Hubbry Logo
Inkjet printingInkjet printingMain
Open search
Inkjet printing
Community hub
Inkjet printing
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Inkjet printing
Inkjet printing
from Wikipedia

A typical inkjet printer

Inkjet printing is a type of computer printing that recreates a digital image by propelling droplets of ink onto paper and plastic substrates.[1] Inkjet printers were the most commonly used type of printer in 2008,[2][needs update] and range from small inexpensive consumer models to expensive professional machines. By 2019, laser printers outsold inkjet printers by nearly a 2:1 ratio, 9.6% vs 5.1% of all computer peripherals.[3]

The concept of inkjet printing originated in the 20th century, and the technology was first extensively developed in the early 1950s. While working at Canon in Japan, Ichiro Endo suggested the idea for a "bubble jet" printer, while around the same time Jon Vaught at Hewlett-Packard (HP) was developing a similar idea.[4] In the late 1970s, inkjet printers that could reproduce digital images generated by computers were developed, mainly by Epson, HP and Canon. In the worldwide consumer market, four manufacturers account for the majority of inkjet printer sales: Canon, HP, Epson and Brother.[5]

In 1982, Robert Howard came up with the idea to produce a small color printing system that used piezos to spit drops of ink. He formed the company, R.H. (Robert Howard) Research (named Howtek, Inc. in Feb 1984), and developed the revolutionary technology that led to the Pixelmaster color printer with solid ink[6] using Thermojet technology. This technology consists of a tubular single nozzle acoustical wave drop generator invented originally by Steven Zoltan in 1972 with a glass nozzle and improved by the Howtek inkjet engineer in 1984 with a Tefzel molded nozzle to remove unwanted fluid frequencies.

The emerging ink jet material deposition market also uses inkjet technologies, typically printheads using piezoelectric crystals, to deposit materials directly on substrates.

The technology has been extended and the 'ink' can now also comprise solder paste in PCB assembly, or living cells,[7] for creating biosensors and for tissue engineering.[8]

Images produced on inkjet printers are sometimes sold under trade names such as Digigraph, Iris prints, giclée, and Cromalin.[9] Inkjet-printed fine art reproductions are commonly sold under such trade names to imply a higher-quality product and avoid association with everyday printing.

Methods

[edit]

Fluid surface tension naturally pulls a stream into droplets. Optimal drop sizes of 0.004 inches (0.10 mm) require an inkjet nozzle size of about 0.003 inches (0.076 mm). Fluids with surface tension may be water based, wax or oil based and even melted metal alloys. Most drops can be electrically charged. There are two main technologies in use in contemporary inkjet printers: continuous (CIJ) and drop-on-demand (DOD). Continuous inkjet means the flow is pressurized and in a continuous stream. Drop-on-demand means the fluid is expelled from the jet nozzle one drop at a time. This can be done with a mechanical means with a push or some electrical method. A large electrical charge can pull drops out of a nozzle, sound waves can push fluid from a nozzle or a chamber volume expansion can expel a drop. Continuous streaming was investigated first many years ago. Drop-on-demand was only discovered in the 1920s.[citation needed]

Continuous inkjet

[edit]
Schematic diagram of a continuous inkjet printing process

The continuous inkjet (CIJ) method is used commercially for marking and coding of products and packages with best-by dates, lot and batch codes, and other product information. In 1867, Lord Kelvin patented the syphon recorder, which recorded telegraph signals as a continuous trace on paper using an ink jet nozzle deflected by a magnetic coil. The first commercial devices (medical strip chart recorders) were introduced in 1951 by Siemens.[10] using the patent US2566443 invented by Rune Elmqvist dated September 4, 1951.

In CIJ technology, a high-pressure pump directs liquid ink from a reservoir through a gunbody and a microscopic nozzle (usually .003 inch diameter), creating a continuous stream of ink droplets via the Plateau-Rayleigh instability. A piezoelectric crystal may be used to create an acoustic wave as it vibrates within the gunbody and causes the stream of liquid to break into droplets at regular intervals: 64,000 to 165,000 irregular-sized ink droplets per second may be achieved.[11] The ink droplets are subjected to an electrostatic field created by a charging electrode or by a magnetic flux field as they form; the field varies according to the degree of drop deflection desired. This results in a controlled deflection by electrostatic charge on each droplet. Charged droplets may be separated by one or more uncharged "guard droplets" to minimize electrostatic repulsion between neighboring droplets.

The droplets pass through another electrostatic or magnetic field and are directed (deflected) by electrostatic deflection plates or flux field to print on the receptor material (substrate), or allowed to continue on deflected to a collection gutter for re-use. The more highly charged droplets are deflected to a greater degree. Only a small fraction of the droplets is used to print, the majority being recycled.

CIJ is one of the oldest (1951) ink jet technologies in use and is fairly mature.[citation needed] Drop-on-demand was not invented until later.[citation needed] The major advantages of CIJ are the very high velocity (≈20 m/s) of the ink droplets, which allows for a relatively long distance between print head and substrate, and the very high drop ejection frequency, allowing for very high speed printing. Another advantage is freedom from nozzle clogging as the jet is always in use, therefore allowing volatile solvents such as ketones and alcohols to be employed, giving the ink the ability to "bite" into the substrate and dry quickly.[11] The ink system requires active solvent regulation to counter solvent evaporation during the time of flight (time between nozzle ejection and gutter recycling), and from the venting process whereby air that is drawn into the gutter along with the unused drops is vented from the reservoir. Viscosity is monitored and a solvent (or solvent blend) is added to counteract solvent loss.

In the later 1950s, heated wax inks became popular with CIJ technologies. In 1971, Johannes F. Gottwald patent US3596285A, Liquid Metal Recorder used molten metal ink with a magnetic flux field to fabricate formed symbols for signage. This may have been the first 3D metal object printed using magnetic core memory as data to produce each symbol.

Drop-on-demand

[edit]
Piezoelectric (left) and thermal (right) drop generation schematic. A print head will contain several such nozzles, and will be moved across the page as paper advances through the printer.
A Canon inkjet with CMYK cartridges
Piezoelectric printing nozzle of an EPSON C20 printer
Howtek style inkjet nozzle (tubular piezo not shown)

There are many ways to produce a drop-on-demand (DOD) inkjet. Common methods include thermal DOD and piezoelectric DOD to speed up the frequency of drops.[12] DOD may use a single nozzle or thousands of nozzles.[13] One DOD process uses software that directs the heads to apply between zero and eight droplets of ink per dot, only where needed.[citation needed] Inkjet fluid materials have expanded to include pastes, epoxies, hot-melt inks, biological fluids, etc. DOD is very popular and has an interesting history. Mechanical DOD came first, followed by electrical methods including piezoelectric devices and then thermal or heat expansion methods.

Thermal DOD printing
Most consumer inkjet printers, including those from Canon (FINE Cartridge system, see photo), Hewlett-Packard, and Lexmark, use the thermal inkjet process.[14] The idea of using thermal excitation to move tiny drops of ink was developed independently by two groups at roughly the same time: John Vaught and a team at Hewlett-Packard's Corvallis Division, and Canon engineer Ichiro Endo. Initially, in 1977, Endo's team was trying to use the piezoelectric effect to move ink out of the nozzle but noticed that ink shot out of a syringe when it was accidentally heated with a soldering iron. Vaught's work started in late 1978 with a project to develop fast, low-cost printing. The team at HP found that thin-film resistors could produce enough heat to fire an ink droplet. Two years later the HP and Canon teams found out about each other's work.[15][16]
Thermal inkjet
In the thermal inkjet process, the print cartridges consist of a series of tiny chambers, each containing a heater, all of which are constructed by photolithography. To eject a droplet from each chamber, a pulse of current is passed through the heating element causing a rapid vaporization of the ink in the chamber and forming a bubble,[17] which causes a large pressure increase, propelling a droplet of ink onto the paper (hence Canon's trade name of Bubble Jet). Early thermal heads ran at just 600–700 dpi[14] but improvements by HP increased the firing range of 8–12 kHz per chamber and as high as 18 kHz with 5-picoliter drop volume by the year 2000. Thermal printheads do not have the power of piezo DOD or continuous inkjet, so the gap between the face of the head and paper is critical. The ink's surface tension, as well as the condensation and resultant contraction of the vapor bubble, pulls a further charge of ink into the chamber through a narrow channel attached to an ink reservoir. The inks involved are usually water-based and use either pigments or dyes as the colorant. The inks must have a volatile component to form the vapor bubble; otherwise droplet ejection cannot occur. As no special materials are required, the print head is generally cheaper to produce than in other inkjet technologies.
Piezoelectric DOD printing
Piezos are electrically polarized ceramic devices, just as a magnet is polarized. Most commercial and industrial inkjet printers and some consumer printers (those produced by Epson (see photo) and Brother Industries) use a piezoelectric material in an ink-filled chamber behind each nozzle instead of a heating element. When a voltage is applied, the piezoelectric material changes shape, generating a pressure pulse in the fluid, which pushes a droplet of ink from the nozzle. Single nozzle tubular inkjets actually are fluid resonator chambers and the drops are expelled by sound waves in the ink chamber. The 1972 patent called them squeeze tube inkjets but later it was discovered to be acoustical inkjets. Piezoelectric (also called piezo) inkjet allows a wider variety of inks than thermal inkjet as there is no requirement for a volatile component, and no issue with kogation (buildup of ink residue), but the print heads are more expensive to manufacture due to the use of piezoelectric material (usually PZT, lead zirconium titanate). However, the ink cartridges can be separate from the head itself and individually be replaced as needed. Piezo, then has the potential for lower running costs. Piezo heads are said to achieve firing rates that are faster than thermal heads at comparable drop volumes.[14]
Piezo inkjet
Piezo inkjet technology is often used on production lines to mark products. For instance, the "use-before" date is often applied to products with this technique; in this application the head is stationary and the product moves past. This application requires a relatively large gap between the print head and the substrate, but also yields a high speed, a long service life, and low operating cost.
Thermoplastic/3D printing
In the 1970s, the first DOD inks were water-based and higher-temperature use was not recommended. In the late 1970s, wax- and oil-based inks were used in the Silonics in 1975, Siemens PT-80i in 1977 and Epson and Exxon in 1980s DOD inkjets.[14] In 1984, a small company, Howtek, Inc.,[6] found that solid ink[14] materials (thermoplastics) could be jetted at 125 °C (257 °F) by maintaining the piezo poling charge while printing. In 1986, Howtek launched the Pixelmaster solid ink-jetting printer, which opened the door to printing three-dimensional plastic inks and led to a 1992 3D patent, US5136515A. This patent was licensed by the first three major 3D printer companies (Sanders Prototype, Inc, Stratasys and 3D Systems).
Braillemaster
In the late 1980s, Howtek introduced the Braillemaster, a printer that used four layers of solid ink per character to create documents in Braille that could be read by people who were blind.
Howtek
Solidscape, Inc., currently uses the Howtek-style thermoplastic materials and Howtek-style single nozzle inkjets (see illustration) very successfully. Ballistic Particle Manufacturing also used the Howtek style materials and inkjets.[18] These inkjets can produce up to 16,000 drops per second and shoot drops at 9 feet per second. Originally designed to only print on standard letter-sized paper sheets they now can print 3D models requiring hundreds of layers.
Thermojet
The thermoplastic inks in piezoelectric inkjets (called Thermojet technology by Howtek) are sometimes confused with the thermal (heat expansion) bubble-jet technology but they are completely different. Bubble jet inks are not solid at room temp and are not heated. Thermojet inks require 125 °C to reduce fluid viscosity in jetting range. Howtek was the first to introduce an inkjet color printer using thermoplastic inks[14] in 1984 at Comdex, Las Vegas.

