Hubbry Logo
BigamyBigamyMain
Open search
Bigamy
Community hub
Bigamy
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Bigamy
Bigamy
Bigamy
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Criminal law
Elements
Scope of criminal liability
Severity of offense
Inchoate offenses
Offense against the person
Sexual offenses
Crimes against property
Crimes against justice
Crimes against the public
Crimes against animals
Crimes against the state
Defenses to liability
Other common-law areas
Portals
Elkanah and his two wives

In a culture where only monogamous relationships are legally recognized, bigamy is the act of entering into a marriage with one person while still legally married to another.[1] A legal or de facto separation of the couple does not alter their marital status as married persons. In the case of a person in the process of divorcing their spouse, that person is taken to be legally married until such time as the divorce becomes final or absolute under the law of the relevant jurisdiction. Bigamy laws do not apply to couples in a de facto or cohabitation relationship,[2] or that enter such relationships when one is legally married. If the prior marriage is for any reason void, the couple is not married, and hence each party is free to marry another without falling foul of the bigamy laws.

Bigamy is a crime in most countries that recognise only monogamous marriages. When it occurs in this context often neither the first nor second spouse is aware of the other. In countries that have bigamy laws, with a few exceptions (such as Maldives and Sudan), consent from a prior spouse makes no difference to the legality of the second marriage, which is usually considered void.

History of anti-bigamy laws

[edit]

Even before Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire, Diocletian and Maximian passed strict anti-polygamy laws in 285 AD that mandated monogamy as the only form of legal marital relationship, as had traditionally been the case in classical Greece and Rome.[citation needed] In 393, the Roman Emperor Theodosius I issued an imperial edict to extend the ban on polygamy to Jewish communities. In 1000, Rabbi Gershom ben Judah ruled polygamy inadmissible within Ashkenazi Jewish communities living in a Christian environment.

[edit]
See also: Legal status of polygamy
Philip I, Landgrave of Hesse, was exposed as a bigamist in 1540 by his sister, Elisabeth

Most western countries do not recognise polygamous marriages, and consider bigamy a crime. Several countries also prohibit people from living a polygamous lifestyle. This is the case with the United States where the criminalisation of a polygamous lifestyle originated as anti-Mormon laws, although they are rarely enforced.[3] De facto polygamy is illegal under US federal law, the Edmunds Act.

In diplomatic law, consular spouses from polygamous countries are sometimes exempt from a general prohibition on polygamy in host countries. In some such countries, only one spouse of a polygamous diplomat may be accredited, however.[4]

By country and region

[edit]
  • Australia: Illegal. Up to five years' imprisonment.[5]
  • Belgium: Illegal. Five to ten years' imprisonment.[6]
  • Brazil: Illegal. Two to six years' imprisonment.[7]
  • Canada: Illegal. Up to five years' imprisonment.[8][9]
  • China: Illegal. Up to two years' imprisonment, and up to three years for bigamy with soldiers (but tolerated for some minorities, such as Tibetans, in some rural areas in the south-west).[citation needed]
  • Colombia: Illegal with exceptions (such as religion). Although bigamy no longer exists as a lone figure in the Colombian judicial code, marrying someone new without dissolving an earlier marriage may yield to other felonies such as civil status forgery or suppression of information.[10]
  • Egypt: Legal for men if first wife consents.
  • Eritrea: Illegal. Up to five years' imprisonment.
  • Germany: Illegal. Up to three years' imprisonment.[11]
  • Ghana: Illegal. Up to six months' imprisonment.
  • Hong Kong: Illegal. Up to seven years' imprisonment.[12]
  • Iceland: Illegal.[13]
  • India: Legal only for Muslim men but very rarely practiced. Up to 10 years' imprisonment for others except in the state of Goa for Hindus due to its own civil code.
  • Indonesia: Depending on the specific tribe in question, bigamy can be legal or illegal.
  • Republic of Ireland: A criminal offence under section 57 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, up to seven years' imprisonment.[14] The Director of Public Prosecutions has discretion and rarely prosecutes.[15] Catholic canon law permits a second marriage if the first was in a UK register office or annulled by the church; the state considered such marriages bigamous without a civil annulment (more restricted than a church annulment) or divorce (illegal from 1937 until 1996) and two cases in the 1960s led to suspended sentences.[16] The 1861 act replaced an 1829 act[17] which in turn replaced acts of 1725 and 1635.[18]
  • Iran: Legal for men with consent of first wife. Rarely practised.
  • Israel: Illegal for members of each confessional community. Up to five years' imprisonment.[19]
  • Italy: Illegal. Up to five years' imprisonment.[20]
  • Libya: Legal for men with conditions.
  • Malaysia: Illegal for non-Muslims under federal jurisdiction. Under section 494 of Chapter XX of the Penal Code, non-Muslim offenders found guilty of bigamy or polygamy can be punished up to seven years' imprisonment. Bigamy or polygamy is legal only for Muslim men with restrictions under state jurisdiction, rarely practised.[21]
  • Maldives: Permitted for anyone.[citation needed]
  • Malta: Illegal.[22]
  • Morocco: Permitted for Muslims, restrictions apply.
  • Netherlands: Illegal. Up to six years' imprisonment. If the new partner is aware of the bigamy they can be imprisoned for a maximum of four years.
  • New Zealand: Illegal.[23] Up to seven years' imprisonment, or up to two years' imprisonment if the judge is satisfied the second spouse was aware their marriage would be void.
  • Pakistan: Polygamy in Pakistan is permitted to men with some restrictions.
  • Philippines: Legal for Muslim men. Others face six to 12 years' imprisonment and legal dissolution of marriage.
  • Poland: Illegal, up to two years' imprisonment.[24]
  • Portugal: Illegal. Up to two years' imprisonment, or up to 240 days of day-fine.[25]
  • Romania: Illegal.[26][27][28][29]
  • Russia: Illegal.
  • Saudi Arabia: Bigamy or polygamy is legal for men with some restrictions, but has become less common in the late 1900s and early 2000s; see Polygamy in Saudi Arabia
  • Somalia: Polygamy is legal for men at marriage courts; long-standing tradition.
  • South Africa: Legal for men under the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, 1998 for customary marriages. Under civil law marriages (regulated by the Marriage Act), any marriage in addition to an already existing one is invalid (but not criminalised).
  • Spain: Illegal. Between six months to a year's imprisonment (Art. 217 of the Criminal Code).[30]
  • Sudan: Bigamy or polygamy is legal for men.
  • Taiwan: Illegal. Up to five years' imprisonment.
  • Thailand: Prior to October 1, 1935, polygamy in Thailand could be freely practised and recognised under civil law. Since its abolition, it is still practised and widely accepted in Thailand, though no longer recognised, as the law states "A man or a woman cannot marry each other while one of them has a spouse."
  • Tunisia: Illegal. Up to five years' imprisonment.
  • Turkey: Illegal. Up to two years' imprisonment.[31]
  • United Kingdom: Illegal, although marriages performed abroad may be recognised for some legal purposes (see Polygamy in the United Kingdom).
On indictment, up to seven years' imprisonment[32] or on summary conviction up to six months' imprisonment, or to a fine of a prescribed sum, or to both.[33]
  • United States: Illegal in every state. Up to five years' imprisonment. (see Polygamy in North America.)
  • Uzbekistan: Illegal. Up to three years of imprisonment and a fine of 50 to 150 monthly wage installments. Women are not punished if they marry a man who has another unknown wife.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bigamy

