Hubbry Logo
SuddSuddMain
Open search
Sudd
Community hub
Sudd
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Sudd
Sudd
Sudd
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Sudd
Sudd Swamp from space, May 1993. This photograph was taken during the driest time of the year.
Location of the Sudd in South Sudan
Ecology
RealmAfrotropical
Biomeflooded grasslands and savannas
Borders
Geography
Area57,000 km2 (22,000 sq mi)
CountrySouth Sudan
Coordinates8°N 31°E / 8°N 31°E / 8; 31
Map
Designated5 June 2006
Reference no.1622[1]
Satellite image of the swamp around the time of the wet season

The Sudd (Arabic: السد, romanized: as-Sudd, Nuer: Baki̱ec, Dinka: Toc) is a vast swamp in South Sudan, formed by the White Nile's Baḥr al-Jabal section. The Arabic word sudd is derived from sadd (سد), meaning "barrier"[2] or "obstruction".[3] The term "the sudd" has come to refer to any large solid floating vegetation island or mat. The area which the swamp covers is one of the world's largest wetlands and the largest freshwater wetland in the Nile Basin.

For many centuries the swamp, and especially its thicket of vegetation, proved an impenetrable barrier to navigation along the Nile. The ancient Egyptians failed to penetrate the Sudd and reach the areas south of it.[4] In AD 61, a party of Roman soldiers sent by the Emperor Nero proceeded up the White Nile but were not able to get beyond the Sudd, which marked the limit of Roman penetration into equatorial Africa.[5] For the same reasons in later times, the search for the source of the Nile was particularly difficult; it eventually involved overland expeditions from the central African coast, so as to avoid having to travel through the Sudd.

In 2019, a study suggested that increased water flows into the Sudd may be partly causing up to a third of the whole West African rise in atmospheric methane levels over the previous decade.[6][7]

Location

[edit]

The Sudd stretches from Mongalla to just outside the Sobat River confluence with the White Nile just upstream of Malakal as well as westwards along the Bahr el Ghazal. The shallow and flat inland delta lies between 5.5 and 9.5 degrees latitude north and covers an area of 500 kilometres (310 mi) south to north and 200 kilometres (120 mi) east to west between Mongalla in the south and Malakal in the north.

Its size is highly variable, averaging over 30,000 square kilometres (12,000 sq mi). During the wet season it may extend to over 130,000 square kilometres (50,000 sq mi) comprising 21% of the country, depending on the inflowing waters, with the discharge from Lake Victoria being the main control factor of flood levels and area inundation. Since the Sudd area consists of various meandering channels, lagoons, reed and papyrus fields and loses half of its inflowing water through evapotranspiration in the permanent and seasonal floodplains, the complex hydrology has many primary and secondary effects.[8] A major feature of the area is the incomplete Jonglei Canal, which was planned to bypass waters from the Sudd to avoid evaporation losses and increase the amount of water discharged at the outlet of the Sudd.

From 1961 to 1963, a great increase in the flooded area occurred when the level of Lake Victoria rose, and the outflow increased. The total area of the Sudd is related to the amount of water reaching Bor from the Albert Nile and from torrents or seasonal watercourses that can add substantial amounts to the flow in the upstream end of the Sudd. During the 1960s increase in Lake Victoria discharge, where flows at Mongalla roughly doubled, the flows at Malakal at the northern end of the swamps increased by 1.5 times the previous average flow. As a consequence of these high flows, the areas of permanent swamp and seasonal floodplains have, taken together, increased to 2.5 times their former size. The swamps have increased the most, and the seasonal floodplain is 1.5 times its previous size.[9]

Settlement on Sudd flooded grassland

From the southern inflow of the Bahr al Jabal ("Sea of the Mountain") at Mongalla, the defined riverbed successively widens into a floodplain, where the waters flow in meandering river stretches and various channels and lagoons throughout the dry season. With rising water levels it expands over the semi-flooded grasslands during the flood season.

Slightly downstream of Bor, the Bahr el Zeraf ("Sea of the Giraffes") river branches off the Bahr al Jabal to the east, diverting part of the flow, and again joins the Bahr al Jabal just before reaching Malakal. During the course of its flow, the Bahr al Jabal passes Lake No, where the Bahr el Ghazal ("Sea of the Gazelles") connects to the Bahr al Jabal, contributing an inflow with seasonal variation. At Malakal, the Sobat River joins into the system. The combined flows then stream to the north as the White Nile in a defined bed, joining with the Blue Nile waters at Khartoum to form the main Nile.

Sudd was designated as a Ramsar Wetland of International Importance in 2006. An area of 57,000 square kilometres (22,000 sq mi) was designated.

Climate

[edit]

Hydrologically the Sudd plays an important role in storing floodwaters and trapping sediments from the Bahr al Jabal. Roughly 55% of water entering the area is lost to evaporation.[10] Water levels fluctuate by up to 1.5 metres, depending on the intensity of seasonal flooding.[9] The region receives less rainfall (typically between 55 and 65 centimetres per year) than neighbouring areas at the same latitude. Orographic lifting on the eastern and western sides of the Sudd contribute to that condition.[11]

Geomorphology

[edit]

The morphology of the area is defined by the channel and lagoon system of the permanent Sudd swamps, the adjacent flood plains, and the surrounding flat terrain. The Bahr al Jabal runs to the north-northwest and therefore in an angle to the gradient of the floodplain, which slopes down to the north, while north of Juba the river flows in an incised trough. The banks of this trough decrease in height from south to north with the Bahr al Jabal approaching Bor and ending in the Sudd flood plain just north of Bor on the eastern bank and towards Shambe on the western bank. In the southern part, the river meanders from side to side in the restraining trough in one or more channels, but further north the swamp is not limited by higher ground and the system of river channels becomes increasingly complex. The characteristics of the river with its network of channels and lagoons are distinguishable in satellite imagery and digital elevation models.

The geology of the area is defined by heavy clay soils, highly impermeable with a top layer of "black cotton" vertisol of approximately 500 mm on average. Sandy soils are found only at depths of approximately 30 metres (98 ft) and below, as determined by well drilling profiles.[12] This indicates a very limited groundwater influence on the area's hydrology.

