Community hub
0 subscribers7 pages, 0 posts
Recent from talks
All channels
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Welcome to the community hub built to collect knowledge and have discussions related to Clusium.
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Clusium
View on Wikipediafrom Wikipedia
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (March 2019) |
Clusium (Ancient Greek: Κλύσιον, Klýsion, or Κλούσιον, Kloúsion;[1] Umbrian: Camars) was an ancient city in Italy, one of several found at the same site overlapping the current municipality of Chiusi (Tuscany). The Roman city remodeled an earlier Etruscan city, Clevsin, found in the territory of a prehistoric culture, possibly also Etruscan or proto-Etruscan. The site is located in northern central Italy on the west side of the Apennines.[2]
Location
[edit]Chiusi is situated on a hill above the valley of the Clanis river near lake Clusium, both of which features had those names in antiquity. The Clanis is part of the Tiber drainage system and was navigable by boat from there. Rome was also accessed by the via Cassia, which was built over an Etruscan road.
Etruscan history
[edit]
By the time it appears in Livy's History, it is already a major Etruscan city being petitioned for assistance against the republican partisans of ancient Rome.
About its life prior to that time, Livy only makes a brief statement that it was once called Camars.[3]
Villanovan pottery has been found at Chiusi. One common type is a cinerary urn dating to the 8th century BC. These urns are in the shape of wattle-and-daub huts with thatched roofs, presumably the homes of the deceased.[4] This style of architecture is so different from classical Etruscan that many Etruscologists have denied a continuity. On the other hand, it is clear that the people of the region received a strong impetus from Greek colonies such as Cumae[citation needed] and from Greek immigration.[citation needed]
Different theories exist about the city's origin. The minority theory[citation needed] is the Proto-Italic. In this theory, Etruscans from the coast or from the Aegean resettled and renamed an Umbrian city called Camars,[5] which the exponents believe means "marshland" in Italic.[citation needed] On enclosing the city with a wall they changed the name to "enclosure", using an Etruscanized form, Clevsin, of the perfect passive participle, clusus, of Latin cludere, "to close".
The majority theory[citation needed] holds that Clevsin and Camars are more likely Etruscan words. The limited known Etruscan vocabulary[citation needed] includes camthi, the name of a magistracy, which might be segmented cam-thi, where -thi is a known locative ending. -Ar, -arasi, -aras are plural endings of different cases. A cleva is an offering. -S and -isi are genitive and dative endings. A "place of offering" (Clevsin) or "place of magistracies" (Camars) seems entirely harmonious with Etruscan culture and the uses of a regional capital city. The final resolution of the question awaits more evidence.[citation needed]
It is believed that Clusium joined the Etruscan League of twelve cities in the 600s BC, to defend against the Roman king Tarquinius Priscus.[6]
Lars Porsena was king of Clusium in 508 BC. Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, formerly king of Rome, had been expelled along with his family from Rome in 509 BC. He had sought to regain the throne, firstly by the Tarquinian conspiracy and secondly by force of arms. Both attempts had been unsuccessful, the conspiracy having been discovered, and Tarquin's army having been defeated at the Battle of Silva Arsia.
Tarquin convinced Lars Porsena to lead his army against Rome. The war between Clusium and Rome followed, during which Porsena besieged Rome. The siege and the war ended with a peace treaty, by which Porsena received hostages from Rome and returned to Veii lands that had previously been taken by Rome. In 507 BC Rome's hostages and lands were restored, and peace between Rome and Porsena was cemented. Tarquinius was not restored to the Roman throne.[7]
In 508 BC, after the siege of Rome, Porsena split his forces and sent part of the Clusian army with his son Aruns to besiege the Latin city of Aricia. The Clusians besieged Aricia; however the Aricians sent for assistance from the Latin League and from Cumae, and the Clusian army was defeated in battle.[8]
Pliny the Elder wrote that a magnificent tomb was built for Porsena; a large mausoleum surrounded by cascades of pyramids over a labyrinth of underground chambers in which an intruder could get lost. Pliny never saw this tomb, so his description was based on a report from Varro and perhaps a conflated comparison to the Minoan labyrinths he describes before this tomb. Large-sized tumuli of the late archaic period were built at Chiusi, and modern scholars have tried to associate these (especially Poggio Gaiella) with the legendary tomb of Porsena.[9]
In the early 4th century BC (391 BC according to Varronian chronology) it was besieged by Gauls, and the Clusines called upon Rome to intermediate. However, in the following negotiations, one of the Roman delegates, of the gens Fabia, killed a Gallic leader. When the Romans refused to hand over the Fabii and in fact appointed two members of the family as consuls for the next year, the enraged Gauls broke up their siege and under the leadership of Brennus they marched onto and subsequently sacked Rome.
Roman history
[edit]At the time of the invasion of the Gauls in 391 BC, Clusium was on friendly terms with Rome. It was once thought that it was the action of the Roman envoys who had come to intercede for the people of Clusium with the Gauls, and then, contrary to international law, took part in the battle which followed, which determined the Gauls to march on Rome; whether this was true or not, the Gauls needed no real provocation.[10] Near Clusium too, according to Livy, a battle occurred in 296 BC between the Gauls and Samnites combined, and the Romans; a little later the united forces of Clusium and Perusia were defeated by the Romans. The precise period at which Clusium came under Roman supremacy is, however, uncertain, though this must have happened before 225 BC, when the Gauls advanced as far as Clusium. In 205 BC, during the Second Punic War it was reported that they promised ship timber and corn to Scipio Africanus.[6]
The Via Cassia, constructed after 187 BC, passed just below the town. In Sulla's civil war, Papirius Carbo took up his position here, and two battles occurred in the neighbourhood. Sulla appears to have increased the number of colonists, and a statue was certainly erected in his honour here. In imperial times we hear little of it, though its grain and grapes were famous. Christianity found its way into Clusium as early as the 3rd century, and the tombstone of a bishop of AD 322 exists. In 540, it was named as a strong place to which the Ostrogothic king Vitiges sent a garrison of a thousand men.[6]
Archaeology
[edit]The site of ancient Clusium was reoccupied in Roman and later times, obscuring and obliterating much of the Etruscan layers. For example, the ancient sources describe the tomb of Lars Porsena at Clusium as well as the sacking and levelling of the city by Sulla. Much of what remains are its tombs and its underground passages, some of which might have been associated with the monument to Porsena.
