Hubbry Logo
ChenopodiumChenopodiumMain
Open search
Chenopodium
Community hub
Chenopodium
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Chenopodium
Chenopodium
Chenopodium
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
"Goosefoot" redirects here. For other uses, see Goosefoot (disambiguation). "Rhagodia" redirects here. For the arachnid genus, see Rhagodia (arachnid).

Chenopodium
Chenopodium berlandieri
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Eudicots
Order: Caryophyllales
Family: Amaranthaceae
Subfamily: Chenopodioideae
Tribe: Atripliceae
Genus: Chenopodium
L. (1753)
Species[1]

132; see text

Synonyms[1][2]
  • Agatophyton Fourr. (1869)
  • Blitum Hill (1757), nom. illeg.
  • Botrys Rchb. ex Nieuwl. (1914)
  • Einadia Raf. (1838)
  • Rhagodia R.Br. (1810)
  • Vulvaria Bubani (1897), nom. illeg.
  • Chenopodium sect. Leprophyllum Dumort.
  • Chenopodium sect. Chenopodiastrum Moq.

Chenopodium is a genus of numerous species of perennial or annual herbaceous flowering plants known as the goosefoot, which occur almost anywhere in the world.[3] It is placed in the family Amaranthaceae in the APG II system; older classification systems, notably the widely used Cronquist system, separate it and its relatives as Chenopodiaceae,[4] but this leaves the rest of the Amaranthaceae polyphyletic. However, among the Amaranthaceae, the genus Chenopodium is the namesake member of the subfamily Chenopodioideae.[2]

Description

[edit]

The species of Chenopodium (s.str., description according to Fuentes et al. 2012)[2] are annual or perennial herbs, shrubs or small trees.[5] They generally rely on alkaline soil.[5] They are nonaromatic, but sometimes fetid (foul-smelling). The young stems and leaves are often densely covered by vesicular globose hairs, thus looking farinose. Characteristically, these trichomes persist, collapsing later and becoming cup-shaped. The branched stems grow erect, ascending, prostrate or scrambling. Lateral branches are alternate (the lowermost ones can be nearly opposite). The alternate or opposite leaves are petiolate. Their thin or slightly fleshy leaf blade is linear, rhombic or triangular-hastate, with entire or dentate or lobed margins.[2]

Inflorescences are standing terminal and lateral. They consist of spicately or paniculately arranged glomerules of flowers. Plants are monoecious (rarely dioecious). In monoecious plants flowers are dimorphic or pistillate. Flowers consist of (4–) 5 perianth segments connate, basally (at the base) or close to the middle, usually membranous margined and with a roundish to keeled back; almost always 5 stamens, and one ovary with 2 stigmas.[2]

In fruit, perianth segments become sometimes coloured, but mostly keep unchanged, somewhat closing over or spreading from the fruit. The pericarp is membranous or sometimes succulent, adherent to or loosely covering the seed. The horizontally oriented seeds are depressed-globular to lenticular, with rounded to subacute margin. The black seed coat is almost smooth to finely striate, rugulose or pitted.[2]

Taxonomy

[edit]

The genus Chenopodium was described by Carl Linnaeus in 1753 (In: Species Plantarum, Vol. 1, p. 218–222). Type species is Chenopodium album. This generic name is derived from the particular shape of the leaf, which is similar to a goose's foot: from Greek χήν (chen), "goose" and πούς (pous), "foot" or ποδίον (podion), "little foot".

In its traditional circumscription, Chenopodium comprised about 170 species.[3] Phylogenetic research revealed, that the genus was highly polyphyletic and did not reflect how species were naturally related. Therefore, a new classification was necessary. Mosyakin & Clemants (2002, 2008) separated the glandular species as genus Dysphania (which includes epazote) and Teloxys in tribe Dysphanieae. Fuentes-Bazan et al. (2012) separated many species to genera Blitum (in tribe Anserineae), Chenopodiastrum, Lipandra, and Oxybasis (like Chenopodium in tribe Atripliceae). They included Rhagodia and Einadia in Chenopodium.[2]

Species

[edit]

132 species are currently accepted.[1]

Excluded species

[edit]

Ecology

[edit]

Certain species grow in large thickets, providing cover for small animals. Goosefoot foliage is used as food by the caterpillars of certain Lepidoptera.[citation needed] The seeds are eaten by many birds, such as the yellowhammer (Emberiza citrinella) of Europe or the white-winged fairy-wren (Malurus leucopterus) of Australia.[citation needed] Goosefoot pathogens include the positive-sense ssRNA viruses – apple stem grooving virus, sowbane mosaic virus and tobacco necrosis virus.[citation needed]

