DNA replication
DNA replication
Main page
2324799

DNA replication

logo
Community Hub0 subscribers
Read side by side
from Wikipedia
DNA replication: The double helix is 'unzipped' and unwound, then each separated strand (turquoise) acts as a template for replicating a new partner strand (green). Nucleotides (bases) are matched to synthesize the new partner strands into two new double helices.

DNA replication is the process by which a cell makes exact copies of its DNA.[1][2][3][4] This process occurs in all organisms and is essential to biological inheritance, cell division, and repair of damaged tissues. DNA replication ensures that each of the newly divided daughter cells receives its own copy of each DNA molecule.[5]

DNA most commonly occurs in double-stranded form, made up of two complementary strands held together by base pairing of the nucleotides comprising each strand. The two linear strands of a double-stranded DNA molecule typically twist together in the shape of a double helix.[6] During replication, the two strands are separated, and each strand of the original DNA molecule then serves as a template for the production of a complementary counterpart strand, a process referred to as semiconservative replication. As a result, each replicated DNA molecule is composed of one original DNA strand as well as one newly synthesized strand.[7] Cellular proofreading and error-checking mechanisms ensure near-perfect fidelity for DNA replication.[8][9]

DNA replication usually begins at specific locations known as origins of replication[10] which are scattered across the genome.[11] Unwinding of DNA at the origin is accommodated by enzymes known as helicases and results in replication forks growing bi-directionally from the origin. Numerous proteins are associated with the replication fork to help in the initiation and continuation of DNA synthesis. Most prominently, DNA polymerase synthesizes the new strands by incorporating nucleotides that complement the nucleotides of the template strand. DNA replication occurs during the S (synthesis) stage of interphase.[12]

DNA replication can also be performed in vitro (artificially, outside a cell).[13] DNA polymerases isolated from cells and artificial DNA primers can be used to start DNA synthesis at known sequences in a template DNA molecule. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), ligase chain reaction (LCR), and transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) are all common examples of this technique. In March 2021, researchers reported evidence suggesting that a preliminary form of transfer RNA, a necessary component of translation (the biological synthesis of new proteins in accordance with the genetic code), could have been a replicator molecule itself in the early abiogenesis of primordial life.[14][15]

DNA structure

[edit]
The structure of the DNA double helix (type B-DNA). The atoms in the structure are color-coded by element, and the detailed structures of two base pairs are shown in the bottom right.

DNA is a double-stranded structure, with both strands coiled together to form the characteristic double helix. Each single strand of DNA is a chain of four types of nucleotides. Nucleotides in DNA contain a deoxyribose sugar, a phosphate, and a nucleobase. The four types of nucleotide correspond to the four nucleobases: adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine, commonly abbreviated as A, C, G, and T, respectively. Adenine and guanine are purine[16] nucleobases, while cytosine and thymine are pyrimidines. These nucleotides form phosphodiester bonds, creating phosphate-deoxyribose backbone of the DNA double helix with the nucleobases pointing inward (i.e., toward the opposing strand). Complementary nucleobases are matched between strands through hydrogen bonds to form base pairs. Adenine pairs with thymine (two hydrogen bonds), and guanine pairs with cytosine (three hydrogen bonds).[17]

DNA strands have a directionality, and the different ends of a single strand are called the "3′ (three-prime) end" and the "5′ (five-prime) end". By convention, if the base sequence of a single strand of DNA is given, the left end of the sequence is the 5′ end, while the right end of the sequence is the 3′ end. The strands of the double helix are anti-parallel, with one being 5′ to 3′, and the opposite strand 3′ to 5′. These terms refer to the chemical convention of numbering the carbon atoms comprising the deoxyribose molecule and indicate the specific carbon atom to which the next phosphate in the chain attaches. Directionality has consequences in DNA synthesis, because DNA polymerase can synthesize DNA in only one direction by adding nucleotides to the 3′ end of a DNA strand.[18]

The pairing of complementary bases in DNA (through hydrogen bonding) means that the information contained within each strand is redundant. Phosphodiester (intra-strand) bonds are stronger than hydrogen (inter-strand) bonds. The actual job of the phosphodiester bonds is to connect the 5' carbon atom of one nucleotide to the 3' carbon atom of another nucleotide, while the hydrogen bonds stabilize DNA double helices across the helix axis but not in the direction of the longitudinal axis.[19] This makes it possible to separate the strands from one another. The nucleotides on a single strand can therefore be used to reconstruct nucleotides on a newly synthesized partner strand.[20]

DNA polymerase

[edit]
DNA polymerases adds nucleotides to the 3′ end of a strand of DNA.[21] If a mismatch is accidentally incorporated, the polymerase is inhibited from further extension. Proofreading removes the mismatched nucleotide and extension continues.

DNA polymerases are a family of enzymes that carry out all forms of DNA replication.[22] DNA polymerases in general cannot initiate synthesis of new strands but can only extend an existing DNA or RNA strand paired with a template strand. To begin synthesis, a short fragment of RNA, called a primer, must be created and paired with the template DNA strand.

DNA polymerase adds a new strand of DNA by extending the 3′ end of an existing nucleotide chain, adding new nucleotides matched to the template strand, one at a time, via the creation of phosphodiester bonds. The energy for this process of DNA polymerization comes from hydrolysis of the high-energy phosphate (phosphoanhydride) bonds between the three phosphates attached to each unincorporated base. Free bases with an attached sugar molecule (deoxyribose in the case of DNA) are called nucleosides, and nucleosides with one or more attached phosphate groups are called nucleotides; in particular, nucleosides with three attached phosphate groups are called nucleoside triphosphates. When a free nucleotide is being added to a growing DNA strand, the formation of a phosphodiester bond between the proximal phosphate of the free nucleotide and the deoxyribose of another nucleotide within the growing chain is accompanied by hydrolysis of a high-energy phosphate bond with release of the free nucleotide's two distal phosphate groups as a pyrophosphate. Enzymatic hydrolysis of the resulting pyrophosphate into inorganic phosphate consumes a second high-energy phosphate bond and renders the reaction effectively irreversible.[Note 1]

In general, DNA polymerases are highly accurate, with an intrinsic error rate of less than one mistake for every 107 nucleotides added.[23] Some DNA polymerases can also delete nucleotides from the end of a developing strand in order to fix mismatched bases. This is known as proofreading. Finally, post-replication mismatch repair mechanisms monitor the DNA for errors, being capable of distinguishing mismatches in the newly synthesized DNA strand from the original strand sequence. Together, these three discrimination steps enable replication fidelity of less than one mistake for every 109 nucleotides added.[23]

The rate of DNA replication in a living cell was first measured as the rate of phage T4 DNA elongation in phage-infected E. coli.[24] During the period of exponential DNA increase at 37 °C, the rate was 749 nucleotides per second. The mutation rate per base pair per replication during phage T4 DNA synthesis is 1.7 per 108.[25]

Replication process

[edit]
Overview of the steps in DNA replication
Steps in DNA synthesis

DNA replication, like all biological polymerization processes, proceeds in three enzymatically catalyzed and coordinated steps: initiation, elongation and termination.

Initiation

[edit]
Role of initiators for initiation of DNA replication
Formation of pre-replication complex

For a cell to divide, it must first replicate its DNA.[26] DNA replication is an all-or-none process; once replication begins, it proceeds to completion. Once replication is complete, it does not occur again in the same cell cycle. This is made possible by the division of initiation of the pre-replication complex.[citation needed]

Pre-replication complex

[edit]

In late mitosis and early G1 phase, a large complex of initiator proteins assembles into the pre-replication complex at particular points in the DNA, known as "origins".[11][10] In E. coli the primary initiator protein is Dna A; in yeast, this is the origin recognition complex.[27] Sequences used by initiator proteins tend to be "AT-rich" (rich in adenine and thymine bases), because A-T base pairs have two hydrogen bonds (rather than the three formed in a C-G pair) and thus are easier to strand-separate.[28] In eukaryotes, the origin recognition complex (ORC) catalyzes the assembly of initiator proteins into the pre-replication complex. In addition, a recent report suggests that budding yeast ORC dimerizes in a cell cycle dependent manner to control licensing.[29][30] [clarification needed] In turn, the process of ORC dimerization is mediated by a cell cycle-dependent Noc3p dimerization cycle in vivo, and this role of Noc3p is separable from its role in ribosome biogenesis. An essential Noc3p dimerization cycle mediates ORC double-hexamer formation in replication licensing and Noc3p are continuously bound to the chromatin throughout the cell cycle.[31] Cdc6 and Cdt1 then associate with the bound origin recognition complex at the origin in order to form a larger complex necessary to load the Mcm complex onto the DNA. In eukaryotes, the Mcm complex is the helicase that will split the DNA helix at the replication forks and origins. The Mcm complex is recruited at late G1 phase and loaded by the ORC-Cdc6-Cdt1 complex onto the DNA via ATP-dependent protein remodeling. The loading of the MCM complex onto the origin DNA marks the completion of pre-replication complex formation.[32]

