Hubbry Logo
I'jazI'jazMain
Open search
I'jaz
Community hub
I'jaz
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
I'jaz
I'jaz
I'jaz
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A page of the Qur'an,16th century: "They would never produce its like not though they backed one another" written at the center.

In Islam, ’i‘jāz (Arabic: اَلْإِعْجَازُ, romanized: al-ʾiʿjāz) or inimitability challenge of the Qur’ān, the doctrine which holds that the Qur’ān has a miraculous quality, both in content and in form, that no human speech can match.[1] According to this doctrine the Qur'an is a miracle and its inimitability is the proof granted to Muhammad (The Prophet of Islam) in authentication of his prophetic status. It serves the dual purpose of proving the authenticity of its divineness as being a source from the creator as well as proving the genuineness of Muhammad's (The Prophet of Islam) prophethood, an unlettered man who could neither read nor write, to whom it was revealed.

History and sociology

[edit]

The concept of “I'jaz” (lit; challenging) existed in preislamic Arabic poetry as a tradition in the sense of challenging one's rivals and rendering them incapable of creating a similar one, and a large part of the Quran was in the "nature of poetry".[2]

The first works about the I'jaz of the Quran began to appear in the 9th century in the Mu'tazila circles, which emphasized only its literary aspect, and were adopted by other religious groups.[3] The scientific miraculousness of the Quran began to be claimed in recent times. The claim that it was a miracle was reinforced by the emphasis that, despite some rumors to the contrary, Muhammad could not have achieved these feats without being able to read and write, and that this success could only come with Divine help.

Angelika Neuwirth lists the factors that led to the emergence of the doctrine of I'jaz: The necessity of explaining some challenging verses in the Quran;[4] In the context of the emergence of the theory of "proofs of prophecy" (dâ'il an-nubûvva) in Islamic theology, proving that the Quran is a work worthy of the emphasized superior place of Muhammad in the history of the prophets, thus gaining polemical superiority over Jews and Christians; Preservation of Arab national pride in the face of confrontation with the Iranian Shu'ubiyya movement, etc.[5]


The poetic structure of the Quran also means that it can contain many allegories or literal mysteries that cause problems in Quran translations, and that some literary arts and exaggerations are used in the Quran to increase impressiveness.[6]

Heinz Grotzfeld talks about the advantages of metaphorical interpretations.[7] Thus, some Muslims may adopt a more flexible lifestyle in the face of the rules imposed by religious leaders on society based on the apparent meaning of the expressions of the Quran,[8] and some religious leadersowner of great claims such as being mahdi, mujaddid, or "being chosen" such as Said Nursi, may claim that some verses of the Quran are actually talking about themselves or their works[9] and giving good news to them.

Qur'anic basis

[edit]
Quran
History
Manuscripts
Divisions
Content
Reading
Translations
Exegesis
Characteristics
Related

The concept of inimitability originates in the Qur'an. In six different verses, opponents are challenged to produce something like the Qur'an. The suggestion is that those who doubt the divine authorship of the Qur'an should try to disprove it by demonstrating that a human being could have created it:

  • "If men and Jinn banded together to produce the like of this Qur'an they would never produce its like not though they backed one another." (17:88) [10]
  • "Say, 'If you are truthful, bring some Book from Allah better in guidance than the two on them so that I may follow it." (28:49)[11]
  • "Say, Bring you then ten chapters like unto it, and call whomsoever you can, other than God, if you speak the truth!" (11:13) [12]
  • "Or do they say he has fabricated it? Say bring then a chapter like unto it, and call upon whom you can besides God, if you speak truly!" (10:38) [13]
  • "Or do they say he has fabricated it? Nay! They believe not! Let them then produce a recital like unto it if they speak the truth." (52:34) [14]
  • "And if you are in doubt concerning that which We have sent down to our servant, then produce a chapter of the like." (2:23) [15]

In the verses cited, Muhammad's opponents are invited to try to produce a text like the Qur'an, or even ten chapters, or even a single chapter. It is thought among Muslims that the challenge has not been met.[16]

Study

[edit]
Folio from a section of the Qur'an, 14th century

The literary quality of the Qur'an has been praised by Muslim scholars and by many non-Muslim scholars.[1][17][18] Some Muslim scholars claim that early Muslims accepted Islam on the basis of evaluating the Qur'an as a text that surpasses all human production.[18] Whilst western views typically ascribe social, ideological, propagandistic, or military reasons for the success of early Islam, Muslim sources view the literary quality of the Qur'an as a decisive factor for the adoption of the Islamic creed and its ideology, resulting in its spread and development in the 7th century.[16] A thriving poetic tradition existed at the time of Muhammad, but Muslim scholars such as Afnan Fatani contend that Muhammad had brought, despite being unlettered, something that was superior to anything that the poets and orators had ever written or heard. The Qur'an states that poets did not question this, what they rejected was the Qur'an's ideas, especially monotheism and resurrection.[1] Numerous Muslim scholars devoted time to finding out why the Qur'an was inimitable. The majority of opinions was around eloquence of the Qur'an are in both wording and meaning as its speech does not form to poetry nor prose commonly expressed in all languages. However, some Muslims differed, claiming that after handing down the Qur'an, God performed an additional miracle which rendered people unable to imitate the Qur'an, and that this is the source of I'jaz. This idea was less popular, however.[19]

Nonlinguistic approaches focus on the inner meanings of the Qur'an.[20] Oliver Leaman, favoring a nonlinguistic approach, criticizes the links between aesthetic judgment and faith and argues that it is possible to be impressed by something without thinking that it came about supernaturally and vice versa it is possible to believe in the divine origin of the Qur'an without agreeing to the aesthetic supremacy of the text. He thinks that it is the combination of language, ideas, and hidden meanings of the Qur'an that makes it an immediately convincing product.[21]

Classic works

[edit]

There are numerous classical works of Islamic literary criticism which have studied the Qur'an and examined its style:

The most famous work on the doctrine of inimitability is Dalāʾil al-Iʿjāz ("The Proofs of Inimitability in the Qur'ān") authored by the prominent grammarian and rhetorician, Abd al-Qāhir al-Jurjānī (d. 1078 CE). Al Jurjani argued that the inimitability of the Qur'an is a linguistic phenomenon and proposed that the Qur'an has a degree of excellence unachievable by human beings.[22] Al Jurjani believed that Qur'an's eloquence must be a certain special quality in the manner of its stylistic arrangement and composition or a certain special way of joining words. He studied the Qur'an with literary proofs and examined the various literary features and how they were utilized.[19] He rejected the idea that the words (alfaz) and meaning (ma'ani) of a literary work can be separated. In his view the meaning was what determined the quality of the style and that it would be absurd to attribute qualities of eloquence to a text only by observing its words. He explains that eloquence does not reside in the correct application of grammar as these are only necessary not sufficient conditions for the quality of a text. The originality of Al Jurjani is that he linked his view on meaning as the determining factor in the quality of a text by considering it not in isolation but as it is realized within a text. He wished to impress his audience with the need to study not only theology but also grammatical details and literary theory in order to improve their understanding of the inimitability of the Qur'an.[23] For Al Jurjani the dichotomy much elaborated by earlier critics between 'word' and 'meaning' was a false one. He suggested considering not merely the meaning but 'the meaning of the meaning'. He defined two types of meaning one that resorts to the 'intellect' the other to the 'imagination'.[24]

A page from the Surah of Quran with name of Surah Al-Ala with illumination, 16th century

Al-Baqillani (d. 1013 CE) wrote a book named I'jaz al-Qur'an ('inimitability of the Qur'an') and emphasized that the style of the Qur'an cannot be classified, and eloquence sustains throughout the Qur'an in spite of dealing with various themes. Al Baqillani's point was not that the Qur'an broke the custom by extraordinary degree of eloquence but that it broke the custom of the existing literary forms by creating a new genre of expression.

Ibrahim al-Nazzam of Basra (d. 846 CE) was among the first to study the doctrine.[19] According to Al Nazzam, the Qur'an's inimitability is due to the information in its content which as divine revelation contains divine knowledge. Thus, Qur'an's supremacy lies in its content rather than its style.[18] A- Murtaza (d. 1044 CE) had similar views, turning to divine intervention as the only viable explanation as to why the challenge was not met.[25]

Al-Qadi Abd al-Jabbar (d. 1025 CE), in his book Al-Mughni ("the sufficient book"), insists on the hidden meanings of the Qur'an along with its eloquence and provides some counter-arguments against the criticism leveled at Muhammad and the Qur'an. Abd al-Jabbar studies the doctrine in parts 15 and 16 of his book series. According to Abd al-Jabbr, Arabs chose not to compete with Muhammad in the literary field but on the battlefield and this was another reason that they recognized the superiority of the Qur'an. Abd al-Jabbar rejected the doctrine of sarfah (the prohibition from production) because according to him sarfah makes a miracle of something other than the Qur'an and not the Qur'an itself. The doctrine of sarfah means that people can produce a rival to the Qur'an but due to some supernatural or divine cause decide against doing so. Therefore, according to Abd al-Jabbar, the correct interpretation of sarfah is that the motives to rival the Qur'an disappears because of the recognition of the impossibility of doing so.[26]