Uses

[edit]
Cooked quinoa (C. quinoa) seeds

The genus Chenopodium contains several plants of minor to moderate importance as food crops as leaf vegetables – used like the closely related spinach (Spinacia oleracea) and similar plants called quelite in Mexico – and pseudocereals.[citation needed] These include white goosefoot (C. album), kañiwa (C. pallidicaule) and quinoa (C. quinoa). On the Greek island of Crete, tender shoots and leaves of a species called krouvida (κρουβίδα) or psarovlito (ψαρόβλητο) are eaten by the locals, boiled or steamed.[citation needed] As studied by Bruce D. Smith, Kristen Gremillion and others, goosefoots have a history of culinary use dating back to 4000 BC or earlier, when pitseed goosefoot (C. berlandieri) was a staple crop in the Native American Eastern Agricultural Complex,[citation needed] and when white goosefoot was apparently used by the Ertebølle culture of Europe.[citation needed] Members of the eastern European Yamnaya culture also harvested white goosefoot as an apparent cereal substitute to round out an otherwise mostly meat and dairy diet c. 3500–2500 BC.[7]

There is increased interest in particular in goosefoot seeds today, which are suitable as part of a gluten-free diet.[citation needed] Quinoa oil, extracted from the seeds of C. quinoa, has similar properties, but is superior in quality, to corn oil.[citation needed] Oil of chenopodium is extracted from the seeds of epazote, which is not in this genus anymore.[citation needed] Shagreen leather was produced in the past using the small, hard goosefoot seeds.[citation needed] C. album was one of the main model organisms for the molecular biological study of chlorophyllase.[citation needed]

Goosefoot pollen, in particular of the widespread and usually abundant C. album, is an allergen to many people and a common cause of hay fever.[8] The same species, as well as some others, have seeds which are able to persist for years in the soil seed bank.[citation needed] Many goosefoot species are thus significant weeds, and some have become invasive species.[8]

In Australia, the larger Chenopodium species are among the plants called "bluebushes".[citation needed] According to the 1889 book The Useful Native Plants of Australia, Chenopodium auricomum "is another of the salt-bushes, which, besides being invaluable food for stock, can be eaten by man. All plants of the Natural Order Chenopodiaceae (Salsolacese) are more or less useful in this respect." The book goes on to give the following account from the Journal de la Ferme et des Maisons de campagne:[9]

We have recently gathered an abundant harvest of leaves from two or three plants growing in our garden. These leaves were put into boiling water to blanch them, and they were then cooked as an ordinary dish of spinach, with this difference in favour of the new plant, that there was no occasion to take away the threads which are so disagreeable in chicory, sorrel, and ordinary spinach. We partook of this dish with relish—the flavour—analogous to spinach, had something in it more refined, less grassy in taste. The cultivation is easy: sow the seed in April (October) in a well-manured bed, for the plant is greedy; water it. The leaves may be gathered from the time the plant attains 50 centimetres (say 20 inches) in height. They grow up again quickly. In less than eight days afterwards another gathering may take place, and so on to the end of the year.

Safety

[edit]

Sphaeraphides occur in the leaves, stem, pith and mesophloem.[10]

Fossil record

[edit]

†Chenopodium wetzleri fossil seeds of the Chattian stage, Oligocene, are known from the Oberleichtersbach Formation in the Rhön Mountains, central Germany.[11]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Chenopodium

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Chenopodium is a of flowering in the family , comprising approximately 100 species of annual and perennial herbs that are widely distributed in temperate and subtropical regions worldwide. The generic name derives from the words chḗn (goose) and poús (foot), alluding to the triangular or goose-foot-shaped leaves characteristic of many species in the . Commonly known as goosefoots, , or pigweeds, these typically feature erect or spreading stems, simple alternate leaves that are entire to toothed or lobed, and small, inconspicuous flowers borne in dense spikes or panicles. Native to , , , and parts of and , species of Chenopodium often thrive in disturbed habitats such as roadsides, agricultural fields, and waste areas, exhibiting a weedy due to their rapid growth and high production. Many species are covered in a farinose (mealy) or glandular pubescence that gives them a powdery or silvery appearance, and their fruits are utricles enclosing vertical or horizontal, lenticular seeds that are black or red-brown. Ecologically, they play roles as in succession and can accumulate soil nitrates, sometimes rendering them toxic to if overconsumed. Several Chenopodium species hold significant economic and cultural importance, particularly as sources of food and medicine. Chenopodium quinoa, domesticated in the Andean region around 7000 years before present, is cultivated globally for its protein-rich pseudocereal seeds, which are gluten-free and contain essential amino acids. The leaves of species like Chenopodium album are edible and nutritious, historically used by Indigenous peoples in North America and Europe as greens or for flour, though some contain oxalates or saponins requiring processing. Additionally, certain species, such as Chenopodium ambrosioides (epazote), are used in traditional medicine for their antiparasitic and digestive properties, attributed to volatile oils. Taxonomically, the genus has undergone revisions; formerly placed in Chenopodiaceae, it is now included in the expanded under the , reflecting molecular phylogenetic evidence of close relations with amaranths and beets. Hybridization and morphological variability complicate species delimitation, with ongoing using fruit and to refine classifications. Despite their utility, many Chenopodium species are invasive in agricultural settings, prompting management efforts in crop production.

