Hubbry Logo
AnodizingAnodizingMain
Open search
Anodizing
Community hub
Anodizing
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Anodizing
Anodizing
Anodizing
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
These carabiners have an anodized aluminium surface that has been dyed; they are made in many colors.

Anodizing is an electrolytic passivation process used to increase the thickness of the natural oxide layer on the surface of metal parts.

The process is called anodizing because the part to be treated forms the anode electrode of an electrolytic cell. Anodizing increases resistance to corrosion and wear, and provides better adhesion for paint primers and glues than bare metal does. Anodic films can also be used for several cosmetic effects, either with thick porous coatings that can absorb dyes or with thin coatings whose color is due to thin film interference.

Anodizing is also used to prevent galling of threaded components and to make dielectric films for electrolytic capacitors. Anodic films are most commonly applied to protect aluminium alloys, although processes also exist for titanium, zinc, magnesium, niobium, zirconium, hafnium, and tantalum. Iron or carbon steel metal exfoliates when oxidized under neutral or alkaline micro-electrolytic conditions; i.e., the iron oxide (actually ferric hydroxide or hydrated iron oxide, also known as rust) forms by anoxic anodic pits and large cathodic surface, these pits concentrate anions such as sulfate and chloride accelerating the underlying metal to corrosion. Carbon flakes or nodules in iron or steel with high carbon content (high-carbon steel, cast iron) may cause an electrolytic potential and interfere with coating or plating. Ferrous metals are commonly anodized electrolytically in nitric acid or by treatment with red fuming nitric acid to form hard black Iron(II,III) oxide. This oxide remains conformal even when plated on wiring and the wiring is bent.

Anodizing changes the microscopic texture of the surface and the crystal structure of the metal near the surface. Thick coatings are normally porous, so a sealing process is often needed to achieve corrosion resistance. Anodized aluminium surfaces, for example, are harder than aluminium but have low to moderate wear resistance that can be improved with increasing thickness or by applying suitable sealing substances. Anodic films are generally much stronger and more adherent than most types of paint and metal plating, but also more brittle. This makes them less likely to crack and peel from ageing and wear, but more susceptible to cracking from thermal stress.

History

[edit]

Anodizing was first used on an industrial scale in 1923 to protect Duralumin seaplane parts from corrosion. This early chromic acid–based process was called the Bengough–Stuart process and was documented in British defence specification DEF STAN 03-24/3. It is still used today despite its legacy requirements for a complicated voltage cycle now known to be unnecessary. Variations of this process soon evolved, and the first sulfuric acid anodizing process was patented by Gower and O'Brien in 1927. Sulfuric acid soon became and remains the most common anodizing electrolyte.[1]

Oxalic acid anodizing was first patented in Japan in 1923 and later widely used in Germany, particularly for architectural applications. Anodized aluminium extrusion was a popular architectural material in the 1960s and 1970s, but has since been displaced by cheaper plastics and powder coating.[2] The phosphoric acid processes are the most recent major development, so far only used as pretreatments for adhesives or organic paints.[1] A wide variety of proprietary and increasingly complex variations of all these anodizing processes continue to be developed by industry, so the growing trend in military and industrial standards is to classify by coating properties rather than by process chemistry.

Aluminium

[edit]
Colored anodized aluminium key blanks
Colored anodized aluminium Raspberry Pi 4 heat sink cases

Aluminium alloys are anodized to increase corrosion resistance and to allow dyeing (coloring), improved lubrication, or improved adhesion. However, anodizing does not increase the strength of the aluminium object. The anodic layer is insulative.[3]

When exposed to air at room temperature, or any other gas containing oxygen, pure aluminium self-passivates by forming a surface layer of amorphous aluminium oxide 2 to 3 nm thick,[4] which provides very effective protection against corrosion. Aluminium alloys typically form a thicker oxide layer, 5–15 nm thick, but tend to be more susceptible to corrosion. Aluminium alloy parts are anodized to greatly increase the thickness of this layer for corrosion resistance. The corrosion resistance of aluminium alloys is significantly decreased by certain alloying elements or impurities: copper, iron, and silicon,[5] so 2000-, 4000-, 6000 and 7000-series Al alloys tend to be most susceptible.

Although anodizing produces a very regular and uniform coating, microscopic fissures in the coating can lead to corrosion. Further, the coating is susceptible to chemical dissolution in the presence of high- and low-pH chemistry, which results in stripping the coating and corrosion of the substrate. To combat this, various techniques have been developed either to reduce the number of fissures, to insert more chemically stable compounds into the oxide, or both. For instance, sulphuric-anodized articles are normally sealed, either through hydro-thermal sealing or precipitating sealing, to reduce porosity and interstitial pathways that allow corrosive ion exchange between the surface and the substrate. Precipitating seals enhance chemical stability but are less effective in eliminating ionic exchange pathways. Most recently, new techniques to partially convert the amorphous oxide coating into more stable micro-crystalline compounds have been developed that have shown significant improvement based on shorter bond lengths.

Some aluminium aircraft parts, architectural materials, and consumer products are anodized. Anodized aluminium can be found on MP3 players, smartphones, multi-tools, flashlights, cookware, cameras, sporting goods, firearms, window frames, roofs, in electrolytic capacitors, and on many other products both for corrosion resistance and the ability to retain dye. Although anodizing only has moderate wear resistance, the deeper pores can better retain a lubricating film than a smooth surface would.

Anodized coatings have a much lower thermal conductivity and coefficient of linear expansion than aluminium. As a result, the coating will crack from thermal stress if exposed to temperatures above 80 °C (353 K). The coating can crack, but it will not peel.[6] The melting point of aluminium oxide is 2050 °C (2323K), much higher than pure aluminium's 658 °C (931K).[6] This and the insulativity of aluminium oxide can make welding more difficult.

In typical commercial aluminium anodizing processes, the aluminium oxide is grown down into the surface and out from the surface by equal amounts.[7] Therefore, anodizing will increase the part dimensions on each surface by half the oxide thickness. For example, a coating that is 2 μm thick will increase the part dimensions by 1 μm per surface. If the part is anodized on all sides, then all linear dimensions will increase by the oxide thickness. Anodized aluminium surfaces are harder than aluminium but have low to moderate wear resistance, although this can be improved with thickness and sealing.

Process

[edit]

Desmut

[edit]

A desmut solution can be applied to the surface of aluminium to remove contaminants. Nitric acid is typically used to remove smut (residue), but is being replaced because of environmental concerns.[8][9][10][11]

Electrolysis

[edit]

The anodized aluminium layer is created by passing a direct current through an electrolytic solution, with the aluminium object serving as the anode (the positive electrode in an electrolytic cell). The current releases hydrogen at the cathode (the negative electrode) and oxygen at the surface of the aluminium anode, creating a build-up of aluminium oxide. Alternating current and pulsed current is also possible but rarely used. The voltage required by various solutions may range from 1 to 300 V DC, although most fall in the range of 15 to 21 V. Higher voltages are typically required for thicker coatings formed in sulfuric and organic acid. The anodizing current varies with the area of aluminium being anodized and typically ranges from 30 to 300 A/m2.

Aluminium anodizing (eloxal or Electrolytic Oxidation of Aluminium)[12] is usually performed in an acidic solution, typically sulphuric acid or chromic acid, which slowly dissolves the aluminium oxide. The acid action is balanced with the oxidation rate to form a coating with nanopores, 10–150 nm in diameter.[6] These pores are what allow the electrolyte solution and current to reach the aluminium substrate and continue growing the coating to greater thickness beyond what is produced by auto-passivation.[13] These pores allow for the dye to be absorbed, however, this must be followed by sealing or the dye will not stay. Dye is typically followed up by a clean nickel acetate seal. Because the dye is only superficial, the underlying oxide may continue to provide corrosion protection even if minor wear and scratches break through the dyed layer.[citation needed]

Conditions such as electrolyte concentration, acidity, solution temperature, and current must be controlled to allow the formation of a consistent oxide layer. Harder, thicker films tend to be produced by more concentrated solutions at lower temperatures with higher voltages and currents. The film thickness can range from under 0.5 micrometers for bright decorative work up to 150 micrometers for architectural applications.

Dual-finishing

[edit]

Anodizing can be performed in combination with chromate conversion coating. Each process provides corrosion resistance, with anodizing offering a significant advantage when it comes to ruggedness or physical wear resistance. The reason for combining the processes can vary, however, the significant difference between anodizing and chromate conversion coating is the electrical conductivity of the films produced. Although both stable compounds, chromate conversion coating has a greatly increased electrical conductivity. Applications where this may be useful are varied, however the issue of grounding components as part of a larger system is an obvious one.

The dual finishing process uses the best each process has to offer, anodizing with its hard wear resistance and chromate conversion coating with its electrical conductivity.

The process steps can typically involve chromate conversion coating the entire component, followed by a masking of the surface in areas where the chromate coating must remain intact. Beyond that, the chromate coating is then dissolved in unmasked areas. The component can then be anodized, with anodizing taking to the unmasked areas. The exact process will vary dependent on service provider, component geometry and required outcome. It helps to protect aluminium article.

Widely used specifications

[edit]

The most widely used anodizing specification in the US is a U.S. military spec, MIL-A-8625, which defines three types of aluminium anodizing. Type I is chromic acid anodizing, Type II is sulphuric acid anodizing, and Type III is sulphuric acid hard anodizing. Other anodizing specifications include more MIL-SPECs (e.g., MIL-A-63576), aerospace industry specs by organizations such as SAE, ASTM, and ISO (e.g., AMS 2469, AMS 2470, AMS 2471, AMS 2472, AMS 2482, ASTM B580, ASTM D3933, ISO 10074, and BS 5599), and corporation-specific specs (such as those of Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Airbus and other large contractors). AMS 2468 is obsolete. None of these specifications define a detailed process or chemistry, but rather a set of tests and quality assurance measures which the anodized product must meet. BS 1615 guides the selection of alloys for anodizing. For British defense work, a detailed chromic and sulfuric anodizing processes are described by DEF STAN 03-24/3 and DEF STAN 03-25/3 respectively.[14][15]

Chromic acid (Type I)

[edit]

The oldest anodizing process uses chromic acid. It is widely known as the Bengough-Stuart process but, due to the safety regulations regarding air quality control, is not preferred by vendors when the additive material associated with type II doesn't break tolerances. In North America, it is known as Type I because it is so designated by the MIL-A-8625 standard, but it is also covered by AMS 2470 and MIL-A-8625 Type IB. In the UK it is normally specified as Def Stan 03/24 and used in areas that are prone to come into contact with propellants etc. There are also Boeing and Airbus standards. Chromic acid produces thinner, 0.5 μm to 18 μm (0.00002" to 0.0007")[16] more opaque films that are softer, ductile, and to a degree self-healing. They are harder to dye and may be applied as a pretreatment before painting. The method of film formation is different from using sulfuric acid in that the voltage is ramped up through the process cycle.

