93
- ^ Hooton 2007b, p. 91
- ^ Buckley 1998, p. 127
- ^ Corum 1997, pp. 274–275
- ^ Corum 1997, pp. 275–277
- ^ Killen 2003, pp. 114–116
- ^ Killen 2003, p. 149
- ^
Stahel, David (2009). Operation Barbarossa and Germany's Defeat in the East. Cambridge Military Histories (reprint ed.). Cambridge University Press (published 2012). p. 301. ISBN 978-0521768474. ISSN 1754-758X. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
In the opening days of Barbarossa the Luftwaffe inflicted carnage on the Soviet air force [...]. One authority put the figure at 4,614 Soviet aircraft destroyed by the end of June, 3,176 of these being eliminated on the ground and 1,438 in the air. By comparison, German losses amounted to just 330 planes.
- ^ Killen 2003, pp. 171–184
- ^ Hawley, Charles (11 February 2005). "Spiegel Interview: 'Dresden Bombing Is To Be Regretted Enormously'". Der Spiegel. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 2 February 2014.
- ^ Dierich 1976, p. 35
- ^ Morgan, Hugh; Weal, John (1998). German Jet Aces of World War 2. Aircraft of the Aces No 17. London: Osprey Publishing. p. 78. ISBN 9781855326347.
- ^ SAF/FMCE, USAF Summaries for 1945–2005, United States Air Force Statistical Digest, 1983
- ^ Г. Ф. Кривошеев, Россия и СССР в войнах XX века – Потери вооруженных сил Статистическое исследование, Москва "Олма-Пресс", 2001, p. 430 (G. F. Krivoseev, Russia and USSR in the XX century wars. Armed forces losses: statistical research, Olma-Press, Moscow, 2001, p. 430)
- ^ E.R. Hooton, Luftwaffe at War – Blitzkrieg in the West: Volume 2, Chevron/Ian Allan, London, 2007 ISBN 978-1-85780-272-6
- ^ John Ellis, World War II: A Statistical Survey: The Essential Facts and Figures for All the Combatants, Facts on File Inc., 1993, p. 259
- ^ Obermaier 1989, p. 241
- ^ Uwe Feist, The Fighting Me 109, Arms and Armour Press, London, 1993, p. 51
- ^ Ager, Philipp; Bursztyn, Leonardo; Leucht, Lukas; Voth, Hans-Joachim (October 2022). "Killer Incentives: Rivalry, Performance and Risk-Taking among German Fighter Pilots, 1939–45". The Review of Economic Studies. 89 (5): 2257–2292. doi:10.1093/restud/rdab085.
- ^ Obermaier 1989, p. 14
- ^ Alessandro Giorgi, Chronology of World War II 1939–1945, 2017
- ^ John Ellis, World War II: A Statistical Survey: The Essential Facts and Figures for All the Combatants, Facts on File Inc., 1993, p. 258
- ^ a b Hahn, Fritz. Waffen und Geheimwaffen des deutschen Heeres 1933–1945. Band I. Infanteriewaffen, Pionierwaffen, Artilleriewaffen, Pulver, Spreng- und Kampfstoffe Koblenz: Bernard & Graefe Verlag, 1986 – ISBN 3-7637-5830-5
- ^ Schramm, Percy E. (21 November 2012). "Die deutschen Verluste im Zweiten Weltkrieg". Die Zeit (in German). Archived from the original on 10 July 2018. Retrieved 1 February 2019.
- ^ Caldwell & Muller 2007, p. 42
- ^ Murray 1983, p. 132
- ^ a b c Caldwell & Muller 2007, p. 46
- ^ Caldwell & Muller 2007, p. 286
- ^ Bergström 2007, p. 118
- ^ Homze 1976, p. 123
- ^ Bergström 2007, p. 108
- ^ a b Corum 1997, p. 282
- ^ Corum 1997, p. 281
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Caldwell & Muller 2007, p. 287
- ^ a b Overy 1980, p. 32
- ^ Overy 1980, p. 33
- ^ a b c Murray 1983, p. 133
- ^ Murray 1983, p. 138
- ^ Murray 1983, p. 139
- ^ a b Murray 1983, pp. 253–255
- ^ founded on the all-metal airframe design technologies pioneered by Hugo Junkers Junkers J 1 in 1915
- ^ Mantelli-Brown- Kittel-Graf 2019 pp. 23–24.
- ^ a b c Griehl & Dressel 1998, p. 224
- ^ von Gersdorff, Kyrill; Schubert, Helmut (2007). Die deutsche Luftfahrt: Flugmotoren und Strahltriebwerke (in German). Bonn: Bernard & Graefe Verlag. ISBN 978-3-7637-6128-9.
- ^ Griehl & Dressel 1998, p. 54
- ^ Fedden, Sir Roy (6 December 1945). "German Piston-Engine Progress". Flight Magazine. London, UK: Flightglobal. p. 603.
- ^ Christopher 2013, pp. 80–81.
- ^ Christopher 2013, p. 74.
- ^ a b Ketley & Rolfe 1996, p. 8
- ^ Ketley & Rolfe 1996, quoted p. 4
- ^ Mayer & Taylor 1974, p. 95
- ^ Williamson, Gordon (2003). The Hermann Göring division. Men At Arms No. 385. illustrated by Stephen Andrew. Oxford: Osprey. ISBN 1-84176-406-X. OCLC 59364241.[page needed]
- ^ Thomas & Caballero Jurado 1992, pp. 4, 13.
- ^ Dobosiewicz 2000, p. 194.
- ^ a b Vajda & Dancey 1998, p. 118.
- ^ Uziel 2011, pp. 180, 185.
- ^ Buggeln 2014, p. 45.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 870.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 958.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 959.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 962.
- ^ a b USHMM 2009, p. 955.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 396.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 999.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 984.
- ^ Buggeln 2014, p. 44.
- ^ Bauer 1994, pp. 155–156.
- ^ Buggeln 2014, pp. 46, 48.
- ^ a b "Messerschmitt GmbH Regensburg". www.mauthausen-memorial.org. Archived from the original on 28 July 2018. Retrieved 28 July 2018.
- ^ Bartrop & Dickerman 2017, p. 427.
- ^ "Gusen". www.ushmm.org. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Archived from the original on 8 July 2018. Retrieved 28 July 2018.
- ^ USHMM 2009, pp. 969, 1012–3.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 1292.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 1294.
- ^ USHMM 2009, pp. 1426, 1479.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 352.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 527.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 652.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 702.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 820.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 834.
- ^ USHMM 2012, p. 1078.
- ^ USHMM 2012, p. 1166.
- ^ USHMM 2012, p. 1288.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 336.
- ^ USHMM 2009, pp. 820–1.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 222.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 291.
- ^ USHMM 2009, pp. 1016–7.
- ^ Westermann, Edward B. (2016). Hitler's Ostkrieg and the Indian Wars: Comparing Genocide and Conquest. University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN 9780806157122.[page needed]
- ^ Neal, Stephan D. Yada-Mc (2018). Places of Shame – German and Bulgarian war crimes in Greece 1941–1945. BoD – Books on Demand. p. 36. ISBN 9783744850735.
- ^ "On This Day June 3, 1941: What Happened to the Cretan Village of Kandanos When its Citizens Defended Their Homes from Invading Nazis? – The Pappas Post". The Pappas Post. 3 June 2018. Archived from the original on 22 August 2018. Retrieved 22 August 2018.
- ^ "1. Fallschirmjäger-Division". Atlante delle Stragi Naziste e Fasciste in Italia (in Italian). Archived from the original on 21 September 2018. Retrieved 20 September 2018.
- ^ "3. Panzer Grenadier Division". Atlante delle Stragi Naziste e Fasciste in Italia (in Italian). Archived from the original on 21 September 2018. Retrieved 20 September 2018.
- ^ "4. Fallschirm-Jäger-Division". Atlante delle Stragi Naziste e Fasciste in Italia (in Italian). Archived from the original on 21 September 2018. Retrieved 20 September 2018.
- ^ "III. Gruppe/Luftwaffe-Artillerie-Regiment 19". Atlante delle Stragi Naziste e Fasciste in Italia (in Italian). Archived from the original on 21 September 2018. Retrieved 20 September 2018.
- ^ "20. Luftwaffe-Feld-Division". Atlante delle Stragi Naziste e Fasciste in Italia (in Italian). Archived from the original on 21 September 2018. Retrieved 20 September 2018.
- ^ "Fallschirm-Panzer-Division "Hermann Goring"". Atlante delle Stragi Naziste e Fasciste in Italia (in Italian). Archived from the original on 21 September 2018. Retrieved 20 September 2018.
- ^ USHMM 2012, p. 1550.
- ^ USHMM 2012, p. 267.
- ^ USHMM 2012, p. 638.
- ^ Blood 2010, p. 249.
- ^ Blood 2010, p. 251, 266.
- ^ Blood 2010, p. 256.
- ^ Blood 2010, p. 262.
- ^ Blood 2010, p. 258.
- ^ Blood 2010, p. 252.
- ^ a b c d USHMM 2009, p. 444.
- ^ a b Tyson, Peter. "Holocaust on Trial: The Experiments." Archived 4 September 2017 at the Wayback Machine NOVA Online. Retrieved: 23 March 2008.
- ^ Cockburn & St. Clair 1999, pp. 149–150.
- ^ USHMM 2009, p. 1005.
- ^ Javier Guisández Gómez (30 June 1998). "The Law of Air Warfare". International Review of the Red Cross (323): 347–363. Archived from the original on 25 April 2013.
- ^ Terror from the Sky: The Bombing of German Cities in World War II. Berghahn Books. 2010. p. 167. ISBN 978-1-8454-5844-7.
