Hubbry Logo
Core Socialist ValuesCore Socialist ValuesMain
Open search
Core Socialist Values
Community hub
Core Socialist Values
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Core Socialist Values
Core Socialist Values
Core Socialist Values
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Core Socialist Values
Statue listing the twelve Core Socialist Values of the Chinese Communist Party
Simplified Chinese社会主义核心价值观
Traditional Chinese社會主義核心價值觀
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinShèhuì zhǔyì héxīn jiàzhíguān
Wade–GilesShê-hui chu-yi ho-hsin chia-chih-kuan
Yue: Cantonese
Yale RomanizationSéhkūi zyūjìh hàhtsàm gáazìhkgùn
Southern Min
Hokkien POJSiā-hōe Chú-gī hu̍t-sim kè ta̍t koan

The Core Socialist Values is a set of official interpretations of the Chinese Communist Party's ideology of socialism with Chinese characteristics promoted at its 18th National Congress in 2012. The 12 values, written in 24 Chinese characters,[1] are the national values of "prosperity", "democracy", "civility" and "harmony"; the social values of "freedom", "equality", "justice" and the "rule of law"; and the individual values of "patriotism", "dedication", "integrity" and "friendship".[a][2][3]

Background

[edit]

In 1989, paramount leader Deng Xiaoping stated in a speech that he considered education to be the biggest reform failure of the 1980s, and in particular ideological and political education. The government had tried to effect mass campaigns to this end, but these would not ultimately be regarded as effective. The Death of Wang Yue in 2011 might be considered an instigator for a new program. In 2012, the building of a system of "Core Socialist Values" was proposed to address what was perceived as a moral crisis resulting from China's rapid economic development, which the People's Daily refers to as the "decayed, outdated ideals of mammonism and extreme individualism."[3] At the 18th National Congress, Party general secretary Hu Jintao represented the 17th Central Committee and presented the content of the new values that are intended to be enshrined by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).[1]

A quote from CCP general secretary Xi Jinping at the Eighteenth National Congress says:

If our 1.3 billion citizens and 82 million Party members as well as overseas Chinese can achieve consensus, we will constitute a powerful force [...]  We must realize that people from different localities and social strata who have different backgrounds and occupations think differently. We must therefore consider: where can we find consensus? Where can we allow differences to persist?[4]

List of Values

[edit]

The twelve Core Socialist Values are:

Program

[edit]
A poster in Dalian promoting the twelve Core Socialist Values.
Giant poster listing the twelve Core Socialist Values of the Chinese Communist Party (2017).

The program called for the local governments to "organize moral education campaigns", and for media organizations to "practice self-discipline". In addition, artists were asked to promote the values, while party members and state officials are expected to put these new values in practice.[3] It also called on schools to incorporate them, with the Ministry of Education issuing a document in 2014 requesting all educational institutions promote them.[3] Xi Jinping expressed in a high-level meeting that promotional campaigns for 'Core Socialist Values' should be thorough, to the extent that public support for Chinese-style socialism will be "as ubiquitous as the air".[5] Another quote from 2014 further elaborates his position:

We need to energetically foster and promote core socialist values; promptly establish a value system that fully reflects Chinese characteristics, our national identity, and the features of the times; and strive to occupy the leading position on this issue. Ethical values play a very important role among core values. Without morals, a country cannot thrive, and its people cannot stand upright. Whether or not a nation or an individual has a strong sense of identity largely depends on their morals. If our people cannot uphold the moral values that have been formed and developed on our own soil, and instead indiscriminately and blindly parrot Western moral values, then it will be necessary to genuinely question whether we will lose our independent ethos as a country and a people. Without this independent ethos, our political, intellectual, cultural and institutional independence will have the rug pulled out from under it.[4]

The 2015 National Security Law's article on cultural security requires the state to uphold socialist core values.[6]

In 2016, Hunan Province officials responded to the campaign by organizing a series of dance routines to "spread the values" and express their support for the CCP.[7]

In June 2017, the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television issued several notices that intended to further restrict freedom of the press. One of the notices, with a patriotic bent, demanded broadcasters promote core values in their programs and "forcefully oppose" content that celebrates "money worship, hedonism, radical individualism and feudal thought."[8]

Reception

[edit]
Blank pieces of paper stuck to the characters "自由" ("Freedom"), part of the Core Socialist Values, on the slogan board at Xidian University, in a November 2022 protest

Shiyuan Hao considers the program of "great significance" for a "multi-national country like China", and for the creation of both a "harmonious culture" and a "creative breeding ground" for cultural diversity.[9]

Michael Gow considers that, compelled to align its interests with the "broader interests of the Chinese people and different groups", the program for Core Socialist Values might best be analyzed as a shift from a focus on the economy to cultural power; or, if one wished to extrapolate, an attempt to cement legitimacy through the creation of a new cultural order, consent to which might be regarded as "essential for long-term social stability".[10]

Liu Ruisheng, a researcher of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences School of Journalism, criticizes the governments attempts more generally as simply lacking the same depth of value promotion in the west, which is "concealed" in the social sciences, education, religion, and entertainment, whereas the CCP presents ideology ad hoc. He is still pro-CCP however.[11]

Frank N. Pieke refers to the values as Confucian and as otherwise lacking any specifically socialist content,[2] but then as Michael Gow points out most Chinese do share a "broadly accepted, common-sense understanding of Confucian values."[10]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Core Socialist Values

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Core Socialist Values (社会主义核心价值观) refer to a set of twelve official moral principles articulated by the (CCP) to embody the ideals of . These values were formally proposed at the 18th National Congress of the CCP in November 2012, during the early tenure of as general secretary. Divided into national, social, and individual categories, they include prosperity and democracy at the national level, freedom, equality, justice, and socially, and patriotism, dedication, integrity, and friendship individually. The initiative aims to foster a unified ideological framework that integrates traditional with Marxist principles, serving as a of on for a New Era. Promotion efforts have permeated , media, public signage, and legal proceedings, with mandates for their display in schools, government buildings, and online platforms to cultivate public adherence. Authorities have enforced alignment through mechanisms, including restrictions on generative AI models to prevent outputs contradicting these values. Integration into judicial opinions represents an attempt to embed these principles directly into the , potentially prioritizing ideological conformity over neutral legal interpretation. While presented as aspirational guides to national rejuvenation under the "," the values have sparked debate over their substantive meaning in a , where concepts like and are framed within CCP rather than multiparty competition or unrestricted . Critics argue that aggressive dissemination risks raising unmet expectations or suppressing , as evidenced by occasional pushback against mandatory ideological campaigns. Nonetheless, they remain a key instrument in the CCP's strategy to legitimize and counter Western influences amid rising .

