Hubbry Logo
Ring ouzelRing ouzelMain
Open search
Ring ouzel
Community hub
Ring ouzel
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ring ouzel
Ring ouzel
Ring ouzel
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Ring ouzel
Black bird with a white crescent on its breast
Male T. t. torquatus in Spain
Blackish bird with a pale grey crescent on its breast
  • Female T. t. torquatus in Spain
  • Bird's call
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Order: Passeriformes
Family: Turdidae
Genus: Turdus
Species:
T. torquatus
Binomial name
Turdus torquatus
Approximate range with subspecies

The ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) is a mainly European member of the thrush family Turdidae. It is a medium-sized thrush, 23–24 centimetres (9.1–9.4 in) in length and weighing 90–138 grams (3.2–4.9 oz). The male is predominantly black with a conspicuous white crescent across its breast. Females are browner and duller than males, and young birds may lack the pale chest markings altogether. In all but the northernmost part of its range, this is a high-altitude species, with three subspecies breeding in mountains from Ireland east to Iran. It breeds in open mountain areas with some trees or shrubs, the latter often including juniper and other treeline conifers, rowan, bilberry, heather, and hairy alpenrose. It is a migratory bird, leaving the breeding areas to winter in southern Europe, North Africa and Turkey, typically in mountains with junipers. The typical clutch is 3–6 brown-flecked pale blue or greenish-blue eggs. They are incubated almost entirely by the female, with hatching normally occurring after 13 days. The altricial, downy chicks fledge in another 14 days and are dependent on their parents for about 12 days after fledging.

The ring ouzel is omnivorous, eating invertebrates, particularly insects and earthworms, some small vertebrates, and a wide range of fruit. Most animal prey is caught on the ground. During spring migration and the breeding season, invertebrates dominate the adult's diet and are also fed to the chicks. Later in the year, fruit becomes more important, particularly the common juniper.

With an extensive range and a large population, the ring ouzel is evaluated as least concern by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). There are signs of decline in several countries; suspected causes including climate change, human disturbance, hunting and outdoor leisure activities. Loss of junipers may also be a factor in some areas. Natural hazards include predation by mammalian carnivores and birds of prey, and locally there may also be competition from other large thrushes such as the common blackbird, mistle thrush and fieldfare.

Etymology

[edit]

"Ouzel" is an old name for the common blackbird, the word being cognate with the German Amsel.[2] "Ouzel" may also be applied to a group of superficially similar but more distantly related birds, the dippers, the European representative of which is sometimes known as the water ouzel.[3] "Ring Ouzel" was first used by John Ray in his 1674 Collection of English Words not Generally Used and became established with his 1678 book The Ornithology of Francis Willughby of Middleton in the County of Warwick.[4][5][6] As with the English term, the scientific name also refers to the male's prominent white neck crescent, being derived from the Latin words turdus, "thrush", and torquatus, "collared".[7] Old and local names for the ring ouzel include "fell blackbird", "hill blackbird", "moor blackbird", "rock ouzel"[8] and "mountain blackbird".[9]

Taxonomy

[edit]

The ring ouzel was first described by Carl Linnaeus under its current scientific name in his 1758 10th edition of Systema Naturae.[10] He noted earlier descriptions by Francis Willughby and Eleazar Albin, both of whom gave it the name Merula torquata.[11][a]

There are 104 species of medium to large thrushes in the genus Turdus.[13][14] They are characterised by rounded heads, medium or longish pointed wings, and usually melodious songs.[15]

A 2020 study of the genetics of Turdus[14] suggested that the genus arose about 9.37 million years ago (Mya), expanding out of Africa around 7.2 Mya, and diverging into Palearctic and Oriental groups about 5.7 Mya. Further radiation from Africa to the Americas followed at about 5.3 Mya. Details of the study suggest that the ring ouzel, a member of the Eurasian group, may be more closely related to Naumann's and dusky thrushes than to the superficially more similar common blackbird.[14]

Subspecies

[edit]

The ring ouzel has three recognised subspecies:[13][16]

Image Scientific name Distribution Identification

Cairngorm, Scotland		 T. t. torquatus
Linnaeus, 1758		 Breeds Ireland (rare), Great Britain to Scandinavia and the far northwest of Russia; winters from Spain south to northwest Africa and the Canary Islands Black plumage with moderate pale fringes

Hohe Tauern, Austria		 T. t. alpestris
(C. L. Brehm, 1831)[17]		 Breeds in the mountains of Iberia, the Pyrenees, the Alps, the Carpathians, and the Balkan Mountains, and with small outlying populations in the Atlas Mountains of Algeria, the Haut Vosges of Belgium, and the higher hills of northern Germany; winters in northern Africa, southern Europe and southern Turkey All body feathering with strong pale fringes, giving a very 'scaly' appearance

Artashavan, Armenia		 T. t. amicorum
E. Hartert, 1923[18]		 Breeds in central and eastern Turkey east through the Caucasus and Elburz Mountains to Turkmenistan; winters mainly in Iran and parts of Iraq Blackest plumage with minimal pale fringing on the body feathers, but with very strong pale wing panel

Analysis of mitochondrial DNA samples from across Europe suggests that this species had a much broader distribution after the Last Glacial Period that ended about 11,700 years ago than it does now.[19]

Description

[edit]

The ring ouzel is 23–24 centimetres (9.1–9.4 in) in length and weighs 90–138 grams (3.2–4.9 oz). The plumage of the male of the nominate race is entirely black except for a conspicuous white crescent on the breast, narrow greyish scaling on the upperparts and belly and pale edges to the wing feathers. The bill is yellow and the legs are greyish brown. The female resembles the male but is browner and with a duller breast band. Juveniles are like the female, but with a faint or non-existent breast crescent.[16]

The pale breast marking makes adults of this species unmistakeable; first-winter males also sometimes show a pale crescent. Other young ouzels can be confused with the common blackbird, but always show a paler wing panel than that species.[20]

Males of T. t. alpestris have broader white scalloping (repeated small curves) on their underparts than T. t. torquatus, giving a distinctly scaly appearance below. The wing panel is also paler than in the nominate subspecies. Females are much as the nominate race, but with broad white fringes on the chin and throat.[21] Males of T. t. amicorum have the largest and whitest breast band of the three subspecies, and the broader white edges and tips of the wing feathers form a distinctive whitish panel in the wing. Females have narrow white fringes on their underparts.[21] Adult ring ouzels undergo a complete moult after breeding from late June to early September, before their autumn migration. Juveniles have a partial moult between July and September, replacing their head, body and wing covert feathers.[21]

Voice

[edit]

The male ring ouzel sings from a low perch or occasionally in flight. The song consists of a repetition of 2–4 plaintive fluty notes, tri-ríí, tri-ríí, ti-ríí with pauses between repeats. The call is a loud tac-tac-tac, becoming harsher if the bird is alarmed. The contact call is a soft cherrr in flight.[16] Males sing most frequently at dawn and sunset.[21]

Distribution and habitat

[edit]

The ring ouzel breeds discontinuously across western and northern Europe from north-west Ireland through Scandinavia to northwest Russia, and in mountains across central southern Europe from the Pyrenees through the Alps, the Balkans, Greece and Turkey east to Turkmenistan.[1] In 2014, breeding was recorded on the Timan Ridge, Arkhangelsk Oblast, about 300 kilometres (190 mi) further east than previously known breeding sites in north Russia.[16]

