Hubbry Logo
Transatlantic communications cableTransatlantic communications cableMain
Open search
Transatlantic communications cable
Community hub
Transatlantic communications cable
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Transatlantic communications cable
Transatlantic communications cable
Transatlantic communications cable
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Cable laying in the 1860s

A transatlantic telecommunications cable is a submarine communications cable connecting one side of the Atlantic Ocean to the other. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, each cable was a single wire. After mid-century, coaxial cable came into use, with amplifiers. Late in the 20th century, all cables installed use optical fiber as well as optical amplifiers, because distances range thousands of kilometers.

History

[edit]

When the first transatlantic telegraph cable was laid in 1858 by Cyrus West Field, it operated for only three weeks; a subsequent attempt in 1866 was more successful.[1] On July 13, 1866 the cable laying ship Great Eastern sailed out of Valentia Island, Ireland and on July 27 landed at Heart's Content in Newfoundland, completing the first lasting connection across the Atlantic. It was active until 1965.[2]

Although a telephone cable was discussed starting in the 1920s,[3] to be practical it needed a number of technological advances which did not arrive until the 1940s.[citation needed] Starting in 1927, transatlantic telephone service was radio-based.[4]

TAT-1 (Transatlantic No. 1) was the first transatlantic telephone cable system. It was laid between Gallanach Bay, near Oban, and Clarenville, Newfoundland between 1955 and 1956 by the cable ship Monarch.[5] It was inaugurated on September 25, 1956, initially carrying 36 telephone channels. In the first 24 hours of public service, there were 588 London–U.S. calls and 119 from London to Canada. The capacity of the cable was soon increased to 48 channels. Later, an additional three channels were added by use of C Carrier equipment. Time-assignment speech interpolation (TASI) was implemented on the TAT-1 cable in June 1960 and effectively increased the cable's capacity from 37 (out of 51 available channels) to 72 speech circuits. TAT-1 was finally retired in 1978. Later coaxial cables, installed through the 1970s, used transistors and had higher bandwidth. The Moscow–Washington hotline was initially connected through this system.

Current technology

[edit]

All cables presently in service use fiber optic technology. Many cables terminate in Newfoundland and Ireland, which lie on the great circle route from London, UK to New York City, US.

There has been a succession of newer transatlantic cable systems. All recent systems have used fiber optic transmission, and a self-healing ring topology. Late in the 20th century, communications satellites lost most of their North Atlantic telephone traffic to these low-cost, high-capacity, low-latency cables. This advantage only increases over time, as tighter cables provide higher bandwidth – the 2012 generation of cables drop the transatlantic latency to under 60 milliseconds, according to Hibernia Atlantic, deploying such a cable that year.[6][7]

Some new cables are being announced on the South Atlantic: SACS (South Atlantic Cable System)[8] and SAex (South Atlantic Express).[9]

TAT cable routes

[edit]

The TAT series of cables constitute a large percentage of all North Atlantic cables. All TAT cables are joint ventures between a number of telecommunications companies, e.g. British Telecom. CANTAT cables terminate in Canada rather than in the US.

Name In service Type Initial channels Final channels Western end Eastern end
TAT-1 1956–1978 Galvanic 36 51 Newfoundland Scotland
TAT-2 1959–1982 Galvanic 48 72 Newfoundland France
TAT-3 1963–1986 Galvanic 138 276 New Jersey England
TAT-4 1965–1987 Galvanic 138 345 New Jersey France
TAT-5 1970–1993 Galvanic 845 2,112 Rhode Island Spain
TAT-6 1976–1994 Galvanic 4,000 10,000 Rhode Island France
TAT-7 1978–1994 Galvanic 4,000 10,500 New Jersey England
TAT-8 1988–2002 Fiber-optic 40,000 – New Jersey England, France
TAT-9 1992–2004 Fiber-optic 80,000 – New Jersey, Nova Scotia Spain, France, England
TAT-10 1992–2003 Fiber-optic 2 × 565 Mbit/s – US Germany, Netherlands
TAT-11 1993–2003 Fiber-optic 2 × 565 Mbit/s – New Jersey France
TAT-12/13 1996–2008 Fiber-optic 12 × 2.5 Gbit/s – US × 2 England, France
TAT-14 2001–2020 Fiber-optic 3.2 Tbit/s – New Jersey × 2 England, France, Netherlands, Germany, Denmark
CANTAT-1 1961–1986 Galvanic 80 – Newfoundland Scotland
CANTAT-2 1974–1992 Galvanic 1,840 – Nova Scotia England
CANTAT-3 1994–2010 Fiber-optic 2 × 2.5 Gbit/s Nova Scotia Iceland, Faroe Islands, England, Denmark, Germany
PTAT-1 1989–2004 Fiber-optic 3 × 140 Mbit/s? New Jersey & Bermuda Ireland & England

Private cable routes

[edit]

There are a number of private non-TAT cables.

Cable name Ready for service Cable length (km) Nominal capacity Latency (ms) Landing points Owner
Gemini (decommissioned) May 1998 under 100 ms north: Charlestown, US-RI; Oxwich Bay, GB-WLS; south: Manasquan, US-NJ; Porthcurno, GB-ENG Vodafone (originally Cable & Wireless)
AC-1 May 1998 14,301 km 120 Gbit/s 65 ms[7] Brookhaven, US-NY; Whitesands Bay, GB-ENG; Beverwijk, NL-NH; Sylt, DE-SH Lumen Technologies (originally Global Crossing)
Columbus III December 1999 9,833 km Hollywood, US-FL; Ponta Delgada (Azores), PT; Carcavelos, PT; Conil de la Frontera, ES-AN; Mazara del Vallo (Sicily), IT various telecom operators
Yellow/AC-2 September 2000 7,001 km 640 Gbit/s under 100 ms Bellport, US-NY; Bude, GB-ENG Lumen Technologies
Hibernia Atlantic April 2001 12,200 km 320 Gbit/s, upgraded to 10.16 Tbit/s[10] 59 ms[7] Lynn, US-MA; Herring Cove, CA-NS; Dublin, IE-L; Southport, GB-ENG; Coleraine, GB-NIR GTT Communications, Inc. (originally Hibernia Networks)
FLAG Atlantic June 2001 14,500 km under 100 ms Island Park, US-NY; Plerin, FR-BRE; Skewjack, GB-ENG; Northport, US-NY Global Cloud Xchange (Reliance Communications)
Tata TGN-Atlantic June 2001 13,000 km 5.1 Tbit/s under 100 ms Wall Township, US-NJ; Highbridge, GB-ENG Sold by Tyco to Tata Communications in 2005
Apollo February 2003 13,000 km 3.2 Tbit/s under 100 ms Manasquan, New Jersey, US-NJ; Lannion, FR-BRE; Bude, GB-ENG; Shirley, US-NY Vodafone (originally Cable & Wireless)[11]
Greenland Connect March 2009 4,780 km Milton, CA-NL; Aasiaat, GL-QA; Sisimiut, GL-QE; Maniitsoq, GL-QE; Nuuk, GL-SM; Qaqortoq, GL-KU; Landeyjar, IS TELE Greenland
Hibernia Express September 2015 4,600 km Halifax, CA-NS; Cork, IE-M; Brean, GB-ENG GTT Communications, Inc. (originally Hibernia Networks)
AEConnect (AEC-1) January 2016 5,522 km 4 × 10 Tbit/s (four strand 100 × 100 Gbit/s) 54 ms Shirley, US-NY; Killala, IE-C Aqua Comms
MAREA February 2018 6,600 km 160 Tbit/s Virginia Beach, US-VA; Bilbao, ES-PV Facebook (25 %), Microsoft (25 %), Telefónica (50 %)
Midgardsormen Q2 2019 (planned) 7,848 km Virginia Beach, US-VA; Blaabjerg, DK; Mo i Rana, NO Midgardsormen
Dunant September 2020 (live) 6,400km 250 Tbit/s Virginia Beach, US-VA; Saint-Hilaire-de-Riez, FR Google[12][13]
Havfrue, including America Europe Connect-2 (AEC-2) branch December 2020 7,851km 108 Tbit/s New Jersey, US; Dublin, RoI; London, UK; Amsterdam, NL; Blaabjerg, DK; Kristiansand, NO AquaCommms, Bulk Infrastructure, Facebook and Google[14]
Grace Hopper September 2022 6,000km 352 Tbit/s New York, US; Bude, UK; Bilbao, Spain Google[15][16]
Amitié July 2023 6,600km 320 Tbit/s Lynn, Massachusetts, US; Bude, UK; Le Porge, France A consortium comprising Facebook, Microsoft, Aqua Comms, Vodafone (through Cable & Wireless Americas Systems), Orange[17]