Sulfuric acid (Type II & III)

[edit]

Sulfuric acid is the most widely used solution to produce an anodized coating. Coatings of moderate thickness 1.8 μm to 25 μm (0.00007" to 0.001")[16] are known as Type II in North America, as named by MIL-A-8625, while coatings thicker than 25 μm (0.001") are known as Type III, hard-coat, hard anodizing, or engineered anodizing. Very thin coatings similar to those produced by chromic anodizing are known as Type IIB. Thick coatings require more process control,[6] and are produced in a refrigerated tank near the freezing point of water with higher voltages than the thinner coatings. Hard anodizing can be made between 13 and 150 μm (0.0005" to 0.006") thick. Anodizing thickness increases wear resistance, corrosion resistance, ability to retain lubricants and PTFE coatings, and electrical and thermal insulation. Sealing Type III will improve corrosion resistance at the cost of reducing abrasion resistance. Sealing will reduce this greatly. Standards for thin (Soft/Standard) sulfuric anodizing are given by MIL-A-8625 Types II and IIB, AMS 2471 (undyed), and AMS 2472 (dyed), BS EN ISO 12373/1 (decorative), BS 3987 (Architectural). Standards for thick sulphuric anodizing are given by MIL-A-8625 Type III, AMS 2469, BS ISO 10074, BS EN 2536 and the obsolete AMS 2468 and DEF STAN 03-26/1.

Organic acid

[edit]

Anodizing can produce yellowish integral colors without dyes if it is carried out in weak acids with high voltages, high current densities, and strong refrigeration.[6] Shades of color are restricted to a range which includes pale yellow, gold, deep bronze, brown, grey, and black. Some advanced variations can produce a white coating with 80% reflectivity. The shade of color produced is sensitive to variations in the metallurgy of the underlying alloy and cannot be reproduced consistently.[2]

Anodizing in some organic acids, for example malic acid, can enter a 'runaway' situation, in which the current drives the acid to attack the aluminium far more aggressively than normal, resulting in huge pits and scarring. Also, if the current or voltage are driven too high, 'burning' can set in; in this case, the supplies act as if nearly shorted and large, uneven and amorphous black regions develop.

Integral color anodizing is generally done with organic acids, but the same effect has been produced in laboratories with very dilute sulfuric acid. Integral color anodizing was originally performed with oxalic acid, but sulfonated aromatic compounds containing oxygen, particularly sulfosalicylic acid, have been more common since the 1960s.[2] Thicknesses of up to 50 μm can be achieved. Organic acid anodizing is called Type IC by MIL-A-8625.

Phosphoric acid

[edit]

Anodizing can be carried out in phosphoric acid, usually as a surface preparation for adhesives. This is described in standard ASTM D3933.

Borate and tartrate baths

[edit]

Anodizing can also be performed in borate or tartrate baths in which aluminium oxide is insoluble. In these processes, the coating growth stops when the part is fully covered, and the thickness is linearly related to the voltage applied.[6] These coatings are free of pores, relative to the sulfuric and chromic acid processes.[6] This type of coating is widely used to make electrolytic capacitors because the thin aluminium films (typically less than 0.5 μm) would risk being pierced by acidic processes.[1]

Plasma electrolytic oxidation

[edit]

Plasma electrolytic oxidation is a similar process, but where higher voltages are applied. This causes sparks to occur and results in more crystalline/ceramic type coatings.

Other metals

[edit]

Magnesium

[edit]

Magnesium is anodized primarily as a primer for paint. A thin (5 μm) film is sufficient for this.[17] Thicker coatings of 25 μm and up can provide mild corrosion resistance when sealed with oil, wax, or sodium silicate.[17] Standards for magnesium anodizing are given in AMS 2466, AMS 2478, AMS 2479, and ASTM B893.

Niobium

[edit]

Niobium anodizes in a similar fashion to titanium with a range of attractive colors being formed by interference at different film thicknesses. Again the film thickness is dependent on the anodizing voltage.[18][19] Uses include jewelry and commemorative coins.

Stainless steel

[edit]
Anodized stainless steel test plate (molybdate-based solution)

Stainless steel can be anodized in baths containing sulphuric acid and hexavalent chromium compounds.[20] Baths containing NaOH or KOH solutions can be used too.As hexavalent chromium compounds are prohibited for use in the EU based on ROHS regulations and are toxic and carcinogenic, solutions based on molybdate are proposed as a replacement (e.g. molybdate 30-100g/ boric acid 10-18 g/manganese sulfate 0.5 - 5 g/1 liter of water, 0.1 - 20 A/dm2, 0.1–15 minutes).[21][22]

Tantalum

[edit]

Tantalum anodizes similarly to titanium and niobium with a range of attractive colors being formed by interference at different film thicknesses. Again the film thickness is dependent on the anodizing voltage and typically ranges from 18 to 23 Angstroms per volt depending on electrolyte and temperature. Uses include tantalum capacitors.

Titanium

[edit]
Selected colors achievable through anodization of titanium

An anodized oxide layer has a thickness in the range of 30 nanometers (1.2×10−6 in) to several micrometers.[23] Standards for titanium anodizing are given by AMS 2487 and AMS 2488.

AMS 2488 Type III anodizing of titanium generates an array of different colors without dyes, for which it is sometimes used in art, costume jewellery, body piercing jewellery and wedding rings. The color formed is dependent on the thickness of the oxide (which is determined by the anodizing voltage); it is caused by the interference of light reflecting off the oxide surface with light travelling through it and reflecting off the underlying metal surface. AMS 2488 Type II anodizing produces a thicker matte grey finish with higher wear resistance.[24]

Zinc

[edit]

Zinc is rarely anodized, but a process was developed by the International Lead Zinc Research Organization and covered by MIL-A-81801.[17] A solution of ammonium phosphate, chromate and fluoride with voltages of up to 200 V can produce olive green coatings up to 80 μm thick.[17] The coatings are hard and corrosion resistant.

Zinc or galvanized steel can be anodized using DC at lower voltages (20–30 V) in silicate baths containing varying concentrations of sodium silicate, sodium hydroxide, borax, sodium nitrite, and nickel sulfate.[25]

Dyeing

[edit]
Colored iPod Mini cases are dyed following anodizing and before thermal sealing.

The most common anodizing processes, for example, sulphuric acid on aluminium, produce a porous surface which can accept dyes easily. The number of dye colors is almost endless; however, the colors produced tend to vary according to the base alloy. The most common colors in the industry, due to them being relatively cheap, are yellow, green, blue, black, orange, purple and red. Though some may prefer lighter colors, in practice, they may be difficult to produce on certain alloys such as high-silicon casting grades and 2000-series aluminium-copper alloys. Another concern is the "lightfastness" of organic dyestuffs—some colors (reds and blues) are particularly prone to fading. Black dyes and gold produced by inorganic means (ferric ammonium oxalate) are more lightfast. Dyed anodizing is usually sealed to reduce or eliminate dye bleedout. White color cannot be applied due to the larger molecule size than the pore size of the oxide layer.[26]

Alternatively, metal (usually tin) can be electrolytically deposited in the pores of the anodic coating to provide more lightfast colors. Metal dye colors range from pale champagne to black. Bronze shades are commonly used for architectural metals. Alternatively, the color may be produced integral to the film. This is done during the anodizing process using organic acids mixed with the sulfuric electrolyte and a pulsed current.[citation needed]

Splash effects are created by dying the unsealed porous surface in lighter colors and then splashing darker color dyes onto the surface. Aqueous and solvent-based dye mixtures may also be alternately applied since the colored dyes will resist each other and leave spotted effects.[citation needed]

aluminum anodizing interference color
Anodizing interference colors

Another interesting coloring method is anodizing interference coloring. The thin oil film resting on the water's surface displays a rainbow hue due to the interference between light reflected from the water-oil interface and the oil film's surface. Because the oil film's thickness isn't regulated, the resulting rainbow color appears random.

In the anodizing coloring of aluminum, desired colors are achieved by depositing a controllably thick metal layer (typically tin) at the base of the porous structure. This involves reflections on the aluminum substrate and the upper metal surface. The color resulting from interference shifts from blue, green, and yellow to red as the deposited metal layer thickens. Beyond a specific thickness, the optical interference vanishes, and the color turns bronze. Interference-colored anodized aluminum parts exhibit a distinctive quality: their color varies when viewed from different angles.[27][better source needed] The interference coloring involves a 3-step process: sulfuric acid anodizing, electrochemical modification of the anodic pore, and metal (tin) deposition.[28]

Sealing

[edit]

Sealing is the final step in the anodizing process. Acidic anodizing solutions produce pores in the anodized coating. These pores can absorb dyes and retain lubricants, but are also an avenue for corrosion. When lubrication properties are not critical, they are usually sealed after dyeing to increase corrosion resistance and dye retention. There are three most common types of sealing.