The species is migratory, birds leaving the breeding areas in September and October. Birds of the nominate subspecies winter in southern Spain and northwest Africa. Central European populations of T. t. alpestris move to higher elevations initially before moving south or southwest through the Swiss Alps; some two weeks later migrants of the nominate form pass through the same area to winter in the south of the breeding range or around the Mediterranean. Eastern alpestris ouzels migrate through the Balkans and Turkey. T. t. amoricus moves south to Egypt and neighbouring areas. The return migration is mainly in March and April, the males arriving some days before the females. Northern breeders arrive later, and in the mountains, some birds may ascend in stages as the snow melts.[16] Many birds stop off at traditional well-grazed grassland locations in both spring and autumn.[22]

The ring ouzel is extinct in Latvia and occurs only on migration in Denmark. It is a passage migrant in Syria and a vagrant to Iceland, Jordan, the Arabian Peninsula, Sudan, Kazakhstan, Mauritania, Svalbard and Jan Mayen.[1] In the Atlantic, it is a regular winter visitor to the Canary Islands but a rarity in the Azores and Madeira.[16]

In middle latitudes, the ring ouzel is a bird of continental mountains, but in the north of its range, it is found in coastal uplands. It can cope with wind and rain but avoids ice and snow. Nominate T. t. torquatus is usually found on open moorland with a few stunted trees above 250 metres (820 ft), and reaching 1,200 metres (3,900 ft) in Scotland and northern Europe.[23] In Switzerland, ring ouzels breed on rugged upland slopes with heather, conifers, beech or hairy alpenrose at 1,100–1,300 metres (3,600–4,300 ft),[16][23] although in Turkey birds are found from sea level to 1,500 metres (4,900 ft).[21] In Armenia and the Caucasus, it occupies similar steep habitat with conifer stands, rhododendron thickets, and juniper scrub and shrub, from sea level to 2,000–3,000 metres (6,600–9,800 ft).[16]

In northwest Africa ring ouzels winter in juniper forest at 1,800–2,200 metres (5,900–7,200 ft), often near rivers or ponds. On migration, ouzels may occur on coastal grassland and steep hillsides with short, unsown wild grass and sparse scrub.[16]

Behaviour

[edit]

The ring ouzel is territorial and normally seen alone or in pairs, although loose flocks may form on migration. When not breeding, several birds may be loosely associated in good feeding areas, such as a fruiting tree, often with other thrushes such as song thrushes or redwings. The ouzel's flight is direct, and birds often perch on rocks or heather clumps.[21]

Breeding

[edit]
Three greenish eggs
Eggs in collection of Museum Wiesbaden

Ring ouzels nest from mid-April to mid-July in the Alps and the British Isles, and from May to August in Scandinavia. Territories may be strung out along streams, 160–200 metres (520–660 ft) apart and the ranges may overlap, but this species does not form breeding colonies. The nest, built by the female, is a cup of leaves, dry grass and other plant material consolidated with mud. In the west of the range nests are almost always built on the ground, but T. t. alpestris may also nest in a small tree or scrub at an average height of 3.5 metres (11 ft).[16][21]

The clutch is 3–6 pale blue or greenish-blue eggs flecked with reddish-brown.[16] The eggs are 30 mm × 22 mm (1.18 in × 0.87 in) in size and weigh 7.4 grams (0.26 oz) of which 6% is shell. Incubation is almost always by the female, hatching typically occurring after 13 days. The altricial, downy chicks fledge in another 14 days.[24] The young are dependent on their parents for about 12 days after fledging.[16]

Adults breed after their first year and their average lifespan is two years, although nine years has been recorded.[24] There may be two broods, especially in the south of the range,[21] although triple-brooding is rare. This species is philopatric, returning to the same area to breed each year.[25] Around 36% of juveniles survive their first year, while the annual survival rate for adults is 47% for males and 37% for females. The main causes of death in northwest Europe are predation (9%), accidental human-related incidents (10%), and hunting, mainly in France (77%).[16]

Diet

[edit]
A large bird of prey in flight
Juniper berries are a favoured winter food item.

The ring ouzel is omnivorous, eating a wide range of insects, earthworms, small amphibians and reptiles and fruit. Most animal prey is caught on the ground.[21]

During spring migration and the breeding season, invertebrates dominate the diet, and include earthworms, beetles flies, ants, spiders and snails. Later in the year, fruit becomes more important, including bramble, strawberry, cherry, hawthorn, rowan and juniper.[16] Where it is available common juniper makes up more than 90% of the ring ouzel's winter diet, with arthropods constituting most of the rest. As a result, the ring ouzel is an important vector for dispersing juniper seeds,[26] and is key to the dispersal of the endemic Canary Islands juniper in the Canary Islands.[27]

The young are mainly fed invertebrates, caterpillars and earthworms being major items where available. Although birds migrating in autumn use similar habitat to that used in spring, seasonal berries make up most of their diet, particularly elderberries, haws and, where available, juniper berries.[16]

Predators and parasites

[edit]
The common buzzard is a predator of ring ouzels.

Predators of the ring ouzel include the tawny owl, long-eared owl,[28] common buzzard, common kestrel and Eurasian sparrowhawk, least weasel and stoat. Most deaths are of young juveniles, and birds hatched early in the season are more likely to survive than later broods.[29] A Scottish study showed that raptors were responsible for 59% of deaths and mammals for 27%. In Romania, eggs were taken by red squirrels and spotted nutcrackers.[16] As with other Turdus thrushes, the ring ouzel is rarely a host of the common cuckoo, a brood parasite. If the thrush's nest cup is too deep for the cuckoo to evict the host's chicks, the young cuckoo cannot successfully compete for food with the fast-growing host species' chicks, and if the cuckoo does manage to expel its nest-mates, the parents are reluctant to feed it; either way, the young cuckoo will starve.[30]

A study in the Carpathian Mountains found that a significant proportion of ring ouzels carried trombiculid mites. These mites commonly infect ground-feeding birds, and heavy infestations can cause birds to lose condition and stop feeding.[31] The hard-bodied tick Ixodes festai commonly parasitises thrushes, including the ring ouzel.[32] There is a record of this species carrying a Haemoproteus blood parasite.[33]

Status and conservation

[edit]

The ring ouzel has an extensive range, estimated at 9.17 million square kilometres (3.54 million sq mi), and a large population, estimated at 600,000–2 million individuals in Europe (which comprises 95% of the breeding range). The species is not believed to approach the thresholds for the population decline criteria of the IUCN Red List (i.e., declining more than 30% in ten years or three generations), and is therefore evaluated as least concern. The breeding population in Europe was estimated to be 299,000–598,000 pairs in 2019.[1]

There are signs of decline in several countries. Its decline in Ireland in recent years has been striking, with regular breeding now confined to two counties. Suspected causes include climate change, human disturbance, hunting and outdoor leisure activities. Loss of junipers may be a factor in southern Spain and north-west Africa, as may upland forestation in the UK. There may also be competition from larger thrushes like the common blackbird, mistle thrush and fieldfare.[1] A Scottish study suggested that sites at higher altitudes and with a good cover of heather were less likely to have been deserted by breeding ring ouzels than lower or more open locations.[34]

In the Alps, the density of breeding pairs can reach 60–80 per square kilometre (160–210/sq mi) but is generally much lower with 37 per square kilometre (96/sq mi) in Haute-Savoie, 22 per square kilometre (57/sq mi) in the Jura Mountains, and 8 per square kilometre (21/sq mi) in more open habitats in Britain.[16]

