Hubbry Logo
Tethys OceanTethys OceanMain
Open search
Tethys Ocean
Community hub
Tethys Ocean
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tethys Ocean
Tethys Ocean
Tethys Ocean
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
First phase of the Tethys Ocean's forming: the (first) Tethys Sea starts dividing Pangaea into two supercontinents, Laurasia and Gondwana.

The Tethys Ocean (/ˈtiːθɪs, ˈtɛ-/ TEETH-iss, TETH-; Greek: Τηθύς Tēthús), also called the Tethys Sea or the Neo-Tethys, was a prehistoric ocean during much of the Mesozoic Era and early-mid Cenozoic Era. It was the predecessor to the modern Indian Ocean, the Mediterranean Sea, and the Eurasian inland marine basins (primarily represented today by the Black Sea and Caspian Sea).[1][2]

During the early Mesozoic, as Pangaea broke up, the designation “Tethys Ocean” refers to the ocean located between the ancient continents of Gondwana and Laurasia. After the opening of the Indian and Atlantic oceans during the Cretaceous Period and the breakup of these continents over the same period, it refers to the ocean bordered by the continents of Africa, Eurasia, India, and Australasia. During the early-mid Cenozoic, the Indian, African, Australian and Arabian plates moved north and collided with the Eurasian plate, which created new borders to the ocean, a land barrier to the flow of currents between the Indian and Mediterranean basins, and the orogenies of the Alpide belt (including the Alps, Himalayas, Zagros, and Caucasus Mountains). All of these geological events, in addition to a drop in sea level from Antarctic glaciation, brought an end to the Tethys as it previously existed, fragmenting it into the Indian Ocean, the Mediterranean Sea, and the Paratethys.[1][2]

It was preceded by the Paleo-Tethys Ocean, which lasted between the Cambrian and the Early Triassic, while the Neotethys formed during the Late Triassic and lasted in some form up to the Oligocene–Miocene boundary (about 24–21 million years ago) when it completely closed.[1][3] A portion known as the Paratethys was isolated during the Oligocene (34 million years ago) and lasted up to the Pliocene (about 5 million years ago), when it largely dried out.[4] The modern inland seas of Europe and Western Asia, namely the Black Sea and Caspian Sea, are remnants of the Paratethys Sea.[1]

Etymology

[edit]

The sea is named after Tethys, who, in ancient Greek mythology, is a water goddess, a sister and consort of Oceanus, mother of the Oceanid sea nymphs and of the world's great rivers, lakes and fountains.

Terminology and subdivisions

[edit]

The eastern part of the Tethys Ocean is sometimes referred to as Eastern Tethys. The western part of the Tethys Ocean is called Tethys Sea, Western Tethys Ocean, or Paratethys or Alpine Tethys Ocean. The Black, Caspian, and Aral seas are thought to be its crustal remains, though the Black Sea may, in fact, be a remnant of the older Paleo-Tethys Ocean.[5] The Western Tethys was not simply a single open ocean. It covered many small plates, Cretaceous island arcs, and microcontinents. Many small oceanic basins (Valais Ocean, Piemont-Liguria Ocean, Meliata Ocean) were separated from each other by continental terranes on the Alboran, Iberian, and Apulian plates. The high sea level in the Mesozoic flooded most of these continental domains, forming shallow seas.[citation needed]

During the early Cenozoic, the Tethys Ocean could be divided into three sections: the Mediterranean Tethys (the direct predecessor to the Mediterranean Sea), the Peri-Tethys (a vast inland sea that covered much of eastern Europe and central Asia, and the direct predecessor to the Paratethys Sea), and the Indian Tethys (the direct predecessor to the Indian Ocean).[6] The Turgai Strait extended out of the Peri-Tethys, connecting the Tethys with the Arctic Ocean.[7]

As theories have improved, scientists have extended the "Tethys" name to refer to three similar oceans that preceded it, separating the continental terranes: in Asia, the Paleo-Tethys (Devonian–Triassic), Meso-Tethys (late Early Permian–Late Cretaceous), and Ceno-Tethys (Late-Triassic–Cenozoic) are recognized.[8] None of the Tethys oceans should be confused with the Rheic Ocean, which existed to the west of them in the Silurian Period.[9] To the north of the Tethys, the then-land mass is called Angaraland and to the south of it, it is called Gondwanaland.[10]

Modern theory

[edit]

From the Ediacaran (600 Mya) into the Devonian (360 Mya), the Proto-Tethys Ocean existed and was situated between Baltica and Laurentia to the north and Gondwana to the south.

From the Silurian (440 Mya) through the Jurassic periods, the Paleo-Tethys Ocean existed between the Hunic terranes and Gondwana. Over a period of 400 million years, continental terranes intermittently separated from Gondwana in the Southern Hemisphere to migrate northward to form Asia in the Northern Hemisphere.[8]

Plate tectonic reconstruction of the Tethys realm at 249 Mya

Triassic Period

[edit]

About 250 Mya,[11] during the Triassic, a new ocean began forming in the southern end of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean. A rift formed along the northern continental shelf of Southern Pangaea (Gondwana). Over the next 60 million years, that piece of shelf, known as Cimmeria, traveled north, pushing the floor of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean under the eastern end of northern Pangaea (early / proto- Laurasia). The Neo-Tethys Ocean formed between Cimmeria and Gondwana, directly over where the Paleo-Tethys formerly rested.[citation needed]

Jurassic Period

[edit]

During the Jurassic period about 150 Mya, Cimmeria finally collided with Laurasia and stalled, so the ocean floor behind it buckled under, forming the Tethys Trench. Water levels rose, and the western Tethys shallowly covered significant portions of Europe, forming the first Tethys Sea. Around the same time, Laurasia and Gondwana began drifting apart, opening an extension of the Tethys Sea between them which today is the part of the Atlantic Ocean between the Mediterranean and the Caribbean. As North and South America were still attached to the rest of Laurasia and Gondwana, respectively, the Tethys Ocean in its widest extension was part of a continuous oceanic belt running around the Earth between about latitude 30°N and the Equator. Thus, ocean currents at the time around the Early Cretaceous ran very differently from the way they do today.[citation needed]

Late Cretaceous

[edit]
Plate tectonic reconstruction of the Tethys realm at 100 Mya

Between the Jurassic and the Late Cretaceous, which started about 100 Mya, Gondwana began breaking up, pushing Africa and India north across the Tethys and opening up the Indian Ocean. During the Late Cretaceous the Tethys sea was home to many different animals, including marine reptiles, bony fish, cartilaginous fish and cephalopods. The islands that were located in the northern parts of the Tethys sea (Europe) created biodiverse ecosystems that had animals that went through insular dwarfism and insular gigantism. The insular dwarfism process happened mostly to the dinosaurs that lived on the islands, like the sauropods and the hadrosaurs. Telmatosaurus is a good representation of the insular dwarfism process. While the insular dwarfism process happened to the dinosaurs, the pterosaurs that lived on the islands went through the process known as insular gigantism. Hatzegopteryx was a huge azhdarchid pterosaur that lived on the islands of the Tethys sea. This giant pterosaur would have filled its ecological niche as an apex predator. During the Maastrichtian, the Tethys sea had many different large mosasaurs that lived in the same geographical area and would have competed with each other. Europe had large mosasaurs like Prognathodon giganteus, Prognathodon saturator, Prognathodon sectorius, Mosasaurus hoffmannii and Mosasaurus lemonnieri. North Africa would have also had large mosasaurs like Prognathodon giganteus, Prognathodon currii, Thalassotitan atrox, Hainosaurus boubker and Mosasaurus beaugei. The competition between many different apex predators is something we don't only see in the Tethys sea, but also in the Western Interior Seaway.[citation needed]

Cenozoic

[edit]
Vast regions of Europe and west-central Asia were still covered by a contiguous Tethys at the start of the Eocene (top image), but by the Oligocene, most of this had dried out (bottom image), and the Tethys was almost entirely divided into the Indian Ocean, Mediterranean and Paratethys.