Ink formulations

[edit]

The earliest reference to a continuous inkjet ink (CIJ) in the 1971 patent US3596285A states " The preferred ink is characterized by viscosity and surface tension characteristics such that the liquid will be maintained over span under the force with which it is moving in bridge or stream. Implicit in such requirement is that the pressure applied to the ink in formation of said stream is sufficient to form a jet and to impart enough energy to carry the jet as a continuous liquid mass notwithstanding the defective forces which are or may be applied. Furthermore, the color of the ink and the color of the carrier should be such that good optical contrast is formed there between the following printing. The preferred ink is a "hot-melt ink". That is to say it will assume a solid phase at the temperature of the carrier and liquid phase at some higher temperature. The range of commercially available ink compositions which could meet the requirement of the invention are not known at the present time. However, satisfactory printing according to the invention has been achieved with a conductive metal alloy as ink. It is extremely hard at room temperature and adheres well to the surface of the carrier.

The basic problem with inkjet inks is the conflicting requirements for a coloring agent that will stay on the surface versus rapid bleed through the carrier fluid.[11]

Desktop inkjet printers, as used in offices and homes, tend to use aqueous ink[11] based on a mixture of water, glycol and dyes or pigments. These inks are inexpensive to manufacture but difficult to control on the surface of media, often requiring specially coated media. HP inks contain sulfonated polyazo black dye (commonly used for dyeing leather), nitrates and other compounds.[11] Aqueous inks are mainly used in printers with thermal inkjet heads, as these heads require water to perform the ink-expelling function.

While aqueous inks often provide the broadest color gamut and most vivid color, most are not waterproof without specialized coating or lamination after printing. Most dye-based inks, while usually the least expensive, are subject to rapid fading when exposed to light or ozone. Pigment-based aqueous inks are typically more costly but provide much better long-term durability and ultraviolet resistance. Inks marketed as "archival quality" are usually pigment-based.

Some professional wide format printers use aqueous inks, but the majority in professional use today employ a much wider range of inks, most of which require piezo inkjet heads and extensive maintenance.

Solvent inks
The main ingredient of these inks are volatile organic compounds (VOCs), organic chemical compounds that have high vapor pressures. Color is achieved with pigments rather than dyes for excellent fade-resistance. The chief advantage of solvent inks is that they are comparatively inexpensive and enable printing on flexible, uncoated vinyl substrates, which are used to produce vehicle graphics, billboards, banners and adhesive decals. Disadvantages include the vapor produced by the solvent and the need to dispose of used solvent. Unlike most aqueous inks, prints made using solvent-based inks are generally waterproof and ultraviolet-resistant (for outdoor use) without special over-coatings.[11] The high print speed of many solvent printers demands special drying equipment, usually a combination of heaters and blowers. The substrate is usually heated immediately before and after the print heads apply ink. Solvent inks are divided into two sub-categories: hard solvent ink offers the greatest durability without specialized over-coatings but requires specialized ventilation of the printing area to avoid exposure to hazardous fumes, while mild or "eco" solvent inks, while still not as safe as aqueous inks, are intended for use in enclosed spaces without specialized ventilation of the printing area. Mild solvent inks have rapidly gained popularity in recent years as their color quality and durability have increased while ink cost has dropped significantly.
UV-curable inks
These inks consist mainly of acrylic monomers with an initiator package. After printing, the ink is cured by exposure to strong UV light. Ink is exposed to UV radiation where a chemical reaction takes place where the photo-initiators cause the ink components to cross-link into a solid. Typically a shuttered mercury-vapor lamp or UV LED is used for the curing process. Curing processes with high power for short periods of times (microseconds) allow curing inks on thermally sensitive substrates. UV inks do not evaporate, but rather cure or set as a result from this chemical reaction. No material is evaporated or removed, which means about 100% of the delivered volume is used to provide coloration. This reaction happens very quickly, which leads to instant drying that results in a completely cured graphic in a matter of seconds. This also allows for a very fast print process. As a result of this instant chemical reaction no solvents penetrate the substrate once it comes off the printer, which allows for high quality prints.[19][20] The advantage of UV-curable inks is that they "dry" as soon as they are cured, they can be applied to a wide range of uncoated substrates, and they produce a very robust image. Disadvantages are that they are expensive, require expensive curing modules in the printer, and the cured ink has a significant volume and so gives a slight relief on the surface. Though improvements are being made in the technology, UV-curable inks, because of their volume, are somewhat susceptible to cracking if applied to a flexible substrate. As such, they are often used in large "flatbed" printers, which print directly to rigid substrates such as plastic, wood or aluminium where flexibility is not a concern.
Dye sublimation inks
These inks contain special sublimation dyes and are used to print directly or indirectly on to fabrics which consist of a high percentage of polyester fibers. A heating step causes the dyes to sublimate into the fibers and create an image with strong color and good durability.
Solid ink
These inks consist mainly of waxy compounds which are heated past their melting point to enable printing, and which harden upon hitting the cooled substrate. Hot-melt inks[11] are typically used for masking processes and are found in graphic printing.[6][21] The earliest hot-melt ink was patented in 1971 by Johannes F Gottwald, US3596285A, Liquid Metal Recorder was intended for printing. The patent states "As used herein the term "printing" is not intended in a limited sense but includes writing or other symbol or pattern formulation with an ink. The term ink as used is intended to include not only dye or pigment-containing materials, but any flowable substance or composition suited for application to surface for forming symbols, characters or patterns of intelligence by marking. The materials employed in such process can be salvaged for reuse. Another object of the invention is to increase the size of characters.....in terms of material requirements for such large and continuous displays".

Printing heads

[edit]
Inkjet heads: disposable head (left) and fixed head (right) with ink cartridge (middle)

There are two main design philosophies in inkjet head design: fixed-head and disposable head. Each has its own strengths and weaknesses.

Fixed head

[edit]

The fixed-head philosophy provides an inbuilt print head (often referred to as a gaiter-head) that is designed to last for the life of the printer. The idea is that because the head need not be replaced every time the ink runs out, consumable costs can be made lower and the head itself can be more precise than a cheap disposable one, typically requiring no calibration. On the other hand, if a fixed head is damaged, obtaining a replacement head can become expensive, if removing and replacing the head is even possible. If the printer's head cannot be removed, the printer itself will then need to be replaced.

Fixed head designs are available in consumer products, but are more likely to be found on industrial high-end printers and large format printers. In the consumer space, fixed-head printers are manufactured primarily by Epson and Canon; however, many more recent Hewlett-Packard models use a fixed head, such as the Officejet Pro 8620 and HP's Pagewide series.[22]

Disposable head

[edit]

The disposable head philosophy uses a print head which is supplied as a part of a replaceable ink cartridge. Every time a cartridge is exhausted, the entire cartridge and print head are replaced with a new one. This adds to the cost of consumables and makes it more difficult to manufacture a high-precision head at a reasonable cost, but also means that a damaged or clogged print head is only a minor problem: the user can simply buy a new cartridge. Hewlett-Packard has traditionally favored the disposable print head, as did Canon in its early models. This type of construction can also be seen as an effort by printer manufacturers to stem third party ink cartridge assembly replacements, as these would-be suppliers do not have the ability to manufacture specialized print heads.

An intermediate method does exist: a disposable ink tank connected to a disposable head, which is replaced infrequently (perhaps every tenth ink tank or so). Most high-volume Hewlett-Packard inkjet printers use this setup, with the disposable print heads used on lower volume models. A similar approach is used by Kodak, where the printhead intended for permanent use is nevertheless inexpensive and can be replaced by the user. Canon now uses (in most models) replaceable print heads which are designed to last the life of the printer, but can be replaced by the user should they become clogged.

Cleaning mechanisms

[edit]
Video: covering the printhead nozzles with a rubber cap

The primary cause of inkjet printing problems is ink drying on the printhead's nozzles, causing the pigments and dyes to dry out and form a solid block of hardened mass that plugs the microscopic ink passageways. Most printers attempt to prevent this drying from occurring by covering the printhead nozzles with a rubber cap when the printer is not in use. Abrupt power losses, or unplugging the printer before it has capped the printhead, can cause the printhead to be left in an uncapped state. Even when the head is capped, this seal is not perfect, and over a period of several weeks the moisture (or other solvent) can still seep out, causing the ink to dry and harden. Once ink begins to collect and harden, the drop volume can be affected, drop trajectory can change, or the nozzle can completely fail to jet ink.

To combat this drying, nearly all inkjet printers include a mechanism to reapply moisture to the printhead. Typically there is no separate supply of pure ink-free solvent available to do this job, and so instead the ink itself is used to remoisten the printhead. The printer attempts to fire all nozzles at once, and as the ink sprays out, some of it wicks across the printhead to the dry channels and partially softens the hardened ink. After spraying, a rubber wiper blade is swept across the printhead to spread the moisture evenly across the printhead, and all jets are again fired to dislodge any ink clumps blocking the channels.

Some printers use a supplemental air-suction pump, using the rubber capping station to suck ink through a severely clogged cartridge. The suction pump mechanism is frequently driven by the page feed stepper motor: it is connected to the end of the shaft. The pump only engages when the shaft turns backwards, hence the rollers reversing while head cleaning. Due to the built-in head design, the suction pump is also needed to prime the ink channels inside a new printer, and to reprime the channels between ink tank changes.

Professional solvent- and UV-curable ink wide-format inkjet printers generally include a "manual clean" mode that allows the operator to manually clean the print heads and capping mechanism and to replace the wiper blades and other parts used in the automated cleaning processes. The volume of ink used in these printers often leads to "overspray" and therefore buildup of dried ink in many places that automated processes are not capable of cleaning.

