Hubbry Logo
Giant oceanic manta rayGiant oceanic manta rayMain
Open search
Giant oceanic manta ray
Community hub
Giant oceanic manta ray
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Giant oceanic manta ray
Giant oceanic manta ray
Giant oceanic manta ray
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Giant oceanic manta ray
Temporal range: 23–0 Ma[1] Early Miocene to Present
CITES Appendix II [3]
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Chondrichthyes
Subclass: Elasmobranchii
Order: Myliobatiformes
Family: Mobulidae
Genus: Mobula
Species:
M. birostris
Binomial name
Mobula birostris
(Walbaum, 1792)
Range of the giant oceanic manta ray
Synonyms[4]
List
    • Raja birostris Walbaum, 1792
    • Manta birostris (Walbaum, 1792)
    • Manta brevirostris (Walbaum, 1792) (lapsus calami)
    • Raja manatia Bloch & Schneider, 1801
    • Cephalopterus vampyrus Mitchill, 1824
    • Cephalopterus manta Bancroft, 1829
    • Manta americana Bancroft, 1829
    • Ceratoptera ehrenbergi Müller & Henle, 1841
    • Ceratoptera ehrenbergii Müller & Henle, 1841
    • Manta ehrenbergii (Müller & Henle, 1841)
    • Ceratoptera johnii Müller & Henle, 1841
    • Brachioptilon hamiltoni Hamilton & Newman, 1849
    • Manta hamiltoni (Hamilton & Newman, 1849)
    • Cephaloptera stelligera Günther, 1870
    • Manta raya Baer, 1899
M. birostris swimming with a diver

The giant oceanic manta ray, giant manta ray, or oceanic manta ray (Mobula birostris) is a species of ray in the family Mobulidae and the largest type of ray in the world. It is circumglobal and is typically found in tropical and subtropical waters but can also be found in temperate waters.[5] Until 2017, the species was classified in the genus Manta, along with the smaller reef manta ray (Mobula alfredi). DNA testing revealed that both mantas are closer related to some Mobula species than these are to other Mobula, being claded together. As a result, the two Manta species were absorbed into Mobula to reflect the new classification.[6]

Distribution and habitat

[edit]

The giant oceanic manta ray has a widespread distribution in tropical and temperate waters worldwide. In the Northern Hemisphere, it has been recorded as far north as southern California and New Jersey in the United States, Aomori Prefecture in Japan, the Sinai Peninsula in Egypt, and the Azores in the northern Atlantic. In the Southern Hemisphere, it occurs as far south as Peru, Uruguay, South Africa, and New Zealand.[2]

It is an ocean-going species and spends most of its life far from land, travelling with the currents and migrating to areas where upwellings of nutrient-rich water increase the availability of zooplankton.[7] The oceanic manta ray is often found in association with offshore oceanic islands.[8]

Description

[edit]
M. birostris with rolled up cephalic fins and characteristic dorsal coloration (Ko Hin Daeng, Thailand)
Side view of M. birostris with unfolded cephalic fins (Ko Hin Daeng, Thailand)

The giant oceanic manta ray can grow up to 9 m (30 ft) in length[9] and a disc size of 7 m (23 ft) across, with a weight around 3,000 kg (6,600 lb),[10][11] but the typical size is 4.5 m (15 ft).[12] It is dorsoventrally flattened and has large, triangular pectoral fins on either side of the disc. At the front, it has a pair of cephalic fins, which are forward extensions of the pectoral fins. These can be rolled up in a spiral for swimming or can be flared out to channel water into the large, forward-pointing, rectangular mouth when the animal is feeding. The teeth are in a band of 18 rows and are restricted to the central part of the lower jaw. The eyes and the spiracles are on the side of the head behind the cephalic fins, and the gill slits are on the ventral (under) surface. It has a small dorsal fin and the tail is long and whip-like. The manta ray does not have a spiny tail, as do the closely related devil rays (Mobula spp.), but has a knob-like bulge at the base of its tail.[8]

The skin is smooth with a scattering of conical and ridge-shaped tubercles. The colouring of the dorsal (upper) surface is black, dark brown, or steely blue, sometimes with a few pale spots and usually with a pale edge. The ventral surface is white, sometimes with dark spots and blotches. The markings can often be used to recognise individual fish.[13]

Physical distinctions

[edit]
Front of a reef manta ray (M. alfredi) with closed mouth, Raja Ampat, West Papua, Indonesia

M. birostris is similar in appearance to M. alfredi, and the two species may be confused, as their distribution overlaps, but distinguishing features exist. The oceanic manta ray is larger than the reef manta ray, typically 4.0–5.0 m (13.1–16.4 ft) compared to 3.0–3.5 m (9.8–11.5 ft).[14] If the observed rays are young, though, their size can easily bring confusion. Only the colour pattern remains an effective way to distinguish them. The reef manta ray has a dark dorsal side with usually two lighter areas on top of the head, looking like a nuanced gradient of its dark dominating back coloration and whitish to greyish, the longitudinal separation between these two lighter areas forms a kind of "Y", while for the oceanic manta ray, the dorsal surface is deep dark and the two white areas are well marked without gradient effect. The line of separation between these two white areas forms a "T".

The two species can also be differentiated by their ventral coloration. The reef manta ray has a white belly often with spots between the branchial gill slits and other spots spread across trailing edge of pectoral fins and abdominal region. The oceanic manta ray has also a white ventral coloration with spots clustered around lower region of its abdomen. Its cephalic fins, inside of its mouth and its gill slits, are often black.