If environmental conditions are right in late G1 phase, the G1 and G1/S cyclin-Cdk complexes are activated, which stimulate expression of genes that encode components of the DNA synthetic machinery. G1/S-Cdk activation also promotes the expression and activation of S-Cdk complexes, which may play a role in activating replication origins depending on species and cell type. Control of these Cdks vary depending on cell type and stage of development. This regulation is best understood in budding yeast, where the S cyclins Clb5 and Clb6 are primarily responsible for DNA replication.[33] Clb5,6-Cdk1 complexes directly trigger the activation of replication origins and are therefore required throughout S phase to directly activate each origin.[32]

In a similar manner, Cdc7 is also required through S phase to activate replication origins. Cdc7 is not active throughout the cell cycle, and its activation is strictly timed to avoid premature initiation of DNA replication. In late G1, Cdc7 activity rises abruptly as a result of association with the regulatory subunit DBF4, which binds Cdc7 directly and promotes its protein kinase activity. Cdc7 has been found to be a rate-limiting regulator of origin activity. Together, the G1/S-Cdks and/or S-Cdks and Cdc7 collaborate to directly activate the replication origins, leading to initiation of DNA synthesis.[32]

Preinitiation complex

[edit]

In early S phase, S-Cdk and Cdc7 activation lead to the assembly of the preinitiation complex, a massive protein complex formed at the origin. Formation of the preinitiation complex displaces Cdc6 and Cdt1 from the origin replication complex, inactivating and disassembling the pre-replication complex. Loading the preinitiation complex onto the origin activates the Mcm helicase, causing unwinding of the DNA helix. The preinitiation complex also loads α-primase and other DNA polymerases onto the DNA.[32]

After α-primase synthesizes the first primers, the primer-template junctions interact with the clamp loader, which loads the sliding clamp onto the DNA to begin DNA synthesis. The components of the preinitiation complex remain associated with replication forks as they move out from the origin.[32]

Elongation

[edit]

DNA polymerase has 5′–3′ activity. All known DNA replication systems require a free 3′ hydroxyl group before synthesis can be initiated (note: the DNA template is read in 3′ to 5′ direction whereas a new strand is synthesized in the 5′ to 3′ direction—this is often confused). Four distinct mechanisms for DNA synthesis are recognized:[citation needed]

  1. All cellular life forms and many DNA viruses, phages and plasmids use a primase to synthesize a short RNA primer with a free 3′ OH group which is subsequently elongated by a DNA polymerase.
  2. The retroelements (including retroviruses) employ a transfer RNA that primes DNA replication by providing a free 3′ OH that is used for elongation by the reverse transcriptase.
  3. In the adenoviruses and the φ29 family of bacteriophages, the 3′ OH group is provided by the side chain of an amino acid of the genome attached protein (the terminal protein) to which nucleotides are added by the DNA polymerase to form a new strand.
  4. In the single stranded DNA viruses—a group that includes the circoviruses, the geminiviruses, the parvoviruses and others—and also the many phages and plasmids that use the rolling circle replication (RCR) mechanism, the RCR endonuclease creates a nick in the genome strand (single stranded viruses) or one of the DNA strands (plasmids). The 5′ end of the nicked strand is transferred to a tyrosine residue on the nuclease and the free 3′ OH group is then used by the DNA polymerase to synthesize the new strand.

Cellular organisms use the first of these pathways leading to it being the most well-known. In this mechanism, once the two strands are separated, primase adds RNA primers to the template strands. The leading strand receives one RNA primer while the lagging strand receives several. The leading strand is continuously extended from the primer by a DNA polymerase with high processivity, while the lagging strand is extended discontinuously from each primer forming Okazaki fragments. RNase removes the primer RNA fragments, and a low processivity DNA polymerase distinct from the replicative polymerase enters to fill the gaps. When this is complete, a single nick on the leading strand and several nicks on the lagging strand can be found. Ligase works to fill these nicks in, thus completing the newly replicated DNA molecule.[citation needed]

The primase used in this process differs significantly between bacteria and archaea/eukaryotes. Bacteria use a primase belonging to the DnaG protein superfamily which contains a catalytic domain of the TOPRIM fold type.[34] The TOPRIM fold contains an α/β core with four conserved strands in a Rossmann-like topology. This structure is also found in the catalytic domains of topoisomerase Ia, topoisomerase II, the OLD-family nucleases and DNA repair proteins related to the RecR protein.[citation needed]

The primase used by archaea and eukaryotes, in contrast, contains a highly derived version of the RNA recognition motif (RRM). This primase is structurally similar to many viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases, reverse transcriptases, cyclic nucleotide generating cyclases and DNA polymerases of the A/B/Y families that are involved in DNA replication and repair. In eukaryotic replication, the primase forms a complex with Pol α.[35]

Multiple DNA polymerases take on different roles in the DNA replication process. In E. coli, DNA Pol III is the polymerase enzyme primarily responsible for DNA replication. It assembles into a replication complex at the replication fork that exhibits extremely high processivity, remaining intact for the entire replication cycle. In contrast, DNA Pol I is the enzyme responsible for replacing RNA primers with DNA. DNA Pol I has a 5′ to 3′ exonuclease activity in addition to its polymerase activity, and uses its exonuclease activity to degrade the RNA primers ahead of it as it extends the DNA strand behind it, in a process called nick translation. Pol I is much less processive than Pol III because its primary function in DNA replication is to create many short DNA regions rather than a few very long regions.[citation needed]

In eukaryotes, the low-processivity enzyme, Pol α, helps to initiate replication because it forms a complex with primase.[36] In eukaryotes, leading strand synthesis is thought to be conducted by Pol ε; however, this view has recently been challenged, suggesting a role for Pol δ.[37] Primer removal is completed Pol δ[38] while repair of DNA during replication is completed by Pol ε.

As DNA synthesis continues, the original DNA strands continue to unwind on each side of the bubble, forming a replication fork with two prongs. In bacteria, which have a single origin of replication on their circular chromosome, this process creates a "theta structure" (resembling the Greek letter theta: θ). In contrast, eukaryotes have longer linear chromosomes and initiate replication at multiple origins within these.[39]

Replication fork

[edit]
Scheme of the replication fork.
a: template, b: leading strand, c: lagging strand, d: replication fork, e: primer, f: Okazaki fragments
Many enzymes are involved in the DNA replication fork.

The replication fork is a structure that forms within the long helical DNA during DNA replication. It is produced by enzymes called helicases that break the hydrogen bonds that hold the DNA strands together in a helix. The resulting structure has two branching "prongs", each one made up of a single strand of DNA. These two strands serve as the template for the leading and lagging strands, which will be created as DNA polymerase matches complementary nucleotides to the templates; the templates may be properly referred to as the leading strand template and the lagging strand template.[citation needed]

DNA is read by DNA polymerase in the 3′ to 5′ direction, meaning the new strand is synthesized in the 5' to 3' direction. Since the leading and lagging strand templates are oriented in opposite directions at the replication fork, a major issue is how to achieve synthesis of new lagging strand DNA, whose direction of synthesis is opposite to the direction of the growing replication fork.[citation needed]

Leading strand

[edit]

The leading strand is the strand of new DNA which is synthesized in the same direction as the growing replication fork. This sort of DNA replication is continuous.[citation needed]

Lagging strand

[edit]

The lagging strand is the strand of new DNA whose direction of synthesis is opposite to the direction of the growing replication fork. Because of its orientation, replication of the lagging strand is more complicated as compared to that of the leading strand. As a consequence, the DNA polymerase on this strand is seen to "lag behind" the other strand.[citation needed]

The lagging strand is synthesized in short, separated segments. On the lagging strand template, a primase "reads" the template DNA and initiates synthesis of a short complementary RNA primer. A DNA polymerase extends the primed segments, forming Okazaki fragments. The RNA primers are then removed and replaced with DNA, and the fragments of DNA are joined by DNA ligase.[citation needed]

Dynamics at the replication fork

[edit]
The assembled human DNA clamp, a trimer of the protein PCNA

In all cases the helicase is composed of six polypeptides that wrap around only one strand of the DNA being replicated. The two polymerases are bound to the helicase hexamer. In eukaryotes the helicase wraps around the leading strand, and in prokaryotes it wraps around the lagging strand.[40]

As helicase unwinds DNA at the replication fork, the DNA ahead is forced to rotate. This process results in a build-up of twists in the DNA ahead.[41] This build-up creates a torsional load that would eventually stop the replication fork. Topoisomerases are enzymes that temporarily break the strands of DNA, relieving the tension caused by unwinding the two strands of the DNA helix; topoisomerases (including DNA gyrase) achieve this by adding negative supercoils to the DNA helix.[42]

Bare single-stranded DNA tends to fold back on itself forming secondary structures; these structures can interfere with the movement of DNA polymerase. To prevent this, single-strand binding proteins bind to the DNA until a second strand is synthesized, preventing secondary structure formation.[43]

Double-stranded DNA is coiled around histones that play an important role in regulating gene expression so the replicated DNA must be coiled around histones at the same places as the original DNA.[44] To ensure this, histone chaperones disassemble the chromatin before it is replicated and replace the histones in the correct place. Some steps in this reassembly are somewhat speculative.[45]