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Bigamy is the criminal act of entering into a second while a prior legal to another remains undissolved and valid. This offense, distinct from broader by limiting the spousal count to two, violates statutory requirements for monogamous unions in the vast majority of countries, where it is prosecuted as a or with penalties including . Empirically, bigamy occurs infrequently worldwide, often as a subset of polygamous arrangements that affect only about 2% of the global population, concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa's "polygamy belt" (such as and , where rates exceed 30%) and select Middle Eastern or Asian contexts permitting under religious law. In monogamy-enforcing nations like the , where it is banned in all states, detection relies on civil records or spousal complaints, leading to underreporting due to factors like spousal desertion or geographic mobility. Enforcement varies, with some jurisdictions treating it as —requiring no proof of intent—while others, like in 2020, downgraded non-cohabitating polygamous living to infractions amid low prosecution rates. Historically, bigamy has been penalized in Western societies since medieval prohibitions, escalating to status in by 1604 amid rising marital instability from and informal separations, as was unavailable. Despite biblical precedents of tolerated bigamy (e.g., figures like with dual wives), causal factors such as economic pressures or spousal abandonment drove clandestine remarriages, often evading detection through aliases or distance. Modern controversies center on reconciling bigamy laws with alternative relational models like , prompting constitutional challenges in the U.S. for equal protection, though empirical rarity and documented familial disruptions (e.g., disputes, conflicts) sustain prohibitions.

Definition and Terminology

Core Definition and Etymology

Bigamy is the act of entering into a marriage with one person while still legally married to another spouse whose prior marriage remains undissolved and the original spouse is alive. This results in a state of having two simultaneous spouses under applicable legal frameworks, distinguishing it from informal polygamous relationships that lack formal marital recognition. In jurisdictions where marriage confers specific legal rights and obligations, bigamy invalidates the second union while potentially exposing the individual to criminal penalties, as the act contravenes monogamous marriage statutes predicated on exclusive spousal bonds. The term "bigamy" originates from the mid-13th century, borrowed into from bigamie and bigamia, denoting the condition of having two spouses at once. It combines the Latin prefix bi- ("two" or "double") with gamus, derived from gamos (""), ultimately tracing to Proto-Indo-European ǵem- ("to marry"). This etymological structure reflects a conceptual emphasis on duality in marital unions, contrasting with (from Greek monos "single" + gamos), and entered and secular legal discourse to proscribe plural marriages in contexts enforcing one-spouse exclusivity. Bigamy specifically denotes the act of entering into a second while a prior legal remains valid and undissolved, rendering the subsequent union void ab initio in jurisdictions that prohibit it. This contrasts with , which encompasses the broader practice of maintaining multiple s simultaneously; while may be legally recognized in certain cultural or religious contexts (such as in some Islamic jurisdictions), in monogamy-only systems like the , arrangements are typically prosecuted as serial instances of bigamy, with the U.S. in Murphy v. Ramsey (1885) equating the two by defining as marrying another while a lives or cohabiting with multiple partners under marital pretense. Unlike , which constitutes voluntary between a married and someone not their —often a civil or criminal offense against but not requiring any marital —bigamy hinges on the formal to solemnize a second , irrespective of or sexual relations. For instance, under traditions adopted in many Western legal systems, undermines marital fidelity without challenging the exclusivity of legal spousal status, whereas bigamy directly contravenes the state's monopoly on recognizing one valid per at a time. Bigamy also differs from , a historical or informal arrangement where a (typically a man) maintains a secondary partner or household without legal , lacking the ceremonial or state-sanctioned elements that define bigamy; thus evades bigamy charges by not purporting to create a spousal bond. Serial monogamy, by contrast, involves successive legal marriages following the dissolution of prior ones through or spousal , ensuring only one spouse at any given moment and thus avoiding bigamy's simultaneous duality. (multiple husbands) and (multiple wives) represent subtypes of rather than bigamy per se, distinguished primarily by configuration rather than ; in prohibitive regimes, both manifest as bigamous acts when formalized. These distinctions underscore bigamy's focus on unauthorized marital multiplicity within state-enforced , separate from informal or sequential unions.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern Practices

In ancient , marriages were predominantly monogamous, structured through arranged contracts between families for economic or political purposes, as documented in records from the third millennium BCE onward. However, was tolerated among kings and affluent men, who could take secondary wives or concubines if the primary wife failed to produce heirs, a provision reflected in the around 1750 BCE, which regulated inheritance and dowries in such unions without prohibiting the practice outright. Biblical accounts describe polygyny among ancient Israelite patriarchs and kings, beginning with Lamech in Genesis 4:19, the first named practitioner, followed by Abraham with and , Jacob with and plus their handmaids, and King David with at least eight wives, alongside King Solomon's reported 700 wives and 300 concubines in 1 Kings 11:3. These instances, spanning roughly the second millennium BCE to the BCE, indicate cultural acceptance among elites for securing alliances and heirs, though law neither explicitly endorsed nor banned it, and narratives often highlight associated familial strife. In , was largely confined to pharaohs and high nobility from (c. 2686–2181 BCE) through the New Kingdom (c. 1550–1070 BCE), where multiple wives and concubines in royal harems aimed to maximize male heirs and political ties, as seen in Ramses II's over 100 children from various unions. Commoners adhered to due to economic constraints, with legal contracts emphasizing mutual support rather than multiplicity. Pre-modern Chinese society, from the (1046–256 BCE) into the imperial era, featured among emperors and wealthy officials, who maintained principal wives alongside concubines selected via beauty contests or service, as in the Han dynasty's records of imperial harems numbering in to ensure dynastic continuity. This system persisted through the (1644–1912 CE), symbolizing status and potency, though limited to elites capable of sustaining multiple households. In pre-modern , under Christian influence from the early medieval period (c. 5th–15th centuries CE), bigamy—whether simultaneous or serial—was criminalized as a violation of sacramental , with courts prosecuting cases like those in 14th-century , where men faced penalties for second marriages without dissolution of the first. Practices were rare, confined to clandestine or arrangements among nobility, diverging sharply from contemporaneous polygynous norms in Islamic regions where up to four wives were permitted under from the 7th century CE onward.

