Hubbry Logo
OrthonectidaOrthonectidaMain
Open search
Orthonectida
Community hub
Orthonectida
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Orthonectida
Orthonectida
Orthonectida
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Orthonectida
Two different female Orthonectids
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Subkingdom: Eumetazoa
Clade: ParaHoxozoa
Clade: Bilateria
Clade: Nephrozoa
Clade: Protostomia
Clade: Spiralia
Clade: Platytrochozoa
Phylum: Orthonectida
Giard, 1877 [1][2]
Species

See text

Orthonectida (/ˌɔːrθəˈnɛktɪdə, -θoʊ-/[3]) is a small phylum of poorly known parasites of marine invertebrates[4] that are among the simplest of multi-cellular organisms. Members of this phylum are known as orthonectids.

Biology

[edit]

The adults, which are the sexual stage, are microscopic wormlike animals, consisting of a single layer of ciliated outer cells surrounding a mass of sex cells. They swim freely within the bodies of their hosts, which include flatworms, polychaete worms, bivalve molluscs, and echinoderms. Most are gonochoristic, with separate male and female individuals, but a few species are hermaphroditic.[5][6]

When they are ready to reproduce, adults leave the host, and sperm from the males penetrate the bodies of the females to achieve internal fertilisation. The resulting zygote develops into a ciliated larva that escapes from the mother to seek out new hosts. Once it finds a host, the larva loses its cilia and develops into a syncytial plasmodium larva. This, in turn, breaks up into numerous individual cells called agametes (ameiotic generative cells) which grow into the next generation of adults.[5][7]

Classification

[edit]

The phylum consists of about 20 known species, of which Rhopalura ophiocomae is the best-known.[4] The phylum is not divided into classes or orders, and contains just two families.

Although originally described in 1877 as a class,[8] and later characterized as an order of the phylum Mesozoa, a 1996 study has suggested that orthonectids are quite different from the rhombozoans, the other group in Mesozoa.[4] The genome of one orthonectid species, Intoshia linei, has been sequenced.[9] These animals are simplified spiralians. The genome data confirm earlier findings which allocated these organisms to Spiralia based on their morphology.[10]

Their position in the spiralian phylogenetic tree has yet to be determined. Some work appears to relate them to the Annelida[11][7] and, within the Annelida, finds them most closely allied to the Clitellata.[12] On the other hand, a 2022 study compensating for long-branch attraction has recovered the traditional grouping of Orthonectida with rhombozoans in a monophyletic Mesozoa placed close to Platyhelminthes or Gnathifera.[13] This supports a previous study which found orthonectids and rhombozoans to make a monophyletic taxon Mesozoa and form a clade with Rouphozoa (platyhelminths and gastrotrichs).[14]

Known species

[edit]

Phylum Orthonectida

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Orthonectida

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Orthonectida is a small of microscopic, multicellular parasites that infect , characterized by an extremely simplified body plan lacking complex organs such as digestive, circulatory, or excretory systems. These worm-like organisms consist of a single layer of ciliated epithelial cells surrounding reproductive elements, with a syncytial as their trophic stage inside host tissues. Comprising approximately 20 to 43 described , Orthonectida are among the simplest known metazoans, yet they retain bilaterian features like a microvillar and a rudimentary with a dorsal . The life cycle of orthonectids exhibits metagenesis, alternating between an asexual plasmodial phase within the host—where a multinucleated proliferates and produces agametes—and free-living sexual stages that emerge to reproduce. These sexual forms, typically under 1 mm in length, are either dioecious (separate males and females) or hermaphroditic, copulating externally after exiting the host via plasmodial outgrowths that pierce host tissues. Fertilized eggs develop into ciliated larvae that infect new hosts, perpetuating the cycle; parthenogenetic reproduction may also occur in some species. Hosts include a diverse array of , such as annelids, mollusks (including cephalopods like squid and octopuses), echinoderms, and platyhelminths, with infections often confined to specific tissues without causing overt host pathology. Taxonomically, Orthonectida forms a distinct within the superphylum , historically grouped with Dicyemida under the informal due to shared simplicity, though this clade is now rejected based on molecular evidence. Phylogenetic analyses, including genomic and mitochondrial studies as of 2025, place Orthonectida firmly within and nested within Annelida, often branching basally relative to the clade Pleistoannelida, supported by shared traits like metameric muscle arrangement, high sequence divergence indicative of reductive , and mitochondrial synapomorphies. Their enigmatic nature stems from rarity, , and genome streamlining—featuring short introns and reduced repetitive elements—reflecting adaptations to . Despite their simplicity, orthonectids possess a functional muscle system with circular and longitudinal fibers, underscoring their metazoan affinities.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

