Hubbry Logo
AnizahAnizahMain
Open search
Anizah
Community hub
Anizah
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Anizah
Anizah
Anizah
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Anizah
Adnanite
EthnicityArab
NisbaAnezī
Location
Descended fromAnizah Ibn Asad Ibn Rabīʿa Ibn Nizar Ibn Ma'add Ibn Adnan.[1]
Parent tribeRabīʿa
ReligionIslam

Anizah or Anazah[2] (Arabic: عنزة, romanized: ʻanizah, Najdi pronunciation: [ʕni.zah]) is an Arabian tribe in the Arabian Peninsula, Upper Mesopotamia, and the Levant.

Approximate locations of some of the important tribes and states of the Arabian Peninsula in the early 1900s, Anizah inhabited and Ruled over Nejd between modern-day Saudi Arabia and Turkey .

Genealogy and origins

[edit]

Anizah's existence as an autonomous tribal group, like many prominent modern tribes, predates the rise of Islam in the seventh century. The classical Arab genealogists placed Anizah within the large Rabiʿa branch of the Adnanites alongside the tribes of Abd al-Qays, Banu Bakr, Bani Hanifa, and Taghlib. In the genealogical scheme, Anizah's eponymous ancestor is a great uncle of all of these.

Two main branches of Anizah are recorded by the early historians. One branch was nomadic, living in the northern Arabian steppes bordering Syria and Mesopotamia. The other, was sedentary, living within the wadis of the district of Al-Yamama in eastern Najd, just south of their purported cousins, the Bani Hanifa of the Banu Bakr, who inhabited modern-day Riyadh. One of these clans Bani Hizzan, Families tracing their origin to Anizah through Hizzan still exist in that area today.[3]

The other tribes of Rabiʿa were far more prominent in the events of late pre-Islamic Arabia and the early Islamic era. According to historians such as al-Tabari (10th century), the Anizah joined with Bakr ibn Wa'il under an alliance they called al-Lahazim. Many of these tribes were followers of the Christian faith prior to Islam. Others such as bani Taghlib remained largely Christian even after the Muslim conquest of Mesopotamia and the Levant.

Bahrain's House of Khalifa and Kuwait's House of Sabah royal families both trace their ancestry to this vast tribe.[4] Saudi Arabia's House of Saud trace their ancestry to Anizah's cousin tribe, the Bani Hanifa,[5] which has merged with the larger tribe Anizah, and are therefore considered members of it as well.[6]

History

[edit]

Anizah in Hejaz

[edit]

According to the historians al-Hamdani and Abu'l-Hasan Bayhaqi, the Anizah tribe settled in the Hijaz region, specifically in Khaybar, at the end of the 10th century AD.[7][8] The Uyunid prince and poet Ali bin al Mugrab Al Uyuni mentioned the news of the Anizah tribe fighting rulers of Khaybar, the descendants of Ja'far al-Tayyar, and expelled them from it.[9] With the passage of time, a part of the Anizah become urban, while the other part remained on the nomadic lifestyle.

The 13th-century historian Ibn Sa'id al-Maghribi says about himself that he came to the Arabian Peninsula and asked about the rest of the Rabi’a tribes, saying about that 'I entered the Arabian Peninsula and asked: Are there any Rabi'ah tribes left in its regions? They said: There is no one left who rides horses, settles and migrates except for the Anazah, and they are in the regions of Khaybar, and the Banu Shu'bah are famous for highway robbery and tearing down veils in the outskirts of the Hijaz near Yemen and the sea, and the Banu Anz are in the region of Tabalah; and other than that we do not know of in the East or the West'".[10]

The 14th-century historian Ibn Fadlallah al-Umari notes that the Anazah were one of the tribes allied with the Al Fadl, along with several other tribes, the most prominent of which were Khath'am, Adwan, and Dhafeer.[11]

In the 19th century, the Swiss traveler Burckhardt and the British traveler Doughty visited the tribe in their stronghold of Khaybar and gathered from them many details of Bedouin life

Anizah in Levant and Mesopotamia

[edit]
Post-card of Emir Mejhem ibn Meheid, chief of the Anizah tribe near Aleppo with his sons after he was decorated with the Croix de Légion d'honneur on 20 September 1920 by General Gouraud

The Anizah tribe participated with the other Rabi'a tribes in the side of the fourth Rashidun caliph, Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib, in the Battle of Siffin. Historian Naṣr Ibn Muzahim mentions that 4,000 armored warriors joined Ali's army.[12]

The modern tribe of Anizah became prominent in the Ottoman era, as masters of the oasis towns of northwestern Arabia, particularly Khaybar and Al-'Ula. Although not farmers themselves, the Anizah levied crops from the inhabitants, and only spent the winter months in the area, while migrating northwards into southern Syria in the summer months, where they collected tribute from the inhabitants of the Hawran region. The tribute was known as khuwwa ("brotherhood"), and in exchange, the tribesmen pledged to protect the farmers from other tribes. Other clans of the tribe spread across the northern Arabian steppes as far north and east as the Euphrates. According to Encyclopedia of Islam, "it is not known whence they came", while many such as the Western travelers Philby and Anne Blunt simply assumed they had recently migrated from Nejd, having been pushed northwards into Syria by other tribes.

The first Anizah tribe to enter Syria was the Hasana in the mid-18th century. They established themselves as the dominant tribe in the plains around Hama and Homs. Around the same time entered the Wuld Ali in the Hawran. The Ruwallah followed the Wuld Ali in the early 19th century and rivaled them for influence in the Hawran, while the Fad'an and the Sba'a entered the central Syrian plains and often entered into conflict with the Hasana in the early 19th century.[13]

One branch of the Anizah in that area, centered around Al-Jouf and the valley of Wadi Sirhan and extending into Jordan and Syria, became so large and powerful that it practically developed into an independent tribe, known as the Ruwallah. The Ruwallah engaged in battle with other branches of Anizah, and also became the arch-enemy of the large tribe of Shammar, who inhabited roughly the same area and dominated Nejd in the late 19th century after temporarily deposing the Al Saud. A 19th century oral poetic epic telling the tale of a rivalry between two heroes from Shammar and Anizah was published in 1992.[14] The Ruwallah were among the tribes that took part in the "Arab Revolt" against the Ottomans in 1916. Another northern branch of Anizah, the `Amarat, was centered in the deserts of Iraq.