Throughout the Cenozoic (66 million to the dawn of the Neogene, 23 Mya), the connections between the Atlantic and Indian Oceans across the Tethys were eventually closed off in what is now the Middle East during the Miocene, as a consequence of the northern migration of Africa/Arabia and global sea levels falling due to the concurrent formation of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. This decoupling occurred in two steps, first around 20 Mya and another around 14 Mya.[2] The complete closure of the Tethys led to a global reorganization of currents, and is what is thought to have allowed for upwelling in the Arabian Sea and led to the establishment of the modern South Asian Monsoon. It also caused major modifications to the functioning of the AMOC and ACC.[2]

During the Oligocene (33.9 to 23 Mya), large parts of central and eastern Europe were covered by a northern branch of the Tethys Ocean, called the Paratethys. The Paratethys was separated from the Tethys with the formation of the Alps, Carpathians, Dinarides, Taurus, and Elburz mountains during the Alpine orogeny. During the late Miocene, the Paratethys gradually disappeared, and became an isolated inland sea.[12] Separation from the wider Tethys during the early Miocene initially led to a boost in primary productivity for the Paratethys, but this gave way to a total ecosystem collapse during the late Miocene as a result of rapid dissolution of carbonate.[3]

Historical theory

[edit]

In Chapter 13 of his 1845 book,[13] Roderick Murchison described a distinctive formation extending from the Black Sea to the Aral Sea in which the creatures differed from those of the purely marine period that preceded them. The Miocene deposits of Crimea and Taman (south of the Sea of Azov) are identical with formations surrounding the present Caspian Sea, in which the univalves of freshwater origin are associated with forms of Cardiacae and Mytili that are common to partially saline or brackish waters. This distinctive fauna has been found throughout all the enormously developed Tertiary formations of the southern and south-eastern steppes.

... and leads at once to the conviction, that during long periods antecedent, as will be hereafter explained, to the historic æra, a vast region of Europe and Asia was covered by a Mediterranean Sea of brackish water, of which the present Caspian is the diminished type. ... To render the distinction between these accumulations and all others clear and unambiguous, we have adopted the term Aralo-Caspian, first applied in a geographical sense, by our great precursor Humboldt, to this region of the globe. ... Judging from the recital of travellers and from specimens of the rock, we have no doubt that it extended to Khivah and the Aral Sea ; beyond which the low level of the adjacent eastern deserts would lead us to infer, that it spread over wide tracts in Asia now inhabited by the Turkomans and Kirghis, and was bounded only by the mountains of the Hindoo Kusk and Chinese Tartary. ... there can be no sort of doubt, that all the masses of water now separated from each other, from the Aral to the Black Sea inclusive, were formerly united in this vast pre-historical Mediterranean ; which (even if we restrict its limits to the boundaries we already know, and do not extend them eastward, amid low regions untrodden by geologists) must have exceeded in size the present Mediterranean!

On the accompanying map, Murchison shows the Aralo-Caspian Formation extending from close to the Danube delta across Crimea, up the east side of the Volga river to Samara, then south of the Urals to beyond the Aral Sea. Brackish and upper freshwater components (OSM) of the Miocene are now known to extend through the North Alpine foreland basin and onto the Swabian Jura with thickness of up to 250 m (820 ft); these were deposited in the Paratethys when the Alpine front was still 100 km (62 mi) farther south.[14][15]

Geologist Eduard Suess in 1869

In 1885, the Austrian palaeontologist Melchior Neumayr deduced the existence of the Tethys Ocean from Mesozoic marine sediments and their distribution, calling his concept Zentrales Mittelmeer (lit. 'Central Mediterranean Sea') and described it as a Jurassic seaway, which extended from the Caribbean to the Himalayas.[16]

In 1893, the Austrian geologist Eduard Suess proposed the hypothesis that an ancient and extinct inland sea had once existed between Laurasia and the continents which formed Gondwana II. He named it the Tethys Sea after the Greek sea goddess Tethys. He provided evidence for his theory using fossil records from the Alps and Africa.[17] He proposed the concept of Tethys in his four-volume work Das Antlitz der Erde (The Face of the Earth).[18]

In the following decades during the 20th century, "mobilist" geologists such as Uhlig (1911), Diener (1925), and Daque (1926) regarded Tethys as a large trough between two supercontinents which lasted from the late Palaeozoic until continental fragments derived from Gondwana obliterated it.

After World War II, Tethys was described as a triangular ocean with a wide eastern end.[citation needed]

From 1920s to the 1960s, "fixist" geologists, however, regarded Tethys as a composite trough, which evolved through a series of orogenic cycles. They used the terms 'Paleotethys', 'Mesotethys', and 'Neotethys' for the Caledonian, Variscan, and Alpine orogenies, respectively. In the 1970s and 1980s, these terms and 'Proto-Tethys', were used in different senses by various authors, but the concept of a single ocean wedging into Pangea from the east, roughly where Suess first proposed it, remained.[19]

In the 1960s, the theory of plate tectonics became established, and Suess's "sea" could clearly be seen to have been an ocean. Plate tectonics provided an explanation for the mechanism by which the former ocean disappeared: oceanic crust can subduct under continental crust.[citation needed]

Tethys was considered an oceanic plate by Smith (1971); Dewey, Pitman, Ryan and Bonnin (1973); Laubscher and Bernoulli (1973); and Bijou-Duval, Dercourt and Pichon (1977).[citation needed]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tethys Ocean

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Tethys Ocean was a vast east-west-oriented body of water that separated the northern supercontinent of Laurasia from the southern supercontinent of Gondwana, existing from the Triassic period through the Pliocene epoch as a key feature of Mesozoic and early Cenozoic paleogeography. It originated in the late Paleozoic as part of the breakup of the supercontinent Pangaea, with seafloor spreading creating an expansive seaway that stretched from the site of the present-day Mediterranean to the region now occupied by Southeast Asia. During the Mesozoic, the Tethys Ocean facilitated diverse marine ecosystems and sediment deposition along its margins, influencing global biogeographic patterns and the distribution of fauna between northern and southern hemispheres. The ocean's progressive closure began in the Late Cretaceous due to northward drift of Gondwanan fragments like India and Africa, driven by subduction and continental collision processes. By the Eocene, this convergence reduced the Tethys to a narrow seaway, culminating in its near-complete obliteration during the Oligo-Miocene, which profoundly altered global ocean circulation, climate, and led to the uplift of major orogenic belts including the Alps, Himalayas, and Zagros Mountains. Today, remnants of the Tethys persist as the Mediterranean Sea, Black Sea, Caspian Sea, and parts of the Indian Ocean's northern margins, preserving geological records of its dynamic history.