Yahya ibn Ziyad al-Farra (d. 822 CE), Abu Ubaydah (d. 824 CE), Ibn Qutaybah (d. 889 CE), Rummani (d. 994 CE), Khattabi (d. 998 CE), and Zarkashi (d. 1392 CE) are also among notable scholars in this subject. Ibn Qutaybah considered 'brevity' which he defined as "jam' al-kathir mi ma'anih fi l-qalil min lafzih" (collection of many ideas in a few words) as one aspect of Qur'anic miraculousness.[27] Zarkashi in his book Al-Burhan stated that miraculousness of the Qur'an can be perceived but not described.[19]

Scientific I'jaz Literature

[edit]
Further information: Quranic cosmology and Islamic attitudes towards science
Ziauddin Sardar; "According to some Muslim scholars, everything from genetics to robotics and space travel is described in the Quran. What nonsense".[28]

Some hold that certain verses of the Qur'an contain scientific theories that have been discovered only in modern times, confirming Qur'an's miraculousness.[29][30][31] This has been criticized by the scientific community. Critics argue that verses which allegedly explain modern scientific facts, about subjects such as plate tectonics, the expansion of the universe, subterranean oceans, biology, human evolution, the beginnings and origin of human life, or the history of Earth, for example, contain fallacies and are unscientific.[32][33][34]

Maurice Bucaille argued that some Quranic verses are agreement with modern science and contain information that had not been known in the past. He stated that he examined the degree of compatibility between the Qur'an and modern scientific data and concluded that the Qur'an did not contradict modern science. He argued that it is inconceivable that the scientific statements of the Qur'an could have been the work of man.[35] Bucaille's arguments have been criticized by both Muslim and non-Muslim scientists.[36]

The methodology of scientific I'jaz has not gained full approval by Islamic scholars and is the subject of ongoing debate.[37] According to Ziauddin Sardar, the Qur'an does not contain many verses that point towards nature, however, it constantly asks its readers to reflect on the wonders of the cosmos. He refers to verse 29:20 which says "Travel throughout the earth and see how He brings life into being" and 3:190 which says "In the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of night and day there are indeed signs for men of understanding" and concludes that these verses do not have any specific scientific content, rather they encourage believers to observe natural phenomena and reflect on the complexity of the universe. According to Nidhal Guessoum some works on miracles in the Qur'an follow a set pattern; they generally begin with a verse from the Qur'an, for example, the verse "So verily I swear by the stars that run and hide . . ." (81:15-16) and quickly declare that it refers to black holes, or take the verse "I swear by the Moon in her fullness, that ye shall journey on from stage to stage" (84:18-19) and decide it refers to space travel, and so on. "What is meant to be allegorical and poetic is transformed into products of science".[38]

I'jaz has also been examined from the vantage point of its contribution to literary theory by Rebecca Ruth Gould,[39] Lara Harb,[40] and others.

Some researchers have proposed an evolutionary reading of the verses related to the creation of man in the Qur'an and then considered these meanings as examples of scientific miracles.[41]

Muhammad's illiteracy

[edit]

In Islamic theology, Muhammad's illiteracy is a way of emphasizing that he was a transparent medium for divine revelation and a sign of the genuineness of his prophethood since the illiterate prophet could not have composed the eloquent poetry and prose of the Qur'an.[42] According to Tabatabaei (d. 1981), a Muslim scholar, the force of this challenge becomes clear when we realize that it is issued for someone whose life should resemble that of Muhammad namely the life of an orphan, uneducated in any formal sense, not being able to read or write and grew up in the unenlightened age of the jahiliyah period (the age of ignorance) before Islam.[43]

The references to illiteracy are found in verses 7:158,[44] 29:48,[45] and 62:2.[46] The verse 25:5[47] also implies that Muhammad was unable to read and write. The Arabic term "ummi" in 7:158 and 62:2 is translated to 'illiterate' and 'unlettered'.[48] The medieval exegete Al Tabari (d. 923 CE) maintained that the term induced two meanings: firstly, the inability to read or write in general and secondly, the inexperience or ignorance of the previous books or scriptures.[49]

The early sources on the history of Islam provide that Muhammad especially in Medina used scribes to correspond with the tribes. Likewise, though infrequently rather than constantly, he had scribes write down, on separate pages not yet in one single book, parts of the Qur'an.[49] Collections of prophetic tradition occasionally mention Muhammad having basic knowledge of reading and writing, while others deny it. For example, in the book Sahih al-Bukhari, a collection of early sayings, it is mentioned that when Muhammad and the Meccans agreed to conclude a peace treaty, Muhammad made a minor change to his signature or in one occasion he asked for a paper to write a statement.[50] On another occasion, the Sira of Ibn Ishaq records that Muhammad wrote a letter with secret instructions to be opened after two days on the expedition to Nakhla in 2 A.H. Alan Jones has discussed these incidents and the use of Arabic writing in the earliest Islamic period in some detail.[51]

Fakhr Al-Razi, the 12th century Islamic theologian, has expressed his idea is his book Tafsir Al Razi:[52]

...Most arabs were not able to read or write and the prophet was one of them. The prophet recited a perfect book to them again and again without editing or changing the words, in contrast when arab orators prepared their speech they added or deleted large or small parts of their speech before delivering it. But the Prophet did not write down the revelation and recited the book of God without addition, deletion, or revision...If he had mastered writing and reading, people would have suspected that he had studied previous books but he brought this noble Qur'an without learning and education...the Prophet had not learned from a teacher, he had not studied any book, and did not attend any classroom of a scholar because Mecca was not a place of scholars. And he was not absent from Mecca for a long period of time which would make it possible to claim that he learned during that absence.

Contrary views

[edit]

Imitators

[edit]
Main article: Attempted imitations of the Quran

Critics

[edit]

German orientalist Theodor Nöldeke criticized the Qur'anic text as careless and imperfect, pointing out claimed linguistic defects. His argument was countered by Muslim scholar Muhammad Mohar Ali in his book "The Qur'an and the Orientalists".[53] Orientalist scholars Friedrich Schwally and John Wansbrough held a similar opinion to Nöldeke.[1] Some writers have questioned Muhammad's illiteracy.[49] Ruthven states that "The fact of Muhammad's illiteracy would in no way constitute proof of the Qur'an's miraculous origin as the great pre-Islamic poets were illiterate."[54] Peters writes: "We do not know where this minor merchant of Mecca learned to make poetry...most oral poets and certainly the best have been illiterate."[55] Others believe that Muhammad hired poets or that the Qur'an was translated into Arabic from another language.[56]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

I'jaz

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
I'jāz al-Qurʾān, or the inimitability of the Qurʾān, constitutes the core Islamic theological assertion that the Qurʾān exhibits a miraculous quality in its linguistic form, rhetorical structure, and substantive content, rendering it impossible for human composition to replicate equivalently, thereby evidencing its divine provenance. This doctrine posits that the text's eloquence surpasses the pinnacle of pre-Islamic and prose, with its challenge to produce a or ten surahs of comparable merit remaining unmet throughout history. The concept traces directly to provocations embedded in the Qurʾān itself, such as in verses 2:23 and 17:88, which dare disbelievers to forge a rival text, a gauntlet thrown to the eloquent of seventh-century Arabia who, despite their mastery of , failed to respond adequately. Scholarly systematization emerged in the second to fourth centuries AH (eighth to tenth centuries CE), with pivotal contributions from figures like al-Bāqillānī (d. 403/1013), who delineated its literary uniqueness in works such as Kitāb Iʿjāz al-Qurʾān, emphasizing sustained rhetorical perfection unattainable by finite human cognition. Early debates among Muʿtazilites and others grappled with its mechanisms, including hypotheses like ṣarfah (divine aversion preventing imitation), though later thinkers such as ʿAbd al-Jabbār rejected such auxiliary explanations in favor of the text's intrinsic superiority. While classical iʿjāz centered on balāghah (Arabic rhetoric and ), as elaborated by al-Jurjānī (d. 1078 CE) through (precise word arrangement), subsequent interpretations incorporated predictions, preservation from alteration, and even purported scientific insights, expanding its scope amid modern . The doctrine's evidentiary weight hinges on testimonial consensus among literati, yet it encounters contention regarding the objectivity of literary inimitability, as aesthetic judgments resist empirical and cultural-linguistic specificity limits universal verification. No historically documented imitation has compelled widespread scholarly acquiescence to equivalence, reinforcing the claim within Islamic tradition, though external critiques often highlight the unfalsifiability of subjective criteria.

Definition and Quranic Foundations

Conceptual Definition

I'jaz al-Qur'an denotes the doctrine in Islamic that the Quran exhibits an inimitable quality rendering it impossible for humans or to replicate, thereby evidencing its divine origin as a miraculous to . This inimitability encompasses linguistic, rhetorical, and structural excellence that surpasses human capability, positioning the Quran as a proof (mu'jizah) tailored to the eloquent Arab society of 7th-century Arabia. The concept underscores a challenge (tahaddi) issued within the Quran itself, defying skeptics to produce even a single chapter equivalent in impact and form, with failure interpreted as confirmation of its otherworldly source. Etymologically, "i'jaz" stems from the triliteral root ʿ-j-z, signifying to render powerless or incapable, as the purportedly subdues challengers by exposing their inadequacy in emulation. In theological application, it functions as a rational and empirical warrant for prophethood, distinct from prior prophets' physical miracles, by leveraging the ' mastery of as the arena for proof—where no has succeeded despite incentives and threats. Proponents argue this incapacity arises not merely from subjective beauty but from objective features like precision, coherence, and predictive fulfillment, though assessments remain contested outside orthodox Islamic frameworks due to reliance on cultural and interpretive criteria. The basis of i'jaz lies in the Quran's self-presentation as inimitable, with verses such as 17:88 addressing all creation to produce a like discourse, and 2:23 conditioning belief on successful replication, which historical attempts by poets and adversaries, including Musaylimah in the CE, failed to achieve according to traditional accounts. This framework privileges the text's intrinsic challenge over external validation, positing that true equivalence would require matching its totality in , preservation, and transformative effect, elements deemed causally irreducible to human authorship.

