Hubbry Logo
TicketmasterTicketmasterMain
Open search
Ticketmaster
Community hub
Ticketmaster
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Ticketmaster
Ticketmaster
Ticketmaster
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Ticketmaster Entertainment, LLC is an American ticket sales and distribution company based in Beverly Hills, California, with operations in many countries around the world. In 2010, it merged with events/concert promoter Live Nation under the name Live Nation Entertainment,[1] with both brand names continuing to operate as subsidiaries of Live Nation Entertainment.

Key Information

The company's ticket sales are fulfilled digitally or at its two main fulfillment centers located in Charleston, West Virginia, and Pharr, Texas, for both primary and secondary markets. Ticketmaster's clients include venues, artists and promoters. Clients control their events and set ticket prices, and Ticketmaster sells tickets that the clients make available to them. Ticketmaster also owns and operates TicketWeb, a ticketing website geared towards independent venues.

Ticketmaster is subject to numerous controversies and lawsuits, alleging violations of various laws. The platform charges a fee on tickets purchased and resold on the platform. The fees from ticket sales can account for a large percentage of overall ticket costs and have received scrutiny from regulators, customers, and musicians. The company has also faced scrutiny from the United States Department of Justice for retaliation against venues violating its 2010 10-year consent decree from the Live Nation merger, which has been extended an additional five years from 2020 through 2025.

Following the widespread criticism of the company's handling of the pre-sale of Taylor Swift's The Eras Tour in November 2022, the Department of Justice (DOJ) began a formal investigation into Live Nation Entertainment on the grounds of monopoly, antitrust law and consumer rights violations. The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee examined the merger with a hearing in January 2023. On May 23, 2024, the DOJ and a coalition of 29 states formally launched an antitrust suit against Live Nation and Ticketmaster.[2] An additional 10 states joined the lawsuit, bringing the total number of co-plaintiffs to 40.[3]

History

[edit]

Ticketmaster was founded in Phoenix, Arizona in 1976[4] by college staffers Peter Gadwa and Albert Leffler, Gordon Gunn III, as well as businessman Jerry Nelson.[5][6] The company originally licensed computer programs and sold hardware for ticketing systems. Its first ticketed concert was Electric Light Orchestra, held at the University of New Mexico.[6][7]

In 1982, Fred Rosen was appointed CEO of Ticketmaster and moved the company to Los Angeles to be closer to the live entertainment industry. The move enabled the company to build contracts with many well-known venues including the LA Forum. Rosen drove investment into the company and led the switch to computerized ticketing.[8] By 1985 the company had operations in the U.S., Canada and Europe.[6] Under Rosen, the company moved into publishing and set up a travel agency and acquired rival Ticketron in 1991, making it the market leader.[8][9]

In November 1993, Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen acquired an 80% stake for more than $325 million.[10][8]

InterActiveCorp years

[edit]

In 1998, USA Networks Inc., later named InterActiveCorp (IAC), purchased a majority stake in Ticketmaster.[11] That same year, the company merged with CitySearch and was renamed Ticketmaster Online-CitySearch.[12] In May 2000, Ticketmaster Online-CitySearch acquired TicketWeb Inc., a ticket vendor that sold tickets online and over the phone.[13] In 2003, IAC repurchased the remaining Ticketmaster stock that it had previously sold off.[14]

In September 2006, Ticketmaster President Sean Moriarty told NPR that Ticketmaster had lobbied several states to enact laws that would limit the ticket resale market to authorized companies. Economists worried these laws would harm competition, but Moriarty expressed the need to reduce corrupt scalpers and counterfeit tickets.[15]

In January 2008, Ticketmaster acquired Paciolan Inc., a developer of ticketing system applications and hosted ticketing systems, after litigation over the potential breach of antitrust laws.[16] Also in January, Ticketmaster acquired the UK-based secondary ticket marketplace, Getmein.com.[17] And finally, in that same January, Ticketmaster acquired TicketsNow, a ticket reseller in the United States, for $265 million.[18]

IAC spun off Ticketmaster as its own company in the summer of 2008.[19] Later in 2008, Ticketmaster acquired Front Line Management, an artist management firm that worked with artists such as Aerosmith, Christina Aguilera and Jimmy Buffett.[20] Front Line CEO Irving Azoff became CEO of the new company, which was renamed Ticketmaster Entertainment.[21]

Live Nation merger

[edit]

In February 2009, Ticketmaster entered into an agreement to merge with event promoter Live Nation to form Live Nation Entertainment.[22] The deal was cleared by the U.S. Justice Department in January 2010 under the condition that the company sell Paciolan to Comcast Spectacor or another firm, and license its software to Anschutz Entertainment Group (AEG), its biggest competitor.[23] The new company, which would be called Live Nation Entertainment, would also be subject to provisions for 10 years that prevented it from retaliating against venues that partnered with competing ticketing firms.[23] When the DOJ planned to bring court proceedings against the company in 2020 for six violations to these provisions, Live Nation agreed to a settlement that extended them an additional fine years to 2025.[24] Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino was named CEO of the new company.[25]

One year after merging, Live Nation settled a previous class action lawsuit against Ticketmaster which alleged that the company had misled plaintiffs in its descriptions of delivery and processing fees.[26]

Growth and acquisitions

[edit]

In 2015, Ticketmaster acquired Front Gate Tickets, a music festival ticketing service that provided services for festivals including Lollapalooza and Austin City Limits.[27] The same year, the company acquired Universe, a DIY ticketing platform,[27] and Two Toasters, a mobile app developer.[28] In 2017, TicketWeb, Ticketmaster's self-service ticketing platform, acquired Strobe Labs, a marketing platform that allows users to market to fans through social media.[29] In 2018, Ticketmaster acquired UPGRADED, a company which converts physical tickets into digital ones, utilising blockchain.[30] In 2020, Ticketmaster acquired Taiwan's Tixcraft (拓元售票) for entering the Asian market.[31]

Products and services

[edit]
A Ticketmaster paper ticket

Ticketmaster sells tickets that its clients make available to it.[32] In 2009, Ticketmaster released a digital ticketing system that required customers to prove their identity prior to purchase. The company believed this would help circumvent brokers and scalpers.[33]

In 2016, Ticketmaster released a statement in favor of the Better Online Ticket Sales Act (BOTS Act), which banned the use of ticket bots to buy large amounts of tickets online and resell them at inflated prices.[34] The following year, the company filed a lawsuit against the ticket broker Prestige Entertainment after the company used bots to buy more than 30,000 tickets to the Broadway play "Hamilton".[35]

The company reported nearly 500 million tickets sold for 400,000 events in 2018.[36]

In November 2020, Ticketmaster announced it will check the COVID-19 vaccination status of ticket buyers before issuing passes when live events return in 2021. Fans that either failed to verify their vaccination status or tested positive would be denied access to the event.[37]

Pricing

[edit]

The face value of Ticketmaster tickets is determined by the artist or client.[38] In addition to the face value price, venues and Ticketmaster add fees to pay for their services.[39]

Typically, fees added to a ticket's face value have included:[40][41][42]

  • Facility charge – Charge added by the venue.
  • Delivery fee – Charges added dependent on the ticket delivery method and credit card processing fees.
  • Service fee – Sum of charges added based on the "agreement with each client (artists)" and the order processing fee. Ticketmaster "may earn a profit on the order processing fee".[42]

As the Los Angeles Times has explained, "the 'service fee' is intentionally kept separate from the list price for two reasons: to make the base price of a ticket appear more affordable, and to create the impression that only Ticketmaster pockets that fee."[43] In other words, "Ticketmaster is effectively paid to be a punching bag" for consumer frustration with opaque add-on fees, and then some of the fees find their way back to the artist or venue.[43] Utilizing such subterfuge to extract additional revenue from fans without arousing direct backlash towards themselves has become increasingly important for artists. The collapse of record album sales after the year 2000 means that as of the 2020s, 95 percent of artist income comes from concert tours.[44]

Fee amounts vary between events and are dependent on the venue, available delivery methods, and preferences of the artist.[38] Some economists and activist groups have claimed that high ticket prices are due to a lack of competition within the music industry.[39][45]

In 2013, the jam band The String Cheese Incident gave fans money to purchase 400 tickets to one of its shows in order to resell them on its own site with fewer fees. The band said they were protesting Ticketmaster's ticket fees, while Ticketmaster argued that the band was taking revenue from venues and promoters.[46][47]

As of 2016, ticket resale was Ticketmaster's fastest growing business.[48]

In 2022, Ticketmaster was experimenting with a demand-based, dynamic pricing which would vary the ticket price based upon demand. The new system is touted to give artists a higher share of the revenues that would otherwise be coming through resale ticket sales.[49] In May 2025, Ticketmaster announced it would start showing how much buyers paid for tickets — fees included — before checkout. The company announced the “All In Prices” initiative as part of its efforts to comply with the Federal Trade Commission’s ban on junk fees, which goes into effect on May 12th 2025.[50]