History of classification

The phylum Orthonectida was established by Alfred Giard in 1877 based on his observations of the genus Rhopalura parasitizing ophiuroids, such as Ophiocoma neglecta, which he described as a new class of worms characterized by their simple, worm-like adult forms and endoparasitic lifestyle. Giard's work highlighted their ciliated, vermiform structure and sexual dimorphism, distinguishing them from known metazoan groups and prompting initial comparisons to primitive or transitional forms between protozoans and multicellular animals. Early in the , Orthonectida were incorporated into the Mesozoa by Karl Grobben in , alongside Dicyemida (then called Rhombozoa), and regarded as primitive multicellular animals bridging unicellular and more complex metazoans. This classification reflected the prevailing view of Mesozoa as an intermediate group, with Orthonectida seen as retaining ancestral simplicity rather than derived degeneration. Élie Metschnikoff's 1881 studies on Ciliocincta, an orthonectid genus, further contributed to this perspective by detailing their developmental stages and reinforcing ideas of primitiveness through comparisons to early metazoan embryos. Throughout the , classifications of Orthonectida sparked debates over whether they represented primitive metazoans or degenerate forms derived from more complex ancestors, with some researchers linking them to Platyhelminthes due to superficial resemblances in and body simplification. By mid-century, works such as Libbie Hyman’s 1951 Invertebrates maintained their placement in as a distinct or , separate from Platyhelminthes, emphasizing their unique syncytial organization and lack of typical bilaterian features. Others, however, proposed affinities to flatworms based on shared parasitic adaptations, though Orthonectida were often retained as a standalone to accommodate their enigmatic traits. The latter half of the marked a transition toward the molecular era, with electron microscopy studies from the 1970s to 1990s, such as those by Eugene N. Kozloff, confirming the syncytial nature of the orthonectid and revealing ultrastructural details like ciliated epithelia and minimal organ systems that challenged earlier interpretations of primitiveness. These findings supported views of Orthonectida as highly reduced parasites while paving the way for pre-2016 molecular analyses, including 18S rRNA sequencing, which began to indicate affinities within without resolving their exact position.

Current taxonomy

The Orthonectida, established by Giard in 1877, currently comprises the Rhopaluridae Stunkard, 1937, with no subfamilies defined; the Pelmatosphaeridae Stunkard, 1937 (genus Pelmatosphaera) is sometimes included but its placement within Orthonectida is debated. The total number of valid is approximately 40 (as of 2025), reflecting a small and specialized group of multicellular parasites. The family Rhopaluridae includes genera such as Ciliocincta, Intoshia, Rhopalura, and Stoecharthrum, encompassing about 39 species. Ciliocincta and Intoshia primarily infect annelids and flatworms, while Rhopalura predominantly parasitizes echinoderms and mollusks, and Stoecharthrum is known from fewer hosts. The name Rhopalura derives from the Greek words rhopalon (club) and ura (tail), referring to the distinctive posterior structure observed in its members. Recent taxonomic revisions since the have involved synonymies and consolidations of descriptions, such as reassignments within Ciliocincta and Intoshia based on morphological and molecular data, refining the overall count of valid taxa.

Phylogenetic relationships

The phylogenetic position of Orthonectida has been a subject of intense debate, with early classifications linking them to the polyphyletic alongside Dicyemida, though molecular evidence from 2016 onward has established them as members of within . The genome sequencing of Intoshia linei revealed extensive gene loss, including many bilaterian developmental genes, yet retention of spiralian-specific genes such as those involved in trochophore larva formation and lophotrochozoan patterning, confirming their placement as highly simplified spiralians rather than basal metazoans or acoelomates. Subsequent phylogenomic analyses using nuclear and mitochondrial s have positioned Orthonectida within as highly degenerate members of Annelida, supported by shared signatures in 18S rRNA sequences, expanded protein datasets that mitigate long-branch attraction artifacts, and rare evolutionary events like specific positions and arrangements unique to this clade. For instance, multigene analyses recover Orthonectida nesting among annelids. The of remains debated: while some studies, including a 2022 phylogenomic analysis, support it with Orthonectida and Dicyemida as sister taxa within , others reject it, highlighting in and independent simplifications. A 2025 study using rare evolutionary events further confirms Orthonectida's embedding within Annelida. Despite this progress, unresolved questions persist regarding exact affinities within , with some analyses suggesting proximity to or Platyhelminthes in broader lophotrochozoan trees. The extreme reduction in Orthonectida, resulting in one of the smallest metazoan genomes (~20 Mb), complicates resolution and underscores their value for studying metazoan evolutionary simplification and parasitic adaptations. Key contributions include the foundational genomic work by Mikhailov et al. (2016) and phylogenomic refinements by Schiffer et al. (2018), with ongoing debates informed by recent rare-event analyses.