Description and Morphology

General Characteristics

Plants in the genus Chenopodium are primarily annual or perennial herbs, though some species form shrubs or small trees reaching up to 3 meters in height. They exhibit a weedy growth habit, often with erect or ascending stems that are branched and range from green to reddish in color. The stems are typically not jointed or armed, and in some cases, they may appear somewhat succulent. Leaves are arranged alternately on the stems, simple in form, and usually petiolate, though sometimes sessile. They measure 2-15 cm in length and are often triangular, lanceolate, or rhombic, with margins that can be entire, toothed, or lobed. The blades vary from thin to thickish, occasionally fleshy, and lack aromatic qualities. A distinguishing feature of Chenopodium species is the frequent presence of a mealy or farinose coating on young stems and leaves, resulting from dense coverings of vesicular globose hairs that collapse into persistent cup-shaped structures at maturity. These plants belong to the family and typically produce dense inflorescences that contribute to their overall bushy appearance.

Reproductive Structures

The flowers of Chenopodium species are typically small, greenish, and hermaphroditic, though rarely unisexual, measuring approximately 1–3 mm in diameter and arranged in dense, spicate or paniculate inflorescences that form terminal or axillary glomerules. The consists of (3–)5 free or basally connate tepals that are rounded or keeled on the abaxial surface, lacking petals and sepals as distinct structures; these tepals often enclose the reproductive organs and may persist into fruiting. Inside, there are 1–5 stamens with filiform filaments and versatile anthers, surrounding a superior, unilocular topped by a single style (sometimes absent) and 2(–5) filiform stigmas. Pollination in Chenopodium is primarily anemophilous, with wind facilitating transfer among the inconspicuous flowers, though predominates due to their hermaphroditic nature and proximity of anthers to stigmas. occurs at low rates, up to 3% in species like C. album, mediated by wind over short distances of up to 2 m. Fertilization follows standard angiosperm patterns, with grains germinating on the stigmas to form pollen tubes that deliver to the sac; the latter develops via the Polygonum-type pattern, where a single megaspore mother cell undergoes to produce a functional megaspore that matures into a seven-celled, eight-nucleate sac containing , synergids, central cell, and antipodals. This process ensures , yielding and formation, though is often scant and perisperm-dominant in the mature seed. Following fertilization, the develops into a utricle, an indehiscent or irregularly dehiscent dry fruit that encloses a single and is often retained within the persistent for protection. The pericarp is thin (5–600 µm), , and 1–3 layered, sometimes bearing papillae up to 120 µm tall in core Chenopodium sections, with adherence to the coat varying from loose to tight. are typically horizontal (rarely vertical), lens-shaped (lenticular) to subglobose, 1–2 mm in diameter, and colored black, brown-black, or reddish-brown, featuring a crustaceous coat (5–150 µm thick) that may exhibit smooth, undulate, or surface patterns useful for species identification. The is annular or horseshoe-shaped (hippocrepiform), surrounding abundant farinaceous perisperm, with an inferior or centrifugal . Reproductive strategies in the show variability, particularly in seed heteromorphism observed in like C. album, where plants produce two types—larger, non-dormant brown seeds for immediate and smaller, dormant black seeds with enhanced (viable for over 30 years)—allowing to fluctuating environmental conditions. This polymorphism, combined with facultative selfing and occasional , contributes to the genus's ecological success without reliance on asexual production.

Taxonomy and Classification

Etymology and History

The genus name Chenopodium derives from the Greek words chēn (goose) and pous (foot), referring to the goosefoot-shaped leaves characteristic of many species in the genus. The genus was formally established by Carl Linnaeus in his seminal work Species Plantarum (1753), where he described 22 species under a broad circumscription that included diverse herbaceous plants with farinose or glabrous stems and variable leaf forms. Linnaeus designated Chenopodium album as the type species, setting the foundation for subsequent taxonomic treatments. Early recognition of Chenopodium species appears in ancient Greek literature, such as the 1st-century AD De Materia Medica by Pedanius Dioscorides, who described Chenopodium botrys (known then as botrys) as a honey-yellow, shrub-like plant useful for repelling moths from clothing due to its strong odor. This reflects the long history of the plants' practical uses in Mediterranean cultures. In the 19th and 20th centuries, botanists like Paul Aellen advanced the understanding through detailed monographs, including his 1929 systematic treatment of American Chenopodium species based on extensive herbarium collections. Aellen's work highlighted the genus's morphological variability and initial broad delimitation, which encompassed taxa later recognized as distinct. Key contributions to modern taxonomic revisions have come from Sergei L. Mosyakin and Steven E. Clemants, whose studies in the late 20th and early 21st centuries refined the genus's scope using comparative morphology and early phylogenetic insights.

