Hubbry Logo
MicrotechniqueMicrotechniqueMain
Open search
Microtechnique
Community hub
Microtechnique
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Microtechnique
Microtechnique
Microtechnique
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Microtechnique is an aggregate of methods used to prepare micro-objects for studying.[1] It is currently being employed in many fields in life science. Two well-known branches of microtechnique are botanical (plant) microtechnique and zoological (animal) microtechnique.

With respect to both plant microtechnique and animal microtechnique, four types of methods are commonly used, which are whole mounts, smears, squashes, and sections, in recent micro experiments.[2] Plant microtechnique contains direct macroscopic examinations, freehand sections, clearing, maceration, embedding, and staining.[3] Moreover, three preparation ways used in zoological micro observations are paraffin method, celloidin method, and freezing method.[4]

History

[edit]

The early development of microtechnique in botany is closely related to that in zoology. Zoological and botanical discoveries are adopted by both zoologists and botanists.[5]

The field of microtechnique lasted from at the end of the 1930s when the principle of dry preparation emerged.[6] The early development of microtechnique in botany is closely related to that in zoology. Zoological and botanical discoveries are adopted by both zoologists and botanists.[5] Since Hooke discovered cells, microtechnique had also developed with the emergence of early microscopes. Microtechnique then had advanced over the period of 1800–1875.[6] After 1875, modern micro methods have emerged. In recent years, both traditional methods and modern microtechnique have been in use in many experiments.[3]

Commonly used methods

[edit]

Some general microtechnique can be used in both plant and animal micro observation. Whole mounts, smears, squashes, and sections are four commonly used methods when preparing plant and animal specimens for specific purposes.[2]

Whole mounts

[edit]

Whole mounts are usually used when observers need to use a whole organism or do some detailed research on specific organ structure.[7] This method requires objects in which moisture can be removed, like seeds and micro fossils.[2]

According to different purposes, Whole-mounts can be divided into three categories, Temporary whole mounts, Semi-permanent whole mounts, and permanent whole mounts. Temporary whole mounts are usually used for teaching activities in class.[8] Semi-permanent whole mounts are prepared for longer using time, which is no more than fourteen days. In this preparation, Canada balsam is used to seal the specimens, and this method is used to observe unicellular and colonial algae, fungal spores, mosses protonemata, and prothalli. The third way is a permanent whole mount.[8] Two methods are usually used, which are hygrobutol method and glycerine-xylol method.[9]

Smear from solid medium and liquid medium

Smears

[edit]

Smears is an easy way for preparing slices. This method is used in many laboratories.[10] Smears can be employed when making slide specimens by spreading liquid or semi-liquid materials or lose tissues and cells of animals and plants evenly on the slide.[10] The steps and requirements for the application of the smear method are as follows: first, smear. When the solid material is smeared, the material should be placed on the glass slide and wiped away, then use the blade to press the material on one side.[11] The cells should be pressed out and distributed evenly on the glass slide in a thin layer, such as the anther smeared.[10]

Squashes

[edit]

Squashes are methods, in which objects are crushed with force. This method is suitable for preparing both transparent and tender tissues.[12] When preparing squashes slides, specimens are supposed to be thin and transparent so that objects can be observed clearly under microscopes.[12]

This technique is to place the material on the glass slide and remove it with the scalpel or to dissect needle, then add a drop of dye solution.[2] After these steps, apply the second slide to cover the initial slide and apply pressure evenly to break the material and disperse the cells.[12] Furthermore, another possible way can be used to prepare slides. The specimens can also be extruded between the cover slide and the slide with equal pressure.[12]

Sections

[edit]
Main article: Histology

Sections are known as thin slices need to be tested in all studies of cellular structures.[13] This technique can be used for the preparation of tissue of animals and plants.[14] For using under optical microscopy, the thickness of the material should be between above 2 and 25 micrometers. When observing under electron microscopy, sections should be from 20 to 30 nanometers.[2] Microtome can be used in sectioning of sufficiently thin slices. If the objects cannot satisfy the requirement of thickness, materials are required to be dehydrated using alcohol before section.[12] Three commonly used sectioning method are freehand section technique, paraffin method, and celloidin method.

Methods used in plant micro-experiments

[edit]

Botanical microtechnique is an aggregate of methods providing micro visualization of gene and gene product in an entire plant.[15] Plant microtechnique is also a study providing valuable experimental information.[3] Plant microtechnique involves classical methods developed over a hundred years ago and new methods developed to expand our research scope and depth in botanical micro studies.[15] Both traditional and new micro technique is useful for experimental research, and some will have a significant influence on further study.[3] Different methods are used to prepare plant specimens, including direct macroscopic examinations, freehand sections,[16] clearing, maceration, embedding, and staining.

Direct microscopic examinations

[edit]

The direct micro examination is a simple way prepared for observing micro-objects. Also, this method is useful to observe whether the mold grows on the surface of the specimens. This can be an initial step of the micro experiment.[17]

Freehand section

[edit]

Freehand slicing is a method of making thin slices of fresh or fixed experimental materials with a hand-held blade.[18] Freehand slicing refers to the method of directly cutting fresh or fixed materials (generally plants with a low degree of lignification) into thin slices without special instruments or special chemical reagents.[16]

Clearing

[edit]

Clearing technique provides translucent slides via removing part of cytoplasmic content and then applying high refractive index reagents to process the tissues.[2] This method is suitable for preparing whole mount slides. The clearing is a procedure of using clearing reagents for removal of alcohol and makes tissue translucent.[19] Xylene is the most popular clearing agent.[20][21]

Maceration

[edit]

Macerating tissues is the process of separating the constituent cells of tissues. This method enables observers to study the whole cell in third-dimensional detail.[8] Chemical maceration method means the using chemicals to process organs or part to soften tissue and dissolving the cells so that different cell can be identified.[8]

Tissue processing - Embedding station

Embedding

[edit]
Main article: Histology

Embedding technique is a medium stage when doing a sectioning process.[13] When preparing specimens, it is difficult to make uniform slices since the tissue is soft.[22] Therefore, it is necessary to soak the tissue with a certain substance to harden the whole tissue, to facilitate the slicing. This process is called embedding.[22] The substance used to embed tissue is embedding media, which is chosen depends on the category of the microscope, category of the micro tome, and category of tissue.[23] Paraffin wax, whose melting point is from 56 to 62°C, is commonly used for embedding.[22]

Tissue processing - Tissue sections on slides are stained on an automated stainer