Brain size and intelligence

[edit]

The oceanic manta has the largest brain of any fish, weighing up to 200 g (7.1 oz) (five to ten times larger than a whale shark brain.) Their brains are surrounded by a network of blood vessels, the rete mirabile, which warms the blood flowing to the brain, and they are one of the few animals (land or sea) that might pass the mirror test, seemingly exhibiting self-awareness.[15][16]

Biology

[edit]
M. birostris at cleaning station (Ko Hin Daeng, Thailand)

When traveling in deep water, the giant oceanic manta ray swims steadily in a straight line, while further inshore, it usually basks or swims idly. Mantas may travel alone or in groups of up to 50. They sometimes associate with other fish species, as well as sea birds and marine mammals. About 27% of their diet is based on filter feeding,[17] and they migrate to coastlines to hunt varying types of zooplankton such as copepods, mysids, shrimp, euphausiids, decapod larvae, and on occasion, varying sizes of fish.[18] When foraging, it usually swims slowly around its prey, herding the planktonic creatures into a tight group before speeding through the bunched-up organisms with its mouth open wide.[17] While feeding, the cephalic fins are spread to channel the prey into its mouth and the small particles are sifted from the water by the tissue between the gill arches. As many as 50 individual rays may gather at a single, plankton-rich feeding site.[13] Research published in 2016 proved about 73% of their diet is mesopelagic (deep-water) sources including fish. Earlier assumptions about exclusively filter feeding were based on surface observations.[19]

The giant oceanic manta ray sometimes visits a cleaning station on a coral reef, where it adopts a near-stationary position for several minutes while cleaner fish consume bits of loose skin and external parasites. Such visits occur most frequently at high tide.[20] It does not rest on the seabed as do many flat fish, as it needs to swim continuously to channel water over its gills for respiration.[21]

M. birostris at Socorro Island
M. birostris (melanistic) at Socorro Island

The oceanic manta ray can swim at speeds up to 24 km/h (15 mph).[22] Because of this speed and its size, it has very few lethal natural predators. Only large sharks such as the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier), the great hammerhead shark (Sphyrna mokarran), the bullshark (Carcharhinus leucas), dolphins, the false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens), and the killer whale (Orcinus orca) are capable of preying on the ray. Nonlethal shark bites are very common occurrences, with a vast majority of adult individuals bearing the scars of at least one attack.[23]

Reproduction

[edit]

Males become sexually mature when their disc width is about 4 m (13 ft), while females need to be about 5 m (16 ft) wide to breed. When a female is becoming receptive, one or several males may swim along behind her in a "train". During copulation, one of the males grips the female's pectoral fin with his teeth and they continue to swim with their ventral surfaces in contact. He inserts his claspers into her cloaca, and these form a tube through which the sperm is pumped. The pair remains coupled for several minutes before going their own way.[24]

The fertilized eggs develop within the female's oviduct. At first, they are enclosed in an egg case and the developing embryos feed on the yolk. After the egg hatches, the pup remains in the oviduct and receives nourishment from a milky secretion.[25] As it does not have a placental connection with its mother, the pup relies on buccal pumping to obtain oxygen.[26] The brood size is usually one, but occasionally, two embryos develop simultaneously. The gestation period is thought to be 12–13 months. When fully developed, the pup is 1.4 m (4 ft 7 in) in disc width, weighs 9 kg (20 lb), and resembles an adult. It is expelled from the oviduct, usually near the coast, and it remains in a shallow-water environment for a few years while it grows.[13][25] Females only reproduce every two to three years. Long gestation periods and slow reproduction rates make this species highly vulnerable to shifts in population.

Relation to humans

[edit]

Fishery

[edit]

The oceanic manta ray is considered to be endangered by the IUCN's Red List of Endangered Species because its population has decreased drastically over the last 20 years due to overfishing.[27] Because M. birostris feeds in shallow waters, the risk of them getting caught in fishing equipment is higher, especially in surface drift gillnets and bottom set nets.[28] Whatever the type of fishing (artisanal, targeted, or bycatch), the impact on a population with a low fecundity rate, a long gestation period with mainly a single pup at a time, and a late sexual maturity can only be seriously detrimental to a species that cannot compensate for the losses over several decades.[27]

Since the 1970s,[29] fishing for manta rays has been significantly boosted by the price of their gill rakers on the traditional Chinese medicine market.[30] In Chinese culture, they are the main ingredient in a tonic that is marketed to increase immune system function and blood circulation, though no strong evidence supports that the tonic is actually beneficial to health. For this reason and others, gill rakers are sold at relatively high prices – up to $400 per kilogram – and are sold under the trade name pengyusai.[31][29] In June 2018, the New Zealand Department of Conservation classified the giant oceanic manta ray as "data deficient" with the qualifier "threatened overseas" under the New Zealand Threat Classification System.[32]

Pollution

[edit]

The threat of microplastics also exists in the diets of oceanic manta rays. A 2019 study in Indonesia's Coral Triangle was performed to determine if the filter-feeding megafauna of the area were accidentally ingesting microplastics, which can be eaten by filter-feeders either directly (by ingesting layers of plastic polymers that float on the surface of the water in feeding areas) or indirectly (by eating plankton that previously ate microplastics). The results of the study provided ample evidence that filter feeders, such as oceanic manta rays, that lived in the area were regularly consuming microplastics. Though it was also proven via stool samples that some of the plastic simply passed through the digestive systems of manta rays, the discovery is a concern because microplastics create sinks for persistent organic pollutants such as dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethanes (DDTs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Manta rays that consume microplastics harboring these pollutants can suffer from a variety of health effects that range from short-term negative effects such as the reduction of bacteria in their guts, or long-term effects including pollutant-induced weakening of the population's reproductive fitness over future generations, which could negatively affect population levels of the rays in the future.[33]

M. birostris rays are also victims of bioaccumulation in certain regions. At least one study has shown how heavy metals such as arsenic, cadmium, and mercury can be introduced to the marine environment by pollution and can travel up the trophic chain. For example, a study in Ghana involving the testing of tissue samples from six M. birostris carcasses showed evidence of high concentrations of arsenic and mercury (about 0.155–2.321 μg/g and 0.001–0.006 μg/g, respectively). While the sample size was low, it is a first step towards further understanding the true amount of bioaccumulation that M. birostris undergoes due to human pollution. These high levels of metals can cause harm to the people who consume M. birostris and could also cause health problems for the M. birostris species itself.[34]

