Hubbry Logo
Oracle CorporationOracle CorporationMain
Open search
Oracle Corporation
Community hub
Oracle Corporation
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Oracle Corporation
Oracle Corporation
from Wikipedia

Oracle Corporation is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Austin, Texas.[5] Co-founded in 1977 in Santa Clara, California, by Larry Ellison, the world's second-richest person[6][7] and its executive chairman, Oracle is among the 20 largest companies in the world[8] by market cap, and ranked 66th[9] on the Forbes Global 2000 as of 2025.

Key Information

The company sells database software (particularly the Oracle Database), and cloud computing software and hardware. Oracle's core application software is a suite of enterprise software products, including enterprise resource planning (ERP), human capital management (HCM), customer relationship management (CRM), enterprise performance management (EPM), Customer Experience Commerce (CX Commerce) and supply chain management (SCM) software.[10]

History

[edit]
Larry Ellison, executive chairman and co-founder of Oracle
Oracle Corporation's former headquarters in Redwood Shores, California
USA 17 at Oracle Corporation Headquarters
Picture of the Oracle Austin Riverside Campus in 2018

Larry Ellison, Bob Miner, and Ed Oates co-founded Oracle in 1977 in Santa Clara, California, as Software Development Laboratories (SDL).[2][11] Beginning as consultants with a background in large-scale memory after a project for Ampex,[12] Ellison took inspiration[13] from the 1970 paper written by Edgar F. Codd on relational database management systems (RDBMS) named "A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks."[14] He heard about the IBM System R database[12] from an article in the IBM Research Journal provided by Oates. Ellison wanted to make Oracle's product compatible with System R, but failed to do so as IBM kept the error codes for their DBMS a secret. SDL changed its name to Relational Software, Inc (RSI) in 1979,[15] then again to Oracle Systems Corporation in 1983,[16] to align itself more closely with its flagship product Oracle Database. The name also drew from the codename of a 1977 project for the Central Intelligence Agency, Oracle's first customer;[17][18][11] the company received permission to use the code name for the new product.[12] (According to Oracle executive Mike Humphries, Miner told him that the new company had the choice of the CIA database project or another offer to develop a compiler for the PDP-4, and the founders flipped a coin to decide.)[19]

Miner served as a senior programmer, and Oates also worked in development. The three founders decided that Ellison was the worst programmer so he became the salesman. Understanding both customers and technology, Ellison designed database tables that he used to demonstrate the power of SQL to customers.[12] By February 1983 the Rosen Electronics Letter said that Oracle was "the most comprehensive offering we've seen" among databases, with good marketing and a substantial installed base encouraging developers to write software for it. The newsletter said that revenue in fiscal 1983 would be about $8 million and would double in 1984.[20] On March 12, 1986, the company had its initial public offering.[21] In 1989, Oracle moved its world headquarters to the Redwood Shores neighborhood of Redwood City, California, though its campus[22] was not completed until 1995.[23] The company hired so many from top universities that Humphries compared it to "Cargill buying crops". Some new employees worked as receptionists or distributed coffee until more suitable positions became available.[12]

Oracle in the late 1980s began selling enterprise software running on the database, starting with financial software, then manufacturing. Many at Oracle wanted to discontinue applications; the first several versions were weak, they competed with the company's independent software vendors and value-added reseller partners, and applications were never profitable for Oracle until after 2000. Selling them (and acquiring vendors such as JD Edwards and PeopleSoft, the latter being the second hostile takeover in the history of software) nonetheless allowed Oracle to compete with SAP; by the mid-2000s it was the world's largest enterprise software vendor. The company's Ken Jacobs later said:[12]

It created a strategic footprint in our customers. It gave us a whole stack, a credible stack. And we could now sell at a higher point into the companies, into the board room. And, our large customers wanted to consider us a strategic partner, rather than just a vendor of technology. So, it has, actually, had a big impact on the way our sales force could sell.

In 1995, Oracle Systems Corporation changed its name to Oracle Corporation,[24] officially named Oracle, but is sometimes referred to as Oracle Corporation, the name of the holding company.[25]

Oracle acquired the following technology companies:

  1. PeopleSoft (2005), an ERP company
  2. Siebel (2006), a CRM company
  3. BEA Systems (2008), an enterprise infrastructure software company
  4. Sun Microsystems (2010), a computer hardware and software company (noted for its Java programming language).

On July 15, 2013, Oracle transferred its stock listing from Nasdaq to the New York Stock Exchange. At the time, it was the largest-ever U.S. market transfer.[26]

In an effort to compete with Amazon Web Services and its products, Oracle announced in 2019 it was partnering with former rival Microsoft. The alliance claimed that Oracle Cloud and Microsoft Azure would be directly connected, allowing customers of each to store data on both cloud computing platforms and run software on either Oracle or Azure. Some saw this not only as an attempt to compete with Amazon but also with Google and Salesforce, which acquired Looker and Tableau Software, respectively.[27]

In 2018, Oracle opened a new office in southeast Austin, Texas.[28] In December 2020, Oracle announced that it was moving its world headquarters from Redwood Shores to Austin, Texas.[29]

In December 2021, Oracle announced the acquisition of Cerner, a health information technology company.[30] The acquisition of Cerner was completed on June 8, 2022, for US$28.3 billion in cash.[31] Also in December 2021, Oracle announced the acquisition of Federos, an artificial intelligence (AI) and automation tools company for network performance.[32]

In February 2023, the company announced it was going to invest $1.5 billion into the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, including opening a data centre in the country's capital, Riyadh.[33]

In April 2024, Oracle announced it was moving its world headquarters from Austin to a new complex in Nashville, Tennessee.[34] No timeframe was given.

In June 2024, Oracle announced a $1 billion investment in Spain to enhance artificial intelligence and cloud computing. This investment will create a new cloud region in Madrid in partnership with Telefónica. The goal is to help Spanish businesses and the public sector with digital transformation and to meet European Union regulations.[35]

In January 2025, President Donald Trump announced Stargate, a joint venture by Oracle, OpenAI, SoftBank and investment firm MGX to invest $500 billion over four years in artificial intelligence infrastructure in the US.[36]

Products and services

[edit]

Databases

[edit]
  • Oracle Database - The company's first and, through at least the year 2000, only profitable product.[12]
    • Release 10: In 2004, Oracle Corporation shipped release 10g (g standing for "grid") as the then latest version of Oracle Database. (Oracle Application Server 10g using Java EE integrated with the server part of that version of the database, making it possible to deploy web-technology applications. The application server was the first middle-tier software designed for grid computing. The interrelationship between Oracle 10g and Java allowed developers to set up stored procedures written in the Java language, as well as, those written in the traditional Oracle database programming language, PL/SQL.)[citation needed]
    • Release 11: Release 11g became available in 2007. Oracle Corporation released Oracle Database 11g Release 2 in September 2009. This version was available in four commercial editions—Enterprise Edition, Standard Edition, Standard Edition One, and Personal Edition—and in one free edition—the Express Edition. The licensing of these editions shows various restrictions and obligations that were called complex by licensing expert Freirich Florea.[37] The Enterprise Edition (DB EE), the most expensive of the Database Editions, has the fewest restrictions—but nevertheless has complex licensing. Oracle Corporation constrains the Standard Edition (DB SE) and Standard Edition One (SE1) with more licensing restrictions, in accordance with their lower price.
    • Release 12: Release 12c (c standing for "cloud") became available on July 1, 2013.[38]

Oracle Corporation has acquired and developed the following additional database technologies:

Middleware

[edit]

Oracle Fusion Middleware is a family of middleware software products, including (for instance) application server, system integration, business process management (BPM), user interaction, content management, identity management and business intelligence (BI) products.

[edit]

Oracle Secure Enterprise Search (SES), Oracle's enterprise-search offering, gives users the ability to search for content across multiple locations, including websites, XML files, file servers, content management systems, enterprise resource planning systems, customer relationship management systems, business intelligence systems, and databases.

Oracle Beehive

[edit]

Released in 2008, the Oracle Beehive collaboration software provides team workspaces (including wikis, team calendaring and file sharing), email, calendar, instant messaging, and conferencing on a single platform. Customers can use Beehive as licensed software or as software as a service ("SaaS").[40]

Applications

[edit]

Oracle Applications, software sold by Oracle based on its own database, first appeared in the late 1980s.[12] Following a number of acquisitions beginning in 2003, especially in the area of applications, Oracle Corporation as of 2008 maintains a number of product lines:

Development of applications commonly takes place in Java (using Oracle JDeveloper) or through PL/SQL (using, for example, Oracle Forms and Oracle Reports/BIPublisher).[41][42] Oracle Corporation has started[43] a drive toward "wizard"-driven environments with a view to enabling non-programmers to produce simple data-driven applications.

Third-party applications

[edit]

Oracle Corporation works with "Oracle Certified Partners" to enhance its overall product marketing. The variety of applications from third-party vendors includes database applications for archiving, splitting and control, ERP and CRM systems, as well as more niche and focused products providing a range of commercial functions in areas like human resources, financial control and governance, risk management, and compliance (GRC). Vendors include Hewlett-Packard, Creoal Consulting, UC4 Software,[44] Motus,[45] and Knoa Software.[46]

Enterprise management

[edit]

Oracle Enterprise Manager (OEM) provides web-based monitoring and management tools for Oracle products (and for some third-party software), including database management, middleware management, application management, hardware and virtualization management and cloud management.[47]

The Primavera products of Oracle's Construction & Engineering Global Business Unit (CEGBU) consist of project-management software.[48]

Development software

[edit]

Oracle Corporation's tools for developing applications include (among others):

Many external and third-party tools make the Oracle database administrator's tasks easier.[49]

File systems

[edit]

Operating systems

[edit]

Oracle Corporation develops and supports two operating systems: Oracle Solaris and Oracle Linux.

Hardware

[edit]
Oracle Exadata and Exalogic

Services

[edit]

Oracle Cloud

[edit]

Oracle Cloud is a cloud computing service offered by Oracle Corporation providing servers, storage, network, applications and services through a global network of Oracle Corporation managed data centers. The company allows these services to be provisioned on demand over the Internet.[55]

Oracle Cloud provides Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), Software as a Service (SaaS) and Data as a Service (DaaS). These services are used to build, deploy, integrate and extend applications in the cloud. This platform supports open standards (SQL, HTML5, REST, etc.) open-source solutions (Kubernetes, Hadoop, Kafka, etc.) and a variety of programming languages, databases, tools and frameworks including Oracle-specific, free and third-party software and systems.[56]

  • Software as a Service (SaaS)[57]
    • Enterprise applications: SCM, EPM, HCM, ERP and CX SaaS offerings[58]
    • Oracle sells a SaaS suite of Oracle Fusion Applications business applications.
    • On July 28, 2016, Oracle bought NetSuite, the first cloud company, for $9.3 billion.[59] NetSuite provides cloud ERP, CRM, supply chain and e-commerce software to small and medium-sized businesses. It is regarded as the first fully cloud company in the world and is an industry leader in its own right.
  • Platform as a Service (PaaS)[57]
    • Oracle has branded its Platform as a Service as Oracle Cloud Platform. Oracle Cloud Platform include Data Management, Application Development, Integration, Content and Experience, Business Analytics, Management and Security.[60][61]
    • Platform services on which to build and deploy applications or extend SaaS applications: database, Java application server, mobile, business analytics, integration, process, big data, Internet of Things, Node.js etc.[62]
  • Data as a Service (DaaS)
  • Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)[57]
    • Oracle IaaS, branded as Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), offerings include the following services.[64]
      • Compute Service
      • Storage Service
      • Network Service

On May 16, 2018, Oracle announced that it had acquired DataScience.com, a privately held cloud workspace platform for data science projects and workloads.[65]

In 2022 Oracle shared a $9 billion contract from the United States Department of Defense for cloud computing with Amazon, Google, and Microsoft.[66]