- ^ a b Davies, Norman (29 August 2009). "We must not forget the real causes of the war". The Independent. Archived from the original on 26 January 2012. Retrieved 25 February 2010.
- ^ Słomińska, Sylwia. "Wieluń, 1 września 1939 r" (in Polish). Archived from the original on 5 January 2009.
- ^ a b Trenkner, Joachim (29 August 2008). "Wieluń, czwarta czterdzieści" [Wieluń, four forty am] (PDF) (in Polish). Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 March 2012.
file, direct download 67.9 KB
- ^ Trenkner, Joachim (1 September 2009). "Ziel vernichtet" [Target destroyed]. Die Zeit (in German). 2003 (7). Archived from the original on 8 September 2009. Retrieved 4 June 2010.
- ^ Jolly 2010, p. 501.
- ^ Morrow 2014, p. 255.
- ^ Boog, Krebs & Vogel 2006, p. 366.
- ^ Pavlowitch 2007, pp. 17–18.
- ^ Ramet 2006, p. 131.
- ^ Tomasevich 2001, p. 756–757.
- ^ von Lingen 2009, pp. 110–118.
Bibliography
[edit]- Ager, Philipp; Bursztyn, Leonardo; Leucht, Lukas; Voth, Hans-Joachim (October 2022). "Killer Incentives: Rivalry, Performance and Risk-Taking among German Fighter Pilots, 1939–45". The Review of Economic Studies. 89 (5): 2257–2292. doi:10.1093/restud/rdab085.
- Bartrop, Paul R.; Dickerman, Michael (2017). The Holocaust: An Encyclopedia and Document Collection [4 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 9781440840845.
- Bauer, Yehuda (1994). Jews for Sale?: Nazi-Jewish Negotiations, 1933–1945. Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300059137.
- Bekkerm Cajus. Angriffshohe 4000 (in German). Munich, Germany: Heyne, 1964.
- Bergström, Christer (2007), Barbarossa: The Air Battle: July–December 1941, London: Chevron/Ian Allan, ISBN 978-1-85780-270-2
- Bergstrom, Christer. Stalingrad: The Air Battle: November 1942 – February 1943. London: Chevron/Ian Allan, 2008. ISBN 978-1-85780-276-4.
- Bergström, Christer, Kursk: The Air Battle: July 1943. London: Chevron/Ian Allan, 2008. ISBN 978-1-903223-88-8.
- Bergström, Christer and Andrey Mikhailov. Black Cross/Red Star – Vol. 1, Operation Barbarossa 1941. London: Classic Colours, 2003. ISBN 978-0-935553-48-2.
- Bergström, Christer and Martin Pegg. Jagdwaffe: The War in Russia: January–October 1942. London: Classic Colours, 2003. ISBN 1-903223-23-7.
- Blood, Philip W. (2001). Holmes, E. R. (ed.). Bandenbekämpfung: Nazi occupation security in Eastern Europe and Soviet Russia 1942–45 (PhD thesis). Cranfield University.
- Blood, Philip W. (3 August 2010). "Securing Hitler's Lebensraum: The Luftwaffe and Bialowieza Forest, 1942–1944". Holocaust and Genocide Studies. 24 (2): 247–272. doi:10.1093/hgs/dcq024. S2CID 144825154.
- Bowman, Martin and Theo Boiten. Battles with the Luftwaffe: The Air War Over Germany 1942–1945. London: Collins, 2001. ISBN 978-0-00-711363-7.
- Blumberg, Arnold (November 2014). "The First Ground-Pounders". Aviation History. 25 (Aviation History).
- Boog, Horst; Krebs, Gerhard; Vogel, Detlef (2006). Germany and the Second World War: Volume VII: The Strategic Air War in Europe and the War in the West and East Asia, 1943–1944/5. Clarendon Press. ISBN 978-0-19-822889-9.
- Mantelli-Brown- Kittel-Graf (11 February 2019). The Messerschmitt Bf 109. Edizioni R.E.I. France. ISBN 978-2-37297-359-5.
- Buckley, John (1998), Air Power in the Age of Total War, West Midlands, UK: UCL Press, ISBN 978-1-85728-589-5
- Buggeln, Marc (2014). Slave Labor in Nazi Concentration Camps. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780191017643.
- Bungay, Stephen. The Most Dangerous Enemy: A History of the Battle of Britain. London: Aurum Press, 2000.ISBN 1-85410-721-6.
- Caldwell, Donald; Muller, Richard (2007). The Luftwaffe over Germany: Defense of the Reich. London: Greenhill Books. ISBN 978-1-85367-712-0..
- Christopher, John (2013). The Race for Hitler's X-Planes. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire: History Press. ISBN 978-1803995649.
- Cockburn, Alexander; St. Clair, Jeffrey (1999). Whiteout: The CIA, Drugs, and the Press. Brooklyn, New York: Verso. ISBN 978-1-85984-139-6 – via Internet Archive.
- Cooper, Matthew. The German Air Force 1933–1945: An Anatomy of Failure. New York: Jane's Publishing Incorporated, 1981. ISBN 0-531-03733-9.
- Corum, James. "The Luftwaffe's Army Support Doctrine, 1918–1941". The Journal of Military History, Vol. 59, No. 1, January 1995, pp. 53–76.
- Corum, James (1997), The Luftwaffe: Creating the Operational Air War, 1918–1940, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, ISBN 978-0-7006-0836-2
- Corum, James. The Roots of Blitzkrieg: Hans von Seeckt and German Military Reform. Modern War Studies. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. 1992. ISBN 0-7006-0541-X.
- Corum, James F. (Mueller, R. and H.E. Volkmann, eds.). "Staerken und Schwaechen der Luftwaffe". Die Wehrmacht: Mythos und Realitaet (in German). Munich, Germany: Oldenbourg Verlag, 1999.
- Crawford, Steve. Eastern Front, Day by Day. London: Spellmount Publications, 2006. ISBN 1-86227-359-6.
- de Zeng IV, Henry L. and Douglas G. Stankey. Bomber Units of the Luftwaffe 1933–1945: A Reference Source: Volume 1. London: Midland Publishing, 2007. ISBN 978-1-90653-708-1.
- Dierich, Wolfgang (1976). Die Verbände der Luftwaffe: 1935–1945 (in German). Motorbuch-Verlag. ISBN 9783879434374.
- Dobosiewicz, Stanisław (2000). Mauthausen–Gusen; w obronie życia i ludzkiej godności [Mauthausen–Gusen; in defense of life and human dignity] (in Polish). Warsaw: Bellona. ISBN 978-83-11-09048-4.
- Drabkin, Artem.The Red Air Force at War: Barbarossa and the Retreat to Moscow: Recollections of Soviet Fighter Pilots on the Eastern Front. Barnsley, South Yorkshire, UK: Pen & Sword Books, 2007.ISBN 978-1-84415-563-7.
- Dressel, Joachim; Griehl, Manfred (1994). Bombers of the Luftwaffe. London: Arms and Armour:DAG Publications. ISBN 978-1-85409-140-6.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link). - Dye, Peter J. "Logistics in the Battle of Britain". Air Force Journal of Logistics, Winter 2000.
- Faber, Harold. Luftwaffe: An analysis by Former Luftwaffe Generals. London: Sidgwick & Jackson, 1979. ISBN 0-283-98516-X.
- Fischer, Klaus P. (1995). Nazi Germany: A New History. Continuum. ISBN 9780826407979.
- Goss, Chris. Dornier 17 (In Focus). Surrey, UK: Red Kite, 2005. ISBN 0-9546201-4-3.
- Goss, Chris. The Bombers' Battle: Personal Accounts of the Battle of Britain by Luftwaffe Bomber Crews July–October 1940. London: Crécy Publishing, 2000. ISBN 978-0-947554-82-8.
- Griehl, Manfred; Dressel, Joachim (1998). Heinkel He 177 – 277 – 274. Shrewsbury, UK: Airlife Publishing. ISBN 978-1-85310-364-3..
- Hayward, Joel S. Stopped at Stalingrad: The Luftwaffe and Hitler's Defeat in the East 1942–1943. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 2001. ISBN 0-7006-1146-0.
- Hall, Steve and Lionel Quinlan.KG55. Surrey, UK: Red Kite, 2000. ISBN 0-9538061-0-3. photo history of a bomber group
- Hess, William N. B-17 Flying Fortress: Combat and Development History. St. Paul, Minnesota: Motorbook International, 1994. ISBN 0-87938-881-1
- Holmes, Tony. Spitfire vs Bf 109: Battle of Britain. Oxford, UK: Osprey Publishing, 2007. ISBN 978-1-84603-190-8.
- Homze, Edward (1976), Arming the Luftwaffe, Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska, ISBN 978-0-8032-0872-8
- Hooton, E.R. Phoenix Triumphant: The Rise and Rise of the Luftwaffe. London: Brockhampton Press, 1994. ISBN 1-86019-964-X.
- Hooton, E.R. (2010), The Luftwaffe: A Study in Air Power, 1933–1945, London: Classic Publications, ISBN 978-1-906537-18-0
- Hooton, E.R. (2007a), Luftwaffe at War : Volume 1: Gathering Storm 1933–39, London: Chevron/Ian Allan, ISBN 978-1-903223-71-0
- Hooton, E.R. (2007b), Luftwaffe at War Volume 2: Blitzkrieg in the West, London: Chevron/Ian Allan, ISBN 978-1-85780-272-6
- Hooton, E.R. Eagle in Flames: The Fall of the Luftwaffe. London: Weidenfeld Military, 1997. ISBN 978-1-85409-343-1.