Anizah in Nejd

[edit]

The sparse chronicles of Nejd relating to the pre-Wahhabi era relate a process of penetration of the tribe into northern and western Nejd, where they began to claim pastures during the winter months.[15] One 19th-century historian, Ibn La'bun, a descendant of Anizah who went by the tribal appellation of "Al-Wa'ili", recorded the story of the settlement of several `Annizi families in Nejd, which he placed in the 14th century CE. In the 15th century, the region of Al-Qassim in northern Nejd was being rapidly settled through migration and the majority of this activity was by members of Anizah. In the early 18th century the Bedouins of Anizah are recorded to have reached as far as the gates of Riyadh, killing its ruler, Zayd Abazara'a, in battle. This battle was part of a tribal war in which Riyadh and its neighboring villages took sides.

With the rise of the First Saudi State in the late 18th century, Anizah were among the tribes that adopted a favorable attitude towards this new power, but took little active part in supporting it militarily, due to their geographical location. The royal family of Saudi Arabia Al Saud family are from the 'Anizah tribe,[16] with Al Saud having ancestry from Wa'il, the region's native inhabitants as well as the migratory Anizah. The Saud intermarried with their 'Anizah rivals, al Shammar, along with other powerful tribes to solidify their dynasty. Ibn Saud sired dozens of children by his many wives. He had at most four wives at a time, divorcing many times, making sure to marry into many of the noble clans and tribes within his territory, including the chiefs of the Bani Khalid, Ajman, and Shammar tribes, as well as the Al ash-Sheikh.[17]

In the 19th century, Sheikh Mashaan Ibn Hathal was cavalier, leader, and poet who gained his fame from leading the Bedouin clans of the Anizah tribe across the Arabian peninsula and unifying it against the tribe's enemies at the Battle of Al Shimasiyah on 18 June 1825. Sheikh Mashaan died in the battle of Al Shimasiyah but the Anezis won consequently.[18]

20th century

[edit]

Limited settlement of Bedouin tribesmen in nearby towns and villages has always been an ongoing process in the region. Settled families in Anizah are to be found not only in Saudi Arabia, where they are most numerous, but also in Kuwait, Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Oman, Bahrain, Ahwaz (Iran) and the West Bank, where the village of Anzah near Jenin is reportedly named after the tribe.

The establishment of the modern borders of the Middle East dealt a severe blow to the Bedouin lifestyle of tribes such as Anizah, which were accustomed to raising their animals over wide areas spanning many modern states. Special arrangements were made in the early 20th century for these tribes, but the vast majority ended up settling within these new states and taking Saudi, Kuwaiti, Iraqi, Lebanese, Syrian, or Jordanian citizenship. These recently settled tribesman are often distinguished from their sedentary cousins by retaining tribal appellations such as al-`Annizi or Al-Ruwaili as their surnames.

Notable people

[edit]

Among the tribe's members are:

Notable families

[edit]

The Anizah tribe is historically divided into urban and nomadic families, the most prominent of which are:

  • Al-Hathal : the sheikhs of the sheikhs of Anizah, they descend from The Al-Hblan branch of Anizah. In the eleventh century AH/17th century CE, their grandfather Hathal Ibn Adenan led the Tribes of Anizah. Hathal Ibn Adenan was given the title of (Sheikh Al-Shuyoukh) by the Sheriff of Makkah, Saad Ibn Zeid (1666-1705).

Several stories about the way Hathal obtained the Sheikhdom were told, however Ibn Abar a notable Anezi Historian believes that history tells us that Hathal came to power when Makkah's Sharif was unable to collect the zakat of one of the tribes near Makkah and was disturbed about it, here Sheikh Hathal emerged and pledged to the sheriff to bring him the zakat of this tribe, and in fact this was done for him, and from here he was appointed as a general sheikh of the tribe of Anizah and was given the seal and the bundle of Sheikhdom. Ibn Abar quoted on this saying :

"It is for the benefit of this narration that it is told from various perspectives with agreement and consensus on the cause and content, and it is for the purpose of collecting zakat from this tribe and bringing it to the Sharif, and we have the right to ask why sheikh Hathal pledged to carry out this mission. Did Sheikh Hathal have a personal contact with the Sharif, or did he have knowledge and connections with him? Was he the one who offered this service on his own initiative, or was it something that was brought to his attention? Why was the actual version of this story not kept in the same way over and over again? There are a lot of unanswered questions and mysterious occurrences around the circumstances of this case that we don't know about! There is no doubt, however, that the man was of enormous importance and presence among the people of his tribe, and that he was not an average person at the time, and that something like this prompted him to assume the Sheikhdom of this vast, great, and ancient tribe."

Hathal had two sons who were both considered Sheikhs : Sheikh Abdullah Ibn Hathal, and Sheikh Mndeel Al-Shuja' Or Mndeel the Brave. Their progeny are still regarded to be the Sheikhs of Anizah and are still given the honorary title of the Sheikhs of Shuyoukh of Anizah.

  • Al-Awaji : sheikh of the tribe of Walad Suleiman,
  • Al-Aida : sheikh of the tribe of Walad Ali,
  • Al-Qaqa’a : sheikh of al-Qa’qa’ah from al-Rawla,
  • Ibn Mujlad : sheikh of Al-Dahamisha,
  • Al-Rafdi : Sheikh of Al-Salqa,
  • Ibn Bakr : Sheikh of Al-Suwaylmat from Al-Dahamsheh,
  • Ibn Dhbayan : Sheikh of Al-Mehlef of Al-Dahamsheh,
  • Al-Taiyar : from the sheikhs of Walad Ali,
  • Ibn Ghabin : Sheikh of Dana Kahil from Al-Fadaan,
  • Ibn Muhaid : Sheikh of Al-Fadaan,
  • Ibn Quaishish : Sheikh of Al-Kharsa and currently is also the sheikh of Dana Majid from Al-Fadaan,
  • Ibn Huraymis : Sheikh Al-Aqaqrah from Al-Fadaan,
  • Ibn Murshid : Sheikh of Sbaee,
  • Ibn Hudayb : Sheikh of Al-Abedah from Sba’ah,
  • Ibn Aida : Sheikh of Al-Rasaleen from Sba’ah,
  • Al Mana : From the Sheikhs of Al-Mehlef
  • Ibn Shaalan : the sheikh of Al-Ruwullah, including Nuri Al Shalaan
  • Ibn Melhem : the Sheikh of Al-Manabaha,
  • Ibn Swailem : from the Sheikhs of Walad Suleiman,
  • Al-Faqeer : the Sheikh of Al-Faqara from Al-Manabha,
  • Ibn Ya’ish : the Sheikh of Al-Masalikh from Al-Manabha,
  • Ibn Dhwehr : from the sheikhs of Walad Suleiman,
  • Ibn Ma’jil : the Sheikh of Al-Ashaja’ah from Al-Mehlef,
  • Ibn Jandal : Sheikh Al-Sawalmeh from Al-Mehlef,
  • Ibn Majid : the sheikh of Al-Abadla, from the Mehlef,
  • Ibn Khael : the sheikh of the Tawala’, from the Walad Ali,
  • Al-Murtaed : the sheikh of Al-Yemnah, from the Walad of Sulayman,
  • Ibn Nasir : the sheikh of al-Mr’ad, from al-Rawla.
  • Al-Saud : rulers of Saudi Arabia,[19] their relation to Anizah is disputed and is claimed to be maternal, Al Saud officially and are locally recognized paternally as part of Banu Hanifa.
  • Al-Sabah : rulers of Kuwait [20]
  • Al-Khalifa : rulers of Bahrain [21]
  • El Assaad Family/AlSaghir dynasty : rulers of Jabal Amel 1639-1971
  • Abalkhail family:

former rulers of AlQassim region 1863-1908

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Anizah

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
ʿAniza (Arabic: عنزة), also rendered as Anazah or Anazzah, is a large confederation of Arab tribes claiming descent from a common ancestor within the ancient Rabiʿah lineage of northern Arabian Adnanite , historically centered in northern and central Arabia with migrations extending their influence across the , , the , and Gulf regions. Renowned for their , breeding, and equestrian traditions—including contributions to foundational strains—the ʿAniza have maintained a reputation as noble warriors and raiders, exacting tolls on trade routes and providing armed escorts for Ottoman pilgrimage caravans to . The confederation divides primarily into the Ḍanā Bishr (encompassing subgroups like the Fadʿān, Sbaʿa, and ʿAmārāt) and Ḍanā Muslim (including the Ḥasana, Wuld ʿAlī, and Ruwala), with southern branches known as Banū Ḥizzān, reflecting a loose genealogical unity rather than strict political cohesion. Historically antagonistic toward neighboring groups such as the , the ʿAniza supported key figures like Ibn Saʿūd in consolidating power in and allied with British interests in during colonial consolidations, while their mobility shaped interactions with Ottoman and later modern state authorities across borders. Their enduring tribal structures, adapted to sedentarization pressures post-World War I, underscore a legacy of adaptability amid regional transformations from nomadic dominance to partitioned nation-states.

Origins and Etymology

Name and Linguistic Roots

The name Anizah (Arabic: ʿAnīzah, عَنِيزَة), also transliterated as Anazah or ʿAnizzah, derives from the Arabic term ʿanazah, referring to a short or with a blade at its tip resembling an axe head or goat's horn, a historically associated with the tribe's martial prowess. Tribal traditions, recorded in early Arabic genealogical and historical accounts, attribute the adoption of this name to an eponymous ancestor who slew an enemy using the ʿanazah, leading the group—originally possibly known as ʿĀmir—to take it as their identifier. Linguistically, the root ʿ-n-z connects to ʿanz ("" or "he-goat" in Classical Arabic), with ʿanīzah as a feminine form implying "she-goat" or "nanny ," potentially evoking the spear's curved, horn-like design or the tribe's involving caprine herding. However, primary nasab (genealogical) sources prioritize the weapon's connotation over animal symbolism, as the ʿanazah was a distinctive implement in pre-Islamic Arabian warfare, symbolizing and precision akin to a goat's movements. Classical chroniclers like those in Ibn al-Kalbī's works (d. 819 CE) embed the name within the Rabiʿah branch of Adnanite Arabs, tracing it to an ancestor ʿAnīzah ibn ʿĀʾid ibn Rabiʿah, though debates among nasab scholars question whether this figure is historical or a later construct to explain the martial . Alternative folk , such as links to a legendary "goat-like" figure or totemic , lack substantiation in verified pre-modern texts and appear as later rationalizations rather than causal origins.

Ancestral Claims and Genealogical Debates

The ʿAnizah tribe, a prominent confederation, traces its lineage through traditional (nasab) to ʿAnizah ibn ʿĀṣim (or variations such as ʿAnazah ibn ), positioned within the Rabiʿah branch of the Adnanite , descending from Nizar ibn Maʿadd ibn Adnan. This places ʿAnizah among the northern ("ʿArab al-Mustaʿribah") , purportedly originating from Ishmaelite lines in the Hijaz and expanding northward, in contrast to the southern ("ʿArab al-ʿĀribah") tribes of . Medieval nasab compilers, drawing on pre-Islamic and oral traditions, integrated ʿAnizah into broader Rabiʿah confederations like Bakr ibn Waʾil, emphasizing descent from semi-nomadic groups active in the by the CE. Tribal lore attributes the name ʿAnazah to an eponymous ancestor's use of an ʿanazah—a short or —in a fatal altercation, symbolizing martial prowess and leading to the adoption of the term as a tribal identifier around the early Islamic era. Some accounts posit an earlier name, ʿAmir, for the group before this renaming, reflecting adaptive self-identification common in oral histories to consolidate alliances or assert dominance over rival clans. These narratives, preserved in 19th-century ethnographic records and earlier chronicles, served to legitimize territorial claims in the Jazirah and Nejd, where ʿAnizah competed with tribes like for grazing rights and raid spoils. Genealogical debates center on the fluidity and potential fabrication of deep nasab lines, as tribal affiliations often prioritized social utility over verifiable ; scholars note discrepancies between medieval sources like Ibn al-Kalbi's Jamharat al-Nasab (compiled circa 820 CE) and later recitations, where branches like or al-Wuld may retroactively emphasize "pure" nomadic descent to exclude settled or client groups. Historical analyses highlight that while core Rabiʿah ties are consistent across sources from the 9th to 19th centuries, claims of unbroken descent from pre-Islamic ʿAnazah face scrutiny due to sparse epigraphic evidence and the role of Islamic-era migrations in reshaping confederations—evidenced by ʿAnizah's 17th-century expansions from Nejd, which incorporated diverse lineages under shared eponyms. Modern anthropological studies underscore nasab as a dynamic tool for identity amid , rather than empirical , with no archaeological or genetic corroboration for lineages predating the CE.

