Hubbry Logo
MardukMardukMain
Open search
Marduk
Community hub
Marduk
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Marduk
Marduk
Marduk
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Marduk
9th-century BC depiction of the Statue of Marduk, with his servant dragon Mušḫuššu. This was Marduk's main cult image in Babylon.
AbodeBabylon
PlanetJupiter
Symbolmušḫuššu, spade
Genealogy
ParentsEnki and Damgalnuna
SiblingsNinsar, Ninkurra, Uttu, Ninti
ConsortSarpanit
ChildrenNabu
Equivalents
GreekZeus[1]
RomanJupiter
EgyptianAmen or Ra
This article contains cuneiform script. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of cuneiform script.
Part of a series on
Religion in Mesopotamia
Chaos Monster and Sun God
Chaos Monster and Sun God
Primordial beings
Seven gods who decree
  • Four primary
  • Three sky gods
Other major deities
Minor deities
Demigods and heroes
Spirits and monsters
Tales
Terms
Genealogy

Marduk (/ˈmɑːrdʊk/;[2] cuneiform: 𒀭𒀫𒌓 dAMAR.UTU; Sumerian: amar utu.k "calf of the sun; solar calf"; Hebrew: מְרֹדַךְ, Modern: Merōdaḵ, Tiberian: Mərōḏaḵ) is a god from ancient Mesopotamia and patron deity of Babylon who eventually rose to prominence in the 1st millennium BC. In Babylon, Marduk was worshipped in the temple Esagila. His symbol is the spade and he is associated with the Mušḫuššu.[3]

By the 1st millennium BC, Marduk had become astrologically associated with the planet Jupiter. He was a prominent figure in Babylonian cosmology, especially in the Enūma Eliš creation myth.

Name

[edit]

The name of Marduk was solely spelled as dAMAR.UTU in the Old Babylonian Period, although other spellings such as MES and dŠA.ZU were also in use since the Kassite Period. In the 1st millennium BC, the ideograms dŠU and KU were regularly used.[4] The logogram for Adad is also occasionally used to spell Marduk.[5]

Texts from the Old Babylonian period support the pronunciation Marutu or Marutuk, with the shortened spelling Martuk or Marduk attested starting from the Kassite period. His name in Hebrew, Merodak, supports the longer version,[6] and First Millennium Assyrian and Babylonian texts employ the long spelling when the circumstances call for the precise form of the name.[7] The personal name Martuku is not to be confused with the god Marduk.[8] Marduk was commonly called Bēl (lord) in the First Millennium BC.[9]

The etymology for the name Marduk is generally understood to be derived from damar-utu-(a)k, meaning "bull-calf of Utu".[7] Sommerfield suggests this is used to explain the name Marduk in the Enuma Elish as "He is the 'son of the sun[a]' of the gods, radiant is he."[11] While the name may suggest a relationship with Shamash, Marduk has no genealogy with the sun god.[12] However, Babylon was closely associated with the city of Sippar in this period, which may have been the reason for the name.[13]

History

[edit]

3rd millennium BC

[edit]

Marduk, along with the city of Babylon, was unimportant[14] and sparsely attested in the 3rd millennium BC. The earliest mention of Marduk comes from a fragmentary inscription, most likely dating to the Early Dynastic II period (ED II). It is left by an unnamed ruler of the city of BAR.KI.BAR (likely Babylon[15]) who constructed a temple for Marduk.[16] A text from the Fara period (ED IIIa) seems to mention Marduk without the divine determinative, and a fragment of a contemporary god list from Abu Salabikh contains dutu-ama[r], likely Marduk written with reversed sign order.[17] A dubious reference to Marduk from the subsequent Ur III period comes from the possible personal name "Amar-Sin is the star of Marduk",[18] although Johandi suggests that the god Martu who appeared together with Enki and Damgalnuna in the Ur III period could possibly refer instead to the similarly named Marduk who is otherwise missing in Ur III documentation, as Martu is later attested to have a different parentage (Anu and Urash) and Marduk is later considered the son of Enki/Ea.[19] If so, this could be evidence that Marduk was already part of the pantheon of Eridu during the Ur III period.

Old Babylonian period

[edit]
Main article: Old Babylonian period

During the First Dynasty of Babylon under the king Sumu-la-El, Marduk appeared in oaths and several year names,[20] namely year name 22, which recorded fashioning a throne for Marduk, and year name 24, which recorded making a statue for the goddess Zarpanitum, his spouse.[21] Marduk also started to appear in theophoric names, which would become more frequent in the following decades but would remain rare, appearing in less than 1% of names, although it would grow to 1-2% under Hammurabi.[22] During the reigns of Sabium, Apil-Sin and Sin-muballit, Marduk started to be mentioned outside of the city of Babylon and was invoked alongside local gods in cities subject to the Babylonian kings.[23] Starting from the reign of Hammurabi, sanctuaries to Marduk were found in other cities.[24]

In the Old Babylonian Period, while Marduk is acknowledged to be the ruler of the people,[25] there is no evidence that Hammurabi or his successors promoted Marduk at the expense of other gods.[26] Enlil was still recognized as the highest authority, and Marduk was far from being the pantheon head,[27] instead appearing to be a mediator between the great gods and Hammurabi.[28] This is also expressed in inscriptions from Hammurabi's successor Samsu-iluna, expressing that he receives Enlil's orders through the other gods, such as Ishtar, Zababa, Shamash and of course Marduk.[29]

A key development during the Old Babylonian period was the association of Marduk with the pantheon of Eridu. Marduk was syncretized with Asalluhi in the later half of the Old Babylonian period, and the opening of the Code of Hammurabi identify Ea as the father of Marduk,[30] a genealogy that would remain canonical. God lists from the Old Babylonian period sometimes place him within the circle of Enki.[31] TCL 15 10 lists Asalluhi and Marduk as separate gods, but close together in the list. Lambert suggests that this may be an intrusion by another scribe, and that the editor scribe did so under the belief that Marduk and Asalluhi were the same god.[31] Johandi on the other hand suggests that Marduk and Asalluhi were not seen as the same god, but were viewed to be related to one another.[32] The Nippur God List also lists Asalluhi and Marduk separately, with Marduk appearing seventy names before Asalluhi.[33] In the Weidner god list, however, it appears that Marduk and Asalluhi were viewed as the same god.[34]

According to the Marduk prophecy and inscriptions of Agum II, the statue of Marduk and Zarpanitum were removed from Babylon by Mursili I during his raid on Babylon (middle chronology 1595 BC), which was returned during the reign of Agum II.[35]

Middle Babylonian period

[edit]
Main article: Middle Babylonian period

In the Kassite period, theophoric names containing Marduk grew to over 10%, and the local temple to Marduk in Nippur was firmly integrated and well established.[26] The Kassite kings sometimes gave Marduk pompous epithets,[26] showing Marduk's growing popularity, however Enlil still ranks as the most important Mesopotamian god, still heading the list along with Anu and Ea. At least five Kassite kings bore theophoric names containing Enlil,[36] and Kassite kings, especially Nazi-Maruttash and Kudur-Enlil, are known to have visited Nippur at the beginning of the year.[37] Kurigalzu calls himself the "regent of Enlil"[38] and Dur-Kurigalzu's temple complex holds temples to Enlil, Ninlil and Ninurta.[39]

There are two administrative documents from Nippur from the reigns of two Kassite kings, perhaps Nazi-Maruttash and Shagarakti-Shuriash, that mention the celebration of the akitu festival connected to Marduk.[40] Another text claims the late Kassite king Adad-shuma-usur embarked on a pilgrimage from Babylon to Borsippa and Kutha, Marduk, Nabu and Nergal respectively.[37] However, there are reasons to doubt the historicity of these texts, especially the alleged journey of Adad-shuma-usur since the trio of Marduk, Nabu and Nergal fit the ideology of the 1st millennium BC.[37] Nonetheless, the texts could be evidence that the rise of Marduk was a gradual process that began before Nebuchadnezzar I.[41] Similarly, in the god list An = Anum the number 50, Enlil's number, was assigned to Marduk instead.[42]

A private document dating to the reign of Ashur-uballit I in Assyria refers to a sanctuary of Marduk in the city of Assur. A gate of Marduk was also attested in Assur in the 13th Century.[43] Similar to the Neo-Assyrian period, Marduk was mentioned to receive offerings and gifts in Assur. In the Coronation text of Tukulti-Ninurta, Marduk even received the same amount of offerings as Ashur.[43] The statue of Marduk was carried off by Tukulti-Ninurta I to Assyria, where it would stay until it was returned. The cult of Marduk in Assyria would remain attested in the Neo-Assyrian period.

