Hubbry Logo
NahuasNahuasMain
Open search
Nahuas
Community hub
Nahuas
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Nahuas
Nahuas
from Wikipedia

The Nahuas (/ˈnɑːwɑːz/ NAH-wahz[5]) are a Uto-Nahuan ethnic group and one of the Indigenous people of Mexico, with Nahua minorities also in El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica.[6][7][8][9][10][11] They comprise the largest Indigenous group in Mexico,[12][13] as well as the largest population out of any North American Indigenous people group who are native speakers of their respective Indigenous language. Amongst the Nahua, this is Nahuatl. When ranked amongst all Indigenous languages across the Americas, Nahuas list third after speakers of Guaraní and Quechua.[14]

Key Information

The Mexica (Aztecs) are of Nahua ethnicity, as are their historical enemies and allies of the Spaniards: the Tlaxcallans (Tlaxcaltecs). The Toltecs which predated both groups are often thought to have been Nahua as well. However, in the pre-Columbian period Nahuas were subdivided into many groups that did not necessarily share a common identity.

Their Nahuan languages, or Nahuatl, consist of many variants, several of which are mutually intelligible. About 1.5 million Nahuas speak Nahuatl and another million speak only Spanish. Fewer than 100 native speakers of Nawat remain in El Salvador.[15]

It is suggested that the Nahua peoples originated near Aridoamerica, in regions of the present day Mexican states of Durango and Nayarit or the Bajío region. They split off from the other Uto-Aztecan speaking peoples and migrated into central Mexico around 500 CE. The Nahua then settled in and around the Basin of Mexico and spread out to become the dominant people in central Mexico. However, Nahuatl-speaking populations were present in smaller populations throughout Mesoamerica.

Nomenclature

[edit]

The name Nahua is derived from the Nahuatl word-root nāhua- [ˈnaːwa-],[16] which generally means "audible, intelligible, clear" with different derivations including "language" (hence nāhuat(i) [ˈnaːwat(i)] "to speak clearly" and nāhuatl [ˈnaːwat͡ɬ] both "something that makes an agreeble sound" and "someone who speaks well or speak one's own language").[17] It was used in contrast with popoloca [popoˈloka], "to speak unintelligibly" or "speak a foreign language".[18] Another, related term is Nāhuatlācatl [naːwaˈt͡ɬaːkat͡ɬ] (singular) or Nāhuatlācah [naːwaˈt͡ɬaːkaʔ] (plural) literally "Nahuatl-speaking people".[17]

The Nahuas are also sometimes referred to as Aztecs. Using this term for the Nahuas has generally fallen out of favor in scholarship, though it is still used for the Aztec Empire. They have also been called Mēxihcatl [meːˈʃiʔkat͡ɬ] (singular), Mēxihcah [meːˈʃiʔkaʔ] (plural)[19] or in Spanish Mexicano(s) [mexiˈkano(s)] "Mexicans", after the Mexica, the Nahua tribe which founded the Aztec Empire.

Distribution

[edit]

In Mexico

[edit]
Nahua man of Morelos ploughing a bean field by mule
Total number of Nahuatl speakers in the 2020 Mexican Census[20]
Language Total persons 3 years & older speaking an Indigenous language % of total Indigenous speakers 3 years & older in Mexico Total Indigenous speakers 3 years & older who do not speak Spanish Monolingual rate (%)
Náhuatl 1,651,958 22.4% 111,797 6.8%
Speakers over 5 years of age in the ten states with most speakers (2000 census). Absolute and relative numbers.[21]
Region Totals Percentages
Federal District 37,450 0.44%
Guerrero 136,681 4.44%
Hidalgo 221,684 9.92%
Mexico (state) 55,802 0.43%
Morelos 18,656 1.20%
Oaxaca 10,979 0.32%
Puebla 416,968 8.21%
San Luis Potosí 138,523 6.02%
Tlaxcala 23,737 2.47%
Veracruz 338,324 4.90%
Rest of Mexico 50,132 0.10%
Total: 1,448,937 1.49%

The Mexican government does not categorize its citizens by ethnicity, but only by language. Statistical information recorded about the Nahua deals only with speakers of the Nahuatl language, although unknown numbers of people of Nahua ethnicity have abandoned the language and now speak only Spanish. Other Nahuas, though bilingual in Nahuatl and Spanish, seek to avoid widespread anti-Indigenous discrimination by declining to self-identify as Nahua in INEGI's decennial census.[22] Nor does the census count as Indigenous children under 5 (estimated to be 11–12% of the Indigenous population[23]). An INI-Conepo report indicates the Mexican Indigenous population is nearly 250% greater than that reported by INEGI.[24]

As of 2020, Nahuatl is spoken across Mexico by an estimated 1.6 million people, including 111,797 monolingual speakers.[25] This is an increase from 1.4 million people speakers total but a decrease from 190,000 monolingual speakers in 2000.[26] The state of Guerrero had the highest ratio of monolingual Nahuatl speakers, calculated at 24.8%, based on 2000 census figures. The proportion of monolinguals for most other states is less than 5%.[27]