- Jolly, Philip (2010). Jewish Wielun – a Polish Shtetl. Philip Jolly. ISBN 9781445287737.[self-published source]
- Ketley, Barry; Rolfe, Mark (1996). Luftwaffe Fledglings, 1935–1945: Luftwaffe Training Units and Their Aircraft. Hikoki. ISBN 9780951989920.
- Killen, John (2003), The Luftwaffe: A History, Barnsley, South Yorkshire: Pen & Sword Books, ISBN 978-0-85052-925-8
- von Lingen, Kerstin (2009). Kesselring's Last Battle: War Crimes Trials and Cold War Politics, 1945–1960. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-1641-1. OCLC 263605489.
- Manrho, John and Ron Putz. Bodenplatte: The Luftwaffe's Last Hope–The Attack on Allied Airfields, New Year's Day 1945. Aldershot, UK: Hikoki Publications, 2004. ISBN 1-902109-40-6.
- Macksey, K. The Memoirs of Field-Marshal Kesselring. London: Greenhill Books, 2006. ISBN 978-1-85367-287-3
- Davin, D M (1974). "the Battle of Crete". In Taylor, A.J.P. (ed.). History of World War II. compiled by Sl Mayer. London: Octopus Books. ISBN 978-0-7064-0399-2.
- Morrow, James D. (2014). Order within Anarchy: The Laws of War as an International Institution. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139992893.
- Murray, Williamson (1983), Strategy for Defeat: The Luftwaffe 1933–1945, Maxwell AFB, Alabama: Air University Press (US Air Force), ISBN 978-1-58566-010-0
- Neitzel, Söhnke. Der Einsatz der Deutschen Luftwaffe über der Nordsee und dem Atlantik: 1939–45 (in German). Bonn, Germany: Bernard & Graefe, 1995. ISBN 978-3-76375-938-5.
- Neitzel, Söhnke; Weltzer, Harald (2012). Soldaten: On Fighting, Killing and Dying: The Secret Second World War Tapes of German POWs. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-1-84983-948-8..
- Obermaier, Ernst (1989). Die Ritterkreuzträger der Luftwaffe Jagdflieger 1939–1945 [The Knight's Cross Bearers of the Luftwaffe Fighter Force 1941–1945] (in German). Mainz, Germany: Verlag Dieter Hoffmann. ISBN 978-3-87341-065-7.
- Overy, Richard (1980). The Air War, 1939–1945. Washington: Potomac Books. ISBN 978-1-57488-716-7.
- Pavlowitch, Stevan K. (2007). Hitler's New Disorder: The Second World War in Yugoslavia. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-1-85065-895-5.
- Pegg, M. Transporter Vol. 1: Luftwaffe Transport Units 1937–1943. London: Classic Publications, 2007. ISBN 978-1-90322-363-5.
- Price, Alfred. The Last Year of the Luftwaffe: May 1944 – May 1945. London: Greenhill Books, 2001. ISBN 978-1-85367-440-2.
- The Rise and Fall of the German Air Force 1933–1945. 1983 [1948].
- Ramet, Sabrina (2006). The Three Yugoslavias: State-Building and Legitimation, 1918–2005. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-34656-8.
- Richhardt, Dirk (2002). Auswahl und Ausbildung junger Offiziere 1930–1945. Philipps–Universität Marburg.
- Ruffner, Kevin. Luftwaffe Field Divisions, 1941–45. Oxford, UK: Osprey, 1997. ISBN 1-85532-100-9
- Scutts, Jerry. Mustang Aces of the Eighth Air Force. Oxford, UK: Osprey Publishing, 1994. ISBN 1-85532-447-4.
- Scutts, Jerry. Bf 109 Aces of North Africa and the Mediterranean. Oxford, UK: Osprey Publishing, 1994. ISBN 1-85532-448-2.
- Smith, Peter. Luftwaffe at War: Defeat in the West 1943–1945 (Luftwaffe at War, Vol. 6). London: Greenhill Books, 1998. ISBN 978-1-85367-318-4.
- Smith, Peter. Luftwaffe at War: The Sea Eagles: The Luftwaffe's Maritime Operations. London: Greenhill Books, 2001. ISBN 978-1-85367-442-6.
- Smith, Peter. Luftwaffe at War: Stukas Over Steppe, Blitzkrieg in the East 1941–1944 (Luftwaffe at War Series, Vol. 9). London: Greenhill Books, 1999. ISBN 978-1-85367-355-9.
- Smith, Peter and E.J. Creek. Kampfflieger: Bombers of the Luftwaffe: 1942–1943. London: Classic Publications, 2004. ISBN 978-1-903223-49-9.
- Stedman, Robert F. (2012). Luftwaffe Air & Ground Crew 1939–45. Men at Arms. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 9781782006855.
- Stein, George H. (March 1962). "Russo-German Military Collaboration: The Last Phase, 1933". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (1): 54–71. doi:10.2307/2146497. JSTOR 2146497.
- Stenman, K. Luftwaffe Over Finland (Luftwaffe at War Series, Vol. 18). London: Greenhill Books, 2002. ISBN 978-1-85367-469-3.
- Thomas, Nigel; Caballero Jurado, Carlos (1992). Wehrmacht Auxiliary Forces. Men At Arms No. 254. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1855322579.
- Tomasevich, Jozo (2001). War and Revolution in Yugoslavia, 1941–1945: Occupation and Collaboration. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-3615-2.
- Tooze, Adam. The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy. London: Allen Lane, 2006. ISBN 0-7139-9566-1.
- Trigg, Jonathan (2024). The Air War through German Eyes. Stroud, Gloucestershire, UK: Amberley Publishing.
- Trigg, Jonathan (2018). The Defeat of the Luftwaffe: The Eastern Front 1941-45: A Strategy for Disaster. Stroud, Gloucestershire, UK: Amberley Publishing.
- USHMM (2009). Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos, 1933–1945. Vol. 1. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. ISBN 978-0-253-35328-3.
- USHMM (2012). Dean, Martin (ed.). Encyclopedia of Camps and Ghettos, 1933–1945. Vol. 2: Ghettoes in German-occupied Eastern Europe. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. ISBN 978-0-253-00202-0.
- "US Strategic Bombing Survey". Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air University Press (US Air Force), 1987. (Reprint of the Summary Reports (Europe and the Pacific) of the strategic bombing surveys conducted near the close of World War II.)
- Uziel, Daniel (2011). Arming the Luftwaffe: The German Aviation Industry in World War II. Jefferson: McFarland. ISBN 9780786488797.
- Vajda, Ferenc A.; Dancey, Peter (1998). German Aircraft Industry and Production, 1933–1945. McFarland. ISBN 9781853108648.
- van Creveld, M., S. Cranby and K. Brower. Airpower and Maneuver Warfare Air. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air University Press (US Air Force), 1994.
- Vasco, John. Zerstorer: Luftwaffe Fighter Bombers and Destroyers 1939–1945: Volume 1. London: Classic Publications, 2005. ISBN 978-1-903223-57-4.
- Zentner, Kurt (1963). Illustrierte Geschichte des Zweiten Weltkrieges [Illustrated history of the Second World War]. Stuttgart/Hamburg: Südwest Verlag.