Etymology and Nomenclature

Etymology

The name "Tethys Ocean" was introduced by Austrian geologist Eduard Suess in 1893, in the second volume of his seminal work Das Antlitz der Erde (The Face of the Earth), to denote a long-vanished sea that once separated the ancient landmasses of and . Suess drew the term from , where Tethys is depicted as a Titaness and the consort of , the primordial god embodying the encircling world-ocean, thereby evoking an image of an ancient, all-encompassing sea. This mythological allusion aligned with Suess's vision of Tethys as a fundamental feature of Earth's geological history. Suess proposed the Tethys concept based on paleontological evidence, particularly the striking similarities in Mesozoic marine fossils—such as ammonites and rudist bivalves—found in rock sequences across separated regions of Europe, , and , suggesting these areas had once been connected by a continuous equatorial . In his earlier 1893 article "Are Great Ocean Depths Permanent?" published in , Suess first elaborated on this idea, portraying Tethys as a —a vast, subsiding trough filled with sediments—within his broader of global contraction and continental wrinkling. Over the subsequent century, the and of Tethys evolved significantly, transitioning from Suess's static, contractionist geosynclinal model to a dynamic paleoceanographic entity in the context of . By the mid-20th century, with the acceptance of and , Tethys came to represent not a single but a series of evolving ocean basins that facilitated faunal exchanges and orogenic processes, while the original name persisted as a foundational term in sciences.

Subdivisions

The Tethys Ocean system is traditionally divided into chronological and geographic phases reflecting successive rifting, oceanic spreading, and events, with intervening microcontinents such as Cimmeria playing a key role in defining boundaries. These subdivisions—Proto-Tethys, Paleo-Tethys, Neo-Tethys, and in some models, Meso-Tethys—are based on plate tectonic reconstructions that integrate paleomagnetic data, occurrences, and sedimentary records to trace the evolution of the proto-Atlantic to oceanic realm. The Proto-Tethys Ocean represents the earliest phase, spanning the late Precambrian to early (approximately 600–400 Ma), and originated from the breakup of the . It separated northern continental blocks, including and , from the main landmass to the south, facilitating early drift and convergence. Following the closure of the Proto-Tethys, the emerged as the middle phase during the to early (approximately 400–240 Ma), characterized by northward along its northern margin. This basin extended longitudinally from the western Mediterranean region eastward to , accommodating the northward migration of terranes detached from . The Neo-Tethys Ocean constitutes the principal and most extensively studied phase, active from the to Eocene (approximately 240–50 Ma), and achieved the widest extent of the Tethyan system. It formed between northern Gondwana-derived fragments, including the Cimmerian blocks, and the southern margin of , driven by rifting associated with the Pangea disassembly. In recent tectonic models, the Meso-Tethys is recognized as a transitional branch linking the Paleo- and Neo-Tethys, persisting from the Permian to (approximately 300–150 Ma) primarily in the eastern segments of the system. This subdivision highlights intra-oceanic zones and arc systems that bridged the two major basins, refining earlier binary models of Tethyan .

Origin and Early History

Proto-Tethys Ocean

The Proto-Tethys Ocean originated during the breakup of the in the late , around 600 Ma, manifesting as a separating northern Asian cratons such as Tarim, , and from the northern margin of the . This rifting process was part of the broader fragmentation of , which began as early as 750 Ma but accelerated significantly by 620 Ma, leading to the development of an elongate along the diverging margins. Geographically, the Proto-Tethys extended as a relatively narrow seaway in low-to-mid latitudes, from the margins of and in the north to the northern Gondwanan margin in the south, flanked by passive continental margins that transitioned into zones of early arc volcanism as tectonic forces shifted toward convergence. This configuration facilitated and magmatic activity, with the ocean's width likely limited compared to later Tethyan phases, reflecting its role as an initial rift arm in Rodinia's disassembly. The ocean's closure was diachronous, beginning in the Early around 480 Ma and completing by approximately 420 Ma, primarily through beneath the margins of Asian cratons and peri-n terranes, triggering deformational events in the Caledonide orogenic belts and resulting in remnants incorporated into early tectonic systems. Key evidence for this history includes complexes preserved in Asian Caledonide-equivalent belts, such as the Qilian and Kunlun orogens, representing obducted fragments of Proto-Tethyan oceanic lithosphere, and detrital populations in associated sediments that record provenance from both northern (Tarim-North ) and southern () continental sources. Post-2020 investigations have refined the timeline, revealing initiation around 530 Ma in the North Qaidam belt of northern , where intra-oceanic arc development marked the onset of convergence, followed by maturation of the zone by 520 Ma as indicated by high-pressure to ultrahigh-pressure (HP-UHP) metamorphic assemblages in eclogites and gneisses. These findings, derived from U-Pb and petrological analysis, underscore a rapid evolution from to convergent , with ceasing by 480 Ma and paving the way for the Paleo-Tethys as a successor basin.

Paleo-Tethys Ocean

The Paleo-Tethys Ocean opened during the period, approximately 400 million years ago (Ma), in the aftermath of the Proto-Tethys Ocean's closure. This rifting occurred as a behind the southward of the along the northern Gondwanan margin, leading to the separation of the Hun superterrane from . The process involved driven by slab rollback, with initial mafic magmatism exhibiting ocean island basalt-like signatures indicative of asthenospheric in an extensional setting. By the Permian period, the Paleo-Tethys reached its peak extent, forming an east-west trending seaway stretching from Iberia in the west to Indochina in the east, separating the northern Eurasian margin from the Cimmerian terranes derived from . This expansive basin featured diverse environments, including extensive carbonate platforms along its margins—such as those preserved in the of and the of Turkey—and deeper marine trenches associated with ongoing zones. of the Paleo-Tethys lithosphere initiated in the late , around 320 Ma, beneath the northern active margins, where northward-dipping slabs consumed and triggered arc magmatism. This process led to the rifting and northward drift of Cimmerian microcontinents, such as and , from the Gondwanan margin, with paleomagnetic data indicating a progressive ~30° northward displacement relative to stable during the Permian. The closed by the , approximately 240 Ma, through the collision of the drifting with the southern Eurasian margin, culminating in the . This diachronous closure, progressing from east to west, involved obduction of and intense deformation, prominently recorded in regions like the Pontides of Turkey and the Mountains of , where deposits and thrust belts mark the suturing. Key evidence for this includes Permian ophiolite complexes, such as those in the Mashhad area of northeastern and remnants in the and Himalayan suture zones, which preserve supra-subduction zone signatures of the oceanic lithosphere. Paleomagnetic studies further corroborate the tectonic history, revealing the significant latitudinal shift of Gondwanan fragments across the . The closure of the Paleo-Tethys ultimately set the stage for the subsequent rifting of the Neo-Tethys Ocean along Cimmeria's southern flank.

Mesozoic Expansion

Triassic Period

During the Permian-Triassic transition, with rifting initiating around 250-240 Ma and accelerating in the (approximately 237–201 Ma), the Neo-Tethys Ocean developed along the northern margin of , particularly from the Arabian and Indian plates, as a direct consequence of the ongoing closure of the to the north. This rifting process involved the northward drift of Cimmerian continental fragments away from , marking the transition from continental extension to the formation of a new between the separating landmasses. The resulting Neo-Tethys basin remained narrow during this early stage, characterized by continental slivers such as the Anatolides, which acted as intervening blocks within rift basins. These features facilitated initial , with sedimentary records showing continental to shallow marine deposits interspersed with volcanic activity indicative of . The basin's configuration reflected a diachronous separation, progressing from east to west across the region. Subduction of the Neo-Tethys oceanic lithosphere commenced in the (~200 Ma) along the southern margin of , triggered by the final closure of the Paleo-Tethys. This initiated the development of volcanic arcs, including precursors to the Zagros and Himalayan systems, where calc-alkaline produced andesitic to dacitic volcanics associated with settings. Paleogeographically, the Tethys Ocean served as a major seaway bisecting the Pangea, with its central portions featuring warm, shallow epicontinental seas that fostered diverse marine ecosystems. These environments supported reef-building organisms, including sponges, tubular , and early scleractinian corals, leading to the formation of carbonate platforms and patch reefs in tectonically stable areas. Geological evidence for these Triassic events includes ophiolitic fragments in , which preserve remnants of nascent formed during early rifting, and salt domes derived from deposits in restricted sub-basins. The , primarily and , indicate episodic hypersaline conditions in shallow, semi-enclosed arms of the Neo-Tethys, providing key markers for the basin's restricted paleoceanography.