Criticism and controversies

[edit]

Anti-competition claims

[edit]

In May 1994, the grunge band Pearl Jam filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice claiming Ticketmaster had cut the group out of venue bookings in a dispute over fees.[51] The investigation was closed without action in 1995, though the Justice Department stated it would continue to monitor the developments in the ticket industry.[52][53] Chuck Philips, a reporter who covered the issue,[54][55][56][57] was told by sources close to the case that the investigation was closed due to a combination of a shortage of resources and the case being difficult and having uncertain prospects.[52]

In a 2009 article by the CBC, Ticketmaster argued that legislation was needed in Ontario to protect fans from scalpers and unauthorized ticket brokers saying, "You and I both know there is a thriving ticket-broker industry ... so the law is really a fiction ... We very strongly feel the law needs to be modernized to reflect the reality of internet commerce. By keeping a price cap in place, you're really just driving the [resale] business into the shadows."[58] That same year, musician Bruce Springsteen complained of a conflict of interest between Ticketmaster and TicketsNow after fans were directed to TicketsNow once tickets to his concert sold out on Ticketmaster.com. Irving Azoff, Ticketmaster CEO at the time, released an apology and stated that the TicketsNow link would no longer be shown for Springsteen's concerts.[59][60] In 2018, the United States Department of Justice began reviewing complaints by AEG that claimed the company had engaged in anti-competitive practices. As of April 2018, the Department of Justice had not released comments on its investigation.[61]

In 2020, the Department of Justice fined Ticketmaster $3 million for violating a consent decree resulting from the Live Nation merger. The consent decree is extended through 2025 and is required to enforce its own compliance with the decree with a penalty of $1 million for any future violations.[24]

On May 23, 2024, the DOJ and a coalition of 29 states formally launched an antitrust suit against Live Nation and Ticketmaster.[2] The lawsuit contends that Live Nation, which owns Ticketmaster, abused its unrivaled power in the concert and ticketing industry to eliminate competition, lessening consumer choice and resulting in rising prices.[62]

Rewards program monthly fees

[edit]

In May 2013, Ticketmaster agreed to pay up to $23 million for enrolling customers into a rewards program that charged $9 per month. Ticketmaster made $85 million in fees, from customers who took about eight months on average to cancel their enrollment in the program. 1.12 million customers were eligible to claim up to a $30 refund.[63]

Secret partnership with scalpers

[edit]

Ticketmaster has secretly partnered with scalpers to drive up prices for consumers.[64][65][66] Economists characterize the secondary market in tickets as socially wasteful rent-seeking.[67][68] In the mid-2000s, Ticketmaster engaged in primary market auctions that reduced the rents involved in secondary market scalping – however, Ticketmaster ended these primary market auctions, opting instead to enter into the secondary market.[68]

In September 2018, the Toronto Star reported that Ticketmaster was not enforcing ticket limit rules on its resale platform, TradeDesk.[69] Ticketmaster denied the allegations, saying it would examine its resale policies on TradeDesk, and that it "never allows ticket scalpers to buy tickets ahead of fans."[70] One month later, a group of customers filed a class action lawsuit against Ticketmaster.[71]

In July 2019, a report by Billboard revealed a strategy by Live Nation, Ticketmaster's parent company, to secretly bypass placing certain tickets for sale on the primary market and instead, place them directly on resale sites "without giving fans a chance to buy them through normal channels at face value."[72] The company acknowledged it has "facilitated the quiet transfer of concert tickets directly into the hands of resellers through the years, though only at the request of the artists involved."

In September 2025, the United States Federal Trade Commission, joined by seven states, accused Ticketmaster and Live Nation of allowing ticket resellers to ignore purchasing limit set by artists, which allowed resellers to scoop up tickets and sell them for a markup, while Ticketmaster reaped in $3.7 billion in resale fees between 2019 and 2024.[73]

Data breaches

[edit]

In June 2018, Ticketmaster notified 40,000 U.K. customers that it had identified a hack caused by malicious software on a third-party customer support product it contracted. The company stated that customers who bought tickets between February and June 2018 may have had data compromised.[74][75][76][77]

Between April 2 and May 18, 2024, an "unauthorized third party obtained information from a cloud database hosted by a third-party data services provider" that exposed personal information including payment-card details. Ticketmaster identified customers whose data may have been affected by the breach on May 23, 2024, but only notified them of this a month later in a June 22 letter.[78]

On May 20, 2024, Ticketmaster’s suffered a breach from their database hosted by Snowflake Inc. as part of a mass Snowflake customer data breach. Ticketmaster's parent company, Live Nation, revealed the breach on May 31, with Australian authorities confirming they were working with the company on the incident.[79] Further investigation revealed that the hackers were able to access Ticketmaster's Snowflake database by using credentials stolen from EPAM, a 3rd party business process outsourcing firm.[80]

As part of the stolen data, hackers leaked customer information and event barcodes for more than 70,000 Ticketmaster events, including Taylor Swift 'Eras Tour' and hundreds of other events.[81][82]

Deceptive pricing

[edit]

A class action lawsuit was filed against Ticketmaster in 2003, alleging that it did not fully disclose UPS and order processing fees added to tickets sold online. The case settlement was approved in 2015 and Ticketmaster issued vouchers and discount codes to fans who purchased tickets online between 1999 and 2013.[83][84] In a related case, Ticketmaster filed suit against its liability insurance carrier, Illinois Union Insurance Company, a subsidiary of ACE Limited, in 2010 for failing to aid in its defense in the 2003 suit.[85]

In June 2019, Canada's Competition Bureau fined Ticketmaster $4.5 million dollars ($3.44 million US dollars) as part of a settlement after it was discovered that Ticketmaster "topped advertised costs by more than 20% -- and sometimes as much as 65%." In addition to the required payment, Ticketmaster signed a consent agreement to ensure its advertising policies abide by Canadian law.[86]

Competitor computer hacking

[edit]

In December 2020, Ticketmaster "entered into a plea agreement with federal prosecutors" and agreed to pay a $10 million fine after being charged with illegally accessing computer systems of a competitor.[87] According to FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge Williams Sweeney, "Ticketmaster used stolen information to gain an advantage over its competition, and then promoted the employees who broke the law."[88] The allegations were first reported in 2017 when a former CrowdSurge top executive hired by Ticketmaster hacked into his former employer's database.[89]

Dynamic pricing and "platinum" tickets

[edit]

Ticketmaster and Live Nation has faced backlash for their dynamic pricing system and "platinum" tickets when tickets for Bruce Springsteen's and Blink-182's 2023 tours went on sale in July and October 2022 respectively, which saw fans of both acts criticize prices for random seats across the venue going for hundreds or thousands of dollars during pre-sales or right when tickets went on sale for the general public.[90][91] In March 2023, Robert Smith criticized the model and announced that the Cure would not be allowing Ticketmaster to sell dynamically-priced or platinum tickets for the band's upcoming North American tour.[92] Smith priced tickets for the Cure's concerts for as low as $20, but Ticketmaster charged fees that equalled more than the price of the base ticket. After Smith expressed his outrage, Ticketmaster refunded a portion of the fees to the purchasers.[93]

Taylor Swift tour pre-sale crash

[edit]
Further information: Taylor Swift–Ticketmaster controversy

On November 15, 2022, the first day of pre-sale of tickets to verified fans for the US leg of the Eras Tour (2023) by American singer-songwriter Taylor Swift,[94] Ticketmaster's official website crashed following "historically unprecedented demand with millions showing up", halting the pre-sale.[95] In less than an hour of availability, the ticketing platform's servers were "unable to answer", with users "either completely logged out or in a queue 2,000-plus people strong that appeared frozen." Ticketmaster immediately published a statement saying they are working to fix the issues "as the site was unprepared to accommodate the sheer force of hundreds of thousands of Swift fans",[96] and subsequently reported that "hundreds of thousands of tickets" had already been sold and rescheduled the remaining onsales to a different time, including the Capital One onsale to November 16.[97]

Fans and customers online widely criticized Ticketmaster for a flawed ticketing model that obstructed them from purchasing tickets. The word "Ticketmaster" was trending number one worldwide on various social media platforms such as Twitter and TikTok.[98] Several US lawmakers took notice of the issue. US congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted that Ticketmaster is a monopoly and that it must be unmerged from Live Nation Entertainment. Congressman Bill Pascrell, who had previously petitioned US Attorney General Merrick Garland in support of "strong antitrust enforcement by the Biden Administration" and criticized the merger of Ticketmaster and Live Nation, stated that he attempted to purchase tickets but was placed on the waitlist.[99] The Tennessee Attorney General, Jonathan Skrmetti, began an investigation into "consumer complaints about chaos during the presale of tickets" to the tour. He said in a press conference on November 16 that "a lack of competition [for Ticketmaster] has led to a poor experience and higher prices for consumers."[100] Following investigations initiated by the Tennessee Attorney General[100] and the North Carolina Attorney General on the grounds of consumer rights violations,[101] the federal Department of Justice began an investigation into Live Nation Entertainment and Ticketmaster on November 18.[102]