Scriptural Challenges and Basis

The doctrine of i'jaz derives its primary basis from explicit challenges issued within the itself, directing opponents to replicate its content, style, or structure as a test of its claimed divine authorship. These tahaddī (challenges) appear across multiple surahs, framing inimitability as empirical proof accessible to human scrutiny rather than abstract assertion. Islamic tradition interprets these as perpetual invitations, unmet by any historical attempt, thereby substantiating the text's miraculous status. The challenges escalate in scope and difficulty, beginning with calls to produce a single surah comparable to existing ones. Surah Al-Baqarah (2:23) states: "And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah the like thereof and call upon your witnesses other than Allah, if you should be truthful." Similarly, Surah Yunus (10:38) demands: "Or do they say [of Muhammad], 'He invented it?' Say, 'Then produce a surah like it and call upon [for assistance] whoever you can besides Allah, if you should be truthful.'" These verses target the Quran's literary form, implying replication must match its rhetorical precision, thematic coherence, and linguistic depth. Further challenges intensify the test by specifying quantity or collective effort. Surah Hud (11:13) counters claims of fabrication by urging: "Or they say, 'He invented it.' Say, 'Then produce ten like it—invented—and call upon [for assistance] whomever you can besides , if you should be truthful.'" The most comprehensive appears in (17:88): "Say, 'If mankind and the gathered in order to produce the like of this , they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants.'" Additional references, such as (52:33-34), reinforce this by challenging production of discourse equivalent to the Quran's prophetic content. These verses collectively underpin i'jaz by positioning inimitability as a falsifiable criterion: success in imitation would disprove divine origin, while failure affirms it. Classical exegetes, including Al-Razi (d. 1209 CE), viewed the challenges as multifaceted, encompassing not only eloquence but also predictive accuracy and moral impact, though the text itself emphasizes holistic equivalence over isolated traits. Critics from non-Islamic perspectives, however, contend that subjective criteria like "likeness" render the test unverifiable, a point traditional proponents counter by citing the absence of consensus-accepted equivalents despite centuries of literary efforts in .

Historical Development

Origins in Pre-Islamic Arabia

Pre-Islamic Arabia, spanning roughly the 5th to 7th centuries CE, featured a sophisticated oral tradition dominated by poetry in classical Arabic (fusha), which Arabs regarded as the supreme measure of intellectual and tribal prestige. Poets (sha'ir), often viewed as divinely inspired intermediaries, composed intricate odes (qasidas) that encapsulated genealogy, warfare, praise, and satire, serving as historical records and instruments of rivalry. Annual fairs, such as the renowned gathering at Ukaz near Mecca, hosted competitive recitations where verses were judged for rhetorical excellence, with victors' works—like the seven Mu'allaqat (suspended odes) of poets including Imru' al-Qais and Tarafa—hung in honor from the Kaaba. This environment fostered a culture of linguistic challenges, where rivals boasted superiority through unmatched eloquence, establishing poetry as both a shield for honor and a weapon in intertribal disputes. The concept of i'jaz—the Quran's asserted inimitability—originated within this framework of poetic contestation, as the text's revelation around 610 CE explicitly invoked Arab standards of literary prowess by issuing a tahaddi (challenge) to replicate even a single surah (Quran 2:23, 10:38, 11:13). Arabs, who derisively termed non-Arabs 'ajam (mute or inarticulate) to underscore their linguistic dominance, prided themselves on mastering complex meters (bahrs), rhymes, and metaphors honed over years of apprenticeship under elder poets. Yet, despite incentives from Meccan leaders to discredit Muhammad through imitation, no equivalent emerged, with contemporaries like the poet al-Walid ibn al-Mughira conceding the Quran's "sweetness" and distinction from poetry or soothsaying speech. Prominent figures such as Labid ibn Rabi'ah, author of one Mu'allaqa, abandoned poetry upon conversion, declaring it obsolete beside the Quran's style. Early replication efforts underscored the challenge's empirical weight: Musaylimah al-Kadhdhab, a rival claimant from Yamama, produced rhymed prose mimicking short Meccan surahs (e.g., "The elephant—what made the elephant?"), but these were derided for superficiality and grammatical flaws by Arab critics like al-Baqillani (d. 403 AH). Similarly, Ibn al-Mukaffa' (d. 139 AH) reportedly drafted an imitation but destroyed it upon reaching Quran 11:42–46, unable to sustain the depth. These failures, set against Jahiliyyah poetry's documented sophistication—evidenced in over 10,000 preserved verses—positioned i'jaz not as abstract theology but as a direct causal outcome of unmet replication in a rhetorically supreme society. While later Islamic scholarship formalized i'jaz, its pre-Islamic roots trace to this tradition of rivalrous eloquence, where the Quran's emergence disrupted an unchallenged cultural paradigm.

Early Islamic Articulations

The Qurʾān's own verses constitute the earliest articulations of iʿjāz, issuing direct challenges to produce a or ten surahs like it, as in Sūrat al-Baqarah 2:23–24, revealed circa 622–623 CE during the Medinan period. Similar injunctions appear in Sūrat Yūnus 10:38 and Sūrat Hūd 11:13, both Meccan revelations around 610–622 CE, emphasizing that even collective human effort, aided by , could not replicate its structure or content. These challenges targeted the ' linguistic prowess, positioning the Qurʾān as inimitable evidence of divine origin amid a where and oratory defined excellence. During Muḥammad's prophethood (610–632 CE), opponents acknowledged the text's rhetorical superiority while rejecting its source, as exemplified by al-Walīd ibn al-Mughīrah, a elder, who described its recitation as possessing an unmatched "sweetness" and nobility beyond human poetry or sorcery around 615 CE. Attempts at imitation, such as those by the self-proclaimed prophet Musaylimah al-Kaḍḍāb in Yamāmah circa 631–632 CE, produced rhymed prose mimicking short Meccan surahs (e.g., on themes like "the "), but these were dismissed by contemporaries for lacking depth, coherence, and transformative impact. Early converts among poets, including ibn Rabīʿah, ceased composition upon hearing the Qurʾān, citing its transcendence over eloquence in the 620s CE. Among the ṣaḥābah (companions), articulations remained practical rather than systematic, focusing on the Qurʾān's evidentiary role in conversion and defense. ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbbās (d. 68 AH/687 CE), a key exegete, highlighted its precision and foresight in tafsīr traditions transmitted orally in the first half of the first century AH, underscoring linguistic uniqueness without formal treatises. Under the Rāshidūn Caliphs (632–661 CE), recitations in public settings, such as during the in 630 CE, prompted mass acknowledgments of its incomparability, reinforcing iʿjāz as a lived amid tribal contests. These responses prioritized empirical failure of rivals over theoretical analysis, predating later scholastic expansions.

Classical Formalization (3rd-5th Centuries AH)

The doctrine of i'jaz (the inimitability of the ) underwent systematic formalization in the 3rd to 5th centuries AH through dedicated treatises by theologians and rhetoricians, who shifted from incidental defenses to structured arguments centered on linguistic, syntactic, and compositional excellence. These scholars, including Mu'tazilis and emerging Ash'arites, responded to rationalist critiques by analyzing the Quran's verbal form (lafẓ) and meaning (maʿnā), emphasizing its transcendence over human eloquence while integrating principles of balāghah (Arabic rhetoric). This era produced foundational texts that categorized i'jaz as arising from the Quran's holistic , challenging imitators to match its precision in expression and arrangement. Early contributions emerged in the 3rd century AH with Amr ibn Bahr (d. 255 AH/869 CE), whose works like Kitāb al-Bayān wa al-Tabyīn explored Quranic as superior to pre-Islamic , highlighting its clarity, conciseness, and persuasive power as of divine origin. argued that the Quran's style evoked unparalleled emotional and intellectual impact, though later critics like contested some interpretations of his views on . In the 4th century AH, Ali ibn Isa al-Rummani (d. 384 AH/994 CE), a Mu'tazili scholar, advanced the discourse in Bayan I'jaz al-Qur'an, positing that the Quran's miracle lay in its inimitable fusion of brevity, informativeness, and syntactic harmony, which defied human replication even in partial emulation. Concurrently, Abu Bakr al-Baqillani (d. 403 AH/1013 CE), an Ash'arite, elaborated in I'jaz al-Qur'an that i'jaz manifested primarily in the nazm (orderly construction) of the text's entirety, encompassing phonetic, lexical, and semantic layers that surpassed Arabic literary norms; he quantified aspects like the Quran's avoidance of redundancy while maximizing depth, attributing this to non-human authorship. The period culminated in the 5th century AH with Abd al-Qahir al-Jurjani (d. 471 AH/1078 CE), whose Dalā'il al-I'jāz synthesized prior efforts into a rigorous theory of nazm, asserting that the Quran's inimitability resided not in isolated words or tropes but in their interdependent syntactic relations (iḍāfāt) and propositional linkages, which generated infinite interpretive layers inaccessible to finite human minds. Al-Jurjani illustrated this through examples like Quranic balāghah in muḥākamah (precision of judgment) and istiʿārah (metaphor), where rearrangement or substitution disrupted the original's equilibrium, as seen in analyses of verses such as Q 2:115; he complemented this in Asrār al-Balāghah by delineating how maʿnā emerges uniquely from lafẓ, formalizing i'jaz as a causal interplay of form and content defying empirical imitation. This framework influenced subsequent rhetoric, privileging verifiable textual mechanics over subjective aesthetics.