Clamp proteins act as a sliding clamp on DNA, allowing the DNA polymerase to bind to its template and aid in processivity. The inner face of the clamp enables DNA to be threaded through it. Once the polymerase reaches the end of the template or detects double-stranded DNA, the sliding clamp undergoes a conformational change that releases the DNA polymerase. Clamp-loading proteins are used to initially load the clamp, recognizing the junction between template and RNA primers.[9]:274-5

DNA replication proteins

[edit]

At the replication fork, many replication enzymes assemble on the DNA into a complex molecular machine called the replisome. The following is a list of major DNA replication enzymes that participate in the replisome:[46]

Enzyme Function in DNA replication
DNA helicase Also known as helix destabilizing enzyme. Helicase separates the two strands of DNA at the Replication Fork behind the topoisomerase.
DNA polymerase The enzyme responsible for catalyzing the addition of nucleotide substrates to DNA in the 5′ to 3′ direction during DNA replication. Also performs proof-reading and error correction. There exist many different types of DNA Polymerase, each of which perform different functions in different types of cells.
DNA clamp A protein which prevents elongating DNA polymerases from dissociating from the DNA parent strand.
Single-strand DNA-binding protein Bind to ssDNA and prevent the DNA double helix from re-annealing after DNA helicase unwinds it, thus maintaining the strand separation, and facilitating the synthesis of the new strand.
Topoisomerase Relaxes the DNA from its super-coiled nature.
DNA gyrase Relieves strain of unwinding by DNA helicase; this is a specific type of topoisomerase
DNA ligase Re-anneals the semi-conservative strands and joins Okazaki Fragments of the lagging strand.
Primase Provides a starting point of RNA (or DNA) for DNA polymerase to begin synthesis of the new DNA strand.
Telomerase Lengthens telomeric DNA by adding repetitive nucleotide sequences to the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes. This allows germ cells and stem cells to avoid the Hayflick limit on cell division.[47]

In vitro single-molecule experiments (using optical tweezers and magnetic tweezers) have found synergetic interactions between the replisome enzymes (helicase, polymerase, and Single-strand DNA-binding protein) and with the DNA replication fork enhancing DNA-unwinding and DNA-replication.[13] These results lead to the development of kinetic models accounting for the synergetic interactions and their stability.[13]

Replication machinery

[edit]
E. coli Replisome. Notably, the DNA on lagging strand forms a loop. The exact structure of replisome is not well understood.

Replication machineries consist of factors involved in DNA replication and appearing on template ssDNAs. Replication machineries include primosotors are replication enzymes; DNA polymerase, DNA helicases, DNA clamps and DNA topoisomerases, and replication proteins; e.g. single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSB). In the replication machineries these components coordinate. In most of the bacteria, all of the factors involved in DNA replication are located on replication forks and the complexes stay on the forks during DNA replication. Replication machineries are also referred to as replisomes, or DNA replication systems. These terms are generic terms for proteins located on replication forks. In eukaryotic and some bacterial cells the replisomes are not formed.[citation needed]

In an alternative figure, DNA factories are similar to projectors and DNAs are like as cinematic films passing constantly into the projectors. In the replication factory model, after both DNA helicases for leading strands and lagging strands are loaded on the template DNAs, the helicases run along the DNAs into each other. The helicases remain associated for the remainder of replication process. Peter Meister et al. observed directly replication sites in budding yeast by monitoring green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged DNA polymerases α. They detected DNA replication of pairs of the tagged loci spaced apart symmetrically from a replication origin and found that the distance between the pairs decreased markedly by time.[48] This finding suggests that the mechanism of DNA replication goes with DNA factories. That is, couples of replication factories are loaded on replication origins and the factories associated with each other. Also, template DNAs move into the factories, which bring extrusion of the template ssDNAs and new DNAs. Meister's finding is the first direct evidence of replication factory model. Subsequent research has shown that DNA helicases form dimers in many eukaryotic cells and bacterial replication machineries stay in single intranuclear location during DNA synthesis.[49]

Replication Factories Disentangle Sister Chromatids. The disentanglement is essential for distributing the chromatids into daughter cells after DNA replication. Because sister chromatids after DNA replication hold each other by Cohesin rings, there is the only chance for the disentanglement in DNA replication. Fixing of replication machineries as replication factories can improve the success rate of DNA replication. If replication forks move freely in chromosomes, catenation of nuclei is aggravated and impedes mitotic segregation.[48]

Termination

[edit]

Eukaryotes initiate DNA replication at multiple points in the chromosome, so replication forks meet and terminate at many points in the chromosome. Because eukaryotes have linear chromosomes, DNA replication is unable to reach the very end of the chromosomes. Due to this problem, DNA is lost in each replication cycle from the end of the chromosome. Telomeres are regions of repetitive DNA close to the ends and help prevent loss of genes due to this shortening. Shortening of the telomeres is a normal process in somatic cells. This shortens the telomeres of the daughter DNA chromosome. As a result, cells can only divide a certain number of times before the DNA loss prevents further division. (This is known as the Hayflick limit.) Within the germ cell line, which passes DNA to the next generation, telomerase extends the repetitive sequences of the telomere region to prevent degradation. Telomerase can become mistakenly active in somatic cells, sometimes leading to cancer formation. Increased telomerase activity is one of the hallmarks of cancer.[50]

Termination requires that the progress of the DNA replication fork must stop or be blocked. Termination at a specific locus, when it occurs, involves the interaction between two components: (1) a termination site sequence in the DNA, and (2) a protein which binds to this sequence to physically stop DNA replication. In various bacterial species, this is named the DNA replication terminus site-binding protein, or Ter protein.[51]

Because bacteria have circular chromosomes, termination of replication occurs when the two replication forks meet each other on the opposite end of the parental chromosome. E. coli regulates this process through the use of termination sequences that, when bound by the Tus protein, enable only one direction of replication fork to pass through. As a result, the replication forks are constrained to always meet within the termination region of the chromosome.[52]

Regulation

[edit]
The cell cycle of eukaryotic cells

Eukaryotes

[edit]

Within eukaryotes, DNA replication is controlled within the context of the cell cycle. As the cell grows and divides, it progresses through stages in the cell cycle; DNA replication takes place during the S phase (synthesis phase). The progress of the eukaryotic cell through the cycle is controlled by cell cycle checkpoints. Progression through checkpoints is controlled through complex interactions between various proteins, including cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases.[53] Unlike bacteria, eukaryotic DNA replicates in the confines of the nucleus.[54]

The G1/S checkpoint (restriction checkpoint) regulates whether eukaryotic cells enter the process of DNA replication and subsequent division. Cells that do not proceed through this checkpoint remain in the G0 stage and do not replicate their DNA.[citation needed]

Once the DNA has gone through the "G1/S" test, it can only be copied once in every cell cycle. When the Mcm complex moves away from the origin, the pre-replication complex is dismantled. Because a new Mcm complex cannot be loaded at an origin until the pre-replication subunits are reactivated, one origin of replication can not be used twice in the same cell cycle.[32]

Activation of S-Cdks in early S phase promotes the destruction or inhibition of individual pre-replication complex components, preventing immediate reassembly. S and M-Cdks continue to block pre-replication complex assembly even after S phase is complete, ensuring that assembly cannot occur again until all Cdk activity is reduced in late mitosis.[32]

In budding yeast, inhibition of assembly is caused by Cdk-dependent phosphorylation of pre-replication complex components. At the onset of S phase, phosphorylation of Cdc6 by Cdk1 causes the binding of Cdc6 to the SCF ubiquitin protein ligase, which causes proteolytic destruction of Cdc6. Cdk-dependent phosphorylation of Mcm proteins promotes their export out of the nucleus along with Cdt1 during S phase, preventing the loading of new Mcm complexes at origins during a single cell cycle. Cdk phosphorylation of the origin replication complex also inhibits pre-replication complex assembly. The individual presence of any of these three mechanisms is sufficient to inhibit pre-replication complex assembly. However, mutations of all three proteins in the same cell does trigger reinitiation at many origins of replication within one cell cycle.[32][55]

In animal cells, the protein geminin is a key inhibitor of pre-replication complex assembly. Geminin binds Cdt1, preventing its binding to the origin recognition complex. In G1, levels of geminin are kept low by the APC, which ubiquitinates geminin to target it for degradation. When geminin is destroyed, Cdt1 is released, allowing it to function in pre-replication complex assembly. At the end of G1, the APC is inactivated, allowing geminin to accumulate and bind Cdt1.[32]

Replication of chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes occurs independently of the cell cycle, through the process of D-loop replication.[citation needed][56]

Replication focus

[edit]

In vertebrate cells, replication sites concentrate into positions called replication foci.[48] Replication sites can be detected by immunostaining daughter strands and replication enzymes and monitoring GFP-tagged replication factors. By these methods it is found that replication foci of varying size and positions appear in S phase of cell division and their number per nucleus is far smaller than the number of genomic replication forks.