Staining

[edit]
Main article: Histology

Since few plant tissues have a color, there is little chromatically difference between plant tissues makes it difficult to differentiate botanical structure.[24] Material is usually dyed before installation. This process is called staining, which can be used to prepare botanical specimens so that it is possible to distinguish one part of the sample from another in terms of color.[2] Acid dyes can be used when staining micro slides, for example, acid dyes are in use when coloring nuclei and other cellular components are stained using alkaline.[2] There are also staining machine used for staining, which allows tissue to be stained automatically.[25]

Microtechnique used for animal observation

[edit]

The zoological microtechnique is the art of the preparation for microscopic animal observation. Although many microtechniques can be used in both plant and animal micro experiments. Some methods may differ from itself when employed in different field. Three commonly used preparation ways used in zoological micro observations can be concluded as paraffin method, celloidin method, freezing method, and miscellaneous techniques.[4]

Paraffin wax

Paraffin method

[edit]

Infiltration and embedding

[edit]

This process usually consists of steps of infiltration, embedding, sectioning, affixing and processing the sections.[26] Followed by the initial stage, fixation, the next step is dehydration, which removes the water in the tissue using alcohol.[27] Then the tissue can be infiltrated and embedded with wax. A tissue specimen can keep for several years after finishing embedding this tissue into the wax.[27] Paraffin wax, which is soft and colorless, is the most commonly used reagent.[28]

Microtome-knife-profile

Sectioning

[edit]

Sectioning a tissue can use either the micro tome knife or the razor blade as the cutting blade.[4]

The micro tome knife is used for handling sectioning. It is necessary to use a micro tome knife when preparing sections less than 1/1000 micrometers.[29] When using such a knife, the operators must be extremely careful. This instrument is impractical sometimes, so using the razor blade for general work to prepare sections above 9 microns (1 micron equals 1/1000 micrometers).[29] Furthermore, the razor blade works better than the micro tome knife when requiring thick sections with no less than 20 microns.[4]

Affixing and processing

[edit]

After sectioning, the prepared slices are affixed on slides. There are two commonly used affixatives, Haupt's and Mayer's.[30] Haupt's affixative contains 100 ccs (cubic centimeter) distilled water, 1gm gelatin, 2 gm phenol crystals, 15 cc glycerine. Mayer's affixative is consist of 5 cc egg albumen, 50 cc glycerine, 1 gm sodium salicylate.[31] The general steps of affixing paraffin sections can be concluded as 1. Clean the required slides, 2. Mark the cleaned slides, 3. Drop affixative on each slide, 4. Put on another slide, 5. Spread the affixative, 6. Drop floating medium, 7. Divide the paraffin into required length, 8. Transfer the sections, 9. Add more floating medium if incomplete floating occurs, 10. Rise the temperature, 11. Remove slides and redundant floating medium, 12, drying the section.[4]

Processing paraffin sections include 1. Deparaffination, 2. Removing the deparaffing solution, 3. Hydration, 4. Staining, 5. Dehydration, 6. Dealcoholisation and clearing, 7. Mounting the cover slide.[4]

Celloidin method

[edit]

Celloidin technique is the procedure of embedding a specimen in celloidin.[32] This method can be used for embedding large, hard objects.[33] Celloidin is a digestive fiber, which is flammable, and it is soluble in acetone, clove oil, and the mixture of anhydrous alcohol and ether.[34] Celloidin will turn into white emulsion turbid liquid when it meets water, so it is required to use a dry container to contain celloidin.[33]

The method of celloidin slicing is to fix and dehydrate the tissue, then treat it with the anhydrous alcohol-ether mixture. After this step, to impregnate, embed and slice the tissue with celloidin.[35] Moreover, this slicing method can slice large tissues and has the advantage that its heat allows the tissues does not shrink. However, this technique contains some shortcomings. For instance, the slices cannot be sliced very thin (more than 20 microns), and impregnation with celloidin is time-consuming.[36]

Freezing method

[edit]

Freezing technique is the most commonly used sectioning method.[37] This method can preserve the immune activity of various antigens well. Both fresh tissue and fixed tissue can be frozen. Moreover, it is also a technique used for freezing sections of either fresh or fixed plant tissues.[38]

During the freezing procedure, the water in tissues is easy to form ice crystals, which often affects the antigen localization.[37] It is generally believed that when ice crystals are small, the effect is small, and when ice crystals are large, the damage to the tissue structure is large, and the above phenomenon is more likely to occur in tissues with more moisture components.[39] The size of an ice crystal is directly proportional to its growth rate and inversely proportional to the nucleation rate (formation rate), that is, the larger the number of ice crystal formation, the smaller it is, and the more serious the impact on the structure.[40] Therefore, the number of ice crystals should be minimized. The freezing method allows sectioning tissues rapidly and biopsy without using reagents. This procedure should be rapidly in case of the form of ice crystal.[39]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Microtechnique

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Microtechnique is the specialized set of procedures used to prepare biological tissues, cells, or other small specimens for microscopic examination, involving steps such as fixation to preserve structure, sectioning into thin slices, to enhance contrast, and mounting on slides for observation. These techniques ensure that specimens retain their morphological integrity while allowing detailed visualization of internal features under , , or other microscopes. The origins of microtechnique trace back to the , when early microscopists like developed rudimentary methods for mounting specimens, such as smearing samples on glass or using capillary tubes, to observe microorganisms and tissues without advanced preservation. By the 18th and 19th centuries, the field advanced with the invention of the for precise sectioning and the introduction of chemical fixatives and synthetic dyes, enabling more permanent and detailed preparations that supported the growth of and . Key historical milestones include the evolution of sliding microtomes around 1865 and the standardization of staining protocols, such as hematoxylin and eosin, which remain foundational today. At its core, microtechnique follows a sequential process: after tissue acquisition and fixation—often using formalin to stabilize proteins—specimens undergo with graded alcohols, clearing with agents like to remove , and embedding in for support during sectioning into slices typically 3–10 micrometers thick. then differentiates cellular components, with common dyes binding to nuclei or , while mounting media secure the sections under coverslips for durability. These methods apply to diverse fields, including medical diagnostics, botanical studies, and , where adaptations like cryofixation for frozen sections or heavy-metal for address specific needs. Modern advancements in microtechnique incorporate , such as robotic tissue processors, and innovative embedding media to minimize artifacts, enhancing resolution in high-throughput research and clinical applications. As of 2025, digital integration, including AI-assisted image analysis software, further refines interpretation, while sustainable practices, such as alternative fixatives to , aim to reduce hazardous chemicals.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Microtechnique encompasses the specialized procedures used to prepare biological specimens for detailed examination under microscopes, with adaptations for non-biological materials such as minerals and synthetic samples in fields like . This field involves a systematic approach to rendering specimens suitable for observation, transforming raw samples into stable, transparent forms mounted on slides that can withstand prolonged scrutiny without degradation. Biological specimens, such as tissues, cells, and organisms, require techniques that halt natural decay processes while maintaining cellular , whereas non-biological specimens focus on enhancing clarity and contrast for . The core principles of microtechnique revolve around sequential steps designed to stabilize, process, and present specimens optimally. Fixation is the initial step, employing chemical agents such as formalin for light microscopy or osmium tetroxide for electron microscopy to cross-link proteins and lipids, thereby preventing autolysis, putrefaction, and structural distortion in biological materials. Dehydration follows, using graded series of solvents like ethyl alcohol (from 70% to 100%) to remove water content, preparing the specimen for subsequent embedding without causing shrinkage or plasmolysis. Clearing then renders the tissue translucent by replacing the dehydrant with agents like xylene or cedar wood oil, which match the refractive index of the mounting medium to minimize light scattering. Finally, mounting secures the processed specimen on a glass slide with a coverslip using media such as Canada balsam or DPX, ensuring permanence, optical clarity, and protection for repeated viewing. These principles are fundamental to , as they enable the resolution of fine details at cellular and subcellular levels that would otherwise be obscured by opacity, distortion, or decay. In light , microtechnique enhances contrast and transparency for visible light illumination, allowing observation of stained tissues to reveal morphological features. For electron , the processes are adapted for ultra-thin sections and vacuum compatibility, providing high-resolution insights into , though both approaches rely on the same foundational preservation strategies to ensure artifact-free imaging. By facilitating such detailed analysis, microtechnique supports advancements in fields ranging from to .