Marduk was found in Ugarit in an Akkadian hymn that may have been part of the scribal school curriculum.[44]

During the Kassite period, Nabu, previously the scribe of Marduk, came to be viewed as Marduk's son.[45]

Second dynasty of Isin

[edit]

By the time of the Babylonian Dynasty of Isin (not to be confused with the Sumerian Dynasty of Isin), an established syncretism of Babylon and Nippur (and by extension Marduk and Enlil) was in place. The names of the city walls were switched, with Imgur-Enlil and Nimit-Enlil in Babylon while Imgur-Marduk and Nimit-Marduk were in Nippur.[46] A first millennium bilingual hymn to Nippur links Babylon and Nippur together:

Nippur is the city of Enlil, Babylon is his favorite. Nippur and Babylon, their meaning is the same.[37]

The ideology of the supremacy of Marduk is generally viewed to have been promoted by Nebuchadnezzar I and his successors. Nebuchadnezzar's second campaign into Elam and the return of the statue of Marduk that was carried off to Elam by either Shutruk-Nahhunte[47] or his son Kutir-Nahhunte[48][49][50] in 1155 BC is thought to be the trigger.[51] However, there are chronological problems regarding the abduction of the statue by the Elamites, as the statue of Marduk abducted by Tukulti-Ninurta I wasn't returned yet by the Assyrians before the Elamites sacked Babylon in 1155 BC. Johnson suggests that Tukulti-Ninurta could have taken a different statue of Marduk while the main cult statue was taken by Kuter-Nahhunte,[52] while Bányai believes that immediately following the return of the statue of Marduk by Ninurta-tukulti-Ashur a second invasion by Kuter-Nahhunte carried off the same statue.[49]

Nonetheless, beginning from the reign of Nebuchadnezzar, acknowledgement of Marduk's supremacy over other gods was now the norm. A kudurru dating to the reign of Nebuchadnezzar claims that Marduk, now the "king of the gods" directly dispatched Nebuchadnezzar and gave him weapons,[47] and in the Epic of Nebuchadnezzar, it is Marduk who commanded the gods to abandon Babylonia.[53] A kudurru from the reign of Enlil-nadin-apli calls Marduk the "king of the gods, the lord of the lands", a title that Enlil traditionally held.[47] Likewise, when Simbar-shipak, the first king of the Second Dynasty of Sealand, made Enlil a replacement throne for the one made by Nebuchadnezzar, in his mind this was actually dedicated to Marduk.[54] Other texts, such as Akkadian prayers and incantations also call Marduk the king of the gods.[55]

1st millennium BC

[edit]

The earliest copy of the Enuma Elish, the Babylonian epic of creation, was found in the city of Assur and dated to the 9th century,[56] although the text could go back to the Isin II period.[53] Dalley believes that the Enuma Elish may have been composed during the Old Babylonian Period,[57] although other scholars consider it unlikely.[58] The Enuma Elish describes Marduk's ascendance to kingship by defeating Tiamat. In the end, Marduk is proclaimed the ruler, declares Babylon as the city of kingship, received his fifty names (fifty being the number of Enlil), while Enlil is ignored.[59]

In Assyrian sources, most of the mentions of Marduk's power and authority came from the reigns of the Sargonids.[55] Generally, the Neo-Assyrian kings cared for Babylon and the cult of Marduk. Shalmaneser III visited multiple Babylonian sanctuaries, including that of Marduk.[60] Tiglath-pileser III, after conquering Babylonia, participated in the Akitu festival in Babylon,[61] and Sargon II made Babylon his temporary residence while Dur-Sharrukin was under construction and took part in the Akitu.[62][63] Marduk frequently appears in Assyrian royal inscriptions, before the Assyrian kings even gained control over Babylonia.[64] In continuation from the Middle Assyrian times, an actual cult of Marduk seemed to have also existed in the Neo-Assyrian period. The Assyrian Divine Directory mentioned that a shrine to Marduk existed in the temple of Gula in Ashur in the Neo-Assyrian period.[43] Marduk and his son Nabu also shared a sanctuary in Nineveh, although it seemed that Nabu was the main deity in contrast to Marduk.[43]

One exception was Sennacherib, who after a series of revolts and the extradition of the crown prince Assur-nadin-shumi to the Elamites (who then probably killed him), decided to destroy Babylon.[65] The Destruction of Babylon in 689 BCE was, judging from Sennacherib's own accounts, bad by Neo-Assyrian standards.[66] Outside of claiming to have destroyed the temples and the cult statues, there was no explicit mention of the fate of Marduk's statue, although Esarhaddon would later claim that the cult statue was taken from Babylon.[67] Sennacherib followed with what has been called a religious reform, the infrastructure of Assur being refashioned in the model of Babylon's, and the Assyrian edition of the Enuma Elish replaced Marduk with the god Ashur (spelled as Anshar) and Babylon with Assur (spelled as Baltil).[68] Other texts referencing Marduk were also adapted and changed to fit Ashur instead, and a bed and throne dedicated to Marduk were rededicated to Ashur after the furniture was brought from Babylon to Assur.[69] The Marduk Ordeal contained cultic commentaries on the Akitu festival reinterpreted to refer to instead Marduk's punishment.[61][70] However, the more radical reforms were reversed under the reign of his successor Esarhaddon, who also oversaw the reconstruction of Babylon and the eventual return of the statue of Marduk under Šamaš-šuma-ukin. Esarhaddon also crafted a narrative justifying both Sennacherib's destruction and his rebuilding by citing Marduk's divine anger as the cause for Babylon's destruction, who originally decreed for the city to be abandoned for seventy years, but Marduk relented and allowed Esarhaddon to rebuild it.[71][b]

Nabonassar claimed that Marduk proclaimed him lordship and had ordered him to "plunder his enemy's land" (referring to Assyria), who only ruled Babylonia due to divine anger. He claimed that he killed the Assyrian and laid waste to his lands by the command of Marduk and Nabu and with the weapons of Erra,[74] which was the main trio of the First Millennium Babylonian ideology.[37] In literary texts from the Achaemenid and Seleucid eras, Marduk is said to have commissioned Nabonassar to take revenge on the land of Akkad (Babylonia).[75]

In royal inscriptions of the Neo-Babylonian kings, Marduk is exalted as the king of the gods and as the source of their authority, while Enlil is hardly ever mentioned except when in relation to the city of Nippur.[76] In a Late Babylonian god list, all the gods on the list were identified with Marduk. For example, Ninurta was Marduk of the pickaxe, Nabu was Marduk of accounting, Shamash was Marduk of justice and Tishpak was Marduk of the troops.[77] This "syncretistic tendency" is observed in other late texts, where the other gods appear as aspects of Marduk.[78]

Cyrus, justifying his conquest of Babylonia, claimed that Marduk had abandoned Nabonidus who offended Marduk by turning his back on the Esagila in the Cyrus Cylinder.[79] Another anti-Nabonidus text, the Verse Account, explains that Nabonidus favoured Sin over Marduk.[80] Nabonidus' reverence for the moon god may have been because of familial roots to the city of Harran, and later he even revived the religious institutions of Ur, the main sanctuary of Sin.[81]

Characteristics

[edit]
Mušḫuššu, a dragon-like creature, was associated with Marduk.

Symbol

[edit]

His symbol is the spade and he is associated with the Mušḫuššu, a dragon-like creature from Mesopotamian mythology.[3]

Original role

[edit]

Since sources pertaining to Marduk in the early periods are sparse, Marduk's original role is unknown. However, since Marduk appeared in the Abu Salabikh list behind three minor deities whose names point to a possible connection with the underworld, Johandi suggests that Marduk may have been a minor god connected to the underworld.[82] Similarly, Oshima recently proposed that Marduk may have originally had a role similar to Nergal, which may even explain why the logogram dAMAR.UTU is used in Hittite texts to write the name of the god Šanta,[83] who was similar in nature to Nergal.[84]

In the earlier forerunners to the Udug Hul where both Marduk and Asalluhi appear together in a passage Marduk, in contrast to Asalluhi, does not help the victim but instead captures him, either because of his powerlessness or because he simply refused to help.[85] Oshima interpreted the passage as supporting the idea that Marduk's original role was illness and death.[86] Similarly, in Sin-iddinam's prayer to Ninisina, Asalluhi (here identified with Marduk) imposing an evil spell on Sin-iddinam (the king of Larsa) causing him to become sick[87] may reflect that Marduk's power to cause illness extended beyond the dominion of Babylon.[88] However Sommerfield, who previously believed that there was little evidence for Marduk being related to magic,[89] more recently suggested that Marduk was originally a god of incantations before his syncretism with Asalluhi.[90]

Jacobsen suggests that Marduk was originally a storm god due to the storm imageries in the Enuma Elish, wielding the four winds and storms as weapons, and assigning to himself the rain and clouds that came from Tiamat's corpse.[91] Abusch, citing Jacobsen, also believes that Marduk was a storm god, and may have been associated with water and vegetation before joining the pantheon of Eridu as it is improbable to suppose that all of Marduk's traits with water as being taken from the circle of Enki.[92] However, there is no other evidence suggesting that Marduk was originally a local storm god, and the usage of wind and storm as weapons are not limited to storm gods.

Schwemer points to Ninurta, who is not a storm god, as the original model for Marduk using storms, winds and floods as weapons.[93] Schwemer also summarizes that although Marduk has characteristics that overlap with the storm god profile, it does not mean that Marduk or other gods in similar position (such as Ninurta, Martu, Telepinu and Tishpak) are necessarily storm gods.[94]

Marduk's symbol, the spade, may point to him originally being a god of agriculture, or more likely as a god of canals and by extension fertility.[95] Unlike Abusch, Oshima believes that Marduk's association with water came from his association with canals. He is depicted as the supplier of water in Prayer to Marduk no.2, dating to the Kassite period, and was praised as the bringer of water from rivers, seasonal floods and rains to the fields.[96] Various prayers to Marduk refer to his connection with springs and rivers, and Ashurbanipal applies the epithet "the canal inspector of the heavens and the earth" to Marduk[97][c].