P. Heun et al.,[48](2001) tracked GFP-tagged replication foci in budding yeast cells and revealed that replication origins move constantly in G1 and S phase and the dynamics decreased significantly in S phase.[48] Traditionally, replication sites were fixed on spatial structure of chromosomes by nuclear matrix or lamins. The Heun's results denied the traditional concepts, budding yeasts do not have lamins, and support that replication origins self-assemble and form replication foci.[citation needed]

By firing of replication origins, controlled spatially and temporally, the formation of replication foci is regulated. D. A. Jackson et al.(1998) revealed that neighboring origins fire simultaneously in mammalian cells.[48] Spatial juxtaposition of replication sites brings clustering of replication forks. The clustering do rescue of stalled replication forks and favors normal progress of replication forks. Progress of replication forks is inhibited by many factors; collision with proteins or with complexes binding strongly on DNA, deficiency of dNTPs, nicks on template DNAs and so on. If replication forks get stuck and the rest of the sequences from the stuck forks are not copied, then the daughter strands get nick nick unreplicated sites. The un-replicated sites on one parent's strand hold the other strand together but not daughter strands. Therefore, the resulting sister chromatids cannot separate from each other and cannot divide into 2 daughter cells. When neighboring origins fire and a fork from one origin is stalled, fork from other origin access on an opposite direction of the stalled fork and duplicate the un-replicated sites. As other mechanism of the rescue there is application of dormant replication origins that excess origins do not fire in normal DNA replication.[citation needed]

Bacteria

[edit]
Dam methylates adenine of GATC sites after replication

Most bacteria do not go through a well-defined cell cycle but instead continuously copy their DNA; during rapid growth, this can result in the concurrent occurrence of multiple rounds of replication.[57] In E. coli, the best-characterized bacteria, DNA replication is regulated through several mechanisms, including: the hemimethylation and sequestering of the origin sequence, the ratio of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and the levels of protein DnaA. All these control the binding of initiator proteins to the origin sequences.[58]

Because E. coli methylates GATC DNA sequences, DNA synthesis results in hemimethylated sequences. This hemimethylated DNA is recognized by the protein SeqA, which binds and sequesters the origin sequence; in addition, DnaA (required for initiation of replication) binds less well to hemimethylated DNA. As a result, newly replicated origins are prevented from immediately initiating another round of DNA replication.[59]

ATP builds up when the cell is in a rich medium, triggering DNA replication once the cell has reached a specific size. ATP competes with ADP to bind to DnaA, and the DnaA-ATP complex is able to initiate replication. A certain number of DnaA proteins are also required for DNA replication — each time the origin is copied, the number of binding sites for DnaA doubles, requiring the synthesis of more DnaA to enable another initiation of replication.[citation needed]

In fast-growing bacteria, such as E. coli, chromosome replication takes more time than dividing the cell. The bacteria solve this by initiating a new round of replication before the previous one has been terminated.[60] The new round of replication will form the chromosome of the cell that is born two generations after the dividing cell. This mechanism creates overlapping replication cycles.

Problems with DNA replication

[edit]
Replication fork restarts by homologous recombination following replication stress
Epigenetic consequences of nucleosome reassembly defects at stalled replication forks

There are many events that contribute to replication stress, including:[61]

Polymerase chain reaction

[edit]

Researchers commonly replicate DNA in vitro using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR uses a pair of primers to span a target region in template DNA, and then polymerizes partner strands in each direction from these primers using a thermostable DNA polymerase. Repeating this process through multiple cycles amplifies the targeted DNA region. At the start of each cycle, the mixture of template and primers is heated, separating the newly synthesized molecule and template. Then, as the mixture cools, both of these become templates for annealing of new primers, and the polymerase extends from these. As a result, the number of copies of the target region doubles each round, increasing exponentially.[62]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
DNA replication is the biological process by which a double-stranded DNA molecule is copied to produce two identical DNA molecules, ensuring that each daughter cell receives a complete set of genetic information prior to cell division.[1] This semi-conservative mechanism, first experimentally demonstrated in bacteria, results in each new DNA double helix containing one parental (template) strand and one newly synthesized complementary strand, allowing for high-fidelity duplication through base-pairing rules (adenine with thymine, guanine with cytosine).[2] The process occurs during the S phase of the eukaryotic cell cycle and is orchestrated by a multiprotein complex at specialized replication origins, achieving remarkable speed and accuracy to copy billions of base pairs with an error rate as low as one in 10^9 nucleotides.[3] In eukaryotes, replication initiates at multiple origins of replication—sequences rich in adenine-thymine base pairs—where the enzyme helicase unwinds the DNA double helix, creating a Y-shaped replication fork and generating single-stranded templates stabilized by single-strand binding proteins.[2] Primase then synthesizes short RNA primers to provide a 3'-OH group for DNA polymerases to begin synthesis, which proceeds exclusively in the 5' to 3' direction; the leading strand is synthesized continuously toward the fork, while the lagging strand is formed discontinuously in short Okazaki fragments (100–200 nucleotides long) away from the fork.[3] DNA polymerases (such as alpha, delta, and epsilon in eukaryotes) extend these strands by adding deoxyribonucleotides, with proofreading exonuclease activity correcting mismatches during synthesis, and topoisomerases relieving torsional stress ahead of the fork.[2] Completion of replication involves the enzyme DNA polymerase removing RNA primers and filling gaps with DNA, followed by DNA ligase sealing nicks to form continuous strands; replication termination occurs when converging forks meet, and in eukaryotes with linear chromosomes, telomerase extends telomeres to counteract the end-replication problem at chromosome ends.[4] Fidelity is further enhanced by post-replicative mismatch repair systems that scan for and correct errors, reducing the overall mutation rate dramatically.[2] Prokaryotes, like bacteria, employ a similar core mechanism but with a single origin and enzymes such as DNA polymerase III, enabling faster replication suited to their simpler genomes.[3] Disruptions in this process, such as enzyme deficiencies, can lead to genomic instability, mutations, and diseases including cancer.[3]

Fundamentals of DNA Replication

DNA Structure and Topology

The double-helix structure of DNA, proposed by James D. Watson and Francis H. C. Crick in 1953, consists of two antiparallel right-handed helical strands composed of deoxyribonucleotide subunits, with the sugar-phosphate backbones forming the outer rails and the nitrogenous bases projecting inward.[5] The strands are stabilized by specific hydrogen bonding between complementary base pairs—adenine (A) pairing with thymine (T) via two hydrogen bonds, and guanine (G) pairing with cytosine (C) via three—ensuring faithful transmission of genetic information during replication.[5] This configuration creates a uniform diameter of approximately 2 nm and a helical pitch of 3.4 nm with 10 base pairs per turn, while the asymmetric positioning of the glycosidic bonds results in major and minor grooves along the helix; the major groove is wider (about 1.2 nm) and shallower, allowing proteins to access the base edges for sequence-specific recognition without disrupting the double helix.[5] The topological properties of DNA, particularly supercoiling, arise from the linking number (Lk), defined as the number of times one strand crosses the other in a projection, which remains invariant unless broken; underwinding (negative supercoiling) or overwinding (positive supercoiling) introduces torsional stress that compacts the molecule or hinders processes like unwinding.[6] In prokaryotes, the genome is organized as a single circular chromosome, as visualized by John Cairns in 1963 using autoradiography of Escherichia coli DNA, which revealed a theta-shaped structure during replication and confirmed the circular topology, with the chromosome spanning about 700–900 μm when linearized.[7] During replication, helicase unwinding generates positive supercoils ahead of the fork, which topoisomerases relieve by transiently breaking and rejoining strands; type I topoisomerases, first identified by James C. Wang in 1971 as the E. coli ω protein, relax supercoils through single-strand nicks, while type II enzymes handle catenanes in circular genomes. The semiconservative nature of replication—each parental strand serving as a template for a new complementary strand—was experimentally verified by Matthew Meselson and Franklin W. Stahl in 1958 using density-labeled E. coli DNA, which showed hybrid density after one generation and segregated densities thereafter.[8] In eukaryotes, chromosomes are linear, presenting distinct topological challenges: the ends, capped by telomeres, cannot be fully replicated by conventional DNA polymerases due to the requirement for an RNA primer and the 5'-to-3' synthesis direction, leading to progressive shortening known as the end-replication problem, as independently proposed by James D. Watson in 1972 and Alexey Olovnikov in 1973. Centromeres, characterized by highly repetitive α-satellite DNA, pose replication hurdles due to their heterochromatic nature and propensity for secondary structures, which delay fork progression and increase breakage risk, necessitating specialized mechanisms like increased origin density and checkpoint activation to maintain stability.[9] These structural features ensure that replication proceeds accurately while accommodating the topological constraints imposed by supercoiling and chromosomal architecture.

