Hubbry Logo
Maxwell relationsMaxwell relationsMain
Open search
Maxwell relations
Community hub
Maxwell relations
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Maxwell relations
Maxwell relations
from Wikipedia
Flow chart showing the paths between the Maxwell relations. is pressure, temperature, volume, entropy, coefficient of thermal expansion, compressibility, heat capacity at constant volume, heat capacity at constant pressure.

Maxwell's relations are a set of equations in thermodynamics which are derivable from the symmetry of second derivatives and from the definitions of the thermodynamic potentials. These relations are named for the nineteenth-century physicist James Clerk Maxwell.

Equations

[edit]

The structure of Maxwell relations is a statement of equality among the second derivatives for continuous functions. It follows directly from the fact that the order of differentiation of an analytic function of two variables is irrelevant (Schwarz theorem). In the case of Maxwell relations the function considered is a thermodynamic potential and and are two different natural variables for that potential, we have

Schwarz's theorem (general)

where the partial derivatives are taken with all other natural variables held constant. For every thermodynamic potential there are possible Maxwell relations where is the number of natural variables for that potential.

The four most common Maxwell relations

[edit]

The four most common Maxwell relations are the equalities of the second derivatives of each of the four thermodynamic potentials, with respect to their thermal natural variable (temperature , or entropy ) and their mechanical natural variable (pressure , or volume ):

Maxwell's relations (common)

where the potentials as functions of their natural thermal and mechanical variables are the internal energy , enthalpy , Helmholtz free energy , and Gibbs free energy . The thermodynamic square can be used as a mnemonic to recall and derive these relations. The usefulness of these relations lies in their quantifying entropy changes, which are not directly measurable, in terms of measurable quantities like temperature, volume, and pressure.

Each equation can be re-expressed using the relationship which are sometimes also known as Maxwell relations.

Derivations

[edit]

Short derivation

[edit]

Source:[1]

Suppose we are given four real variables , restricted to move on a 2-dimensional surface in . Then, if we know two of them, we can determine the other two uniquely (generically).

In particular, we may take any two variables as the independent variables, and let the other two be the dependent variables, then we can take all these partial derivatives.

Proposition:

Proof: This is just the chain rule.

Proposition:

Proof. We can ignore . Then locally the surface is just . Then , etc. Now multiply them.

Proof of Maxwell's relations:

There are four real variables , restricted on the 2-dimensional surface of possible thermodynamic states. This allows us to use the previous two propositions.

It suffices to prove the first of the four relations, as the other three can be obtained by transforming the first relation using the previous two propositions. Pick as the independent variables, and as the dependent variable. We have .

Now, since the surface is , that is,which yields the result.

Another derivation

[edit]

Source:[2]

Since , around any cycle, we haveTake the cycle infinitesimal, we find that . That is, the map is area-preserving. By the chain rule for Jacobians, for any coordinate transform , we haveNow setting to various values gives us the four Maxwell relations. For example, setting gives us

Extended derivations

[edit]

Maxwell relations are based on simple partial differentiation rules, in particular the total differential of a function and the symmetry of evaluating second order partial derivatives.

Derivation

Derivation of the Maxwell relation can be deduced from the differential forms of the thermodynamic potentials:
The differential form of internal energy U is This equation resembles total differentials of the form It can be shown, for any equation of the form, that Consider, the equation . We can now immediately see that Since we also know that for functions with continuous second derivatives, the mixed partial derivatives are identical (Symmetry of second derivatives), that is, that we therefore can see that and therefore that

Derivation of Maxwell Relation from Helmholtz Free energy

The differential form of Helmholtz free energy is From symmetry of second derivatives and therefore that The other two Maxwell relations can be derived from differential form of enthalpy and the differential form of Gibbs free energy in a similar way. So all Maxwell Relationships above follow from one of the Gibbs equations.

Extended derivation

Combined form first and second law of thermodynamics,

U, S, and V are state functions. Let,

Substitute them in Eq.1 and one gets, And also written as, comparing the coefficient of dx and dy, one gets Differentiating above equations by y, x respectively

and

U, S, and V are exact differentials, therefore, Subtract Eq.2 and Eq.3 and one gets Note: The above is called the general expression for Maxwell's thermodynamical relation.