Equipment and Materials

Microtechnique procedures require a range of specialized equipment for preparing specimens suitable for microscopic examination. Essential tools include microtomes for precise sectioning, glass slides and coverslips for mounting, fine for handling delicate tissues, and embedding molds for supporting samples during processing. Microtomes vary by design and application; rotary microtomes, which advance the specimen vertically against a fixed , are commonly used for routine paraffin-embedded tissues, producing sections typically 3-10 microns thick, while sledge microtomes, featuring a sliding for harder materials like , are preferred for challenging samples to minimize compression artifacts. Reagents play a critical role in preserving and enhancing specimen visibility. Fixatives such as 10% neutral buffered formalin stabilize cellular structures by cross-linking proteins, often used as a standard for light microscopy, while dehydrants like graded series (70-100%) remove water to prepare tissues for embedding. Clearing agents, including , render tissues transparent by matching their to embedding media, and stains like hematoxylin and provide contrast, with hematoxylin targeting nuclei for blue coloration. Safety protocols are paramount due to the hazardous nature of many chemicals involved. Protective gear, including gloves, lab coats, and safety goggles, must be worn to prevent and eye exposure, while chemical fume hoods with proper ventilation are required for handling volatile solvents like and formalin to avoid risks. Waste disposal follows regulatory guidelines, such as segregating hazardous materials like mercury-based fixatives for specialized treatment, and all procedures adhere to standards from organizations like OSHA to minimize environmental and health impacts. Cost and accessibility differ significantly between professional lab-grade setups and improvised educational configurations. High-end equipment, such as diamond knives for , can cost several thousand dollars, making full setups prohibitive for small institutions, whereas educational alternatives like plastic rotary microtomes or freehand sectioning with razor blades and simple holders enable low-cost preparation of plant tissues without advanced machinery.

Historical Development

Early Techniques

The origins of microtechnique trace back to the 17th century, when pioneered simple observation methods using his handmade single-lens microscopes. These instruments featured small glass bead lenses, often ground from molten rods, which provided magnifications up to 270 times when held to natural light sources like sunlight or candle flames. Leeuwenhoek prepared specimens via basic wet mounts, placing drops of pond water, , or other fluids containing microorganisms on thin plates or needles positioned near the lens, allowing him to describe "animalcules" ( and ) for the first time in detailed letters to the Royal Society starting in 1674. By the 19th century, innovations addressed optical limitations and specimen handling, enhancing clarity for biological studies. Joseph Jackson Lister, an amateur microscopist, developed achromatic compound lenses in 1830 by combining crown and flint glass elements in specific curvatures, which corrected chromatic aberration (color fringing) and spherical aberration (blurring at edges), enabling sharper images of fine structures without distortion. This breakthrough, detailed in his Philosophical Transactions paper, revolutionized microscopy by making multi-lens systems practical for routine use. Concurrently, naturalists like incorporated rudimentary sectioning into plant studies; in works such as On the Movements and Habits of Climbing Plants (1865), Darwin employed freehand transverse cuts of stems and leaves, mounted between glass or , to examine internal vascular arrangements and growth patterns under simple microscopes, contributing to early histological insights into . Key milestones in the mid-19th century advanced precise tissue manipulation. In 1866, anatomist Wilhelm His invented the first practical , a sliding mechanism with micrometer screws that produced uniform sections as thin as 10 micrometers from hardened tissues, facilitating serial analysis of embryos and organs. This device, described in His's Die Haarbildung in den Embryonen (1868), marked a shift from irregular freehand slicing to controlled cutting. Three years later, in 1869, pathologist Edwin Klebs introduced paraffin wax embedding, infiltrating fixed tissues with melted paraffin to provide rigid support for sectioning, as outlined in his Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie article; this method overcame brittleness in alcohol-hardened samples and became foundational for embedding. Early practitioners grappled with specimen drying and , which caused shrinkage, cracking, or loss of cellular detail during prolonged or storage. These issues, prevalent in 17th- and early 19th-century preparations where unfixed wet mounts evaporated quickly under illumination, prompted the adoption of basic fixation techniques by the 1830s–1840s, such as immersion in dilute alcohol, , or to stabilize proteins and prevent autolysis. Such methods, refined through trial by microscopists like , preserved structural integrity for extended study while minimizing artifacts, laying groundwork for standardized protocols.