Enzymatic Machinery: DNA Polymerases and Associated Proteins

DNA replication relies on a suite of specialized enzymes and proteins that coordinate the unwinding, priming, and synthesis of new DNA strands. Central to this process is DNA polymerase, an enzyme that catalyzes the addition of deoxyribonucleotides to a growing DNA chain in a template-directed manner. The first DNA polymerase was isolated and characterized from Escherichia coli by Arthur Kornberg and colleagues in 1956, marking a pivotal advancement in understanding enzymatic DNA synthesis. DNA polymerases exhibit strict directionality, synthesizing new DNA strands exclusively in the 5' to 3' direction, which aligns with the antiparallel nature of DNA strands.[10] They cannot initiate synthesis de novo and require a short RNA or DNA primer with a free 3'-OH group to begin polymerization. Key properties include high processivity—the ability to add many nucleotides before dissociating—and fidelity, achieved primarily through selective base-pairing mechanisms that discriminate correct from incorrect nucleotides during incorporation.[10] Processivity is dramatically enhanced by accessory factors such as sliding clamps; in bacteria, the β-clamp forms a ring around DNA, tethering the polymerase for extended synthesis, enabling the addition of thousands of nucleotides per binding event.[11] In prokaryotes like E. coli, multiple DNA polymerases exist with distinct roles, but DNA polymerase III (Pol III) serves as the primary replicative enzyme, forming a multi-subunit holoenzyme complex that ensures efficient chromosomal duplication.[12] Pol III incorporates nucleotides at rates exceeding 500 per second with error rates below 10^{-5} per base, bolstered by its proofreading 3'→5' exonuclease activity.[12] In contrast, DNA polymerase I (Pol I) primarily fills gaps after RNA primer removal and performs repair functions, while Pol II contributes to replication restart and translesion synthesis under stress conditions.[13] Eukaryotic cells employ a more complex set of replicative polymerases, including DNA polymerase α (Pol α), δ (Pol δ), and ε (Pol ε). Pol α, associated with primase, initiates synthesis by extending short RNA primers with DNA. Pol δ primarily handles lagging-strand synthesis, while Pol ε is dedicated to leading-strand elongation, both achieving high processivity through interactions with the PCNA sliding clamp analogous to the bacterial β-clamp.[14] These polymerases collectively ensure accurate genome duplication across the larger eukaryotic chromosomes. Accessory proteins are indispensable for creating and maintaining a suitable environment for polymerase activity. Helicases, such as DnaB in E. coli, unwind the DNA double helix ahead of the replication fork in a 5'→3' direction, powered by ATP hydrolysis, to expose single-stranded templates.[15] Primase, exemplified by DnaG in bacteria, synthesizes short RNA primers (typically 10-12 nucleotides) complementary to the DNA template, providing the necessary 3'-OH for polymerase initiation.[16] Single-strand binding proteins (SSBs), like the SSB tetramer in E. coli, coat unwound single-stranded DNA to prevent reannealing, protect against nucleases, and facilitate the recruitment of other replication factors.[17] Together, these components form a dynamic replisome, enabling coordinated and high-fidelity DNA synthesis.

Stages of the Replication Process

Initiation at Origins of Replication

In prokaryotes like Escherichia coli, DNA replication initiates at a single chromosomal origin known as oriC, a ~245 base pair sequence characterized by an AT-rich DNA unwinding element (DUE) and multiple high- and low-affinity binding sites for the initiator protein DnaA, termed DnaA boxes.[18] The DUE consists of three 13-mer repeats that facilitate initial strand separation due to their low melting temperature.[19] DnaA, bound to ATP, recognizes these boxes with cooperative binding, wrapping the DNA into a right-handed helical filament that promotes localized unwinding at the DUE.[20] The assembly of the initiation complex at oriC begins with DnaA oligomerization on the DnaA boxes, which distorts the DNA and exposes single-stranded regions in the DUE.[21] This unwound region allows DnaA to recruit the DnaB helicase (in complex with DnaC) via direct protein-protein interactions, loading two DnaB hexamers onto the separated strands in a head-to-head orientation.[22] Once loaded, DnaB further unwinds the DNA, and the DnaG primase associates with DnaB to synthesize short RNA primers, marking the transition to elongation.[23] This process ensures precise and regulated initiation at oriC. In eukaryotes, replication origins are distributed across chromosomes, with the human genome featuring 30,000 to 50,000 such sites to accommodate the large genome size and complete replication within the cell cycle.[24] Unlike prokaryotes, eukaryotic origins often lack a strict sequence consensus; in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), they are defined by autonomously replicating sequences (ARS) containing a conserved 17-bp ARS consensus sequence (ACS) that serves as a binding platform.[25] In higher eukaryotes, origin selection is more flexible, influenced by chromatin accessibility, histone modifications, and non-sequence-specific factors rather than rigid DNA motifs.[26] Eukaryotic initiation assembly centers on the origin recognition complex (ORC), a conserved heterohexameric protein (Orc1-6) that binds origins in an ATP-dependent manner to mark potential start sites.[27] ORC recruits the ATPase Cdc6 and the licensing factor Cdt1, which together load two head-to-head MCM2-7 hexameric helicase complexes onto the double-stranded DNA, encircling it without initial unwinding and forming the pre-replicative complex (pre-RC).[28] The MCM complexes serve as the replicative helicase, and their loading "licenses" the origin for future activation. To prevent re-licensing and re-replication within the same cell cycle, Cdt1 is inhibited by binding to geminin, a cell cycle-regulated protein that accumulates in S, G2, and M phases.[29] Pre-RC formation occurs primarily during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, ensuring that origins are licensed before S phase entry, while activation— involving kinase-mediated unwinding and primer synthesis by DNA polymerase α-primase— is restricted to the G1/S transition to coordinate with cell cycle progression.[30] This temporal separation maintains genomic stability by limiting replication to once per cycle.

Elongation and Fork Progression

During the elongation phase of DNA replication, the replication fork adopts a characteristic Y-shaped structure, consisting of two diverging arms where the parental DNA double helix is unwound to form a bubble of single-stranded DNA. This unwinding creates a region of exposed template strands that serve as scaffolds for new DNA synthesis, with the fork progressing bidirectionally away from the origin of replication in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.[31] In prokaryotes such as Escherichia coli, this process was first visualized through autoradiography as theta (θ)-shaped intermediates, confirming the bidirectional nature of fork movement.80070-4) DNA synthesis at the fork proceeds through the incorporation of deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) by DNA polymerases, which catalyze the formation of phosphodiester bonds while releasing pyrophosphate as a byproduct, driving the reaction forward energetically. The leading strand is synthesized continuously in the 5' to 3' direction toward the advancing fork, whereas the lagging strand is synthesized discontinuously in short segments called Okazaki fragments, each initiated by an RNA primer. These fragments, typically 1000–2000 nucleotides long in bacteria and 100–200 in eukaryotes, were discovered by Reiji Okazaki and colleagues in 1968 through pulse-labeling experiments on E. coli DNA. The overall rate of fork progression varies by organism: approximately 1000 nucleotides per second in bacterial systems like E. coli, enabling rapid genome duplication, compared to about 50 nucleotides per second in eukaryotes, reflecting the added complexity of chromatin and larger genomes.[32][33] As the replication fork advances, the unwinding of the DNA helix generates positive supercoils ahead of the fork, which must be relieved to prevent stalling and breakage. Topoisomerases manage this topological stress: type I topoisomerases, such as topoisomerase I, introduce transient single-strand breaks to relax supercoils without ATP, while type II topoisomerases, like DNA gyrase in bacteria or topoisomerase II in eukaryotes, use ATP-dependent double-strand breaks to remove supercoils and decatenate intertwined daughter strands.[34] This coordinated action ensures smooth fork progression and maintains genomic integrity throughout elongation.[35]

Termination and Completion

In prokaryotes, particularly in Escherichia coli, DNA replication termination is precisely controlled by a replication fork trap mechanism involving the Tus protein and specific Ter sites arranged in the terminus region opposite the origin of replication (oriC). The E. coli chromosome is circular, with bidirectional replication forks initiating at oriC and progressing until they converge in the terminus region, located approximately 180° opposite oriC on the circular map. This region contains 10 Ter sites (TerA through TerJ) organized into two oppositely oriented clusters that create a trap: Tus binds tightly to these 21-base-pair Ter sequences, forming polar barriers that halt approaching replication forks in a direction-specific manner while permitting passage in the opposite direction. The first Ter sites (TerA and TerB) were identified in 1988, and the tus gene, encoding the 309-amino-acid Tus protein, was cloned and characterized in 1989, revealing its role as a DNA-binding terminator that interacts with the DnaB helicase to arrest fork progression. This system ensures efficient fork convergence and prevents over-replication, with Tus-Ter complexes trapping the final forks to coordinate termination.[36] In eukaryotes, termination lacks dedicated Ter-like barriers and instead occurs stochastically when replication forks from adjacent origins converge at random inter-origin sites along linear chromosomes. Fork convergence requires the resolution of topological constraints, primarily through decatenation by topoisomerase II (Topo II), which removes intertwinings (catenanes) between newly replicated sister chromatids to allow their separation. Inactivation or depletion of Topo II in yeast leads to incomplete replication, as unresolved catenanes stall forks and prevent replisome disassembly, highlighting its essential role in termination.00303-1) Linear eukaryotic chromosomes face an additional challenge at their ends: the end-replication problem, where the lagging-strand RNA primer at the terminus cannot be fully replaced, leading to progressive shortening with each cell division. This issue, first proposed in 1971, is mitigated by telomerase, a ribonucleoprotein enzyme discovered in 1985 that extends telomeres by adding TTAGGG repeats using its RNA template.[37] Following fork convergence in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, post-termination processing completes genome duplication. RNA primers from Okazaki fragments on the lagging strand are removed—by DNA polymerase I exonuclease activity in prokaryotes and by flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) coordinated with DNA polymerase δ in eukaryotes—and the resulting nicks are sealed by DNA ligase to form continuous strands. In prokaryotes, NAD+-dependent DNA ligase accomplishes this, while eukaryotic DNA ligase I, associated with PCNA, performs the final ligation during S phase. Chromatin reassembly then restores epigenetic marks and nucleosome structure on the duplicated DNA; in eukaryotes, this is mediated by chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1), which deposits histone H3-H4 tetramers onto newly synthesized DNA in a replication-coupled manner, ensuring faithful transmission of chromatin organization.00129-8) These steps are critical for genome stability, with defects leading to chromosomal aberrations or cell cycle arrest.