Phylogenetic Relationships

Chenopodium is placed within the subfamily of the family , as recognized by the IV classification system, which merged the former Chenopodiaceae into Amaranthaceae based on molecular evidence. This subfamily encompasses a diverse array of genera, with Chenopodium sensu lato historically including a broad range of taxa that molecular studies have revealed to be . Early phylogenetic analyses, such as those by Kadereit et al. (2010), utilized nuclear ribosomal ITS and chloroplast matK sequences to delineate major clades within Chenopodioideae, highlighting the non-monophyletic nature of the traditional Chenopodium and supporting its division into distinct lineages based on morphological, chemical, and genetic differences. Building on this, Fuentes-Bazán et al. (2012) conducted a comprehensive molecular phylogenetic study using expanded ITS and matK/trnK datasets, confirming polyphyly and proposing a revised generic classification that segregates taxa into genera such as Dysphania (for taxa lacking betalains and characterized by different chemistry, primarily in the and ) and Blitum (for Eurasian lineages with distinct morphology). These revisions narrowed the circumscription of Chenopodium to a monophyletic core centered on Eurasian and North American species with horizontal testa cells and pigmentation. Subsequent updates have reinforced this framework, integrating additional genomic data to refine tribal arrangements within Chenopodioideae. Within Chenopodioideae, Chenopodium in its current sense shows close phylogenetic affinity to genera like (tribe Atripliceae) and Beta (subfamily Betoideae, though basal relationships remain somewhat unresolved), as evidenced by chloroplast genome comparisons that place them in neighboring clades supported by shared synapomorphies in seed coat and floral . However, potential for hybridization, particularly within polyploid complexes like the C. album aggregate, complicates generic and species boundaries, with blurring phylogenetic signals. Ongoing debates in Chenopodium phylogeny center on delimitation, driven by high in response to environmental factors and evidence of reticulate through hybridization and , which challenge traditional morphological classifications and necessitate integrated molecular and cytological approaches for resolution.

Accepted Species

The genus Chenopodium comprises approximately 132 accepted in its current circumscription, primarily or short-lived distributed worldwide, with a concentration in temperate and subtropical regions. Among the most notable species is Chenopodium album L., commonly known as , a widespread annual weed characterized by triangular to lanceolate leaves with toothed margins and farinose (mealy) indumentum on the undersides, native to temperate and now cosmopolitan due to human dispersal. Its seeds are black, lenticular, and horizontal, aiding in its identification. Another prominent species is Chenopodium quinoa Willd., an annual crop plant from the with broad, lobed leaves and dense inflorescences of small green flowers, native to regions from to northwestern , where it grows in high-altitude saline or alkaline soils. Chenopodium berlandieri Moq., known as pitseed goosefoot, is a North American annual featuring serrated, evenly lobed leaves and distinctive honeycomb-pitted seeds with a thin testa, occurring in disturbed habitats from southern to . Regional endemics include Chenopodium foggii Wahl., a rare annual restricted to eastern , from and southward to , inhabiting calcareous woodlands, ledges, and cliff bases on high-pH , with narrow-ovate leaves and sparse farinose covering. Similarly, Chenopodium standleyanum Aellen, or woodland goosefoot, is native to the eastern and , from to and west to , favoring shaded, disturbed soils in open woods, thickets, and floodplains, distinguished by its ovate leaves with dentate margins and horizontal, reddish-brown seeds. Species delimitation in Chenopodium often relies on seed testa patterns—such as pitted, smooth, or reticulate surfaces—and leaf indumentum variations, including the density and distribution of farinose glands, which provide key diagnostic traits amid morphological variability influenced by environmental factors.

Formerly Included Species

Several species formerly placed in Chenopodium have been reclassified into separate genera following phylogenetic studies that revealed distinct evolutionary lineages within the traditional broad concept of the genus. A prominent segregate is Dysphania, which comprises aromatic, glandular such as D. ambrosioides (previously Chenopodium ambrosioides), noted for their volatile oils and vesicular hairs that distinguish them from core Chenopodium. These traits, combined with molecular data from plastid trnL-F and matK genes plus nuclear ITS regions, support Dysphania as a monophyletic group sister to Chenopodium sensu stricto. The genus Blitum was reinstated for taxa like B. capitatum (formerly Chenopodium capitatum) and B. bonus-henricus (formerly Chenopodium bonus-henricus), characterized by compact inflorescences and smooth, horizontal seed testa, differing from the vertical orientation in Chenopodium. Phylogenetic analyses positioned Blitum in a distant from core Chenopodium, justified by both and . Species such as Oxybasis rubra (previously Chenopodium rubrum) were transferred to Oxybasis, a defined by dimorphic fruits, open at maturity, and a basal position in the Chenopodium alliance per molecular evidence. These segregations, primarily from a 2012 study, reduced the size of Chenopodium from around 250 species in the sensu lato sense to approximately 130 accepted species today, enhancing and aligning with evolutionary relationships. Regional treatments, including updates in the Flora of , have incorporated these changes, reassigning former Chenopodium taxa to genera like Dysphania and Blitum.