Marduk's anger and mercy

[edit]

Sin-iddinam's prayer to Ninisina shares similar motifs with the Prayer to Marduk no.1 and Ludlul bel nemeqi, where Marduk's anger is blamed for some certain ailment affecting the sufferer, and can only be remedied by Marduk having mercy and forgiving them. In the Prayer to Marduk no.1, Marduk is asked to not kill his client,[100] and in Ludlul Marduk is praised for his mercy after forgiving his client.[101] As such, some scholars claim that Marduk was being praised for his wrath,[102] and others claim that Marduk comes off as having "unpredictable mood swings.[103]" Lambert also points to one of Marduk's names in the Enuma Elish, Meršakušu ("savage, yet relenting"), suggests that the Babylonians may have stressed Marduk's mercy so he could be less savage,[6] although Oshima proposes that the Babylonians had to stress both his wrath and mercy to appease him.[101] Others believe that the purpose of the poem was to stress that Marduk's true inner quality was mercy and benevolence.[104] The Prayer to Marduk no.2, on the other hand, praises Marduk's power to heal, which may have been as a result of syncretism with Asalluhi.[105]

Connections to the River Ordeal

[edit]

Due to being the son of Ea, Marduk had connections with the River Ordeal.[106] Sin-iddinam's prayer to Ninisina also identified Idlurugu (the river ordeal) as the father of Marduk/Asalluhi, in contrast to the standard genealogy.[86]

Incantations

[edit]

Marduk features in incantations of the Marduk-Ea type formula, in which the god Ea/Enki engages in dialogue with his son Marduk/Asalluhi. The structure of the formula starts with Marduk/Asalluhi noticing a problem and reporting to his father. Ea reassures his son about his knowledge and then proceeds to instruct his son on the procedures.[107] In later incantations from the First Millennium BC, the priests usually claim to be direct representations of Marduk/Asalluhi, replacing the divine dialogue between father and son,[108] for example in Marduk's Address to the Demons the priest starts by declaring themselves to be Marduk.[109] In Neo-Assyrian Assyria, Marduk was one of the major gods that incantation-prayers were directed at, with only Shamash being invoked more than Marduk.[110] It is difficult to tell if Marduk originally had a role in incantations prior to being identified with Asalluhi.[111] Marduk sometimes appears in the Sumerian-Akkadian bilinguals as the Akkadian name for Asalluhi,[107][112] although Marduk and Asalluhi were also attested to appear separately in two different texts, one being the incantation against the evil Udug where Marduk captured the victim instead of helping in contrast to Asalluhi who sought out Enki,[85][111] the other being an incantation against Lamashtu that listed Marduk and Asalluhi separately as deterrence to the demon.[113]

Epics and literature

[edit]

Enuma Elish

[edit]
Main article: Enuma Elish

The Enuma Elish, generally believed to have been composed in the Isin II period, details Marduk's rise to power as the king of the gods. There are similarities between the Epic of Creation and the Anzu myth as well as other traditions related to Ninurta.[59] The Tablet of Destinies is a key object in both myths, and Marduk uses largely the same weapons as Ninurta.[114] A ritual tablet mentions how the Epic of Creation would be recited and possibly reenacted during the Akitu festival, on the fourth day of the month of Nisannu.[115] The epic starts off by mentioning Apsu and Tiamat, here the oldest gods, and created a younger generation of the gods. However, Apsu was disturbed by their noisiness and decided to kill them. Ea, however, found out about the plot and kills Apsu and takes his splendour. Later Marduk was born to Ea and Damkina, and already at birth he was special. Tiamat then decides to wage war against the younger generation of the gods, giving Kingu the Tablet of Destinies and appointing him as the commander. Marduk volunteers to do battle against Tiamat and defeats her. The world was fashioned from Tiamat's corpse with Babylon as the center, and Marduk assumes kingship and receives his fifty names. The fifty names taken was based on the An = Anum god list, the columnar arrangement removed and slotted in.[116] One of his titles, bēl mātāti (king of the lands) originally belonged to Enlil, who was conspicuously missing from the epic except when he gave this title to Marduk[117]

Ludlul bel nemeqi

[edit]
Main article: Ludlul bel nemeqi

Also known as the "Babylonian Job[118]", the poem describes the narrator's suffering caused by Marduk's anger, causing him to lose his job and to experience hostility from his friends and family. Diviners were incapable of helping him and his personal protective spirits and gods also did not come to help. He claims that nobody understood the actions of the gods, and despite the narrator's protests of innocence and that he had always been pious to the gods and never abandoned him, he quickly became ill and was on death's bed. Then, in a series of dreams, he met a young man, an incantation priest that purified him, a young woman with a godlike appearance who came to say that his suffering had ended, and an incantation priest from Babylon. Afterwards, the narrator praises Marduk's mercy[119] which was the main point of the text despite the expressions of Marduk's anger.[120]

Epic of Erra

[edit]

In the Erra epic, Erra convinced Marduk to leave Esagil and to go to the netherworld, leaving Erra to become king. Afterwards, Erra wreaks havoc on all the cities and causes instability. Marduk came back and lamented the state of Babylon. Unlike the Enuma Elish which championed Marduk as the bringer of peace and stability, Marduk is here the one who brought instability by leaving his seat, thus bringing darkness upon the world.[121] He also indirectly brought war by yielding to Erra.[122]

Marduk Ordeal

[edit]

Written in the Assyrian dialect,[123] versions of the so-called Marduk Ordeal Text are known from Assur, Nimrud and Nineveh.[70] Using sceneries and language familiar to the procession of the Akitu Festival, here Marduk is instead being held responsible for crimes committed against Ashur and was subject to a river ordeal and imprisonment.[70] The text opens with Nabu arriving in Babylon looking for Marduk, his father. Tashmetum prayed to Sin and Shamash.[124] Meanwhile, Marduk was being held captive, the color red on his clothes was reinterpreted to be his blood, and the case was brought forward to the god Ashur. The city of Babylon also seemingly rebelled against Marduk, and Nabu learned that Marduk was taken to the river ordeal. Marduk claims that everything was done for the good of the god Ashur and prays to the gods to let him live[d]. After various alternate cultic commentaries, the Assyrian version of the Enuma Elish was recited, proclaiming Ashur's superiority.[126] However, despite the content, the Marduk Ordeal was not simply an anti-Marduk piece of literature. At no point was Marduk actually accused of a crime, and the end of the text seems to suggest that the gods fought to get Marduk out by drilling holes through the door which he is locked behind.[127] Marduk also appeared in the curse section, so it is possible that the majority of the blame was put on the Babylonians for leading Marduk astray, while Marduk retains a position within the pantheon.[128] While most attribute this text to Sennacherib's destruction of Babylon, Frymer-Kensky suggests that the background could be the return of Marduk's statue to Babylon in 669 BCE.[127]

Enmesharra's Defeat

[edit]

Known from only one copy and with a badly damaged top half, Enmesharra's Defeat is likely composed in the Seleucid or Parthian era.[129] Structurally similar to the Enuma Elish, the text starts with Enmesharra and his seven sons going against Marduk, who subsequently defeated them and threw them into jail with Nergal as the prison warden. The preserved portion starts with Nergal announcing Marduk's judgement to Enmesharra that he and his sons would all be put to death, and Enmesharra laments about Marduk's terrible judgement and pleads with Nergal. Nergal replies, but the text breaks off.[130] Nergal is then shown to be escorting Enmesharra and his sons to Marduk, who first beheads the sons, and Enmesharra's radiance was then taken and given to Shamash. Nabu was also given the power of Ninurta, Nergal those of Erra, and Marduk took Enlil's power. Marduk, Nabu and Nergal then shared the throne, which likely previously belonged to Anu, together. The gods were then assigned their cities, and a voice from heaven could be heard. A fish-goat praised Marduk as the exalted lord, and the text ends with the gods gathering at Babylon.

Syncretisms

[edit]

Asalluhi

[edit]

The earliest evidence of Asalluhi's syncretism with Marduk is Sin-iddinam's prayer to Ninisina,[131] where Asalluhi was called the "king of Babylon.[132]" An Old Babylonian text substitutes "son of Eridu" for "lord of Tintir" as a title for Asalluhi[133] (Tintir being another attested name for Babylon.[134]) In Hammurabi's prayer to Asalluhi, he is clearly viewed as synonymous with Marduk.[135] However, in a prayer for Samsu-iluna, Marduk and Asalluhi were mentioned as separate gods, suggesting that the syncretism Marduk = Asalluhi was not yet fully established as canonical in the Old Babylonian period.[136] Johandi also suggests that keeping Marduk and Asalluhi separate was a deliberate act on the part of Samsu-iluna to reclaim authority over the southern cities,[137] which were centers of rebellion during the early years of his reign.

Sommerfield suggested that the syncretism may have been due to both having a similar role as a god of incantations,[138] or because Asalluhi was more well known in Southern Babylonia compared to Marduk, who was still a local god.[89] Lambert also believes the syncretism to be a means to elevate Marduk to a more respectable position.[31] Johandi proposes that Marduk and Asalluhi were identified for some other reason other than magic, and Marduk only became a god associated with magic after being syncretized with Asalluhi.[139]

Enlil

[edit]

The syncretism of Babylon and Nippur was in place from the Isin II period, and the names of the city walls were switched, with Imgur-Enlil and Nimit-Enlil in Babylon while Imgur-Marduk and Nimit-Marduk were in Nippur.[46] By extension, Marduk was also identified with Enlil, and in the Isin II period Marduk was attested with Enlil's titles. Marduk was often called the "Enlil of the gods" in the First Millennium.