External links
[edit]- Myths of the Luftwaffe: lecture on YouTube, via the Museum of Flight
- The Nazi German Air Force 1935–1945 (Luftwaffe)
Grokipedia
Luftwaffe
View on GrokipediaOrigins and Pre-War Development
Constraints Under the Treaty of Versailles
The Treaty of Versailles, signed on 28 June 1919, dismantled Germany's military aviation through Articles 198–202 in Part V (Military, Naval and Air Clauses), prohibiting any reconstitution of air forces and mandating the surrender of related assets. These provisions targeted the Luftstreitkräfte, which had comprised over 15,000 aircraft at the armistice, by enforcing total demobilization and material destruction or transfer to the victors.[4][5] Article 198 barred the armed forces of Germany from including any military or naval air forces, permitting only a temporary exception until 1 October 1919 for up to 100 unarmed seaplanes or flying boats for mine-searching, each with one spare engine; dirigibles were entirely forbidden.[4] Article 199 required demobilization of all air force personnel within two months of the Treaty's ratification, limiting retention to 1,000 officers and men for air cadres until the same deadline.[5] By 1926, oversight restricted active aviation personnel to 36 Reichswehr and naval pilots plus 50 police pilots.[5] Article 201 prohibited manufacturing or importing aircraft, engines, or parts within Germany for six months after enforcement.[4] Article 202 compelled delivery of all military and naval aeronautical material—including complete aircraft, dirigibles, engines, armaments, munitions, instruments, and factories—to Allied depots within three months, for allocation as follows: France 30%, Great Britain 30%, United States 15%, Italy 15%, Japan 5%, and Belgium 5%.[5] Article 200 ensured Allied aircraft unrestricted passage, transit, and landing rights over Germany until full troop evacuation.[4] Enforcement fell to the Inter-Allied Commission of Control, which verified compliance and compensated Allies for surrendered assets, such as 9,550,000 gold marks for destroyed dirigibles in 1922; civil aviation resumed under strict limits by February 1922, per the Conference of Ambassadors, but remained subject to definitions distinguishing military from civilian use.[5] These clauses rendered Germany devoid of sovereign aerial military capability, fostering dependence on monitored commercial operations while precluding doctrinal or technological continuity in armed aviation.[5]Rearmament and Doctrinal Foundations (1933–1936)
Upon Adolf Hitler's assumption of power in January 1933, the Nazi regime initiated the rearmament of Germany's air forces, building on clandestine efforts from the Weimar Republic era that had maintained a cadre of aviation experts and civil aviation infrastructure under Treaty of Versailles constraints. Hermann Göring, appointed Prussian Minister of the Interior, leveraged police aviation units to expand capabilities, while the Reich Aviation Ministry was established in May 1933 under Göring to coordinate secret development. By the end of 1935, personnel had grown to approximately 900 flying officers, 200 anti-aircraft officers, and 17,000 enlisted men, supported by an aircraft industry workforce expanding from 4,000 in 1933.[6] [6] The Luftwaffe was formally authorized as the third branch of the Wehrmacht via a secret decree signed by Hitler on February 26, 1935, with Göring designated as Commander-in-Chief; this violated the Versailles Treaty's prohibition on military aviation. Public announcement followed on March 16, 1935, coinciding with the reintroduction of conscription, signaling open defiance of international agreements and prompting limited diplomatic protests from Britain and France. Erhard Milch, as State Secretary, drove industrial mobilization, though resource shortages in synthetic fuels and foreign exchange initially constrained production rates.[1] [7] [6] Doctrinal foundations emphasized a flexible air strategy integrating tactical support for ground forces with capabilities for air superiority and limited strategic operations, as articulated in the 1935 Luftwaffe manual Conduct of the Air War. Walther Wever, appointed Chief of the General Staff in 1933, was instrumental in shaping this approach, advocating bombers not only for close air support but also for strikes against enemy "roots"—industry, transport, and command centers—to achieve decisive effects alongside army advances. Unlike pure strategic bombing theorists like Giulio Douhet, Wever's vision balanced offensive air power with defensive needs and inter-service cooperation, influencing early procurement priorities for multi-role bombers over specialized long-range heavies.[6] [8] [6] Göring's political oversight prioritized rapid numerical expansion and morale over rigorous strategic planning, while Wever's untimely death in a June 1936 plane crash left doctrinal evolution to subordinates like Albert Kesselring, who reinforced tactical emphases suited to Germany's resource limitations and blitzkrieg concepts. This period laid the groundwork for a force focused on short-range operations supporting mechanized warfare, reflecting causal priorities of achieving local air dominance to enable ground breakthroughs rather than independent strategic campaigns.[9] [8]Leadership Shifts and Tactical Focus (1936–1939)
Walther Wever served as Chief of the General Staff of the Luftwaffe from September 1935 until his death in a plane crash on June 3, 1936, during which time he advocated for a balanced air power doctrine incorporating strategic bombing capabilities through development of four-engine heavy bombers such as the Dornier Do 19 and Junkers Ju 89.[6][9] His untimely death removed the primary proponent of independent strategic air operations, leading to a leadership vacuum that facilitated shifts toward tactical priorities.[6][9] Albert Kesselring succeeded Wever as Chief of Staff immediately on June 3, 1936, overseeing Luftwaffe expansion but facing internal conflicts with State Secretary Erhard Milch, resulting in his replacement within approximately one year by Hans-Jürgen Stumpff in 1937.[6] Stumpff held the position until early 1939, when Hans Jeschonnek was appointed in February, marking frequent turnover that reflected Hermann Göring's inconsistent management and lack of a unifying strategic vision.[6][9] Concurrently, Ernst Udet, a World War I ace, was appointed head of the Luftwaffe's technical departments in 1936, rising to Director of the Technical Office by 1938 and exerting significant influence over procurement and development.[9] The doctrinal emphasis post-Wever pivoted from strategic independence to tactical integration with ground forces, driven by lessons from the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939) where units under Wolfram von Richthofen demonstrated the efficacy of close air support and dive bombing.[6] Udet's advocacy amplified this trend, prioritizing dive bombers like the Junkers Ju 87 Stuka for precision strikes and fast medium bombers for battlefield interdiction, while strategic heavy bomber programs were curtailed due to technical delays, resource constraints, and a reorientation toward short-range aircraft suited to Blitzkrieg operations.[9] By 1939, Luftwaffe regulations codified this tactical focus, emphasizing army cooperation over independent long-range bombing campaigns, a shift causal to production inefficiencies and limited industrial capacity for heavy bombers.[6][9]Organizational Structure
Command Hierarchy and Key Commanders
The Luftwaffe's command hierarchy placed Hermann Göring as Oberbefehlshaber der Luftwaffe (Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force) from the service's official establishment on 26 February 1935 until his dismissal on 23 April 1945, with direct subordination to Adolf Hitler as Supreme Commander of the Wehrmacht.[10] [11] Göring also served as Reich Minister of Aviation, overseeing the Reich Air Ministry (Reichsluftfahrtministerium, RLM), which handled administrative, procurement, and technical functions alongside the operational Oberkommando der Luftwaffe (OKL).[12] Erhard Milch, appointed State Secretary in the RLM on 17 November 1933 and promoted to Generalfeldmarschall in 1940, acted as Göring's deputy for production and organization, effectively managing day-to-day operations due to Göring's frequent absences and morphine addiction.[12] The OKL's General Staff, responsible for planning and operations, was led by a series of Chiefs of the General Staff: Walther Wever from 1 March 1935 until his death in an air crash on 3 June 1936; Hans-Jürgen Stumpff from 1 June 1937 to 31 January 1939; Hans Jeschonnek from 1 February 1939 until his suicide on 18 August 1943 amid mounting defeats; and Karl Koller from 31 January 1944 to war's end on 8 May 1945.[12] Ernst Udet, head of the Technical Office from 1936 and promoted to General der Luftwaffe, influenced procurement toward tactical dive-bombers over strategic capabilities, contributing to doctrinal imbalances until his suicide on 17 November 1941.[12] Operational command was decentralized into Luftflotten (air fleets), each assigned to theaters: for instance, Luftflotte 1 under Hans Geisler and then Alfred Keller in the North; Luftflotte 2 under Albert Kesselring during the Battle of France and Britain; Luftflotte 3 under Hugo Sperrle; and later commands like Alexander Löhr's Luftflotte 4 in the Balkans and East.[13] [12] Kesselring, promoted to Generalfeldmarschall in 1940, exemplified field commanders who adapted close air support tactics effectively in early campaigns but faced resource shortages later.[14] In the final weeks, following Göring's removal for alleged disloyalty, Robert Ritter von Greim was appointed Oberbefehlshaber on 26 April 1945, tasked with desperate defense against Allied advances, but he surrendered on 8 May 1945 after minimal impact.[11] This succession highlighted the Luftwaffe's collapse, with command fractured by Hitler's direct interventions and personnel losses exceeding 100,000 pilots by 1945.[12]Personnel Recruitment, Training, and Elite Units