Swift released a statement on November 18, 2022, via her Instagram story; she asserted that she is protective of her fans and wanted to assure a quality experience for them, but found it difficult to "trust an outside entity with these relationships and loyalties". She said that she was "not going to make excuses for anyone because we asked [Ticketmaster], multiple times, if they could handle this kind of demand and we were assured they could." She concluded that she is taking the necessary measures to resolve the issue and resume the sale.[103]

In December, a group of Swift's fans, called "Swifties," filed a lawsuit against Ticketmaster and its parent company Live Nation, accusing them of fraud, anti-trust violations, and price-fixing. In the lawsuit, fans demanded $2,500 for each violation, which could potentially amount to several million in total.[104]

Cloned and invalid Bad Bunny concert tickets

[edit]

On December 9, 2022, the day of Bad Bunny's first concert of his World's Hottest Tour in Mexico City, an unprecedented number of tickets were cancelled, affecting a considerable group of concertgoers, whose tickets were confiscated and destroyed.[105] Because of this, Ticketmaster received a great amount of criticism because many of the attendees who were denied entry were accused of having counterfeit or cloned tickets, even though those attendees presented proof of payment or their ticket had not even been previously scanned. The procurator of Office of the Federal Prosecutor for the Consumer, described on Twitter that the agency had already requested a report from Ticketmaster Mexico on what happened at the Estadio Azteca and asked affected consumers to formalize their complaints under the terms of the law.[106] Due to the criticism, Ticketmaster Mexico released a statement through their social networks apologizing and saying that "the inconveniences in the accesses were a consequence of the presentation of an unprecedented number of fake tickets, which caused an out of the ordinary agglomeration of people and an intermittent operation of our system". They also offered refunds for the full cost of the tickets.[107] However, PROFECO ordered that those affected not only be refunded the full cost of the ticket, but an additional 20%.[108]

United States Senate committee hearing

[edit]

On January 24, 2023, a three-hour hearing by the Senate judiciary committee,[109] titled "That's the Ticket: Promoting Competition and Protecting Consumers in Live Entertainment", to analyze "the long-simmering dissatisfaction over the 2010 consent decree governing the merger of Ticketmaster and Live Nation", was held at 10:00 am EST in the Hart Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C.[110] The hearing was telecast live. Various media outlets reported that both the Democrat and Republican senators "grilled" Ticketmaster's representative, Joe Berchtold, the company's chief financial officer. The senators questioned Berchtold over Ticketmaster's monopolistic practices, policies, ticket costs, lack of transparency, lack of defense against bots, and insensitivity to music artists. Berchtold, despite apologizing for the debacle, denied accusations of monopoly and fraud, but accepted that "there are several things we could have done better—including staggering the sales over a longer period of time and doing a better job setting fan expectations for getting tickets" and continued to blame "industrial-scale ticket scalping" and "unprecedented number of bots" in Swift's tour debacle. The witnesses prosecuting Ticketmaster included Jerry Mickelson, the president of JAM Creative Productions; and Jack Groetzinger, co-founder of SeatGeek.[111][112] Live Nation cited several letters of support within its testimony, including one from American country singer Garth Brooks.[113] Free Britney America, a D.C. organization that was part of the Free Britney movement, protested outside the U.S. Capitol during the hearing "in support of ending Ticketmaster-Live Nation's monopoly over the live event and ticketing industry."[114]

Zach Bryan scalpers and Drake tour misinformation

[edit]

On December 26, 2022, American country singer Zach Bryan criticized Ticketmaster for his Burn Burn Burn tour (2023) and listed out non-transferrable tickets to stop scalpers.[115] He went on to release a live album, entitled All My Homies Hate Ticketmaster.[116][117]

In March 2023, fans of Canadian rapper Drake also filed a class action lawsuit against Ticketmaster in the Superior Court of Quebec, alleging intentional deception and fraud. Plaintiffs claimed that the on-sale for the It's All a Blur Tour, a co-headlining concert tour by Drake and 21 Savage, "intentionally misleads consumers for [Ticketmaster's] own financial gain" by concealing information about additional show dates to drive demand and ticket prices.[118][119] The suit seeks $300 in punitive damages per customer and compensatory damages covering the difference between the "Official Platinum" ticket prices and the regular cost for the seats.[120]

Eurovision 2023 on-sale crash

[edit]

For the Eurovision Song Contest 2023 in Liverpool in May 2023, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) and the host broadcaster BBC partnered with Ticketmaster.[121] Prior to the ticket booking platform going live, many users complained that the Ticketmaster website had crashed with a 500 error.[122] Tickets for the contest's final sold out in 36 minutes, with the remaining available shows selling out around an hour later.[123] Following this, tickets were available on third-party resale platforms such as Viagogo, with a general admission standing ticket for the final, originally priced at £380, being sold for up to £11,800.[124][125][126]

Coronation concert ballot misinformation

[edit]

Ticketmaster was heavily criticised for their handling of the tickets for Coronation Concert of Charles III and Camilla. After two rounds of ticket balloting for guaranteed tickets, remaining unclaimed tickets were released on a first-come, first-served basis to those who had previously applied to the ballot. Despite tickets being fully claimed, thousands of emails were sent to those unsuccessful in the ballot incorrectly informing them that they won tickets.[127][128] As a result, many people rushed to book travel, accommodation and time off work for the event.[129] Ticketmaster was criticised and the email was labeled "misleading".[130]

Oasis dynamic pricing scrutiny

[edit]

Many fans criticised the sales process and prices for the Oasis 2025 reunion tour, noting hours-long queues or website crashes when attempting to buy tickets: other fans reported being placed in a queue for the ticket queue. If fans were able to reach the purchase section of the website, tickets would dramatically change in price, with reports indicating rises from £135, to more than £350.[131] It was confirmed ticket prices, and the sudden increase, was due to Ticketmaster's dynamic pricing system. According to Jonathan Brown, chief executive of the Society of Ticket Agents and Retailers, the band itself holds the power to opt-in to dynamic pricing.[132] Oasis responded to this in statement, saying, "[we] leave decisions on ticketing and pricing entirely to their promoters and management" and that they had "at no time had any awareness that dynamic pricing was going to be used".[133] However, in 2023, Robert Smith of The Cure confirmed dynamic pricing used by Ticketmaster is something artists can choose to opt into.[134]

On 5 September 2024, the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) announced it was launching an investigation into Ticketmaster over Oasis concert ticket sales. The CMA said its investigation would include how dynamic pricing may have been used and would scrutinise whether the sale of tickets may have breached consumer protection law. This included considering whether Ticketmaster had engaged in unfair commercial practices, if consumers were given clear and timely information to explain that the tickets could be subject to dynamic pricing, and if consumers were put under pressure to buy tickets within a short period of time – at a higher price than they understood they would have to pay.[135]

Ticket transfer hacking

[edit]

In fall 2024, Ticketmaster customers began noticing tickets were being incorrectly removed from accounts. Despite thousands of customers taking to Ticketmaster's social media accounts over a period of months, the platform initially ignored the comments and released a statement in October 2024 indicating that affected customers were "victims of hackers" taking advantage of the platform's ticket transfer feature.[136] Despite this, Ticketmaster did not replace missing tickets or pull its ticket transfer feature pending an investigation into the hacking. This issue continued in November 2024 for fans attending an Usher concert, with the tickets only being refunded after fans complained to the Better Business Bureau. Due to Ticketmaster's lack of information and action, social media users and fans questioned if the organization was in on the scam itself.[137]

Partners

[edit]

Ticketmaster has partnerships with venues, professional sports leagues and teams, college and universities, musical acts and theatre tours[138][139][140] and target corporation in the United States and internationally.[141] Ticketmaster has partnered with musical acts such as Taylor Swift,[142] and the Trans-Siberian Orchestra,[143] and theatre productions such as Hamilton and Harry Potter and the Cursed Child.[138][144]

Ticketmaster has been the ticketing provider for the National Football League (NFL), National Hockey League (NHL) and the National Basketball Association (NBA).[145][146][147] In 2008, Ticketmaster entered into an agreement with the National Football League (NFL) to manage its resale market on NFL TicketExchange.[148] Ticketmaster also works with wrestling promotions World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) (1994) and All Elite Wrestling (AEW) (2019)

In 2017, Ticketmaster announced it would open the TicketExchange platform to allow the sale and validation of tickets on third-party websites, including StubHub.[148] Ticketmaster has also partnered with the United States Tennis Association,[149] Tennis Canada,[150] and the PGA Tour.[151]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ticketmaster

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc. is an American company specializing in ticketing services for live events, including concerts, sports, and theater. Founded in 1976 in , by university staffers Albert Leffler, Peter Gadwa, and businessman Gordon Gunn, it initially focused on developing and selling ticketing hardware and software systems. Since merging with in 2010 to form , Inc., Ticketmaster has operated as a wholly owned , integrating promotion, venue management, and primary ticketing under one entity. It commands a dominant position in the U.S. market, handling over 70% of primary ticketing for live concerts and events through exclusive venue contracts and artist agreements. This market power has drawn antitrust challenges, including a 2024 U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit alleging monopolization across live concert markets and a 2025 suit accusing deceptive practices in and fee disclosures.