20th-Century Advancements

In the early , celloidin () emerged as a key embedding medium in microtechnique, offering superior support for delicate tissues compared to earlier methods like paraffin, with widespread adoption for serial sectioning in histological studies. This material, refined from its initial introduction in the late , allowed for thicker sections (up to 100–200 μm) that were easier to handle and less prone to distortion during cutting on sliding s. Concurrently, freezing techniques advanced significantly; in 1905, Louis B. Wilson at the developed a carbon dioxide-based method for rapid tissue freezing and sectioning, enabling intraoperative pathological diagnosis within minutes by attaching a CO2 cylinder to a modified . This innovation reduced preparation time from days to under an hour, marking a pivotal shift toward real-time tissue analysis in surgical settings. By the mid-20th century, embedding underwent standardization following refinements in the , establishing it as the dominant method for routine due to its compatibility with automated processing and thin sectioning (typically 4–10 μm). Protocols emphasized controlled melting points (56–60°C) and infiltration times to minimize tissue shrinkage, facilitating reproducible results across laboratories. The introduction of , notably in 1963 by Leduc, Marinozzi, and Bernhard, further enhanced preservation by enabling at low temperatures and yielding sections with superior morphological detail for light microscopy. This resin's water-miscible properties reduced dehydration artifacts, allowing better retention of activity and ultrastructural features in embedded specimens. In the late 20th century, particularly the , automated rotary microtomes proliferated, incorporating motorized advancement for consistent section thickness and reducing manual variability in high-volume research. Vibratomes, such as the model introduced around 1960 and refined in subsequent decades, enabled vibration-assisted cutting of unfixed or lightly fixed tissues without , ideal for preserving native enzyme localization in applications. Initial cryotechniques for preservation, building on freeze-substitution methods pioneered by Gersh in the 1930s and advanced in the for electron microscopy, minimized damage through rapid freezing in or , followed by dehydration under vacuum. These approaches preserved membranes and soluble proteins better than chemical fixation alone. These 20th-century innovations collectively transformed microtechnique by streamlining workflows, enhancing resolution, and curtailing preparation-induced artifacts, thereby supporting expansive applications in diagnostic pathology—such as faster cancer detection—and fundamental biological research, including cytological studies of cellular organelles. For instance, the reduced distortion from synthetic resins and cryomethods improved artifact-free imaging of subcellular structures, boosting the reliability of histopathological diagnoses in clinical settings.

General Preparation Methods

Whole Mounts

Whole mount preparation involves the mounting of entire small specimens or thin structures directly onto a for microscopic examination without the need for sectioning, allowing observation of intact organisms in their three-dimensional form. This technique is particularly suited to transparent or naturally thin materials that permit light transmission, such as small , , or delicate plant parts. The method emphasizes preservation of the specimen's natural architecture while enhancing visibility through optional and clearing processes. The procedure begins with the selection of suitable specimens, typically thin and transparent examples like small invertebrates such as or , which are small enough to be viewed in their entirety under low to medium . Specimens are first fixed to preserve structure and prevent autolysis, commonly using 70% ethyl alcohol or 4-5% solutions, with durations ranging from hours to days depending on size; for contractile forms like , narcotization with agents such as may precede fixation to relax tissues and avoid distortion. If needed, staining follows to highlight specific features, employing vital or nuclear stains like hematoxylin or applied briefly (5 minutes to 1 hour) and differentiated in acid alcohol for contrast. Dehydration occurs through a graded alcohol series (70% to absolute), followed by clearing in agents like or oil to increase transparency. Finally, the specimen is mounted in a medium such as glycerin for temporary slides or resinous for permanent preparations, placed in a drop on the slide, covered with a slip, and sealed to prevent drying. This approach offers several advantages, including the preservation of the specimen's three-dimensional structure and spatial relationships between components, which is essential for studying overall morphology without disruption. It is quick and straightforward, requiring minimal equipment and no advanced skills, making it ideal for educational demonstrations in classrooms where intact views of organisms are prioritized over cellular detail. Common examples include whole mounts of to observe eyespots and branched intestines, like for ciliary patterns, feathers to examine barbule arrangements, and thin leaves or algae filaments such as to study cellular organization; these are frequently prepared for teaching basic in school settings. Despite its utility, whole mount preparation has limitations, being restricted to small, non-opaque samples that are inherently thin or translucent, as thicker tissues obscure internal details. Air bubbles introduced during mounting can distort views, and improper may lead to shrinkage or media failure, while some fixatives like alcohol can cause brittleness in delicate structures.

Smears and Squashes

Smear preparation involves spreading fluid or semi-fluid samples across a glass slide to form a thin, even monolayer of cells suitable for microscopic examination. This technique is commonly used in cytology to preserve cellular morphology without embedding, often employing a spreader or second slide to distribute the sample. For instance, in blood smear preparation, a small drop of anticoagulated blood is placed on a clean slide and spread using a wedge technique with another slide at a 30-45 degree angle to create a thin film that allows individual cells to be observed. The smear is then air-dried or heat-fixed to adhere the cells to the slide and prevent distortion during staining. Heat-fixing, achieved by passing the slide over a flame, coagulates proteins and aligns with basic fixation principles to immobilize the specimen. A prominent application of smear preparation is in diagnostic cytology, such as the Pap smear for screening. Cells are collected from the using a or , transferred to a slide, and spread thinly before fixation in alcohol to maintain nuclear details for subsequent staining and evaluation. In , bacterial smears are prepared by suspending a colony in saline, spreading it on the slide, air-drying, and heat-fixing to enable staining procedures like the Gram method, which differentiates based on properties—crystal violet-iodine staining followed by decolorization and counterstaining with . This approach reveals Gram-positive (purple) and Gram-negative (pink) organisms, aiding identification in clinical samples. The squash method, in contrast, compresses solid or thick tissue samples to disrupt and flatten cells into a single layer for rapid , particularly useful for studying internal structures like chromosomes. Tissue, such as root tips, is typically pretreated with fixatives like acetic alcohol, macerated briefly if needed, stained (e.g., with acetocarmine), and then pressed between a slide and coverslip using to spread the cells evenly without embedding. Acetic acid is often added during squashing to soften tissues and clear , enhancing visibility of nuclear components. A classic example is the onion root tip squash for studies, where meristematic cells are fixed, hydrolyzed in acid, stained, and squashed to display stages of —, , , and —under the . Both techniques offer key advantages in microtechnique, including speed and simplicity, as they require only basic tools like slides, coverslips, and fixatives, making them ideal for temporary mounts and intraoperative diagnostics. They enable quick assessment of cellular details and relative cell populations without the need for sectioning equipment, though they sacrifice three-dimensional structural context. In cytogenetic applications, squashes provide high-resolution views of chromosomes in minutes, facilitating studies of division and abnormalities.