The largest concentrations of Nahuatl speakers are found in the states of Puebla, Veracruz, Hidalgo, San Luis Potosí, and Guerrero. Significant populations are also found in México State, Morelos, and Mexico City, with smaller communities in Michoacán and Durango. Nahuatl was formerly spoken in the states of Jalisco and Colima, where it became extinct during the 20th century. As a result of internal migrations within the country, all Mexican states today have some isolated pockets and groups of Nahuatl speakers. The modern influx of Mexican workers and families into the United States has resulted in the establishment of a few small Nahuatl-speaking communities, particularly in Texas, New York and California.[28]

64.3% of Nahuatl speakers are literate in Spanish compared with the national average of 97.5% for Spanish literacy. Male Nahuatl speakers have 9.8 years of education on average and women 10.1, compared with the 13.6 and 14.1 years that are the national averages for men and women, respectively.[29]

In Central America

[edit]

In El Salvador, it is estimated that there are 12,000 Nahuas/Pipiles.[30] However, some Indigenous organizations claim that the real population is significantly higher. Their Nawat language is endangered, but undergoing a revival.[31]

In Nicaragua, the International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs counted 20,000 Nahuas/Nicaraos in 2022.[32] The International Labour Organization also counted 20,000 Nicaraos. However, DNA analysis has proven that the Nahua admixture in the modern Nicaraguan gene pool is high, especially among western Nicaraguans, both whites and Mestizos alike, making the number of Nahua descendants much higher.[33][34] Fully Indigenous Nahuas can be found all over the western half of Nicaragua.[35] They spoke the Nawat language before it went extinct in Nicaragua in the late 1800s.[36][37]

In Costa Rica, a small population of Nahuas inhabit Bagaces and other parts of Guanacaste province.[10][11] They are descended from Nicaraos who migrated and displaced the Huetares who originally inhabited Bagaces.[38][39] They spoke the Nawat language before it went extinct in Costa Rica.[36][40]

In Honduras, different sources give estimates of 6,339[41][42] and 19,800[43] persons of Nahua ethnicity. They are concentrated in Olancho, in the municipalities of Catacamas, Gualaco, Guata, Jano and Esquipulas del Norte. Nawat is extinct here. However, unlike the Nahuas of El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica who fled central and southern Mexico during the post-classical era due to famine, societal collapse, civil wars, and invasions from enemy forces, the Nahuas of Olancho are descended from pochtecas who were sent to Central America by Ahuizotl of Tenochtitlan at the start of the modern era in 1501 CE to establish trade relations with the Indigenous peoples of Central America.[44] There were some Nahua communities in other parts of Honduras in the 16th century, but they have since disappeared.

Geography

[edit]
Number of Nahuatl speakers per state, according to the 2000 Mexican census
Current and historical distribution of Nahuatl variants

At the turn of the 16th century, Nahua populations occupied territories ranging across Mesoamerica as far south as Panama.[45] However, their core area was Central Mexico, including the Valley of Mexico, the Toluca Valley, the eastern half of the Balsas River basin, and modern-day Tlaxcala and most of Puebla, although other linguistic and ethnic groups lived in these areas as well. They were also present in large numbers in El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, southeastern Veracruz, and Colima and coastal Michoacan.[8] Classical Nahuatl was a lingua franca in Central Mexico before the Spanish conquest due to Aztec hegemony,[46] and its role was not only preserved but expanded in the initial stage of colonial rule, encouraged by the Spaniards as a literary language and tool to convert diverse Mesoamerican peoples. There are many Nahuatl place names in regions where Nahuas were not the most populous group (including the names of Guatemala and several Mexican states), due to Aztec expansion, Spanish invasions in which Tlaxcaltecs served as the main force, and the usage of Nahuatl as a lingua franca.

The last of the southern Nahua populations today are the Pipil of El Salvador, the Nahua of Honduras and the Nicarao of Nicaragua.[47] Nahua populations in Mexico are centered in the middle of the country, with most speakers in the states of Puebla, Veracruz, Hidalgo, Guerrero and San Luis Potosí. However, smaller populations are spread throughout the country due to recent population movements within Mexico. Within the last 50 years, Nahua populations have appeared in the United States, particularly in New York City, Los Angeles, and Houston.[48]

History

[edit]

Pre-conquest period

[edit]
Ceramic sculpture of Nahua deity from Puebla

Archaeological, historical and linguistic evidence suggest that the Nahuas originally came from the deserts of northern Mexico (Aridoamerica) and migrated into central Mexico in several waves.[49] The presence of the Mexicanero people (who speak a Nahuatl variant) in this area until the present day affirms this theory. Before the Nahuas entered Mesoamerica, they were probably living for a period of time in northwestern Mexico alongside the Cora and Huichol peoples.[50] The first group of Nahuas to split from the main group were the Pochutec who went on to settle on the Pacific coast of Oaxaca possibly as early as 400 CE.[51] From c. 600 CE the Nahua quickly rose to power in central Mexico and expanded into areas earlier occupied by Oto-Manguean, Totonacan and Huastec peoples.[52] Through their integration in the Mesoamerican cultural area the Nahuas adopted many cultural traits including maize agriculture and urbanism, religious practices including a ritual calendar of 260 days and the practice of human sacrifices and the construction of monumental architecture and the use of logographic writing.

