Hubbry Logo
The Right HonourableThe Right HonourableMain
Open search
The Right Honourable
Community hub
The Right Honourable
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
The Right Honourable
The Right Honourable
The Right Honourable
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
This engraving of George Cornewall Lewis includes The Right Honourable in its caption, reflecting the Home Secretary position he held at the time of its creation.

The Right Honourable (abbreviation: The Rt Hon. or variations) is an honorific style traditionally applied to certain persons and collective bodies in the United Kingdom, the former British Empire, and the Commonwealth of Nations. The term is predominantly used today as a style associated with the holding of certain senior public offices in the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand, and, to a lesser extent, Australia.

Right in this context is an adverb meaning 'very' or 'fully'.[1] Grammatically, The Right Honourable is an adjectival phrase which gives information about a person.[2] As such, it is not considered correct to apply it in direct address, nor to use it on its own as a title in place of a name; but rather it is used in the third person along with a name or noun to be modified.[3][4][a]

Right may be abbreviated to Rt, and Honourable to Hon., or both. The is sometimes dropped in written abbreviated form, but is always pronounced.

Countries with common or current usage

[edit]

United Kingdom

[edit]

Entitlement

[edit]
Queen Victoria holding a meeting of her Privy Council. All privy counsellors are styled Right Honourable (unless they are personally entitled to a higher style).
The parliamentary robes of a baron, worn by Lord Montagu of Beaulieu. Peers of the rank of baron, viscount or earl are entitled to the style Right Honourable.
Gavyn Arthur, the 675th Lord Mayor of London, was entitled to be styled "The Right Honourable Lord Mayor of London" during his year in office.

According to the British government,[5] the following persons are entitled to be styled Right Honourable:

Members of the Privy Council
The Privy Council is notionally the body of formal advisers to the sovereign. Members of the Cabinet, senior politicians, and some few other officials are appointed as members for life, and are personally entitled to be styled Right Honourable thereafter.[6][7]
Peers below the rank of marquess
Earls and countesses,[8] viscounts and viscountesses[9] and barons and baronesses[10] who hold a substantive title (whether hereditary or for life) are personally entitled to the style Right Honourable.[11] A peer's wife or widow also has a legal right to the style of her husband.
The lord mayors and lord provosts of certain cities (ex officio)
The lord mayors of London, Cardiff, Belfast, Bristol and York and the lord provosts of Edinburgh and Glasgow are styled Right Honourable while in office. However, the title is attached to the office, not to the name of the person.

Privy counsellors

[edit]

Privy counsellors are appointed by the sovereign on the advice of the prime minister, and remain members for life unless they resign or are expelled. In practice, membership of the privy council is granted to:

  • all members of the Cabinet (itself technically a committee of the Privy Council), and certain other senior ministers in the government;
  • senior members of the Shadow Cabinet, the leaders of the major political parties in parliament, and the Speaker of the House of Commons;
  • the first ministers of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and the leader of the largest opposition party in the Scottish Parliament;
  • the two archbishops of the Church of England, who sit in the House of Lords ex officio;
  • senior judges, who fulfil the judicial functions of the Privy Council;
  • senior representatives of the Commonwealth nations; and
  • senior members of the royal family.

A large proportion of the former and current prominent politicians of the United Kingdom are thus entitled to be styled Right Honourable.

No new appointments have been made to the Privy Council of Northern Ireland since 1971, but surviving appointed members remain entitled to the style. Non-British Commonwealth-citizen judges appointed to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council are also entitled to the style, although the appellation may be ignored in the judge's home country.

It is the current practice of the House of Lords[12] and the College of Arms to apply the style Right Honourable to privy counsellors only.[13]

Peers

[edit]

All holders of a substantive peerage below the rank of marquess are entitled to be styled Right Honourable,[b] as are their wives and widows.[citation needed] However, a peer's heir who uses a courtesy title is not accorded the corresponding style.[citation needed] Peers above the rank of earl are entitled to different styles: dukes and duchesses are styled The Most Noble or His or Her Grace, and marquesses and marchionesses are styled as The Most Honourable.

In order to differentiate peers who are also members of the Privy Council—and therefore entitled to a style in both capacities—from peers who are not, the post-nominal letters PC can be used to identify the privy counsellors.[c] This applies to peers of all rank, as a holder of a dukedom or marquessate who becomes a Privy Counsellor retains their higher style and so could not be identified without the letters. In practice, in contexts where there might be confusion, official publications use the style Right Honourable exclusively to identify privy counsellors.[27][13]

Lord mayors, lord provosts and other officers

[edit]

The lord mayors of London, Cardiff, Belfast and York; and the lord provosts of Edinburgh and Glasgow are all entitled to be styled Right Honourable while in office. The lord mayors of Belfast and Cardiff are so entitled by an explicit grant from the sovereign, and the others through ancient custom.[5] The style is used with the name of the office, not the personal name of the office-holder, e.g. "The Right Honourable Lord Mayor of London" or "The Right Honourable the Lord Provost of the City of Edinburgh".[28]

Other lord mayors may be styled Right Worshipful, and other lord provosts do not use a style. By the 1920s, a number of city mayors, including the Lord Mayor of Leeds,[29] were unofficially using the style Right Honourable, and the matter was consequently raised in parliament. The Lord Mayor of Bristol at present still uses the style Right Honourable, without official permission.[30][31] In guidance issued in June 2003, the Crown Office recommended that the lord provosts of Aberdeen and Dundee be styled Right Honourable in the same manner as those of Edinburgh and Glasgow.[28]

The Chairman of the London County Council (LCC) was granted the style in 1935 as part of the celebrations of the silver jubilee of King George V.[32] The Chairman of the Greater London Council (GLC), the body that replaced the LCC in 1965, was similarly granted the style[33] until the GLC was abolished in 1986.

Right Honourable is also used as a style by the Lord Lyon King of Arms in office,[34][35][36] preceding his title rather than his personal name, as with other applications ex officio.

In the House of Commons

[edit]
In the House of Commons, members use honourable and right honourable when referring to one another.