Population

[edit]

Nuer and Dinka pastoralists use the Sudd and the surrounding areas extensively. Livestock and rain-fed agriculture are the dominant means of support for the largely rural population for which the seasonal flooded grasslands along the Sudd provides valuable grazing lands.[10]

Vegetation and ecosystem

[edit]

Vegetation cover of the area can generally be classified in five categories which depend on the elevation of the area above river flood level: the lakes and rivers, the floating plant life of the swamp, river-flooded grasslands (Toic), rain-flooded grasslands, and wooded grasslands on the fringes. Grassland and woodland areas have been cultivated by local populations.

The density of the grasslands along the Sudd changes with the season, with tall grass in the rainy season and short dry grass in the dry season, when frequent fires also occur. The fluvial area is mostly overgrown with vegetation, with some main and side channels as well as lagoons of open water. The vegetation distribution is described in further detail in Sutcliffe (1974) and Petersen (2007). The main species are:

The first three species are anchored so their distribution is limited to the depth of flooding. For the last species their root system needs to be permanently in water or saturated soil, which is a good indicator of flood patterns. P. communis, E. pyramidalis and O. barthii for example dominate only in areas where the depth of flooding does not exceed 130 cm over a period of ten years or 118 cm for one month in the year.

Floating vegetation of C. papyrus had caused blockages in the Sudd swamps on a number of occasions between 1879 and 1900, when the plants were torn out by increased flooding. C. papyrus needs saturated conditions and can tolerate flooding that is not more than 150 cm deep.[13]

When the matted vegetation breaks free of its moorings, it forms floating islands of vegetation up to 30 km in length. Such islands, in varying stages of decomposition, eventually break up.

Historically, the fully floating Nile cabbage (Pistia stratiotes) was an important plant in the Sudd, but it has largely been replaced by the invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes).[14] The sluggish waters are host to a large population of mosquitoes and parasites that cause waterborne diseases.

Fauna

[edit]

Including several diverse aquatic habitats like swamps, lakes, channels and floodplains, the Sudd is rich in fish. Some 70 species have been recorded, and this mostly involves fish that are found in much of the Nile system such as marbled lungfish, Senegal bichir, African arowana, Mormyrus caschive, Nile carp, Nile tilapia, mango tilapia, redbelly tilapia, Nile perch, Distichodus rostratus, elongate tigerfish, African tetras, African sharptooth catfish, Synodontis frontosus, S. schall and others.[14] Among the few endemics of the Sudd system are Clarias engelseni, Enteromius yeiensis, Nothobranchius nubaensis, N. virgatus and two apparently undescribed species of Enteromius, and the fish fauna in significant sections still has not been properly studied.[15]

Over 400 species of bird are found in the Sudd, including shoebills (a stronghold for the species with several thousand individuals), great white pelicans, and black crowned cranes. The Sudd provides food and water to large populations of migrating birds. As the surrounding landscape is a large swath of dry Sahel across Africa, the swamp is also a haven for migrating mammals, especially antelopes, such as the bohor reedbuck, sitatunga (the most aquatic antelope of the Sudd, mostly inhabiting permanent swampland), the endangered Nile lechwe (not in permanent swampland, but generally near the water's edge and often walking in shallow water), and the white-eared kob (further away from the permanent swampland).[14] White-eared kob, tiang and Mongalla gazelle take part in one of the largest mammal migrations on Earth, numbering about 1.2 million individuals in total.[16][17] The shallow water is frequented by Nile crocodiles and hippopotamuses. In more upland areas the Sudd was known as an historic habitat for the endangered painted hunting dog, which however may have been exterminated in the region.[18]

Threats and preservation

[edit]

The long-running civil war in Southern Sudan seriously disrupted conservation efforts in the Sudd, especially as the widespread availability of weapons has encouraged wildlife poaching, including of elephants. There are three game reserves: Zeraf Island between the Zeraf River and the Nile, Shambe Reserve, and Mongalla Game Reserve.

Jonglei diversion canal

[edit]
Main article: Jonglei Canal

The early explorers searching for the source of the Nile experienced considerable difficulties, sometimes taking months to get through the Sudd. In his 1972 book The White Nile, Alan Moorehead says of the Sudd, "there is no more formidable swamp in the world".[19] The Sudd swamp is sustained by the water from the southwestern tributaries (the Bahr el Ghazal system) and consumes a proportion of the main river through evaporation and transpiration.

Sir William Garstin, Undersecretary of State of Public Works of Egypt, created the first detailed proposal for digging a canal east of the Sudd in 1907.[20] By bypassing the swamps, evaporation of the Nile's water would vastly decrease, allowing an increase in the area of cultivatable land in Egypt by 8,100 km2 (2,000,000 acres). The Egyptian government in the 1930s proposed digging a canal east of the Sudd to divert water from the Bahr al Jabal above the Sudd to a point farther down the White Nile, bypassing the swamps and carrying the White Nile's water directly to the main channel of the river.[21]

The Jonglei Canal scheme was studied by the government of Egypt in 1946, and plans were developed between 1954 and 1959. Construction work on the canal began in 1978, but the outbreak of political instability in Sudan has held up work for many years. By 1984 when the Sudan People's Liberation Army brought the works to a halt, 240 km of the canal of a total of 360 km had been excavated. The rusting remains of the giant German-built excavation machine—variously nicknamed either "Sarah" or "Lucy"[22]—are visible on a Google Earth image at the south end of the canal, where it has been located since it was disabled by a missile.[23] When peace was restored in 2000, speculation grew about a restart of the project. However, on 21 February 2008, the Sudanese government said the revival of the project was not a priority. Nevertheless, in 2008, Sudan and Egypt agreed to restart the project and finish the canal in 24 years.[24] South Sudan gained independence in 2011.

It is estimated that the Jonglei canal project would produce 3.5–4.8 billion m3 of water per year (equal to a mean annual discharge of 110–152 m3/s (3 883–5 368 ft3/s), an increase of around 5–7% of Egypt's current water supply.[17] The canal's benefits would be shared by Egypt and Sudan, with the expected damage falling on South Sudan.[24] The complex environmental and social issues involved, including the collapse of fisheries, drying of grazing lands,[25] a drop of groundwater levels, and a reduction of rainfall in the region,[26] limits the practicality of the project. The draining of the Sudd is likely to have environmental effects comparable to the drying of Lake Chad or the draining of the Aral Sea.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Sudd

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Sudd is a vast freshwater wetland in , spanning approximately 57,000 km² and constituting one of the largest swamps in the world, characterized by expansive flooded grasslands and papyrus marshes fed by the White Nile's Bahr al-Jabal section. The name "Sudd," derived from the word for "barrier," reflects the dense floating vegetation that impedes river flow, creating a natural dam-like obstruction. This wetland's size fluctuates seasonally and with upstream water releases, ranging from 30,000 to over 100,000 km² during high floods, acting as a critical hydrological buffer that absorbs floodwaters, filters sediments, and sustains through habitats for migratory birds, , and large mammals such as and . Designated as a Ramsar Wetland of International Importance, the Sudd supports vital ecosystem services including , , and flood mitigation for downstream regions, while hosting rich aquatic and terrestrial species assemblages. Human activities, including by local ethnic groups like the Nuer and Dinka, , and proposed like the to divert water for and , have sparked debates over balancing development with conservation, amid ongoing challenges from conflict, climate variability, and high contributing to global greenhouse gases.