The following description from the early 20th century shows that excavation of the ancient site had by then been extensive. Of pre-Roman or Roman buildings in the town itself, there are few remains, except for some fragments of the Etruscan town walls composed of rather small rectangular blocks of travertine, built into the medieval fortifications. Under it, however, extends an elaborate system of rock-cut passages, probably drains. The chief interest of the place lies in its extensive necropolis, which surrounds the city on all sides. The earliest tombs (tombe a pozzo, shaft tombs) precede Greek importation. There are no tombe a fosso, and the next stage is marked by the so-called tombe a ziro, in which the cinerary urn (often with a human head) is placed in a large clay jar. These belong to the 7th century BC, and are followed by the tombe a camera, in which the tomb is a chamber hewn in the rock, and which can be traced back to the beginning of the 6th century BC. From one of the earliest of these came the famous François Vase; another is the tomb of Poggio Renzo, or della Scimmia (the monkey), with several chambers decorated with archaic paintings. The most remarkable group of tombs is, however, that of Poggio Gaiella, 3 miles to the north, where the hill is honeycombed with chambers in three storeys (however, much ruined and inaccessible), partly connected by a system of passages, and supported at the base by a stone wall which forms a circle and not a square, a fact which renders impossible its identification with the tomb of Porsena. Other noteworthy tombs are those of the Granduca, with a single subterranean chamber carefully constructed in travertine, and containing eight sarcophagi of the same material; of Vigna Grande, very similar to this; of Colle Casuccini (the ancient stone door of which is still in working order), with two chambers, containing paintings representing funeral rites; of Poggio Moro and Valdacqua, in the former of which the paintings are almost destroyed, while the latter is now inaccessible.[6]
A conception of the size of the whole necropolis may be gathered from the fact that nearly three thousand Etruscan inscriptions have come to light from Clusium and its district alone, while the part of Etruria north of it as far as the Arno has produced barely five hundred. Among the later tombs, bilingual inscriptions are by no means rare, and both Etruscan and Latin inscriptions are often found in the same cemeteries, showing that the use of the Etruscan language only died out gradually. A large number of the inscriptions are painted upon the tiles that closed the niches containing the cinerary urns. The urns themselves are small, often of terracotta, originally painted, though the majority of them have lost their colour, and rectangular. In Roman times, the territory of Clusium seems to have extended as far as Lake Trasimeno.[6]
Two Christian catacombs were found near Clusium, one in the hill of Santa Caterina near the railway station, the inscriptions of which seem to go back to the 3rd century, another 1 mile to the east in a hill on which a church and monastery of St Mustiola stood, which goes back to the 4th century, including among its inscriptions one bearing the date 303, and the tombstone of L. Petronius Dexter, bishop of Clusium, who died in 322. The total number of Etruscan inscriptions known in Clusium is nearly 3,000.[6]
In 2004 Professor of Urban Restoration Giuseppe Centauro suggested that the traditional location of Clusium at Chiusi is wrong and that it is near Florence.[11] As of 2008 he was trying to raise money and get permission to excavate.[12]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Polybius, Histories, 2:25:2
- ^ George Dennis (1848). The Cities and Cemeteries of Etruria. John Murray. pp. 327–.
- ^ Liv. 10.25.11.2 http://latin.packhum.org/loc/914/1/508/1773-1779
- ^ Louise Adams Holland (1925). The Faliscans in prehistoric times. American Academy in Rome.
- ^ Luisa Banti (1973). Etruscan Cities and Their Culture. University of California Press. pp. 162–. ISBN 978-0-520-01910-2.
- ^ a b c d e f One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Ashby, Thomas (1911). "Clusium". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 6 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 570–571.
- ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 2.9-15
- ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 2.14
- ^ William M. Gaugler (January 2002). The Tomb of Lars Porsenna at Clusium and Its Religious and Political Implications. Laureate Press. ISBN 978-1-884528-25-5.
- ^ Drummond, Andrew (1996), "Fabius Ambustus, Quintus", in Hornblower, Simon; Spawforth, Antony (eds.), Oxford Classical Dictionary (3rd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-521693-8, OCLC 45857759
- ^ "Lost Italian City dug up in Tuscany" The Sunday Times 18 April 2004 [1]
- ^ "Sotto Prato dorme una città etrusca"
External links
[edit]- Livius.org: Clusium (Chiusi) Archived 2008-08-21 at the Wayback Machine
| Authority control databases: Geographic |
|---|
Clusium
View on Grokipediafrom Grokipedia
Clusium (Etruscan: Clevsin; modern Chiusi) was an ancient city-state of Etruria in central Italy, situated on a hill overlooking the Val di Chiana.[1] Founded amid Villanovan settlements dating to the 8th century BCE, it emerged as one of the twelve principal cities of the Etruscan League by the 7th century BCE and remained a key political and cultural center until its incorporation into the Roman Republic around the 3rd century BCE.[2] Under the kingship of Lars Porsenna in the late 6th century BCE, Clusium led a notable military challenge against early Rome, aiming to restore the exiled Tarquinian monarchy, which underscored its influence in regional power dynamics despite ultimate Roman ascendancy.[3] The city's defining archaeological legacy includes extensive necropoleis with chamber tombs, canopic urns depicting human heads, and bucchero ware pottery, evidencing advanced funerary practices and trade networks that highlight its economic vitality and artistic sophistication.[4]
Geography and Setting
Location and Topography
Clusium occupied a prominent hilltop site in southern Etruria, corresponding to modern Chiusi in Tuscany, central Italy, at coordinates 43°01′N 11°57′E.[3] The city was positioned on an isolated tufa hill that dominated the surrounding landscape, including the broad Val di Chiana to the north and the valley of the Clanis River (modern Chiana), which flowed through fertile lowlands supporting agriculture.[1][5] This elevated terrain, rising approximately 250 meters above sea level near Lake Clusium (modern Lago di Chiusi at 251 meters), provided inherent defensive strengths through steep slopes and panoramic oversight of approaching routes and valleys.[6][5] The site's strategic vantage extended over a territory bounded northwest by the Ombrone River and south by the Paglia River, facilitating control of trade paths and agricultural resources in the region.[1][5]Natural Resources and Strategic Importance
