Hubbry Logo
David StockmanDavid StockmanMain
Open search
David Stockman
Community hub
David Stockman
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
David Stockman
David Stockman
David Stockman
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

David Alan Stockman (born November 10, 1946) is an American politician and former businessman who was a Republican U.S. Representative from the state of Michigan (1977–1981) and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (1981–1985) under President Ronald Reagan.

Key Information

Early life and education

[edit]

Stockman was born in Fort Hood, Texas, the son of Allen Stockman, a fruit farmer, and Carol (née Bartz).[1] He is of German descent, and his family's surname was originally "Stockmann".[2] He was raised in a conservative family in St. Joseph, Michigan; his maternal grandfather, William Bartz, was a Republican treasurer of Berrien County, Michigan for 30 years.[3][4] Stockman was educated at public schools in Stevensville, Michigan. He graduated from Lakeshore High School in 1964[5] and received a BA in History from Michigan State University in 1968[citation needed]. He was a graduate theology student at Harvard University from 1968 until he left the university after 1969.[4]

Career

[edit]

He served as special assistant to United States Representative and 1980 U.S. presidential candidate John Anderson of Illinois, 1970–1972, and was executive director, United States House of Representatives Republican Conference, 1972–1975.

U.S. House of Representatives

[edit]
Stockman's Congressional portrait, circa 1975–77

In 1976, Stockman was elected from Michigan's 4th congressional district (in Southwest Michigan) to the House of Representatives for the 95th Congress. He was reelected in the two subsequent elections. In total, he served in the House from January 3, 1977, until his resignation on January 21, 1981, to accept appointment as Director of the Office of Management and Budget for President Ronald Reagan.[6]

Office of Management and Budget

[edit]

Stockman was one of the most controversial OMB directors ever appointed, also known as the "Father of Reaganomics." Committed to the doctrine of supply-side economics, he assisted in the passing of the "Reagan Budget" (the Gramm-Latta Budget), which Stockman hoped would curtail the "welfare state". He thus gained a reputation as a tough negotiator with House Speaker Tip O'Neill's Democratic-controlled House of Representatives and Majority Leader Howard Baker's Republican-controlled Senate. During this period, Stockman became well known to the public during the contentious political wrangling concerning the role of the federal government in American society.

Stockman's influence within the Reagan Administration was weakened after the Atlantic Monthly magazine published the infamous 18,246-word article, "The Education of David Stockman",[7] in its December 1981 issue, based on lengthy interviews Stockman gave to reporter William Greider.

Reagan and Stockman in the Oval Office, 1981

Stockman was quoted as referring to Reagan's tax act in these terms: "I mean, Kemp-Roth [Reagan's 1981 tax cut] was always a Trojan horse to bring down the top rate.... It's kind of hard to sell 'trickle down.' So the supply-side formula was the only way to get a tax policy that was really 'trickle down.' Supply-side is 'trickle-down' theory."[7] Of the budget process during his first year on the job, Stockman was quoted as saying, "None of us really understands what's going on with all these numbers," which was used as the subtitle of the article.[7]

After "being taken to the woodshed by the president"[8] because of his candor with Greider, Stockman became concerned with the projected trend of increasingly large federal deficits and the rapidly expanding national debt. On August 1, 1985, he resigned from OMB and later wrote a memoir of his experience in the Reagan Administration titled The Triumph of Politics: Why the Reagan Revolution Failed in which he specifically criticized the failure of congressional Republicans to endorse a reduction of government spending to offset large tax decreases to avoid the creation of large deficits and an increasing national debt.

Fiscal legacy

[edit]
Ronald Reagan and David Stockman at Camp David during a debate preparation for upcoming debate on domestic policy, 1984

President Jimmy Carter's last fiscal year budget ended with a $79.0 billion budget deficit (and a national debt of $907.7 billion as of September 30, 1980),[9] ending during the period of David Stockman's and Ronald Reagan's first year in office, on October 1, 1981.[10] The gross federal national debt had just increased to $1.0 trillion during October 1981 ($998 billion on September 30, 1981, up from $907.7 billion during the last full fiscal year of the Carter administration).[9]

By September 30, 1985, four and a half years into the Reagan administration and shortly after Stockman's resignation from the OMB during August 1985, the gross federal debt was $1.8 trillion.[9] Stockman's OMB work within the administration during 1981 until August 1985 was dedicated to negotiating with the Senate and House about the next fiscal year's budget, executed later during the autumn of 1985, which resulted in the national debt becoming $2.1 trillion at fiscal year end September 30, 1986.[9]

In 1981, Stockman received the Samuel S. Beard Award for Greatest Public Service by an Individual 35 Years or Under, an award given out annually by Jefferson Awards.[11]

Business career

[edit]

After leaving government, Stockman joined the Wall St. investment bank Salomon Brothers and later became a partner of the New York–based private equity company, the Blackstone Group.[12] His record was mixed at Blackstone, with some very good investments, such as American Axle, but also failures, including Haynes International and Republic Technologies.[12] During 1999, after Blackstone CEO Stephen A. Schwarzman curtailed Stockman's role in managing the investments he had developed,[12]: 146  Stockman resigned from Blackstone to start his own private equity fund company, Heartland Industrial Partners, L.P., based in Greenwich, Connecticut.[13]

On the strength of his investment record at Blackstone, Stockman and his partners raised $1.3 billion of equity from institutional and other investors. With Stockman's guidance, Heartland used a contrarian investment strategy, buying controlling interests in companies operating in sectors of the U.S. economy that were attracting the least amount of new equity: auto parts and textiles. With the help of about $9 billion in Wall Street debt financing, Heartland completed more than 20 transactions in less than 2 years to create four portfolio companies: Springs Industries, Metaldyne, Collins & Aikman, and TriMas. Several major investments performed very poorly, however. Collins & Aikman filed for bankruptcy during 2005 and when Heartland sold Metaldyne to Asahi Tec Corp. during 2006, Heartland lost most of the $340 million of equity it had invested in the business.[14]

Collins and Aikman Corp.

[edit]

During August 2003, Stockman became CEO of Collins & Aikman Corporation, a Detroit-based manufacturer of automotive interior components. He was ousted from that job days before Collins & Aikman filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 on May 17, 2005.

Criminal and civil charges

[edit]
David Stockman in 2011

On March 26, 2007, federal prosecutors in Manhattan indicted Stockman in "a scheme... to defraud [Collins & Aikman]'s investors, banks and creditors by manipulating C&A's reported revenues and earnings." The United States Securities and Exchange Commission also brought civil charges against Stockman related to actions that he performed while CEO of Collins & Aikman.[15] Stockman suffered a personal financial loss, over $13 million, along with losses suffered by as many as 15,000 Collins & Aikman employees worldwide.