Historical Development

Pre-Islamic and Early Islamic Periods in Hejaz

The Anizah tribe, a subdivision of the ancient Rabiʿah tribal confederation originating from northern Arabian lineages, exhibited limited documented activity in the Hejaz during the pre-Islamic era (prior to 610 CE). Traditional genealogical accounts link them to early settlements in the oasis, approximately 150 km north of , where some clans are said to have established a presence amid the dominant Jewish agricultural communities such as . The 10th-century Yemeni scholar al-Hamdānī referenced Anizah habitation in this Hijazi locale in his geographical compendium Sifāt Jazīrat al-ʿArab, portraying it as part of their broader nomadic range across northwestern Arabia, though archaeological and epigraphic evidence for such settlements remains sparse and contested. Rabiʿah tribes more generally roamed eastern and central regions like and , engaging in intertribal raids and alliances, but Hejaz-specific interactions for Anizah appear marginal compared to tribes such as or . During the early Islamic period (610–661 CE), the Hejaz transformed into the cradle of Islam, with Mecca and Medina as focal points for revelation and community formation under Muhammad (c. 570–632 CE). Anizah records in this phase are notably absent from canonical narratives of pivotal events, including the Hijra to Medina in 622 CE, the Constitution of Medina, or the Battle of Khaybar in 628 CE, where Muslim forces subdued local Jewish strongholds but without mention of Anizah alliances or opposition. This paucity suggests their influence remained peripheral in core Hijazi affairs, overshadowed by urban Quraysh merchants and Yathrib's Aws-Khazraj confederations. As Islamic authority consolidated post-632 CE under the Rashidun Caliphs, Rabiʿah elements—including potential Anizah kin—faced integration pressures during the Ridda Wars (632–633 CE), where eastern apostasy movements involved related Bakr bin Wa'il clans, leading to broader tribal submissions to Medina's rule. By Abu Bakr's caliphate (632–634 CE), surviving nomadic groups like Anizah likely pledged nominal fealty, facilitating their eventual role in the conquests beyond Hejaz, though primary sources such as Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah (d. 767 CE) prioritize local dynamics over distant Rabiʿah fringes.

Migrations to Levant, Mesopotamia, and Nejd

The Anizah maintained a presence in Nejd as part of their broader Arabian tribal expansions, with historical settlement patterns integrating them into central regions like Al-Qassim by the medieval period. From these bases in , significant northward migrations commenced in the 17th and 18th centuries, driven by competition for pastures, tribal conflicts, and environmental pressures, leading to Anizah incursions into the and adjacent areas of the . The Shammar and Anazah tribes, in particular, advanced from Arabia into the during this timeframe, establishing seasonal grazing routes and challenging incumbent groups. By the early 18th century, Anazah factions had penetrated the Syrian Steppe (Bādiyat al-Shām), forcibly displacing tribes such as the Mawālī and asserting control over key pastoral zones extending into modern-day , , and northern . These movements mirrored those of allied confederations, fostering a translocal network across Ottoman borderlands in the and , where Anizah subtribes like the ʿAmārāt maintained influence through raiding, horse breeding, and alliances with local authorities. A documented wave occurred in 1814 CE (1230 AH), when subtribes including the Fadʿān, Sbāʿah, and ʿAmārāt relocated from to the , fleeing severe drought and harsh conditions; this influx intensified rivalries with earlier Anizah arrivals such as the Wuld ʿAlī and Manābiḥah. In , Anizah migrations similarly entrenched their role in Iraq's tribal landscape, with nomadic circuits linking the valleys to the Syrian badia and back to Nejd, enabling economic activities like herding and tribute extraction amid Ottoman and later colonial oversight. These patterns underscored the Anizah's adaptive mobility, transforming them into a dominant force across these regions by the .

19th-Century Dynamics and Ottoman Interactions

During the reforms initiated in 1839, the sought to extend centralized authority over nomadic groups like the ʿAnizah, who dominated the , northern Arabia, and fringes of , but faced significant resistance due to their raiding activities and mobility that disrupted trade routes and administrative control. The ʿAnizah, alongside the , acted as major barriers to implementing reforms in Arab provinces, as their confederations evaded taxation and sedentarization efforts while preying on pilgrim caravans and settled populations. Ottoman military expeditions in the and 1850s targeted ʿAnizah encampments to curb incursions, yet initial weakness in imperial authority limited success, leading to temporary truces rather than subjugation. From 1840 to 1862, Ottoman-ʿAnizah relations evolved through pragmatic negotiations, with imperial officials offering subsidies (known as hüddam payments) to ʿAnizah sheikhs in exchange for protecting key routes, such as those linking to , and refraining from raids on urban centers. Prominent ʿAnizah leaders, including representatives like Ahmed Hafız in , received Ottoman medals and titles, facilitating intermediary roles that integrated tribal elites into the provincial administration without fully dismantling nomadic autonomy. This co-optation strategy acknowledged the ʿAnizah's prowess—estimated at tens of thousands of warriors—and their control over vast arid territories, where direct remained infeasible. By the , under intensified centralization efforts, the Ottomans systematized these pacts, appointing ʿAnizah sheikhs as official protectors of infrastructure like telegraph lines and highways, though underlying tensions persisted as tribes occasionally violated agreements during periods of imperial distraction, such as the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–1878. Such interactions highlighted a pattern of mutual accommodation: the empire gained nominal security for its frontiers, while ʿAnizah maintained economic leverage through protection rackets and seasonal migrations, resisting full incorporation into sedentary Ottoman structures until external pressures in the early . This dynamic underscored the limits of Ottoman reform in nomadic peripheries, where tribal agency shaped imperial policy more than vice versa.

20th-Century Transformations and State Formations

The imposition of modern national borders following and the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916 severely restricted the traditional nomadic migrations of the Anizah tribe across the , , and the , compelling gradual sedentarization and integration into emerging state structures. Colonial mandates in and , established by Britain and respectively after , fragmented Anizah territories, with subtribes like the Amarat navigating alliances with mandate authorities to maintain autonomy amid divide-and-rule policies. This era marked a shift from fluid tribal confederations to fixed territorial affiliations, as Anizah groups adapted to bureaucratic controls and cross-border restrictions that curtailed raiding and pastoral economies by the . In the , Anizah clans played peripheral yet notable roles in the under Abdulaziz Al Saud from 1902 to 1932, with some segments allying against rival tribes like the while others faced incorporation or resistance during the revolts of 1927–1930. Threats from Anizah elements to join raids pressured the nascent Saudi state to extend protections, facilitating their eventual settlement in and integration into the kingdom's tribal policies post-1932. Concurrently, the Ruwala subtribe, centered in the Syro-Jordanian borderlands, allied with the in Transjordan, contributing to the stabilization of the established in 1921 under British oversight, though border demarcations in the confined their ranges. The Al-Sabah dynasty, descending from the Anizah-affiliated Banu Utub clans that settled around 1710, consolidated the sheikhdom's amid 20th-century transformations, evolving from a pearl-diving to an oil-driven state following discoveries in 1938 and formal independence from Britain on , 1961. Tribal loyalties, including Anizah kinship networks, underpinned in , where citizenship policies post-independence privileged original Utub and allied tribes, fostering a hybrid governance blending monarchical rule with social hierarchies. In and , Anizah dominance persisted in rural deserts into the mid-20th century, but state centralization under Faisal I in (1921–1933) and French mandates in compelled pacts with tribal shaykhs, transitioning many from autonomous pastoralists to subsidized settlers by the 1940s. These shifts, driven by resource extraction and security imperatives, eroded traditional raiding by the 1950s, aligning Anizah economies with national development frameworks.