Strand-Specific Synthesis Mechanisms

Leading Strand Synthesis

The leading strand is synthesized continuously in the 5' to 3' direction, aligning with the movement of the replication fork, where DNA helicase unwinds the double helix to expose the template strand. This process begins at the origin of replication with a single RNA primer synthesized by primase, which DNA polymerase then extends without interruption, adding nucleotides to the 3' end of the growing chain as the fork progresses.[38] In bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, the DNA polymerase III (Pol III) holoenzyme serves as the primary replicative polymerase for leading strand synthesis, achieving high processivity through association with the β sliding clamp. The holoenzyme's core, comprising the α catalytic subunit for nucleotide addition, the ε proofreading subunit for error correction, and the θ stabilizing subunit, is tethered to the DNA by the ring-shaped β clamp, which encircles the duplex DNA and slides along it, preventing dissociation and enabling synthesis of thousands of nucleotides per binding event. The clamp is loaded onto the primed template in an ATP-dependent manner by the γ complex (clamp loader), ensuring efficient, continuous elongation at rates up to 1000 nucleotides per second.[11] In eukaryotes, DNA polymerase ε (Pol ε) performs the bulk of leading strand synthesis, forming a tetrameric holoenzyme with catalytic Pol2, accessory subunits Dpb2, Dpb3, and Dpb4. Pol ε physically couples with the CMG helicase complex via interactions mediated by Dpb2's OB-fold domain, which channels the emerging single-stranded template directly to the polymerase active site for coordinated unwinding and polymerization. This association enhances processivity, with Dpb3–Dpb4 stabilizing the enzyme on double-stranded DNA through a mooring helix, allowing high-fidelity replication across large chromosomal regions.[39][40] The continuous nature of leading strand synthesis confers advantages in efficiency and fidelity, requiring only one priming event per replicon and minimizing initiation-related errors compared to discontinuous mechanisms. This continuity facilitates tight coordination with helicase activity, where polymerase progression matches unwinding speed to maintain fork stability and expose template without excessive single-stranded gaps, ultimately achieving error rates as low as 1 per 10^9 nucleotides through integrated proofreading.[2][41]

Lagging Strand Synthesis

The lagging strand is synthesized discontinuously in short segments known as Okazaki fragments, a process necessitated by the antiparallel nature of DNA strands and the unidirectional 5' to 3' synthesis by DNA polymerases. This contrasts with the continuous extension of the leading strand. Each Okazaki fragment begins with an RNA primer synthesized by primase, followed by DNA polymerase extension until it reaches the previous fragment's primer region.[42] The discovery of Okazaki fragments in 1968 by Reiji Okazaki and colleagues provided key evidence for this discontinuous mechanism during bacteriophage T4 DNA replication in Escherichia coli. In prokaryotes, these fragments are typically 1,000 to 2,000 nucleotides long, while in eukaryotes, they average 100 to 200 nucleotides.[42] The shorter eukaryotic fragments reflect differences in primase efficiency and replication fork speed.00093-6) In eukaryotes, DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) primarily extends the RNA primers on the lagging strand, associating with the PCNA sliding clamp for processivity.[43] After synthesis, the RNA primers are removed through coordinated nuclease activity: RNase H2 cleaves most of the RNA, leaving a flap that is processed by the 5' flap endonuclease FEN1, often in conjunction with DNA2 helicase/nuclease.00157-X) The resulting nick is then sealed by DNA ligase I, completing the fragment and forming a continuous strand.00157-X) To coordinate synthesis, the lagging strand polymerase recycles via the trombone model, where the template DNA loops out, allowing the polymerase to remain tethered to the replisome while synthesizing multiple fragments without dissociating.[44] This model, first proposed by Bruce Alberts for the T4 phage system, ensures efficient coupling with leading strand progression. The discontinuous nature of lagging strand synthesis, involving multiple priming and joining events, contributes to a higher mutation rate compared to the leading strand, particularly at lesion sites, due to increased opportunities for replication errors during fragment initiation and processing.[45]

Coordination at the Replication Fork

The replisome is a multiprotein complex that coordinates DNA unwinding, priming, and synthesis at the replication fork to ensure efficient and directional progression. In prokaryotes, such as Escherichia coli, the replisome assembles as a coupled unit comprising DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, DnaB helicase, and DnaG primase, with the helicase encircling the lagging strand template to drive fork movement while polymerases synthesize both strands. Single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) stabilizes the unwound single-stranded DNA regions, preventing reannealing and secondary structure formation, thereby maintaining fork integrity and facilitating primase access for Okazaki fragment initiation. In eukaryotes, the core replisome centers on the CMG (Cdc45-MCM2-7-GINS) helicase complex, which translocates along the leading strand template in a 3' to 5' direction, coupled with DNA polymerase ε (Pol ε) for leading-strand synthesis and DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) for lagging-strand synthesis, supported by Pol α-primase for primer synthesis.[46][47][40] Coordination between leading- and lagging-strand synthesis is achieved through physical tethering and looping mechanisms within the replisome, ensuring synchronized progression despite the discontinuous nature of lagging-strand synthesis. The lagging strand polymerase enhances overall replisome processivity by approximately 61%, extending the coupled synthesis distance from 52 kb (leading strand alone) to 86 kb, likely due to dual polymerase anchoring via sliding clamps that provide increased DNA grip. However, this coupling reduces fork speed by about 23%, from 317 nt/s to 246 nt/s, reflecting the periodic repriming and looping required for Okazaki fragments. Fork stalling, often triggered by DNA lesions on the leading strand, is managed through recovery pathways involving lesion skipping by repriming enzymes like PrimPol in eukaryotes or translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases that bypass damage while maintaining replisome integrity via interactions with clamps and repair factors.[48][49] In eukaryotes, the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) sliding clamp, loaded onto DNA by the replication factor C (RFC) complex at primer-template junctions, enhances polymerase processivity and facilitates switching between replicative and TLS polymerases during stalling events. RFC captures the 3' ss/dsDNA junction, partially melts the duplex, and loads PCNA in a multistep, ATP-dependent process that closes the clamp around DNA without hydrolysis in the final step, promoting efficient Okazaki fragment extension. The CMG helicase integrates with Pol ε to form a stable 15-subunit holoenzyme (CMG^E), where the Dpb2 subunit of Pol ε binds the GINS component of CMG, ensuring leading-strand specificity and fork directionality at rates up to 1.92 kb/min when coupled with PCNA. Replisome speed is regulated to align with cell cycle demands, slowing during nutrient limitation or stationary phase to adapt elongation rates (e.g., from exponential to stationary growth), which delays completion without invoking damage responses. Recent cryo-EM structures post-2010, such as those of Drosophila CMG at 7.4–9.8 Å resolution, reveal dynamic ATPase states that grip or release DNA, supporting monomeric CMG translocation on the leading strand while implying loose dimeric tethering for bidirectional forks, thus elucidating replisome stability and uncoupling mechanisms.[50][40][46][51][52]