Jurassic Period

During the Jurassic period, in the Neo-Tethys Ocean accelerated following the initial rifting phase from the , with ridge activity trending north-south and rates of approximately 1–2 cm/year leading to the ocean's expansion to a maximum width of around 3,000 km between and fragments of by the late (~175 Ma). This spreading contributed to the gradual of Pangea, balancing the closure of the Paleo-Tethys through and dextral displacement of up to 3,000 km between the northern and southern supercontinents. The process fostered widespread detachment faulting along the , facilitating formation over roughly 60 million years of activity. Paleogeographic reconfiguration intensified as India began drifting northward at rates of 3–5 cm/year, detaching from eastern and promoting the inundation of shallow epicontinental seas across the fragmented Pangea supercontinent. These seas extended along the northern margins of and into the widening Neo-Tethys, creating warm, shallow marine environments conducive to deposition and biotic diversification. Key events included the initiation of the Central Atlantic as a western extension of the Tethys system, where rifting between and transitioned into , linking oceanic circulation between the proto-Atlantic and Tethys basins. In the Alpine region, Jurassic carbonates accumulated in rift basins along the southern Tethyan margin, with syn-rift sediments such as bedded limestones and dolostones preserving evidence of the ocean's early passive margins. Northward subduction of the Neo-Tethys slab drove the development of island arcs and back-arc basins, particularly in the eastern segments near present-day , where supra- zone settings emerged by the . This fostered intra-oceanic arc systems, contributing to the fragmentation of continental margins and the initiation of retro-forearc basins along the Australian plate's northwestern edge. Recent studies highlight a multi-stage magmatic in these eastern domains, characterized by arc-related and the emplacement of adakitic rocks indicative of slab rollback, which enhanced of the subducting oceanic during the mid-to-. These processes underscored the Neo-Tethys' dynamic role in , setting the stage for further oceanic widening.

Cretaceous Period

During the Early Cretaceous, approximately 150–100 Ma, the Neo-Tethys Ocean attained its maximum latitudinal extent, spanning up to 5,000 km between the northern and southern continental margins, with extensive deep formation and the initiation of intra-oceanic zones that facilitated arc volcanism within the basin. This phase marked the culmination of northward drift of continental fragments from , including blocks that would later form parts of , while the ocean's broad configuration supported widespread marine sedimentation and tectonic activity. The onset of compression in the Neo-Tethys became evident through the obduction of ophiolitic sequences onto adjacent continental margins, exemplified by the Semail Ophiolite in Oman, which was emplaced around 95 Ma as a result of intra-oceanic thrusting and subsequent collision dynamics. This event signaled the transition from passive margin development to active convergence, with ophiolites preserving remnants of the Neo-Tethyan lithosphere that had formed earlier in the period. Paleomagnetic evidence further supports this tectonic shift by documenting latitudinal positions and stress changes in the region during the Cretaceous. Paleogeographically, the Neo-Tethys occupied an equatorial to low-latitude position, which amplified global greenhouse conditions and influenced patterns, contributing to elevated sea surface temperatures across the period. Tethyan marginal basins accumulated thick sequences of organic-rich black shales during multiple oceanic anoxic events (OAEs), such as OAE1a in the Barremian-Aptian and OAE2 in the Cenomanian-Turonian, where expanded oxygen minimum zones led to widespread anoxia and enhanced carbon burial. These deposits, rich in preserved marine microfossils, reflect heightened productivity and restricted ventilation in the Neo-Tethys realm. Northward subduction of the Neo-Tethys oceanic lithosphere beneath the Eurasian margin intensified during the , generating Andean-type magmatic arcs along the Bitlis-Zagros suture zone, characterized by calc-alkaline and associated plutonism. This regime, active from approximately 95 Ma, involved the consumption of and the accretion of island arcs, setting the stage for subsequent in the .

Cenozoic Closure

Paleogene Period

During the Paleogene Period (66–23 Ma), subduction of the Neo-Tethys Ocean accelerated as the Indian plate rapidly approached the Eurasian plate, with mean subduction rates reaching approximately 5.5 cm/yr during the (66–56 Ma) and increasing to up to 8.3 cm/yr between 56 and 53 Ma, contributing to the narrowing of the ocean basin to about 2,000 km by the late (62–59 Ma). This acceleration extended the subduction regime, maintaining active underthrusting along the Neo-Tethyan margin. The process involved northward-directed convergence, with the Indian plate's leading edge consuming oceanic lithosphere at elevated velocities, leading to enhanced magmatic activity and forearc basin development. The initial India-Asia collision commenced around 55–50 Ma in the western sector, characterized as a "soft" collision involving the docking of the Indian continental margin with an intra-oceanic arc or microcontinent, accompanied by continued underthrusting of Neo-Tethyan remnants. This event marked the onset of continental convergence, with paleomagnetic and stratigraphic evidence indicating the cessation of deep-marine sedimentation in the suture zone by approximately 50.8 Ma, transitioning to shallow-water and terrestrial deposits. In parallel, around 35 Ma, the Arabia- contact initiated in the Zagros region, triggering the onset of folding and thrusting in the proto-Zagros fold-thrust belt as Arabian underthrusted beneath . Paleogeographic reconstructions of the Neo-Tethys reveal remnant ocean basins filled with deep-marine deposits, particularly in the Outer Carpathian domains, where –Eocene turbidites record ongoing -related sedimentation in settings. Eocene volcanic arcs developed along the northern margins, including in the Carpathian region, where calc-alkaline magmatism in the Inner Carpathians reflected of remnant Neo-Tethyan lithosphere beneath the Eurasian plate. These features highlight a fragmented seaway with isolated basins persisting amid accelerating closure. Recent geophysical studies, including , image slab remnants of the subducted Neo-Tethys lithosphere in the , confirming Oligo-Miocene closure phases that disrupted global circulation by severing low-latitude connections between the Indian and Atlantic Oceans, thereby influencing Eocene–Oligocene transitions.

Neogene Period

The Neogene Period (23–2.58 Ma) witnessed the culmination of the Neo-Tethys Ocean's closure, a process that spanned roughly 23–5 Ma and finalized the and suturing of its remnants. This final phase was dominated by the hard collision between the Indian and Asian continents, which began around 50 Ma but achieved substantial completion during the through ongoing convergence and crustal shortening. Concurrently, the indentation of the Arabian plate into the Eurasian margin further constricted the western Neo-Tethys, leading to the progressive elimination of oceanic basins in the Anatolian and Zagros regions by the middle to . These dynamics marked the transition from -dominated to , reshaping the paleogeography of . Subduction along the Neo-Tethyan margins largely ceased during the , triggering slab break-off beneath the collisional zones and initiating post-collisional . In western , this manifested as potassic , characterized by high potassium content and alkaline affinities, resulting from upwelling of asthenospheric mantle through tears in the detached slab. Such , dated to the early to middle , reflects the shift from compressional to extensional regimes following further phases of the Arabia-Eurasia collision around 20–15 Ma in the Anatolian region. Paleogeographically, the closure drove major topographic changes, including the uplift of the beginning around 20 Ma, as evidenced by sedimentary provenance shifts and paleoaltimetry in the Basin indicating surface elevation gains of over 1 km. Similarly, the Alpine chains experienced accelerated exhumation and uplift in the , linked to the ongoing Africa-Europe convergence and the final consumption of the Alpine Tethys remnants. Remnant marine basins, such as the , persisted as isolated epi-continental seas in , evolving into brackish environments amid the broader Tethyan regression. A pivotal event in this closure was the around 6 Ma (5.97–5.33 Ma), which affected the precursor to the modern —a residual Neo-Tethyan basin—causing near-total due to restricted Atlantic inflow and deposition exceeding 1 million cubic kilometers. fission-track dating from Himalayan foreland sediments reveals rapid exhumation rates of 0.5–1 km/Myr during the , corroborating tectonic unroofing tied to the India-Asia collision's final stages.