Core Arguments for Inimitability

Muhammad's Illiteracy as Evidence

The refers to as the ummī prophet in verses such as 7:157, a term traditionally interpreted by Islamic exegetes to denote illiteracy or lack of familiarity with prior scriptures. This characterization is reinforced in 29:48, which states that "did not recite before it any scripture, nor did you inscribe one with your right hand," emphasizing his non-engagement with written texts prior to , thereby preempting accusations of human authorship derived from existing books. Historical accounts in early Islamic literature uniformly attest to Muhammad's inability to read or write. The biography of Ibn Ishaq (d. 767 CE), preserved in Ibn Hisham's recension, recounts the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah in 628 CE, where Muhammad instructed Ali ibn Abi Talib to read the document aloud because he could not do so himself. Hadith collections, such as Sahih al-Bukhari, record Muhammad describing his community as "an illiterate nation; we neither write, nor know accounts" (Bukhari 1913), and being called the "Apostle of the illiterates" (Bukhari 3055). These narrations, compiled by al-Bukhari (d. 870 CE) from chains traced to companions, reflect a consensus among early sources that Muhammad, born around 570 CE in Mecca, received no formal scribal training amid a society where literacy was rare but not absent among elites. In the doctrine of i'jaz, Muhammad's illiteracy serves as a foundational proof of the Quran's inimitable divine origin, as articulated by classical scholars like (d. 1013 CE) and al-Jurjani (d. 1078 CE). They contend that an unlettered individual from a tribal, oral culture—lacking exposure to literary composition—could not independently produce the Quran's rhythmic prose (saj') surpassing pre-Islamic , its legal codification, or ethical frameworks without intervention. This argument posits a causal impossibility: human capability alone cannot account for the text's emergence over 23 years (610–632 CE), especially given contemporary Arab poets' failed attempts to emulate even a single surah, as challenged in Quran 2:23. Proponents emphasize that illiteracy precluded plagiarism from Jewish or Christian scriptures, aligning with the Quran's self-claim of uniqueness (17:88). Critics within and outside Islamic tradition, however, debate the strict illiteracy premise, interpreting ummī as "" or "of the unscriptured community" rather than literal non-literacy, citing hadiths of dictating treaties and letters (e.g., Bukhari 2731–2732). Yet, even these accounts depict him as relying on scribes, consistent with oral transmission rather than personal inscription, preserving the i'jaz claim's core: the Quran's sophistication exceeds what an individual without scribal could fabricate amid 7th-century Arabian constraints. Empirical attestation from primary sources outweighs later reinterpretations, underscoring illiteracy's role in causal arguments for revelation's authenticity.

Linguistic and Rhetorical Superiority

The linguistic and rhetorical superiority of the forms a central pillar of i'jaz doctrine, asserting that its text demonstrates unmatched eloquence (balagha) through precise word choice, syntactic arrangement (), and rhetorical devices that convey layered meanings unattainable by human composition. This superiority is evidenced by the 's conciseness (i'jaz al-ijtinaab), where maximal meaning is expressed in minimal form, as in Surah al-Kawthar ( 108), a three-verse chapter that encompasses divine favor, ritual command, and eschatological victory without redundancy. Abd al-Qahir al-Jurjani (d. 471 AH/1078 CE), in his seminal work Dala'il al-I'jaz, formalized this argument by emphasizing as the Quran's inimitability: the unique ordering of words that generates emergent meanings beyond lexical summation, distinguishing it from pre-Islamic poetry's reliance on alone. Al-Jurjani contended that human attempts at imitation fail to replicate this coherence, as seen in the Quran's integration of syntax, semantics, and to evoke emotional and intellectual resonance— for instance, through iltifat (pronominal shifts), where abrupt changes in (e.g., from third to second in Quran 2:21-22) heighten direct address and emphasis without disrupting flow. Rhetorical devices further underscore this claim, including (tibaq) for contrastive parallelism, as in Quran 55:3-4 ("He created man; He taught him "), juxtaposing creation and instruction to affirm divine origin; and for rhythmic memorability, evident in surahs like al-Rahman ( 55); and tawqif (strategic pauses) that build suspense and interpretive depth. Scholarly analyses note that these elements resist without loss, as prepositional phrases and emphatic structures (tawkid) in verses like 2:2 preserve rhetorical force tied to morphology. In pre-Islamic Arabia, where oral poetry prized eloquence, contemporaries like the poets of the Mu'allaqat acknowledged the Quran's stylistic challenge (tahdhiir) to produce a comparable surah (Quran 2:23), yet efforts such as those by Musaylima ibn Habib yielded caricatured imitations derided for incoherence. This historical failure, per classical balagha scholars, substantiates the rhetorical barrier, as the Quran's fusion of brevity, universality, and affective power defied the era's linguistic virtuosi. Modern linguistic studies, while subjective in aesthetic judgment, corroborate unique syntactic patterns via computational analysis, though they attribute superiority to cultural context rather than divine exclusivity.

Structural and Thematic Uniqueness

The Quran's structural uniqueness lies in its (harmonious composition), an intricate arrangement of words, verses, and surahs that integrates diverse literary elements into a unified whole, distinct from conventional or . Classical theorists of i'jaz, such as al-Bāqillānī (d. 403 AH/1013 CE), emphasized this precision in taʾlīf (placement and connection), where even abrogated verses fit seamlessly without disrupting overall coherence, as seen in the final verse of Surah al-Baqarah (2:281) revealed years after the preceding content. This non-chronological ordering, prioritizing thematic resonance over revelation sequence, creates interconnections across surahs that scholars argue exceed 7th-century Arab literary norms. Ring composition, or chiastic , exemplifies this structure, with outer sections mirroring inner ones thematically around a central pivot, fostering layered meaning and mnemonic efficacy. Raymond Farrin identifies such patterns throughout the , including in al-Baqarah, where legal and narrative elements parallel symmetrically, and Yusuf, framing Joseph's story with reciprocal motifs of dreams and family dynamics. Proponents of i'jaz contend this deliberate symmetry, undocumented in pre-Islamic texts, evidences superhuman design, as human authors typically favor linear progression. Thematically, the Quran unifies , , , and across 114 revealed piecemeal from 610 to 632 CE, without internal contradictions—a point verse 4:82 invokes as proof of divinity, challenging production of a comparable chapter. This cohesion persists despite topical shifts within verses, integrating command, narrative, and invocation seamlessly, as in , which blends praise, , and polemic. Such thematic depth, maintained amid oral transmission and revision, is attributed to divine oversight in i'jaz discourse, surpassing the fragmented compositions of contemporary orators. Rhetorical devices like iltifāt (abrupt grammatical shifts, e.g., from third to second person in Surah al-Nisa 4:114) and tied to semantics further bind structure to theme, averting repetition while amplifying impact. These elements, per analysts like , render the text inimitable, as attempts to replicate yield either prosaic dullness or poetic rigidity, failing the Quran's balanced fusion.

Categories of I'jaz Claims

Traditional Balaghah (Eloquence and Rhetoric)

Traditional arguments for the i'jaz (inimitability) of the Quran emphasize its rhetorical excellence within the framework of balaghah, the classical Arabic science of encompassing clarity, semantic depth, and stylistic refinement. Pre-Islamic , renowned for their mastery of and oratory, were challenged by the (e.g., in verses such as 2:23 and 17:88) to produce even a single comparable , a feat they failed to achieve despite their linguistic expertise, as testified by early contemporaries like al-Walid ibn al-Mughira. This superiority is attributed not merely to content but to the Quran's precise expression, rhythmic , and vivid , which convey profound meanings with unmatched conciseness and impact, transcending human poetic norms. The discipline of balaghah formalized these claims through three primary branches: 'ilm al-bayan (rhetorical figures like and for expressive clarity), 'ilm al-ma'ani (contextual semantics ensuring logical coherence and audience adaptation), and 'ilm al-badi' (artistic embellishments such as parallelism and for aesthetic elevation). Early articulations, from the AH onward, integrated these to argue that the Quran's achieves perfect harmony between form and meaning, evoking emotional and intellectual responses unattainable elsewhere. For instance, scholars like Abu Bakr al-Nazzam (d. 231 AH) highlighted the Quran's avoidance of redundancy and its layered significations, while al-Rummani (d. 384 AH) in al-Tanbih 'ala qudrah al-Qur'an systematically analyzed its rhetorical proofs as evidence of divine origin. A pivotal advancement came with (d. 471 AH/1078 CE), whose works Dala'il al-i'jaz and Asrar al-balaghah shifted focus to (syntactic and semantic arrangement of words), positing it as the Quran's core miracle. Al-Jurjani contended that the Quran's inimitability lies in how its generates novel meanings and interconnections, surpassing mere lexical —e.g., in surahs where propositions interlink to form irreplaceable wholes, defying replication without altering essence. His , blending and , influenced subsequent () like al-Zamakhshari's al-Kashshaf (d. 538 AH), which applied balaghah tools to unveil the Quran's eloquent subtleties, such as elliptical constructions that imply volumes in brevity. These analyses underscore that appreciation requires profound proficiency, rendering the challenge empirically unmet in classical records.

