Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Anarcho-primitivism
View on Wikipedia
| Part of a series on |
| Green anarchism |
|---|
Anarcho-primitivism is an anarchist critique of civilization and a branch of green anarchism that advocates a return to non-civilized ways of life through deindustrialization, abolition of the division of labor or specialization, abandonment of large-scale organization and all technology other than prehistoric technology, and the dissolution of agriculture. Anarcho-primitivists critique the origins and alleged progress of the Industrial Revolution and industrial society.[1] Most anarcho-primitivists advocate for a tribal-like way of life while some see an even simpler lifestyle as beneficial. According to anarcho-primitivists, the shift from hunter-gatherer to agricultural subsistence during the Neolithic Revolution gave rise to coercion, social alienation, and social stratification.[2]
Anarcho-primitivism argues that civilization is at the root of societal and environmental problems.[3] Primitivists also consider domestication, technology and language to cause social alienation from "authentic reality". As a result, they propose the abolition of civilization and a return to a hunter-gatherer lifestyle.[4]
Roots
[edit]The roots of primitivism lay in Enlightenment philosophy and the critical theory of the Frankfurt School.[5] The early-modern philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau blamed agriculture and cooperation for the development of social inequality and causing habitat destruction.[5] In his Discourse on Inequality, Rousseau depicted the state of nature as a "primitivist utopia";[6] however, he stopped short of advocating a return to it.[7] Instead, he called for political institutions to be recreated anew, in harmony with nature and without the artificiality of modern civilization.[8] Later, critical theorist Max Horkheimer argued that environmental degradation stemmed directly from social oppression, which had vested all value in labor and consequently caused widespread alienation.[5]
Development
[edit]
The modern school of anarcho-primitivism was primarily developed by John Zerzan,[9] whose work was released at a time when green anarchist theories of social and deep ecology were beginning to attract interest. Primitivism, as outlined in Zerzan's work, first gained popularity as enthusiasm in deep ecology began to wane.[10]
Zerzan claimed that pre-civilization societies were inherently superior to modern civilization and that the move towards agriculture and the increasing use of technology had resulted in the alienation and oppression of humankind.[11] Zerzan argued that under civilization, humans and other species have undergone domestication, which stripped them of their agency and subjected them to control by capitalism. He also claimed that language, mathematics and art had caused alienation, as they replaced "authentic reality" with an abstracted representation of reality.[12] In order to counteract such issues, Zerzan proposed that humanity return to a state of nature, which he believed would increase social equality and individual autonomy by abolishing private property, organized violence and the division of labor.[13]
Primitivist thinker Paul Shepard also criticized domestication, which he believed had devalued non-human life and reduced human life to their labor and property. Other primitivist authors have drawn different conclusions to Zerzan on the origins of alienation, with John Fillis blaming technology and Richard Heinberg claiming it to be a result of addiction psychology.[4]
Adoption and practice
[edit]Primitivist ideas were taken up by the eco-terrorist Ted Kaczynski, although he has been repeatedly criticized for his violent means by more pacifistic anarcho-primitivists, who instead advocate for non-violent forms of direct action.[14] Primitivist concepts have also taken root within the philosophy of deep ecology, inspiring the direct actions of groups such as Earth First!.[15] Another radical environmentalist group, the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), was directly influenced by anarcho-primitivism and its calls for rewilding.[16]
Primitivists and green anarchists have adopted the concept of ecological rewilding as part of their practice, i.e., using reclaimed skills and methods to work towards a sustainable future while undoing institutions of civilization.[17]
Anarcho-primitivist periodicals include Green Anarchy and Species Traitor. The former, self-described as an "anti-civilization journal of theory and action" and printed in Eugene, Oregon, was first published in 2000 and expanded from a 16-page newsprint tabloid to a 76-page magazine covering monkeywrenching topics such as pipeline sabotage and animal liberation. Species Traitor, edited by Kevin Tucker, is self-described as "an insurrectionary anarcho-primitivist journal", with essays against literacy and for hunter gatherer societies. Adjacent periodicals include the radical environmental journal Earth First![18]
See also
[edit]- Abecedarians, religious sect supposedly opposed to learning
- Agrarian socialism
- Anti-modernization
- Back-to-the-land movement
- Degrowth
- Doomer
- Earth liberation
- Ecofeminism
- Ecofascism
- Eco-socialism
- Ecoterrorism
- Environmental ethics
- Evolutionary psychology
- Freedomites
- Individualists Tending to the Wild
- Jacques Camatte
- National Anarchism
- Neo-Luddism
- Neo-tribalism
- Noble savage
- Primitive communism
- Romanticism
- Solarpunk
- Survivalism
Notes
[edit]- ^ el-Ojeili & Taylor 2020, pp. 169–170.