  1. Long immersion in boiling-hot—96–100 °C (205–212 °F)—deionized water or steam is the simplest sealing process, although it is not completely effective and reduces abrasion resistance by 20%.[6] The oxide is converted into its hydrated form and the resulting swelling reduces the porosity of the surface.
  2. Mid-temperature sealing process which works at 160–180 °F (70–80 °C) in solutions containing organic additives and metal salts. However, this process will likely leach the colors.
  3. Cold sealing process, where the pores are closed by impregnation of a sealant in a room-temperature bath, is more popular due to energy savings. Coatings sealed in this method are not suitable for adhesive bonding. Teflon, nickel acetate, cobalt acetate, and hot sodium or potassium dichromate seals are commonly used. MIL-A-8625 requires sealing for thin coatings (Types I and II) and allows it as an option for thick ones (Type III).

Cleaning

[edit]

Anodized aluminium surfaces that are not regularly cleaned are susceptible to panel edge staining, a unique type of surface staining that can affect the structural integrity of the metal.

Environmental impact

[edit]

Anodizing is one of the more environmentally friendly metal finishing processes. Except for organic (aka integral color) anodizing, the by-products contain only small amounts of heavy metals, halogens, or volatile organic compounds. Integral color anodizing produces no VOCs, heavy metals, or halogens as all of the byproducts found in the effluent streams of other processes come from their dyes or plating materials.[29] The most common anodizing effluents, aluminium hydroxide and aluminium sulfate, are recycled for the manufacturing of alum, baking powder, cosmetics, newsprint and fertilizer or used by industrial wastewater treatment systems.

Mechanical considerations

[edit]

Anodizing will raise the surface since the oxide created occupies more space than the base metal converted.[30] This will generally not be of consequence except where there are tight tolerances. If so, the thickness of the anodizing layer has to be taken into account when choosing the machining dimension. A general practice on engineering drawing is to specify that "dimensions apply after all surface finishes". This will force the machine shop to take into account the anodization thickness when performing the final machining of the mechanical part before anodization. Also, in the case of small holes threaded to accept screws, anodizing may cause the screws to bind, thus, the threaded holes may need to be chased with a tap to restore the original dimensions. Alternatively, special oversize taps may be used to precompensate for this growth. In the case of unthreaded holes that accept fixed-diameter pins or rods, a slightly oversized hole to allow for the dimension change may be appropriate. Depending on the alloy and thickness of the anodized coating, the same may have a significantly negative effect on fatigue life. Conversely, anodizing may increase fatigue life by preventing corrosion pitting.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Anodizing

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Anodizing is an electrolytic passivation that thickens the natural layer on the surface of metals, particularly aluminum and its alloys, to form a porous aluminum . This electrochemical treatment involves immersing the workpiece as the in an acidic bath, such as , and applying to drive the oxidation reaction, producing a durable, layer typically 5 to 25 micrometers thick. The resulting anodic is highly adherent, electrically insulating, and resistant to , , and abrasion, while also enabling for aesthetic purposes. The anodizing process begins with surface preparation, including alkaline cleaning and acid etching to remove contaminants, followed by rinsing, immersion in the , current application, optional of the porous structure, sealing to close pores, and final drying. Common variants include Type I ( anodizing for thin, corrosion-resistant coatings), Type II ( anodizing for general decorative and protective finishes), and Type III (hard anodizing for thick, wear-resistant layers up to 50 micrometers). Although primarily applied to aluminum, the process can be adapted for metals like , magnesium, and to achieve similar surface enhancements. Key benefits of anodizing include superior protection against atmospheric and saltwater exposure, increased surface hardness comparable to , and improved electrical insulation properties, making it ideal for demanding environments. It also offers aesthetic versatility through color anodizing and sealing, while being cost-effective and environmentally preferable to many methods due to minimal waste generation when managed with techniques like solution recovery. Applications span components for lightweight durability, architectural extrusions for weather resistance, automotive parts for abrasion tolerance, for decorative finishes, and medical devices for .

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Anodizing is an electrolytic passivation process that increases the thickness of the naturally occurring layer on the surface of metals, particularly valve metals such as aluminum, , and , by making the workpiece the in an . This controlled electrochemical reaction promotes the growth of a durable film directly from the substrate, typically ranging from nanometers to tens of micrometers in thickness, depending on process conditions. The core principles of anodizing revolve around anodic oxidation, where an applied drives migration across the forming layer. At the , metal ions are generated and migrate outward through the under the influence of the high (often on the order of 10^6-10^7 V/cm), while oxygen ions from the migrate inward to combine with the metal, facilitating continuous film growth. This field-assisted transport mechanism contrasts with , in which the metal serves as the to prevent oxidation via reduction reactions. The resulting is electrically insulating and chemically stable, forming a barrier that integrates seamlessly with the . The primary purposes of anodizing include enhancing resistance through the barrier properties of the layer, increasing surface and resistance for improved , promoting for subsequent paints, dyes, or coatings, and enabling decorative finishes via absorption of colorants or sealing. These benefits arise because the layer acts as an integral extension of the substrate, rather than an external deposit. The basic setup for anodizing comprises an electrolyte bath (typically acidic or alkaline solutions), the anode (the metal workpiece), a cathode (often made of inert materials like lead or graphite), and a direct current power supply delivering voltages generally between 10 and 100 V to establish the necessary electric field. Unlike electroplating, where material is deposited from the electrolyte onto the cathode, anodizing produces an oxide that converts the surface of the anode itself, ensuring strong metallurgical bonding without introducing foreign layers.

Electrochemical Mechanisms

Anodizing involves the electrochemical oxidation of a metal in an , where the primary reaction at the anode surface is the oxidation of the metal: \ceM−>Mn++ne−\ce{M -> M^{n+} + n e^-}, releasing metal cations and electrons. Concurrently, at the cathode, reduction or hydrogen occurs, while oxygen-containing species such as \ceO2−\ce{O^{2-}} or \ceOH−\ce{OH^-} ions are generated through electrolysis or oxygen , migrating to combine with the metal cations to form the layer \ceMOx\ce{MO_x}. This process establishes a growing film that acts as a barrier, with the applied voltage driving the overall reaction. Under the influence of a high across the layer (typically 10^6 to 10^7 V/cm), ions migrate through the film via field-assisted conduction. Metal cations move outward from the metal/ interface toward the /electrolyte interface, while oxygen anions move inward, leading to growth primarily at the metal/ interface. The Cabrera-Mott theory describes this for thin films, positing that the strong lowers the for hopping across the lattice, enabling transport despite the insulating nature of the film. Rate-determining steps include field-assisted migration and a balance between growth and localized dissolution, particularly in acidic electrolytes where anion incorporation can influence film integrity. The growth kinetics follow a high-field conduction model, with the oxide growth rate approximated by: dxdt≈Aexp⁡(−WkT)sinh⁡(BE)\frac{dx}{dt} \approx A \exp\left(-\frac{W}{kT}\right) \sinh(B E) where xx is the oxide thickness, AA is a pre-exponential factor related to ion attempt frequency, WW is the activation energy for ion migration, kk is Boltzmann's constant, TT is temperature, EE is the electric field strength (proportional to applied voltage divided by thickness), and BB incorporates ion charge and lattice parameters. This equation highlights the exponential dependence on field strength, resulting in self-limiting growth as the field decreases with increasing thickness, often yielding logarithmic or inverse-logarithmic thickness-time relationships. Layer thickness is primarily governed by applied voltage, which sets the field and thus the maximum achievable thickness (roughly 1-2 nm/V for many oxides); , typically ranging from 1 to 20 A/dm², controls the initial growth rate; and temperature, maintained between 10-30°C to balance kinetics and quality without excessive dissolution. Higher voltages promote thicker films, while elevated temperatures accelerate mobility but can reduce thickness by enhancing chemical dissolution. The oxide structure begins with a compact barrier layer formed at the metal interface due to initial cation-anion under high field. In acidic electrolytes, this evolves into a porous structure as localized field enhancements at weak points cause pitting and dissolution, leading to ordered pore development with a thin residual barrier layer at pore bases, typically 10-50 nm thick. This dual-layer morphology enhances the film's functionality, particularly for aluminum as the most common substrate.

Historical Development

Early Innovations

The anodizing process for aluminum originated in the early , with the first industrial-scale application occurring in 1923 to enhance protection on alloys used in components. This breakthrough addressed the vulnerability of high-strength aluminum-copper alloys like , which were prone to despite their widespread adoption in post-World War I . The initial process, known as the Bengough-Stuart method, utilized electrolytes to form thin, adherent coatings typically 2-5 micrometers thick, which were non-dyeable but provided effective barrier protection without significantly altering the alloy's fatigue strength. Patented in 1923 by British engineers G. D. Bengough and J. M. Stuart, this Type I process marked the seminal innovation in controlled electrochemical oxidation, enabling reliable surface passivation for structural parts. In parallel, the development of anodizing emerged in the late 1920s as a complementary approach, pioneered by British innovations like the Gower and O'Brien method, patented in 1927. This process produced thicker, more porous coatings suitable for dyeing and enhanced durability, with commercialization advanced by companies including Laboratories. It operated at higher voltages to yield oxide layers up to 25 micrometers, offering superior abrasion resistance for demanding applications. Early adoption focused on , where anodized components improved longevity in marine environments, though challenges such as smut formation—a gray-black residue from alloying elements like copper dissolving during etching—required process refinements like optimized desmutting baths to ensure uniform coatings. Sealing techniques, involving hot water or dichromate immersion to hydrate and close pores, were developed in the late 1920s and 1930s, significantly improving corrosion resistance. By the 1930s, anodizing expanded beyond aviation into automotive and architectural sectors, with sulfuric acid processes enabling decorative finishes on trim and facades. Notable examples from the era include the Montecatini building in Milan, featuring anodized aluminum that has endured for over 80 years. In automotive applications, it protected radiator grilles and body accents from environmental degradation, though early sulfuric baths often produced inconsistent results due to smut and burn marks on high-silicon alloys. These innovations laid the groundwork for broader commercialization, transitioning anodizing from niche protection to a versatile finishing technology, with significant advancements during World War II for military aircraft components.