Morphology and development

Adult structure

Adult Orthonectida exhibit a highly simplified, elongated, worm-like body plan, typically measuring 50–800 μm in length and 15–80 μm in width, depending on species and sex. The body is enclosed by a thin cuticle (0.25–0.30 μm thick) and consists of a single layer of somatic epithelial cells arranged in alternating rings of ciliated and non-ciliated types, totaling several dozen to several hundred cells across species. These epithelial cells form the outer jacket, which surrounds a central core of reproductive cells embedded in a cytoplasmic matrix resembling the plasmodium stage. In gonochoristic species, pronounced is evident, with males generally smaller and possessing fewer somatic cells (e.g., 20 rings in Rhopalura ophiocomae males, approximately 90–130 μm long) compared to females (e.g., 125–260 μm long with more extensive cell rings). Males often feature crystalline inclusions in epidermal cells and specialized genital pores, while females contain a compact mass of 9–20 oocytes arranged in rows or clusters within the central matrix. Hermaphroditic forms occur in certain species, such as Stoecharthrum giardi, where individuals up to 800 μm long bear both oocytes and masses in a single body without dimorphism. Ciliation is uniform across the epithelial surface for locomotion, with each ciliated cell bearing 5–7 cilia emerging from kinetosomes in shallow pits, supported by cross-striated rootlets and connected by fibrous bands forming ring-like structures. Anterior and posterior regions show specialization, such as reduced or absent cilia in the foremost rings and posterior marginal ciliation in elongated forms. Orthonectida lack digestive, circulatory, and excretory systems, reflecting their short-lived, non-feeding adult phase; however, recent ultrastructural analyses reveal a simple of outer circular and inner longitudinal fibers (4–6 cords) for body undulation, along with a rudimentary including a putative anterior with reduced numbers (down to 4–6 in some species like Intoshia variabili) and sensory cells. Family-level variations include more compact, dimorphic adults in Rhopaluridae (e.g., Rhopalura spp., with sharp regional demarcations and mixed ciliation patterns) compared to the often more elongated, uniformly ciliated forms in Orthonectidae (e.g., Intoshia and Ciliocincta spp., with over 50% fully ciliated rings). The central matrix in both families supports germinal cells that differentiate into gametes, maintaining a plasmodium-like syncytial organization internally while the outer remains distinctly cellular.

Life stages

The life stages of Orthonectida encompass the and the syncytial , representing transient developmental phases that alternate between free-living dispersal and intra-host proliferation. The is a free-swimming stage produced from zygotes within the female parent, featuring an outer layer of ciliated cells surrounding internal germinal cells; it is motile via cilia and serves to infect new hosts by entering through genital ducts or other openings. Upon host entry, the larva sheds its ciliated , releasing internal cells that initiate the next stage. The syncytial forms as a multinucleate, amoeboid mass in the within host tissues, such as gonads or the , where it resides as the trophic phase and grows through binary fission of nuclei within the shared . Recent molecular analyses confirm it as a true parasitic entity, not derived from host cells, with abilities for and interaction via extracellular vesicles. This stage persists for extended periods, potentially months, supporting asexual proliferation before transitioning to reproductive development. From the , uninucleate agametes arise through fragmentation, differentiating into nascent adults that eventually emerge from the host. The free-swimming larval phase typically endures for hours to days, facilitating rapid dispersal in marine environments. Differences in plasmodial organization occur between families: those in Orthonectidae (e.g., Intoshia spp.) exhibit more fragmented structures with gradual outgrowths piercing host tissues for emission, whereas Rhopaluridae (e.g., Rhopalura spp.) form more cohesive masses leading to simultaneous release of adults, often culminating in host death within approximately 24 hours.