Numerical and Mathematical Patterns

Claims of numerical and mathematical patterns in the Qur'an emerged predominantly in modern interpretations of i'jaz, positing that the text exhibits deliberate symmetries in word frequencies, verse structures, and numerical ratios that surpass human capability and align with cosmic or natural constants. These arguments often rely on computational analyses of roots, letter counts, or , suggesting a coded divine blueprint. Unlike classical i'jaz focused on linguistic , numerical claims gained traction in the late amid responding to scientific scrutiny. A central example is the "miracle of 19," advanced by in works like Quran: Visual Presentation of the Miracle (1981), which asserts that the number 19—referenced in al-Muddaththir 74:30 ("Over it are nineteen [angels]")—underlies the Qur'an's architecture. documented patterns such as the total verses (6346) being a multiple of 19, the Bismillah formula appearing 114 times (19×6), and initial letter counts in s divisible by 19, using recitation standards. He extended this to claim textual authentication, rejecting verses 9:128-129 as post-Muhammad interpolations for disrupting the pattern, though this alteration was condemned by orthodox scholars as (innovation). Evaluations of Khalifa's 52 specific claims, as in peer-reviewed analyses, find partial consistencies (e.g., counts and certain ) but frequent failures under rigorous statistical testing, attributing successes to chance in a text of finite length. Word repetition symmetries form another subset, where proponents highlight balanced occurrences of antonyms or thematic pairs. For instance, the roots for "" (this world) and "akhira" (hereafter) each appear 115 times, "mala'ika" (angels) and "shayatin" (devils) 88 times, and "hayat" (life) and "mawt" (death) 145 times, interpreted as reflecting theological equilibrium. Similar claims include "yawm" (day) at 365 occurrences matching solar days in a year, and "bahr" () to "barr" () ratios approximating Earth's (71:29). These derive from root-based tallies in tools like Qur'anic frequency databases, but depend on excluding variants, synonyms, or dual forms, yielding variable results across recitations (). Classical scholars like al-Razi (d. 1209 CE) noted rhetorical repetitions but not numerical miracles as proof of inimitability, while modern critiques, including from figures like , argue such patterns arise from in any large corpus and risk over . Esoteric approaches incorporate numerology (assigning values to Arabic letters), as in Ibn Arabi's (d. 1240 CE) , analyzing Huruf Muqatta'at (disjointed letters opening 29 s) for gematric harmonies, such as totals yielding multiples of 7 or 19. Contemporary extensions claim (φ ≈ 1.618) embeddings in lengths or verse distributions, with one study deriving a "Qur'an Constant" of 70.449 from prime factorizations and word statistics. However, these rely on subjective selections and lack , with statistical models showing comparable "miracles" in secular texts like under similar cherry-picking. Mainstream Islamic authorities, per fatwas, caution against overemphasizing numerical i'jaz, viewing it as peripheral to the Qur'an's core balaghah and potentially divisive, as seen in rejections by al-Azhar and Saudi scholars.

Scientific and Predictive Interpretations

Scientific interpretations of i'jaz posit that the conveys accurate descriptions of natural phenomena unknown to 7th-century Arabs, thereby demonstrating supernatural foreknowledge. These claims gained prominence in the , particularly through Maurice Bucaille's 1976 book The Bible, the Quran and Science, which argued for alignments between Quranic verses and modern discoveries in fields like , cosmology, and . For example, Al-Mu'minun (23:12-14) outlines human creation from a "drop" progressing to a "clinging clot," then "a lump," interpreted by proponents as matching stages of observed via in the 19th-20th centuries. Similarly, (78:6-7) describes mountains as "pegs," claimed to prefigure the understanding of tectonic roots stabilizing the , a concept formalized in theory after the . Proponents, including organizations like the Yaqeen Institute, assert such verses required divine revelation, as lacked access to empirical tools or advanced texts. Critiques of these scientific claims emphasize their reliance on post-hoc reinterpretations and ambiguity in Arabic phrasing, allowing retrofitting to contemporary while ignoring potential contradictions. Scholar , a Muslim apologist, has argued that pursuing i'jaz through is methodologically flawed, as it ties the Quran's miraculousness to potentially falsifiable human knowledge, and verses like those on echo pre-Islamic sources such as ’s (2nd century CE) descriptions of fetal stages, disseminated via trade routes to Arabia. Historical analysis traces the scientific i'jaz genre to responses against 19th-century European and , rather than classical Islamic , where linguistic and prophetic elements dominated; classical scholars like (d. 1013 CE) focused on over empirical predictions. Empirical scrutiny reveals inconsistencies, such as Surah Al-Kahf (18:86) depicting the sun setting in a "muddy spring," which literalist readings conflict with , though apologists offer metaphorical parses. Predictive interpretations highlight Quranic verses forecasting specific future events as proof of i'jaz, distinct from vague oracles by their alleged precision and fulfillment. A prominent example is Surah Ar-Rum (30:2-4), revealed circa 615-616 CE after the Byzantine defeat by Persians in 614 CE, predicting Roman victory "within a few years" (bid‘ sinin, typically 3-9 years); the Byzantines rebounded under , defeating Persians by 622-628 CE, aligning with the timeline amid ongoing Meccan skepticism. Another is Surah Yunus (10:92), promising Pharaoh's body preservation as a "sign for posterity" post-drowning, linked by modern proponents to the 1881 discovery and display of Ramesses II's mummy, though ancient Egyptian embalming practices routinely preserved rulers, predating the event. Proponents like those in Unchallengeable Miracles of the Quran (2001) catalog over a dozen such prophecies, including the Battle of Badr's outcome (8:7-8, revealed pre-battle in 624 CE). Scholarly evaluations of predictive i'jaz underscore verifiable historical correlations for events like the Roman-Persian reversal, supported by non-Muslim chronicles such as those of Theophanes (8th-9th century), but caution against overgeneralization; many "predictions" involve ex post facto applications or conditional phrasing open to multiple outcomes. Unlike scientific claims, predictions evade ongoing falsification but depend on interpretive chains, with classical (exegeses) like Al-Tabari's (d. 923 CE) treating them as morale-boosters rather than empirical proofs. Overall, while proponents view these as cumulative evidence transcending 7th-century cognition, skeptics attribute alignments to , astute observation, or selective emphasis, urging first-principles assessment over apologetic aggregation.

Scholarly Literature and Analysis

Classical Texts and Authors

The doctrine of i'jaz received systematic treatment in classical Arabic rhetorical and theological works starting from the 3rd century AH, as scholars responded to theological debates and the need to articulate the Quran's linguistic superiority. Early contributions built on the Quran's self-challenge (taḥaddī) verses, such as Quran 2:23 and 17:88, which invite imitation to prove its divine origin. These texts primarily focused on balāghah (rhetoric), nazm (concise arrangement), and the Quran's unparalleled eloquence beyond human capacity. Amr ibn Bahr al-Jahiz (d. 255 AH/869 CE) discussed i'jaz in Ḥujaj al-Nubuwwah, framing the Quran as a proof of prophethood through its rhetorical impact on Arab linguists. Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari (d. 310 AH/923 CE) addressed inimitability in his Tafsir, interpreting taḥaddī passages as evidence of the Quran's structural perfection unattainable by poets or soothsayers. Muhammad al-Wasiti (d. 306 AH/918 CE) authored Kitāb Iʿjāz al-Qurʾān fī Naẓmihi wa-Taʾlīfihi, pioneering analysis of the Quran's metrical composition and thematic cohesion as inimitable features. In the 4th century AH, ʿAli ibn ʿIsa al-Rummani (d. 384 AH/994 CE) composed al-Nukat fī Iʿjāz al-Qurʾān, detailing rhetorical devices like iqtibās (allusion) and the Quran's precision in expression that defied emulation by pre-Islamic eloquence masters. Hamd ibn Muhammad al-Khattabi (d. 388 AH/998 CE) expanded on this in Bayān Iʿjāz al-Qurʾān, incorporating emotional resonance and auditory superiority, arguing that the Quran's rhythm evoked unparalleled conviction among listeners. Abu Bakr al-Baqillani (d. 403 AH/1013 CE), an Ashʿarite theologian, systematized the field in Kitāb Iʿjāz al-Qurʾān, integrating kalām (theology) with poetics to assert that the Quran's brevity, clarity, and predictive elements exceeded human linguistic norms, influencing subsequent Ashʿarite thought. Abd al-Qahir al-Jurjani (d. 471 AH/1078 CE) marked a pinnacle with Dalāʾil al-Iʿjāz fī al-Qurʾān, a cornerstone of that dissected and maʿnā (meaning) interrelations, positing the Quran's miracle in its innovative fusion of semantics and syntax, unmatched by any or . His companion work, Asrār al-Balāghah, further elaborated on these principles, establishing frameworks for later balāghah studies. These texts collectively shifted i'jaz from anecdotal proofs to rigorous analytical paradigms, though their arguments rested on subjective aesthetic judgments prevalent in medieval .