Standardization and Modern Advances

The establishment of standardized anodizing practices accelerated in the 1950s and 1960s, building on wartime innovations to ensure consistent quality for industrial and military applications. The MIL-A-8625 specification, with origins tracing to 1945 and multiple revisions through the decade, formalized the classification of anodic coatings on aluminum into Types I ( process), II ( process), and III (hard anodizing), providing detailed requirements for thickness, resistance, and performance testing. Complementary international and U.S. standards emerged for , including ISO 7599, which specifies methods for assessing decorative and protective anodic oxidation coatings on aluminum through measurement of admittance and sealing quality, and ASTM B449, which outlines test specimens and procedures for evaluating chromate conversion coatings often used in conjunction with anodizing. These frameworks enabled reproducible outcomes across sectors like , where uniform coating integrity was critical. In the and , technological refinements expanded anodizing's utility, particularly for demanding environments. Hard anodizing, designated as Type III under MIL-A-8625 revisions in the 1960s, was introduced to achieve superior wear resistance through thicker, denser oxide layers, with typical values reaching 360 (equivalent to Rockwell C 37), making it ideal for components subject to abrasion. Concurrently, (PEO), a high-voltage variant of traditional anodizing, was developed and patented in the mid-1970s, utilizing micro-arc discharges to form ceramic-like coatings on aluminum and other light metals, enhancing and stability beyond conventional methods. From the 2000s to 2025, environmental regulations drove the shift toward sustainable anodizing processes, prioritizing alternatives to hazardous electrolytes. and organic-based electrolytes emerged as viable replacements for anodizing (Type I), offering comparable protection with reduced toxicity; this transition has been influenced by the European Union's REACH regulation, which imposes ongoing restrictions on to mitigate health and ecological risks. In parallel, nanoscale anodizing advanced significantly in the , with focusing on titania nanotube arrays for biomedical ; for instance, studies from 2024 demonstrated that anodized surfaces with ordered nanotubes promote enhanced and antibacterial properties, improving implant longevity in dental and orthopedic applications. Recent innovations between 2020 and 2025 have integrated anodizing with emerging techniques, enhancing functionality for complex geometries. Anodizing post-processing of additively manufactured aluminum parts has become standard, applying protective layers to 3D-printed components to boost resistance and durability, as seen in and automotive prototypes where surface finishing bridges the gap between printed and machined performance. Sustainable sealing advancements, such as nickel-free hydrothermal treatments, have addressed environmental concerns by eliminating heavy metal use while maintaining sealing efficacy, aligning with 2024 OSHA updates to the Hazard Communication Standard that refined labeling and safety protocols for in metal finishing operations. Global standards for anodizing have continued to evolve through collaborative efforts, with the Aluminum Anodizers Council (AAC) issuing comprehensive guidelines on coating specifications, thickness designations (e.g., AA10 for 10-micrometer minimum), and to harmonize practices worldwide. This evolution extends to specialized applications, such as magnesium anodizing for (EV) battery components, where PEO-based standards have been adopted to provide lightweight, corrosion-resistant housings that meet automotive durability requirements amid rising EV production.

Anodizing Aluminum

Surface Preparation

Surface preparation is essential in the anodizing of aluminum to achieve uniform growth and prevent defects such as pitting, burning, or inconsistent thickness, which can arise from residual contaminants like oils, greases, or the native layer. By ensuring a clean and activated surface, this step directly influences the , durability, and aesthetic quality of the anodic , as the substrate texture is largely replicated in the final layer. Proper preparation minimizes variations in and thickness, enhancing resistance and overall performance. The process typically begins with to remove organic residues, using alkaline baths such as solutions at temperatures of 50-70°C or solvent-based cleaners, depending on the contamination level. This is followed by , often with caustic alkaline solutions, to dissolve the thin native and lightly roughen the surface for better contact and uniform anodization. promotes a consistent starting point for initiation by exposing fresh aluminum. Desmutting then addresses any residual smearing or particles—such as or magnesium compounds—through immersion in solutions, which dissolves these impurities without further roughening. For high-silicon cast aluminum, desmutting with containing additives is used to remove residues and ensure uniform anodization. Rinsing protocols are conducted after each chemical step to eliminate carryover of process solutions, typically involving multiple immersions in deionized to maintain rinse pH between 4 and 9 and prevent contamination of subsequent baths. For aluminum alloys in the and 7000 series, which contain higher levels of and , extended desmutting is necessary to remove these elements that form tenacious smut layers, ensuring a residue-free surface. Quality assurance during surface preparation includes contact angle measurements to evaluate wettability, where angles below 90° confirm effective and hydrophilicity for optimal anodizing. Over-etching must be avoided, as excessive exposure to alkaline solutions can introduce absorption, potentially leading to embrittlement in high-strength alloys like those in the 7000 series. These checks ensure the prepared surface meets standards for defect-free anodization.

Electrolytic Anodization

Electrolytic anodization represents the core electrochemical process in aluminum surface treatment, where the metal serves as the in an to grow a controlled layer. This step follows surface preparation and involves immersing the aluminum workpiece in an bath while applying , leading to the oxidation of the aluminum surface into a porous alumina film. The process is particularly emphasized for Type II anodizing using , which produces coatings typically 5-25 µm thick for resistance and decorative purposes. The bath setup for standard electrolytic anodization of aluminum employs an of at 10-20% concentration by weight, serving as the for Type II processes. To maintain optimal conditions, the bath requires vigorous agitation—often via air sparging or mechanical pumps—and cooling systems, such as heat exchangers or chilled coils, to keep the temperature between 18-22°C. This temperature control is essential to manage the exothermic nature of the reaction and ensure uniform growth across the workpiece. Key process parameters include a gradual voltage ramp-up to 12-20 V to avoid initial instability, followed by operation at a density of 1-2 A/dm², which is preferred over constant voltage for precise control and reduced processing time. The duration typically ranges from 20-60 minutes, yielding thicknesses of 5-25 µm, with the exact time determined by the 720 rule approximating thickness in mils as (current density in A/ft² × time in minutes) / 720. power supplies are favored as they promote consistent layer formation by maintaining steady ionic migration rates. During anodization, an initial compact barrier layer forms at the metal-oxide interface, approximately 10-30 nm thick, acting as a through which ions under a high . This is followed by the development of a hexagonal array of pores, with diameters of 10-30 nm, emerging due to localized dissolution at the oxide-electrolyte interface and driven by field-assisted ionic of Al³⁺ outward and O²⁻ inward. The growth kinetics rely on high-field conduction mechanisms, where the electric field strength (around 10⁶-10⁷ V/cm in the barrier layer) accelerates migration exponentially, enabling steady oxide thickening at rates of 0.1-1 µm/min depending on conditions. Quality control during electrolytic anodization involves real-time monitoring of voltage transients, which can indicate bath contamination or through unexpected rises or fluctuations signaling increased resistance. Endpoint determination is achieved via coulometric thickness , integrating charge passed (in ampere-hours) to calculate oxide buildup based on Faraday's laws, ensuring the target thickness without over-anodizing. Aluminum alloy composition influences the resulting structure, with the 6xxx series (e.g., 6061 or 6063) exhibiting higher in the anodic film due to alloying elements like magnesium and that promote more aggressive pore initiation and growth during . Additionally, the process generates significant at the , necessitating enhanced agitation and cooling to dissipate and prevent burning—characterized by localized or pitting—which can occur if temperatures exceed 25°C locally and compromise coating uniformity.

Specialized Finishing Methods

Dual-finishing techniques in aluminum anodizing integrate chemical or electrolytic brightening with the core electrolytic to achieve enhanced aesthetic effects, such as improved and surface smoothness. Originating in the as part of early architectural finishing methods, these approaches combine pre-anodizing treatments like acid to remove surface irregularities with subsequent anodization for protective layers, resulting in reflective or appearances suitable for decorative applications. Modern variants may incorporate laser-assisted for precise control over texture, though traditional chemical brightening remains prevalent for smoothing peaks and valleys prior to formation. Extensions of hard anodizing include integral color anodizing, where alloy composition adjustments—such as increased or content in suitable alloys—enable the formation of colored layers during the anodization itself, producing stable earth-tone hues without dyes. This one-step process relies on specific conditions and current densities to integrate pigmentation into the dense structure, offering durable finishes for architectural elements. Complementing this, as a pre-anodizing step creates mirror-like finishes by electrochemically dissolving microscopic high points on the aluminum surface, yielding a stress-free, reflective base that enhances the uniformity and clarity of the subsequent anodic coating. Post-2010 emerging methods like pulse anodizing apply high-frequency pulsed currents (typically 100-1000 Hz) to form denser, more uniform layers on aluminum, reducing porosity and improving hardness compared to processes by allowing intermittent recovery periods that minimize heat buildup. Recent advances (as of 2025) include (PEO), a variant producing thicker, ceramic-like coatings with enhanced wear resistance. Hybrid approaches, such as combining anodizing with sol-gel coatings, embed nanocomposites like silica or particles into the pores, enhancing barrier properties and self-healing resistance on alloys like AA2024-T3. Specific techniques integrate mechanical finishing, exemplified by post-anodizing , which imparts compressive residual stresses to counteract the tensile stresses from anodization, thereby boosting resistance in alloys like AA7175-T74 by up to 33% in high-cycle regimes. Coil-to-coil continuous anodizing processes aluminum sheets by unwinding coils through sequential treatment stations, enabling precise, uniform deposition over large areas without batch variations. These specialized methods provide advantages such as superior uniformity on complex geometries, where traditional rack anodizing may falter, and find key applications in architectural panels for facades and cladding, delivering consistent protection and aesthetic consistency across expansive surfaces.