Historical Origins

Precursors Under Hu Jintao (2006–2012)

During 's tenure as General Secretary of the from 2002 to 2012, rapid since the late 1970s exacerbated social fissures, including surging income inequality and entrenched , which officials linked to a broader erosion of socialist morality. The national climbed to 0.41 by 2000 and remained elevated through the decade, underscoring disparities fueled by urban-rural divides and uneven regional growth that prioritized material gains over collective ethos. These dynamics, rooted in market incentives supplanting ideological controls, manifested in ethical lapses such as widespread graft among cadres exploiting reform-era opportunities for personal enrichment. Public discontent intensified, with "mass incidents"—the state's term for protests, petitions, and disturbances—escalating from about 8,700 recorded in to roughly 87,000 by 2005, often triggered by land seizures, , and corrupt local governance. scandals proliferated, exemplified by large-scale cases like the 2001 Xiamen smuggling ring involving billions in evaded duties and high-level officials, which highlighted systemic vulnerabilities in oversight amid . Such episodes, alongside rural tax burdens and urban spikes post-state-owned enterprise reforms, drove demands for rectification, as unchecked undermined party legitimacy and social cohesion. In this context, introduced the "Eight Honors and Eight Disgraces" on March 4, 2006, framing it as a "socialist of honor and " to instill ethical priorities aligned with party doctrine. This moral code contrasted honors like , , and unity with disgraces such as harming the nation, , and arrogance, aiming to reassert collectivist virtues against reform-induced self-interest. Propagated through and , it represented an initial ideological bulwark, responding causally to crises by reinforcing state-defined norms over liberalizing tendencies, though implementation relied on voluntary compliance amid persistent material incentives. These proto-values prefigured structured ethical frameworks by targeting the same perceived decay, emphasizing propaganda-driven renewal without altering underlying economic drivers.

Formal Introduction at the 18th National Congress (2012)

The 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC), held from November 8 to 14, 2012, in , formally introduced core socialist values (CSV) as a foundational element of the party's ideological framework for advancing . In the political report delivered by , the outgoing General Secretary, CSV were characterized as "the soul of the " and a critical guide for national development, aimed at cultivating a unified and cultural to underpin social stability. The congress resolution endorsed this emphasis, calling for CSV to "take root among the people" through and efforts. Concurrently, the amended CPC , adopted on November 14, 2012, explicitly committed the party to promoting CSV while adhering to as its guiding ideology. With Xi Jinping's election as CPC General Secretary at the , CSV became integral to his early leadership agenda, serving as ideological pillars for consolidating party authority amid emerging domestic pressures. Xi linked CSV to the "" of great national rejuvenation, which he outlined in a November 29, 2012, speech to the cadre academy, framing them as essential for realizing prosperity and strength while resisting external cultural dilutions. This positioning reflected a strategic response to perceived legitimacy challenges, including widespread corruption scandals—such as the case unfolding in 2012—and an economic deceleration, with GDP growth easing from 9.5% in 2011 to 7.8% in 2012, signaling the end of double-digit expansion. State media and party directives portrayed CSV as countermeasures to moral decay attributed to market reforms and global influences, prioritizing indigenous values over universalist imports to reinforce CPC governance. The initial post-congress rollout in late 2012 and 2013 involved directives from the CPC Central Committee to embed CSV in official discourse, tying them to the "Two Centenary Goals" of building a by 2021 and a modern socialist country by 2049, as affirmed in the report. This codification under Xi marked a shift toward intensified ideological , distinct from prior Hu-era emphases on scientific development, with CSV positioned to sustain party dominance through rather than solely economic performance. By 2018, their prominence culminated in amendments to the , mandating the state to "champion core socialist values" in policy and education.

Definition and Structure

National-Level Values

The national-level values within China's Core Socialist Values framework—prosperity (富强), (民主), (文明), and (和谐)—are positioned as foundational principles for , emphasizing macro-level objectives such as economic power, political consultation, ethical norms, and social stability to cultivate collective national resilience under (CCP) guidance. These values were formalized in to align national development with , prioritizing state-directed progress over individual liberties. Prosperity focuses on building a strong, affluent nation through sustained economic expansion, directly linked to CCP-set GDP targets, such as the ambition to double 2010 GDP by 2020, which was met via infrastructure investment and export-led growth averaging 7.7% annually from 2013 to 2019. Empirical data reveals, however, that this pursuit has coincided with persistent income disparities, as evidenced by China's of 37.1 in 2020 per World Bank estimates, indicating moderate-to-high inequality comparable to many developing economies despite official alleviation claims. Alternative calculations, adjusting for underreported high-end incomes, suggest even higher figures around 50-60, underscoring how concentrates wealth in urban elites and state-owned enterprises while rural and migrant workers lag. Democracy, in this context, denotes a CCP-orchestrated consultative mechanism rather than competitive elections, framed as "" where citizen input occurs via party-vetted channels like the CPPCC, which convenes non-CCP figures for policy advice but holds no power over decisions. This model, emphasized since Xi Jinping's 2021 speeches, integrates feedback from over 2,000 CPPCC delegates annually but maintains the CCP's vanguard role as constitutionally enshrined, diverging from liberal democratic norms by subordinating pluralism to unified leadership. Civility promotes a refined national ethos, encouraging behaviors aligned with Confucian-influenced modernization, such as public and cultural preservation, to elevate China's global image amid rapid . It manifests in state campaigns urging ethical conduct in governance and daily life, though enforcement often prioritizes over substantive debate. Harmony seeks equilibrated social relations to prevent discord, building on Hu Jintao's earlier "" concept but intensified under Xi to justify stability maintenance through measures like the anti-corruption drive, which targeted over 1.5 million party members by for graft undermining collective order. This value causally links internal purification to national cohesion, yet data on suppressed —such as the handling of over 100,000 annual "stability maintenance" incidents—suggests harmony is achieved via and rather than organic consensus.