M. birostris at Okinawa Churaumi Aquarium

Captivity

[edit]

A few public aquariums have giant manta rays in captivity. Since 2009, captive manta rays have been classified as Ꮇ. alfredi.[citation needed]

Since 2018, Ꮇ. birostris has been exhibited at Nausicaá Centre National de la Mer in France and Okinawa Churaumi Aquarium in Japan.[35][36] There are also reports that they were kept at the Marine Life Park, part of the Resorts World Sentosa in Singapore.[37][38]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Giant oceanic manta ray

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

The giant oceanic manta ray (Mobula birostris) is a large elasmobranch fish in the family , recognized as the largest ray species with a wingspan (disc width) of up to 7 meters (23 feet) and a weight exceeding 1,350 kilograms (3,000 pounds). It features a diamond-shaped body, cephalic fins that form a distinctive "horns" appearance when rolled forward, and a terminal mouth adapted for filter-feeding on and small organisms, which it captures by swimming with its mouth open and gill rakers straining prey. This pelagic species inhabits circumtropical and subtropical waters of the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans, often occurring offshore near productive zones or cleaning stations where it interacts with smaller that remove parasites from its . Giant oceanic manta rays are ovoviviparous, with females giving live birth to a single large pup—up to 1.2 meters in disc width—after a gestation period of about 12 months, and reaching at around 3-4 meters disc width after 8-10 years. Their slow growth, late maturity, and low reproductive rate contribute to vulnerability, as populations recover slowly from exploitation. Classified as Endangered on the due to population declines exceeding 30% over three generations from targeted fisheries for gill plates used in traditional medicines and in gillnets and purse seines, the faces additional pressures from boat strikes and habitat degradation. In the United States, it is listed as Threatened under the Endangered Species Act, prompting international trade regulations via Appendix II and regional protections to curb mortality. Despite these measures, ongoing demand in Asian markets for manta products underscores the need for stronger enforcement and monitoring of pelagic fisheries.

Taxonomy

Classification and nomenclature

The giant oceanic manta ray is classified as Mobula birostris (Walbaum, 1792) in the family and order . It was originally described by Johann Julius Walbaum as Raja birostris in 1792, based on specimens from the Atlantic Ocean. The genus Manta was established by Edward Nathaniel Bancroft in 1829 to encompass the species, reflecting its distinctive morphology, and M. birostris served as the . Prior to 2009, a single species was recognized under Manta birostris, but morphological and genetic analyses by Marshall et al. distinguished the giant oceanic form from the smaller (M. alfredi), elevating the latter as a valid species while retaining M. birostris for the oceanic populations. In , phylogenetic evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, combined with morphological data, prompted White et al. to synonymize the genus Manta with , integrating the manta rays into the broader devil ray genus due to their monophyletic nesting within it; this revision shifted the name to Mobula birostris without altering species boundaries. The U.S. formalized this change in a 2023 technical correction under the Act, updating listings from Manta birostris to Mobula birostris to align with prevailing while preserving the species' threatened status. Historical synonyms for M. birostris include Manta brevirostris (Walbaum, 1792), Raja diabolus marinus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801), Cephalopterus vampyrus (Mitchill, 1824), and Manta hamiltoni (Bancroft, 1829), many arising from early misidentifications of Atlantic and specimens as variants of a single .

Relation to other manta rays

The giant oceanic manta ray (Mobula birostris) and reef manta ray (Mobula alfredi) belong to the family , which encompasses all manta and devil rays, sharing a common ancestry as filter-feeding elasmobranchs within the genus . Phylogenetic analyses using mitogenome and nuclear sequences place M. birostris and M. alfredi as species, diverging from other devil ray lineages approximately 13-20 million years ago, with their own split occurring more recently, around 4-5 million years ago based on estimates. This positions them as a derived clade adapted for pelagic and coastal lifestyles, respectively, distinct from the smaller, more benthic-oriented devil rays such as Mobula mobular or Mobula tarapacana. Prior to 2009, M. birostris and M. alfredi were often lumped as a single (Manta birostris), but genetic studies post-dating this taxonomic revision, employing (mtDNA) and nuclear DNA (nDNA), have affirmed their status as separately evolving lineages with minimal hybridization. For instance, comparative population reveal M. birostris exhibits significantly higher heterozygosity and than M. alfredi, reflecting broader oceanic dispersal and larger effective population sizes in the former, despite the recency of their divergence. Devil rays, while congeneric, form outgroups in phylogenies, with M. birostris and M. alfredi sharing derived traits like enlarged cephalic lobes for enhanced prey filtration, underscoring their closer evolutionary ties to each other than to non-manta mobulids. Evolutionary distinctions between M. birostris and M. alfredi include specializations for open-ocean versus reef-associated existence, evidenced by genomic signatures of local adaptation in M. alfredi to coastal environments, such as reduced across fragmented habitats leading to fine-scale structure absent in the more vagile M. birostris. Within , both manta species retain ancestral devil ray characteristics like dorsally directed spiracles but have independently evolved greater body sizes and migratory behaviors suited to their niches, resolving earlier uncertainties from morphological overlap alone.