Geological Remnants

Modern Seas and Basins

The represents the primary surviving remnant of the ancient Tethys Ocean, preserving the final fragments of its Neo-Tethyan branch after progressive closure during the . The eastern portion of this branch experienced its last major isolation event during the approximately 5.97 to 5.33 million years ago (Ma), when tectonic uplift restricted inflow from the Atlantic, leading to widespread and deposition across the basin. This crisis marked a pivotal stage in the Tethys's terminal evolution, transforming the once-vast seaway into a series of restricted sub-basins that refilled during the . The and constitute extensions of the , a northern arm of the Tethys that became isolated from the main Mediterranean realm during Miocene regressions. Between approximately 12.65 and 7.65 Ma, the underwent severe water-level fluctuations due to tectonic isolation and climatic , culminating in the separation of its eastern and western segments and the formation of brackish to freshwater lakes that persist today. This regression severed connections to open marine environments, fostering endemic ecosystems in these landlocked basins. Other notable basins linked to the Tethys's post-closure dynamics include the , an active rift arm within the broader Afar-Gulf of Aden system, and the , a post-collisional foreland depression. The initiated rifting around 29–26 Ma in response to extensional stresses following Neo-Tethys subduction, representing a branch of the that accommodates Arabian Plate motion. Similarly, the formed as a subsiding basin after the Arabia-Eurasia collision, accumulating sediments in a flexural foreland setting influenced by ongoing convergence. Sedimentological records in these remnants feature thick evaporite sequences and deposits that infill subsided depocenters, reflecting episodic restriction and basin evolution. In the Mediterranean, evaporites—comprising , , and associated clastics—reach thicknesses exceeding 1,000 meters in peripheral basins, overlain by that document renewed marine incursion and deep-water . Analogous evaporitic and fills occur in basins, where regressions deposited platforms and fine-grained deep-sea fans, preserving evidence of fluctuating salinities and flows. Recent seismic imaging studies have illuminated the subsurface fate of Tethyan , revealing subducted slabs beneath and through tomographic models. High-velocity anomalies in transition zone and trace Neo-Tethys remnants extending from the northward under and into , indicating stalled and slab fragmentation during closure. These structures, imaged using P- and S-wave , extend to depths exceeding 660 km and correlate with ongoing tectonic deformation in adjacent orogenic belts.

Associated Orogenies

The Alpine-Himalayan , spanning approximately 50 million years ago to the present, represents the primary mountain-building event associated with the closure of the Tethys Ocean, driven by the progressive collision between the Eurasian and n plates. This formed an extensive collisional belt extending from the Mediterranean to the Himalayan ranges, resulting from the northward drift of fragments and the of Tethyan oceanic lithosphere beneath . The process involved multi-phase convergence, with initial of the Neo-Tethys Ocean floor commencing in the , followed by phases that thickened the crust and elevated topographic highs exceeding 8 km in elevation. The unfolded in distinct phases: the Eo-Alpine phase during the , characterized by initial and obduction of ophiolitic sequences along the northern Tethyan margin; the Meso-Alpine phase in the Eocene, marked by intensified and nappe emplacement; and the Neo-Alpine phase from the onward, involving continued shortening and uplift through faulting. These phases reflect the evolving geometry of Tethys closure, with the Eo-Alpine event linked to the closure of the northern Neo-Tethys branch, while later phases accommodated the final India-Eurasia convergence. of these dynamics includes large-scale nappes—stacked sheets of crystalline basement and sedimentary cover—in the , where and eclogite facies metamorphism records high-pressure conditions. In the eastern segments, the Zagros and ranges exemplify subduction-related orogenesis tied to Arabian plate convergence, initiating around 35 million years ago with the of the southern Neo-Tethys remnant beneath . The Zagros fold-thrust belt features imbricated sedimentary sequences deformed into anticlines, while the accretionary prism preserves deep-sea trench sediments accreted during ongoing . Thrust faults dominate the structural fabric, with major systems like the Mountain Front Flexure in the Zagros accommodating up to 200 km of shortening since the . Metamorphic cores, such as the high-grade domes in the , expose exhumed lower crustal material from Eocene collision, revealing Barrowian-type up to granulite facies. Recent studies highlight the multi-stage evolution of Proto-Tethys segments, where early subduction contributed to the foundational roots of later orogenic systems through the closure of this ancestral ocean basin around 420 million years ago. These early events involved arc magmatism and obduction in regions like the North Qilian Belt, setting the stage for superimposed deformation in the broader Tethyan framework. Such findings underscore the polyphase inheritance in the Alpine-Himalayan belt, with Proto-Tethys remnants providing deep structural controls on later collision dynamics.

Paleogeographic and Tectonic Significance

Continental Drift Patterns

The continental drift patterns associated with the Tethys Ocean were characterized by the progressive northward migration of Gondwana-derived fragments, which narrowed the ocean basin over time and facilitated major reconfiguration. During the , the initial disassembly of Pangea involved rifting along the southern Tethys margin, where the separation of Cimmerian terranes from around 240–230 Ma contributed to the opening of the Neo-Tethys Ocean, contemporaneous with early stages of Pangea's disassembly. In the , the closure of the Tethys through northward drift and subsequent collisions reassembled continental masses, integrating fragments into and forming the Alpine-Himalayan by approximately 50 Ma. A prominent example of this northward drift is the Indian plate, which accelerated to approximately 20 cm/year during the (around 67 Ma) following the separation from and , driven by mantle plume activity beneath the region. This rapid motion slowed after the initial India-Asia collision around 50 Ma, transitioning to convergence rates of 4–5 cm/year as subduction of Tethyan continued. Other fragments, such as Arabia and the Iranian block, exhibited similar northward trajectories at rates of 5–10 cm/year from the onward, progressively consuming the Neo-Tethys. Paleomagnetic studies provide key evidence for these latitudinal shifts, indicating that Tethys margins transitioned from equatorial positions in the Permian to mid-latitudes by the Eocene. For instance, paleopoles from the Qiangtang block in northern show a northward drift from about 20°S in the Early Permian to approximately 32°N by the , while the block moved from 30°S to 10°N over the . These reconstructions, derived from apparent paths, confirm a total latitudinal displacement of over 3,000 km for Indian margin rocks, aligning with and sedimentary indicators of paleoclimate changes. Global plate reconstructions using GPlates software illustrate the Tethys' width variations over the past 300 million years, starting with the Paleo-Tethys at approximately 2,000–3,000 km wide in the Late Carboniferous (around 300 Ma) and narrowing as Cimmerian blocks drifted northward. By the Middle Triassic (240 Ma), the Neo-Tethys opened to 800–1,000 km, expanding to over 3,000 km in the Late Jurassic before contracting to less than 1,000 km by the Paleogene due to subduction. This evolution integrated with the opening of the Atlantic Ocean, where Tethys closure acted as a compensatory mechanism, balancing extension in the proto-Atlantic with convergence rates that matched early rifting velocities of 2–4 cm/year from 200 Ma onward.