Tribal Organization

Subtribes and Confederations

The ʿAnizah (also spelled ʿAnazah or Anazzah) functions as a loose tribal confederation comprising multiple subtribes descended from lineages, particularly the Rabīʿah and Bakr ibn Wāʾil federations, with a fluid structure emphasizing autonomy among sections while allowing for unified leadership during migrations, raids, or alliances. This organization reflects adaptability to vast desert territories spanning northern Arabia, the Syrian , , and the , where subtribes maintain distinct territories and sheikhly hierarchies but invoke confederational ties for mutual protection or Ottoman-era subsidies. The paramount authority, notionally the Amīr al-Rabīʿah, oversees nominal unity, though practical power resides with subtribal shaykhs, as seen in 19th-century dynamics under figures like Fahad Beg ibn Hadhdhal of the ʿAmārāt. The Bishr branch forms the confederation's core, including the ʿAmārāt (the largest and most militarily dominant section, subdivided into clans like Saqr and al-Ṭarīfa, controlling oases such as Khaybar and al-ʿUlā under the Hadhdhal family since the 18th century), the Fadāʿān (or Fidʿān, politically influential camel-herders in central Arabia), and the Sbāʿah (active in Najaf-Karbala regions, noted for shorter stature but robust raiding capabilities). Other Bishr-aligned groups include the Muntafiq and al-Askar. The Rabīʿah branch encompasses subtribes like the Ruwālā (Rwalah, paramount under the Nuwaymī shaykhs, dominating Syrian-Iraqi borderlands with over 10,000 tents by the early 20th century) and smaller sections such as the Dahmshah and Zana. Additional subtribes, often operating semi-independently within the confederation, include the ʿĀbdah (subgroup of Sbāʿah-ʿĀbdah, involved in 1930s revolts in Mandatory against colonial policies), Walad ʿAlī (present in al-ʿUlā oases alongside Shurāʿibah and Manābahah), and the Badūr from Rabʿ al-Fawāz, settled in Dhi Qar province, Iraq (Al-Qaṭīʿa in Al-Baṭḥā), with nakhwa "Awlād Badr"; the Al-Murtaḍhā subgroup employs the nakhwa "Mashāhīr" ("famous ones") during raids and battles to boost morale. These divisions, totaling estimates of 100,000-150,000 members by the mid-20th century, facilitated the confederation's dominance as the largest nomadic Arab group, though sedentarization and state borders since the have fragmented traditional ties. Inter-subtribal feuds, such as those between ʿAmārāt and Ruwālā over grazing rights, underscore the confederation's internal tensions despite shared genealogical claims.

Leadership and Social Hierarchy

The Anizah tribe exhibits a patrilineal social hierarchy structured around units derived from shared male ancestry, forming a of clans (ashāʾir) and sub-clans (butūn), which further divide into lineages (fakhd) and extended families (ḥamūla). This organization emphasizes agnatic (ibn ʿamm), where loyalty and support flow upward from nuclear families to larger groups, with authority concentrated in elder males who mediate inheritance, marriages, and resource allocation such as camel herds. Social prestige correlates with lineage purity and noble descent, positioning Anizah as one of the elite sharīf tribes—claiming ancient Qahtani or Adnani origins—above non-sharīf groups in matters of alliance and intermarriage, though actual influence hinges on economic control and demonstrated prowess in or conflict. Leadership centers on the shaykh, a hereditary role confined to specific sheikhly families within clans, yet requiring affirmation through tribal councils of elders based on personal attributes like bravery, generosity in , and diplomatic acumen to command respect and mobilize followers. Paramount shaykhs emerge for the broader , elected from leading lineages to arbitrate inter-clan disputes, negotiate with external powers, and lead raids or migrations, as exemplified by figures like al-Sha'lan of the Ruwala branch during early 20th-century alliances. In practice, shaykhs derive authority from diyah payments, shares, and fees, fostering dependency among followers while balancing coercion with consensus to prevent fragmentation. Auxiliary roles complement the shaykh, including the ʿaqīd for military command during feuds or defenses, selected for tactical skill rather than , and councils () of notables for deliberative input on , blood feuds, or alliances. This persists in semi-nomadic contexts, adapting to state influences by integrating shaykhs into local governance, as seen with paramount leaders like Lawrence Mutib al-Hathal of the Albu-Aniza in modern Anbar, , who leverage traditional prestige for political brokerage. Women hold indirect influence through family networks and but are excluded from formal leadership, reinforcing patrilineal primacy.

Culture and Traditions

Nomadic Practices and Economy

The ʿAnizah, as a predominantly nomadic tribe spanning northern Arabia, the Syrian steppe, and , traditionally practiced centered on herding, which enabled mobility across arid landscapes for accessing seasonal pastures and water sources. Their migrations followed ecological patterns, with northern sections like the Fidʿān utilizing summer pastures near and winter ranges in the Jazīrah, adapting to rainfall variability and forage availability that sustained herds numbering in the thousands per subtribe. Sheep and supplemented stocks, providing , , and , though camels dominated due to their endurance in traversal and role in transport. Raiding constituted a core economic mechanism for the ʿAnizah, serving as redistribution of amid environmental risks like drought-induced herd losses, with tribes launching targeted raids to replenish stocks and assert territorial control over lands. Sheikhs coordinated these operations, balancing offensive gains against defensive needs, as exemplified in 19th-century conflicts where ʿAnizah groups clashed with Ottoman forces and rival nomads like the over resources. This practice, rooted in ecological adaptation rather than mere predation, maintained tribal viability but drew imperial interventions aimed at sedentarization. Beyond herding and raiding, the ʿAnizah economy incorporated protection rackets, extracting fees from sedentary shepherds, semi-nomads, and traversing their territories, particularly in Syrian steppelands controlled by northern confederations. Tolls on trade routes and occasional participation in escorts generated supplementary income, leveraging their mobility and martial prowess. Some subtribes, such as the Ḥsanā, transitioned toward semi-nomadism by the early , integrating limited or wage labor while retaining core pastoral elements. These diversified strategies underscored the tribe's resilience in a resource-scarce environment, where self-reliant tribal units prioritized as the primary wealth metric.