Physical Characteristics

Location and Extent

The Sudd is a large inland situated in central , encompassing parts of Unity, Lakes, Jonglei, and states. It lies downstream of Lake Albert along the course of the , specifically the Baḥr al-Jabal section, where the river's flat terrain causes extensive flooding and blockages. Geographically, the wetland spans latitudes from approximately 6.5° N to 9.5° N and longitudes from 30.2° E to 31.8° E. The extent of the Sudd varies significantly with seasonal flooding, typically ranging from to km² during wet and dry periods, respectively, due to the river's inflow and high rates. Its overall dimensions approximate 400 km in length and 320 km in width, forming one of Africa's largest swamps and a critical hydrological feature in the . Larger estimates, such as the 57,000 km² designated under the in 2006, account for maximum flooded areas including peripheral zones.

Hydrology and Water Loss

The Sudd receives its primary inflow from the Bahr al Jabal of the White Nile, gauged at Mongalla, with historical average annual discharges of 26.8 km³ for 1905–1960 and 49.2 km³ for 1961–1983, reflecting variability driven by upstream Lake Victoria outflows. Upon entering the low-gradient terrain (approximately 1:10,000), the river decelerates from velocities of about 1 m/s to near stagnation, causing water to disperse over seasonally inundated areas ranging from 15,000 to over 30,000 km². This prolonged residence time facilitates extensive water losses, predominantly through evapotranspiration, with infiltration minimal due to underlying impermeable clay soils. Evapotranspiration constitutes the dominant loss mechanism, accounting for nearly all net water depletion after accounting for local of 600–1,000 mm annually. Rates vary by surface type: open evaporation averages around 1,718 mm/year, while flooded vegetation exhibits both lower and higher values depending on plant cover, with papyrus-dominated areas showing up to 2,760 mm/year in experimental measurements. estimates using SEBAL on NOAA-AVHRR data yield annual totals of 1,460–1,935 mm for 1995–2000, corresponding to absolute losses of 57–74 km³ over the extent. Central Sudd areas consistently register 1,500–2,000 mm/year. Water balance analyses indicate that approximately half the inflow is lost, with outflows at averaging 14.2 km³ (1905–1960) and 20.8 km³ (1961–1983), yielding net losses of 47–58% that increase with higher inflows due to expanded flooded area. These losses have motivated projects like the , aimed at bypassing the wetland to conserve an estimated 4.7–5 km³ annually for downstream users. Recent satellite-based modeling refines these estimates by integrating inundation extents and potential evapotranspiration, confirming the sensitivity of losses to seasonal flooding and climatic variability.

Geomorphology and Formation

The Sudd constitutes an expansive alluvial of recent , characterized by vertic soils interspersed with alfisols and minimal topographic , with elevations ranging from approximately 380 to 500 meters above . The terrain slopes gently northward at a of about 0.1 meters per kilometer, fostering a dominated by permanent swamp zones featuring meandering channels, lagoons, and floating vegetation mats, alongside adjacent seasonal punctuated by depressions known as toiches that retain water post-inundation. These geomorphic elements arise from ongoing deposition and driven by the White Nile's flow dynamics within this low- basin. The formation of the Sudd stems from the Bahr al-Jabal () entering a broad, flat depression downstream of Lake Albert, where the abrupt reduction in river slope to roughly 1:10,000 causes flow deceleration, promoting sediment and lateral spillage over the plain. Prolific growth of and other aquatic vegetation in the resulting shallow, stagnant waters forms dense floating sudd mats—derived from the term for "barrier"—that impede downstream drainage, exacerbate water retention, and facilitate further wetland expansion through backwater effects. Seasonal flood pulses, with peak inflows from to , reshape these features by depositing fine clays and silts to build low levees and islands while eroding channels, sustaining a dynamic equilibrium between inundation and losses exceeding 50% of incoming volume. Geomorphic evolution in the Sudd reflects alluvial processes within the Basin's Sudd , with continuous transformation of riverbanks, floodplains, and aquatic habitats influencing hydrological patterns and substrate stability. While some suggests precursors like a Pliocene- megalake in the broader region, the contemporary swamp's configuration is maintained by these recurrent fluvial-vegetative interactions rather than static geological structures.

Climate and Environmental Dynamics

Seasonal and Climatic Patterns

The Sudd wetland experiences a characterized by high temperatures and a bimodal rainfall pattern, with the spanning approximately May to October and the from November to April. Annual averages around 910 mm, predominantly concentrated during the wet months, though spatial variability exists across the region, with lower amounts in the northern extents. Mean annual temperatures reach approximately 36°C, with minimal seasonal fluctuations due to the equatorial proximity, fostering consistently high rates that exceed 2,000 mm annually. Seasonal flooding in the Sudd is primarily driven by the annual flood pulse of the (Bahr el Jebel), augmented by local rainfall, leading to pronounced expansions and contractions of inundated areas. Floodwaters from upstream sources, including Lake Albert and seasonal rains in the and , begin arriving in June–July, initiating the inundation phase. Peak flooding occurs between and , when maximum river discharge coincides with peak local , expanding the wetland's surface area to over 20,000 km² in high-flow years, with tables rising to support extensive seasonal swamps. During the , receding river levels and absent rainfall cause rapid dewatering, reducing inundated extents to as low as 8,000–10,000 km² by March–April, exposing clay-rich soils and promoting . This cycle results in stark hydrological contrasts, with water depths varying from over 5 in permanent channels during floods to less than 0.5 in peripheral zones during low flows. The consistent heat amplifies evaporative losses, which can account for up to 60% of annual inflows, underscoring the Sudd's role as a major in the system.

