Hubbry Logo
Onondaga languageOnondaga languageMain
Open search
Onondaga language
Community hub
Onondaga language
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Onondaga language
Onondaga language
from Wikipedia

DUC:dualic PUNC:punctual aspect REP:repetitive SRFL:semireflexive

Onondaga
Onǫdaʼgegáʼ
Onoñdaʼgegáʼ nigaweñoʼdeñʼ
Pronunciation[onũdaʔɡeɡáʔ niɡawẽnoʔdẽʔ]
Native toCanada, United States
RegionSix Nations Reserve, Ontario, and central New York state
Ethnicity1,600 Onondaga people (2007)[1]
Native speakers
40 (2007)[1]
Revivalincreasing numbers since 2010[2]
Iroquoian
  • Northern
    • Lake Iroquoian
      • Five Nations
        • Onondaga
Language codes
ISO 639-3ono
Glottologonon1246
ELPOnondaga
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA.

Onondaga (Onoñdaʼgegáʼ nigaweñoʼdeñʼ, IPA: [onũdaʔɡeɡáʔ niɡawẽnoʔdẽʔ], literally "Onondaga is our language") is the language of the Onondaga First Nation, one of the original five constituent tribes of the League of the Iroquois (Haudenosaunee).

This language is spoken in the United States and Canada, primarily on the reservation in central New York State and near Brantford, Ontario.

Usage and revitalization

[edit]

According to the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger, there are about 10 mother tongue Onondaga speakers in New York, and 40 native speakers on the Six Nations Reserve in Ontario, Canada.[3] The language has come to be endangered due to the pressure to assimilate to English as the language of power. Standardization also occurred in residential schools across Canada in the 1800s to 1900s. Young boys and girls at the Mohawk Institute Indian Residential School in Brantford, Ontario, were punished for using their heritage language.[4]

The Onondaga Nation Language Center (called Neʼ Eñhadiweñnayeñdeʼnhaʼ, or "they will get to know the language") has been engaged in language revitalization efforts since 2010. Children learn the Onondaga language at Onondaga Nation School, and classes are also available for adults. In September 2015, it was announced that fifteen adults would enter a full-time language immersion class in Onondaga, after which they would become teachers of the language.[2] In Canada, Gawęnahwishe' Onǫda'gega is a revitalization project that launched in 2017 with six new language learners. It is an adult immersion program that implements the Six Nations Language Commission's (SNLC) framework.[5] They are involved with translating the local radio station, putting on programs with local elementary and secondary schools, and outreach events for the community.[5]

Phonology

[edit]

This table shows the (consonant) phonemes that are found in Onondaga.

Consonant phonemes
Alveolar Postalveolar
/ Palatal
Velar Glottal
Plosive t k ʔ
Affricate
Fricative s h
Sonorant n j w

The two plosives, /t/, /k/ are allophonically voiced to [d] and [ɡ] before vowels and resonants (the bottom row of the chart labelled 'sonorant') and are spelled ⟨d⟩ and ⟨g⟩ in this case. There is considerable palatalization and affrication in the language.

Front Central Back
Close i ũ
Mid e o
Open æ a

Onondaga has five oral vowels, /i e o æ a/ (/æ/ is sometimes represented orthographically as ⟨ä⟩), and two nasal vowels, /ẽ/ and /ũ/. The nasal vowels, following the Iroquoianist tradition, are spelled with ogoneks in the scholarly literature and in Ontario (⟨ę⟩ and ⟨ǫ⟩ or ⟨ų⟩). In New York, they are represented with a following ⟨ñ⟩ (⟨eñ⟩ and ⟨oñ⟩). Vowels can be both short and long. When vowel length derives from the now lost consonant *r, it is phonemic. Vowel length is written with a following colon, ⟨꞉⟩ or raised dot (half colon) ⟨ꞏ⟩.

Morphology

[edit]

Onondaga is a polysynthetic language, exhibiting a great deal of inflectional and derivational morphology on the verbal forms (including noun incorporation). Nominal forms have less morphology. Additionally, there are particles, which are monomorphemic.

Verbal morphology

[edit]

Onondaga verbs can be divided into three main classes according to their aspectual properties (discussed below). These are the active verbs, motion verbs, and stative verbs. We must distinguish between tense and aspect. Tense refers to when the event takes place, either in the past, the present or the future. Aspect refers to the event itself, such as whether it is finished or ongoing or occurs repeatedly.

There are four aspects in Onondaga. The first is the habitual aspect (HAB). This aspect is used to refer to an event that takes place repeatedly or on an ongoing basis. The second is the punctual aspect (PUNC) (also known as perfective aspect). This aspect refers to an entire event in its completeness. When used in the past tense, the event is described as "over and done-with". It cannot describe an event that is interrupted or incomplete. The third aspect is the stative (STAT) (also known as imperfective) refers to an event that is ongoing or incomplete or, if it occurs in the past tense, that has some bearing on the present. Finally, there is the purposive aspect (PURP), which refers to imminent action and usually implies intent or volition on the part of the subject. Active verbs can appear with any of the first three aspects. Motion verbs can appear with any of all four aspects. Stative verbs can only appear with the stative aspect.

Verbal template

[edit]

A typical Onondaga verb consists of several morphemes (components). The following chart outlines the order of the morphemes. Obligatory morphemes appear in boldface, and optional morphemes are in standard font. Note that some of the "optional" morphemes are obligatory with certain verb roots. The obligatory morphemes, however, must appear on each and every single verb.

pre-pronominal prefixes pronominal prefixes reflexive or semireflexive incorporated noun verb root derivational suffixes aspect suffix expanded aspect suffix

Each of the following sections outlines the shapes that these morphemes can take.

Pre-pronominal prefixes

[edit]
[edit]

The prepronominal prefixes express a variety of concepts and ideas. The first concept is modality, which expresses the degree of urgency, certainty or likelihood of the event. There are three modal prefixes in Onondaga. The modal prefixes only appear with the punctual aspect. They also appear if there is a modalizer suffix.

The first of these is commonly called the future modal prefix. This prefix expresses events that have not yet taken place at the time the speaker is talking.

ęhayę́꞉twaʔ

ę-

FUT-

ha-

3.SG.M.AG-

yętw-

plant-

PUNC

ę- ha- yętw- aʔ

FUT- 3.SG.M.AG- plant- PUNC

'He will plant it.'

The second is the factual modal prefix. This prefix indicates that the speaker knows the event happened for a fact. It typically has a past tense reading (since we are normally only sure about events that happened in the past).

waʔhayę́꞉twaʔ

waʔ-

FACT-

ha-

3.SG.M.AG-

yę꞉tw-

plant-

PUNC

waʔ- ha- yę꞉tw- aʔ

FACT- 3.SG.M.AG- plant- PUNC

'He planted it.'

The third is optative modal prefix. This prefix expresses the idea that the event should or ought to take place. It is also used to express untrue events or events that might have taken place but have not. Here are some examples.

ahayę́꞉twaʔ

a-

OPT-

ha-

3.SG.M.AG-

yę꞉tw-

plant-

PUNC

a- ha- yę꞉tw- aʔ

OPT- 3.SG.M.AG- plant- PUNC

'He might plant it.'

The following chart lists forms of the three modal prepronominal prefixes and indicates when to use which form.

Mood Pre-pronominal Prefix When used Example
factual waʔ default
waʔhayę́꞉twaʔ

waʔ-ha-yę꞉tw-aʔ

FACT-he-plant-PUNC

waʔ-ha-yę꞉tw-aʔ

FACT-he-plant-PUNC

'He planted it.'

weʔ any 2nd person or 1st person inclusive (except 2.SG.AG)
weʔdniyę́꞉twaʔ

weʔ-dni-yę꞉tw-aʔ

FACT-1.DU.INCL.AG-plant-PUNC

weʔ-dni-yę꞉tw-aʔ

FACT-1.DU.INCL.AG-plant-PUNC

'You and I planted it.'