History

Founding and Early Expansion (1979–1990s)

Ticketmaster was founded on October 2, 1976, in , by Albert Leffler, Peter Gadwa, and Gordon Gunn III, individuals associated with who sought to address inefficiencies in manual concert ticketing through automated systems. Initially, the company sold hardware and software for ticketing operations rather than directly handling sales, securing its first contract in 1977 to manage tickets for events in . Early operations remained modest, with limited revenue and staff, as the firm focused on developing and installing computerized ticketing terminals for venues. The company's trajectory shifted in 1982 when Chicago-based investor , founder of the Hotels chain, acquired Ticketmaster for approximately $4 million, injecting capital and installing Fred Rosen as CEO. Rosen relocated headquarters to and adopted an aggressive strategy of securing exclusive long-term contracts with arenas, stadiums, and promoters, which locked in primary ticketing rights and service fees. This approach facilitated rapid domestic expansion, growing from 25 employees and $1 million in annual sales in 1982 to broader U.S. coverage by the mid-1980s, including partnerships with major sports teams and concert halls. International efforts began in the early with an office in the and deals for local entertainment venues, while domestically, Ticketmaster capitalized on rising demand for live events amid economic recovery. By the early , these efforts positioned the company for dominance, highlighted by the 1991 acquisition of rival for $285 million, which eliminated a key competitor and expanded its client base to over 90% of major U.S. venues. This period marked Ticketmaster's transition from a niche hardware provider to the preeminent ticketing service, reliant on contractual exclusivity rather than technological monopoly.

Acquisitions and Technological Shifts (1990s–2000s)

In 1991, Ticketmaster acquired its primary rival, Ticketron, securing control over approximately 90% of the computerized primary ticketing market in North America. This acquisition, part of a broader expansion strategy, followed Ticketmaster's purchase of seven competitors between 1985 and 1991, enabling nationwide scale through integrated systems and exclusive venue contracts. During the 1990s, the company further grew via strategic alliances and joint ventures, including partnerships that enhanced operational reach without full ownership. In 1993, Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen purchased an 80% stake in Ticketmaster for $80 million, injecting capital and a technology-oriented vision that prioritized digital infrastructure over traditional operations. Allen's involvement accelerated the company's pivot toward internet capabilities, culminating in Ticketmaster's initial public offering in 1996, which raised funds for system upgrades and raised its market capitalization to over $500 million at the time. By late 1998, Ticketmaster merged its online operations with CitySearch, forming Ticketmaster Online-CitySearch, a publicly traded entity focused on integrating ticketing with web portals for event discovery and sales. The launch of Ticketmaster.com in 1995 marked a pivotal technological shift from phone- and outlet-based sales to platforms, allowing real-time inventory access and reducing reliance on physical queues. This transition capitalized on emerging adoption, with online sales volumes growing rapidly into the 2000s as expanded; by 2000, digital channels accounted for a significant portion of transactions, supported by backend software enhancements for detection and dynamic pricing. Complementary acquisitions in 1999–, such as TicketLink and Admission Network, bolstered multilingual and regional online capabilities, further embedding Ticketmaster in the digital ecosystem amid competition from nascent rivals. These moves entrenched Ticketmaster's infrastructure advantages, though they drew scrutiny for limiting in an increasingly digitized market.

Merger with Live Nation and Regulatory Approval (2008–2010)

On February 10, 2009, Live Nation, Inc. and Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc. announced a definitive agreement to merge in a transaction valued at approximately $2.5 billion, structured as a merger of equals that would create , Inc., combining Live Nation's concert promotion operations with Ticketmaster's primary ticketing services. The deal followed the expiration of an exclusive ticketing agreement between the companies in 2008, amid competitive pressures including Ticketmaster's struggles against secondary markets and Live Nation's expansion into artist management and venue ownership. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) initiated an antitrust review shortly after the announcement, expressing concerns that the merger could reduce competition in primary ticketing services, where Ticketmaster held about 80% , potentially leading to higher fees for consumers and venues. Regulators also scrutinized risks, given Live Nation's control over promotions and venues, which could disadvantage rival ticketers through exclusive contracts or retaliation. The review involved input from states and stakeholders, with critics arguing the combination would entrench monopoly power in live , while proponents cited efficiencies from integrated operations that could lower costs and improve service delivery. On January 25, 2010, the DOJ approved the merger via a , requiring Live Nation to refrain from retaliating against venues using competing ticketers for five years, license its ticketing software to at least one significant rival, and relinquish certain secondary ticketing rights to entities like . Additional behavioral remedies included establishing a ticketing division at arm's length from promotion activities and submitting to oversight by an independent monitor for ten years to ensure compliance. The merger closed the same day, with Ticketmaster becoming a wholly owned of , retaining its brand for ticketing operations. This approval reflected the DOJ's assessment that, with these structural and conduct restrictions, the deal would not substantially lessen , though it acknowledged ongoing risks from the combined entity's scale in a concentrated industry.

Post-Merger Growth and Global Reach (2010–present)

Following the completion of the merger between Live Nation and Ticketmaster on January 25, 2010, the combined entity under reported initial annual revenue of $5.1 billion for that year, despite a net loss of $189 million amid integration costs and economic recovery from the . By 2023, overall company revenues had risen to approximately $36 billion, with the ticketing segment—dominated by Ticketmaster—generating $4.1 billion in 2022 alone, reflecting compounded annual growth driven by increased event volumes and post-pandemic demand resurgence. From 2009 levels, Live Nation's concert and ticketing revenues expanded more than fivefold by 2023, attributable to operational synergies such as unified promotion-ticketing platforms that enhanced efficiency in selling over 500 million tickets annually across venues. Ticketmaster's market position solidified domestically, capturing 63% of U.S. online ticket purchases among consumers surveyed in the prior year as of , maintaining over 80% share in primary ticketing for major concert venues—a dominance that persisted despite entrants like . This scale enabled innovations like verified fan presales and resale integrations, boosting secondary market volumes, though absolute U.S. edged lower since 2010 amid broader industry . Internationally, Ticketmaster extended operations to over 35 countries by the mid-2010s, leveraging partnerships and localized platforms for events in , , and . Notable expansions included deepened penetration in starting in 2014 through venue contracts previously held by competitors, and acquisitions like Quicket in 2024 to enter and broader African markets with 20 million annual tickets sold via the target. In 2025, Ticketmaster launched in , enhancing Latin American coverage alongside stakes in promoters like Mexico's OCESA, which sells 20 million tickets yearly, to facilitate cross-border artist tours and digital ticketing adoption. These moves supported global revenue diversification, with international ticketing comprising a growing portion of the segment amid rising live entertainment demand in emerging markets.

Business Model and Operations

Core Products and Services

Ticketmaster's core products center on primary ticketing services, facilitating the initial sale of tickets for live events such as concerts, sports, theater, and family entertainment on behalf of event organizers and venues. These services encompass end-to-end event ticketing management, from inventory setup and pricing to distribution and entry validation, primarily through digital platforms accessible via web and mobile applications. As a of , Ticketmaster integrates these offerings to support a wide range of clients, including stadiums, arenas, and smaller venues, emphasizing scalability for events of varying sizes. The flagship TM1 platform powers these operations, providing an enterprise-grade system for event creation, customization, and optimization across the ticketing lifecycle. TM1 enables features like dynamic seat selection, revenue tracking by price levels, multi-event management tools, and self-serve marketing capabilities, including audience segmentation, email campaigns, and pixel tracking for targeted promotions. Complementing this, Ticketmaster offers flexible APIs, SDKs, and widgets for third-party integrations, allowing partners to embed ticketing functionality into custom applications or websites. Security is integral to these products via SafeTix, a digital ticketing technology that employs encrypted tickets linked to user accounts, featuring automatically refreshing barcodes to prevent , counterfeiting, and unauthorized resale. SafeTix facilitates contactless entry scanning and real-time attendance insights for venues, reducing risks associated with screenshots or duplicated tickets. On event day, TM1 enhancements support efficient validation, flexible venue management, and streamlined fan entry processes.