Life cycle and reproduction

Host infection process

The infection process of Orthonectida begins with free-swimming ciliated larvae, produced externally following fertilization, actively seeking out and penetrating suitable marine invertebrate hosts. These larvae, typically measuring 10-20 μm in length, use their cilia for motility and burrow into the host's epidermis, gut epithelium, or coelomic cavity, often facilitated by lytic enzymes such as acid phosphatase that dissolve host tissues. Upon entry, the larva sheds its outer ciliated layer, and its internal germinal cells integrate into host tissues, initiating the formation of a multinucleated syncytial plasmodium. Within the host, the expands intracellularly or intracoelomically, primarily in tissues such as the gonads or , through and apomictic . This growth causes localized of host cells, forming modified structures like galleries in the , where the consumes surrounding cells via and without immediately killing the host. The remains enclosed by host-derived membranes and can persist for extended periods, generating numerous reproductive cells that differentiate into embryos, males, or females. Mature adults emerge from the plasmodium when ready for , with the exit mechanism varying by . In Intoshia , the plasmodium forms elongated, tube-like outgrowths that penetrate the host's ciliated , allowing ciliated adults to actively swim out over 6-13 days without rupturing the host. In contrast, Rhopalura induce rapid host body wall rupture, releasing adults synchronously in about 24 hours, often during host stress like spawning, which can lead to host death. The full cycle from larval to adult release typically spans weeks to months, influenced by host and environmental factors such as temperature. Orthonectida infections generally exhibit low pathogenicity, with minimal immediate host mortality in many cases, as the avoids widespread tissue destruction. However, heavy infections can displace host organs, gonadal tissues, and lead to sterilization by interfering with production, particularly in mollusks and polychaetes. In severe instances, such as with Rhopalura philinae in Philine scabra, the process culminates in host fatality due to structural rupture.

Reproductive strategies

Orthonectida predominantly exhibit , with separate male and female adults emerging from the host to aggregate externally, where occurs as spermatozoa penetrate the female's body. This sexual phase alternates with , forming a metagenetic life cycle that includes both amphimictic (bisexual) and parthenogenetic generations. In the free-living adults, which range from 50 to 800 μm in length, gametes develop from generative cells derived from the central axial cell of the body. While most species are dioecious, hermaphroditism occurs in select genera such as Stoecharthrum, where individuals possess both oocytes and spermatozoa, enabling potential self-fertilization. , specifically ameiotic parthenogenesis, contributes to the reproductive repertoire, allowing unfertilized eggs to develop into viable offspring during certain phases of the life cycle. Following fertilization, zygotes undergo cleavage to form ciliated larvae, which are released to infect new hosts. Asexual reproduction facilitates clonal propagation within the host via binary fission or of the multinucleate , producing agametes that differentiate into the next generation of sexual individuals. This stage ensures rapid proliferation inside host tissues, contrasting with the brief free-living sexual phase. Orthonectida are exclusively viviparous during the sexual generation, with embryos nourished matrotrophically within the female or , though the precise nutritional mechanisms remain unclear.

Ecology and distribution

Host associations

Orthonectida are obligate endoparasites of , including spiralians such as annelids, platyhelminths, mollusks, nemerteans, and bryozoans, as well as echinoderms. Primary hosts include annelids (e.g., species in Sabellariidae and Spionidae), flatworms (e.g., turbellarians in Leptoplanidae), bivalve mollusks (e.g., saddle oysters in Anomiidae), and echinoderms (e.g., brittle stars in Amphiuridae). No records exist of Orthonectida infecting vertebrates, freshwater invertebrates, or non-marine hosts, reflecting their strict adaptation to coastal marine environments. Host associations exhibit family-specific patterns, with Orthonectidae primarily infecting annelids, platyhelminths, and nemerteans, while Rhopaluridae are associated with echinoderms, mollusks, and bryozoans. For instance, genera in Orthonectidae such as Ciliocincta and Intoshia are documented in polychaetes, turbellarians, and nemerteans (e.g., Lineus spp. in Lineidae), whereas Rhopaluridae species like Rhopalura occur in ophiuroids and bivalves. This distribution underscores a degree of host specificity, where individual Orthonectida species typically infect one or a few closely related host taxa, potentially limiting transmission to shared habitats. Infections are common in coastal host populations, with prevalence reaching up to around 10% in some cases, such as in certain turbellarian and polychaete assemblages, though rates are generally lower (often a few percent) and vary by location and season. Co-infections with other parasites, including trematodes, occur occasionally but are not widespread, and Orthonectida do not exhibit mutualistic interactions with hosts. The observed host specificity, particularly with lophotrochozoan hosts, suggests possible co-speciation in some lineages, aligning with phylogenetic evidence placing Orthonectida within Lophotrochozoa.