Other services

[edit]
  • Oracle Consulting – technical and business expert services
  • Oracle Financing
  • Oracle Marketing & Support
    • Product support: Oracle Corporation identifies its customers and their support entitlements using CSI (Customer Support Identifier) codes.[67] Registered customers can submit Service Requests (SRs)[68]—usually via the web-accessible My Oracle Support[69] (MOS),[70] a re-incarnation of Oracle Metalink[71] with web access administered by a site Customer User Administrator (CUA).[72]
    • Critical Patch Updates: since 2005 Oracle Corporation has grouped collections of patches and security fixes for its products each quarter into a "Critical Patch Update" (CPU), released each January, April, July and October.[73]
    • Oracle Configuration Manager (OCM, previously Customer Configuration repository or CCR) gathers and uploads details of the configuration of Oracle software.[74]
    • Oracle Auto Service Request (ASR) automatically creates Service Requests for specific hardware faults on qualified Oracle server, storage, Oracle Exadata, and Oracle Exalogic products.[75]
    • My Oracle Support Community (MOSC)[76]
  • Oracle University (training in Oracle products)[77]
  • NetSuite Social Impact program assists nonprofits with moving operations to the cloud. In October 2018, Oracle announced the expansion of the program to include product donation, pro bono expansion and online community building.[78]
  • As of September 13, 2020, Oracle acquired a trade deal with the ByteDance owned social video platform TikTok. This was the result of an executive order issued by U.S. president Donald Trump stating that TikTok must be sold to a U.S. company by September 15, 2020. The exact nature of the agreement is still unknown, but it implies that Oracle will become TikTok's technology partner and assume responsibility for the company's U.S. user data. The agreement is still pending approval from regulatory government bodies.[79][80] As of April 2025, TikTok continues to operate in the US under Chinese ownership and multiple US companies, including Oracle, expressed interest in acquiring 50% ownership.[81]

Marketing

[edit]

Sales practices

[edit]

In 1990, Oracle laid off 10% (about 400 people) of its work force because of accounting errors.[82] This crisis came about because of Oracle's "up-front" marketing strategy, in which sales people urged potential customers to buy the largest possible amount of software all at once. The sales people then booked the value of future license sales in the current quarter, thereby increasing their bonuses.[83] This became a problem when the future sales subsequently failed to materialize. Oracle eventually had to restate its earnings twice, and also settled (out of court) class-action lawsuits arising from its having overstated its earnings. Ellison stated in 1992 that Oracle had made "an incredible business mistake".[82]

Humphries described the cause—"building for years"—as a combination of technical problems that benefited rivals, and the sales force using side letters and other improper tactics to meet the company's longstanding goal of doubling revenue each year. Ellison hired ("bring in adults", Jerry Held said) new executives Jeff Henley and Raymond J. Lane, who helped the company recover from what Ken Jacobs later described as a "near death experience", in which Oracle required an investment from a Japanese steel company to meet payroll.[12]

Competition

[edit]

The relational database industry was unusually concentrated. Besides being headquartered near each other in the San Francisco Bay area, database technology experts attended the same universities and served on the same standards committees (with Jim Gray serving as neutral arbiter as companies tried to get competing proposals enacted).[84] Sales and marketing people were both fierce rivals and often moved between the companies, even as engineers socialized with each other. The smaller, later-founded database vendors viewed Oracle as their top enemy[85]—the "evil empire", said Bob MacDonald of Informix Software— while Humphries described his company as "the Klingons of" the bay.[84]

Held later described his company's philosophy as "it's not good enough for Oracle to win. It was important for somebody else to lose". Ingres was its first major competitor; Oracle's strategy of focusing on one opponent at a time—even publicly complimenting other rivals "to take the pressure off", Held said—while effective, caused it to neglect Sybase as a threat. Conversely, when Sybase had technical problems "it was: how do you put every ounce of product marketing, sales effort and focus on that".[12] IBM's endorsement of SQL in Db2 in the early 1980s benefited Oracle and forced rivals like Ingres and Informix Corporation to adopt SQL to compete.[86][87] Oracle acknowledged IBM as the standard while emphasizing its own superiority, touting "total IBM SQL compatibility" while IBM's software ran "only on IBM mainframes".[88] By the mid-1980s the company described its database as "the last DBMS", bragging that Oracle now had larger database revenue than dBASE maker Ashton-Tate,[89] and stating that Microsoft, Ashton-Tate, and Sybase's planned Microsoft SQL Server "jumped on Oracle's SQL bandwagon".[90]

MacDonald credited Oracle with "being marketing oriented before any of the competitors ... pushing the envelope on selling the future way ahead of the rest of us".[87] Stu Schuster of Sybase said "Larry taught us a lot about marketing". While other database companies' brochures emphasized technical features, Oracle advertisements showed an Oracle jet fighter shooting down an Ashton-Tate biplane.[89][19][12] dBASE, IBM, and Db2 were among the many competitors Oracle marketing criticized by name.[88] Conversely, another Oracle ad quoted Microsoft's Bill Gates, Sun's Scott McNealy, Hewlett-Packard's John A. Young, and Apple Computer's John Sculley as agreeing with Ellison on Oracle's database breakthroughs.[91] Larry Rowe of Ingres said "you could never come up with a strategy to beat Oracle because whatever you said today, two days later Ellison was saying it with more marketing dollars".[85] Jacobs said, by contrast:[12]

It really surprises me when people say Oracle's a great marketing machine because by definition, if you think a company has great marketing, they don't. If you think they have great technology then they do have a great marketing machine. Larry's belief has fundamentally always been that marketing isn't critical; he's famous for saying, "If you're not building the product and you're not selling it, tell me what it is you do." Because those are the things that he felt were important. So marketing has never been a focus.

The "benchmark wars" began in the early 1980s;[85] Roger Sippl of Informix said that when his company's product beat Oracle on 27 of 30 benchmarks, advertisements titled "Oracle wins again!" appeared citing the three it won,[87] and Ellison allegedly called Dave DeWitt at the University of Wisconsin after he developed a benchmark unfavorable to Oracle, threatening to get the professor fired.[85] Schuster and Held recalled "a not very pleasant environment because it was so directly competitive". They and Sippl described "a vicious cycle" of companies battling each other over, for example, whose distributed database had the best two-phase commit:[92][87][19]

The ads weren't to let me show you how my product helps you solve your business problem, Mr. Customer. It's let me tell you how much better I am than the guy down the street to the point of taking out billboards.

Even IBM participated in the "billboard wars".[19] By 1995 Oracle had 44% of the $2.4 billion relational database market; Sybase had 17% and Informix had 16%. By 1996 Informix, after acquiring Illustra, became Oracle's most important rival.[93] The intense war between Informix CEO Phil White and Ellison made front-page news in Silicon Valley for three years. Informix claimed that Oracle had hired away Informix engineers to disclose important trade secrets about an upcoming product. Informix finally dropped its lawsuit against Oracle in 1997.[94] Held said[12]

And, in one year, we kind of turned the focus from Sybase to Informix, and basically they never knew what hit them. It was such a concerted effort. I mean, it was amazing how you could get product management, marketing, and sales focused. We had a thing, "Where in the world is Phil White," because Phil White was their best sales person. If he went into an account, one of our best guys was in right after them to make sure that they didn't win that business. It was such amazingly focused effort. And within 12 months, Informix was basically on the floor.

In November 2005, a book detailing the war between Oracle and Informix was published, titled The Real Story of Informix Software and Phil White. It gave a detailed chronology of the battle of Informix against Oracle, and how Informix Software's CEO Phil White landed in jail because of his obsession with overtaking Ellison.

After what Held described as "the period of time where some of the wheels came off, first at Ingres then at Sybase, and then at Informix", Oracle was the only substantial independent database vendor until Microsoft SQL Server became widespread in the late 1990s[92] and IBM acquired Informix Software in 2001 (to complement its Db2 database). Today Oracle competes for new database licenses on UNIX, GNU, and Windows operating systems primarily against IBM's Db2 and Microsoft SQL Server. IBM's Db2 still dominates the mainframe database market.

In 2004, Oracle's sales grew at a rate of 14.5% to $6.2 billion, giving it 41.3% and the top share of the relational-database market (InformationWeek – March 2005), with market share estimated at up to 44.6% in 2005 by some sources.[95] Oracle Corporation's main competitors in the database arena remain IBM Db2 and Microsoft SQL Server, and to a lesser extent Sybase and Teradata,[92][95] with free databases such as PostgreSQL and MySQL also having a significant[96] share of the market. EnterpriseDB, based on PostgreSQL, has recently made inroads[97] by proclaiming that its product delivers Oracle compatibility features[clarification needed] at a much lower price-point.

As of 2007 Oracle's top competitors are IBM, Microsoft,[12] and in applications,[98][99] SAP. On March 22, 2007, Oracle sued SAP, accusing them of fraud and unfair competition.[100]

In the market for business intelligence software, many other software companies—small and large—have successfully competed in quality with Oracle and SAP products. Business intelligence vendors can be categorized into the "big four" consolidated BI firms such as Oracle, who has entered BI market through a recent trend of acquisitions (including Hyperion Solutions), and the independent "pure play" vendors such as MicroStrategy, Actuate, and SAS.[101]

Oracle Financials was ranked in the Top 20 Most Popular Accounting Software Infographic by Capterra in 2014, beating out SAP and a number of their other competitors.[102]

Oracle and SAP

[edit]

From 1988, Oracle Corporation and the German company SAP AG had a decade-long history of cooperation, beginning with the integration of SAP's R/3 enterprise application suite with Oracle's relational database products. Despite the SAP partnership with Microsoft, and the increasing integration of SAP applications with Microsoft products (such as Microsoft SQL Server, a competitor to Oracle Database), Oracle and SAP continue their cooperation. According to Oracle Corporation, the majority of SAP's customers use Oracle databases.[103]

In 2004, Oracle began to increase its interest in the enterprise-applications market (in 1989, Oracle had already released Oracle Financials). A series of acquisitions by Oracle Corporation began, most notably with those of PeopleSoft, Siebel Systems, and Hyperion.

SAP recognized that Oracle had started to become a competitor in a markets where SAP had the leadership, and saw an opportunity to lure in customers from those companies that Oracle Corporation had acquired. SAP would offer those customers special discounts on the licenses for its enterprise applications.

Oracle Corporation would resort to a similar strategy, by advising SAP customers to get "OFF SAP" (a play on the words of the acronym for its middleware platform "Oracle Fusion for SAP"),[104] and also by providing special discounts on licenses and services to SAP customers who chose Oracle Corporation products.

Currently Oracle and SAP (the latter through its recently acquired subsidiary TomorrowNow) compete in the third-party enterprise software maintenance and support market. On March 22, 2007, Oracle filed a lawsuit against SAP. In Oracle Corporation v. SAP AG Oracle alleged that TomorrowNow, which provides discount support for legacy Oracle product lines, used the accounts of former Oracle customers to systematically download patches and support documents from Oracle's website and to appropriate them for SAP's use.[105] Some analysts have suggested the suit could form part of a strategy by Oracle Corporation to decrease competition with SAP in the market for third-party enterprise software maintenance and support.[106][107]

On July 3, 2007, SAP admitted that TomorrowNow employees had made "inappropriate downloads" from the Oracle support website. However, it claims that SAP personnel and SAP customers had no access to Oracle intellectual property via TomorrowNow. SAP's CEO Henning Kagermann stated that "Even a single inappropriate download is unacceptable from my perspective. We regret very much that this occurred." Additionally, SAP announced that it had "instituted changes" in TomorrowNow's operational oversight.[108]

On November 23, 2010, a U.S. district court jury in Oakland, California, found that SAP AG must pay Oracle Corp $1.3 billion for copyright infringement, awarding damages that could be the largest-ever for copyright infringement. While admitting liability, SAP estimated the damages at no more than $40 million, while Oracle claimed that they are at least $1.65 billion. The awarded amount is one of the 10 or 20 largest jury verdicts in U.S. legal history. SAP said they were disappointed by the verdict and might appeal.[109] On September 1, 2011, a federal judge overturned the judgment and offered a reduced amount or a new trial, calling Oracle's original award "grossly" excessive.[110] Oracle chose a new trial.