Revenue Mechanisms and Pricing Practices

Ticketmaster derives the majority of its revenue from service fees imposed on primary ticket sales facilitated through its platform, where it holds exclusive or preferred ticketing contracts with venues and promoters. These contracts typically entitle Ticketmaster to a per-ticket service charge, often ranging from 15% to 25% of the ticket's face value, which is retained as the company's primary income stream after covering operational costs such as order processing, customer support, and prevention. In 2024, the ticketing segment, dominated by Ticketmaster, contributed 13% to Live Nation Entertainment's overall revenue of $19.6 billion, with Ticketmaster reporting $742.7 million in revenue for Q2 2025 alone amid a record $9 billion in gross transaction value. Pricing practices begin with the face value established by the event organizer—considering factors like production expenses, venue capacity, and market demand—followed by layered fees that can significantly inflate the total cost to consumers. Service fees, charged per ticket, fund Ticketmaster's platform operations and are the sole direct revenue from sales, while facility fees allocated to venues support maintenance and local taxes, and additional order processing or delivery fees apply per transaction or method. Historically, these fees were disclosed only at checkout, prompting accusations of deceptive practices that obscured final costs, with averages adding 27% to 31% to face value and peaks reaching up to 75% in high-demand scenarios. In response to a Federal Trade Commission rule effective May 2025 mandating transparent "all-in" pricing for live events, Ticketmaster shifted to displaying total costs—including service, facility, and processing fees—upfront, aiming to eliminate surprises while complying with regulations against hidden fees. Dynamic pricing, a demand-responsive model akin to airline surge pricing, allows face values to fluctuate in real-time based on supply, viewer , and purchase during , primarily benefiting organizers by capturing higher willingness-to-pay from fans. Implemented via Ticketmaster's Verified Fan system for select events since 2017, it has drawn scrutiny for exacerbating price volatility—evident in the 2022 Taylor Swift tour presale where tickets escalated from $49 to over $300—but proponents argue it reduces by aligning prices closer to realities. Despite these mechanisms, a 2025 class-action alleged Ticketmaster's practices violated state laws by displaying artificially low initial prices, though the company maintains fees are contractual and essential for service delivery.

Technological Innovations and Anti-Fraud Measures

Ticketmaster introduced SafeTix in 2023 as a secure digital ticketing solution employing encrypted mobile tickets with dynamically refreshing barcodes that update every 15 seconds to thwart screenshotting, duplication, and unauthorized transfers. This technology ties tickets directly to the purchaser's Ticketmaster account via NFC-enabled smartphones, enabling venue scanners to validate authenticity in real time while providing operators with entry to optimize crowd management. By 2025, SafeTix adoption expanded to major festivals and venues, reducing counterfeit incidents by integrating fraud-proofing into standard mobile entry protocols. To address bot-driven scalping, Ticketmaster launched the Verified Fan program, which requires pre-event registration to assess fan authenticity through account history and behavioral signals, granting presale access codes only to verified participants. This system, first widely applied to high-demand tours like those of major artists in the late , filters out automated purchases by limiting queues to human-verified users, thereby directing a larger share of to primary buyers rather than resellers. Complementing this, Ticketmaster's fan-to-fan resale marketplace verifies secondary transfers, enforcing price caps and authenticity checks to minimize scalper dominance. The company has allocated over $1 billion toward anti-fraud infrastructure, encompassing machine learning-based bot detection, IP monitoring, and transaction anomaly algorithms designed to flag and block high-volume automated attempts during sales. In October 2025, amid FTC scrutiny over facilitation, Ticketmaster implemented a policy banning multiple user accounts per individual, enhancing prior measures like challenges and velocity limits on purchases. These efforts align with the 2016 BOTS Act requirements for bot mitigation, though independent analyses note persistent challenges from sophisticated evasion tactics. Additional innovations include RFID wristbands for granular fan tracking at events, capturing movement and concession data to inform future personalization without compromising privacy through aggregated insights. Mobile advancements, such as the Ignite platform launched in 2023, centralize ticket management in venue apps with push notifications and seamless wallet integrations, reducing entry friction while embedding fraud layers like geofencing. Emerging integrations via the partner program explore for touchless verification, tested in pilot venues by mid-2025 to further elevate security amid rising digital threats.

Market Position and Industry Impact

Dominance in Primary Ticketing

Ticketmaster holds a commanding position in the primary ticketing market, particularly in the United States, where it controls approximately 70% of the market through exclusive contracts with venues. This dominance extends to over 80% of primary ticketing at major concert venues, enabling the company to process the majority of official ticket sales for concerts, , and theater events directly from promoters and organizers. Prior to its 2010 merger with Live Nation, Ticketmaster's share in U.S. primary ticketing exceeded 80%, and despite regulatory divestitures, it has maintained substantial control, with estimates around 66-70% post-merger as of 2024-2025 analyses. The company's stems primarily from long-term exclusive ticketing agreements with arenas, stadiums, and amphitheaters, which span 10-20 years and often include penalties for early termination or incentives tied to revenue thresholds. These contracts, covering hundreds of key U.S. venues, create high for competitors like AXS or , as venues prioritize Ticketmaster's established for inventory management and fan data analytics. Integration with Live Nation's promotion and venue ownership further reinforces this, as the combined entity leverages its control over event scheduling to favor Ticketmaster's platform, processing billions in gross transaction value annually—up 10% in early 2025 for primary sales. Globally, Ticketmaster's primary ticketing footprint is less concentrated but still significant, with about 60% usage among U.K. event ticket buyers and operations in over 30 countries, though it faces stronger regional competitors like in . U.S. Department of Justice investigations have highlighted how these practices, including threats to withhold promotion support from venues seeking alternatives, sustain dominance at the expense of , though Ticketmaster defends them as pro-competitive efficiencies derived from scale in fraud prevention and tools. In 2024, primary ticketing revenue contributed substantially to Live Nation's overall earnings, underscoring the segment's role in the ecosystem despite ongoing antitrust scrutiny.

Partnerships with Venues, Promoters, and Artists

Ticketmaster secures exclusive primary ticketing rights through long-term contracts with a significant portion of major venues, estimated at 70-80% of large U.S. arenas, amphitheaters, and stadiums. These agreements typically span multiple years and include provisions that penalize venues for using competing ticketing services, such as liquidated damages or restrictions on secondary providers. For instance, on December 6, 2023, MetLife Stadium, along with the New York Giants and New York Jets, extended its multi-year partnership with Ticketmaster, emphasizing enhanced fan experiences via digital tools. Similarly, in July 2021, Ticketmaster inked a deal with Oak View Group to handle ticketing for venues including UBS Arena, Climate Pledge Arena, and Moody Center, integrating advanced digital platforms for concerts and sports. Internationally, Ticketmaster has forged partnerships with venue operators like Venues NSW, covering sites such as the (SCG) and Allianz Stadium, to streamline ticketing for concerts and events. In August 2020, committed to a long-term agreement bringing Ticketmaster's technology to Denver-based facilities, including and . These contracts often bundle ticketing with promotional support, data analytics, and anti-fraud features, which Ticketmaster promotes as value-adds, though critics from regulatory bodies argue they entrench market control by limiting venue flexibility. With promoters, Ticketmaster's relationships are deeply intertwined following its 2010 merger with Live Nation, which operates as the promotion arm of Live Nation Entertainment. Live Nation leverages its ticketing revenue to subsidize promotional bids, making it difficult for independent promoters to compete on artist tours or venue deals. For example, federal antitrust filings detail how Live Nation conditions venue access for artists on using its promotion services, effectively tying promotion to ticketing exclusivity. In one documented case from 2013, Live Nation employed its promoter and artist management divisions to negotiate exclusive venue contracts, cross-subsidizing to outbid rivals. Artist partnerships primarily arise indirectly through venue and promoter agreements, where performers must utilize Ticketmaster for primary sales to access preferred sites. Live Nation's artist management roster, representing hundreds of acts, funnels tours into Ticketmaster ecosystems, with policies requiring bundled services for optimal routing and promotion. A March 2025 court ruling upheld challenges to these practices, noting obligations that compel artists to align with Live Nation promotion for venue bookings, potentially foreclosing alternatives. Ticketmaster's terms also mandate compliance with artist-set conditions, but in practice, high-profile tours—such as those by major acts—default to its platform due to integrated data and inventory controls, enhancing efficiency while raising concerns over choice.