Social-Level Values

The social-level values within China's Core Socialist Values comprise (zìyóu), equality (píngděng), (gōngzhèng), and (fǎzhì), designed to regulate public interactions and foster societal cohesion under Party-guided socialism. These principles, articulated in official Party documents, prioritize expressions compatible with national stability and collective welfare over individualistic liberties. Freedom is promoted as participation in state-endorsed activities, but implementation reveals constraints through systemic content controls and surveillance. China's rating stood at 9/100 in , the lowest worldwide for the tenth consecutive year, driven by blocks on dissent-related sites and real-time monitoring of user behavior. Authorities maintain this via the Great Firewall, which filters billions of posts annually, and strategic distraction campaigns involving fabricated content to dilute critical discourse. Equality aims for equitable resource distribution and opportunity access, yet the hukou registration framework enforces persistent rural-urban segmentation. In 2023, 297.53 million rural-to-urban migrants operated under rural hukou, barring them from equivalent urban entitlements in housing, education, and pensions despite contributing to city economies. This sustains income divergence, with urban per capita disposable income at 51,821 yuan against 21,691 yuan rural, per National Bureau of Statistics data. Reforms converted hukou for over 40 million migrants from 2021 to 2023, but systemic barriers remain, confining most to second-class status in major cities. Justice and stress procedural fairness and legal supremacy in public affairs, though dominance subordinates these to ideological imperatives. Constitutional provisions and statutes mandate judicial adherence to CCP guidance, positioning the as the ultimate arbiter over legal outcomes. In practice, mechanisms like liuzhi— a CCP-internal detention process evading standard courts—saw usage surge 46.15% from 2023 to 2024, facilitating holds without formal charges or defense rights. Monitoring groups recorded 1,486 ongoing arbitrary detention cases as of February 2023, often targeting rights advocates, underscoring selective enforcement over uniform application.

Citizen-Level Values

The citizen-level values of the Core Socialist Values framework encompass (àiguó), dedication (jìngyè), (chéngxìn), and (yǒuhǎo), positioned as personal ethical standards to guide individual behavior in alignment with state objectives. These virtues emphasize subordinate roles for citizens relative to and national priorities, aiming to internalize loyalty through everyday conduct that reinforces regime stability. Patriotism, defined as love for the nation and party, mandates expressions of allegiance, such as public oaths in official settings, and ties into broader campaigns fostering suspicion of foreign influences to prioritize domestic unity. This value cultivates loyalty by framing external criticism or influences as threats, evident in state-driven narratives equating national devotion with support for ruling institutions, though such efforts have correlated with heightened nationalist sentiments that deter internal dissent. Dedication promotes a rigorous focused on professional diligence and contribution to societal , intended to channel individual effort toward economic goals aligned with directives. However, empirical on labor unrest reveals persistent tensions, with manufacturing strikes surging from 37 incidents in 2022 to 438 in 2023, indicating that despite rhetorical emphasis on dutiful labor, underlying grievances over wages and conditions undermine this value's effectiveness in fostering unwavering loyalty. Integrity and friendship emphasize honest dealings and amicable relations, respectively, with integrity invoked in anti-corruption drives to signal moral uprightness among officials and citizens. Anti-corruption enforcement since 2012 has disciplined over a million cadres, including high-level figures, yet analyses describe it as selectively applied—targeting political rivals while sparing entrenched elite networks and failing to address systemic graft at the apex, thus prioritizing regime consolidation over universal ethical adherence. Friendship, in turn, encourages interpersonal harmony to sustain social order, but its promotion appears instrumental in diffusing conflicts that could challenge authority, with limited evidence of independent cultivation beyond state-monitored interactions. Overall, these virtues function to embed regime loyalty by conflating personal morality with political conformity, though gaps in enforcement and outcomes suggest they serve more as aspirational tools for control than transformative ethics.

Implementation and Propagation

Educational Integration and Youth Programs

Following the 18th National Congress of the in November 2012, Core Socialist Values were mandated for integration into the national curriculum starting in 2013, with revisions to textbooks in subjects such as and to explicitly incorporate the 12 values. These changes established a system spanning primary, secondary, and higher education levels, allocating dedicated class hours—often 1-2 per week in elementary and middle schools—for instruction on values like , , and through themed lessons, recitations, and discussions. By 2017, updated curriculum standards for further embedded CSV into core competencies, requiring teachers to link values to historical narratives and socialist principles in daily . Youth organizations serve as primary vehicles for CSV propagation through structured programs. The Chinese Young Pioneers, a mass organization for children aged 6-14 affiliated with the Communist Youth League, integrates CSV into oaths, flag-raising ceremonies, and annual campaigns, with 114.8 million members participating nationwide as of December 2023. The Communist Youth League of China (CYLC), for individuals aged 14-28, runs "Core Values Practice" initiatives including study groups, volunteer drives, and competitions on themes like dedication and harmony, engaging approximately 74.17 million members across 4.32 million branches by the end of 2023. These efforts, coordinated by the Ministry of Education and CYLC committees, target millions of students annually in school-based activities, with metrics such as participation rates exceeding 90% in urban pilot programs reported in official evaluations. Assessments of these programs' impact on youth attitudes reveal elevated and reported value alignment. A 2018 national survey of young people found 93.5% expressing strong identification with patriotic elements of CSV, such as national rejuvenation. Similarly, a 2020 survey indicated that the majority of respondents under 35 endorsed , attributing this to educational exposure amid rising nationalist sentiments encouraged by and curricula. Official data from the CYLC highlight correlations between program involvement and self-reported increases in , though independent observers note that such metrics, derived from state-conducted polls, may reflect performative compliance influenced by the authoritarian educational context rather than unprompted conviction.