Customs, Honor Codes, and Family Structures

The Anizah, as a prominent tribe, adhere to traditional customs emphasizing (diyafa), which mandates protection and provision for guests, often extending to (dakhala) invoked through a solemn pledge by the host tribe or family, regardless of prior enmities. This practice underscores the causal link between guest protection and tribal , where failure invites retaliation or loss of standing. Customs also include regulated raiding (ghazw) for economic sustenance, governed by unwritten rules to avoid excessive violence, and as a medium for preserving genealogies and resolving disputes through verbal . Honor codes among the Anizah revolve around sharaf (male honor, encompassing bravery, generosity, and loyalty) and ird (female honor, centered on chastity and family protection), forming the ethical core that dictates social interactions and . Violations, such as insults to lineage or assaults on women, trigger tha'r (blood feuds), where retaliation is permissible but often commuted via diya (blood money) negotiated by tribal mediators, with liability shared among groups of 10–15 members in smaller units or hundreds in larger confederations. These codes, rooted in pre-Islamic nomadic imperatives for survival amid scarce resources, prioritize empirical deterrence over abstract justice, with empirical data from Iraqi Anizah subgroups showing diya payments stabilizing alliances despite occasional escalations. Family structures are patrilineal and patriarchal, organized hierarchically from the bayt ( unit) to the a'ilah (), with descent traced exclusively through males to maintain cohesion in mobile pastoral economies. Marriage is arranged by male guardians (), typically endogamous within subtribes to preserve wealth and alliances, involving bride-price () and allowing up to four wives under Islamic norms, though Anizah women in Shammar-influenced branches retain some veto power over suitors, diverging from stricter controls in other groups like Sinai tribes. Inheritance favors sons, with daughters receiving minimal shares redirected through marriage ties, reinforcing male authority while women hold indirect influence via kin networks; succession to leadership passes agnatically, ensuring stability amid migrations documented as early as the across the and .

Military and Political Roles

Historical Raiding and Feuds

The ʿAnizah, as a nomadic , engaged in ghazw—organized raiding expeditions—as a central element of their and , targeting caravans, sedentary villages, and rival tribes to acquire , camels, and resources essential for survival in arid regions spanning , , and northern Arabia. These raids were governed by customary codes emphasizing surprise, minimal casualties, and honorable withdrawal, though the adoption of repeating in the late escalated lethality, particularly after 1900 among subtribes like the Ruwallah. Ottoman records document repeated ʿAnizah incursions into settled areas, contributing to imperial failures in pacification efforts during the , as tribes evaded campaigns through mobility and alliances. Intertribal feuds (th'ar) formed the core of ʿAnizah conflicts, often triggered by disputes over grazing rights, during raids, or honor violations, with cycles of retaliation persisting for generations until mediated by blood money (diyah) or truces. A prominent example involved ʿAnizah subtribes raiding allies of the Ibn Saʿlan in the , led by the seven sons of as-Sreyfi, prompting retaliatory campaigns by Kwahwlah and Shammar forces that inflicted significant losses. Internal divisions exacerbated these, as seen in prolonged hostilities between the Ruwallah and Wuld ʿAli subtribes, which fragmented ʿAnizah unity and diverted resources from external threats. The most enduring rivalry pitted the ʿAnizah against the confederation, dominating politics in and the for over 150 years from the mid-19th century onward, with contests over pasturelands and pilgrimage routes fueling battles that shaped regional power balances. Subtribes such as the ʿAmārāt aligned with the Āl Saʿūd against the Shammar-backed Rashīd dynasty from the , participating in raids that weakened Shammar dominance, including actions as late as 1910. These feuds intertwined with state dynamics, as ʿAnizah raids undermined Ottoman and later British authority, while Shammar alliances with occasionally forced temporary ceasefires, though underlying territorial animosities persisted.

Engagements in Regional Conflicts

The ʿAnizah confederation, alongside the , exerted significant control over the Syrian and deserts and countryside from the late , frequently engaging in migrations and raids that disrupted Ottoman administration and settled agriculture during summer months. These activities prompted Tanzimat-era imperial efforts to curb nomadic incursions through military expeditions, subsidies, and deportation policies, though such measures often failed against the tribes' mobility and cohesion. The ʿAnizah's dominance stemmed from their large numbers and decentralized structure, enabling sustained resistance to central authority in northern Arabia, , and . Inter-tribal rivalries, particularly with the over grazing lands and migration routes, defined many ʿAnizah engagements, as seen in the enmity between the Ruwallah branch of ʿAnizah and groups sharing the . These feuds escalated during periods of scarcity, contributing to broader instability in the borderlands between Ottoman provinces. In the post-World War I mandate era, ʿAnazah subtribes like the ʿAmārāt clashed over resources such as camels, leading to the 1929–1934 "Camel Dispute" along the Iraqi-Syrian frontier, where cross-border raids strained Anglo-French colonial boundaries and prompted diplomatic interventions. During the Saudi unification campaigns of the early 20th century, ʿAnizah elements in central Arabian oases faced subjugation by Abdulaziz ibn Saud's forces, notably in the 1904 capture of , a strategic town linked to ʿAnizah settlement, where defenders suffered heavy losses amid the Saudi-Rashidi wars. Such conflicts reflected the tribe's fragmented allegiances, with some factions aligning against Wahhabi expansion while others integrated into emerging state structures, influencing the consolidation of Saudi control over nomadic territories.