Anodizing Specifications

Type I: Chromic Acid Process

The Type I anodizing process, as specified in MIL-A-8625, involves electrolytic treatment of aluminum in a to form a thin coating. The bath typically contains 3-10% (CrO₃) by weight, maintained at a of 38-42°C, with applied voltages ranging from 20-32 V (or up to 40 V in conventional setups) and processing times of 30-90 minutes, resulting in coating thicknesses of 0.5-2.5 µm. This process produces a thin barrier-type oxide layer characterized by low porosity and minimal pore structure, which contributes to its inherent stability. The coating exhibits excellent corrosion resistance without the need for sealing, as the dense structure effectively blocks ion penetration. Due to the limited porosity, the layer is generally non-dyeable, preserving the natural metallic appearance of the substrate. Key advantages include the formation of ductile coatings that maintain substrate formability, making it suitable for parts requiring post-anodizing bending or assembly without cracking. However, the process incurs high operational costs due to the specialized electrolyte and equipment, and the use of toxic hexavalent chromium poses significant health and environmental risks, prompting regulatory phase-out efforts such as those under the EU REACH regulation, where authorizations for its use have been expiring progressively in the 2020s. In April 2025, the (ECHA) proposed an EU-wide restriction on certain hexavalent chromium substances to further protect health, potentially impacting anodizing applications. Type I anodizing is widely applied in fasteners and marine hardware, where its thin profile minimizes dimensional changes and weight addition while providing robust protection in harsh environments. often includes salt spray testing per ASTM B117, with coatings demonstrating resistance exceeding 336 hours without or pitting. Process variations include decorative chromic anodizing, which emphasizes by controlling voltage ramping to avoid dulling, and emerging low-chromium alternatives developed in the , such as reduced Cr(VI) concentration baths or hybrid electrolytes, to meet compliance requirements while approximating the original performance.

Type II: Sulfuric Acid Process

Type II sulfuric acid anodizing, as defined in military specification MIL-A-8625, is a widely used electrochemical for producing general-purpose coatings on aluminum and its alloys, typically achieving thicknesses of 2 to 25 µm. The employs an electrolyte bath consisting of 15-20% by weight, maintained at approximately 20°C, with applied voltages of 12-15 V for durations of 20-40 minutes to form the desired coating thickness. This method generates a moderately thick, porous aluminum layer that enhances resistance and serves as an excellent base for decorative finishes, distinguishing it from thinner alternatives like the chromic acid . The resulting coatings exhibit a columnar porous structure with approximately 50-60% , which facilitates the absorption of dyes and pigments for coloration, making it ideal for aesthetic applications. These coatings are classified under MIL-A-8625 as Class 1 (und dyed, emphasizing natural appearance and protection) or Class 2 (dyed, for enhanced visual appeal). However, the inherent necessitates a subsequent sealing step to close the pores, thereby improving resistance by preventing ingress of corrosive agents; unsealed coatings remain vulnerable to . In the electrolytic setup, the aluminum workpiece acts as the , while cathodes are typically constructed from lead or aluminum to facilitate hydrogen evolution and maintain bath . The process achieves a current of around 90%, where growth is balanced against simultaneous dissolution in the acidic , yielding a net growth rate of 0.3-1 µm per minute. Sealing remains an essential follow-up to and stabilize the porous structure. This anodizing type offers key advantages, including cost-effectiveness due to the use of inexpensive and its versatility for both protective and decorative purposes, while providing moderate wear resistance suitable for everyday exposures. A primary is the potential for hydration-induced cracking in unsealed coatings, which can compromise integrity in humid environments. Common applications include architectural extrusions for building facades and housings, where the combination of durability and color options is valued. For painted anodized surfaces, adhesion is often evaluated using ASTM D1654 to ensure performance under corrosive conditions.

Type III: Hard Anodizing

Type III hard anodizing, also known as hardcoat anodizing, is a -based electrolytic process specified under MIL-A-8625 Type III for producing thick, wear-resistant coatings on aluminum alloys. The typically consists of 10-15% (H₂SO₄) with additives such as to enhance density and uniformity. The process operates at low temperatures of 0-5°C to minimize dissolution of the layer, applying high voltages of 75-100 over durations of 20-120 minutes, resulting in thicknesses of 13-50 µm (0.5-2 mils). These parameters yield a dense aluminum layer that penetrates and builds upon the substrate, providing superior mechanical properties compared to standard anodizing. The resulting coating is characterized by high hardness, reaching up to 60 HRC (Rockwell C), due to the formation of a compact α-alumina structure with lower porosity than Type II coatings. This reduced porosity contributes to enhanced barrier protection and reduced susceptibility to corrosive ingress. For applications prioritizing lubricity and abrasion resistance, the coatings are often left unsealed, allowing retention of oils or dry lubricants within the surface asperities to lower friction coefficients. The process involves high voltages that induce localized sparking or dielectric breakdown at the anode, promoting rapid oxide growth but generating significant heat that requires vigorous agitation and cooling to prevent burning or uneven deposition. Alloy compatibility is limited; wrought series such as 5xxx (magnesium-alloyed) and 6xxx (magnesium-silicon-alloyed) perform best, yielding uniform, high-integrity coatings, while high-copper 2xxx or silicon-rich cast alloys may exhibit poor throw power or cracking. Key advantages include exceptional abrasion resistance, with coatings enduring over 1000 cycles in Taber abrasion tests (CS-17 wheels, 1000 g load) while maintaining weight loss below 1.5 mg per 1000 cycles per MIL-A-8625 requirements, outperforming untreated aluminum by up to 100 times. This durability stems from the coating's high compressive strength and low friction, making it ideal for demanding environments. However, the thick, brittle nature of the oxide layer (Vickers hardness often exceeding 300 HV) renders it susceptible to cracking under tensile stress or bending, limiting use in flexible or impact-prone designs. Applications leverage these properties in high-wear components such as , pistons, valves, and joints in industrial machinery, as well as weapons and hardware requiring electrical insulation and resistance. In the 2020s, advancements have extended its use to (EV) components, including battery enclosures and motor housings, where unsealed or PTFE-impregnated coatings provide integral to reduce in high-speed, low-maintenance assemblies.

Alternative Electrolytes

Alternative electrolytes for aluminum anodizing provide specialized options beyond traditional chromic and sulfuric acid processes, often prioritizing enhancement, decorative finishes, or environmental . These electrolytes enable the formation of layers tailored for niche applications, such as or biomedical implants, while minimizing and waste generation. Phosphoric acid anodizing (PAA), typically conducted in 5-10% solutions at 20-25°C and 10-20 V, produces thin oxide layers (1-5 µm thick) optimized for adhesive-promoting surfaces. This , exemplified by Boeing's method for structural bonding, generates a porous alumina that enhances interfacial strength in composites without the risks of thicker coatings. The resulting morphology facilitates superior adhesion, critical for high-stress assemblies in components. Organic acid electrolytes, such as and at 3-10% concentrations and 40-60°C, offer lower-toxicity alternatives for decorative and biomedical applications. anodizing forms ordered nanoporous structures resembling titania tubes on aluminum surfaces, enabling bio-compatible coatings for implants with improved and potential. variants, often in mixed baths, yield uniform, aesthetically pleasing films with reduced environmental hazards compared to chromic processes, supporting decorative finishes in . Borate and tartrate baths, operating at neutral pH, facilitate the growth of thin films (under 1 µm) suitable for , where minimal substrate distortion is essential. Originating in the for precision applications, these electrolytes have seen renewed interest in the for sustainable anodizing, as they avoid acidic effluents and enable energy-efficient processing of microelectronic components. (PEO), employing high voltages (200-1000 V) in silicate-phosphate mixtures, produces ceramic-like coatings up to 100 µm thick with hardness exceeding 1000 HV. This process relies on micro-arc discharges to induce phase transformations, forming dense gamma-alumina layers resistant to wear and . PEO's electrolyte composition allows for customizable , such as enhanced stability in automotive or marine environments. These alternative electrolytes collectively reduce environmental load by eliminating and minimizing , while offering comparable or superior performance in targeted uses like and sustainability-driven manufacturing.

Anodizing Other Metals

Reactive Metals (, Magnesium)

displays valve-like behavior during anodization, characterized by the formation of a rectifying layer that allows current flow in one direction while inhibiting the reverse. The process typically involves electrolytic treatment in dilute or electrolytes at applied voltages of 10-50 , enabling the growth of thin films that produce interference colors through light and reflection; for instance, voltages around 20 yield blue hues, while 100 produce gold tones. These interference colors arise from oxide thicknesses of 10-200 nm, suitable for optical and decorative applications, whereas biomedical uses often employ thicker of 5-20 µm to enhance surface bioactivity and integration with bone tissue. The passive on forms primarily through the inward migration of O²⁻ ions from the to the metal-film interface under the high , contributing to the layer's high integrity and resistance. Color predictability in anodized is governed by precise control, with thickness approximating t=k⋅Vt = k \cdot V, where k≈2k \approx 2 nm/V, allowing reproducible chromatic effects for identification in medical implants. Anodized finds key applications in biomedical implants, such as orthopedic screws and dental fixtures, where the modified surface promotes and reduces wear. Magnesium's high reactivity necessitates anodizing in specialized baths, such as those incorporating for fluoride-based coatings or solutions, conducted at low voltages of 5-15 V and to generate corrosion-resistant barriers typically 2-10 µm thick. For alloys like AZ91D, additives are essential to stabilize the process and prevent substrate dissolution by forming protective MgF₂ layers that inhibit aggressive ion attack. Organic additives, such as benzoates or , are incorporated into these electrolytes to mitigate evolution reactions, which can otherwise compromise film uniformity and increase . In automotive applications, anodized magnesium components support lightweighting efforts in 2020s electric vehicles, reducing overall mass for improved while maintaining structural integrity. A primary challenge in magnesium anodizing is the material's inherent flammability, which poses ignition risks during handling and electrolyte interactions, requiring stringent protocols like inert atmospheres. Recent advancements, reported in 2023, involve (PEO) variants of anodizing on magnesium for biomedical coatings, integrating phases to enhance osteoconductivity and control degradation rates in contexts. Sealing is generally not required for these reactive metal anodized layers due to their inherent .