ǫ optionally replaces sequence waʔwa
ǫgyę́꞉twaʔ

waʔ-wak-yę꞉tw-aʔ

FACT-1.SG.PAT-plant-PUNC

waʔ-wak-yę꞉tw-aʔ

FACT-1.SG.PAT-plant-PUNC

'It planted me.' (ex, a monster)

future ę does not change
ęhayę́꞉twaʔ

ę-ha-yę꞉tw-aʔ

FUT-he-plant-PUNC

ę-ha-yę꞉tw-aʔ

FUT-he-plant-PUNC

'He will plant it.'

optative a / a꞉ default (/a-/ and /a꞉-/ are in free variation)
ahayę́꞉twaʔ

a-ha-yę꞉tw-aʔ

OPT-he-plant-PUNC

a-ha-yę꞉tw-aʔ

OPT-he-plant-PUNC

'He might plant it.'

ae any 2nd person or 1st person inclusive (except 2.SG.AG)
aedniyę́꞉twaʔ

ae-dni-yę꞉tw-aʔ

OPT-1.DU.INCL.AG-plant-PUNC

ae-dni-yę꞉tw-aʔ

OPT-1.DU.INCL.AG-plant-PUNC

'You and I might plant it.'

optionally replaces sequence /awa/
aǫgyę́꞉twaʔ

a-wak-yę꞉tw-aʔ

OPT-1.SG.PAT-plant-PUNC

a-wak-yę꞉tw-aʔ

OPT-1.SG.PAT-plant-PUNC

'It might plant me.' (ex, a monster)

Non-modal pre-pronominal prefixes
[edit]

In addition to the modal prefixes, there is also a set of prefixes that express a variety of concepts, some of which do not have a clearly distinct meaning, rather their meaning varies depending on context. The list of these includes repetitive, cislocative, dualic, translocative, partitive, coincident, contrastive, and negative.

Repetitive
[edit]

The repetitive morpheme adds the meaning of doing something again or repeating some-thing. The basic form of the repetitive morpheme is /s-/. Here are some examples. Example (37) has the prepronominal prefix /sa-/, which is a combination of both repetitive and factual mood. Example (38) has the prepronominal prefix /ęs-/, which is a combination of repetitive and future. These contrast with example (39), which does not have the repetitive morpheme.

a.
sahayę́꞉twaʔ

sa–

REP.FACT-

ha–

3.SG.M-

yętw–

plant-

PUNC

sa– ha– yętw– aʔ

REP.FACT- 3.SG.M- plant- PUNC

'He planted it again.'

b.
ęshayę́꞉twaʔ

ęs–

REP.FUT-

ha–

3.SG.M-

yętw–

plant-

PUNC

ęs– ha– yętw– aʔ

REP.FUT- 3.SG.M- plant- PUNC

'He will plant it again.'

c.
waʔhayę́꞉twaʔ

waʔ–

FACT-

ha–

3.SG.M-

yętw–

plant-

PUNC

waʔ– ha– yętw– aʔ

FACT- 3.SG.M- plant- PUNC

'He planted it.'

Cislocative
[edit]

The cislocative (CLOC) morpheme is used to indicate movement toward the speaker. It can also mean that a particular event is pinpointed back in time. In some cases, the meaning of the cislocative is unpredictable. Some of these are listed below. There are two forms of the cislocative.

/t-/ default
/di-/ used with any 2nd person or 1st person inclusive, except 2.SG.AG

Translocative
[edit]

The translocative (TLOC) morpheme is used to indicate movement away from the speaker. The form of the translocative is /he-/

Dualic
[edit]

The dualic (DUC) does not have a specific meaning. The form of the dualic is /de-/, but changes when it appears in combination with other prepronominal prefixes. Whenever it appears with a verb stem, it changes the meaning in unpredictable ways. Usually, however, there is some notion of there being two of something or of some reciprocal activity such as trading. Also, some verb roots must appear with the dualic prepronominal prefix. In examples (41) and (42), the dualic prefix is obligatory. In example (43), the dualic prefix adds the meaning of becoming two pieces.

a.
deyǫshę́thwas

de-

DUC-

yǫ-

3.SG.F-

ashęthw-as

cry-HAB

de- yǫ- ashęthw-as

DUC- 3.SG.F- cry-HAB

'She is crying'

b.
dehahahíyaʔks

de-

DUC-

ha-

3.SG.M-

ahah-

road-

iyaʔk-

cross-

s

HAB

de- ha- ahah- iyaʔk- s

DUC- 3.SG.M- road- cross- HAB

'He crosses a road.'

c.
dehá꞉yaʔks

de-

DUC-

ha-

3.SG.M-

yaʔk-

break-

s

HAB

de- ha- yaʔk- s

DUC- 3.SG.M- break- HAB

'He breaks it into two.'

d.
há꞉yaʔks

ha-

3.SG.M-

yaʔk-

break-

s

HAB

ha- yaʔk- s

3.SG.M- break- HAB

'He breaks it off.'

Pronominal prefixes

[edit]

There are three series of pronominal prefixes in Onondaga. There is a transitive series, used with transitive verbs. Intransitive verbs use either the agent series or the patient series. The choice between the latter two is often complex, as we will see. The phonological shape of the pronominal prefix depends on the identity of the following sound. This gives rise to several series of pronominal prefixes, which are labelled according to the following segment. These include the c-series (for pronominal prefixes which precede a consonant), the a-series (for pronominal prefixes which precede /a/), the e-series, ę-series, o-series, ǫ-series, and i-series. Finally, the pronominal prefixes inflect for person, number and gender. We discuss each of these in turn.

Onondaga distinguishes three persons: first (I or we), second (you) and third (he, she, it or they). The first person can be either exclusive (EXCL), which excludes the listener, or inclusive (INCL), which includes the listener.

Here, when John says we, it does not include the person he is talking to. In other words, Mary does not get to go to the movies. This use of we is called the first person exclusive. English does not make a distinction between inclusive and exclusive we but Onondaga does. Consider the following two words. The pronominal prefix /dn-/ indicates a first person dual inclusive subject, and the pronominal prefix /agn-/ indicates a first person dual exclusive subject.

a.
weʔdnek

weʔ–

FACT-

dn–

1.DU.INCL-

ek–

eat-

Ø

PUNC

weʔ– dn– ek– Ø

FACT- 1.DU.INCL- eat- PUNC

'We two (you and I) ate it.'

b.
waʔagnek

waʔ–

FACT-

agn–

1.DU.EXCL-

ek–

eat-

Ø

PUNC

waʔ– agn– ek– Ø

FACT- 1.DU.EXCL- eat- PUNC

'We two (someone else and I) ate it.'

Three numbers are also distinguished in Onondaga: singular (for one entity, SG), dual (for two entities, DU), and plural (for three or more entities, PL). In the glosses, singular is marked with SG, dual is marked with DU, and plural is marked with PL.

a.
waʔsek

waʔ–

FACT-

s–

2.SG-

ek–

eat-

Ø

PUNC

waʔ– s– ek– Ø

FACT- 2.SG- eat- PUNC

'You (sing.) ate it.'

b.
weʔsnek

weʔ–

FACT-

sn–

2.DU-

ek–

eat-

Ø

PUNC

weʔ– sn– ek– Ø

FACT- 2.DU- eat- PUNC

'You two ate it.'

c.
weʔswek

weʔ–

FACT-

sw–

2.PL-

ek–

eat-

Ø

PUNC

weʔ– sw– ek– Ø

FACT- 2.PL- eat- PUNC

'You all ate it.'

Additionally, Onondaga distinguishes three genders, which are realized in the third person only. The first is masculine (M), which is used to refer to male humans and certain animals, either alone or in a group. The second is feminine (F). This is used to refer to female humans, certain animals, or some unknown person. It is sometimes called the feminine-indefinite. For groups of people that contain both men and women, the masculine is used. The third is neuter (N), which is used to refer to most animals and inanimate objects. In older texts, the neuter is used to refer to human females in certain circumstances, although this usage is no longer common. See Abrams (2006: 17) for more discussion. (Abbott, 1984 also discusses two feminine genders in Oneida.) Here are some examples.

a.
waʔek

waʔ-

FACT-

e-

3.SG.F-

k-

eat-

Ø

PUNC

waʔ- e- k- Ø

FACT- 3.SG.F- eat- PUNC

'She ate it.' OR 'Someone ate it.'

b.
waʔwek

waʔ-

FACT-

we-

3.SG.N-

k-

eat-

Ø

PUNC

waʔ- we- k- Ø

FACT- 3.SG.N- eat- PUNC

'Something/it ate it.'

c.
waʔhek

waʔ-

FACT-

he-

3.SG.M-

k-

eat-

Ø

PUNC

waʔ- he- k- Ø

FACT- 3.SG.M- eat- PUNC

'He ate it.'