Recent Variability, Flooding, and Methane Emissions

The Sudd has undergone notable hydrological variability in recent decades, characterized by alternating prolonged droughts and intense events, driven by upstream fluctuations in discharge from and erratic regional precipitation patterns. These shifts have altered the seasonal pulse, with inundation extents varying significantly; for instance, total flooded area averaged approximately 41,000 km² annually in early assessments, including about 9,200 km² of permanent . Climate-driven changes, including rising upstream lake levels, have intensified this variability, contributing to expanded boundaries beyond historical norms. Major flooding episodes from 2021 to 2023 marked a departure from typical recession patterns, with initial inundation spilling far beyond limits and persistent high water levels into subsequent years, displacing hundreds of thousands across and submerging up to two-thirds of the country in recurrent events. By 2024, extreme floods continued to overwhelm levees and ecosystems, fueled by record inflows from and heavy seasonal rains, exacerbating humanitarian crises amid political instability that hinders comprehensive monitoring. Such events reflect broader impacts, including prolonged wet phases that delay drying and amplify downstream risks, though direct attribution to anthropogenic warming requires further disaggregation from natural variability. This enhanced inundation has elevated (CH₄) emissions from the Sudd, a tropical hotspot where anaerobic in flooded organic soils produces substantial biogenic CH₄, accounting for a notable fraction of global contributions. Recent satellite-derived estimates indicate emissions increased from 4.1 ± 0.8 Tg yr⁻¹ (2003–2018) to 5.7 ± 1.5 Tg yr⁻¹ (2019 onward), linked to expanded area during prolonged flooding that promotes via waterlogged conditions overcoming shallow riverbanks. Prior models underestimated these fluxes by reporting smaller inundated extents, understating the Sudd's influence on observed global CH₄ surges in 2020–2021, when tropical emissions rose by 20–25 Tg yr⁻¹ amid heightened dynamics. Persistent hotspots, emitting up to 4.5 million tonnes annually, underscore the wetland's role in atmospheric CH₄ growth, though quantification remains challenged by sparse ground validation in conflict zones.

Ecological Features

Vegetation and Habitat Types

The Sudd features diverse adapted to varying flood regimes, encompassing approximately 350 plant species across permanent swamps, seasonally flooded grasslands, woodlands, and open water . Patterns of inundation dictate these zones, with nutrient-rich clay soils supporting high in wetter areas. Permanent swamps, covering the core of the wetland, are dominated by dense stands of along riversides and in the wettest zones, forming floating mats up to several meters thick that impede water flow. These are bordered by communities of Phragmites communis and Vossia cuspidata, with extensive Phragmites and Typha swamps extending behind papyrus fringes. Seasonally inundated grasslands, influenced by river and rain flooding, consist of productive grass-dominated communities including Echinochloa pyramidalis and species, which thrive during peak flood periods and dry out in low-water seasons. woodlands and scrublands occupy higher, less frequently flooded elevations, featuring tree and shrub species adapted to periodic submersion. Open water bodies and channels support submerged macrophytes and floating fringe vegetation, contributing to habitat gradients from aquatic to terrestrial zones. These habitats exhibit longitudinal and vertical zonation, with southern floodplains wetter (around 800 mm annual rainfall) than northern ones (600 mm), influencing vegetation density and composition.

Fauna and Biodiversity

The Sudd wetland sustains a diverse adapted to its and swamp environments, encompassing over 90 species, more than 400 bird species, and significant populations of reptiles, amphibians, and . These assemblages benefit from seasonal flooding that facilitates cycling and connectivity, supporting both resident and migratory wildlife. Mammalian herbivores dominate the terrestrial and semi-aquatic zones, with key species including the white-eared kob (Kobus kob leucotis), surveyed at over 758,000 individuals in 2007; the tiang (), exceeding 155,000 in the same assessment; and the semi-aquatic, endemic lechwe (Kobus megotis), numbering 30,000 to 40,000. Additional ungulates such as the (Redunca redunca), migratory Mongalla gazelle (Gazella rufifrons), and rare (Taurotragus derbianus) contribute to one of Africa's largest annual migrations, historically involving up to 1.5 million animals traversing between wet-season calving grounds and dry-season refuges in the Sudd. (Hippopotamus amphibius) inhabit permanent water bodies, influencing vegetation through grazing and trampling. Avifauna is exceptionally rich, with over 2.5 million migratory birds—primarily Palaearctic species—arriving annually to exploit the wetland's productivity. The Sudd hosts the world's largest population of shoebills (Balaeniceps rex), estimated at around 6,400 individuals, alongside strongholds for great white pelicans (Pelecanus onocrotalus), ferruginous ducks (Aythya nyroca), and black crowned cranes (Balearica pavonina). Reptilian diversity includes the (Crocodylus niloticus), which preys on fish and mammals in channels and lagoons, and the near-endemic Werner's garter snake (Elapsoidea werneri). Amphibians occur but exhibit relatively low diversity compared to surrounding savannas. Fish assemblages underpin the , featuring species like the (Lates niloticus) and leopard (Protopterus annectens), which tolerate hypoxic conditions via air-breathing adaptations.
Key SpeciesTypeNotable Details
White-eared kob (K. kob leucotis)>758,000 (2007); major migrant.
Nile lechwe (K. megotis)30,000–40,000; semi-aquatic endemic.
Shoebill (B. rex)~6,400; largest global population.
Nile perch (L. niloticus)FishDominant predator in open waters.

Ecosystem Services and Valuation

The Sudd wetland delivers essential provisioning services, including fisheries that sustain local livelihoods through harvesting, with reported as the primary income source for many households in surrounding areas, supplemented by on floodplains and extraction of reeds, , and timber for construction and crafts. Regulating services are prominent, encompassing attenuation by absorbing seasonal overflows, thereby mitigating downstream flooding risks; water quality improvement via and sedimentation processes that normalize nutrient loads and reduce sedimentation for the ; and climate regulation through in swamp vegetation and peat, offset partially by from anaerobic decomposition. Cultural services support indigenous communities' spiritual connections to the landscape, transmission, and limited potential, while supporting services underpin hotspots that foster habitat diversity for migratory birds, aquatic species, and large mammals. Economic valuations of these services vary by methodology, such as market pricing for provisioning outputs, avoided cost approaches for flood control, and for non-market benefits, reflecting challenges in data scarcity and boundary delineation for the dynamic ~57,000 km² extent. A 2020 Nile Basin Initiative assessment, using frameworks, estimated the annual benefits exceeding $660 million USD (base year 2020), with regulating services comprising the largest share, followed by support and provisioning. A 2022 peer-reviewed analysis placed the Sudd's annual value at $2.3 billion USD, attributing approximately $1.2 billion to regulating functions like flood control and , underscoring their dominance over provisioning and cultural contributions. The World Bank, in a 2023 report on South Sudan's , cited a minimum annual economic value of $3.2 billion USD, emphasizing services' role in regional stability amid fragility. These estimates highlight the Sudd's outsized contributions relative to South Sudan's GDP (~$4-5 billion in recent years), though undercounting non-use values and long-term resilience benefits may yield conservative figures.