Description

Morphological features


The giant oceanic manta ray ( birostris) exhibits a dorsoventrally flattened body with a rhomboid disc formed by the expansive pectoral fins that fuse anteriorly with the sides of the head and posteriorly with the pelvic fins, creating a diamond-like outline. The disc width typically measures 4 to 5 meters in adults, with maximum recorded widths reaching 6.8 meters. Body weight can attain up to 2,000 kilograms in large individuals. Prominent cephalic fins, paired appendages originating from the head, are capable of curling forward and are integral to the ' anatomy. The tail is slender, whiplike, and lacks a stinging spine, distinguishing it from many other ray species. The skin is covered in small dermal denticles featuring bifid cusps arranged along ridges, providing a rough texture observed in specimens from strandings and captures. Dorsally, the coloration is predominantly black, while the ventral surface displays white markings with unique, individually identifiable patterns formed by spots and blotches, facilitating photo-identification studies. is evident primarily in reproductive structures, with males possessing paired claspers extending from the pelvic fins for , whereas females lack these organs; mature females generally attain slightly larger disc widths than males. Internally, as a member of the class , the skeleton consists entirely of rather than bone, supporting the large disc and fins. Five pairs of slits are positioned ventrally, adjacent to the broad , enabling efficient filter-feeding through flow across the gills. Dissections from netted specimens in have confirmed these features, including the absence of calcified structures in the tail and the lightweight cartilaginous framework adapted to pelagic life.

Distinctions from reef manta ray

The giant oceanic manta ray (Mobula birostris) attains significantly larger dimensions than the (Mobula alfredi), with maximum disc widths measured at up to 7 meters for oceanic individuals versus 5.5 meters for reef mantas. Oceanic mantas also exhibit a knob-like bulge at the base of the tail, housing a vestigial spine, a feature absent in reef mantas. Dorsal coloration and patterning further distinguish the species: oceanic mantas typically display darker dorsal surfaces with a characteristic T-shaped black marking and distinct white shoulder patches, while reef mantas often feature lighter dorsal tones with Y- or V-shaped markings. These pigmentation differences, along with variations in shoulder girth and pectoral fin curvature, enable reliable species identification through photographic databases compiled from field observations. Ecologically, oceanic mantas predominantly occupy deeper, offshore pelagic waters and exhibit broader migratory patterns, as evidenced by and acoustic tagging data showing extensive open-ocean movements. In contrast, reef mantas show stronger residency to coastal habitats and cleaning stations, with tagging studies revealing limited dispersal and higher site fidelity to nearshore areas.
FeatureGiant oceanic manta ray (M. birostris)Reef manta ray (M. alfredi)
Maximum disc widthUp to 7 mUp to 5.5 m
Tail base morphologyKnob-like bulge presentAbsent
Primary habitatOffshore, pelagicCoastal reefs, nearshore

Distribution and habitat

Global range

The giant oceanic manta ray exhibits a circumglobal distribution across tropical and subtropical waters of the and Atlantic oceans, with verified sightings extending into temperate regions on occasion. Records confirm presence in hotspots such as the and along the , where shelf-edge concentrations have been documented through sighting databases spanning multiple decades. Satellite tagging and photographic evidence highlight key aggregation areas, including coastal Ecuador and Hawaiian waters, where individuals undertake long-distance migrations across oceanic expanses. Studies utilizing acoustic and satellite telemetry from 2011 to 2023 have mapped movements linking these sites, revealing predominantly offshore affinities but with empirical gaps in central oceanic basins due to sparse sampling efforts. Historical fisheries interactions, as recorded in logs predating the , align with contemporary distribution patterns, indicating range persistence in core areas like the western North Atlantic without evidence of wholesale contraction from baseline records. Post-2010 tagging data corroborate this stability, though underreporting in remote regions underscores ongoing needs for expanded verification via and vessel observer programs.

Environmental preferences and migrations

The giant oceanic manta ray inhabits pelagic and epipelagic zones of tropical and subtropical waters, primarily occupying depths between 0 and 100 meters, with 83% of tracked locations in waters shallower than 50 meters. Individuals show a strong association with productive oceanic features such as thermal fronts, ocean currents, and zones that enhance availability through nutrient . These rays prefer sea surface temperatures ranging from 22.8°C to 29°C, with a mean of 27.6°C and frequent occurrences above 26°C, reflecting to warm, stratified waters where vertical mixing supports primary productivity. Detection probabilities increase with chlorophyll-a concentrations of 2.5–7 mg/m³ and specific wind patterns (southward 3–5 m/s, westward 2.5–4.5 m/s) that drive coastal , indicating a causal link to hydrographic processes rather than uniform dispersal. Telemetry studies reveal migratory patterns characterized by seasonal residency and partial migrations, with rays exhibiting site fidelity to upwelling-influenced aggregation sites. Acoustic tagging of 66 individuals from 2014 to 2021 in , , yielded 6,675 detections showing year-round presence with peaks from January to April and mid-May to early October, correlated with La Niña phases and tidal extremes that modulate local productivity. tracking demonstrates shuttling movements along fronts, with average track lengths of 368 km and maximum displacements up to 116 km from tagging sites, often remaining over 20 km offshore in 92% of locations. While capable of longer travels spanning hundreds to thousands of kilometers across ocean basins, many individuals display localized foraging excursions tied to persistent dynamics, underscoring habitat-driven rather than nomadic behavior.

Biology and behavior

Feeding ecology

The giant oceanic manta ray (Manta birostris) is a filter-feeder that consumes small crustaceans such as euphausiids and other planktonic organisms, supplemented by mesopelagic including and other small fish. Stable isotope analysis (SIA) of muscle tissue indicates that surface contributes approximately 27% to the diet, while mesopelagic sources comprise the remaining 73%, challenging prior assumptions of predominant surface feeding based on observational biases at aggregation sites. δ¹³C values averaging -16.8‰ (versus -19.7‰ for surface ) support this deeper foraging component, consistent with tag data showing dives to 1400 m where prey patches form. Foraging involves opportunistic strategies adapted to patchy prey distributions in pelagic environments, including continuous barrel rolls to traverse dense layers and the use of cephalic fins to channel prey toward the mouth's filter pads. These behaviors occur opportunistically at the surface during upwelling-driven blooms or in mid-water scattering layers, enabling efficient capture without active pursuit. Submersible observations confirm barrel rolling at depths exceeding 300 m, aligning with SIA evidence of vertical migration exploitation for energy optimization in low-density oceanic habitats. Daily intake supports the species' large body mass (up to 1350 kg), with estimates of 20–30 kg of plankton-equivalent prey, equating to roughly 2% of body weight to meet metabolic demands as a ram-filter feeder. SIA-derived trophic levels around 3.4 position M. birostris as a mid-level in pelagic food webs, linking to higher predators through top-down control of dynamics. This role underscores causal dependencies on prey patchiness for sustaining low-energy filter-feeding efficiency over vast ranges.