Media, Culture, and Public Campaigns

State broadcasters in received directives from the in June 2017 to produce and distribute programs explicitly promoting core socialist values, emphasizing content that aligns with official over prioritizing Western lifestyles. Similarly, a 2016 law mandated that cinematic productions serve and disseminate these values to enrich public cultural life, with regulators enforcing compliance through content approvals and restrictions on foreign influences. In 2016, provincial initiatives like Hunan's song-and-dance performances propagated the twelve values through accessible cultural formats, aiming to embed them in popular as a means of ideological dissemination. On social media platforms such as , state-directed campaigns since the values' formalization in 2012 have utilized hashtags and to normalize CSV, with Communist Youth League guidelines in 2015 encouraging online dissemination via posts, videos, and forums to foster public engagement. Celebrities have been leveraged in philanthropy drives on , where endorsements frame charitable acts as embodiments of socialist harmony and unity, though such efforts occur amid broader regulatory pressures to align with official values. Public campaigns feature widespread displays of the 24-character on billboards, posters, and urban infrastructure, visible in cities and even exported symbolically abroad, as in a 2023 London that sparked debate over coercive promotion. These efforts are credited by Chinese authorities with enhancing cultural by unifying national narratives around prosperity and harmony, yet they coincide with the Great Firewall's systematic blocking of foreign sites and domestic content diverging from CSV, such as critiques of party policies, thereby limiting exposure to alternative viewpoints and reinforcing on value propagation. Empirical outcomes include heightened visibility of official messaging—posters proliferated post-2012 across public spaces—but causal links to genuine societal internalization remain contested, as suppresses dissenting narratives that could test adherence, with platforms required to prioritize content upholding socialist core values over pluralistic discourse. In December 2013, the General Office of the State Council issued a circular mandating the inclusion of the 12 Core Socialist Values on official seals, documents, and public signage to standardize their across governmental administration. This directive extended to legal drafting, with the Standing Committee emphasizing the embedding of these values in legislative processes by 2014, aiming to align laws with ideological principles such as and integrity. By 2016, civil service oaths were revised to incorporate pledges of adherence to socialist core values, requiring officials to affirm to these principles during induction ceremonies, as part of broader efforts to instill them in . The Communist Party of China (CPC) linked cadre promotions to demonstrated adherence to Core Socialist Values through internal directives, integrating value-based assessments into performance evaluations and disciplinary mechanisms. For instance, the Party's 2017 report to the 19th National Congress highlighted how efforts targeted violations of values like and dedication, with over 1.5 million officials investigated between 2013 and 2017 for corruption undermining these principles. Purges under Xi Jinping's campaign, such as those of high-profile figures like in 2014, were framed as enforcing value compliance, with state media attributing dismissals to failures in upholding socialist and . Official compliance metrics, reported through Party inspections, claimed widespread adoption, with over 90% of localities incorporating values into administrative oaths and documents by 2018, though independent verification remains limited due to opaque reporting. Underground resistance persisted, evidenced by surging VPN usage to bypass of dissenting content challenging enforced values; usage nearly doubled from 2022 to 2023 amid tightened controls, with surveys indicating 31% of users regularly employing VPNs by late 2022 despite legal penalties. This circumvention reflects evasion of ideological enforcement, including blocks on materials critiquing state-mandated values.

Claimed Achievements and Empirical Outcomes

Social Cohesion and Moral Education Claims

The promotion of core socialist values, particularly and , has been credited by the (CCP) with bolstering social cohesion through intensified efforts initiated in . These campaigns, framed as moral rectification aligned with citizen-level values like dedication and , resulted in the disciplinary action against approximately 4.7 million CCP members and officials by 2023, according to official tallies, with proponents arguing this diminished systemic graft and fostered public trust in governance. However, independent assessments via the indicate only modest gains, with 's score rising from 39 in to 42 in 2023 on a 0-100 scale where higher values denote lower perceived , suggesting limited perceptual shifts despite high-profile prosecutions. Official statistics further assert contributions to social stability through reduced criminality, attributing declines to value-driven ethical emphasizing and . China's reported intentional rate fell to 0.50 per 100,000 by 2020, down from higher levels in prior decades, with specific categories like gun-related incidents dropping 81.3% from 311 cases in to 58 in 2017 per government data. Such trends are presented as evidence of cohesive societal norms curbing deviance, though underreporting and definitional variances in state metrics limit cross-verification with global benchmarks. In moral education, the embedding of core values into curricula since 2012 is claimed to elevate socialist consciousness and ethical conduct, with state-directed programs in primary and secondary schools promoting and as foundational to national unity. Empirical studies, often conducted within Chinese academic frameworks, report positive associations, such as enhanced among primary students exposed to these values, based on self-reported behavioral improvements and assessments in surveys of thousands of participants. State-affiliated surveys indicate over 90% awareness and endorsement rates among youth by the mid-2010s, though these instruments, reliant on voluntary responses in a politically homogeneous environment, exhibit biases toward affirmative outcomes due to respondent incentives for alignment with official . From a causal standpoint, the top-down inculcation of uniform values may generate observable short-term —manifest in metrics like disciplinary compliance or reported —by reinforcing shared rituals and sanctions, yet sustained cohesion hinges on voluntary internalization rather than rote propagation, as divergent individual incentives could erode authenticity over time absent diverse ethical contestation. Limited longitudinal data beyond state channels constrains verification of deeper attitudinal shifts versus surface-level adherence.