In the chamber of the House of Commons, members are not permitted to address each other directly, nor to name other members, but must instead address the speaker and refer to other members indirectly. This practice is intended to enforce a polite tone to maintain order and good honour.[37] Only the occupant of the Chair addresses Members by name. Members generally refer to one another as "my honourable friend" if in the same party, and "the honourable gentleman/lady/member" otherwise. If needed, constituencies ("the honourable member for ...") or ministerial offices (e.g. "my right honourable friend the Prime Minister") can be used for clarity.[d]

Referring to one another as honourable is merely a courtesy used within the House, and is not a style used outside the chamber. However, when a member is in fact entitled to be styled Right Honourable (in practice always through membership of the Privy Council), they are referred to as such in the chamber. Further embellishments are traditionally applied to clergy (reverend), military officers (gallant) and barristers (learned), a practice recommended to be abolished following a 2010 report of the Modernisation Committee, but in practice continued.[38][39] In summary:

  • "Honourable" is used for members who are not privy counsellors.
  • "Right honourable" is used for members who are privy counsellors.
  • "(Right) honourable and reverend" may be used for clergy.[40]
  • "(Right) honourable and gallant" may be used for military officers.[41][42]
  • "(Right) honourable and learned" may be used for barristers.[43][44]

Collective entities

[edit]

Right Honourable is added as a prefix to the name of various collective entities, including:

  • "The Right Honourable the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in Parliament Assembled", i.e. the House of Lords
  • "The Right Honourable the Lords of the Privy Council", i.e. the Privy Council
  • "The Right Honourable the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty", i.e. the former Board of Admiralty

Canada

[edit]
Further information: Canadian honorifics

In Canada, occupants of only the three most senior public offices are styled as Right Honourable (Le/La très honorable in French). Formerly, this was by virtue of their appointment to the Privy Council of the United Kingdom. However, Canadian appointments to the British Privy Council were ended by the government of Lester Pearson. Currently, individuals who hold, or have held, one of the following offices are awarded the style of Right Honourable for life:

The Right Honourable is not to be confused with His or Her Excellency, used by governors general during their term of office, or The Honourable, used only while in office (except in Nova Scotia, Alberta, and Saskatchewan, where honorary members of the Executive Council enjoy the title permanently) by provincial premiers and cabinet ministers, and for life by senators and members of the King's Privy Council for Canada (chiefly cabinet ministers, as well as other figures such as party leaders or provincial premiers who may be appointed from time to time).

The title may also be granted for life by the Governor General to eminent Canadians who have not held any of the offices that would otherwise entitle them to the style. This has been done on two occasions: to eight prominent political figures to mark the 125th anniversary of Canadian Confederation in 1992,[e] and to longtime Member of Parliament Herb Gray upon his retirement in 2002.

Living Canadians holding the style The Right Honourable
Person Birthplace Office Born Granted
Mark Carney Fort Smith, Northwest Territories Prime Minister 16 March 1965 14 March 2025
Justin Trudeau Ottawa, Ontario Former prime minister 25 December 1971 4 November 2015
Stephen Harper Toronto, Ontario 30 April 1959 6 February 2006
Paul Martin Windsor, Ontario 28 August 1938 12 December 2003
Jean Chrétien Shawinigan, Quebec 11 January 1934 4 November 1993
Kim Campbell Port Alberni, British Columbia 10 March 1947 25 June 1993
Joe Clark High River, Alberta 5 June 1939 4 June 1979
Mary Simon Fort Severight, Quebec Governor general 21 August 1947 26 July 2021
Julie Payette Montreal, Quebec Former governor general 20 October 1963 2 October 2017
David Johnston Sudbury, Ontario 28 June 1941 1 October 2010
Michaëlle Jean Port-au-Prince, Haiti 6 September 1957 27 September 2005
Adrienne Clarkson Hong Kong 10 February 1939 7 October 1999
Edward Schreyer Beausejour, Manitoba 21 December 1935 22 January 1979
Richard Wagner Montreal, Quebec Chief justice 2 April 1957 18 December 2017
Beverley McLachlin Pincher Creek, Alberta Former chief justice 7 September 1943 7 January 2000

Over the years, a number of prominent Canadians became members of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom and thus were entitled to use the style Right Honourable, either because of their services in Britain (e.g. serving as envoys to London) or as members of the Imperial War Cabinet, or due to their prominence in the Canadian Cabinet. These included all but three of Canada's early prime ministers (Alexander Mackenzie, John Abbott, and Mackenzie Bowell), who governed before the title was used domestically.

New Zealand

[edit]

Previously in New Zealand the prime minister and some other senior cabinet ministers were customarily appointed to the Privy Council of the United Kingdom and thus styled Right Honourable.[45]

Helen Clark did not recommend the appointment of any new privy counsellors during her tenure as Prime Minister, from 1999 to 2008. In 2009 it was announced that her successor, John Key, had decided not to make any further recommendations to the Crown for appointments to the Privy Council.[46]

In August 2010, the Queen of New Zealand announced that, with immediate effect, individuals who hold, and those persons who after the date of the signing of these rules are appointed to, the following offices are awarded the style Right Honourable for life:[45]

This change was made because the practice of appointing New Zealanders to the Privy Council of the United Kingdom had ceased. However, the change had little immediate effect, as all but two of the holders or living former holders of the offices granted the style had already been appointed to the Privy Council.[47][48]

The living New Zealanders holding the style Right Honourable as a result of membership of the Privy Council are:

The living New Zealanders holding the style The Right Honourable for life as a result of the 2010 changes are:

Name Reason Date Granted
Sir Anand Satyanand Former Governor-General 2 August 2010
Sir John Key Former Prime Minister
Sir Lockwood Smith Former Speaker of the House of Representatives
Sir Jerry Mateparae Former Governor-General 31 August 2011
Sir David Carter Former Speaker of the House of Representatives 31 January 2013
Dame Patsy Reddy Former Governor-General 28 September 2016
Sir Bill English Former Prime Minister 12 December 2016
Dame Jacinda Ardern 26 October 2017
Sir Trevor Mallard Former Speaker of the House of Representatives 7 November 2017
Dame Helen Winkelmann Chief Justice 14 March 2019
Dame Cindy Kiro Governor-General 21 October 2021
Adrian Rurawhe Former Speaker of the House of Representatives 24 August 2022
Chris Hipkins Former Prime Minister 25 January 2023
Christopher Luxon Prime Minister 27 November 2023
Gerry Brownlee Speaker of the House of Representatives 5 December 2023

Africa

[edit]

During the periods of its existence, the Prime Minister of Kenya post was styled Right Honourable. In post-independence Kenya two people have been styled with the "right honorable" title. The country's founding president Jomo Kenyatta who was the first prime minister of Kenya and Raila Amolo Odinga, who served as the country's second prime minister between 2008 and 2013. Raila Odinga also known as Baba (Political father and Enigma) is a towering icon in Africa, well known for his Pan-Africanism and championing for good governance. The prime ministers of Namibia and Uganda are both currently styled with the same honorific. The speaker and deputy speaker of the Parliament of Uganda are also entitled to the style.

Caribbean

[edit]

The prime ministers of Barbados, Grenada, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Trinidad and Tobago are styled as Right Honourable. The West Indies Federation prime minister was also styled as such during that office's short existence.

Malaysia

[edit]

In Malaysia, only the Prime Minister, his or her deputy, four judges of the Federal Court[f] and MPs who are titled Tun are styled as Right Honourable (Malay: Yang Amat Berhormat, Yang Amat Arif for judges) at the federal level. For the state level, all the Menteris Besar, Chief Ministers and Premier along with their deputies are also styled Right Honourable.