The Luftwaffe recruited personnel primarily through a combination of mandatory national service and voluntary applications, with aircrew roles attracting motivated volunteers amid general conscription for ground support staff. Young men typically entered via the Reich Labour Service, followed by Luftwaffe-specific induction at replacement units (Flieger-Ersatz-Abteilungen), where initial screening assessed physical fitness, aptitude, and ideological alignment.[15][16] Selection for pilot or observer roles involved a rigorous three-day process including motor skills tests, psychological evaluations, and leadership simulations, reassigning failures to technical or ground duties; pre-war expansion drew heavily from World War I veterans to staff early units.[16] By 1939, annual intake exceeded 100,000 recruits, but wartime demands shifted toward broader conscription, diluting volunteer quality.[2] Training commenced with 8 weeks of basic military instruction in Fliegerausbildungsdivisions, emphasizing discipline and technical orientation, before branching into specialized paths.[17] Aspiring pilots underwent 6-12 months of ground school and elementary flight training at Flugzeugführerschulen (FFS), earning A/B licenses on gliders and primary aircraft like the Bü 131, progressing to advanced single-engine (FFS A) or multi-engine (FFS B/C) instruction with 50-60 hours of instrument flying for bomber crews.[15][18] Operational conversion occurred at Ergänzungstaffeln attached to combat Geschwader, simulating tactics; pre-1942 programs lasted 13-20 months with 200+ flight hours, but by 1944, shortages reduced this to 160 hours or less, prioritizing quantity over proficiency and contributing to elevated attrition rates exceeding 80% for new pilots.[19] Non-flying personnel, including mechanics and radio operators, received vocational training at Luftnachrichtenschulen or technical schools, often lasting 3-6 months.[15] Elite units drew top performers from standard pipelines, with fighter wings (Jagdgeschwader) selecting experienced pilots for high-threat theaters. Jagdgeschwader 52, operating exclusively Bf 109s, amassed over 10,000 victories on the Eastern Front, led by aces like Erich Hartmann (352 kills), establishing it as the Luftwaffe's most prolific fighter unit.[20] Similarly, JG 27 excelled in North Africa with pilots like Hans-Joachim Marseille (158 kills), while JG 26 under Adolf Galland defended the Channel coast as an "elite" formation dubbed the "Abbeville Boys" for its tenacity against RAF raids.[21] These units prioritized combat veterans for instruction, fostering tactical innovation but suffering irreplaceable losses by 1943. The Fallschirmjäger paratrooper regiments, Luftwaffe-controlled shock troops, recruited volunteers from airborne-qualified personnel via selective calls, undergoing 3 months of intensified infantry drills plus 16-day parachute courses at schools like Stendal, enabling rapid assaults as in Crete (1941).[22] Their elite status derived from superior equipment and versatility, though post-1941 they increasingly fought as elite infantry due to operational constraints.[23]Technological and Production Aspects
Aircraft Development and Major Types
Aircraft development for the Luftwaffe commenced clandestinely during the Weimar Republic, with firms like Junkers and Heinkel designing military prototypes disguised as civilian or sporting aircraft to evade Treaty of Versailles prohibitions on armed aviation.[24] Following the Nazi seizure of power in January 1933, the Reich Air Ministry (RLM) under Hermann Göring formalized rearmament efforts, establishing the Technisches Amt to issue performance specifications for fighters, bombers, and other types.[6] By 1935, when the Luftwaffe's existence was publicly revealed, prototypes such as the Messerschmitt Bf 109 fighter and Heinkel He 111 bomber had already undergone initial testing, enabling rapid expansion to over 4,000 combat aircraft by September 1939.[25] The RLM's procurement process emphasized tactical aircraft suited to close air support and battlefield interdiction, influenced by early doctrinal writings from General Walther Wever advocating a balanced force including strategic bombers, though his death in a crash on June 3, 1936, shifted priorities toward dive bombing under Ernst Udet's leadership of the Technisches Amt from 1936.[9] Engine development lagged, with reliance on liquid-cooled inline engines like the Daimler-Benz DB 601 constraining designs due to protracted lead times, while radial engines powered later fighters such as the Focke-Wulf Fw 190 introduced in 1941.[9] Production scaled dramatically during the war, peaking at 40,593 aircraft in 1944, but dispersed manufacturing and Allied bombing increasingly hampered quality and output efficiency.[26] Major Luftwaffe aircraft types encompassed fighters, bombers, ground-attack planes, and reconnaissance models, with Messerschmitt, Junkers, and Heinkel dominating production. The Bf 109 served as the primary single-engine fighter, achieving first flight on May 29, 1935, and totaling 33,984 units built, equipping Jagdgeschwader throughout the war.[27] The Fw 190, entering service in June 1941, introduced superior speed and firepower with 20,000+ produced, bolstering defenses against Allied bombers.[28]| Aircraft | Manufacturer | Role | First Flight | Production (approx.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bf 109 | Messerschmitt | Fighter | 1935 | 33,984[27] |
| Fw 190 | Focke-Wulf | Fighter/Ground-attack | 1939 | 20,000+[28] |
| Ju 87 | Junkers | Dive bomber | 1935 | 6,500[27] |
| He 111 | Heinkel | Medium bomber | 1935 | 7,300[27] |
| Ju 88 | Junkers | Multirole bomber | 1936 | 15,000+[28] |
| He 177 | Heinkel | Heavy bomber | 1939 | 1,169[27] |
Engine, Manufacturing, and Late-War Innovations
The Luftwaffe relied primarily on liquid-cooled inverted V-12 engines from Daimler-Benz and Junkers for its fighters and bombers during the early war years. The Daimler-Benz DB 601, introduced in 1937, delivered approximately 1,100 horsepower at takeoff and powered aircraft such as the Messerschmitt Bf 109, with later variants like the DB 605 reaching up to 1,475 horsepower through supercharger and fuel injection improvements.[29] Junkers Jumo 211 engines, also inverted V-12s producing around 1,200 horsepower, equipped dive bombers like the Ju 87 Stuka and medium bombers such as the Ju 88, offering reliable performance for tactical operations.[30] Radial engines, including the BMW 801 with outputs exceeding 1,700 horsepower, were used in the Focke-Wulf Fw 190 fighter, providing robustness against battle damage.[31] Aircraft manufacturing expanded rapidly under Nazi rearmament, with the industry workforce growing from 4,000 in 1933 to over 200,000 by 1939, centered on firms like Messerschmitt, Focke-Wulf, and Junkers.[32] Production peaked in 1944 at approximately 40,000 aircraft, nearly double the 1943 output, achieved through factory dispersion to underground sites and rationalization under committees like the Jägerstab, despite Allied bombing campaigns.[33] This surge depended heavily on forced labor, including concentration camp prisoners deployed in Messerschmitt and BMW facilities, where workers endured up to 12-hour shifts under brutal conditions to sustain output.[34][35] Late-war innovations shifted toward jet propulsion and guided munitions to counter numerical inferiority. The Junkers Jumo 004 turbojet, the first mass-produced axial-flow jet engine, powered the Messerschmitt Me 262, which entered limited production in April 1944 with about 1,400 units built before war's end, achieving speeds over 540 mph but hampered by fuel shortages and engine reliability issues.[36][37] The V-1 flying bomb, a pulsejet-powered cruise missile developed under Luftwaffe oversight, saw over 30,000 produced from mid-1944, launched against London and Antwerp to impose terror and divert resources, though interception rates exceeded 70 percent.[38] Radio-guided glide bombs like the Henschel Hs 293 and Ruhrstahl Fritz X, deployed from 1943, demonstrated precision strikes against ships, sinking vessels such as the Italian battleship Roma on September 9, 1943.[39] These advancements, while technologically advanced, arrived too late and in insufficient quantities to alter the war's outcome.Pre-War Operations and Testing
Intervention in the Spanish Civil War
The Luftwaffe's intervention in the Spanish Civil War began shortly after the conflict erupted on July 17, 1936, with Germany providing air support to Nationalist forces led by General Francisco Franco under the framework of Operation Feuerzauber.[40] Initial deployments included Junkers Ju 52 transport aircraft for troop and supply transport, escorted by Heinkel He 51 biplane fighters, marking the first combat use of these machines.[40] By November 1936, the Condor Legion was formally established as a self-contained unit comprising approximately 6,000 personnel at its peak, including four bomber squadrons of 12 aircraft each, four fighter squadrons, anti-aircraft batteries, and reconnaissance elements.[41] [42] Key aircraft tested included the Heinkel He 111 medium bomber, Junkers Ju 87 Stuka dive bomber, Henschel Hs 123 dive bomber, and Messerschmitt Bf 109 fighter, which progressively replaced earlier models like the He 51 after demonstrating vulnerabilities in dogfights against Soviet-supplied Polikarpov I-16s.[43] The Legion conducted close air support operations, emphasizing coordinated strikes with ground forces to achieve breakthroughs, as seen in the July 1937 Brunete offensive where synchronized attacks disrupted Republican advances.[40] A notable action was the April 26, 1937, bombing of Guernica, where Condor Legion He 111s and Ju 52s dropped around 31 tons of high-explosive and incendiary bombs over three hours to interdict retreating Basque troops and destroy a key bridge, resulting in extensive destruction and civilian casualties amid the town's military significance as a logistical hub.[44] [45] Throughout the war, ending with Nationalist victory in March 1939, the Condor Legion flew over 20,000 sorties, claiming destruction of 320 Republican aircraft in aerial combat and 52 via anti-aircraft fire, while suffering 298 German fatalities, including 102 aircrew.[46] These operations validated the Luftwaffe's emphasis on tactical air power, including dive bombing for precision strikes and fighter sweeps for air superiority, refining doctrines like the "finger-four" formation pioneered by pilots such as Werner Mölders to enhance situational awareness in combat.[47] The experience exposed limitations in bomber vulnerability without escorts and the need for improved ground-attack resilience, informing pre-World War II rearmament by prioritizing versatile, protected designs over pure strategic bombing.[48] [43]Annexations and Border Conflicts (1938–1939)
The Luftwaffe played a supporting role in the Anschluss of Austria on March 12, 1938, providing air cover for advancing Wehrmacht ground forces and conducting demonstrative flyovers to intimidate potential resistance and signal German air superiority. Squadrons of Dornier Do 17 bombers flew in formation over Vienna shortly after Adolf Hitler's arrival, reinforcing the psychological impact of the occupation amid minimal opposition from Austrian forces. Hermann Göring, as Luftwaffe commander, coordinated these efforts alongside his political pressure on Austrian Chancellor Kurt Schuschnigg, though no combat operations occurred due to the bloodless nature of the annexation.[49] During the Sudetenland crisis leading to the Munich Agreement on September 30, 1938, the Luftwaffe contributed to German coercive diplomacy by massing aircraft along the Czech border, highlighting deficiencies in strategic bombing capabilities but projecting tactical dominance to pressure Czechoslovakia and its allies. German forces, including Luftwaffe units, occupied the Sudetenland starting October 1, 1938, without aerial engagements, as the agreement ceded the territory peacefully; reconnaissance flights and troop transports underscored air power's role in facilitating rapid ground advances. The crisis exposed Luftwaffe limitations in long-range operations, influencing subsequent doctrinal shifts toward tactical support.[50] In the occupation of the remaining Czech territories on March 15, 1939, establishing the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, the Luftwaffe positioned squadrons around key areas, prepared to execute devastating raids on Prague and other cities if Czech resistance materialized, as reported by French diplomatic observations. This threat deterred mobilization of the Czechoslovak air force, which numbered around 600 aircraft but lacked parity; German troops entered without firing shots, supported by Luftwaffe logistics and airborne readiness, though paratrooper drops were ultimately unnecessary. Border tensions, including Hungarian advances into Carpatho-Ukraine in March 1939, saw no direct Luftwaffe combat involvement, as German policy favored partition without escalation.[51][52]World War II Campaigns