Finally, we observe that there are two series of prefixes for intransitive verbs, the agent series (AG) and the patient series (PAT). As a general rule, verbs which involve active, purposeful movement or activity on the part of the subject are conjugated with the agent series. Verbs which involve involuntary action or states are conjugated with the patient series. There are so many exceptions to this generalization, however, that one has to simply learn for each intransitive verb whether it takes the agent or the patient series. There is an additional rule for the intransitive verbs that take the agent series. When these verbs appear with stative aspect, they use the patient series rather than the agent series. This rule does not have any exceptions.

There are six classes of conjugations which depend on the initial sound of the following morpheme (i.e., the first sound of the verb root or of the incorporated noun if there is one).

C-Stem
[edit]

The following chart lists the pronominal prefixes for stems that begin with a consonant. Note that (y) or (w) in brackets disappears when preceded by a pre-pronominal prefix.

Intransitive, Agent-series
singular dual plural
1st person exclusive k- (y)agni- (y)agwa-
inclusive dni- dwa-
2nd person s- sni- swa-
3rd person masculine ha- hni- hadi-
feminine/
indefinite
(y)e- gni- gǫdi-
Intransitive, Patient-series
singular dual plural
1st person (w)ak- (y)ǫgni- (y)ǫgwa-
2nd person sa- sni- swa-
3rd person masculine ho- hodi-
feminine/
indefinite
((y)a)go- (y)odi-
Transitive Series
Patient (to right)
Agent (below)
1.SG 1.DU 1.PL 2.SG 2.DU 2.PL 3.NEUT 3.SG.MASC 3.FEM/INDEF.SG 3.FEM.DU/PL 3.MASC.DU/PL
1.SG gǫ- gni- gwa- he- khe-
1.DU.EXCL gni- gni- gwa- shagni- (y)akhni-
1.PL.EXCL gwa- gwa- gwa- shagwa-
1.DU.INCL shedni- (y)ethi-
1.PL.INCL shedwa-
2.SG sk- sgni- sgwa- hes- she-
2.DU sgni- sgni- sgwa- shesni- (y)etchi-
2.PL sgwa- sgwa- sgwa- sheswa-
3.SG.MASC hak- shǫgni- shǫgwa- hya- shesni- sheswa- hǫwa- shago-
3.SG.FEM/INDEF (y)ǫk- (y)ǫkhi- (y)esa- (y)etchi- gǫwa- hǫwa- (y)ǫdat- gǫwadi- hǫwadi-
3.DU/PL.FEM ((y)a)godi-
3.DU.PL.MASC hǫk- shagodi-
A-Stem
[edit]

The following chart lists the pronominal prefixes for stems that begin with a consonant. Note that (y) or (w) in brackets disappears when preceded by a pre-pronominal prefix.

Intransitive, Agent-series
singular dual plural
1st person exclusive g- (y)agy- (y)agw-
inclusive dy- dw-
2nd person (h)s- jy- sw-
3rd person masculine hǫhR- hy- hǫw-
feminine/
indefinite
yǫw- gy- gǫw-
Intransitive, Patient-series
singular dual plural
1st person (w)ag- (y)ǫgy- (y)ǫgw-
2nd person s- jy- sw-
3rd person masculine how- hon-
feminine/
indefinite
((y)a)gow- (y)on-
Transitive Series
Patient (to right)
Agent (below)
1.SG 1.DU 1.PL 2.SG 2.DU 2.PL 3.NEUT 3.SG.MASC 3.FEM/INDEF.SG 3.FEM.DU/PL 3.MASC.DU/PL
1.SG gǫy- gy- gw- hey- khey-
1.DU.EXCL gy- gy- gw- shagy- (y)akhiy-
1.PL.EXCL gw- gw- gw- shagw-
1.DU.INCL shedy- (y)ethy-
1.PL.INCL shedwa-
2.SG sg- sgy- sgw- hes- shey-
2.DU sgy- sgy- sgw- shejy- (y)etchiy-
2.PL sgw- sgw- sgw- shesw-
3.SG.MASC hag- shǫgy- shǫgw- hy- (s)hejy- (s)hesw- hǫw- shagow-
3.SG.FEM/INDEF (y)ǫg- (y)ǫkhiy- (y)es- (y)etchiy- gǫw- hǫw- (y)ǫdad- gǫwan- hǫwadiy-
3.DU/PL.FEM ((y)a)godiy-
3.DU.PL.MASC hǫg- shagodi-
E-Stem
[edit]

The following chart lists the pronominal prefixes for stems that begin with a consonant. Note that (y) or (w) in brackets disappears when preceded by a pre-pronominal prefix.

Intransitive, Agent-series
singular dual plural
1st person exclusive g- (y)agn- (y)agw-
inclusive dn- dw-
2nd person (h)s- sn- sw-
3rd person masculine h- hn- hęn-
feminine/
indefinite
yagǫ(y)- gn- gǫn-
Intransitive, Patient-series
singular dual plural
1st person (w)ag- (y)ǫgn- (y)ǫgw-
2nd person s- sn- sw-
3rd person masculine haw- hon-
feminine/
indefinite
((y)a)gaw- (y)on-
Transitive Series
Patient (to right)
Agent (below)
1.SG 1.DU 1.PL 2.SG 2.DU 2.PL 3.NEUT 3.SG.MASC 3.FEM/INDEF.SG 3.FEM.DU/PL 3.MASC.DU/PL
1.SG gǫy- gn- gw- hey- khey-
1.DU.EXCL gn- gn- gw- shagn- (y)akhiy-
1.PL.EXCL gw- gw- gw- shagw-
1.DU.INCL shedn- (y)ethy-
1.PL.INCL shedwa-
2.SG sg- sgn- sgw- hes- shey-
2.DU sgn- sgn- sgw- shejy- (y)etchiy-
2.PL sgw- sgw- sgw- shesw-
3.SG.MASC hag- shǫgn- shǫgw- hy- (s)hesn- (s)hesw- hǫw- shagaw-
3.SG.FEM/INDEF (y)ǫg- (y)ǫkhiy- (y)es- (y)etchiy- gǫw- hǫw- (y)ǫdad- gǫwan- hǫwadiy-
3.DU/PL.FEM ((y)a)godiy-
3.DU/PL.MASC hǫg- shagodi-
Ę-Stem
[edit]

The following chart lists the pronominal prefixes for stems that begin with /ę/. Note that (y) or (w) in brackets disappears when preceded by a pre-pronominal prefix.

Intransitive, Agent-series
singular dual plural
1st person exclusive g- (y)agy- (y)agw-
inclusive dy- dw-
2nd person (h)s- jy- sw-
3rd person masculine hǫhR- hy- hǫw-
feminine/
indefinite
yǫw/yag- gy- gǫn-
Intransitive, Patient-series
singular dual plural
1st person (w)ag- (y)ǫgy- (y)ǫgw-
2nd person s- jy- sw-
3rd person masculine how- hon-
feminine/
indefinite
((y)a)gow- (y)on-
Transitive Series
Patient (to right)
Agent (below)
1.SG 1.DU 1.PL 2.SG 2.DU 2.PL 3.NEUT 3.SG.MASC 3.FEM/INDEF.SG 3.FEM.DU/PL 3.MASC.DU/PL
1.SG gǫy- gy- gw- hey- khey-
1.DU.EXCL gy- gy- gw- shagy- (y)akhiy-
1.PL.EXCL gw- gw- gw- shagw-
1.DU.INCL shedy- (y)ethy-
1.PL.INCL shedwa-
2.SG sg- sgy- sgw- hes- shey-
2.DU sgy- sgy- sgw- shejy- (y)etchiy-
2.PL sgw- sgw- sgw- shesw-
3.SG.MASC hag- shǫgy- shǫgw- hy- (s)hejy- (s)hesw- hǫw- shagow-
3.SG.FEM/INDEF (y)ǫg- (y)ǫkhiy- (y)es- (y)etchiy- gǫw- hǫw- (y)ǫdad- gǫwan- hǫwadiy-
3.DU/PL.FEM ((y)a)godiy-
3.DU.PL.MASC hǫg- shagodi-
O-Stem
[edit]

The following chart lists the pronominal prefixes for stems that begin with a consonant. Note that (y) or (w) in brackets disappears when preceded by a pre-pronominal prefix.