- ^ Jeihouni & Maleki 2016, p. 67.
- ^ Aaltola 2010, p. 164.
- ^ a b Aaltola 2010, p. 166.
- ^ a b c Aaltola 2010, pp. 166–167.
- ^ Long 2013, pp. 218–219.
- ^ Long 2013, pp. 218–219; Marshall 2008, p. 124.
- ^ Long 2013, pp. 218–219; Marshall 2008, p. 15.
- ^ Aaltola 2010, pp. 164–165; Price 2012, pp. 240–241; Price 2019, p. 289.
- ^ Price 2012, pp. 240–241.
- ^ Price 2012, pp. 240–241; Price 2019, p. 289.
- ^ Aaltola 2010, pp. 164–165.
- ^ Aaltola 2010, p. 165.
- ^ Aaltola 2010, p. 167.
- ^ Aaltola 2010, pp. 167–170.
- ^ Humphrey 2013, p. 298.
- ^ Etherington 2024, p. 246.
- ^ Dodge, Chris (July 2006). "Apocalypse Soon?". Utne. pp. 38–39. ISSN 1544-2225. ProQuest 217426998.
Bibliography
[edit]- Aaltola, Elisa (2010). "Green Anarchy: Deep Ecology and Primitivism". In Franks, Benjamin; Wilson, Matthew (eds.). Anarchism and Moral Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 161–185. doi:10.1057/9780230289680_9. ISBN 978-0-230-28968-0.
- Becker, Michael (2010). Anarcho-Primitivism: The Green Scare in Green Political Theory (Annual Meeting Paper). Western Political Science Association. pp. 1–16.
- Cudworth, Erika (2019). "Farming and Food". In Adams, Matthew S.; Levy, Carl (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 641–658. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75620-2_36. ISBN 978-3-319-75620-2. S2CID 242090793.
- Eddebo, Johan (2017). "Babylon Will Be Found No More: On Affinities Between Christianity and Anarcho-Primitivism". Journal of Religion and Society. 19: 1–17. ISSN 1522-5658.
- el-Ojeili, Chamsy; Taylor, Dylan (2 April 2020). ""The Future in the Past": Anarcho-primitivism and the Critique of Civilization Today". Rethinking Marxism. 32 (2): 168–186. doi:10.1080/08935696.2020.1727256. ISSN 0893-5696. S2CID 219015323.
- Etherington, Ben (June 2024). "Is Rewilding Twenty-First-Century Primitivism?". Comparative Literature. 76 (2): 240–259. doi:10.1215/00104124-11052901. ISSN 0010-4124.
- Gardenier, Matthijs (2016). "The "anti-tech" movement, between anarcho-primitivism and the neo-luddite". Sociétés. 131 (1): 97–106. doi:10.3917/soc.131.0097. ISSN 0765-3697.
- Humphrey, Matthew (2013). "Environmentalism". In Gaus, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 291–302. ISBN 978-0-415-87456-4. LCCN 2012013795.
- Jeihouni, Mojtaba; Maleki, Nasser (12 December 2016). "Far from the madding civilization: Anarcho-primitivism and revolt against disintegration in Eugene O'Neill's The Hairy Ape". International Journal of English Studies. 16 (2): 61–80. doi:10.6018/ijes/2016/2/238911. hdl:10201/51564. ISSN 1989-6131.
- Long, Roderick T. (2013). "Anarchism". In Gaus, Gerald F.; D'Agostino, Fred (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 217–230. ISBN 978-0-415-87456-4. LCCN 2012013795.
- Marshall, Peter H. (2008) [1992]. Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. London: Harper Perennial. ISBN 978-0-00-686245-1. OCLC 218212571.
- Morris, Brian (2017). "Anarchism and Environmental Philosophy". In Jun, Nathan (ed.). Brill's Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy. Leiden: Brill. pp. 369–400. doi:10.1163/9789004356894_015. ISBN 978-90-04-35689-4.
- Moore, John (1995). "An Archaeology of the Future: Ursula Le Guin and Anarcho-Primitivism". Foundation: 32. ISSN 0306-4964. ProQuest 1312027489.