Epson Maintenance box full of used ink

The ink consumed in the cleaning process needs to be collected to prevent ink from leaking in the printer. The collection area is called the spittoon, and in Hewlett-Packard printers this is an open plastic tray underneath the cleaning/wiping station. In Epson printers, there is typically a large absorption pad in a pan underneath the paper feed platen. For printers that are several years old, it is common for the dried ink in the spittoon to form a pile that can stack up and touch the printheads, jamming the printer. Some larger professional printers using solvent inks may employ a replaceable plastic receptacle to contain waste ink and solvent, which must be emptied or replaced when full.

Labyrinth air vent tubes on the top of an Epson Stylus Photo 5-color ink tank. The long air channels are molded into the top of the tank and the blue label seals the channels into long tubes. The yellow label is removed prior to installation, and opens the tube ends to the atmosphere so that ink can be sprayed onto the paper. Removing the blue label would destroy the tubes and cause the moisture to quickly evaporate.

There is a second type of ink drying that most printers are unable to prevent. For ink to spray from the cartridge, air must enter to displace the removed ink. The air enters via an extremely long, thin labyrinth tube, up to 10 cm (3.9 in) long, wrapping back and forth across the ink tank. The channel is long and narrow to reduce moisture evaporation through the vent tube, but some evaporation still occurs and eventually the ink cartridge dries up from the inside out. To combat this problem, which is especially acute with professional fast-drying solvent inks, many wide-format printer cartridge designs contain the ink in an airtight, collapsible bag that requires no vent. The bag merely shrinks until the cartridge is empty.

The frequent cleaning conducted by some printers can consume quite a bit of ink and has a great impact on cost-per-page determinations.

Clogged nozzles can be detected by printing a standard test pattern on the page. Some software workaround methods are known for rerouting printing information from a clogged nozzle to a working nozzle.[citation needed]

Ink delivery developments

[edit]

Ink cartridges have been the traditional method for delivering ink to the printhead. Continuous ink system (CISS) inkjet printers connect the printhead either to high-capacity ink tanks or packs, or replenish the built-in cartridges via external tanks connected via tubes, typically a retrofit configuration. Supertank printers–a subset of CISS printers–have high-capacity integrated ink tanks or ink packs, and are manually refilled via ink bottles. When supertank ink systems are paired with disposable printhead technology, replaceable cartridges are used to replace the exhausted print heads.

Advantages

[edit]

Compared to earlier consumer-oriented color printers, inkjet printers have a number of advantages. They are quieter in operation than impact dot matrix or daisywheel printers. They can print finer, smoother details through higher resolution. Consumer inkjet printers with photographic print quality are widely available.

In comparison to technologies like thermal wax, dye sublimation, and laser printing, inkjets have the advantage of practically no warm up time, and often lower cost per page. However, low-cost laser printers can have lower per-page costs, at least for black-and-white printing, and possibly for color.

For some inkjet printers, monochrome ink sets are available either from the printer manufacturer or from third-party suppliers. These allow the inkjet printer to compete with the silver-based photographic papers traditionally used in black-and-white photography, and provide the same range of tones: neutral, "warm" or "cold". When switching between full-color and monochrome ink sets, it is necessary to flush out the old ink from the print head with a cleaning cartridge. Special software or at least a modified device driver are usually required, to deal with the different color mapping.

Some types of industrial inkjet printers are now capable of printing at very high speeds, in wide formats, or for a variety of industrial applications ranging from signage, textiles, optical media,[23] ceramics and 3-D printing into biomedical applications and conductive circuitry. Leading companies and innovators in hardware include HP, Epson, Canon, Konica Minolta, Fujifilm, EFi, Durst, Brother, Roland DG, Mimaki, Mutoh and many others worldwide.

Disadvantages

[edit]

Many "intelligent" ink cartridges contain a microchip that communicates the estimated ink level to the printer; this may cause the printer to display an error message, or incorrectly inform the user that the ink cartridge is empty. In some cases, these messages can be ignored, but some inkjet printers will refuse to print with a cartridge that declares itself empty, to prevent consumers from refilling cartridges. For example, Epson embeds a chip which prevents printing when the chip claims the cartridge is empty, although a researcher who over-rode the system found that in one case he could print up to 38% more good quality pages, even though the chip stated that the cartridge was empty.[24] Third-party ink suppliers sell ink cartridges at significant discounts (at least 10–30% off OEM cartridge prices, sometimes up to 95%, typically averaging around 50%),[citation needed] and also bulk ink and cartridge self-refill kits at even lower prices. Many vendors' "intelligent" ink cartridges have been reverse-engineered. It is now possible to buy inexpensive devices to reliably reset such cartridges to report themselves as full, so that they may be refilled many times.

The very narrow inkjet nozzles are prone to clogging. The ink consumed in cleaning them—either during cleaning invoked by the user, or in many cases, performed automatically by the printer on a routine schedule—can account for a significant proportion of the ink used in the machine. Inkjet printing head nozzles can be cleaned using specialized solvents, or by soaking in warm distilled water for short periods of time (for water-soluble inks.)

The high cost of OEM ink cartridges and the intentional obstacles to refilling them have been addressed by the growth of third-party ink suppliers. Many printer manufacturers discourage customers from using third-party inks, stating that they can damage the print heads due to not being the same formulation as the OEM inks, cause leaks, and produce inferior-quality output (e.g., of incorrect color gamut). Consumer Reports has noted that some third-party cartridges may contain less ink than OEM cartridges, and thus yield no cost savings,[25] while Wilhelm Imaging Research claims that with third-party inks the lifetime of prints may be considerably reduced.[26] However, an April 2007 review showed that, in a double-blind test, reviewers generally preferred the output produced using third-party ink over OEM ink. In general, OEM inks have undergone significant system reliability testing with the cartridge and print-head materials, whereas R&D efforts on third-party ink material compatibility are likely to be significantly less. Some inkjet manufacturers have tried to prevent cartridges being refilled using various schemes including fitting chips to the cartridges that log how much the cartridge has printed and prevent the operation of a refilled cartridge.

The warranty on a printer may not apply if the printer is damaged by the use of non-approved supplies. In the US the Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act is a federal law which states that warrantors cannot require that only brand name parts and supplies be used with their products, as some printer manufacturers imply. However, this would not apply if non-approved items cause damage.

Durability

[edit]

Inkjet documents can have poor to excellent archival durability, depending on the quality of the inks and paper used.[27] If low-quality paper is used, it can yellow and degrade due to residual acid in the untreated pulp; in the worst case, old prints can literally crumble into small particles when handled. High-quality inkjet prints on acid-free paper can last as long as typewritten or handwritten documents on the same paper.

Because the ink used in many low-cost consumer inkjets is water-soluble, care must be taken with inkjet-printed documents to avoid even the smallest drop of moisture, which can cause severe "blurring" or "running".[citation needed] In extreme cases, even sweaty fingertips during hot humid weather could cause low-quality inks to smear. Similarly, water-based highlighter markers can blur inkjet-printed documents and discolor the highlighter's tip. The lifetime of inkjet prints produced using aqueous inks is generally shorter (although UV-resistant inks are available) than those produced with solvent-based inkjets; however, so-called "archival inks" have been produced for use in aqueous-based machines which offer extended life.

In addition to smearing, gradual fading of many inks can be a problem over time. Print lifetime is highly dependent on the quality and formulation of the ink. The earliest inkjet printers, intended for home and small office applications, used dye-based inks. Even the best dye-based inks are not as durable as pigment-based inks, which are now available for many inkjet printers. Many inkjet printers now utilize pigment based inks which are highly water resistant: at least the black ink is often pigment-based. Resin or silicone protected photopaper is widely available at low cost, introducing complete water and mechanical rub resistance for dye and pigment inks. The photopaper itself must be designed for pigment or for dye inks, as pigment particles are too large to be able to penetrate through dye-only photopaper protection layer.

The highest-quality inkjet prints are often called "giclée" prints, to distinguish them from less-durable and lower-cost prints. However, the use of the term is no guarantee of quality, and the inks and paper used must be carefully investigated before an archivist can rely on their long-term durability.

To increase the durability of inkjet printer prints, more attention is needed for the inkjet ink cartridge. One way to treat ink cartridges on an inkjet printer is to maintain the temperature of the printer itself. Excessive variation in space temperature is very bad for printer ink cartridges. The user should prevent the printer becoming too hot or too chilly as the cartridges can dry up. For lasting printer efficiency, the user should ensure the area has a regular and steady temperature level.[citation needed]

Operating cost tradeoffs

[edit]

Inkjets use solvent-based inks which have much shorter expiration dates compared to laser toner, which has an indefinite shelf life. Inkjet printers tend to clog if not used regularly, whereas laser printers are much more tolerant of intermittent use.[citation needed] Inkjet printers require periodical head cleaning, which consumes a considerable amount of ink, and will drive printing costs higher especially if the printer is unused for long periods.

If an inkjet head becomes clogged, third-party ink solvents/head cleaners and replacement heads are available in some cases. The cost of such items may be less expensive compared to a transfer unit for a laser printer, but the laser printer unit has a much longer lifetime between required maintenance. Many inkjet printer models now have permanently installed heads, which cannot be economically replaced if they become irreversibly clogged, resulting in scrapping of the entire printer. On the other hand, inkjet printer designs which use a disposable printhead usually cost significantly more per page than printers using permanent heads.[citation needed] By contrast, laser printers do not have printheads to clog or replace frequently, and usually can produce many more pages between maintenance intervals.

Inkjet printers have traditionally produced better quality output than color laser printers when printing photographic material. Both technologies have improved dramatically over time, although the highest-quality giclée prints favored by artists use what is essentially a high-quality specialized type of inkjet printer.

Business model

[edit]
Ink cartridges
Microchips from Epson ink cartridges. These are tiny printed circuit boards; a deposit of black epoxy covers the chip itself.