Reproduction and life cycle

The giant oceanic manta ray (Manta birostris) is aplacental viviparous, with embryos nourished by uterine histotroph and secretions rather than a or . Embryos acquire oxygen through of fluid within the , an enabling development without direct maternal blood connection. spans 12-13 months, culminating in the birth of a single, fully formed pup with a disc width of 1.2-2 meters. Sexual maturity occurs at 8-10 years for females and 4-5 years for males, based on size-at-maturity data from dissections and field observations. During , males grasp females using bites to the pectoral fins, wings, or , resulting in prominent scars that serve as indicators of reproductive activity. Genetic analyses of embryos reveal , with multiple paternity common, suggesting females mate with several males per cycle to enhance . Females exhibit low , birthing one pup every 2-3 years as documented through photo-identification and tagging recaptures in aggregation sites during the . With a lifespan exceeding 40 years, these traits reflect a slow life history vulnerable to perturbations, as empirical population models link extended interbirth intervals to prolonged recovery times from mortality events.

Social structure and movement

Giant oceanic manta rays (Manta birostris) exhibit primarily solitary behavior, with individuals occasionally forming loose aggregations of up to dozens at cleaning stations or productive feeding sites, but without evidence of stable schools or persistent social groups. Photo-identification studies in Ecuador's documented 2,803 individuals between 2010 and 2020, revealing a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.67 and resighting rates of only 12.9%, indicating transient associations rather than fixed social units. Similar patterns emerge from tagging and observation data in Indonesia's , where mantas displayed repeated visits to specific sites over periods averaging days (up to 526 days), yet maintained nomadic lifestyles without forming enduring bonds. Locomotion in giant oceanic manta rays relies on rhythmic undulations of their expansive pectoral s, enabling a , flight-like propulsion through the . Cruising speeds typically range from 5 to 10 km/h, achieved through efficient fin oscillations that minimize drag and support sustained travel across oceanic expanses. Breaching behaviors, where individuals propel themselves clear of the surface before splashing down, occur sporadically and may serve to dislodge ectoparasites, though direct causation remains inferred from observational correlations rather than experimental confirmation. Photo-identification efforts, leveraging unique ventral spot patterns, confirm site fidelity to aggregation hotspots amid broader nomadic movements, with individuals returning to locales like Ecuadorian islands over multi-year spans while dispersing widely between visits. This combination of localized loyalty and extensive ranging underscores a flexible adapted to patchy resource distribution in pelagic environments.

Physiology and intelligence

Sensory and physiological adaptations

The giant oceanic manta ray ( birostris) possesses , a network of electroreceptive pores concentrated around the head and ventral surface, enabling detection of weak electric fields generated by prey muscle contractions or environmental sources. These sensory organs, filled with conductive gel, function in marine elasmobranchs by transducing voltage gradients into neural signals, with sensitivity thresholds as low as 5 nV/cm, facilitating prey localization in turbid or low-visibility conditions. Olfaction in M. birostris is acute, supported by enlarged olfactory bulbs relative to reef-associated batoids, which enhance detection of chemical cues from prey over long distances in pelagic habitats. Vision is adapted for dim oceanic environments through large, laterally positioned eyes providing a broad field of view (approximately 180–200 degrees) and structures optimized for low-light sensitivity, though lacking strong evidence for color discrimination beyond rod-dominated photoreception. Physiologically, M. birostris maintains osmotic balance in via urea retention, achieving plasma concentrations around 350–400 mM alongside trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) to counter urea's protein-denaturing effects, rendering body fluids slightly hyperosmotic to the external medium and minimizing diffusive loss across low-permeability gills and kidneys. This strategy, conserved across marine elasmobranchs including rays, contributes to by reducing overall tissue density, with and TMAO comprising key solutes that offset the negative from low stores. Filter-feeding imposes high metabolic demands, necessitating continuous processing of large volumes (up to thousands of liters daily) to ingest sufficient , estimated at 10–15% of body mass weekly for adults exceeding 1,000 kg. Gill morphology supports efficient oxygen extraction during ram ventilation, with countercurrent blood flow across lamellae enabling simultaneous respiration and feeding even in hypoxic mesopelagic zones accessed during dives to 500–1,000 m depths.

Brain size and cognitive evidence

The giant oceanic manta ray (Manta birostris) exhibits the largest relative size among elasmobranchs, with a mass of 122 grams documented in specimens of approximately 165 kilograms body mass. This yields an (EQ) of 1.02, calculated as the ratio of observed to expected mass for body size, surpassing values in most other batoids such as skates and stingrays. The telencephalon constitutes over 60% of total mass, featuring a prominent dorsal pallial bulge, while the displays advanced foliation (grade 5, with deep sulci), indicative of enhanced neural folding for sensory-motor integration. Dissections of mobulid brains, including M. birostris, reveal pallial hypertrophy, particularly in the dorsal pallium's central nucleus, a region linked to olfactory and electrosensory processing in filter-feeding elasmobranchs. Compared to predatory batoids like eagle rays, mobulids show elevated brain-to-body ratios and more complex cerebellar architecture, correlating with demands of pelagic navigation and social aggregation rather than predatory pursuits. Empirical tests demonstrate associative learning and . In controlled feeding experiments with a captive M. birostris, the individual associated specific locations (e.g., an 11.6 m × 6.2 m area) and cues—such as visual buckets or 0.3 L extract dispersed in a 4,700 m³ tank—with food, navigating directly to sites and avoiding fixed obstacles like shallow rocks even in darkness, suggesting retention of a over multiple sessions. Visual stimuli elicited stronger responses (49 instances of head-out-of-water actions) than olfactory alone, indicating cue prioritization in . Mirror exposure trials in 2012 with two captive specimens (disc widths 3.3–4.2 m) revealed contingency checking, including prolonged circling and cephalic fin adjustments, occurring in 67.88% of observation time with a mirror versus 18.54% in controls (p=0.0001). Self-directed behaviors, such as ventral exposure and bubble release, increased exclusively during mirror presence, without aggressive or affiliative responses typical of conspecific encounters, pointing to discrimination between self-image and external stimuli as a precursor to self-recognition testing. These findings, while not confirming abstract cognition, exceed reflexive patterns in basal elasmobranchs and align with the species' elevated EQ.