Valve Metals (Niobium, Tantalum, Zinc)

Valve metals, such as niobium, tantalum, and zinc, exhibit rectifying behavior during anodization, enabling the formation of stable oxide layers that function as dielectrics in electronic applications or protective passivators. For niobium and tantalum, anodization primarily occurs in sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄) or hydrofluoric acid (HF)-containing electrolytes at voltages ranging from 10 to 200 V, producing amorphous pentoxide layers (Nb₂O₅ and Ta₂O₅) with thicknesses proportional to the applied voltage, typically 1.5-2.5 nm/V and up to 1 µm thick. These layers possess high dielectric constants (ε ≈ 20-40 for Nb₂O₅ and ≈ 25-30 for Ta₂O₅), making them ideal for solid electrolytic capacitors where the oxide serves as the insulating barrier between the metal anode and a solid or liquid electrolyte cathode. The anodization process for and involves electrochemical oxidation, where the metal acts as the in the electrolyte bath, leading to the growth of a dense, non-porous that demonstrates self-healing properties in electrolytic environments—defects or breakdowns trigger localized reformation of the , preventing . This self-healing mechanism enhances reliability in high-density designs, with particularly valued in for their volumetric efficiency and stability under varying temperatures. In 2025, high-voltage variants (up to 100 V or more) have seen increased adoption in (EV) power , such as DC-DC converters and inverters, driven by the sector's growth and demand for compact, high-capacitance components. offers a cost-effective alternative to , though its lower requires thicker dielectrics for equivalent ratings, limiting standalone use to around 100 V without arcing risks. The high of extraction and processing remains a key challenge, prompting ongoing research into -based hybrids for broader integration. For zinc, anodizing focuses on passivation of galvanized coatings to enhance resistance, typically performed in alkaline or baths at voltages of 10-30 V, yielding layers 1-5 µm thick that act as a barrier against . These chromate conversion coatings, formed via electrochemical anodization, effectively prevent white rust ( formation) on outdoor-exposed surfaces by stabilizing the native and inhibiting oxygen . In practical applications, such as fasteners and hardware, this treatment extends in humid or coastal environments without significantly altering the substrate's appearance or conductivity. Unlike and , anodizing prioritizes sacrificial protection over performance, though it shares the valve metal trait of voltage-dependent growth for controlled film thickness.

Stainless Steel and Alloys

Anodizing is non-standard compared to aluminum or valve metals, as traditional electrolytic processes can lead to and dissolution of the substrate in acidic baths typically used for other materials. Instead, (PEO), an advanced variant of anodization, is employed to form protective layers on surfaces. This process operates in alkaline s, such as - or silicate-based solutions, at voltages ranging from 300 to 600 V, producing coatings with thicknesses of 10 to 50 µm that incorporate elements from the and substrate. These PEO coatings enhance , making them suitable for biomedical applications by promoting and reducing ion release. The PEO process on enriches the natural (Cr₂O₃) passivation layer inherent to the , contributing to improved resistance while minimizing pitting through the use of alkaline conditions that stabilize the surface. Pre-etching the surface is essential to ensure , as the high content—particularly and —can lead to uneven morphology and potential if not properly prepared. For other alloys, PEO adaptations are similarly niche. Nickel-based alloys, such as , benefit from PEO coatings that provide high-temperature corrosion protection, forming hard oxide layers resistant to oxidation in extreme environments like turbine engines. In contrast, copper alloys are rarely anodized due to poor oxide adhesion stemming from the metal's and tendency for the coating to flake under stress. Applications of PEO on include medical implants, particularly 316L grade, where the ceramic layers improve and reduce inflammatory responses in orthopedic devices. In , PEO-treated blades from alloys exhibit enhanced durability under thermal cycling. Recent research has explored hybrid anodizing-PEO approaches on for oil and gas components, combining electrolytic oxidation with sol-gel overlays to boost wear resistance in abrasive, corrosive downhole conditions. PEO extends principles from aluminum anodizing but adapts to non-valve metals like through plasma discharges for denser coatings.

Post-Treatment Processes

Dyeing Techniques

Dyeing in anodizing involves immersing the anodized substrate, typically aluminum, in a bath after the anodization process to impart color to the porous layer. This coloration occurs through the adsorption of molecules into the nanoscale pores formed during anodization, which act as capillaries drawing in the colorants via and electrostatic forces. The process enhances the aesthetic appeal of anodized parts while maintaining the protective qualities of the . The standard dyeing procedure entails submerging the freshly anodized article in an aqueous solution at temperatures between 50°C and 60°C for 5 to 15 minutes, allowing sufficient time for penetration without compromising the structure. Common dyes include azo compounds and metal-complex dyes, which bond effectively to the surface through coordination chemistry. For optimal results, the bath is maintained at 4 to 6, promoting of dye molecules for better uptake into the acidic pore environment. Organic dyes are widely used for vibrant, translucent colors on Type II sulfuric acid anodized aluminum, where pore diameters of 20 to 30 nm facilitate deep penetration and uniform coloration. Inorganic dyes, such as metal salts like ferric or compounds, produce heat-resistant blacks and earth tones by precipitating within the pores. Metallic dyeing, an electrodeposition variant, deposits thin metal layers (e.g., or silver) for iridescent effects, though it requires precise current control to avoid pore blockage. Dye classes encompass dyes for direct absorption, reactive dyes that form covalent bonds with the , and disperse dyes for solvent-based applications in specialized finishes. Color consistency and durability are evaluated through standardized tests, including lightfastness assessment via AATCC Test Method 16, which simulates accelerated exposure to measure fade resistance, and color matching according to ISO 23603 for spectrophotometric verification against reference standards. On Type III hard anodized surfaces, is limited due to the denser pore structure (10-15 nm diameter) and higher oxide density, often resulting in subdued or uneven colors unless pre-treatments widen the pores. Sealing follows dyeing to lock in the colorants.

Sealing Methods

Sealing is a critical post-treatment process in anodizing, particularly for aluminum, where it involves the hydration of the porous anodic oxide layer to form boehmite (AlOOH), which swells and effectively blocks the pores, thereby enhancing corrosion resistance to levels exceeding 1000 hours in salt spray tests under standards like ASTM B117. This transformation occurs through the reaction of amorphous aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) with water, producing a more stable hydrated structure that prevents ingress of corrosive agents and improves long-term durability. Common sealing techniques include hot water sealing, which immerses parts in deionized water at 95-100°C for 15-30 minutes, promoting uniform hydration via a hydrothermal mechanism without additives. Historically, dichromate sealing used a solution of 0.5% at 99°C, but it has been largely phased out due to environmental and health concerns over . For modern applications, especially on dyed Type II anodized aluminum, acetate sealing at 80-90°C is preferred, as it accelerates the process through chemical precipitation within pores while maintaining compatibility with architectural finishes. Sealing typically requires 1-3 minutes per micrometer of oxide thickness, influenced by temperature, solution chemistry, and oxide thickness, and can be verified using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to confirm pore occlusion by measuring increased coating impedance. Hydrothermal sealing relies on thermal energy to drive boehmite formation, whereas chemical methods incorporate ions like nickel or fluoride to deposit sealing agents, offering faster rates but requiring precise control to avoid inconsistencies. For aluminum anodizing, sealing is essential for Type II sulfuric acid processes to achieve required performance, while it is optional for Type I chromic acid layers due to their inherently thinner and less porous structure. Over-sealing can lead to defects such as "volcanoing," where excessive causes blistering and localized rupture of the layer. Recent advances include nickel-free sealing methods, such as those using or additives at lower temperatures (as of 2020), to enhance while maintaining performance. In contrast, (PEO) layers on metals like magnesium often exhibit self-sealing properties due to the incorporation of species during formation, reducing the need for additional treatments. Sealing is generally performed immediately after to lock in color while optimizing protection.

Cleaning and Maintenance

Routine cleaning of anodized surfaces requires mild detergents with a pH range of 6 to 8, applied using soft brushes or non-abrasive cloths to gently remove dirt and contaminants without damaging the protective layer. Harsh abrasives, acidic solutions, or strong alkaline cleaners must be avoided, as they can etch or dissolve the anodic , compromising resistance. For intricate or complex parts, methods are suitable when using neutral, aluminum-compatible solutions to ensure thorough removal of residues while preventing pitting or finish degradation. In architectural applications, such as building facades, anodized aluminum benefits from following ASTM D4214 guidelines for evaluating surface chalking, which recommends annual washing with low-pressure water and mild to prevent buildup and maintain aesthetic integrity. Chalking, appearing as a powdery residue from environmental exposure, can be safely removed using bicarbonate-based solutions that dissolve the deposit without attacking the underlying . Long-term maintenance involves periodic inspection for seal degradation, commonly assessed through acid dissolution tests that measure mass loss to assess seal quality, as outlined in ASTM B680. Worn or damaged areas may necessitate localized re-sealing to reinstate barrier properties against moisture and . UV is enhanced by incorporating stabilizers or additives during the anodizing or sealing stages, extending the lifespan of the in outdoor environments. Key challenges in maintaining anodized surfaces include dye fading accelerated by atmospheric pollutants and UV radiation, which can alter color vibrancy over time despite robust sealing. Additionally, in assemblies with dissimilar metals like or , galvanic corrosion risks arise if the anodized layer is breached, requiring vigilant separation or insulating barriers during upkeep to prevent accelerated degradation. Recent advancements in the 2020s emphasize sustainable, bio-based cleaners derived from plant sources for anodized surface care, aligning with certification standards for green buildings by minimizing volatile organic compounds while effectively preserving the finish.