Explanatory notes

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e BirdLife International. (2019) [amended version of 2018 assessment]. "Turdus torquatus". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2019 e.T22708768A155629409. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2018-2.RLTS.T22708768A155629409.en. Retrieved 2021-06-14.
  2. ^ Lockwood (1984) p. 112.
  3. ^ Lockwood (1984) p. 162.
  4. ^ Lockwood (1984) p. 129.
  5. ^ Ray, John (1674). Collection of English Words not Generally Used. London: John Martyn. p. 86. Archived from the original on 2021-08-14. Retrieved 2021-05-04.
  6. ^ Willughby, Francis; Ray, John (1678). The Ornithology of Francis Willughby of Middleton in the County of Warwick. London: H. Bruges. pp. 24, 194–195 and 187. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.63683.
  7. ^ Jobling, James A (2010). The Helm Dictionary of Scientific Bird Names. London: Christopher Helm. pp. 388, 393. ISBN 978-1-4081-2501-4.
  8. ^ Lockwood (1984) p. 61.
  9. ^ Harvie-Brown, John A; Cordeaux, John (1880). "Report on the migration of birds in the autumn of 1879". The Zoologist. Series 3. 4: 161–204 (165). Archived from the original on 2021-08-14. Retrieved 2021-03-13.
  10. ^ Linnaeus, Carl (1758). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata (in Latin). Vol. 1. Holmiae. (Laurentii Salvii). p. 170. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.542. Archived from the original on 2021-04-10. Retrieved 2021-04-06. T. nigricans, torque albo, rostro fiavescente.
  11. ^ Albin, Eleazar; Derham, William (1731). A Natural History of Birds: Illustrated with a Hundred and One Copper Plates, Curiously Engraven from the Life. Vol. 1. London: Printed for the author and sold by William Innys. p. 37, Plate 37. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.62897. Archived from the original on 2021-08-14. Retrieved 2021-04-06.
  12. ^ Polaszek, Andrew (2010). Systema Naturae 250 – The Linnaean Ark. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. p. 34. ISBN 978-1-4200-9502-9.
  13. ^ a b "Thrushes – IOC World Bird List". IOC World Bird List – Version 14.2. 2025-02-20. Retrieved 2025-05-13.
  14. ^ a b c Batista, Romina; Olsson, Urban; Andermann, Tobias; Aleixo, Alexandre; Ribas, Camila Cherem; Antonelli, Alexandre (2020). "Phylogenomics and biogeography of the world's thrushes (Aves, Turdus): new evidence for a more parsimonious evolutionary history". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 287 (1919) 20192400. doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.2400. PMC 7015335. PMID 31964299.
  15. ^ Clement (2000) pp. 36–37.
  16. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Collar, Nigel; Christie, David A (2020). del Hoyo, Josep; Elliott, Andrew; Sargatal, Jordi; Christie, David A; de Juana, Eduardo (eds.). "Ring Ouzel (Turdus torquatus), version 1.0". Birds of the World. Ithaca, New York: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. doi:10.2173/bow.rinouz1.01. S2CID 241353806.
  17. ^ Brehm, C L (1831). Handbuch der Naturgeschichte aller Vogel Deutschlands (in German). Ilmenau: Voigt. pp. 377–378. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.169254. Archived from the original on 2021-06-09. Retrieved 2021-02-24.
  18. ^ Hartert, Ernst (1923). Die Vögel der paläarktischen Fauna. Systematische Übersicht der in Europa, Nord-Asien und der Mittelmeerregion vorkommenden Vögel. Nachtrag I (in German). Berlin: R. Friedlander & Sohn. p. 57.
  19. ^ Bacht, Michael; Rösner, Sascha; Müller, Jörg; Pfeifer, Robert; Stadler, Jutta; Brandl, Roland; Opgenoorth, Lars (2013). "Are Ring Ouzel (Turdus torquatus) populations of the low mountain ranges remnants of a broader distribution in the past?". Journal of Ornithology. 154 (1): 231–237. Bibcode:2013JOrni.154..231B. doi:10.1007/s10336-012-0889-0. S2CID 254157782.
  20. ^ Svensson, Lars; Mullarney, Killian; Zetterstrom, Dan; Grant, Peter (2010). Birds of Europe (2nd ed.). London: Collins. p. 296. ISBN 978-0-00-726726-2.
  21. ^ a b c d e f g h i Clement (2000) pp. 346–349.
  22. ^ Leverton, Roy (1993). "Migrant Ring Ouzels at a stopover site on the South Downs" (PDF). British Birds. 86 (6): 253–266. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-04-16. Retrieved 2021-04-16.
  23. ^ a b Snow, David; Perrins, Christopher M, eds. (1998). The Birds of the Western Palearctic concise edition. Vol. 2 Passerines. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 1212–1215. ISBN 0-19-854099-X.
  24. ^ a b "Ring Ouzel Turdus torquatus [Linnaeus, 1758]". BTOWeb BirdFacts. British Trust for Ornithology. Archived from the original on 2019-05-13. Retrieved 2021-03-07.
  25. ^ Sim, Innes M W; Rebecca, Graham W; Wilkinson, Nicholas I (2012). "Frequency of multiple brooding in Ring Ouzels, including first documented cases of triple brooding". Bird Study. 59 (3): 358–362. Bibcode:2012BirdS..59..358S. doi:10.1080/00063657.2012.707637. S2CID 83528323.
  26. ^ Zamora, Regino (1990). "The fruit diet of ring-ouzels (Turdus torquatus) wintering in the Sierra Nevada (South-East Spain)". Alauda. 58 (1): 67–70.
  27. ^ Rumeu, Beatriz; Padilla, David P (2010). "The key role of a Ring Ouzel Turdus torquatus wintering population in seed dispersal of the endangered endemic Juniperus cedrus in an insular environment". Acta Ornithologica. 44 (2): 199–204. doi:10.3161/000164509X482786. hdl:10498/30572. S2CID 84868622.
  28. ^ Yalden, D W (1985). "Dietary separation of owls in the Peak District". Bird Study. 32 (2): 122–131. Bibcode:1985BirdS..32..122Y. doi:10.1080/00063658509476867.
  29. ^ Sim, Innes M W; Ludwig, Sonja C; Grant, Murray C; Loughrey, Joanna L; Rebecca, Graham W; Reid, Jane M (2013). "Postfledging survival, movements, and dispersal of Ring Ouzels (Turdus torquatus)". The Auk. 130 (1): 69–77. doi:10.1525/auk.2012.12008. hdl:2164/3367. S2CID 54722381. Archived from the original on 2021-04-24. Retrieved 2021-04-24.
  30. ^ Grim, Tomáš; Samaš, Peter; Moskát, Csaba; Kleven, Oddmund; Honza, Marcel; Moksnes5, Arne; Røskaft, Eivin; Stokke, Bård G (2011). "Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts?". Journal of Animal Ecology. 80 (3): 508–518. Bibcode:2011JAnEc..80..508G. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01798.x. PMID 21244420.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  31. ^ Literák, I; Honza, M; Pinowska, B; Haman, A (2001). "Larvae of trombiculid mites (Acarina: Trombiculidae) in wild birds in Slovak and Polish Carpathians" (PDF). Acta Veterinaria Brno. 70 (4): 479–483. doi:10.2754/avb200170040479. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-07-21. Retrieved 2021-03-09.
  32. ^ Contini, C; Palmas, C; Seu, V; Stancampiano, L; Usai, F (2011). "Redescription of the male of Ixodes festai Rondelli, 1926 (Ixodida: Ixodidae) on specimens from Sardinia (Italy)". Parasite. 18 (3): 235–240. doi:10.1051/parasite/2011183235. PMC 3671470. PMID 21894264.
  33. ^ Dimitrov, Dimitar; Zehtindjiev, Pavel; Bensch, Staffan (2010). "Genetic diversity of avian blood parasites in SE Europe:Cytochrome b lineages of the genera Plasmodium and Haemoproteus (Haemosporida) from Bulgaria". Acta Parasitologica. 55 (3): 201–209. doi:10.2478/s11686-010-0029-z.
  34. ^ Sim, Innes M W; Burfield, Ian J; Grant, Murray C; Pearce-Higgins, James W; Brooke, M de L (2007). "The role of habitat composition in determining breeding site occupancy in a declining Ring Ouzel Turdus torquatus population". Ibis. 149 (2): 374–385. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00655.x.