- Parson, Sean (2018). "Ecocentrism". In Franks, Benjamin; Jun, Nathan; Williams, Leonard (eds.). Anarchism: A Conceptual Approach. Routledge. pp. 219–233. ISBN 978-1-138-92565-6. LCCN 2017044519.
- Price, Andy (2012). "Social Ecology". In Kinna, Ruth (ed.). The Continuum Companion to Anarchism. Continuum International Publishing Group. pp. 231–249. ISBN 978-1-4411-4270-2.
- Price, Andy (2019). "Green Anarchism". In Adams, Matthew S.; Levy, Carl (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Anarchism. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 281–291. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75620-2_16. ISBN 978-3-319-75620-2. S2CID 242090793.
- Purkis, Johnathan (2012). "The Hitchhiker as Theorist: Rethinking Sociology and Anthropology from an Anarchist Perspective". In Kinna, Ruth (ed.). The Continuum Companion to Anarchism. Continuum International Publishing Group. pp. 140–161. ISBN 978-1-4411-4270-2.
- Shakoor, Abdul; Ahmad, Mustanir (2022). "Anarcho-Primitivism in D.H. Lawrence's Post War Fiction: An Eco-Critical Analysis". Pakistan Journal of Social Research. 4 (4): 10–17. doi:10.52567/pjsr.v4i04.782. ISSN 2710-3137. S2CID 254323210.
- Smith, Mick (2002). "The State of Nature: The Political Philosophy of Primitivism and the Culture of Contamination". Environmental Values. 11 (4): 407–425. Bibcode:2002EnvV...11..407S. doi:10.3197/096327102129341154. ISSN 1752-7015.
Further reading
[edit]- Filiss, John (2002). "What is Primitivism?". Primitivism. Archived from the original on 30 July 2019.
- Sheppard, Brian Oliver (2008) [2003]. Anarchism vs Primitivism. London: Active Distribution. OCLC 1291401071.
- Zerzan, John; Carnes, Alice, eds. (1991). Questioning Technology. New Society Publishers. ISBN 0-86571-205-0.
- Zerzan, John (1994). Future Primitive and Other Essays. Autonomedia. ISBN 1-57027-000-7.
- Zerzan, John (1999) [1988]. Elements of Refusal (Revised ed.). Columbia Alternative Library Press. ISBN 1-890532-01-0.
- Zerzan, John (2001). "Language: Origin and Meaning". Primitivism. Archived from the original on 13 September 2019.
- Zerzan, John (2002). Running on Emptiness: The Pathology of Civilization. Los Angeles: Feral House.
- Zerzan, John, ed. (2005). Against Civilization. Los Angeles: Feral House.
- Zerzan, John (2008). Twilight of the Machines. Los Angeles: Feral House. ISBN 978-1-932595-31-4.
External links
[edit]
Media related to Anarcho-primitivism at Wikimedia Commons
Quotations related to Anarcho-primitivism at Wikiquote- Articles tagged with "anarcho-primitivism" and "anti-civ" at The Anarchist Library.
Anarcho-primitivism
View on GrokipediaAnarcho-primitivism is a radical strain of anarchist thought that identifies civilization—beginning with agriculture, sedentism, and technological development—as the origin of hierarchy, alienation, and ecological devastation, advocating the complete rejection of industrial society in favor of autonomous, small-scale hunter-gatherer bands without domestication or symbolic mediation.[1]
Pioneered by thinkers such as John Zerzan in the late 20th century, it posits that the Neolithic Revolution marked humanity's "fall" into division of labor, surplus accumulation, and coercive institutions, rendering all subsequent reforms futile and technology inherently domestication-enforcing.[1][2]
Proponents argue for deindustrialization and rewilding to restore wildness and immediacy, often critiquing not only capitalism but also leftist ideologies for perpetuating civilized myths of progress.[1]
However, the philosophy faces empirical challenges, as ethnographic and archaeological data reveal pre-agricultural societies plagued by chronic warfare, infanticide, nutritional stress, and average lifespans under 30 years, contradicting primitivist portrayals of harmonious egalitarianism.[3][4]
Its defining characteristics include opposition to all forms of representation, mass society, and even language as abstracted control mechanisms, with limited practical achievements beyond theoretical influence on green anarchist and anti-civ currents.[1]
Definition and Principles
Core Tenets
Anarcho-primitivism posits that civilization, defined as the complex of agricultural, technological, and institutional developments emerging from the Neolithic Revolution approximately 10,000 years ago, constitutes an inherently coercive system that engendered hierarchy, alienation, and ecological degradation.[5][6] Proponents argue that this transition from foraging to domestication initiated the domestication of humans themselves, fostering division of labor, property relations, and symbolic mediation that severed direct relations with the natural world and imposed involuntary social structures.[7][5] Unlike reformist approaches within anarchism, anarcho-primitivists advocate the immediate abolition of these systems rather than their reconfiguration, viewing any perpetuation of civilized forms as perpetuating domination.