South Atlantic cable routes

[edit]
Cable name Ready for service Length Landing points Owner
Atlantis-2 February 2000 8,500 km Carcavelos, PT; El Médano, ES-CN; Praia, CV; Dakar, SN; Fortaleza, BR-CE; Las Toninas, AR-B various telecom operators
EllaLink Q2 2021 5,900 km Sines, PT; Fortaleza, BR-CE; Santos, BR-SP Telebras, IslaLink
SACS Q3 2018 6,165 km Fortaleza, BR-CE; Luanda, AO Angola Cables
SAIL Q4 2018 5,900 km Fortaleza, BR-CE; Kribi, CM Camtel, China Unicom

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Transatlantic communications cable

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A transatlantic communications cable refers to a submarine cable system that spans the Atlantic Ocean, connecting North America and Europe to transmit telecommunications signals, including telegraph messages, telephone calls, and high-speed internet data. These cables form the backbone of intercontinental connectivity, carrying over 95% of international data traffic between the two continents. The origins of transatlantic communications trace back to the mid-19th century with efforts to lay telegraph cables. The first successful transmission occurred in August 1858, when a cable laid by the Atlantic Telegraph Company connected Valentia Island, Ireland, to Heart's Content, Newfoundland, allowing Queen Victoria to send a congratulatory message to U.S. President James Buchanan; however, this cable failed after only a few weeks due to insulation issues and high-voltage transmission errors. A more durable cable was successfully completed in July 1866 by Cyrus Field's team, using ships like the Great Eastern to lay and repair the line, enabling reliable telegraphy at speeds of about 12 words per minute and marking the first permanent link for instant transoceanic messaging. By the early 20th century, multiple telegraph cables were in operation, supporting growing commercial and diplomatic communications. Advancements in the shifted focus to voice transmission with the introduction of telephone cables. The first transatlantic telephone cable, (Transatlantic No. 1), became operational in September 1956, linking to Newfoundland with 36 voice circuits and to amplify signals over its 3,400-kilometer length, revolutionizing long-distance . This was followed by additional systems in the and 1970s, increasing capacity to hundreds of circuits. Since the late 1980s, fiber-optic technology has dominated, offering vastly superior bandwidth through light pulses rather than electrical signals. The inaugural fiber-optic transatlantic cable, , entered service in 1988, connecting the U.S., U.K., and with an initial capacity of 40,000 simultaneous telephone calls or equivalent data. Today, over a dozen active fiber-optic cables operate across the Atlantic, including high-capacity systems like MAREA (200 Tbps, owned by , Meta, and Telxius) and Dunant (250 Tbps, owned by ), which support the global , financial transactions, and cloud services for trillions of daily data exchanges. These modern cables, often landing in key hubs like New York, Halifax, and , are designed with multiple fiber pairs and advanced error-correction to withstand oceanic hazards, ensuring resilient connectivity essential for the .

Overview

Definition and Scope

A transatlantic communications cable is a specialized type of that spans the Atlantic Ocean, linking infrastructure between land-based stations on opposite shores, primarily in and . These cables are engineered to lie on the , often buried in shallow coastal waters for protection, and transmit high volumes of digital signals including data, , and video streaming. The defines a submarine communications cable as "a cable laid on the sea bed, or buried in shallow water, intended to carry communications" between such stations. Unlike satellite systems, which handle only about 1% of global data traffic, these fiber-optic cables provide the primary medium for reliable, low-latency transoceanic connectivity. The scope of transatlantic cables extends geographically across the North and South Atlantic, encompassing routes from the eastern coasts of the and to western Europe (such as the , , and ), with some systems branching to or the . As part of the broader global undersea network of approximately 570 active cables and 1,712 landing stations connecting all continents except , transatlantic cables carry nearly all intercontinental data flows between these regions. The global network, including transatlantic systems, accounts for 99% of transoceanic digital communications worldwide. This infrastructure supports critical sectors like —facilitating trillions of dollars in daily transactions—and cloud services, enabling seamless data exchange for multinational corporations and governments. In terms of capacity and evolution, modern transatlantic cables utilize dense over fiber optics to achieve terabit-per-second speeds, far surpassing earlier coaxial and telegraph systems; for instance, the MAREA cable between Virginia Beach, USA, and , , provides 200 terabits per second, equivalent to millions of simultaneous streams. Their deployment involves international coordination under frameworks like the Convention on the , which governs cable laying in while requiring permissions in territorial seas up to 12 nautical miles offshore. Disruptions to these cables, which occur on average more than three times per week globally due to natural hazards or human activities, underscore their vulnerability and the need for resilient design within this defined scope.

Significance in Global Communications

Transatlantic communications cables form the backbone of intercontinental data exchange between and , two of the world's largest economic and technological hubs, enabling the seamless flow of information that underpins modern global connectivity. These systems carry the vast majority of transatlantic , which constitutes a critical segment of the over 95% of all international data and voice transfers routed through undersea fiber-optic cables worldwide. By providing high-capacity, low-latency links—with typical round-trip ping latencies of approximately 70 ms from Western Europe (e.g., London) to the US East Coast (e.g., New York) as of early 2026, remaining stable in the 68–70 ms range in recent years—they support essential services such as real-time financial trading, , and video streaming, far surpassing the capabilities of alternatives in terms of volume, speed, and cost-efficiency. Economically, these cables drive substantial value by facilitating daily international financial transactions estimated at $10 trillion, primarily between U.S. and European markets, while also enabling the digital economy's growth through enhanced access and data center interconnectivity. Deployments of new transatlantic cables have been shown to significantly improve international bandwidth capacity, leading to broader economic benefits like increased , gains, and GDP contributions in connected regions—for instance, individual systems like MAREA have been linked to annual economic impacts of €16.7 billion in alone. Major technology firms, including , Meta, , and Amazon, now control about 66% of global capacity as of 2022, reflecting their pivotal role in scaling infrastructure for AI, 5G networks, and applications that fuel global commerce. From a and geopolitical perspective, transatlantic cables are indispensable for military, governmental, and diplomatic communications within alliances like , where disruptions could severely hamper operations—as evidenced by past incidents like the 2008 cable cuts that affected Mediterranean connectivity. With modern cables boasting capacities up to 352 terabits per second, such as the system, they ensure resilient pathways for sensitive data amid rising threats from state actors and environmental hazards, underscoring their status as strategic assets in maintaining transatlantic stability and global information superiority. Bandwidth demands on these routes are projected to double every two years, driven by emerging technologies, highlighting their enduring significance in an increasingly interconnected world.