Regulation and Control Mechanisms

Prokaryotic Replication Control

In prokaryotes, DNA replication is tightly regulated to ensure it occurs once per origin per cell cycle, coordinating with rapid bacterial growth and division. This control is streamlined for unicellular organisms, relying on mechanisms that link initiation to cell mass accumulation and prevent over-replication through feedback loops. Unlike the complex, multi-phase licensing in eukaryotes, bacterial systems emphasize efficiency, with initiation primarily governed at the origin of replication (oriC) in model organisms like Escherichia coli.[53] Initiation of replication is controlled by the DnaA protein, which binds to oriC in its ATP-bound form (DnaA-ATP) to unwind the DNA and assemble the replisome, while the ADP-bound form (DnaA-ADP) is inactive. The DnaA-ATP/ADP cycle is regulated by regulatory inactivation of DnaA (RIDA), where Hda protein, associated with the β-clamp on newly replicated DNA, stimulates ATP hydrolysis on DnaA, reducing active DnaA levels post-initiation to prevent re-initiation. Additionally, the datA locus titrates DnaA and promotes its hydrolysis, further fine-tuning the timing. This cycling ensures replication initiates only when DnaA-ATP levels are sufficient, typically tied to cell growth rate, as faster-growing E. coli cells accumulate more DnaA per origin, allowing initiations at smaller cell sizes and enabling multifork replication during rapid division (doubling times as short as 20 minutes).[54][55][56] Post-replication, oriC is sequestered to block premature re-initiation. Immediately after fork passage, the newly duplicated oriC becomes hemimethylated at GATC sites, as Dam methylase lags behind replication. The SeqA protein preferentially binds these hemimethylated sequences, preventing DnaA from accessing oriC and sequestering it for about one-third of the cell cycle (roughly 10-15 minutes in E. coli). Full remethylation by Dam methylase then restores oriC accessibility, completing the sequestration cycle and ensuring a refractory period. This mechanism is essential for maintaining replication timing, as seqA mutants exhibit asynchronous initiations and over-replication.[57][58][59] Prokaryotes lack the elaborate checkpoints of eukaryotes, with minimal cell cycle pauses beyond basic damage sensing. Instead, the RecA protein mediates the SOS response to replication stress or damage, forming nucleoprotein filaments on single-stranded DNA at stalled forks to halt progression, induce error-prone repair, and facilitate fork restart via homologous recombination. This response prioritizes survival over strict fidelity, allowing replication to resume quickly in dynamic environments.[60][61] In E. coli, these controls enable the 4.6 Mb genome to replicate in approximately 40 minutes via bidirectional forks moving at ~1,000 base pairs per second each, despite generation times shorter than this in fast growth, achieved through overlapping replication rounds.[62]

Eukaryotic Replication Licensing and Timing

In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication is tightly regulated to ensure that the genome is duplicated exactly once per cell cycle, a process that begins with the licensing of replication origins during the G1 phase. Licensing involves the assembly of the pre-replication complex (pre-RC) at origins, where the origin recognition complex (ORC) binds to DNA and recruits Cdc6 and Cdt1 proteins, which in turn load the MCM2-7 helicase complex as a double hexamer around the DNA.[63][28] This MCM loading renders origins "licensed" and competent for future activation, occurring exclusively in G1 when cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity is low.[64] To prevent re-replication, high CDK levels in S, G2, and M phases phosphorylate pre-RC components, inhibiting their rebinding to origins and promoting their degradation or nuclear export, thus ensuring licensing is restricted to post-mitotic G1.[65][66] Once licensed, origins fire stochastically during S phase, with only a subset activating while many remain dormant as a backup mechanism against replication stress. Origin firing is triggered by S-phase CDKs and Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK), which phosphorylate MCM and associated factors to unwind DNA and recruit polymerases, but the timing and efficiency vary due to local chromatin context and inter-origin spacing.[63][67] In human cells, the genome contains approximately 30,000 to 50,000 potential origins, spaced about 50-100 kb apart, allowing efficient coverage of the 6 billion base pairs within the ~8-hour S phase.[68][69] Active replication forks cluster into "replication factories" or foci, where multiple origins within a chromosomal domain coordinate to form these immobile sites, facilitating processive synthesis and enabling dormant origins to fire locally if nearby forks stall.[70][71] S-phase progression is temporally regulated to replicate early-firing euchromatic regions before late-firing heterochromatin, coordinating with mitosis to ensure complete duplication before chromosome segregation.[72] This timing is influenced by epigenetic marks and nuclear positioning, with checkpoints halting progression if forks are impeded.[73] Telomere maintenance during replication involves specialized mechanisms, as the linear ends pose an "end-replication problem"; while standard origins fire inefficiently here, shelterin proteins and alternative lengthening pathways ensure telomere integrity without relying on telomerase in all cases.[74] Recent studies from the 2020s highlight origin plasticity under stress, where dormant origins are dynamically recruited to counteract fork stalling from DNA damage or nucleotide depletion, adapting the replication program to maintain genome stability.[75][76]

Fidelity, Errors, and Repair

Sources of Replication Errors

DNA replication errors arise primarily from intrinsic limitations in the fidelity of DNA polymerases and from spontaneous or induced chemical alterations to the DNA template. During nucleotide incorporation, base mismatches occur when the polymerase selects an incorrect dNTP, often due to transient tautomerization of bases, where keto-enol shifts in nucleotides like guanine or thymine lead to non-standard Watson-Crick pairing, such as G pairing with T instead of C.[77] These mismatches contribute to transition mutations (purine-to-purine or pyrimidine-to-pyrimidine substitutions). Insertions and deletions (indels) are another common error type, particularly in repetitive sequences like microsatellites or homopolymer runs, where polymerase slippage during strand synthesis causes frameshift mutations; this is exacerbated by imbalanced dNTP pools that favor misalignment.[78] The intrinsic error rate of replicative polymerases, such as Pol δ and Pol ε in eukaryotes, is approximately 10^{-4} to 10^{-5} errors per nucleotide incorporated in vitro, though in vivo rates are slightly lower at around 10^{-7} due to contextual factors like replication fork speed.[79] Spontaneous chemical damage to DNA also serves as a major source of replication errors, independent of polymerase activity. Depurination, the hydrolysis of the N-glycosyl bond releasing adenine or guanine, occurs at a rate of about 5,000 purine bases lost per human cell per day, leaving an apurinic (AP) site that, if unreplicated, can result in base deletions or transversions during synthesis as the polymerase inserts an adenine opposite the void.[80] Deamination, another frequent event, affects cytosine (converting it to uracil at ~100 sites per cell per day) or adenine (to hypoxanthine), leading to C·G to T·A transitions if the altered base is used as a template, since uracil pairs with adenine.[80] External factors amplify these errors; ultraviolet (UV) radiation induces cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (e.g., T-T dimers) that stall polymerases and promote error-prone bypass, while chemical mutagens like alkylating agents form adducts (e.g., O^6-methylguanine) that mispair with thymine, increasing G·C to A·T transitions.[78] Certain genomic regions, such as replication origins and repetitive elements, act as error hotspots due to structural features like secondary structures or high GC content, and these hotspots show evolutionary conservation across species, suggesting selective pressures maintain them for functions like recombination despite mutagenic risk.[81] Overall, despite these sources, the net mutation rate in humans is remarkably low at approximately 1.2 × 10^{-8} per base pair per generation, reflecting the baseline error burden after all processes.[82] These replication errors play dual roles: in evolution, they generate genetic variation essential for adaptation and diversity, while in pathology, elevated error rates contribute to genomic instability, driving somatic mutations in cancers such as colorectal and endometrial tumors where polymerase variants like POLE mutations increase mutagenesis.[83]

Proofreading and Error Correction

During DNA replication, proofreading is an intrinsic error-correction mechanism performed by replicative DNA polymerases, which possess a 3'→5' exonuclease activity that excises mismatched nucleotides immediately after incorporation.[84] This activity allows the polymerase to reverse its polymerization step, removing the incorrect base from the 3' end of the growing strand before resuming synthesis.[85] In eukaryotes, the leading-strand polymerase ε (Pol ε) relies on its catalytic subunit's exonuclease domain for this proofreading, enhancing replication fidelity by detecting and correcting base-pairing errors with high efficiency.[85] Without proofreading, the intrinsic error rate of nucleotide incorporation by DNA polymerases is approximately 10^{-4} to 10^{-5}, but the exonuclease activity improves accuracy by a factor of 10^{2} to 10^{3}, reducing errors to about 10^{-7} per base pair.[10] Post-replication, mismatch repair (MMR) provides an additional layer of fidelity by scanning the newly synthesized DNA for persistent mismatches that escaped proofreading. In bacteria, the MutS protein recognizes mismatched bases, forming a complex that recruits MutL to initiate repair; strand discrimination occurs via dam methylation, where the unmethylated daughter strand is targeted for excision.[86] In eukaryotes, homologs such as MSH2-MSH6 (MutSα) detect mismatches, while MLH1-PMS2 (MutLα) coordinates excision; strand discrimination relies on nicks or gaps in the nascent strand, often introduced by ribonucleotide incorporation or Okazaki fragment processing.[87] MMR excises a segment of the error-containing strand (typically 100-1000 nucleotides) using helicase and exonuclease activities, followed by resynthesis and ligation, further reducing the error rate by 10^{2} to 10^{3}-fold.[88] Combined with base selection and proofreading, MMR achieves an overall replication fidelity of 10^{-9} to 10^{-10} errors per base pair.[89] Defects in MMR genes, such as MLH1 or MSH2 mutations, underlie Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer), leading to microsatellite instability and a dramatically elevated mutation rate that predisposes carriers to colorectal and other cancers.[90] Beyond MMR, other repair pathways address replication-associated damage: base excision repair (BER) removes oxidized or alkylated bases via glycosylases, creating single-strand breaks that are processed during or shortly after replication to prevent fork stalling.[91] For non-instructive lesions that block high-fidelity polymerases, translesion synthesis employs specialized low-fidelity polymerases (e.g., Pol κ or Pol ζ) to bypass the damage, allowing replication to continue while deferring accurate repair.[92] These mechanisms collectively ensure high-fidelity genome duplication, though translesion bypass introduces errors at rates up to 10^{-3} per lesion.[93]