Distribution and Ecology

Global Distribution

The genus Chenopodium is cosmopolitan in its native distribution, occurring primarily in temperate and subtropical zones across , the , , and . It is native to a vast array of regions, including (from to Mexico), (from Albania to Ukraine), (from to ), (from to ), and (from to ), with approximately 130 documented worldwide. The origins of the genus trace back to and the , where phylogenetic studies indicate early diversification in these areas, supported by diversity patterns in key species aggregates. Centers of include the Andean region of and parts of , such as the Mediterranean Basin, where environmental conditions have fostered endemic speciation and adaptation. Biogeographic patterns reveal a Holarctic influence, with significant radiation in northern temperate zones and subsequent southward extensions into subtropical areas. Approximately 34 species are recorded in , reflecting this pattern, though the total rises when including broader continental tallies. Dispersal has been facilitated by lightweight seeds adapted for wind and animal transport, as well as extensive human-mediated movement through and , enabling the genus to colonize diverse landscapes. The genus has been widely introduced outside its native ranges, particularly as weeds in , parts of , and temperate , where species like C. album have become invasive in agricultural fields and disturbed sites. Introduced populations are documented in 35 additional regions, including the (e.g., , ), northern (e.g., , ), and Pacific islands (e.g., ). Recent studies from 2024–2025 indicate ongoing range expansions, particularly into urban areas, driven by change-induced shifts in and that favor tolerance. For instance, a 2025 study predicts contractions in highly suitable areas for C. hybridum in , with expansions into arid and high-altitude regions under future climate scenarios. Modeling also predicts northward and urbanward shifts for species like C. hybridum in , with similar patterns observed in North American and European contexts.

Habitat Preferences

Species of the genus Chenopodium predominantly occupy disturbed habitats, including roadsides, agricultural fields, areas, and other human-modified sites, where they exhibit a ruderal life strategy characterized by rapid growth in open, sunny environments. This adaptability allows them to thrive in nutrient-enriched conditions, particularly as nitrophilous favoring eutrophic soils high in , often resulting from agricultural runoff or organic . For instance, C. album is commonly found in such nitrogen-rich, disturbed locales across temperate regions. The genus demonstrates broad tolerance to challenging soil conditions, including saline, alkaline, and compacted substrates, enabling colonization of marginal sites like salt marshes and alkaline flats. preferences span temperate to arid zones, with many enduring through a farinose (mealy) covering that reduces and water loss. Some taxa extend to specialized microhabitats, such as wetlands or coastal dunes, though the majority favor well-drained, open areas; C. quinoa, for example, persists in high-altitude arid Andean environments. In human-influenced ecosystems, Chenopodium species are prevalent in agroecosystems, often as archaeophytes—plants introduced pre-1500 AD and now naturalized in crop fields and settlements. C. album, a classic archaeophyte in Europe and beyond, exemplifies this by colonizing arable lands and ruderal zones near human activity, reflecting its historical association with early agriculture.

Ecological Role and Interactions

Species in the genus Chenopodium serve as important food sources for various wildlife, including birds, mammals, and . The seeds of Chenopodium album, commonly known as , are consumed by songbirds and small mammals, providing a nutrient-rich resource in disturbed habitats. Leaves and foliage support herbivorous , such as the caterpillars of several species, including skippers, which feed on the foliage during their larval stage. Additionally, the from Chenopodium species acts as an , contributing to interactions in ecosystems where it affects sensitive organisms, though primarily noted in human contexts; its , such as the Che a 1 allergen in C. album, highlights its biochemical role in plant-insect dynamics. Chenopodium species function as hosts for several plant pathogens, facilitating the spread of that impact ecosystems. For instance, C. album serves as a for Beet western yellows virus (BWYV), a polerovirus transmitted by , which can infect nearby crops like and , leading to yield reductions. Similarly, Chenopodium spp. are natural hosts for Sowbane mosaic virus (SoMV), a sobemovirus that primarily affects chenopods but can vector to other via mechanical means or , exacerbating cycles in weed-crop interfaces. In terms of and , Chenopodium exhibits allelopathic effects through the release of biochemical compounds from its tissues, inhibiting the growth of neighboring plants. Extracts from C. album significantly reduce shoot and nutrient uptake in like tomatoes, demonstrating its role in suppressing competitors via leachates and root exudates. As a , C. album thrives in early successional stages on disturbed soils, rapidly colonizing bare areas and facilitating before giving way to later seral communities. The genus influences biodiversity variably across regions. In agroecosystems, Chenopodium supports pollinators by providing pollen resources, attracting bees and other insects that contribute to crop pollination services, as seen in studies of weed-pollinator interactions. However, as an invasive weed in non-native areas, it can reduce native plant diversity by outcompeting local flora through dense stands and allelopathy, altering community composition in grasslands and fields.