Clusium's territory encompassed fertile alluvial plains in the Clanis (modern Chiana) valley, supporting intensive agriculture including grain cultivation and viticulture, which formed the economic backbone of the settlement from the Villanovan period onward.[7] Adjacent forests supplied timber for construction and fuel, while the surrounding wetlands and Lake Clusium (Lago di Chiusi) provided resources such as fish, waterfowl, and possibly reeds for crafts.[2] The city's hinterland extended to mineral-rich areas, notably Mount Amiata to the southwest, where deposits of iron, copper, and other metals were exploited, contributing to Etruscan metallurgical industries and trade networks.[8] These resources underpinned Clusium's prosperity as one of Etruria's twelve principal cities, enabling surplus production that fueled artisanal output, such as the bucchero pottery and bronze work characteristic of the region.[4] However, extraction was limited compared to coastal centers like Populonia, with inland mining focused on smaller-scale operations suited to local demands rather than export dominance.[9] Strategically, Clusium occupied an elevated plateau approximately 250 meters above the valley floor, offering natural fortifications against invaders and overlooking key transit corridors between northern Etruria, Umbria, and the Roman sphere.[10] This position controlled inland routes linking Etruscan urban centers and facilitated military campaigns, as evidenced by King Lars Porsenna's expedition against Rome circa 508 BCE, leveraging the city's access to the Tiber valley approaches.[11] The site's role as a northern bulwark was further highlighted during the Gallic incursion of 390 BCE, when its siege precipitated broader threats to Roman territories, underscoring Clusium's function as a defensive pivot in Etruscan confederation dynamics.[4] By the late Republic, its alignment with the Via Cassia amplified this importance, though ancient preeminence derived primarily from topographic dominance over the fertile yet vulnerable lowlands.[12]Etymology and Nomenclature
Ancient Names and Linguistic Origins
The primary ancient name for the city in Etruscan inscriptions is Clevsin (or Clevsi), attested in texts dating from the 7th to 5th centuries BCE, reflecting its status as a major Etruscan settlement.[3] [13] In Latin sources from the Roman Republic onward, it was rendered as Clusium, a form that persisted into imperial times and emphasized the city's fortified, hilltop position.[4] Greek writers, such as those in the Hellenistic period, transcribed it as Klýsion (Κλύσιον) or Kloúsion (Κλούσιον), adaptations likely influenced by phonetic approximations of the Etruscan original.[14] An earlier or alternative designation, Camars, appears in Umbrian contexts and some Etruscan traditions, possibly denoting the site's marshy surroundings—translated as "surrounded by bogs"—consistent with the topography near Lake Chiusi and prehistoric wetlands.[4] This name may represent a pre-Etruscan or indigenous Italic layer, with linguistic ties to Umbrian Camars and nearby Camerino, suggesting continuity from proto-Italic speakers before Etruscan dominance around the 8th century BCE.[13] The shift to Clevsin aligns with Etruscan settlement expansion, as evidenced by Villanovan-era artifacts predating full urbanization. Linguistically, Clevsin derives from Etruscan clevsi, a non-Indo-European root whose precise meaning remains debated but may evoke enclosure or closure, mirroring the city's defensive walls and isolated eminence.[14] The Latin Clusium likely borrowed directly from this, without deeper semantic evolution, as Roman nomenclature often preserved Etruscan phonology for conquered sites; no Indo-European cognate is firmly established, underscoring Etruscan's isolate status amid Italic languages.[13] Inscriptions like those on cinerary urns from Chiusi confirm the form's use in proper names and toponyms, linking it to Etruscan onomastic patterns rather than Greek or Umbrian innovations.[3]Origins and Early Development
Prehistoric Settlements
The earliest evidence of human settlement in the Clusium area dates to the late Bronze Age, during the late second millennium BCE, when small villages of shepherds and farmers were established on the surrounding hills.[7] These proto-urban communities likely exploited the fertile Val di Chiana valley for agriculture and pastoralism, reflecting broader patterns of Bronze Age occupation in inland Etruria associated with the Apennine culture.[15] Archaeological finds from this period, including pottery and tools, indicate continuity into the subsequent Final Bronze Age, with sites such as La Rocca near Chiusi showing evidence of fortified hilltop habitations transitioning toward early Iron Age patterns.[16] The National Etruscan Museum in Chiusi houses artifacts from the Bronze Age, underscoring localized activity prior to the Villanovan phase, though systematic excavations remain limited compared to later Etruscan remains.[17][18] No substantial Neolithic or Chalcolithic settlements have been identified directly at Clusium, suggesting the site's strategic hilltop position gained prominence only in the later prehistoric era amid regional population movements and resource exploitation in Tuscany's interior.[19]Villanovan and Proto-Etruscan Phases
The earliest archaeological evidence for Clusium (modern Chiusi) emerges from the Villanovan culture, an Iron Age tradition spanning roughly 900–700 BCE, marked by nucleated settlements on tufa hills and extensive necropolises featuring cremation burials in biconical urns housed in deep pit graves (pozzi).[20] These finds indicate continuity from late Bronze Age occupations in the Chiana Valley's southern hills, such as Poggio La Rocca, Poggio Falterona, and Poggio Renzo, where early Iron Age activity intensified around the 9th–8th centuries BCE, transitioning from dispersed proto-urban clusters to more organized habitation.[16] Villanovan tombs at Clusium, concentrated in areas like Poggio Renzo, reveal simple ceramic urns often topped with impasto lids mimicking hut roofs, accompanied by grave goods including bronze fibulae, iron weapons, and spindle whorls, suggesting a community engaged in agriculture, metallurgy, and textile production.[16] This phase aligns with broader proto-Etruscan developments in inland Etruria, where Clusium stood as one of the oldest Villanovan settlements, predating full urban coalescence but evidencing social stratification through varying tomb sizes and offerings.[1] By the late 8th to early 7th centuries BCE, the proto-Etruscan phase saw evolutionary shifts, with urn forms gaining complexity—evolving toward chamber tombs and early canopic features—reflecting cultural exchanges and technological advances like improved wheel-thrown pottery, though Clusium retained distinct local traits amid emerging Etruscan linguistic and ritual practices.[20] Excavations yield evidence of sustained settlement without major disruption, underpinning Clusium's role as a strategic inland node by the Orientalizing period's onset around 700 BCE.[16]Etruscan Clusium
Political Organization and the Etruscan League