Emergence of Anti-Bigamy Norms in Western Societies

In ancient Roman society, legal was inherently monogamous, permitting only one at a time despite informal among elites. Emperor ' Lex Julia of 18 BCE and Lex Papia Poppaea of 9 CE incentivized monogamous unions through rewards for legitimate offspring and penalties for or , embedding as a civic norm to bolster imperial stability and population growth. Emperor Constantine reinforced this in 320 CE with an edict prohibiting married men from maintaining concubines, marking an explicit legal barrier against de facto under Christian influence as Rome's rulers converted. Early Christian doctrine, drawing from Greco-Roman precedents, elevated as a divine imperative, with like (c. 155–220 CE) arguing it reflected renewal in Christ and precluded polygamous origins from Eden. As permeated from the 4th century onward, authorities integrated anti-bigamy strictures into , viewing successive or concurrent marriages as impediments to sacraments and . By the 12th century, Gratian's Decretum (c. 1140) systematized these prohibitions, treating bigamy—whether public or clandestine—as a diriment impediment nullifying marital validity and ecclesiastical eligibility, thus aligning secular rulers' customs with to curb noble excesses. The Protestant Reformation tested these norms but ultimately reinforced them amid scandal. In 1540, Landgrave , a key Lutheran ally, contracted a secret bigamous to Margarethe von der , receiving private approval from and Philipp Melanchthon as a lesser evil than or for his pastoral distress. Public exposure in 1541 provoked outrage, prompting the reformers to advocate secrecy to avoid undermining the movement, yet the episode highlighted bigamy's incompatibility with emerging Protestant marital ethics rooted in interpretations favoring monogamy. The Catholic (1545–1563) responded by dogmatically affirming monogamy as the exclusive Christian form, codifying indissolubility and unity against polygamous deviations. These developments entrenched anti-bigamy norms across Western Christendom, intertwining religious doctrine with legal enforcement to prioritize marital exclusivity for , clarity, and authority, distinguishing Europe from contemporaneous polygynous systems elsewhere. In the , the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 codified bigamy as a statutory offense under Section 57, stipulating that any married person who marries another during the lifetime of their commits a , punishable by up to seven years' with or without , regardless of whether the second was solemnized in or elsewhere. This provision replaced earlier sanctions and approaches, which had treated bigamy primarily as a civil impediment to valid rather than a criminal act, and it applied extraterritorially to protect the monogamous structure of English amid rising and mobility that facilitated undetected second unions. In the United States, federal codification intensified in the mid-19th century to suppress polygamous practices among Latter-day Saints in , where plural marriage had been introduced doctrinally in the 1840s. The Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act, enacted on July 8, 1862, and signed by President , declared bigamy a punishable by fines up to $500 and imprisonment up to five years in U.S. territories; it invalidated plural marriages, limited territorial probate courts' over polygamists' estates, and capped church property ownership at $50,000 to curb institutional support for the practice. This marked the first national legislative assault on bigamy beyond state-level prohibitions, driven by congressional concerns over territorial governance and moral order, though enforcement was initially limited until post-Civil War federal assertiveness. Subsequent U.S. federal laws expanded these measures: the of 1882 elevated and unlawful to felonies with penalties of up to five years' and $500 fines, disqualified practitioners from voting, jury service, or public office, and required affidavit denials of for territorial voters, resulting in over 1,300 convictions by 1890. The Edmunds-Tucker Act of 1887 further dismantled support structures by dissolving the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints' corporate charter, escheating its assets to the U.S. government, disincorporating Utah's , and mandating anti- oaths for public officials, effectively pressuring the church to issue its renouncing plural marriage. By the early , all states had enacted or retained bigamy statutes, often classifying it as a with penalties mirroring federal precedents, reinforcing as a uniform civil and criminal norm amid family reforms. Across continental Europe, 19th-century civil and penal codes systematically prohibited bigamy to align with post-Enlightenment secularization and state control over family law. France's Code Pénal of 1810, under Articles 433 and 434, criminalized bigamy with imprisonment from five years to life, complementing Article 147 of the Code Civil (1804), which voided second marriages contracted before dissolution of the first; these provisions endured through 20th-century revisions, emphasizing civil dissolution requirements to prevent inheritance disputes and social instability. Similarly, the German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch) of 1900, effective January 1, 1900, entrenched monogamy in Sections 1306–1312, rendering bigamous unions null and subjecting offenders to penal sanctions under contemporaneous laws, reflecting unification efforts to standardize marital exclusivity amid industrialization's disruptions to traditional kinship. These codifications prioritized empirical family stability—evidenced by reduced inheritance conflicts and clearer property lines—over cultural variances, with 20th-century amendments focusing on procedural enforcement rather than substantive relaxation.

Religious and Cultural Perspectives

Views in Abrahamic Religions

In Judaism, the Hebrew Bible records numerous instances of polygyny among patriarchs and kings, such as Lamech, Abraham, Jacob, David, and Solomon, without explicit divine condemnation, though narratives often depict associated familial strife and jealousy, as in the cases of Sarah and Hagar or Rachel and Leah. Regulations in Deuteronomy 21:15-17 address inheritance rights in polygynous households, indicating tolerance rather than endorsement. However, some Second Temple period wisdom literature, such as Sirach 26:6, elevates monogamy as an ideal, portraying the "faithful wife" singularly. By the 10th-11th centuries CE, Rabbi Gershom ben Judah issued a ban (herem) prohibiting polygyny among Ashkenazi Jews, effective around 1000 CE, influenced by prevailing European monogamous norms and aimed at protecting women from abandonment; this prohibition remains binding for most Orthodox Ashkenazi communities today, while Sephardic and Yemenite Jews historically permitted it until later rabbinic rulings. Christianity views bigamy as incompatible with the marital ideal established in Genesis 2:24, where "a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his , and they shall become one flesh," affirmed by in Matthew 19:4-6 as God's original intent predating concessions to human hardness of heart. Although the describes polygynous arrangements without prescriptive approval—and often illustrates their dysfunction, such as Solomon's 700 wives leading to in 1 Kings 11—the explicitly requires church elders and deacons to be "the husband of one " (1 Timothy 3:2, 12; 1:6), establishing as the normative standard for believers. Early like and Augustine condemned , aligning with Roman imperial bans by the 4th century CE, and canonical law across Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant traditions has uniformly prohibited it as contrary to Christ's teaching on indissoluble monogamous union. In , the permits a man to marry up to four wives simultaneously, as stated in 4:3, which conditions this on the ability to treat them justly in material provision and time, while urging marriage to orphans if needed to prevent ; however, 4:129 acknowledges the practical impossibility of perfect equity among wives, implying a strong preference for as the default. This framework limited pre-Islamic Arabian practices of unlimited , with the Prophet Muhammad exemplifying multiple marriages—up to 11 wives at various points, though not exceeding four concurrently after the Quranic limit—for political alliances, widow support, and propagation of , as detailed in collections like . Scholarly interpretations emphasize that is exceptional, not obligatory, and requires financial capability and fairness, with failure to uphold justice warranting reduction to one wife; modern applications vary, but classical jurists across madhabs (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanbali) uphold the permissibility under strict conditions.