Basic Sections

Basic sectioning in microtechnique involves preparing thin slices of fixed biological specimens to enable detailed microscopic examination of internal structures. The process begins with fixation, typically using a chemical agent such as 10% neutral buffered formalin to preserve tissue morphology and prevent autolysis, followed by with graded series of solutions (e.g., 50%, 70%, 80%, and 100%) to remove . After , the specimen is infiltrated with a supporting medium like and then cut into sections, usually 5-10 micrometers thick, using a to produce uniform slices suitable for . Sectioning can be performed manually with razor-sharp microtome knives or via automated rotary s equipped with high-carbon steel or disposable blades, allowing precise control over thickness and orientation. Once cut, sections are floated on a warm water bath (around 37-40°C) to flatten wrinkles and then affixed to glass slides using adhesives like albumen or by gentle heating on a slide dryer to ensure adhesion for either temporary viewing or permanent mounting. Temporary slides allow short-term without coverslipping, while permanent preparations involve additional clearing, , and mounting in resin to preserve sections long-term. This technique is fundamental to general for revealing tissue architecture, such as cellular arrangements in organs like the liver or , providing clearer views of internal layers compared to thicker preparations like squashes that compress rather than slice specimens. A common challenge during sectioning is tissue tearing, often due to brittle or dull blades, which can be mitigated by partial in paraffin to provide support and stability before cutting.

Plant-Specific Techniques

Direct Examinations and Freehand Sections

Direct microscopic examinations of plant specimens involve observing living cells without fixation or , allowing visualization of dynamic cellular processes in their natural state. A common example is the preparation of epidermal peels, where a thin layer of the bulb's inner is gently separated using and mounted in a drop of water on a under a coverslip. This method preserves cell turgor and enables observation of structures such as nuclei, , and cell walls using at 40× magnification. Plasmolysis demonstrations further illustrate osmotic responses in living plant cells through direct examination. For instance, epidermal peels from or leaves are prepared as wet mounts in , then exposed to a hypertonic salt solution (e.g., 6% NaCl) by wicking it across the slide, causing the to shrink away from the as water effluxes via . Chloroplasts in affected cells clump toward the center, and the process is reversible by reintroducing hypotonic water, redistributing organelles and restoring turgor while the rigid remains intact. This technique highlights permeability and is routinely used in educational settings to study plant cell physiology without altering protoplasmic integrity. Freehand sectioning complements direct examinations by producing thin slices (15–50 μm) of fresh tissues using a sharp , suitable for soft materials like tubers or herbaceous stems. The specimen is held firmly against a supporting surface (e.g., finger or block) submerged in , and transverse cuts are made at a 45° angle in a single downward motion to yield uniform sections, which are then transferred with a fine to a slide and mounted in or a dilute iodine solution (e.g., ) to stain granules blue-black. This approach avoids artifacts and is ideal for immediate observation under compound . The primary advantages of direct examinations and freehand sections lie in their simplicity and preservation of , enabling rapid assessment of live tissues in laboratories without the need for fixation, embedding, or specialized equipment beyond a razor blade, slides, and . These methods facilitate quick results for educational and preliminary purposes, contrasting with more involved techniques like those in basic sectioning by bypassing chemical processing for plant-specific structures such as cell walls. Representative examples include cross-sections of tubers to view vascular tissues and storage cells, or blades to examine stomatal complexes in the , where freehand cuts reveal and pores without distortion from embedding. Such preparations are particularly valuable for demonstrating anatomical features , as seen in studies of herbaceous stems and roots.

Clearing and Maceration

Clearing techniques in plant microtechnique involve chemical treatments that render opaque tissues transparent by dissolving pigments and other light-scattering components, facilitating microscopic examination of internal structures without sectioning. One widely used method employs , often saturated with , to pretreat and clear leaves and other thin tissues; for instance, leaves of grandiflora can be immersed in 85% for up to three weeks at or heated at 60°C for 24 hours to soften and decolorize them. This is followed by transfer to a clearing solution such as Herr's fluid—a mixture of , , phenol crystals, clove oil, and in a 2:2:2:2:1 ratio by weight—which penetrates the tissue over 2 to 24 hours, typically at or with gentle heating, to achieve translucency. The cleared specimen is then mounted directly in the clearing fluid under a coverslip for observation under bright-field, phase-contrast, or . These clearing processes are particularly valuable for studying vascular bundles in leaves or entire cleared organs such as roots and ovules, where they reveal cellular arrangements and developmental patterns without disrupting three-dimensional architecture; for example, Herr's fluid has been applied to ovules for 12 to 48 hours to visualize megasporogenesis. Typical durations range from 24 to 48 hours for most herbaceous materials, though thicker or lignified tissues may require longer exposure. However, over-clearing poses risks, including tissue shrinkage, loss of cellular contrast, or structural damage due to excessive and chemical degradation. Maceration complements clearing by selectively dissolving the —the pectin-rich cementing layer between adjacent cells—to isolate individual cells or tissue elements for detailed morphological analysis. A classic chemical approach uses Jeffrey's macerating fluid, consisting of equal parts 10% and 10% , in which thin sections of stem or (≤1 mm thick) are immersed for 24 to 72 hours, often with periodic agitation or heating to accelerate breakdown; the separated cells, such as vessels and tracheids, are then teased apart with needles, washed, and mounted in glycerin. Enzymatic maceration offers a safer alternative for soft tissues, employing (6–15 g per 100 mL water) to hydrolyze pectins in the middle lamella; leaves or young stems are soaked for 2 to 4 hours (or up to 3 days for tougher samples), allowing gentle separation of epidermal peels, vascular bundles, or without hazardous acids. Applications of maceration are essential for examining xylem elements like vessels in woods such as those of flowering , enabling measurements of cell dimensions and wall thickenings that inform phylogenetic and functional studies. Durations typically span 24 to 48 hours for optimal separation, but over-maceration can lead to cell wall rupture or fragmentation, compromising specimen integrity; precautions include monitoring progress and using protective equipment for chemical methods. Enzymatic variants reduce these risks while maintaining efficacy for educational and research purposes in soft tissues.

Embedding and Staining for Plants

Embedding in plant microtechnique involves infiltrating dehydrated tissues with paraffin or resin to create solid blocks suitable for thin sectioning under light microscopy. The process begins with fixation, typically in formalin-acetic acid-alcohol (FAA), followed by dehydration through a graded alcohol series (e.g., 50%, 70%, 95%, and 100% ethanol) to remove water and prepare tissues for embedding media. Lignified tissues such as wood may require longer clearing times for thorough penetration due to the rigidity imparted by lignin. In paraffin embedding, tissues are then infiltrated with molten paraffin at 58–60°C, typically for 1–2 hours with 2–3 changes. Alternatively, resin embedding, such as with LR White acrylic resin, follows similar dehydration but uses vacuum infiltration at room temperature for 24–48 hours, offering superior preservation of cell walls in lignified structures by minimizing shrinkage. Sectioning of embedded tissues is performed using a rotary , yielding ribbons of 8-12 μm thickness to balance resolution and structural integrity, particularly for capturing details in vascular elements like . For example, in wood sections, this allows visualization of ray cells, where the preserves the three-dimensional arrangement of lignified tracheids and non-lignified . Resin-embedded sections can be thinner (5-10 μm) for finer detail but require knives to avoid compression artifacts in hard materials. Staining enhances contrast in these sections, with sequential dyes targeting specific components. The safranin-fast protocol is widely used: sections are first stained in 1% O for 30 minutes to overnight to intensely color lignified tissues red, then counterstained with 0.5% fast FCF for 15-45 seconds to differentiate non-lignified tissues , followed by in an series and mounting. This double is particularly effective for , highlighting ray against lignified fibers. For live cells, vital stains like fluorescein diacetate (FDA) are applied directly to fresh tissues, hydrolyzing inside viable cells to produce fluorescence under , assessing cell viability without killing the sample.