Cited texts

[edit]
  • Clement, Peter; Hathway, Ren; Wilczur, Jan (2000). Thrushes. Helm Identification Guides. London: Christopher Helm. ISBN 0-7136-3940-7.
  • Lockwood, W B (1984). Oxford Book of British Bird Names. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-214155-4.
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ring ouzel

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) is a medium-sized thrush in the family Turdidae, measuring 23–24 cm in length and weighing 95–130 g, distinguished by the adult male's glossy black plumage, yellow bill, and prominent white crescent across the breast. Females exhibit duller brownish-black upperparts with a narrower, greyish throat band, while juveniles are speckled below. This primarily European species breeds in upland and mountainous habitats, including rocky slopes with heather, conifers, and shrubs, from Scandinavia to the Caucasus, and undertakes long-distance migration to winter in juniper-dominated mountains of southern Europe, North Africa, and Turkey. During the breeding season, it forages on the ground for invertebrates such as earthworms, insects, and snails, shifting to berries and fruits post-breeding. Classified as Least Concern globally by the IUCN due to its large range and stable population estimates of 600,000–1,200,000 mature individuals, the ring ouzel faces localized declines in regions like the UK from habitat loss, climate change, and increased predation.

Taxonomy and nomenclature

Etymology

The common name ring ouzel combines "ring," alluding to the male's conspicuous white crescent-shaped band across the breast resembling a collar or necklace, with "ouzel," an obsolete English term for the common blackbird (Turdus merula), derived from Old English ōsle (also spelled osle), from Proto-West Germanic \ą̄slā or amslā, ultimately from Proto-Germanic \amslǭ and linked to Proto-Indo-European *h₂ems-, denoting blackness or a blackbird. This usage of "ouzel" for dark thrushes persisted into the early modern period, distinguishing the ring ouzel from the plainer blackbird while emphasizing its predominantly sooty-black plumage. The binomial Turdus torquatus, established by in (10th edition, 1758), employs Turdus, the classical Latin generic name for thrushes, and the specific epithet torquatus, a past participle adjective meaning "provided with a " or "collared," from Latin torques (a twisted ornament or , derived from torquēre, "to twist"). This nomenclature directly references the same diagnostic white , underscoring the bird's superficial resemblance to a blackbird adorned with a pale ring.

Taxonomy

The ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) is a species of true thrush described by in the 10th edition of Systema Naturae published on 1 October 1758. This binomial name places it in the genus Turdus, which encompasses approximately 65 species of mainly thrushes characterized by their spotted juvenile plumage and melodious songs, though T. torquatus exhibits adaptations for montane habitats in the Palearctic. The species belongs to the family Turdidae, a group of about 170 species of birds known as thrushes, chats, and allies, distinguished by their insectivorous and frugivorous diets, upright posture, and often strong legs for terrestrial foraging. Turdidae is nested within the oscine suborder Passeriformes, the largest avian order comprising over 6,000 species adapted for perching and song production via a specialized . Phylogenetic studies confirm Turdus torquatus forms a monophyletic clade within Turdus, supported by haplotypes clustering distinctly from congeners like the (T. merula), with no evidence of hybridization elevating it to status. Taxonomic placement remains stable, with no recent proposals for elevation to full or separation, as molecular analyses align its morphology and vocalizations firmly within core Turdidae rather than peripheral genera like Monticola or Zoothera.

Subspecies

The ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) is classified into three , distinguished primarily by geographic distribution and subtle variations in coloration, basing, and the width of the white crescent. The nominate subspecies, T. t. torquatus, breeds across , western Britain, western and northern , and northwestern eastward to the and recently the northern Timan Mountains in ; it winters in and northwestern . This form exhibits darker, more sooty-black upperparts and flanks in adults, with minimal white feather bases on the belly and undertail coverts, and a narrower, sometimes smudged white breast crescent compared to southern populations. T. t. alpestris occupies montane regions from the northern , through to the Carpathians, , , and western Asia Minor, with possible breeding in northern (e.g., ); wintering occurs in , , and southern . It is paler grey-black overall, particularly in first-year females, with broader white shaft-streaks on undertail coverts, white bases visible on flank and belly feathers (more pronounced in juveniles), and a more uniform white breast crescent in adults. T. t. amicorum breeds in central and eastern (east from the Taurus Range), the , northern Iran's Elburz Mountains, and southwestern Turkmenistan's Kopet Dag; it winters in central and , parts of , and occasionally the or . This subspecies resembles alpestris in paleness but features an even broader and more extensive white breast band.
SubspeciesBreeding RangeKey Distinctions
T. t. torquatus, W Britain, Scandinavia, NW Darker sooty-black; narrow/smudged crescent; minimal white feather bases
T. t. alpestrisN Iberia, C to , W Asia MinorPaler grey-black; broader white crescent; white bases on flanks/undertail
T. t. amicorumC/E , , N , SW Similar to alpestris but broader band

Physical characteristics

Morphology and plumage

The ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) is a medium-sized member of the thrush family, measuring 23–24 cm in total length, with a wingspan of 38–42 cm and an average body mass of 90–138 g. Its build resembles that of the (Turdus merula), featuring a slender, slightly decurved yellow bill tipped with black in adults, relatively long wings suited for migration, and strong legs colored dull orange-brown for terrestrial foraging. Adult males of the nominate subspecies (T. t. torquatus) display glossy black overall, accented by a bold white crescent-shaped band across the upper breast, narrow greyish scaling on the mantle and flanks (sometimes absent on the upperparts), and pale fringes on the outer secondaries that form a subtle panel in flight. The bill is bright yellow with a prominent black culmen tip, and the iris is dark brown. Females are duller and browner than males, particularly on the head, , back, and scapulars, with more extensive grey-brown scaling on the body feathers and a narrower, less sharply defined whitish or pale breastband. Juveniles closely resemble females but exhibit buffy-white spots and streaks on the upperparts, , and flanks, providing cryptic patterning against rocky substrates. In worn , scaling becomes more pronounced across all ages, especially outside the breeding season. Subspecies vary subtly in plumage intensity and breastband characteristics; for instance, T. t. alpestris males are darker with reduced scaling and a narrower, often greyish breast crescent, while T. t. amicorum shows intermediate traits with slightly paler underparts. These differences reflect geographic clines rather than discrete boundaries, with northern populations generally possessing broader white bands.