Practices in Non-Western Cultures and Islam

In , polygyny—specifically a man marrying up to four wives simultaneously—is permitted under Quranic injunction, as stated in Surah An-Nisa 4:3, which allows marriage to orphans or other women provided the husband can maintain among them; the verse explicitly cautions that if cannot be upheld, one wife suffices. This provision is conditional on financial capability, equitable treatment in time, resources, and emotional fairness, though Islamic jurisprudence acknowledges the practical difficulty of perfect equity, often interpreting the Quranic preference for when full is unattainable. Polygyny is not obligatory and is framed as a solution for specific social needs, such as caring for widows or in wartime demographics with excess women, rather than unrestricted license. Prevalence varies widely across Muslim-majority countries, remaining low in urbanized or Gulf states—less than 1% of marriages in and similarly rare in the UAE among non-elites—due to economic barriers and modernization. In sub-Saharan African nations with significant Muslim populations, rates are higher, intersecting with customary laws; for instance, 40% of married men in and 35% in practice , often under Islamic personal status laws. is legally recognized in approximately 58 sovereign states, predominantly Muslim-majority, including , , and , where men must obtain court or prior wives' consent in some cases, though enforcement prioritizes the husband's ability to provide. Beyond Islam, polygynous practices persist in various non-Western cultures, particularly in , where 11% of the population resides in polygamous households as of recent demographic surveys, concentrated in the "polygamy belt" spanning West and . In countries like (up to 40% of women in polygynous unions) and (over 25%), it aligns with traditional systems emphasizing lineage expansion and labor division, independent of or alongside Islamic influence. These arrangements often involve bridewealth exchanges and are declining with and , from peaks of 25-30% in the mid-20th century to current levels reflecting economic pressures on sustaining multiple households. Polyandry, rarer than polygyny, occurs in select non-Western societies facing resource scarcity, such as fraternal polyandry among Tibetan communities in the , where brothers share one wife to consolidate land holdings and avoid fragmentation in high-altitude agrarian economies; this practice, documented in and parts of until recent decades, affects fewer than 5% of households and is eroding due to state laws and migration. Similar patterns appear historically among the Nyinba of and Irula tribes in , driven by in marginal environments rather than religious doctrine. In both and contexts, practices are embedded in patrilineal or matrilineal structures, with empirical data indicating correlations to lower in polyandrous cases but sustained family units in resource-poor settings.

Secular and Evolutionary Arguments

Secular and evolutionary perspectives on bigamy emphasize its incompatibility with human social structures shaped by and empirical social outcomes, rather than divine mandates. suggests that human mating systems lean toward social to support biparental care, as infants require extensive provisioning due to altricial birth and long childhood dependency; this reduces risks from competing males and ensures paternal investment in survival. Models indicate evolves under conditions of resource scarcity or female territorial spacing, where males cannot effectively monopolize multiple partners, contrasting with polygynous systems that favor high-status males but leave surplus males without mates, heightening intrasexual competition. Cultural evolutionary theory, as articulated by Henrich et al., posits that monogamous norms emerged and persisted via group-level selection advantages: they curb polygyny-induced male rivalry, which correlates with elevated , lower trust, and reduced economic in societies permitting multiple wives. In such systems, only about 14-22% of individuals are polygynously married, but the resulting pool of unpaired young men—often 20-30% in high-polygyny contexts—fuels unrest, as seen in data linking polygyny rates to levels 1.5-2 times higher than in monogamous societies. This dynamic undermines large-scale essential for complex civilizations, with monogamy fostering equality in mate access and prosocial behaviors like toward non-kin. Empirically, bigamy and broader yield measurable social costs, including heightened psychological distress among co-wives, who face resource dilution and rivalry; studies of Bedouin-Arabs and other groups report polygamous women experiencing 2-3 times higher rates of depression, anxiety, and low compared to monogamous counterparts. Children in these unions show elevated mortality (up to 50% higher infant death rates in some African datasets), poorer , and increased behavioral issues, attributable to fragmented paternal and economic strain. Societally, polygynous structures correlate with imbalances, elevated conflict over brides (e.g., bride price inflation), and stalled development, as resources concentrate among few men, exacerbating inequality without compensatory benefits like expanded kin networks outweighing these harms. These patterns hold across diverse non-Western samples, underscoring bigamy's role in perpetuating instability absent institutional .

Global Overview of Legality

Bigamy, defined as contracting a second while a prior legal remains valid and undissolved, is criminalized in the vast of countries enforcing civil as the exclusive marital form, with penalties typically including ranging from two to ten years depending on . This prohibition aligns with secular legal systems prioritizing equal marital rights and family stability, as seen in , the , and much of , where subsequent marriages are void and subject to prosecution upon discovery through registry checks or spousal complaints. Polygyny, a form of plural marriage allowing one man multiple wives (up to four under Islamic conditions of financial equity and consent), is legally permitted in approximately 58 countries as of 2025, primarily Muslim-majority states in , the , and parts of , such as , , , and the , where Sharia-derived personal status laws govern Muslim family matters. In these contexts, bigamy charges do not apply to sanctioned polygynous unions registered under religious or customary frameworks, though civil codes in some nations (e.g., Indonesia's regional allowances) impose restrictions like court approval. —one woman with multiple husbands—remains illegal globally, with no recognized legal exceptions. Customary practices persist even in nominally monogamous countries like or , where civil law bans but tribal norms tolerate it without formal prosecution. International frameworks, including the UN's Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), deem polygamous arrangements incompatible with principles of , emotional well-being, and economic security for women and dependents, recommending their discouragement and legal prohibition to prevent subordination and resource dilution within families. The International Covenant on has similarly been interpreted by UN bodies to conflict with polygamy's allowance, though enforcement relies on state and domestic , leading to uneven global adherence. Despite these positions, affects about 2% of the world's population, concentrated in West and , where socioeconomic factors like and gender imbalances sustain its practice amid weak state oversight.