A statue of Marduk, conveniently named "King of the gods of Heaven and the Underworld" was placed in Enlil's sanctuary in Babylon, and Marduk receives the title bēl mātāti "king of the lands" in the Enuma Elish.[117]

Tutu

[edit]

The previous patron deity of Borsippa. Although Hammurabi recognized Tutu's dominion as extending over Borsippa and E-zida,[140] Tutu became another name for Marduk after Hammurabi, but became a byname for Nabu in the First Millennium.[141] Tutu was also a name for Marduk in the Enuma Elish.[142] In the bird call text, the bird of Enmesharra calls that he sinned against Tutu, here meaning Marduk.[141]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ Fontenrose 1980, pp. 150, 158.
  2. ^ "Marduk". Collins English Dictionary. HarperCollins.
  3. ^ a b Wiggermann 1992, p. 157.
  4. ^ Sommerfield 1982, p. 7.
  5. ^ Schwemer 2001, p. 75.
  6. ^ a b Lambert 1984, p. 6.
  7. ^ a b Lambert 1984, p. 7.
  8. ^ Sommerfield 1982, p. 8.
  9. ^ Oshima 2011, p. 39.
  10. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 117.
  11. ^ Sommerfield 1982, p. 10.
  12. ^ Sommerfield 1982, p. 11.
  13. ^ Lambert 1984, p. 8.
  14. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 251.
  15. ^ Beaulieu 2019, p. 29.
  16. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 249.
  17. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 250.
  18. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 250-251.
  19. ^ Johandi 2019, p. 72-73.
  20. ^ Sommerfield 1982, p. 22.
  21. ^ Beaulieu 2018, p. 71.
  22. ^ Sommerfield 1987, p. 363.
  23. ^ Sommerfield 1982, p. 27.
  24. ^ Sommerfield 1987, p. 363-364.
  25. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 256.
  26. ^ a b c Sommerfield 1987, p. 364.
  27. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 256-258.
  28. ^ Johandi 2018, p. 565.
  29. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 257-258.
  30. ^ Sommerfield 1982, p. 13.
  31. ^ a b c Lambert 2013, p. 252.
  32. ^ Johandi 2019, p. 110.
  33. ^ Johandi 2019, p. 114.
  34. ^ Johandi 2019, p. 116.
  35. ^ Beaulieu 2018, p. 119.
  36. ^ Beaulieu 2018, p. 139.
  37. ^ a b c d e Tenney 2016, p. 160.
  38. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 266.
  39. ^ Malko 2017, p. 481.
  40. ^ Tenney 2016, p. 158.
  41. ^ Tenney 2016, p. 161.
  42. ^ Lambert 1984, p. 3.
  43. ^ a b c d Frame 1999, p. 13.
  44. ^ Ayali-Darshan 2022, p. 39.
  45. ^ Beaulieu 2018, p. 157.
  46. ^ a b Schneider 2022, p. 758.
  47. ^ a b c Lambert 2013, p. 271.
  48. ^ Beaulieu 2018, p. 150.
  49. ^ a b Bányai 2016, p. 124.
  50. ^ Nielsen 2018, p. 3.
  51. ^ Beaulieu 2018, p. 161.
  52. ^ Johnson 2013, p. 114-115.
  53. ^ a b Beaulieu 2018, p. 162.
  54. ^ George 1997, p. 69.
  55. ^ a b Lambert 2013, p. 275.
  56. ^ Frahm 2010, p. 5.
  57. ^ Dalley 2008, p. 229.
  58. ^ Frahm 2010, p. 5-6.
  59. ^ a b Seri 2006, p. 517.
  60. ^ Frahm 2017b, p. 291.
  61. ^ a b Frahm 2017b, p. 292.
  62. ^ Frahm 2017a, p. 183.
  63. ^ Sommerfield 1987, p. 366.
  64. ^ Frame 1999, p. 14.
  65. ^ Frahm 2017b, p. 293.
  66. ^ Nielsen 2018, p. 95.
  67. ^ Nielsen 2018, p. 97.
  68. ^ Frahm 2010, p. 8.
  69. ^ Frahm 2010, p. 10.
  70. ^ a b c Nielsen 2018, p. 98.
  71. ^ Nielsen 2018, p. 102-103.
  72. ^ Johnson 2013, p. 116.
  73. ^ Cogan 2009, p. 166-167.
  74. ^ Bedford 2016, p. 57-58.
  75. ^ Bedford 2016, p. 59.
  76. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 263.
  77. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 264.
  78. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 265.
  79. ^ van der Spek 2014, p. 28.
  80. ^ van der Spek 2014, p. 29.
  81. ^ Beaulieu 2018, p. 239.
  82. ^ Johandi 2018, p. 552-553.
  83. ^ Oshima 2011, p. 47.
  84. ^ Taracha 2009, p. 113.
  85. ^ a b Geller 1985, p. 15.
  86. ^ a b Oshima 2011, p. 45.
  87. ^ Brisch 2007, p. 143.
  88. ^ Oshima 2011, p. 46.
  89. ^ a b Sommerfield 1982, p. 16.
  90. ^ Sommerfield 1987, p. 368.
  91. ^ Jacobsen 1968, p. 106.
  92. ^ Abusch 1999, p. 544.
  93. ^ Schwemer 2007, p. 128.
  94. ^ Schwemer 2016, p. 70.
  95. ^ Oshima 2006, p. 80.
  96. ^ Oshima 2006, p. 81.
  97. ^ Oshima 2006, p. 82.
  98. ^ Hoffner,_Jr. 1998, p. 52.
  99. ^ Pongratz-Leisten 2015, p. 261.
  100. ^ Oshima 2011, p. 49.
  101. ^ a b Oshima 2011, p. 51.
  102. ^ Oshima 2011, p. 50.
  103. ^ Piccin & Worthington 2015, p. 114, citing Spieckermann.
  104. ^ Piccin & Worthington 2015, p. 116.
  105. ^ Oshima 2011, p. 62.
  106. ^ Soldt 2005, p. 127.
  107. ^ a b George 2016, p. 2.
  108. ^ Johandi 2019, p. 182.
  109. ^ Geller 2015, p. 15.
  110. ^ Frame 1999, p. 15.
  111. ^ a b Cunningham 1997, p. 114.
  112. ^ Cunningham 1997, p. 114-115.
  113. ^ Johandi 2019, p. 176.
  114. ^ Dalley 2008, p. 230.
  115. ^ Dalley 2008, p. 231.
  116. ^ Seri 2006, p. 515.
  117. ^ a b George 1997, p. 66.
  118. ^ Oshima 2014, p. 3.
  119. ^ Oshima 2014, p. 11.
  120. ^ Oshima 2014, p. 9.
  121. ^ Dalley 2008, p. 293.
  122. ^ Frahm 2010, p. 7.
  123. ^ Frymer-Kensky 1983, p. 131.
  124. ^ Frymer-Kensky 1983, p. 134.
  125. ^ Livingstone 1989, p. 88.
  126. ^ Livingstone 1989, p. 85.
  127. ^ a b Frymer-Kensky 1983, p. 140.
  128. ^ Nielsen 2018, p. 99.
  129. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 281.
  130. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 291.
  131. ^ Johandi 2019, p. 154.
  132. ^ Johandi 2019, p. 141.
  133. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 253.
  134. ^ Beaulieu 2019, p. 30.
  135. ^ Johandi 2019, p. 144.
  136. ^ Oshima 2011, p. 195.
  137. ^ Johandi 2019, p. 147.
  138. ^ Sommerfield 1982, p. 17.
  139. ^ Johandi 2018, p. 561.
  140. ^ George 1997, p. 68.
  141. ^ a b Lambert 2013, p. 288.
  142. ^ Lambert 2013, p. 125.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Marduk

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Marduk (/ˈmɑːrdʊk/; cuneiform: 𒀭𒀫𒌓 dAMAR.UTU; Sumerian: amar utu.k "calf of the sun; solar calf"; Hebrew: מְרֹדַךְ, Modern: Merōdaḵ, Tiberian: Mərōḏaḵ) was the patron deity of the city of and the supreme god of the Mesopotamian pantheon by the first millennium BCE, presiding over justice, compassion, healing, regeneration, magic, and fairness. He is best known as the central figure in the Babylonian creation epic , where he defeats the chaos goddess , slays her forces, and uses her body to form the heavens and earth, thereby establishing cosmic order and claiming kingship among the gods. In this myth, the assembled deities grant him fifty names symbolizing his supreme attributes and authority. Originally an obscure local god in the third millennium BCE, possibly linked to incantations and syncretized with the deity Asalluḫi in association with and the god /Ea, Marduk's prominence grew alongside Babylon's political power. His elevation accelerated during the reign of King (c. 1792–1750 BCE), when he assimilated attributes from other major gods such as warrior aspects and Enki's wisdom, transforming him into a multifaceted creator and protector figure. By the second millennium BCE, Marduk had replaced as the head of the pantheon, reflecting Babylon's imperial dominance. Marduk's worship centered on the temple in , a vast complex that included the , and he was honored annually during the New Year's festival, where rituals reenacted his victory over to renew kingship and fertility. His primary symbol was the , a horned snake-dragon, often depicted alongside a (marru) representing his agricultural ties, and he was commonly invoked as Bel, meaning "Lord." Marduk's consort was (also Zarpanitu), first attested around 1880–1845 BCE, and his cult extended to other cities like , though it waned after the fall of to in 331 BCE.

