Hubbry Logo
Intef IIIIntef IIIMain
Open search
Intef III
Community hub
Intef III
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Intef III
Intef III
Intef III
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Intef III was the third pharaoh of the Eleventh Dynasty of Egypt during the late First Intermediate Period in the 21st century BC, at a time when Egypt was divided in two kingdoms. The son of his predecessor Intef II and father of his successor Mentuhotep II,[7] Intef III reigned for 8 years over Upper Egypt and extended his domain North against the 10th Dynasty state, perhaps as far north as the 17th nome. He undertook some building activity on Elephantine.[8] Intef III is buried in a large saff tomb at El-Tarif known as Saff el-Barqa.[9]

Key Information

Family

[edit]
See also: Eleventh Dynasty of Egypt family tree

Intef III was the son of his predecessor Intef II. This is indicated by the stela of Tjeti, chief treasurer during the reigns of Intef II and Intef III. Tjeti's stele mentions the death of Intef II and goes on describing how Tjeti served Intef II's son who acceded to the throne upon the death of his father:

Then, when his son assumed his place, Horus, Nakht-neb-Tepnefer, King of Upper and Lower Egypt, Son of Re, Intef, fashioner of beauty, living like Re, forever, I followed him to all his good seats of pleasure.

Intef III possibly married his sister Iah, described as a king's mother (mwt-nswt), king's daughter (sȝt-nswt) and priestess of Hathor (ḥmt-nṯr-ḥwt-ḥr).[10] This indicates that Intef III's successor, Mentuhotep II, was his son. This is further confirmed by the stele of Henenu (Cairo 36346), an official who served under Intef II, Intef III and his "son", which the stele identifies as Horus Sankhibtawy (s-ˁnḫ-[jb-tȝwy]),[11][12] Mentuhotep II's first Horus name. Another piece of evidence for this parentage is a relief on the Gebel el-Silsileh in the Wadi Shatt er-Rigal, known as the Silsileh petroglyph, depicting Mentuhotep II surrounded by Iah and Intef III.[8]

Additionally, Mentuhotep II's royal wife Neferu II bore the title of king's daughter, and an inscription in her tomb names her mother as Iah.[13] This establishes that she was Intef III's daughter and the sister of Mentuhotep II.[14]

Reign

[edit]

Intef III's father and predecessor reigned for 49 years and Intef III might thus have acceded to the throne a middle-aged[8] or even elderly man.[1] Although Intef III's name is lost in a lacuna of the Turin canon, a king list compiled in the early Ramesside period, its reign length is still readable on column 5, row 15,[15] and given as 8 years.[8][16][17]

The relative chronological position of Intef III as the successor of Intef II and predecessor of Mentuhotep II is secured by his established parentage to these two kings as well as the Turin canon and two blocks from the temple of Montu at Tod.[8] These blocks show the succession of kings from Intef I to Mentuhotep II and while Intef III's horus name is damaged, its position is certain.[8] The absolute dating of Intef III's reign is less certain and several dates have been proposed: 2069–2061 BC,[1] 2063–2055 BC[4] and 2016–2009 BC.[5]

Military activities

[edit]

Intef III inherited a large and relatively peaceful domain in Upper Egypt.[8] Over his 8 years of reign, Intef was militarily active.[1] He successfully defended the territory that his father Intef II had won, as is attested by the tomb of an official of the time, Nakhty, located at Abydos and in which a doorjamb bearing Intef III's names was discovered.[8] He also conquered territories north of Abydos, in particular Asyut[1] and extended his domain perhaps as far as the seventeenth nome of Upper Egypt thereby "imposing his family’s control over most of Upper Egypt".[4] Alternatively, this might have been achieved by his son Mentuhotep II, early in his reign.