Polish Campaign and Phoney War (1939)
The Luftwaffe commenced operations against Poland on 1 September 1939 with coordinated preemptive strikes on airfields, destroying numerous Polish aircraft on the ground and rapidly attaining air superiority. Nearly 2,000 aircraft participated, including approximately 1,000 bombers divided between missions to neutralize the Polish Air Force and provide tactical support to advancing German armies. The Polish Air Force, numbering fewer than 800 combat-ready aircraft at the outset, suffered 333 losses in combat during the campaign.[53] Dive-bombing attacks by Junkers Ju 87 Stukas proved decisive in disrupting Polish defenses and facilitating breakthroughs by Army Groups North and South, targeting troop concentrations, bridges, and supply lines. In the campaign's opening week, Polish fighters claimed 105 Luftwaffe aircraft downed while losing 79 of their own, though overall German losses reached 258 to all causes out of the committed force. By mid-September, surviving Polish aviation operated from improvised bases, but sustained Luftwaffe pressure, including intensified raids on Warsaw starting around 15 September and peaking on 25 September with over 400 bombers and Stukas, compelled the city's surrender on 27 September after inflicting heavy damage on military and civilian infrastructure.[54][55][53] After Poland's capitulation in early October 1939, the Luftwaffe redeployed significant elements to the Western Front amid the Phoney War, a period of relative quiescence until May 1940. Activities remained subdued, centered on reconnaissance flights over France and the Low Countries to gather intelligence on Allied dispositions, alongside sporadic propaganda leaflet drops and naval mine-laying in the North Sea. Encounters with RAF and Armée de l'Air patrols led to limited aerial clashes, with Luftwaffe Bf 109 fighters incurring 36 losses in dogfights—resulting in 16 pilots killed and 10 captured—and 6 additional aircraft to anti-aircraft fire. This interlude enabled repairs, pilot training, and logistical buildup without major attrition.[56][57]Battle of France and Low Countries (1940)
The Luftwaffe played a pivotal role in the German invasion of France and the Low Countries, codenamed Fall Gelb, which commenced on May 10, 1940, by securing air superiority and providing close air support to advancing ground forces. Under the overall command of Hermann Göring, Luftflotte 2 led by Albert Kesselring operated in the north, targeting the Low Countries and northern France, while Luftflotte 3 under Hugo Sperrle focused on central sectors. Approximately 4,000 aircraft were committed to the campaign, enabling rapid disruption of Allied communications and destruction of enemy air forces on the ground during initial strikes on airfields in Belgium, the Netherlands, and France.[58][59] Early operations emphasized fighter sweeps by Messerschmitt Bf 109s to neutralize Allied fighters, achieving dominance within days as Dutch, Belgian, and significant portions of French and British Expeditionary Force (BEF) aircraft were destroyed or dispersed. In the Low Countries, Luftwaffe bombers targeted key infrastructure, including the devastating raid on Rotterdam on May 14, which compelled Dutch surrender, while Stuka dive-bombers supported paratroop operations and breakthroughs. By mid-May, the Luftwaffe had crippled Allied air resistance, with French losses exceeding 1,200 aircraft and RAF commitments in France suffering heavy attrition, allowing unhindered tactical operations.[58][60] The Junkers Ju 87 Stuka proved highly effective in close air support, particularly during the Ardennes offensive, where its precision dive-bombing halted French counterattacks and decimated armored columns, contributing causally to the collapse of the Allied front. Stukas operated with minimal opposition initially, inflicting severe damage on retreating forces amid refugee chaos, though vulnerability to fighters emerged later. This tactical integration with panzer spearheads exemplified Blitzkrieg doctrine, accelerating the encirclement of Allied armies.[58][61] In the campaign's closing phase, Luftwaffe efforts focused on the Dunkirk pocket from May 26 to June 4, but adverse weather and intensified RAF fighter cover limited effectiveness despite heavy bombing sorties. Overall, the Luftwaffe lost about 1,100 aircraft to enemy action and 300 to accidents, representing 28% of frontline strength, yet this toll was offset by the destruction of over 2,000 Allied planes and the attainment of operational freedom over Western Europe. The campaign's success validated Luftwaffe emphasis on tactical air power but highlighted limitations in sustained strategic bombing capacity.[58][59][60]Battle of Britain (1940)
The Luftwaffe's involvement in the Battle of Britain commenced in July 1940, following the fall of France, with the objective of securing air superiority over southern England to enable Operation Sea Lion, the planned invasion of Britain.[10] Under Hermann Göring's command, three Luftflotten—primarily Luftflotte 2 from bases in northern France and the Low Countries, supported by Luftflotten 3 and 5—deployed approximately 2,550 aircraft, including around 780 Messerschmitt Bf 109 fighters, 240 Bf 110 heavy fighters, and medium bombers such as Heinkel He 111s, Dornier Do 17s, and Junkers Ju 88s.[62] The strategy emphasized daylight bombing raids escorted by fighters to attrit Royal Air Force (RAF) Fighter Command, drawing on tactical successes from the Blitzkrieg campaigns but lacking sufficient long-range bombers or heavy escort capabilities for sustained operations over enemy territory.[63] The initial phase, known as the Kanalkampf or Channel Battle from early July to mid-August, targeted British shipping convoys and coastal ports to provoke RAF interception and test defenses.[64] These operations inflicted losses on merchant vessels but yielded high Luftwaffe attrition, with Bf 109 pilots limited to 10-15 minutes of combat time over England due to fuel constraints and the need to escort bombers across the Channel.[65] On August 13, "Adlertag" (Eagle Day) marked the escalation to direct attacks on RAF airfields, radar stations, and infrastructure, involving massed formations of up to 1,000 aircraft daily, though poor weather and coordination issues reduced effectiveness.[10] By late August, intensified raids on sector airfields and command centers, including operations like the Hardest Day on August 18 when 69 Luftwaffe aircraft were lost, strained RAF resources but failed to dismantle Fighter Command's integrated radar-directed defenses.[63] A critical strategic error occurred on September 7, when Göring redirected efforts from airfields to bombing London, prompted by a minor RAF raid on Berlin, allowing RAF recovery and relieving pressure on operational bases.[63] This shift initiated the Blitz, with large-scale daylight and subsequent night raids on cities using pathfinder techniques, but it prioritized terror bombing over military targets, yielding limited disruption to RAF operations.[64] The Luftwaffe's Bf 110 proved vulnerable as a long-range escort, suffering heavy losses, while inadequate reconnaissance underestimated RAF pilot reserves and production rates, which outpaced German replacements.[65] By mid-September, unsustainable losses—totaling 1,887 aircraft, including 650 Bf 109s and 223 Bf 110s—coupled with over 2,500 aircrew casualties, eroded Luftwaffe combat effectiveness, as experienced pilots could not be rapidly retrained to match RAF standards.[63][66] Hitler postponed Sea Lion on September 17, effectively conceding air superiority denial, though night Blitz continued into 1941 without altering the strategic impasse.[63] The failure stemmed from doctrinal emphasis on tactical support rather than strategic interdiction, range limitations, and Göring's overconfidence in quick victory, as evidenced by flawed directives ignoring logistical strains across the Channel.[65]Operation Barbarossa and Eastern Front (1941–1943)
Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union, commenced on June 22, 1941, with the Luftwaffe deploying approximately 2,500 combat aircraft across three air fleets supporting Army Groups North, Center, and South.[67] In the opening strikes, Luftwaffe forces destroyed around 1,800 to 2,000 Soviet aircraft, predominantly on the ground, securing air superiority within days and enabling effective close air support for advancing panzer groups.[68] [67] Soviet archival records indicate 3,922 aircraft lost in the first three days against roughly 78 German losses, highlighting the surprise and tactical edge of preemptive airfield attacks.[69] Throughout 1941, the Luftwaffe maintained dominance, conducting thousands of sorties for interdiction, reconnaissance, and ground attack, which facilitated rapid encirclements like those at Minsk and Kiev, where Soviet forces suffered massive losses.[70] However, operational strains emerged from the theater's vast distances, inadequate forward airfields, and logistical overextension, compounded by the redirection of some assets to the Mediterranean.[67] By December 1941, harsh winter conditions and intensified Soviet resistance halted advances toward Moscow, with Luftwaffe losses accumulating despite initial low rates; overall strength had declined to 30-40% of pre-Barbarossa levels across all fronts due to attrition and maintenance issues.[71] In 1942, during Operation Blue toward the Caucasus and Stalingrad, Luftwaffe units provided critical but increasingly strained support, with dive bombers and fighters contesting growing Soviet air forces rebuilt through relocated industry.[72] At Stalingrad, following the encirclement of the German Sixth Army in November, the Luftwaffe attempted an airlift to supply 300 tons daily but delivered only about 8,350 tons total over two months amid heavy flak, weather, and Soviet intercepts, resulting in over 200 transport aircraft lost and contributing to the army's surrender.[73] This failure exacerbated pilot shortages and equipment wear, as Eastern Front losses constituted roughly 24% of total Luftwaffe aircraft attrition by mid-war.[74] By early 1943, sustained combat had eroded Luftwaffe numerical and qualitative advantages, with Soviet production outpacing German replacements and enabling VVS challenges to air superiority, setting the stage for defensive operations.[75] German fighter Geschwader experienced steady attrition of 2-3 aircraft monthly per unit, while overall commitments remained at 21-24% of day fighters despite rising demands.[75] [76] The shift reflected systemic overcommitment, as the Luftwaffe prioritized tactical roles over strategic reserves, limiting adaptability to the protracted ground war.[70]Mediterranean and North African Theaters (1941–1943)