Subduction and Collision Dynamics

The subduction of the Tethys Ocean involved a complex evolution of polarity, initially characterized by northward-directed beneath the southern margin of during the Paleo-Tethys phase, which accommodated the closure of early oceanic branches as Gondwanan terranes drifted northward. This polarity shifted in the with the opening and subsequent of the Neo-Tethys, where northward predominated beneath , driven by the convergence of Gondwanan fragments like and Arabia toward the Eurasian plate. The transition reflects a broader pattern of multiple systems operating within the Neo-Tethys since approximately 130 Ma, following the separation of the Indian plate from . Slab dynamics played a critical role in the Tethys closure, with tomographic imaging revealing detached slabs in beneath the eastern Mediterranean, including a prominent break-off event around 25–26 Ma associated with the Bitlis slab at depths of up to 500 km. This break-off, imaged through , marked the termination of in parts of the Neo-Tethys, allowing asthenospheric and influencing post-collisional . Such events were not isolated; analogous detachments occurred progressively across the subduction zone, contributing to the irregular closure of the ocean basin. Collision mechanics in the Tethys realm were dominated by oblique convergence, which induced lateral and escape tectonics, particularly evident in the Anatolian plate's westward movement along major strike-slip faults like the North Anatolian and East Anatolian Faults. This process, initiated in the late amid ongoing Arabia-Eurasia collision, facilitated the partitioning of convergence into and lateral displacement, with the Anatolian block escaping toward the Aegean extensional domain. During the Eocene, convergence rates between and decelerated to 4–6 cm/yr following slab break-off around 45 Ma, contributing to approximately 2,500 km of total north-south across the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen through crustal thickening and folding. Recent research has refined the early stages of Tethys evolution through a three-stage model for the Proto-Tethys , emphasizing initiation around 540–500 Ma in branches like the Buqingshan Ocean, followed by bidirectional and final closure by 450 Ma. This model, supported by geochronological and geochemical data from Early intrusions, highlights diachronous along the northern Proto-Tethys margin, linking it to the accretion of microcontinents in . Such frameworks underscore the long-term cyclicity of Tethyan , from Proto- to Neo-Tethys phases.

Paleoclimatic and Biological Impacts

Ocean Circulation Changes

Prior to its closure, the equatorial Tethys Ocean facilitated a circumglobal current system that enabled east-west exchange of warm surface waters across low latitudes, contributing to the globally warm climate of the Eocene epoch. This low-latitude passage enhanced poleward heat transport, elevating high-latitude temperatures by 3–7°C without changes in , and supported equable conditions with reduced meridional temperature gradients. The progressive closure of the Tethys Ocean from approximately 50 Ma to 5 Ma disrupted this east-west circulation, isolating the from the Atlantic and Mediterranean and redirecting flow patterns. This tectonic reconfiguration strengthened the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) by increasing salinity in the North Atlantic through reduced low-latitude inflows, promoting deeper and northward heat transport. Paleoclimate records indicate that Tethys narrowing contributed to the Eocene-Oligocene cooling transition around 34 Ma, as evidenced by a positive shift in benthic foraminiferal δ¹⁸O values exceeding 1‰, reflecting combined deep-ocean cooling of ~4°C and initial ice-sheet growth. These δ¹⁸O data from deep-sea cores highlight how gateway restrictions amplified by altering heat redistribution and moisture transport. Regionally, the India-Asia collision around 40 Ma intensified the Asian system by uplifting the , which enhanced seasonal rainfall contrasts through orographic effects and altered . This led to increased in while decreasing it in , as modeled simulations of Tethys closure demonstrate shifts in dynamics. Recent evidence from 2023 seismic tomography reconstructions links Neo-Tethyan subduction-driven to atmospheric CO₂ variations, showing how closure redistributed land-ocean ratios and promoted greater on emergent continents, thereby enhancing long-term CO₂ drawdown.

Tethyan Fossil Realms

The Tethyan faunal province encompassed a distinctive during the Era, hosting marine biota adapted to the warm, equatorial waters of the Tethys Ocean. This province featured high diversity in ammonites, which exhibited clear paleobiogeographic differentiation from northern Boreal faunas, with Tethyan groups like Perisphinctidae dominating southern assemblages during the to transition. Marine reptiles, including ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, and mosasaurs, were prominent inhabitants, exploiting the nutrient-rich, tropical marine environments across the Tethyan seaway. In the Cretaceous, bivalves emerged as key reef-builders, forming extensive bioherms and biostromes that characterized Tethyan carbonate platforms, often in association with corals and larger foraminiferans; these structures were particularly endemic to the warm, shallow Tethyan margins, with endemism peaking from the Neocomian to stages. Floral elements along the Tethys margins reflected the ocean's role in connecting northern and southern paleofloras, with Permian assemblages featuring , a characteristic Gondwanan seed fern, preserved in equatorial to subtropical deposits such as those in , then positioned near the northeastern Tethyan boundary. These floras, indicative of humid, coastal environments on the southern Tethyan rim, transitioned during the to more diverse assemblages, culminating in the rapid radiation of angiosperms by the mid-Cretaceous. Angiosperms, initially herbaceous but later including arborescent forms, proliferated in Tethyan lowlands, contributing to global vegetation shifts and higher plant diversity in warm, coastal settings. Following the progressive closure of the Tethys Seaway in the , particularly by the mid-, the ocean's remnants led to the isolation of biota from Atlantic-Mediterranean faunas, restricting and promoting independent evolutionary trajectories in tropical marine ecosystems. In the , a northern derived from Tethys, this isolation fostered highly endemic assemblages, including brackish-water mollusks such as cardiids and limnic hydrobiids, which dominated Sarmatian (middle ) deposits with over 70% in central and eastern regions. These endemics thrived in fluctuating environments, reflecting restricted connectivity and evaporative conditions post-closure. The Tethyan fossil realms exhibited high attributable to the ocean's persistent equatorial position, which supported tropical hotspots and limited dispersal barriers, thereby informing vicariance models where tectonic fragmentation drove in both marine and terrestrial lineages. Fossil correlations across these realms, particularly like ammonites and , provided key evidence for the Tethys's existence, as recognized by geologist Eduard Suess in the late ; Suess linked similar faunas from the to the , inferring a continuous ancient seaway that had since vanished. This biogeographic patterning underscored Tethys's role in shaping global biodiversity patterns through vicariant events.

Development of the Concept

Pre-Plate Tectonics Theories

Early ideas about the Tethys Ocean emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries within the framework of , which viewed it as a vast, subsiding linear depression between ancient continents. In 1893, Austrian geologist Eduard Suess introduced the term "Tethys" to describe this feature, conceptualizing it as a —a elongated trough that subsided over time, accumulating thick sequences of marine sediments eroded from the adjacent landmasses of to the north and to the south. Suess's model emphasized vertical crustal movements to explain the deposition of these sediments, portraying Tethys as a Mediterranean-like sea that connected distant regions during the era. Building on fossil evidence, French geologist Émile Haug in 1900 further delineated the Tethys by recognizing paleobiogeographic connections between the Mediterranean and Alpine domains. Haug's analysis of fossils, such as similar marine faunas in sedimentary rocks from the , the Mediterranean Basin, and extending eastward, supported the idea of a continuous seaway linking these areas, which he integrated into his broader theory of geosynclines as sites of prolonged between stable continental areas. This fossil-based linkage reinforced the view of Tethys as a unified depositional basin, with Haug mapping it as an expansive feature akin to a widened Central Mediterranean realm proposed earlier by Melchior Neumayr. Under the prevailing fixed-continent paradigm, explanations for Tethys's evolution relied on epeirogenic processes—broad vertical uplifts and subsidences of the —coupled with vertical , which dismissed any lateral movement of continents. Geologists attributed the ocean's formation to differential allowing infill, followed by later uplift to form mountain belts like the , without invoking horizontal displacement. Swiss geologist Émile Argand advanced this in 1924 through his contraction theory, depicting Tethys as a "wrinkled belt" where cooling and contraction of the compressed the geosynclinal sediments, leading to intense folding and thrusting observed in Asian and Alpine orogens. These pre-plate theories, however, faced significant limitations, particularly in explaining the mechanisms for Tethys's initial opening and eventual closure. Without a process for creation or destruction, proponents resorted to ad hoc models and contraction hypotheses that inadequately accounted for the scale and timing of accumulation and orogenic deformation.