A common business model for inkjet printers involves selling the actual printer at or below production cost, while dramatically marking up the price of the (proprietary) ink cartridges (a profit model called the "razor and blades model"). Most current inkjet printers attempt to enforce this product tying by anticompetitive measures such as microchips in the cartridges to hinder the use of third-party or refilled ink cartridges. The microchips monitor usage and report the ink remaining to the printer. Some manufacturers also impose "expiration dates". When the chip reports that the cartridge is empty (or out of date) the printer stops printing. Even if the cartridge is refilled, the microchip will indicate to the printer that the cartridge is depleted. For many models (especially from Canon), the 'empty' status can be overridden by entering a 'service code' (or sometimes simply by pressing the 'start' button again). For some printers, special circuit "flashers" are available that reset the quantity of remaining ink to the maximum.[28][29]

Some manufacturers, most notably Epson and Hewlett-Packard, have been accused of indicating that a cartridge is depleted while a substantial amount of ink remains.[30][31] A 2007 study found that most printers waste a significant quantity of ink when they declare a cartridge to be empty. Single-ink cartridges were found to have on average 20% of their ink remaining, though actual figures range from 9% to 64% of the cartridge's total ink capacity, depending on the brand and model of printer.[32] This problem is further compounded with the use of one-piece multi-ink cartridges, which are declared empty as soon as one color runs low. Of great annoyance to many users are those printers that will refuse to print documents requiring only black ink, just because one or more of the color ink cartridges is depleted.

In recent years, many consumers have begun to challenge the business practices of printer manufacturers, such as charging up to US$8,000 per gallon (US$2,100 per liter) for printer ink. Alternatives for consumers are cheaper copies of cartridges, produced by third parties, and the refilling of cartridges, using refill kits. Due to the large differences in price caused by OEM markups, there are many companies selling third-party ink cartridges. Most printer manufacturers discourage refilling disposable cartridges or using aftermarket copy cartridges, and say that use of incorrect inks may cause poor image quality due to differences in viscosity, which can affect the amount of ink ejected in a drop, and color consistency, and can damage the printhead. Nonetheless, the use of alternative cartridges and inks has been gaining in popularity, threatening the business model of printer manufacturers. Printer companies such as HP, Lexmark, and Epson have used patents and the DMCA to launch lawsuits against third-party vendors.[33][34] An anti-trust class-action lawsuit was launched in the US against HP and office supply chain Staples, alleging that HP paid Staples $100 million to keep inexpensive third-party ink cartridges off the shelves.[35]

In Lexmark Int'l v. Static Control Components, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that circumvention of this technique does not violate the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.[36] The European Commission also ruled this practice anticompetitive: it will disappear in newer models sold in the European Union.[37] Patents protecting the structure of their cartridges prevent the sale of cheaper copies of the cartridges. For some printer models (notably those from Canon), the manufacturer's own microchip can be removed and fitted to a compatible cartridge thereby avoiding the need to replicate the microchip (and risk prosecution). Other manufacturers embed their microchips deep within the cartridge in an effort to prevent this approach.

In 2007, Eastman Kodak entered the inkjet market with its own line of All-In-One printers based on a marketing model that differed from the prevailing practice of selling the printer at a loss while making large profits on replacement ink cartridges. Kodak claimed that consumers could save up to 50 percent on printing by using its lower-cost cartridges filled with the company's proprietary pigmented colorants while avoiding the potential problems associated with off-brand inks.[38] This strategy proved unsuccessful, and Kodak exited the consumer inkjet printer business in 2012.

A more recent development is the supertank printer, which uses an integrated continuous ink system. Supertank printers are defined by their large, permanently installed ink tanks which are filled from ink bottles. The printer itself is typically sold at a substantial premium, but ink bottles are inexpensive and contain enough ink to print thousands of pages. Supertank printers generally ship with full bottles of ink in the box, allowing up to two years of printing before the tanks needs to be refilled. Epson pioneered this technology by launching the EcoTank range, first in Indonesia in 2010,[39] with a North American launch in 2015.[40] The supertank concept proved commercially successful,[39] and Canon and HP launched their own lines of supertank printers, under the names MegaTank (Canon)[41] and Smart Tank (HP).

Region-coding of printers and ink cartridges

[edit]

Many manufacturers give their printers and cartridges region codes, comparable to those of DVDs, so customers cannot import them from a cheaper region. The region code can be changed a few times by the customer or the customer-service department of the manufacturer, but then, the printer is region-locked like a RPC-2 DVD drive.

One method to bypass printer-region-coding is to store empty cartridges from the old region and refill them with ink from the new region, but, as mentioned above, many modern ink cartridges have chips and sensors to prevent refilling, which makes the process more difficult. On the Internet, there are refill instructions for different printer models available. Another method is to have ink cartridges from the old region shipped to the new region.

Some manufacturers of region-coded printers also offer region-free printers specially designed for travelers.

Printer types

[edit]

Professional models

[edit]

In addition to the widely used small inkjet printers for home and office, there are professional inkjet printers, some for "page-width" format printing and many for wide format printing. Page-width format means that the print width ranges from about 8.5–37 in (22–94 cm). "Wide format" means print width ranging from 24" up to 15' (about 60 cm to 5m). The most common application of page-width printers is in printing high-volume business communications that do not need high-quality layout and color. Particularly with the addition of variable data technologies, the page-width printers are important in billing, tagging, and individualized catalogs and newspapers. The application of most wide format printers is in printing advertising graphics; a lower-volume application is printing of design documents by architects or engineers. But nowadays, there are inkjet printers for digital textile printing up to 64" wide with good high definition image of 1440×720 dpi.[42]

Another specialty application for inkjets is producing prepress color proofs for printing jobs created digitally. Such printers are designed to give accurate color rendition of how the final image will look (a "proof") when the job is finally produced on a large volume press such as a four-color offset lithography press. An example is an Iris printer, whose output is what the French term giclée was coined for.

The largest-volume supplier is Hewlett-Packard, which supplies over 90 percent of the market for printers for printing technical drawings. The major products in their Designjet series are the Designjet 500/800, the Designjet T Printer series (including the T1100 and T610), the Designjet 1050 and the Designjet 4000/4500. They also have the HP Designjet 5500, a six-color printer that is used especially for printing graphics as well as the new Designjet Z6100 which sits at the top of the HP Designjet range and features an eight color pigment ink system.

Epson, Kodak, and Canon also manufacture wide-format printers, sold in much smaller numbers than standard printers. Epson has a group of three Japanese companies around it that predominantly use Epson piezo printheads and inks: Mimaki, Roland, and Mutoh.

Scitex Digital Printing developed high-speed, variable-data, inkjet printers for production printing, but sold its profitable assets associated with the technology to Kodak in 2005 who now market the printers as Kodak Versamark VJ1000, VT3000, and VX5000 printing systems. These roll-fed printers can print at up to 305m per minute.

Professional high-volume inkjet printers are made by a range of companies. These printers can range in price from US$35,000 to $2 million. Carriage widths on these units can range from 54" to 192" (about 1.4 to 5 m), and ink technologies have tended toward solvent, eco-solvent, and UV-curing with a more recent focus toward water-based (aqueous) ink sets. Major applications where these printers are used are for outdoor settings for billboards, truck sides and truck curtains, building graphics and banners, while indoor displays include point-of-sales displays, backlit displays, exhibition graphics, and museum graphics.

The major suppliers for professional high-volume, wide- and grand-format printers include: EFI,[43] LexJet, Grapo, Inca, Durst, Océ, NUR (now part of Hewlett-Packard), Lüscher, VUTEk, Scitex Vision (now part of Hewlett-Packard), Mutoh, Mimaki, Roland DG, Seiko I Infotech, IQDEMY, Leggett and Platt, Agfa, Raster Printers, DGI and MacDermid ColorSpan (now part of Hewlett-Packard), swissqprint, SPGPrints (formerly Stork Prints), MS Printing Systems and Digital Media Warehouse.

SOHO multifunction inkjet photo printers

[edit]

SOHO multifunction inkjet printers for photo printing use up to 6 different inks:

  • Canon: cyan, yellow, magenta, black, pigment black, gray. 1 pl thermal.[44]
  • Epson: cyan, yellow, magenta, light cyan, light magenta, black. 1.5 pl piezo variable. Also with A3 paper printing,[45] or FAX and duplex ADF.[46]

Professional inkjet photo printers

[edit]

Inkjet printers for professional photo printing use up to twelve different inks:

  • Canon: photo magenta, photo cyan, yellow, magenta, cyan, red, photo black, matte black, grey, plus either blue, photo gray, and one chroma optimiser for black density and uniform glossiness,[47] or light gray, dark gray and one chroma optimiser,[48] or green, blue, and photo gray.[49] 4 pl thermal.
  • Epson (10 colors from 12): vivid magenta, yellow, cyan, orange, green, vivid light magenta, light cyan, light black, matte black or photo black, plus an irreversible choice of either light light gray or violet (V not for photo).[50] 3.5 pl piezo variable.
  • HP: magenta, yellow, red, green, blue, light magenta, light cyan, gray, light gray, matte black, photo black, and one gloss enhancer.[citation needed] 4 pl thermal.

They can print an image of 36 megapixels on A3 borderless photo paper with 444 ppi.[51]

Compact photo printers

[edit]

A compact photo printer is a stand-alone inkjet printer designed to produce 4×6 or 2×3 inch prints from digital cameras. It works without the use of a computer. It is also known as a portable photo printer or a snapshot printer. Compact photo printers came on the market shortly after the popularity of home photo printing took off in the early 2000s. They were designed as an alternative to developing photos or printing them on a standard inkjet photo printer.

The majority of compact photo printers can only print 4 in × 6 in (100 mm × 150 mm) pictures. Given this limitation, they are not meant to replace standard inkjets. Many manufacturers advertise the cost per page of photos printed on their machines; this theoretically convinces people that they can print their own pictures just as cheaply as retail stores or through online printing services. Most compact photo printers share a similar design. They are small units, usually with large LCDs in order to allow people to browse and edit their photos, as can be done on a computer. The editing options are usually somewhat advanced, allowing the user to crop photos, remove red eye, adjust color settings as well as other functions. Compact photo printers typically feature a large number of connection options, including USB and most memory card formats.

Compact photo printers are currently manufactured by most of the leading printer manufacturers such as Epson, Canon, HP, Lexmark and Kodak. While they have increased in popularity in recent years, they still make up a relatively small share of the inkjet printer market. LG's Pocket Photo uses Zink thermal paper which has chemistries embedded on each inkless photo paper and the image will appear with the heat.[52]

Other uses

[edit]

U.S. Patent 6,319,530 describes a "Method of photocopying an image onto an edible web for decorating iced baked goods". In other words, this invention enables one to inkjet print a food-grade color photograph on a birthday cake's surface. Many bakeries now carry these types of decorations, which are printable using edible inks and dedicated inkjet printers.[citation needed] Edible ink printing can be done using normal home use inkjet printers like Canon Bubble Jet printers with edible ink cartridges installed, and using rice paper or frosting sheets.[citation needed]

Inkjet printers and similar technologies are used in the production of many microscopic items. See Microelectromechanical systems.

Inkjet printers are used to form conductive traces for circuits, and color filters in LCD and plasma displays.