Modern and Contemporary Works

In the twentieth century, scholarly attention to i'jaz increasingly incorporated interpretations linking Quranic content to modern scientific discoveries, a development termed i'jaz 'ilmi (scientific inimitability). This approach gained prominence through works like Maurice Bucaille's The Bible, the and Science (1976), which posits that the contains accurate descriptions of , cosmology, and other phenomena predating scientific confirmation, contrasting it with perceived biblical inconsistencies. Bucaille, a French , argued these alignments demonstrate divine origin, influencing subsequent apologetic literature despite criticisms of selective interpretation. Twentieth-century Egyptian scholar Muhammad Mitwalli ash-Sha'rawi extended i'jaz discussions in The Miracles of the Qur'an, originally delivered as lectures in the and later translated, emphasizing both linguistic and predictive elements, such as references to natural phenomena interpretable through contemporary knowledge. Sha'rawi maintained that the Quran's challenge to produce a comparable remains unmet, attributing this to its multifaceted superiority in , knowledge, and legislative precision. In the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, renewed focus on classical balaghah (rhetoric) emerged alongside scientific claims. Mustafa Sadiq al-Rafi'i's The Miracle of the Qur'an and the Prophetic Eloquence (1930s, with modern editions) analyzes the Quran's stylistic uniqueness, such as its rhythmic harmony and semantic depth, as inimitable even by pre-Islamic poets. Contemporary extensions include Hamza Tzortzis's The Eternal Challenge: A Journey Through the Miraculous Qur'an (2011), which employs linguistic analysis to argue the text's inimitability in structure, imagery, and audience impact, drawing on to counter secular dismissals. Recent academic studies have scrutinized i'jaz methodologies. A 2021 paper on "Quranic Inimitability in Quranic " examines variant readings () as evidence of preserved textual integrity and rhetorical flexibility, positing their harmonious integration defies human replication. Similarly, a 2024 analysis in Agatheos evaluates testimonial arguments for inimitability, applying to historical and contemporary claims of unmatched , while noting evidential challenges in subjective aesthetic judgments. These works reflect a blend of traditional and empirical approaches, often prioritizing linguistic expertise amid broader debates on verifiability. Yaqeen Institute publications, such as the 2020 essay "Introduction to I'jāz al-Qur'ān," synthesize linguistic, historical, and prophethood-related arguments, asserting the Quran's challenge has withstood imitation attempts across eras. A 2022 Sapience Institute study dissects the shortest (Al-Kawthar) to illustrate phonetic, semantic, and structural miracles, claiming its conciseness amplifies rhetorical power beyond prosaic or poetic norms. Such contemporary efforts often engage digital tools for pattern analysis, though they coexist with scholarly caution regarding overreliance on post-hoc correlations.

Methodological Approaches in Studies

Classical studies of i'jaz predominantly utilized rhetorical and linguistic methodologies rooted in balaghah (Arabic eloquence), emphasizing the Quran's unique (textual arrangement), semantic precision, and stylistic superiority over pre-Islamic poetry and prose. Scholars like (d. 1078 CE) applied detailed exegetical analysis in works such as Dala'il al-I'jaz, dissecting verses for their inimitable fusion of form and meaning, often through comparative evaluation against human compositions to highlight unattainable coherence and impact. This approach relied on subjective aesthetic judgment by Arabic linguists, presupposing the Quran's challenge (tahaddi) as empirically unmet, though modern critiques note its circularity in assuming divine origin without independent verification. In contrast, modern affirmative studies diversify methodologies to include interdisciplinary elements, such as statistical enumeration for numerical patterns (e.g., word repetitions aligning with natural phenomena) and hermeneutical alignment of verses with post-7th-century scientific discoveries, as seen in analyses claiming embryological or cosmological foreknowledge. These often employ descriptive-qualitative document analysis, cross-referencing Quranic text with empirical data, but face scrutiny for , where interpretations retrofit ambiguous verses to fit contemporary knowledge rather than predicting it prospectively. Phonetic and prosodic examinations, drawing from sound systems, further probe rhythmic and auditory effects on listeners, using qualitative assessment of impacts. Critical and secular scholarship adopts empirical and epistemological frameworks, such as to evaluate testimonial consensus among early Arabs on the Quran's eloquence, weighing it against potential cultural conditioning or lack of surviving counterexamples. Literary-critical methods involve comparative stylometrics and imitation simulations, testing reproducibility of structures like ring composition or semantic density, often concluding that claims of inimitability reflect subjective cultural valuation rather than objective , given the absence of falsifiable criteria. Analytical tracking of grammatical anomalies or rhetorical devices persists across paradigms, but rigorous studies prioritize inter-subjective verification over faith-based assertion, highlighting how institutional biases in Islamic academia may undervalue disconfirming evidence.

Attempts at Imitation and Responses

Historical Imitators and Challenges

One of the earliest documented attempts to imitate the Quran's style occurred amid the following Muhammad's death in 632 CE, when several claimants to prophethood produced texts mimicking its rhymed prose (saj') and revelatory form. ibn Habib of the tribe in Yamama composed short fragments, such as one praising natural elements in a manner echoing Quranic oaths, but these were derided by contemporaries for lacking depth and coherence. His efforts accompanied a political that mobilized up to 40,000 followers before defeat by ibn al-Walid's forces under Caliph , resulting in Musaylima's death in the Battle of Yamama. Concurrent challengers included bint al-Harith, a Christian convert from the tribe, who around 631 CE issued prophecies in Quranic-like diction to rally tribes in northern Arabia; her movement briefly allied with Musaylima's but dissolved after her submission to Muslim authorities. , operating in circa 630 CE, similarly claimed revelation and produced imitative utterances while seizing control of Sana'a, only to be assassinated within months, ending his brief . These early efforts, rooted in tribal power struggles, were uniformly suppressed militarily and dismissed in Islamic sources as inferior in linguistic precision and thematic unity to the . In the Abbasid era, Ibn al-Muqaffa' (d. circa 756 CE), a Persian convert and litterateur known for translating pre-Islamic texts, faced accusations of attempting Quranic as part of broader critiques of Arab-centric traditions. Accounts claim he began rendering surahs like Al-Rahman but abandoned the project, unable to replicate its rhythmic and semantic balance, leading to his execution amid suspicions of heresy. Such sporadic trials underscore the Quran's explicit challenge (e.g., in Surah 2:23) to produce a comparable chapter, yet no pre-modern achieved enduring literary or communal traction, as evidenced by their confinement to polemical histories rather than independent scriptural traditions.

Evaluation of Imitation Efforts

Historical attempts to imitate the , such as those attributed to ibn Habib in the CE, were contemporaneously dismissed by poets and linguists for employing crude, repetitive rhymes lacking the Quran's rhythmic precision, semantic depth, and structural cohesion. These evaluations, recorded in early Islamic histories, emphasize that Musaylima's verses failed to evoke the transformative awe reported among Quran reciters, underscoring a perceived gap in rhetorical mastery (balagha) that defied replication by pre-Islamic literary standards. Modern imitation efforts, including "" published in 1999 by , aim to mirror Quranic form—such as divisions, oaths, and imperative addresses—while embedding , yet systematic analyses reveal shortcomings in (textual arrangement), lexical innovation, and auditory harmony when benchmarked against . Arabic scholars applying methodologies from al-Jurjani's 11th-century framework critique such works for artificiality and doctrinal inconsistencies that disrupt the seamless unity (wahda) characteristic of Quranic discourse, preventing equivalent persuasive or mnemonic efficacy. Scholarly assessments of these efforts diverge along interpretive lines: proponents of i'jaz maintain that no has achieved the Quran's multifaceted inaccessibility, evidenced by the absence of rival texts gaining enduring linguistic or cultural parity in literary traditions. Critics, however, contend that inimitability hinges on subjective aesthetic judgments rather than falsifiable criteria, noting that imitations like those in al-Ma'arri's 11th-century Fusul or modern multilingual adaptations engage Quranic without necessitating divine origin, thus framing i'jaz as a hermeneutic construct open to literary replication. Empirical evaluations remain constrained by the challenge's vagueness, with no consensus metric—beyond anecdotal expert —for deeming an effort successful, perpetuating debate over whether failures reflect inherent uniqueness or evaluator bias.