Intransitive, Agent-series
singular dual plural
1st person exclusive g- (y)agy- (y)agw-
inclusive dy- dw-
2nd person (h)s- jy- sw-
3rd person masculine hǫhR- hy- hǫw-
feminine/
indefinite
yǫw- gy- gǫw-
Intransitive, Patient-series
singular dual plural
1st person (w)ag- (y)ǫgy- (y)ǫgw-
2nd person s- jy- sw-
3rd person masculine how- hon-
feminine/
indefinite
((y)a)gow- (y)on-
Transitive Series
Patient (to right)
Agent (below)
1.SG 1.DU 1.PL 2.SG 2.DU 2.PL 3.NEUT 3.SG.MASC 3.FEM/INDEF.SG 3.FEM.DU/PL 3.MASC.DU/PL
1.SG gǫy- gy- gw- hey- khey-
1.DU.EXCL gy- gy- gw- shagn- (y)akhiy-
1.PL.EXCL gw- gw- gw- shagy-
1.DU.INCL shedn- (y)ethiy-
1.PL.INCL shedy-
2.SG sg- sgn- sgy- hes- shey-
2.DU sgn- sgn- sgy- shesn- (y)etchiy-
2.PL sgy- sgy- sgy- shejy-
3.SG.MASC hag- shǫgn- shǫgy- hyay- (s)hesn- (s)hejy- hǫy- shaga-
3.SG.FEM/INDEF (y)ǫg- (y)ǫkhiy- (y)es- (y)etchiy- gǫw- hǫw- (y)ǫdad- gǫwan- hǫwadiy-
3.DU/PL.FEM ((y)a)godiy-
3.DU.PL.MASC hǫg- shagodi-
Ǫ-Stem
[edit]

The following chart lists the pronominal prefixes for stems that begin with a consonant. Note that (y) or (w) in brackets disappears when preceded by a pre-pronominal prefix.

Intransitive, Agent-series
singular dual plural
1st person exclusive g- (y)agy- (y)agw-
inclusive dy- dw-
2nd person (h)s- jy- sw-
3rd person masculine hǫhR- hy- hǫw-
feminine/
indefinite
yǫw- gy- gǫw-
Intransitive, Patient-series
singular dual plural
1st person (w)ag- (y)ǫgy- (y)ǫgw-
2nd person s- jy- sw-
3rd person masculine how- hon-
feminine/
indefinite
((y)a)gow- (y)on-
Transitive Series
Patient (to right)
Agent (below)
1.SG 1.DU 1.PL 2.SG 2.DU 2.PL 3.NEUT 3.SG.MASC 3.FEM/INDEF.SG 3.FEM.DU/PL 3.MASC.DU/PL
1.SG gǫy- gy- gw- hey- khey-
1.DU.EXCL gy- gy- gw- shagy- (y)akhiy-
1.PL.EXCL gw- gw- gw- shagw-
1.DU.INCL shedy- (y)ethy-
1.PL.INCL shedwa-
2.SG sg- sgy- sgw- hes- shey-
2.DU sgy- sgy- sgw- shejy- (y)etchiy-
2.PL sgw- sgw- sgw- shesw-
3.SG.MASC hag- shǫgy- shǫgw- hy- (s)hejy- (s)hesw- hǫw- shagow-
3.SG.FEM/INDEF (y)ǫg- (y)ǫkhiy- (y)es- (y)etchiy- gǫw- hǫw- (y)ǫdad- gǫwan- hǫwadiy-
3.DU/PL.FEM ((y)a)godiy-
3.DU.PL.MASC hǫg- shagodi-
I-Stem
[edit]

The following chart lists the pronominal prefixes for stems that begin with a consonant. Note that (y) or (w) in brackets disappears when preceded by a pre-pronominal prefix.

Intransitive, Agent-series
singular dual plural
1st person exclusive g- (y)agy- (y)agw-
inclusive dy- dw-
2nd person (h)s- jy- sw-
3rd person masculine hǫhR- hy- hǫw-
feminine/
indefinite
yǫw- gy- gǫw-
Intransitive, Patient-series
singular dual plural
1st person (w)ag- (y)ǫgy- (y)ǫgw-
2nd person s- jy- sw-
3rd person masculine how- hon-
feminine/
indefinite
((y)a)gow- (y)on-
Transitive Series
Patient (to right)
Agent (below)
1.SG 1.DU 1.PL 2.SG 2.DU 2.PL 3.NEUT 3.SG.MASC 3.FEM/INDEF.SG 3.FEM.DU/PL 3.MASC.DU/PL
1.SG gǫy- gy- gw- hey- khey-
1.DU.EXCL gy- gy- gw- shagy- (y)akhiy-
1.PL.EXCL gw- gw- gw- shagw-
1.DU.INCL shedy- (y)ethy-
1.PL.INCL shedwa-
2.SG sg- sgy- sgw- hes- shey-
2.DU sgy- sgy- sgw- shejy- (y)etchiy-
2.PL sgw- sgw- sgw- shesw-
3.SG.MASC hag- shǫgy- shǫgw- hy- (s)hejy- (s)hesw- hǫw- shagow-
3.SG.FEM/INDEF (y)ǫg- (y)ǫkhiy- (y)es- (y)etchiy- gǫw- hǫw- (y)ǫdad- gǫwan- hǫwadiy-
3.DU/PL.FEM ((y)a)godiy-
3.DU.PL.MASC hǫg- shagodi-

Reflexive and semireflexive

[edit]

This section discusses reflexive sentences such as "John saw himself", and "We like ourselves", and reciprocal sentences such as "We like each other." The basic form of the reflexive marker (REFL) is /atat-/ and it appears right after the pronominal prefix and before the incorporated noun, if any. The reflexive is typically found only on transitive verbs, but because there is only one participant in the event, we use the intransitive series of pronominal prefixes. Here's an example of a reflexive and a regular (non-reflexive) transitive for comparison.

a.
waʔgadadaehsę́thwaʔ

waʔ-

FACT-

k-

1.SG.AG-

atat-

REFL-

aehsęthw-

kick-

PUNC

waʔ- k- atat- aehsęthw- aʔ

FACT- 1.SG.AG- REFL- kick- PUNC

'I kicked myself.'

b.
waʔsgaehsę́thwaʔ

waʔ-

FACT-

sk-

2.SG.AG:1.SG.PAT-

aehsęthw-

kick-

PUNC

waʔ- sk- aehsęthw- aʔ

FACT- 2.SG.AG:1.SG.PAT- kick- PUNC

'You kicked me.'

In the non-reflexive transitive form there is a pronominal prefix, /sk-/ that indicates the subject ('you') and the object ('me'). In the reflexive form, there is only one participant in the act of kicking ('me'), so the intransitive form of the pronominal prefix is used, /k-/.

A reflexive action is something that you do to yourself. A reciprocal action is something people do to each other. Reciprocals must have at least two people involved. They are formed with the reflexive marker and the dualic prepronominal prefix discussed in section 3.4.1.1.2.4. Here is an example.

a.
waʔthyadadyǫ́dyahdęʔ

waʔ-

FACT-

t-

DUC-

hy-

3.DU.AG-

atat-

REFL-

yǫtya-

laugh-

ht-

CAUS-

ęʔ

PUNC

waʔ- t- hy- atat- yǫtya- ht- ęʔ

FACT- DUC- 3.DU.AG- REFL- laugh- CAUS- PUNC

'They two made each other laugh.'

The semireflexive (SRFL) appears in a variety of circumstances that are not easy to pin down. The usual form of the semireflexive is /at-/, but certain verb roots take different forms. Listed here are some of the more common situations in which the semireflexive is used.

First, when a person's own body part is the object of the action a semireflexive is normally used. Here is an example with and without a semireflexive. Again notice that the form with the semireflexive uses the intransitive pronominal prefix while the form without the semireflexive uses the transitive pronominal prefix.

a.
waʔgadnęntshagetsgwaʔ

waʔ-

FACT-

k-

1.SG.AG-

at-

SRFL-

nęntsh-

arm-

a-

JOIN-

getsgw-

raise-

PUNC

waʔ- k- at- nęntsh- a- getsgw- aʔ

FACT- 1.SG.AG- SRFL- arm- JOIN- raise- PUNC

'I raised my arm.' Unknown glossing abbreviation(s) (help);

b.
waʔkhenęntshagetsgwaʔ

waʔ-

FACT-

khe-

1.SG.AG:3.SG.F.PAT-

nęntsh-

arm-

a-

JOIN-

getsgw-

raise-

PUNC

waʔ- khe- nęntsh- a- getsgw- aʔ

FACT- 1.SG.AG:3.SG.F.PAT- arm- JOIN- raise- PUNC

'I raised her arm.' Unknown glossing abbreviation(s) (help);

Second, the semireflexive is used with verbs of grooming.

a.
John waʔhadyaʔdohaeʔ

John

John

waʔ-

FACT-

ha-

3.SG.M.AG-

at-

SRFL-

yaʔt-

body-

ohae-

wash-

ʔ

PUNC

John waʔ- ha- at- yaʔt- ohae- ʔ

John FACT- 3.SG.M.AG- SRFL- body- wash- PUNC

'John washed (himself).'