Inkjet printers, especially models produced by Dimatix (now part of Fujifilm), Xennia Technology and Pixdro, are in fairly common use in many labs around the world for developing alternative deposition methods that reduce consumption of expensive, rare, or problematic materials. These printers have been used in the printing of polymer, macromolecular, quantum dot, metallic nanoparticles, and carbon nanotubes. The applications of such printing methods include organic thin-film transistors, organic light emitting diodes, organic solar cells, and sensors.[53][54]

Inkjet technology is used in the emerging field of bioprinting. They are also used for the production of OLED displays.[55]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Inkjet printing is a non-contact technology that ejects controlled droplets of liquid ink from microscopic nozzles onto a substrate, such as , , or fabric, to form precise patterns, text, or images through the controlled deposition and drying of these droplets. The process relies on the physics of , where ink , , and ejection velocity determine drop formation and placement accuracy, enabling resolutions up to thousands of . The foundational principles of inkjet printing trace back to 1948, when Swedish inventor Rune Elmqvist patented a continuous inkjet system for chart recording using a pressurized ink stream broken into droplets via vibration. Practical development accelerated in the 1960s with continuous inkjet (CIJ) techniques employing electrostatic deflection for non-printing drops, while drop-on-demand (DOD) methods emerged in the 1970s, including thermal inkjet—which vaporizes ink via heat to create ejection pressure—and piezoelectric inkjet, which uses mechanical deformation of crystals to squeeze ink from chambers. Commercialization in the 1980s by Hewlett-Packard (thermal), Epson (piezoelectric), and Canon propelled widespread adoption, transforming inkjet from laboratory curiosity to ubiquitous desktop and industrial tool. Inkjet printing's defining advantages include its digital nature, eliminating the need for printing plates and enabling , cost-effectiveness for short runs, and versatility across substrates and inks, from aqueous to UV-curable formulations. Applications span consumer document and photo printing, industrial coding and marking, textile dyeing, electronics fabrication via conductive inks, and even pharmaceutical personalization, though challenges like ink clogging and high consumable costs persist in high-volume use. These attributes have democratized high-quality color reproduction, with global shipments exceeding hundreds of millions of units annually by the , underscoring its causal role in shifting printing from analog to on-demand paradigms.

History

Early Concepts and Inventions (1950s-1970s)

The concept of inkjet printing emerged in the early with the development of continuous inkjet systems for recording devices. In 1951, Swedish inventor patented a that utilized a continuous of droplets propelled from a onto , employing electrostatic forces for basic control; this Siemens-licensed device marked an initial application of ink ejection principles, though limited to simple line tracing rather than image reproduction. Advancements in continuous inkjet (CIJ) technology occurred in the , driven by research at . In 1963, Richard G. Sweet developed the first functional CIJ system, which generated uniform ink droplets from a pressurized by applying pressure waves at the Rayleigh breakup frequency, followed by electrostatic charging and deflection to direct drops onto a substrate while deflecting non-printing drops to a catcher. Sweet, collaborating with John Cumming, patented a multi- array design in 1965 that used magnetostrictive actuation for droplet modulation, enabling higher resolution alphanumeric printing; this laid the groundwork for industrial CIJ printers like the A.B. Dick VideoJet introduced in 1968. Drop-on-demand (DOD) inkjet concepts, which eject only when needed to conserve material and simplify operation, gained traction in the amid efforts to overcome CIJ's ink waste and complexity. developed and commercialized an early piezoelectric DOD printer by the late 1970s, using mechanical deformation of a to force through nozzles on demand. Independently, Canon engineers advanced thermal DOD (later termed bubblejet) in 1977, heating to create vapor bubbles that expand and expel droplets, as prototyped in their experimental systems. pursued thermal inkjet for low-power calculator printers during the decade, focusing on resistor-based heating elements to achieve reliable ejection without continuous flow. These DOD innovations prioritized efficiency and addressed CIJ limitations like in catchers, setting the stage for consumer viability despite initial challenges in nozzle clogging and ink stability.

Commercial Emergence (1980s-1990s)

The commercialization of inkjet printing accelerated in the mid-1980s as manufacturers introduced affordable desktop models leveraging and piezoelectric technologies, targeting users seeking quieter alternatives to dot-matrix printers. Hewlett-Packard's ThinkJet (model 2225), launched in 1984, marked the debut of a mass-produced inkjet printer for and home use, featuring a compact design and print speeds of approximately 150 characters per second in draft mode. This model relied on ink vaporization to eject droplets, enabling non-contact printing without mechanical impact, which reduced noise and maintenance needs relative to impact-based systems. Canon followed in 1985 with the BJ-80, the first printer employing its proprietary Bubble Jet technology—a variant of thermal inkjet that used precisely controlled heating elements to form and expel ink bubbles for consistent droplet formation. entered the market the same year with the SQ-2000 (IP-130K in ), pioneering piezoelectric inkjet heads that deformed crystals via electrical pulses to generate pressure for ink ejection, offering advantages in durability and handling diverse ink viscosities. These early devices, priced around $500–$1,000, initially focused on black-and-white text but demonstrated viability for graphical output, spurring competition amid rising personal computing adoption. By the late 1980s, refinements enabled color capabilities and higher resolutions, with Hewlett-Packard's DeskJet series in 1988 introducing laser-comparable black-text quality at lower costs, further eroding demand for impact printers. The saw exponential market growth, as inkjet systems integrated into multifunction devices for faxing and copying, while advancements in nozzle density and ink formulations improved permanence and speed, making them the dominant household printing technology by decade's end. Annual shipments surged from thousands in the mid-1980s to millions by the mid-, driven by dropping prices and compatibility with graphical user interfaces like Windows.

Technological Maturation and Expansion (2000s-2010s)

During the 2000s, inkjet printing matured through refinements in drop-on-demand mechanisms, enabling resolutions up to 1440 dpi and print speeds exceeding those of early models, driven by advancements in thermal and piezoelectric printhead designs from manufacturers like HP, Canon, and . These improvements stemmed from smaller droplet sizes—often below 5 picoliters—and better precision, reducing artifacts like banding and enhancing color for photographic output. Pigment-based inks gained prominence over dyes, offering fade resistance up to 200 years on archival media when paired with specialized coatings, as demonstrated in 's UltraChrome systems introduced around 2000. HP's 2008 introduction of latex ink technology marked a pivotal shift, utilizing water-based polymers that cure via heat for durable, odorless prints on uncoated substrates, expanding viability for indoor signage and vehicle wraps without solvents' environmental drawbacks. This innovation facilitated wider adoption in large-format applications, where inkjet displaced pen-plotters by delivering sharper lines and faster throughput, with printers achieving up to 50 square meters per hour. Concurrently, UV-curable inks emerged for rigid media, enabling instant-drying prints resistant to abrasion, further bridging consumer and professional divides. In the , industrial expansion accelerated as single-pass inkjet systems proliferated, particularly in ceramics and textiles, where digitalization reduced setup times compared to and enabled variable data at volumes rivaling offset lithography. Production inkjet presses, such as those from and HP, scaled to web speeds of 150 meters per minute with 600 dpi resolution, capturing over 50% of digital print volume by mid-decade through efficiencies in short runs. Printhead reliability improved via self-diagnostic piezo actuators, minimizing downtime, while -substrate interactions advanced to handle non-porous surfaces, fostering applications in and prototyping. By 2019, inkjet's in commercial printing neared parity with electrophotography, propelled by these scalable, low-waste processes.

Operating Principles

Continuous Inkjet

Continuous (CIJ) printing involves the ejection of a steady stream of from a pressurized , forming droplets through Rayleigh-Plateau instability as the jet breaks into uniform segments. The process maintains constant flow, typically at high velocities up to 120,000 droplets per second, enabling non-contact on diverse substrates. In operation, ink is pumped through a small orifice under pressure, vibrating at a matching the natural breakup point to produce consistent droplet sizes, often 50-150 micrometers in . Selected droplets are charged electrostatically by passing between charging electrodes timed to the drop formation, imparting a charge proportional to the desired deflection. A deflection plate then applies an to steer charged droplets toward the substrate based on charge magnitude, while uncharged or oppositely deflected droplets are captured in a gutter for recirculation and . This technology originated with Richard G. Sweet's 1963 prototype at , utilizing electrostatic deflection for drop control. Commercialization followed in 1969 with A.B. Dick's Model 9600 for applications, and IBM's 6640 printer in 1976 integrated CIJ for broader document printing. CIJ excels in industrial environments requiring high-speed variable data printing, such as coding expiration dates, barcodes, and serial numbers on bottles, cans, and packaging moving at production line speeds. It supports printing on irregular, curved, or non-porous surfaces like metal, glass, and plastic without direct contact, using solvent-based inks resistant to evaporation in the recirculating system. Unlike drop-on-demand systems, which eject ink only as needed, CIJ's continuous operation minimizes latency but necessitates solvent addition to compensate for evaporation during recirculation, ensuring ink viscosity stability.

Drop-on-Demand Inkjet

Drop-on-demand (DOD) inkjet printing generates and ejects ink droplets from nozzles solely when required to form an image on a substrate, minimizing ink waste compared to continuous inkjet systems that produce unbroken streams. This approach relies on precise control of droplet formation through electrical actuation, followed by ejection, flight to the surface, and impact dynamics including spreading and coalescence. The enables high-resolution printing with droplet volumes typically ranging from 1 to 100 picoliters and velocities of 5 to 20 meters per second, depending on the actuation method and properties. The two dominant DOD mechanisms are thermal inkjet and piezoelectric inkjet. Thermal inkjet, pioneered in commercial form by in 1984, uses a thin-film resistor to heat ink in a chamber to approximately 340°C in microseconds, vaporizing it to create an expanding bubble that forces a droplet through the ; the bubble collapses upon cooling, refilling the chamber via . This method suits water-based inks but limits versatility due to heat sensitivity, potentially degrading non-aqueous or high-viscosity fluids. Piezoelectric inkjet, in contrast, employs a piezoelectric crystal or polymer that deforms under applied voltage—typically 20-50 volts—to mechanically squeeze ink from a flexible diaphragm or wall, ejecting droplets without thermal input; this allows compatibility with a broader range of inks, including solvents and bio-materials, though it requires more complex fabrication. Early DOD concepts emerged in the 1970s, with developing the first operational DOD printer in 1977 using impulse-based ejection, marking a shift from continuous systems toward on-demand efficiency. Piezoelectric variants trace to experimental designs in the late , while gained traction post-1980s for cost-effective applications; both have evolved to support resolutions exceeding 1200 dpi through nozzle arrays of thousands. DOD systems offer advantages in precision and substrate adaptability, with piezoelectric enabling higher and providing faster ejection rates up to 18 kHz per , though 's heat can introduce satellite droplets if not optimized. challenges, such as (ideally 1-20 cP) and (25-70 mN/m), critically influence jet stability and prevent issues like nozzle or tail .