Name and Etymology

Origins and Meaning

The name Marduk, rendered in as dAMAR.UD, derives from Sumerian elements where AMAR signifies "calf" or "young bull," and UD represents Utu, the sun god, yielding a interpreted as "calf of the sun" or "solar calf." This interpretation, however, is considered a later popular association rather than the original meaning, as Marduk's genealogical ties do not consistently position him as Utu's son in mythological texts. Scholarly analysis suggests the name may predate Sumerian linguistic conventions, potentially incorporating non-Sumerian substrates, though definitive origins remain obscure. Debates surrounding the semantic implications of Marduk's name often center on its protective and incantatory connotations, influenced by early Sumerian associations with purification rituals and wisdom traditions. Some researchers propose connections to the deity Asalluḫi (or Asarluḫi), a minor god of magic and from the pantheon, whose name also lacks a clear but evokes themes of benevolent intervention against chaos. This implies that Marduk's name may have absorbed protective attributes from Sumerian local cults, emphasizing roles in averting misfortune rather than solar imagery alone. Alternative interpretations, such as links to storm or marsh-related elements, have been proposed but lack robust support and are generally dismissed in favor of the incantation-focused reading. The earliest cuneiform attestations of Marduk appear in the Early Dynastic period around 2500 BCE, though these are ambiguous and limited to local Babylonian contexts, such as possible theophoric elements in personal names or ritual lists. Clearer evidence emerges in the Old Babylonian period (ca. 2000–1600 BCE), where the name is explicitly tied to incantations, marking the beginning of its broader theological significance. These early references establish Marduk as a rooted in southern Mesopotamian traditions before his later elevation.

Variations and Epithets

Marduk's name exhibits variations between Sumerian and Akkadian forms, with the Sumerian logographic writing dAMAR.UD representing the , while the Akkadian syllabic rendering is typically ma-ru-du-uk or similar, reflecting phonetic adaptations such as the shift from Sumerian UD to Akkadian -duk. These forms appear in bilingual texts and inscriptions from the Old Babylonian period onward, illustrating the god's integration into broader Mesopotamian religious contexts. Among the most common epithets for Marduk are "Lord of Babylon" and "King of the Gods," which underscore his role as patron of the and supreme ruler of the pantheon, particularly in late-period royal inscriptions. The title "Bel-Marduk," where Bel signifies "," became prevalent in the first BCE, often used interchangeably with Marduk in cultic and literary texts to emphasize his authority. These honorifics evolved to reflect Marduk's ascending status, from a local figure to the head of the divine assembly. In Babylonian god lists and hymns, Marduk is attributed over 50 distinct titles, many of which elaborate his multifaceted attributes and powers. A prominent example is found in the , where Tablet VII enumerates 50 names bestowed upon him after his victory over , including Asar-alim-nuna, meaning "great lord of the ," symbolizing his foundational role in creation and urban order. These epithets, drawn from Sumerian and Akkadian roots, highlight Marduk's evolving roles in cosmology, kingship, and ritual. Marduk's prominence is further evidenced by his frequent appearance in theophoric personal names, particularly during the Kassite period (c. 1600–1155 BCE), where names incorporating the exceeded 10% of the onomasticon, indicating widespread devotion across social strata. This high frequency in Kassite naming practices, as analyzed in records, reflects the god's rising cultic importance beyond into broader Babylonian society.

Historical Development

Early Attestations (3rd Millennium BC)

Marduk's earliest attestations appear in the Early Dynastic III period, around 2500 BC, in administrative and lexical texts from southern . A fragment of a god list from (OIP 99, plate 49, no. 89) includes Marduk, written as dutu-amar (with reversed signs), positioned among netherworld deities, suggesting an initial chthonic association. Similarly, a text from Fara (WVDOG 43, 29, rev. I 3–8) possibly references Marduk as amar-utu in a list of deities, though the reading remains debated due to orthographic ambiguities. These mentions portray Marduk as a minor figure without national significance, primarily linked to the pantheon of through with Asalluḫi, a described as a "whirling storm" and identified as the son of (Ea). This connection positions Marduk as an aspect or offspring of Ea, emphasizing and incantatory roles rather than prominence. No evidence ties him directly to in this era, and his cult lacked widespread recognition beyond local contexts. Archaeological evidence for Marduk's early worship is sparse, with no definitive cylinder seals or artifacts from the third millennium BC explicitly depicting him or confirming cult sites near . A dedication inscription on (YOS IX 2) may hint at early veneration in the Babylon region, but its precise dating and provenance are uncertain, underscoring Marduk's obscurity before his later political elevation.

Rise in Old and Middle Babylonian Periods

During the Old Babylonian Period, Marduk emerged as the patron deity of , particularly under King (c. 1792–1750 BC), whose reign marked the city's political ascendancy. In the prologue to the , the king declares that Marduk, as the "lord of the lands," commissioned him to rule justly and promote the welfare of his people, thereby establishing the god as the divine endorser of royal authority. This portrayal elevated Marduk beyond his prior local associations, integrating him into the broader justification of Babylonian kingship and imperial expansion. In the subsequent Middle Babylonian or Kassite Period (c. 1595–1155 BC), Marduk's prominence solidified as the Kassite dynasty adopted Babylon as their capital and actively supported his cult. Royal inscriptions, such as that of Agum-kakrime, document the recovery of Marduk's statue from exile in Ḫana and its reinstallation in the Esagila temple, accompanied by the refurbishment of cult images and rituals. This act underscored Marduk's central role in Kassite legitimacy, with kings invoking him alongside traditional deities. The god's growing influence is reflected in onomastics, where theophoric names incorporating Marduk increased to over 10% of attested personal names, indicating widespread devotion. Temples dedicated to Marduk were also founded beyond Babylon, including one in Nippur as a counterpart to the Enamtila shrine, facilitating his integration into regional cult practices. Royal inscriptions from both periods facilitated Marduk's transformation into a pan-Mesopotamian figure, as Babylonian and Kassite rulers attributed military victories and building projects to his favor, gradually equating his authority with that of while extending his across conquered territories. This ideological shift, evident in texts praising Marduk's and , laid the groundwork for his later supremacy in the pantheon.

Kassite and Isin II Influences

During the (c. 1595–1155 BC), which established as its capital, rulers actively invoked Marduk as a prominent deity, integrating him into the Babylonian pantheon through with local gods such as Asalluhi, associating Marduk with and the wisdom of /Ea, and with Tutu, the patron of . This elevation is evidenced by the celebration of the akītu festival at in the 13th century BC, where administrative texts like CBS 10616 and CBS 11536 record sacrifices and offerings to Marduk alongside , blending Babylonian cult practices with Sumerian traditions to legitimize Kassite rule. Kassite kings, including (c. 1186–1172 BC), patronized temple constructions and repairs, such as those to the Ehursagkalamma in Kish, reflecting broader efforts to support Marduk's cult amid regional integrations. However, the period ended with an Elamite invasion that abducted Marduk's statue, temporarily diminishing his cult's prominence. The Second Dynasty of Isin (c. 1157–1025 BC) marked a revival of Marduk's status following the Kassite collapse, particularly under the late Kassite king Marduk-apla-iddina I (c. 1171–1159 BC), whose name itself honors Marduk and whose reign bridged the dynasties through land grants and protective inscriptions emphasizing the god's favor. This revival intensified under Isin II rulers like (c. 1125–1104 BC), who retrieved Marduk's statue from and returned it to in a triumphant , restoring the god's central in Babylonian identity and using his in anti-Assyrian rhetoric during conflicts with . Marduk-nādin-aḫḫē (c. 1095–1078 BC) further highlighted this by portraying Marduk as a divine protector against Assyrian threats in royal inscriptions. Evidence of Marduk's enduring protective role appears on kudurru boundary stones from both periods, where curses invoke him to punish land violators. In the Kassite era, a kudurru from 's reign grants land to Khasardu and calls upon Marduk, "the leader of the gods," to pursue transgressors with evil (col. III, l. 13). Another under Marduk-apla-iddina I awards land to Marduk-zākir-šumi, beseeching Marduk and to deny mercy to offenders (col. III, ll. 42–44). During Isin II, a kudurru of Marduk-nādin-aḫḫē (10th year) grants land to Adad-zēr-ikīša, listing Marduk among deities ensuring the stele's sanctity (col. III, ll. 23–24), while an undated Isin II example for Gula-erēš invokes Marduk, "," to impose severe punishment on violators (col. IV, ll. 4–6). These stones underscore Marduk's integration into legal and divine enforcement across dynastic shifts.