Human Interactions and Utilization

Indigenous Populations and Traditional Livelihoods

The Sudd supports indigenous Nilotic populations, including the Dinka, Nuer, Shilluk, and Anyuak, who have inhabited the region for centuries as semi-nomadic pastoralists adapted to the seasonal flooding of the . These groups, numbering over one million people collectively in the Sudd area alongside several million , depend on the wetland's marshes and grasslands for survival, with forming the economic and cultural cornerstone of Dinka and Nuer societies. Traditional livelihoods center on , where communities migrate northward during the dry season (December to May) to higher grounds for grazing and return to the inundated lowlands in the (June to November) for water access and . Dinka and Nuer herders prioritize management, using breeds resilient to infestation, while serve multiple roles beyond milk and meat, including as for bridewealth and markers. , conducted by men in dugout canoes with spears, traps, and nets amid the seasonal floods, provides protein and goods, particularly like and abundant in the nutrient-rich waters. Subsistence agriculture is opportunistic and secondary, involving the cultivation of , millet, and on levees or drained areas during low-water periods, supplemented by gathering wild grains, roots, and fruits from the . Shilluk communities exhibit a more , with relatively fewer cattle holdings and greater emphasis on riverine and crop production compared to the cattle-dominant Dinka and Nuer. These practices reflect causal adaptations to the Sudd's , where annual floods dictate resource availability, fostering resilience but also inter-group competition over prime and sites.

Economic Significance and Resource Extraction

The Sudd supports significant economic activity primarily through provisioning services, with an estimated total annual economic value of approximately $2.3 billion, encompassing both direct uses like fisheries and and indirect services such as flood control and provision. Provisioning services, which include extractable resources, account for about 8% of the total economic value, estimated at $3.3 billion in broader assessments that emphasize regulating and contributions. These values derive from local livelihoods dependent on the 's resources, though systematic national-level data remains limited due to conflict and underutilization. Fisheries represent the most substantial direct resource extraction, with an annual catch estimated at 300,000 metric tons as of 2024, primarily from the and connected channels, supporting protein needs for millions and generating local market value around $300 million based on fresh fish prices of approximately $1 per . This yield remains below sustainable potential, which could reach 1-2 million tons during high floods with improved like cold storage and roads, potentially enabling $300 million in annual exports. Extraction occurs via subsistence and small-scale commercial methods, including hooks, nets, and canoes, sustaining communities in Jonglei, Lakes, and states. Papyrus (Cyperus papyrus) harvesting provides another key extractable resource, with annual direct value from raw stems around $6 million and additional $15 million from crafts such as mats, baskets, and roofing materials produced across roughly 481,000 hectares of suitable . Local populations collect stems manually for household use and sale, contributing to non-timber forest products that bolster rural incomes, though overharvesting risks depletion without sustainable quotas. Complementary extractions include fuelwood and reeds for and , valued at under $5 million combined annually, alongside seasonal supporting economies worth about $84 million. Limited large-scale extraction occurs on the wetland's periphery, including drilling in adjacent fields like those in Block 5A, which contribute to South Sudan's national revenues but pose risks to Sudd without direct quantification of wetland-specific yields. Agricultural extraction is constrained by flooding but includes flood-recession farming on 131,000 hectares, yielding crops valued at roughly $45 million annually. Overall, resource use remains predominantly artisanal, with economic potential hindered by insecurity, poor , and lack of , despite the wetland's role in regional and trade.

Threats and Anthropogenic Pressures

The Sudd wetland experiences pronounced hydrological variability as a natural challenge, with water levels fluctuating dramatically due to seasonal inflows from the and erratic local rainfall, leading to periodic extreme flooding that inundates up to 15,000 square kilometers during peak wet seasons and subsequent dry periods that expose soils to . These fluctuations disrupt habitat continuity, as prolonged high water levels drown terrestrial while droughts concentrate pollutants and stress aquatic biota through hypoxia and reduced connectivity between floodplain channels. Interannual variability, driven by El Niño-Southern Oscillation influences on Nile discharge, has historically caused flood extents to vary by over 50% between years, challenging resilience without human intervention. Climate change intensifies these dynamics through observed and projected shifts in regional hydroclimatology, including a decline in mean annual by approximately 10-20% in the Sudd region since the 1970s alongside temperature increases of 1-1.5°C, which accelerate and diminish net . Higher dry-season temperatures exacerbate drying, with models indicating potential carbon release from the Sudd's estimated 13 billion tons of stored if hydroperiods shorten by even 10-15 days annually, amplifying global warming feedbacks. Biodiversity faces compounded risks from these alterations, as altered flooding regimes favor invasive aquatic plants like Vossia cuspidata proliferation during irregular inundations, outcompeting native species and reducing habitat heterogeneity. assemblages, adapted to stable seasonal cycles, exhibit declining catches and range shifts southward, attributed to warmer waters and oxygen deficits during intensified droughts, with local observations confirming reduced spawning success in shallow refugia. Without adaptive measures, South Sudan's vulnerability index places the Sudd among globally high-risk wetlands for climate-driven regime shifts by mid-century.

Human Activities and Overexploitation

Human activities in the Sudd wetland primarily revolve around subsistence fishing, , , and limited , which have intensified due to and displacement from conflicts. supports livelihoods for communities such as the Nuer and Dinka, with species like Labeo horie and Alestes spp. targeted using nets and hooks, but unsustainable practices including the use of small-mesh nets and lack of seasonal restrictions have led to and depletion of . Influxes of refugees and returnees have exacerbated pressure, resulting in overharvesting that damages fish communities and reduces catch per unit effort, as documented in assessments calling for stricter regimes. Wildlife hunting, traditionally for subsistence, has shifted toward commercial facilitated by small-arms proliferation during South Sudan's civil war, targeting species such as antelopes, , and for meat, hides, and . This has caused significant declines in large populations, with aerial surveys post-2013 conflict revealing hotspots and that hinder migrations. with automatic rifles, rather than traditional methods, has accelerated , undermining the wetland's role as a refuge for migratory herds estimated at over 1 million animals annually. Pastoralism involves seasonal grazing by cattle herds on floodplain grasses, but overgrazing from concentrated livestock during dry periods degrades vegetation cover and promotes soil erosion. Agricultural expansion, including clearance for sorghum fields, contributes to deforestation for fuelwood and settlement, fragmenting habitats and reducing the wetland's flood-retention capacity. These activities, driven by human population pressures exceeding sustainable levels in the region, collectively threaten the Sudd's ecological integrity without effective regulatory enforcement.