Vocalizations

The song of the ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) is primarily delivered by males during the breeding season, often from an elevated perch such as a rock or , or occasionally during short song flights. It consists of a series of short, fluty phrases, each typically comprising 2–5 clear, musical notes that are repeated several times, resulting in a simple yet pleasant and repetitive structure reminiscent of other thrushes but adapted to montane environments. These phrases may incorporate of local bird species, and sonographic reveals the song as explosive pulses rich in harmonics, with frequencies extending beyond 6 kHz, aiding projection across rugged terrain for defense and mate attraction. Calls form a diverse repertoire used for alarm, contact, and flight. The primary alarm call is a sharp, chucking "tchak," "chack," or "chuck," emitted when disturbed or to warn of predators, similar in raspiness to the blackbird's (Turdus merula) but more abrupt. Contact and flight calls include a thin "seep" or low "tak-tak-tak" series for maintaining group cohesion, particularly during migration or foraging, while a buzzy "zrrp" or rattling variant signals agitation. Nocturnal flight calls, though infrequent, are striking and jolt-like, facilitating orientation during high-altitude migrations. Vocalizations are largely confined to the breeding period, with males using to proclaim and instruct fledglings, though females produce subdued calls in response to threats. Regional dialects exist, such as simpler homologous songs in certain populations, reflecting local adaptations without altering core functions.

Geographic distribution

Breeding distribution

The ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) breeds in upland and mountainous habitats across Europe and western Asia, with a range extending from Iceland and Ireland in the west to northwestern Russia and Iran in the east, and from Scandinavia and the British Isles in the north to the Pyrenees, Alps, Carpathians, Balkans, Caucasus, and Elburz Mountains in the south. Breeding occurs in countries including Albania, Armenia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Faroe Islands, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom. Three subspecies delineate the primary breeding distributions: the nominate T. t. torquatus occupies (Ireland, western Britain, northwestern ), western and northern , and northwestern east to the , with breeding confirmed in 2014 in the northern Timan Mountains of , approximately 300 km east of prior known eastern limits in ; T. t. alpestris breeds in the northern , central Europe east to the , the , , and western Asia Minor (possibly extending to northern in ); and T. t. amicorum is found in central and eastern (eastward from the Taurus Range), the region, northern (Elburz Mountains), and southwestern (Kopet Dag). In the northernmost portions of its range, such as northern Scotland and Scandinavia, breeding occurs from near sea level, whereas across most of its distribution the species favors higher elevations between 300 m and 3,000 m. In Britain, the breeding range has contracted by 43% since the 1968–1972 period, with recent losses concentrated in peripheral areas, though core upland populations persist in regions like the Scottish Highlands, Pennines, and North York Moors. Continental European populations, particularly in the Alps and Pyrenees, remain more stable in their core montane breeding areas.

Non-breeding distribution

The ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) exhibits a non-breeding distribution primarily in and northwest for northern breeding populations, with birds departing breeding grounds in and favoring montane habitats dominated by junipers. British and northern European breeders of the nominate subspecies (T. t. torquatus) winter mainly in and the of , where they forage in open, rocky areas with scattered shrubs. Central European populations migrate to Mediterranean regions, including parts of and the , while eastern breeders extend to and occasionally or during winter. Wintering sites are characterized by elevations from to highlands, with concentrations in (Juniperus spp.) woodlands providing cover and food resources like berries and ; geolocator studies confirm Moroccan Atlas as a key stopover and wintering area for western migrants, with birds arriving by late . Vagrant winter records occur rarely in Britain, often in gardens, but these represent exceptions rather than typical distribution. Subspecies such as T. t. alpestris from the may winter locally or in adjacent southwest Asia, though data remain limited compared to western races.

Migration

The ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) exhibits migratory behavior typical of many Palearctic thrushes, with northern and central European populations vacating breeding grounds in late summer to overwinter in warmer regions, while some southern remain sedentary. Nominate race birds from Britain and primarily winter in the of northwest , particularly and , as revealed by geolocator tracking of individuals from Scottish breeding sites, which showed autumn departure in late to early followed by a return journey in March. Central European breeders tend toward southern European wintering sites, including mountainous areas of , , and the with juniper-dominated habitats. Autumn migration involves a predominantly southeastern trajectory for British birds, routing through France and Iberia, with peak passage recorded in October at coastal and upland stopover sites in the UK and southern Europe. Spring return follows a more westerly path for northern populations, with Scandinavian individuals crossing from Africa via Iberia and the Atlantic fringe, arriving in Britain from mid-March and reaching Norway by April-May. Overall migration distances for nominate race individuals average 3,000–4,000 km, with stopovers in Mediterranean uplands facilitating refueling on invertebrates and berries. Populations of subspecies such as T. t. torquatus in the nominate range show high fidelity to specific wintering locales, with geolocator data indicating minimal movement within Atlas winter territories (typically <100 km radius) from November to February. In contrast, southern peripheral populations, including those in the Canary Islands (T. t. Cabrerae) and parts of the Mediterranean, exhibit partial residency, remaining year-round in montane habitats like Teide National Park, Tenerife, where individuals maintain territories within a few hundred hectares during winter. These differences underscore latitudinal variation in migratory strategy, driven by climatic stability in southern refugia.

Habitat preferences

Breeding habitats

The ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) breeds primarily in upland and mountainous , extending into parts of southwest , favoring open, rocky terrains such as slopes, crags, steep gullies, and with sparse vegetation cover. These sites provide structural features like boulders and rock outcrops for nest concealment and protection from predators. In the , breeding occurs from northward to , typically on heather-dominated steep slopes that offer nesting cover alongside nearby short-grass swards or grazed pastures essential for foraging on . Nests are constructed as cups of plant material, moss, and mud, usually placed on the ground level among boulders, in heather tussocks, stands, or occasionally in crevices, derelict structures, or low trees where natural rock features are absent. Preferred vegetation includes mixtures of heather (Calluna vulgaris), (Vaccinium myrtillus), and grasses or sedges, which support both nesting security and proximity to food resources; excessive (Pteridium aquilinum) cover, however, correlates with reduced reproductive success due to poorer conditions. In , such as the Carpathians, breeding sites are selected in middle to upper subalpine zones with boreal or mountain plant communities, often at altitudes ranging from 685 to 1,316 above sea level. Habitat quality directly influences breeding parameters, with clutch sizes increasing in areas dominated by grass, sedge, or rush cover and decreasing at higher altitudes or with greater bracken prevalence, reflecting trade-offs between nest site stability and food availability. Territories are compact, typically within 250 meters of the nest, emphasizing the need for heterogeneous habitats combining rocky nesting refuges with open, invertebrate-rich grasslands maintained by .