Economic Contributions and Scale Efficiencies

, operator of Ticketmaster, recorded $23.1 billion in total revenue for 2024, driven primarily by concerts and ticketing segments that underpin the live events sector's expansion. Ticketmaster's ticketing operations alone generated approximately $2.99 billion in that year, facilitating access to millions of events and supporting revenue flows to venues, promoters, and artists through primary sales mechanisms. These activities connect over 788 million fans globally via concerts and ticketing platforms, amplifying economic multipliers from event-related spending on lodging, dining, and transportation in host communities. The company's scale enables substantial efficiencies in the live events , including across promotion, venue management, and ticketing, which minimizes transaction frictions and coordination expenses compared to fragmented competitors. allow reinvestment in proprietary technologies for high-volume processing, such as unified data systems that streamline multi-event management and reduce operational redundancies for large-scale tours and festivals. Network effects further enhance this, as Ticketmaster's dominant venue partnerships create in ticket inventory, lowering per-event distribution costs and improving reliability for primary sales that smaller platforms struggle to match. These efficiencies manifest in sustained industry growth, with Live Nation reporting record deferred revenue from Ticketmaster—$317 million in Q2 2025, up 22% year-over-year—indicating front-loaded demand handling that smaller entities could not efficiently absorb without proportional infrastructure. By centralizing anti-fraud measures and scalable backend systems, the platform mitigates risks like infiltration at volumes unattainable by rivals, preserving revenue integrity for stakeholders while enabling broader event proliferation.

Historical Antitrust Scrutiny and Settlements

In 1994, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) opened an antitrust investigation into Ticketmaster following complaints from the band , which alleged that the company's exclusive long-term contracts with venues created for rival ticketing services and enabled excessive service fees that harmed consumers and artists. The probe examined whether Ticketmaster's practices constituted monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, given its growing dominance in primary ticketing through venue lockups that deterred competitors from bidding on contracts. However, the DOJ closed the investigation on July 5, 1995, without filing charges, determining that Ticketmaster lacked the monopoly power necessary to sustain an antitrust violation and that its contracts did not unreasonably restrain trade. Antitrust concerns resurfaced with the proposed 2009 merger between Ticketmaster, which held about 80% of the U.S. primary ticketing market, and Live Nation, the largest promoter, potentially allowing the combined entity to bundle services and exclude competitors via tied promotions and venue pressures. The DOJ initially moved to block the deal but reached a settlement through a finalized on January 25, 2010, after the merger closed, imposing behavioral remedies to mitigate anticompetitive risks without requiring divestitures. Key provisions of the 2010 decree prohibited Live Nation from retaliating against venues that selected non-Ticketmaster ticketing providers, required the company to offer "fair and objective" criteria for ticketing bids without considering its promotion interests, and mandated licensing Ticketmaster's advanced ticketing platform to at least one major competitor, such as AEG, for use in 12 regional amphitheaters and one arena over five years to enable viable alternatives in key markets. The remedies, overseen by an antitrust compliance officer and subject to DOJ monitoring, were set to expire after 10 years but reflected a structural preference for conduct restrictions over to preserve efficiencies while promoting entry by firms like in resale and emerging ticketers. No monetary penalties were imposed, and the decree did not address secondary markets or artist contracts directly.

Recent DOJ and FTC Actions (2024–2025)

In May 2024, the (DOJ) filed an antitrust lawsuit against and its subsidiary Ticketmaster, alleging of live concert ticketing, promotion, and venue operations through such as exclusive contracting and threats to venues and promoters. The complaint claims Live Nation controls approximately 60% of major concert promotions and 80% or more of primary ticketing at major U.S. venues, stifling competition and harming fans, artists, and smaller promoters. Joined by 30 bipartisan state attorneys general in August 2024, the suit seeks structural remedies including divestitures to restore competition. In March 2025, a federal judge in New York denied Live Nation's motion to narrow the DOJ's case, allowing the lawsuit to proceed on claims of ongoing monopolistic conduct post-2010 . The DOJ's action revives scrutiny from the 2010 merger settlement, which it argues failed to curb Live Nation's dominance due to inadequate enforcement. On September 18, 2025, the (FTC), alongside seven state attorneys general, sued Live Nation and Ticketmaster for deceptive practices in ticket sales and resale, including "" tactics where mandatory fees—reaching up to 44% of ticket prices—were concealed until checkout, costing consumers over $16.4 billion in fees from 2019 to 2024. The FTC alleges Ticketmaster facilitated illegal resale by scalpers through its TradeDesk platform, helping brokers evade purchase limits and verified fan restrictions while deceiving artists about inventory. In response to the FTC suit, Ticketmaster announced in October 2025 it would limit users to one account per person, require resellers to submit taxpayer identification numbers, and discontinue TradeDesk operations to curb bulk buying by . The FTC seeks injunctions, consumer redress, and civil penalties for violations of the FTC Act and state laws. , Ticketmaster's parent company, issued a detailed to the U.S. Department of Justice's antitrust filed on May 23, 2024, which sought to divest Ticketmaster and eliminate venue ticketing exclusivity agreements. Executive Vice President Dan Wall described the government's monopoly allegations as "absurd," citing 's 2023 net profit margin of 1.4%, far below averages, as evidence against enabling supra-competitive pricing. The company argued that competitive pressures in promotion, venue management, and primary ticketing have reduced industry take rates over time, fostering growth in live events rather than exploitation, and attributed elevated face-value prices primarily to increased production expenses, artist draw, and secondary-market enabled by online platforms. Ticketmaster's service fees were characterized as a modest share of total costs, comparable to digital marketplace commissions, with no evidence of gouging. Live Nation defended the 2010 merger with Ticketmaster—approved by the Obama-era DOJ with behavioral remedies—as delivering operational efficiencies that benefit fans through integrated services, without contravening antitrust law, and asserted that remains pro-competitive by aligning incentives among promotion, venues, and ticketing. It refuted specific DOJ accusations of exclusionary conduct, such as coercing a sale of an Australian promoter's stake or retaliating against a venue's ticketing switch, by providing documented justifications and noting venues' voluntary preferences for single-ticketing systems to minimize and errors. On legal grounds, Live Nation contended there is no antitrust duty to assist rivals, aligning with precedents, and criticized the DOJ's approach as populist overreach ignoring consumer welfare standards and empirical harm. Wall emphasized that a forced breakup would raise costs by severing synergies, contrary to DOJ predictions of lower fees. In response to the Federal Trade Commission's September 18, 2025, lawsuit alleging facilitation of illegal resale through practices like multiple-account usage and the TradeDesk platform, Ticketmaster committed to policy reforms including banning multi-account creation, requiring taxpayer ID verification for resellers, and discontinuing TradeDesk, while defending its distribution methods as transparent and artist-directed in a letter to U.S. senators. These measures were framed as proactive anti-scalping enhancements rather than admissions of wrongdoing.

Notable Operational Incidents

System Crashes and High-Demand Events

Ticketmaster's online ticketing platform has repeatedly encountered capacity overloads and outages during sales for major events characterized by exceptionally high consumer demand, resulting in widespread user frustration and operational disruptions. These incidents often involve virtual waiting rooms that fail to process queues efficiently, site crashes preventing access, and delays in transaction completion, exacerbating perceptions of the company's infrastructural limitations despite its market dominance. The most prominent example occurred during presales for Taylor Swift's Eras Tour on November 15, 2022, when the platform received 3.5 billion system requests—many attributed by Ticketmaster to bots—leading to repeated crashes and users experiencing intermittent issues such as passcode validation errors and unavailability of inventory. Over 2 million tickets were ultimately sold that day, setting a record, but fans reported waiting up to eight hours in virtual queues only to face error messages or sold-out notices upon reaching checkout, prompting Ticketmaster to cancel the subsequent public onsale on November 18, 2022. The company defended its performance by citing "historically unprecedented demand" exceeding prior records by a factor of 13 in some metrics, while implementing measures like Verified Fan protocols to filter bots, though less than 5% of tickets were confirmed as resold initially. Similar failures recurred in international markets, such as the July 12, 2023, presale for Taylor Swift's European tour dates in , where high demand combined with bot activity overwhelmed the system, resulting in delays, access denials, and criticism for inadequate bot detection that failed to distinguish legitimate users. In the UK, the August 31, 2024, onsale for Oasis's reunion tour caused a widespread outage as hundreds of thousands of fans flooded the site, rendering it inaccessible for extended periods and prompting complaints of bot ejections and queue resets. Ticketmaster has responded to these patterns by enhancing queue management and anti-bot tools, but outages persist under peak loads, with real-time monitoring services like logging spikes in user-reported issues during such events. These crashes have fueled broader scrutiny, including U.S. hearings in January 2023 where lawmakers questioned Ticketmaster's preparedness and monopoly-like position, potentially disincentivizing robust scaling investments. While the company maintains that external factors like bot armies—estimated to account for a significant portion of traffic—drive many failures, independent analyses highlight deficiencies in and error handling that amplify cascading effects during surges. No major U.S.-based crashes were publicly reported in through October, though global high-demand sales continue to test the platform's resilience.