Economic and Stability Correlations

China's promotion of Core Socialist Values, particularly "" (富强) and "" (和谐), coincided with robust and social order in the , following their formal enunciation in 2012. Annual GDP growth averaged approximately 7-8% from 2010 to 2019, lifting hundreds of millions from through export-led industrialization and . This period of stability was marked by low levels of overt social unrest, with official narratives attributing cohesion to value-driven and dedication, enabling policy continuity amid global financial shocks.
Year RangeAverage Annual GDP Growth (%)
2010-2019~7.5
2020-2023~4.0
Data compiled from World Bank and IMF estimates; growth slowed post-2020 due to pandemic effects and structural shifts. The emphasis on "harmony" reportedly facilitated compliance during the stringent zero-COVID lockdowns from 2020 to 2022, which contained outbreaks at the cost of economic disruption but preserved regime stability by framing restrictions as collective sacrifice for public good. Empirical studies indicate initial public support for these measures, with surveys showing satisfaction rates above 80% in select urban areas, linked to state propaganda reinforcing socialist values of unity over individual freedoms. However, prolonged enforcement led to localized protests, such as those in late 2022, underscoring limits to voluntary adherence. By the 2020s, indicators of emerged, challenging claims of inherent prosperity from Core Socialist Values. for ages 16-24 reached a record 21.3% in mid-2023 and hovered around 17-19% through 2025, reflecting mismatches between state-directed and market demands amid slowing growth projected at 4.8% for 2025. GDP expansion decelerated to 2.2% in 2020 and stabilized below 5% thereafter, hampered by property sector debt, demographic decline, and policy reversals like delisting private firms. Independent economic analyses attribute China's pre-2020 prosperity primarily to market-oriented reforms since 1978—such as of state enterprises, foreign incentives, and WTO accession—rather than ideological values like those in Core Socialist Values, which postdate the core phase. State ideology under since 2012 has increasingly prioritized security and control over unfettered markets, correlating with reduced dynamism and foreign , per metrics from think tanks tracking overcapacity and regulatory crackdowns. This causal realism suggests that while values rhetoric supports order, empirical drivers of growth remain pragmatic incentives, with recent interventions risking further erosion of efficiency gains from earlier hybrid models.

Criticisms and Domestic Challenges

Ideological Inconsistencies and Authoritarian Contradictions

The inclusion of democracy in the Core Socialist Values presents a fundamental paradox with China's constitutional framework, which explicitly defines the as a led by the and based on the worker-peasant alliance. This doctrine, originating in Mao Zedong's 1949 essay and enshrined in Article 1 of the 1982 Constitution (amended multiple times without altering its core), rationalizes the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) monopoly on power as a over perceived class enemies while claiming democratic representation for the masses. In practice, national leadership selection occurs through opaque CCP internal processes, with no competitive elections allowing alternation of ruling parties or genuine opposition; subordinate "democratic parties" in the system function as advisory bodies without veto power or independent candidacy rights. The CCP's promotion of "" since 2019 reframes participation as consultation within party-guided channels, such as local people's congresses where candidates are vetted by CCP committees, underscoring the values' role in rebranding authoritarian selection as democratic consultation rather than instituting electoral competition. The espoused value of equality similarly clashes with entrenched elite privileges, exemplified by the "" (taizidang)—descendants of revolutionary leaders and senior officials—who leverage familial ties for disproportionate access to power and resources. Empirical analysis of CCP elite trajectories from 1982 to 2012 reveals receive career boosts, including faster promotions to Standing Committee roles and overrepresentation in state-owned enterprises, fostering collective elite reproduction that undermines meritocratic or egalitarian ideals. Despite the Core Socialist Values' emphasis on since their 2013 formalization, these networks have facilitated wealth accumulation for party-connected families amid post-1978 market reforms, with prominent in sectors like and , contradicting the socialist rhetoric of leveling class distinctions. Xi Jinping's 2012-launched drive, which investigated over 4.7 million cadres by 2023, targeted some rivals but spared core princeling factions, preserving hierarchical perks under the guise of purifying party integrity. At root, the Core Socialist Values operate as a legitimizing to sustain CCP rule without yielding to the reforms implied by their liberal-sounding tenets, prioritizing ideological over causal mechanisms for or pluralism. Rolled out amid slowing GDP growth (from 10.6% in 2010 to 2.2% in 2020) and rising public grievances, the values—divided into national (e.g., prosperity, ), social (e.g., , equality), and citizen (e.g., , ) categories—aim to fill a perceived moral void from Deng-era while reinforcing one-party supremacy. Evidence of this instrumental use includes their integration into legal and educational systems without corresponding power-sharing, as seen in the constitutional removal of presidential term limits, which centralized authority under Xi rather than dispersing it per democratic or rule-of-law principles. This pattern reveals the values as adaptive to bolster regime stability, adapting eclectic elements (e.g., Confucian with Marxist equality) to mask authoritarian rigidity rather than enable self-correcting governance.

Suppression of Dissent and Enforcement Mechanisms

The enforcement of Core Socialist Values in has involved legal charges of subversion against individuals perceived to undermine state ideology, exemplified by the July 9, 2015, "709 crackdown" in which authorities arrested over 200 lawyers, legal assistants, and activists across multiple provinces. Those targeted, including prominent figures like Wang Quanzhang, faced accusations of "subversion of state power" under Article 105 of 's Criminal Law for activities such as representing clients in politically sensitive cases or advocating for legal reforms. Wang was convicted in January 2019 and sentenced to four years and six months in prison, with five years of deprived political rights, following a closed ; reports documented his subjection to and during . Subsequent cases have extended these charges to broader dissent, with courts interpreting criticism of government policies or exposure of abuses as threats to national security and socialist principles. In February 2024, activist Li Qiaochu was convicted of "inciting subversion of state power" and sentenced to three years and eight months in prison for public statements on torture suffered by her associate Xu Zhiyong, whom prosecutors linked to "subversive thoughts" influencing her actions. Amnesty International documented similar patterns, noting that from 2015 onward, Chinese courts have systematically prosecuted human rights defenders by equating their advocacy with subversion, often without access to independent legal counsel or public trials. These proceedings have incurred human rights costs, including allegations of ill-treatment in detention facilities, as verified in Amnesty's examinations of cases post-709. Parallel to criminal prosecutions, the —initiated through pilot programs in 2014 and formalized in subsequent guidelines—incorporates compliance with Core Socialist Values as a criterion for assessing "creditworthiness," enabling administrative punishments for perceived ideological non-adherence. The system blacklists individuals and entities for violations of laws promoting socialist core values, such as and , resulting in restrictions on travel, employment opportunities, and ; by 2021, millions were reportedly affected annually through such mechanisms. While primarily targeting regulatory and economic infractions, its linkage to moral and patriotic standards has facilitated enforcement against dissenters, amplifying punitive effects beyond judicial penalties. This dual approach of legal and administrative tools has sustained a climate of deterrence, with human rights organizations reporting elevated risks of arbitrary detention for those challenging value propagation.