"Atlantean figures" from the Nahua culture of the Toltecs at Tula

Around 1000 CE the Toltec people, normally assumed to have been of Nahua ethnicity, established dominion over much of central Mexico which they ruled from Tollan Xicocotitlan.[53]

From this period on the Nahua were the dominant ethnic group in the Valley of Mexico and far beyond, and migrations kept coming in from the north. After the fall of the Toltecs a period of large population movements followed and some Nahua groups such as the Pipil and Nicarao arrived as far south as northwestern Costa Rica.[54][55][56][57] And in central Mexico different Nahua groups based in their different "Altepetl" city-states fought for political dominance. The Xochimilca, based in Xochimilco ruled an area south of Lake Texcoco; the Tepanecs ruled the area to the west and the Acolhua ruled an area to the east of the valley. One of the last of the Nahua migrations to arrive in the valley settled on an island in the Lake Texcoco and proceeded to subjugate the surrounding tribes. This group were the Mexica who during the next 300 years became the dominant ethnic group of Mesoamerica ruling from Tenochtitlan their island capital. They formed the Aztec Empire after allying with the Tepanecs and Acolhua people of Texcoco, spreading the political and linguistic influence of the Nahuas well into Central America.

Conquest period (1519–1523)

[edit]
Depiction of Tlaxcaltec soldiers leading a Spaniard to Chalco from Lienzo de Tlaxcala

In 1519 an expedition of Spaniards sailing from Cuba under the leadership of Hernán Cortés arrived on the Mexican gulf coast near the Totonac city of Quiyahuiztlan. The Totonacs were one of the peoples that were politically subjugated by the Aztecs and word was immediately sent to the Aztec Emperor (in Nahuatl, Tlatoani) of Tenochtitlan Motecuhzoma II. Going inland the Spaniards encountered and fought with Totonac forces and Nahua forces from the independent Altepetl of Tlaxcallan. The Tlaxcaltecs were a Nahua group who had avoided being subjugated by the Aztecs. After being defeated in battle by the Spaniards, the Tlaxcalans entered into an alliance with Cortes that would be invaluable in the struggle against the Aztecs.[58] The Spanish and Tlaxcaltec forces marched upon several cities that were under Aztec dominion and "liberated" them, before they arrived in the Aztec capital of Tenochtitlan. There they were welcomed as guests by Motecuhzoma II, but after a while they took the ruler prisoner. When the Aztec nobility realized that their ruler had been turned into a Spanish puppet they attacked the Spaniards and chased them out of the city. The Spaniards sought refuge in Tlaxcala where they regrouped and awaited reinforcements. During the next year they cooperated with large Tlaxcaltec armies and undertook a siege campaign resulting in the final fall of Tenochtitlan. After the fall of Tenochtitlan Spanish forces now also allied with the Aztecs to incorporate all the previous Aztec provinces into the realm of New Spain. New Spain was founded as a state under Spanish rule but where Nahua people were recognized as allies of the rulers and as such were granted privileges and a degree of independence that other Indigenous peoples of the area did not enjoy. Recently historians such as Stephanie Wood and Matthew Restall have argued that the Nahua did not experience the conquest as something substantially different from the sort of ethnic conflicts that they were used to, and that in fact they may have at first interpreted it as a defeat of one Nahua group by another.[59]

Colonial period (1521–1821)

[edit]

With the arrival of the Spanish in Mesoamerica a new political situation ensued. The period has been extensively studied by historians, with Charles Gibson publishing a classic monograph entitled The Aztecs Under Spanish Rule.[60] Historian James Lockhart built on that work, publishing The Nahuas After the Conquest in 1992. He divides the colonial history of the Nahua into three stages largely based on linguistic evidence in local-level Nahuatl sources, which he posits are an index of the degree of interaction between Spaniards and Nahuas and changes in Nahua culture.[61] An overview of the Nahuas of colonial Central Mexico can be found in the Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas.[62]

Stage one (1519–c. 1550) Conquest and early colonial period

[edit]
Depiction of Tlaxcaltecs and Spanish at the founding of the Colonial Province of Tlaxcala in 1545

The early period saw the first stages of the establishment of churches by mendicant friars in large and important Indigenous towns, the assertion of crown control over New Spain by the high court (Audiencia) and then the establishment of the viceroyalty, and the heyday of conqueror power over the Indigenous via the encomienda. In the initial stage of the colonial period, contact between Spaniards and the Indigenous populations was limited. It consisted mostly in the mendicants who sought to convert the population to Catholicism, and the reorganization of the Indigenous tributary system to benefit individual Spaniards. The Indigenous system of smaller settlements' paying tribute and rendering labor service to dominant political entities was transformed into the Encomienda system. Indigenous of particular towns paid tribute to a Spanish encomendero who was awarded the labor and tribute of that town.[63][64] In this early period, the hereditary Indigenous ruler or tlatoani and noblemen continued to hold power locally and were key to mobilizing tribute and labor for encomenderos. They also continued to hold titles from the pre-conquest period. Most willing accepted baptism so that records for this period show Nahua elites with Christian given names (indicating baptism) and many holding the Spanish noble title don. A set of censuses in alphabetic Nahuatl for the Cuernavaca region c. 1535 gives us a baseline for the impact of Spanish on Nahuatl, showing few Spanish loanwords taken into Nahuatl.[65]

As the Spaniards sought to extend their political dominance into the most remote corners of Mesoamerica, the Nahua accompanied them as auxiliaries. In the early colonial period, new Nahua settlements were made in northern Mexico and far south into Central America. Nahua forces often formed the bulk of the Spanish military expeditions that conquered other Mesoamerican peoples, such as the Maya, Zapotecs, and Mixtecs.