Finally, the semireflexive is used to describe events or actions that are internally caused or spontaneous.

a.
waʔwadehnhóhwak

waʔ-

FACT-

w-

3.SG.N.PAT-

at-

SRFL-

ehnhohw-

door-

aR-

apply-

k

PUNC

waʔ- w- at- ehnhohw- aR- k

FACT- 3.SG.N.PAT- SRFL- door- apply- PUNC

'The door closed.'

b.
odųhwejiyáʔgi꞉h

o-

3.SG.N.PAT-

at-

SRFL-

ųhwęjy-

earth-

yaʔk-

break-

ih

STAT

o- at- ųhwęjy- yaʔk- ih

3.SG.N.PAT- SRFL- earth- break- STAT

'The earth has caved in.'

c.
waʔdyųdetgwęʔdaʔnéꞏgaꞏʔ

waʔ-d-yų-adet-gwęʔd-ʔnegaꞏ-aʔ

FACT-change.of.state-she-self-belly-burst-at.one.point.in.time

waʔ-d-yų-adet-gwęʔd-ʔnegaꞏ-aʔ

FACT-change.of.state-she-self-belly-burst-at.one.point.in.time

"she blabbed, she revealed a secret" [literally, 'she burst her belly']

The constituent morphemes are separated by hyphens in the second line of the example. Each one is translated, as closely as possible, in the third line. It is important to understand that none of the component morphemes is a separate word, since they cannot be uttered, or understood, in isolation.

A second way in which linguists classify the morphology of languages is in terms of how the morphemes of a word combine. This distinction is between languages that are fusional and languages that are agglutinative. Fusion occurs in two ways: a single morpheme may have two or more functions (or meanings) in a given word or contiguous morphemes may affect each other's shape in such a way that it is difficult to segment the word into morphemes. A language is agglutinative if the morphemes composing a word each carries its own meaning and can be easily segmented from its neighbor. Onondaga is fusional (in the second sense of that term). Fusion is especially prevalent at the boundary between prefixes and the stem. Here certain phonological processes take place which change the shapes of one or both contiguous morphemes. For example:

a.
gędéꞏih

ga-idęꞏ-ih

N.AG-help.out-STAT

ga-idęꞏ-ih

N.AG-help.out-STAT

"it is helping."

Languages are also classified in terms of the preeminent morphological processes they manifest. In Onondaga the two major morphological processes are prefixing and suffixing. Prefixes and suffixes are bound morphemes, that is, they are morphemes that cannot occur in isolation. Onondaga verbs must, minimally, begin in a pronominal prefix and inflect for aspect. For example:

a.
hayę́thwas

ha-yę́thw-as

3.SG.M.AG-plant-HAB

ha-yę́thw-as

3.SG.M.AG-plant-HAB

"he plants"

Nouns must, minimally, begin in a nominal prefix and end in a noun suffix. For example:

a.
ganáʔjyaʔ

ga-naʔjy-aʔ

N.AG-pail-noun.suffix

ga-naʔjy-aʔ

N.AG-pail-noun.suffix

"pail"

Nominal Morphology

[edit]

A basic noun is composed of the following three morphemes in this order: noun prefix, root, and noun suffix.

According to Woodbury (2003), nouns in Onondaga are categorized into two main classes. These are non-human and human. The inanimate nouns are further divided into natural and man-made. The prefix (NPRE) on the noun depends on these classes. For inanimate nouns, the prefix is either /o-/ for natural objects or /ka-/ for man-made objects. The noun forming suffix also depends on the noun class. It is /aʔ/ for non-human nouns and /-h/ for human nouns.

Noun incorporation

[edit]

Noun incorporation is a process of compounding in which two stems, a noun and a verb stem, are combined into a new stem that is inflected with verbal morphology and that functions as a verb. Nouns occupying the semantic roles or thematic relations, of patient, theme, factitive theme, location, goal, path, or instrument are eligible for incorporation. Of these, it is nouns designating semantic patients and themes that are most frequently incorporated. Semantic agents, causers, and beneficiaries are not eligible for incorporation.

The first example shows that the nominal root -nęh- "corn" has been incorporated into the verbal complex forming a single word. The second example shows the noun /onęhaʔ/ ('corn') as a separate word and preceded by the particle neʔ, a particle which marks a following word or phrase as a nominal.

a.
waʔhanęhayę́thwaʔ

waʔ-ha-nęh-yęthw-aʔ

FACT-he-corn-plant-PUNC

waʔ-ha-nęh-yęthw-aʔ

FACT-he-corn-plant-PUNC

'he planted corn' [literally, 'he corn-planted'].

b.
waʔhayę́thwaʔ neʔ onę́haʔ

waʔ-ha-yęthw-aʔ

FACT-he-plant-PUNC

neʔ

nominal.particle

o-nęh-aʔ

it-corn-noun.suffix

waʔ-ha-yęthw-aʔ neʔ o-nęh-aʔ

FACT-he-plant-PUNC nominal.particle it-corn-noun.suffix

'he planted (the) corn'

Noun incorporation is a highly productive process in Onondaga. However, its productivity is an attribute of individual nouns and verbs. Every noun and every verb is lexically marked in terms of its incorporation characteristics.[citation needed] Some nouns incorporate frequently, that is, they can combine with many different verbs, others almost never. Among the verbs that can incorporate—and some do not incorporate at all—there is a continuum of productivity. At their most productive, verbs can incorporate one of any number of nouns, in fact, some verbs can only occur together with an incorporated noun. Verbs at their most unproductive can incorporate only a single noun. Between these extremes are additional types: verbs that can incorporate only a restricted set of nouns; verb and noun combinations that are highly idiomatic—these often denote conventionalized activities (e.g., English 'he information-gathered)—so that separating the noun, though interpretable, is perceived as inappropriate.

The use of noun incorporation is governed by various discourse factors. It is often used as a way of backgrounding information.[citation needed]

Word order

[edit]

Word order is typically free in Onondaga (though see question formation below). It depends on various discourse factors.

Question formation

[edit]

Wh-questions begin with the interrogative word:

a.
gaę nų́ tganųhsáꞏyęʔ

gaę

where

nų́

place

t-ga-nųhs-yę-ʔ

here-it-house-be.lying-STAT

gaę nų́ t-ga-nųhs-yę-ʔ

where place here-it-house-be.lying-STAT

"Where is the house?"

b.
wadę́ʔ nihsaꞏdyéꞏhaʔ

wadę́ʔ

what

ni-hs-adyéꞏ-haʔ

thus-you-do-HAB

wadę́ʔ ni-hs-adyéꞏ-haʔ

what thus-you-do-HAB

"What are you doing?"

Yes–no questions are formed by appending the question-particle to the questioned item:

a.
Sędáʔwih khę́h.

sa-idáʔw-ih

you-be.asleep-STAT

khę́h.

Q

sa-idáʔw-ih khę́h.

you-be.asleep-STAT Q

"Are you asleep?"

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The is a Northern Iroquoian language historically spoken by the Onondaga Nation, designated as the "Firekeepers" within the Haudenosaunee () Confederacy, with its core communities centered in present-day and . Classified within the Lake Iroquoian subgroup alongside related tongues like Cayuga and Seneca, it features a complex phonological inventory including glottal stops, nasal vowels, and contrastive tone, alongside a adapted from Roman orthography since the . Linguistically, Onondaga exemplifies polysynthesis through verb-centric constructions that bundle pronominal prefixes, incorporated nouns, and suffixes denoting aspect, mood, and , often obviating the need for separate tense markers or independent nouns in . This morphology supports noun incorporation, as in formations where a nominal fuses directly into the stem to convey compounded events, a trait yielding highly compact yet semantically dense expressions integral to Onondaga oral traditions, rituals, and worldview transmission. Critically endangered due to intergenerational transmission disruptions from colonial policies and assimilation pressures, fluent speakers number fewer than 60 as of the early , concentrated among elders with revitalization initiatives emphasizing immersion schooling and digital archiving to sustain ceremonial and cultural proficiency. These efforts underscore the language's foundational role in Haudenosaunee protocols, where precise lexical distinctions preserve systems, ecological knowledge, and consensus-based decision-making unbound by external ideological overlays.