Clusium operated as an independent city-state with a monarchical government during its early Etruscan phase, exemplified by the rule of Lars Porsena around 508 BCE, who commanded military campaigns against Rome on behalf of the exiled Tarquinian kings.[21] This kingship, termed lucumo in Etruscan contexts, concentrated executive, military, and religious authority in a single ruler, reflecting the theocratic elements common in Etruscan polities where leaders derived legitimacy from divine auspices and priestly roles.[9] Archaeological evidence from Clusium's necropoleis and inscriptions supports hereditary elite families dominating governance, with transitions toward oligarchic structures by the 5th century BCE, involving collegiate magistrates such as the zilath (chief executive) elected annually to oversee assemblies and senatorial councils. Clusium participated in the Etruscan League, a loose confederation of twelve city-states known as the dodecapolis, which emerged in the 7th–6th centuries BCE primarily for religious festivals, mutual defense, and periodic political consultations rather than centralized governance. The league convened at the sanctuary of Voltumna near Volsinii, where representatives from cities including Clusium, Veii, Tarquinii, and Caere deliberated on common threats, such as Roman expansion, without subordinating individual city autonomy.[5] Clusium's integration into this alliance, likely formalized around the 600s BCE, enhanced its strategic position amid rivalries with emerging Latin powers, though the confederation's effectiveness waned by the 4th century BCE due to internal divisions and external pressures.Economy, Trade, and Social Structure
The economy of Clusium centered on agriculture in the fertile Clanis valley, where cultivation of grains such as barley and millet, alongside olives and vines, supported local sustenance and surplus for trade. Deposits of iron and copper ore enabled metallurgical activities, contributing to regional prosperity alongside natural hot springs. Archaeological surveys indicate enhanced agricultural exploitation through improved tools, yielding products like olive oil and wine by the 6th century BCE.[9][22] Craft production in Clusium included bucchero pottery, characterized by its burnished black surface, as well as bronze cauldrons and fine stone sculpture, evident from 6th-century BCE artifacts. These goods formed part of broader Etruscan exports, with Clusium's inland position facilitating distribution through overland routes to coastal emporia such as Cerveteri and Tarquinia. Trade involved bartering agricultural staples and manufactures for imports like Attic pottery, ivory from Egypt, and amber, as attested by grave goods in elite tombs from the 7th to 5th centuries BCE, reflecting growing wealth and Greek-Phoenician contacts.[22][23] Social structure in Clusium mirrored broader Etruscan hierarchies, emphasizing extended family and clan units that maintained separate burial grounds and derived status from kinship ties. An aristocratic elite, including monarchs like Porsenna who wielded religious and political authority symbolized by fasces, dominated land ownership, trade, and governance, evolving toward elected magistrates by later periods. Lower strata comprised artisans, farmers, merchants, clients, serfs, and slaves, with tomb evidence suggesting limited social mobility and elite display through monumental burials containing metal objects and imports; women held elevated roles, inheriting property and participating in public life.[24][24][23]Religion, Art, and Cultural Practices
![Etruscan urn from the Pietro Bonci Casuccini collection in the Antonino Salinas Regional Archaeological Museum, Palermo][float-right] The religion of Etruscan Clusium adhered to the polytheistic and animistic framework typical of Etruscan spirituality, where divine forces manifested in natural events and required consultation through divination methods such as haruspicy and augury. Priests, known as haruspices, examined animal entrails and observed bird flights to interpret omens, guiding civic and personal decisions; this practice is evidenced indirectly through the broader Etruscan cultural context and textual references to leaders like Lars Porsena invoking divine oaths. Tombs in Clusium reveal ritual elements, including processions and offerings, indicating beliefs in an afterlife populated by ancestral spirits demanding propitiation.[25][26] Artistic expression in Clusium focused heavily on funerary contexts, with rock-cut tombs adorned by frescoes depicting vibrant scenes of banquets, dances, and daily activities that conveyed status and continuity with the living world. The Tomba della Scimmia, excavated near Chiusi and dating to the 5th-4th centuries BCE, features wall paintings of reclining figures, musicians, and attendants in dynamic poses, showcasing a local style with expressive figures differing from southern Etruscan counterparts like those at Tarquinia. Cinerary urns, often carved from local stone such as travertine or alabaster, bore sculpted lids portraying deceased individuals reclining as if in eternal repose, accompanied by narrative friezes; examples from the Colle Casuccini tomb highlight this craftsmanship.[27] ![Bucchero chalice, Louvre][center] Clusium contributed to Etruscan ceramic traditions, including bucchero ware—a fine, black-gloss pottery produced via reduction firing from the 7th to 5th centuries BCE, used for vessels in both ritual and domestic settings. Northern Etruscan workshops, including those near Clusium, specialized in heavier forms of bucchero (bucchero pesante) with incised or molded decorations imitating metalwork.[28][29] Cultural practices emphasized communal banquets and funerary rites, as illustrated in tomb art where elites, including women, participated in symposia with wine libations and entertainment, reflecting social hierarchies and gender inclusivity uncommon in contemporary Greek societies. These depictions suggest rituals aimed at sustaining the deceased through periodic feasts, with grave goods like pottery and jewelry interred to equip the afterlife journey. Divination informed warfare and governance, aligning with Etruscan causal emphasis on omens preceding events like the Gallic interactions in the 4th century BCE.[30][27]Military History and External Relations
Conflicts with Latin and Greek Cities
Around 508 BC, Clusium, under King Lars Porsena, initiated a war against Aricia, a prominent Latin city in the Alban Hills, primarily over control of the sacred grove of Diana Nemorensis, a site of religious and territorial significance.[31] The dispute escalated when the exiled Roman king Tarquinius Superbus, seeking Etruscan support for his restoration, joined Porsena's forces, providing military expertise and reinforcing Clusium's campaign against the Latin settlement.[32] Aricia sought aid from Cumae, a Greek colony in Campania, whose tyrant Aristodemus mobilized troops to bolster the Latin defenders.[31] In the ensuing Battle of Aricia, circa 505 BC, the combined Latin-Greek forces decisively defeated the Etruscan army from Clusium and its allies, capturing numerous Tyrrhenian (Etruscan) prisoners and halting Porsena's expansion southward.[32] This engagement highlighted Clusium's ambitions to extend influence into Latin territories but also demonstrated the effectiveness of Greco-Latin alliances against Etruscan incursions, foreshadowing broader regional tensions.[31] No other major direct conflicts between Clusium and Greek colonies are recorded, as Clusium's inland position limited its involvement in southern maritime disputes typical of coastal Etruscan cities like Tarquinia. With Latin cities beyond Aricia, interactions remained tied to the Etruscan League's collective pressures on Rome and its neighbors, though Clusium's role diminished after this period in favor of diplomatic alignments.[32]The Reign of Lars Porsena