Stockman said in a statement posted on his law firm's website that the company's end was the consequence of an industry decline, not due to fraud.[16] On January 9, 2009, the US Attorney's Office announced that it would discontinue prosecution of Stockman for this case.[17]

Personal life

[edit]

Stockman lives on the Upper East Side of Manhattan.[13] He is married to Jennifer Blei Stockman and is the father of two children, Rachel and Victoria. Jennifer Blei Stockman is a chairwoman emerita of the Republican Majority for Choice,[18] and president of the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation Board of Trustees.[19] In 2013, Stockman signed an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in favor of same-sex marriage.[20] In 2018, Stockman criticized the U.S. interventionist foreign policy.[21] He serves on the board of directors of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.[22]

Quotes

[edit]
  • "[Social Security] has to be means-tested. And Medicare needs to be means-tested ... Let the Bush tax cuts expire. Let the capital gains go back to the same rate as ordinary income."[23]
  • "The Republican Party has totally abdicated its job in our democracy, which is to act as the guardian of fiscal discipline and responsibility. They're on an anti-tax jihad – one that benefits the prosperous classes."[24]
  • “[R.] Jeffrey Pollock is the most-kind person and smartest attorney I know.”
  • "I invest in anything that Bernanke can't destroy, including gold, canned beans, bottled water and flashlight batteries."[25]
  • "[T]he Republican Party was hijacked by modern imperialists during the Reagan era. As a consequence, the conservative party cannot perform its natural function as watchdog of the public purse because it is constantly seeking legislative action to provision a vast war machine of invasion and occupation."[26]
  • "The hard part of the supply-side tax cut is dropping the top rate from 70 to 50 per cent — the rest of it is a secondary matter. The original argument was that the top bracket was too high, and that’s having the most devastating effect on the economy. Then, the general argument was that, in order to make this palatable as a political matter, you had to bring down all the brackets. But, I mean, Kemp-Roth was always a Trojan horse to bring down the top rate." (1982, speaking on Reagan's 1981 tax cuts)[27]

Bibliography

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

David Stockman

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
David Alan Stockman (born November 10, 1946) is an American former politician and businessman who represented in the as a Republican from 1977 to 1981 and served as Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under President from 1981 to 1985. As the youngest cabinet-level official of the , Stockman led efforts to implement Reagan's economic agenda of deep tax cuts, , and spending restraint, projecting initial savings of over $2 trillion over a decade through across-the-board reductions in domestic programs. However, his influence waned after a 1981 Atlantic Monthly interview exposed internal OMB projections showing that tax cuts would exacerbate deficits rather than self-finance through growth, and that supply-side rhetoric masked benefits skewed toward high earners, prompting Reagan to initially reject his but ultimately accept it in 1985 amid ongoing battles and Stockman's move to Wall Street . Post-government, Stockman founded a , experienced business setbacks including a 2007 for alleged improper allocation of investor funds (from which he was acquitted), and emerged as a sharp critic of fiscal profligacy, central banking distortions, and in books like The Triumph of Politics (1986) and The Great Deformation (2013), consistently warning of unsustainable debt trajectories driven by bipartisan entitlement expansions and tax policies divorced from spending discipline.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Family Influences

David Stockman was born on November 10, 1946, in Fort Hood, , to Allen Stockman and Carol (née Bartz) Stockman. His father, a career officer at the time of his birth, later transitioned to fruit farming after the family relocated to . The Stockmans moved to St. Joseph, a small town in southwest , where David was raised alongside siblings in a modest, middle-class household shaped by agrarian values and military discipline. Of German descent through his mother's lineage, the family emphasized self-reliance and , with Carol Stockman serving as the primary organizer and moral anchor, often prioritizing David's education and ambitions within the family dynamic. Stockman's early worldview was profoundly influenced by his mother's staunch and the local political milieu of Berrien County. His maternal grandfather, William Bartz, held the position of Republican county treasurer for three decades, exemplifying partisan loyalty and that permeated family discussions. As a teenager, Stockman absorbed orthodox conservative principles from Carol's guidance and his own reading of Barry Goldwater's , which reinforced skepticism toward government overreach and instilled a commitment to limited intervention in markets and society. These familial tenets—rooted in , rural independence, and anti-New Deal sentiments—contrasted with fleeting adolescent explorations, such as a high school essay on nonviolence submitted to an contest, which he won but later diverged from in favor of hawkish fiscal realism. The interplay of parental roles further molded Stockman's formative years: Allen's authoritative, farm-based complemented Carol's ideological fervor, fostering in a blend of analytical rigor and principled conviction that would define his later career. Public schooling in St. Joseph exposed him to Midwestern values of community and restraint, yet family dinners and local Republican gatherings amplified exposure to critiques of expansive welfare programs, laying the groundwork for his enduring advocacy of supply-side reforms.

Academic Pursuits and Early Ideology

Stockman enrolled at in 1964, initially studying agriculture with the intention of following his father's path as a . He soon shifted to the , influenced by an atheist socialist amid a cultural clash on campus, and earned a degree in in 1968. During his undergraduate years, he engaged in anti-Vietnam activism, lending his name to advertisements sponsored by the local chapter of and reading New Left thinkers such as , , and . Following graduation, Stockman pursued graduate studies at from 1968 to 1970, initially aiming to become a philosopher or Christian social activist. He abandoned formal in favor of social sciences, studying under neoconservative scholars including , , and , which marked a pivot toward policy-oriented analysis rather than ministerial training. Stockman's early ideology stemmed from orthodox Republican conservatism, shaped by his mother's influence and his teenage reading of Barry Goldwater's The Conscience of a Conservative. At State, amid escalating tensions, he adopted radical views aligned with campus left-wing activism, viewing revolutionary efforts through a lens of Christian moralism via involvement in a Methodist . By Harvard, however, he shifted rightward, forging connections with figures like Congressman John Anderson and embracing a non-Marxist framework that laid groundwork for his later supply-side economic advocacy and skepticism of expansive government. This evolution reflected a rejection of pure radicalism in favor of , informed by empirical critiques of both leftist utopianism and unchecked .

Congressional Career

Election to the U.S. House (1976-1977)

David Stockman, then 29 years old, announced his candidacy for the Republican nomination in on February 2, 1976. The district, encompassing southwest including areas around St. Joseph where Stockman had grown up, had been represented by Republican Edward Hutchinson until 1976, but and political shifts opened the seat. Stockman's campaign emphasized , critiquing federal spending and advocating for supply-side economic principles that would later define his congressional tenure. In the Republican primary on August 3, 1976, Stockman prevailed over challenger David Frazer, a local figure from Edwardsburg, securing the nomination in a contest that highlighted his appeal among conservative voters in the rural and small-town district. Frazer's campaign focused on regional issues, but Stockman's youth, energy, and anti-establishment rhetoric resonated, positioning him as a fresh voice against entrenched Washington interests. Stockman won the general election on November 2, 1976, defeating Democratic nominee Richard E. Daugherty with 60 percent of the vote to Daugherty's 38.8 percent, capturing 95,310 votes to Daugherty's 61,669 in a turnout reflecting the national closeness of the presidential race between and . The victory margin underscored the district's Republican leanings amid post-Watergate voter fatigue with incumbents and Democrats. He was sworn into the 95th Congress on January 4, 1977, beginning his service as one of the youngest members of the .