Nepal

[edit]

In Nepal, the president, vice president speaker of the House of Representatives, prime minister and chief justice are formally styled Right Honourable (Nepali: सम्माननीय, romanized: Sammānanīya). Ministers, members of parliament (Lower and Upper Houses and provincial parliaments) and Chief ministers of provinces are styled "Honourable" only. It is usually joked during informal discussions about the use of the word "Honourable" to differentiate senior and less senior government dignitories. It can also be spelled in English as The Rt. Hon’ble.

South Korea

[edit]

In South Korea, the President, Prime Minister, Speaker of the National Assembly and Chief Justice can use the Right Honourable style.[citation needed]

Spain

[edit]

In the Spanish autonomous community of Catalonia, the president of the Generalitat de Catalunya and the president of the Parliament of Catalonia are formally referred as the Right Honourable.

Countries with rare or historic usage

[edit]

Australia

[edit]

In Australia, the lord mayors of Adelaide, Brisbane, Hobart, Melbourne, Perth and Sydney are entitled to be styled Right Honourable while in office.

Historically, a number of Australians were entitled to the style as members of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom. Appointment to the Australian equivalent of the Privy Council, the Federal Executive Council, does not entitle a person to the style. Typical appointees to the Imperial Privy Council included senior politicians and judges at state and federal level. Malcolm Fraser in 1976 was the most recent prime minister to accept appointment to the Privy Council and thus to be styled Right Honourable. Of his 21 predecessors, only four were not members of the Privy Council – Alfred Deakin (declined appointment), Chris Watson (never offered), Arthur Fadden (accepted after leaving office), and Gough Whitlam (declined appointment). The last Governor-General to be entitled to the style was Sir Ninian Stephen, who left office in 1988. The last active politician to be entitled to the style was Ian Sinclair, who retired in 1998. The few Australian recipients of British peerages were also entitled to the style.

Present-day Australian governments no longer recommend Australians for elevation to the peerage or appointment to the Privy Council. However, some present-day Australian citizens either hold hereditary peerages (e.g. Malcolm Murray, 12th Earl of Dunmore).

Living Australians holding the style The Right Honourable Reason Formerly
Ian Sinclair, AC Member of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom Former Speaker of the Australian House of Representatives
Sir William Heseltine, GCB, GCVO, AC Member of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom Former Private Secretary to the Sovereign
Malcolm Murray, 12th Earl of Dunmore Earl of Dunmore Former Member of the House of Lords
Robert Fiennes-Clinton, 19th Earl of Lincoln Earl of Lincoln
Simon Abney-Hastings, 15th Earl of Loudoun Earl of Loudoun
George Dawson-Damer, 7th Earl of Portarlington Earl of Portarlington
Keith Rous, 6th Earl of Stradbroke Earl of Stradbroke
Francis Grosvenor, 8th Earl of Wilton Earl of Wilton
Nicholas St John, 9th Viscount Bolingbroke, 10th Viscount St John Viscount Bolingbroke
Charles Cavendish, 7th Baron Chesham Baron Chesham
James Lindsay, 3rd Baron Lindsay of Birker Baron Lindsay of Birker
David Campbell, 7th Baron Stratheden and Campbell Baron Stratheden
David Baden-Powell, 5th Baron Baden-Powell Baron Baden-Powell

Ireland

[edit]

Members of the Privy Council of Ireland were entitled to be styled Right Honourable, even after the Privy Council ceased to have any functions or to meet on the creation of the Irish Free State in December 1922. Nevertheless, the Lord Mayor of Dublin, like some of his counterparts in Great Britain, retained the use of the honorific style as a result of its having been conferred separately by legislation; in 2001 it was removed, as a consequence of local government law reform.[citation needed]

Sri Lanka

[edit]

In Sri Lanka (formerly known as Ceylon) the British practice was followed with Ceylonese members of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom were styled Right Honourable and were referred to as Mahamanya in Sinhala. Ceylonese appointees to the privy council included D. S. Senanayake and Sir John Kotelawala.[49]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

The Right Honourable

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Right Honourable is an honorific style of address in the , primarily granted for life to members of the upon their appointment by the , allowing them to prefix their names with "The Right Honourable" in formal contexts. This prefix denotes high distinction in public service and is also extended to certain non- holding senior offices, such as the Speaker of the or the , though usage has been refined over time—for instance, the ceased applying it to peers unless they are . In parliamentary proceedings, who are Members of Parliament are routinely addressed as "the Right Honourable Gentleman/Lady" followed by their constituency, distinguishing them from other MPs referred to simply as "honourable". The style originates from the medieval , an advisory body to the that evolved from the , with the reflecting the council's role in and its members' and confidentiality. Historically, Privy Counsellors have included prime ministers, senior judges, and leading politicians, ensuring the prefix's association with executive and advisory influence at the highest levels. While the Privy Council's formal powers have diminished since the —with executive functions largely transferred to the Cabinet—the "Right Honourable" endures as a marker of elite political status, applicable across realms with variations, though its employment remains tied to British constitutional traditions rather than mere titular inflation. This enduring usage underscores a commitment to ceremonial continuity amid modern democratic shifts, without implying substantive legal privileges beyond precedence in formal address.

Definition and Etymology

Distinction from "The Honourable"

"The Right Honourable" denotes a superior rank of honorific precedence within British and traditions, typically conferred upon Privy Counsellors, peers ranking above barons (such as viscounts, , and marquesses), and select senior officials with lifetime entitlement, distinguishing them from holders of the lesser "". In , this elevation reflects formal recognition of advisory roles to the or noble status, whereas "The Honourable" applies more broadly to Members of Parliament (MPs) without Privy Council membership, younger sons or daughters of higher peers, and junior government positions during debates or official correspondence. A key non-overlapping application occurs in the , where MPs are routinely addressed as "the Member for [constituency]" unless they are Privy Counsellors, in which case "the Right Honourable Member for [constituency]" is used to acknowledge their distinct seniority and oath-bound service. This practice maintains procedural while avoiding direct , emphasizing constituency or descriptors over personal names. The "Right" prefix historically amplified the honorific to signify enduring privileges associated with admission or equivalent lifetime distinctions, establishing a clear that precludes interchangeable use and underscores contextual specificity in formal .

Linguistic and Symbolic Origins

The term "" originates from the Latin honorabilis, denoting worthiness of honor, which entered via honorable during the medieval period, reflecting Roman administrative traditions of designating dignitaries deserving respect. The "right" in this context functions archaically to denote a superior or emphatic degree, akin to "very" or "properly," elevating the style beyond basic to signify institutional precedence within monarchical and ary frameworks. This compound form emerged in formal English by the 16th century, as evidenced in civic titles such as the , where it underscored authority derived from public service rather than mere social rank. In British usage, the full style "The Right Honourable" became associated with the by the early 18th century, with records from the 1710s applying it to figures like Speaker William Bromley, predating its broader extension to other offices and imperial contexts. This evolution drew from precedents emphasizing hierarchical distinctions earned through advisory roles to the , as privy counsellors were sworn to provide counsel on matters of state, thereby justifying a lifelong marker of elevated trustworthiness and duty. Symbolically, the title embodies a tradition of recognizing merit-based authority over undifferentiated equality, rooted in pre-modern English governance where honor was conferred for contributions to the commonweal, such as legislative or executive service, rather than innate attributes alone. This aligns with the Privy Council's oath-bound structure, which prioritizes fidelity to crown and realm, distinguishing "right" honour from lesser forms applied to untitled MPs or junior officials. Such usage reinforced causal chains of accountability, wherein public roles warranted presumptive integrity, a principle traceable to medieval advisory bodies evolving into formalized constitutional elements.