Foraging and winter habitats

Ring ouzels winter primarily in montane habitats of the Mediterranean Basin and northwest Africa, favoring elevations from sea level to high mountains with open terrain and scattered scrub. Northern European populations, including those from Britain, migrate southward to wintering sites in the Atlas Mountains of Morocco and Algeria, as tracked by geolocators on individuals departing in late summer. Central European birds of the alpestris subspecies often remain in southern breeding range extensions or move to Mediterranean mountains in Spain and Italy. Winter habitats typically feature juniper-dominated woodlands and open slopes with short vegetation, providing cover and food resources such as berries from Juniperus species. In southern and insular environments like the , ring ouzels exploit endemic junipers (J. cedrus) for fruit, playing a key role in while in understory and adjacent open ground. These sites offer patchy scrub and herb-rich areas, similar to migration stopover preferences, where birds probe and leaf litter. Foraging in winter mirrors breeding-season patterns but adapts to lower latitudes and milder climates, emphasizing ground-level searches in moist soils and livestock-disturbed areas for like earthworms and beetles, supplemented by fruits. Wet flushes and dung pats in pastures enhance prey availability, with birds frequenting unimproved grasslands and edges of scrub for efficient terrestrial probing. Seasonal shifts in use prioritize areas with persistent and low vegetation cover to facilitate access to buried prey.

Behavioral ecology

Breeding behavior

Ring ouzels are highly territorial during the breeding season, with males arriving first at upland sites to establish and defend territories through persistent singing from prominent perches, deterring rivals and attracting females. Breeding commences from mid-April to mid-July in regions like the and , extending to May–August further north. Socially monogamous pairs for the season construct a bulky, cup-shaped nest from dry grass, stems, , leaves, and mud, lined with finer dry grass; sites are typically sheltered rock crevices, crags, stream gullies, or dense heather on steep slopes, with placement varying by altitude and vegetation cover to optimize concealment and stability. The female lays 3–6 eggs (typically 4–5) over 4–5 days, pale blue to greenish-blue with small reddish-brown blotches; clutch size correlates positively with habitat quality, such as grass or sedge cover, and negatively with bracken or higher altitude. Incubation, lasting 13–14 days, is performed almost exclusively by the female, who leaves the nest briefly for foraging. The altricial, downy chicks are brooded by the female and fed invertebrates by both parents; the nestling period spans 14–16 days (average 13 days in some populations), after which young fledge but remain dependent for at least 10 days post-fledging, with increased activity like wing-flapping preceding departure. British populations often produce two broods per season, each cycle averaging 29–30 days from laying to fledging, enabling replacement or additional attempts despite variable success rates (e.g., 79.5% hatching, 35.6% fledging in monitored Carpathian nests).

Diet and foraging

The ring ouzel exhibits a seasonally variable diet, shifting from predominantly invertebrate prey during the breeding period to fruits in late summer and winter. Earthworms (Lumbricidae) dominate the breeding-season diet, comprising approximately 80% of prey items by abundance and 90% by , particularly for nestlings, though this proportion declines as the season advances. Other invertebrates supplement the diet early in breeding, with adults and parents provisioning nestlings at rates sensitive to conditions—rainfall increases delivered per feeding bout, while elevated temperatures reduce overall provisioning frequency. Foraging occurs primarily on the ground, with birds employing typical thrush probing techniques using their bill to extract buried from soft, moist soils in grasslands and flushes. Preferred sites feature low soil penetrability (mean 1.5 kg cm⁻², compared to 2.55 kg cm⁻² in unused areas) and short swards often shaded by moss or sparse vegetation, enabling detection of earthworms near the surface; this behavior persists flexibly across wet and dry years. From June to mid-July, foraging targets grass-rich, low-acidity plots at lower elevations for ; by mid-July to early , birds relocate to higher-altitude, heather-dominated moorlands to consume berries such as bilberries () and crowberries (), which become the primary food source. In non-breeding periods, the diet turns frugivorous, with wintering populations relying heavily on fleshy cones ("berries") of junipers (Juniperus spp.), facilitating long-distance in some habitats. Juveniles select post-fledging areas based on higher biomass or berry abundance relative to random sites, reflecting adaptive habitat choice amid varying food availability.

Territoriality and social structure

Ring ouzels exhibit strong territoriality during the breeding season, with males vigorously defending areas against conspecifics and other bird species, particularly during pair formation, nest building, and egg-laying phases. Territories are typically centered on nest sites and encompass a radius of approximately 200 m (about 12.57 ha), though actual home ranges average 5.3 ha based on minimum convex polygons from radio-tracked pairs in . Defense intensity peaks early in the season, often involving vocalizations from prominent perches, with boundary disputes rare beyond the core nesting and zones; nearest-neighbor distances range from 254 m in high-density areas like Glen Esk to 678 m in lower-density sites such as the Moorfoot Hills. Territory occupancy correlates positively with features like heather cover and burnt areas within a 100 m radius, influencing holding duration and at intermediate elevations around 539 m. Socially, breeding ring ouzels form monogamous pairs that independently or jointly within their territories, showing high within-season : 87% of marked adults return to the same site, and 89% of pairs remain together. Pairs often attempt multiple , with 56.5–66.7% of marked females in Scottish studies succeeding in two per season and 1.8% achieving three, typically relocating nests within 100 m. In Alpine populations, breeding remains largely solitary with usually one brood, emphasizing parental biparental care in nestling provisioning amid prey-dependent microhabitats. Adjacent territories may overlap temporally without on shared grounds, reflecting a dispersed but non-random clumped distribution (aggregation index R = 0.50). Outside breeding, social structure shifts to loose aggregations: post-fledging in late July, individuals form small nomadic flocks for , migration, and wintering, though less gregarious than congeners like redwings. Wintering birds in or occur solitarily or in small groups, with foraging distances extending up to hundreds of meters but without sustained territorial defense. Densities vary regionally, reaching 40.7 territories per 100 ha in Swiss hotspots, but overall patterns underscore seasonal territorial exclusivity giving way to opportunistic .

Ecological interactions

Predators

Nest predation significantly impacts ring ouzel breeding success, with eggs and chicks vulnerable to corvids such as crows and ravens, as well as mammals including foxes, mustelids like stoats and weasels, and occasionally squirrels. In one study in the West Carpathians, predators accounted for the loss of 51 chicks across monitored nests, with nine attributed to birds of prey, two to mustelids, and two to squirrels. Adult ring ouzels face threats from raptors including common buzzards, sparrowhawks, peregrine falcons, and kestrels, which target them during flight or on the ground, as well as owls such as tawny and long-eared species that may hunt at dusk or night. Overall, natural predation contributes to approximately 9% of mortality in ringed individuals across northwest Europe. Increases in predator populations, facilitated by enhanced food availability from sources like sheep and pheasant carrion, have been linked to heightened nest predation rates in upland breeding areas. Conservation recommendations include managing key nest predators such as foxes, crows, stoats, and weasels to mitigate these impacts.

Parasites and pathogens

The ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) hosts haemosporidian blood parasites, including lineages of Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon, as documented in molecular surveys of avian haemosporidians across Europe. These protozoans are transmitted by blood-sucking insects such as blackflies (Simuliidae) for Leucocytozoon and biting midges (Ceratopogonidae) for Haemoproteus, with prevalence varying by region and season but commonly reported in thrush species including the ring ouzel. Plasmodium species, causing avian malaria, have also been detected in related Turdus hosts, though specific lineage data for the ring ouzel remain limited to general haemosporidian screenings. Ectoparasites include larvae of trombiculid mites (Acarina: ), which infest ring ouzels in montane habitats like the Slovak and Polish Carpathians, with a recorded of 29% (2 out of 7 examined birds). These chiggers attach to the skin and may cause or transmit pathogens, though impacts on host fitness are not quantified for this . Nest-dwelling ectoparasites, such as fleas or mites, occur in breeding sites and have been extracted using photoeclectors during studies in the West Carpathians, suggesting potential effects on nestling condition. Bacterial pathogens like spp. have been targeted in surveillance of migrating ring ouzels in southern , where birds were sampled upon return from winter quarters to assess carriage and dispersal risk, indicating a vector role despite low documented prevalence in passerines. No widespread outbreaks of viral pathogens such as or have been specifically linked to ring ouzels, though the species is modeled as a potential competent host in European transmission networks due to its migratory . Data on endoparasitic helminths or other protozoans remain sparse, with most records derived from opportunistic sampling rather than systematic parasitological surveys.