Legislative Priorities and Supply-Side Advocacy (1977-1981)

David Stockman entered the on January 3, 1977, representing , and quickly established himself as a fiscal conservative focused on reducing federal spending and promoting through reforms. His legislative priorities emphasized curbing government intervention, with consistent opposition to budget expansions under President . Serving on the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Stockman advocated for energy deregulation, supporting the decontrol of and to enhance market efficiency and reduce reliance on regulatory mandates. He criticized Carter's National Energy Act and related measures as overly interventionist, voting against provisions that imposed and standby rationing authorities, which he viewed as distortions of free-market dynamics. These positions aligned with his broader push to dismantle barriers to production in the energy sector amid the late oil crises. Stockman became a key House advocate for , partnering with Representative to champion the Kemp-Roth bill (H.R. 8333), introduced in 1977 and passed by the House on June 29, 1978, by a 199-185 margin. The legislation proposed a 30% across-the-board reduction in individual rates over three years, aiming to incentivize savings, , and labor supply by lowering marginal rates and countering bracket creep from . Though stalled in the , Stockman's efforts highlighted his commitment to tax cuts as a mechanism for revitalizing economic productivity rather than demand-side stimulus. In December 1980, he co-authored a with Kemp urging Republicans to reject budgets and pursue aggressive spending restraints to avert fiscal .

Reagan Administration Service

Appointment and Initial Budget Reforms (1981)

President nominated David Stockman to serve as Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on January 20, 1981, the day of his . Stockman, then 34 years old and a former U.S. Representative from , was confirmed by the on January 27, 1981. In this role, Stockman became a key architect of Reagan's fiscal agenda, focusing on substantial reductions in federal spending to curb and promote through supply-side principles. Stockman's initial efforts centered on a program-by-program review to identify inefficiencies and eliminate or reduce non-essential expenditures, targeting approximately $40 billion in cuts for 1982. He assembled a transition prior to the and, upon assuming office, directed a working group to propose swift eliminations, such as zeroing out the (CETA) and the Community Services Administration. Specific targets included a 25% reduction in education aid, tightened eligibility for food stamps, cuts to price supports totaling $1 billion, and $752 million from the Export-Import Bank to end corporate subsidies. These proposals exempted major entitlements like Social Security and Medicare, as well as defense spending, which received a planned 7% annual increase. By February 1981, Stockman's team had outlined $41.4 billion in reductions, though compromises arose from Cabinet resistance and lobbying, such as restoring some Export-Import Bank funds. This groundwork culminated in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, signed into law on August 13, 1981, which enacted nearly $35.2 billion in spending cuts below prior projections through 83 major adjustments across domestic programs. Stockman emphasized merit-based evaluations, prioritizing the termination of ineffectual initiatives over broad client-based protections. Early approval of aligned measures passed 88-10, signaling initial congressional support despite ongoing negotiations.

Execution of Tax Cuts and Spending Reductions (1981-1983)

As Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), David Stockman played a central role in formulating and executing President Reagan's initial economic agenda, which emphasized supply-side tax reductions alongside spending restraint. In early 1981, Stockman led the development of the fiscal year 1982 budget proposal, targeting $41.4 billion in domestic spending cuts while proposing a $32 billion increase in defense outlays. This plan aimed to reduce the projected federal deficit by aligning expenditures with anticipated revenue growth from tax cuts, though it faced immediate congressional scrutiny. The cornerstone of this agenda was the Economic Recovery Tax Act (ERTA) of 1981, which Stockman helped architect to stimulate through marginal rate reductions. Enacted on August 4, 1981, and signed into law by Reagan on August 13, 1981, ERTA implemented a 25% across-the-board cut in individual rates, phased over three years from 1981 to 1983, lowering the top marginal rate from 70% to 50%. The legislation also introduced accelerated cost recovery for businesses, replacing the prior system to encourage investment, and indexed tax brackets for starting in 1985. These provisions took effect progressively, with the first 5% rate reduction applying to 1981 tax liabilities paid in 1982, followed by 10% cuts in 1982 and 1983. On the spending side, Stockman directed a program-by-program review to identify efficiencies, achieving approximately $39 billion in budget cuts during Reagan's first year, primarily targeting non-defense discretionary programs such as , subsidies, and grants. For fiscal years 1982 and 1983, federal outlays on major means-tested programs for the poor declined by only 3.1% in real terms, reflecting resistance to deeper entitlement reforms. Defense spending rose sharply, from $134 billion in FY1981 to $185 billion in FY1982 and $245 billion in FY1983, offsetting many domestic savings and contributing to persistent deficits as tax revenues initially lagged due to recessionary pressures. Stockman's execution efforts encountered political hurdles, including bipartisan opposition in to proposed cuts in agriculture supports, urban aid, and student loans, which he criticized as inefficient during 1981 confirmation hearings and budget negotiations. By late 1982, as deficits swelled to $128 billion for FY1983—far exceeding initial projections—Stockman leveraged the fiscal shortfall to advocate for additional restraint, proposing revenue enhancements and further domestic trims, though these met limited success amid Democratic control of the and GOP reluctance to revisit tax cuts. His internal OMB reforms, including revised economic modeling to incorporate supply-side dynamics, supported these initiatives but highlighted tensions between ideological goals and pragmatic fiscal outcomes.

Internal Conflicts and Resignation (1983-1985)

During the early 1980s, federal budget deficits expanded rapidly, reaching $195 billion in 1983 despite initial supply-side reforms, as defense spending surged under Reagan's buildup while domestic entitlement programs resisted cuts. Stockman, as OMB director, increasingly clashed with congressional Republicans and administration hawks who prioritized defense allocations exceeding his proposed caps, arguing that unchecked growth—projected at 7-10% annual increases—undermined fiscal discipline without corresponding domestic reductions. In February 1985, during hearings, Stockman assailed pension costs as unsustainable, warning they contributed to long-term insolvency risks akin to Social Security's projected "devastating ," and urged freezes despite concessions that would likely trim the president's $285 billion defense request. These tensions peaked amid 1985 budget negotiations, where Stockman advocated $56 billion in additional spending cuts to address a projected $180 billion deficit for 1986, but faced deadlock from Democrats protecting entitlements and Republicans reluctant to curb defense or tax benefits. Internal administration frictions compounded this, as Stockman pressed Reagan for harder choices on spending restraint, later recounting in his 1986 the president's inconsistent grasp of policy trade-offs and failure to enforce across-the-board . By mid-1985, personal factors including the birth of his first child and desire for higher private-sector earnings influenced his decision to depart after four years of contentious oversight. On July 9, 1985, Stockman submitted his resignation, effective August 1, citing exhaustion from budget battles and the need to transition to opportunities, while Reagan praised his "tireless effort" for fiscal stability in accepting it. Reflecting later, Stockman attributed his exit to the broader "destruction of fiscal rectitude" under Reagan, marked by ballooning deficits from unrestrained defense outlays and political compromises that diluted original spending-cut ambitions. His tenure ended amid unresolved congressional impasses, leaving OMB under acting director as Reagan pursued alternative deficit-reduction strategies.