Classification and Overview

Linguistic Affiliation

The Onondaga language belongs to the Iroquoian language family, a group of indigenous North American languages characterized by polysynthetic morphology and the absence of labial consonants. Within this family, Onondaga is classified in the Northern Iroquoian branch, which encompasses the languages historically spoken by the member nations of the Confederacy. Northern Iroquoian languages include Mohawk, Oneida, Cayuga, Seneca, and Tuscarora, with Onondaga serving as a central language due to its association with the Onondaga Nation's role as the "firekeepers" of the Confederacy. These languages share a common ancestor but exhibit low , diverging through phonological, morphological, and lexical innovations over centuries. Onondaga's closest relatives are often considered Cayuga and Seneca, forming a subgroup sometimes termed Lake Iroquoian, based on shared vocabulary retention rates of approximately 20-24% with more distant Northern Iroquoian varieties. The Iroquoian family as a whole is distinct from neighboring phyla like Algonquian, with no established genetic links to other macro-families despite speculative proposals in or , which remain unverified by rigorous comparative methods. Onondaga's affiliation underscores its ties to the cultural and political unity of the Haudenosaunee, where linguistic similarities facilitated intertribal communication in councils despite dialectal barriers.

Geographic Distribution and Speakers

The Onondaga language, a Northern Iroquoian tongue, is primarily spoken within the territories of the Onondaga Nation's sovereign lands in , , approximately 10 kilometers south of Syracuse, and by Onondaga community members at the Six Nations of the Grand River reserve near , , . These two communities represent the core geographic loci of use, with the New York reservation serving as the traditional "firekeepers" seat of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, while the Canadian contingent stems from historical migrations and relocations during colonial eras. Transmission occurs mainly in familial and ceremonial contexts, though daily conversational use remains limited to elders. As of estimates around 2010–2021, fluent speakers number approximately 50 worldwide, with a subset of 15–30 residing in the United States, predominantly elderly individuals over age 60. A higher concentration of speakers is reported in community, aligning with observations of greater there compared to the U.S. side. The language's restricted speaker base underscores its severely endangered status, with intergenerational transmission disrupted by historical assimilation pressures and English dominance in education and media.

Historical Context

Pre-Contact Origins

The Onondaga language belongs to the Northern Iroquoian branch of the , descending from Proto-Northern Iroquoian (PNI), which in turn evolved from the reconstructed Proto-Iroquoian (PI). PI featured a small inventory lacking labials (e.g., t, k, kʷ, Ɂ, n, s, h, ts, ɹ, j, w), a vowel system with short/long and nasalized pairs, and polysynthetic morphology including incorporation, pronominal prefixes (e.g., ki- "1SG:3"), and verb aspect markers. These traits persisted in descendants, reflecting continuity in verbal complexity and alienable possession encoding. Linguistic reconstructions place PI around 2624 BCE, with its likely homeland in the Finger Lakes region of west-central New York, based on lexical dissimilarity correlating with geographic distance among modern languages. Divergence from PI into PNI and occurred approximately 3,500–3,800 years ago, coinciding with the Late Archaic–Early Woodland transition (ca. 4,000–2,500 years ago) in the . This split aligned with subsistence shifts from upland mast forest foraging to proto-horticultural practices, evidenced by archaeological patterns like projectile point distributions and vessel trade along Appalachian routes. Within Northern Iroquoian, Onondaga forms part of the Inland subgroup with Seneca and Cayuga, diverging from eastern branches (e.g., Mohawk–Oneida) through innovations like the development of a three-way in third-person prefixes, loss of non-singular animate prefixes, and phonological shifts such as s > ʃ (except after nasals) and intervocalic ts > hs. These changes reflect internal diversification tied to archaeological markers, including early adoption and emergence in the Northeast by ca. 1000–500 BCE, predating Onondaga settlement in (from to ). Pre-contact Onondaga speakers maintained oral traditions integral to social and ritual life, with no evidence of writing systems.

Documentation from European Contact

The first sustained European documentation of the Onondaga language occurred through French Jesuit missionary efforts in the mid-17th century, following initial military contacts such as Samuel de Champlain's 1615 expedition against Onondaga warriors allied with the Hurons. Jesuit Father Simon Le Moyne made exploratory visits to Onondaga territory near in 1653 and 1654, establishing diplomatic relations and baptizing the first Onondaga convert on , 1654, which necessitated basic linguistic exchange for evangelization. In 1655–1656, Le Moyne and companions including Joseph Chaumonot and Claude Dablon resided among the Onondaga, compiling lexical materials amid efforts to establish a mission, though the outpost was short-lived due to intertribal conflicts and suspicions of French motives. The earliest surviving written record is an anonymous French-Onondaga dictionary manuscript from the , likely authored by a Jesuit during these mid-century interactions and preserved in the Mazarin Library in . This document, reproduced and edited by John Gilmary Shea in 1860, contains an extensive vocabulary reflecting Archaic Onondaga phonology, including distinctions such as /ʃ/ versus /s/ and the presence of /ɹ/, with examples like khrenahsh ('I cut') and knuhwes ('I like it'). The dictionary's compilation aligns with Jesuit strategies for in missions, prioritizing terms for religious instruction, daily life, and , though it lacks full grammatical analysis. Scattered lexical items also appear in the Jesuit Relations (1610–1791), a series of annual reports documenting Iroquoian terms encountered during travels, such as Onondaga place names and basic nouns, but these are incidental rather than systematic. By the late 17th century, documentation remained sparse due to the abandonment of permanent missions after 1658 and ongoing disrupting sustained contact. Jesuit records from this era, including works by Jacques Bruyas, occasionally reference Onondaga roots in broader Iroquoian grammars like Radices Verborum Iroquaeorum (compiled late 17th century, published 1863), providing verb stems and examples such as jo'rahkot ('it is hot'), which exhibit shared morphological patterns with Onondaga. These efforts, while valuable for preserving archaic forms, were primarily utilitarian for conversion and were not expanded into comprehensive grammars until Moravian David Zeisberger's mid-18th-century manuscripts, which record transitional "Old Onondaga" features like the merger of /ʃ/ and /s/ into /s/. Overall, 17th-century records highlight the language's polysynthetic structure but are limited in scope, reflecting the precariousness of European-Onondaga interactions rather than exhaustive study.

20th-Century Recording Efforts

In the early , J. N. B. Hewitt, an of Tuscarora descent employed by the Smithsonian Institution's , conducted extensive fieldwork among Iroquoian-speaking communities, including Onondaga speakers on the Six Nations Reserve. Hewitt documented Onondaga myths, cosmology, and oral traditions through literal translations and texts, such as the 1903-1904 publication of Iroquoian cosmology featuring Onondaga versions of creation narratives. His efforts produced manuscripts like an 1883 Onondaga text copy and contributed to the preservation of lexical and narrative data, drawing on his speaking proficiency in Onondaga. Mid-century documentation advanced through Floyd G. Lounsbury's fieldwork starting in 1939, which encompassed Onondaga among other , yielding audio recordings, texts, and morphological analyses archived at institutions like the . Lounsbury's collections include French-Onondaga materials and extensive audio of speakers, supporting comparative Iroquoian studies. Concurrently, the amassed Onondaga audio from the 1950s, featuring autobiographical narratives, descriptions of reservation life, and cultural practices recorded directly from fluent speakers. Wallace L. Chafe furthered semantic and grammatical recording in the , culminating in his 1970 sketch of Onondaga, which analyzed verb morphology and structure based on elicited and from native consultants. These analog recordings, often stored in university and archival repositories, formed legacy resources that later informed revitalization, though access challenges arose due to analog formats and ethical concerns over community rights. By the latter half of the century, such efforts shifted toward collaborative work with Onondaga consultants, emphasizing comprehensive audio capture amid declining fluent speakers.