Historical Development

Early English and British Usage

The style "The Right Honourable" emerged as a customary prefix for members of the , with roots in 16th- and 17th-century protocols for addressing royal advisers who held positions of significant trust and confidentiality. These customs distinguished privy counsellors from other officials, emphasizing their oath-bound role in deliberating state matters privately with the sovereign. Early precedents appear in official correspondence and parliamentary proceedings, where the prefix denoted not only rank but also the expectation of impartial counsel amid Tudor and Stuart political turbulence. The of 1688 marked a pivotal reinforcement of the title within Britain's shifting constitutional framework, as the Privy Council's advisory functions were curtailed in favor of a smaller cabinet system while retaining ceremonial and titular prestige. Post-revolution oaths and appointments under William III and Mary II preserved the style for core members, embedding it in the institutions of and limiting monarchical absolutism. This period saw the title's consolidation as a marker of lifelong entitlement for those sworn to secrecy, even as the council's size fluctuated—numbering around 50-100 members by the early —reflecting pragmatic adjustments to governance needs. By the , formalization extended the usage to privy counsellors in official gazettes and legal instruments, with the 1708 establishment of the of standardizing it across merged English and Scottish elements. Empirical evidence from parliamentary archives confirms its routine application; for instance, records from 1803 onward consistently prefix the names of privy counsellors in debates, such as references to figures like the Right Honourable , illustrating entrenched institutional adherence. This usage persisted without interruption, underscoring the title's role in maintaining hierarchical clarity amid expanding legislative scrutiny.

Expansion to Empire and Commonwealth

The title "The Right Honourable" extended to the British dominions through the integration of colonial governance structures with the United Kingdom's , where appointments conferred the lifelong style on senior officials, facilitating advisory roles in imperial policy. This dissemination paralleled the evolution of self-governing colonies into dominions, beginning with under the Act 1867, which vested executive authority in and preserved British honorific practices for key figures like the . , 's first , was styled "The Right Honourable" following his appointment to the , underscoring the causal link between monarchical continuity and title usage in dominion administration. In Australia, formed as a federation in 1901, prime ministers such as William Morris Hughes and Stanley Bruce in the 1920s held the title via Privy Council membership, reflecting the dominion's participation in imperial decision-making prior to greater autonomy. The Statute of Westminster 1931 formalized legislative independence for dominions including Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa, yet did not sever honorific traditions; appointments to the UK Privy Council continued voluntarily, preserving the title's role in linking dominion leaders to the Crown. This retention supported coordinated governance amid rising dominion sovereignty, with governors-general and premiers often bearing the style to denote their advisory proximity to the sovereign. Following the 1949 , which permitted republics like to join the without recognizing the British monarch as , the title persisted in the 15 remaining realms where Crown ties endured, including and . In realms, Privy Council eligibility sustained the honorific for high officials, contrasting with its discontinuation in republican members to align with post-imperial identities; however, curtailed routine Privy Council appointments for prime ministers after the 1970s, limiting new conferrals while honoring prior usages. This evolution highlighted causal realism in title retention: monarchical realms preserved imperial-era forms for institutional continuity, whereas shifts to prompted divestment, without uniform abolition across the .

Core Principles of Entitlement

Criteria for Conferral

The title "The Right Honourable" is conferred primarily through two mechanisms rooted in constitutional conventions: appointment to the or elevation to a qualifying . membership, granted by the Sovereign on the Prime Minister's advice, recognizes sustained high-level service in executive, judicial, or roles, with recipients including cabinet ministers, archbishops, and senior judges; this path emphasizes merit-based achievement over inheritance, as appointments are discretionary and tied to public contributions rather than automatic entitlement. Peerages confer the style automatically for holders ranking as viscounts and above—such as earls and marquesses—by virtue of the title's inherent dignity, though barons typically require concurrent status; , introduced under the , extend the prefix to barons created for distinguished service, blending hereditary tradition with modern recognition of individual merit. This distinction highlights automatic entitlement via (often hereditary but historically granted for service) versus the advisory, recommendation-driven process for Privy Counsellors, prioritizing causal links between accomplishment and honor. Entitlement persists for life, with exceptional and reserved for , as exercised by royal warrant; no systematic expiry applies post-office, reinforcing permanence for verified service. Collective bodies, such as the when addressed in petitions or formal communications, receive the style in aggregate as "the Right Honourable the and Temporal," extending the convention to institutional entities embodying collective authority.

Lifelong vs. Office-Held Usage

The style "The Right Honourable" is conferred on a lifelong basis for certain dignities, such as membership of the , where admission grants the prefix permanently, persisting after any active service unless membership is terminated under rare disciplinary provisions. This lifetime entitlement underscores the enduring advisory role envisioned for privy counsellors in supporting the monarch and executive continuity. In contrast, for civic offices like the lord mayoralties of , , , , and , or the lord provostships of and , the style applies exclusively while in office, reverting upon completion of the term to avoid perpetuating temporary municipal authority as a perpetual .) Historically, 20th-century developments in realms shifted some entitlements toward lifetime grants to stabilize recognition of high service; for instance, Canadian protocols formalized perpetual use for prime ministers upon assuming office, reflecting a broader trend to reward sustained national beyond tenure. Such permanence contrasts with office-bound applications, where the style's withdrawal post-term aligns with the transient nature of elected or appointed civic roles, preventing dilution of the prefix's prestige for enduring institutional ties. This distinction maintains hierarchical clarity, with lifelong conferrals fostering incentives for long-term allegiance to crown and state functions, as evidenced by the Privy Council's structure emphasizing advisory stability over episodic duties.

Usage in the United Kingdom

Privy Counsellors

Membership in the of the is conferred for life by the upon the advice of the , granting recipients the style of "The Right Honourable" as a prefix to their name. Appointments are made to individuals who hold or have held senior political, judicial, ecclesiastical, or positions, including by convention the leaders of the opposition parties, the Archbishops of and , and Speakers of the . As of September 2025, the comprises 747 living members, reflecting expansions during periods of frequent government changes and the inclusion of opposition figures to ensure cross-party input on certain matters. This body formally advises the on the exercise of the royal prerogative, though in practice its meetings—held approximately monthly—primarily approve Orders in Council that implement executive decisions, with much business conducted via circulation rather than deliberation. The entitlement to "The Right Honourable" also extends to surviving members of the of , a separate body established in 1922 that became dormant following the suspension of the in 1972, with no new appointments made since 1971 amid the imposition of from Westminster. This arrangement underscores the 's role in accommodating regional executive structures within the 's constitutional framework, though contemporary advice on matters flows primarily through the main Council and Cabinet channels.