Animal-Specific Techniques

Paraffin Method

The paraffin method is a foundational technique in animal histology for preparing thin sections of fixed tissues, enabling detailed microscopic examination of cellular structures while preserving morphological integrity. Following initial fixation and dehydration, this process involves clearing the tissue, infiltrating it with , embedding the sample into a solid block, sectioning the block into ribbons of ultra-thin slices, and mounting those sections on slides for subsequent . Widely adopted since the late , it supports routine diagnostic and applications in tissues, such as mammalian organs, due to its compatibility with standard and ability to produce serial sections for three-dimensional reconstruction. Infiltration begins after dehydration, where the tissue—now alcohol-saturated—is cleared using or a similar hydrophobic agent to remove residual water and fats, making it receptive to . This clearing step typically involves multiple immersions in for 20-45 minutes each, depending on tissue thickness (ideally ≤4 mm for optimal processing). Subsequent infiltration replaces the clearing agent with molten (heated to approximately 60°C) through a series of 30-45 minute incubations, often in an automated processor. To enhance penetration, especially in dense or fatty animal tissues like muscle or liver, a is employed to evacuate air bubbles and draw the wax into intercellular spaces, ensuring uniform impregnation without distortion. At least three wax changes are recommended to fully eliminate clearing residues, with application used cautiously for small specimens to avoid over-shrinkage. Embedding solidifies the infiltrated tissue into a manipulable block for sectioning. The oriented sample—positioned to expose the desired plane, such as longitudinal for muscle fibers—is placed in a or disposable mold and covered with additional molten on a heated embedding center (around 60°C). The mold is then transferred to a cold plate (4-10°C) for rapid solidification, forming a firm block attached to a labeled cassette for identification. This step maintains spatial relationships within the tissue, crucial for analyzing organ , and typically takes 10-30 minutes to cool completely. Sectioning employs a rotary to slice the paraffin block into thin ribbons, with routine thicknesses of 4-6 μm suitable for most histological studies to balance resolution and structural preservation. The block is trimmed to expose the tissue face, then advanced incrementally as the microtome's handwheel rotates, producing continuous ribbons due to the wax's cohesive properties; a clearance of 5-10° on the blade minimizes compression artifacts. These ribbons are gently transferred to a warm water bath (38-44°C, adjusted for tissue fragility) to expand and flatten, removing wrinkles without melting the paraffin. Sections are then picked up onto charged slides (e.g., poly-L-lysine coated) at a slight and dried on a slide warmer at ~44°C overnight to promote adhesion. Post-sectioning processing prepares the slides for by removing the paraffin (dewaxing) and rehydrating the tissue. Slides are immersed in two changes of for 5-10 minutes each to dissolve the wax, followed by graded series (100%, 95%, 70%; 2 minutes per step) to transition to aqueous conditions, and a final rinse in tap water. This dewaxing and rehydration sequence, often performed in staining racks, clears the sections for initial setups like hematoxylin and (H&E), where the now-uncovered tissue can absorb dyes effectively for contrast enhancement of nuclei and in animal samples.

Celloidin and Freezing Methods

The celloidin method involves embedding animal tissues in , a pliable medium that supports sectioning of delicate or large specimens without the rigidity associated with paraffin. Tissues are first fixed and dehydrated in graded alcohols, then immersed in increasing concentrations of celloidin solution—typically prepared by dissolving in equal parts of absolute alcohol and —to allow infiltration. As alcohol and evaporate, the celloidin concentration rises, forming a supportive matrix around the tissue; the embedded block is then hardened in vapor or solution to prevent further shrinkage, followed by storage in 80% alcohol. Sectioning occurs using a sliding to produce thicker slices, ranging from 20 to 100 μm, which maintain structural integrity for light microscopy. In contrast, the freezing method employs rapid to immobilize unfixed animal tissues, minimizing artifacts from chemical fixatives. Fresh tissue is oriented in an medium like optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound within a cryomold, then quickly frozen by immersion in precooled to -70°C to -80°C using , ensuring even cooling without formation. The frozen block equilibrates in a chamber at approximately -20°C before sectioning into thin ribbons (typically 5-10 μm) using a retracting blade, allowing immediate mounting on slides for . Celloidin excels for large specimens such as whole brains or eyes, where its solvent-based infiltration penetrates dense, lipid-rich tissues with minimal distortion or shrinkage compared to paraffin, enabling serial sections up to 500 μm thick for volumetric studies. Freezing, meanwhile, preserves labile enzymes and antigens critical for histochemical and analyses, as the absence of heat or solvents maintains biochemical activity in unfixed samples. Representative applications include embryonic tissues in celloidin to capture developmental morphology in serial sections without fragmentation, and freezing muscle biopsies to evaluate deficiencies or types via rapid diagnostic .