Criticisms and Contrary Perspectives

Internal Muslim Debates and Skepticism

The doctrine of i'jāz has elicited debates among Muslim theologians regarding whether the Quran's inimitability resides intrinsically in its linguistic and substantive qualities or extrinsically through divine intervention known as ṣarfa, whereby God averts human capacity to emulate it. Early rationalist schools, including certain Mu'tazilites like al-Nazzām (d. 231/846), endorsed ṣarfa to explain the failure of challengers despite presumed Arab eloquence, positing that inimitability stems from God's deflection rather than the text's form alone. This view emerged in the second century AH amid efforts to establish prophetic proof beyond immediate textual analysis. Prominent Mu'tazilite scholar ʿAbd al-Jabbār (d. 415/1025) critiqued ṣarfa as deficient, arguing it erroneously attributes the miracle to an external act, thereby diminishing the Quran's self-evident superiority in , rational coherence, legislative comprehensiveness, and alignment with observable reality. He insisted that ' inability to match even short surahs demonstrates inherent textual excellence, not mere prohibition, and cited Quranic verses like 17:88 to underscore universal challenge without reliance on divine withholding. Similarly, some Hanafi jurists, following Abū Ḥanīfa (d. 150/767), prioritized meaning and content over precise composition (naẓm), permitting non-Arabic recitations in prayer and viewing linguistic form as mutable rather than eternally inimitable. Shiʿi theologians like Sharīf al-Murtaḍā (d. 436/1044) defended ṣarfa, contending God removes either the motivation, knowledge, or precise emulation capacity, allowing that the Quran's eloquence could theoretically be rivaled absent intervention. This position sparked rejoinders from figures like ʿAbd al-Jabbār, who deemed it incompatible with the Quran's explicit linguistic challenge (e.g., 2:23), favoring intrinsic proofs observable to contemporaries. extended to outright rejections, as with Abū Mūsā ʿĪsā ibn Ṣubayḥ al-Murdār, who denied as inimitable, asserting humans could produce superior , and Muʿammar ibn ʿAbbād (d. 209/824), who treated inimitability as an incidental attribute rather than divine intent. These classical contentions persisted, influencing Ashʿarī and Māturīdī syntheses that emphasized linguistic i'jāz while incorporating rational validation, though without resolving extrinsic theories entirely. In later periods, juristic allowances for translation and abridgment reflected ongoing wariness of over-relying on form, prioritizing doctrinal essence. Modern Muslim discourse has scrutinized extensions like scientific i'jāz, with some scholars critiquing it for anachronistic impositions absent in early exegeses, potentially undermining core linguistic claims if empirically contested, though affirming traditional inimitability.

External Secular and Non-Muslim Critiques

Secular scholars have contested the of i'jāz by emphasizing the subjective nature of literary judgments and the absence of empirically verifiable criteria for inimitability. They argue that claims of unparalleled rely on culturally conditioned aesthetic preferences among speakers predisposed to view the text as divine, rendering the Qur'an's challenge to produce a comparable inherently unfalsifiable, as rejections of imitations often stem from theological rather than objective linguistic . Linguists and orientalists, including Theodor Nöldeke in his 1860 Geschichte des Qorāns, have highlighted stylistic features such as monotonous rhyme schemes, occasional forced assonances, and syntactically ambiguous constructions—such as sentences beginning with suspended "when" clauses—that disrupt rhythmic flow and clarity, qualities not indicative of superhuman composition but reflective of 7th-century oral traditions. Nöldeke acknowledged the text's rhetorical power in exhortation and narrative but attributed it to Muhammad's personal genius within the conventions of pre-Islamic sajʿ (rhymed prose) and poetry, comparable to works by poets like Imru' al-Qays whose eloquence rivaled or exceeded the Qur'an in concision and imagery. Devin J. Stewart, a specialist in literature, further undermines uniqueness claims by tracing Qur'anic sajʿ to established pre-Islamic genres, noting that early Muslim exegetes initially denied its presence in the Qur'an to bolster inimitability arguments, yet textual evidence reveals heavy reliance on rhymed, rhythmic patterns common in soothsayers' orations and tribal speeches. Stewart's analysis in the Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān illustrates how these elements, far from innovative, evolved from existing Arabian verbal arts, with the Qur'an adapting rather than transcending them, as evidenced by parallels in structure and diction to non-Qur'anic sources. Critiques extend to broader i'jāz assertions, including purported scientific prescience, which secular analysts dismiss as retroactive interpretations imposing modern knowledge on ambiguous verses; for instance, embryological descriptions echo Hellenistic sources like (2nd century CE) rather than anticipating empirical discoveries, with terms like muḍgha (chewed lump) aligning with observable stages but lacking predictive specificity. Prophetic elements are similarly viewed as vague or post-hoc fulfillments, not causal demonstrations of foreknowledge, as historical contingencies could align with multiple outcomes without divine intervention. Non-Muslim textual critics, examining variant readings from manuscripts like those in Sana'a (dated to the 7th-8th centuries), point to orthographic and substantive discrepancies that challenge claims of flawless, inimitable preservation integral to i'jāz. In sum, these perspectives frame i'jāz as a theological construct unsubstantiated by or , where the Qur'an emerges as an adept synthesis of contemporary cultural motifs—effective for its audience but replicable by skilled rhetoricians under similar conditions—rather than an empirically transcendent artifact.

Empirical and Verifiable Challenges

Critics have scrutinized purported scientific foreknowledge in the , arguing that verses claimed as miraculous align with pre-Islamic misconceptions rather than empirical modern . For instance, the embryological progression in Quran 23:12-14, describing the formation of bones followed by flesh enveloping them, mirrors the second-century CE errors of , who asserted skeletal primacy over musculature, whereas establishes concurrent differentiation from mesodermal somites, with cartilage precursors ossifying alongside muscle fibers as early as the sixth week of . Similarly, cosmological depictions, such as the heavens and earth initially joined then separated (Quran 21:30), are interpreted by proponents as anticipating the , but scholarly analysis identifies this as echoing Aristotelian and Babylonian cosmogonies prevalent in the , lacking specificity on expansion or quantum origins verifiable only post-20th century. Historical narratives in the face verifiable discrepancies with archaeological and textual evidence from . The threat of by against ' followers (Quran 20:71, 26:49) constitutes an , as no Egyptian records from the New Kingdom (c. 1550–1070 BCE) document ; this punishment emerged with Achaemenid circa 522 BCE and was systematized under and Romans, while Egyptian sanctions for sorcery involved live burial, , or drowning, as detailed in tomb inscriptions and papyri like the Harris Papyrus. The identification of as 's and builder of the tower (Quran 28:6, 40:36) conflates a Persian-era figure from the ( BCE) with Egyptian administration, absent from Ramesside hieroglyphs or , suggesting synthesis from disparate late antique traditions rather than precise historiography. Linguistic inimitability, central to classical I'jaz, encounters analytical challenges from early Islamic rationalists who conceded its subjectivity, positing instead the doctrine of ṣarfa—divine withholding of human capability—as the barrier to , implying intrinsic replicability absent supernatural restraint. Mu'tazilite thinkers like al-Naẓẓām argued humans could compose equivalent without such intervention, while Sharīf al-Murtaḍā critiqued (balāgha) as perceptual rather than objective proof, evidenced by failed historical imitations dismissed theologically rather than linguistically. This shift, documented in 10th–11th century kalām texts, relocates outside empirical textual analysis, undermining verifiable superiority claims against pre-Islamic saj' or later masterpieces. Modern linguistic metrics, such as rhyme density and syntactic novelty, further indicate the Quran's style as an of Hijazi oral traditions, quantifiable via corpus analysis but not uniquely inimitable.

Reception and Broader Implications

Theological Role in Islam

In Islamic theology, i'jaz denotes the Quran's inimitability, serving as the principal evidentiary miracle (mu'jizah) attesting to its divine authorship and Muhammad's prophetic mission. This doctrine posits that the Quran's unparalleled linguistic precision, rhetorical mastery, and substantive profundity defy replication by humans or jinn, as explicitly challenged in verses such as Quran 2:23 ("And if you are in doubt about what We have sent down upon Our Servant [Muhammad], then produce a surah the like thereof") and 17:88 ("Say, 'If mankind and the jinn gathered in order to produce the like of this Quran, they could not produce the like of it, even if they were to each other assistants'"). The absence of successful imitation throughout history reinforces this as an enduring proof, distinguishing it from the transient miracles of preceding prophets, which were context-bound and required direct witness. Theological centrality of i'jaz lies in its role validating the as the uncreated speech of (kalam Allah), integral to core creedal tenets including (divine unity) and the finality of Muhammad's prophethood. Classical scholars like (d. 403 AH/1013 CE) systematized i'jaz by enumerating aspects such as the Quran's concise yet comprehensive style (iqtisab) and its transformative impact on Arabian literary norms, arguing these transcend human capability, especially from an illiterate in 7th-century . This framework counters skepticism by framing the not merely as but as self-authenticating , accessible for perpetual verification independent of time or place. Furthermore, i'jaz undergirds Islamic (da'wah) by emphasizing empirical engagement: believers and skeptics alike are invited to assess the text's superiority, with its unchallenged status affirming divine intervention. In Sunni and Shia traditions alike, this obviates the need for additional prophetic signs post-revelation, as the Quran's perpetuity ensures ongoing substantiation of . The doctrine thus occupies a foundational position, intertwining linguistic miracle with metaphysical certainty in God's sole capacity for such creation.