Key Components

Ink Formulations

Inkjet inks consist primarily of colorants, vehicles (solvents or carriers), binders, and functional additives tailored to ensure reliable jetting, , and image permanence. Colorants are typically dyes or pigments dispersed or dissolved in the vehicle, with dyes providing soluble molecular color for vibrant hues but limited , while pigments offer insoluble particulates for superior durability against fading and water exposure, though they require dispersants to prevent agglomeration and nozzle occlusion. Common vehicle types include water-based formulations, dominant in consumer applications for their low toxicity and compatibility with thermal printheads, comprising (often 70-90% by volume) blended with humectants like or to regulate and . Solvent-based inks employ organic solvents such as alcohols or acetates for faster drying on non-porous substrates, enhancing penetration and resistance to smearing in industrial settings. UV-curable inks incorporate monomers and oligomers that polymerize under ultraviolet light, enabling instant fixation on diverse materials without , though they demand precise concentrations (1-5% typically) to balance cure speed and depth. Additives constitute 5-20% of formulations and critically influence performance: surfactants lower to 25-35 dynes/cm for optimal droplet formation and substrate , while biocides inhibit microbial growth in aqueous systems, and chelators stabilize against metal-induced degradation. must remain low, generally 1-15 mPa·s at jetting temperatures (20-60°C), to facilitate piezoelectric or ejection without droplets or incomplete breakup, with shear-thinning behavior preferred for high-speed operation. Binders, often acrylic resins in inks, enhance rub and resistance post-drying, but excess can elevate beyond jetting limits. Formulation challenges arise from trade-offs in stability and compatibility; pigment inks, with particle sizes under 200 nm, demand robust dispersion to avoid settling (achieved via milling and stabilizers), yet risk kogation—thermal degradation residue—in thermal printheads, whereas dye inks offer simpler mixing but inferior archival quality, fading in 25-30 years under light exposure versus pigments' 100+ years. Multiple validation studies confirm pigments' edge in permanence for professional outputs, though dyes persist in cost-sensitive photo printing due to broader color . The print head is the critical component of an inkjet printer consisting of an array of microscopic nozzles and chambers that precisely eject droplets onto a substrate. These heads incorporate actuators to generate the required for drop formation and ejection, enabling resolutions up to 1200 dpi or higher in modern designs. Print heads vary by actuation mechanism, with drop-on-demand systems dominating and many industrial applications due to their efficiency in usage compared to continuous methods. Thermal inkjet print heads, pioneered by Ichiro Endo at Canon in 1977, employ thin-film resistors to rapidly heat within firing chambers to temperatures exceeding 300°C, vaporizing it to form an expanding bubble that propels a droplet through the . The bubble's collapse then creates a partial vacuum, drawing fresh from a . This technology, also known as Bubble Jet by Canon and adopted by , benefits from scalable micro-electro-mechanical systems () fabrication, allowing high densities such as 15,360 total nozzles in Canon's FINE heads or 52,800 in HP's Edgeline series operating at 48 kHz. However, thermal heads are constrained to heat-tolerant, primarily water-based s and susceptible to kogation, where degraded residues accumulate on heaters, potentially reducing longevity. Piezoelectric print heads utilize voltage-induced deformation of piezoelectric crystals, such as (PZT), to mechanically squeeze chambers and eject droplets without processes. Early patents date to 1972 by Zoltan at Clevite Corporation, but commercialized its Micro Piezo technology in 1993 with the Stylus 800 printer, following development from 1990 and by late 1992. This enables compatibility with diverse formulations, including UV-curable and solvent-based types unsuitable for heads, and supports variable drop volumes (e.g., 6-42 pl in 16 levels at 2.8-28 kHz in some industrial models). Drawbacks include higher manufacturing complexity and cost due to precise crystal alignment. Industrial variants from manufacturers like Xaar and extend to high-resolution graphics and textiles. In both types, print head design emphasizes minimizing between nozzles, ensuring uniform drop size and velocity, and incorporating maintenance features like wipers to prevent . Consumer models often integrate heads with cartridges for disposability, while industrial heads prioritize and for prolonged operation. Advances continue in pitch reduction and coatings to enhance reliability and support smaller droplet sizes for finer detail.

Delivery and Maintenance Systems

Ink delivery systems in inkjet printers transport ink from reservoirs to the printhead nozzles, maintaining consistent pressure and flow to enable precise droplet ejection. Reservoirs typically consist of replaceable cartridges or bulk tanks, with capacities ranging from 5 to 20 milliliters in consumer models, connected via flexible tubes or integrated channels equipped with filters to remove particulates and debris that could clog nozzles. Negative pressure, often around -2 to -4 inches of water column, is applied in the reservoir to prevent ink leakage while allowing capillary action to supply the printhead chambers on demand. In thermal drop-on-demand systems, ink delivery integrates with the process, where resistors heat ink in firing chambers supplied directly from the cartridge, ensuring rapid replenishment for frequencies up to 8 kHz per . Piezoelectric systems employ similar supply paths but use mechanical deflection for ejection, requiring dampers to absorb pulses from droplet formation and prevent between nozzles. Bulk ink delivery systems, prevalent in industrial applications, use pumps and degassers to handle larger volumes and viscous inks, reducing per-page costs compared to cartridge-based setups. Maintenance systems, known as service stations, protect printhead longevity by addressing nozzle clogging from ink drying or air ingestion, which can reduce print quality and yield. Capping stations employ elastomeric seals that vacuum-seal the during idle periods, typically maintaining above 50% to inhibit , with actuation via linear motors or cams synchronized to movement. Wiping mechanisms use rubber or fabric blades that traverse the plate to remove residual and , often following sequences where the printhead ejects 10-100 droplets per nozzle into a to clear incipient blockages without excessive . Purging or priming operations, initiated periodically or on detection, apply positive to force cleaning fluid or fresh through channels, expelling air bubbles and dried , though this consumes 1-5 milliliters of per cycle. collects in absorbent pads or tanks, with capacities designed for 10-20% of total ink throughput before replacement. Advanced maintenance incorporates sensors for health, triggering automated routines, and non-contact methods like ultrasonic in some industrial heads to dislodge contaminants without physical wiping, minimizing wear on delicate plates with apertures as small as 20 micrometers. These systems extend printhead life to over 100 million actuations in high-volume printers, though consumer models often necessitate full printhead or cartridge replacement after 1-3 years of use due to integrated designs.

Applications

Consumer and Office Printing

Inkjet printers entered the consumer market in the late 1980s with Hewlett-Packard's DeskJet 500 series, released in 1988 at a price of about $1,000, enabling affordable color and monochrome printing for home users. These devices rapidly gained popularity due to their ability to produce vibrant color outputs on standard paper, contrasting with the noisier dot-matrix printers prevalent at the time. By the , falling prices and improved resolutions made them staples in households and small offices. In consumer settings, inkjet printers serve everyday needs such as printing photographs, schoolwork, recipes, and personal documents, leveraging high resolutions—often exceeding 4,800 dpi—for sharp images and text comparable to photo labs. Their compact design and connectivity features, standard since the , allow seamless integration with laptops, smartphones, and tablets for casual use. Hobbyists also employ them for crafts like and custom cards on specialty media. For applications, particularly in small and , inkjet models handle low-volume tasks including reports, invoices, flyers, and prototypes, where color accuracy and media versatility outweigh speed requirements. Multifunction variants, combining with scanning, , and faxing, dominate this segment, reducing the need for multiple devices in space-constrained environments. Leading manufacturers like HP, Canon, and offer thermal or piezoelectric drop-on-demand systems tailored for these uses, with print speeds typically ranging from 10 to 20 pages per minute for text. The consumer inkjet market exhibited resilience, with personal segment shipments rising 6% in fiscal year 2020 despite business declines, driven by trends. However, suitability is limited to intermittent printing; prolonged inactivity risks ink drying in nozzles, necessitating regular maintenance or use. Cartridge-based inkjet printers, common in consumer models, offer the lowest upfront costs—often under $100—excellent photo quality, and compact designs, making them best suited for very low-volume color needs on a tight budget. Nonetheless, without subscription services, they incur the highest long-term costs due to expensive ink replacements. Initial costs remain low—often under $100 for basic models—making them accessible, though ongoing expenses favor them over alternatives only for color-heavy, sporadic outputs. For brochure printing, inkjet printers excel in image-heavy designs on glossy paper due to photo-like vibrancy, while laser printers provide sharper text, faster speeds, smudge-resistant output, and lower long-term costs for higher volumes or matte/coated paper; both are suitable for small-to-medium runs with compatible media.

Industrial and Professional Uses

Industrial inkjet printing systems facilitate high-speed, non-contact marking and coding on production lines, enabling the application of variable data such as batch codes, expiration dates, barcodes, and serial numbers directly onto materials like bottles, cans, and boxes. These printers operate continuously at speeds exceeding 100 meters per minute in some configurations, minimizing downtime in environments. In the and labeling sectors, this supports compliance with regulatory requirements for , with adoption driven by its ability to handle diverse substrates including plastics, metals, and without the need for inks to dry via alone. In textiles and ceramics manufacturing, inkjet systems enable precise deposition for decorative and functional , such as direct-to-fabric that reduces water and chemical usage by up to 90% compared to methods. Roll-to-roll inkjet processes in textiles allow for on-demand production of customized apparel and , supporting micro-factories that produce small batches efficiently as of 2023 implementations. For ceramics, the deposits colored inks onto tiles and surfaces to create intricate designs at resolutions finer than traditional glazing techniques, with industrial-scale systems handling large-format substrates since the early . Professional applications extend to , where inkjet deposits conductive inks to form circuit traces and sensors on flexible substrates, enabling in industries like automotive and . In pharmaceuticals, inkjet printing fabricates personalized by layering active ingredients, as demonstrated in research achieving sub-milligram precision in drug deposition by 2023. These uses leverage the drop-on-demand mechanism for material-efficient deposition, though challenges like control persist in high-volume production.