Building activities

[edit]

A doorjamb bearing Intef III's name was uncovered on Elephantine in the sanctuary of Hekayeb, a deified nomarch of the 6th Dynasty, which shows that he must have ordered work there.[18] Another doorjamb was discovered in the temple of Satet, also on Elephantine, which attests to building activity on the site.[8]

Tomb

[edit]

Coordinates: 25°44′12″N 32°38′11″E / 25.73667°N 32.63639°E / 25.73667; 32.63639

Herbert Winlock's 1915 photography of the tomb of Intef III. The tomb was tentatively attributed to Intef II by Winlock and reattributed to Intef III by Arnold.[19]

The necropolis of the kings of the 11th Dynasty is located in El-Tarif, on the opposite bank of the Nile from Thebes. Several saff-tombs of imposing dimensions are found there but, until the excavations of the German Archaeological Institute under the direction of Dieter Arnold from 1970 until 1974, it was unclear to whom some of these tombs belonged.[9]

Although no inscriptions could be found in the tombs (except that of Intef II) to confirm their ownership, their positions, together with the much later-attested chronological succession of the rulers of the 11th Dynasty, led to the attribution of the tomb known today as Saff el-Baqar[9] to Intef III. The tomb resembles that of his predecessor Intef II[8] and consists of a 75 m (246 ft) wide and 85–90 m (279–295 ft) long courtyard on a northwest - southeast axis facing a canal. The courtyard is surrounded, on all sides but the east, by many chambers dug into the rock.[8][9][20] The courtyard leads to a large double-pillared facade totalling 48 columns behind which many more chambers are located.

In spite of the ruined state of the tomb, the 1970s excavations have shown that its walls must once have been lined with sandstone and adorned with decorations.[21] Nowadays, the tomb lies beneath the constructions of a village.

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Intef III.

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Intef III

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Intef III, also known as Nakhtnebtepnefer Intef, was the third pharaoh of Egypt's Eleventh Dynasty, ruling during the late First Intermediate Period from approximately 2059 to 2051 BC. As the son and successor of Wahankh Intef II, he governed from Thebes in Upper Egypt, inheriting and defending a domain that extended northward into central regions of the Nile Valley amid ongoing conflicts with rival northern powers. His eight-year reign represented a crucial transitional phase, stabilizing Theban authority and laying groundwork for the eventual reunification of Egypt under his son and successor, Nebhepetre Mentuhotep II. Historical records of Intef III are sparse, primarily consisting of funerary stelae and administrative inscriptions from Thebes and el-Tarif, which highlight the continuity of royal bureaucracy and cult practices. Notable artifacts include the limestone stela of Chief Treasurer Tjetji (, EA 614), which describes Tjetji's service under both and III, emphasizing loyalty and administrative roles during the dynasty's expansion efforts. Another example is the painted limestone stela of the royal follower Megegi and his wife Henit (, 14.2.6), dating to his reign and reflecting emerging Theban religious elements, such as names invoking the god . These objects underscore a period of artistic and epigraphic development, with influences from styles beginning to appear in Theban works. Intef III's rule focused on defense and territorial consolidation rather than major building projects, contrasting with the monumental achievements of his successors. While no large-scale temples or pyramids are directly attributed to him, his era supported the growth of local cults and administrative infrastructure in , contributing to the dynasty's shift from nomarchal rule to centralized pharaonic authority. This consolidation helped position Thebes as the nucleus of Middle Kingdom power, bridging the fragmented politics of the First Intermediate Period and the unified prosperity that followed.

Names and Titles

Birth Name and Variants

The birth name of Intef III was Intef, derived from the Middle Egyptian expression jnj.t.f, meaning "his father brings him". This name, common among the Theban elite of the 11th Dynasty, reflects a theophoric or familial structure typical of personal names in ancient Egyptian , emphasizing paternal protection or divine intervention. Phonetic variants of the name appear across ancient sources, including Inyotef, Antef, and Anjotef, as transliterated in modern scholarship from hieroglyphic inscriptions on stelae and tomb reliefs. For instance, the name is attested in low-relief inscriptions on limestone stelae, such as that of the official Tjetji ( EA614), where it demonstrates variations in spelling influenced by regional scribal practices. In royal contexts, Intef's was enclosed within a , often prefixed with Sa- ("Son of "), signifying his divine legitimacy as ; this usage is documented in king lists and monumental inscriptions. Prior to ascension, the name appeared in non-royal settings without cartouches, as seen in familial or administrative records of the Theban rulers, though direct attestations for Intef III himself are sparse. The complemented his Nakhtnebtepnefer within the full royal titulary.