Economic Philosophy and Policy Impact

Foundations of Supply-Side Economics Implementation

David Stockman's engagement with supply-side economics began during his time in Congress, where he was introduced to its principles by Representative Jack Kemp and became a vocal advocate for tax rate reductions to enhance productive incentives. Central to this was his support for the Kemp-Roth bill, first introduced in 1977, which sought a 30 percent across-the-board cut in individual income tax rates phased over three years, aiming to counteract the disincentives posed by high marginal rates—particularly the top rate of 70 percent—that discouraged work, saving, and investment. Stockman viewed these cuts as foundational to shifting economic policy from demand-side stimulus toward bolstering supply through marginal rate relief, arguing that lower taxes would expand the tax base via increased economic activity rather than mere redistribution. As director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) starting January , Stockman operationalized these foundations by overhauling the agency's budgeting framework to incorporate supply-side dynamics. He directed the revision of OMB's econometric models, discarding Keynesian static assumptions in favor of projections that factored in behavioral responses to tax cuts, such as higher labor participation and leading to GDP growth rates of 3-4 percent annually. This dynamic scoring underpinned the fiscal 1982 budget proposal, which combined $41 billion in non-defense spending reductions with the Economic Recovery Tax Act (ERTA) of , enacting a 25 percent phased reduction in rates—including the top marginal rate to 50 percent—while indexing brackets to prevent bracket creep. Stockman emphasized that the core supply-side mechanism lay in top-rate cuts, describing broader provisions as secondary to unleashing entrepreneurial supply. Implementation rested on the causal premise that excessive taxation distorted resource allocation, with federal revenues consuming over 20 percent of GDP by 1980 stifling private sector vitality; Stockman projected that rate relief would restore balance without net revenue loss, contingent on rigorous spending discipline to achieve budget balance by 1983. He orchestrated a rapid, line-by-line review of the federal budget, reallocating resources toward defense while targeting domestic entitlements and programs for truncation, reflecting supply-side realism that government contraction would amplify private output. These efforts crystallized in Reagan's February 1981 economic program, where Stockman's preparations enabled swift congressional passage of ERTA by August 1981, marking the practical enactment of supply-side tenets amid stagflation.

Fiscal Achievements and Growth Outcomes

As Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) from 1981 to 1985, David Stockman played a central role in advancing the Reagan administration's supply-side fiscal agenda, particularly through the Economic Recovery Tax Act (ERTA) of 1981, which reduced the top marginal rate from 70% to 50% and implemented further cuts in subsequent years, aiming to incentivize and . These tax reductions, totaling about 23% across income tax brackets over three years, were projected to stimulate economic expansion by increasing after-tax returns on capital and labor, with Stockman advocating for their passage amid congressional negotiations despite initial resistance from Democrats. The legislation also introduced accelerated for business investments and indexed tax brackets to , addressing prior distortions that eroded . On the spending side, Stockman spearheaded efforts to curb non-defense discretionary outlays, achieving a slowdown in the growth of federal domestic programs from prior highs; for instance, real federal spending growth dropped from double-digit rates pre-1981 to an average of about 2.5% annually in the early Reagan years, with cuts targeting areas like , subsidies, and jobs under programs such as CETA, which saw funding halved from $8 billion to $3.7 billion. Overall federal outlays as a share of GDP stabilized around 22-23% during 1981-1985, lower than the 21.6% peak in fiscal 1981 but still elevated due to rising defense appropriations, which Stockman supported as part of anti-Soviet buildup but later critiqued for offsetting domestic restraint. These measures reflected Stockman's push for "supply-side" discipline, though congressional compromises limited deeper entitlement reforms. The fiscal policies under Stockman's oversight coincided with robust economic recovery following the 1981-1982 recession induced by Federal Reserve tightening; real GDP growth accelerated from -1.8% in 1982 to 4.58% in 1983, 7.24% in 1984, and 4.17% in 1985, marking one of the strongest post-recession expansions in postwar history. Proponents attribute this to the tax cuts' boost in private investment, which rose sharply as after-tax incentives aligned with deregulation, contributing to noninflationary output gains and unemployment falling from 10.8% in late 1982 to 7.2% by 1985. Inflation, meanwhile, declined from double digits in 1980 to under 4% by 1983, aided by monetary policy but amplified by fiscal signals of credible commitment to growth over redistribution. While deficits widened to $200 billion annually by mid-decade due to unmatched revenue losses from tax cuts and defense hikes, the era's output surge—averaging over 4% annual real GDP growth from 1983-1985—validated elements of Stockman's vision for unleashing private sector dynamism.

Critiques of Policy Shortfalls and Deficit Realities

Stockman, in his 1986 book The Triumph of Politics: Why the Reagan Revolution Failed, argued that the administration's fiscal agenda collapsed due to political compromises that prioritized short-term consensus over rigorous spending restraint, resulting in persistent budget shortfalls. He contended that initial projections for balancing the federal budget by 1984—based on assumptions of 3% real GDP growth, substantial domestic spending reductions, and supply-side tax cuts generating dynamic revenue—proved unrealistic as growth averaged only 2.5% initially, and watered down cuts to entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare. This led to federal deficits averaging 4.0% of GDP from 1982 to 1989, peaking at 6.0% in 1983, far exceeding the pre-Reagan average of 2.2% of GDP from 1970 to 1980. A core policy shortfall, per Stockman, was the failure to curb non-defense discretionary and , which rose from 16.5% of GDP in 1981 to 17.2% by 1985 despite targeted cuts in the 1981 Omnibus Reconciliation Act. Defense outlays, however, surged from 5.2% of GDP in 1981 to 6.2% in 1986 to fund initiatives like the , exacerbating the imbalance without offsetting domestic reductions. Stockman attributed this to Reagan's reluctance to confront congressional allies and his aversion to increases, noting in interviews that the president viewed deficits primarily as a spending problem while rejecting measures: "I don’t want to hear any more about taxes. The problem is ." Consequently, the national debt tripled from $997 billion in 1981 to $2.6 trillion by January 1989, with cumulative deficits exceeding $1.4 trillion over the decade. Stockman's resignation as OMB director on July 9, 1985, underscored these realities, as he cited frustration with an impasse over reducing projected $180 billion deficits for 1986 amid stalled bipartisan negotiations. He later described the era's fiscal path as a choice "between huge deficits and large deficits," warning that incompetent advising and Reagan's optimism masked the buildup of public debt that would impose "cataclysmic economic troubles." While acknowledging economic growth averaging 3.5% annually from 1983 to 1989, Stockman emphasized that supply-side incentives did not fully offset revenue losses from the 25% marginal rate cuts in the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, as static scoring underestimated dynamic effects but ignored the absence of parallel . This critique highlighted a causal disconnect: tax reductions stimulated investment but, without expenditure discipline, fueled deficits rather than self-financing balance, a Stockman deemed a triumph of politics over principled economics.

Private Sector and Business Endeavors

Transition to Finance and Investment (1985-2000s)

Upon resigning as Director of the Office of Management and Budget in August 1985, Stockman transitioned to the by joining , a prominent investment bank, where he served as a managing director focused on . In this role, he applied his fiscal expertise to advisory services for corporate clients, navigating the boom of the late amid rising junk bond financing. Stockman subsequently moved to the private equity firm Blackstone Group, becoming one of its early partners and a senior managing director, positions that extended into the . At Blackstone, founded in 1985, he contributed to deal and portfolio management, leveraging the firm's growing emphasis on buyouts and during a period of economic expansion and . This phase marked his deeper immersion in private equity, where he emphasized operational turnarounds and debt-financed acquisitions, contrasting with his prior public-sector advocacy. By 1999, Stockman established his own private equity firm, Heartland Industrial Partners, based in Greenwich, Connecticut, targeting manufacturing and industrial sectors for leveraged investments. Heartland raised approximately $500 million in its initial fund, focusing on mid-market companies with potential for cost-cutting and efficiency gains, reflecting Stockman's supply-side roots applied to corporate governance. Through the early 2000s, this venture solidified his reputation in investment management, though it later faced challenges in the automotive supplier downturn.