Lars Porsena, also known as Porsenna, served as lucumo (king) of Clusium, a leading Etruscan city-state, during the late 6th century BCE, with his rule centered around the period of Rome's transition to republican governance.[33] As a prominent figure among the Etruscan elite, he commanded significant military resources, reflecting Clusium's status as one of the twelve cities of the Etruscan League, though his precise tenure lacks fixed dates due to the scarcity of contemporary inscriptions. Roman annalistic traditions, such as those preserved in Livy and Dionysius of Halicarnassus, depict him as a formidable ruler whose actions extended Clusium's influence southward, but these accounts, composed centuries later, emphasize Roman resilience over Etruscan triumphs, potentially minimizing Porsena's achievements to bolster narratives of republican fortitude.[33] In circa 508 BCE, following the exile of Rome's last king, Tarquinius Superbus, Porsena intervened at the Tarquins' behest to restore the monarchy, launching a campaign that culminated in the siege of Rome. He assembled a large Etruscan force, advancing along the Tiber River and establishing camps on the Janiculum Hill, where his troops reportedly numbered in the tens of thousands, though exact figures vary across sources. Key episodes include the defense of the Sublician Bridge by Horatius Cocles, who held off pursuers to allow its destruction, and the failed assassination attempt by Gaius Mucius Scaevola, who infiltrated Porsena's camp but slew the wrong man, leading to the famous tale of burning his own hand without flinching; these anecdotes, drawn from Livy (Ab Urbe Condita 2.10–13) and Dionysius (Roman Antiquities 5.21–35), underscore Roman valor but rely on oral traditions prone to embellishment.[33] The siege ended in a negotiated peace rather than outright conquest, with Rome conceding Veii's disputed territories, surrendering hostages including noblewomen, and granting free navigation of the Tiber for Etruscan trade, terms that temporarily humbled the fledgling republic without restoring Tarquin. Alternative local traditions from Clusium and other Etruscan sites suggest Porsena achieved greater success, possibly occupying Rome briefly and installing Tarquin as a client ruler before withdrawing, a view supported by later historians like Cassius Dio but contested due to the pro-Roman bias in primary narratives.[33] Following the Roman campaign, Porsena redirected efforts southward, besieging the Latin city of Aricia around 506 BCE in alliance with Tarquin, only to face defeat by a Cumaean-led Greek coalition, marking a limit to his expansionist ambitions. Porsena's reign reinforced Clusium's regional power, evidenced by its continued prosperity in subsequent decades, though no direct archaeological artifacts confirm his personal rule amid the city's broader Villanovan-to-Orientalizing material culture.[33] His legacy endures in legends of a vast mausoleum in Clusium—described by Pliny the Elder as a massive wheeled structure rivaling pyramids—but unexcavated and likely exaggerated, highlighting the blend of history and myth in Etruscan-Roman relations.[33] Scholarly consensus views him as a real historical figure whose campaigns checked Roman growth, preserving Etruscan autonomy until later Celtic incursions.[33]The Gallic Sack and Its Aftermath
In 391 BC, the Senones, a Gallic tribe led by Brennus, invaded Etruria and laid siege to Clusium, demanding a share of its lands amid their southward migration and population pressures.[11] Clusium's leaders refused the demand and, anticipating defeat against the numerically superior force of approximately 30,000 Gauls, dispatched envoys to Rome seeking military aid.[34] The Roman Senate responded by sending three ambassadors from the prominent Fabian family—Quintus Fabius Ambustus and his two sons or brothers—to negotiate with the Gauls on Clusium's behalf.[4] The Roman envoys initially urged the Gauls to withdraw but, upon observing a skirmish from Clusium's walls, violated their diplomatic neutrality by arming themselves and charging into battle alongside Clusian forces.[35] This intervention routed a Gallic detachment but enraged Brennus, who identified the Roman participants and appealed to Roman fetial priests for justice; the priests, upholding the breach of foedus (treaty of hospitality), declared war.[36] The Gauls lifted the siege on Clusium proper, redirecting their army of roughly 30,000 toward Rome, where they decisively defeated Roman legions at the Battle of the Allia on July 18, 390 BC (or 387 BC by the Roman calendar), before sacking the city and occupying it for seven months.[37] Clusium escaped direct sacking, though its surrounding territories suffered devastation from Gallic foraging and reprisals during the initial siege.[4] The diversion of Gallic forces to Rome preserved Clusium's urban core and fortifications, but the event underscored the city's vulnerability and cemented its tactical alliance with Rome against the barbarian threat—contrasting with other Etruscan polities' hostilities toward Roman expansion.[11] In the immediate aftermath, as the Gauls withdrew northward after extracting 1,000 talents of gold from Rome (later contested by Camillus' forces at the city's recovery), Clusium faced no further direct incursions from Brennus' army, which fragmented into settlements in Cisalpine Gaul.[34] This respite allowed Clusium to rebuild agrarian resources, but the broader incursion accelerated Etruria's decline by introducing persistent Gallic pressures in the Po Valley, straining trade routes and military capacities across the region.[36] The incident fostered enduring Roman-Clusian diplomatic ties, positioning Clusium as a Roman ally in subsequent conflicts and facilitating its integration into Roman spheres by the late 4th century BC, amid Rome's post-sack military reforms and consolidation over central Italy.[11] Unlike adversarial Etruscan cities such as Tarquinii, which rebelled post-390 BC, Clusium's cooperation mitigated immediate Roman reprisals, though it contributed to the erosion of independent Etruscan league autonomy.[4] Archaeological evidence from Clusium's necropoleis shows continuity in elite burial practices through the late 4th century, indicating social stability despite the turmoil, with no marked disruptions attributable to the Gallic episode.[34]Transition to Roman Control
Initial Roman Interactions