Global occurrence

Orthonectida are obligate parasites of , exhibiting a primarily within coastal marine environments worldwide. They inhabit temperate and tropical waters, from intertidal zones to depths of up to 200 m, reflecting their dependence on benthic and epibenthic hosts such as polychaetes, mollusks, and echinoderms. Records indicate regional hotspots in the North Atlantic, including the , , , and , where species like Intoshia variabili and Rhopalura litoralis have been documented in hosts from these areas. In the Pacific, occurrences are noted along the northwestern coasts, such as in and , with parasites reported in bivalves like Mytilus galloprovincialis. Antarctic records remain sparse, limited to occasional findings in southern polar invertebrates, suggesting underrepresentation rather than true rarity. Abiotic preferences align with typical coastal marine conditions, thriving in salinities of 25–35 ppt and temperatures of 10–25°C, conditions prevalent in their host-associated habitats but absent in deep-sea (>200 m) or extreme polar environments. Sampling biases contribute to uneven global coverage, with the underreported due to fewer dedicated surveys compared to northern temperate regions. , through ocean warming, may drive potential range expansions poleward, as inferred from 2020s observations of shifting marine parasite distributions in warming coastal ecosystems.

Diversity of species

Family overview

The Orthonectida comprises two families, Rhopaluridae and Pelmatosphaeridae, which together account for approximately 20–40 described distributed across five genera, all of which are extant with no known extinct taxa. These families exhibit distinct biological traits, including differences in morphology, host preferences, and structure, contributing to their diagnostic separation within the . Recent surveys suggest potential for additional undescribed , particularly in unsampled marine hosts. The Rhopaluridae is the larger family, encompassing around 15–30 species across four genera (Ciliocincta, Intoshia, Rhopalura, and Stoecharthrum), featuring adults typically measuring 50–500 μm in length. These parasites infect a range of hosts such as annelids (polychaetes), nemerteans, echinoderms (e.g., ophiuroids), bivalves, and gastropods, with plasmodia exhibiting fragmented or cohesive syncytial morphology that integrates with host tissues. Rhopalurids display variation in ciliation across epidermal rings, facilitating motility within host environments, and often show pronounced sexual dimorphism. In comparison, the Pelmatosphaeridae includes 1–5 species in the genus Pelmatosphaera, with adults ranging from 50–300 μm and spherical plasmodia. They primarily parasitize polychaetes and nemerteans, distinguished by limited somatic cell rings (12–16) and a more compact structure. Key diagnostic features distinguishing the families include host type, adult body size, and plasmodium morphology (often fragmented in Rhopaluridae versus spherical in Pelmatosphaeridae).