Tenure at Collins & Aikman Corporation

David Stockman joined Collins & Aikman Corporation, a Detroit-area manufacturer of automotive interior components such as trim, cockpits, and carpets, through his involvement with Heartland Industrial Partners, a he co-founded in 1999. Heartland acquired a controlling stake in the company in 2001, after which Stockman served on the . The company, then valued around $4 billion in revenue, had pursued aggressive growth via acquisitions but faced mounting financial pressures from the automotive industry's downturn and high debt levels. On August 11, 2003, Stockman assumed the role of , succeeding Jerry Mosingo and serving concurrently as chairman of the board. This marked his third CEO appointment at the firm within 15 months amid operational instability. During his tenure, Collins & Aikman grappled with shortfalls and vendor payment delays, prompting efforts to restructure supplier agreements and extend credit terms. However, federal investigations later alleged that from late 2001 through early 2005—including periods under Stockman's direct oversight—company executives, directed by Stockman, engaged in improper practices. These included "round-trip" transactions with suppliers to inflate reported income by over $49 million across multiple quarters and obtaining falsified documents to deceive auditors, overstating pre-tax operating income or understating losses by more than 10% in eight consecutive quarters. Stockman's leadership ended on May 12, 2005, when he was ousted following an internal probe revealing accounting irregularities and a concealed . Five days later, on May 17, 2005, Collins & Aikman filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, burdened by approximately $1.2 billion in debt amid declining auto sector demand. The filing triggered civil fraud charges from the Securities and Exchange Commission in March 2007 against Stockman and eight other former officers and directors for misleading investors and lenders about the company's financial health. Criminal indictment followed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, accusing Stockman of conspiracy, , , and wire fraud related to vendor rebate manipulations and false financial disclosures. Prosecutors dropped all criminal charges against Stockman in January 2009, citing insufficient evidence to prove intent beyond a despite the admitted errors. Stockman maintained that the firm's collapse stemmed from a "reckless" board and external market pressures rather than executive malfeasance, while acknowledging personal financial losses exceeding $13 million from the investment. In 2010, he settled the SEC civil claims without admitting or denying wrongdoing, agreeing to pay $7.2 million in , penalties, and interest. The proceedings culminated in the company's substantial asset sales and eventual dissolution by 2007, with Heartland Industrial Partners incurring a $360 million loss on the venture. Collins & Aikman Corporation filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on May 17, 2005, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of , citing acute shortages and an inability to meet operational cash needs amid restructuring efforts in the struggling automotive supplier sector. The filing listed assets and liabilities each exceeding $1 billion, with the company securing of up to $530 million to sustain operations during reorganization. Stockman had resigned as CEO and chairman on May 12, 2005, five days prior, following an internal probe into practices related to supplier rebates. The bankruptcy triggered multiple legal actions, including an SEC civil complaint filed on March 26, 2007, accusing Stockman and other executives of orchestrating fraudulent schemes from 2001 to 2005 to overstate earnings by approximately $40 million through improper recognition of vendor rebates as immediate income rather than deferred costs. Concurrently, a federal in the Southern District of New York indicted Stockman on 31 counts, including , , , and wire fraud, alleging he directed falsified documentation and misled banks and investors to secure over $1 billion in financing while concealing the company's deteriorating finances. Collins & Aikman itself initiated a against Stockman and former executives in May 2007, seeking for alleged breaches contributing to the firm's collapse. Legal repercussions culminated in the U.S. Attorney's Office dropping all criminal charges against Stockman in 2008 without a , citing evidentiary challenges despite the indictment's scope. In the SEC civil case, Stockman consented to a final on April 20, 2010, without admitting or denying wrongdoing, requiring payment of $4.42 million in , $2.37 million in prejudgment interest, and a $400,000 , totaling $7.19 million, to fund a Fund distribution to harmed investors. A 2009 Delaware Chancery Court ruling later advanced Stockman's indemnification claims against certain investors, affirming coverage for defense costs incurred in the probes under corporate bylaws, though full recovery details remain tied to ongoing proceedings.

Post-Government Commentary and Advocacy

Evolution into Deficit and Debt Critic

After resigning as Director of the Office of Management and Budget on August 16, 1985, Stockman began articulating sharp criticisms of the Reagan administration's fiscal trajectory, emphasizing how political expediency had overridden commitments to spending restraint and balanced budgets. In his 1986 memoir The Triumph of Politics: Why the Reagan Revolution Failed, he detailed internal battles where tax cuts proceeded without corresponding reductions in domestic outlays or entitlement reforms, leading to federal deficits that tripled the national debt from $900 billion in 1980 to $2.6 trillion by 1988. Stockman attributed this to congressional and White House concessions, arguing that the supply-side promise of revenue growth through lower rates proved illusory amid unchecked military and social spending increases. This shift marked Stockman's departure from pure supply-side orthodoxy, as he had earlier, during his OMB tenure, advocated for revenue-raising measures like a 1982 increase and further hikes in fiscal years 1983 and 1984 to curb deficits, positions that alienated Republicans wedded to absolutism. By the late and into the , while pursuing private ventures, Stockman extended his critique to bipartisan fiscal irresponsibility, warning in public commentaries that accumulating —reaching 50% of GDP by the early —crowded out private investment and risked future hikes or . His analysis rejected deficit denialism prevalent among some conservatives, insisting that deficits did elevate real rates, as evidenced by yields climbing above 10% in the mid- despite easing. Stockman's role as a debt critic solidified in the 2000s and through writings and interviews decrying the normalization of deficits under both parties, including the George W. Bush-era tax cuts and wars that added $5 trillion to the from 2001 to 2009. In his 2013 book The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in America, a New York Times bestseller, he traced 80 years of policy distortions, blaming interventions and cronyism for enabling endless borrowing rather than market discipline, with public surging from 30% of GDP in 1980 to over 100% by 2012. He argued that this deformation perpetuated "voodoo economics" on steroids, where deficits fueled asset bubbles instead of sustainable growth. By the 2020s, Stockman's commentary intensified amid post-pandemic spending, with federal deficits averaging 7% of GDP and debt exceeding $35 trillion by 2025, which he deemed an "existential threat" requiring deep cuts to entitlements and discretionary outlays rather than monetary gimmicks. In a July 2025 interview, he highlighted how low fiscal and Fed accommodation had entrenched runaway borrowing, projecting debt service costs alone surpassing $1 trillion annually by decade's end without reform. This evolution reflected his first-hand experience with failed fiscal revolutions, positioning him as a skeptic of both Keynesian stimulus and supply-side purism untethered from spending discipline.