Neo-Babylonian and Achaemenid Prominence

During the (626–539 BC), Marduk reached the zenith of his prominence as the supreme deity of the Babylonian pantheon, particularly under King (r. 604–562 BC), who undertook extensive restorations of the temple complex in dedicated to Marduk. 's inscriptions describe how Marduk and entrusted him with the task of embellishing the city and restoring its temples, including the , which he rebuilt using millions of bricks to reinforce its sacred status as the "House of the Raised Head." In royal inscriptions from this period, Marduk is exalted as the sole king of the gods and the ultimate source of divine authority, effectively demoting from his traditional role as chief deity everywhere except in the cult center of , where Enlil's worship persisted. This theological shift underscored Marduk's universal dominion, aligning Babylonian imperial ideology with his cosmogonic victory in texts like the . Following the Persian conquest in 539 BC, Marduk's prominence adapted under Achaemenid rule (539–331 BC), as evidenced by the , which portrays Marduk as the divine orchestrator of the Great's victory over the Neo-Babylonian king . The cylinder's text states that Marduk "pronounced the name of , king of , declared him ruler of all the world," and chose him to restore order after 's impiety, thereby legitimizing Persian authority while honoring Babylonian religious traditions. 's policies further integrated Marduk into the empire by repatriating exiled cult images and maintaining the Esagila's rituals, with theophoric names incorporating Marduk continuing among Babylonian elites throughout the Achaemenid era. In late Babylonian theological texts, such as god lists from this period, reached its peak by equating nearly all major deities with specific aspects of Marduk, reinforcing his monolatrous supremacy. For instance, is identified as "Marduk of the pickaxe," symbolizing Marduk's dominion over agriculture and warfare, while becomes "Marduk of the written word" and "Marduk of lordship." These lists, preserved in temple libraries like that of , illustrate how Marduk absorbed the attributes of the entire pantheon, culminating in a hierarchical where all gods manifested his singular power.

Characteristics and Attributes

Iconography and Symbols

Marduk's prominently features the , known as the marru, a triangular-headed tool that originated as an agricultural implement for digging canals and systems, reflecting his early associations with and water management in Babylonian contexts. Over time, particularly from the Old Babylonian period onward, the marru evolved into a divine scepter symbolizing Marduk's royal authority over the land and its cultivation, often depicted standing on altars or held by the god in artistic representations. Accompanying this is the , a hybrid snake-dragon with a horned viper's head, scaly body, forepaws, eagle talons, and tail, serving as Marduk's sacred animal emblem of protection and power. The horned crown, a multi-tiered headdress of horns common to major Mesopotamian deities, further adorns Marduk in surviving images, signifying his divine kingship. Visual depictions of Marduk appear primarily on cylinder seals from the Old Babylonian period (circa ), where he is shown as a bearded figure wielding weapons against monstrous foes, such as spearing a lion-dragon hybrid to assert cosmic order. In the Neo-Babylonian era, under (604–562 BC), Marduk's symbols dominate monumental architecture, including the glazed brick reliefs of the in , where processions of mušḫuššu dragons alternate with lions and to symbolize the god's guardianship over the city. These reliefs, molded in vibrant blue-glazed ceramic, portray the mušḫuššu in dynamic poses, emphasizing its role as a fierce yet controlled beast aligned with Marduk's dominion. Marduk's iconography is distinguished from that of predecessor deities like through unique emblems such as the , whereas is more closely linked to the horned cap and, in mythological contexts, of destinies representing divine decrees. This motif, absent in Enlil's primary symbols, underscores Marduk's localized Babylonian identity tied to urban and agricultural prosperity, even as he adopts shared divine attributes like the horned crown. In ritual practices, these symbols—particularly the and —were invoked for and incantations, reinforcing Marduk's presence in .

Original Role as Local Deity

Marduk originally functioned as the patron deity of , a local city god whose worship was centered on protecting the urban center and its surrounding marshes during the Early Dynastic and Old Babylonian periods. His emerged alongside the city's growth, with early attestations linking him exclusively to Babylonian prosperity rather than broader Mesopotamian or cosmic domains. In this initial role, Marduk was closely tied to water management, , and , reflecting the vital needs of Babylon's agrarian economy in the Euphrates floodplain. He was invoked as a canal digger who maintained ditches and springs, ensuring seasonal floods from the and supported crop growth and livestock abundance. As the firstborn son of Ea (), the god of the subterranean freshwater ocean (apsû), Marduk embodied regenerative forces, channeling fresh waters for agricultural renewal in the Babylonian marshes. His healing attributes complemented these, positioning him as a restorer of through rituals tied to water's purifying power. Marduk also served as patron of and incantations, a domain inherited from his paternal lineage and emphasized in Old Babylonian texts where he aided in exorcisms and protective spells without extending to universal authority. This contrasted sharply with supreme deities like , whose rule encompassed the heavens and all cities; Marduk's scope remained localized to Babylon's defenses, , and communal well-being. Old Babylonian hymns further depict him as a localized storm-bringer, summoning rains for regional harvests but lacking the cosmic later attributed to him in Babylonian . His iconographic symbolized this practical role in earthworks and .

Divine Personality: Anger, Mercy, and Justice

Marduk's divine personality in Babylonian literature reveals a complex anthropomorphic character marked by intense wrath, capable of inflicting widespread suffering on both individuals and the city of . In the poem , Marduk's anger leads him to abandon the protagonist, stripping away divine protection and resulting in , terrifying dreams, and demonic afflictions that manifest as debilitating illnesses and plagues-like symptoms, such as chills, , and wasting away. This wrathful abandonment extends metaphorically to itself, symbolizing the god's withdrawal from his people as a form of for perceived offenses. Balancing this ferocity is Marduk's capacity for , which emerges after periods of appeasement through prayer and ritual penance. In , once his mind is soothed, Marduk dispatches healing messengers, reverses the sufferer's misfortunes, and restores , status, and , affirming his relenting heart and gentle palm that rescues the dying. This dual nature—furious yet compassionate—portrays Marduk as an emotionally dynamic whose interventions reflect a that punishes wrongdoing but ultimately favors redemption. Marduk's sense of manifests through mechanisms like divine ordeals, where tests determine guilt or legitimacy, balancing his with measured , particularly in the context of royal legitimization during festivals like the . In these s, the king undergoes a symbolic ordeal before Marduk's image, such as a ritual slap to confirm divine approval, underscoring the god's role in upholding ethical order and validating rulers as instruments of fairness. This approach contrasts with the unchanging, impartial of , the sun god whose steady gaze symbolizes unwavering equity, while Marduk's volatile introduces elements of caprice and restoration influenced by the legal of Hammurabi's era, where Marduk himself entrusts the king with promoting and protecting the land from .

Ritual Connections: Ordeal and Incantations

Marduk played a pivotal role in Babylonian legal rituals as the guarantor of truth during the river ordeal, a judicial practice where an accused individual underwent trial by drowning to determine guilt or innocence. This ordeal is explicitly outlined in §2 of the , which states that if a man charged another with sorcery but could not prove it, the accused would plunge into the river; survival indicated innocence, while drowning signified guilt, with the accuser facing execution in the former case. As patron deity of and overseer of Hammurabi's system, Marduk was invoked to ensure the river's , reflecting his attributes of and in resolving disputes. Beyond legal ordeals, Marduk extended his influence to protective , serving as patron of the asû-priests, healers who employed incantations to combat demonic afflictions and diseases. These recited spells invoking Marduk's authority to expel evil spirits, drawing on his expertise in purification and . A key example is the composition Marduk's Address to the Demons, an exorcistic text comprising approximately 260 lines, where Marduk directly confronts and subdues malevolent entities, proclaiming his supremacy over them to safeguard humanity. This text, part of the Utukkū lemnūtu series (Tablet 11), was performed by āšipu-exorcists who identified with Marduk, wearing ritual garments symbolizing his splendor to amplify the incantation's efficacy. Marduk's domain in and was distinct from that of his father Ea, who encompassed broader and incantation creation from the Apsû. While Ea supplied the foundational spells, Marduk focused on their practical implementation against demons, often in triad with Ea and Šamaš for purification and judgment. In late Babylonian god lists, such as , Marduk is epitomized as the "lord of ," underscoring his specialized role in warding off supernatural threats through ritual address and command.

Literary Depictions

Enuma Elish and Cosmogonic Role

The , known as the Babylonian Epic of Creation, is an Akkadian-language mythological text that narrates the origins of the cosmos and the ascendancy of Marduk as the supreme deity of the Babylonian pantheon. Composed during the reign of (c. 1125–1104 BCE), the epic reflects a period of Babylonian resurgence following military victories, serving to legitimize Marduk's primacy in the divine hierarchy. The text, preserved on seven clay tablets, begins with the primordial chaos of the mingled fresh and salt waters embodied by Apsu and , whose union produces the first generation of gods, leading to discord among the younger deities. In the epic's cosmogonic narrative, Marduk, son of Ea (Enki), emerges as the champion selected by the assembled gods to confront , who, enraged by the slaying of Apsu, creates an army of monstrous allies to restore order on her terms. Armed with winds, a net, and divine weapons forged by the gods, Marduk engages in battle, filling her mouth with gale-force winds to prevent her from closing it before piercing her heart with an arrow, thus defeating the embodiment of chaos. Victorious, Marduk splits 's corpse to form the heavens and earth: her upper half becomes the sky, held in place by barring the waters above, while her lower half shapes the terrestrial realm, with her eyes forming the sources of the and rivers, her tail the , and her ribs the vault of heaven. He then organizes the cosmos by assigning stations to the stars, constellations, and planets, establishes the temple in as the divine abode, and creates humanity from the blood of Kingu, 's consort and slain general, to serve the gods and relieve them of labor. As reward for his deeds, the gods acclaim Marduk with fifty names, each encapsulating an aspect of his power and attributes, symbolizing his comprehensive sovereignty over all divine functions and ensuring his eternal supremacy. The , the great gods, submit to Marduk's authority, with three hundred stationed in the heavens and three hundred in the underworld, forming his divine court and affirming Babylon's as the cosmic center where fates are decreed. This elevation marks a theological shift, positioning Marduk as the new creator-king in place of , adapting older Sumerian motifs to center Babylonian theology on Marduk and his city. The was ritually recited during the festival, Babylon's New Year celebration in the month of Nisannu (spring), specifically on the fourth day in the temple, to reenact the triumph over chaos and renew cosmic order annually. This liturgical role underscored Marduk's ongoing role in maintaining the universe's stability, linking the myth directly to Babylonian state and religious identity.