Implications for Genome Stability

DNA replication fidelity plays a crucial role in maintaining genome stability by minimizing mutations that could lead to oncogenic transformations. Random errors during DNA synthesis account for approximately two-thirds of the mutations driving human cancers, independent of environmental or hereditary factors, as these arise from the inherent stochasticity of polymerase activity in proliferating cells. In tumor cells, replication stress—often induced by oncogene activation such as MYC or RAS—exacerbates fork stalling and collapse, promoting genomic instability and facilitating tumor evolution through the accumulation of chromosomal aberrations. This stress response, if unchecked, can trigger senescence or apoptosis as a barrier to tumorigenesis, but evasion of these safeguards allows cancer progression.[94] Telomere shortening during successive replication cycles contributes to cellular aging and organismal lifespan limits by eroding protective chromosomal ends, ultimately leading to replicative senescence. In 1961, Hayflick and Moorhead observed that human diploid fibroblasts undergo approximately 50 population doublings before entering senescence, a phenomenon now linked to progressive telomere attrition of about 50-100 base pairs per division in the absence of telomerase activity. This "Hayflick limit" underscores how replication-imposed constraints prevent indefinite proliferation, thereby safeguarding against immortalization in aging tissues. Pathologies like Fanconi anemia exemplify the consequences of impaired replication fork protection; defects in the Fanconi anemia pathway lead to hypersensitivity to interstrand crosslinks, causing frequent fork collapse and double-strand breaks that heighten cancer risk, particularly leukemias.[95] From an evolutionary perspective, replication errors serve as a primary source of genetic diversity, enabling adaptation through the introduction of beneficial mutations under selective pressure. Studies in microbial systems reveal that replication-induced copy number variations and point mutations drive adaptive evolution, such as antibiotic resistance in bacteria, by generating heritable variation at rates tuned by polymerase fidelity. Core replication mechanisms, including the replisome architecture and origin recognition, are highly conserved across prokaryotes and eukaryotes, reflecting their ancient origins and essentiality for genome integrity from bacteria to humans. In modern biotechnology, CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in the 2020s have highlighted replication's vulnerability, as unintended double-strand breaks can induce fork stalling and mutagenesis, compromising genome stability in edited cells and necessitating improved fidelity strategies.[96][97]

Applications and Techniques

In Vitro Replication Methods

In vitro replication methods enable the study of DNA synthesis outside living cells using purified enzymes and cell-free extracts, providing insights into the biochemical mechanisms of replication. The foundational achievement came in 1957 when Arthur Kornberg and colleagues isolated DNA polymerase I from Escherichia coli and demonstrated its ability to synthesize DNA from a DNA template, marking the first enzymatic replication in a test tube. This system required a primed DNA template, deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and magnesium ions, but initially produced short DNA fragments due to the enzyme's low processivity. During the 1970s, Kornberg's group advanced bacterial in vitro replication by reconstituting more complete systems with purified proteins, notably replicating the single-stranded DNA genome of bacteriophage φX174. This involved assembling a replisome-like complex including DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, primase, helicase, and single-stranded DNA-binding protein, allowing semi-conservative replication starting from an intact phage template. These efforts revealed key accessory factors, such as the β-sliding clamp (the core subunit of the γ complex), which dramatically enhanced polymerase processivity from ~10 nucleotides to thousands, enabling efficient fork progression. For eukaryotic systems, cell-free extracts from mammalian cells infected with simian virus 40 (SV40) provided a model to study viral DNA replication dependent on host machinery. In 1984, Li and Kelly established an SV40 in vitro system using HeLa cell extracts, the viral origin of replication, and the SV40 large T antigen, which recruits cellular replication factors like DNA polymerase α-primase and replication protein A to initiate bidirectional synthesis. This setup recapitulated theta-mode replication intermediates and required ATP, but relied on crude extracts rather than fully purified components.[98] More recent advances have achieved full reconstitution of eukaryotic replisomes with purified proteins. In 2015, a yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) system was developed using 31 distinct polypeptides, enabling coupled leading- and lagging-strand synthesis while suppressing nucleoprotein filament formation.[99] In 2022, a human replisome was reconstituted with 11 purified factors, demonstrating fast and efficient replication of DNA templates at rates comparable to in vivo processes.[100] Key advances in the 2010s included reconstitution of the E. coli chromosome replication cycle using 14 purified enzymes (25 polypeptides), enabling exponential propagation of circular DNA templates and multiple rounds of replication without added primers.[101] This system, developed by Su’etsugu and colleagues, incorporated DnaA for origin unwinding and demonstrated coordinated leading- and lagging-strand synthesis at rates approaching in vivo speeds.[101] Such reconstitutions facilitated structural studies via cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), revealing dynamic replisome architectures, including polymerase-clamp interactions during fork progression in bacteriophage T7 systems.[102] However, these methods face limitations, particularly for complex eukaryotes, where chromatin assembly, histone modifications, and numerous accessory factors are not fully recapitulated, leading to incomplete fidelity and regulation compared to prokaryotic models.[103] In vitro approaches laid the groundwork for techniques like PCR, which amplify specific DNA segments through repeated thermal cycling.

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is an in vitro technique that selectively amplifies specific DNA segments through repeated thermal cycling, enabling the generation of billions of copies from minute starting amounts for analysis in research, diagnostics, and other fields. Developed by biochemist Kary Mullis in 1983 during his tenure at Cetus Corporation, PCR was first demonstrated in a 1985 publication and marked a pivotal advancement in nucleic acid manipulation. Mullis received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 for this invention, recognizing its transformative impact on biology and medicine.[104] The PCR process relies on three sequential steps cycled 20–40 times: denaturation, annealing, and extension, powered by a thermostable DNA polymerase. Denaturation heats the reaction to 94–98°C for 20–30 seconds, separating the double-stranded DNA template into single strands by disrupting hydrogen bonds. Annealing cools the mixture to 50–65°C for 20–40 seconds, permitting two synthetic oligonucleotide primers—short DNA sequences designed to flank the target region—to hybridize specifically to their complementary sites on the template strands. Extension then occurs at 72°C for 30 seconds to 2 minutes, during which the DNA polymerase, typically Taq derived from the thermophilic bacterium Thermus aquaticus, synthesizes new DNA strands by incorporating deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) along the template starting from the 3' end of each primer. This cyclic process results in exponential amplification, producing theoretically 2n2^n copies of the target sequence after nn cycles, though actual yields are slightly lower due to inefficiencies. Taq polymerase, originally isolated from T. aquaticus cells grown in hot springs, remains stable at high temperatures, eliminating the need to replenish the enzyme after each denaturation step.[105] Key reaction components include the target DNA template (often nanograms or less), forward and reverse primers (typically 18–22 nucleotides long), a mixture of the four dNTPs (dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP), a buffered solution with Mg²⁺ ions to optimize polymerase activity and primer annealing, and the thermostable polymerase enzyme. These elements are assembled in a small volume (10–50 μL) and subjected to automated temperature control in a thermal cycler device. The specificity of amplification is dictated by primer design, allowing precise targeting of genes or regions of interest.[105] Variants of PCR address limitations of the standard method and expand its scope. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) incorporates an initial reverse transcription step using reverse transcriptase enzyme to convert RNA into complementary DNA (cDNA), followed by PCR amplification; this facilitates studies of RNA expression levels, viral genomes, and transcriptomics. Quantitative PCR (qPCR), or real-time PCR, integrates fluorescent reporter molecules (such as SYBR Green dye or TaqMan probes) to detect and quantify product accumulation during each cycle via fluorescence measurement, providing data on initial template abundance through the threshold cycle (Ct) value where signal exceeds background. These techniques underpin diverse applications, including forensic science for amplifying degraded or trace DNA from evidence like bloodstains or touch samples to generate DNA profiles for suspect identification, and clinical diagnostics for rapid pathogen detection (e.g., in tuberculosis or SARS-CoV-2 testing), genetic disorder screening, and monitoring disease progression through viral load assessment.[106][107][108] Compared to cellular DNA replication, standard PCR with Taq polymerase exhibits higher infidelity, with error rates around 10410^{-4} to 10510^{-5} mutations per base pair per cycle, attributable to the absence of robust proofreading mechanisms. Such errors can accumulate, particularly in long amplicons or numerous cycles, potentially introducing artifacts in downstream analyses like sequencing. High-fidelity polymerases, such as those engineered with 3'–5' exonuclease activity (e.g., Pfu from Pyrococcus furiosus or blends like Phusion), reduce error rates to approximately 10610^{-6} or better, enhancing accuracy for applications requiring precise sequence fidelity, such as cloning or variant detection.[109][110]

References

User Avatar
No comments yet.