In January 1941, Fliegerkorps X, comprising approximately 200 bombers and fighters, was transferred from Norway to Sicily to target British naval forces in the Mediterranean and neutralize the island of Malta as a staging base for Allied operations.[77] On 10 January 1941, during British Operation Excess to reinforce Malta and Greece, Ju 87 Stuka dive bombers and Ju 88 medium bombers from Fliegerkorps X attacked the aircraft carrier HMS Illustrious, inflicting severe damage with multiple bomb hits that crippled her flight operations and forced extensive repairs.[78] These anti-shipping strikes disrupted Allied convoys and demonstrated the Luftwaffe's tactical effectiveness in coastal interdiction, though sustained naval superiority eluded Axis forces due to limited resources allocated to this peripheral theater.[77] Following the arrival of Erwin Rommel's Afrika Korps in Libya on 14 February 1941, Luftwaffe units extended operations to North Africa, providing reconnaissance, close air support, and interdiction against British supply lines.[77] Stuka dive bombers played a pivotal role in ground offensives, such as the rapid advance to Tobruk in April-May 1941, where precise strikes supported the encirclement and capture of Allied positions.[79] In the broader campaign, Luftwaffe aircraft contested air superiority over the desert, pinning down Commonwealth forces during Rommel's 1942 push toward Egypt, though logistical constraints from overextended supply chains hampered continuous operations.[80] The siege of Malta intensified in 1942, with Luftwaffe forces mounting large-scale bombing campaigns from January to April, deploying 462 aircraft—including three bomber Geschwader (eight Gruppen), two Stuka Gruppen, and two fighter Geschwader (five Gruppen)—to drop 8,400 tons of bombs, destroying 251 enemy aircraft while sustaining only 60 losses.[79] This effort temporarily suppressed Malta's offensive capacity, facilitating Axis convoys to North Africa, but by mid-1942, reinforced British fighters like the Spitfire eroded German advantages, compelling a shift to night operations.[79] In May 1942, during the capture of Tobruk, around 1,500 Luftwaffe sorties supported ground forces, contributing to the taking of 30,000 prisoners at the cost of minimal German air losses initially.[79] As Allied Operation Torch commenced on 8 November 1942 with landings in Morocco and Algeria, Luftwaffe commitments escalated under Luftflotte II and Fliegerkorps II, but overstretched forces suffered heavy attrition; for instance, Fliegerkorps II lost 320 of 577 aircraft in November-December 1942 amid intensified Allied air opposition.[79] By early 1943, in the Tunisian campaign, German air units provided defensive cover for retreating Axis armies, employing fighters like the Bf 109 and bombers for interdiction, yet Allied numerical superiority—bolstered by U.S. and British reinforcements—led to the evacuation of remaining Luftwaffe strength by May 1943, marking the theater's loss.[77] Throughout, the Luftwaffe's operations highlighted tactical prowess in close support and anti-shipping roles but were undermined by divided commitments, with the majority of forces (up to 65% or 2,770 aircraft by spring 1943) prioritized for the Eastern Front, preventing decisive dominance in the Mediterranean.[77]Defense Against Allied Bombing and Late-War Offensives (1943–1945)
By mid-1943, following defeats at Stalingrad and in North Africa, the Luftwaffe reoriented its dwindling resources toward Reichsverteidigung, the defense of German airspace against intensifying Allied strategic bombing. The United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) and Royal Air Force (RAF) escalated daylight and night raids, targeting industrial centers like the Ruhr Valley and ball-bearing plants at Schweinfurt. On August 17, 1943, during the Regensburg-Schweinfurt mission, Luftwaffe fighters intercepted 376 USAAF bombers, contributing to the loss of 60 B-17s and severe damage to production facilities, though at the cost of heavy German fighter attrition. The subsequent Schweinfurt raid on October 14, 1943—known as "Black Thursday"—saw Luftwaffe defenses claim 60 of 291 attacking bombers, with 138 fighters lost in return, temporarily halting USAAF deep-penetration raids without long-range escorts.[81][82] This defensive focus relied on upgraded piston-engine fighters like the Messerschmitt Bf 109 and Focke-Wulf Fw 190, organized into Jagdgeschwader (fighter wings) employing hit-and-run tactics to exploit numerical inferiority. However, fuel shortages, inadequate pilot training—reducing flight hours from 200 to under 50—and Allied long-range escorts like the P-51 Mustang eroded effectiveness; by late 1943, Luftwaffe fighter strength had fallen to around 2,000 operational aircraft, facing over 10,000 Allied bombers and escorts. The RAF's night bombing campaign, peaking with the March 1943 raid on Essen that destroyed 75% of the city center using area bombing, faced lighter opposition due to radar-directed night fighters like the Bf 110, but cumulative losses mounted without decisively stemming production declines. Allied "Big Week" operations from February 20–25, 1944, targeted German aircraft factories, destroying over 600 Luftwaffe fighters on the ground and in air, representing about one-third of the fighter force and marking a pivotal shift toward unchallenged Allied air superiority.[83] Technological innovations offered temporary respite but arrived too late for systemic impact. The Messerschmitt Me 262, the world's first operational jet fighter, entered combat in July 1944 with superior speed exceeding 540 mph and 30 mm cannons, enabling units like Jagdverband 44 to down over 500 Allied aircraft by war's end. On March 18, 1945, 37 Me 262s from JG 7 intercepted a formation of 1,221 USAAF bombers, claiming multiple kills despite minimal losses in that engagement. Yet production delays, Hitler's insistence on bomber variants, engine reliability issues, and vulnerability during takeoff and landing—where Allies destroyed hundreds on airfields—limited deployment to fewer than 1,400 units, with operational availability rarely exceeding 100 at once. Arado Ar 234 jet bombers conducted reconnaissance but inflicted negligible damage on Allied bomber streams.[84][37] Late-war Luftwaffe offensives were desperate bids to regain initiative amid collapse. During the Ardennes Offensive (Battle of the Bulge) in December 1944, Luftwaffe sorties totaled under 1,000 due to fuel rationing, providing minimal close air support and suffering 25% losses to superior Allied numbers. The final major push, Operation Bodenplatte on January 1, 1945, mobilized approximately 900–1,000 aircraft—mostly fighters—in low-level strikes against Allied airfields in Belgium, Holland, and northern France, destroying or damaging around 465 enemy planes on the ground. However, miscoordinated attacks, encounters with unexpectedly operational Allied fighters, and friendly anti-aircraft fire (mistaking Germans for foes) resulted in 272–300 Luftwaffe aircraft lost in combat or to flak, plus over 200 pilots killed, including key aces; total irreplaceable losses exceeded 500 aircraft, hastening the force's dissolution as reserves evaporated. By May 1945, the Luftwaffe mustered fewer than 300 operational fighters, unable to contest the skies during the final Allied advances into Germany.[85][86][87]Ground and Auxiliary Components
Fallschirmjäger and Airborne Operations
The Fallschirmjäger, or paratroopers, formed the airborne branch of the Luftwaffe, distinct from the Heer (army) due to their aviation affiliation. The first experimental parachute unit emerged in 1936 within the Luftwaffe's structure, evolving into the 1st Fallschirmjäger Division by October 1938 under Generalmajor Kurt Student, comprising two regiments for a total strength of around 10,000 men trained in parachuting, gliding, and combat tactics.[88][89] Student, appointed to lead airborne development in 1938, emphasized vertical envelopment to seize key objectives behind enemy lines, integrating paratroops with glider-borne infantry for rapid strikes.[90] This force pioneered large-scale airborne assaults, drawing on interwar experiments but constrained by limited transport aircraft like the Junkers Ju 52. Initial combat deployments occurred during the 1940 invasions. On 9 April 1940, a small Fallschirmjäger detachment executed the war's first parachute drop in Norway, securing Oslo's Fornebu airfield against Norwegian defenders despite heavy losses from inexperienced jumping and ground resistance.[91] Larger operations followed in the Low Countries on 10 May 1940: glider troops from Sturmabteilung Koch captured Belgium's Fort Eben-Emael in under 24 hours using shaped charges to breach casemates, neutralizing a fortress that guarded key bridges and enabling Panzer advances.[91] Concurrently, paratroopers seized Dutch bridges and airfields, including a drop near Rotterdam, though scattered landings and fierce opposition led to high casualties, with around 1,200 killed or wounded in the Netherlands alone. These actions demonstrated tactical surprise but highlighted vulnerabilities like poor radio coordination and dependence on follow-up ground forces.[91] The pinnacle of Fallschirmjäger airborne operations was Operation Mercury, the invasion of Crete on 20 May 1941, involving XI Fliegerkorps under Student. Approximately 22,000 paratroopers and glider troops from the 7th Flieger Division and 5th Mountain Division assaulted Allied-held airfields at Maleme, Retimo, and Heraklion, facing 32,000 Commonwealth and Greek defenders. Initial drops suffered catastrophic losses—over 40% casualties on the first day from anti-aircraft fire, defensive preparations informed by prior operations, and equipment malfunctions—yet paratroopers secured Maleme airfield by 21 May, allowing reinforcements to land and turning the battle.[92][93] Crete fell by 1 June after amphibious support, but at a staggering cost: 6,500 German casualties, including 3,352 dead or missing, representing one-quarter of the assault force.[94] Adolf Hitler, citing the "butchery" of isolated paratroops, prohibited further major airborne drops, relegating Fallschirmjäger to elite infantry roles thereafter.[93] Post-Crete, the Fallschirmjäger divisions—expanded to ten by 1944—fought dismounted in defensive battles, such as Monte Cassino in 1944 where the 1st Division held against Allied assaults, or Normandy where the 6th Division delayed advances near Carentan. Without large-scale vertical insertions, their airborne expertise shifted to glider raids like the 12 September 1943 rescue of Benito Mussolini from Gran Sasso, executed by Otto Skorzeny's commandos with Fallschirmjäger support. Overall, early successes validated airborne integration in blitzkrieg but exposed logistical limits, high attrition, and Allied adaptations that rendered mass drops untenable by mid-war.[95][91]Flak Units and Ground-Based Air Defenses