Royal Epithets

Intef III's royal epithets were centered on his Horus name, as the rulers of the early Eleventh Dynasty did not employ the complete fivefold titulary typical of later periods. His Horus name, Nakhtnebtepnefer (nḫt-nb-tp-nfr), is translated as "The possessor of a perfect beginning is victorious," emphasizing triumph and a prosperous inception to his reign. This name appears on key artifacts, such as the limestone stela of the official Tjetji (British Museum EA614) and the stela of Intef (British Museum EA1203), where it is enclosed in a serekh surmounted by the Horus falcon. A abbreviated variant, Neb tep-nefer ("Possessor of a perfect beginning"), is recorded on the funerary stela of Megegi (Metropolitan Museum of Art 14.2.6). No throne name (prenomen in ), Nebty name, or Golden Horus name is attested for Intef III in surviving inscriptions, reflecting the transitional nature of royal nomenclature during the First Intermediate Period. The served as the primary vehicle for royal ideology, encapsulating Intef III's legitimacy through martial prowess and renewal. In the context of political instability, this epithet evoked the king's role as a victorious unifier, countering fragmentation by invoking divine Horus-like strength to "pacify" and stabilize against northern threats. Such symbolism reinforced Theban dynastic claims to overarching authority, bridging local traditions with aspirations of national restoration.

Family

Parents and Ancestry

Intef III, bearing the Horus name Nakhtnebtepnefer, was the son of his immediate predecessor, , known as Wahankh, and Neferu (also attested as Neferuayt or Neferukayet). This direct paternal link is evidenced by inscriptions from the period, including a dedicatory column at that explicitly describes the succession: "Now when his son had taken his place Nakhtnebtepnefer, King of , Son of Intef born of Neferu." Further corroboration appears in biographical stelae of officials who served under both rulers, such as that of the chamberlain Tjefi, which references service spanning the reigns and implies continuity in the royal line. Intef II's rule during the First Intermediate Period (c. 2118–2069 BCE) was characterized by aggressive expansionist policies that strengthened Theban authority in southern . He launched military campaigns northward, extending control from to (the ninth Upper Egyptian nome), while challenging the rival Heracleopolitan dynasty in the north; these efforts are documented in his tomb stela, where he bequeaths territorial gains to his successor. This consolidation of power provided the foundation for Intef III's brief reign, enabling further Theban advances. The paternal ancestry of Intef III connects to Sehertawy, the probable grandfather and founder of the Theban branch of the Eleventh Dynasty. , originally a (provincial governor) of Thebes, was the first to adopt the and proclaim kingship, transitioning the family from local administration to royal status around the late Tenth or early Eleventh Dynasty. This lineage's roots lie in the non-royal Theban nomarchy, where rulers like , described in inscriptions as "borne of Iku," rose amid the political fragmentation following . Attestations of this upward genealogy are preserved in royal stelae and temple reliefs from Thebes, underscoring the dynasty's emergence from provincial elites rather than established pharaonic descent.

Consorts and Offspring

Intef III's principal consort was , who held the titles of king's daughter (sȝt-nswt), king's wife (ḥmt-nswt), king's mother (mwt-nswt), and priestess of (ḥmt-nṯr Ḥwt-Ḥr). These designations suggest she may have been Intef III's , a common practice in royal marriages to maintain lineage purity, and her roles extended to religious functions honoring the goddess . Iah is prominently featured in a rock-cut at Shatt el-Rigal near , where she appears as the king's mother beside Intef III and their son , emphasizing her central position in the royal family. The couple had at least two attested offspring: a son, , who succeeded Intef III and later unified , ending the First Intermediate Period. This filiation is confirmed by the stela of the official Henenu (Cairo JE 36346), which records service under , Intef III, and "his son" , as well as the Shatt el-Rigal relief depicting the family group. They also had a daughter, Neferu II, whose identity as king's daughter is inscribed in her tomb (TT319) at , naming as her mother and linking her parentage to Intef III. Neferu II later married her brother , serving as his chief queen and participating in royal and cultic duties, as evidenced by attestations on stelae dedicated by officials such as Tjeti ( EA 614) and Henenu, which highlight the stability of the succession through this sibling union. No other consorts or children are definitively known, though fragmentary inscriptions from Theban contexts hint at possible additional royal kin, interpretations of which remain speculative due to incomplete evidence.