Ludlul bel nemeqi and Personal Piety

Ludlul bēl nēmeqi, often translated as "I Will Praise the Lord of Wisdom," is an Akkadian poem from the late second millennium BCE, likely composed during the Kassite period around 1300 BCE. The work narrates the ordeal of a righteous sufferer, Šubši-mešrê-Šakkan, who faces inexplicable calamities despite his toward , the chief Babylonian . This text exemplifies personal in Mesopotamian by depicting the individual's unwavering devotion amid divine disfavor, emphasizing reliance on , , and to restore harmony with the gods. In the plot, the protagonist laments his descent into illness, poverty, and social isolation, attributing these woes to Marduk's concealed anger, which withdraws divine protection and invites chaos. Friends and family abandon him, and he questions the gods' justice, yet he persists in supplication. Marduk's wrath persists until intercessor gods, including Ea and Asalluhi, advocate for the sufferer, leading to Marduk's relenting mercy; this shift manifests through three revelatory dreams featuring ritual experts who perform purification rites, and omens that herald recovery and reinstatement to favor. The poem concludes with thanksgiving hymns extolling Marduk's benevolence, portraying his return as a personal salvation. The narrative grapples with , probing why a virtuous endures undeserved hardship, and affirms that stems not from inherent guilt but from inscrutable divine will, resolvable through pious . Marduk emerges as unpredictable in his fury yet fundamentally just, his mercy signaled by omens and dreams that guide human response. This duality of anger and compassion aligns with broader depictions of Marduk's temperament. The poem's exploration of innocent has drawn scholarly parallels to the biblical , particularly in motifs of pious lament and divine restoration.

Epic of Erra and Marduk Ordeal

The Epic of Erra, also known as the Poem of Erra and , is a Babylonian literary composition dating to approximately the BCE, preserved on tablets from the Neo-Babylonian period. In this narrative, Marduk, identified as Asalluḫi, is depicted as recognizing that his divine statue has become defiled due to the excessive noise and impurity of 's inhabitants, necessitating a period of purification. Persuaded by Erra (a destructive aspect of ), Marduk voluntarily abdicates his throne in Esagil, the temple in , and departs for the Apsû (the subterranean waters) to undergo cleansing rituals, leaving Erra in temporary control. During Marduk's absence, Erra unleashes widespread chaos and devastation across the land, ravaging cities, slaying humans and gods alike, and embodying themes of uncontrollable violence and plague; his Ishum attempts to mitigate the destruction but fails to fully restrain it. The epic portrays this as a cosmic disruption, with the natural order unraveling—rivers drying up, animals turning feral, and society collapsing—highlighting Marduk's essential role in maintaining harmony. Upon completing his purification, Marduk returns to , reclaims his throne, and restores equilibrium, with Erra subdued and the world renewed through Marduk's merciful intervention. The Marduk Ordeal Text, a fragmentary Akkadian composition from the late first millennium BCE, presents a distinct of Marduk's vulnerability through a divine . In this account, Marduk (referred to as or simply "the god") faces accusation by of gods for unspecified transgressions, possibly related to the mismanagement of cosmic order or historical misfortunes befalling . He is bound, interrogated, and subjected to an ordeal involving submersion in water, symbolizing a test of purity akin to human judicial practices, with his consort (likely Ṣarpanītu) interceding on his behalf before Šamaš and Sîn. Ultimately, Marduk is exonerated, his innocence affirmed, and he is released to resume his kingship, underscoring themes of , redemption, and the precarious balance of divine authority. Both texts reflect late Babylonian traditions where Marduk's power is shown as temporarily eclipsed, revealing a more humanized portrayal of the amid , contrasting his supreme cosmogonic role in earlier myths. Scholars link these narratives to historical upheavals, particularly the Assyrian invasions and the 689 BCE sack of Babylon by , during which Marduk's statue was looted and the city devastated, symbolizing the god's "absence" and subsequent restoration under later rulers. This motif of ordeal and return may also connect to ritual practices in the festival, where Marduk's symbolic humiliation and triumph reinforced cosmic and political stability.

Enmesharra's Defeat and Late Traditions

In the Late Babylonian myth known as Enmešarra's Defeat, Marduk engages in a confrontation with Enmešarra, an ancient underworld deity symbolizing primordial forces, and his seven sons, who are depicted as rebellious warriors akin to the Sebitti. The narrative unfolds with Nergal, the enforcer of the underworld, bringing the challengers before Marduk for trial; Marduk then subdues them through divine judgment and combat, binding their powers and affirming his unchallenged rule. This victory not only neutralizes the threat to cosmic order but also solidifies Marduk's kingship, portraying him as the ultimate arbiter capable of quelling subterranean disorder. Composed in the Seleucid or Parthian era (approximately the BCE to CE), the text reflects post-Hellenistic esoteric traditions that maintained Marduk's centrality amid cultural shifts. Its anti-chaos themes parallel earlier cosmogonic motifs but adapt them to emphasize Marduk's ongoing vigilance against archaic rivals, ensuring stability in the divine hierarchy. The single preserved tablet, originating from , highlights the myth's role in reinforcing Marduk's supremacy during a period of foreign rule. Supporting this portrayal, late Babylonian god lists such as equate Marduk with a vast array of deities, assigning him the sacred number 50—previously Enlil's—and presenting him as the embodiment of all divine attributes, thus affirming his total authority over the pantheon. These lists, copied into the , underscore the enduring theological construct of Marduk as the comprehensive sovereign, integrating older Neo-Babylonian equivalences into a unified vision of totality.

Syncretism and Identifications

Merger with Asalluhi and Tutu

Marduk's with Asalluhi, an early Sumerian associated with incantations and purification rites, occurred by the Old Babylonian period, allowing Marduk to absorb Asalluhi's specialized role in magical practices. Asalluhi, originally a son of Ea and linked to the city of , was fully merged into Marduk's identity, resulting in the composite form Marduk-Asalluhi that appears in ritual texts where he collaborates with Ea and to counter evil omens and perform exorcisms. This merger expanded Marduk's domain into healing and , emphasizing his role as a divine who thwarts demonic threats through incantations. Similarly, Marduk incorporated Tutu, a protective originally patron of , into his persona during the late second millennium BCE, as evidenced in god lists and syncretistic hymns. Tutu, known for binding foes and warding off evil in spells, became equated with Marduk as Marduk-Tutu, particularly in protective rituals against enemies and malevolent forces. This absorption is reflected in shared cultic spaces, such as 's Ezida temple, which rededicated to Marduk despite its prior association with Tutu. These mergers with Asalluhi and Tutu enhanced Marduk's functions in and protection, with texts like Marduk's to the Demons illustrating how the composite invokes spells to expel demons, often alongside references to rituals. Through these syncretisms, Marduk transitioned from a local Babylonian god to a multifaceted patron of magical , integrating minor deities' attributes into his broader theological profile.

Equivalence to Enlil and Other Gods

In the aftermath of the Enūma Eliš, Marduk's elevation to the head of the Mesopotamian pantheon involved a deliberate theological equivalence with , the traditional Sumerian lord of the earth and chief executive deity. Marduk inherited key titles from , such as "lord of the land" (bel māti), symbolizing supreme authority over the terrestrial realm, a transfer that underscored Babylon's aspiration to supplant 's religious primacy. This equivalence was foreshadowed in the prologue to the (ca. 1792–1750 BCE), where and explicitly entrust Marduk with the "Enlil-ship" (enlilūtu) over humanity, granting him oversight of kingship and justice. However, this identification remained rare in texts, Enlil's cult center, where local traditions resisted full assimilation, but it became standard in Babylonian and broader Mesopotamian compositions elsewhere. Marduk's syncretism extended to other supreme deities, positioning him as a multifaceted universal god. He was equated with in his celestial aspect, representing the distant sky-father and ultimate sovereignty, while his identification with Ea () emphasized wisdom, magic, and subterranean waters, often through his role as Ea's son in mythological narratives. These equivalences reflected Marduk's absorption of attributes from the older Sumerian triad of , Enlil, and Ea, allowing him to embody the full spectrum of divine functions—from heavenly decree to earthly rule and intellectual counsel. By the late Babylonian period, god lists formalized this dominance, portraying all major deities as aspects or manifestations of Marduk. In the canonical An = Anum list (Middle Babylonian onward), Enlil appears as the "Marduk of sovereignty and control," Anu as the "Marduk of heaven," and Ea as the "Marduk of wisdom," among over fifty such identifications that subsumed the pantheon under Marduk's identity. This theological construct peaked in the Neo-Babylonian era (626–539 BCE), driven by political motivations under rulers like Nebuchadnezzar II, who promoted Marduk's supremacy to legitimize Babylonian imperial expansion and unify diverse Mesopotamian cults under Babylon's patronage.