On August 3, 2012, SAP and Oracle agreed on a judgment for $306 million in damages, pending approval from the U.S. district court judge, "to save time and expense of [a] new trial". After the accord has been approved, Oracle can ask a federal appeals court to reinstate the earlier jury verdict. In addition to the damages payment, SAP has already paid Oracle $120 million for its legal fees.[111]

Slogans

[edit]
  • "Information driven"[112][113]
  • For the Oracle Database: "Can't break it, can't break in"[114] and "Unbreakable"[115]
  • "Enabling the Information Age"[116]
  • "Enabling the Information Age Through Network Computing"[117][118][119]
  • As of 2008: "The Information Company"[120]
  • As of 2010: "Software. Hardware. Complete."[121]
  • As of late 2010: "Hardware and Software, Engineered to Work Together"[122][123]
  • As of mid 2015: "Integrated Cloud Applications and Platform Services"[124]

Corporate affairs

[edit]

Finances

[edit]
Sales by region (2025)[125]
Region share
United States 55.9%
United Kingdom 4.5%
Germany 3.2%
Japan 3.1%
Other countries 33.4%

Oracle was ranked No. 82 in the 2018 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue.[126] According to Bloomberg, Oracle's CEO-to-employee pay ratio is 1,205:1. The CEO's compensation in 2017 was $108,295,023. Oracle is one of the approved employers of ACCA and the median employee compensation rate was $89,887.[127]

Development since 2005[128]
Year Revenue
in million US$
Net Income
in million US$
EOY adj price per
share in US$
Employees
2005 11,799 2,886 9.98
2006 14,380 3,381 14.01
2007 17,996 4,274 18.46
2008 22,430 5,521 14.49
2009 23,252 5,593 20.20
2010 26,820 6,135 25.98
2011 35,622 8,547 21.44
2012 37,121 9,981 28.25
2013 37,180 10,925 32.68 122,000
2014 38,275 10,955 38.88 122,000
2015 38,226 9,938 32.02 132,000
2016 37,047 8,901 34.23 136,000
2017 37,728 9,335 42.76 138,000
2018 39,831 3,825 41.33 137,000
2019 39,506 11,083 49.32 136,000
2020 39,068 10,135 61.26 135,000
2021 40,479 13,746 83.85 132,000
2022 42,440 6,717 79.95 143,000
2023 49,954 8,503 104.69 164,000
2024 52,961 10,467 165.26 159,000
2025 57,399 12,443 162,000

Personnel

[edit]
  • Larry Ellison: ex-executive chairman and CTO (since September 2014), co-founder of the company, previously CEO (1977–2014),[129] previously chairman (1990–2004). As of September 2021, he owned 42% of the company.[3] As of 2025 Ellison remains a top executive but no longer CEO.[130]
  • Safra Catz: CEO (since September 2014),[129] previously co-president (since 2004) and CFO.[131] In 2016, she was ranked tenth on Fortune's Most Powerful Women list.[132]
  • Jeff Henley: vice chairman (since September 2014), previously chairman (2004–2014) and CFO (1991–2004).
  • Mark Hurd: former CEO (2014–2019),[129] previously co-president (2010–2014). In 2007, Mark Hurd was ranked No. 16 on Fortune's list of the 25 Most Powerful People in Business.[133] He died in 2019.
  • Charles Phillips: former co-president and director (2003–2010); replaced by Mark Hurd.
  • Bob Miner: co-founder of the company and co-architect of Oracle Database. Led product design and development for Oracle Database (1977–1992). Spun off a technology group within Oracle in 1992. Oracle board member until 1993. He died in 1994.
  • Ed Oates: co-founder of the company. Retired from Oracle in 1996.
  • Umang Gupta: former vice president and general manager (1981–1984). Wrote the first business plan for the company. He died in 2022.
  • Bruce Scott: The first hired employee (after the co-founders; employee number 4) at Oracle (then Software Development Laboratories). Scott served as the co-author and co-architect of the Oracle database up to Version 3. He left Oracle in 1982.[2][134]
  • Marc Benioff: former protégé of Ellison and the youngest to be promoted to vice president at the time; left to found and lead Salesforce in 1999.[135][136]

Board of directors

[edit]

As of September 2025, the company's board consisted of the following directors:[137]

Controversies

[edit]

Trashgate

[edit]

In 2000, Oracle attracted attention from the computer industry and the press after hiring private investigators to dig through the trash of organizations involved in an antitrust trial against Microsoft.[138] The Chairman of Oracle Corporation, Larry Ellison, staunchly defended his company's hiring of an East Coast detective agency to investigate groups that supported rival Microsoft Corporation during its antitrust trial, calling the snooping a "public service". The investigation reportedly included a $1,200 offer to janitors at the Association for Competitive Technology to look through Microsoft's trash. When asked how he would feel if others were looking into Oracle's business activities, Ellison said: "We will ship our garbage to Redmond, and they can go through it. We believe in full disclosure."[139]

"Can't break it, can't break in"

[edit]

In 2002, Oracle Corporation marketed many of its products using the slogan "Can't break it, can't break in", or "Unbreakable".[140] This signified a claim of information security. Oracle Corporation also stressed the reliability of networked databases and network access to databases as major selling points.

However, two weeks after its introduction, David Litchfield, Alexander Kornbrust, Cesar Cerrudo and others demonstrated a whole suite of successful attacks against Oracle products.[141][142] Oracle Corporation's chief security officer Mary Ann Davidson said that, rather than representing a literal claim of Oracle's products' impregnability, she saw the campaign in the context of fourteen independent security evaluations[143] that Oracle Corporation's database server had passed.

Relationship with John Ashcroft

[edit]

In 2004, then-United States Attorney General John Ashcroft sued Oracle Corporation to prevent it from acquiring a multibillion-dollar intelligence contract. After Ashcroft's resignation from government, he founded a lobbying firm, The Ashcroft Group, which Oracle hired in 2005. With the group's help, Oracle went on to acquire the contract.[144]

Expeditionary Combat Support System

[edit]

Computer Sciences Corporation, as the prime contractor, reportedly spent a billion dollars developing the Expeditionary Combat Support System for the United States Air Force. It yielded no significant capability, because, according to an Air Force source, the prime contractor "was simply not up to the task of adapting" the Oracle software, on which the system was based, to meet the specialized performance criteria.[145]

Cover Oregon Healthcare Exchange

[edit]

Oracle Corporation was awarded a contract by the State of Oregon's Oregon Health Authority (OHA) to develop Cover Oregon, the state's healthcare exchange website, as part of the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. When the site tried to go live on October 1, 2013, it failed, and registrations had to be taken using paper applications until the site could be fixed.

On April 25, 2014, the State of Oregon voted to discontinue Cover Oregon and instead use the federal exchange to enroll Oregon residents.[146] The cost of switching to the federal portal was estimated at $5 million, whereas fixing Cover Oregon would have required another $78 million.

Oracle president Safra Catz responded to Cover Oregon and the OHA in a letter claiming that the site's problems were due to OHA mismanagement, specifically that a third-party systems integrator was not hired to manage the complex project.[147][148]

In August 2014, Oracle Corporation sued Cover Oregon for breach of contract,[149] and then later that month the state of Oregon sued Oracle Corporation, in a civil complaint for breach of contract, fraud, filing false claims and "racketeering".[150] In September 2016, the two sides reached a settlement valued at over $100 million to the state, and a six-year agreement for Oracle to continue modernizing state software and IT.[151][152][153][154]

Class action tracking lawsuit

[edit]

In August 2022, a class action lawsuit was filed against Oracle by the law firm Lieff Cabraser. The lawsuit alleges that Oracle engaged in "deliberate and purposeful surveillance of the general population via their digital and online existence", specifically focusing on Oracle operating a surveillance machine which tracks in real-time and records indefinitely the personal information of hundreds of millions of people. The litigants argue that through such surveillance, the company violates the Federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act, California's state constitution, the California Invasion of Privacy Act, competition law, and California Common Law.[155][156]

The lawsuit was settled in July 2024 when Oracle paid $115 million to some of its customers and agreed to stop tracking users.[157]

Heritage Foundation database of employees for Republican administration

[edit]

In 2023, Oracle was contracted by conservative think tank Heritage Foundation to construct a database of conservative employees to help staff a prospective Republican presidency in 2025, part of the Foundation's Project 2025.[158][159]

Violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

[edit]

Africa

[edit]

In August 2011, The Wall Street Journal reported that Oracle was being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation for paying bribes to government officials in order to win business in Africa, in contravention of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).[160]

India

[edit]

In 2012 Oracle agreed to pay about $2 million to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC at the time alleged that the company's Indian subsidiary structured transactions with foreign governments in a way that enabled them to hold about $2.2 million of the proceeds inside funds that could be used for unauthorized purposes and therefore was a violation of the FCPA.[161]

India, Turkey, United Arab Emirates

[edit]

In September 2022, Oracle settled with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) without admitting or denying its findings, by agreeing to pay $23 million to settle the charges. The SEC announced that Oracle violated the FCPA between 2014 and 2019 when its subsidiaries in India, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) created slush funds to bribe foreign officials in order to win business.[162][163]

South African National Treasury contract and corruption probe

[edit]

In 2017, a whistleblower notified the SEC and US Department of Justice, alleging possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in awarding of a R1 billion (2015) (equivalent to R1.17 billion or US$88.54 million in 2018)[164] contract by National Treasury in 2015.[165]

In March 2024, South Africa's Special Investigating Unit found that there were conflicts of interest, irregular processes, and non-compliance with policies and legislation, and said it would petition to blacklist Oracle in South Africa, cancel the contract and recover the money paid.[166]

Ownership of JavaScript trademark

[edit]

In November 2024, Deno Land filed a petition with the US Patent and Trademark Office to cancel Oracle's registered trademark for "JavaScript" because it is "a generic term that Oracle has never controlled and thus isn't eligible under the law for trademark protection", "Oracle abandoned the JavaScript trademark because it doesn't actually use the term in any of the products or services it sells", and because Oracle made false statements when Oracle applied for the trademark.[167][168][169] In February 2025, Oracle denied all three claims.[170]

Reaction to the Israel-Hamas war 2023-2025

[edit]

Following the 2023–2025 Gaza genocide by Israel, Oracle’s top executives, including Safra Catz and Larry Ellison, publicly aligned the company with Israel’s military operations. They issued statements of solidarity, paid double salaries to Israeli employees, and donated to organizations connected to Israel’s wartime response. Critics argue that these moves demonstrate corporate complicity in the suffering of Palestinian civilians and reflect a broader normalization of support for military action under the guise of “corporate values.”[171]

Events

[edit]

Acquisition of Sun Microsystems

[edit]

In January 2010, Oracle completed its acquisition of Sun Microsystems—valued at more than $7 billion—a move that transformed Oracle from solely a software company to a manufacturer of both software and hardware. The acquisition was delayed for several months by the European Commission because of concerns about MySQL, but was unconditionally approved in the end.[172] In September 2011, U.S. State Department Embassy cables were leaked to WikiLeaks. One cable revealed that the U.S. pressured the E.U. to allow Oracle to acquire Sun.[173]

The Sun acquisition was closely watched by free software users and some companies, due to the fear that Oracle might end Sun's traditional support of free projects.[174][175][176][177] Since the acquisition, Oracle has discontinued OpenSolaris and StarOffice, and sued Google over the Java patents Oracle acquired from Sun.[178][179]

Fraud Accusations by the US Department of Justice

[edit]