Attacks on Federal Reserve Policies and Cronyism

Stockman has repeatedly characterized the as a "serial bubble machine," arguing that its post-2008 policies of and near-zero interest rates artificially inflated asset prices without fostering genuine . In his 2013 book The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in America, he traces the Fed's role in enabling back to early interventions under , which he claims severed the dollar from gold discipline and prioritized financial elites over market discipline. By 2013, Stockman highlighted the Fed's expansion from $500 billion in March 2000 to $3.2 trillion, asserting this "mad money printing" fueled a speculation bubble rather than productive investment, with real median family income declining 8% and net worth for the bottom 90% of households falling by one-fourth during the period. He contends that Fed policies exemplify cronyism by systematically favoring large financial institutions through bailouts and liquidity injections, perpetuating a "too-big-to-fail" regime that distorts capital allocation toward speculation and away from enterprise. In a 2013 New York Times , Stockman warned that eight decades of bipartisan Fed-enabled money printing had exhausted fiscal capacity, warning against further bailouts that would exacerbate zero-sum upon inevitable bubble bursts. He has criticized the Fed's response to the 2008 crisis as entrenching crony elements, such as implicit guarantees for , which encouraged and like stock buybacks over industrial reinvestment. Stockman's attacks extend to the Fed's distortion of global markets, claiming its easy-money regime since the has stoked worldwide asset bubbles by suppressing interest rates and enabling excessive leverage among speculators. In 2013 Bloomberg interviews, he described the Fed's near-doubling of its as venturing into "unsafe and unknown territory," predicting it would prolong malinvestment and inequality by benefiting asset holders disproportionately. More recently, in a March 2025 discussion, Stockman lambasted the Fed's prolonged ultra-low rates and trillions in —initially emergency measures in 2008 and 2020—as morphing into permanent fixtures that foster "casino capitalism," widening the gulf between gains and stagnant wages for average workers. He argues this crony dynamic hollows out productive sectors, as evidenced by the U.S. industrial base's decline amid financial asset inflation, and calls for curtailing the Fed's operations to restore market of .

Recent Warnings on Economic Bubbles and Unsustainability (2010s-2025)

Throughout the , Stockman issued stark warnings about asset bubbles inflated by monetary expansion and fiscal profligacy, characterizing the U.S. as addicted to with no viable path to without drastic cuts. In a 2013 interview, he asserted that policymakers and markets remained "blind to the bubble," as borrowing had become the default mechanism to fund deficits, rendering balanced budgets politically infeasible amid entitlement spending and commitments. He extended these concerns to financial markets, declaring in 2013 that "bubbles are all over" in equities and other assets, urging investors to seek refuge in due to unpriced risks from slowing global growth, fiscal cliffs, and Europe's sovereign woes. Stockman's critiques intensified in the , linking chronic money printing to a "great money bubble" that distorted asset valuations far beyond productive capacity. In his 2022 book The Great Money Bubble: Protect Yourself from the Coming Storm, he argued that rising asset prices posed a greater threat than consumer , detailing how Fed interventions enabled manipulations, speculative excess, and an unbalanced equation of debt-fueled liquidity overwhelming real economic output. He forecasted imminent collapses, predicting in March 2019 a 40% plunge as rallies were propped up not by fundamentals but by "day traders, chart monkeys, [and] robo machines," ignoring signals. By March 2020, amid the onset, Stockman warned of a triggered , with the potentially bottoming at 1,600—a over-50% drop from peaks—exacerbated by $74 in aggregate public and private debt rendering the economy fragile to shocks. Into 2024 and 2025, Stockman maintained that systemic unsustainability had reached a "fiscal and monetary dead end," with overvalued assets and runaway deficits—projected to push public debt beyond $37 trillion—making a 30-50% market correction "damn near impossible" to avert without reigniting . He pinpointed the 2021-2022 surge (peaking at 9%) as a harbinger that shattered the prior era of stable prices, constraining further and exposing the limits of endless borrowing to sustain bubbles. These pronouncements underscored his view that Fed policies had eroded manufacturing competitiveness and real growth, prioritizing speculation over structural reforms.

Writings and Intellectual Contributions

Major Books and Theoretical Works

Stockman's first major book, The Triumph of Politics: Why the Reagan Revolution Failed, published in 1986, provides an insider account of his tenure as Director of the Office of Management and Budget from to 1985. In it, he argues that the Reagan administration's initial supply-side tax cuts succeeded politically but failed to achieve promised spending reductions due to congressional , interest-group pressures, and compromises that expanded deficits rather than curbing federal growth. Stockman details specific miscalculations, such as the 1981 Economic Recovery Tax Act's $750 billion revenue loss over five years without offsetting cuts, attributing the outcome to the triumph of short-term political expediency over fiscal discipline. His 2013 work, The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in America, spans over 700 pages and offers a historical critique of U.S. from the era through the and beyond. Stockman contends that successive interventions by the — including Nixon's 1971 abandonment of the gold standard, Greenspan's low-interest policies fueling asset bubbles, and post-2008 —deformed free-market capitalism into a crony system reliant on cheap debt and bailouts. He quantifies the distortion, noting federal debt rose from 30% of GDP in 1980 to over 100% by 2012, while markets ballooned unsustainably, warning of inevitable fiscal cliffs absent radical entitlement reforms. In Trumped! A Nation on the Brink of Ruin... And How to Bring It Back (2016), Stockman analyzes the context, blaming 30 years of bipartisan fiscal profligacy—deficits averaging 3-5% of GDP annually—for eroding middle-class prosperity and enabling populist backlash. He proposes restoring sound money through audited Fed reforms, slashing defense spending by $200 billion yearly, and means-testing entitlements to avert collapse, critiquing Wall Street's role in inflating bubbles via leveraged speculation. Peak Trump: The Undrainable Swamp and the Fantasy of MAGA (2019) extends this analysis to the Trump administration's first years, arguing its cuts and masked deeper failures like continued deficit expansion to $1 trillion annually by 2019 and failure to "drain the swamp" of entrenched interests. Stockman warns of an impending crash from a 30-year debt-fueled bubble, citing valuations at 150% of historical norms and spending exceeding $700 billion yearly, urging a return to pre-1971 . These works collectively advance Stockman's theoretical framework of "," emphasizing how monetary manipulation and unchecked deficits undermine productive and long-term growth.

Ongoing Columns, Interviews, and Public Engagements

Stockman maintains an active online presence through his website, David Stockman's Contra Corner, where he publishes frequent commentary on , monetary distortions, and market dynamics. The platform features sections such as "Stockman's Corner" for his personal analyses and "Contra Corner Weekly" for curated contrarian perspectives, distributed via free newsletters to subscribers. These columns emphasize critiques of government spending, interventions, and perceived , often drawing on historical data to argue against sustained deficits and easy money policies. In addition to written output, Stockman engages in regular interviews and podcast appearances to disseminate his views. On July 20, 2025, he discussed the U.S. public debt's trajectory from $930 billion in 1981 to $37 trillion in 2025, projecting $130 trillion by 2055 absent reforms, in an with Thoughtful Money. Earlier, on , 2025, he appeared on a program advocating deep spending cuts for initiatives like the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), warning that superficial measures would fail to address fiscal imbalances. In a November 3, 2024, with the Lead Lag Report, Stockman analyzed the Federal Reserve's policy evolution from Paul Volcker's inflation controls to later expansions under and beyond, attributing current economic vulnerabilities to these shifts. Stockman's public engagements extend to podcasts and , reinforcing his contrarian stance. He joined the Tom Woods Show on July 11, 2024, to critique inflation drivers, political fiscal recklessness under figures like —whom he labeled the "King of Debt" for averaging 20% annual spending growth—and broader policy failures. On X (formerly ), under @DA_Stockman, he posts updates on metrics like U.S. interest expenses reaching $1.019 trillion in the first ten months of 2025, highlighting escalating service burdens. These activities position him as a persistent voice urging fiscal restraint amid what he describes as unsustainable borrowing and monetary accommodation.