Modern Plate Tectonics Framework

The modern framework for the Tethys Ocean emerged in the 1970s, building on the acceptance of and to explain the ocean's complex evolution as a series of successively opening and closing basins between major al blocks. A pivotal contribution came from A.M.C. Şengör's 1979 model, which differentiated the Tethys into Paleo-Tethys—an older ocean basin closing by the —and Neo-Tethys, a younger ocean that opened as a behind the northward-migrating Cimmerian , a composite block rifted from comprising terranes like , , and . This model resolved earlier ambiguities by positing the Cimmerian as an intervening fragment that separated the two oceanic realms, with Paleo-Tethys subducting northward beneath it, driving the Cimmerian . Subsequent advances in the refined these reconstructions through detailed analysis of —fragments of obducted onto continental margins—which provided key evidence for polarity and timing. John F. Dewey's 1988 synthesis integrated , , and structural data from the Himalayan and Mediterranean regions to argue for northward-dipping along much of the Tethyan margins, with supra-subduction zone (e.g., in and the ) indicating intra-oceanic arc formation prior to . This work emphasized how obduction sequences revealed episodic flips and slab rollback, linking Tethyan closure to the piecemeal accretion of Gondwanan terranes to . Contemporary observations from GPS and have confirmed the ongoing dynamics of Tethyan remnants, particularly the Arabia-Eurasia collision zone. GPS measurements indicate a convergence rate of approximately 2 cm/year between the Arabian and Eurasian plates, partitioned across strike-slip and faults in the Zagros and , reflecting the final closure phases of Neo-Tethys. images subducted Neo-Tethyan slabs beneath and the , extending to depths of 400-600 km, supporting models of slab steepening and detachment following initial continent-ocean collision around 35 Ma. In the 2020s, multi-ocean Tethys models have incorporated high-resolution U-Pb to delineate transitions between Proto-Tethys (Early ) and Paleo-Tethys (Late ), revealing a sequence of rifting and events that fragmented the original Proto-Tethyan basin into multiple arms. These models, drawing on detrital zircon provenance from sedimentary basins in and the , resolve the Proto-Paleo transition at around 420-400 Ma, with northward drift of the block initiating Paleo-Tethys spreading. A longstanding debate concerns the timing of the India-Eurasia collision, with estimates ranging from 55 Ma (based on initial contact) to 50 Ma (favoring full suturing), but integrated stratigraphic, paleomagnetic, and provenance data from foreland basins have converged on approximately 51 Ma as the onset of significant coupling. This resolution highlights diachronous closure along the Tethyan suture, with earlier soft collision in the west transitioning to hard collision eastward, influencing uplift of the .