In 391 BC, Clusium appealed to Rome for military assistance against the invading Senones Gauls led by Brennus, reflecting friendly relations between the two powers at the time.[11] Rome dispatched three envoys from the Fabii family to mediate, but they violated diplomatic neutrality by participating in combat on Clusium's behalf during a sortie against the Gauls.[4] The Gauls, outraged by this breach of ius gentium, demanded the envoys' extradition; Rome's refusal and subsequent election of the Fabii as tribunes escalated the conflict, prompting the Gauls to march on Rome, culminating in the Battle of the Allia and the sack of the city in 390 BC.[4] This episode, while straining immediate ties, underscored Clusium's strategic value as a northern ally amid Gallic threats, though it indirectly contributed to Rome's humiliation. Relations deteriorated in the late 4th century BC amid Rome's expansionist campaigns. During the Third Samnite War (298–290 BC), Clusium allied with the Samnites, Gauls, and other Etruscan cities in an anti-Roman coalition, participating in hostilities that included skirmishes near its territory.[1] Roman forces, under consuls Lucius Postumius Megellus and Marcus Fulvius, conducted diversionary attacks on Clusium to disrupt the coalition's coordination.[38] The decisive Roman victory at the Battle of Sentinum in 295 BC shattered the alliance; in its aftermath, Clusium was subdued and compelled to submit, marking a pivotal shift from autonomy to Roman hegemony in northern Etruria.[1] Livy records this subjugation as part of Rome's consolidation of control over Etruscan territories following the coalition's defeat (Livy 10.30).[1] Post-submission, Clusium transitioned to a client status, providing auxiliary troops and resources to Rome during subsequent conflicts, including campaigns against lingering Gallic groups and the Second Punic War (218–201 BC).[39] This alignment facilitated gradual Roman administrative influence, though full civic incorporation as a municipium occurred later, in the 1st century BC, amid extensions of citizenship following the Social War.[40] Archaeological evidence, such as Roman-style fortifications and inscriptions from the 3rd century BC onward, corroborates this evolving dependency without immediate cultural erasure.[4]Incorporation as a Municipium
Clusium was formally incorporated as a Roman municipium in 87 BC, following the extension of Roman citizenship to loyal Italian communities in the aftermath of the Social War (91–88 BC).[40] This status granted its inhabitants full Roman citizenship while allowing the city to retain a degree of local self-governance, including magistrates and a municipal senate, under Roman oversight.[41] The incorporation aligned with the creation of new voting tribes for newly enfranchised citizens, assigning Clusium to the tribus Arnensis, as recorded by Pliny the Elder. Prior to this, Clusium had maintained generally amicable relations with Rome since the late fourth century BC, avoiding direct conquest and participating in alliances against common threats, such as the Gallic incursions of 390 BC and 225 BC, during which Roman legions intervened to defend the city.[42] Unlike many central Italian allies that rebelled during the Social War seeking enfranchisement, Clusium appears not to have joined the uprising, likely due to its peripheral Etruscan position and established ties, facilitating a smoother integration rather than forcible subjugation.[43] As a municipium, Clusium's elite adopted Roman legal and administrative practices, with evidence of Latin inscriptions and Roman-style magistracies emerging shortly thereafter, marking the culmination of gradual Romanization that had intensified since the third century BC.[41] This status preserved the city's territorial integrity and economic role while binding it irrevocably to the Roman state, contributing to the homogenization of Italy under republican rule.Roman Urban and Administrative Changes
Following its incorporation into the Roman state after the Social War (91–88 BC), Clusium achieved the status of a municipium civium Romanorum with civitas optimo iure through the Lex Plautia Papiria of 89 BC, granting full Roman citizenship rights while retaining local autonomy under Roman oversight.[44][40] This administrative shift integrated the city into the ager Romanus, assigned to the tribus Arnensis, with local governance evolving from Etruscan structures to Roman magistracies: initially quattuorviri in the 1st century BC, transitioning to duoviri by the early 1st–2nd century AD.[44] Etruscan elites adapted through bilingual inscriptions (e.g., CIL XI 2357, 2463), maintaining influence amid gradual Romanization, though some debate persists over a possible brief Sullan colonial phase around 80 BC, as hinted in Pliny the Elder (Naturalis Historia 3.52).[44] Urban development proceeded more conservatively than in southern Etruria, building atop the Etruscan layout without radical replanning, as evidenced by limited excavations revealing continuity in settlement patterns post-Battle of Sentino (295 BC).[44] The forum, identified in early topographical studies, served as the civic core but lacked extensive monumentalization compared to larger Roman centers.[44] Public infrastructure emphasized connectivity, with the Via Cassia—constructed around 171 or 154 BC by C. Cassius Longinus—traversing the territory, later augmented by the Via Traiana Nova (108–109 AD) and restored under Hadrian (123 AD), supported by milestones (e.g., CIL XI 6668) and a curator viae.[44] Surviving elements include a 1st-century BC porticus renovated by quattuorviri and roadside curbstones (viae crepidines), alongside dedications to Romanized deities like Victoria, Hercules, Mercury, and Diana, reflecting localized cult adaptations.[44] Defensive walls, referenced in epigraphic findspots, persisted with Roman modifications, though archaeological traces remain sparse due to overlying medieval and modern occupation.[44] Water management is inferred from cults like Hercules Salutaris but lacks confirmed aqueducts; nearby rural sites, such as cisterns and villas near Chianciano, indicate suburban expansion tied to elite estates.[44] No theaters or amphitheaters are attested, underscoring Clusium's modest imperial-scale growth, sustained into the 4th century AD via epigraphy (e.g., CIL XI 2095–2122) documenting military presence and social continuity.[44] Overall, these changes prioritized administrative assimilation and infrastructural linkage over transformative urbanism, preserving Etruscan topographic features amid Roman legal and elite integration.[44]Archaeology
Major Necropoleis and Tombs