Specialized and Emerging Applications

Inkjet printing has been adapted for , enabling the fabrication of flexible circuits, sensors, and displays through the precise deposition of conductive inks such as silver nanoparticles or carbon-based materials. This application leverages drop-on-demand mechanisms to achieve resolutions down to micrometers, facilitating low-cost production of (RFID) tags and thin-film transistors on non-planar substrates like plastics or textiles. Challenges include optimization to prevent clogging and post-print for conductivity enhancement, with peer-reviewed studies reporting conductivities approaching bulk metals after thermal or photonic processing. In bioprinting, inkjet technology deposits bioinks containing living cells and hydrogels to construct tissue scaffolds, with or piezoelectric variants ejecting picoliter droplets at speeds up to thousands per second. Applications include vascular network formation and grafts, where cell viabilities exceed 85% post-printing due to minimal in optimized systems. Emerging protocols integrate multi-nozzle arrays for heterogeneous tissues, as demonstrated in 2023 studies fabricating functional organoids with precise spatial control over cell types. Pharmaceutical applications utilize inkjet printing for personalized , such as fabricating polypills with layered active ingredients or microneedle arrays for administration. inkjet variants have produced oral films with controlled release profiles, achieving dosage accuracies within 5% via droplet volume calibration. Recent advancements, reviewed in 2023, highlight for on-demand manufacturing, though regulatory hurdles persist for clinical translation. Emerging uses extend to and energy devices, including perovskite solar cells printed with resolutions enabling power conversion efficiencies over 20% in lab prototypes as of 2022. Integration with hydrogels supports and wearable sensors, where inkjet enables gradient material properties for enhanced . These developments underscore inkjet's versatility beyond traditional , driven by advancements in functional ink formulations since 2020.

Performance Characteristics

Advantages

Inkjet printing enables the production of high-resolution images with exceptional detail and color fidelity, particularly for photographic and graphical content, due to the precise ejection of microscopic ink droplets that allow for smooth gradients and vibrant hues. This capability stems from the technology's ability to deposit variable droplet sizes, achieving resolutions often exceeding dpi in commercial systems. In comparison to toner-based methods like laser printing, inkjet systems excel in rendering continuous-tone images without the banding artifacts common in electrophotographic processes. The non-contact nature of inkjet deposition minimizes substrate damage and contamination risks, facilitating scalable patterning over large areas with various functional inks, including conductive, , and biological materials. This versatility extends to diverse substrates such as , fabrics, plastics, and even non-planar surfaces, broadening applications beyond traditional document printing to include textiles, , and solar cells. Unlike analog methods requiring plates or masks, inkjet's digital control supports and short-run production without setup costs, reducing lead times and enabling print-on-demand models. Initial equipment costs for inkjet systems are generally lower than those for high-volume alternatives like offset lithography, making it accessible for small-scale and consumer use. Material efficiency is enhanced in targeted applications, such as fabrication, where precise ink placement cuts waste by avoiding blanket deposition techniques. Additionally, the process operates quietly with minimal mechanical vibration, suitable for office and home environments, and supports high-speed operation in industrial variants exceeding 100 meters per minute.

Disadvantages

Inkjet printers exhibit higher operating costs per page than printers, with black-and-white prints typically costing 5-10 cents and color prints 15-20 cents, driven by expensive ink cartridges that often yield fewer pages before replacement. This contrasts with printers' toner-based systems, which achieve 2-5 cents per page due to longer-lasting cartridges. Print heads in inkjet systems are susceptible to clogging from dried residues, particularly during infrequent use or with pigment-based inks, necessitating regular cycles that consume additional and can degrade performance if unresolved. Clogs arise from precipitation at nozzles, exacerbated by incompatible media coatings or environmental factors like low , leading to streaks, uneven color, or complete failure requiring head replacement. Printed output from inkjet printers often suffers from reduced durability, including on non-specialized due to slow ink times and fading from exposure to pollutants such as or , which react with dyes to cause discoloration over months to years. inks offer better resistance than dyes but still underperform compared to toner fusion in laser prints, limiting archival suitability without protective coatings. Printing speeds are generally slower in inkjet technology, limited by droplet ejection frequencies and drop impact dynamics, making them less efficient for high-volume tasks where printers excel at rates exceeding 20-40 pages per minute. Factors like resolution demands and substrate variability further constrain throughput, often to under 10-15 pages per minute in consumer models, rendering inkjet unsuitable for sustained bulk printing.

Durability and Reliability

Inkjet printers exhibit variable durability influenced by usage patterns, quality, and print head technology, with consumer models typically lasting 3 to 5 years under moderate home or office conditions. Print heads, the most failure-prone component, can achieve mean times to failure exceeding 6 billion ink ejections per channel in industrial-grade systems, though actual lifespan depends on and environmental factors. Reliability declines with infrequent operation, as ink residues dry and solidify in nozzles, leading to that manifest as streaking or missing colors in output. Primary failure modes include nozzle clogging from dried , air entrapment, dust ingress, and incompatible or low-quality that precipitate or separate. inkjet heads, which vaporize via resistive , suffer accelerated wear from repeated thermal cycling, potentially shortening lifespan compared to piezoelectric heads that use mechanical deformation without exposure. Piezoelectric systems demonstrate superior durability, resisting heat-induced degradation and supporting broader viscosities, though they require periodic capping and wiping to mitigate residue buildup. Reliability improves with regular printing cycles to circulate ink and automated cleaning protocols, which purge clogs but consume resources if overused. Industrial applications, with continuous operation and sealed environments, yield higher uptime than setups, where neglect—such as prolonged idle periods—exacerbates issues like airflow blockages or solvent mismatches during . or sealed print head constructions enhance resistance to contaminants, extending operational life in demanding settings. Overall, while inkjet offers accessible entry costs, its reliability hinges on proactive upkeep, with piezoelectric variants providing a causal edge in due to reduced mechanical stress per ejection cycle.

Economic Aspects

Operating Cost Tradeoffs

Inkjet printers exhibit higher operating costs per page compared to printers, primarily due to the expense of cartridges relative to toner. The economical choice between inkjet and laser printers depends on print volume, document type, and usage frequency; laser printers are more economical for high-volume text printing (e.g., 100-200+ pages/month) due to reliability without ink drying and lower costs for black-and-white needs, while inkjet printers are preferable for infrequent printing requiring colors or photos, low upfront budgets, or models with continuous ink supply systems (CISS). Typical costs for standard inkjet cartridge systems range from 7 to 15 cents per black-and-white page and 15 to 25 cents per color page, assuming standard page coverage of 5% for black and higher for color. These figures derive from ink yields of approximately 200-500 pages per cartridge for black and less for color, with replacement cartridges priced at $20-50 each depending on capacity. For low-volume users printing fewer than 100 pages monthly, inkjet systems offer a favorable tradeoff with low initial purchase prices often under $100, minimizing the impact of elevated per-page costs. However, at higher volumes exceeding 1,000 pages per month, the cumulative expenditure surpasses that of laser printers, which achieve 2-5 cents per page through higher-yield toner cartridges lasting 2,000-10,000 pages. This volume-dependent escalation stems from inkjet's liquid formulation, which evaporates or clogs if unused, necessitating more frequent replacements and wasting residual . Ink tank or continuous ink supply systems, such as Epson's EcoTank models introduced widely since 2015, mitigate these costs by refilling large reservoirs with bottled ink, yielding 0.2-1 cent per black page and 5-10 cents per color page for volumes up to 7,500 pages per bottle set. The here involves a higher upfront cost—often $200-400 versus $50-150 for cartridge models—but long-term savings for moderate-to-high volume users, with typically at 500-1,000 pages. Such systems reduce from disposable cartridges but require user to avoid air or , potentially increasing costs. Color printing amplifies inkjet cost tradeoffs, as pigment-based inks for photo-quality output consume more volume per page—up to 20% coverage—elevating expenses to 20-50 cents per 4x6 photo print on premium paper. In contrast, text-focused applications favor for efficiency, underscoring inkjet's niche suitability for sporadic, high-fidelity over bulk document production. Maintenance costs, including printhead cycles that expend 5-10% of ink reserves, further erode economies in intermittent use scenarios.

Business Models and Industry Practices

The inkjet printing industry predominantly employs the , wherein printers are sold at low prices or even at a loss to stimulate initial adoption, while the majority of profits derive from high-margin consumables such as . This strategy, exemplified by manufacturers like HP, Canon, and , subsidizes hardware costs through recurring ink sales, with industry analyses indicating that supplies and service often account for the bulk of revenue rather than printer units themselves. For instance, ink cartridge pricing can exceed the cost of the printer over time, enabling margins that sustain the ecosystem despite commoditized hardware competition. To enhance and predictably monetize usage, leading firms have introduced subscription-based ink delivery services. HP's Instant Ink program, launched in 2013 and expanded by 2025, automatically ships replacement cartridges based on monitored page counts, charging monthly fees tiered by volume (e.g., starting at $7.99 for 20 pages). Similar offerings include Canon's PIXMA Print Plan and Epson's ReadyPrint, which aim to reduce waste and upfront costs but tie users to proprietary ecosystems via integration. These models shift from one-time purchases to recurring revenue streams, with proponents arguing they lower effective per-page costs for moderate users, though overprinting can lead to excess fees. Industry practices include technological measures to enforce OEM ink compatibility, such as microchips in cartridges that authenticate genuineness and track usage, often blocking third-party alternatives through updates. HP and have implemented dynamic security features since the early 2010s, citing printhead protection and , despite consumer backlash over restricted choices and potential warranty voids. In response to competitive pressures, and Canon have pivoted toward high-capacity tank systems like EcoTank and MegaTank, introduced widely by 2020, which use refillable bottles to undercut cartridge economics and appeal to cost-sensitive markets, achieving lower long-term operating costs estimated at 1-2 cents per page. Third-party ink providers, comprising compatible and remanufactured cartridges, capture significant market share by offering discounts up to 50-70% over OEM prices, fostering aftermarket innovation but prompting OEM countermeasures like chip detection. As of 2025, global inkjet market growth, projected at a CAGR of around 5-7% through 2030, underscores the tension between locked-in profitability and demands for , with models comprising over 20% of consumer sales in regions like . Inkjet printer manufacturers, including HP and , have employed (DRM) technologies such as updates and microchips in cartridges to prevent the use of third-party or refilled , prompting numerous legal challenges from consumers and competitors alleging . These measures, like HP's "Dynamic Security" system introduced around 2016, detect non-original and disable printing functions, ostensibly to ensure print quality and device security, but critics argue they create a monopoly in the aftermarket for replacement cartridges, inflating costs for users who face prices up to five times higher for OEM compared to alternatives. In the United States, HP faced a class-action filed in 2023 accusing it of violating federal and state antitrust laws by monopolizing ink sales through that bricks printers using non-HP cartridges, with plaintiffs claiming damages from forced purchases and device obsolescence. The case, which advanced past motions to dismiss, settled in March 2025 without monetary payouts or admission of wrongdoing, but HP agreed to make future updates optional for affected models and provide clearer disclosures on compatibility. Similarly, encountered a 2024 in alleging software updates unlawfully disabled printers with non- ink, echoing claims of market foreclosure and consumer harm. European regulators have also intervened; in 2022, HP settled with the Dutch consumer authority for €1.35 million to compensate users impacted by blocked third-party ink via updates, marking one of the first regulatory actions against such practices. Additional scrutiny targeted subscription models like HP's Instant Ink, with a November 2024 class-action suit in seeking $5 million for allegedly misleading consumers into overpaying through auto-renewals and compatibility restrictions tied to DRM. While manufacturers defend these technologies as necessary against counterfeit inks that risk damage—citing instances of clogged nozzles and suboptimal performance—courts have dismissed some claims, as in an October 2025 ruling rejecting antitrust arguments over cartridge replacements due to insufficient evidence of market power. These disputes highlight tensions between protections and consumer rights, with parallels to the 2004 Lexmark v. Static Control case where the U.S. in 2014 limited DMCA misuse claims against cartridge refurbishers, affirming for compatibility parts. Ongoing litigation and right-to-repair advocacy continue to challenge OEM lock-in strategies, though enforcement varies by jurisdiction, with no uniform global resolution as of 2025.