With the arrival of Christian missionaries, the first priority of the colonial authorities was eradicating Indigenous religious practices, something they achieved by a combination of violence and threats of violence, and patient education. Nahua were baptized with Spanish names. The Nahua who did not abandon their religious practices were severely punished or executed. The Nahua, however, often incorporated pre-Christian practices and beliefs into the Christian religion without the authorities' noticing it. Often they kept practicing their own religion in the privacy of their homes, especially in rural areas where Spanish presence was almost completely lacking and the conversion process was slow.

The Nahua quickly took the Latin alphabetic writing as their own. Within 20 years of the arrival of the Spanish, the Nahua were composing texts in their own language. In 1536 the first university of the Americas, the Colegio de Santa Cruz de Tlatelolco was inaugurated. It was established by the Franciscans whose aim was to educate young Nahua noblemen to be Catholic priests who were trilingual: literate in Spanish, Latin and Nahuatl.[66]

Stage two (c. 1550 – c. 1650)

[edit]

There are a large number of texts by and about Nahuas in this middle period and during this period Nahuatl absorbed a large number of loanwords from Spanish, particularly nouns for particular objects, indicating the closer contact between the European sphere and the Indigenous. However, Nahuatl verbs and syntax show no evidence of the impact of Spanish contact.[67] In the mid-sixteenth century, cultural change at the local level can be tracked through the production of Nahuatl alphabetic texts. The production of a wide range of written documents in Nahuatl dates from this period, including legal documents for transactions (bills of sale), minutes of Indigenous town council (cabildo) records, petitions to the crown, and others.

Institutionally, Indigenous town government shifted from the rule of the tlatoani and noblemen to the establishment of Spanish-style town councils (cabildos), with officers holding standard Spanish titles. A classic study of sixteenth-century Tlaxcala, the main ally of the Spaniards in the conquest of the Mexica, shows that much of the prehispanic structure continued into the colonial period.[68] An important set of cabildo records in Nahuatl for Tlaxcala is extant and shows how local government functioned in for nearly a century.[69]

Regarding religion, by the mid- to late 16th century, even the most zealous mendicants of the first generation doubted the capacity of Nahua men to become Christian priests so that the Colegio de Santa Cruz de Tlatelolco ceased to function to that end and in 1555 Indians were barred from ordination to the priesthood. However, in local communities, stone-built church complexes continued to be built and elaborated, with murals in mixed Indigenous-Spanish forms.[70] Confraternities (cofradías) were established to support the celebrations of a particular Christian saint and functioned as burial societies for members. During this period, an expression of personal piety, the Church promoted the making of last wills and testaments, with many testators donating money to their local Church to say Masses for their souls.

For individual Nahua men and women dictating a last will and testament to a local Nahua notary (escribano) became standard. These wills provide considerable information about individuals' residence, kin relations, and property ownership provides a window into social standing, differences between the sexes, and business practices at the local level. showing not only that literacy of some elite men in alphabetic writing in Nahuatl was a normal part of everyday life at the local level[71] and that the notion of making a final will was expected, even for those who had little property. A number of studies in the tradition of what is now called the New Philology extensively use Nahuatl wills as a source.[72][73][74]

Stage three (c. 1650 – 1821) Late colonial period to independence

[edit]

From the mid-seventeenth century to the achievement of independence in 1821, Nahuatl shows considerable impact from the European sphere and a full range of bilingualism.[75] Texts produced at the local level that in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries were sometimes a mixture of pictorial and alphabetic forms of expression were now primarily alphabetic.[76] In the late eighteenth century, there is evidence of text being written in "Nahuatlized Spanish", written by Nahuas who were now communicating in their own form of Spanish.[77] Year-by-year accounts of major occurrences, a text known as an annal, no longer reference the prehispanic period.[78] Local level documentation for individual Nahuas continued to be produced, in particular last wills and testaments, but they are much more simplified than those produced in the late sixteenth century.[79][80]

Nahuas began to produce an entirely new type of text, known as "primordial titles" or simply "titles" (títulos), that assert Indigenous communities' rights to particular territory, often by recording local lore in an atemporal fashion. There is no known prehispanic precedent for this textual form and none appears before 1650.[81] Several factors might be at work for the appearance of titles. One might be a resurgence of Indigenous population after decades recovering from devastating epidemics when communities might have been less concerned with Spanish encroachment. Another might be the crown's push to regularize defective land titles via a process known as composición.[82] The crown had mandated minimum land holdings for Indigenous communities at 600 varas, in property that was known as the fundo legal [es], and to separate Indigenous communities from Spanish lands by more than 1,100 varas. Towns were to have access to water, uplands for gathering firewood, and agricultural land, as well as common lands for pasturage.[83] Despite these mandated legal protections for Indian towns, courts continued to find in favor of Spaniards and the rules about minimum holdings for Indian towns were ignored in practice.[84]

Labor arrangements between Nahuas and Spaniards were largely informal, rather than organized through the mainly defunct encomienda and the poorly functioning repartimiento. Spanish landed estates needed a secure labor force, often a mixture of a small group of permanent laborers and part-time or seasonal laborers drawn from nearby Indigenous communities. Individual Indians made arrangements with estate owners rather than labor being mobilized via the community. The Indigenous communities continued to function as political entities, but there was greater fragmentation of units as dependent villages (sujetos) of the main settlement (cabecera) sought full, independent status themselves.[78] Indigenous officials were no longer necessarily noblemen.