Performance Characteristics

Mechanical Properties

Anodizing significantly enhances the surface of metals by forming a dense layer, with Type III hard anodizing on aluminum s achieving values typically ranging from 400 to 800 HV, depending on conditions and alloy composition. This increase arises from the conversion of aluminum to a crystalline alumina structure, which is substantially harder than the base metal's 50-150 HV. For (PEO) applied to magnesium and , can reach up to 1100 HV, due to the incorporation of ceramic phases such as and structures during high-voltage plasma discharges. These ceramic reinforcements provide a robust, wear-resistant surface while maintaining compatibility with lightweight substrates. The oxide layer introduced by anodizing, however, can compromise life and in aluminum alloys, typically reducing strength by 20-50% compared to uncoated material, primarily due to crack initiation at pores or defects in the brittle . This reduction is more pronounced in thicker coatings, where stress concentrations at the -substrate interface accelerate under cyclic loading. Mitigation strategies include using thinner coatings, such as those from anodizing (5-10 µm), which minimize the impact on while still providing basic protection. In terms of abrasion and wear resistance, sealed Type II anodized aluminum exhibits improved performance in standardized tests. The coefficient of friction for such surfaces, when lubricated, ranges from 0.1 to 0.3, enabling smoother sliding contact in mechanical assemblies compared to bare aluminum. Mechanical properties are evaluated using established standards, including hardness tests per ASTM E384 for thin coatings due to its precision on micro-scale indentations, and Brinell per ASTM E10. Tensile impact testing follows MIL-A-8625 guidelines to ensure the coating withstands dynamic loads without , verifying overall structural integrity post-anodizing. For other metals, titanium anodizing improves wear resistance through a thickened TiO₂ layer. Similarly, PEO on stainless steel alloys enhances toughness by increasing surface hardness via oxide formation, improving resistance to deformation without significantly altering bulk properties.
PropertyAluminum (Type III)Magnesium/Titanium (PEO)Testing Standard
Hardness (HV)400-800300-1100ASTM E384 (Vickers)
Fatigue Reduction20-50%N/AMIL-A-8625 (tensile impact)
Abrasion Loss (mg/1000 cycles)Improved (sealed Type II)N/ATaber Abraser

Corrosion and Wear Resistance

Anodizing enhances resistance primarily through the formation of a thick layer that acts as a barrier, significantly increasing the pitting potential of the metal substrate. For aluminum alloys, this barrier shifts the pitting potential to more noble values, often by several hundred millivolts compared to bare metal, thereby delaying the onset of localized in chloride-containing environments. Sealed Type II anodized aluminum coatings, typically 10–25 μm thick, demonstrate exceptional durability, withstanding over 336 hours of neutral salt spray exposure per ASTM B117 without significant , far surpassing the performance of uncoated aluminum which fails within hours. The protective mechanisms rely on pore sealing, which hydrates the oxide surface to form or other insoluble compounds that block ion ingress and reduce penetration into the porous structure. In valve metals such as and , anodizing promotes self-passivation, where the growing layer exhibits high ionic resistivity, limiting further growth and providing inherent stability against aggressive media. Electrochemical impedance (EIS) quantifies this protection, with well-sealed anodized coatings exhibiting low-frequency impedance moduli exceeding 10^6 Ω cm², indicating effective barrier properties. Additionally, anodizing shifts the position of aluminum in the toward more noble potentials, minimizing its anodic dissolution in couples with other metals. Wear resistance is bolstered by the integration of the anodized layer's hardness with the substrate, particularly in advanced processes like (PEO) on . PEO coatings on alloys can significantly reduce wear rates in saline environments during pin-on-disk tests, owing to the formation of hard, rutile-rich oxide phases that resist abrasive and adhesive . This improvement stems from the coating's microhardness, often exceeding 1000 HV, which distributes contact stresses and minimizes material removal under sliding conditions. Despite these benefits, limitations exist. In galvanic couples with dissimilar metals like or , breaches in the anodized layer can accelerate localized at the interface due to the potential difference. Furthermore, ultraviolet (UV) degradation of organic dyes in colored anodized finishes can compromise surface integrity over time, potentially accelerating wear by increasing and exposing underlying pores to environmental attack.

Environmental and Practical Considerations

Ecological Impacts

The anodizing process generates acidic effluents, primarily from (H₂SO₄) electrolytes, which pose risks to through acidification and heavy metal contamination if discharged without treatment. Additionally, chromic acid anodizing produces (Cr(VI)), a highly toxic and carcinogenic compound that persists in the environment and bioaccumulates in aquatic organisms. The sealing stage further contributes sludge primarily composed of amorphous aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH)₃), which can lead to solid waste accumulation and potential leaching of aluminum into and water bodies. during anodizing is significant, supporting the electrochemical reactions and heating requirements, while magnesium anodizing baths often incorporate fluorides that harm aquatic life by disrupting ecosystems and causing in and . Regulatory efforts have driven reductions in Cr(VI) emissions globally, with the U.S. EPA implementing stricter limits under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, including a 30% reduction in the emission limit from 0.01 mg/dscm to 0.007 mg/dscm for certain and anodizing sources, with compliance deadlines extending into the mid-2020s. These measures address chromic acid's carcinogenicity and environmental persistence, phasing out its use in favor of alternatives in many sectors. Mitigation strategies include closed-loop rinsing systems that recycle rinse water, substantially reducing effluent volumes and freshwater intake in anodizing operations. (PEO), an advanced variant, employs lower concentrations of hazardous chemicals and generates fewer toxic byproducts compared to traditional methods. From a lifecycle perspective, anodized coatings enhance product , extending and decreasing the frequency of maintenance coatings, which in turn lowers (VOC) emissions associated with repainting or refinishing. The overall of anodizing is approximately 6 kg CO₂ equivalent per square meter, encompassing energy use and chemical inputs. Recent advancements, such as 2024 trials using as a bio-based , highlight its potential as a non-toxic alternative to harsher acids.

Safety and Regulatory Aspects

Anodizing processes involve several occupational hazards primarily stemming from chemical, electrical, and physical risks associated with electrolyte baths and high-voltage operations. Acid burns are a common danger due to contact with concentrated sulfuric acid or chromic acid used in the baths, which can cause severe skin and eye damage. Hydrogen gas evolution at the cathode during direct current anodizing poses an explosion risk if the gas accumulates in confined spaces, particularly in alkaline or sulfate electrolytes where corrosion reactions generate flammable mixtures. In chromic acid anodizing, inhalation of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) aerosols or mists can lead to respiratory irritation, lung cancer, and other systemic effects, with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) setting a permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 5 μg/m³ as an 8-hour time-weighted average. Plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO), a variant of anodizing, introduces electrical shock hazards from high voltages typically ranging from 300 to 700 V, which exceed standard anodizing levels and require stringent isolation measures. To mitigate these hazards, operators must employ (PPE) such as acid-resistant gloves, face shields, aprons, and NIOSH-approved respirators to prevent skin contact and inhalation exposure. Adequate ventilation systems, including fume hoods and local exhausts, are essential to capture and remove hazardous vapors and aerosols, with designs capable of maintaining concentrations below regulatory thresholds through effective airflow. For emergency situations, spills of should be neutralized immediately using soda ash or lime to prevent further or release of fumes, followed by absorption with inert materials and proper disposal as . Regulatory compliance is critical for anodizing operations, governed by standards addressing toxic substances and environmental management. OSHA's 29 CFR 1910.1000 establishes air contaminant limits, including the Cr(VI) PEL, requiring exposure monitoring, , and medical surveillance in facilities using chromic acid anodizing. Under the European Union's REACH Regulation, Annex XVII restricts hexavalent chromium compounds, with proposals submitted in 2025 aiming to impose stricter limits or bans on uses like chromic acid in anodizing to protect worker health, potentially eliminating concentrations above 0.1% by weight in relevant processes. As of November 2025, the proposal remains under public consultation, with decisions pending from ECHA committees and the EU Commission. Facilities often adopt ISO 14001 certification for environmental management systems to systematically identify, control, and reduce pollution risks from anodizing, including waste handling and emission controls. Specific operational protocols further enhance safety, including mandatory on bath handling to recognize instability in electrolytes and proper use of monitoring equipment. Spill response plans must detail containment for acids like H2SO4, using absorbents such as soda ash to neutralize and prevent environmental release. For magnesium anodizing, continuous monitoring for flammability is required due to the metal's high reactivity and potential for ignition during or heating steps prior to anodizing. Recent developments emphasize safer practices, particularly for anodizing components in electric vehicles (EVs). The 2024 edition of updates electrical safety requirements, incorporating enhanced procedures and risk assessments that apply to high-voltage PEO processes in EV manufacturing to prevent shocks and arc flashes. Additionally, the industry shift toward low-hazard alternatives, such as anodizing over variants, has significantly reduced exposure incidents by promoting non-toxic electrolytes and compliant sealing methods.