Historical Development

Telegraph Era (1850s–1920s)

The development of transatlantic telegraph cables marked a pivotal advancement in global communication during the mid-19th to early 20th centuries, transforming the weeks-long delay of transoceanic mail into near-instantaneous message exchange. Efforts began in the early 1850s, driven by the rapid expansion of land-based telegraph networks in and , which underscored the need for a submarine link across the Atlantic. The first serious proposal came in 1854 from American entrepreneur Cyrus West Field, who founded the New York, Newfoundland and London Telegraph Company to extend existing lines from Newfoundland to . Initial attempts faced formidable engineering challenges, including cable breakage during laying and signal degradation over the 2,000-plus nautical miles, but perseverance led to the first successful transmission in 1858. The inaugural transatlantic cable was laid in August 1858 by the Atlantic Telegraph Company, a joint British-American venture backed by Field, using the ships and USS Niagara. Stretching approximately 2,200 nautical miles from , , to Trinity Bay, Newfoundland, the cable consisted of a single insulated with and armored for protection against seabed hazards. On August 16, sent a congratulatory message to U.S. President , taking 16 hours and 1 minute for 98 words, heralding the cable's operational debut. However, high-voltage testing by chief electrician Wildman Whitehouse damaged the insulation, causing failure after just three weeks and 732 messages, rendering it inoperable by September. A subsequent attempt in 1865 using the massive steamship Great Eastern—designed by —ended in cable loss 1,200 miles out due to snags on the ocean floor. Success came in July 1866 when the Great Eastern completed a 1,852-nautical-mile cable from Valentia to Heart's Content, Newfoundland, under the Anglo-American Telegraph Company; the crew then recovered and spliced the 1865 cable, effectively doubling capacity by August. British physicist William Thomson (later ) played a crucial role, inventing the mirror galvanometer to detect faint signals weakened by cable and resistance. Subsequent decades saw iterative improvements and multiple cables to meet growing demand for commercial, diplomatic, and news traffic. The 1866 cable operated reliably until 1872, transmitting at speeds up to 17 words per minute by the 1870s, but faults from natural wear and fishing trawlers necessitated replacements. In 1873, the Anglo-American Telegraph Company laid a new 1,877-nautical-mile cable using the Great Eastern, followed by the Direct United States Cable Company's 3,200-nautical-mile route in 1875 from Rye Beach, , to Ballinskelligs, , via . Competition intensified with the Commercial Cable Company, founded by John P. Mackay and James Gordon Bennett, laying two cables in 1884-1887 totaling over 6,500 nautical miles from to and , bypassing monopolistic rates of the Anglo-American firm. By the 1890s, advancements like duplex (two-way) and quadruplex (four-message simultaneous) systems, pioneered by and others, boosted throughput; for instance, the 1894 Anglo-American cable (Britannia 2) incorporated stronger steel armoring. German interests entered with the 1900 German Atlantic Telegraph Company cable from the to New York, spanning 2,290 nautical miles. Through the early , up to eight parallel telegraph cables crisscrossed the Atlantic by the , handling thousands of messages daily and costing about $5 per word—equivalent to a skilled worker's daily . Key later additions included the 1906 cable from to the and the 1924 CS Faraday-laid cable by the Commercial Pacific Cable Company, enhancing redundancy against faults from icebergs, earthquakes, and sabotage during . Technical refinements focused on better insulation with compounds like Chatterton's, for signal boosting (though limited in telegraph era), and specialized cable ships like for repairs. These networks not only facilitated synchronization and wartime coordination but also symbolized technological triumph, with the 1866 cable alone transmitting over 3 million messages by 1900. The era waned as demands grew, but telegraph cables remained vital until the transition in the 1950s.

Coaxial Cable and Telephone Era (1950s–1980s)

The coaxial cable and telephone era represented a transformative phase in transatlantic communications, shifting from low-bandwidth telegraphy to high-capacity voice telephony through the deployment of submarine coaxial systems. This period, spanning the 1950s to 1980s, was dominated by the TAT (Transatlantic Telephone) series of cables, which utilized a central copper conductor insulated with polyethylene, armored for deep-sea protection, and equipped with powered repeaters to amplify signals over thousands of nautical miles. These innovations enabled reliable, real-time conversations, dramatically increasing circuit capacity from dozens to thousands of simultaneous telephone channels and reducing dependence on short-wave radio, which suffered from atmospheric interference. The era commenced with , the world's first transatlantic telephone cable, laid in 1956 between Oban, , and , Newfoundland—a distance of approximately 1,950 nautical miles—using two parallel cables with 51 vacuum-tube repeaters spaced about 30 nautical miles apart for unidirectional amplification. This joint project by (United States), the British , and the Canadian Overseas Telecommunication Corporation provided 36 voice circuits (each supporting 3-4 kHz bandwidth), tripling the Atlantic's capacity at the time and facilitating clearer, more secure calls for business, diplomacy, and personal use. operated until 1978, proving the viability of repeatered submarine systems despite challenges like high-voltage power feeding from shore stations. Subsequent cables rapidly advanced repeater technology from bulky vacuum tubes to compact transistors, enabling bidirectional transmission, shorter spacing (down to 5-10 nautical miles), and higher operating frequencies up to 30 MHz for greater bandwidth. TAT-2 (1959) extended connectivity to Penmarc'h, , with 48 circuits, while TAT-3 (1963) and TAT-4 (1965) routed directly from New Jersey to and , respectively, each carrying 138 circuits using rigid for improved reliability. By the 1970s, TAT-5 (1970) connected Rhode Island to with 845 circuits via germanium transistors, and TAT-6 (1976) achieved 4,000 circuits on a Rhode Island-to- route using silicon transistors and 694 . The era culminated with TAT-7 (1983), the last coaxial system, linking New Jersey to Porthcurno, , with 4,200 circuits, 677 , and shore-controlled equalizers to mitigate signal —handling over 10,000 calls per day before supplanted the technology. These systems, often built by consortia including , European telecoms, and international partners, were laid using specialized cable ships like the CS Long Lines, with shore ends buried via plows for protection. Capacities escalated over the decades due to refined modulation techniques and materials, such as oil-filled evolving to solid-state designs, allowing cables to carry not only voice but also early data and telegraph services. By the , the TAT network dominated transatlantic traffic, complementing satellites with lower latency and higher security, and laying the groundwork for digital transmission.
CableYearPrimary RouteCapacity (Voice Circuits)Number of RepeatersKey Technological Note
1956 to Newfoundland3651Vacuum-tube, unidirectional
TAT-21959 to Newfoundland4857Similar to TAT-1, twin cables
TAT-31963 to 138182Transistor-based, bidirectional
TAT-41965 to 138186Enhanced repeater gain
TAT-51970 to 845361Germanium transistors, 10 nm spacing
TAT-61976 to 4,000694 transistors, 5.1 nm spacing
TAT-71983 to 4,200677Shore equalizers, 30 MHz operation
Data compiled from historical records.