National period (1821–present)

[edit]

With the achievement of Mexican independence in 1821, the casta system, which divided the population into racial categories with differential rights, was eliminated and the term "Indian" (indio) was no longer used by government, although it continued to be used in daily speech.[85] The creation of a republic in 1824 meant that Mexicans of all types were citizens rather than vassals of the crown. One important consequence for Nahua people and other Indigenous people was that documentation in the native languages generally ceased to be produced. Indigenous towns did not cease to exist nor did Indigenous populations speaking their own language, but the Indigenous people were far more marginalized in the post-independence period than during the colonial era. In the colonial era the crown had a paternalistic stance toward the Indigenous people, in essence according them special rights, a fuero, and giving support to structures in Indigenous towns and giving Indigenous people a level of protection against those who were not Indigenous. This can be seen in the establishment of the General Indian Court where Indigenous towns and individual Indigenous people could sue those making incursions on their land and other abuses.[86] These protections disappeared in the national period. One scholar has characterized the early national period of Nahua people and other Indigenous people "as the beginning of a systematic policy of cultural genocide and the increasing loss of native languages."[87] Lack of official recognition and both economic and cultural pressures meant that most Indigenous peoples in Central Mexico became more Europeanized and many became Spanish speakers.[87]

In 19th-century Mexico, the so-called "Indian Question" exercised politicians and intellectuals, who viewed Indigenous people as backward, unassimilated to the Mexican nation, whose custom of communal rather than individual ownership of land was impediment to economic progress.[88] Non-Indigenous landowners of estates had already encroached on Indigenous ownership in the colonial era, but now liberal ideology sought to end communal protections on ownership with its emphasis on private property.[89] Since land was the basis for Indigenous peoples'ability to maintain a separate identity, and a sense of sovereignty, land tenure became a central issue for liberal reformers. The liberal Reforma enshrined in the Constitution of 1857 mandated the breakup of corporate-owned property, therefore targeting Indigenous communities and the Roman Catholic Church, which also had significant holdings. This measure affected all Indigenous communities, including Nahua communities, holding land. Liberal Benito Juárez, a Zapotec who became president of Mexico, was fully in support of laws to end corporate landholding. The outbreak of the Mexican Revolution in Morelos, which still had a significant Nahua population, was sparked by peasant resistance to the expansion of sugar estates. This was preceded in the nineteenth century by smaller Indigenous revolts against encroachment, particularly during the civil war of the Reforma, foreign intervention, and a weak state following the exit of the French in 1867.[90]

A number of Indigenous men had made a place for themselves in post-independence Mexico, the most prominent being Benito Juárez. But an important nineteenth-century figure of Nahua was Ignacio Manuel Altamirano (1834–1893), born in Tixtla, Guerrero who became a well respected liberal intellectual, man of letters, politician, and diplomat. Altamirano was a fierce anticlerical politician, and was known for a period as "the Marat of the Radicals" and an admirer of the French Revolution.[91] Altamirano, along with other liberals, saw universal primary public education as a key way to change Mexico, promoting for upward mobility. Altamirano's chief disciple in this view was Justo Sierra.[92] Another prominent Nahua figure of this period was Prospero Cahuantzi, who served as governor of Tlaxcala from 1885 to 1911.[93] Indigenous surnames were uncommon in post-colonial Mexico but prevalent in Tlaxcala due to certain protections granted by the Spanish government in return for Tlaxcallan support during the overthrow of the Aztecs.[94] Cahuantzi was active in promoting the preservation of Indigenous culture and artifacts at a time when Mexican government policy was generally that of suppression.[95]

The Mexican revolutionary Emiliano Zapata (1879–1919) was likely of mixed Nahua-Spanish heritage, with ancestry going back to the Nahua city of Mapaztlán, in the state of Morelos.[96] Zapata was evidently fluent in Nahuatl and would give speeches in the language to Nahua peasants in hopes of inspiring them to join his cause.[97]

Culture

[edit]

Economy

[edit]

Many Nahua are agriculturists. They practice various forms of cultivation including the use of horses or mules to plow or slash-and-burn. Common crops include corn, wheat, beans, barley, chilli peppers, onions, tomatoes, and squash. Some Nahuas also raise sheep and cattle.[98]

Language

[edit]

The languages traditionally spoken by the Nahuas are the Nahuan languages, which include the different dialects of Nahuatl and the Pipil language.[99]

Religion

[edit]

Dances

[edit]