Maxwell's first relation
Allow x = S and y = V and one gets
Maxwell's second relation
Allow x = S and y = P and one gets
Maxwell's third relation
Allow x = T and y = V and one gets
Maxwell's fourth relation
Allow x = T and y = P and one gets

Derivation based on Jacobians

[edit]

If we view the first law of thermodynamics, as a statement about differential forms, and take the exterior derivative of this equation, we get since . This leads to the fundamental identity

The physical meaning of this identity can be seen by noting that the two sides are the equivalent ways of writing the work done in an infinitesimal Carnot cycle. An equivalent way of writing the identity is

The Maxwell relations now follow directly. For example, The critical step is the penultimate one. The other Maxwell relations follow in similar fashion. For example,

General Maxwell relationships

[edit]

The above are not the only Maxwell relationships. When other work terms involving other natural variables besides the volume work are considered or when the number of particles is included as a natural variable, other Maxwell relations become apparent. For example, if we have a single-component gas, then the number of particles N  is also a natural variable of the above four thermodynamic potentials. The Maxwell relationship for the enthalpy with respect to pressure and particle number would then be:

where μ is the chemical potential. In addition, there are other thermodynamic potentials besides the four that are commonly used, and each of these potentials will yield a set of Maxwell relations. For example, the grand potential yields:[3]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Maxwell relations are a set of equations in that relate the partial derivatives of the thermodynamic state functions, such as , , , and , arising from the symmetry of second partial derivatives and the exact differentials of these potentials. Named after James Clerk Maxwell, who first employed them in his analysis of thermodynamic properties, these relations stem from the combined first and second , expressed through total differentials like dU=Td[S](/page/Entropy)Pd[V](/page/Volume)dU = T d[S](/page/Entropy) - P d[V](/page/Volume), where UU is , TT is , SS is , PP is , and VV is . The four primary Maxwell relations correspond to the four fundamental thermodynamic potentials and are derived by equating the mixed second partial derivatives, ensuring the potentials are state functions. For the U(S,V)U(S, V), the relation is (TV)S=(PS)V\left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial V} \right)_S = -\left( \frac{\partial P}{\partial S} \right)_V. For the H(S,P)H(S, P), it is (TP)S=(VS)P\left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial P} \right)_S = \left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial S} \right)_P. The A(T,V)A(T, V) yields (SV)T=(PT)V\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial V} \right)_T = \left( \frac{\partial P}{\partial T} \right)_V, and the G(T,P)G(T, P) gives (SP)T=(VT)P\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial P} \right)_T = -\left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial T} \right)_P. These relations are invaluable in because they connect experimentally measurable quantities, such as and changes, to thermodynamic properties like that are harder to measure directly, facilitating the calculation of dependencies without additional experiments. For instance, the relation from the allows determination of the change with volume at constant using the thermal expansion coefficient. They also underpin derivations in and apply to a wide range of systems, from ideal gases to complex materials, ensuring consistency in thermodynamic modeling.

Introduction

Definition and principles

Maxwell relations are a set of thermodynamic equations that arise from the equality of mixed second partial derivatives of thermodynamic potentials, which are state functions in thermodynamics. These relations stem from the fundamental mathematical property in multivariable calculus that, for a potential Φ\Phi depending on natural variables xx and yy, the mixed derivatives satisfy (2Φxy)=(2Φyx)\left( \frac{\partial^2 \Phi}{\partial x \partial y} \right) = \left( \frac{\partial^2 \Phi}{\partial y \partial x} \right), assuming the second derivatives are continuous. This principle, applied to thermodynamics, ensures the total differentials of potentials like internal energy or Gibbs free energy are exact, linking conjugate pairs of variables such as entropy and temperature, or volume and pressure. In essence, Maxwell relations connect key thermodynamic variables—including (PP), (TT), (VV), (SS), and (μ\mu)—by equating cross-derivatives of these potentials. For instance, the general form for a potential Φ(x,y)\Phi(x, y) yields (y)x(Φx)y=(x)y(Φy)x\left( \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \right)_x \left( \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial x} \right)_y = \left( \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right)_y \left( \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial y} \right)_x, where the partials correspond to measurable responses like or . This interconnection arises because thermodynamic potentials are constructed via Legendre transforms from the fundamental relation, such as dU=TdSPdV+μdNdU = T dS - P dV + \mu dN, allowing relations to bridge across different ensembles. These relations play a crucial role in thermodynamics by guaranteeing the internal consistency of experimental data on state variables, as any inconsistency would violate the equality of mixed derivatives. Moreover, they enable the prediction of hard-to-measure properties—such as changes in entropy with pressure—from more accessible quantities like isothermal volume expansion, without requiring direct calorimetric or volumetric experiments. This predictive power stems from the symmetry inherent in exact differentials, reducing the number of independent second derivatives needed to describe a system and facilitating broader applications in equilibrium thermodynamics.