International Reception and Comparisons

Global Critiques from Western Perspectives

Western analysts, including those from , have characterized China's Core Socialist Values (CSV) as a mechanism to legitimize state and ideological , rather than genuine moral or social principles. In its 2022 World Report, HRW documented how authorities suppressed online content deemed incompatible with CSV, targeting celebrities, fan groups, and dissident voices under pretexts like "misbehavior" that contradicted values such as civility and harmony. Similarly, the 2021 report highlighted expansions in internet controls to enforce alignment with these values, enabling the Cyberspace Administration to block material promoting pluralism or criticism of the (CCP). These critiques frame CSV not as aspirational ideals but as tools for authoritarian control, where abstract virtues mask the suppression of independent thought. Comparisons to Orwellian dystopias appear in Western commentary, emphasizing how CSV's emphasis on "harmony" enforces uniformity at the expense of genuine pluralism. Observers note that values like and , promoted since their formalization at the 18th National Congress in 2012, prioritize collective obedience over individual freedoms, echoing themes of thought control in 1984 by redefining dissent as disharmony. A 2016 Council on Foreign Relations analysis questioned the depth of CSV's implementation, suggesting it entrenches public expectations that could expose contradictions between rhetoric and practice, yet primarily serves CCP legitimacy amid tightening controls. Such views posit that CSV's national rollout—via , media, and law—functions as to sustain one-party rule, suppressing diverse viewpoints under the guise of socialist unity. From right-leaning perspectives, CSV undermines free-market principles by subordinating economic to state-directed . The Heritage Foundation's ranks China's economy as "repressed," attributing this to CCP dominance that prioritizes socialist values like "" and "dedication" over market liberalization, with direct state intervention distorting . Conservative analyses argue this ideological framework sustains barriers to private enterprise, as seen in Xi Jinping's reinforcement of "" since 2013, which favors party control over entrepreneurial and global trade norms. These critiques contend that embedding state in core values erodes incentives for , fostering dependency on directives rather than voluntary exchange.

Contrasts with Liberal Values and Human Rights Standards

Core Socialist Values (CSV) emphasize collective harmony, state-directed prosperity, and social stability, interpreting terms like freedom and equality through a lens of communal obligations under Communist Party leadership, in contrast to Lockean liberalism's focus on individual natural rights to life, liberty, and property, which prioritize negative liberties—freedom from arbitrary interference—as foundational to human flourishing. John Locke's framework posits individuals as ends in themselves, with governments deriving legitimacy from protecting these rights via consent, whereas CSV subordinates individual autonomy to group welfare and national goals, viewing unchecked personal freedoms as potential threats to societal order. Similarly, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 10, 1948, enshrines inherent human dignity and equal rights for all without distinction (Articles 1-2), emphasizing civil and political liberties such as freedom of opinion and expression (Article 19) independent of state approval. In CSV, however, freedom is framed as "ordered liberty" aligned with party ideology, prioritizing economic development and social equity over individual dissent, reflecting a collectivist paradigm where equality means uniform adherence to state-defined norms rather than equal protection against majoritarian or authoritarian overreach. The CSV inclusion of "" (法治) purports to establish legal governance, yet implementation reveals Party supremacy, with no independent judiciary to check executive or political , diverging sharply from liberal standards requiring and judicial to safeguard . In , courts operate under CCP political-legal committees that direct verdicts in sensitive cases, ensuring alignment with state interests over neutral application of law, as evidenced by the absence of mechanisms for of Party decisions. This contrasts with UDHR Article 10's guarantee of fair and public hearings by independent tribunals, and Lockean principles where law binds rulers equally to prevent tyranny. Chinese official discourse rejects Western as incompatible with socialist governance, prioritizing "rule by law" for stability over 's constraints on power. Empirically, CSV enforcement correlates with diminished , as measured by Freedom House's 2024 report scoring 9 out of 100 ("Not Free"), with political at -2/40 and at 11/60, attributing low ratings to systemic suppression of independent expression and association under ideological campaigns. This score, consistent since at least 2023, reflects causal links between value promotion—via mandatory and —and restricted freedoms, as individual indices remain low despite rhetorical commitments to CSV principles like justice and freedom, underscoring a prioritization of collective control over universal benchmarks. Such outcomes challenge claims of CSV universality, as enforced collectivism empirically undermines Lockean and UDHR protections for personal agency.

Recent Developments (2023–2025)

Policy Reinforcements Under Xi Jinping

During the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC) in October 2022, Xi Jinping's report emphasized the cultivation of core socialist values (CSV) as integral to advancing Chinese-style modernization, portraying patriotism—the essence of CSV—as a foundation for national unity and cultural confidence. The congress resolution reinforced Xi's core position within the Party while directing mechanisms to embed CSV in ideological work, aiming to foster socialist successors capable of upholding these values amid global challenges. In a September 2024 article in Qiushi, the CPC's theoretical journal, Xi advocated for cultivating "well-rounded socialist successors" by institutionalizing CSV practice in and youth organizations, with emphasis on personal , public , and resistance to Western cultural influences that could undermine ideological loyalty. This directive aligned CSV promotion with Party-led moral , mandating their integration into curricula and extracurricular activities to ensure generational adherence. The Fourth of the 20th CPC , held in October 2025, further escalated these reinforcements by communique, instructing the promotion and practice of CSV within cultural programs to develop a socialist culture possessing "the power to guide, unite, and inspire the people," while bolstering cultural confidence as a bulwark against external ideological pressures. These policy measures intersect with Xi's "" agenda, articulated in the 2022 congress report as an essential socialist feature requiring CSV—particularly prosperity, equality, and harmony—to underpin equitable wealth distribution and mitigate social disparities exacerbated by post-2020 economic slowdowns, including rates exceeding 15% in mid-2023. Party mechanisms enforce this linkage through targeted campaigns, viewing CSV as moral imperatives to sustain stability without altering core economic structures.