Peers and Hereditary Titles

All holders of peerages in the ranks of , , or —whether hereditary or for life—are entitled to the style "The Right Honourable" prefixed to their title in formal address, such as "The Right Honourable the ". This entitlement applies irrespective of whether the peer sits in the , as the style derives from the peerage itself rather than parliamentary membership. Hereditary peers in these ranks have held this privilege since the style's formalization in British usage, predating modern reforms, with examples including viscounts and earls addressed as "The Right Honourable" in official documents and correspondence. The marked a significant expansion by authorizing the creation of non-hereditary baronies for life, typically conferring the style "The Right Honourable the [Surname]" upon recipients, such as political appointees or experts elevated to advise the . Prior to 1958, peerages were overwhelmingly hereditary, limiting the style's application to familial succession; the Act enabled over 1,400 such creations by 2023, broadening access beyond inherited while maintaining the baronial rank's association with "The Right Honourable". Hereditary peerages retain their stylistic entitlement despite legislative changes, including the , which removed automatic sitting rights for most hereditary peers while preserving their titles and honors. As of October 2025, the comprises approximately 800 members eligible for the style, including around 44 excepted hereditary peers (primarily barons and viscounts) alongside hundreds of life peers, though ongoing reforms via the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill aim to phase out hereditary legislative roles without affecting titular styles. Dukes and marquesses, by contrast, use distinct styles—"His Grace" and "," respectively—excluding them from "The Right Honourable" usage across both hereditary and life categories.

Local and Civic Officials

In the United Kingdom, select local and civic officials receive the style "The Right Honourable" exclusively during their term of office, marking an exception to the typical lifelong entitlement associated with national honors such as privy counsellorship. This applies to the Lord Mayors of London, York, Belfast, and Bristol, as well as the Lord Provosts of Edinburgh and Glasgow. The privilege underscores the ceremonial prestige of these ancient municipal roles but lapses upon completion of tenure, reflecting their office-bound nature rather than personal distinction. The , head of the , exemplifies this usage, addressed as "The Right Honourable the Lord Mayor of London" in official capacities. Similarly, the , convener of the , holds the style "The Right Honourable the Lord Provost of Edinburgh." These titles derive from royal charters and municipal traditions that elevate civic leadership in historic cities, often granting lieutenantcy over the sovereign's domain within their jurisdiction. For instance, York's Lord Mayor gained this honor through 19th-century civic developments tied to Mansion House protocols. Historically, such entitlements trace to specific grants via or charters, expanding from early precedents in and before 1863 to later inclusions like Belfast's in the 1920s. Cardiff's briefly shared this style from its creation until abolition in 2012, highlighting variability in municipal reforms. Unlike parliamentary or applications, these civic styles emphasize local governance autonomy within the UK's devolved structure, without conferring parliamentary precedence or post-tenure courtesy.

Parliamentary and Collective Application

In the House of Commons, Members of Parliament who serve as Privy Counsellors are addressed during debates as "the Right Honourable Gentleman" or "the Right Honourable Lady," depending on , while non-Privy Counsellor MPs are referred to as "the Honourable Member" or similar formulations. This distinction underscores the 's role in elevating certain parliamentarians' formal status within proceedings, with MPs required to speak in the third person and avoid direct naming to maintain decorum. As of 2025, approximately 20-25% of MPs hold membership, primarily senior figures like the , cabinet ministers, and opposition leaders, enabling their use of the style in parliamentary contexts. Collectively, the style applies to institutional roles such as "the Right Honourable the Speaker of the ," who presides over debates and is formally entitled to it upon , though routinely addressed simply as "Mr Speaker" or "Madam Speaker" in the chamber. This collective usage extends to procedural references, like petitions or motions invoking "the Right Honourable the Speaker," preserving hierarchical address without implying individual . These protocols, including honorifics in debate and Hansard transcription, have remained substantively unchanged since the 19th century, when phrases like "the right honourable gentleman" became standardized in recorded proceedings to denote Privy Counsellors amid expanding parliamentary business post-1832 Reform Act. , the official verbatim record since 1803, faithfully reproduces these forms, ensuring consistency; for instance, in sessions from 1900 onward, Privy Counsellor MPs are invariably styled "Rt Hon" in indices and attributions. Deviations are rare and typically corrected for accuracy, reflecting the style's role in formal protocol rather than casual nomenclature.

Usage in Other Commonwealth Realms

Canada

In Canada, the style "The Right Honourable" is granted for life to the , the , and the of the upon assuming their respective offices. This lifelong entitlement reflects the formal protocol for these federal positions, distinguishing them from other members of the , who are styled "" during and after service. The , for instance, is addressed as "The Right Honourable" immediately upon appointment and retains the prefix indefinitely, even after leaving office. Provincial premiers and territorial leaders, by contrast, are styled "The Honourable" exclusively while in office and do not receive the "Right" prefix, nor do they retain the style post-tenure unless separately appointed to the federal . This federal-provincial distinction underscores the hierarchical nature of Canadian honours, with "The Right Honourable" reserved for national constitutional roles tied directly to . Cabinet ministers at both levels typically use "The Honourable" during service, with federal ministers retaining it for life if Privy Counsellors, but without elevation to "Right Honourable." The retention of "The Right Honourable" persists following the 1982 of the Constitution Act, which severed legislative ties to the United Kingdom's Parliament while preserving Canada's status as a under the shared sovereign. Despite intermittent republican sentiments and debates over monarchical symbols—such as calls to abolish the General's role—no legislative changes have abolished these styles, maintaining continuity with pre- traditions adapted to .

New Zealand

In , as a , the style "The Right Honourable" is conferred on holders of senior constitutional offices and Privy Counsellors, reflecting continuity with British traditions adapted to the local honours system. are granted the prefix upon assuming office and retain it for life, a practice formalized in rules approved by the Sovereign on the advice of New Zealand ministers. For instance, the current , , is styled "The Right Honourable " following his appointment on 27 November 2023. This lifelong entitlement applies similarly to former prime ministers, such as (1999–2008) and (2008–2016), who continue to use the style post-tenure. Governors-General are also entitled to "The Right Honourable" during their term and retain it thereafter, underscoring the viceregal role's alignment with privileges. The current Governor-General, , is addressed as "Her Excellency The Right Honourable , GNZM, QSO" since her swearing-in on 21 October 2021. Predecessors like (2016–2021) and (2006–2011) exemplify this retention, with no substantive alterations to the convention since the 1970s despite evolving republican sentiments in other realms. Privy Counsellors, whether appointed to the or recognized under New Zealand's honours framework, may use the style alongside post-nominals "PC" if applicable, though New Zealand-specific grants emphasize office-holders over standalone privy status. This has ensured stable application, with empirical records showing consistent usage for figures like former Simon English (2016–2017), without dilution from post-constitutional reforms. The Department of the and Cabinet maintains an official roll of entitled persons, confirming over 20 living individuals as of 2023, primarily from executive and judicial roles.