Fiber Optic Transition (1990s–Present)

The transition to fiber optic technology in transatlantic communications cables marked a pivotal shift from copper-based systems, enabling vastly higher data capacities through light-based signal transmission. This era began with the deployment of in 1988, which carried an initial capacity of 40,000 telephone circuits at 280 Mbps across two fiber pairs, but the 1990s saw rapid expansion as optical amplifiers and (WDM) emerged, allowing multiple light wavelengths to travel simultaneously on a single fiber. By the mid-1990s, systems like TAT-12/13, operational in 1996, incorporated early WDM to achieve capacities exceeding 5 Gbps per fiber pair, tripling effective throughput through upgrades in 1999 that added three wavelengths. These advancements, driven by consortia including , British Telecom, and France Télécom, reduced latency and error rates compared to prior cables, supporting the burgeoning internet traffic. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) revolutionized capacity, packing up to 80 or more channels per fiber at 10 Gbps each, pushing total system throughputs into the tens of Gbps. TAT-14, activated in 2001, exemplified this with 4 fiber pairs and an initial capacity of 640 Gbps (160 Gbps per pair using 16 × 10 Gbps DWDM channels), later upgraded via DWDM to over 3 Tbps, connecting the U.S. to the and over 15,000 km. Concurrently, private initiatives like PTAT-1 (1989, upgraded in the 1990s to 2.5 Gbps) and the AC-1 cable (1998, 5 Gbps initial) diversified routes, while the FLAG Atlantic-1 (FA-1) system, launched in 2001 by , spanned 13,000 km with DWDM-enabled capacities reaching 10 Tbps through subsequent upgrades. These developments accommodated the dot-com boom's data demands, with fiber optics handling over 90% of transatlantic bandwidth by 2000. The 2010s introduced coherent optical technology and space-division multiplexing (SDM), further amplifying capacities to terabits per second amid surging and streaming needs. Marea, a 6,600 km cable operational since 2018 between , U.S., and , —built by and Meta—delivered 200 Tbps across 16 fiber pairs using advanced DWDM and coherent detection, equivalent to 22 million simultaneous HD video streams. Google's Dunant cable, activated in 2021 linking to Saint-Hilaire-de-Riez, , achieved 250 Tbps via SDM on 12 fiber pairs, incorporating open optical line systems for flexible upgrades. Other notable systems include Havfrue/AEC-2 (2020, 200+ Tbps to with branches to and ) and Amitié (2023, 368 Tbps over 6,800 km from to Le Porge, ), both leveraging 16-pair designs and probabilistic constellation shaping for efficiency. Today, transatlantic fiber optic cables form the backbone of global , carrying over 99% of intercontinental data traffic with aggregate capacities exceeding 1 Pbps across multiple routes. Recent innovations focus on , such as low-loss fibers and AI-optimized routing, as seen in the cable (2021, 350 Tbps connecting New York to Bude, , and Bilbao, ). In 2025, AWS's Fastnet cable became operational, providing over 320 Tbps capacity between the and . Future projects like 2Africa (operational 2025, 180 Tbps with transatlantic extensions; segments activated as of November 2025) and Project Waterworth (2030, multi-terawatt potential over 50,000 km) emphasize route diversity to Europe’s southern and Nordic shores, enhancing resilience against outages. These evolutions, led by tech giants like , , and Meta alongside traditional carriers, underscore fiber optics' role in enabling , AI, and across the Atlantic.

Technical Components

Cable Design and Materials

Transatlantic communications cables, primarily fiber-optic systems, are engineered with a multi-layered structure to protect delicate optical fibers while enabling high-speed transmission across oceanic distances. The core consists of multiple pairs of optical fibers, typically made from high-purity silica with a core doped with or other materials to optimize light propagation, surrounded by a fluorine-doped cladding to minimize signal loss. These fibers, often 4 to 8 pairs for classic transatlantic routes but up to dozens in modern systems, transmit using laser pulses via , achieving capacities exceeding 20 terabits per second per fiber pair, enabling total system capacities over 200 Tbps in modern cables. The fibers are embedded in a protective gel, such as or , to prevent ingress and mechanical stress, then encased in a hermetic metal tube—usually or aluminum—for electrical conductivity to power submerged that amplify signals every 50-100 kilometers. This tube is surrounded by an , fiberglass, or strength member to provide tensile support during laying and retrieval, capable of withstanding tensions up to several tons. Subsequent layers focus on environmental resilience. An aluminum or water barrier seals the assembly against hydrostatic , followed by layers of stranded wires for armoring, which shield against abrasion, anchors, trawls, and seismic activity—critical for transatlantic cables traversing depths up to 8 kilometers. The outer , typically high-density polyethylene, offers corrosion resistance and buoyancy control, with variations like additional galvanized tapes for shallow-water segments near stations. Overall cable diameter rarely exceeds 50-70 millimeters, balancing flexibility for deployment with durability for a 25-year life.
Layer (Innermost to Outermost)Primary MaterialFunction
Optical FibersSilica glass (germanium-doped core, fluorine-doped cladding)Data transmission via light pulses; low attenuation (~0.15 dB/km at 1550 nm).
Cushioning GelPetroleum jelly or siliconeCushions against vibration and moisture.
Central TubeCopper or aluminumHermetic seal; conducts power for repeaters.
Strength MemberAramid (e.g., Kevlar), fiberglass, or steel wireTensile support during installation.
Water BarrierAluminum or copper foilPrevents water penetration under pressure.
ArmoringGalvanized steel wires (single or double layer)Protection from mechanical damage; denser in high-risk areas.
Insulation TapeMylar or nylonElectrical insulation and bedding.
Outer JacketPolyethyleneWaterproofing, UV resistance, and burial facilitation.

Signal Transmission and Capacity

In modern transatlantic communications cables, signals are transmitted as pulses of light through optical fibers made of silica glass, generated by lasers at the sending end and detected by photodetectors at the receiving end. This fiber-optic technology replaced earlier electrical transmission methods, enabling high-speed transfer for , voice, and video communications across distances exceeding 6,000 kilometers. The light signals operate in the near-infrared spectrum, typically around 1550 nm wavelength, where fiber is minimal, allowing with reduced loss compared to visible light. The propagation of light over these transatlantic distances imposes a fundamental round-trip latency. In early 2026, typical round-trip ping latency from Western Europe (e.g., London) to the US East Coast (e.g., New York) over optimized routes was approximately 70 ms, with values consistently in the 68-70 ms range based on real-time measurements and provider statistics. This latency is primarily the propagation delay arising from the cable length (typically 6,000–7,000 km) and the speed of light in silica fiber (approximately 200,000 km/s), with minor additional contributions from repeaters and terminal equipment. To counteract signal degradation over long distances due to absorption and in the , optical —essentially inline amplifiers—are integrated into the cable at intervals of approximately 50 to 100 kilometers. These employ erbium-doped amplifiers (EDFAs), which use ions in a silica core to amplify the optical signal directly without converting it to electrical form. The amplification process involves forward pumping with high-power 980 nm laser diodes, achieving output powers greater than +15 dBm and noise figures below 4.7 dB, while gain-flattening filters ensure uniform amplification across a bandwidth of up to 40 nm. Power for the is supplied via a (typically 3,000 to 15,000 volts) fed through a central within the cable, with the providing the return path. Capacity in these systems has evolved through advanced multiplexing techniques, primarily dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM), which superimposes multiple independent light signals on different wavelengths within the same fiber pair, often supporting 80 to 100 channels per pair. Coherent optical detection, utilizing phase and polarization information, further boosts spectral efficiency, enabling data rates up to 800 Gbps per wavelength. More recent innovations incorporate space division multiplexing (SDM) via multi-core or multi-mode fibers, increasing the number of parallel transmission paths and approaching the theoretical Shannon limit for capacity. More recent trials have demonstrated up to 1.3 Tbps per wavelength on transatlantic routes, as achieved by Telxius and in 2025. A typical transatlantic cable features 8 to 16 fiber pairs, with tailored to each pair for bidirectional amplification. Representative examples illustrate the scale: the MAREA cable, operational since 2018, provides a design capacity of 200 terabits per second (Tbps) using SDM and DWDM across its 6,600 km route. Similarly, the Amitié system achieved 800 Gbps per over 6,234 km in 2024, supporting and AI traffic growth. Overall, the transatlantic route saw over 90 Tbps of new capacity added in alone, underscoring its role in handling more than twice the data volume of other major oceanic links.