Scalping Facilitation Allegations and Resale Practices

Ticketmaster maintains an official resale marketplace that enables ticket holders to sell eligible tickets to other buyers, with prices determined by market demand and subject to event organizer restrictions. Resale transactions are governed by policies requiring sellers to possess legal rights to the tickets and comply with applicable state resale laws, while purchases are final with refunds limited to organizer-specified circumstances. The platform integrates with primary sales to facilitate fan-to-fan transfers, aiming to channel resale activity away from unauthorized secondary markets. To mitigate —defined as for resale at inflated prices—Ticketmaster employs the Verified Fan program, which requires pre-registration and identity verification to prioritize purchases by genuine fans over automated bots or resellers. The company reports having invested over $1 billion in anti-bot technologies and purchase limit enforcement to detect and block scalper tactics, such as deploying software to simulate multiple user sessions. Allegations of facilitation intensified with a , 2025, filed by the (FTC) and seven states against Live Nation and Ticketmaster, accusing the firms of illegal resale practices that enabled brokers to dominate inventory. The complaint claims Ticketmaster tacitly coordinated with professional brokers by permitting circumvention of per-event purchase caps—allegedly artificial limits—through tools like TradeDesk software, which allowed scalpers to manage multiple queues, exceed allocations, and resell tickets at markups while the company collected fees on both primary and secondary transactions. Additional charges include deceptive pricing by concealing mandatory fees—reaching up to 44% of ticket costs—until the final checkout stage, thereby inflating effective prices and disadvantaging consumers. Ticketmaster has denied the FTC's assertions as "categorically false," maintaining that its systems actively combat and that brokers' violations lead to account bans, with millions of such actions taken annually. In response to the suit, on October 20, 2025, the company announced policy overhauls, including requiring unique taxpayer IDs for resale accounts to limit multiples, deploying advanced AI for detection, banning TradeDesk usage, and canceling excess broker-linked accounts. Industry groups such as the National Independent Venue Association criticized these measures as insufficient, arguing they fail to address underlying market dominance enabling persistent scalper advantages. The lawsuit remains pending, with no judicial findings on the allegations to date.

Data Security Breaches and Hacking Attempts

In May 2024, Ticketmaster confirmed a incident involving unauthorized access to an isolated hosted by a third-party provider, . The breach stemmed from compromised credentials for accounts, enabling lateral movement by attackers, including the hacking group , who claimed responsibility. Access occurred between April 2 and May 18, 2024, with Ticketmaster detecting the activity approximately 51 days after initial intrusion. ShinyHunters advertised for sale what they described as 1.3 terabytes of stolen data purportedly belonging to 560 million Ticketmaster customers, encompassing names, addresses, phone numbers, addresses, and partial such as the first six and last four digits of cards. Ticketmaster did not verify the full scope claimed by the hackers but notified affected users where required by law and emphasized that core account security, including login credentials, remained intact. The incident highlighted vulnerabilities in third-party cloud configurations lacking , a factor Snowflake attributed to customer-side lapses rather than platform flaws. No prior large-scale data breaches involving Ticketmaster were publicly confirmed in available records, though the company has faced sporadic phishing attempts and smaller unauthorized access claims without material impact. In response to the 2024 event, Ticketmaster collaborated with cybersecurity firms to contain the breach, enhanced monitoring on affected systems, and advised users to monitor for , while regulators like the UK's initiated inquiries into compliance with data protection laws. The episode underscored Ticketmaster's reliance on external vendors for , contributing to broader scrutiny of its operational resilience amid high-profile incidents.