On July 29, 2010, the United States Department of Justice (DoJ) filed suit against Oracle Corporation alleging fraud. The lawsuit argues that the government received deals inferior to those Oracle gave to its commercial clients. The DoJ added its heft to an already existing whistleblower lawsuit filed by Paul Frascella, who was once senior director of contract services at Oracle.[180] It was settled in 2011.[181]

Lawsuit against Google

[edit]

Background

[edit]

Oracle, the plaintiff, acquired ownership of the Java computer programming language when it acquired Sun Microsystems in January 2010.[182] The Java software includes sets of pre-developed software code to allow programs and apps to accomplish common tasks in a consistent manner. The pre-developed code is organized into separate "packages" which each contain a set of "classes". Each class contains numerous methods, which instruct a program or app to do a certain task. Software developers "became accustomed to using Java's designations at the package, class, and method level".[183]

Oracle and Google (the defendant) tried to negotiate an agreement for Oracle to license Java to Google, which would have allowed Google to use Java in developing programs for mobile devices using the Android operating system. However, the two companies never reached an agreement. After negotiations failed, Google created its own programming platform, which was based on Java, and contained 37 copied Java packages as well as new packages developed by Google.[183]

First trial

[edit]

In 2010, Oracle sued Google for copyright infringement for the use of the 37 Java packages.[183][182] The case was handled in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge William Alsup (who taught himself how to code computers[184]).[182] In the lawsuit, Oracle sought between $1.4 billion and $6.1 billion.[182] In June 2011 the judge had to force Google through a judicial order to make public the details about Oracle's claim for damages.[182]

By the end of the first jury trial (the legal dispute would eventually go on to another trial) the arguments made by Oracle's attorneys focused on a Java function called "rangeCheck":

The argument centered on a function called rangeCheck. Of all the lines of code that Oracle had tested—15 million in total—these were the only ones that were 'literally' copied. Every keystroke, a perfect duplicate. – The Verge, 10/19/17[184]

Although Google admitted to copying the packages, Judge Alsup found that none of the Java packages were covered under copyright protection, and therefore Google did not infringe.[183]

First appeal

[edit]

After the case was over, Oracle appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (750 F.3d 1339 (2014)).[183][185] On May 9, 2014, the appeals court partially reversed Judge Alsup's decision, finding that Java APIs are copyrightable. API stands for "application programming interface" and are how different computer programs or apps communicate with each other. However, the appeals court also left open the possibility that Google might have a "fair use" defense.[185]

Supreme Court petition

[edit]

On October 6, 2014, Google filed a petition to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court denied the petition.[185]

Second trial

[edit]

The case was then returned to the U.S. District Court for another trial about Google's fair use defense.[185] Oracle sought $9 billion in damages.[186] In May 2016, the trial jury found that Google's use of Java's APIs was considered fair use.[185]

Second appeal

[edit]

In February 2017, Oracle filed another appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.[185] This time it was asking for a new trial because the District Court "repeatedly undermined Oracle's case", which Oracle argued led the jury to make the wrong decision. According to ZDNet, "For example, it [Oracle] says the court wrongly bought Google's claim that Android was limited to smartphones while Java was for PCs, whereas Oracle contends that Java and Android both compete as platforms for smart TVs, cars, and wearables."[186]

Discontinuation of OpenSolaris

[edit]

On August 13, 2010, an internal Oracle memo leaked to the Internet cited plans for ending the OpenSolaris operating system project and community.[187] With Oracle planning to develop Solaris only in a closed source fashion, OpenSolaris developers moved to the Illumos and OpenIndiana project, among others.[188]

Discontinuation of OpenSSO

[edit]

As Oracle completed their acquisition of Sun Microsystems in February 2010, they announced that OpenSSO would no longer be their strategic product.[189] Shortly after, OpenSSO was forked to OpenAM,[189] and will continue to be developed and supported by ForgeRock.

Mark Hurd as president

[edit]

On September 6, 2010, Oracle announced that former Hewlett-Packard CEO Mark Hurd was to replace Charles Phillips, who resigned as Oracle co-president. In an official statement made by Larry Ellison, Phillips had previously expressed his desire to transition out of the company. Ellison had asked Phillips to stay on through the integration of Sun Microsystems Inc.[190] In a separate statement regarding the transition, Ellison said "Mark did a brilliant job at HP and I expect he'll do even better at Oracle. There is no executive in the IT world with more relevant experience than Mark."[191]

On September 7, 2010, HP announced a civil lawsuit against Mark Hurd "to protect HP's trade secrets",[192] in response to Oracle hiring Hurd. On September 20, Oracle and HP published a joint press release announcing the resolution of the lawsuit on confidential terms and reaffirming commitment to long-term strategic partnership between the companies.[193]

OpenOffice.org issue

[edit]

A number of OpenOffice.org developers formed The Document Foundation and received backing by Google, Novell, Red Hat, and Canonical, as well as some others, but were unable to get Oracle to donate the brand OpenOffice.org, causing a fork in the development of OpenOffice.org with the foundation now developing and promoting LibreOffice. Oracle expressed no interest in sponsoring the new project and asked the OpenOffice.org developers that started the project to resign from the company due to "conflicts of interest". On November 1, 2010, 33 of the OpenOffice.org developers gave their letters of resignation.[194] On June 1, 2011, Oracle donated OpenOffice.org to the Apache Software Foundation.[195]

HP and Oracle lawsuit

[edit]

On June 15, 2011, HP filed a lawsuit in California Superior Court in Santa Clara, claiming that Oracle had breached an agreement to support the Itanium microprocessor used in HP's high-end enterprise servers.[196] Oracle called the lawsuit "an abuse of the judicial process"[197] and said that had it known SAP's Léo Apotheker was about to be hired as HP's new CEO, any support for HP's Itanium servers would not have been implied.[198]

On August 1, 2012, a California judge said in a tentative ruling that Oracle must continue porting its software at no cost until HP discontinues its sales of Itanium-based servers.[199][200] HP was awarded $3 billion in damages against Oracle in 2016.[201] HP argued Oracle's canceling support damaged HP's Itanium server brand. Oracle had announced that it would appeal both the decision and damages, but the decision stayed.[202][203]

GSA business bidding ban

[edit]

On April 20, 2012, the US General Services Administration banned Oracle from the most popular portal for bidding on GSA contracts for undisclosed reasons. Oracle has previously used this portal for around four hundred million dollars a year in revenue.[204] Oracle previously settled a lawsuit filed under the False Claims Act, which accused the company of overbilling the US government between 1998 and 2006. The 2011 settlement forced Oracle to pay $199.5 million to the General Services Administration.[205]

Cerner acquisition

[edit]

On December 20, 2021, Oracle announced that it had entered into an agreement to acquire Cerner Corporation (now Oracle Health and Oracle Life Sciences) for approximately US$28.3 billion, creating a dedicated Industry Business Unit within the company. Cerner is the largest international supplier of health information technology, such as electronic health records (EHR), revenue cycle solutions, and biomedical device integration platforms, and has its headquarters in Kansas City, Missouri, US.[206] The deal closed in early July 2022 after receiving final approval from European regulators, making it Oracle's largest acquisition and one of the largest in corporate history.[207]

Oracle's purchase of Cerner is part of an effort to introduce Oracle products into the healthcare market, particularly in the United States although Oracle plans to expand Cerner's global operations.[207] It mirrors closely to expansions of other large information technology companies such as Google, Microsoft and Amazon into the healthcare sector. Cerner already used Oracle solutions for its "largest business and most important clinical system", and Oracle announced its intention to integrate autonomous solutions such as the Oracle Voice Digital Assistant into Cerner clinical solutions. Oracle additionally has shared its plans to improve the usability and user experience of Cerner solutions.[206]

While the acquisition was originally met with mixed reactions by industry and investors, some industry experts have developed a more positive perception of the purchase. Cerner won a major contract in 2017 to supply its EHR software to the US Department of Defense and Veterans Administration Hospitals, which resulted in Cerner "leaving its traditional base of hospital systems high and dry" with delays in resolving issues and implementing innovations. Oracle's acquisition allows for the larger corporation to support Cerner's operations, with the goal of "addressing basic operational issues... improving resiliency and usability" in the short-term.[208] Some opinions have expressed longer-term concern, with Oracle Health expecting a decline in US-based sales in 2024, although an increase in global sales. Additionally, clients of Cerner have reported minimal improvements to the core system and a focus by Oracle on future advancements over resolving current issues.[209]

A September 2024 announcement by Oracle listed "tens of thousands of engineering hours and millions of dollars" of investments in the core clinical operations, and the release of the highly anticipated Oracle Clinical Digital Assistant, a generative AI system that automatically creates consultation documentation and proposes orders.[210]

Oracle Health data breach

[edit]

In March 2025, a threat actor claimed to have stolen 6 million data records from Oracle Health (formerly Cerner), affecting 140,000 patients.[211] Oracle has denied the breach despite multiple online reports and legal complaints filed.[212] In April 2025, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a warning to Oracle customers to secure their environments, despite no public acknowledgment of the breach by Oracle.[213]

U.S. TikTok's operations

[edit]

On September 13, 2020, Bloomberg News reported that Oracle won a bidding war with other U.S.-based companies to take over social media company TikTok's operations in the United States following the company's pressure to forcibly be shut down by the Trump administration. Oracle was described as a "trusted tech partner" by TikTok, suggesting the deal may not be as structured as an outright sale.[214] On September 19, 2020, the Trump administration approved of the sale of TikTok's US operations to Oracle "[delaying] — by one week — restrictions that were originally to take effect" on September 20 as indicated by the United States Department of Commerce.[215]

On February 10, 2021, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing a source familiar with the matter, the Biden administration would be backing off from banning TikTok and shelving the sale of TikTok indefinitely, as the U.S. Commerce Department began reviewing whether or not Trump's claims about TikTok can justify the attempts to ban it.[216] On February 27, 2023, Biden changed his "indefinite" stance on TikTok as he echoed Trump's 2020 claims of disapproval. Biden said Federal agencies have thirty days to remove TikTok from all federal devices. Federal contractors must meet the same standard in ninety days. On March 8, 2024, Biden said he would sign a bipartisan bill banning TikTok in the United States if the Chinese company ByteDance didn't divest.[citation needed]

As of the 25th September 2025, TikTok was bought by Silver Lake and Abu Dhabi’s MGX. Oracle will own 45% of the app in the US, and ByteDance 35% after delays with the ban for the 4th time.[217][218]

Oracle will store data of US TikTok users on its cloud computers,[219] and it will be involved in the new TikTok spinoff's cybersecurity.[220]

Offices

[edit]

Since December 2020, Oracle Corporation's world headquarters has been located in Austin, Texas. Oracle has plans to build its largest office hub, with 8,500 jobs, in Nashville, Tennessee within the next few decades.

Oracle has a large office complex located on the San Francisco Peninsula in the Redwood Shores area of Redwood City. This complex was home to Oracle world headquarters from 1989 to 2020. It is located on the former site of Marine World/Africa USA, which moved from Redwood Shores to Vallejo in 1986. Oracle Corporation originally leased two buildings on the Oracle Parkway site, moving its finance and administration departments from the corporation's former headquarters on Davis Drive, Belmont, California. Eventually, Oracle purchased the complex and constructed four additional buildings.

The distinctive Oracle Parkway buildings, nicknamed the Emerald City,[221] served as sets for the futuristic headquarters of the fictional company "NorthAm Robotics" in the Robin Williams film Bicentennial Man (1999).[222] The campus also represented the headquarters of Cyberdyne Systems in the movie Terminator Genisys (2015).[223]

Oracle offices and former headquarters in Redwood Shores, California

Corporate structures

[edit]

Oracle Corporation operates in multiple markets and has acquired many companies to help it do so. In some cases these companies became the starting points for global business units (GBUs) targeting particular vertical markets., including:[224]

  • Communications
  • Construction and engineering—formerly the Primavera GBU
  • Energy and Water
  • Financial services
  • Food and Beverages
  • Health sciences
  • Hospitality
  • Retail

Sponsorships

[edit]
BMW Oracle Racing USA-71, at the German Sailing Grand Prix Kiel 2006. It was moored at Oracle headquarters in Redwood Shores, California, until 2014.