Endangerment and Vitality

Current Speaker Demographics

As of 2021, Onondaga is spoken fluently by approximately 52 individuals, nearly all of whom acquired it as a and are elderly. These speakers are concentrated in two primary locations: the in , , where the community's total population is around 430, and the Six Nations of the Grand River Reserve near , , , home to a larger Haudenosaunee population that includes an Onondaga subgroup. Earlier UNESCO assessments aligned closely, estimating about 50 speakers, underscoring the language's critically low vitality tied to aging demographics. Fluency is rare among younger generations, with transmission primarily limited to elder-led informal settings rather than widespread home use or formal , resulting in a demographic skew toward those over 60. U.S. Census data from self-reported language use indicates only about 29 individuals claiming Onondaga proficiency, though this likely undercounts semi-speakers and does not specify levels. In Canada, national census figures aggregate , reporting 2,055 total speakers in 2021 but without disaggregation for Onondaga specifically, which complicates precise tracking amid multilingual reserve environments. Revitalization efforts have produced a small cohort of second-language learners, but these do not yet offset the decline in native .

Causal Factors in Decline

The decline of the Onondaga language, an Iroquoian tongue historically spoken by the Onondaga Nation in and , accelerated following European contact, with fluent speakers dropping from near-universal use among the population until the early to fewer than eight native speakers by the . Key historical drivers included territorial dispossession and demographic shocks from colonial wars and epidemics; between 1788 and 1822, the Onondaga lost approximately 95% of their land through state actions in New York, disrupting traditional communal structures essential for language transmission. An epidemic in 1777, likely , killed around ninety Onondaga, including key leaders, further eroding the social fabric supporting linguistic continuity. Assimilation policies imposed by U.S. and Canadian governments exacerbated this erosion, particularly through off-reservation boarding schools operational from the late 19th to mid-20th centuries, where indigenous children faced for speaking native languages, fostering a generational break in fluency. These institutions, part of broader efforts to enforce English dominance for , reduced Onondaga usage in educational and domestic domains, with the language's prevalence waning sharply by the 1930s as English supplanted it in schools and daily interactions. Socioeconomic pressures in the compounded these effects, including , intermarriage with English speakers, and the prioritization of English for wage labor and , leading to reduced intergenerational transmission. By the late , the language's confinement to ceremonial contexts among elders, without systematic reinforcement in youth, created a feedback loop of , as domains like and shifted entirely to English. These factors, rooted in external subjugation rather than inherent linguistic instability, mirror patterns in other Northern , where sustained contact with dominant settler societies eroded vitality without compensatory institutional support.

Revitalization Initiatives

Community-Led Programs

The Onondaga Nation established the Ne' Enhadiwennayende'nha' Language Center in 2010 to coordinate instruction and cultural transmission. In fall 2015, the Nation launched a two-year full-time adult immersion program enrolling 15 community members, who received stipends to participate and committed to teaching subsequent learners upon completion. Instruction was delivered by five full-time and one part-time fluent speakers using methods such as , emphasizing physical engagement with vocabulary through commands and actions; this built on earlier efforts, including classes led by instructor Jay Meacham training nine paid adult students shortly before the program's formal start. Complementing adult initiatives, the Onondaga Nation School integrates daily one-hour Onondaga classes for grades K-8 since 2013, alongside weekly ceremonial practices and environmental signage with "word of the day" prompts to reinforce usage in daily contexts. Community discussion groups and supplemental adult classes, facilitated by elders like Sue Parsons, further promote conversational practice among participants of varying proficiency levels. In the Haudenosaunee community of Six Nations of the Grand River, , the Six Nations Language Commission has operated Onondaga adult immersion programs since at least 2007, with classes running seven hours daily from to Friday to develop second-language fluency among young adults, many of whom serve as part-time educators. These efforts received targeted funding, such as a 2017 Anglican Healing Fund grant of $10,755 for audiovisual equipment and software to support instruction. A new cohort of the Onǫdaˀgegaˀ Nidwawęnoˀdęh adult immersion program is scheduled to begin in September 2025, employing a root-word tailored for beginners while incorporating advanced content.

Empirical Outcomes and Obstacles

The Onondaga Language Adult Immersion Program, operated by the Six Nations Language Commission, has sought to develop second-language speakers through intensive daily classes, with a focus on creating a "" capable of conversational use and teaching roles. As of 2017, the program targeted young adults, including part-time educators, but fewer than 10 native fluent speakers remained available for guidance, limiting direct transmission. In 2015, the Onondaga Nation initiated a two-year paid immersion cohort of 15 adults required to subsequently teach others, alongside school-based integration of daily language instruction for K-8 students and community classes at the Ne' Enhadiwennayende'nha' Language Center, which employed six teachers by that year. These efforts have yielded anecdotal intergenerational transmission, such as children instructing elders, but no comprehensive metrics on acquisition or sustained daily usage have been publicly documented. Obstacles to measurable progress include the acute scarcity of fluent elders, historically exacerbated by mid-19th to early 20th-century suppression in boarding schools that instilled shame and prioritized English, reducing the language to ceremonial contexts. Economic pressures pose a persistent barrier, as participants often forgo wages during full-time immersion while facing living costs, necessitating external like targeted donations for program . Additionally, native speakers proficient in the language may lack pedagogical skills for adult learners, complicating scalable teacher training. Broader institutional gaps, such as absence from public curricula and reliance on community-led initiatives without widespread governmental integration, further hinder expansion, though recent programs like online classes and youth groups indicate adaptive responses.

Phonology

Consonant and Vowel Inventory

The Onondaga language, a Northern Iroquoian tongue, features a modest consonant inventory characteristic of the family, with no labial obstruents or stops—a trait shared across Iroquoian languages, where labials in loanwords are typically substituted by alveolars or velars. The core consonants include two voiceless stops /t/ and /k/ (with /k/ labialized as /kʷ/ in clusters), an affricate /ts/, a fricative /s/, a nasal /n/, approximants /j/ (palatal) and /w/ (labial-velar), and glottal /ʔ/ and /h/. Voicing occurs allophonically, as /t/ and /k/ voice intervocalically or before resonants, while /ts/ and /s/ may palatalize before /i/ or /j/ to [tʃ] or [ʃ].
Manner/PlaceAlveolarPalatalVelarGlottal
Stopstk (kʷ)ʔ
Affricate
Fricativessh
Nasaln
Approximants
This yields approximately nine consonantal phonemes, excluding clusters like /kw/, with restrictions on onsets and codas limiting combinations. Onondaga's vowel system distinguishes five oral vowel qualities, more than the four (/a, i, e, o/) found in sister languages like Mohawk or Cayuga, owing to the historical loss of the resonant *r (circa 1750–1852), which conditioned a new /æ/ from compensatory lengthening. Corresponding nasalized vowels exist for each, yielding ten total vowel phonemes, with length contrastive primarily in oral vowels (e.g., /a/ vs. /aː/) and often automatic in nasals or *r-derived contexts. Unstressed vowels reduce, as /a/ to [ɐ] and /e/ to [ɛ].
QualityOral (short/long)Nasalized
High fronti / iːĩ
Mid fronte / eː
Low frontæ / æːæ̃
Low centrala / aːã
Mid backo / oːõ
arises phonologically before nasal consonants or in specific morphological environments, but maintains phonemic status. This inventory totals around 19–20 segmental phonemes, aligning with the 16–22 range noted in descriptive accounts.

Phonological Processes

Onondaga exhibits several phonological processes, particularly in morphological contexts such as pronominal prefixation and verb-to-noun derivation, where deletions and assimilations alter underlying forms to fit surface realizations. These include glide deletions (of /w/ and /y/) that occur word-initially or in specific environments, reducing clusters and simplifying onsets. For instance, the prefix wag- surfaces as ag- at word start, as in certain pronominal forms, reflecting a word-initial /w/-deletion rule. Similarly, /y/-drop applies in prefixes like yagy-agy- when following certain elements such as the factual prefix or null, preventing impermissible sequences. Fricative assimilation and metathesis also feature prominently, especially involving /hs/ clusters in prefixes. Before stems beginning with /s/, /hs-/ assimilates to /hc-/, while before /y/-initial stems, it shifts to /sh-/, as in pronominal variants adapting to stem classes. /H/-drop or metathesis can further simplify these, yielding /s-/ or /sh-/ outputs. In derivational morphology, /w/-deletion occurs when verbs nominalize, exemplified by adyeńdakhwa- yielding adyeńdakhwaØ for '', where the final /w/ elides in noun form. Historically, Onondaga underwent the loss of the resonant /r/, a process shared with other Northern of the Five Nations subgroup, occurring between approximately 1750 and 1852 and involving compensatory in affected positions. This diachronic change, governed by phonological rules distinct from broader r-loss patterns in related languages, reduced the resonant inventory and reshaped lexical items. reduction represents a phonetic aspect of modern Onondaga, interacting with these historical shifts to produce surface contrasts. These processes, often conditioned by morphological boundaries and stem classes, underscore the language's agglutinative nature, where interfaces closely with .