Netotiliztli

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Nahuas are indigenous peoples primarily inhabiting central and western , defined by their use of languages, which belong to the Uto-Aztecan linguistic family, and numbering over two million individuals who self-identify as Nahua, making them the largest indigenous ethnic group in the country. Originating from migrations out of around the CE, they established numerous city-states in , culminating in the formation of the —or more precisely, the Triple Alliance—by the 15th century, centered in , which demonstrated advanced hydraulic agriculture via chinampas, monumental pyramid construction, and a pictorial in codices. Nahua society was stratified by , , warriors, and commoners, with a cosmology emphasizing cyclical renewal through ritual , practiced on a scale involving thousands annually to appease deities and maintain cosmic order, alongside incessant warfare for captives known as xochiyaoyotl or "flowery wars." The Spanish conquest in , aided by alliances with rival Nahua polities like , triggered catastrophic population decline from Old World diseases and exploitation, yet Nahuas adapted by preserving elements of their legal, linguistic, and cultural frameworks within colonial structures, producing hybrid documents in using the Latin alphabet. In contemporary Mexico, Nahuas reside mainly in states such as , , , and Hidalgo, where they engage in subsistence farming, craftsmanship, and seasonal migration, while facing socioeconomic marginalization and efforts to revitalize amid pressures from Spanish dominance and . Their legacy endures in Mexican national symbols, cuisine like tamales and , and ongoing assertions of against state encroachments on communal lands.

Nomenclature and Identity

Etymology and Terminology

The ethnonym Nahua derives from the linguistic root nāhua-, signifying "audible," "intelligible," or "clear," a designation applied to those whose speech——was mutually comprehensible among dialect speakers, distinguishing them from neighboring groups with unintelligible languages. This root reflects the self-referential nature of Nahuatl terminology, where clarity of articulation denoted cultural and linguistic affinity. The term Nahuatl for the language itself stems from nāhuatl ahtōlli or similar constructions meaning "clear speech" or "language that rings clear," emphasizing phonetic precision and eloquence in oral traditions documented in colonial-era grammars and dictionaries by Spanish missionaries like in the . Scholars adopted "Nahua" in the 19th and 20th centuries to collectively describe Mesoamerican peoples speaking dialects, encompassing groups from central to , rather than narrower tribal identifiers. Contemporary usage distinguishes "Nahua" as an exonym preferred in and for its linguistic basis, while avoiding conflation with "Aztec," a term originating from —the purported northern homeland of Chichimec migrants—and initially denoting the specifically, later extended erroneously to all Nahuas by European chroniclers and 19th-century historians like . Nahua communities often self-identify by regional or local names (e.g., Pipil in or Olmec in contexts) rather than the pan-ethnic "Nahua," reflecting fluid ethnic boundaries tied to geography and dialect rather than rigid categorization.

Modern Self-Identification and Ethnic Boundaries

In contemporary , Nahua ethnic identity centers on self-identification tied to language use, adherence to traditional practices known as costumbre, and communal agrarian lifestyles, distinguishing them from surrounding populations. Ethnographic studies in Nahua villages, such as Amatlán in , reveal that residents refer to themselves as masehualmej (indigenous farmers) or mexijcaj (Nahuas), emphasizing pride in pre-Hispanic Aztec heritage while maintaining cultural continuity through corn-based subsistence, rituals honoring spirits, and localized kinship networks. These markers foster a situational identity adapted to interethnic pressures, where Nahuas strategically preserve autonomy amid economic dependence on s. Ethnic boundaries are delineated by linguistic proficiency, with approximately 1.6 million speakers reported in Mexico's 2020 , though self-identification as Nahua often encompasses non-speakers claiming cultural descent, contributing to broader indigenous self-identification trends exceeding language speakers by a factor of about 3:1 nationally. Boundaries manifest in social separation, including endogamous marriage preferences, distinct attire like embroidered blouses and caltsoj pants, and ritual exclusivity, which reinforce separation from mestizos perceived as hierarchical and exploitative. Mutual stereotypes—Nahuas viewing mestizos as arrogant and mestizos seeing Nahuas as backward—perpetuate these divides, though limited ritual kinship ties and out-migration introduce fluidity, particularly in urban settings where identity prevails over daily practice. In , smaller Nahua communities in , , and maintain analogous self-identification through variants and shared cosmology, but face greater assimilation pressures, with ethnic boundaries more permeable due to historical migrations and intermixing. Overall, Nahua persists as a resilient construct of cultural resistance, with self-identification rates rising in recent censuses due to revival movements rather than solely demographic growth, reflecting strategic assertions amid systemic marginalization.

Demographics and Geography

Current Population Estimates

According to Mexico's 2020 of Population and Housing conducted by INEGI, 1,651,958 individuals aged three years and older reported speaking a variant of the language, representing the largest group of speakers in the country. This figure marks a slight increase from 1,586,884 speakers recorded in the 2010 , though it remains below historical peaks due to factors including , intermarriage, and toward Spanish. Broader ethnic estimates, based on self-identification within indigenous households, place the Nahua at 2,810,906 as of the same 2020 data compiled by the Instituto Nacional de los Pueblos Indígenas (INPI). This metric captures individuals who may not actively speak but affiliate culturally or ancestrally with Nahua identity, accounting for the discrepancy between linguistic and ethnic counts; approximately 30-40% of self-identified indigenous persons in speak their native . Nahua communities outside Mexico, primarily in (as Pipil speakers), , and , number in the low tens of thousands at most, with limited recent data available; these groups descend from pre-colonial migrations but constitute a minor fraction of the total . Overall, contemporary Nahua estimates hover between 2.8 and 3 million, predominantly in central and eastern , reflecting resilience amid assimilation pressures but underscoring the need for updated post-2020 surveys to account for demographic changes.