Advanced and Modern Methods

Cryotechniques

Cryotechniques encompass a suite of low-temperature methods designed to preserve the of biological specimens in microtechnique by rapidly immobilizing cellular components and preventing structural artifacts. These approaches, particularly prominent since the late , rely on —transforming water into a glass-like amorphous state—to avoid the formation of damaging ice crystals that occur in slower freezing processes. Unlike earlier freezing methods, cryotechniques enable the retention of native hydration and molecular distributions, making them essential for high-resolution imaging in light and electron microscopy. Central to cryotechniques is cryofixation, which achieves instantaneous immobilization of water through techniques such as high-pressure freezing (HPF) or plunge freezing. In HPF, specimens are subjected to pressures up to 2,100 bar while being cooled to -196°C, allowing vitrification of samples up to 200 μm thick without formation. Plunge freezing involves rapidly dipping samples into cryogens like cooled to -180°C, effectively vitrifying thin specimens (typically <10 μm) by extracting heat at rates exceeding 10^5 K/s. These methods, pioneered in the 1980s, have revolutionized specimen preparation by preserving dynamic cellular processes, such as cytoskeletal arrangements and integrity, far superior to chemical fixation. Following cryofixation, cryosectioning produces ultrathin sections for detailed analysis, often using cryomicrotomes maintained at temperatures around -80°C to -120°C. Sections are typically cut from frozen, resin-embedded blocks, with Lowicryl resins employed for their compatibility with low-temperature polymerization and minimal extraction of cellular components. This technique is particularly valuable in , where it facilitates the localization of antigens without denaturation, enabling precise labeling of proteins in tissues like lymphoid organs. A seminal application involves the Tokuyasu method, which generates 50-100 nm frozen sections for immunogold labeling, preserving accessibility for electron microscopy. The advantages of cryotechniques include superior retention of antigens and , which are often compromised in traditional dehydration-based methods, allowing for authentic visualization of structures and biochemical activities. Post-1980s advancements have integrated these with , enhancing correlative workflows for three-dimensional reconstructions. For instance, frozen sections have been used to localize enzymes like phosphatases in cellular compartments, revealing their native distributions without fixation-induced relocation. processes further exemplify this by enabling cryo- of vitreous ice-embedded samples, capturing transient states such as release in neurons. Since 2020, cryotechniques have seen further refinements in , including correlative cryo-light and electron microscopy (cryo-CLEM) workflows that use functionalized EM grids with fiducial markers for improved sample adhesion and registration, enabling precise targeting of regions of interest in thicker samples up to 300 nm via cryo-focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (cryo-FIB-SEM) lamella preparation. Automated cryo-FIB to cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) pipelines, such as those integrating predictive tracking and motion correction, have streamlined for multicellular organisms like C. elegans, while rapid mixing-vitrification devices achieve sub-10 ms time resolution for dynamic studies, all as of 2025.

Electron Microscopy Preparations

Electron microscopy preparations in microtechnique involve specialized protocols to preserve for high-resolution in (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), enabling visualization at the nanoscale. These methods address the challenges of electron beam interaction with biological samples, requiring chemical stabilization, , and enhancement of contrast without introducing artifacts. Fixation typically begins with aldehydes to cross-link proteins, followed by to stabilize , ensuring minimal distortion of cellular components. and follow to prepare samples for sectioning or surface imaging, with contrasting agents providing for clear delineation of organelles and membranes. For TEM, primary fixation uses 2-5% in a buffered solution, often combined with , for 1-2 hours or overnight at 4°C to preserve morphology by cross-linking proteins. This is followed by secondary fixation in 1% for 1-2 hours, which fixes and enhances membrane contrast by reacting with unsaturated fatty acids. Post-fixation rinses in buffer remove excess fixatives, preventing precipitation artifacts. proceeds through a graded acetone series at progressively lowering temperatures (e.g., starting at -20°C and descending to -90°C) to minimize extraction of cellular contents and maintain hydration-sensitive structures like . This progressive lowering of temperature (PLT) technique, particularly useful for resin embedding, reduces formation and preserves antigenicity for correlative studies. Embedding for TEM occurs in epoxy resins such as Epon 812, which provide mechanical stability for ultrathin sectioning; samples are infiltrated gradually over 24-48 hours and polymerized at 60°C. Sections of 50-100 nm thickness are cut using an ultramicrotome equipped with a diamond knife, whose ultra-sharp edge ensures minimal compression and uniform ribbons for grid mounting. Contrasting enhances : ultrathin sections are first stained with 2-4% aqueous uranyl acetate for 5-10 minutes to bind nucleic acids and proteins, followed by Reynolds' lead citrate for 2-5 minutes to delineate membranes and through heavy metal deposition. This double-staining protocol, standard since the , achieves high-contrast images by exploiting differential affinity for biological macromolecules. SEM preparations focus on surface topology, starting with similar fixation and dehydration but emphasizing drying to avoid collapse. Critical point drying (CPD) replaces acetone with liquid CO₂ at its critical point (31°C, 73 atm), eliminating that could deform delicate structures like cilia or extracellular matrices. Samples are then sputter-coated with a 5-20 nm layer of or in a , where ions dislodge metal atoms onto the specimen for conductivity and reduced charging under the beam. In the , focused beam-scanning microscopy (FIB-SEM) has advanced these techniques by combining milling for site-specific cross-sectioning with SEM imaging, enabling 3D volume reconstruction at 5-10 nm resolution without full embedding. This dual-beam approach, refined since the early 2000s, supports correlative workflows and analysis of hydrated or resin-embedded samples. From 2020 to 2025, electron microscopy sample preparation has incorporated automation and integration, such as the EMSBot system for electrostatic dispersion of powder samples onto grids or stubs, enabling consistent, solvent-free preparation of diverse materials like oxides and metals with reduced agglomeration via a modified 3D printer setup operating at 10 kV. Broader innovations include programmable mounting systems like SimpliVac for streamlined material handling and the rise of integrated workflows combining cryo-EM with expansion microscopy for enhanced 3D visualization in biological and nanomaterials research.