References

  1. https://business.ticketmaster.com/why-ticketmaster/our-story/
  2. https://media.ticketmaster.com/en-us/img/static/aboutus/tmTimline08.pdf
  3. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1335258/000119312510012287/dex991.htm
  4. https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/article/241104-ticketing-companies-win-big-from-funflation-in-live-entertainment-s13299189
  5. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-live-nation-ticketmaster-monopolizing-markets-across-live-concert
  6. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/09/ftc-sues-live-nation-ticketmaster-engaging-illegal-ticket-resale-tactics-deceiving-artists-consumers
  7. https://www.livenation.com/ticketmaster/
  8. https://access.intix.org/Full-Article/the-founding-of-ticketmaster-part-1-how-the-piano-the-us-52nd-army-band-a-love-story-and-a-lasagna-dinner-started-it-all
  9. https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences-and-law/economics-business-and-labor/businesses-and-occupations/ticketmaster
  10. https://www.company-histories.com/Ticketmaster-Group-Inc-Company-History.html
  11. https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/may/04/how-ticketmaster-swallowed-the-live-entertainment-scene
  12. https://bclawreview.bc.edu/articles/3106/files/65b7a90085500.pdf
  13. https://www.nytimes.com/1994/11/06/business/ticketmaster-s-mr-tough-guy.html
  14. https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/antitrust-enforcers-to-break-up-ticketmaster
  15. https://prospect.org/power/ticketmasters-dark-history/
  16. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1006637/000091205702013057/a2074560z10-k.htm
  17. https://quartr.com/insights/edge/master-of-tickets-breaking-down-live-nation-entertainment
  18. https://musicbusinessresearch.wordpress.com/2011/09/30/ticket-masters-part-4-online-ticketing-and-the-secondary-market/
  19. https://www.theverge.com/23645057/taylor-swift-ticketmaster-eras-tour-beyonce-antitrust-monopoly-reagan-senate-hearing-congress
  20. https://slidebean.medium.com/how-ticketmaster-became-a-monopoly-e7fca521f227
  21. https://techcrunch.com/2009/02/10/ticketmaster-and-live-nation-conduct-25-billion-merger-create-live-nation-entertainment/
  22. https://news.pollstar.com/2009/02/10/live-nation-ticketmaster-announce-merger/
  23. https://musicbusinessresearch.wordpress.com/2011/10/26/ticket-masters-part-6-the-begin-of-a-new-era-%25E2%2580%2593-the-ticketmaster-live-nation-merger/
  24. https://www.justice.gov/archives/atr/speech/ticketmasterlive-nation-merger-review-and-consent-decree-perspective
  25. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2010/02/10/2010-2754/united-states-et-al-v-ticketmaster-entertainment-inc-and-live-nation-inc-proposed-final-judgment-and
  26. https://www.kelleydrye.com/viewpoints/client-advisories/doj-approves-ticketmaster-live-nation-merger-with-conditions
  27. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/26/business/26ticket.html
  28. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/live-nation-ticketmaster-merge-agree-to-us-terms-idUSTRE60O4E5/
  29. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-will-move-significantly-modify-and-extend-consent-decree-live
  30. https://www.forbes.com/sites/petercohan/2024/05/27/post-lawsuit-live-nation-entertainment-stock-flat-as-sales-seen-up-5/
  31. https://investors.livenationentertainment.com/sec-filings/annual-reports/content/0001335258-24-000063/0001335258-24-000063.pdf
  32. https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/data/live-nation-annual-revenue-broken-down-by-category/
  33. https://www.statista.com/chart/32319/concert-and-ticketing-revenue-of-live-nation-entertainment/
  34. https://www.statista.com/chart/32320/most-used-online-ticketing-providers-in-the-us/
  35. https://luckboxmagazine.com/trends/live-nation-ticketmaster-an-alleged-monopoly-achieves-record-growth/
  36. https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/ticketmaster-grows-presence-in-germany/
  37. https://businesstech.co.za/news/business/784158/massive-international-company-expanding-in-south-africa/
  38. https://business.ticketmaster.com/press-release/ticketmaster-colombia-launch/
  39. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/us-antitrust-lawsuit-live-nation-ticketmaster-could-reshape-global-industry-by-karina-montoya-1-and-daniel-a-hanley-2024-07
  40. https://legal.ticketmaster.com/purchase-policy/
  41. https://business.ticketmaster.com/solutions/
  42. https://www.livenationentertainment.com/
  43. https://business.ticketmaster.com/harness-the-power-of-tm1-with-the-latest-updates/
  44. https://business.ticketmaster.com/solutions/event-creation-management/
  45. https://business.ticketmaster.com/client-marketing-self-serve-tools/
  46. https://developer.ticketmaster.com/products-and-docs/
  47. https://business.ticketmaster.com/safetix-the-game-changer-in-digital-ticketing/
  48. https://business.ticketmaster.com/solutions/event-day/
  49. https://business.ticketmaster.com/optimizing-event-entry-with-tm1-entry-enhancements/
  50. https://help.ticketmaster.com/hc/en-us/articles/9663528775313-How-are-ticket-prices-and-fees-determined
  51. https://www.reddit.com/r/Concerts/comments/1jd06v2/ticket_master_service_fee/
  52. https://investors.livenationentertainment.com/
  53. https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/Articles/2025/08/08/ticketmaster-sees-record-q2-gross-transaction-value-as-live-nation-releases-financial-report/
  54. https://help.ticketmaster.no/hc/en-us/articles/360017966658-What-is-a-service-fee
  55. https://gizmodo.com/do-prices-on-ticketmaster-suddenly-seem-much-higher-youre-not-alone-2000601097
  56. https://www.pricefx.com/learning-center/ticketmasters-dynamic-pricing-what-it-is-and-how-it-works
  57. https://americansongwriter.com/ticketmaster-to-eliminate-hidden-fees-as-new-federal-rule-goes-into-effect/
  58. https://blog.ticketmaster.com/all-in-pricing-explained/
  59. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/ticketmaster-and-stubhub-must-now-display-upfront-prices-concert-tickets
  60. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/sep/06/ticketmaster-oasis-fan-experience
  61. https://www.the-sun.com/money/15215190/ticketmster-lawsuit-junk-fees-pricing-rules-unlawful-live-nation/
  62. https://business.ticketmaster.com/harness-the-power-of-safetix-in-2025/
  63. https://www.iqmagazine.com/2023/08/ticketmaster-rolls-out-safetix-tech-to-festivals/
  64. https://www.grammy.com/news/ticketmasters-verified-fan-successfully-blocks-ticket-bots
  65. https://www.popsugar.com/entertainment/how-does-ticketmaster-verified-fan-work-44271292
  66. https://www.ticketmaster.com/verified/
  67. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/music/articles/ticketmaster-ban-users-multiple-accounts-001111116.html
  68. https://deadline.com/2025/10/ticketmaster-ftc-lawsuit-scalpers-1236592745/
  69. https://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2025/09/ftc-investigating-ticketmaster-and-how-it-battles-bots.html
  70. https://business.ticketmaster.com/unlocking-deeper-fan-insights-with-rfid-technology/
  71. https://business.ticketmaster.com/ticketmasters-innovations-reshaping-live-events-in-2023/
  72. https://business.ticketmaster.com/2025-nexus-state-of-ticketing/
  73. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48179
  74. https://www.economicliberties.us/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/052023_AELP_Ticketmaster_PolicyBrief.pdf
  75. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/live-nation-entertainment-reports-first-quarter-2025-results-302444365.html
  76. https://thehustle.co/the-sneaky-economics-of-ticketmaster
  77. https://business.ticketmaster.com/press-release/metlife-stadium-new-york-giants-new-york-jets-and-ticketmaster-extend-partnership/
  78. https://business.ticketmaster.com/press-release/201073-oak-view-group-inks-deal-with-ticketmaster-to-provide-ticketing-services-across-its-world-class-venues/
  79. https://business.ticketmaster.com/why-ticketmaster/our-clients/
  80. https://www.coloradorapids.com/news/kroenke-sports-entertainment-and-ticketmaster-announce-long-term-partnership
  81. https://truthonthemarket.com/2024/05/24/live-nation-breakup-are-mergers-really-to-blame-for-ticketmasters-problems/
  82. https://www.promarket.org/2024/07/01/the-government-has-a-compelling-monopolization-lawsuit-against-live-nation-ticketmaster/
  83. https://www.courthousenews.com/live-nation-cant-dodge-antitrust-claims-judge-says/
  84. https://www.billboard.com/pro/live-nation-earnings-full-year-2024-revenue-record-23-billion/
  85. https://www.statista.com/statistics/193712/ticketing-revenue-of-live-nation-entertainment-since-2008/
  86. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1335258/000133525825000028/lyv-20241231.htm
  87. https://business.ticketmaster.com/tm1-multi-event-tools/
  88. https://notes.thruhq.com/ticketmasters-dominance-in-event-ticketing-business-model-success-factors-and-growth-strategies/
  89. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/live-nation-entertainment-reports-second-quarter-2025-results-302524774.html
  90. https://www.ainvest.com/news/ticketmaster-ticket-future-event-tech-big-play-2506/
  91. https://jipel.law.nyu.edu/vol-3-no-1-3-baker/
  92. https://cardozoaelj.com/2023/03/01/ticketmaster-and-live-nation-know-antitrust-laws-all-too-well/
  93. https://scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1088&context=commlaw
  94. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1995-07-06-fi-20642-story.html
  95. https://www.deseret.com/1995/7/6/19180666/probe-of-ticketmaster-ends-with-no-action
  96. https://www.economicliberties.us/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/LiveNation_QuickTake_R3-3.pdf
  97. https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/If6f33975b42911e398db8b09b4f043e0/U-S-v-Ticketmaster-Entertainment-Inc-and-Live-Nation-Inc-consent-decree?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29
  98. https://www.promarket.org/2024/07/02/four-strengths-of-the-governments-lawsuit-against-live-nation-ticketmaster/
  99. https://www.paulweiss.com/insights/client-memos/breaking-down-the-doj-s-complaint-to-break-up-live-nation-ticketmaster
  100. https://foleyhoag.com/news-and-insights/blogs/state-ag-insights/2024/august/30-state-attorneys-general-team-up-with-doj-to-sue-live-nation-for-violations-of-antitrust-law/
  101. https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2025/attorney-general-james-announces-court-win-allowing-lawsuit-against-live-nation
  102. https://www.rstreet.org/research/the-complexities-of-antitrust-action-against-live-nation-and-ticketmaster/
  103. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/FTCvLiveNation-Ticketmaster-Complaint-filed.pdf
  104. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2025-10-20/ticketmaster-to-ban-multiple-accounts-and-tradedesk-following-ftc-lawsuit
  105. https://www.livenationentertainment.com/2024/05/breaking-down-the-doj-lawsuit/
  106. https://loudwire.com/live-nation-respond-antitrust-lawsuit/
  107. https://news.pollstar.com/2024/05/24/breaking-down-live-nations-early-response-to-doj-lawsuit/
  108. https://musically.com/2025/10/21/ticketmaster-defends-its-policies-in-letter-to-us-senators/
  109. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/music/music-industry-news/ticketmaster-bans-multiple-accounts-after-ftc-suit-1236405390/
  110. https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray/2025/10/20/ticketmaster-promises-overhaul-crackdown-targets-scalpers/
  111. https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/unprecedented-demand-taylor-swift-tour-crashes-ticketmaster-website-2022-11-15/
  112. https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/17/business/ticketmaster-taylor-swift-ticket-explanation
  113. https://variety.com/2022/music/news/ticketmaster-explains-taylor-swift-ticket-crisis-eras-tour-1235435673/
  114. https://business.ticketmaster.com/press-release/taylor-swift-the-eras-tour-onsale-explained/
  115. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/17/arts/music/taylor-swift-tickets-ticketmaster.html
  116. https://www.npr.org/2022/12/06/1140968805/taylor-swift-fans-ticketmaster-lawsuit
  117. https://www.enterprisesecuritytech.com/post/ticketmaster-struggles-with-high-demand-and-bot-issues-during-taylor-swift-ticket-sale-in-france
  118. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13799031/ticketmaster-oasis-fans-outage.html
  119. https://downdetector.com/status/ticketmaster/
  120. https://www.hyve.com/insights/handling-high-traffic-events-reflecting-on-the-ticketmaster-oasis-sale/
  121. https://engineeringenablement.substack.com/p/taylor-swift-ticketmaster-meltdown
  122. https://www.ticketmaster.com/sell
  123. https://legal.ticketmaster.com/resale-purchase-policy/
  124. https://legal.ticketmaster.com/reseller-policy/
  125. https://blog.ticketmaster.com/ticket-scalpers/
  126. https://edm.com/industry/ticketmaster-cracking-down-ticket-scalpers-ftc-lawsuit/
  127. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/09/ticketmaster-intentionally-screwed-fans-out-of-billions-ftc-lawsuit-says/
  128. https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/ftc-sues-live-nation-ticketmaster-scalpers-1235430610/
  129. https://variety.com/2025/music/news/ticketmaster-denies-ftc-claims-scalpers-1236557421/
  130. https://www.billboard.com/pro/ticketmaster-policy-multiple-accounts-tradedesk-shutdown/
  131. https://www.billboard.com/pro/ticketmaster-resale-policy-changes-indie-venues-respond/
  132. https://www.cbc.ca/news/investigates/ticketmaster-crackdown-scalpers-9.6948616
  133. https://help.ticketmaster.com/hc/en-us/articles/26110487861137-Ticketmaster-Data-Security-Incident
  134. https://www.wired.com/story/epam-snowflake-ticketmaster-breach-shinyhunters/
  135. https://www.strongdm.com/what-is/ticketmaster-data-breach
  136. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ticketmaster-breach-shinyhunters-560-million-customers/
  137. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/31/business/ticketmaster-hack-data-breach.html
  138. https://frameworksecurity.com/post/ticketmaster-breach-a-deep-dive-into-the-may-2024-cyberattack-and-the-history-of-the-alleged-hackers
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.