The Luftwaffe's Flak (Flugabwehrkanone) units formed the core of Germany's ground-based air defense system, comprising anti-aircraft artillery batteries organized into battalions, regiments, brigades, divisions, and corps under Luftwaffe command.[96] These formations were structured for both static homeland defense and mobile field support, with Flak corps providing massed firepower equivalent to divisional artillery for anti-aircraft, antitank, and general fire support roles on all fronts.[97] By 1944, the system included over 1 million personnel, encompassing gunners, radar operators, searchlight crews, and administrative staff, reflecting the escalating demands of Allied strategic bombing.[98] Primary equipment consisted of heavy guns like the 8.8 cm Flak 18/36/37, capable of engaging high-altitude bombers at up to 10,000 meters, supplemented by lighter 2 cm and 3.7 cm automatic cannons for low-level threats and the rarer 12.8 cm Flak 40 for extended range.[96] Batteries typically fielded 4 to 8 guns, with battalions grouping 3 to 4 batteries under a heavy Flak Abteilung, scalable to regiments of multiple battalions; for instance, a standard heavy Flak regiment might include 4 heavy batteries and mixed light-heavy units for layered defense.[99] Integration with Würzburg radar for fire control and searchlights enhanced accuracy, though proximity (vicinity) fuzes were not widely adopted until late 1944, limiting burst effectiveness against maneuvering formations.[98] Deployment evolved from fixed Reich defenses in Flakgruppen—regiment-sized groups under administrative areas—to mobile units supporting army groups, with divisions like the 1st Flak Division assigned to Luftflotten for front-line air cover and opportunistic ground roles, particularly the versatile 88 mm gun against Soviet armor.[98] Peak strength reached approximately 9,000 heavy guns by mid-1944, concentrated around industrial targets like the Ruhr, but resource shortages and Allied countermeasures, including fighter escorts and jamming, strained operations.[96] In terms of effectiveness, Flak inflicted significant attrition on Allied bombers, damaging 54,539 U.S. Eighth Air Force aircraft from December 1942 to April 1945 and contributing to over 47,000 aircrew casualties, while accounting for roughly 50% of heavy bomber losses in some estimates.[100][101] However, efficiency was low, with calculations indicating up to 16,000 rounds expended per 8.8 cm gun kill against B-17s due to predictive firing challenges and bomber altitudes exceeding optimal gun ceilings without oxygen-fuzed shells.[102] Despite damaging raids—such as causing 217 B-17 damages but only 7 losses in a single Merseburg operation—Flak could not independently halt large-scale daylight missions, serving primarily as a attrition tool that diverted guns from ground duties and consumed vast ammunition stocks, exceeding 10 million shells monthly by 1944.[103][96] Late-war shifts saw up to 70% of Flak assets repurposed for infantry defense, diluting air defense coherence as Allied air superiority intensified.[98]Doctrinal and Strategic Elements
Close Air Support and Blitzkrieg Integration
The Luftwaffe's doctrine from the mid-1930s onward prioritized tactical air operations in direct support of ground forces, aligning with the Wehrmacht's Blitzkrieg concept of swift, concentrated mechanized advances that required immediate suppression of enemy resistance. Unlike strategic bombing advocates, Luftwaffe planners, influenced by experiences in Spain and exercises, viewed aircraft as "flying artillery" to deliver rapid, pinpoint strikes against troop concentrations, artillery, and command posts, thereby creating breakthroughs for panzer exploitation.[9][2] This integration was structurally enabled by the formation of Fliegerkorps, self-contained air corps assigned to army groups, which included dive bomber, fighter, and reconnaissance units for organic support. Liaison officers and radio-equipped forward observers from ground units requested strikes in real-time, minimizing response delays and maximizing synchronization; for instance, Fliegerkorps I and II operated in tandem with Army Group North during early campaigns, adjusting missions dynamically based on battlefield needs.[58][9] The Junkers Ju 87 Stuka epitomized this CAS role, executing near-vertical dives from altitudes under 3,000 feet to achieve bomb placement errors below 30 yards, with average pilots securing a 25 percent probability of hits within 100 feet of the aim point. Its fixed undercarriage and automatic dive recovery system allowed two-man crews to focus on sighting, while the attached sirens induced panic among ground troops, amplifying tactical disruption beyond material damage.[104][105] In the Polish invasion starting 1 September 1939, Stuka-equipped squadrons from multiple Fliegerkorps flew close support missions from the outset, targeting rail hubs, bridges, and field fortifications to isolate Polish armies and enable encirclements; these operations, conducted under conditions of near air superiority, demoralized defenders and prevented effective counterattacks, contributing to the campaign's conclusion in under five weeks.[106][107] The Battle of France from 10 May 1940 further demonstrated this efficacy, as Luftwaffe dive bombers supported the Ardennes thrust by neutralizing French armor and artillery concentrations, such as at Sedan where Stukas silenced gun batteries in hours, allowing XIX Panzer Corps to cross the Meuse unhindered. This tactical concentration—often 300-500 sorties per day in key sectors—exploited Allied dispersion, shattering defensive cohesion and accelerating the collapse of French lines by early June.[108][58][9]Debates on Strategic Bombing Capacity
Walther Wever, as Luftwaffe Chief of Staff from 1935 until his death in a June 3, 1936, plane crash, advocated for a balanced doctrine incorporating strategic bombing capabilities alongside tactical support.[109][9] In his 1935 treatise Die Luftkriegsführung ("The Conduct of the Air War"), Wever emphasized the need for long-range bombers to target enemy industry and infrastructure, proposing the "Ural Bomber" concept for strikes deep into Soviet territory using four-engine heavy aircraft.[109] He argued that air power should prioritize decisive effects on war economy over mere battlefield support, influencing early specifications for heavy bomber prototypes like the Junkers Ju 89 and Dornier Do 19, though production remained limited due to rearmament constraints post-Versailles Treaty.[9][110] Following Wever's death, doctrinal emphasis shifted toward tactical air support integral to Blitzkrieg operations, sidelining strategic bombing development.[109] Ernst Udet, appointed as head of technical development in 1938, prioritized dive-bombing precision and medium bombers like the Junkers Ju 87 Stuka and Heinkel He 111, reflecting his World War I experience and belief in close air support over high-altitude strategic raids.[111][109] Udet's influence mandated that even later heavy bomber designs, such as the Heinkel He 177, incorporate dive-bombing features initially, leading to coupled-engine configurations that caused chronic reliability issues and delayed deployment until 1942, with only about 1,169 produced amid engine failures and production bottlenecks.[111][112] Historians debate whether sustained focus on strategic bombers could have enhanced Luftwaffe effectiveness, constrained by Germany's industrial base and strategic priorities.[9] Williamson Murray contends that even under Wever, the Luftwaffe could not have fielded a viable strategic force by 1939, given aluminum shortages, engine production limits, and the need to prioritize fighters and tactical bombers for anticipated short wars against France and Poland.[9] Germany's economy, geared toward rapid rearmament rather than mass heavy bomber output like the Allied B-17 (12,731 built), favored versatile medium bombers numbering over 7,000 He 111s and Do 17s by war's start, suitable for tactical roles but inadequate for sustained deep strikes.[113][110] Critics of Luftwaffe decisions argue that diverting resources to heavies might have crippled early victories, as tactical air integration proved decisive in 1939-1940 campaigns, while strategic bombing demanded vast fuel reserves—Germany produced only 1.5 million tons annually by 1940 versus Allied capacities exceeding 10 million—and trained crews Germany lacked.[114][9] Proponents of alternative paths, including some counterfactual analyses, suggest earlier commitment to four-engine designs could have enabled raids on British or Soviet rear areas, potentially disrupting Allied production before U.S. entry, though causal factors like Hitler's continental focus and aversion to total war escalation until 1943 limited such shifts.[115][9] Empirical evidence from Luftwaffe operations shows medium bombers inflicted tactical damage but failed strategically, as in the Battle of Britain where range limitations restricted payloads over England.[10] Late-war efforts, including the Amerika Bomber program for transatlantic strikes, underscored inherent limitations, with prototypes like the Messerschmitt Me 264 flying only test missions amid Allied bombing of factories.[112] Overall, debates highlight that Luftwaffe capacity reflected deliberate prioritization of air superiority and ground support over strategic independence, a choice aligned with Germany's resource realities and initial war aims but exposing vulnerabilities in prolonged conflict.[9][109]Performance Evaluations
Tactical Achievements and Pilot Effectiveness
The Luftwaffe's tactical achievements were most pronounced in the initial campaigns of World War II, where fighter and ground-attack units achieved local air superiority through coordinated operations with army advances. During the invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939, Luftwaffe bombers and fighters destroyed over 400 Polish aircraft, many on the ground, enabling unchallenged support for panzer breakthroughs and paralyzing enemy communications within days.[2] Similarly, in the Battle of France commencing May 10, 1940, tactical bombing by Ju 87 Stukas targeted bridges and troop concentrations with high accuracy, contributing to the rapid collapse of French defenses and the Dunkirk evacuation's air cover limitations, where German fighters downed approximately 1,000 Allied aircraft against losses of around 400.[116] These successes stemmed from pre-war emphasis on short-range tactical air power, honed in the Spanish Civil War by the Condor Legion, rather than long-range strategic bombing.[2] Luftwaffe pilot effectiveness was exemplified by the high aerial victory tallies of its Experten (expert pilots), who leveraged rigorous training, combat seasoning, and flexible formations to outperform numerically superior foes. Erich Hartmann, operating primarily on the Eastern Front from 1941 to 1944, achieved 352 confirmed kills— the highest of any fighter pilot in history—using Messerschmitt Bf 109s in "boom-and-zoom" tactics that exploited altitude and speed advantages over slower Soviet aircraft.[117] Other aces, such as Hans-Joachim Marseille with 158 victories in North Africa by September 1942 and Gerhard Barkhorn with 301, demonstrated similar proficiency; Marseille's rate of 1.5 kills per sortie reflected adept maneuvering in adverse conditions like dust storms and outnumbered engagements against British fighters.[117] These pilots benefited from a decentralized command structure allowing initiative, superior gunnery practice, and early war experience that yielded kill-to-loss ratios often exceeding 5:1 in favorable theaters, contrasting with Allied pilots' more rigid formations like the RAF's "Vic."[118]| Ace Pilot | Confirmed Victories | Primary Theater | Notable Tactic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Erich Hartmann | 352 | Eastern Front | Energy fighting (boom-and-zoom) |
| Hans-Joachim Marseille | 158 | North Africa | Close-range dogfighting in low visibility |
| Gerhard Barkhorn | 301 | Eastern Front | Rotte pair formations for mutual cover |