Deployment, Landing, and Maintenance

The deployment of transatlantic communications cables begins with extensive route planning and marine surveys to select paths that minimize risks from , currents, and human activities such as . These surveys, often conducted using multibeam and geophysical tools, ensure the cable follows an efficient route across the Atlantic, typically spanning 5,000 to 7,000 kilometers while avoiding hazards like seamounts and trenches. Once the route is finalized, the cable is manufactured in segments and loaded onto specialized cable-laying vessels, such as the SubCom Reliance-class ships, which have capacities exceeding 5,500 metric tons and are equipped with linear cable engines for controlled payout. The laying process starts at one landing station, where the shore end is deployed and buried in shallow coastal waters (up to 1,500 meters deep) using plows or remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) to protect against abrasion and external damage; in deeper waters, the cable is surface-laid at speeds of about 6 knots, allowing it to settle naturally on the with calculated slack to account for ocean floor contours. The vessel traverses the entire route in a single run if possible, end-to-end testing the system before completing the far shore end, a process that can take weeks for transatlantic spans. Landing transatlantic cables occurs at fortified coastal facilities known as cable landing stations (CLS), which serve as the interface between the submarine cable and terrestrial fiber optic networks, housing repeaters, power feed equipment, and encryption systems. In the United States, prominent CLS include , and , while European endpoints feature sites like , (UK), Le Porge (France), and (Spain). For instance, the MAREA cable lands at Virginia Beach and connects to , facilitating high-capacity data transfer, whereas the Amitié system terminates at , , and Le Porge to link North American and European networks. Nearshore burial, typically to depths of 1-2 meters, is standard to mitigate risks from anchors and trawlers, with permits required for environmental compliance. Maintenance of transatlantic cables emphasizes continuous monitoring through network operations centers (NOCs) that detect faults via signal degradation, with global submarine systems experiencing around 200 faults annually, 86% attributable to external aggressions like fishing gear and ship anchors in shallow waters. Repairs are coordinated via consortium agreements such as the Atlantic Cable Maintenance Agreement (ACMA), established in 1965, which provides non-profit, shared access to a dedicated fleet for the Atlantic region, including vessels like the CS Sovereign (based in Portland, UK) and CS Pierre de Fermat (Brest, France), ensuring response times within 24 hours and transit of 7-8 days to fault sites. The repair process involves locating the fault using precise coordinates from NOCs, grappling and cutting the cable to recover both ends, testing for damage, and splicing in a replacement section from onboard spares (often 100-200 kilometers of stocked cable) via fusion splicing machines, which can take 1-2 days per splice; the repaired cable is then redeployed, potentially buried with ROVs in vulnerable areas, completing the operation in about one week post-arrival. Transatlantic repairs face challenges from aging vessel fleets—64% expected to reach end-of-life by 2040—and geopolitical delays in permitting, prompting investments in multi-purpose ships and public-private partnerships for resilience. Other key vessels include the IT Infinity and IT Intrepid, operated from Halifax, Canada, with ROV and plow capabilities for Atlantic operations.
Example Transatlantic Cable Systems and Landing Stations
System
MAREA (2018)
Amitié (2023)
AC-1 (1998)
These stations exemplify the strategic coastal placements that support over 20 active transatlantic routes, ensuring redundancy and low-latency connectivity.

Key Cable Systems

TAT Series Routes

The TAT series, formally known as the Transatlantic Telephone cables, comprises a foundational sequence of submarine cable systems deployed across the North Atlantic from 1956 to 2001, linking North American landing points primarily in the and to European stations in the , , , and later other nations. These cables evolved from analog designs for voice telephony to digital fiber-optic systems supporting high-capacity transmission, forming the backbone of transatlantic communications until their phased retirement in the and 2010s. Owned and operated by consortia including , British Telecom, and France Télécom, the series emphasized reliable, direct routes to minimize latency and signal degradation over distances exceeding 3,000 nautical miles. The inaugural TAT-1, laid in 1956, established the northernmost route in the series, spanning from Clarenville, Newfoundland, Canada, across the Atlantic to Oban, Scotland, with a total length of approximately 2,200 nautical miles including a coastal extension via the Cabot Strait to Sydney Mines, Nova Scotia. This coaxial cable supported 36 simultaneous voice circuits and 51 repeaters spaced at 37.5 nautical miles, revolutionizing real-time transatlantic telephony by enabling direct calls between North America and Europe for the first time. Subsequent early systems diversified southern routes: TAT-3 (1963) connected Tuckerton, New Jersey, to Widemouth Bay, England (3,518 nautical miles, 128 circuits), while TAT-4 (1965) linked Tuckerton to Saint-Hilaire-de-Riez, France (3,600 nautical miles, 128 circuits). These paths avoided deep oceanic trenches by following shallower continental shelf contours, enhancing deployment feasibility. Mid-series cables further expanded capacity and geographic reach. TAT-6 (1976) followed a 3,600-nautical-mile route from Green Hill, , to Saint-Hilaire-de-Riez, , accommodating 4,000 voice circuits with 745 spaced at 5 nautical miles using silicon technology. TAT-7 (1983) routed 3,286 nautical miles from Tuckerton to Porthcurno, , supporting 4,000 circuits. The transition to fiber optics began with (1988), the first transatlantic optical cable, which branched from Tuckerton to both Widemouth Bay, , and Penmarch, (total 6,705 km, 280 Mbps per fiber, equivalent to 4,000 circuits), utilizing regenerative every 67 km to boost over the dual endpoints. These routes prioritized redundancy, with southern paths hugging the U.S. East Coast and to connect growing European markets. Later iterations incorporated multi-nation branching for broader connectivity. TAT-9 (1991) spanned 8,910 km from , via Pennant Point, , to Goonhilly, ; Saint-Hilaire-de-Riez and Penmarch, ; and Conil, (2 x 560 Mbps). TAT-10 (1992) connected Green Hill, , to northern European points including Norden, ; and , (7,354 km, 560 Mbps). TAT-12/13 (1996), a paired system, linked and , to Porthcurno, , and Penmarch, (6,321 km, 3 x 5 Gbps per pair). The final (2001) extended 15,428 km from U.S. landings at Tuckerton, , and , to European sites including Bude and Goonhilly, ; Saint-Hilaire-de-Riez, Concarneau, and Lannion, (4 fibers, 16 x 10 Gbps wavelengths, up to 3.2 Tbps total capacity). This expansive route integrated dense to handle surging , landing in , , the , and via branches. All TAT systems were retired by 2020, supplanted by higher-capacity private cables.
CableYearPrimary Route (Nautical Miles/km)Key Landing PointsCapacity
1956Clarenville, NL to Oban, Scotland (~2,200 nm) (CA), Oban ()36 voice circuits
TAT-31963Tuckerton, NJ to , (3,518 nm)Tuckerton (), ()128 voice circuits
TAT-61976Green Hill, RI to Saint-Hilaire-de-Riez, FR (3,600 nm)Green Hill (), Saint-Hilaire-de-Riez (FR)4,000 voice circuits
1988Tuckerton, NJ to , & Penmarch, FR (6,705 km)Tuckerton (), (), Penmarch (FR)280 Mbps (4,000 circuits)
TAT-12/131996RI/NY to Porthcurno, & Penmarch, FR (6,321 km)/Shirley (), Porthcurno (), Penmarch (FR)15 Gbps total
2001NJ to multiple EU sites (15,428 km)Tuckerton/Manahawkin (), /Goonhilly (), Saint-Hilaire-de-Riez (FR)3.2 Tbps