Influence on Modern Geopolitics

The Anizah tribe maintains influence in modern geopolitics through its historical ties to ruling families in Gulf monarchies, particularly Bahrain and Kuwait, where tribal descent bolsters legitimacy and shapes alliances within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The Al Khalifa dynasty of Bahrain traces its origins to the Anizah, originating from Najd before migrating to the Gulf in the 18th century as part of the Utub confederation. This lineage has facilitated the integration of tribal networks into state institutions, supporting Bahrain's role as a key U.S. ally hosting the Navy's Fifth Fleet and participating in coalitions like the Saudi-led intervention in Yemen starting in 2015. Similarly, Kuwait's Al Sabah family descends from Anizah clans that settled the region in the early 1700s, enabling tribal consultations that inform Kuwait's mediation efforts in regional disputes, such as the 2017 Qatar diplomatic crisis. Cross-border Anizah kin networks, spanning , , , and , challenge rigid national boundaries inherited from colonial eras, fostering informal transnational ties that impact border security and migration. In , the Anizah , one of the largest nomadic groups, has engaged in post-2003 political activities, including alliances with U.S. forces and participation in tribal awakening councils against insurgents. These dynamics persist in fragile states, where Anizah sheikhs mediate local conflicts and influence counterterrorism efforts, as seen in tribal resistance to ISIS in Sunni areas. In , Anizah subgroups have navigated the civil war by aligning variably with opposition forces or regime elements, complicating stabilization in eastern regions. Overall, while modern states have centralized power, Anizah tribal structures provide resilience against ideological and enable pragmatic , though they can exacerbate sectarian tensions in diverse polities like and . This enduring agency underscores how pre-modern tribal confederations continue to intersect with state , affecting GCC cohesion and broader Middle Eastern security architectures.

Notable Individuals and Families

Historical Leaders and Warriors

Fahd ibn Hadhdhāl served as the paramount sheikh of the ʿAmārāt subsection of the Anizah confederation in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, commanding territories south of the River in northern Arabia and . Under his leadership, the ʿAmārāt engaged in raids (ghazw) against rival tribes and navigated relations with Ottoman authorities and European explorers, maintaining tribal autonomy through military strength and . Ibn Hadhdhāl's forces relied on swift and horse cavalry, reflecting the Anizah's reputation for hardy warriors adapted to , with documented encampments supporting thousands of tribesmen equipped for intertribal conflicts. Anizah warriors under such sheikhs frequently clashed with neighboring confederations like the over pastures and migration routes, particularly in the and Jazira region during the 18th and 19th centuries. These engagements emphasized , leveraging superior mobility to capture livestock and assert dominance, as the Anizah's expansive confederation—spanning from to the —required constant defense against incursions. Sheikh families like the Hadhdhāl upheld a hierarchical system where leaders doubled as chief combatants, breeding Arabian horses renowned for endurance in prolonged raids that could span hundreds of kilometers. Earlier migrations in the 17th and 18th centuries saw Anizah subsections, such as the ʿUtub, branch into coastal settlements under warrior-leaders who subdued local populations to found principalities; for instance, Sabah I ibn Jaber, a chieftain from Anizah stock, established around 1752 through conquest and alliance-building. Similarly, the Al Khalifa rulers of , descending from Anizah ʿUtub clans, originated in 18th-century seafaring raids that secured the by 1783, blending nomadic martial traditions with nascent . These figures exemplified the transition from pure nomadism, where Anizah leaders prioritized asabiyyah (tribal solidarity) in battle, to semi-sedentary rule, though core confederation sheikhs remained tied to raiding economies.

Contemporary Figures

The , the ruling family of since 1783, traces its origins to the Anizah tribe as part of the Utub confederation that migrated from in central Arabia. King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, born on January 28, 1950, succeeded his father as emir on March 6, 1999, and proclaimed a with himself as king on February 14, 2002. Under his leadership, has pursued economic diversification and political reforms, including the establishment of an elected , though these have faced criticism for limited democratic substance. His son, Crown Prince , born on November 21, 1969, serves as the since November 2020, overseeing key aspects of governance and foreign policy. The family's Anizah heritage underscores their roots, with historical ties to nomadic raiding and alliance-building in the Gulf region, now channeled into state institutions. In and other Gulf states, Anizah descendants hold influential positions in business, military, and politics, but traditional tribal leadership has diminished to symbolic roles amid centralized state authority. For instance, branches like the Al-Hithlain maintain cultural prominence, yet without autonomous political power, reflecting broader sedentarization and integration into modern nation-states.

Modern Presence and Challenges

Demographic Spread and Sedentarization

The Anizah (also spelled Anaza or Anazeh) tribal confederation maintains a broad demographic footprint across the northern and adjacent regions, with principal concentrations in , , , , , and smaller communities in the and . In , where settled Anizah families are most numerous, they predominate in northern provinces like and Qassim, including urban centers such as city. Significant populations also reside in western 's Anbar Province and eastern 's and governorates, areas historically tied to their nomadic circuits in the . In , Anizah descendants form a core element of the Bedouin citizenry, clustered around . hosts Anizah groups in its eastern deserts, while diaspora extensions reach Palestinian territories and through historical migrations. Population figures for the Anizah are imprecise due to self-identification, intermarriage, and lack of official tribal censuses, but estimates place core members at 1-2 million, with broader affiliations potentially exceeding 10 million including urbanized across states. They rank among the largest confederations numerically, surpassing many contemporaries in historical nomadic scale, though modern urbanization has diffused concentrations. Tribal genealogists emphasize patrilineal descent from the 'Anaza , sustaining identity amid dispersal. Sedentarization of the Anizah progressed unevenly from the late , driven by Ottoman border controls, colonial partitions post-, and national state-building, which curtailed transhumant across the Jazirah and Syrian . In , the process intensified after Al Saud's unification campaigns (1902-1932), as subsidies, land grants, and Ikhwan settler policies encouraged camel-herders to establish permanent villages, reducing full nomadism to marginal fringes by the 1950s oil boom. Many transitioned to semi-sedentary agropastoralism or urban wage labor, integrating into national institutions like the while retaining tribal shaykhates for dispute resolution. In Syria and Iraq, French and British mandates (1920s-1940s) imposed sedentarization through taxation, military coercion, and irrigated settlement schemes, fragmenting Anizah raiding economies and prompting partial urbanization in Aleppo and Baghdad peripheries. By the mid-20th century, Gulf states like Kuwait accelerated settlement via citizenship incentives and oil-funded housing, converting Anizah nomads into suburban commuters who truck livestock rather than migrate seasonally. This shift preserved cultural markers—such as poetry and hospitality codes—but eroded traditional ecological knowledge, with younger generations prioritizing formal education and state employment over herding. Contemporary challenges include land disputes in unrecognized settlements and identity dilution in megacities, yet tribal networks endure for social welfare and political mobilization.