On October 20, 2006, the Golden State Warriors and the Oracle Corporation announced a 10-year agreement in which the Oakland Arena would become known as the Oracle Arena.[225] The agreement ended after the 2018–2019 NBA season when the Warriors relocated to the Chase Center in San Francisco.[226]

Larry Ellison's sailing team competes as Oracle Team USA. The team has won the America's Cup twice, in 2010 (as BMW Oracle Racing)[227] and in 2013,[228] despite being penalized for cheating.[229][230]

Sean Tucker's "Challenger II" stunt biplane is sponsored by Oracle and performs frequently at air shows around the US.[231]

In January 2019, the San Francisco Giants entered into a 20-year agreement to rename their stadium Oracle Park.[232]

From the 2022 Formula One season, Oracle signed a five-year deal worth $500m to become title sponsors of Red Bull Racing, after already being a sponsor effective from the 2021 season.[233] In 1994 and 1995, Oracle sponsored Benetton. It was revealed in July 2022 that NASCAR's Joe Gibbs Racing team tried to sign a sponsorship with Oracle after Mars Inc. would announce they would leave JGR after the 2022 season, but the deal reportedly fell through.[234]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Oracle Corporation is an American multinational computer technology company headquartered in Redwood Shores, California, that specializes in developing and selling database management systems, cloud infrastructure, applications, and related services. Its core business focuses on transitioning traditional databases to cloud infrastructure, with strong growth in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure driven by multi-cloud strategies and demand for AI solutions, while legacy businesses provide stable cash flow. Founded in 1977 by , , and as Software Development Laboratories in , the company was renamed Oracle Systems Corporation in 1979 and Oracle Corporation in 1982 after its flagship product, the , which was the first commercially available management system. The company has achieved prominence through its dominance in enterprise database software, serving over 275,000 customers across more than 145 countries, and reporting 2025 revenues of $57 billion with approximately 162,000 employees. Oracle's product portfolio includes the , Oracle Cloud Infrastructure for , Fusion Cloud Applications for ERP, HCM, and SCM, as well as hardware engineered systems and AI-integrated solutions like the world's first autonomous database introduced in 2018. Its growth has been fueled by over 150 acquisitions totaling more than $110 billion, including notable purchases like in 2010 and Cerner in 2022, which expanded its reach into Java stewardship, hardware, and healthcare IT. Recent developments include a September 2025 leadership transition appointing Clay Magouyrk—previously president of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, having joined from Amazon Web Services in 2014—and Mike Sicilia—formerly president of Oracle Industries, via the 2008 Primavera acquisition—as co-CEOs, with Safra Catz moving to Executive Vice Chair; founder remains chairman and chief technology officer. Key partnerships enhancing its cloud, AI, and data infrastructure include a landmark agreement with OpenAI for the Stargate project, delivering approximately 4.5 gigawatts of data center capacity valued at over $300 billion over five years beginning in 2027, and a 15% stake in the TikTok U.S. joint venture finalized in January 2026, involving oversight of algorithm retraining on U.S. data. These initiatives underscore Oracle's strategic focus amid competition from rivals like and . While celebrated for technological advancements such as large-scale implementations serving millions, Oracle has encountered controversies, including antitrust challenges during acquisitions, a $115 million settlement in a 2024 consumer data privacy lawsuit, and criticisms over its of acquired assets like Cerner, where implementation issues have been linked to operational disruptions in healthcare settings.

History

Founding and Initial Development (1977–1980s)

Software Development Laboratories (SDL) was established on June 16, 1977, in , by , , and , who had previously collaborated at Corporation. The founders, with an initial investment of approximately $2,000, sought to commercialize a relational database management system (RDBMS) inspired by Edgar F. Codd's 1970 IBM paper on relational data models, aiming to implement structured query language (SQL) capabilities ahead of competitors. The company's flagship product, codenamed after a database project the founders had encountered during prior consulting for the , became the first commercially available RDBMS to use SQL, sparking the relational database revolution. In June 1979, SDL—renamed Relational Software, Inc. (RSI) that month and relocated to —released Oracle Version 2 (skipping Version 1 for marketing purposes) for Digital Equipment Corporation's PDP-11 minicomputers, with the U.S. Air Force as an . This portable implementation, written in , emphasized and ACID-compliant transactions, distinguishing it from hierarchical and network databases prevalent at the time. Throughout the early 1980s, RSI expanded 's compatibility to platforms including mainframes and VAX systems, releasing Version 3 in with multi-table joins and Version 4 in 1984 featuring user-defined datatypes. The company rebranded as Systems Corporation in 1982 to align with its product name, reflecting growing revenue from defense and financial sector clients amid the RDBMS market's emergence. By 1986, achieved an on , raising funds from 2.1 million shares amid rapid adoption driven by its pioneering SQL standardization.

Expansion and Relational Database Dominance (1990s)

In the early 1990s, faced significant financial difficulties stemming from aggressive expansion and practices that led to its first quarterly loss in , prompting layoffs of approximately 400 employees—10% of its workforce—and the restatement of prior sales figures. These issues culminated in class-action lawsuits, which settled, and internal debates about retaining CEO . Despite reaching $584 million in revenue that , the company underwent restructuring, recruiting key executives like a new to stabilize operations. This period marked a pivot toward disciplined growth, with refocusing on its core management system (RDBMS) strengths amid competition from Sybase and . The release of Oracle7 in June 1992 catalyzed recovery, introducing procedural language/SQL () for stored procedures and triggers, along with enhanced performance and features that improved for enterprise applications. Oracle7's portability across platforms and compliance with SQL standards solidified its appeal for mission-critical workloads, enabling broader adoption in sectors like and . Subsequent releases, including Oracle8 in 1997—which added object-relational capabilities, partitioning, and advanced indexing—and Oracle8i in 1999, optimized for internet-scale data with integration, further entrenched Oracle's technical edge. These innovations addressed limitations in rivals' offerings, such as slower query processing, positioning Oracle as a benchmark for reliability and throughput. By the mid-1990s, Oracle had established dominance in the RDBMS market, leveraging its pioneering first-mover advantage—sparked by releasing the first commercial RDBMS in 1979 and advancing portability and key features in the 1980s to become the enterprise standard—to build an empire through superior handling of large-scale, secure workloads, as demonstrated in early U.S. government contracts like the CIA's system. While exact shares varied, Oracle outpaced competitors, with Sybase at around 17% and at 16% in the early decade, benefiting from rivals' stumbles like 's 1997 accounting scandal. Oracle's emphasis on multi-platform support and ANSI SQL adherence drove enterprise preference for its databases over hierarchical or network models still prevalent elsewhere. This leadership translated to revenue milestones, surpassing $2 billion in sales by mid-1994, with database products comprising the bulk. Expansion efforts included international pushes, such as Nippon Steel's 1992 investment in Oracle Japan, and selective acquisitions like the 1994 purchase of Digital Equipment Corporation's Rdb database for VMS platforms, enhancing Oracle's portfolio without diluting focus. By decade's end, Oracle had diversified into adjacent areas like (ERP) precursors while maintaining RDBMS as its revenue core, setting the stage for sustained market primacy through empirical advantages in speed and robustness over alternatives.

Acquisition-Driven Growth (2000s)

During the , Oracle Corporation accelerated its acquisition strategy to expand beyond its dominant market into complementary segments, including , CRM, and performance management, amid slowing and intensifying competition from and others. This approach involved over 50 deals from 2005 onward, focusing on acquiring mature technologies and customer bases to consolidate the industry and achieve cost synergies through integration with Oracle's stack. A pivotal transaction was the $10.3 billion acquisition of , completed in January 2005 after an 18-month hostile bid launched in June 2003 at $16 per share and culminating in a $26.50 per share agreement announced December 13, 2004. The deal faced U.S. Department of Justice antitrust scrutiny over potential database but was approved with conditions, adding PeopleSoft's management and applications to Oracle's portfolio while eliminating a key rival. Oracle followed with the $5.85 billion purchase of , announced September 12, 2005, and closed January 31, 2006, at $10.66 per share, bolstering CRM capabilities and capturing Siebel's sales automation customer base. In March 2007, it acquired for $3.3 billion in cash, enhancing and performance management tools for financial consolidation and reporting. The decade's largest software deal was in October 2008 for $8.5 billion, which strengthened offerings like WebLogic Server for application integration. These acquisitions, alongside smaller targets in retail (e.g., Retek in ) and other niches, significantly fueled expansion, with fiscal year revenues rising from $10 billion in 2000 to $23 billion in 2009, as acquired revenues offset maturing database license sales and enabled . The strategy proved accretive long-term, despite initial integration challenges and criticisms of aggressive tactics, by reducing fragmented competition and building a more comprehensive enterprise suite.

Shift to Cloud and AI Era (2010s–2025)

In the early 2010s, Oracle began transitioning from its traditional on-premises database dominance toward amid intensifying competition from and . In September 2010, the company introduced Exalogic Elastic , an engineered system marketed as a "cloud in a box" for private cloud deployments, emphasizing integrated hardware and software for enterprise workloads. By June 2012, Oracle launched its public offerings, including (IaaS), (PaaS), and (SaaS) products, targeting rivals like in enterprise applications. Oracle accelerated its cloud strategy through acquisitions and infrastructure investments. In 2016, it acquired for $9.3 billion, bolstering its SaaS capabilities in cloud-based and CRM for small and medium enterprises. That year, Infrastructure (OCI) became generally available as Bare Metal Cloud Services, focusing on high-performance, bare-metal instances to differentiate from virtualized competitors by offering dedicated hardware for database workloads. Throughout the late , Oracle invested heavily in global data centers, pivoting from software licenses to subscription-based cloud revenue, though initial growth lagged hyperscalers due to its late entry and focus on multitenant architectures suited for . The 2020s marked a resurgence driven by AI demand for scalable compute and storage. In 2021, Oracle acquired Cerner for $28.3 billion, enhancing its care cloud offerings with electronic health records integrated into OCI for AI-enabled and predictive modeling. OCI surged, reaching $10.23 billion in fiscal year 2025 (ended May 31, 2025), with growing 52% year-over-year, fueled by AI training and inference workloads requiring Oracle's optimized database services. Projections indicated cloud climbing 77% to $18 billion in fiscal 2026, supported by partnerships like those with AWS for interoperable database hosting and for AI accelerators. By 2025, Oracle embedded AI across its stack, launching the AI Data Platform in October to unify with agentic for enterprise AI initiatives, emphasizing secure, autonomous lakehouses for generative AI applications. This shift positioned OCI as a cost-effective alternative for AI infrastructure, with overall growing 42% year-over-year as of mid-2025, driven by demand for and regulated industry workloads resistant to pure hyperscaler dominance. Despite earlier criticisms of aggressive tactics and license-to- migrations, Oracle's engineered systems and database heritage provided causal advantages in performance for AI vector databases and real-time , contributing to its market cap approaching $1 trillion by late 2025.