Private and Consortium Cables

Private and consortium cables mark a significant shift in the ownership structures of transatlantic submarine communications systems, moving away from the large-scale telecommunications consortia that dominated earlier eras like the TAT series. Private cables are fully owned and operated by a single entity, typically a hyperscale technology provider, enabling customized infrastructure to support proprietary data needs such as cloud services and AI training. Consortium cables, on the other hand, are collaboratively funded and managed by multiple partners, including tech firms and network operators, to distribute financial risks and maximize capacity sharing across diverse routes. This dual model has proliferated since the , driven by surging transatlantic data traffic from digital services, with content providers financing more than 50% of global submarine cable investments by 2025. Tech giants have pioneered private cables to secure dedicated bandwidth. Google's Dunant, launched in 2021 as the company's first fully owned transatlantic link, connects Virginia Beach in the United States to Brest in France over 6,600 km, delivering a then-record 250 Tbps via 12 fiber pairs using space-division multiplexing technology. Building on this, Google's Grace Hopper cable, activated in late 2021, spans from New York to Bude in the United Kingdom and Bilbao in Spain across approximately 6,600 km, with 16 fiber pairs providing around 350 Tbps of capacity to handle equivalent to 17.5 million simultaneous 4K video streams. In July 2025, Google announced Sol, its private transatlantic cable connecting Palm Coast, Florida, to Santander, Spain, via Bermuda and the Azores, to bolster resiliency and capacity. Amazon Web Services followed suit with Fastnet, its debut private system announced in 2025, linking Maryland in the United States to County Cork in Ireland over a route emphasizing resilience against disruptions, with over 320 Tbps capacity slated for service in 2028 to bolster cloud and AI connectivity. Consortium arrangements offer collaborative advantages, pooling expertise and resources for broader network integration. The MAREA cable, a of , Meta, and Telxius (a subsidiary), entered service in 2018, connecting Virginia Beach to over 6,600 km with 200 Tbps across 8 fiber pairs, establishing it as a high-capacity backbone for transatlantic internet traffic at the time. More advanced is the Amitié cable, operational since October 2023, which links Lynn near in the to Bude and Le Porge in the and , respectively, over 6,800 km; owned primarily by Meta (80% stake) alongside , Aqua Comms, , and Orange, it features 16 fiber pairs for 400 Tbps—the highest-capacity transatlantic system deployed to date. The Havfrue (also known as AEC-2) cable, ready for service in 2020, connects the to with branches to and , jointly owned by , Meta, Aqua Comms, and Bulk Infrastructure, enhancing Nordic-European connectivity with multiple fiber pairs supporting terabit-scale throughput. These private and initiatives have dramatically increased transatlantic bandwidth, from under 100 Tbps total in 2010 to over 1,000 Tbps by , while introducing innovations like advanced optical amplification and route diversity to mitigate risks from faults or threats. They underscore the strategic importance of such in sustaining global economies, with ongoing investments ensuring for future demands.

South Atlantic and Alternative Routes

The South Atlantic routes represent a significant evolution in transatlantic communications infrastructure, offering alternatives to the congested and geopolitically vulnerable northern paths that dominate connections between , , and . These southern crossings primarily link and , providing direct, lower-latency pathways for data traffic between emerging markets in and the African continent. By bypassing the traditional North Atlantic corridor, which carries over 90% of transatlantic bandwidth, South Atlantic cables enhance network resilience against disruptions such as , cable faults, or intentional in northern waters. The pioneering South Atlantic Cable System (SACS), operational since October 2018, established the first direct fiber-optic link across the South Atlantic. Spanning approximately 6,200 kilometers from , Brazil, to Sangano near Luanda, , SACS utilizes four fiber pairs with advanced optical transmission technology to deliver an initial capacity of 40 terabits per second (Tbps). Fully owned by Cables and supplied by Corporation, the system integrates with the Cable System (WACS) at its Angolan landing point, enabling efficient routing of Latin American traffic to and beyond without traversing northern routes. This connectivity has been crucial for boosting intra-continental data flows, supporting in underserved regions by reducing reliance on longer, indirect paths via the or . Building on SACS, the South Atlantic Express (SAEx) project aims to further diversify and expand southern transatlantic capacity. SAEx1, the core segment, is a planned 25,000-kilometer system connecting , , to Virginia Beach, , with branches to , , and , offering a minimum capacity of 108 Tbps across six fiber pairs. Led by SAEx International Ltd. with backing from investors including the Industrial Development Corporation of , the project is advancing toward financial close in late 2025, with construction to follow and service expected in the late . By providing an express route from southern to the —and extending to via SAEx2— it addresses bandwidth bottlenecks in while offering strategic diversity for global traffic, potentially reducing latency by up to 50% for southern hemisphere communications compared to northern alternatives. These routes underscore the growing emphasis on geographic diversity in submarine cable networks, particularly as data demands from cloud services, , and digital economies surge in the Global South. Earlier systems like Atlantis-2 (deployed in 2000, linking to and ) laid foundational and early fiber connections but lacked the scale of modern optics; SACS and represent a shift toward high-capacity, resilient tailored to multipolar connectivity needs. Overall, South Atlantic cables not only mitigate risks associated with northern route overcrowding—such as the 2006 Mediterranean earthquake that severed multiple lines—but also foster equitable access, enabling faster integration of African and Latin American markets into the global .