Interspecific relationships

The ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) engages in primarily with sympatric thrush species (Turdus spp.) over food resources and breeding territories in upland habitats. Competition with the Eurasian blackbird (T. merula), (T. viscivorus), and (T. pilaris) is hypothesized to contribute to range contraction and population declines, particularly as warmer temperatures enable these lower-altitude species to expand upward into ring ouzel strongholds, overlapping in foraging for and berries. Models of potential distributions in regions like predict increased competitive exclusion under future climate scenarios, with blackbirds projected to occupy more ring ouzel breeding areas by 2050. Direct for resource competition remains sparse, however, as ring ouzels select distinct microhabitats—such as steep heather-dominated slopes for nesting and short-grass mosaics for —that exhibit limited spatial overlap with those of congeners like blackbirds, which favor edges and plantations. ranges in British uplands show minimal intrusion by other thrushes, and abandoned ring ouzel sites are rarely reoccupied by competitors, suggesting niche partitioning mitigates conflict during breeding. Territorial displays target interspecific intruders, but aggression is absent in neutral communal zones up to 500 m from nests. In non-breeding periods, ring ouzels form loose associations with other thrushes and common starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), particularly in southern wintering grounds like , where mixed flocks exploit dung pats and open grasslands for . These aggregations facilitate shared access to ephemeral food sources without evident antagonism, though they may heighten exposure to shared pathogens or predators. No mutualistic interspecific relationships, such as alarm-calling symbioses, are documented.

Population dynamics and threats

The Ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) has undergone steady population declines in several core breeding regions since the early , with contractions in both numbers and range documented across upland habitats in . In the , the breeding range contracted by 27% between 1970 and 1990, followed by a further 44% reduction from 1970 to 2010, alongside an estimated 71% between 1990 and 2012. By 1999, the UK breeding population was estimated at 6,157–7,549 pairs, but surveys in 2012 recorded 5,332 territories (95% confidence limits: 4,096–6,875), indicating a 29% non-significant decline over that interval. Regionally, trends vary, with sharper declines in Britain and the contrasting relative stability elsewhere. In , populations fell by 36% over the three decades prior to 2021, accompanied by an average upward elevational shift of 84 meters, primarily at lower altitudes in the Jura and northern . The range specifically diminished by 43% in occupied 10-km squares from 1968–1972 to 2008–2011, contributing to its placement on the UK Red List since 2002 due to these long-term reductions. In contrast, European-wide assessments indicate overall stability between 1998 and 2013, with Fennoscandian and some central/southern populations showing no major shifts. Globally, the species maintains a Least Concern status under IUCN criteria, supported by an extensive range and mid-1990s European estimates of 247,032–355,281 breeding pairs, though localized declines persist without reversing broader regional patterns. Recent monitoring in specific sites, such as Moor, suggests localized stability over the past two decades as of 2023, but national trajectories indicate ongoing vulnerability in fragmented upland habitats.

Identified threats

The ring ouzel faces multiple identified threats across its breeding, migration, and wintering ranges, with population declines particularly pronounced in , including a 50% reduction in the UK breeding population since the 1980s. is a primary driver, as warmer summer s and reduced rainfall in upland breeding habitats correlate with lower breeding success and territory occupancy; for instance, models from northern Britain indicate that a 1°C temperature rise could reduce productivity by up to 20% through of soil , a key food source. Earlier in alpine regions further exacerbates this by shortening the availability of foraging habitats synchronized with invertebrate emergence. Habitat alteration from land-use changes compounds these effects, including pasture abandonment in mountainous areas leading to encroachment of shrubs and tall grasses that degrade open grounds preferred by the . In contrast, by in some regions can similarly reduce suitable dwarf and bare ground mosaics essential for nesting and feeding. Increased human recreational activity in uplands, such as and off-road vehicles, causes nest disturbance and chick mortality, with studies noting higher abandonment rates near trails. On wintering grounds in , particularly , habitat degradation from intensified grazing and firewood collection threatens berry-producing shrubs critical for survival during the non-breeding season, potentially contributing to carry-over effects on spring arrival and breeding condition. Despite these identifications, the relative contributions remain debated, as no single factor fully explains regional variations in decline rates, underscoring the need for integrated monitoring.

Debates on causal factors

Studies of Ring Ouzel (Turdus torquatus) declines have highlighted low first-year as a primary demographic driver in British populations, rather than reduced breeding productivity, prompting debate over whether causative factors operate predominantly on breeding grounds, during migration, or on wintering areas in . Demographic analyses from Scottish study sites spanning 1997–2009 estimated annual first-year at approximately 0.25–0.30, insufficient to offset adult mortality and maintain stable populations, with evidence suggesting poor post-fledging conditions exacerbate losses. This contrasts with earlier assumptions of habitat-driven breeding failures, shifting focus to extrinsic pressures like food scarcity or predation, though direct causation remains unproven due to challenges in tracking migratory juveniles. Climatic warming has been proposed as a key factor influencing survival, with models linking warmer, drier late summers to reduced prey availability, correlating with 50–60% declines in abundance since the 1980s. Beale et al. (2006) used long-term data from and to demonstrate that summer increases explained up to 75% of variation in occupancy, independent of breeding success metrics, attributing this to desiccation effects on critical for post-breeding . Critics argue such correlations may confound local habitat quality, as improved pastures and reduced heather mosaics—associated with agricultural intensification—also negatively predict abundance, with 1988–1999 surveys showing positive correlations with unmanaged Nardus-dominated grasslands but negative ones with reseeded fields. Empirical tests indicate that while explains temporal trends, spatial variation ties more closely to land-use changes, suggesting interactive effects rather than singular causation. In , particularly the , debates center on the interplay between -induced shifts and land abandonment, with earlier thaws (advancing 2–5 days per decade) potentially desynchronizing breeding with peak invertebrate emergence, while ungrazed pastures lead to rank reducing foraging efficiency. A 2021 study across Swiss and Italian sites found occupancy declined 20–30% in abandoned areas due to prey depletion, yet models predict broader elevational range contractions independent of . Predation by corvids and raptors is occasionally invoked but lacks quantitative support as a primary driver, with stable predator populations not aligning temporally with ouzel declines. Overall, unresolved tensions persist between global attribution—supported by correlative weather-demography links—and testable local interventions like rotational , with calls for integrated monitoring to disentangle synergies.