The necropoleis of Clusium encircled the ancient city, with major sites including Poggio Renzo to the north and Colle Casuccini to the east, spanning from the Villanovan period (9th-8th centuries BC) through the Hellenistic era.[1] [45] Excavations have yielded nearly three thousand Etruscan inscriptions, underscoring the site's extensive burial grounds and cultural continuity.[10] Early cremation burials predominated in Villanovan phases at Poggio Renzo, evolving to inhumation chamber tombs with painted decorations by the 6th century BC.[1] The Tomb of the Monkey (Tomba della Scimmia), located in the Poggio Renzo necropolis, dates to approximately 480-470 BC and features a long dromos leading to multiple chambers with coffered ceilings and frescoes depicting banqueting scenes, athletic games, and a distinctive monkey figure among attendants.[27] [46] Discovered in 1846, it represents one of the earliest painted tombs at Clusium, illustrating influences akin to Tarquinian art with figures including priestesses and dwarfs.[27] The frescoes, though deteriorated, highlight funerary rituals emphasizing symposiums and entertainment.[1] The Tomba del Colle Casuccini, situated about one mile east of Chiusi, is a 6th-century BC inhumation tomb with a level passage, travertine pivot doors, and three chambers, two adorned with paintings of funeral games, musicians, and banquets featuring 26 figures.[27] [1] Uncovered in 1833, it exemplifies Etruscan rock-cut architecture in tufa, with coffered ceilings and remnants of urns, reflecting elite burial practices.[27] Other significant tombs include the Deposito de' Dei, with friezes of games and pediment banquets, and Hellenistic examples like the Tomba della Pellegrina (mid-3rd to mid-2nd century BC) featuring loculi and sarcophagi, and the Tomba del Granduca with its barrel-vaulted chamber for eight cremations.[27] [1] The Belverde di Cetona necropolis preserves Bronze Age tombs, among the earliest in the region, transitioning to Iron Age practices at Poggio Renzo.[45] These sites collectively demonstrate Clusium's burial evolution from simple urn fields to complex painted hypogeums, informed by local tufa geology.[47]Urban Excavations and Fortifications
Archaeological investigations within the urban core of Clusium (modern Chiusi) have revealed limited Etruscan-period remains, primarily due to continuous occupation from antiquity through the medieval era, which obscured or repurposed earlier structures. Excavations have uncovered fragments of building materials and architectural elements integrated into later constructions, such as sphinx-decorated stone spheres and terracotta decorations embedded in modern houses, but no intact civic or residential complexes have been identified. Subterranean features, including a network of tunnels and chambers beneath the city—accessible near San Francesco and Piazza del Duomo—suggest Etruscan engineering for water management, storage, or possibly ritual purposes, though their precise function remains debated among scholars.[5] The city's fortifications, characteristic of Etruscan urban planning for defense against regional rivals, are attested by surviving segments of walls constructed from rectangular travertine or tufa blocks. These remnants, visible beneath the Duomo near Porta delle Torri and in the Prato area, feature blocks measuring approximately 15 to 21 inches in height, often serving as foundations for medieval buildings or incorporated into fences and city structures. Much of the original circuit was dismantled in later periods for stone reuse or damaged during events like World War II, leaving only fragmentary tracts along the hill's edges, particularly at southern and western cliffs.[5][48]Key Artifacts and Recent Discoveries
![Etruscan urn from the Pietro Bonci Casuccini collection][float-right] The necropoleis of Clusium have produced distinctive canopic urns, terracotta vessels from the 8th to 6th centuries BCE topped with sculpted human figures, often female forms dressed in elaborate attire and holding items such as pomegranates or mirrors, reflecting early Villanovan and Orientalizing influences in Etruscan funerary art.[2] A landmark find is the François Vase, an Attic black-figure volute-krater dated to circa 570 BCE, crafted by potter Ergotimos and painter Kleitias, discovered in 1844 within a Clusium tomb and featuring over 200 figures depicting interconnected Greek mythological narratives including the wedding of Peleus and Thetis.[49][4] The National Etruscan Museum of Chiusi preserves key collections such as the jewelry trousseau from the Tomb of Pania, including gold items with granulation techniques, alongside Hellenistic-era alabaster and marble cinerary urns bearing portrait busts or reclining effigies of the deceased atop lids with mythological relief panels.[50] Other notable artifacts encompass bucchero pottery vessels, bronze incense burners, and impasto duck-shaped askoi from the 4th century BCE, highlighting Clusium's role in Etruscan ceramic production and trade.[2] In November 2024, Italian authorities dismantled an illicit excavation operation at an Etruscan necropolis spanning Chiusi and nearby Città della Pieve, seizing artifacts destined for illicit markets and underscoring ongoing threats to the site's heritage from clandestine digs.[51]Legacy and Scholarly Debates
Representation in Ancient Sources
Clusium features prominently in Roman historiography as a powerful Etruscan center involved in early conflicts with Rome. In Livy's Ab Urbe Condita (Book 2, chapters 9–14), the city's king, Lars Porsenna (or Porsena), leads an Etruscan coalition around 508 BCE to restore the exiled Tarquinius Superbus, besieging Rome and compelling territorial concessions while failing to overthrow the nascent republic; Livy emphasizes Roman heroism, such as the exploits of Horatius Cocles and Mucius Scaevola, drawing from earlier annalistic traditions that blend historical kernels with moral exempla.[52] Dionysius of Halicarnassus, in Roman Antiquities (Book 5, chapter 21 onward), offers a parallel narrative, portraying Porsenna as ruler of Clusium who negotiates with Roman envoys and ultimately withdraws after a treaty, incorporating Greek perspectives on Etruscan-Tyrrhenian customs while relying on Roman sources like Fabius Pictor for chronological details. The city's role in precipitating the Gallic sack of Rome is detailed in Livy (Ab Urbe Condita Book 5, chapters 33–38), where Clusium appeals to Rome for aid against Senonian Gauls led by Brennus circa 390 BCE; Roman ambassadors from the Fabii gens, tasked with mediation, violate diplomatic neutrality by engaging in combat during a Gallic assault, prompting the Gauls to march on and devastate Rome— an event Livy attributes to Clusian instigation but frames within broader themes of Roman resilience and divine favor.[53] Plutarch's Life of Camillus (chapters 15–17) corroborates this, describing the Clusian siege by 30,000–50,000 Gauls and the subsequent Roman embassy's breach, which he sources from annalists and uses to highlight Marcus Furius Camillus's leadership in recovery, though he notes variations in Gallic numbers across traditions. Poetic representations include Virgil's Aeneid (Book 10, lines 163–169, 719), which depicts Clusium as sending a thousand archers under Umbro and a ship commanded by King Osinius in alliance with Turnus against Aeneas, embedding the city in a mythic Etruscan federation hostile to Trojan settlers and reflecting Augustan-era glorification of Roman origins over Etruscan rivals.[54] Pliny the Elder, in Natural History (Book 36, chapter 91), preserves Varro's description of Porsenna's tomb beneath Clusium as a vast square-base pyramid complex with four bronze temples, statues, and an subterranean labyrinth spanning 1,000 feet per side— a marvel rivaling Egyptian structures, though Pliny admits its exaggeration and notes its destruction by rains, underscoring ancient awe at Etruscan engineering amid Roman cultural appropriation.[55] Geographical and antiquarian sources treat Clusium more descriptively: Strabo (Geography 5.2.10) lists it among the twelve Etruscan league cities, inland from the coast and prosperous in agriculture, based on earlier periploi; while later references in Livy (e.g., Book 10) note its alliances against Samnites in 295 BCE, portraying a city transitioning from adversary to Roman client amid Etruria's decline. These accounts, predominantly Roman-authored, exhibit a bias toward emphasizing Clusian aggression to exalt Roman fortitude, yet consistently affirm its status as a leading northern Etruscan power with Villanovan roots and hydraulic expertise.[1]Archaeological Evidence vs. Literary Traditions