Environmental Impact

Resource Consumption and Emissions

Inkjet printers consume ink at rates varying by coverage and model, typically 0.5 to 1.2 milliliters per full-coverage A4 page, accounting for printhead cycles such as . Page yield ratings from manufacturers often assume 5% coverage, underestimating resource use for denser images by factors of up to 16 times for 80% coverage scenarios. Inks, predominantly water-based with pigments or dyes, derive from or synthetic sources, contributing to depletion, though soy- or algae-based alternatives reduce this dependency. Energy use during operation averages 30 to 50 watts for consumer inkjet models, with standby drawing 3 to 5 watts, yielding approximately 0.137 kilowatt-hours per day under typical intermittent use. Typical consumption (TEC) for modern multifunction inkjets certifies at 0.25 kilowatt-hours per week, lower than counterparts due to absence of fusing heat. Per-page energy remains minimal, often under 0.01 kilowatt-hours for text documents, prioritizing efficiency in low-volume applications over high-throughput production. Emissions from inkjet printing include volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released during and , primarily from carriers in non-water-based formulations, though water-based inks emit fewer hazardous air pollutants. Operational are indirect and low, dominated by for printing, with cartridge production adding about 0.46 kilograms of CO2 equivalent per unit. Unlike printing's particulate matter output, inkjets produce negligible ultrafine particles during standard use, though VOCs can contribute to concerns in enclosed spaces. consumption is limited, primarily embedded in ink formulation and occasional printhead cleaning, often under 2 liters per kilogram of output in industrial contexts, far below wet-process alternatives.

Waste Generation and Recycling

Inkjet printing generates significant waste primarily from disposable ink cartridges, which consist of plastic housings, internal foam absorbers, electronic microchips, and residual liquid . Globally, approximately 1.3 billion inkjet cartridges are used annually, with over one million discarded daily. Of these, an estimated 70% end up in landfills due to limited consumer participation in return programs and the prevalence of single-use aftermarket cartridges. The components in cartridges degrade slowly, potentially taking centuries to break down, while residual inks may leach chemicals into and if not properly managed. Recycling efforts focus on , where cartridges are disassembled, cleaned, refilled, and tested for , potentially diverting up to 97% of materials from streams. However, worldwide rates remain low at under 30%, with some estimates as low as 5-15% for inkjet cartridges, largely because compatible third-party cartridges lack structured take-back systems unlike (OEM) programs from companies like HP and . OEM initiatives, such as HP's closed-loop process, have recovered millions of cartridges annually, but overall participation is hindered by shipping costs and consumer inconvenience. Remanufactured cartridges can reduce use by 95% and impact by up to 46.5% compared to new ones, according to life-cycle assessments. Challenges in include proprietary microchips that disable refilled cartridges to enforce OEM business models, complicating third-party and contributing to higher disposal rates. Inkjet printers also produce internal , such as absorbed ink in maintenance boxes or pads, which must be replaced periodically and often end up landfilled without options. Regulatory pressures and voluntary industry standards have driven improvements, but systemic issues like low return rates persist, with only a fraction of potential diverted through certified programs. Emerging trends emphasize for recyclability, such as modular components, though adoption remains uneven across manufacturers.

Comparisons to Alternative Technologies

Inkjet printing differs from electrophotographic ( primarily in mechanism, performance, and application suitability. printers employ a toner-based process involving electrostatic attraction and fusing with heat, achieving print speeds of 20 to 50 pages per minute for high-volume text documents, compared to inkjet speeds of 10 to 20 pages per minute. systems also yield lower cost per page for output, approximately 3 cents versus 10 cents for inkjet black-and-white printing, due to efficient toner usage and reduced waste. In contrast, inkjet excels in color reproduction and photographic quality, depositing liquid droplets for smoother gradients and higher detail on glossy media, making it preferable for and images where toner's particle-based fusing can produce less vibrant results.
AspectInkjet PrintingLaser (Electrophotographic) Printing
Print Speed10-20 ppm; suitable for low-volume20-50 ppm; ideal for high-volume
Cost per Page (B&W)~10 cents; higher due to ~3 cents; toner more efficient
Color QualitySuperior for and gradientsAdequate but less vibrant for images
Initial CostLower (~$50-200 for models)Higher (~$100-500) but durable
MaintenanceFrequent head ; ink drying issuesMinimal; toner cartridges last longer
Data derived from manufacturer benchmarks as of 2023-2024. In industrial and commercial contexts, inkjet competes with offset , a plate-based analog process using wet transfer for high-volume production. Offset achieves superior color consistency and detail for runs exceeding 1,000 units, with per-unit costs dropping below digital methods due to amortized plate setup, but requires significant upfront preparation time and lacks . Inkjet, as a non-impact digital , enables short-run production (under 500 copies) with rapid turnaround—often hours versus days for offset—variable content like personalization, and no plates, reducing setup costs by up to 50% for small batches. High-speed inkjet systems further challenge offset by matching speeds up to 500 feet per minute in , with lower running costs from aqueous inks versus offset's solvent-based ones. Relative to , which heats or ribbons to produce images without ink, inkjet offers broader media compatibility and full-color output, essential for applications like or photos where thermal is limited to or fading direct-thermal prints. Thermal excels in low-maintenance, high-speed labeling (e.g., 4-10 inches per second for barcodes) on specialized substrates, avoiding inkjet's consumable costs and smudging risks in humid environments, but lacks longevity as images degrade over 6-12 months without . Dot matrix (impact) printers, using pin strikes on ribbons, persist in niche uses like multi-part carbonless forms for invoices, where inkjet fails due to insufficient for through-copy penetration, though inkjet provides quieter operation, higher resolution (up to 1200 dpi versus 's 240 dpi), and color versatility at the expense of noise tolerance and durability in dusty settings.

Recent Developments and Future Directions

Market Growth and Technological Advances (2020s)

The global inkjet printing market expanded significantly in the early 2020s, recovering from pandemic disruptions through increased demand in packaging, materials, and industrial applications. In 2020, the market was valued at approximately USD 80.4 billion, encompassing nearly 923 billion A4-equivalent prints, with subsequent growth fueled by the shift toward digital and variable-data that favored inkjet's flexibility over traditional offset methods. By 2023, the inkjet printers segment reached USD 46.35 billion, projecting a (CAGR) of 6.38% to USD 80.68 billion by 2032, driven primarily by commercial and industrial sectors adapting to shorter print runs and on-demand production. Industrial inkjet applications, particularly in and labeling, benefited from surges, while commercial saw inkjet adoption rise due to cost efficiencies in high-volume, customized outputs. Technological advancements in the emphasized higher and precision, with new production inkjet presses achieving up to 30% greater output compared to prior generations through innovations in continuous-feed and cut-sheet systems. Developments in printhead , including drop-on-demand mechanisms that captured 57.9% in industrial inkjet by 2023, enabled faster speeds exceeding 500 meters per minute in continuous inkjet models, supporting applications in high-throughput environments like direct mail and envelope . Enhanced software and AI-driven improved print quality, reduced waste via , and facilitated integration, allowing for versatile substrate handling with UV-curable and water-based inks that extended durability and color fidelity. These progresses, exemplified by systems like the iJetColor series introduced in the mid-, lowered operational costs for short-run jobs while expanding inkjet's viability in wide-format and sustainable niches.

Innovations in Inks and Sustainability

Recent advancements in inkjet printing have emphasized the development of sustainable ink formulations to mitigate environmental impacts associated with traditional petroleum-derived inks, which often contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and non-biodegradable components. Water-based inks, formulated with reduced or eliminated solvents, have gained prominence for their lower VOC emissions and compatibility with processes, enabling faster of printed materials. For instance, bio-based mineral-oil-free (MOF) inks designed for piezo inkjet systems utilize renewable feedstocks to replace mineral oils, thereby decreasing reliance on fossil resources while maintaining print quality in industrial coding applications. Plant-derived and soy-based inks represent key innovations, offering biodegradability and reduced during curing compared to conventional oil-based alternatives. These formulations, derived from oils, can lower usage by up to 50% through improved drying efficiency and eliminate the need for biocides, supporting easier and . In 2025, advancements in dispersion technologies further enhanced the vibrancy and durability of such eco-friendly inks, bridging performance gaps with synthetic counterparts. Algae-based inks have also emerged as a viable option, leveraging microbial cultivation for production to minimize resource extraction impacts. UV-curable and LED-curable inks for inkjet systems have advanced by enabling instantaneous curing under low-energy UV light, reducing drying times and solvent evaporation. These inks, often incorporating bio-based binders like acrylated epoxidized , support goals by facilitating deinkable prints suitable for repulping. Research in 2023-2025 highlighted water-based inks using bio-pigments from bacterial , which provide stable dispersions for while avoiding heavy metal additives. Growth in UV LED inks for inkjet applications, noted in market analyses from early 2025, underscores their role in expanding eco-friendly digital segments like textiles and . Despite these innovations, challenges persist in scaling bio-based formulations to match the of traditional inks under high-volume production, though ongoing refinements in technologies—such as those promoting rapid absorption—address absorption and issues on diverse substrates. Low-VOC natural-based inks replacing ingredients have been shown to cut emissions in applications, aligning with regulatory pressures for healthier production environments. Overall, these developments prioritize causal reductions in lifecycle emissions and waste, driven by empirical assessments of composition rather than unsubstantiated claims of neutrality in legacy formulations.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.