Enforcement and Penalties in Key Jurisdictions

Bigamy is criminalized across all states, classified as a in most jurisdictions with penalties typically ranging from one to five years , though variations exist; for instance, in under Penal Code §281, bigamy carries up to three years in state and a $10,000 fine, while cases limit punishment to one year in county jail and a $1,000 fine. In , under Penal Code §25.01, it constitutes a third-degree with a maximum of ten years confinement and a $10,000 fine. Enforcement often requires evidence of a second marriage during the subsistence of the first, and prosecutions are infrequent absent additional crimes like . In the , bigamy violates Section 57 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, punishable by up to seven years , though actual sentences are often lighter or suspended unless aggravated by . The offense applies to purporting to marry while a prior subsists, with defenses available if the first spouse's existence was unknown or if seven years' absence was reasonably believed to indicate death. Prosecutions remain rare, typically initiated only upon spousal complaints or in contexts. Canada's Section 291 deems bigamy an indictable offense with a maximum five-year prison term, applicable to entering a second while the first remains valid, excluding cases of good-faith in the prior spouse's after seven years' absence. prioritizes cases involving harm or public registry deception, with historical challenges in polygamous communities leading to rare but notable interventions. In , under Section 94 of the Marriage Act 1961, bigamy incurs up to five years imprisonment for conducting a marriage ceremony while already married, with summary convictions capping at two years or fines. Related offenses, such as false declarations on marriage forms, carry additional penalties up to six months. Prosecutions are uncommon, often linked to immigration fraud rather than domestic disputes. India prohibits bigamy under Section 494 of the (now mirrored in Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Sections 85-86 effective July 2024), imposing up to seven years rigorous imprisonment and fines, escalating to ten years if the prior was concealed. Exceptions apply under permitting for men, though unregistered unions may still attract penalties; enforcement is more vigorous in Hindu, Christian, and other monogamous communities, frequently pursued via private complaints. In jurisdictions like where is legally permitted under principles, no penalties apply to men marrying up to four wives provided financial equity and consent conditions are met, though informal or unregistered arrangements may face civil scrutiny rather than criminal sanctions. Enforcement emphasizes compliance with Quranic mandates over prohibition, contrasting sharply with monogamous legal regimes.

Immigration and International Implications

In jurisdictions where bigamy is prohibited, such as the , intending to practice renders immigrants inadmissible under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) § 212(a)(10)(A), barring visa issuance or adjustment of status for those entering to engage in plural marriages. This provision, rooted in late-19th-century legislation amid concerns over Mormon polygamy, extends to , where evidence of bigamous unions within five years prior can disqualify applicants, potentially triggering proceedings for lawful permanent residents. U.S. policy recognizes foreign polygamous marriages only to the extent of validating the for spousal sponsorship, excluding subsequent spouses from benefits and leaving them vulnerable to separation from family units during relocation. Similar restrictions apply in other Western nations. In Canada, while foreign polygamous marriages receive limited recognition for purposes like or under private , domestic immigration policy prohibits sponsorship of multiple spouses, confining family reunification to one partner and shared children, with polygamy itself criminalized under since 1890. The voids polygamous marriages under the , denying them validity for spousal visas or residency claims, except in narrow succession contexts where potentially polygamous unions formed before may confer limited rights to dependents. similarly invalidates polygamous unions for partner visa eligibility under the , recognizing only monogamous relationships and excluding additional spouses, which has resulted in deportation risks for those attempting plural family . Internationally, these policies create tensions under frameworks, as directives permit member states to deny for polygamous families on grounds, prioritizing monogamous norms over universal marriage recognition. Private international law often invokes exceptions to refuse for polygamous marriages, complicating cross-border custody, alimony, and property disputes when families migrate from permissive jurisdictions like parts of the or to monogamy-enforcing states. Such non-recognition exposes secondary spouses and children to risks of abandonment or exploitation during migration, as immigration systems effectively dismantle plural structures without alternative protections, though empirical on outcomes remains limited due to underreporting.

Social, Psychological, and Economic Impacts

Effects on Family Stability and Child Outcomes

consistently indicates that bigamous or polygamous structures, particularly , undermine family stability through heightened interpersonal conflict, resource , and emotional strain among co-wives and children. A comprehensive review of quantitative and qualitative studies found that polygamous marriages exhibit lower overall family cohesion, with frequent reports of , favoritism by the husband, and economic disparities exacerbating tensions. In Syrian samples, women in such arrangements reported significantly reduced marital satisfaction and compared to monogamous counterparts, correlating with disrupted household dynamics. These patterns arise from divided paternal investment and maternal rivalry, leading to fragmented support networks that weaken collective family resilience against stressors like or illness. Children in bigamous families face elevated risks of adverse developmental outcomes, including poorer and academic performance. Systematic reviews of studies across cultures reveal higher incidences of depression, anxiety, behavioral disorders, and social adjustment issues among offspring from polygynous households versus monogamous ones, attributed to inconsistent parental attention and exposure to inter-wife conflicts. For instance, Saudi middle school children from polygamous families demonstrated impaired , mediated by diminished family cohesion and paternal involvement. is also compromised, with lower scores linked to household instability and reduced educational resource allocation in resource-scarce polygynous settings. Health metrics further underscore these impacts, as polygynous structures correlate with higher rates in , driven by maternal nutritional deficits and overburdened caregiving amid competing siblings from multiple mothers. Longitudinal data suggest these effects persist into , with increased vulnerability to psychological distress independent of socioeconomic controls, highlighting causal pathways from structural plurality to suboptimal child rearing environments. While some studies note variability by cultural context, the preponderance of evidence from peer-reviewed analyses points to net destabilization rather than equivalence with monogamous norms.