Australia and Pacific Realms

In , the style "The Right Honourable" has been largely phased out for national political figures following federation in 1901, with usage tied exclusively to membership in the United Kingdom's rather than automatic conferral on office-holders. Early Prime Ministers, such as and , received appointments, entitling them to the prefix during and after their terms, but this practice declined after as asserted greater independence from imperial honors. By the 1970s, appointments ceased entirely for Australian leaders, with ( 1975–1983) as the last to hold the style through such membership. Current national usage is minimal and non-automatic; no Prime Minister since Fraser has been styled "The Right Honourable" by virtue of office, though former Prime Ministers retain "The Honourable" for life under parliamentary convention. At the state level, retention of "The Honourable" applies to former Premiers and certain officials in jurisdictions like South Australia and Queensland, but "The Right Honourable" remains reserved for rare Privy Counsellors or historical figures, with no widespread revival. Notably, Lord Mayors of the six capital cities—Adelaide, Brisbane, Hobart, Melbourne, Perth, and Sydney—continue to use "The Right Honourable" while in office, a courtesy reflecting their civic prominence and retained as a vestige of colonial protocol. In Pacific realms such as , which shares the monarch as head of state, "The Right Honourable" was historically applied to Prime Ministers like (in office 1975–1980, 1982–1985, and 2002–2011) via or equivalent honors, but contemporary practice favors "" for current leaders like , signaling a shift toward localized styles amid post-independence reforms. This evolution aligns with broader republican sentiments in and the Pacific, where debates over retaining monarchical-linked titles have intensified since the failed to pass, yet no realm has abolished the style outright as of 2025, preserving it for ceremonial and traditional continuity.

Usage in Non-Realm Commonwealth Countries

Malaysia

In Malaysia, the style "The Right Honourable" is applied to the and during their tenure, reflecting the retention of British parliamentary conventions in the country's governance structure. This usage aligns with the Yang Amat Berhormat (YAB) designation in Malay, which serves as the formal equivalent and is reserved for these federal executive leaders. The practice extends to state-level executives, including Chief Ministers (in and ) and Menteri Besar (in states), who hold analogous roles under the federal constitutional framework. This styling originated from Malaysia's adoption of the Westminster model following from Britain on 31 August 1957, when the Constitution was enacted, establishing a parliamentary with a and bicameral legislature modeled on British precedents. The 1957 Constitution, drafted under the Reid Commission, incorporated elements such as cabinet responsibility to and ceremonial powers, facilitating the transfer of styles from colonial administration to independent institutions. Unlike in realms, where the prefix may confer lifelong privileges for privy counsellors or peers, Malaysian usage is strictly titular and office-bound, ceasing upon or electoral defeat. As of 2025, the convention persists without formal reforms or abolition, as evidenced by official listings of the formed after the November 2022 , where senior ministers continue to be referenced with the prefix in diplomatic and governmental communications. This continuity underscores Malaysia's selective adaptation of traditions amid its system, where the Yang di-Pertuan Agong rotates among state sultans every five years, but executive styling remains tied to parliamentary roles rather than .

Caribbean Nations

In Caribbean Commonwealth realms, the style "The Right Honourable" continues to be applied to prime ministers in several nations, reflecting retentions from Westminster-style constitutions adopted during independence in the and , such as those of (1981), (1973), (1974), and (1979). These provisions preserve British-derived honorifics for executive heads to denote precedence and ceremonial dignity, often tied to membership or parliamentary convention, without altering substantive governance. Prime ministers in , , , and are routinely addressed as "The Right Honourable," as seen in official communications and diplomatic protocols for incumbents like , Philip Davis, , and . In contrast, deviates by styling its "The " unless the holder is a member of the , a lifelong appointment conferring the elevated form, as codified in Jamaican protocol guidelines. Governors-general in these realms typically receive "The Most Honourable" rather than "The Right Honourable," a distinction emphasizing viceregal authority; examples include Sir Patrick Allen in and Dame Cynthia Pratt in . In republics like and , which transitioned from realms in 2021 and 1976 respectively, the style has been phased out for prime ministers, reverting to "" to align with post-monarchical frameworks, though occasional linkages persist informally.

African Commonwealth States

In Commonwealth realms in Africa, such as and , the style "The Right Honourable" is applied to the as under the . In , Samuel Ntsokoane Matekane has been addressed as "The Right Honourable" in official and government statements since assuming office on October 28, 2022. Similarly, in , Russell Mmiso Dlamini holds the style "The Right Honourable" in parliamentary and international contexts, as reflected in official profiles and addresses at forums like the UNFCCC COP29 in 2024. This usage aligns with conventions for realm prime ministers, distinguishing it from the simpler "" applied to other ministers or members of parliament. In African republics, application of the style has been sporadic and largely confined to transitional periods around in the 1950s and 1960s, when territories retained monarchical ties before full republican status. In , was styled "The Right Honourable Alhaji " from independence in 1960 until the republic's establishment in 1963, reflecting his role in the pre-republican federation under Queen Elizabeth II. In , pre-independence figures like Emmanuel Charles Quist, speaker of the , received the "Right Honourable" prefix in colonial parliamentary contexts until 1957. briefly combined it with presidential titles post-1960, but this lapsed with the republic's consolidation. Contemporary usage in republics like remains negligible, with no standard application to presidents or prime ministers; parliamentary members typically use "" without the "Right" prefix unless holding rare membership from the , which empirical records show as unused for high executives as of 2025. This scarcity underscores the style's linkage to monarchical continuity rather than post-colonial republican norms, with decolonization-era instances fading after constitutional shifts to presidential systems.

Rare or Historic Usage

Ireland

The style "The Right Honourable" was applied in Ireland to members of the prior to , including senior officials, judges, and politicians appointed to the body, which advised the and exercised executive functions. The council's last formal meeting occurred in the Council Chamber of on 16 January 1922, when Viscount FitzAlan handed over administration to the , effectively ending its operations as part of the transition to self-rule under the . The establishment of the in December 1922 initiated the phase-out of the style, as Article 40 of its prohibited the conferral of any "title of honour" on citizens for services related to the state without approval, reflecting a deliberate break from British monarchical conventions. This provision encompassed privy council appointments and associated styles, with no new Irish privy counsellors created thereafter; existing lifetime entitlements lapsed in official usage as the state prioritized indigenous republican symbols over imperial honors. The causal driver was the independence movement's emphasis on , viewing such titles as emblems of subjugation incompatible with . The 1937 Constitution of Ireland codified this discontinuation by omitting any reference to privy councils or monarchical styles, vesting executive authority in the President and without British-derived honorifics. In practice, post-1937 officeholders, including Taoisigh, have been addressed simply as "Taoiseach" or by name in official protocol, underscoring the full rejection of the style amid Ireland's progression to republican status. No verified instances of its use persist in the , distinguishing Ireland from realms retaining ties.