Described species

Orthonectida comprises approximately 20–40 described as of 2025, all obligate endoparasites of , primarily grouped into the families Rhopaluridae (encompassing genera Ciliocincta, Intoshia, Rhopalura, and Stoecharthrum) and Pelmatosphaeridae (genus Pelmatosphaera). These exhibit limited morphological variation, with adults typically measuring 50–300 μm in length, but differ in host specificity, geographic distribution, and subtle ultrastructural features such as ciliary patterns or reproductive dimorphism. Taxonomic revisions in the late 1990s reduced synonymies within Rhopalura, reassigning several names (e.g., R. paraphanostomae to Intoshia paraphanostomae) based on host associations and somatic cell counts. The family Rhopaluridae includes the most diverse and well-studied species. Notable examples are Ciliocincta sabellariae (syn. C. subellariae), first described in 1965 from the Sabellaria cementarium (now Neosabellaria cementarium) in the San Juan Archipelago, ; this species features a distinctive ring of long cilia around the female's posterior end, aiding in host tissue navigation. Intoshia linei, described in 1877 from the nemertean Lineus spp. in , , is the first Orthonectida species with a fully sequenced (completed in 2016), revealing extreme reduction with ~9,000 protein-coding genes consistent with parasitic simplification while confirming lophotrochozoan affinities. A more recent addition, Intoshia variabili (described 2020 from nemerteans in the , ), has the smallest known metazoan (15.3 Mbp, ~5,100 ), highlighting further reductive evolution. Rhopalura ophiocomae, the of the and (described 1877 from the Amphipholis squamata—often reported as Ophiocoma—in , ), is widespread in the eastern North Atlantic and Mediterranean; it induces host gonad distortion and castration, disrupting reproduction in up to 90% of infected individuals. Rhopalura granosa (described 1933 from the bivalve Pododesmus squamula in Plymouth, ; sometimes confused with R. granulata variants in echinoderms like sea urchins) exhibits granular cytoplasmic inclusions in its stage, potentially aiding nutrient absorption. Other Rhopaluridae species include Ciliocincta julini (1899, Scololepis fuliginosa, eastern North Atlantic), Intoshia leptoplanae (1877, Leptoplana tremellaris, ), Rhopalura litoralis (Arctic Ocean, gastropods), and Stoecharthrum giardi (1899, Scoloplos armiger, ; hermaphroditic). An undescribed Orthonectida was reported in 2019 parasitizing the acoelomorph worm Xenoturbella bocki in , expanding known host diversity. The single Pelmatosphaeridae , Pelmatosphaera polycirri (eastern North Atlantic, polychaetes and nemerteans), is distinguished by its spherical form.
Genus/SpeciesFamilyPrimary HostDiscovery Year/LocationUnique Traits
Ciliocincta sabellariaeRhopaluridaePolychaete (Neosabellaria cementarium)1965, USA (San Juan Islands)Posterior ciliary ring for mobility; extracellular plasmodium.
Intoshia lineiRhopaluridaeNemertean (Lineus spp.)1877, France (Wimereux)Genome sequenced (2016); reduced gene set (~9,000 protein-coding genes).
Intoshia variabiliRhopaluridaeNemertean (White Sea spp.)2020, Russia (White Sea)Smallest metazoan genome (15.3 Mbp, ~5,100 genes); extreme streamlining.
Rhopalura ophiocomaeRhopaluridaeBrittle star (Amphipholis squamata)1877, France (Wimereux)Induces host castration; sexual dimorphism with crystalline male inclusions.
Rhopalura granosaRhopaluridaeBivalve (Pododesmus squamula)1933, UK (Plymouth)Granular plasmodium; noted for active swimming behavior.
Pelmatosphaera polycirriPelmatosphaeridaePolychaetes/nemerteans1904, eastern North Atlantic (France)Spherical plasmodium; limited somatic cells (12–16 rings).
Recent studies, including metagenomic surveys from 2019–2023, have detected Orthonectida-like sequences in diverse hosts, hinting at 5–10 additional undescribed species or lineages beyond the current tally.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6543705/
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291825852_Phylum_orthonectida_Morphology_biology_and_relationships_to_other_multicellular_animals
  3. https://winvertebrates.uwsp.edu/24.html
  4. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ede.12462
  5. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasittext/29/
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12249979/
  7. https://journals.biologists.com/jcs/article/s2-20/78/225/61802/The-Orthonectida-a-New-Class-of-the-Phylum-of-the
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384903055_Molecular-genetic_and_morphological_analysis_of_the_nature_of_the_orthonectid_plasmodium_Orthonectida
  9. https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/287660.pdf
  10. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=14220
  11. https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/286929.pdf
  12. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=stats
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982216304584
  14. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.0683
  15. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ede.12462
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226149820_Fine_structure_of_the_ciliated_cells_and_ciliary_rootlets_of_Intoshia_variabili_Orthonectida
  17. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/700834
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230108877_The_Structure_and_Origin_of_the_Plasmodium_of_Rhopalura_ophiocomaePhylum_Orthonectida
  19. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327872862_Structure_and_supposed_feeding_mechanisms_of_the_plasmodium_of_Intoshia_linei_Orthonectida
  20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11605459/
  21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14658313/
  22. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12189
  23. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2019.00443/full
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081028711000269
  25. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article-pdf/13/9/1187/11166510/4hane.pdf
  26. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1525/9780520930438-017/html
  27. https://theses.cz/id/eu2dct/Drabkova_Marie_PHDdisertation_2022.pdf
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12239087_The_multiyear_dynamics_of_infection_and_of_the_distribution_of_3_species_of_Orthonectida_in_the_White_and_Barents_seas
  29. https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/287036.pdf
  30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/census-of-marine-life
  31. https://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=14220
  32. https://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=119142
  33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1463-6395.1994.tb01206.x
  34. https://www.gbif.org/species/144104016
  35. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(16)30458-4
  36. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(20)30105-6
  37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30707607/
  38. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=119165
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.