Development Initiatives and Debates

Jonglei Canal Project: History and Rationale

The project was first proposed in the early 1900s under British colonial administration in , with initial concepts emerging around 1901 to 1904 aimed at bypassing the Sudd wetlands to minimize water losses. Formal studies followed in 1946 by the Egyptian government, with detailed engineering plans developed between 1954 and 1959 to construct a canal diverting the Bahr el Jebel northward, parallel to the river's meandering path through the swamps. In April 1974, the governments of and , alongside the Southern Region's High Executive Council in Sudan, agreed to initiate the project, building on the 1959 Nile Waters Agreement that allocated 55.5 billion cubic meters annually to and 18.5 billion to while recognizing upstream losses in the Sudd. Construction commenced in 1978 using specialized French dredging equipment, excavating approximately 270 kilometers of the planned 360-kilometer before operations halted in 1983 amid the outbreak of the Second , leaving the project roughly two-thirds complete. The primary rationale centered on capturing evaporated in the Sudd, estimated at 14 billion cubic meters per year, to augment downstream flows for , , and urban needs in and northern . Proponents calculated that Phase I completion would yield an additional 4.4 billion cubic meters annually, with a potential Phase II expansion to 7.6 billion, addressing Egypt's veto rights under the 1929 Anglo-Egyptian Treaty and rising demands from and . For , the project promised flood control in Jonglei and Unity states alongside enhanced navigability and local economic activity, though the core hydro-diplomatic imperative was to redistribute evaporative losses equitably per colonial-era water-sharing frameworks.

Jonglei Canal: Projected Benefits and Economic Imperatives

The , if completed, is projected to bypass the Sudd swamps and channel approximately 20 million cubic meters of water per day, thereby saving an estimated 4.7 billion cubic meters annually from losses in the region. This redirected flow would primarily benefit downstream riparian states, and , by augmenting River discharge for and generation, potentially enabling the expansion of cultivated land by millions of acres in arid zones dependent on consistent water supply. For , proponents highlight local economic gains, including enhanced irrigation capacity in the Jonglei region to support large-scale , such as cultivation, which could alleviate food insecurity and foster export-oriented farming amid the country's heavy reliance on rain-fed . The canal would also provide a navigable spanning over 360 kilometers, facilitating transportation of and between southern and northern regions, reducing reliance on seasonal flooding for mobility, and enabling flood control measures to protect adjacent farmlands from inundation. Economically, the project addresses imperatives driven by South Sudan's underdeveloped infrastructure and chronic underutilization of its , where annual Nile inflows at Mongalla exceed 30 billion cubic meters but yield minimal domestic productivity due to swamp dissipation. Completion could inject capital through construction employment—estimated at tens of thousands of jobs during the initial phases—and generate ongoing revenue via water conveyance fees or associated developments, bolstering a national economy marked by dependency and vulnerability to variability. Diplomatically, it underscores the imperative for upstream-downstream , as Egypt's funding commitments reflect mutual interests in stabilizing allocations amid pressures exceeding 100 million in the lower basin.

Jonglei Canal: Environmental Criticisms and Feasibility Concerns

The project has drawn significant environmental criticism for its potential to severely degrade the Sudd wetland, Africa's largest freshwater swamp, by diverting waters and reducing seasonal flooding essential to its . Models indicate the could shrink the Sudd by 7-40%, leading to the of permanent swamps, lakes, and grasslands, with an estimated diversion of 3.5-4.8 cubic kilometers of annually from evaporation losses. This would disrupt the wetland's role as a , potentially releasing up to 4 billion tons of stored carbon from 6,200 square miles of soils, exacerbating regional . Environmental assessments have warned of irreversible or partial destruction of downstream ecosystems, including the collapse of fisheries that support local communities and the loss of habitats for migratory species such as 1.3 million antelopes and populations of crocodiles, hippos, elephants, zebras, and the endangered shoebill stork. Critics, including ecologists like Hannes Lang, argue that the Sudd functions as a critical buffer moderating floods, recharging , and sustaining a "green belt" rainfall system that influences precipitation across , the of Congo, and . Reduced evaporation—currently about 3.4 cubic miles annually—would deliver approximately 1.15 cubic miles more water southward to and but at the cost of diminished local rainfall and of grazing lands, threatening pastoralist livelihoods and corridors for migratory birds. The canal's high water velocity, projected at levels too swift for aquatic life, could sweep fish downstream into Lake Albert, further depleting inland protein sources valued at up to $1 billion annually in services. ese experts such as John Akec and Nhial Tiitmamer have highlighted these risks, estimating the Sudd's total economic value at $3.3 billion based on a 2020 Initiative assessment, underscoring the disproportionate local costs versus downstream benefits. Feasibility concerns encompass technical, economic, and sociopolitical challenges that have repeatedly stalled the project since its inception in and partial excavation of 270-360 kilometers by 1984. Upstream developments, including Ethiopia's and other reservoirs, are projected to reduce inflows into the Sudd by storing floodwaters, thereby diminishing the canal's intended water savings and rendering it less viable as a loss-reduction measure. Economic analyses question the high construction and maintenance costs—estimated at £92 million in 1978 prices for completion, excluding modern inflation and local development allocations of $59.4 million—against uncertain returns, particularly as benefits accrue primarily to while local sectors like fisheries and grazing face collapse. Sociopolitical hurdles include ongoing insecurity in , where civil conflicts halted work in the 1980s and continue to pose risks to labor and infrastructure, as evidenced by 2022 revival attempts suspended amid protests and ministerial opposition. The project would displace communities, block seasonal livestock and wildlife migrations, and heighten inter-ethnic tensions over resources, with calls for comprehensive feasibility studies citing unaddressed , water quality degradation, and disruptions. Despite arguments for flood mitigation in Jonglei and Unity states, stakeholders like Vice Chancellor John Akec emphasize that the ecological trade-offs undermine long-term viability in a climate-vulnerable region.