Gender Dynamics and Empirical Evidence of Harms

In polygynous systems, which constitute the overwhelming majority of plural marriage practices historically and cross-culturally, men typically marry multiple wives while women rarely have multiple husbands, creating asymmetric gender dynamics that disadvantage females in resource access and relational security. Anthropological surveys indicate that approximately 85% of human societies have permitted , compared to rare instances of , often linked to resource scarcity rather than male surplus. This pattern fosters intense female competition for limited high-status males, resulting in younger women marrying older, wealthier men and leaving a surplus of unmarried lower-status males, which exacerbates social instability and . Empirical studies consistently document elevated mental health risks for women in polygynous unions, including higher rates of depression, anxiety, low , and reduced marital and relative to monogamous counterparts. A 2021 review of prevalence studies across polygynous contexts found women experiencing increased , hostility, psychoticism, and overall , attributing these to co-wife , diluted spousal attention, and emotional . Similarly, research in Syrian polygamous families revealed women scoring lower on measures and reporting more psychological distress, with first wives particularly vulnerable due to status loss upon additional marriages. These findings hold after controlling for socioeconomic factors, suggesting causal links to the structure of shared husbandry. Physical harms manifest in heightened and poorer outcomes for women, correlated with community-level prevalence. Cross-national data from and the show polygynous districts exhibiting 20-50% higher rates of domestic abuse, female genital mutilation, and honor-based , as men exert greater control over multiple dependents amid resource competition. A 2015 analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys linked polygyny to increased physical and against women, independent of or wealth, positing that fragmented family authority amplifies patriarchal enforcement. Recent modeling confirms interactive effects, where women's own polygynous status amplifies violence risks in high-polygyny communities, particularly for less-educated or rural women. Broader gender dynamics reveal systemic inequities, such as economic and reduced female , as commodifies women as reproductive assets, delaying societal transitions to gender-egalitarian norms. In high-prevalence regions, correlates with 10-20% lower female labor participation and , perpetuating cycles of dependency and intergenerational harm. While some ethnographic accounts from proponents highlight adaptive coping, quantitative evidence overwhelmingly substantiates net harms to female well-being, underscoring causal realism in plural marriage's gendered toll.

Potential Benefits and Critiques of Monogamous Alternatives

Monogamous marriage has been associated with enhanced family stability and improved child outcomes compared to polygamous arrangements. A systematic review of 18 studies involving over 8,000 children and adolescents found that those from polygynous families experienced higher rates of mental health disorders, such as depression and anxiety, alongside greater social maladjustment and lower academic performance than peers from monogamous families. Similarly, a 2021 cross-sectional study in Lebanon of 330 women and 2,369 children revealed significantly elevated psychological distress, including somatization and hostility, among participants in polygamous unions relative to monogamous ones, attributing this to resource dilution and intra-household competition. On a societal level, institutionalized mitigates intrasexual among males, leading to reduced and . Analysis by Henrich et al. in 2012, drawing on cross-cultural data from 186 societies, demonstrated that monogamous norms correlate with lower rates (by factors of 2-3 times), decreased prevalence of and , and higher per capita GDP growth, as they curb polygyny-induced status striving and surplus males. This dynamic fosters greater paternal investment in offspring and promotes gender equity by limiting the concentration of reproductive resources among high-status males, which in polygynous systems disadvantages lower-status women through intensified mate . Critiques of highlight potential mismatches with human evolutionary predispositions, where mild may align more closely with ancestral mating patterns, potentially contributing to dissatisfaction and in strictly monogamous contexts. Evolutionary psychologists argue that male-biased and female choosiness favor polygynous strategies in resource-variable environments, with evidence from surveys showing persistent preferences for multiple partners among men, leading to higher rates (around 40-50% in Western monogamous societies) as serial monogamy approximates polygyny without institutional support. Recent large-scale analyses, including a 2025 PNAS study of thousands of children in polygynous African households, found no consistent advantages for monogamous child outcomes in survival, growth, or education, and noted that polygynous families often exhibit greater wealth and crisis resilience due to extended kin networks. These findings qualify earlier assumptions of universal monogamous superiority, suggesting contextual benefits to plural systems in high-fertility, agrarian settings, though they do not negate documented psychological harms.

Contemporary Debates and Controversies

Advocacy for Legalization and Modern Polyamory

The Legal Advocacy Coalition (PLAC), founded to promote civil rights for polyamorous individuals and families, advocates for legislative reforms to recognize multi-partner relationships, including protections against in , , and courts. PLAC emphasizes public education and policy changes to address legal challenges such as custody disputes and inheritance issues, citing precedents like the 2015 decision as a basis for extending family rights beyond dyadic . Advocates within PLAC argue that empirical studies, such as those showing rising interest in consensual , underscore the need for legal safeguards to mitigate minority stress reported by over 50% of such individuals. In practice, this advocacy has led to limited municipal recognitions rather than full marital legalization. , enacted the first U.S. multiple-partner domestic partnership ordinance in June 2020, allowing three or more committed adults to register and access city-level spousal benefits like hospital visitation and decision-making authority. Similar measures followed in , extending equivalent protections to non-nuclear families. These ordinances, supported by rights groups, stop short of state-recognized plural marriage but provide targeted relief in areas like parental rights, as seen in a ruling recognizing a three-parent polyamorous family. Separate efforts focus on decriminalizing bigamy to enable plural marriage practices, particularly among fundamentalist Mormon communities. Principle Voices, established in October 2003 as a representing polygamous families, lobbies for reduced penalties and improved government relations, estimating around 37,000 adherents in alone based on a 2009 survey. The group endorsed Utah's Senate Bill 102, signed into law on May 12, 2020, which reclassified consensual bigamy from a third-degree to an infraction equivalent to a violation, while retaining status for coerced unions. Principle Voices contends this reform protects children and reduces underground vulnerabilities without endorsing expansion. Proponents of broader legalization, including some legal scholars, frame plural marriage as an extension of marriage equality principles, arguing it would safeguard property division, spousal support, and child welfare in diverse structures. They cite potential economic benefits, such as decreased through formalized plural households, though such claims rely on theoretical models rather than large-scale longitudinal data. Critics within advocacy circles, however, distinguish polyamory's emphasis on egalitarian consent from historical , limiting pushes for state-sanctioned multi-spouse marriage to avoid endorsing unequal power dynamics observed in empirical studies of global practices.

High-Profile Cases and Enforcement Challenges

In the United States, one notable case involved , a self-professed fundamentalist Mormon, who was convicted in 2001 on four counts of bigamy in after marrying multiple women and fathering children with them while still legally wed. The prosecution highlighted Green's public advocacy for , which drew media attention and underscored tensions between religious practices and state law. Similarly, in the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (FLDS), leaders faced charges related to plural marriages; for instance, Wendell Loy Nielsen, a lieutenant to , was convicted in 2012 on three counts of bigamy following a raid on an FLDS ranch. These cases often intertwined bigamy with allegations of sexual assault, as seen in Jeffs' 2011 life sentence for sexually assaulting minors in polygamous arrangements, though direct bigamy convictions were rarer. The reality television family from , led by Kody Brown, challenged Utah's bigamy statute in 2011, arguing it violated First Amendment rights; a federal court ruled in 2013 that the cohabitation provision was unconstitutional, paving the way for Utah's 2020 law reducing most bigamy offenses to infractions unless involving or . More recently, in 2023, Kevin Coleman, who posed as a and maintained at least 10 purported wives, pleaded guilty to bigamy in , receiving probation after admitting to the plural unions for personal gain. Internationally, enforcement has varied. In the , received a 10-month in 2009 for bigamy after marrying five men while legally wed to another, illustrating lighter penalties for non-violent cases. In , former banker was executed in 2021 for and bigamy, having maintained multiple wives amid of over $260 million, reflecting severe penalties when combined with economic crimes. A 2025 case in saw Indian-origin Vaithialingam Muthukumar jailed for bigamy after his first wife discovered his secret second marriage during . Prosecuting bigamy presents significant challenges, primarily in proving the elements of a legal first concurrent with a second union, often requiring documentation that defendants conceal or dispute. In polygamist communities, such as FLDS enclaves, insular social structures deter witnesses from cooperating due to fear of or retaliation, complicating evidence gathering. Religious freedom claims frequently lead to constitutional challenges, as in the litigation, reducing prosecutorial priority unless abuse is evident. Jurisdictional issues arise when practitioners relocate to areas with lax enforcement, like from to , exploiting varying state s. Digital records and cross-border marriages further hinder verification, while underreporting persists in immigrant or culturally permissive groups where plural unions are normalized but undocumented. Overall, bigamy prosecutions remain infrequent, often bundled with or exploitation to justify resources, reflecting enforcement's dependence on accompanying harms rather than the act alone.