Sri Lanka

In Ceylon (now ), the style "The Right Honourable" was historically applied to prime ministers appointed to the British during the dominion period from 1948 to 1972. Don Stephen Senanayake, the first serving from 1947 to 1952, received the style upon his membership, reflecting the convention for high-ranking dominion officials. Similarly, John Lionel Kotelawala, from 1953 to 1956, was addressed as General The Right Honourable Sir John Lionel Kotelawala CH KBE, denoting his status alongside military and knighthood honours. This usage aligned with British Commonwealth practices, where the style signified advisory roles to . The style's application ended with Ceylon's proclamation as the Republic of Sri Lanka on 22 May 1972, under a new that repudiated monarchical ties and discontinued British honours, including Privy Council appointments. No new conferrals occurred post-republic, as the system was deemed incompatible with sovereign republican governance. Existing holders retained the personal style for life, but its incidence became rare, limited to elderly pre-1972 appointees whose numbers dwindled with natural attrition—Kotelawala, for example, survived until without successors in the role. Today, the style holds no active or official standing in , with zero living holders as of 2025, underscoring its vestigial nature in post-dominion contexts. This pattern mirrors other former British dominions that transitioned to republics, where pre-independence honours persisted briefly among octogenarians or nonagenarians but faded without renewal, prioritizing national symbols over imperial legacies.

Other Former Colonies

In former British colonies beyond the primary realms and select non-realm states, the style "The Right Honourable" was historically conferred on governors-general, premiers, and privy councillors during colonial administration and brief post-independence transitions, but its application faded rapidly with republican shifts. This decline aligned with surges from the 1940s to 1970s, when emerging nations systematically discarded imperial paraphernalia, including Crown-linked titles, to assert sovereignty—exemplified by calls in to renounce British honors as part of anti-colonial resistance. In , governors-general such as (1773–1785) and (1828–1835) held the style as privy councillors overseeing the subcontinent. Specific post-colonial retentions were ephemeral; in , the designation applied to early premiers like (1910–1919), a lor, but lapsed after the 1961 republican severed ties. Analogous patterns emerged in South Asian dominions like , where transitional leaders briefly retained it amid dominion-to-republic evolution by 1956, reflecting the style's dependence on monarchical or affiliations incompatible with full independence. No systematic revivals occurred, as causal ties to British institutional legacies eroded under local constitutional reforms prioritizing egalitarian address conventions. Twenty-first-century records show no verifiable expansions of the style into new former colonies or categories, underscoring its obsolescence outside persistent royal realms; isolated ceremonial echoes in non-colonial contexts, such as Nepal's prime ministerial addresses post-2008 abolition or Spain's presidencies, stem from diplomatic protocol rather than imperial inheritance.

Significance and Debates

Constitutional and Traditional Role

The title "The Right Honourable" constitutionally denotes membership in the , a formal advisory body to the sovereign that promulgates Orders in Council and Proclamations, thereby operationalizing executive prerogatives in . This role ensures the continuity of monarchical functions within ary systems, where the Council's collective endorsement formalizes decisions that bind the state, independent of transient ministerial tenures. Traditionally, Privy Counsellors, bearing the title for life upon appointment for distinguished service, embody an institutional hierarchy that prioritizes accumulated expertise over electoral mandates, fostering deliberative stability amid political flux. In Westminster-derived systems, the title's persistence underscores a meritocratic signaling mechanism, wherein elevation reflects substantive contributions to rather than popular acclaim, thereby mitigating risks of populist disruption to long-term coherence. Empirical patterns in parliamentary democracies indicate that such entrenched advisory structures correlate with executive durability, as evidenced by lower cabinet turnover and sustained legislative cohesion compared to more fluid presidential alternatives. This causal linkage arises from the Council's capacity to aggregate cross-partisan wisdom, preserving constitutional equilibria against short-term ideological swings. The traditional invocation of the title in ceremonial and advisory contexts reinforces hierarchical norms essential for resilience, where non-elective roles provide ballast against democratic volatility. By embedding recognition of service within the polity's fabric, it sustains a framework wherein advisory input draws from historical precedents, promoting causal continuity in processes unbound by electoral cycles.

Criticisms, Reforms, and Abolitions

Criticisms of the style "The Right Honourable" have primarily emanated from republican movements in former British colonies, portraying it as a vestige of imperial hierarchy incompatible with modern egalitarian ideals. In Ireland, following the of 1921 and the establishment of the in 1922, the was abolished, thereby terminating the entitlement to the "Right Honourable" prefix for its members, as part of broader efforts to sever ties with British monarchical traditions. Similarly, in during the 1990s, republican advocates, including figures like Paul , argued during the lead-up to the 1999 referendum that retaining such honorifics alongside the perpetuated colonial symbolism, though the referendum's failure to establish a republic preserved their usage for officials like the and Privy Counsellors. These critiques often frame the title as an anachronistic marker of , yet empirical persistence in realms like the and suggests limited causal impact from anti-hierarchical rhetoric on its abolition. Reform efforts have been sporadic and regionally varied, with some jurisdictions expanding lifetime usage while others curtailed similar honorifics. In New Zealand, amendments effective from 2010 granted the style "The Right Honourable" for life to former Governors-General, such as Sir Anand Satyanand on 2 August 2010, reflecting a deliberate retention and extension of traditional privileges amid ongoing monarchical ties. Conversely, in Canada's British Columbia, a 2019 legislative repeal ended a program granting lifetime "Honourable" titles to former premiers, cabinet ministers, and speakers, prompted by concerns over elitism and taxpayer-funded pomp, though this applied to the lesser "Honourable" rather than "Right Honourable" and did not affect federal usage where Prime Ministers retain the prefix for life. In the United Kingdom, resignations from the Privy Council—entitling members to "The Right Honourable"—have elicited notable emotional responses; former Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott resigned in July 2013 over disagreements on press regulation, decrying the Council's politicization, while earlier cases like the 2013 backlash against a member's alleged dishonesty highlighted personal dismay at forfeiting the lifelong honorific. Despite these challenges, no comprehensive abolitions have occurred in core realms, where the title endures for privy councillors, prime ministers, and governors-general, underscoring a resilience rooted in institutional continuity rather than deference to egalitarian pressures. Canadian policy discussions, such as those in the 1960s Nickle Resolution debates and later reviews, have contemplated restricting titular honors but ultimately preserved "Right Honourable" for high offices without endorsing abolition. This pattern aligns with causal observations that formal traditions like the prefix serve functional roles in protocol and , outlasting ideological critiques absent structural overhauls like republican transitions.