Sociological and Cultural Impact

The doctrine of i'jaz, positing the Quran's linguistic and stylistic inimitability, has profoundly shaped literary traditions by establishing the text as an unparalleled exemplar of , influencing subsequent , , and criticism. Medieval scholars like (d. 1078 CE) developed theories of balagha ( ) centered on Quranic structures, analyzing (word arrangement) and ma'na (meaning) to demonstrate its superiority over pre-Islamic , which thereby elevated religious above secular forms. This framework discouraged direct emulation in creative works, as attempts to match its brevity, rhythm, and semantic depth were viewed as futile, potentially limiting innovation in prose and verse while fostering specialized fields like Quranic () and stylistics.%20-%20108%20pdf.pdf) Culturally, i'jaz underpins practices such as tajwid (precise recitation) and calligraphy, which permeate Islamic art and public life, from mosque decorations to annual competitions drawing participants from over 70 countries, as seen in events like the Dubai International Holy Quran Award established in 1998, reinforcing aesthetic reverence for the text. Belief in its miraculous nature has preserved Classical Arabic as a liturgical language across diverse Muslim societies, countering linguistic fragmentation and promoting cultural continuity amid modernization. Sociologically, i'jaz sustains communal solidarity by framing the as a divine challenge unmet by human rivals, embedding it in systems where (hifz) is prioritized; for instance, in and , millions of students engage in Quranic schools annually, correlating with higher literacy rates among observant Muslims compared to non-religious peers. This fosters social hierarchies valuing hafiz (memorizers) and influences gender roles, with women increasingly participating in circles, though traditional interpretations limit interpretive authority. Modern extensions, including claims of scientific prescience within i'jaz, have gained traction in popular media since the 1970s, boosting among communities but drawing critique for prioritizing over empirical rigor, as noted in analyses of its "high sociological importance" despite methodological weaknesses. Overall, the doctrine reinforces , mitigating secular influences while occasionally constraining literary pluralism.

References

  1. https://yaqeeninstitute.org/read/paper/introduction-to-ijaz-al-quran-the-miraculous-nature-of-the-quran
  2. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d7c/941bdeb8ea23e703f794fd3d5240d352ad0b.pdf
  3. https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/mashadiruna/article/download/25240/pdf
  4. https://al-islam.org/al-bayan-fi-tafsir-al-quran-prolegomena-quran-sayyid-abu-al-qasim-al-khoei/1-inimitability-quran
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383554831_I%27jaz_Al-Quran_in_Linguistic_Perspective_and_it%27s_Impact_on_The_Readers
  6. https://thequranblog.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/ijaz-al-quran.pdf
  7. https://journals.asianindexing.com/article.php?id=1682060030498_145
  8. https://www.islamic-awareness.org/quran/miracle/ijaz1.html
  9. https://www.sapienceinstitute.org/produce-one-chapter-like-it/
  10. https://islamic-awareness.org/quran/miracle/ijaz1.html
  11. https://www.islamreligion.com/en/articles/345/an-unmet-challenge
  12. https://yaqeeninstitute.org/read/paper/the-inimitable-quran-the-revelation-to-prophet-muhammad
  13. https://repository.digital.georgetown.edu/downloads/e071f039-610a-4ad8-8662-d8edbb8210a3
  14. https://jirs.uoh.edu.pk/index.php/JIRS/article/download/331/155/1620
  15. https://wardahbooks.com/products/three-treatises-on-the-ijaz-of-the-quran
  16. https://oaji.net/pdf.html?n=2016/488-1482494802.pdf
  17. https://icn.com/en-jo/product/dalail-al-ijaz-by-abd-al-qahir-al-jurjani-published-by-dar-al-kitab-al-arabi-12117gZlod
  18. https://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=7&verse=157
  19. https://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=29&verse=48
  20. https://sunnah.com/bukhari:3055
  21. https://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=2&verse=23
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358910160_Pragmatic_Thinking_in_the_Book_of_Dalail_Al-I%27jaz_Abdul_Qahir_Al-Jurjani
  23. https://ijll.thebrpi.org/journals/ijll/Vol_5_No_2_December_2017/5.pdf
  24. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/islage-21/125970506
  25. https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijps/article/download/3291/3043/4731
  26. https://iasj.rdd.edu.iq/journals/uploads/2025/06/30/754ef506289bcd9917d34ca5c5a30d77.pdf
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358231719_Rhetoric_in_Islamic_Tradition_Paradigm_and_Its_Development
  28. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020902094
  29. https://www.academia.edu/129687822/Exploring_Stylistic_Problems_in_Translating_the_Style_of_the_Quranic_Emphasis_on_the_Meaning_of_At_Tawkid_Al_Manawi_to_English
  30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40059365
  31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389483530_The_Origins_Theories_and_Linguistic_Development_of_the_Qur%27an
  32. https://kalamullah.com/structure-quran.html
  33. https://bloggingtheology.net/2015/12/03/structure-and-quranic-interpretation-a-study-of-symmetry-and-coherence-in-islams-holy-text-by-prof-raymond-farrin/
  34. https://www.hamzatzortzis.com/the-qurans-unique-literary-form/
  35. https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/JAT/article/download/10636/9167/30237
  36. https://al-allamah.istiqlal.or.id/index.php/pkumi/article/download/28/13/149
  37. https://suheillaher.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/balaghahistorylaher4.pdf
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353290626_Al-Nazm_Stylistic_Discourse_in_I%27jaz_al-Qur%27an_Based_on_Al-Jurjani%27s_Perspective_Analysis_of_Arabic_Literature_Criticism_on_the_Qur%27an_Studies
  39. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/news-wires-white-papers-and-books/abd-al-qahir-al-jurjani
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359553548_The_Development_of_Balaghah_Studies_During_The_Dynamic_of_Studies_A_Historical_Glimpse_into_The_Theory_of_Arabic_Literature_mnhjyt_w_aldrasat_alblaghyt_fy_mrhlt_alazdhar_lmht_tarykhyt_fy_nzryt_aladb_a
  41. https://scj.sbu.ac.ir/article_104910.html
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387794650_The_Miracle_of_Number_19_According_To_The_Rashad_Khalifa_An_Analytical_Study_For_Surah_Al-Mudatsir_Verse_30
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383517808_An_Analysis_of_Repetition_Style_in_the_Qur%27an_According_to_Al-Tabari%27s_Commentary
  44. http://qurananalysis.com/analysis/word-frequency.php?lang=EN
  45. http://muslim-lion.blogspot.com/2021/04/mathematical-patterns-in-quran.html?m=1
  46. https://www.academia.edu/45602793/A_Mathematical_Phenomenon_in_the_Quran_of_Earth_Shattering_Proportions_A_Quranic_Theory_Based_on_Gematria_Determining_Quran_Primary_Statistics_words_verses_chapters_and_Revealing_its_Fascinating_Connection_with_the_Golden_Ratio
  47. https://islamqa.info/en/answers/69741
  48. https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125986626.pdf
  49. https://icn.com/en-jo/product/an-exploration-of-the-profound-scientific-miracles-and-foreknowledge-within-the-holy-quran-12117CYofJ
  50. https://www.hamzatzortzis.com/does-the-quran-contain-scientific-miracles-a-new-approach/
  51. https://jirs.uoh.edu.pk/index.php/JIRS/article/download/331/155
  52. https://traversingtradition.com/2018/04/09/deconstructing-the-scientific-miracles-in-the-quran-argument/
  53. https://quranica.com/articles/quranic-prophecies/
  54. https://www2.arpel.org/virtual-library/u2B278/243205/UnchallengeableMiraclesOfTheQuran.pdf
  55. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02164638/document
  56. https://hedayatcentre.org/3403/the-miracle-of-the-quran/
  57. https://books.google.com/books/about/I_jaz_al_Quran.html?id=6T5vzwEACAAJ
  58. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.31826/9781463234898-012/pdf
  59. https://www.kalamullah.com/miracles-of-the-quran.html
  60. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-miracle-of-the-quran-and-the-prophetic-eloquence-mustafa-sadiq-al-rafii/1146772203
  61. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3736675
  62. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/files/778822421/Kojonen_Testimony_Qur_an_Agatheos_v3.pdf
  63. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/129327
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394957055_The_Miracle_of_the_Holy_Qur_an_and_the_Phonetic_Studies_Among_the_Arabs_A_Study_of_Influence_and_Being_Influenced
  65. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34388/chapter/291611517
  66. https://hrmars.com/papers_submitted/11137/linguistic-miracles-in-the-noble-quran.pdf
  67. https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.13169/reorient.9.1.0050
  68. http://www.najarzadegan.ir/files/METHODOLOGYOFASSESSING.pdf
  69. https://ucalgary.scholaris.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/e7173162-83b5-4217-b7d8-879ff72506fe/content
  70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20836964
  71. https://www.zygonjournal.org/article/id/14283/
  72. https://theologyweb.com/campus/forum/world-religions/islam/1280838-against-the-claim-of-the-inimitability-of-the-qur-an
  73. https://www.reddit.com/r/CritiqueIslam/comments/kbx1ut/the_faulty_claim_of_the_qurans_inimitable/
  74. https://www.answering-islam.org/Books/Noeldeke/quran.htm
  75. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25728224
  76. https://academic.oup.com/book/5204/chapter/147857318
  77. https://3lotus.com/en/Islam/Quran-Not-a-Miracle.htm
  78. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367525011_The_Aesthetical_Reception_of_the_Quran_according_to_Theodore_Noldeke
  79. https://www.zygonjournal.org/article/id/14373/
  80. https://www.academia.edu/130074987/The_Historical_Accuracy_of_The_Qur_an_In_Its_Depiction_of_Ancient_Egypt
  81. https://mquran.org/content/view/9220/12
  82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366952289_Linguistic_Analysis_the_distinctiveness_Text_of_the_Qur%27an
  83. https://www.kalamullah.com/quran00.html
  84. https://al-islam.org/history-muslim-philosophy-volume-2-book-5/chapter-52-arabic-literature-theories-literary-criticism
  85. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/world-literature-i/ijaz-al-quran
  86. https://www.zygonjournal.org/article/13956/galley/28289/download/
  87. https://www.zygonjournal.org/article/id/13956/
  88. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01261.x
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.