Alternative Development Proposals

Proposals for developing the have emphasized sustainable utilization of its services over large-scale hydrological alterations, prioritizing fisheries enhancement, eco-tourism, and conservation to generate economic value while preserving ecological integrity. The government's Sudd Wetlands Management Strategy, outlined for 2022-2050, advocates integrated land and water management systems that promote fair access to resources and , including the development of a national wetland policy to guide sustainable practices in fisheries and . This approach seeks to balance economic imperatives with the wetland's role in flood regulation, , and habitat provision, estimated to contribute significantly to national GDP through non-destructive means. Fisheries management represents a core alternative, leveraging the Sudd's rich aquatic for livelihoods without drainage. A 2021 IGAD workshop on harnessing South Sudan's through a "" highlighted potential expansions in regulated fishing, processing, and export, projecting contributions to amid variability. Recent surveys of 294 fishers and agro-pastoralists in 28 upper Sudd villages revealed interest in adaptive strategies like and education on sustainable harvesting to counter declining catches linked to and flooding, with calls for policy enforcement on gear limits and seasonal closures. The Bank's 2025 Natural Resource Review underscores the untapped potential of renewable resources like fisheries, estimating they could drive economic diversification if managed via cooperatives and infrastructure for cold chains and markets. Eco-tourism and management offer another pathway, capitalizing on the Sudd's migrations and scenic swamps for revenue generation. The Agency for Conservation and Development (ACD), active since the early , focuses on preserving game reserves like Panyikang, Shambe, and Zereff through and habitat restoration, integrating local to foster economic incentives for conservation. models in emphasize low-impact visits to observe such as elephants and antelopes, with operators advocating revenue-sharing to offset pressures from and support patrols. Economic valuations of the Sudd's , conducted around 2020, quantify ecosystem services like and tourism appeal at values supporting "" investments, such as eco-lodges and ranger training, over extractive alternatives. These proposals face implementation hurdles, including institutional capacity gaps and conflict, but align with international frameworks like South Sudan's Nationally Determined Contributions under the , which integrate wetland management for . Critics of drainage schemes argue that such sustainable options could yield higher long-term returns by maintaining the Sudd's hydrological buffer against droughts and floods, as evidenced by modeling of inundation extents. Ongoing debates stress stakeholder involvement, with NGOs and basin organizations pushing for transboundary cooperation to prioritize valuation-informed planning.

Conservation and Management Strategies

International Recognition and Efforts

The Sudd was designated as a of International Importance under the on June 5, 2006, covering approximately 57,000 km² and recognized as one of the largest tropical wetlands globally, as well as Africa's second-largest . This status underscores its ecological role in supporting , including migratory birds, , and mammalian species, while highlighting its function in water regulation for the . The Sudanese government formally received the Ramsar certificate on October 31, 2006, during a co-sponsored workshop, marking an initial step toward international cooperation for conservation amid regional instability. acceded to the on October 10, 2013, following its , thereby committing to national implementation of wetland management aligned with global standards. In addition to Ramsar recognition, the Sudd was added to UNESCO's World Heritage Tentative List in 2017, identified by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in gap assessments as a priority for natural heritage due to its unique floodplain ecosystem and underrepresentation in Africa's protected areas. Efforts to develop a full UNESCO nomination dossier, including integrated management plans, were initiated by the South Sudanese government with UNESCO support as of September 2023, aiming to enhance global visibility and access technical assistance for preservation. These initiatives build on earlier assessments, such as UNESCO's Sudd wetland evaluation project, which emphasized its status as one of the world's largest freshwater ecosystems and the need for transboundary collaboration. International conservation efforts have involved organizations like the Initiative, which promotes the Sudd's management as a transboundary critical for regional and biodiversity, integrating it into broader cooperative frameworks since South Sudan's participation. However, ongoing conflict has limited engagement, with only a few international NGOs resuming operations post-2005 peace accords, focusing on capacity-building rather than large-scale interventions. Ramsar and frameworks have facilitated symbolic and , but implementation remains constrained by political instability and resource scarcity, prioritizing over expansive expansions.

National Policies and Sudd Management Strategy

South Sudan lacks a dedicated national policy or law specifically for wetland management, with oversight integrated into broader provisions under the Transitional of 2011 and sectoral laws such as the Environmental Protection Act and Wildlife Act. These frameworks emphasize general conservation of natural resources, including wetlands, but do not provide comprehensive guidelines tailored to the Sudd's unique hydrological and ecological dynamics. The primary instrument for Sudd management is the Sudd Wetlands Management Strategy 2022-2050, developed collaboratively by the Government of and the Nile Basin Initiative. Unveiled on March 14, 2024, this strategy outlines a long-term framework to protect, conserve, preserve, and sustainably manage the Sudd, aiming to unlock its resource potential for present and future generations while balancing ecological services, , and socio-economic benefits. Key objectives include promoting integrated , mitigating threats like flooding and habitat loss, and fostering regional cooperation on transboundary water resources. Implementation involves coordination among national institutions, including the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation, and Ministry of Wildlife Conservation and Tourism, with support from international partners. The prioritizes , , monitoring of health, and initiatives, such as regulated resource use to prevent . As a Ramsar-designated of international importance, the Sudd imposes additional obligations for wise use, reinforcing national efforts toward conservation amid pressures from variability and human activities. In February 2022, the Ministry of Environment announced intentions to launch a targeted for Sudd restoration and management, though subsequent adoption remains tied to the broader framework. Challenges to execution include institutional capacity constraints, funding shortages, and political instability, which have historically limited proactive management; officials have called for increased investment in implementation programs to realize regional benefits. The strategy's emphasis on evidence-based planning and adaptive measures seeks to address these gaps, aligning with South Sudan's commitments under the Cooperative Framework and .