Modern Challenges and Future Directions

Security Threats and Resilience

Transatlantic communications cables face a range of security threats that could disrupt the vast majority of data flows between and , where these cables carry over 95% of intercontinental . Physical threats predominate, with accidental damage from fishing trawlers and ship anchors accounting for approximately 75% of global faults, often occurring in shallow coastal waters near landing stations. Intentional sabotage by state actors, such as or , poses escalating risks, including the use of specialized vessels or uncrewed underwater vehicles (UUVs) to sever cables at strategic chokepoints like those off New York, , or , , where two cables handle nearly 75% of UK transatlantic capacity. Cyber threats target cable landing stations and network management systems, enabling or denial-of-service attacks that could intercept or degrade signals without physical intervention. For instance, historical programs by the NSA and have demonstrated the feasibility of tapping transatlantic fiber optic cables to collect petabytes of data daily, highlighting vulnerabilities to state-sponsored . Geopolitical risks amplify these issues, as foreign entities may seek control through ownership stakes in cable consortia or by deploying repair ships that double as surveillance platforms, with non-state actors, including terrorists, could exploit these weaknesses for disruptive attacks, though state involvement remains the primary concern. Resilience strategies emphasize and proactive protection to mitigate outages, which can last weeks due to specialized repair needs. Cable systems incorporate diverse routing to avoid single points of failure, supplemented by backups for critical traffic, though these cannot fully replicate fiber's capacity and latency advantages. Physical safeguards include burying cables up to 2 meters in shallow seabeds, establishing protection zones (e.g., up to 1 nautical mile wide in and proposed for ), and deploying acoustic sensors or UUVs for real-time monitoring. International frameworks like the 1884 Submarine Cables Convention and UNCLOS Article 113 mandate penalties for willful damage, while bodies such as the International Cable Protection Committee (ICPC) promote best practices like spatial separation of cables. Nationally, the U.S. FCC enforces licensing and outage reporting, with recent laws like the Coast Guard Authorization Act prohibiting anchoring near cables, while the UK's Subsea Infrastructure Response Group coordinates public-private efforts, including plans for a sovereign repair ship by 2030. NATO's Critical Undersea Infrastructure Network fosters Allied collaboration on surveillance and rapid response, and initiatives aim to integrate cable security into maritime strategies. Despite these measures, gaps persist in cyber defenses at landing stations and in updating outdated penalties (e.g., U.S. maximum fines of $5,000), prompting calls for a comprehensive international treaty to address and coordinated attacks.

Recent and Planned Deployments

In the early 2020s, transatlantic deployments accelerated to address in data traffic, particularly from services, applications, and hyperscale content delivery. A key example is 's Dunant cable, which achieved ready-for-service status in January 2021. Spanning 6,600 kilometers from , in the United States to Le Porge on the French Atlantic coast, Dunant utilizes a 12-fiber-pair space-division design to deliver 250 terabits per second (Tbps) of capacity, marking the first long-haul subsea system to incorporate this technology for enhanced . This cable supports low-latency connectivity critical for real-time applications across and . Another significant deployment is Google's Grace Hopper cable, named after computing pioneer , which entered service in September 2021. This 6,250-kilometer system connects New York, New York, in the United States to , , in the , with a branch to , , providing up to 350 Tbps across 16 fiber pairs. It enhances route diversity by landing in southern European ports, reducing congestion on traditional northern paths and supporting the expansion of Google's global cloud infrastructure. The cable's deployment involved innovative burial techniques at landing sites to mitigate environmental impacts and ensure long-term reliability. The Amitié cable, developed by a including Meta, , Aqua Comms, and , represents a pinnacle of recent capacity advancements and became operational in October 2023. Extending 6,783 kilometers from , in the United States to Bude in the and Le Porge in , it offers over 400 Tbps of potential throughput, making it the highest-capacity transatlantic system deployed to date. This open-access cable emphasizes ultra-low latency (under 60 milliseconds round-trip) and resilience through diversified branching units, catering to the demands of AI-driven data flows and enterprise connectivity. Trials on Amitié have demonstrated 800 Gbps per , underscoring its role in future-proofing transatlantic bandwidth. Looking ahead, planned deployments focus on emerging routes and enhanced amid geopolitical tensions. In July 2025, announced the Sol cable, a private transatlantic system connecting , in the United States to , with intermediate landings in and the . Spanning approximately 7,000 kilometers, will provide direct fiber-optic linkage between and —the first such route since 1999—and bolster overall network resiliency by diversifying landing points away from high-risk chokepoints. As of November 2025, construction is underway with manufacturing by leading suppliers and no announced ready-for-service date, aiming to support growing U.S. East Coast data hubs. Additionally, the Polar Connect project, a Northern European initiative involving Nordic partners including , is in advanced planning to create a northern alternative route via , , and , potentially reducing latency for Nordic and North American connections while avoiding vulnerable southern paths; initial investments were secured in 2022, with service targeted for the late 2020s. These initiatives reflect a broader trend toward global subsea cable investments exceeding $13 billion from 2025 through 2027, with significant focus on transatlantic capacity.

Environmental and Regulatory Considerations

Submarine communication cables, including transatlantic systems, pose environmental risks primarily during installation and burial, where plowing or trenching disturbs seabed sediments and habitats. Globally, cable burial has disturbed an estimated 2.82–11.26 million tonnes of organic carbon in sediments up to 2,000 meters deep, with approximately 51% occurring on continental shelves and 49% on slopes. This disturbance, though smaller in scale than bottom trawling (which affects over 60 million tonnes of carbon annually), can lead to remineralization and potential carbon release, excluding these impacts from broader ocean carbon budgets. In transatlantic contexts, such as routes crossing the Atlantic's continental margins, burial in areas like the Blake-Bahama Basin has mobilized sediments, but the overall footprint remains localized and temporary. Additional environmental concerns include interactions with marine ecosystems and geohazards exacerbated by . Installation can temporarily disrupt benthic communities through sediment plumes, though recovery typically occurs within months, with minimal long-term effects on . Electromagnetic fields from powered cables are low and do not significantly attract or harm marine species like or whales, based on field studies. However, transatlantic cables face heightened risks from turbidity currents in submarine canyons, such as the , where several incidents since 2020, including major cable damages in 2020 and 2021, have affected systems vital for transatlantic connectivity; these flows transport and erode channels up to 50 meters deep. Climate-driven changes, including intensified storms and sea-level rise, increase cable exposure through and stronger currents, potentially accelerating suspension or burial in Arctic-adjacent routes. Mitigation strategies include route planning to avoid canyons and carbon-rich hotspots—such as routing into depths exceeding 5 km, as in the Equiano cable—and using advanced vessels with precise positioning to minimize seabed impact; regular seafloor surveys and sensors further detect erosion risks. Regulatory frameworks for transatlantic cables are governed by international law, emphasizing freedoms while requiring environmental safeguards. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, 1982) grants all states the freedom to lay and maintain submarine cables on the high seas and in exclusive economic zones (EEZs), subject to due regard for coastal state interests (Articles 87(1)(c), 58(1), 79(1–2)). Coastal states may impose reasonable measures to protect seabed resources during continental shelf crossings but cannot impede cable laying outright (Article 79(2)); for territorial seas, they regulate entry and conduct environmental impact assessments (Article 21). UNCLOS mandates that states enact domestic laws punishing willful or negligent cable damage (Article 113) and requires compensation for vessels sacrificing gear to avoid harm (Articles 114–115). The 1884 Convention for the Protection of Submarine Telegraph Cables supplements this by criminalizing intentional or negligent injury outside territorial waters, with penalties including fines up to $500 (Article II), though enforcement remains tied to flag states. In practice, transatlantic projects require permits from multiple jurisdictions, including U.S. and European coastal authorities, incorporating environmental reviews under frameworks like the U.S. or EU directives. Recent developments address emerging threats: the 2022 Authorization Act prohibits anchoring near U.S. cables and funds repair capabilities, while international calls urge UNCLOS updates for better high-seas protections against . Archipelagic and EEZ states must permit maintenance of existing cables upon notice (UNCLOS Article 51(2)), ensuring continuity for systems like TAT-14. These regulations balance connectivity needs with ecosystem protection, prioritizing non-interference and indemnity for environmental compliance costs.