Products and Technologies

Database Management Systems

is a proprietary (DBMS) produced by Oracle Corporation, primarily operating as a (RDBMS) that adheres to SQL standards and supports extensions for procedural languages like . Initially released in 1979 as Oracle Version 2—the first commercially available SQL-based RDBMS—it was developed by Relational Software, Inc. (later renamed ) based on Edgar F. Codd's and IBM's System R research, sparking the relational database revolution through early commercialization of these concepts. The system runs on various platforms, including on-premises servers, virtual machines, and Infrastructure, emphasizing , , and security for enterprise workloads. Key architectural features include multitenant architecture introduced in Oracle 12c (2013), which enables consolidation of multiple pluggable databases into a single container for efficient resource sharing and isolation; Real Application Clusters (RAC) for horizontal scaling across clustered nodes; and advanced partitioning for handling petabyte-scale data volumes. The DBMS supports in-memory columnar processing via , accelerating analytical queries, and integrates , XML, and graph data models alongside traditional relational structures. Security mechanisms encompass , fine-grained access controls, and auditing compliant with standards like GDPR and HIPAA. These capabilities position Oracle Database as a foundation for mission-critical applications in , , and sectors, where downtime costs exceed millions per hour. Evolution has incorporated cloud-native enhancements, such as Autonomous Database, which automates patching, tuning, and scaling using to reduce administrative overhead by up to 80% compared to manual management. The latest long-term support release, Oracle AI Database 26ai (version 23.26.0.0.0), launched in October 2025, builds on prior versions like 23ai by embedding AI Vector Search for semantic querying of and native AI model training within the database, eliminating data movement for . This version replaces 23ai quarterly updates and supports hybrid deployments, with quarterly patches addressing vulnerabilities, as seen in the October 2025 Critical Patch Update fixing six new issues in the . Earlier milestones include client/server support in 1985, capabilities in the 1990s, and optimizations in 10g (2003). In market assessments, Oracle Database holds the top ranking among DBMS systems as of Q1 2025 per DB-Engines metrics, which aggregate popularity indicators like search trends, technical discussions, and job postings, reflecting its dominance in enterprise relational workloads despite competition from open-source alternatives like PostgreSQL and MySQL, which build upon the relational model and SQL standards commercialized and popularized by Oracle. Usage statistics indicate approximately 9.7% share in the relational database category, driven by its reliability in handling complex transactions and its integration with Oracle's ecosystem, though adoption has faced scrutiny for high licensing costs and vendor lock-in. Independent analyses confirm its leadership in structured data management, with persistent growth in cloud migrations bolstering its position amid shifts toward AI-augmented databases.

Middleware and Cloud Infrastructure

Oracle Fusion Middleware comprises a suite of standards-based software products designed for developing, deploying, and managing service-oriented architectures, encompassing Java EE platforms, integration services, tools, and systems. The foundational product, , emerged in 1998, incorporating basic application server capabilities alongside and Reports servers to facilitate enterprise application deployment. Subsequent evolution integrated acquired technologies, such as WebLogic Server from in 2008, evolving into core components like Oracle SOA Suite for orchestration of services and business processes. Recent releases, including Fusion Middleware 14.1.2 on December 20, 2024, enhance developer productivity with updates to WebLogic, SOA Suite, and BPM Suite, supporting extended error corrections for versions like SOA 12.2.1.4 through 2027. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), launched in 2016 as Oracle's public platform, provides foundational services including compute, storage, networking, and database management, optimized for high-performance workloads and enterprise-scale migrations. By fiscal year 2025, OCI achieved 50% year-over-year growth in infrastructure revenue, projected to exceed 70% in fiscal 2026, driven by demand for AI and database services amid total remaining performance obligations reaching $138 billion. Key features include multishape database configurations, sovereign options, and the October 2025 introduction of OCI Zettascale10 clusters for AI training, enabling with reduced latency for large-scale models. OCI integrates Fusion Middleware components natively, allowing seamless deployment of SOA and integration services in environments, while emphasizing through dedicated regions that deliver over 200 services into customer data centers with minimal footprint. In the competitive landscape, OCI holds approximately 3% global in cloud infrastructure as of Q2 2025, trailing AWS (31%), (25%), and Google Cloud (12%), but excels in specialized areas like AI compute and database performance, positioning it as a leader in the 2025 IDC MarketScape for Worldwide Public IaaS. This niche strength stems from Oracle's legacy in relational databases and engineered systems, enabling cost-efficient scaling for enterprises avoiding via multicloud . Adoption in information professional services is accelerating in 2025, addressing complexities with OCI's governance tools and performance optimizations.

Enterprise Applications and ERP

Oracle's enterprise applications portfolio encompasses a range of software solutions designed to manage core business processes, with (ERP) forming a central component. ERP systems integrate functions such as , , , management, and into unified platforms. Oracle's ERP offerings evolved from on-premises solutions to cloud-native architectures, emphasizing , AI-driven insights, and for large enterprises and midmarket segments. The foundation of Oracle's ERP capabilities traces back to acquisitions that expanded its applications beyond database technology. In 2003–2005, Oracle acquired for $10.3 billion and , integrating their modules into its portfolio to compete with . These moves addressed gaps in and , though integrations faced challenges in harmonizing legacy codebases with Oracle's standards. Further bolstering this, the 2016 acquisition of for $9.3 billion introduced a cloud-first tailored for small and midsize businesses (SMBs), enabling two-tier deployments where subsidiaries use NetSuite alongside parent-company Oracle systems. Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS), an older integrated launched in the 1990s and updated through versions like Release 12.2 in 2013, remains available for on-premises or hybrid environments, supporting modular implementations across , , and CRM. Oracle Fusion , introduced in 2011 as part of the Fusion Applications suite, represents the company's modern, SaaS-based flagship, unifying acquired technologies into a single cloud platform with quarterly updates. Key modules include financials for and receivables automation, procurement for supplier management, and for compliance, all leveraging embedded AI for and process orchestration. As of fiscal 2025, Fusion and together generated $3.8 billion in quarterly revenue for Oracle's applications business, up 11% year-over-year, with contributing $1.0 billion in Q4 FY25, reflecting 18% growth driven by AI enhancements and high renewal rates. These systems prioritize standards compliance, such as ASC 606 for , and integrate with Oracle's database and for data consistency. Despite strengths in integration and AI capabilities—like generative AI for contract term extraction and mobile-responsive interfaces—Oracle's implementations have historically required significant customization, leading to longer deployment times compared to rivals. differentiates by offering out-of-the-box usability for SMBs, centralizing finance, inventory, and e-commerce without heavy configuration, while Fusion targets complex enterprises with features like enterprise for synchronization. Oracle continues to invest in innovation, incorporating AI agents for and warehouses for real-time reporting.

Hardware and Engineered Systems

Oracle Corporation's involvement in hardware began significantly with its acquisition of Sun Microsystems, announced on April 20, 2009, and completed on January 27, 2010, for $7.4 billion. This deal provided Oracle with Sun's SPARC processor architecture, Solaris operating system, and a range of servers and storage systems, enabling the company to pursue a strategy of engineering hardware and software to operate as integrated units optimized for Oracle's database and application workloads. Prior to the acquisition, Oracle had partnered with Hewlett-Packard to develop the Exadata Database Machine, launched in September 2008 as the inaugural engineered system for accelerating database processing through hardware offloading of tasks like scanning and filtering. The core of Oracle's hardware offerings lies in its Engineered Systems portfolio, which consists of pre-integrated compute, storage, networking, and software components designed to minimize deployment complexity, lower , and deliver superior performance for mission-critical applications compared to general-purpose hardware. These systems leverage custom optimizations, such as networking for low-latency interconnects and flash storage for high I/O throughput, tailored specifically for , , and enterprise applications. Following the Sun acquisition, Oracle extended this approach to SPARC-based systems, introducing the SPARC T4 processor in September 2011 with silicon-level enhancements for Oracle workloads, including hardware cryptography acceleration and floating-point performance improvements. Key products include the Database Machine, which integrates x86 or servers with Exadata Storage Servers to enable massive parallelism and , with generations evolving from X2 in 2010 to the X11M announced on January 7, 2025, maintaining pricing parity with predecessors while enhancing scalability for cloud-era demands. The Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud, introduced in September 2010, targets Java and middleware environments, combining x86 compute nodes, high-speed storage, and Oracle WebLogic Server in a rack-scale appliance for elastic application deployment. Additional offerings encompass the , launched in 2012 as a converged system blending Exadata and Exalogic capabilities with servers for unified database and application hosting, and the Oracle Private Cloud Appliance, which provides a modular, software-defined for on-premises private clouds. Oracle's hardware strategy emphasizes full-stack integration to achieve deterministic performance, with engineered systems reportedly reducing administrative overhead by automating provisioning and scaling tasks via . While the hardware segment generated $2.94 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2025, representing a minor portion of Oracle's total $54.93 billion, it supports hybrid deployments bridging on-premises and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. Post-acquisition developments in included the M7 processor in 2015, featuring integrated analytics silicon, though Oracle ceased new SPARC roadmap announcements after 2017, redirecting focus toward x86-based engineered systems and commoditized servers like the Oracle Server X8 series for broader compatibility.

Healthcare and Specialized Solutions

Oracle Health, Oracle Corporation's primary healthcare division, originated from the $28.3 billion acquisition of Cerner Corporation, completed in June 2022, marking Oracle's largest deal to date and aimed at integrating electronic health records (EHR) with Oracle's cloud infrastructure. This platform delivers solutions, including EHR systems deployed across hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations, facilitating clinical workflows, patient , and standards like FHIR. Key offerings encompass AI-enhanced tools for , , and , enabling providers to consolidate disparate data sources into unified systems for real-time and outcomes improvement. For instance, Oracle Health's EHR supports over 30,000 facilities globally, processing billions of patient interactions annually through secure data exchange ecosystems that link payers, providers, and public entities. Complementary enterprise applications, such as and modules tailored for healthcare, optimize operational efficiency in areas like inventory for pharmaceuticals and financials for processes. In life sciences, Oracle provides specialized platforms for management, unifying trial data across phases, automating for reporting, and integrating with tools to accelerate timelines. These solutions leverage Oracle's database backbone for handling petabyte-scale genomic and datasets, supporting AI-driven insights for without relying on unverified claims from legacy vendors. Beyond core healthcare, Oracle's specialized solutions extend to industry-vertical adaptations, including health systems where Cerner-derived EHRs have been implemented for agencies like the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, though post-acquisition integrations have faced delays in customization for bespoke federal requirements. For public sector and defense-adjacent operations, Oracle offers secure, cloud-native environments compliant with standards like , emphasizing and zero-trust architectures to mitigate risks in sensitive environments. These tailored deployments prioritize empirical performance metrics, such as reduced latency in query responses for mission-critical , over generalized assurances.

Business Operations

Marketing, Sales, and Competitive Strategies

Oracle maintains a direct model emphasizing a large, specialized force targeting enterprise customers with complex software needs. The company relies primarily on its own representatives to conduct high-touch engagements, including demonstrations, customized proposals, and negotiations for multi-year licenses and subscriptions. This approach supports revenue generation exceeding $1.19 million per and marketing employee annually as of 2023, reflecting efficient allocation in driving deals for database, , and services. Sales tactics often involve aggressive upselling and bundling, such as offering discounts on migrations conditional on commitments to avoid software audits or hardware support reductions. Representatives have proposed "attached deals" linking perpetual licenses to uptake, sometimes pressuring customers with threats of compliance reviews that could reveal overusage and trigger penalties. These methods, while effective for short-term revenue—contributing to growth amid enterprise lock-in—have drawn for alienating clients, with reports of backfiring in adoption efforts as of 2018 and ongoing lawsuits alleging coercive practices to push unwanted services. Negotiations frequently yield 50-70% discounts off list prices for enterprises, underscoring the high initial pricing as leverage in protracted deal cycles. Marketing efforts center on thought leadership, digital campaigns, and major events to position Oracle as an innovator in enterprise . Key initiatives include annual conferences like Oracle OpenWorld (rebranded elements into CloudWorld and AI World by 2025), which attract tens of thousands for keynotes, product unveilings, and networking, fostering leads through executive presentations by figures like CEO . Complementary strategies encompass via blogs and whitepapers on AI integration, targeted digital ads, and partnerships for co-marketing, aiming to highlight and performance advantages over rivals. Competitively, Oracle differentiates through its integrated stack—particularly performance—and multicloud interoperability to counter hyperscalers like AWS and Azure, which hold dominant market shares of around 30% and 20% respectively as of 2025, compared to Oracle's 4%. Strategies include partnerships enabling deployment on AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud infrastructures since 2023-2024, allowing customers to leverage existing investments without full rip-and-replace migrations. Oracle promotes superior price-performance for database-heavy workloads, claiming lower total costs via autonomous management and reduced egress fees, though independent analyses note variability by and ongoing challenges in scaling against broader ecosystems.