Human interactions

Captivity and aquaria

Giant oceanic manta rays (Mobula birostris) are infrequently maintained in captivity owing to their exceptional size and physiological demands. Public aquariums housing them are limited, with in representing the primary success, where specimens have been exhibited since the early in a large tank system designed to support continuous swimming and filtration feeding. The facility achieved the first documented captive birth of a giant oceanic manta ray on June 16, 2007, when a pup measuring 1.8 m in disk width emerged after a 374-day period. This event provided novel data on , including in utero "breathing" behaviors observed via in subsequent studies. In August 2024, Okinawa reported the world's first captive birth of a black (melanistic) variant, with the pup measuring 160 cm in width and weighing 42 kg at birth. Captive maintenance requires enormous enclosures—often exceeding volumes of millions of liters—to accommodate wingspans up to 7 m and enable for ram ventilation, as these rays cannot pump water over their gills while stationary. Dietary provisions demand advanced culturing and systems to replicate pelagic flows, while routine assessments pose risks due to the need to restrain active swimmers. Breeding efforts beyond Okinawa have met with failure, constrained by inadequate space for displays, extended exceeding one year, and low typical of the . High stress-induced mortality is prevalent, as evidenced by the August 2025 euthanasia of a Florida-captured specimen after health decline in a holding facility destined for an overseas aquarium. Post-2010 records indicate scant long-term survivorship outside premier institutions, with inter-aquarium transfers occasionally documented but overall outcomes underscoring biological incompatibilities with confinement.

Fisheries and commercial use

The giant oceanic manta ray (Mobula birostris) is primarily captured as bycatch in small-scale artisanal fisheries using gillnets, driftnets, and trawls, though targeted harvesting occurs in certain regions via harpoons or set nets. Gill plates (rakers) are the principal product traded internationally for use in traditional Chinese medicine tonics, with market values ranging from $191 to $1,260 per kg at the consumer level in Asia, while meat serves as a low-value local food source or bait, priced at $0.24–10 per kg fresh or dried. In , a major harvesting nation, annual landings of manta rays reached up to 2,400 individuals in Lamakera during the , primarily through targeted artisanal fisheries, with subsequent declines of 75% from to in key sites like Tanjung Luar and Cilacap due to intensified effort. Sri Lanka's fisheries, dominated by gillnet , exported approximately 16,725 mobulids annually from 2017 to 2021, equivalent to 12,761.7 kg of gill plates, representing 64% of reported trade volumes for the group. These operations are predominantly artisanal, providing modest income to fishers (e.g., $40 per ray at ), contrasted with amplified value in export chains to markets like and . Prior to the species' listing on CITES Appendix II in 2014, gill plate trade volumes escalated, with Guangzhou markets recording an increase from 60 metric tons in 2011 to 120 metric tons in 2013, sourced largely from , , and . Post-listing, reported exports declined as countries like enacted national bans in 2014, yet unreported and illegal trade persists, evidenced by seizures such as 330 kg of gill plates (valued at $116,000) from in in 2020. , , and accounted for an estimated 90% of manta ray exports as of recent assessments.

Conservation status and threats

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) classified the giant oceanic manta ray (Mobula birostris) as Vulnerable in 2019, based on evidence of widespread population reductions driven by targeted fisheries and , with inferred declines exceeding 30% over three generations in many regions. In December 2024, the IUCN uplisted the species to Endangered, citing continued evidence of ongoing declines and low resilience due to its slow reproductive rate—females produce only one pup every two to three years after a 12-month and delayed maturity at around 8–10 years. This reassessment incorporated data from regional studies showing fishery collapses and reduced encounter rates, though global trends remain challenging to quantify precisely owing to the species' pelagic habits and aggregation-based sampling limitations. Global abundance is unknown, but regional estimates suggest fragmented populations totaling in the low tens of thousands at most, with most subpopulations numbering in the hundreds to low thousands of individuals. The largest documented population occurs off coastal , where a 2022 mark-resight analysis of over 2,800 photo-identified individuals—using unique ventral spot patterns for individual recognition—estimated more than 22,000 rays across and adjacent Peruvian waters, representing over 10 times the size of other known aggregations. This estimate, derived from diver-collected photographs at cleaning stations and feeding grounds, highlights potential under-sampling in open-ocean habitats but also underscores data quality issues: resighting rates were low (12.9%), influenced by factors like and chlorophyll a concentration, which correlate with aggregation dynamics rather than total abundance. Assessments increasingly integrate genetic tools to assess and effective sizes, revealing low and site fidelity that amplify vulnerability in isolated groups. For example, genomic analyses from 2023–2025 samples across and Atlantic sites indicate distinct regional clusters with reduced , consistent with demographic bottlenecks from historical exploitation, though these do not yield absolute abundance figures. Sighting-based metrics, such as those from and fishery logs, document declines—e.g., multi-decade South African catch records show significant reductions in M. birostris landings since the 1990s—but require caution against conflating observation biases (e.g., effort variability, gear selectivity) with true demographic shifts; protected areas like demonstrate relative stability, suggesting declines may be uneven and fishery-dependent rather than uniformly global. Models extrapolating from such data emphasize the species' low intrinsic growth rate (around 2–4% annually), implying slow recovery even absent ongoing pressures.