Personal Life

Family Dynamics and Relationships

Stockman was born on November 10, 1946, in Fort Hood, , to Allen Stockman, a fruit farmer, and Carol Stockman (née Bartz). As the eldest of five children, he grew up primarily in , in a household characterized by strong Republican political engagement; his maternal grandfather, William Bartz, held the position of Republican county treasurer for 30 years. His mother, Carol, who managed family organization and participated in local Republican committees, described Stockman as the least emotional among the siblings. On February 12, 1983, Stockman married Jennifer Blei, then an sales executive and daughter of an oil broker father and insurance agency owner mother, in a ceremony incorporating both Jewish and Protestant elements overlooking the . The couple, who met prior to the wedding and have since described their partnership as a committed unit functioning through shared professional demands, have two daughters: and Victoria. Rachel Lauren Stockman, born in , married Robert Jerold Payne Koven on June 14, 2014. Public records indicate no divorces or significant familial disruptions, with the Stockmans maintaining a long-term exceeding four decades as of 2024. The family resided in , until at least 2014, reflecting a stable domestic structure amid Stockman's post-government career transitions.

Broader Philosophical Stance and Influences

Stockman's economic philosophy centers on a staunch defense of free-market unencumbered by excessive intervention, emphasizing fiscal discipline, sound money, and the inherent self-correcting mechanisms of markets. He views central banking, particularly the Federal Reserve's policies of money printing and low interest rates, as distortive forces that foster bubbles, cronyism, and rather than genuine growth. This stance rejects Keynesian and interventionist bailouts, which he argues exacerbate inequality and inefficiency by favoring over savers and producers. Early in his career, Stockman championed supply-side cuts to incentivize production, but he later critiqued their implementation for failing to curb spending, illustrating his realism that political expediency often overrides economic logic. His influences draw heavily from Austrian school economists, whose critiques of , business cycles driven by credit expansion, and state-induced distortions resonate in Stockman's post-government writings. He frequently references and for their warnings against central planning and inflationary policies that erode . Henry Hazlitt's emphasis on unseen costs of intervention also informs his analysis of how subsidies and regulations stifle entrepreneurship. Initially shaped by supply-side pioneers like , whose 1970s articles on converted Stockman to aggressive revenue reduction as a growth catalyst, his views evolved through firsthand observation of Washington's fiscal profligacy. This pragmatic turn underscores a broader of ideological purity in , prioritizing empirical outcomes over doctrinal adherence. Philosophically, Stockman opposes the welfare state's premise of equality as an enforceable , arguing it justifies expansive redistribution that undermines individual and market signals. He advocates a minimal safety net confined to true destitution, not entitlements that entrench dependency, and decries —where corporations lobby for privileges—as antithetical to true free enterprise. This framework, informed by classical liberal traditions, posits that sustainable prosperity arises from private risk-taking and voluntary exchange, not state-orchestrated stimulus, which he sees as delaying inevitable corrections while amplifying systemic risks.