Historical development

The development of classical thermodynamics in the mid-19th century provided the essential context for the emergence of Maxwell relations, following Sadi Carnot's pioneering 1824 study of heat engines, which established the efficiency limits of reversible cycles, and Rudolf Clausius's subsequent 1850s formulations of the first and second laws, including the introduction of as a measure of unavailable . These advances shifted the understanding of heat from a fluid-like substance to a form of , enabling deeper exploration of state functions and their interdependencies. James Clerk Maxwell introduced the relations in 1871 within his influential textbook Theory of Heat, where he derived them as consequences of the symmetry in the second partial derivatives of thermodynamic potentials, such as expressed in terms of and . Maxwell applied these relations to connect phenomena with mechanical properties, including elasticity in solids and fluids, demonstrating how changes in temperature and pressure relate to variations; his work built on Hermann von Helmholtz's 1847 principle of , which highlighted potential functions in thermodynamic processes. Shortly thereafter, advanced the framework in his 1876–1878 memoir On the Equilibrium of Heterogeneous Substances, formalizing the use of thermodynamic potentials like the to study phase equilibria and heterogeneous systems, where the relations served as foundational equalities among cross-derivatives to ensure consistency in equilibrium conditions. Gibbs's rigorous integration of these tools with vector analysis and graphical methods elevated their role in predicting chemical and physical behaviors, bridging Maxwell's derivations with practical applications in complex systems. By the early 20th century, Maxwell relations had solidified as standard analytical instruments, prominently featured in Max Planck's 1897 Treatise on Thermodynamics, which presented them as direct outcomes of the exact differential nature of state functions and used them to derive properties like specific heats and compressibilities. Planck's authoritative text, emphasizing empirical foundations over speculative models, disseminated the relations widely in academic curricula, ensuring their enduring status as cornerstones of thermodynamic theory.

Thermodynamic Prerequisites

Exact differentials in thermodynamics

In thermodynamics, an exact differential refers to the total differential of a , which depends solely on the current state of the system and is independent of the path taken to reach that state. For a state function Φ(x,y)\Phi(x, y), its differential takes the form dΦ=Mdx+Ndyd\Phi = M\, dx + N\, dy, where M=(Φx)yM = \left( \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial x} \right)_y and N=(Φy)xN = \left( \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial y} \right)_x. This form is exact if the integral of dΦd\Phi between any two states yields the same result regardless of the path, ensuring Φ\Phi is well-defined as a function of state variables. The condition for exactness is the equality of mixed second partial derivatives: My=Nx\frac{\partial M}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial N}{\partial x}. This cross-derivative test, derived from the symmetry of second derivatives in (Clairaut's theorem), confirms whether the differential corresponds to a . In , this property is crucial because it allows state functions to be integrated path-independently, facilitating the definition of equilibrium properties without regard to history. Thermodynamic state functions, such as internal energy UU, exhibit exact differentials, as their changes depend only on initial and final states. For instance, the fundamental relation for internal energy is dU=TdSPdVdU = T\, dS - P\, dV, where TT is temperature, SS is entropy, PP is pressure, and VV is volume; here, M=TM = T (with respect to SS) and N=PN = -P (with respect to VV), and the exactness condition holds because (TV)S=((P)S)V\left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial V} \right)_S = \left( \frac{\partial (-P)}{\partial S} \right)_V. In contrast, heat δQ\delta Q and work δW\delta W are path-dependent quantities with inexact differentials; for reversible processes, δQ=TdS\delta Q = T\, dS, but δQ\delta Q itself is not the differential of a state function, as its value varies with the process path.