Empirical Critiques of Plural Marriage Systems

Empirical research on plural marriage systems, predominantly focusing on due to its prevalence in studied societies, reveals patterns of adverse outcomes for participants, particularly women and children. A of studies across multiple countries found that women in polygamous marriages exhibit significantly higher rates of psychological distress, including depression (prevalence up to 47% higher than in monogamous unions), anxiety, and somatic symptoms, attributed to factors such as , resource , and emotional by husbands. Similarly, children in these families demonstrate elevated risks of issues, with adolescents reporting lower and higher hostility compared to peers from monogamous households. These findings persist after controlling for socioeconomic variables, though correlational designs limit strict causal attribution. Child health and survivorship metrics further underscore critiques, with demographic analyses from showing children in polygynous households facing 20-50% higher under-five mortality rates than those in monogamous ones, linked to diluted and nutritional shortfalls. Historical data from 19th-century Mormon communities corroborate this, revealing statistically insignificant but directionally positive associations between and child death rates, potentially exacerbated by larger family sizes straining resources. In contrast, data on consensual non-monogamous or polyamorous arrangements in Western contexts remain limited and mixed, with small-scale surveys noting child-reported stressors like and relational instability, though without the scale of traditional polygyny's harms. Intimate partner violence emerges as a recurrent empirical concern, with multilevel modeling across 16 sub-Saharan nations indicating women in polygynous unions experience 1.5-2 times higher odds of physical and emotional in the past year, driven by intra-household rivalries and dominance dynamics. Cross-national datasets link to broader inequalities, including justified spousal attitudes (up to 15% higher endorsement rates) and reduced female autonomy in decision-making, perpetuating cycles of subordination. These patterns hold in experimental interventions, such as cash transfers in , where polygamous households showed persistent IPV reductions only when economic pressures eased competition among co-wives. Critics note that while some studies originate from regions with confounding cultural factors, the consistency across datasets—from to —supports causal mechanisms rooted in imbalanced sexual market dynamics and resource allocation under one-male-multiple-females structures.