Distribution in Mexico

The Nahua people, often identified through proficiency in Nahuatl languages, are distributed across Mexico, with the densest concentrations in central and eastern regions. The 2020 Censo de Población y Vivienda reported 1,651,958 individuals aged three and older speaking a Nahuatl variant, comprising the largest group of indigenous language speakers in the country. These speakers reside in 18 states, though the majority inhabit rural municipalities in Puebla, Veracruz, Hidalgo, Guerrero, and San Luis Potosí. In , is spoken in 140 municipalities, particularly in the Sierra Norte de Puebla and areas bordering Hidalgo and , where it forms a core of Nahua cultural continuity. hosts speakers in 146 municipalities, mainly in the Veracruzana region, supporting traditional agrarian communities. Hidalgo features significant Nahua presence in 81 municipalities across the Sierra de Hidalgo and Hidalguense, with dialects bridging local ethnic identities. and also maintain substantial populations, with used in 32 and fewer but notable municipalities respectively, often in mountainous and highland zones. Smaller but noteworthy Nahua communities exist in states such as the , , , , and , where has influenced language retention. In these areas, speakers number in the tens of thousands, concentrated in peri-urban and rural enclaves preserving pre-colonial linguistic diversity. Overall, Nahua distribution reflects historical migrations and settlements from the post-classic period, adapted to modern administrative boundaries.

Presence in Central America and Beyond

Small Nahua-descended populations persist in , primarily as a result of pre-Columbian migrations from central southward during the Postclassic period (circa 900–1521 CE). In , the Pipil (also known as Nahuat-Pipil) represent the largest such group, having established settlements in the western and central regions by the 11th century CE; they speak Nawat, a dialect of that is now critically endangered with fewer than 200 fluent speakers reported as of recent assessments. These communities, concentrated in areas like Sonsonate and departments, maintain cultural practices tied to Nahua cosmology despite historical assimilation pressures. In , remnants of the Nicarao branch of Pipil-Nahua settled along the Pacific coast, contributing loanwords to local Spanish dialects and influencing toponyms, though contemporary speakers number in the low hundreds at most, with the largely extinct since the . hosts minor historical Nahua enclaves, such as in the Aguan and Olancho valleys, where Pipil-related groups were documented at European contact, but current self-identified Nahua populations are negligible, with no longer spoken natively. Smaller traces exist in , linked to similar migrations, but without sustained linguistic or ethnic continuity. Overall, Central American Nahua groups total fewer than 5,000 individuals, facing ongoing challenges from mestizaje policies and . Beyond , modern Nahua presence arises mainly from 20th- and 21st-century labor migration from to the , where an estimated several thousand speakers reside, primarily in urban centers like , , and . These communities, often first- or second-generation migrants from , , and , preserve language through family transmission and cultural associations, though integration and to English and Spanish predominate. Scattered smaller groups have formed in and via secondary migration, but lack formal demographic tracking.

Pre-Columbian History

Origins, Migration, and Early Settlements

The Nahuas, defined primarily as speakers of Nahuan languages within the Uto-Aztecan family, trace their linguistic roots to Proto-Uto-Aztecan speakers who inhabited the uplands of the drainage spanning present-day , , and Chihuahua, where they subsisted mainly as foragers approximately 5,000 years ago. Divergences within the family positioned the ancestors of Nahuan speakers in by around 500 BCE, marking the emergence of Proto-Nahuan amid a broader southward expansion of southern Uto-Aztecan branches. Archaeological, linguistic, and ethnohistorical evidence indicates that Nahua groups migrated from the arid deserts of (Aridoamerica) into central over several centuries, from the late Preclassic period (ca. 200 BCE–250 CE) through the Postclassic (ca. 900–1519 CE), driven by ecological pressures, resource competition, and opportunities in fertile valleys. This movement involved Chichimec-like nomadic bands integrating with or supplanting sedentary populations, with linguistic borrowings from in northern lowlands attesting to early contacts and possible hybrid settlements by the Early Classic period (ca. 250–600 CE). Monumental Maya inscriptions further document Nahua lexical and cultural influences in regions like the Petén by the Late Classic (ca. 600–900 CE), implying established Nahua trader or mercenary enclaves predating mass Postclassic influxes. Prominent among these migrations were those of groups like the , whose chronicles describe departure from the semi-mythic —plausibly in northwestern —around the 11th–12th centuries CE, following a route through ("Place of the Seven Caves") and enduring hardships including floods and conflicts, before reaching the Valley of circa 1250 CE. While narratives incorporate legendary elements, such as divine prophecies and totemic eagles, they align with corroborated patterns of northern nomadic incursions, supported by ceramic styles, toponymic evidence, and oral traditions cross-verified across Nahua codices. Upon settlement, early Nahua communities established footholds in the Basin of Mexico and adjacent highlands, founding sites such as Culhuacan (ca. 13th century CE) under Toltec-influenced rulers and as a hub by the early 1200s CE, where they adopted agriculture, built systems, and formed alliances that evolved into rival polities. These initial outposts, often numbering in the thousands of inhabitants, facilitated the transition from migratory bands to urbanized societies, with the Mexica's foundation of on in 1325 CE exemplifying adaptive settlement amid lacustrine environments. Parallel dispersals seeded Nahua presence in and , contributing to the multicentric rise of (city-states) by the 14th century.