Thermodynamic potentials

In thermodynamics, the primary thermodynamic potentials are state functions that describe the energy of a system in terms of its natural variables, facilitating the analysis of equilibrium properties and processes. These potentials are constructed via Legendre transforms of the , allowing the substitution of intensive variables (such as and ) for extensive ones (such as and ) to suit different experimental conditions. The four fundamental potentials—, , , and —share the property of being exact differentials, which underpins their utility in deriving relations among thermodynamic variables. The UU is the foundational , representing the total internal energy of a as a function of its SS and VV, which are its natural variables. Its differential form is given by dU=TdSPdV,dU = T \, dS - P \, dV, where TT is the and PP is the , serving as the conjugate intensive variables to SS and VV, respectively. No Legendre transform is applied to UU itself, as it is the starting point for generating the other potentials. Enthalpy HH, defined as H=U+PVH = U + PV, is obtained from the via a Legendre transform with respect to volume, replacing VV with its conjugate PP as a natural variable, alongside SS. The resulting differential form is dH=TdS+VdP,dH = T \, dS + V \, dP, making HH particularly useful for processes at constant pressure, where it relates directly to . The Helmholtz free energy FF, expressed as F=UTSF = U - TS, arises from a Legendre transform of UU with respect to entropy, substituting TT for SS while retaining VV as a natural variable. Its differential form is dF=SdTPdV,dF = -S \, dT - P \, dV, which highlights the maximum non-expansion work available at constant temperature and volume. The GG, given by G=HTSG = H - TS or equivalently G=UTS+PVG = U - TS + PV, is derived by applying an additional Legendre transform to the (replacing VV with PP) or directly from (replacing SS with TT), yielding natural variables TT and PP. The differential form is dG=SdT+VdP,dG = -S \, dT + V \, dP, rendering GG essential for constant-temperature and constant-pressure conditions, such as in chemical reactions. As exact differentials of state functions, these thermodynamic potentials enable the equality of mixed second partial derivatives, providing the mathematical foundation for Maxwell relations that connect seemingly independent thermodynamic coefficients.

Standard Maxwell Relations

The four principal relations

The four principal Maxwell relations arise from the equality of mixed second partial derivatives of the fundamental thermodynamic potentials, providing connections between thermodynamic state variables such as TT, PP, volume VV, and SS. These relations are derived from the U(S,V)U(S, V), H(S,P)H(S, P), F(T,V)F(T, V), and G(T,P)G(T, P). The subscript notation in partial derivatives, such as (T/V)S(\partial T / \partial V)_S, indicates the variable held constant during differentiation. From the , the relation is (TV)S=(PS)V.\left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial V} \right)_S = -\left( \frac{\partial P}{\partial S} \right)_V. This equates the rate of change of with at constant to the negative rate of change of with at constant , relevant for adiabatic processes where is conserved. From the enthalpy, the relation is (TP)S=(VS)P.\left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial P} \right)_S = \left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial S} \right)_P. This connects the variation with at constant to the volume variation with at constant , useful in isentropic expansions or compressions. From the , the relation is (SV)T=(PT)V.\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial V} \right)_T = \left( \frac{\partial P}{\partial T} \right)_V. This links the change with at constant to the change with at constant , facilitating analysis of isothermal volume adjustments. From the , the relation is (SP)T=(VT)P.\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial P} \right)_T = -\left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial T} \right)_P. This relates the entropy variation with at constant to the negative volume variation with at constant , directly tying to the thermal expansion coefficient α=1V(VT)P\alpha = \frac{1}{V} \left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial T} \right)_P, which measures material expansion under heating, and indirectly to isothermal compressibility through subsequent thermodynamic identities.