Financial Performance and Growth Metrics

Oracle Corporation's 2025 (ended May 31, 2025) generated of $57.4 billion, reflecting an 8.4% year-over-year increase from $53.0 billion in 2024, primarily fueled by expansion in services and license support. net income for the year reached $12.4 billion, supported by operating income of $17.7 billion, while non-GAAP operating income was $25.0 billion. Oracle generates revenue through primary streams including software licenses and maintenance for on-premises products, recurring subscriptions from cloud services such as SaaS (e.g., Fusion Applications), PaaS, and IaaS via Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, hardware sales from engineered systems, and professional services encompassing consulting and support. These figures underscore Oracle's transition from legacy toward higher-margin offerings, with the strategic shift to cloud-based recurring revenue driving recent growth amid AI demand and contributing to high valuation multiples that reflect scalability, margins, and future potential beyond current revenue. though overall growth moderated compared to peak acquisition-driven surges in prior decades. In the first quarter of 2026 (ended August 31, 2025), accelerated to $14.9 billion, up 12% in U.S. dollars and 11% in constant currency from the prior-year quarter, with revenues surging 28% to drive the performance. infrastructure specifically grew 54% year-over-year, highlighting momentum in infrastructure-as-a-service amid demand for AI workloads. GAAP net income for the quarter was $2.9 billion, with non-GAAP net income at $4.3 billion, up 8% year-over-year. Remaining performance obligations expanded dramatically to $455 billion, a 359% increase, signaling robust contracted future revenues from long-term deals.
Fiscal PeriodTotal Revenue ($B)YoY Growth (%)Cloud Revenue Growth (%)GAAP Net Income ($B)
FY202453.0---
FY202557.48.4-12.4
Q1 FY202614.912282.9
Oracle's trailing twelve-month revenue as of August 31, 2025, stood at $59.0 billion, with a 9.7% year-over-year increase, though free cash flow growth turned negative at -151.8%, reflecting investments in data center expansion for cloud capacity. On February 2, 2026, Oracle announced plans to raise $45-50 billion in gross cash proceeds during 2026 through a mix of debt and equity to fund expansion of its cloud infrastructure, particularly to meet AI demand, addressing contracted AI-driven demand from major customers including AMD, Meta, NVIDIA, OpenAI, TikTok, and xAI. The stock fell about 4% in premarket trading, with shares around $159-164. The company's market capitalization stood at approximately $567 billion as of December 2025, with shares trading around $197. Oracle Corporation trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol ORCL. Profitability metrics remain solid, with gross margins at 70.5% in FY2025, down gradually from 80.6% in FY2021 due to scaling cloud infrastructure costs. This growth trajectory positions Oracle competitively in enterprise software, though sustained cloud acceleration will be critical to offsetting maturing legacy segments.

Global Operations and Corporate Structure


Oracle Corporation maintains its world headquarters at 2300 Oracle Way in , which serves as the primary hub for executive leadership and core operations following the company's relocation from Redwood Shores, California, announced in 2020. The firm operates over 270 office locations across more than 100 countries, organized into key regions including , , , , the , and , enabling localized sales, support, and service delivery.
As of fiscal year 2025, Oracle employs approximately 162,000 people globally, with a significant portion dedicated to customer support and service roles numbering around 18,000. Revenue distribution reflects a strong North American focus, with the Americas generating 63.31% of the company's US$57 billion total revenue in FY2025, while Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) and Asia Pacific contribute the remainder through expanding cloud infrastructure deployments. Oracle supports international expansion via over 45 public cloud regions worldwide, including dedicated facilities in countries such as Japan, Brazil, India, the United Kingdom, and South Korea, which facilitate compliance with regional data sovereignty requirements and reduce latency for enterprise customers. The combines functional departments—such as , , and —with product-oriented divisions focused on areas like database systems, infrastructure, and enterprise applications, allowing for specialized development and market responsiveness. Oracle delineates its operations into primary segments: services (encompassing infrastructure-as-a-service, platform-as-a-service, and software-as-a-service), license support, hardware systems, and , as reported in its financial disclosures. Regional subsidiaries and field organizations handle geographic execution, integrating with global supply chains for hardware and engineered systems, while acquisitions like Cerner and have been incorporated as semi-autonomous units to bolster healthcare and ERP capabilities without disrupting core database operations. This hybrid model supports scalability, with oversight from a centralized executive team reporting to the .

Leadership and Key Personnel

Founders and Early Executives

Oracle Corporation traces its origins to Software Development Laboratories, founded on June 16, 1977, in , by , , and . The trio, former engineers at Corporation, had previously collaborated on a project codenamed "Oracle" for the , which inspired the eventual company name. Ellison, who provided most of the initial funding from his personal savings, served as the driving entrepreneurial force and de facto chief executive, while Miner and Oates contributed core technical expertise in developing the company's first management system (RDBMS). The startup operated from a modest 900-square-foot office, reflecting its bootstrapped beginnings with a small team focused on commercializing SQL-based database technology ahead of competitors. Bob Miner, a skilled programmer, led much of the early software engineering efforts, co-authoring the initial Oracle Version 1 in 1978, which ran on PDP-11 minicomputers and marked the first commercially viable SQL RDBMS. Ed Oates handled programming and operations in the formative years but departed the company in the early 1980s to pursue independent ventures, selling his shares back to Ellison. Larry Ellison remained at the helm, guiding the firm through its rebranding to Relational Software, Inc. in 1979 and subsequent name change to Oracle Systems Corporation in 1983, amid rapid growth and the release of Oracle Version 2 as the first SQL-compliant commercial database. Miner continued as a senior executive and key architect until his death from cancer in 1994, having been instrumental in porting the database to multiple platforms. Among early executives, Bruce Scott joined shortly after founding and participated in the company's first anniversary celebration in alongside the founders, contributing to sales and management during the initial commercialization phase. The core team's emphasis on innovation, drawn from Codd's 1970 theoretical paper, positioned Oracle to secure its first major contract with the CIA in , validating the technology and fueling expansion. Ellison's visionary leadership, combined with Miner and Oates' technical prowess, established the foundational culture of aggressive innovation and market dominance that defined 's trajectory.

Modern Leadership Transitions

In September 2014, founder stepped down as Oracle's CEO after 37 years in the role, transitioning to executive chairman and while appointing and as co-CEOs. Catz, who had served as since and previously as co-president, oversaw corporate functions including and legal, while Hurd, recruited from in 2010 amid controversy over expense report irregularities, focused on sales, marketing, and services. This dual-leadership structure aimed to distribute responsibilities amid Oracle's push into , though it echoed internal tensions from Hurd's prior HP exit involving allegations of and falsified records, which he denied but led to a $12 million settlement without admission of wrongdoing. Mark Hurd died on October 18, , at age 62 from cancer, leaving Catz as sole CEO without an immediate co-CEO replacement, as announced by Ellison. Under Catz's , Oracle emphasized growth, securing major deals like the $28 billion AI data center project with , though critics noted persistent challenges in profitability and market share against competitors like . Ellison retained significant influence as chairman and CTO, with Oracle's board crediting the stability for revenue increases from $39.5 billion in fiscal to over $53 billion by fiscal 2025. On September 22, 2025, revived the co-CEO model by promoting internal executives Clay Magouyrk, president of cloud infrastructure since 2014, and Mike Sicilia, president of industries, to replace Catz, who shifted to executive vice chair. The move, accelerated by a post-earnings stock rally and AI-driven demand, positioned Magouyrk (age 39, ex-Amazon Web Services) to lead technical operations and Sicilia (age 54) to handle industry-specific strategies, with each receiving $175 million in stock options vesting on performance metrics like revenue growth exceeding 20%. Analysts viewed the transition as a succession test for Ellison's AI vision, given Catz's role in fiscal discipline but questions over her innovation track record amid Oracle's lagging cloud market position. As of October 2025, Ellison continued as chairman, ensuring continuity in strategic direction.

Intellectual Property and Antitrust Disputes

Oracle has pursued numerous intellectual property enforcement actions, primarily centered on copyright infringement claims involving its database and Java technologies, reflecting its strategy to protect core software assets amid competition in enterprise computing. In parallel, Oracle faced antitrust scrutiny during key acquisitions, where regulators alleged reduced competition in enterprise resource planning software markets. A landmark case was Oracle America, Inc. v. Google LLC, initiated in 2010 after Oracle acquired , alleging Google's Android platform infringed copyrights on 37 Java application programming interfaces (APIs) by copying declaring code without permission. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California initially ruled the APIs eligible for copyright protection but found Google's use constituted in 2016; the Federal Circuit reversed on in 2018, deeming the APIs copyrightable. The U.S. granted and, in a 6-2 decision on April 5, 2021, held that Google's implementation was transformative and , considering the functional nature of APIs and interoperability needs in , thereby resolving the decade-long dispute in Google's favor without awarding Oracle damages. In Oracle Corp. v. SAP AG, filed in 2007, Oracle accused SAP's subsidiary TomorrowNow of systematically downloading Oracle support documents and software updates from its customer portals without authorization to undercut Oracle's maintenance business, labeling it "corporate theft on a grand scale." A federal in the Northern District of awarded Oracle $1.3 billion in damages on November 23, 2010, based on lost licensing revenue from the stolen materials used to service shared customers. The Ninth Circuit vacated the award in 2014 as speculative, remanding for recalculation; a subsequent reduced it to $272 million in 2016, which SAP paid after appeals concluded, underscoring challenges in quantifying hypothetical license damages in software IP theft cases. Oracle's litigation against Rimini Street, a third-party maintainer of Oracle software, began in 2010 over allegations of unauthorized copying and modification of Oracle code to provide cheaper support services, including using one client's software for others and infringing at Rimini's facilities. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada found Rimini liable for copyright infringement in 2015 and 2020 trials, awarding Oracle damages and injunctions; the Ninth Circuit affirmed core findings, and in July 2023, the district court again ruled Rimini infringed by exceeding licensed use. In September 2024, Oracle secured $58.5 million in attorneys' fees, with the U.S. Supreme Court in 2019 limiting recoverable costs under copyright law to exclude litigation expenses beyond statutory categories. The parties reached a confidential settlement in July 2025, potentially ending the protracted battle. On the antitrust front, the U.S. Department of Justice and several states filed suit on February 26, 2004, to block Oracle's $9.4 billion hostile bid for , arguing the merger would harm competition in high-end enterprise by eliminating as a viable alternative for large customers wary of Oracle's dominance. U.S. District Judge rejected the government's unilateral effects theory on September 9, 2004, finding insufficient evidence of anticompetitive harm given customer preferences for bundled offerings and the presence of competitors like , allowing the acquisition to proceed; Oracle completed the purchase in 2005 for $10.3 billion. The cleared the deal in December 2004 after Oracle's concessions on support pricing, highlighting divergent U.S. and EU merger analyses. This ruling influenced subsequent DOJ merger challenges by emphasizing empirical customer evidence over theoretical models.