References

  1. https://www.noaa.gov/submarine-cables
  2. https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-first-transatlantic-telegraph-cable-was-a-bold-beautiful-failure
  3. https://atlantic-cable.com/
  4. https://www.submarinecablemap.com/
  5. https://www.itu.int/ITU-D/finance/work-cost-tariffs/events/tariff-seminars/Dakar-10/PDF/cable_sous_marin.pdf
  6. https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/backgrounders/Pages/submarine-cable-resilience.aspx
  7. https://www.itu.int/digital-resilience/submarine-cables/
  8. https://submarine-cable-map-2025.telegeography.com/
  9. https://subtelforum.com/legal-status-of-submarine-cables/
  10. https://www.csis.org/analysis/invisible-and-vital-undersea-cables-and-transatlantic-security
  11. https://www.verizon.com/business/terms/latency/
  12. https://www.atlantic-forum.com/atlantica/the-crucial-role-of-submarine-cables-in-the-digital-age
  13. https://www.rti.org/publication/economic-impact-meta-subsea-cable-investments-europe/fulltext.pdf
  14. https://www.subseacables.net/reports-and-coverage/from-telegraph-to-terabits-the-evolution-of-transatlantic-cables/
  15. https://ethw.org/Transatlantic_Cable
  16. https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/how-perseverance-laid-first-transatlantic-telegraph-cable
  17. https://www.history.com/articles/first-transatlantic-telegraph-cable
  18. https://atlantic-cable.com/Cables/CableTimeLine/index1850.htm
  19. https://atlantic-cable.com/Article/AtlanticCables/index.htm
  20. https://ethw.org/Underwater_Cables
  21. https://atlantic-cable.com/Cables/1956TAT-1/index.htm
  22. https://canrev.ieee.ca/en/cr52/CR52_TAT.pdf
  23. https://atlantic-cable.com/Cables/CableTimeLine/index1951.htm
  24. https://atlantic-cable.com/Cables/1970TAT-5/index.htm
  25. https://atlantic-cable.com/Cables/1976TAT-6/index.htm
  26. https://atlantic-cable.com/Cables/speed.htm
  27. https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/trans-atlantic
  28. https://ethw.org/Transatlantic_Optical_Cable
  29. https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/aws/transatlantic-subsea-cable-us-ireland-fastnet-aws
  30. https://www.escaeu.org/articles/submarine-telecommunications-cables/
  31. https://sumitomoelectric.com/id/project/v06/05
  32. https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/trans-atlantic/fastnet/aws-to-build-its-first-private-subsea-cable-connecting-the-us-and-ireland-%E2%80%94-fastnet
  33. https://www2.telegeography.com/submarine-cable-faqs-frequently-asked-questions
  34. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/analysis/what-is-a-submarine-cable-subsea-fiber-explained/
  35. https://www.dupont.com/kevlar-for-built-in-performance/fiber-optics-kevlar.html
  36. https://wondernetwork.com/pings/London/New%20York
  37. https://www.nec.com/en/global/techrep/journal/g10/n01/pdf/100104.pdf
  38. https://hackaday.com/2023/08/08/under-the-sea-optical-repeaters-for-submarine-cables/
  39. https://www.subseacables.net/industry-news/telxius-and-ciena-achieve-1-3-tbps-transatlantic-data-transmission-record/
  40. https://www.ciena.com/insights/articles/2022/the-transatlantic-route-reigning-king-of-the-seas
  41. https://newsroom.cisco.com/c/r/newsroom/en/us/a/y2024/m02/cisco-delivers-800gbps-on-amitie-transatlantic-cable-in-collaboration-with-microsoft-to-support-exponential-growth-of-cloud-and-ai-services.html
  42. https://www.sargassoseacommission.org/storage/documents/Cable_Installation_and_Maintenance_-_TE_SubCom_Sargasso_Sea_Final1.pdf
  43. https://www.fugro.com/expertise/fibre-optic-cable-route-surveys
  44. https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/trans-atlantic/marea
  45. https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/trans-atlantic/amitie
  46. https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/nv/insights/statistics-on-subsea-cable-fault-and-repair
  47. https://www.acma2017.com/
  48. https://www2.telegeography.com/hubfs/LP-Assets/Ebooks/The%2520Future%2520of%2520Submarine%2520Cable%2520Maintenance_%2520Trends%252C%2520Challenges%252C%2520and%2520Strategies.pdf
  49. https://www.iscpc.org/information/cableships-of-the-world/
  50. https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/trans-atlantic/ac-1
  51. https://atlantic-cable.com/Cables/CableTimeLine/atlantic.htm
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3200430_A_history_of_transatlantic_cables
  53. https://ewh.ieee.org/reg/7/canrev/cr52/CR52_TAT.pdf
  54. https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/trans-atlantic/tat-14
  55. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/17/meta-and-google-are-laying-a-fast-growing-web-of-mega-subsea-cables.html
  56. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure/googles-dunant-subsea-cable-is-now-ready-for-service
  57. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/googles-virginia-to-france-dunant-cable-goes-live/
  58. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure/announcing-googles-grace-hopper-subsea-cable-system
  59. https://www.telecomstechnews.com/news/googles-subsea-cable-grace-hopper-new-generation-transatlantic-connectivity/
  60. https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure/announcing-sol-transatlantic-cable
  61. https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/trans-atlantic/fastnet/aws-to-build-its-first-private-subsea-cable-connecting-the-us-and-ireland-%25E2%2580%2594-fastnet
  62. https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/trans-atlantic/marea/marea-cable-system-reaches-200-tbps-of-capacity
  63. https://newsroom.orange.com/orange-announces-the-launch-of-the-amitie-subsea-cable-offering-a-unique-and-robust-transatlantic-solution-with-ultra-low-latency/
  64. https://www.aquacomms.com/resource/aqua-comms-meta-microsoft-and-vodafone-announce-completion-of-amitie-the-highest-capacity-transatlantic-subsea-cable-system-ever-deployed
  65. https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/trans-atlantic/havfrue/havfrue-cable-system-supply-contract-awards-to-te-subcom
  66. https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2025-03-10-expert-comment-what-does-meta-s-undersea-cable-plan-mean-geopolitics
  67. https://blog.telegeography.com/why-does-diversity-matter-for-submarine-cables
  68. https://www.nec.com/en/press/201810/global_20181001_02.html
  69. https://www.capacitymedia.com/article/29ot42ikril15nmoxt5l2/news/analysis-the-worlds-first-south-atlantic-route
  70. https://www.saex.net/
  71. https://www.bso.co/all-insights/southern-corridor-bso-ellalink-global-connectivity
  72. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5901/jtselect/jtnatsec/723/report.html
  73. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/138729/pdf/
  74. https://scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=jlt
  75. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3099&context=ils
  76. https://www.subcom.com/documents/2021/Dunant_RFS_Final_3FEBRUARY2021.pdf
  77. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cornwall-57713168
  78. https://www.reuters.com/technology/arctic-data-cable-linking-europe-japan-secures-first-investment-2022-12-02
  79. https://blog.telegeography.com/building-tomorrows-internet-an-update-on-new-cable-investment
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10097694/
  81. https://www.iscpc.org/publications/submarine-cable-protection-and-the-environment/ICPC_Public_EU_June_2025.pdf
  82. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20230201-how-undersea-cables-may-affect-marine-life
  83. https://pulse.internetsociety.org/blog/are-subsea-cables-feeling-the-heat-from-climate-change
  84. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
  85. https://www.noaa.gov/general-counsel/gc-international-section/submarine-cables-international-framework
  86. https://cil.nus.edu.sg/databasecil/1884-convention-for-the-protection-of-submarine-telegraph-cables/
  87. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/protecting-underseas-cables/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.