References

  1. https://history.house.gov/People/Detail/22294
  2. https://www.crfb.org/biography/directors/david-stockman
  3. https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/contributor/david-stockman/
  4. https://www.theatlantic.com/past/unbound/flashbks/classics/stockman.htm
  5. https://www.nytimes.com/1985/07/10/us/stockman-resigns-top-budget-post-going-to-wall-st.html
  6. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1985/07/09/David-Stockman-whose-number-crunching-prowess-spurred-dramatic-cuts-in/5842489729600/
  7. https://bioguide.congress.gov/search/bio/S000935
  8. https://www.nytimes.com/1981/03/15/magazine/david-stockman-the-president-s-cutting-edge.html
  9. https://kids.kiddle.co/David_Stockman
  10. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-07-27-bk-1428-story.html
  11. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1981/12/the-education-of-david-stockman/305760/
  12. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/magazine/1981/02/08/the-stockman-express/1810b8a5-19fb-4a85-8abe-87d8e2b91a00/
  13. https://www.wvpe.org/commentary/2018-10-22/michiana-stories-david-frazer
  14. https://clerk.house.gov/member_info/electionInfo/1976election.pdf
  15. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/nomination-david-stockman-be-director-the-office-management-and-budget
  16. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c7755/c7755.pdf
  17. https://library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/document.php?id=cqal79-1183239
  18. https://www.heritage.org/taxes/report/tenth-anniversary-celebration-the-kemp-roth-tax-cuts-the-importance-americas-victory
  19. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1980/12/14/the-stockman-manifesto/cd665479-3dca-4dcd-b3c2-a27a96fabe1e/
  20. https://rollcall.com/2017/02/13/its-huge-trump-administration-sets-record-with-empty-omb-director-slot/
  21. https://library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/cqal81-1172382
  22. https://www.nytimes.com/1981/11/22/business/economic-affairs-david-stockman-s-story.html
  23. https://www.nytimes.com/1981/03/11/business/economic-scene-stockman-voice-of-a-revolution.html
  24. https://www.congress.gov/bill/97th-congress/house-bill/4242
  25. https://reagan.blogs.archives.gov/2016/08/15/reaganomics-the-economic-recovery-tax-act-of-1981/
  26. https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/reagans/reagan-administration/reagan-presidency
  27. https://www.nytimes.com/1983/05/05/us/stockman-defends-fairness-of-reagan-policy.html
  28. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-04-13-mn-4399-story.html
  29. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1985/07/10/the-ups-and-downs-of-david-stockman/d2bc8ddb-5f65-4634-8f37-147b1deb3bb7/
  30. https://www.nytimes.com/1985/02/06/business/stockman-assails-military-pensions-in-senate-hearing.html
  31. https://www.npr.org/sections/politicaljunkie/2009/07/on_this_day_in_1985_budget_dir.html
  32. https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speech/letter-accepting-resignation-david-stockman-director-office-management-and-budget
  33. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2013/04/02/mourning-in-america-the-failed-education-of-david-stockman/
  34. https://www.chicagotribune.com/1985/07/10/stockman-quits-as-budget-chief/
  35. https://time.com/archive/6856563/what-stockman-said/
  36. https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Reaganomics.html
  37. https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/dolchp09
  38. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/usa/united-states/gdp-growth-rate
  39. https://www.aei.org/articles/reagan-cut-taxes-revenue-boomed/
  40. https://www.reaganfoundation.org/ronald-reagan/the-presidency/economic-policy
  41. https://www.millercenter.org/president/reagan/domestic-affairs
  42. https://www.amazon.com/Triumph-Politics-Reagan-Revolution-Failed/dp/1610392779
  43. https://www.cato.org/commentary/reagans-budget-legacy
  44. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFSGDA188S
  45. https://www.aei.org/pethokoukis/did-reagans-tax-cuts-cause-those-big-1980s-budget-deficits-or-was-it-paul-volckers-inflation-fighting/
  46. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/22/us-national-debt-tops-1-trillion-oct-22-1981-243966
  47. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1986/04/13/stockman-reagan-revolution-was-doomed/3114c94a-769e-4840-8e49-fd390dce453b/
  48. https://reason.com/2011/03/21/the-triumph-of-politics-over-e/
  49. https://www.roosevelthouse.hunter.cuny.edu/events/david-stockman-on-the-great-deformation-the-corruption-of-capitalism-in-america/
  50. https://www.cato.org/commentary/david-stockman-vs-bain-capital
  51. https://www.theglobalist.com/contributors/david-a-stockman/
  52. https://moneyweek.com/255613/david-stockman-hold-gold-and-cash-abandon-all-equities
  53. https://www.reuters.com/article/legal/government/collins-aikman-sues-former-ceo-others-idUSN18392822/
  54. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/26/business/worldbusiness/26iht-stockman.5.5035072.html
  55. https://www.autonews.com/article/20030818/REG/308180740/stockman-steps-into-ceo-role-at-collins-aikman/
  56. https://www.plasticsnews.com/article/20030818/NEWS/308189998/collins-aikman-brings-in-new-chief
  57. https://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-53.htm
  58. https://www.justice.gov/archive/usao/nys/pressreleases/March07/stockmanetalindictmentpr.pdf
  59. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2007-10-11/stockman-says-reckless-board-sank-collins-aikman
  60. https://www.industryweek.com/the-economy/regulations/article/21953830/stockman-former-head-of-collins-aikman-charged-with-fraud
  61. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna17797966
  62. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna28581007
  63. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/uk/david-stockman-to-pay-72-mln-in-sec-settlement-idUSN19211951/
  64. https://www.autonews.com/article/20071012/REG/71012021/collins-aikman-goes-out-of-business-today/
  65. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/18/business/collins-aikman-files-for-creditor-protection.html
  66. https://www.gainesville.com/story/news/2005/05/18/auto-parts-supplier-collins-aikman-files-for-bankruptcy/31693105007/
  67. https://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/25/business/a-reagan-budget-czar-grapples-with-investment-woes.html
  68. https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2007/comp20055.pdf
  69. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna18736951
  70. https://www.cornerstone.com/insights/cases/united-states-of-america-v-david-a-stockman-et-a/
  71. https://law.justia.com/cases/delaware/court-of-chancery/2009/124460-1.html
  72. https://www.goodwinlaw.com/en/insights/publications/2009/07/new-delaware-case-favors-indemnity-for-investment-professionals
  73. https://www.publicaffairsbooks.com/titles/david-stockman/the-great-deformation/9781610395236/
  74. https://www.npr.org/2011/04/16/135464226/reagans-budget-director-taking-no-sides
  75. https://adamtaggart.substack.com/p/david-stockman-our-runaway-debt-and
  76. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/paul-krugman-david-stockman_n_3033003
  77. https://www.cato.org/events/great-deformation-corruption-capitalism-america
  78. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/opinion/sunday/sundown-in-america.html
  79. https://www.independent.org/article/2014/01/21/stockman-cronyism-is-destroying-american-capitalism-and-american-democracy/
  80. https://aier.org/article/david-stockmans-the-great-deformation-the-corruption-of-capitalism-in-america/
  81. https://www.cnbc.com/2013/11/26/the-fed-has-created-a-huge-global-bubble-stockman.html
  82. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-06-27/david-stockman-takes-on-the-feds-easy-money-policies-and-the-world
  83. https://adamtaggart.substack.com/p/david-stockman-if-it-doesnt-cut-to
  84. https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/10/24/david-stockman-on-how-the-feds-money-printing-broke-american-industry-and-what-comes-next/
  85. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/david-stockman-were-blind-to-the-debt-bubble
  86. http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/stockman-bubbles-over-hide-cash-150205492.html
  87. https://humanixbooks.com/the-great-money-bubble-protect-yourself-from-the-coming-inflation-storm.html
  88. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/13/david-stockman-rally-is-just-day-traders-chart-monkeys-crash-coming.html
  89. https://www.cnbc.com/video/2020/03/19/stockman-coronavirus-is-sparking-a-financial-crisis.html
  90. https://slopeofhope.com/2020/03/mister-stockman.html
  91. https://adamtaggart.substack.com/p/david-stockman-its-damn-near-impossible
  92. https://internationalman.com/articles/david-stockman-on-how-the-feds-money-printing-broke-american-industry-and-what-comes-next/
  93. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15323485-the-triumph-of-politics
  94. https://www.amazon.com/Great-Deformation-Corruption-Capitalism-America/dp/1586489127
  95. https://www.amazon.com/Trumped-Nation-Brink-Ruin-Bring/dp/1621291847
  96. https://www.amazon.com/Peak-Trump-Undrainable-Swamp-Fantasy/dp/0578451107
  97. https://www.davidstockmanscontracorner.com/
  98. https://www.davidstockmanscontracorner.com/free-newsletters/
  99. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlBAQCrldr0
  100. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2aNCcQ4-Cw
  101. https://leadlagreport.substack.com/p/david-stockman-on-capitalisms-evolution
  102. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-2516-david-stockman-on-rfk-trump-and-inflation/id716825890?i=1000661978719
  103. https://internationalman.com/articles/david-stockman-on-why-donald-trump-is-the-king-of-debt/
  104. https://x.com/DA_Stockman/status/1955388114261758384
  105. https://www.streetwisereports.com/article/2024/05/29/former-washington-insider-critical-of-current-financial-regime.html
  106. https://www.infoplease.com/biographies/government-politics/david-alan-stockman-mi
  107. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1983/02/12/Budget-director-David-Stockman-and-IBM-sales-executive-Jennifer/1757413874000/
  108. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1983/05/24/stockmans-life-beyond-the-bottom-line/0edcd981-3f38-45e9-8bea-ef60704f46c1/
  109. https://www.andersonranch.org/blog/conversation-with-jennifer-david-stockman-moderated-by-walter-isaacson/
  110. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/15/fashion/weddings/rachel-stockman-robert-koven.html
  111. https://www.instagram.com/jbstockman/p/C4QqoSyrTJ_/?hl=en
  112. https://patch.com/connecticut/greenwich/former-presidential-budget-director-david-stockman-sells-his-greenwich-estat-0
  113. https://mises.org/library/review-great-deformation-corruption-capitalism-america-david-stockman
  114. https://fee.org/articles/the-great-deformation-the-corruption-of-capitalism-in-america/
  115. https://billmoyers.com/segment/david-stockman-on-crony-capitalism/
  116. https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2013-04-05/david-stockman-the-next-ron-paul
  117. https://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2010/08/06/Eclectic-Ideological-Journey-David-Stockman
  118. https://www.ft.com/content/e9ad510f-acf2-3f57-b47b-994e0d5c2b99
  119. https://mises.org/mises-wire/exposing-our-fed-driven-bubble-economy
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.