Government Contracts and Compliance Violations

Oracle has secured numerous contracts with U.S. federal agencies, leveraging its cloud infrastructure and software solutions for government operations. In April 2025, the United States Department of Agriculture selected Oracle Cloud for the STRATUS program, a multiple-award initiative designed to provide federal agencies with access to Oracle's high-performance cloud infrastructure and applications to enhance efficiency. In July 2025, the General Services Administration (GSA) established a partnership with Oracle offering agencies a 75% discount on license-based technologies, along with substantial reductions on cloud computing services, aimed at accelerating cost savings. Oracle also maintains multiple federal contract vehicles, enabling streamlined procurement of its enterprise cloud services by agencies. Oracle has engaged in several bid protests challenging U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) procurement processes for cloud computing contracts. In 2018, Oracle protested the DoD's solicitation for cloud prototypes under Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs), arguing it improperly bypassed traditional acquisition rules; the Government Accountability Office (GAO) sustained the protest in part, finding the solicitation failed to justify OTA use and required revisions. More prominently, in 2019, Oracle protested the DoD's $10 billion Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) contract, a single-award deal initially granted to Microsoft, contending the solicitation's structure violated competition statutes, evaluation criteria were flawed, and potential conflicts of interest existed due to relationships between DoD officials and competitors; the U.S. Court of Federal Claims denied the protest, a decision affirmed by the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court declined certiorari in 2021, though the JEDI program was ultimately canceled amid broader reviews. Regarding compliance violations tied to government contracts, Oracle faced significant False Claims Act (FCA) liability in 2011. Oracle Corporation and Oracle America Inc. agreed to pay $199.5 million plus interest to resolve allegations that they violated GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) contract terms by submitting inaccurate pricing data, failing to provide the government with the same discounts offered to commercial customers, and misrepresenting compliance with pricing obligations, marking the largest FCA recovery involving a GSA Schedule contractor at the time. The settlement stemmed from a lawsuit initiated by former Oracle employee Paul Frascella, who received $40 million as the whistleblower award. Separately, in January 2011, Oracle America paid $46 million to settle FCA claims related to ' pre-acquisition practices, including inflated pricing on state government contracts.

Privacy, Corruption, and Ethical Controversies

In 2024, Oracle agreed to a $115 million settlement to resolve allegations that it unlawfully collected and sold from up to five billion individuals using tracking technologies such as cookies, , and pixels, without user consent, in violation of the Invasion of Privacy Act and the Federal Wiretap Act; the company admitted no wrongdoing but subsequently shut down its tool and exited the advertising technology business by September 30, 2024. In early 2025, Oracle disclosed a involving its Health division (formerly Cerner, acquired for $28 billion in 2022), discovered on February 20, affecting at least 14,485 individuals across multiple U.S. states, exposing including names, Social Security numbers, clinical test results, usernames, addresses, passwords, and keys; class-action lawsuits were filed in and federal courts accusing Oracle of inadequate security measures and failure to notify affected parties promptly. Concurrently, in March 2025, a claimed to have stolen approximately six million authentication records, including encrypted passwords, from infrastructure, with affected customers confirming the validity of leaked samples; Oracle denied a breach but faced criticism for delayed notifications, limited internal transparency, and reliance on obsolete servers, prompting investigations by the FBI and cybersecurity firms. Oracle has faced multiple enforcement actions under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) for bribery schemes to secure government contracts. In 2022, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Oracle with FCPA violations occurring from 2016 to 2019 in Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, and India, where subsidiaries created slush funds totaling millions of dollars to bribe foreign officials, including payments disguised as conference attendance fees that funded family side trips and luxury travel; Oracle settled without admitting or denying the findings, paying $23 million in disgorgement and penalties. This marked the second such SEC action against Oracle, following a 2012 settlement for $2 million over similar slush fund improprieties in India involving unreconciled cash payments to influence state government deals. In 2024, South Africa's National Treasury considered blacklisting Oracle from public contracts amid allegations of irregularities in a government tender process, including potential collusion and misuse of funds, as raised by anti-corruption investigators. Oracle's business practices have drawn ethical , particularly for aggressive tactics that leverage software audits and licensing disputes to pressure customers toward migrations, often resulting in costly compliance demands and perceptions of . Such strategies, including threats of usage audits on , have been criticized since at least 2018 for alienating clients and prioritizing short-term over long-term relationships, echoing historical patterns like the 1990 overstatement driven by team quotas. Developer communities have highlighted ethical concerns over Oracle's stewardship of open-source projects like , accusing the company of prioritizing proprietary monetization through frequent litigation and restrictive licensing changes that hinder community contributions and foster dependency.

Innovations, Achievements, and Criticisms

Technological Breakthroughs and Industry Impact

Oracle Corporation released Oracle Version 2 in June 1979, marking the first commercially available (RDBMS) to implement Structured Query Language (SQL) as its primary interface for querying and manipulating data. This system, developed by founders , , and , operationalized Edgar F. Codd's 1970 by storing data in tables with rows and columns linked via keys, enabling declarative queries that abstracted underlying storage complexities. The adoption of SQL standardized data access, reducing dependency on procedural code and facilitating portability across implementations, which accelerated the shift from hierarchical and network databases to relational architectures in enterprise environments. Subsequent iterations of introduced innovations in scalability and reliability, including multi-version concurrency control in Oracle 7 (1992) to minimize locking conflicts in high-concurrency , and Real Application Clusters (RAC) in Oracle 9i (2001) for fault-tolerant clustering across multiple nodes. These features supported (OLTP) volumes exceeding millions of transactions per day, underpinning financial systems, , and operations where data consistency and availability were paramount. By the early , Oracle's dominance in the RDBMS market—holding over 40% share in enterprise segments—drove industry standards for ACID-compliant transactions and influenced competitors like and to enhance relational capabilities. In 2008, Oracle launched Exadata Database Machine, the inaugural product in its Engineered Systems portfolio, combining custom hardware with tightly integrated database software to optimize for extreme workloads. Exadata's innovations, such as Smart Scan for columnar projection and predicate filtering directly on storage cells, offloaded processing from database servers, yielding up to 10x performance gains in query execution and compression ratios exceeding 10:1 for analytics datasets. This hardware-software co-design reduced latency in data warehousing and OLTP by minimizing data movement, enabling sub-second responses on terabyte-scale datasets, and set precedents for converged infrastructure that competitors like Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Dell later emulated in their database appliances. Extending this approach, Oracle developed additional Engineered Systems like Exalogic (2011) for and applications, achieving up to 5x throughput improvements via networking and optimized . These systems influenced the broader shift toward purpose-built appliances, lowering for mission-critical deployments by integrating , OS, and application tuning, with deployments scaling to support exabyte-level in sectors like and . On October 14, 2025, Oracle released Database 26ai, embedding AI vector search, retrieval-augmented generation, and autonomous tuning natively into the RDBMS core, allowing seamless integration of models with operational data without data movement. This advancement supports agentic AI workflows across structured and , reducing development cycles from months to days and enhancing accuracy in real-time applications. Collectively, Oracle's breakthroughs have sustained enterprise reliance on centralized, high-performance data platforms, powering digital transformations that process over 1 quadrillion transactions annually across global industries while challenging fragmented open-source alternatives through superior enterprise-grade reliability.

Business Successes and Market Influence

Oracle Corporation has achieved enduring market leadership in relational database management systems, with its Oracle Database consistently ranked as the most popular DBMS worldwide according to the DB-Engines Ranking, a metric aggregating factors like search engine mentions, technical discussions, and job offerings, as of March 2025. This dominance stems from early innovations in the 1970s and 1980s, where Oracle commercialized the first viable SQL-based relational database, capturing significant enterprise adoption and revenue share in a market historically valued for its scalability and reliability in handling large-scale transactions. By 2025, Oracle's database offerings continue to underpin mission-critical applications for thousands of organizations, contributing to its position as a foundational technology provider in sectors like finance, government, and manufacturing. In (ERP) and (CRM) software, Oracle has solidified its influence through integrated suites like Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP and Oracle CX, which serve as comprehensive platforms for business operations. In 2024, Oracle surpassed SAP to become the largest ERP applications provider globally, holding a 6.63% amid a competitive landscape dominated by a few vendors. These solutions have driven adoption among large enterprises, including many companies, by offering modular, cloud-native capabilities that integrate ERP, CRM, , and management functionalities, thereby reducing silos and enhancing operational efficiency. Oracle's ERP dominance is evidenced by its top ranking among vendors by new license revenue and market forecast through 2029, reflecting sustained demand for its ability to handle complex, global-scale deployments. Strategic acquisitions have been instrumental in expanding Oracle's portfolio and market reach, accelerating innovation and filling gaps in emerging areas like and healthcare IT. Notable deals include the $10.3 billion acquisition of in 2005, which bolstered and modules; the $5.85 billion purchase of in 2006, enhancing CRM capabilities; the $7.4 billion acquisition of in 2010, securing and hardware synergies; in 2016 for $9.3 billion to advance for mid-market segments; and the record $28.3 billion buyout of Cerner in 2022, positioning Oracle as a leader in electronic health records and healthcare . These moves have integrated complementary technologies, enabling Oracle to offer end-to-end solutions that compete with hyperscalers and specialized providers, while contributing to revenue diversification— and revenues rose 10.72% to $49.23 billion in fiscal 2025. The company's pivot to via Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) has marked a pivotal success, with OCI achieving 49% revenue growth in Q3 fiscal 2024 and positioning itself as a preferred alternative for AI workloads through partnerships like those with and Azure. Total cloud revenues surged 28% year-over-year to contribute significantly to Oracle's overall performance, with total quarterly revenues reaching $14.9 billion in the period ending September 9, 2025, up 12% in USD. Oracle projects cloud segment to expand to $144 billion by fiscal 2030, driven by AI infrastructure demand and multi-cloud , underscoring its growing influence in the public market where it differentiates through enterprise-grade security, lower egress fees, and database-optimized performance. This trajectory has propelled Oracle's trailing twelve-month to $59.02 billion as of August 31, 2025, reflecting 12.17% growth and affirming its resilience in transitioning from on-premises licensing to subscription-based models.

Challenges, Failures, and Substantiated Critiques

Oracle has encountered notable difficulties in enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations, with several high-profile project failures attributed to inadequate governance, vendor management, and technical expertise. For instance, Birmingham City Council's $48 million Oracle ERP rollout, intended to modernize back-office operations, collapsed in 2025 due to systemic issues including poor project scoping, insufficient testing, and Oracle's failure to deliver promised functionality, resulting in operational disruptions and financial losses exceeding initial estimates. Similarly, a 2016 U.S. House Oversight Committee report held Oracle primarily responsible for the failure of a $125 million California state IT project, citing repeated assurances of progress despite pervasive errors in code and integration, which delayed benefits and wasted taxpayer funds. In cloud computing, Oracle initially struggled to gain traction against dominant providers, facing criticisms for delayed infrastructure buildout and capacity constraints that hampered . During periods of surging demand, such as in 2025, Oracle's policy of withholding expansions until firm contracts were signed led to delivery delays and customer dissatisfaction, exacerbating perceptions of unreliability in its Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). challenges persist, including difficulties in user adoption, managing custom code migrations, and integrating with on-premises systems, often prolonging deployment timelines and inflating costs for enterprises transitioning from legacy Oracle environments. Acquisitions have yielded mixed results, with integration failures contributing to workforce reductions and product stagnation. The 2005 acquisition of , completed after an 18-month antitrust battle, resulted in the of approximately half of PeopleSoft's 5,000 employees shortly thereafter, alongside user concerns over diminished in human capital management software as resources shifted to Oracle's . Critics have noted similar patterns in subsequent deals, where acquired entities experience slowed development and reduced market agility due to Oracle's emphasis on proprietary integration over independent evolution. Internally, Oracle grapples with high employee turnover and recurrent layoffs, signaling morale issues and operational inefficiencies. Employee accounts highlight antiquated processes, redundant roles, and performance management practices that prioritize cost-cutting over retention, contributing to attrition rates that outpace industry averages in sales and engineering teams. In 2022, hiring freezes and subsequent reductions eroded confidence, with staff anticipating further cuts amid shifting priorities toward AI and cloud; by 2025, ongoing restructurings, including a $1.6 billion charge, underscored persistent staffing volatility. Oracle's database products draw substantiated critiques for exorbitant licensing costs that scale unpredictably with data growth and user metrics, coupled with administrative complexities requiring scarce expertise, often deterring smaller enterprises despite robust performance in large-scale environments.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.