Adaptations to Contemporary States

The ʿAnizah tribe has adapted to contemporary Gulf states through branches that form core elements of ruling dynasties, enabling tribal networks to influence national governance while integrating into state institutions. In Kuwait, the Al Sabah family, originating from the Banū ʿUtūb subgroup of ʿAnizah, established rule in 1752 upon settlement by nomadic families from central Arabia, transforming tribal leadership into sovereign authority over a modern emirate. Similarly, Bahrain's Al Khalifa rulers trace descent to ʿAnizah lineages, leveraging ancestral ties for political legitimacy amid oil-driven state formation. These adaptations involved shifting from nomadic raiding to centralized administration, with tribal shaykhs assuming roles in cabinets and security forces to balance kinship loyalties with state citizenship demands. In , ʿAnizah members have integrated into key state apparatuses, particularly the and , reflecting a pragmatic alignment with the post-unification in 1932. The tribe's presence dominates sectors like the and the , where tribal recruitment fosters loyalty and provides employment pathways for clans transitioning from . This incorporation mitigates historical raiding feuds by channeling martial traditions into national defense, though tribal identities persist as social markers influencing patronage and . Across and , ʿAnizah confederations maintain semi-autonomous desert control, negotiating subsidies and grazing rights with central governments to adapt nomadic mobility to fixed borders established after . Post-colonial states have subsidized tribes to secure frontiers, with ʿAnizah shaykhs mediating between state law and customary ʿurf in areas like tribal , though conflicts arise over resource allocation amid . Recent mobilizations, such as in since 2025, highlight ongoing tensions where tribal militias fill security vacuums, underscoring incomplete integration into statist frameworks. Overall, ʿAnizah adaptations emphasize hybrid governance, where tribal supports state stability in rentier economies, yet challenges persist from border restrictions on migration and clashes between customary honor codes and modern legal systems.

References

  1. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/LORO/COM-040040.xml?language=en
  2. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/EI3O/COM-23785.xml
  3. https://www.bedouin-heritage.com/tribes-i
  4. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3628713
  5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3596346
  6. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/jesh/8/1/article-p93_6.xml
  7. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0vn807x4/qt0vn807x4_noSplash_58901d30dfbdcca836da6e70357db75e.pdf
  8. https://journals.openedition.org/arabianhumanities/10103
  9. https://brainly.infogalactic.com/info/Anaiza
  10. https://www.mofa.gov.sa/en/ksa/Pages/history.aspx
  11. https://historyofislam.org/pre-islamic-arab-politics/
  12. https://jcpa.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Egypt2.pdf
  13. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/negotiating-empire-in-the-middle-east/introduction/5282EA35534EF8F0C37670C0CB920C97
  14. https://daughterofthewind.org/a-date-for-the-migration-of-some-anazah-from-central-arabia-to-the-north/
  15. https://www.academia.edu/71009251/The_Camel_Dispute_Cross_Border_Mobility_and_Tribal_Conflicts_in_the_Iraqi_Syrian_Borderland_1929_1934
  16. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/negotiating-empire-in-the-middle-east/conflict/59688534C073C6743E18D58648ACD2C0
  17. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2857747
  18. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/negotiating-empire-in-the-middle-east/expansion-reaction-and-reconciliation-ii/67FD15168058CAE4E2B01772CB609776
  19. https://www.academia.edu/50072883/Negotiating_Empire_in_the_Middle_East_Ottomans_and_Arab_Nomads_in_the_Modern_Era_1840_1914
  20. https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/93322/1/WRAP-Amarat-Sheikh-Colonial-State-Fletcher.pdf
  21. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/mono/10.4324/9781003074564-11/epilogue-christine-moss-helms
  22. https://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/cultures/md04/summary
  23. https://www.kuwait-embassy.or.jp/E_outline_01.html
  24. https://dokumen.pub/kinship-state-formation-and-governance-in-the-arab-gulf-states-9781474488181.html
  25. https://scholarspace.library.gwu.edu/downloads/wm117p096?locale=fr
  26. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RS22626.html
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347974122_Diplo_Wo_64_SAUDI_ARAB_IDENTITY_Jan_De_Maere
  28. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%257CA277519274&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=08227942&p=AONE&sw=w
  29. https://www.bedouin-heritage.com/bedouin-society
  30. https://easternchronicles.me/bedouin-society-structure-hierarchy/
  31. https://www.mei.edu/publications/kin-who-count-mapping-raqqas-tribal-topology
  32. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA621092.pdf
  33. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/nomads-in-the-middle-east/nomads-in-the-modern-middle-east/B84F9A58ED714AC37F6E5D6BC2E5D70A
  34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40561148
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229610772_Camel_Raiding_of_North_Arabian_Bedouin_A_Mechanism_of_Ecological_Adaptation1
  36. https://www.nomadsed.de/fileadmin/user_upload/redakteure/Dateien_Intern/Archiv_AG_1/Stewart_Customary_Law_2006.pdf
  37. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/671b90aefc28a840abc6d274/IRQ%2BCPIN%2BBlood%2Bfeuds_%2Bhonour%2Bcrimes%2Band%2Btribal%2Bviolence-%2BJuly%2B2024.pdf
  38. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20070315_RS22626_ad0975ca0bc18041c9ed35c8a246b196db53b1c4.pdf
  39. https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/93322/1/WRAP-Amarat-Sheikh-Colonial-State-Fletcher.pdf
  40. https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Unification_of_Saudi_Arabia
  41. https://muslimsurnames.com/al-khalifa-surname/
  42. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1132680.pdf
  43. https://gulfnews.com/world/gulf/kuwait/kuwait-asks-ministers-to-remove-sheikh-from-their-titles-1.85357961
  44. https://www.royalark.net/Kuwait/kuwait.htm
  45. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21534764.2022.2225669
  46. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2020/02/28/tribes-and-borders-in-the-gulf/
  47. https://www.go-globe.com/facts-about-king-hamad-bin-isa-al-khalifa-of-bahrain-infographic/
  48. https://www.mofa.gov.bh/en/his-majesty-the-king
  49. https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/xo-aniz.html
  50. https://www.arabnews.com/node/2589287/tribes-saudi-arabia-have-no-effective-power-today-beyond-their-symbolic-roles
  51. https://www.scribd.com/document/719864897/Anizzah
  52. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/468/1/uk_bl_ethos_329362.pdf
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233513643_Negotiating_the_Future_of_a_Bedouin_Polity_in_Mandatory_Syria_Political_Dynamics_of_the_Sba%27a-%27Abada_During_the_1930s
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2869035/
  55. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Sabah-dynasty
  56. https://agsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Weiner_Kinship_Web.pdf
  57. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/field/field_document/20150331SaudiCivil.pdf
  58. https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/from-sectarianism-to-tribalism-rebuilding-syrias-power-structures/
  59. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/21st-century-bedouin-politics-considering-the-modern-power-of-tribes-in-the-arabian-peninsula/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.