References

  1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29024366/
  2. https://www2.oberlin.edu/Geopage/projects/204projects/kolker/kolker.html
  3. https://www.usgs.gov/publications/sedimentary-history-tethyan-margins-eastern-gondwana-during-mesozoic
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8743248/
  5. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-70652-4
  6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825223002830
  7. https://archive.org/details/dasantlitzderer02suesgoog
  8. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-7091-5644-5_1
  9. https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/10.1144/jgs2019-129
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1342937X21000307
  11. https://wiki.aapg.org/Phanerozoic_Tethys_region
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301926807001635
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355289007_Dynamics_of_closure_of_the_Proto-Tethys_Ocean_A_perspective_from_the_Southeast_Asian_Tethys_realm
  14. https://astrobiology.com/2025/08/long-lived-mantle-plume-tracing-the-onset-and-spreading-of-the-proto-tethys-ocean.html
  15. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article/134/1-2/145/596240/Subduction-initiation-of-the-western-Proto-Tethys
  16. https://www.earthdynamics.org/torsvik/torsvik-papers/1996/1996_Torsvik_ESR.pdf
  17. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsl/jgs/article/181/5/jgs2024-006/644884/The-assembly-of-Pangaea-geodynamic-conundrums
  18. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825221002920
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325388420_Timing_of_subduction_initiation_in_the_Proto-Tethys_Ocean_Evidence_from_the_Cambrian_gabbros_from_the_NE_Pamir_Plateau
  20. http://en.earth-science.net/article/doi/10.1007/s12583-021-1453-8
  21. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023EA002985
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379260259_Subduction_Within_the_Proto-Tethys_Ocean_Revealed_by_Recognition_of_the_Earliest_Phanerozoic_Intra-Oceanic_Arc_Northern_Tibetan_Plateau
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351031807_Subduction_initiation_of_the_western_Proto-Tethys_Ocean_New_evidence_from_the_Cambrian_intra-oceanic_forearc_ophiolitic_melange_in_the_western_Kunlun_Orogen_NW_Tibetan_Plateau
  24. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025TC008953
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351907754_Opening_of_the_West_Paleo-Tethys_Ocean_New_insights_from_earliest_Devonian_meta-mafic_rocks_in_the_Saualpe_crystalline_basement_Eastern_Alps
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312935716_Tethyan_oceans
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263234918_Devonian_to_Permian_evolution_of_the_Paleo-Tethys_Ocean_New_evidence_from_U-Pb_zircon_dating_and_Sr-Nd-Pb_isotopes_of_the_Darrehanjir-Mashhad_ophiolites_NE_Iran
  28. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article/136/9-10/3769/635316/Carboniferous-bimodal-volcanic-sequences-along-the
  29. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018JB015511
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024493722001268
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257411140_The_record_of_the_Late_Palaeozoic_active_margin_of_the_Palaeotethys_in_NE_Iran_Constraints_on_the_Cimmerian_orogeny
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355975208_Tectonic_evolution_and_geodynamics_of_the_Neo-Tethys_Ocean
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392211787_Dismembered_Guadalupian_Middle_Permian_seamounts_within_the_Yarlung-Tsangpo_Suture_Zone_Implications_for_the_opening_time_of_the_Neo-Tethys_Ocean
  34. https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1987AREPS..15..213C
  35. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11430-023-1175-5
  36. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/jgs/article/161/3/501/94343/testing-models-of-late-palaeozoic-early-mesozoic
  37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305357542_Evidence_for_the_Triassic_rifting_and_opening_of_the_Neotethyan_Izmir-Ankara_Ocean_and_discussion_on_the_presence_of_Cimmerian_events_at_the_northern_edge_of_the_Tauride-Anatolide_Platform_Turkey
  38. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012825223001083
  39. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geolmag/article/148/5-6/692/307185/Zagros-orogeny-a-subduction-dominated-process
  40. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0024493721005739
  41. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/cup/geolmag/article/160/12/2067/649028/The-onset-of-Neo-Tethys-subduction-in-the-Early
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/triassic-period
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223779606_Late_Triassic_and_Early_Jurassic_palaeogeography_of_the_world
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222566552_Development_of_concepts_concerning_the_genesis_and_emplacement_of_Tethyan_ophiolites_in_the_Eastern_Mediterranean_and_Oman_regions
  45. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gpl/geoarabia/article/18/2/141/567138/Salt-intrusions-in-Jabal-Qumayrah-northern-Oman
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817223000600
  47. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017tc004790
  48. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gpl/geoarabia/article/14/4/17/567101/Opening-of-the-Neo-Tethys-Ocean-and-the-Pangea-B
  49. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392360250_Pangaea_and_the_Tethys_Importance_of_Strike-Slip_Movements_in_Orogenic_Development
  50. https://www.geologist.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2018_Maffione_Tectonics.pdf
  51. http://rcastilho.pt/MBE/ewExternalFiles/Chatterjee_GR_2013.pdf
  52. https://www.britannica.com/place/Tethys-Sea
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383615000267
  54. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1987.tb00576.x
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256860097_Late_Jurassic-Cenozoic_reconstructions_of_the_Indonesian_region_and_the_Indian_Ocean
  56. https://se.copernicus.org/preprints/5/1335/2013/sed-5-1335-2013-print.pdf
  57. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article/135/11-12/2849/620443/Magmatic-records-of-subduction-and-closure-of-the
  58. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020TC006336
  59. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep21605
  60. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article/111/1/104/183418/Tectonic-setting-origin-and-obduction-of-the-Oman
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0040195192902566
  62. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep39643
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4631894/
  64. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/geological-magazine/article/geodynamic-evolution-of-upper-cretaceous-zagros-ophiolites-formation-of-oceanic-lithosphere-above-a-nascent-subduction-zone/1844EEE28B9456C011007CCE797D3B8E
  65. https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/11/1751/2015/cp-11-1751-2015.pdf
  66. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2022GL101372
  67. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-42920-0
  68. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2010JB007673
  69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040195112000509
  70. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/jgs/article/160/3/413/94256/The-Palaeogene-forearc-basin-of-the-Eastern-Alps
  71. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040195198000924
  72. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375601250_Global_seismic_tomography_reveals_remnants_of_subducted_Tethyan_oceanic_slabs_in_the_deep_mantle
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0025322705000897
  74. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bre.12554
  75. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012825217301113
  76. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-91001-z
  77. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264817225000054
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377839823000300
  79. https://hal.science/hal-05015657/file/NREE_ms_preproof.pdf
  80. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2021TC006762
  81. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/sepm/jsedres/article/83/11/942/244697/Evidence-of-Clastic-Evaporites-In-the-Canyons-of
  82. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2005JB003791
  83. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/241/2/1155/8063585
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0031920190901987
  85. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/rgg/article/53/3/221/589464/Evolution-of-the-central-Alpine-Himalayan-belt-in
  86. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250685299_Eoalpine_and_Mesoalpine_tectonics_in_the_Southern_Alps
  87. https://www.tecto.earth.unibas.ch/Members/Schmid/Publications/082_Schmidetal.2004bEcl.pdf
  88. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264370799000368
  89. https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/full/10.1144/sp330.1
  90. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/170/1/182/597762
  91. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167498712030253X
  92. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsw/lithosphere/article/2024/1/lithosphere_2023_290/633430/New-Insights-on-the-Early-Proto-Tethys-Subduction
  93. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/earth-science/articles/10.3389/feart.2024.1473101/full
  94. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep31442
  95. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article/43/4/335/131860/How-the-closure-of-paleo-Tethys-and-Tethys-oceans
  96. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep08407
  97. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1342937X12002390
  98. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019GL085473
  99. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259307820_Paleomagnetism_of_the_Atlantic_Tethys_and_Iapetus_Oceans_Cambridge_University_Press_Cambridge
  100. https://www.earthbyte.org/Resources/Pdf/Seton_etal_Global_Plate_Model_ESR2012.pdf
  101. https://d-nb.info/1373691859/34
  102. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/2016GL070524
  103. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7202883/
  104. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2020GC009009
  105. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2019GC008512
  106. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article/14/3/907/530928/Subduction-termination-through-progressive-slab
  107. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277679976_Anatolian_escape_tectonics_driven_by_Eocene_crustal_thickening_and_Neogene-Quaternary_extensional_collapse_in_the_Eastern_Mediterranean_Region
  108. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2005TC001860
  109. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article/44/4/283/132040/Eocene-Neo-Tethyan-slab-breakoff-constrained-by-45
  110. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012825221003305
  111. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/15/2/127
  112. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/jgs/article/181/1/jgs2022-188/628542/Bidirectional-subduction-of-the-Proto-Tethys-Ocean
  113. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2001PA000730
  114. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2115346119
  115. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230623982_India-Asia_collision_timing
  116. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031018223001591
  117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.03.007
  118. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263379464_Marine_faunal_realms_of_the_Mesozoic_Review_and_revision_under_the_new_guidelines_for_biogeographic_classification_and_nomenclature
  119. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6849608/
  120. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gpl/geoarabia/article/14/1/147/566931/The-Mesozoic-of-Afghanistan
  121. https://palass.org/sites/default/files/media/publications/special_papers_in_palaeontology/number_12/spp12_pp169-174.pdf
  122. https://www.britannica.com/science/Santonian-Stage
  123. https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/taxa/inverts/mollusca/rudists.php
  124. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/geological-magazine/article/first-record-of-the-permian-glossopteris-flora-from-sri-lanka-implications-for-hydrocarbon-source-rocks-in-the-mannar-basin/EF71C7114DD6D3D24027D2290E5E09D7
  125. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231840414_Permian_Glossopteris_and_Elatocladus_megafossil_floras_from_the_English_Coast_eastern_Ellsworth_Land_Antarctica
  126. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818114001477
  127. https://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/G102/lectures/102cretaceous.html
  128. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338332168_Flora_of_the_Cretaceous_Diversity_and_migration_with_an_emphasis_on_flowering_plants
  129. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320351674_Tethyan_changes_shaped_aquatic_diversification_Aquatic_diversification_in_the_Tethyan_region
  130. https://bioone.org/journals/acta-palaeontologica-polonica/volume-56/issue-4/app.2010.0046/Spatiotemporal-Signals-and-Palaeoenvironments-of-Endemic-Molluscan-Assemblages-in-the/10.4202/app.2010.0046.full
  131. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000925412500364X
  132. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9201827/
  133. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-03107-y
  134. https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/MittGeolGes_107_1_0006-0082.pdf
  135. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-7091-5644-5_1
  136. https://www.episodes.org/journal/download_pdf.php?doi=10.18814/epiiugs/1985/v8i1/001
  137. https://ajsonline.org/api/v1/articles/61165-geosynclines-a-fundamental-concept-in-geology.pdf
  138. https://virtualexplorer.com.au/system/files/papers/00234/assets/a-journey-across-two-centuries-of-alpine-geology.pdf
  139. https://cdn.visionias.in/value_added_material/354f3-continental-drift-and-plate-tectonics.pdf
  140. https://www.mantleplumes.org/WebDocuments/Trumpy2001.pdf
  141. https://ajsonline.org/api/v1/articles/61166-geosynclines-a-fundamental-concept-in-geology-part-ii.pdf
  142. https://www.nature.com/articles/279590a0
  143. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.1988.0135
  144. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JB013370
  145. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/13/4/532
  146. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article/52/1/61/629492/Timing-of-India-Asia-collision-and-significant
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.