Worship and Cult

Temples and Sacred Sites

The primary temple of Marduk was the complex in , dedicated as the "Temple whose top is high" and serving as the central sanctuary for the god's cult statue. Located south of the city's main fortress under the modern mound of Amran ibn Ali, Esagila featured a nearly square layout with a main for Marduk on the western side, additional chambers for deities like Ea, and towered gateways on all four sides; its walls were constructed of mud bricks faced with a burnt-brick kisu approximately 6 meters thick. Excavations by from 1899 to 1917 uncovered the temple's foundations at depths of up to 20 meters, revealing multiple construction phases marked by pavements and bricks stamped with Neo-Babylonian royal inscriptions, including those of proclaiming himself the "fosterer of Esagila" and donor of , silver, and precious stones to Marduk's inner chamber (Ekua). Adjoining to the north stood the ziggurat, known as the "House of the Foundation of Heaven and Earth," a seven-tiered stepped tower symbolizing Marduk's cosmic role and topped with a for the god. The structure's base measured approximately 91 by 91 meters, with a height estimated at 91 meters including its outer stairway, as confirmed by Koldewey's measurements of the foundations (91.48 by 91.46 meters) and corroborated by ancient descriptions; noted the base as about 300 feet (roughly 91 meters) per side, with each successive level smaller and accessed by a grand staircase. A cuneiform tablet from 229 BCE, now in the , details 's precise dimensions, materials (including asphalt, , and cedar for the upper temple), and restorations by , who rebuilt it to "rival the heavens" using materials from and the mountains. Beyond , Marduk's worship extended to secondary sites, including the Ezida temple at , approximately 17 kilometers southwest, where (r. 1792–1750 BCE) rebuilt the sanctuary and dedicated it to Marduk as Babylonia's national deity before its later association with . In the Kassite period (ca. 1595–1155 BCE), the new capital of featured temple complexes with additions supporting Marduk's cult, as evidenced by royal inscriptions like that of Agum-kakrime claiming restoration of Marduk's statue and sanctuaries, reflecting the dynasty's integration of the god into their pantheon amid broader building programs that included a and multiple shrines. Koldewey's early 20th-century excavations at and yielded numerous Neo-Babylonian inscriptions on bricks and cylinders from kings such as , , and , detailing repairs and offerings to Marduk, which provided key evidence for the temples' grandeur and the god's prominence in the late Babylonian empire.

Festivals, Rituals, and Priesthood

The festival, the most prominent celebration in Marduk's cult, occurred twice annually in : in spring during the month of Nisannu (–) and in autumn during Tašrītu (–), aligning with the equinoxes and symbolizing cosmic renewal. On the fourth day of Nisannu, priests recited the before Marduk's cult statue in the temple, affirming his cosmogonic victory over Tiāmat and his kingship among the gods. The festival culminated in processions of divine statues to the Akitu-house outside the city walls on the eighth day, evoking Marduk's primordial battle, followed by their triumphant return on the eleventh day, restoring order to the cosmos. A central rite of the spring involved the ritual humiliation and renewal of the king, who represented Marduk's earthly . On the fifth day, the removed the king's , slapped his , and compelled him to kneel before Marduk's , where the king confessed his innocence and fitness to rule; the absence of a reddened or the presence of signified divine approval, renewing the king's mandate. This enactment underscored Marduk's and the interdependence of divine and royal authority, with similar but less elaborate observances in the autumn version. Daily worship at Esagila centered on offerings of food, drink, and incense presented to Marduk's statue during morning and afternoon meals (ginû), performed in the temple courtyard to maintain cosmic harmony. The priesthood operated under a strict hierarchy led by the šangû, the chief administrator responsible for overseeing rituals, temple resources, and prebendary duties, often hereditary among elite families. Bārû diviners, a specialized priestly tier descended from the legendary Enmenduranki, conducted extispicy (liver divination) to interpret omens for temple decisions and royal consultations, ensuring rituals aligned with divine will. Ordeal rites featured in Marduk's cult through symbolic enactments tied to his tribulations, as described in the Marduk Ordeal Text, where his underwent and , possibly evoking a river ordeal to affirm purity. These were integrated into festival contexts like the to dramatize Marduk's trials and vindication, rather than literal passion narratives. Marduk's with Asalluhi, the god of incantations, facilitated private rituals for healing and , where invoked him as an to Ea for apotropaic spells against illness or evil, often in domestic settings. Following the Achaemenid conquest in 539 BCE, Marduk's cult persisted at under Persian patronage, but declined sharply after Xerxes' reprisals in 484 BCE, which halted temple activities; in the (331–141 BCE), priests maintained rituals like namburbû apotropaia amid reduced royal support, though production and prominence waned by the 2nd century BCE.

References

  1. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/amgg/listofdeities/marduk/
  2. https://biologos.org/articles/genesis-1-and-a-babylonian-creation-story
  3. https://www.academia.edu/43063718/Some_Remarks_about_the_Beginnings_of_Marduk
  4. https://www.worldhistory.org/Marduk/
  5. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/DDDO/DDDO-Marduk.xml?language=en
  6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20064540
  7. https://www.academia.edu/60934445/THE_ELEVATION_OF_MARDUK_REVISITED_FESTIVALS_AND_SACRIFICES_AT_NIPPUR_DURING_THE_HIGH_KASSITE_PERIOD
  8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/618314
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341413010_Some_Remarks_about_the_Beginnings_of_Marduk_Melammu_Symposia_9
  10. https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/hammurabi-the-code-of-hammurabi
  11. https://isac.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/uploads/shared/docs/oppenheim_studies.pdf
  12. https://etana.org/sites/default/files/coretexts/20257.pdf
  13. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119257561.ch6
  14. https://www.penn.museum/sites/journal/1116/
  15. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/9789004263048/B9789004263048_005.pdf
  16. https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/2008/12/isb288001
  17. https://www.academia.edu/121219035/Literary_Texts_from_the_Sippar_Library_III_Eri%C5%A1_%C5%A1ummi_A_Syncretistic_Hymn_to_Marduk_Zeitschrift_f%C3%BCr_Assyriologie_112_2022_pp_229_274
  18. https://kb.osu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/05b9a843-38a6-5eb4-bcb1-a74f0f1d973e/content
  19. https://janes.scholasticahq.com/article/2451-marduk-the-canal-digger
  20. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/mesopotamian-deities
  21. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/328299
  22. https://madainproject.com/ishtar_gate_%28babylon%29
  23. https://tuscriaturas.home.blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/encyclopedia-of-gods-demons-and-symbols-of-ancient-mesopotamia-an-illustrated-dictionary-jeremy-black-anthony-green.pdf
  24. https://janes.scholasticahq.com/article/2451-marduk-the-canal-digger/attachment/6392.pdf
  25. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1189&context=cop-facbooks
  26. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/ancient/hamcode.asp
  27. https://brill.com/display/book/9789004496293/B9789004496293_s020.pdf
  28. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004368088/BP000015.xml
  29. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/amgg/listofdeities/enki/
  30. https://www.phil.uni-wuerzburg.de/cmawro/magic-witchcraft/gods-stars/
  31. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1212&context=pubs
  32. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1058&context=studiaantiqua
  33. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/13/8/703
  34. https://janes.scholasticahq.com/api/v1/articles/2432-the-babylonian-akitu-festival-rectifying-the-king-or-renewing-the-cosmos.pdf
  35. https://religiondatabase.org/browse/1661
  36. https://www.tyndalebulletin.org/article/30290-innocent-suffering-in-mesopotamia.pdf
  37. https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstreams/a9732222-20fd-4c07-9884-0c8363d3a31c/download
  38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/601878
  39. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781474469593-008/html
  40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/601866
  41. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/city-of-babylon/in-the-shadow-of-assyria-978625/DECB4E2CF5BDC84888CAF75C1E3C5219
  42. https://www.academia.edu/43064291/The_God_Asar_Asalluhi_in_the_Early_Mesopotamian_Pantheon_PhD_thesis
  43. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/files/115626046/Konstantopoulos_They_are_Seven_Sebettu.pdf
  44. https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/3187/1/Johnson_PhD_11.pdf
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337997784_The_Spiritual_Dimensions_of_Healing_Rituals_in_Ancient_Mesopotamia
  46. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1524/aofo.1997.24.1.158/html
  47. https://babylonian-collection.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Litke%252C%2520Richard%2520L_%2520-%2520A%2520Reconstruction%2520of%2520the%2520Assyro-Babylonian%2520God-Lists_%2520TBC%25203%252C%25201998.pdf
  48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43076310
  49. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/71398/71398-h/71398-h.htm
  50. https://www.livius.org/articles/place/babylon/etemenanki/
  51. https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/W_1880-1112-1895
  52. https://anetoday.org/mirelamn-ritual-humiliation-king/
  53. https://www.thetorah.com/article/enuma-elish-babylonias-creation-myth-and-the-enthronement-of-marduk
  54. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%253A2879659/view
  55. https://www.oriental-studies.org.ua/en/lapushanski-temple-personnel-and-ritual-practice-of-the-esagil-temple-in-the-second-millennium-bc/
  56. https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/amgg/listofdeities/asalluhi/index.html
  57. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/6/731
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.