References

  1. https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6658&context=lalrev
  2. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs297
  3. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/12/07/polygamy-is-rare-around-the-world-and-mostly-confined-to-a-few-regions/
  4. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1288&context=djglp
  5. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/historical-journal/article/bigamous-marriage-in-early-modern-england/0E2AF3EBBD6C701E00F18F0D4BB1921D
  6. https://lawandinequality.org/2021/10/07/constitutional-arguments-for-the-legal-recognition-of-bigamous-marriages/
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8667458/
  8. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bigamy
  9. https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/marriage-requirements-bigamy.html
  10. https://www.besinquelaw.com/what-is-bigamy/
  11. https://www.egattorneys.com/bigamy-penal-code-281
  12. https://www.georgiacriminaldefense.com/blog/bigamy-in-georgia-understanding-the-law-and-consequences/
  13. https://www.etymonline.com/word/bigamy
  14. https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-bigamy-definition-laws-cases.html
  15. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/polygamy
  16. https://thecontentauthority.com/blog/bigamy-vs-concubinage
  17. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/688/love-sex--marriage-in-ancient-mesopotamia/
  18. https://ifstudies.org/blog/our-unequal-polygamous-past
  19. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=djrc
  20. https://www.logos.com/grow/does-jesus-contradict-the-old-testament-on-polygamy/
  21. https://learn.ligonier.org/articles/what-does-the-bible-say-about-polygamy
  22. https://www.str.org/w/polygamy-in-the-bible-is-not-prescriptive
  23. https://africame.factsanddetails.com/article/entry-1117.html
  24. https://heathervoight.com/2025/07/31/marriage-in-ancient-egypt/
  25. https://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/article/1896752/why-polygamy-was-component-imperial-chinas-game-thrones
  26. https://multimedia.scmp.com/culture/article/2154046/forbidden-city/life/chapter_01.html
  27. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03631990221075267
  28. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0424.2010.01598.x
  29. http://laurabetzig.org/pdf/RomanMonogamy.pdf
  30. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/29876
  31. https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/23510/when-did-monogamy-become-the-norm-in-ancient-greece
  32. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0406.htm
  33. https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/bigamy-in-canon-law
  34. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/479173
  35. https://www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2017/11/luther-melanchthon-bigamy-of-philip-of-hesse-is-biblical.html
  36. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/juristcu33&section=26
  37. http://www.johnwittejr.com/the-western-case-for-monogamy-over-polygamy.html
  38. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/24-25/100/section/57/enacted
  39. https://penmansedgwick.com/bigamy/
  40. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/morrill-anti-bigamy-act-of-1862/
  41. https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/the-legislative-antipolygamy-campaign
  42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/753055
  43. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2897657
  44. https://www.academia.edu/116954049/Polygamy_in_the_Old_Testament
  45. https://www.academia.edu/44347562/_The_Wife_of_Ones_Youth_Monogamy_as_an_Ideal_in_Wisdom_Literature_in_Qumran_and_in_Rabbinic_Literature_Hebrew_
  46. https://research.library.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=emw
  47. https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/does-the-bible-permit-polygamy
  48. https://www.gotquestions.org/polygamy.html
  49. https://islamqa.info/en/answers/14022
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394634400_Polygamy_A_Methodological_Analysis_of_Hadith_Studies
  51. https://iqraonline.com/what-are-the-conditions-of-polygamy-in-islam/
  52. https://al-islam.org/articles/polygamy-and-marriages-prophet-muhammad-sayyid-muhammad-rizvi
  53. https://www.quora.com/How-common-is-polygamy-in-Arab-countries
  54. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-where-polygamy-is-legal
  55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7815814/
  56. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20780389.2021.1940946
  57. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=anthrotheses
  58. https://oasis.library.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1139&context=award
  59. https://www.prb.org/resources/polygamy-in-west-africa-impacts-on-fertility-fertility-intentions-and-family-planning/
  60. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2019.00230/full
  61. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep32472
  62. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/02/science/monogamys-boost-to-human-evolution.html
  63. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2011.0290
  64. https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/05/5338/
  65. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-science-history/article/polygamy-the-commodification-of-women-and-underdevelopment/46B0CC134576212650F64E167C8451DE
  66. https://newswirengr.com/2025/10/07/global-marriage-practices-10-countries-where-polygamy-is-legal/
  67. https://docs.un.org/en/CEDAW/C/GC/29
  68. https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/recommendations/recomm.htm
  69. https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/defense/penal-code/281/
  70. https://www.greghillassociates.com/what-is-bigamy-penal-code-281-to-284-punishment.html
  71. https://saputo.law/criminal-law/texas/bigamy/
  72. https://vardags.com/law-guide/legal-marriage-requirements/bigamy-and-polygamy
  73. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/24-25/100/crossheading/bigamy
  74. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/section-291.html
  75. https://www.spectrumfamilylaw.ca/blog/bc/polygamy-laws-in-canada-plus-a-history-possible-loopholes/
  76. https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ma196185/s94.html
  77. https://hugolawgroup.com.au/insights/the-rare-offence-of-bigamy/
  78. https://www.andrewwilliamslawyer.com.au/what-is-the-crime-of-bigamy.html
  79. https://gtclawyers.com.au/bigamy-in-australia/
  80. https://adityaandco.com/bigamy-in-india/
  81. https://preetijd.com/bigamy-second-marriage-laws-under-bns-in-2025/
  82. https://www.drishtijudiciary.com/to-the-point/ttp-hindu-law/bigamy-and-its-punishment
  83. https://womensherald.com/polygamy-womens-rights-and-marital-practices-in-saudi-arabia/
  84. https://www.jaynevytours.com/countries-where-its-legal-to-marry-multiple-people.html
  85. https://fam.state.gov/fam/09FAM/09FAM030212.html
  86. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1528&context=dlj
  87. https://www.justia.com/immigration/naturalization-citizenship/bigamy-polygamy-and-citizenship/
  88. https://www.alllaw.com/resources/immigration-law/applications-and-process/polygamy-bigamy-immigration.html
  89. https://amehdilaw.com/recognition-of-foreign-polygamous-marriages-in-canadian-society-a-brief-overview/
  90. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/other-autre/poly/poly.pdf
  91. https://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/article/polygamous-marriages-and-the-principle-of-mutation-in-the-conflict-of-laws/
  92. https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/are-polyandrous-marriages-ie-where-a-woman-has-more-than-one-husband-recognised-in-england-wales-in
  93. https://www.australianmigrationlawyers.com.au/news-and-updates/polygamous-marriages-and-partner-visas
  94. https://visaenvoy.com/polygamous-marriages-partner-visas/
  95. https://famimove.unimib.it/polygamous-marriages-and-family-reunification-under-eu-and-private-international-law/
  96. https://tlblog.org/a-primer-on-international-family-law/
  97. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9887&context=penn_law_review
  98. https://www.cliniclegal.org/file-download/download/public/72453
  99. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1020925123016.pdf
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3782180/
  101. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283283959_The_effects_of_polygamy_on_children_and_adolescents_a_systematic_review
  102. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.12741
  103. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3974908/
  104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10979923_The_Effect_of_Polygamous_Marital_Structure_on_Behavioral_Emotional_and_Academic_Adjustment_in_Children_A_Comprehensive_Review_of_the_Literature
  105. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3260845/
  106. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380456255_A_Systematic_Review_On_The_Impact_Of_Polygamy_On_Women%27s_Mental_Health
  107. https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-021-04301-7
  108. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1196&context=elj
  109. https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12978-025-02037-7
  110. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13600826.2022.2040444
  111. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/culture-mind-and-brain/201610/did-we-evolve-be-monogamous
  112. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2407785121
  113. https://polyamorylegal.org/
  114. https://polyamorylegal.org/faqs
  115. https://hls.harvard.edu/today/polyamory-and-the-law/
  116. https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-135/threes-company-too-the-emergence-of-polyamorous-partnership-ordinances/
  117. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/01/us/somerville-polyamorous-domestic-partnership.html
  118. https://www.ksl.com/article/7100850/program-increasing-services-to-polygamous-groups
  119. https://www.mormonstories.org/seeking-commentsquestions-for-my-next-interview-polygamy-spokeswoman-anne-b-wilde/
  120. https://le.utah.gov/~2020/bills/static/SB0102.html
  121. https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/12/us/bigamy-decriminalized-utah-trnd
  122. https://www.deseret.com/2008/7/26/20266009/pro-polygamy-group-strives-to-educate/
  123. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1200&context=elj
  124. https://sunstone.org/legalizing-polygamy/
  125. http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/05/19/utah.polygamy/
  126. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/warren-jeffs-lieutenant-found-guilty-three-counts-bigamy-flna584675
  127. https://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/08/09/texas.polygamist.jeffs/
  128. https://news.sky.com/story/sister-wives-tv-polygamists-win-bigamy-case-10424388
  129. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/13/us/utah-bigamy-law.html
  130. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/21/us/pastor-bishop-houston-wives-bigamy.html
  131. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/jul/27/serial-bigamist-emily-horne
  132. https://www.france24.com/en/asia-pacific/20210129-china-executes-ex-banker-lai-xiaomin-in-corruption-bigamy-case
  133. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/rest-of-world/pure-chance-indian-origin-man-jailed-for-bigamy-in-singapore-was-exposed-at-hospital-after-second-wifes-childbirth/articleshow/123480882.cms
  134. https://attorneys.media/bigamy/
  135. https://www.aetv.com/articles/why-is-polygamy-not-prosecuted-in-us
  136. https://dc.law.utah.edu/ulr/vol2016/iss5/2/
  137. https://www.facebook.com/groups/509234674514346/posts/873884908049319/
  138. https://smart.dhgate.com/why-is-bigamy-illegal-legal-and-historical-reasons/
  139. https://www.lawinfo.com/resources/family-law/bigamy-vs-polygamy.html
  140. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385286260_The_Idiocy_of_Polygamy
  141. https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol39/6/39-6.pdf
  142. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11150-016-9353-x
  143. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279456619_Children_in_Polyamorous_Families_A_First_Empirical_Look
  144. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-025-22581-y
  145. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387818314810
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.