References

  1. https://www.accessscience.com/content/article/a424010
  2. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/64758
  3. https://lensonleeuwenhoek.net/content/history-micro-technique
  4. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-history-of-microtechnique%253A-the-evolution-of-the-Bracegirdle/13f6c7620a83fe893900ae38adcef320788888de
  5. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.204.4394.748
  6. https://www.leicabiosystems.com/us/knowledge-pathway/an-introduction-to-specimen-processing/
  7. https://zoolibs.com/microtechnique-definition-scope-and-application/
  8. https://www.leicabiosystems.com/us/histology-equipment/tissue-processors/
  9. https://sirptsciencecollege.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Microscopy_and_Microtechnique.pdf
  10. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-024-02290-0
  11. https://www.nsh.org/blogs/natalie-paskoski/2020/06/09/alternatives-to-formalin
  12. https://webpath.med.utah.edu/HISTHTML/HISTOTCH/HISTOTCH.html
  13. https://www.leicabiosystems.com/knowledge-pathway/microtomes/
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12414758/
  15. https://oer.galileo.usg.edu/context/biology-textbooks/article/1016/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/1_Microscopy_and_Staining.pdf
  16. https://lensonleeuwenhoek.net/content/leeuwenhoeks-microscopes
  17. https://artsci.case.edu/dittrick/2017/01/11/seeing-small-how-the-microscope-changed-everything/
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251464919_Did_Physics_Matter_to_the_Pioneers_of_Microscopy
  19. https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/wilhelm-his-sr-1831-1904
  20. https://www.cellpath.com/latest-news/body-block-tissue-processing-history
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1082441/
  22. https://www.stainsfile.com/theory/tissue-preparation/support-media-processing/celloidin/
  23. http://www.science-info.net/docs/Microtechnique/microtome.pdf
  24. https://meridian.allenpress.com/aplm/article/129/12/1532/459416/The-Centennial-Anniversary-of-the-Frozen-Section
  25. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8571243/
  26. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1963.tb02081.x
  27. https://www.kuhlmann-biomed.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/IET_tissue_05.pdf
  28. https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co118112/oxford-vibratome-tissue-sectioning-system-model-e
  29. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/cryotechnology-history-and-it-s-applications/276387732
  30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15041410/
  31. https://www.leicabiosystems.com/us/knowledge-pathway/an-introduction-to-specimen-preparation/
  32. https://archive.org/download/handbookofbasicm00gray/handbookofbasicm00gray.pdf
  33. https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/plugins/books/17/format/114/download/
  34. https://www.uvm.edu/~jschall/pdfs/techniques/bloodsmears.pdf
  35. https://bio.libretexts.org/Courses/North_Carolina_State_University/MB352_General_Microbiology_Laboratory_2021_%28Lee%29/04%253A_Staining_Techniques/4.03%253A_Lab_Procedures-_Bacterial_Smear_Simple_and_Gram_Staining
  36. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/cytopathologyfnasmearmaking.html
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9063692/
  38. https://asm.org/getattachment/5c95a063-326b-4b2f-98ce-001de9a5ece3/gram-stain-protocol-2886.pdf
  39. https://www.le.ac.uk/bl/phh4/prsquash.htm
  40. https://vlab.amrita.edu/index.php?brch=188&cnt=1&sim=1102&sub=3
  41. https://biology.arizona.edu/cell_bio/activities/cell_cycle/cell_cycle.html
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4253164/
  43. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/aps3.11588
  44. https://www.leicabiosystems.com/us/knowledge-pathway/steps-to-better-microtomy-flotation-section-drying/
  45. https://www.nationaldiagnostics.com/2011/09/26/sectioning/
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124114845000159
  47. http://www.csun.edu/scied/7-microscopy/elodea_plasmolysis/index.htm
  48. https://moticmicroscopes.com/blogs/articles/rapid-preparation-examination-of-plant-sections-with-microscopy
  49. https://www.ableweb.org/biologylabs/wp-content/uploads/volumes/vol-19/9-yeung.pdf
  50. https://plantscience.psu.edu/research/labs/roots/methods/methods-info/root-anatomy/sectioning-root-tissue-unembedded-and-embedded-tissue
  51. https://www.ableweb.org/biologylabs/wp-content/uploads/volumes/vol-5/5-herr.pdf
  52. https://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/science/biology/resources/l&t2/practical/Practical-7.pdf
  53. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10617305/
  54. http://www.cas.miamioh.edu/~meicenrd/anatomy/MicrowaveParaffinTechniqueSchichnes_etal2001.pdf
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0266353820322752
  56. https://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/eirs/viewDocumentDetail.do?fromStatic=true&repository=BDP&documentId=13952
  57. https://mmegias.webs.uvigo.es/02-english/6-tecnicas/4-corte.php
  58. https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/B_Kirchoff_Use_2021.pdf
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/FDA-and-PI-staining-of-plant-cells-a-Diagrams-showing-fluorescein-diacetate-FDA-and_fig1_299346343
  60. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00292-021-00947-4
  61. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/paraffin-embedding
  62. https://www.leicabiosystems.com/sites/default/files/media_document-file/2021-04/190093_Rev_A_Science_of_Tissue_Processing.pdf
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978012394445000045X
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123813732000703
  65. https://anatomy-cellbiology.ecu.edu/wp-content/pv-uploads/sites/7/Paraffin-Sectioning-Instructions.pdf
  66. https://quizlet.com/322935401/histotechnology-microtomy-flash-cards/
  67. https://www.protocols.io/view/dewaxing-and-rehydration-of-paraffin-sections-for-d46f8zbn.html
  68. https://www.bdbiosciences.com/en-us/resources/protocols/parafin-sections
  69. https://www.columbia.edu/itc/hs/medical/sbpm_histology_2009/histology/histology_embedding.html
  70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11074343/
  71. https://www.feinberg.northwestern.edu/sites/mhpl/docs/tissue-freezing-presentation-5-26-20111.pdf
  72. https://www.bio-techne.com/applications/imaging/immunohistochemistry/sample-preparation-for-ihc-experiments
  73. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/328510
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4215994/
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/20471430_High-pressure_freezing_for_the_preservation_of_biological_structure_Theory_and_practice
  76. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4419-9244-4_3
  77. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5607889/
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091679X08614429
  79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10574655_Embedding_media_for_cryomicrotomy_An_applicative_reappraisal
  80. https://www.academia.edu/88786411/LM_and_EM_immunocytochemistry_on_lowicryl_K4M_and_cryc_ultramicrotome_sections_Experience_on_lymphoid_tissue?uc-sb-sw=42859355
  81. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/50384/1060020512_ftp.pdf?sequence=1
  82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12544132_High-Pressure_Freezing_Provides_New_Information_on_Human_Epidermis_Simultaneous_Protein_Antigen_and_Lamellar_Lipid_Structure_Preservation_Study_on_Human_Epidermis_by_Cryoimmobilization
  83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0940960209000041
  84. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-72815-0_12
  85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959440X24001611
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12585484/
  87. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364819972_Recent_advances_and_current_trends_in_cryo-electron_microscopy
  88. https://www.ou.edu/research/electron/bmz5364/prepare.html
  89. https://electron-microscopy.hms.harvard.edu/chemical-fixation
  90. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7086545/
  91. https://electron-microscopy.hms.harvard.edu/sem-preparation
  92. https://www.gu.se/en/core-facilities/tem-sample-preparation-techniques
  93. https://electron-microscopy.hms.harvard.edu/embedding-resin
  94. https://downloads.leica-microsystems.com/UC%2520Enuity/Application%2520Note/UC_Enuity_AppNote_Autoalignment.pdf
  95. https://www.leica-microsystems.com/science-lab/life-science/brief-introduction-to-contrasting-for-em-sample-preparation/
  96. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24357359/
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7818294/
  98. https://www.leica-microsystems.com/science-lab/life-science/sample-preparation-for-em-a-practical-guide-to-coating-and-freeze-fracturing/
  99. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apr/article/10/4/041311/2931107/Roadmap-for-focused-ion-beam-technologies
  100. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12158942/
  101. https://ceder.berkeley.edu/publications/2025_david_EMSbot.pdf
  102. https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-electron-microscopy-and-sample-preparation-market
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.