Explicit forms and variables

The principal Maxwell relations can be adapted into alternative forms that incorporate experimentally measurable coefficients, facilitating practical computations in thermodynamics. For instance, the relation (PT)V=(SV)T\left( \frac{\partial P}{\partial T} \right)_V = \left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial V} \right)_T is often rewritten using the coefficient of thermal expansion α=1V(VT)P\alpha = \frac{1}{V} \left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial T} \right)_P and the isothermal compressibility κT=1V(VP)T\kappa_T = -\frac{1}{V} \left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial P} \right)_T, yielding (SV)T=ακT\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial V} \right)_T = \frac{\alpha}{\kappa_T}. This form links entropy changes to volume variations at constant temperature directly through quantities obtainable from equations of state or calorimetry. Similarly, the relation (SP)T=(VT)P\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial P} \right)_T = -\left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial T} \right)_P rearranges to (VT)P=T(SP)T/VV\left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial T} \right)_P = -T \left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial P} \right)_T / V \cdot V, but more usefully expresses entropy-pressure dependence via (SP)T=Vα\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial P} \right)_T = -V \alpha, emphasizing thermal expansion's role in isothermal processes. Thermodynamic variables in Maxwell relations distinguish between extensive quantities (e.g., entropy SS and volume VV, scaling with system size) and intensive ones (e.g., temperature TT and pressure PP, independent of size). For extensive variables, the relations apply directly to total system properties, but practical applications often employ intensive or molar forms to normalize for system scale. Molar quantities, such as molar entropy s=S/ns = S/n (where nn is the total number of moles) and molar volume v=V/nv = V/n, yield analogous relations like (PT)v=(sv)T=ακT\left( \frac{\partial P}{\partial T} \right)_v = \left( \frac{\partial s}{\partial v} \right)_T = \frac{\alpha}{\kappa_T}, preserving the structure while using per-mole metrics suitable for mixtures or specific substances. These adaptations ensure consistency across system sizes, as thermodynamic potentials are homogeneous functions of degree one in extensive variables. Common rearrangements of the relations highlight dependencies useful for predicting property changes. For example, from (VT)P=(SP)T\left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial T} \right)_P = -\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial P} \right)_T, one obtains the volume-temperature response at constant pressure in terms of entropy-pressure derivatives, aiding of effects on fluids. Another frequent form derives from combining relations with heat capacities; the difference CPCV=TVα2/κTC_P - C_V = T V \alpha^2 / \kappa_T emerges indirectly through Maxwell-linked derivatives, though this specific identity stems from broader thermodynamic identities. The four principal Maxwell relations, in their canonical forms with variable dependencies, are compared below for clarity:
Thermodynamic PotentialRelationFixed VariablesDependent Variables
F(T,V)F(T, V)(SV)T=(PT)V\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial V} \right)_T = \left( \frac{\partial P}{\partial T} \right)_VTTS,V;P,TS, V; P, T
G(T,P)G(T, P)(SP)T=(VT)P\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial P} \right)_T = -\left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial T} \right)_PTTS,P;V,TS, P; V, T
H(S,P)H(S, P)(TP)S=(VS)P\left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial P} \right)_S = \left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial S} \right)_PSST,P;V,ST, P; V, S
U(S,V)U(S, V)(TV)S=(PS)V\left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial V} \right)_S = -\left( \frac{\partial P}{\partial S} \right)_VSST,V;P,ST, V; P, S
These forms specify the constraints (subscripts) and the partial derivatives involved, enabling substitution of measurable quantities like α\alpha and κT\kappa_T in the first two. In multi-component systems, Maxwell relations extend to include chemical potentials μi\mu_i for each ii, reflecting composition dependence. The fundamental relation becomes dU=TdSPdV+iμidnidU = T dS - P dV + \sum_i \mu_i dn_i, leading to generalized forms such as (Tni)S,V,{nj}=(μiS)V,{nj}\left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial n_i} \right)_{S,V,\{n_j\}} = \left( \frac{\partial \mu_i}{\partial S} \right)_{V,\{n_j\}} or (Pni)T,V,{nj}=(μiV)T,{nj}\left( \frac{\partial P}{\partial n_i} \right)_{T,V,\{n_j\}} = -\left( \frac{\partial \mu_i}{\partial V} \right)_{T,\{n_j\}}, where {nj}\{n_j\} denotes other mole numbers held constant. These account for diffusive effects and partial molar properties, with μi\mu_i treated as intensive variables analogous to TT and PP, ensuring relations remain valid for mixtures by differentiating potentials like the or with respect to nin_i. For molar forms in mixtures, partial molar quantities (e.g., vˉi=(Vni)T,P,nj\bar{v}_i = \left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial n_i} \right)_{T,P,n_j}) integrate into the relations, such as ixi(μiT)P,{xj}=sˉ\sum_i x_i \left( \frac{\partial \mu_i}{\partial T} \right)_{P,\{x_j\}} = -\bar{s}, where xix_i are mole fractions and sˉ\bar{s} is average molar .