[7] Central to the ideology is the call for deindustrialization and the dismantling of advanced technology, which is seen not as neutral tools but as autonomous forces amplifying control, fragmentation, and environmental harm through their integration with mass society.[6] Agriculture and symbolic culture, including language and abstraction in some interpretations, are rejected as foundational to this coercive apparatus, with advocates favoring a reversion to non-domesticated, wild existence characterized by direct ecological dependence.[5] This entails privileging small-scale, nomadic bands—typically comprising 5 to 60 individuals—organized through mutual aid, gift economies, and radical egalitarianism, eschewing permanent settlements, borders, or surplus accumulation that enable scaled coercion.[7][6] The envisioned post-civilizational order emphasizes rewilding and reconnection with unmediated nature, positing that only through the collapse of the "megamachine" of state, capital, and technology can autonomy and sustainability be restored, contrasting sharply with industrialized society's purported trajectory toward totalizing control and collapse.[6] Such tenets frame civilization not as progressive but as a historical aberration demanding wholesale rejection to reclaim pre-Neolithic modes of existence.[5][7]Philosophical Underpinnings
Anarcho-primitivists posit a causal chain wherein the emergence of the division of labor, tied to early agricultural practices circa 10,000 BCE, enabled surplus production beyond immediate subsistence needs, thereby undermining personal autonomy and fostering hierarchical specialization.[5] This surplus, they argue, necessitated storage and defense mechanisms that concentrated resources in few hands, displacing egalitarian foraging relations with coercive structures.[8] Concomitantly, reliance on abstracted symbols—such as codified language, quantified time, and symbolic art—arose to manage complexity, interposing mediation between humans and unfiltered perceptual reality, which primitivists claim engenders existential alienation by prioritizing representation over direct participation in the world.[9] Central to this philosophy is a rejection of teleological progress ideologies, which primitivists view as ideological justifications for escalating domination rather than empirical advancements in well-being. They contend that human "domestication" mirrors the selective breeding of plants and animals during the Neolithic Revolution, yielding genetic and behavioral shifts toward neoteny, reduced aggression, and heightened suggestibility—traits that, while adaptive for managed populations, cultivate dependency on external authorities and erode innate capacities for self-determination. This process, per primitivist analysis, amplifies power imbalances by rendering individuals psychologically primed for subservience, with surplus-driven elites exploiting domesticated masses through institutionalized coercion.[10] Anarcho-primitivism synthesizes classical anarchist repudiation of statist authority with a broader anti-civilizational critique, hypothesizing that pre-sedentary hunter-gatherer bands embodied a baseline of "primitive communism"—decentralized, non-coercive networks without fixed property or domination, sustained by nomadic mobility and immediate reciprocity.[5] Sedentism, initiated by reliance on domesticated crops and herds, disrupted this equilibrium by anchoring communities to territory, incentivizing enclosures, and spawning proto-state formations to regulate scarcity and conflict, thus inaugurating the dialectic of civilization as perpetual unfreedom.[8]Historical Origins
Pre-Modern Influences
Ancient Chinese Taoism, attributed to Laozi in the Tao Te Ching (compiled around the 6th–4th centuries BCE), critiqued artificial human constructs and societal hierarchies as deviations from the natural Tao, advocating a return to simplicity and spontaneity (wu wei) over contrived civilization and moral artifices.[11] This emphasis on aligning with uncorrupted nature prefigures later rejections of technological and institutional mediation in human affairs. In ancient Greece, Diogenes of Sinope (c. 412–323 BCE), founder of Cynicism, embodied a radical rejection of societal conventions, choosing to live ascetically—reportedly in a large ceramic jar—in accordance with nature (physis) rather than cultural norms (nomos), publicly defying customs like property ownership and politeness to demonstrate self-sufficiency and virtue.[12][13] Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men (1755) portrayed pre-civilized humans as solitary, self-sufficient, and equal, free from the dependencies and vices introduced by property, agriculture, and government, using this "natural state" to diagnose civilization's role in fostering artificial inequalities and moral corruption.[14] While Rousseau did not advocate regressing to primitive conditions—viewing an intermediate social state as optimal—his analysis influenced primitivist critiques by contrasting egalitarian forager autonomy with hierarchical progress.