Uses and Cultivation

Culinary and Nutritional Uses

Several species of Chenopodium are valued for their edible parts, particularly C. album (), whose tender leaves and shoots serve as a nutritious potherb similar to . These leaves are consumed raw in salads or smoothies and cooked by , sautéing, or adding to soups and curries, providing a source of essential nutrients including proteins (3.7–5.0% fresh weight), vitamins A (11,000 IU/100 g) and C (80–155 mg/100 g), and minerals such as calcium (98.70–178.75 mg/100 g fresh weight) and iron (255 mg/100 g dry weight). C. quinoa () is another prominent edible species, with its seeds functioning as a that is naturally gluten-free and rich in high-quality protein (13.81–21.9% of dry weight, containing all essential ), (~6%), and minerals like iron (5.2 mg/100 g) and magnesium (170–270 mg/100 g). Historically, Chenopodium species have been dietary staples in the . In , C. quinoa was cultivated for approximately 7,000 years and revered as the "mother " by pre-Columbian Inca and Tiahuanaco cultures, forming a key component of diets in the Andean highlands alongside and potatoes. In , C. berlandieri (pitseed goosefoot) was part of the , domesticated around 3,000 years ago and harvested as early as 8,500 years for its seeds and leaves, supporting sedentary indigenous communities. Today, C. quinoa remains widely cultivated in the , particularly in and , where it sustains local populations and contributes to global . Global production reached approximately 147,000 metric tons in 2024, with ongoing expansion into new regions like and . Nutritionally, Chenopodium species offer a balanced profile with bioactive compounds. The seeds and leaves of C. quinoa are rich in omega-3 fatty acids (such as alpha-linolenic acid) and antioxidants like betalains, which exhibit high free radical scavenging activity as measured by FRAP, ABTS, and ORAC assays. Similarly, C. album contains significant omega-3 fatty acids (45.33% of total fatty acids), enhancing its functional value in diets. These species also provide and minerals that support digestion and mineral intake, though antinutrients like in C. quinoa seeds impart bitterness and are reduced through traditional processing methods such as washing, abrading, or cooking. In culinary applications, Chenopodium parts are versatile and incorporated into diverse preparations. C. quinoa seeds are boiled for soups, ground into gluten-free flours for breads and porridges, or used in salads, while C. album leaves feature in fermented dishes like and dosa or dehydrated forms added to dals and flatbreads at 3–15% levels. Underutilized species, such as C. ficifolium, hold potential in indigenous diets of regions like , , where they contribute to nutritional diversity through leaf consumption, though they remain largely unexplored for broader food applications.

Medicinal and Traditional Uses

Chenopodium species have been employed in across various cultures for their purported therapeutic properties, particularly in treating parasitic infections and inflammatory conditions. Formerly classified as Chenopodium ambrosioides (now ), the plant has been widely used as a vermifuge to expel intestinal parasites such as roundworms and hookworms, with decoctions of leaves and seeds administered orally in Central American and African folk practices. Leaves of Chenopodium species, including C. album, are applied as poultices for effects against skin irritations, wounds, and joint in indigenous remedies from and the . Phytochemical analyses reveal that and in Chenopodium contribute to its and activities, inhibiting bacterial pathogens like and scavenging free radicals . Extracts from C. quinoa demonstrate anti-diabetic potential by lowering blood glucose levels and improving insulin sensitivity in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat models, attributed to fractions that modulate . Recent pharmacological research as of 2025 highlights bioactive peptides derived from C. quinoa proteins, which exhibit antihypertensive effects in preclinical studies through gut microbiome modulation. In ethnomedicinal traditions of and , C. album infusions are used to alleviate digestive issues such as dysentery, , and , with saponin-rich preparations acting as mild laxatives and stomachics. Culturally, Chenopodium species hold significance beyond , serving as foods during scarcity in historical North American and European subsistence economies, where seeds provided essential nutrition. In Andean rituals, C. quinoa features in ceremonial preparations like qarasiña, symbolizing and community bonding. Jamaican employs D. ambrosioides leaves in spiritual practices to ward off malevolent spirits, underscoring its role in holistic healing traditions.

Agricultural and Other Uses

Chenopodium quinoa, commonly known as , serves as a major crop cultivated primarily in the Andean region, with global production reaching approximately 147,000 metric tons in 2024. This is valued for its adaptability to marginal soils and harsh climates, enabling expansion into new areas like and for . Varieties are grown for both and dual-purpose uses, including , contributing to diversified farming systems. Certain Chenopodium species, including C. quinoa, function as cover crops to enhance by suppressing weeds, reducing , and improving nutrient cycling through associations with nitrogen-fixing such as strains. These microbial partnerships facilitate availability in nutrient-poor soils, promoting overall soil fertility without relying on synthetic fertilizers. For instance, in the Peruvian , integrating Chenopodium with cover crops has demonstrated significant reduction and yield improvements. Industrial applications of Chenopodium biomass include its use as , where post-harvest residues are incorporated into soil to boost and nutrient retention. While seeds have been explored for biofuel potential due to their high oil content, practical implementation remains limited; instead, pericarp waste from processing is utilized in processes to remove industrial dyes from . Some Chenopodium species, such as C. giganteum with its red-flushed stems and C. rubrum, are cultivated as ornamental for their colorful foliage in gardens. Additionally, C. album acts as a for heavy metal contamination, accumulating metals like and lead, which signals polluted sites for remediation efforts. In agricultural settings, Chenopodium species pose challenges as , particularly C. album, which exhibits resistance to herbicides like due to mutations in the psbA . This resistance, first documented in the , complicates in crops such as and soybeans, necessitating integrated strategies like and alternative herbicides.