References

  1. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7460/
  2. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/titles-included-in-passports/titles-accessible
  3. https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-information-office/g07.pdf
  4. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7460/CBP-7460.pdf
  5. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/privy-council
  6. https://erskinemay.parliament.uk/section/4875/modes-of-address-to-other-members
  7. https://www.parliament.uk/documents/rules-of-behaviour.pdf
  8. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199798/cmselect/cmmodern/600iv/md0404.htm
  9. https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Honourable
  10. https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/about-us/law-historic-governance/the-mayoralty
  11. https://elizabethan.org/compendium/13.html
  12. https://www.ourcommons.ca/marleaumontpetit/DocumentViewer.aspx?Language=E&Print=2&Sec=Ch01&Seq=8
  13. https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/protocol-guidelines-special-event/styles-address.html
  14. https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/C332960
  15. https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstreams/8d6c983d-5f77-4649-8d03-1bafe9f90a0e/download
  16. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1931/4/pdfs/ukpga_19310004_en.pdf
  17. https://thecommonwealth.org/london-declaration-1949
  18. https://debretts.com/what-is-the-privy-council/
  19. https://www.thegazette.co.uk/awards-and-accreditation/content/103823
  20. https://www.regencyhistory.net/blog/regency-etiquette-address-duke-marquess-other-titles
  21. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld/ldcomp/compso2013/2013co06.htm
  22. https://www.ourcommons.ca/About/ProcedureAndPractice3rdEdition/ch_01_2-e.html
  23. https://privycouncil.independent.gov.uk/the-privy-council/
  24. https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/could-a-life-peerage-be-created-without-a-seat-in-the-lords-2/
  25. https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/lords-library/hlllifepeeragesact1958.pdf
  26. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/LLN-2018-0035/LLN-2018-0035.pdf
  27. https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/hereditary-peers-in-the-house-of-lords/
  28. https://members.parliament.uk/parties/lords
  29. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/mar/14/labour-hereditary-peers-clung-on-26-years-house-lords
  30. https://www.york.gov.uk/downloads/file/9612/civic-protocol-2024-to-2025
  31. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-18115555
  32. https://yorkcivictrust.co.uk/heritage/civic-trust-plaques/mansion-house/
  33. https://www.londonmuseum.org.uk/collections/v/object-94355/the-right-honourable-robert-waithman-lord-mayor-of-london-1823-24/
  34. https://www.edinburghlordprovost.com/news/article/30/lord-provost-appointed
  35. https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/privy-council/
  36. https://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1754-1790/survey/iv-house-commons
  37. https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/protocol-guidelines-special-event/table-titles-canada.html
  38. https://www.peacemakers.ca/research/Canada/FormsOfAddress.html
  39. https://www.dpmc.govt.nz/our-programmes/new-zealand-royal-honours/new-zealand-royal-honours-system/types-new-zealand-royal-honours/the-right-honourable
  40. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/changes-rules-around-use-title
  41. https://www.dpmc.govt.nz/our-programmes/new-zealand-royal-honours/new-zealand-royal-honours-system/types-new-zealand-royal-honours/the-right-honourable/the-right-honourable-in-new-zealand
  42. https://gg.govt.nz/office-governor-general/contacting-governor-general/guidance-writing-governor-general
  43. https://www.royal.uk/announcement-new-governor-general-new-zealand-1
  44. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/House_of_Representatives/Powers_practice_and_procedure/Practice7/HTML/Chapter5/Member%27s_titles
  45. https://australianpolitics.com/parliament/general/honourable-members-what-to-call-politicians/
  46. https://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/-/media/Project/Parliament/Documents/Members/Retention-of-the-title-Honourable-in-the-SA-Parliament.pdf
  47. https://www.stylemanual.gov.au/grammar-punctuation-and-conventions/titles-honours-forms-address/parliaments-and-councils
  48. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/23600/framing.pdf
  49. https://www.kln.gov.my/web/are_abu-dhabi/news-from-mission/-/blogs/list-of-new-malaysian-cabinet-minister
  50. https://zairilcom.wordpress.com/2012/11/13/whats-in-a-title/
  51. https://www.dailyexpress.com.my/read/5017/constitution-based-on-westminster-model/
  52. https://dapmalaysia.org/en/malaysias-democracy/
  53. https://health.gov.ag/prime-minister-gaston-browne-meets-prime-minister-of-tanzania-and-baroness-scotland-at-cop29/
  54. https://opm.gov.bs/prime-minister-davis-right-honourable-j-henry-bostwick-tribute/
  55. https://www.fao.org/director-general/news/details/Read-out-of-the-FAO-Director-General-s-meeting-with-The-Right-Honourable-Philip-Joseph-Pierre-Prime-Minister-and-Minister-for-Finance-Economic-Development-and-the-Youth-Economy-of-Saint-Lucia-/en
  56. https://sidsdock.org/grenadas-prime-minister-receives-excellency-in-leadership-award/
  57. https://opm.gov.jm/1-devon-rd/protocol/how-to-address-the-head-of-government/
  58. https://opm.gov.jm/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Modes-of-Address.pdf
  59. https://kingshouse.gov.jm/
  60. https://www.gg.gov.bs/government-house
  61. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/lesotho/remarks-right-honourable-prime-minister-mr-samuel-ntsokoane-matekane-during-signing-ceremony-three_en
  62. https://ls.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/lstjj/wxfg/201507/t20150707_7046512.htm
  63. https://parliament.gov.sz/about/pm/
  64. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/ESWATINI_cop29cmp19cma6_HLS_ENG.pdf
  65. https://tribuneonlineng.com/remembering-tafawa-balewa-the-right-honourable-gentleman/
  66. https://www.facebook.com/Parliament.of.Ghana/posts/throwback-thursday-the-right-honourablesir-emmanuel-charles-quist-esq-obe-kbe-18/1270569490049762/
  67. https://mfa.gov.gh/index.php/ghana-addresses-the-25th-commonwealth-foreign-affairs-ministers-meeting/
  68. https://www.thepresidency.gov.za/node?_e=&page=192
  69. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1922/act/1/enacted/en/print
  70. https://www.dailymirror.lk/opinion/how-honourable-are-the-honourable-few/172-18617
  71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/311593
  72. https://www.nytimes.com/1972/05/23/archives/ceylon-becomes-the-socialist-republic-of-sri-lanka.html
  73. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002088176400600405
  74. https://education.cfr.org/learn/reading/how-did-decolonization-reshape-world
  75. https://www.nationalgalleries.org/art-and-artists/31508/right-honourable-warren-hastings-1732-1818-governor-general-india
  76. https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/general-the-right-honourable-louis-botha-pc-premier-of-the-union-of-south-africa-19101919-214010
  77. https://worldleaders.columbia.edu/directory/sharma-oli
  78. https://www.senado.es/web/composicionorganizacion/organossenado/presidente/eleccionfunciones/index.html?lang=en
  79. https://www.justice.org.uk/reports/the-constitutional-role-of-the-privy-council-and-the-prerogative
  80. https://www.bu.edu/sthacker/files/2012/01/Are-Parliamentary-Systems-Better.pdf
  81. https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/sites/projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/piep/files/dewanspirling_dec2010.pdf
  82. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-34458190
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.