Natural predation

The giant oceanic manta ray (Manta birostris) experiences limited natural predation, primarily from large sharks including (Galeocerdo cuvier) and (Sphyrna mokarran), with occasional involvement of killer whales (Orcinus orca), including the first documented predation event on a giant oceanic manta ray in the Southwest Indian Ocean. Juveniles face higher risk due to their smaller disc widths (typically under 3 meters), which make evasion more challenging during early life stages when swimming efficiency is developing. In contrast, adults, attaining disc widths of 4–7 meters, are seldom successfully predated upon, as their size, burst speeds exceeding 20 km/h, and agile barrel rolls deter most attacks. Predation evidence derives from field observations and photographic identification of bite scars, often semi-circular marks on pectoral fin trailing edges or posterior body regions, indicating failed strikes rather than lethal outcomes. Such scars appear on a substantial portion of sighted individuals in some populations, underscoring opportunistic but low-success predation attempts. Natural mortality from predation remains low across life stages, estimated through life history models as insufficient to constrain in unexploited contexts, reflecting the ' high trophic position as a filter-feeding elasmobranch with few effective predators. Demographic analyses confirm predation's baseline ecological , with annual rates inferred below 1% for adults based on tag-return and patterns in related mobulids.

Anthropogenic threats

Bycatch in various gillnet, purse seine, and trawl fisheries constitutes a primary anthropogenic threat to Mobula birostris, resulting in direct mortality through or injury, with post-release survival often compromised by stress and . Entanglement in discarded fishing gear, such as ropes, nets, and packing materials, further exacerbates injury and mortality rates, particularly given the ' slow reproductive rates that limit recovery from even moderate losses. Vessel strikes from maritime traffic pose an additional risk, especially in aggregation areas where rays surface-feed, leading to lacerations, internal injuries, or death, though documented cases remain underreported due to limited necropsy data. Ingestion of marine plastics, including , occurs via filter-feeding on , with evidence from fecal samples and vomit indicating incorporation into the diet and potential of associated toxins, though long-term health impacts require further quantification beyond observed gastric retention. Climate-driven changes, such as ocean warming and acidification, threaten prey availability by reducing and altering patterns that concentrate euphausiids and copepods, with models projecting distributional shifts and productivity declines in tropical habitats. These threats have contributed to inferred global population declines of 50-79% over three generations (approximately 87 years), based on fishery-dependent and sighting trends, with variability across regions such as steeper reductions in the compared to more stable Atlantic populations.

Protective measures and effectiveness

The giant oceanic manta ray (Mobula birostris) is protected under Appendix II of the since September 2014, which regulates international commercial trade to ensure it does not threaten species survival. It is also listed on Appendix I and II of the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS), prohibiting take of migratory populations and promoting cooperative conservation. In the United States, it was listed as threatened under the in January 2018, banning import, export, and interstate commerce of the species. Nationally, over 40 countries have implemented retention bans or protections, including Indonesia's 2014 gill plate trade ban and fishing prohibition across its , Peru's 2015 fishing ban, and Mexico's safeguards in the Revillagigedo Archipelago Marine Park, North America's largest covering 150,000 square kilometers. Marine protected areas (MPAs) target aggregation sites, such as seamounts and cleaning stations, with examples including in and in , where manta presence is monitored. NOAA Fisheries promotes non-regulatory measures like safe handling guidelines for release, sighting reporting via apps, and distance-keeping to minimize vessel strikes. Effectiveness varies by region and threat. has reduced gill plate exports from major fisheries, contributing to an 86% decline in targeted manta mortality in by 2018 through enforcement and market shifts, though data primarily reflect reef manta rays (M. alfredi) with spillover benefits to oceanic populations. In protected areas, local abundances have stabilized or shown modest increases, such as in MPAs where sightings persist without harvest pressure. However, global populations continue declining due to persistent bycatch in industrial tuna fisheries—estimated at thousands annually—and incomplete enforcement; in , catches showed no significant post-ban reduction as of 2020, indicating illegal fishing and weak compliance. IUCN assessments note stable numbers only in fully protected sites, but overall vulnerability persists from slow reproduction (one pup every 2-3 years after 8-10 year maturity) and pelagic ranging beyond MPA boundaries. A 2024 NOAA draft recovery plan emphasizes expanded MPAs and bycatch mitigation for measurable recovery, yet empirical data on M. birostris rebound remain limited compared to reef species.