Derivations

Derivation from exact differentials

The Maxwell relations arise from the property that the differentials of thermodynamic potentials are , meaning these potentials are state functions whose total differentials satisfy the condition that mixed second partial derivatives are equal. This equality, known as Clairaut's theorem or Schwarz's theorem, holds under the assumption that the thermodynamic potentials are twice continuously differentiable. In general, for a thermodynamic potential Φ\Phi expressed as a function of its natural variables xx and yy, the exact differential takes the form dΦ=Xdx+Ydy,d\Phi = X \, dx + Y \, dy, where X=(Φx)yX = \left( \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial x} \right)_y and Y=(Φy)xY = \left( \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial y} \right)_x. The exactness condition implies that the mixed partial derivatives are equal: (Xy)x=(Yx)y.\left( \frac{\partial X}{\partial y} \right)_x = \left( \frac{\partial Y}{\partial x} \right)_y. This equality yields the Maxwell relation for the . Consider the internal energy U(S,V)U(S, V), whose differential is dU=TdSPdV.dU = T \, dS - P \, dV. Here, X=TX = T, dx=dSdx = dS, Y=PY = -P, and dy=dVdy = dV. Applying the general condition gives (TV)S=((P)S)V=(PS)V.\left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial V} \right)_S = \left( \frac{\partial (-P)}{\partial S} \right)_V = -\left( \frac{\partial P}{\partial S} \right)_V. This is the first Maxwell relation. For the enthalpy H(S,P)=U+PVH(S, P) = U + PV, the differential is dH=TdS+VdP.dH = T \, dS + V \, dP. With X=TX = T, dx=dSdx = dS, Y=VY = V, and dy=dPdy = dP, the exactness condition yields (TP)S=(VS)P.\left( \frac{\partial T}{\partial P} \right)_S = \left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial S} \right)_P. This is the second Maxwell relation. The F(T,V)=UTSF(T, V) = U - TS has the differential dF=SdTPdV.dF = -S \, dT - P \, dV. Setting X=SX = -S, dx=dTdx = dT, Y=PY = -P, and dy=dVdy = dV, the relation becomes ((S)V)T=((P)T)V,\left( \frac{\partial (-S)}{\partial V} \right)_T = \left( \frac{\partial (-P)}{\partial T} \right)_V, or equivalently, (SV)T=(PT)V.\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial V} \right)_T = \left( \frac{\partial P}{\partial T} \right)_V. This is the third Maxwell relation. Finally, for the Gibbs free energy G(T,P)=U+PVTSG(T, P) = U + PV - TS, the differential is dG=SdT+VdP.dG = -S \, dT + V \, dP. With X=SX = -S, dx=dTdx = dT, Y=VY = V, and dy=dPdy = dP, exactness implies ((S)P)T=(VT)P,\left( \frac{\partial (-S)}{\partial P} \right)_T = \left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial T} \right)_P, which simplifies to (SP)T=(VT)P.\left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial P} \right)_T = -\left( \frac{\partial V}{\partial T} \right)_P. This is the fourth Maxwell relation.

Jacobian-based derivation

In thermodynamics, the Jacobian determinant provides a systematic framework for deriving relations between partial derivatives, particularly useful for multivariable systems. The thermodynamic Jacobian is defined as J(a,b;c,d)=acadbcbdJ(a,b;c,d) = \begin{vmatrix} \frac{\partial a}{\partial c} & \frac{\partial a}{\partial d} \\ \frac{\partial b}{\partial c} & \frac{\partial b}{\partial d} \end{vmatrix}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.