Technological and AI Applications

In 2024, released a manually annotated based on the Core Socialist Values (CSV) indicator system, comprising labeled text samples designed to train AI algorithms for recognizing and authenticating content aligned with these values. The , made publicly available through the university's open research platform in August 2025, targets applications in to detect ideological conformity in media, online posts, and educational materials. Chinese regulators, via the (CAC), initiated evaluations of large language models in July 2024 to verify their embodiment of CSV, including principles like , , , and . These assessments involve human censors reviewing AI outputs for alignment, with non-compliant models facing deployment restrictions; by mid-2025, standards from the National Information Security Standardization Technical Committee further mandated CSV integration in protocols. Such models are embedded in systems, where algorithms flag or suppress outputs challenging state authority or promoting subversion, as required under 2023 generative AI regulations extended into enforcement practices. AI-driven CSV enforcement intersects with broader digital surveillance, including for content dissemination that could influence social compliance metrics, though direct ties to financial blacklisting in the remain operationalized through separate data pipelines rather than unified CSV-specific scoring. advocates and analysts have criticized these applications for enabling proactive at scale, arguing that CSV-aligned AI accelerates centralized control over expression by automating ideological filtering across platforms with over 1 billion users. This has raised concerns over reduced algorithmic diversity, as training data biases toward state-approved narratives limit model robustness to unfiltered inputs.