Morphology

Verbal Structure

Onondaga verbs exhibit polysynthetic structure, incorporating pronominal arguments, roots, derivational elements, and aspect markers into a single complex word that often conveys a full predicate with subjects, objects, and adverbial notions. The canonical template positions prepronominal prefixes (for modality or tense) followed by pronominal prefixes encoding agent and roles, the verb root (potentially expanded with applicatives or noun incorporation), and trailing aspect suffixes. This morphology prioritizes aspect over tense, with up to five morphemes in the pronominal cluster alone, reflecting asymmetries such as first-person priority over second-person agreement. Pronominal prefixes obligatorily mark core arguments directly on the stem, distinguishing agent-patient configurations for transitive verbs or single-party for intransitives. The comprises 59 base prefixes across persons (first, second, third), numbers (singular, dual, ), genders (masculine, feminine-zoic, neuter), and roles (agentive or patientive), yielding 271 allomorphic variants conditioned by the stem's initial consonant class (e.g., A-, E-, I-stems) and preceding phonological environment. For instance, first-person singular agent appears as g- before vowel-initial roots, while two-party transitive forms layer agent prefixes external to ones, as in s-g-e-gẽ-haˀ ('you see me', with second-person agent s-, first-person g-, root gẽ 'see', and perfective haˀ). Agreement favors first-person over second-person patients when both are present, and third-person agents typically lack overt marking unless specified by . Number marking via dual (-ni-) or (-wa-) suffixes applies post-root or in prefixes, with plurals overriding duals in mixed contexts. The verb root, often stative or eventive, forms the semantic core and may extend through derivational suffixes for valency changes or noun incorporation, embedding nominal elements to compact expressions like instrument or . Aspect suffixes follow the root, delineating viewpoint: habitual (-as, e.g., hayęthwas 'he plants habitually'), punctual/perfective (-aˀ, requiring prepronominal modals like factual for reference, e.g., waˀhayęthwaˀ 'he planted it'), and stative (-ih, e.g., hokhǫnih 'he is cooking'). Expanded aspects combine these with markers, such as habitual-past (-kwaˀ) for prior habits. Prepronominal elements, including modal prefixes (e.g., , optative), precede pronominals to anchor , as punctual aspects lack inherent tense. This system enables nuanced event framing, with stative and habitual aspects imperfective and punctual perfective, supported by empirical analysis of naturalistic texts.

Nominal Structure

Onondaga exhibit a basic tripartite structure comprising a noun prefix, a lexical , and a , distinguishing them from the more complex polysynthetic verbs. The noun prefix primarily encodes semantic or class, with masculine forms typically reserved for males and feminine forms covering females, most inanimates, and a distinct feminine-zoic subclass for animals. Inanimate show prefixal variation in the singular, motivated semantically by factors such as whether the referent is man-made, reflecting a nuanced system. Possession is marked by substituting the gender prefix with pronominal prefixes, which fuse with the root; examples include waʔ- for first-person singular ('my') and ka- for second-person singular ('your'). , common with body parts and terms, employs shortened or specialized prefix forms that integrate more tightly with the root, often without the full nominal . Alienable possession, by contrast, uses a broader set of prefixes, including third-person a(k)- ('his/her/its'), and may retain or omit the suffix depending on the construction. Unlike verbs, nouns lack for number, tense, or case, with plurality conveyed contextually or via verb agreement rather than nominal morphology. The , often realized as or variants, primarily signals nominal status and appears on free-standing nouns but is typically absent in incorporated or possessed forms. This structure underscores the language's reliance on prefixal morphology for categorization, with nominal roots remaining invariant across contexts.

Syntax

Word Order Patterns

Onondaga exhibits relatively free in declarative clauses, lacking a rigid syntactic template for arranging subjects, verbs, and objects. This flexibility arises from the language's polysynthetic structure, where verbs incorporate extensive pronominal affixes specifying agreement in person, number, and for core arguments, thereby minimizing reliance on linear position to disambiguate grammatical roles. Constituent order instead responds to , such as or focus, allowing speakers to prioritize over fixed hierarchies. Linguist Michael Barrie observes that, despite this freedom, subtle regularities may occur in certain constructions, influenced by semantic or contextual factors, though these do not impose strict constraints akin to those in analytic languages. Such patterns align with broader Northern Iroquoian traits, where no SOV or SVO order governs syntax, and variations serve communicative intent rather than obligatory rules.

Question Formation Mechanisms

In Onondaga, yes-no questions are typically formed by appending a sentence-final particle to an otherwise declarative , without altering the morphology or . This particle, transcribed as khčh in some analyses, signals the interrogative force and corresponds to closed questions in English. The structure preserves the polysynthetic verbal complex, which encodes subject, object, and aspectual information internally. Content questions, or wh-questions, require the —functioning as pronouns or adverbs—to occupy clause-initial position, while the remainder of the sentence adheres to the language's generally free . This fronting mechanism applies to interrogatives querying agents, patients, locations, or manners, with no inversion of subject-verb or additional particles beyond the pro-form itself. Interrogative pro-forms are morphologically distinct from indefinites but may overlap semantically in some contexts, as detailed in analyses of Northern Iroquoian pro-forms. Specific forms include dedicated pronouns for entities like persons (swa' for 'who') and things (kayę́' for 'what'), though exact inventories vary by and elicitation; these integrate into the without triggering agreement changes on the . Embedded questions may employ subordinators, but matrix questions rely primarily on the positional and particulate cues described. Intonation likely reinforces interrogativity, though prosodic details remain underexplored in available descriptions.

Noun Incorporation

Noun incorporation in Onondaga, a Northern Iroquoian language, is a productive morphological process in which a noun stem is prefixed directly to a to form a complex predicate, integrating the noun into the verbal complex as a single word. This phenomenon serves both syntactic and semantic functions: syntactically, it adheres to a general rule where transitive verbs incorporate their direct object and intransitive verbs incorporate their subject, thereby reducing or eliminating the need for a separate . Semantically, incorporation typically backgrounds the noun, rendering it non-specific or generic, which backgrounds its referential salience and emphasizes the verb's action as an ongoing or habitual event involving that noun type. Object incorporation, the more common type, combines the patient noun with the verb to denote a generalized activity. For instance, the non-incorporated form waʔ hahninúʔ neʔ oyʔekwaʔ glosses as 'FACT 3SG.M/buy.ASP the tobacco' and translates to 'he bought tobacco,' where the noun remains external and potentially specific; in contrast, the incorporated waʔ hayʔekwahninúʔ glosses as 'FACT 3SG.M/tobacco/buy.ASP' and means 'he bought tobacco' in a generic sense, such as acquiring tobacco habitually or as a kind. Another example is waʔ-ha-yɛkw-a-hninu-ʔ 'FACT-3SG.M.AG-tobacco-EPEN-buy-ASP,' translating to 'he bought (a kind of) tobacco,' where the incorporated noun yɛkw 'tobacco' forms part of the verbal unit without triggering separate agreement. Similarly, Pet wa?-ha-hwist-ahtu-?t-a? 'Pat FACT-3SG.M-money-lose-ASP-PUNC' means 'Pat lost money' generically, versus the non-incorporated Pet wa?-ha-htu-?t-a? ne? o-hwist-a? 'Pat FACT-3SG.M-lose-ASP-PUNC the his-money' specifying 'Pat lost the money.' Subject incorporation occurs with intransitive s, particularly inactive ones, where the acts as the notional subject. An example is kahsaheʔ tahíhwi glossing as 'it-beans-spill-CAUS-ASP' and translating to 'beans are spilled,' incorporating kahsaheʔ 'beans' into the to describe the event without a detached subject . Incorporated forms can also include nominalizers such as -tshR or -hsR, allowing phrasal elements beyond bare roots to adjoin the , as in agatguʔtshé:hwih '1SG/poisoned.it.with..,' indicating incorporation of a modified or derived nominal. The process exhibits interdependence between syntax and semantics: incorporation is disfavored for focused, specific, or new referents, as it shifts emphasis to the action itself, often yielding lexicalized or classificatory verbs (e.g., instrument or incorporation). In polysynthetic Onondaga, this contributes to compact expression, with incorporated nouns losing status and not controlling agreement, though they retain some referential potential in . Analyses debate whether it involves head or phrasal movement, but empirical patterns confirm its role in forming unified conceptual units.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.