Safety and Toxicity Concerns

Chenopodium species, particularly C. album and C. quinoa, contain antinutritional compounds such as and nitrates in their leaves, which can pose health risks when consumed in excess. levels in raw C. album leaves range from 360 to 2,000 mg per 100 g fresh weight, potentially interfering with calcium absorption and contributing to kidney stone formation in susceptible individuals. Nitrates, present at 3–5% dry weight primarily in stems, may accumulate to levels that exacerbate these risks if leaves from nitrate-rich soils are not properly prepared. Saponins impart bitterness and can cause gastrointestinal upset, including , upon excessive intake due to their irritant effects on the intestinal mucosa. Allergenic potential is another concern, with pollen from wind-pollinated Chenopodium serving as a significant trigger for hay fever and . Exposure to C. album , which disperses widely during late summer and autumn, commonly induces symptoms such as sneezing, , itchy eyes, and coughing in sensitized individuals. Additionally, crystals (including druse forms) in the plant tissues can irritate and mucous membranes upon direct contact, leading to localized or discomfort, though this is less pronounced than in raphide-containing . To mitigate these risks, preparation methods like or leaching are recommended to reduce levels. C. album leaves for 2 minutes leaches out soluble oxalates, decreasing total content by about 39% and soluble forms by 43%, while also lowering nitrates and through thermal degradation and water extraction. Washing and cooking seeds similarly diminishes bitterness and gastrointestinal irritancy. Pregnant individuals should avoid consumption of certain species, such as C. ambrosioides (epazote), due to its properties that may stimulate and pose risks; moderation is advised for all Chenopodium uses during . Recent 2025 research highlights progress in developing low-toxicity cultivars, particularly for C. quinoa, with studies identifying genotypes exhibiting reduced accumulation suitable for expanded, safer cultivation. processing techniques evaluated in these works further confirm that antinutritional factors remain within safe limits post-preparation, supporting broader agricultural applications.

Evolutionary History and Fossil Record

Fossil Evidence

Fossil records of Chenopodium extend back to the Eocene epoch, primarily consisting of grains preserved in sedimentary deposits across and . The earliest known occurrences include from the middle Eocene of , spanning from approximately 48 to 38 million years ago, as documented in palynological analyses of European floras. Similar grains have been identified in middle Eocene to early sediments from the region of , contributing to evidence of the genus's presence in early Tertiary palynofloras. These microfossils indicate that Chenopodium or closely related chenopod taxa were part of diverse Eocene vegetation, often in subtropical to temperate settings. Macroremains, such as seeds and fruits, appear in the fossil record during the late to . Chenopodium-like seeds, measuring about 0.7 mm in length, have been reported from lower deposits (23.3–16 million years ago) in , resembling modern seeds of the Chenopodium. These carpological fossils provide key calibration points for phylogenetic studies, suggesting early diversification within the genus during the early in . Preservation of Chenopodium fossils is favored in anoxic lake sediments, where , seeds, and fruits are commonly found due to rapid burial and minimal decay in fine-grained deposits. Such occurrences, from Eocene lake beds in to Miocene sites in , highlight the genus's association with margins and disturbed soils as an ancient weed or pioneer plant.

Evolutionary Significance

The genus Chenopodium likely originated through divergence within the subfamily during the Eocene epoch, following the post-Cretaceous expansion of open habitats after the K-Pg boundary mass around 66 million years ago. This period marked a shift toward disturbed and arid-adapted environments, facilitating the radiation of early chenopods from ancestral lineages in the broader family, whose common ancestor dates to approximately 60.8 million years ago in the . Within Chenopodioideae, the split from other subfamilies occurred around 30.3 million years ago in the , aligning with and the initial trends that favored halophytic and weedy growth forms. Diversification of Chenopodium accelerated during the Oligocene-Miocene transition, driven by intensifying across continents, which promoted in saline and disturbed soils. The crown age of the genus is estimated at about 9.1 million years ago in the , coinciding with widespread events that expanded ecological niches for drought-tolerant lineages. Hybridization and polyploidization events further propelled this , serving as key mechanisms for ; for instance, allotetraploid formation in complexes like C. album aggregate involved interspecific crosses that generated novel genetic combinations and adaptive traits. Multiple independent origins of C4 within , dating to 15-21 million years ago, enhanced photosynthetic efficiency in arid settings and contributed to the subfamily's overall success, though Chenopodium itself remains predominantly C3. In modern contexts, weediness in Chenopodium represents a derived evolutionary trait, emerging from ancestral adaptations to disturbance and enabling invasive success in agroecosystems worldwide. This trait underscores the genus's resilience but highlights conservation challenges for underutilized like C. quinoa, which possess climate-adaptive qualities such as and amid ongoing global change. Efforts to conserve these are increasingly vital, as their could bolster in warming, aridifying regions. Significant gaps persist in understanding Chenopodium's evolutionary timeline, particularly due to limited calibrations that integrate fossil and genomic data across the . Recent advances, such as the 2025 assembly of C. ficifolium using PacBio HiFi sequencing, are beginning to address these by providing a diploid model for allotetraploid relatives like and elucidating hybridization histories.