References

  1. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/19thcpcnationalcongress/2017-10/12/content_33160115.htm
  2. https://www.cfr.org/blog/how-much-should-we-read-chinas-new-core-socialist-values
  3. https://chinaopensourceobservatory.org/glossary/core-socialist-values
  4. https://pure.coventry.ac.uk/ws/files/24553323/Binder2.pdf
  5. https://www.sofx.com/chinas-government-censorship-restricts-gen-ai-to-enforce-socialist-core-values/
  6. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1868102620981963
  7. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Asia/1012ecran_gobelong.pdf
  8. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1403158111
  9. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI?locations=CN
  10. https://www.piie.com/publications/chapters_preview/4174/05iie4174.pdf
  11. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/860745/pdf
  12. https://www.npr.org/2000/11/08/1113677/china-corruption
  13. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL33416.html
  14. https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/research/docs/clm20am.pdf
  15. https://chinamediaproject.org/2007/07/05/eight-honors-and-eight-disgraces-%25E5%2585%25AB%25E8%258D%25A3%25E5%2585%25AB%25E8%2580%25BB/
  16. http://www.china.org.cn/english/government/164862.htm
  17. http://www.china.org.cn/china/18th_cpc_congress/2012-11/16/content_27137540_6.htm
  18. http://www.china.org.cn/china/18th_cpc_congress/2012-11/16/content_27138030.htm
  19. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14672715.2016.1263803
  20. http://np.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/News/201402/t20140226_1583694.htm
  21. https://www.neac.gov.cn/seac/c103372/202201/1156519.shtml
  22. https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/Amendment-to-the-P.R.C.-Constitution-%282018%29/
  23. http://english.scio.gov.cn/featured/chinakeywords/2019-07/11/content_74977674.htm
  24. https://www.idcpc.org.cn/english2023/tjzl/cpcjj/20thPartyCongrssReport/
  25. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SIPOVGINICHN
  26. https://wid.world/country/china/
  27. https://chinamediaproject.org/the_ccp_dictionary/whole-process-democracy/
  28. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0920203X251361713
  29. https://chinaopensourceobservatory.org/glossary/core-socialist-values?character=C
  30. https://tnsr.org/2023/09/chinese-politics-since-hu-jintao-and-the-origin-of-xi-jinpings-strongman-rule-a-new-hypothesis/
  31. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-68213161
  32. https://freedomhouse.org/country/china/freedom-net/2024
  33. https://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/how_the_chinese_government_fabricates_social_media_posts_for_strategic_distraction_not_engaged_argument.pdf
  34. https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2024-02/Censorship_Practices_of_the_Peoples_Republic_of_China.pdf
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1043951X2400049X
  36. https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2024-03/china_in_numbers_2023-final.pdf
  37. https://english.www.gov.cn/news/202408/03/content_WS66ad8b4fc6d0868f4e8e9b67.html
  38. https://freedomhouse.org/country/china/freedom-world/2025
  39. https://safeguarddefenders.com/en/blog/liuzhi-use-partys-secret-detention-system-soars
  40. https://www.cecc.gov/sites/evo-subsites/www.cecc.gov/files/2024-12/Chapter%25204.%2520Criminal%2520Justice_1.pdf
  41. http://en.qdrfgroup.com/news/102.html
  42. https://english.www.gov.cn/news/topnews/202210/25/content_WS6357e5c6c6d0a757729e1c01.html
  43. https://persecution.org/2024/01/17/chinas-new-patriotic-education-law-tightens-grip-on-church-leaders/
  44. https://www.prcleader.org/post/the-patriotic-education-campaign-in-xi-s-china-the-emergence-of-a-new-generation-of-nationalists
  45. https://chinaworker.info/en/2024/03/30/44910/
  46. https://labourreview.org/strike-wave-china/
  47. https://www.yyrail.com/group-news/carry-forward-socialist-core-values-yongyang-speacial-steel.html
  48. https://www.prcleader.org/post/xi-s-anti-corruption-campaign-an-all-purpose-governing-tool
  49. https://www.hudson.org/corruption/six-myths-about-china-anti-corruption-campaign
  50. https://bitterwinter.org/Vocabulary/core-socialist-values/
  51. https://globalanticorruptionblog.com/2024/12/05/twelve-years-later-did-chinas-sweeping-anticorruption-campaign-deliver/
  52. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12633
  53. http://www.issplc.com/upload/pdf/2025/05/6The%2520Incorporation%2520of%2520Core%2520Socialist%2520Values%2520into%2520Textbooks%25EF%25BC%259AValue%2520Implications%2C%2520Logical%2520Principles%2C%2520and%2520Practical%2520Approaches.pdf
  54. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2096531119850905
  55. https://english.news.cn/20240601/518423b71b2746f882c28f2d4c71194f/c.html
  56. https://www.chinadailyhk.com/hk/article/582331
  57. http://english.scio.gov.cn/whitepapers/2022-04/21/content_78177906_4.htm
  58. https://enapp.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201812/12/AP5c10709ca31047554287477e.html
  59. https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/generation-n-impact-chinas-youth-nationalism
  60. https://fpa.org/education-and-thought-control-in-xi-jinpings-china/
  61. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/chinas-broadcast-regulator-tightening-control-of-content-promotes-core-socia-idUSKBN18U08A/
  62. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/nov/08/china-passes-film-industry-law-box-office-fraud
  63. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/02/world/asia/china-dance-socialist-values.html
  64. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/5313/2341
  65. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/aug/30/the-london-art-student-whose-chinese-political-slogan-mural-caused-a-storm
  66. https://freedomhouse.org/country/china/freedom-net/2023
  67. https://www.idcpc.gov.cn/english2023/ttxw_5749/201805/t20180508_158829.html
  68. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/download/Xi_Jinping%27s_report_at_19th_CPC_National_Congress.pdf
  69. https://www.voanews.com/a/china-s-vpn-usage-nearly-doubles-amid-internet-censorship/7488465.html
  70. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2023/08/19/2003804951
  71. https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/china
  72. https://tradingeconomics.com/china/corruption-index
  73. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2012
  74. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/chn/china/crime-rate-statistics
  75. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-46811397
  76. https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/gsh/2023/Global_study_on_homicide_2023_web.pdf
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10603991/
  78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384870968_The_Impact_of_Developing_Moral_Education_on_the_Morality_of_Primary_School_Students_in_China
  79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378796717_Core_socialist_values_and_curriculum_policy_in_China_A_study_of_the_curriculum_standard_for_Chinese_language
  80. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=CN
  81. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/chn/china/gdp-growth-rate
  82. https://chinapower.csis.org/tracker/china-gdp/
  83. https://www.imf.org/en/Countries/CHN
  84. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-63310524
  85. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9911943/
  86. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13510347.2024.2311832
  87. https://tradingeconomics.com/china/youth-unemployment-rate/news/494934
  88. https://www.scmp.com/economy/article/3329629/chinas-youth-jobless-rate-falls-slightly-remains-high-after-record-graduation-season
  89. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china/overview
  90. https://www.cato.org/publications/chinas-post-1978-economic-development-entry-global-trading-system
  91. https://rhg.com/research/the-strategic-logic-of-chinas-economic-data/
  92. https://dobetter.esade.edu/en/economy-china
  93. http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/lawregulations/201911/20/content_WS5ed8856ec6d0b3f0e9499913.html
  94. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-4/mswv4_65.htm
  95. https://npcobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/PRC-Constitution-2018.pdf
  96. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333099597_The_Rise_of_the_Princelings_in_China_Career_Advantages_and_Collective_Elite_Reproduction
  97. https://www.thecairoreview.com/essays/rule-of-the-princelings/
  98. https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/Chapter_1--CCP_Decision-Making_and_Xi_Jinpings_Centralization_of_Authority.pdf
  99. https://merics.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/171004_MPOC_05_Ideologies_0_web_2.pdf
  100. https://freedomhouse.org/article/chinese-government-impunity-crackdown-lawyers-fuels-decade-repression
  101. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/07/chinese-government-impunity-for-crackdown-on-lawyers-fuels-decade-of-repression/
  102. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-47024825
  103. https://www.npr.org/2019/01/28/689238095/chinese-human-rights-lawyer-sentenced-to-more-than-4-years-in-prison
  104. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/02/china-activist-li-qiaochu-unjustly-convicted-for-speaking-out-about-torture/
  105. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/10/china-courts-used-as-tools-of-systematic-repression-against-human-rights-defenders/
  106. https://jamestown.org/program/far-from-a-panopticon-social-credit-focuses-on-legal-violations/
  107. https://merics.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/MERICS-China-Monitor67-Social-Credit-System-final-4.pdf
  108. https://merics.org/en/report/chinas-social-credit-system-2021-fragmentation-towards-integration
  109. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1072&context=alr
  110. https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/east-asia/china/report-china/
  111. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2022/country-chapters/china-and-tibet
  112. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2021/country-chapters/china
  113. https://www.heritage.org/index/pages/country-pages/china
  114. https://www.heritage.org/international-economies/commentary/how-chinas-economic-freedom-deficit-distorts-markets-beyond-its
  115. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596762/full
  116. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3839668/
  117. https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2019/08/china-and-the-rule-of-law/
  118. https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2021C28/
  119. https://judicature.duke.edu/articles/an-uphill-battle-how-chinas-obsession-with-social-stability-is-blocking-judicial-reform/
  120. https://freedomhouse.org/country/china/freedom-world/2024
  121. https://freedomhouse.org/country/china/freedom-world/2023
  122. https://en.theorychina.org.cn/c/2022-10-23/1451598.shtml
  123. https://policycn.com/public/commentaries/xi-cultivating-well-rounded-socialist-successors-40935
  124. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3276875/xi-jinping-speech-was-call-action-against-foreign-forces-westernising-chinese-youth
  125. http://en.cppcc.gov.cn/2025-10/24/c_1135014.htm
  126. https://news.cgtn.com/news/2025-10-23/Communique-of-the-Fourth-Plenary-Session-of-20th-CPC-Central-Committee-1HIbjwuiAww/p.html
  127. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/assessing-chinas-common-prosperity-campaign/
  128. https://opendata.pku.edu.cn/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.18170/DVN/VB2COB
  129. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/18/chinese-regulators-begin-testing-genai-models-on-socialist-values.html
  130. https://thediplomat.com/2025/02/aligning-ai-with-chinas-authoritarian-value-system/
  131. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2023/07/chinas-ai-regulations-and-how-they-get-made?lang=en
  132. https://advox.globalvoices.org/2025/07/02/china-is-rushing-to-develop-its-ai-powered-censorship-system/
  133. https://nationalsecurity.virginia.edu/research/chinese-communist-partys-layered-artificial-intelligence-strategy
  134. https://journalismresearch.org/2025/09/sensitive-prompts-and-cultural-contexts-a-comparative-study-of-ai-chatbots-in-china-and-the-west/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.