Reign

Chronological Placement

Intef III served as the third ruler named Intef in the Eleventh Dynasty, succeeding and preceding , during the late phase of the First Intermediate Period when Theban kings controlled much of amid ongoing political fragmentation. His position in the dynasty is confirmed by contemporary inscriptions and king lists that place him immediately after the reigns of and , marking a period of consolidation for Theban power before the reunification under . The , a primary document from the Ramesside Period, records a length of 8 years for the king in this dynastic slot, though Intef III's name is missing due to a lacuna; the entry's placement and the year count align precisely with his historical sequence. This duration is corroborated by fragments of other and private monuments that reference events up to at least his eighth , providing a relative framework without contradicting the king list's summation. Absolute dating for Intef III remains debated among scholars due to the paucity of direct astronomical from his and reliance on extrapolated anchors from later periods. High chronology proposals, such as 2069–2061 BC, derive from alignments with Sothic rising observations and synchronisms to Mesopotamian timelines that favor earlier placements for the dynasty's start. Alternative estimates include 2063–2055 BC, as proposed by Ian Shaw based on revised regnal overlaps and inscriptional evidence, and 2074–2066 BC per Aidan Dodson, incorporating broader Near Eastern correlations. Lower chronologies, like 2016–2009 BC in the Handbook of Ancient Egyptian by Hornung, Krauss, and Warburton, stem from conservative interpretations of radiocarbon and king list summations that shorten intervening periods. These variations arise from methodologies including lunar and synchronisms, dendrochronological ties to Levantine wood samples, and Bayesian modeling of radiocarbon results from Old and Middle Kingdom sites, which anchor the Eleventh Dynasty relative to the well-dated Twelfth Dynasty. Contemporary sources, such as stelae and rock inscriptions from Theban nomarchs, offer by linking Intef III's rule to predecessors via familial succession and shared titulary, while modern revisions through 2025 emphasize high chronologies supported by integrated radiocarbon and astrophysical analyses that resolve earlier low-versus-high debates in favor of dates closer to 2070–2050 BC for the late Eleventh Dynasty.

Military Endeavors

Intef III continued the expansionist policies of his predecessors by defending and consolidating Theban control over against incursions from the rival Herakleopolitan kingdom to the north. His reign focused on securing the territories gained during the campaigns of , particularly in the border regions of , where Theban forces repelled threats aimed at reclaiming lost ground. However, direct evidence for these military actions remains limited, primarily inferred from private inscriptions and the extent of Theban control claimed in contemporary monuments. A key aspect of these endeavors was the conquest and integration of , capital of the 13th nome, which represented a significant northward push and provided a strategic buffer against Herakleopolitan advances. Evidence for this expansion comes from biographical stelae of Theban officials who served in the region, highlighting military operations that subdued local nomarchs and established Theban authority. Inscriptions from officials, such as the chief treasurer Tjeti, attest to administrative continuity and service under both and III during the period of territorial expansion. Intef III maintained influence over the 17th nome at , as evidenced by his patronage of local cults, which helped secure southern borders and trade routes with . These actions progressively eroded Herakleopolitan dominance by disrupting their supply lines and alliances with northern nomarchs, creating vulnerabilities that facilitated Thebes' long-term unification ambitions without direct engagement in the final overthrow.

Construction Projects

Intef III sponsored key architectural initiatives at , underscoring his authority over vital southern trade networks linking to . In the sanctuary of Heqayeb—a deified 6th Dynasty nomarch—he oversaw restorations, as evidenced by a doorjamb inscribed with his royal names and titles, discovered during excavations of the site. This find, dated to his reign through paleographic analysis, confirms his direct patronage of the cult, which served as a pilgrimage center for southern expeditions. Similarly, Intef III renovated the nearby temple of Satet, the goddess embodying the Nile's inundation and protector of the southern borders. An inscription from his era, found at Elephantine, explicitly attributes the refurbishment of the shrine's central chapel to him, marking a transition toward more structured stone architecture in provincial religious sites. These efforts utilized local granite and sandstone in a nascent monumental style, blending Old Kingdom traditions with emerging Middle Kingdom proportions to enhance durability and symbolic presence. Fragmentary inscriptions hint at minor building works in Thebes and other Upper Egyptian locales, though details remain sparse and unconfirmed by major finds. Overall, these projects bolstered local cult worship, fostering religious continuity and by reinforcing control over Nubian resources and .