References

  1. https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?tid=11494
  2. https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/hawaiianflora/genusdescr.cfm?genus=Chenopodium
  3. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Chenopodium
  4. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1304&context=ebl
  5. https://floranorthamerica.org/Chenopodium
  6. https://plants.ces.ncsu.edu/plants/chenopodium-album/
  7. https://www.fdacs.gov/content/download/25260/file/botcirc33.pdf
  8. https://plants.sdsu.edu/chenopodium/pdfs/Kadereit_etal2003-AmaranthacChenopodiac.pdf
  9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3633980/
  10. https://plants.sdsu.edu/chenopodium/pdfs/Fuentes-Bazan_etal2012b-Chenopodium-Chenopodiac.pdf
  11. https://www.britannica.com/plant/quinoa
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/chenopodium
  13. https://www.ias.ac.in/public/Volumes/secb/004/03/0179-0200.pdf
  14. https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60437273-2
  15. https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:55993-2
  16. https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:165175-1
  17. https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:56042-2
  18. https://gobotany.nativeplanttrust.org/species/chenopodium/foggii/
  19. https://www.minnesotawildflowers.info/flower/woodland-goosefoot
  20. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0061906
  21. http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=1&taxon_id=106630
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51768631_Towards_a_species_level_tree_of_the_globally_diverse_genus_Chenopodium_Chenopodiaceae
  23. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jbi.13545
  24. https://pakbs.org/pjbot/papers/1740470183.pdf
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330241747_A_global_perspective_on_the_biology_impact_and_management_of_Chenopodium_album_and_Chenopodium_murale_two_troublesome_agricultural_and_environmental_weeds
  26. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395249860_Prediction_of_the_distribution_of_Chenopodium_hybridum_L_in_potentially_suitable_areas_in_China_via_the_optimised_Maxent_model
  27. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8401637/
  28. https://www.urbanhabitats.org/v01n01/climatechange_full.html
  29. https://peerj.com/articles/723/
  30. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.12648
  31. https://academic.oup.com/botlinnean/article/145/3/257/2420246
  32. https://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide/lambs-quarters-pigweed
  33. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11893853/
  34. https://ipm.ucanr.edu/agriculture/lettuce/beet-western-yellows/
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC112128/
  36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12040085/
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11359367/
  38. https://accs.uaa.alaska.edu/wp-content/uploads/Chenopodium_album_RANK_CHALA.pdf
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4486584/
  40. https://www.fao.org/4/aq287e/aq287e.pdf
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7074363/
  42. https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/goosefoot-chenopodium-berlandieri.htm
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1567861/
  44. https://www.indexbox.io/blog/quinoa-world-market-overview-2024-2/
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814617307756
  46. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7179108/
  47. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394545485_Exploring_the_underexplored_genus_Chenopodium_a_potentially_neglected_underutilized_species_from_Manipur_North_Eastern_Region_of_India
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11177892/
  49. https://www.mofga.org/resources/herbs/epazote/
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10343354/
  51. https://tropical.theferns.info/viewtropical.php?id=Chenopodium%2520ambrosioides
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5642801/
  53. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=50119
  54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11487239/
  55. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1308866/full
  56. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/20/3215
  57. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2024.1308384/full
  58. https://jhpn.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41043-025-01036-5
  59. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440319301153
  60. https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/7/10/254
  61. https://natureandsupernaturalnature.wordpress.com/2017/04/07/worm-weed-chenopodium-ambrosioides-l/
  62. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1070472/full
  63. https://academic.oup.com/jambio/article/135/12/lxae296/7911843
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363749489_Cover_crops_associated_with_quinoa_Chenopodium_quinoa_Willd_in_the_Peruvian_Altiplano_Erosion_reduction_improved_soil_health_and_agricultural_yield
  65. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366878342_Utilization_of_Weed_Biomass
  66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2213343723011582
  67. https://www.shootgardening.com/plants/chenopodium-giganteum
  68. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10693238/
  69. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16665624/
  70. https://www.weedscience.org/Details/case.aspx?ResistID=491
  71. https://pfaf.org/user/plant.aspx?LatinName=Chenopodium%2Balbum
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814621026613
  73. https://www.thermofisher.com/phadia/us/en/resources/allergen-encyclopedia/w10.html
  74. https://drhallett.com/blog/understanding-chenopod-pollen-allergies/
  75. https://www.cfs.gov.hk/english/multimedia/multimedia_pub/multimedia_pub_fsf_170_01.html
  76. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/8/1/2
  77. https://www.botanical-online.com/en/medicinal-plants/mexican-tea-epazote-contraindications
  78. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.06.30.662325v1
  79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358671495_Effect_of_thermal_processing_on_the_bioactive_compounds_antioxidative_antinutritional_and_functional_characteristics_of_quinoa_Chenopodium_quinoa
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7195176/
  81. https://paleobotany.ru/palynodata/species/5091?dir=asc&order=ageYoung&page=2
  82. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/378649
  83. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article/15/1/254/568219/Pollen-evidence-of-floristic-turnover-forced-by
  84. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/14/12/2183
  85. https://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12870-024-05164-8
  86. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439609205000152
  87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790318303506
  88. https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.00974.x
  89. https://ethnobiology.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/JoE/13-2/Gremillion.pdf
  90. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-013-0195-0
  91. https://academic.oup.com/g3journal/article/15/10/jkaf162/8206246
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.