References

  1. https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/6276/
  2. https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/1622
  3. https://www.oneearth.org/ecoregions/sudd-flooded-grasslands/
  4. https://web.engr.oregonstate.edu/~arrast/CE413_513Projects_W23/ProjectReports/rosenblumzoe_6350065_98189014_Project_CE513_rosenblum.pdf
  5. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581821001518
  6. https://ceobs.org/land-cover-dynamics-and-conflict-in-the-sudd-wetland/
  7. https://ceobs.org/report-is-south-sudans-sudd-wetland-at-a-fork-in-the-road/
  8. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2024GL110690
  9. https://nilebasin.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/WhitePaper_PeatlandsOfSudd_v3.pdf
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Map-of-the-Sudd-region-showing-the-route-of-Jonglei-Canal_fig1_323947008
  11. https://nilebasin.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/Sudd%252520Wetland%252520Economic%252520Valuation%252520Report_South%252520Sudan_2020.pdf
  12. https://www.mdpi.com/2813-2203/2/3/40
  13. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02626667.2018.1438612
  14. https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/10/507/2006/hess-10-507-2006.pdf
  15. https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/eint/16/1/2011ei382.1.xml
  16. https://develop.unepgrid.ch/en/datasetproxy/MX-CNS6O-3W50L-C35QG
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323073209_Water_losses_from_the_Sudd
  18. https://rsis.ramsar.org/RISapp/files/RISrep/SS1622RIS.pdf
  19. https://nilebasin.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/Sudd%252520Management%252520Strategy.pdf
  20. https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers14-08/25353.pdf
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464343X23001899
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880724000062
  23. https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/10/507/2006/hess-10-507-2006.html
  24. https://journals.ametsoc.org/downloadpdf/view/journals/eint/16/1/2011ei382.1.pdf
  25. https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/latest/life-levee-extreme-flooding-south-sudan
  26. https://www.unicef.org/southsudan/what-we-do/climate-change-and-flooding
  27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214581825005725
  28. https://southsudan.crisisgroup.org/
  29. https://www.preventionweb.net/news/south-sudan-floods-first-example-mass-population-permanently-displaced-climate-change
  30. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ace272
  31. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-55266-y
  32. https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Sentinel-5P/Top_10_persistent_methane_sources
  33. https://www.awf.org/blog/south-sudan%e2%80%99s-conservation-potential
  34. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/sudd-wetlands
  35. https://ihedelftrepository.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/masters1/id/339865/
  36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35199200/
  37. https://nilebasin.org/sites/default/files/2023-10/VALUAT~1.PDF
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352739242_Sudd_Wetland_Economic_Valuation_of_Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Services_for_Green_Infrastructure_Planning_and_Development_NBI_Technical_Reports_Wetlands_and_Biodiversity_Series
  39. https://www.efdinitiative.org/publications/stakeholders-institutional-challenges-and-valuation-wetland-ecosystem-services-south
  40. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2023/03/27/new-report-with-inclusion-and-accountability-water-security-is-key-for-development-and-stability-in-afe-south-sudan
  41. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/southsudan/publication/rising-from-the-depths-water-security-and-fragility-in-afe-south-sudan
  42. https://nilebasin.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/wbBaselineSudan_chapter1-3.pdf
  43. https://iucn.org/sites/default/files/import/downloads/sudan_country_study.pdf
  44. https://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/cultures/fj22/summary
  45. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099011525065023762/pdf/P178749-4f498321-3e6d-474b-8aa3-55e66776d896.pdf
  46. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2025/01/27/world-bank-report-afe-south-sudan-renewable-natural-resources-potential-can-promote-inclusive-economic-growth
  47. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017225000380
  48. https://grace.jpl.nasa.gov/publications/547/
  49. https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/admin/publication_files/resource-1799-headwater_niles_july05.pdf
  50. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4623059
  51. https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/content/jonglei-canal-flawed-logic-hydro-diplomacy-nile-basin
  52. https://journals.ku.edu/EuroJEcol/article/download/14993/14141/37269
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9161201/
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395451010_The_Impact_of_Climate_Change_on_Water_Security_in_The_Agroecological_Zone_of_The_Sudd_Wetland_Jonglei_State-South_Sudan
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230338921_An_appraisal_of_the_fisheries_of_the_Sudd_wetlands_River_Nile_southern_Sudan
  56. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170524191601.htm
  57. https://cdn.peaceopstraining.org/theses/doran.pdf
  58. https://e360.yale.edu/features/will-a-nile-canal-project-dry-up-africas-largest-wetland
  59. https://apnews.com/article/climate-floods-sudan-environment-wetlands-f1a327f23d51bb0b8abe0671ddd5f82e
  60. https://paanluelwel.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/On-the-environmental-and-Socioeconomic-Impact-of-the-Jonglei-Canal-Project-in-South-Sudan.pdf
  61. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02626668709491174
  62. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/environmental-implications-proposed-jonglei-canal-project-elkhidir-fmckf
  63. https://www.chijournal.org/C448
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323947008_Jonglei_Canal_Project_Under_Potential_Developments_in_the_Upper_Nile_States
  65. https://paanluelwel.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Report-The-Impact-of-the-Jonglei-Canal-Project-in-South-Sudan.pdf
  66. https://e360.yale.edu/digest/sudd-wetland-jonglei-canal-south-sudan-suspend-dredging
  67. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504509409469864
  68. https://nilebasin.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/Sudd%252520Wetland%252520Monograph%252520%2525E2%252580%252593%252520Volume%2525203%252520Economic%252520Valuation%252520of%252520Biodiversity%252520and%252520Ecosystem%252520Services%252520for%252520Green%252520Infrastructure%252520Planning%252520and%252520Development.pdf
  69. https://igad.int/harnessing-south-sudan-water-resources-through-blue-economy/
  70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387754451_Navigating_climate_change_challenges_in_Sudd_wetland_fishing_communities_South_Sudan
  71. https://acdsouthsudan.org/
  72. https://journeysbydesign.com/destinations/south-sudan/shambe-national-park-and-sudd
  73. https://www.solutions-site.org/node/234
  74. https://www.ramsar.org/country-profile/south-sudan
  75. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2020-008-En.pdf
  76. https://www.ungm.org/Public/Notice/277088
  77. https://core.unesco.org/en/project/3210212151
  78. https://nilebasin.org/en/action-area/transboundary-wetlands
  79. https://csrf-southsudan.org/conflict-and-conservation-in-south-sudan/
  80. https://nilebasin.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/WRM-WBS-2022-11_South%252520Sudan%252520Wetlands%252520Governance%252520and%252520Management%252520Profile.pdf
  81. https://www.onecitizendaily.com/index.php/2024/03/14/sudd-wetlands-management-plan-unvailed/
  82. https://www.radiotamazuj.org/en/news/article/south-sudan-to-launch-an-environmental-policy-to-manage-sudd-wetlands
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.