Conservation efforts

Status assessments

The ring ouzel (Turdus torquatus) is classified as Least Concern on the due to its extensive breeding range across and parts of , estimated to span over 10 million square kilometers, and a global population believed to exceed 1 million mature individuals, with trends appearing stable overall. This assessment reflects that the species does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable status under IUCN criteria, such as a population decline exceeding 30% over three generations, despite localized declines. In , which encompasses approximately 95% of the breeding range, the population is estimated at 299,000–598,000 breeding pairs, corresponding to 597,000–1,196,000 mature individuals, with the majority in non-EU countries. The European breeding population trend is considered stable or fluctuating but not qualifying for higher threat categories under BirdLife International's evaluations. In the , where the species breeds in upland areas, it has been categorized on the Red List of Birds of Conservation Concern since 2002 owing to historical declines in breeding population and range exceeding 50% over the long term. A national survey in 1999 estimated 6,157–7,549 territories, but a 2012 survey indicated further substantial declines across , , and , with an overall reduction of about 43% over the preceding 40 years. Similar downward trends have been documented in other regions, such as a 36% decline in over the last 30 years, primarily at lower elevations.

Management and recovery initiatives

Management and recovery initiatives for the ring ouzel focus on enhancement in upland moorlands, where populations have declined due to succession, , and land-use changes. These efforts emphasize maintaining mosaics of heather ( vulgaris) and () for nesting cover alongside open grasslands for invertebrate foraging, often through controlled burning, light grazing regimes, and blocking drainage grips to prevent desiccation. Agri-environment schemes in the UK and incentivize landowners to adopt sympathetic practices, such as limiting anti-parasitic chemicals in dung that reduce availability—a key food source—and planting berry-bearing shrubs to support late-season feeding. In , , the Ring Ouzel Delivery Plan, launched around 2014, targeted habitat improvements at nesting sites by 2016, including enhanced cover and forage quality through partnerships with , the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), and local commoners. The plan set goals of 60% breeding success by 2020 and a population of 10 pairs by 2020 (increasing to 12 by 2025), supported by annual monitoring and disturbance minimization during events like the Ten Tors challenge. Northumberland's species action plan, part of broader strategies, aimed to halt and range declines by 2005–2011 through baseline surveys of Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), distribution of landowner guidance on moor burning to retain dwarf shrubs, and promotion of in-bye field management under agri-environment agreements. Ongoing actions include bi-annual assessments to track trends and adaptive adjustments. In Ireland, conservation for remnant populations in , Kerry, recommends restoring heather-grass mosaics via results-based agri-environment projects, experimental light mixed grazing, and heather seeding trials to bolster breeding and post-fledging habitats. Comprehensive surveys are prioritized to inform targeted interventions, given the species' high conservation concern status nationally.

References

  1. https://www.rspb.org.uk/birds-and-wildlife/ring-ouzel/
  2. https://animalia.bio/ring-ouzel/1000
  3. https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/ring-ouzel-turdus-torquatus
  4. https://www.bto.org/learn/about-birds/birdfacts/ring-ouzel
  5. https://www.etymonline.com/word/ouzel
  6. https://www.wordreference.com/definition/ouzel
  7. https://www.discoverwildlife.com/animal-facts/birds/ring-ouzel-guide
  8. https://www.wordzo.com/words/turdus-torquatus.html
  9. https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/species.jsp?avibaseid=CE71B4FF837F276A
  10. https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/12740-Turdus-torquatus
  11. https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/species/1336
  12. https://genomics.senescence.info/species/entry.php?species=Turdus_torquatus
  13. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/rinouz1/cur/introduction
  14. https://www.dutchavifauna.nl/static/images/records/67737.pdf
  15. https://britishbirds.co.uk/sites/default/files/1502-ouzel.pdf
  16. https://www.ringouzel.info/infoandadvice/Ring%2520Ouzel%2520Photo%2520ID_Birdwatch%2520Mar13.pdf
  17. https://ebird.org/species/rinouz1
  18. https://www.ryenats.org.uk/ouzels/sonograms.pdf
  19. https://app.mybirdbuddy.com/birds/ring-ouzel/202c0ab4-58e5-4719-a671-af8df6117bf6
  20. https://soundapproach.co.uk/pages/ring-ouzel
  21. https://xeno-canto.org/species/Turdus-torquatus?query=ssp:%2522torquatus%2522
  22. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00063657.2016.1159180
  23. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00063657.2015.1077779
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425003051
  25. https://irbbp.org/species-list/species-profiles/84_ring-ouzel/
  26. http://www.sbsg.org/images/PDFS/Misc/EasternEdgesRingOuzelSurvey2016V2.pdf
  27. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00063657.2014.905514
  28. https://www.ringouzel.info/local_studies/speciesactionplan%20-%20Northumberland.pdf
  29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2014.905514
  30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2012.745463
  31. http://uppernidderdale.org.uk/wildlife-farming/special-place-for-wildlife/species/ring-ouzel/
  32. https://www.ukclimbing.com/articles/features/ring_ouzels_on_the_eastern_edges-13413
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232687345_The_Key_Role_of_a_Ring_Ouzel_Tardus_torquatus_Wintering_Population_in_Seed_Dispersal_of_the_Endangered_Endemic_Juniperus_cedrus_in_an_Insular_Environment
  34. https://journal.afonet.org/vol94/iss4/art3/
  35. https://irbbp.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Mee-2019-Status-and-Ecology-of-a-remnant-population-of-Ring-Ouzel-in-the-MacGillycuddys-Reeks-Kerry.pdf
  36. https://boristheses.unibe.ch/3219/1/21barras_a.pdf
  37. https://om.vuvb.uniza.sk/index.php/OM/article/download/348/322
  38. https://app.birda.org/species-guide/29993/Ring_Ouzel
  39. https://ringouzel.info/research/Ian%20Burfield%20Thesis.pdf
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316996276_The_placement_and_the_size_and_shape_of_nests_of_Ring_Ouzel_Turdus_torquatus_reflect_the_environmental_conditions_at_different_altitude
  41. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362231352_Breeding_biology_of_ring_ouzel_Turdus_torquatus_in_the_West_Carpathians_Slovakia
  42. https://www.avianbiology.org/blog/ring-ouzels-dont-it-hot
  43. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00063657.2012.707637
  44. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jav.02649
  45. https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/foecol-2025-0021
  46. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ibi.12002
  47. https://www.ringouzel.info/research/Sim_2012_phdthesis_tcm7-354146.pdf
  48. https://binocularbase.com/ring-ouzel-diet-and-size/
  49. https://www.shropshirebirds.com/index/bird-conservation/the-long-mynd-breeding-bird-project-ring-ouzels/
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4875587/
  51. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:764547/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12476400/
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225147699_Modelling_the_recent_and_potential_future_spatial_distribution_of_the_Ring_Ouzel_Turdus_torquatus_and_Blackbird_T_merula_in_Switzerland
  54. https://www.rspb.org.uk/helping-nature/what-we-do/influence-government-and-business/farming/advice-for-farmers-helping-bird-species/ring-ouzel-advice-for-farmers
  55. https://www.ryenats.org.uk/ouzels/ouzelpop.htm
  56. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Population-trends-of-the-Ring-Ouzel-in-Switzerland-in-the-last-decades-a-Annual_fig1_357657223
  57. https://www.yorkshiredales.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2023/05/2022-RZ-Survey.pdf
  58. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01102.x
  59. https://bou.org.uk/blog-jo-saving-the-alpine-ring-ouzel/
  60. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ibi.12954
  61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229068728_The_decline_of_the_Ring_Ouzel_in_Britain
  62. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01750.x
  63. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00063650309461300
  64. https://www.ringouzel.info/aboutringouzels_status.html
  65. https://www.dartmoor.gov.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/78223/Ring-Ouzel-Delivery-Plan.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.