Tomb

Location and Design

The tomb of Intef III is situated at Saff el-Barqa within the El-Tarif on the west bank of the , approximately 5 kilometers north of Deir el-Bahri and near the ancient city of Thebes, forming part of the early royal developed by the 11th Dynasty rulers. This , at coordinates 25°44′12″N 32°38′11″E, provided a secluded desert setting at the base of the Theban cliffs, ideal for monumental funerary complexes during the late First Intermediate Period. Intef III's tomb exemplifies the rock-cut saff (row) design characteristic of early 11th Dynasty royal burials, consisting of an expansive open forecourt measuring about 75 meters in width and 85–90 meters in length along a northwest-southeast axis. The forecourt leads to a prominent pillared hall facade supported by 48 columns, behind which lies the main burial area; this architectural form emphasized grandeur and accessibility for rituals while integrating the structure into the natural rock face. The complex was originally faced with blocks, enhancing its durability and aesthetic prominence against the surrounding cliffs. At the core of the layout is a central chamber, approximately 11 meters deep, containing a side chamber for the , surrounded by multiple subsidiary shafts intended for high-ranking officials and family members to ensure perpetual service in the . This arrangement of aligned shafts reflects evolving dynastic practices, where the king's anchored a communal to reinforce hierarchical and religious continuity. Traces of veneer and decorations on the chamber walls suggest an intent for elaborate iconographic programs depicting royal and divine motifs, though much was lost to ancient and .

Discovery and Excavation

The royal saff tombs at El-Tarif, including the one attributed to Intef III (known as Saff el-Barqa), were initially documented during 19th-century explorations by travelers such as Robert Hay and John Gardner Wilkinson between 1826 and 1830, who mapped and sketched the site's visible features. In the early , British archaeologist William Matthew Flinders Petrie conducted surveys and excavations of private tombs at El-Tarif during the 1908–1909 seasons but omitted detailed work on the royal saff tombs, leaving them largely unexcavated. Systematic investigation of the royal tombs began in 1966 under Dieter Arnold of the in , with major excavations occurring over four campaigns from 1970 to 1974; these efforts uncovered the tombs buried up to 5 meters beneath desert sand and provided the first comprehensive documentation of their layout. Key findings from Saff el-Barqa included fragments of sandstone reliefs and inscriptions that supported its attribution to Intef III through chronological sequencing among the adjacent royal tombs, along with minor artifacts such as offering tables from associated contexts. The site presented significant challenges due to ancient , which had emptied most chambers, and natural erosion affecting the and rock-cut elements; excavators addressed this by partially reconstructing damaged columns and walls to facilitate . Arnold's post-excavation resulted in the 1976 publication Die Gräber des Alten und Mittleren Reiches in El-Tarif, featuring detailed plans, photographs, and stratigraphic data; later studies have referenced this work for interpretations, though no substantial new fieldwork or analyses have emerged in the .

Historical Significance

Role in Dynasty

Intef III ascended to the throne as the third ruler of the Eleventh Dynasty, succeeding his father in a direct familial transition that ensured continuity and helped stabilize Theban authority after the aggressive territorial expansions of the previous reign. This succession mechanism, rooted in patrilineal inheritance, reinforced the dynasty's hold on amid the fragmented political landscape of the First Intermediate Period. His reign, lasting approximately eight years, is marked by fewer monumental attestations than those of Intef I and Intef II, pointing to a transitional phase where focus shifted from conquest to internal consolidation rather than prolific self-commemoration. Administrative governance relied heavily on loyal officials and regional nomarchs, as evidenced by the careers of key figures like the chief treasurer and royal chamberlain Tjeti, whose stela explicitly notes his continued service from Intef II into Intef III's rule, maintaining fiscal and courtly stability. Similarly, the steward Henenu's biographical stele (Cairo JE 36346) records his tenure across the reigns of Intef II, Intef III, and the latter's successor, illustrating the dynasty's dependence on experienced administrators to manage provincial affairs without major disruptions. Under Intef III, dynastic policies emphasized the consolidation of Upper Egyptian territories, strengthening alliances with local nomarchs to secure loyalty and resources in regions like Abydos and the Thinite nome. This approach complemented patronage of Theban cults, particularly those of and other local deities, fostering ideological unity and legitimacy within the dynasty's core power base in Thebes. These efforts laid essential groundwork for the eventual reunification under his successor, without engaging in the broader northern conflicts.