[15] Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) assailed 19th-century industrial modernity as physiologically and culturally decadent, eroding vital instincts through mechanization, egalitarianism, and "herd" conformity, instead valorizing a Dionysian affirmation of life forces against the enfeebling effects of progress and rationalism.[16] His vitalism, emphasizing instinctual strength over civilized restraint, has been selectively invoked by primitivists to underscore technology's domestication of human potential. Peter Kropotkin’s Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution (1902) documented cooperative behaviors in pre-agricultural societies and animal groups, positing mutual aid—not competition—as evolution's primary driver, evidenced by tribal sharing and communal defense among "savages" like Inuit and Australian Aboriginal bands.[17] Though Kropotkin saw such patterns as foundations for advanced anarchism, primitivists extend this to reject post-forager developments like state formation and industrialization as perversions of innate solidarity.[18]Emergence in the 20th Century
Anarcho-primitivism coalesced in the 1970s within U.S. anarchist milieus, building on post-World War II countercultural disillusionment with industrial society. The journal Fifth Estate, established in 1965 in Detroit as an underground publication, shifted toward anti-civilization critiques by the late 1970s, featuring essays that questioned technological progress and advocated reappraisal of pre-civilized lifeways.[19] This marked an early institutional pivot, with compilations of such writings from 1977 to 1988 documenting the initial articulation of primitivist arguments against domestication and hierarchy rooted in agriculture and technology.[19][20] These developments intersected with contemporaneous ecological thought, particularly deep ecology, formalized by Arne Næss in 1972, which emphasized the intrinsic worth of nonhuman life and diagnosed industrial civilization as a root cause of ecological crisis.[21] Deep ecology's rejection of anthropocentrism and call for cultural transformation beyond consumerism paralleled emerging primitivist anti-tech orientations, contributing to a shared critique of modernity's alienating structures within green anarchist currents.[21] Earlier influences included the Situationist International's activities from 1957 to 1972, whose analysis of the "spectacle"—mediated technology enforcing passive consumption—highlighted alienation in advanced capitalism, informing later primitivist views on symbolic and material domination. By the 1980s, amid intensified backlash to industrial overreach—including the 1979 Three Mile Island nuclear incident and 1986 Chernobyl disaster—anarcho-primitivist ideas gained traction via zines, informal networks, and anarchist publications.[20] This period saw the refinement of arguments against civilization's foundational institutions, setting the groundwork for dedicated primitivist texts that explicitly linked technological escalation to existential threats.[19]Key Thinkers and Texts
John Zerzan and Early Development
John Zerzan, born in 1943, became the principal theorist of anarcho-primitivism through his writings starting in the late 1970s, initially via contributions to the anarchist collective Fifth Estate, where he developed critiques of technology and symbolic culture as foundational to domestication.[22] His early essays argued that abstractions such as time, language, and number originated around 10,000 years ago with the Neolithic Revolution, serving as tools of division and control that alienated humans from immediate, unmediated experience.[9] Influenced by Jacques Camatte's analysis of capital's "real subsumption" extending domestication beyond economics to all life, Zerzan extended this to a total rejection of civilization's origins in agriculture and hierarchy. Collaborations with Fifth Estate in the 1980s formalized anarcho-primitivism as a distinct current, emphasizing the inherent violence of progress and the superiority of hunter-gatherer autonomy over sedentary societies.[23] Zerzan's 1999 anthology Against Civilization, compiling his essays and those of like-minded critics, solidified the movement's intellectual framework by tracing civilization's pathologies to its symbolic and technological bases, advocating deindustrialization and a return to pre-civilized lifeways.[24] He promoted "rewilding"—reconnecting with wild nature through skills like foraging and tracking—as practical resistance, though this remained predominantly theoretical without widespread implementation.[25] Into the 2020s, Zerzan continued disseminating these ideas via his weekly Anarchy Radio podcast, launched in the 1990s and ongoing, alongside books such as A People's History of Civilization (2018) and When We Are Human (2021), which reiterated the inescapability of collapse absent radical primitivist praxis.[26][27]