Ancient literary accounts, primarily from Roman historians such as Livy and Dionysius of Halicarnassus, depict Clusium (Clevsin in Etruscan) as a dominant Etruscan power center in the late 6th century BCE, ruled by King Lars Porsena, who led a coalition against the newly established Roman Republic to restore the exiled Tarquin kings.[11] These sources describe Porsena's forces besieging Rome around 508 BCE, employing rafts on the Tiber and advanced tactics, only to withdraw after witnessing Roman valor exemplified in tales of Horatius Cocles defending the Sublician Bridge and Gaius Mucius Scaevola's attempted assassination.[21] Later traditions, including Pliny the Elder's Natural History, embellish Porsena's legacy with an extravagant tomb at Clusium: a hexagonal pyramid over 50 meters tall, adorned with colossal statues, bronze vessels on wheels, and an underground labyrinth, surpassing Egyptian pyramids in scale.[56] Archaeological excavations at modern Chiusi reveal Clusium as a prosperous Iron Age settlement evolving from Villanovan culture (c. 900–700 BCE) into an Archaic Etruscan urban center by the 7th–6th centuries BCE, evidenced by extensive necropoleis like Poggio Renzo and Belverde with over 1,000 chamber tombs containing bucchero pottery, imported Greek vases, and canopic urns depicting elite banquets, indicating trade networks and social stratification but not unparalleled wealth compared to contemporaries like Tarquinia or Caere.[5] Urban remains include cyclopean walls enclosing about 60 hectares, sanctuaries, and cisterns, with peak activity in the 6th–5th centuries BCE followed by contraction, aligning with broader Etruscan urbanization but lacking indicators of centralized hegemony such as oversized palaces or military infrastructure suggestive of empire-wide command.[8] No traces of the described monumental tomb have been identified despite targeted searches beneath the city, with underground passages attributed instead to Etruscan drainage systems or quarries, underscoring the literary account's likely hyperbolic invention to magnify Porsena's stature.[57] These traditions diverge from material evidence in portraying Clusium's military prowess and political primacy; while inscriptions and artifacts confirm Porsena (Pupluna or similar in Etruscan onomastics) as a plausible historical figure amid Etruscan-Roman tensions, the siege's scale lacks corroboration in Roman archaeological layers (e.g., no widespread destruction at the Forum or Tiber defenses c. 508 BCE), and Clusium's role appears more as one city-state among a loose confederation rather than a unifier, as Roman annalists—composed centuries later—may have amplified Etruscan threats to valorize republican origins.[21] Scholarly consensus holds the core conflict historical, rooted in Tarquin exile and territorial disputes, yet literary embellishments reflect Roman historiographical biases favoring dramatic heroism over empirical detail, with Etruscan sources absent due to their non-literary tradition.[58] Ongoing debates highlight how necropolis data—showing continuity rather than post-campaign disruption—challenges narratives of Clusium's temporary supremacy, suggesting instead gradual integration into Roman spheres by the 4th–3rd centuries BCE without the cataclysmic clashes emphasized in texts.[5]Modern Interpretations and Ongoing Controversies
Modern scholars have increasingly emphasized Clusium's status as a preeminent Etruscan city-state by the late sixth century BCE, challenging earlier underestimations derived from Roman-centric narratives that portrayed Etruscan polities as loosely confederated and militarily inferior. Archaeological evidence, including fortified urban structures and extensive necropoleis, supports interpretations of Clusium as a hub of political and economic influence, capable of coordinating regional alliances, as evidenced in analyses resolving discrepancies between literary accounts of Lars Porsena's campaigns and material indicators of Clusian hegemony.[33][59] A key controversy persists regarding the historicity and outcomes of Porsena's siege of Rome around 508 BCE, with Roman sources like Livy depicting it as an Etruscan failure that underscored Roman defiance, potentially exaggerated to bolster republican foundational myths amid later historiographical biases favoring Roman exceptionalism. Recent reassessments, informed by comparative studies of Etruscan urbanism and diplomacy, propose that Clusium achieved strategic concessions, such as temporary Roman submission or tribute, aligning with evidence of sustained Clusian prosperity post-event rather than abrupt decline.[33][60] In Hellenistic-period interpretations, debates center on funerary evidence from Chiusi, where a shift from lavish urns and grave goods to simpler cremation containers after the third century BCE has been attributed by some to Roman-imposed austerity or cultural hybridization, while others argue it reflects endogenous socioeconomic adaptations, such as elite restraint amid demographic pressures, without direct causal linkage to Roman dominance. Chemical analyses of intact Hellenistic ointments and polychrome urn studies further fuel discussions on trade networks and artisanal continuity, questioning narratives of abrupt Etruscan cultural erasure post-incorporation.[61][62][63] Ongoing archaeological controversies involve reconciling sparse urban excavation data with abundant tomb finds, prompting critiques of overreliance on necropoleis for socioeconomic inferences; for instance, recent discoveries at Poggio Renzo necropolis reveal unlooted tombs with imported pottery, intensifying debates over Clusium's integration into Italic exchange systems versus isolationist models favored in earlier scholarship. These findings underscore systemic challenges in Etruscan studies, where Roman literary traditions—often propagandistic—clash with empirical data, necessitating multidisciplinary approaches like archaeobotany to test claims of environmental determinism in urban decline.[64][65][66]References
- https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/clusium
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/From_the_Founding_of_the_City/Book_2
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/From_the_Founding_of_the_City/Book_5