Transition to Middle Kingdom

Intef III's reign, lasting approximately eight years from ca. 2059 to 2051 BC, represented a crucial precursor to the full reunification of under his successor, Nebhepetre . During this period, Intef III consolidated and extended Theban control northward, building on the territorial gains of his father and reaching as far as the seventeenth nome of , thereby weakening the rival Herakleopolitan kingdom in the north. These military advances created a strategic foundation that enabled to complete the conquests, achieving Egypt's unification by ca. 2030 BC and marking the onset of the Middle Kingdom. The end of the First Intermediate Period (ca. 2150–2030 BC) under the Theban Eleventh Dynasty signified a profound shift from political fragmentation and regional autonomy to centralized rule, with Intef III's rule embodying the transition from divided nomarchies to a unified pharaonic authority based in Thebes. This era's conclusion restored national cohesion, fostering the administrative and cultural renaissance characteristic of the Middle Kingdom. In historical king lists, such as the Turin Canon, Intef III (known as Nakhtnebtepnefer) is positioned as a pivotal bridge figure in the Eleventh Dynasty, linking the earlier phases of Theban consolidation to the reunifying efforts of and thus symbolizing the last fragmented phase before centralized stability. Scholarly interpretations emphasize his role in this transitional dynamic, with debates centering on whether his relatively peaceful and stable reign—contrasted against the broader crises of and conflict in the First Intermediate Period—provided continuity that his successor aggressively expanded upon, or if his death ca. 2051 BC precipitated a sense of urgency for unification amid lingering instability. Recent analyses post-2020, including reassessments of the period's innovations in local , portray Intef III's time as one of emerging stability rather than acute crisis, highlighting gradual Theban ascendancy over outright turmoil.

References

  1. https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/phar/hd_phar.htm
  2. https://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/p16028coll12/id/14073/download
  3. https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/refresh/cont-ed-62/olli/21-fall/egypt4.pdf
  4. https://gizamedia.rc.fas.harvard.edu/images/MFA-images/Giza/GizaImage/full/library/breasted_ancient_records_I.pdf
  5. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/544007
  6. http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/propylaeumdok/4177/1/Bussmann_Changing_cultural_paradigms_2015.pdf
  7. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/egypt-in-the-middle-kingdom-2030-1640-b-c
  8. https://www.behindthename.com/name/intef/submitted
  9. https://pharaoh.se/ancient-egypt/pharaoh/intef-iii/
  10. https://www.ijscl.com/article_703784_0fed822dca2a4b5b5c91a18b9b392f66.pdf
  11. https://webhelper.brown.edu/joukowsky/courses/historyofegyptone14/files/27336776.pdf
  12. https://oxfordre.com/africanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277734-e-1203
  13. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/orient/59/0/59_13/_pdf
  14. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/555531
  15. https://pharaoh.se/ancient-egypt/dynasty/11/
  16. https://www.nemo.nu/ibisportal/0egyptintro/4egypt/index.htm
  17. https://pharaoh.se/ancient-egypt/kinglist/turin-contents/
  18. https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/7028
  19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12119019/
  20. https://www.ancientportsantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/PLACES/Egypt-Libya/EgyptianChronology2-Tetley2014.pdf
  21. https://www.thecollector.com/first-intermediate-period-of-egypt/
  22. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/Y_EA614
  23. https://www.nemo.nu/ibisportal/0egyptintro/4egypt/4sidor/inyotefIII.htm
  24. https://www.academia.edu/59231587/Sanctuary_of_Heqaib
  25. https://academic.oup.com/book/37433/chapter/331533873
  26. https://www.academia.edu/111336654/On_the_Beginning_of_Monumental_Stone_Building_in_Ancient_Egyptian_Provincial_Temples
  27. https://www.academia.edu/66330642/Report_on_the_38th_season_of_excavations_and_restoration_on_the_island_of_Elephantine
  28. https://exploreluxor.org/el-tarif-necropolis/
  29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40000143
  30. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/archaeology-of-pharaonic-egypt/ritual-and-discourse/7E9C4D02FAC76F364DA2CA77A2D47C26
  31. https://www.meretsegerbooks.com/pages/books/M0090b/arnold-dieter/graber-des-alten-und-mittleren-reiches-in-el-tarif
  32. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/591346
  33. https://academic.oup.com/book/43915/chapter/370990496
  34. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/kingship-power-and-legitimacy-in-ancient-egypt/early-middle-kingdom-reunifies-egypt/4B95CEEA3E723A0E51B84855E8B7CEC1
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.