References

  1. https://materialsdata.nist.gov/bitstream/handle/11115/221/Anodizing.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  2. https://www.rit.edu/affiliate/nysp2i/sites/rit.edu.affiliate.nysp2i/files/docs/resources/Metal_Finishing_Processes_Best_Practices.pdf
  3. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1386&context=cor
  4. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/prc-5006-current.pdf
  5. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/10/11/1106
  6. https://knowledge.electrochem.org/encycl/art-a02-anodizing.htm
  7. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr60259a005
  8. https://dl.asminternational.org/handbooks/book/chapter-pdf/454259/a0006523.pdf
  9. https://www.asminternational.org/results/-/journal_content/56/ASMHBA0001281/BOOK-ARTICLE/
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780128167069000017
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/anodization
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/oxide-growth
  13. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/9/1/57
  14. https://www.3erp.com/blog/anodizing/
  15. https://interfas.univ-tlse2.fr/nacelles/923
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/anodising-process
  17. https://finishingandcoating.com/index.php/anodizingcat/1243-understanding-the-anodic-oxide-finish-the-first-commercially-available-nanoscale-coating
  18. https://patents.google.com/patent/GB290901A/en
  19. https://sterc.org/files/pf078802.htm
  20. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/dichromate-sealing-problems
  21. https://www.qualanod.net/architectural-applications.html
  22. https://www.xometry.com/resources/machining/sulfuric-acid-anodizing/
  23. https://www.anodizing.org/historical-perspective/
  24. https://www.anodizing.org/military-specification-mil-a-8625/
  25. https://www.iso.org/standard/70156.html
  26. https://www.metaspec.com/post/astm-b449-test-specimens
  27. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/anodizing-qa-typical-hardness-of-type-iii-hardcoat-anodized-coatings
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0257897205001593
  29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245167866_Use_of_LCA_to_evaluate_the_environmental_benefits_of_substituting_chromic_acid_anodizing_CAA
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10929655/
  31. https://3dspro.com/resources/blog/3d-printing-post-processing-guide-anodized-aluminum
  32. https://www.henkel-adhesives.com/il/en/applications/all-applications/industry-insights/cost-efficiency-and-sustainability-in-aluminum-anodizing.html
  33. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA4437.pdf
  34. https://www.anodizing.org/anodic-coating-specifications/
  35. https://blog.keronite.com/magnesium-aluminium-alloys-for-electric-vehicle-battery-housings
  36. https://www.lightmetalage.com/news/industry-news/surface-finishing/introduction-to-anodizing-aluminum/
  37. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/surface-roughness-before-and-after-anodizing
  38. https://finishingandcoating.com/index.php/cleaning-pretreatment/582-anodizing-technology-cleaning
  39. https://bonnellaluminum.com/tech-info-resources/principles-of-the-anodizing-process/
  40. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/smut-and-desmutting
  41. https://www.finishing.com/474/80.shtml
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925838820321988
  43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666845922000058
  44. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20160005654/downloads/20160005654.pdf
  45. https://members.anodizing.org/page/qa_and_testing
  46. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1836473
  47. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/anodizing-fundamentals
  48. https://psec.uchicago.edu/Papers/Chemical_Reviews_Anodic_oxide_films_on_aluminum.pdf
  49. https://finishingandcoating.com/index.php/anodizingcat/1729-anodizing-by-current-density-vs-voltage
  50. http://www.semiconsoft.com/html/download/docs/Anodized_Aluminum_measurement.pdf
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0257897205007681
  52. https://sterc.org/pdf/sf2002/sf02f01.pdf
  53. https://www.apti.org/assets/docs/46.1_SampleArticle_Flandro.pdf
  54. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/electropolishing-as-a-pretreatment-for-anodizing
  55. https://elkamehr.com/en/new-anodizing-methods-for-improving-aluminum-corrosion-resistance/
  56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0257897221004254
  57. https://www.shotpeener.com/library/pdf/2014061.pdf
  58. https://www.anodizing.org/coil-anodizing/
  59. https://www.hlhprototypes.com/anodizing-aluminum-parts-mini-blog/
  60. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-11/documents/chromium_supplement.pdf
  61. https://tirapid.com/chromic-acid-anodizing/
  62. https://www.xometry.com/resources/machining/chromic-acid-anodizing/
  63. https://novationinc.net/chromic-acid/
  64. https://www.anoplate.com/capabilities/anotole/
  65. https://www.fictiv.com/articles/alternatives-to-chromic-acid-anodizing
  66. https://www.reachlaw.fi/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/hexavalent-chromium-compounds-what-have-we-learned-from-ten-years-of-the-eus-authorisation-requirement.pdf
  67. https://echa.europa.eu/-/echa-proposes-restrictions-on-chromium-vi-substances-to-protect-health
  68. https://finishingandcoating.com/index.php/anodizingcat/1693-overview-of-aerospace-anodize-finishes
  69. https://www.anodizing.org/anodizing-reference-guide/
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0257897218307059
  71. https://www.saf.com/how-to-specify/military-specification-anodizing-mil-a-8625/
  72. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/cathode-materials-and-cathodeanode-ratios
  73. https://sterc.org/dcx/papers/sf99024.pdf
  74. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/calculating-anodizing-rate-for-type-ii-and-type-iii-coatings
  75. https://www.anoplate.com/finishes/sulfuric-anodize/
  76. https://www.anodizing.org/current-anodizing-processes/
  77. https://gleich.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Guidelines-for-the-Hard-Anodizing-of-Aluminium.pdf
  78. https://www.chemprocessing.com/page.asp?PageID=65
  79. https://www.anoplate.com/finishes/hardcoat-anodize/
  80. https://www.finishing.com/321/37.shtml
  81. https://www.zenithinmfg.com/anodizing-type-ii-vs-type-iii/
  82. https://finishingandcoating.com/index.php/anodizingcat/1522-proper-testing-wear-of-resistant-anodized-coatings
  83. https://leadrp.net/blog/hardcoat-anodizing-basics-what-you-need-to-know/
  84. https://innovation.ftmc.lt/en/technologies/lubrication-of-porous-aluminum/
  85. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/anodizing-for-bonding-applications-in-aerospace
  86. https://miramarmetalprocessing.com/phosphoric-acid-anodizing-paa/
  87. https://www.finishing.com/43/79.shtml
  88. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/oxalic-acid-anodizingthe-basics
  89. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=56078
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8224744/
  91. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/9/10/614
  92. https://finishingandcoating.com/index.php/anodizingcat/2413-environmentally-friendly-alternatives-to-chromium-based-anodization-and-sealing-for-aerospace
  93. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-chemical-used-anodize-titanium-tuofa-technology-co-ltd--kpooc
  94. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/col.20683
  95. https://monsterbolts.com/pages/anodized-titanium-color-chart
  96. https://tirapid.com/titanium-anodizing/
  97. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311768047_Anodization_of_Ti-based_materials_for_biomedical_applications_A_review
  98. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8281482/
  99. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257270529_Anodic_coloring_of_titanium_and_its_alloy_for_jewels_production
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8920665/
  101. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2022/7636482
  102. https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/12727/InTech-Anodization_of_magnesium_alloys_using_phosphate_solution.pdf
  103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169433206011202
  104. https://news.metal.com/newscontent/103599636/Lightweight-High-Performance-Magnesium-Alloys-Lead-New-Tracks-in-the-Automotive-and-Robotics-Industries-%5BSMM-Research%5D
  105. https://firstmold.com/tips/magnesium/
  106. http://przyrbwn.icm.edu.pl/APP/PDF/129/a129z3p06.pdf
  107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1388248111000221
  108. https://www.capacitorconnect.com/tantalum-capacitors-their-benefits-and-applications/
  109. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c00440
  110. https://passive-components.eu/tantalum-capacitor-history/
  111. https://www.persistencemarketresearch.com/market-research/polymer-tantalum-capacitors-market.asp
  112. https://www.doeeet.com/content/eee-components/passive-components/tantalum-and-niobium-capacitors-applications/
  113. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267395560_Anodizing_of_Zinc_for_Improved_Surface_Properties
  114. https://www.nmfrc.org/pdf/9901104.pdf
  115. https://www.ecwilliams.co.uk/zinc-passivation/
  116. https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/celc.202100216
  117. https://steelprogroup.com/stainless-steel/production/anodizing/
  118. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/14/2/217
  119. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378727394_Corrosion_Behavior_of_Passivation_Layer_Cr2o3_of_Uncoated_Stainless_Steel_In_the_Anodic_and_Cathodic_Conditions_A_First-Principles_Study
  120. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0257897222003243
  121. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393618578_Increasing_of_Wear_Resistance_of_Heat-Resistant_Nickel_Alloy_Using_Anodic_Plasma_Electrolytic_Treatment
  122. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894723006046
  123. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2238785422003180
  124. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/15/8/878
  125. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010938X20325026
  126. https://www.worthwillaluminium.com/blog/anodizing-sealing-process/
  127. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7662489/
  128. https://informaticsjournals.co.in/index.php/jecsi/article/download/51931/34290/115584
  129. https://finishingandcoating.com/index.php/anodizingcat/1220-the-sealing-step-in-aluminum-anodizing
  130. https://assets.ctfassets.net/zogcnwgo7tun/3WJxu4P2TxEYicjAM68bsD/553db7eed9948db84908292afd881c77/AAMA_Maintence_Guide.pdf
  131. https://linetec.com/anodize/anodize-cleaning-maintenance/
  132. https://crest-ultrasonics.com/using-an-ultrasonic-cleaner-for-aluminum-parts/
  133. https://linetec.com/2018/07/11/tackling-a-transportation-center-or-high-traffic-urban-project-consider-corrosion-resistant-finishes/
  134. https://www.astm.org/b0680-80r19.html
  135. https://www.qualanod.net/weathering-of-anodized-aluminium.html?file=files/qualanod/downloads/weathering%20of%20anodized%20aluminium%20110803.pdf
  136. https://vmtcnc.com/what-causes-anodized-aluminum-to-fade/
  137. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/fixing-corrosion-between-anodized-aluminum-and-steel
  138. https://simplegreen.com/industrial/products/clean-building-all-purpose-cleaner/
  139. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0257897217307338
  140. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0257897202007508
  141. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/44294
  142. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/adem.202300394
  143. https://www.metalfinishingsltd.co.uk/articles/anodising-thickness-guidance/
  144. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003632615638031
  145. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0257897225005043
  146. https://chemeon.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CHEMEON-Tech-Specs.pdf
  147. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-01549-y
  148. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010938X08003806
  149. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010938X20324264
  150. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/techniques-to-enhance-uv-stability-of-dye-anodized-coatings
  151. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355586835_The_Anodising_Industry_Wastewater_Considerations_of_Its_Treatment_for_Environmental_Protection
  152. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008JCPro..16.1294H/abstract
  153. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30691903/
  154. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223729809_Study_on_the_environmentally_friendly_anodizing_of_AZ91D_magnesium_alloy
  155. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2012/09/19/2012-20642/national-emission-standards-for-hazardous-air-pollutant-emissions-hard-and-decorative-chromium
  156. https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/chromium-electroplating-national-emission-standards-hazardous-air
  157. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479722022563
  158. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8928550/
  159. https://www.acemetalfinishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Anodizing-and-the-Environment.pdf
  160. https://www.climatiq.io/data/emission-factor/8a052e4b-a38e-4c34-82f6-8155173027ea
  161. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254058424005832
  162. https://www.valencesurfacetech.com/the-news/is-anodized-aluminum-safe/
  163. https://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-15156.pdf
  164. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA-3373-hexavalent-chromium.pdf
  165. https://elemetgroup.com/ppe-needed-for-powder-coating-vs-anodizing/
  166. https://www.3erp.com/blog/titanium-anodizing/
  167. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/19336/cdc_19336_DS1.pdf
  168. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1000
  169. https://www.anoplate.com/environment/
  170. https://www.fire.tc.faa.gov/pdf/tc-13-52.pdf
  171. https://www.seamgroup.com/nfpa-70e-2024-updates-what-changed/
  172. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/a-smooth-transition-from-one-anodizing-process-to-another
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.