References

  1. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/giant-manta-ray
  2. https://oceana.org/marine-life/giant-manta-ray/
  3. https://www.marinebio.org/species/giant-mantas/manta-birostris/
  4. https://saveourseas.com/worldofsharks/species/giant-manta-ray
  5. https://www.barrierreef.org/the-reef/animals/manta-ray
  6. https://mantawatchnz.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/IUCN-Redlist-M-birostris-2020.pdf
  7. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/final-rule-list-giant-manta-ray-threatened-under-endangered-species-act
  8. http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1026118
  9. https://www.fishbase.se/Nomenclature/2061
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263979402_Manta_birostris
  11. https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/182/1/50/3886052
  12. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/11/22/2023-25822/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-and-plants-technical-correction-for-the-giant-manta-ray
  13. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790314003637
  14. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mec.15683
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S105579031200125X
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11789554/
  17. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-023-02130-0
  18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33164287/
  19. https://www.sharksandrays.com/oceanic-manta-ray/
  20. https://www.mantatrust.org/mobula-birostris
  21. https://www.floridamuseum.ufl.edu/discover-fish/species-profiles/manta-ray/
  22. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/s3/2024-10/Recovery-Status-Review-for-Giant-Manta-Ray_508.pdf
  23. https://biblioteca.biofund.org.mz/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/1547041898-Marshall_PhD_thesis.pdf
  24. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Manta_birostris/
  25. https://www.biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1717.1.2
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Physical-characteristics-markings-and-pigmentation-patterns-to-differentiate-between_fig1_236019514
  27. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2020.00725/full
  28. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00227-023-04278-1
  29. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/feature-story/genetic-study-finds-reef-manta-rays-stay-close-home
  30. https://downloads.regulations.gov/NOAA-NMFS-2016-0014-0042/attachment_1.pdf
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353276731_The_Distribution_of_Giant_Manta_Rays_In_The_Western_North_Atlantic_Ocean_Off_The_Eastern_United_States/fulltext/60f0daf0fb568a7098b1f843/The-Distribution-of-Giant-Manta-Rays-In-The-Western-North-Atlantic-Ocean-Off-The-Eastern-United-States.pdf?origin=scientificContributions
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232725018_Satellite_tracking_of_manta_rays_highlights_challenges_to_their_conservation
  33. https://birdsheadseascape.com/download/biodiversitytaxonomyecology/Stewart-et-al._2016_Spatial-Ecology-and-Conservation-of-iManta-birostris....pdf
  34. https://www.boem.gov/node/18296
  35. https://www.bloomassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/10.2305_IUCN.UK_.2011-2.RLTS_.T198921A9108067.en_.pdf
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3349638/
  37. https://fishbase.se/summary/Speciessummary.php?id=2061
  38. https://www.mantatrust.org/tagging-and-tracking
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5180158/
  40. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.160717
  41. https://www.sharktrust.org/blog/creature-feature-oceanic-manta-ray
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3440971/
  43. https://fish.gov.au/docs/SharkReport/2023_FRDC_Mobula_birostris_Final.pdf
  44. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999IchtR..46..289Y
  45. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Biology-and-Population-Ecology-of-Manta-Birostris-Marshall/18c1554ddca431a231c155dd5f6d36733053ea1c
  46. https://www.int-res.com/articles/meps_oa/m700p145.pdf
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226457557_Movements_and_site_fidelity_of_the_giant_manta_ray_Manta_birostris_in_the_Komodo_Marine_Park_Indonesia
  48. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/221/6/jeb166041/20833/Kinematics-of-swimming-of-the-manta-ray-three
  49. https://mantarayadvocates.com/how-fast-can-manta-rays-swim/
  50. https://seaparadise.com/manta-ray-behavior/
  51. https://www.bloomassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/10.2305_IUCN.UK_.2011-2.RLTS_.T198921A9108067.en_-1.pdf
  52. https://fishionary.fisheries.org/ampullae-of-lorenzini/
  53. https://www.americanscientist.org/article/the-discovery-of-the-sharks-electric-sense
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9633280/
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1084952119301156
  56. https://sharkresearch.earth.miami.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Osmoregulation-in-elasmobranchs-a-review-for-fish-biologists-behaviourists-and-ecologists.pdf
  57. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9317582/
  58. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aat9533
  59. https://benthamopenarchives.com/contents/pdf/TOANATJ/TOANATJ-3-1.pdf
  60. https://flyingsharks.eu/literature/Role_sensory_cues_food_searching_behavior_captive_Manta_birostris.pdf
  61. https://willstolzenburg.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ari-and-dagostino-2016-manta-cognition.pdf
  62. https://churaumi.okinawa/sp/en/fishbook/1543394214/
  63. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2007/jun/18/japan.conservation
  64. https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/technology/2007/07/10/captive-birth-sheds-light-on/23624382007/
  65. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna47706726
  66. https://churaumi.okinawa/sp/en/topics/1722994985/
  67. https://phys.org/news/2025-07-florida-capture-threatened-giant-manta.html
  68. https://deeply.thenewhumanitarian.org/oceans/articles/2018/06/27/scientists-track-elusive-giant-manta-rays-as-poaching-threats-grow.html
  69. https://mantarayadvocates.com/manta-rays-wellness-exam/
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4045333/
  71. https://www.tampabay.com/news/environment/2025/08/26/florida-manta-ray-capture-seaworld-abu-dhabi/
  72. https://www.newsherald.com/story/news/local/2025/09/26/pcbs-viral-manta-ray-capture-has-sparked-outrage-prompted-action/86356525007/
  73. https://www.admcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/s10641-024-01636-w.pdf
  74. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2021-12/NOAA%252C%2520Giant%2520Manta%2520Ray.pdf
  75. https://www.mantatrust.org/gill-plate-seizure
  76. https://www.mantatrust.org/worlds-largest-oceanic-manta-ray-population
  77. https://marinemegafauna.org/news/giant-manta-becomes-the-first-manta-ray-to-be-listed-as-an-endangered-species
  78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370952309_Multi-decade_catches_of_manta_rays_Mobula_alfredi_M_birostris_from_South_Africa_reveal_significant_decline
  79. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/s3/2024-10/Draft-Manta-Ray-Recovery-Plan_508-1-.pdf
  80. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Manta-rays-have-low-intrinsic-rates-of-population-increase-due-to-their-slow-growth-to-a_fig3_263014580
  81. https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.13342
  82. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/17096/noaa_17096_DS1.pdf
  83. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03264.x
  84. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8434810/
  85. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/endangered-species-conservation/vessel-strikes
  86. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2019.00679/full
  87. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10641-024-01576-5
  88. https://cites.org/eng/prog/shark/more.php
  89. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/01/22/2018-01031/endangered-and-threatened-wildlife-and-plants-final-rule-to-list-the-giant-manta-ray-as-threatened
  90. https://www.mantatrust.org/protections-management
  91. https://dialogue.earth/en/ocean/10097-indonesia-ban-manta-ray-gills/
  92. https://news.mongabay.com/2024/09/a-mexican-marine-park-shelters-giant-manta-rays-interview-with-madalena-pereira-cabral/
  93. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/giant-manta-ray/conservation-management
  94. https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.314
  95. https://www.sciencenews.org/article/scientists-fishers-save-manta-rays
  96. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308597X20309623
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.