Rise of City-States and the Aztec Empire

The Postclassic period in central Mexico, following the decline of the civilization around 1150–1200 CE, saw the emergence of numerous independent Nahua altepetl (city-states) in the Valley of Mexico, characterized by Nahuatl-speaking polities such as the in Texcoco, the Tepaneca in , and early Xochimilca settlements. These entities, typically encompassing 10,000–15,000 inhabitants and spanning 50–60 square miles each, competed for resources and dominance amid migrations of Chichimec groups, including Nahuatl-speaking tribes that adopted sedentary urban forms influenced by earlier Mesoamerican traditions. By the 13th century, approximately 50–60 such states dotted the Basin of , fostering a landscape of localized warfare, tribute networks, and agricultural intensification via chinampas (raised fields) in lacustrine environments. The , a Nahua originating from northern migrations out of (likely in northwest ) around the , arrived in the Valley of Mexico circa 1250 CE after decades of nomadic wandering and servitude to established powers like Culhuacan. They founded their capital, , in 1325 CE on marshy islets in , guided by a of an eagle perched on a , initially as vassals extracting tribute for the dominant city-state of under ruler Tezozomoc (r. c. 1370–1427). Over the following century, grew through strategic marriages, military service, and internal consolidation, establishing twin cities with Tlatelolco by 1358 CE, while Azcapotzalco's hegemony peaked, subjugating neighboring . The pivotal shift occurred after Tezozomoc's death in 1427 CE, sparking succession disputes that weakened under Maxtla. (r. 1427–1440), of , allied with the exiled Acolhua prince Nezahualcoyotl of Texcoco and the smaller polity of , culminating in the decisive Battle of in 1428 CE. This victory dismantled Tepanec dominance, redistributing provinces and formalizing the Triple Alliance, wherein assumed primacy, Texcoco intellectual and diplomatic roles, and a subordinate position, marking the inception of the Aztec Empire's expansive phase through flower wars, conquests, and a hegemonic system exacting in goods, labor, and captives for rituals. Under subsequent rulers like (r. 1440–1469), the alliance subjugated regions from the Gulf Coast to , integrating diverse Nahua and non-Nahua groups via co-optation of local elites rather than direct administration.

Warfare, Expansion, and Societal Organization

Aztec society, dominated by the Mexica Nahua of Tenochtitlan, was structured around the calpulli, kin-based wards that functioned as self-sustaining units responsible for land allocation, labor tribute, education, and military recruitment. Each calpulli included commoner families organized hierarchically under a leader, with all able-bodied males obligated to serve in warfare from adolescence, reflecting a militarized ethos where martial prowess determined social mobility. This organization facilitated rapid mobilization, as calpulli leaders could assemble contingents for campaigns, integrating warfare into daily governance and economy through tribute extraction. Military hierarchy rewarded captures over kills, elevating commoners to elite orders like the or Eagle warriors upon achieving four captive-taking feats, granting privileges such as land, sumptuary rights, and noble status. Nobles and professionals formed the core of standing forces, equipped with cotton armor, shields, and weapons including the (obsidian-edged club), atlatl spears, and bows, while tactics emphasized ambushes, feigned retreats, and to maximize prisoner yields for ritual sacrifice rather than territorial annihilation. Warfare intertwined with religion, as captives sustained the cosmic order via offerings to deities like Huitzilopochtli, with "flower wars" (xochiyaoyotl)—pre-arranged skirmishes with allies' foes like —providing controlled outlets for this demand, attested in codices and Spanish chroniclers like . Expansion accelerated after the Triple Alliance formed in 1428 between , Texcoco, and , overthrowing overlords under Itzcóatl (r. 1427–1440), who initiated conquests consolidating central . Subsequent rulers like (r. 1440–1469) extended dominion southward to and eastward to the Gulf Coast by 1458, incorporating over 300 tribute-paying polities through intimidation, sieges, and client networks rather than direct administration, yielding annual hauls of 7,000 tons of , , and cacao. This hegemonic model, enforced by periodic campaigns and garrisons, peaked under Ahuitzotl (r. 1486–1502), whose irrigation projects and temple dedications in 1487 symbolized imperial zenith, though revolts persisted due to sacrificial demands. Societal organization thus propelled expansion, with warrior elites benefiting from tribute flows that sustained 's 200,000 inhabitants.

Conquest and Colonial History

Spanish Conquest (1519–1521)

Hernán Cortés landed on the Gulf Coast of modern-day Mexico on February 18, 1519, with approximately 500 Spanish soldiers, several cannons, and 16 horses, initiating contact with Nahua-speaking groups such as the Totonacs of Cempoala, who resented Aztec tribute demands and provided initial guides and porters. After founding the Villa Rica de la Veracruz on April 21, 1519, to legitimize his unauthorized expedition, Cortés marched inland toward the Aztec heartland, exploiting divisions among Nahua city-states subjugated by the Mexica-dominated Triple Alliance. In September 1519, Cortés encountered fierce resistance from the Tlaxcalans, a powerful Nahua confederation long at war with the over territorial incursions and sacrificial captives; after initial defeats, including battles at Tizatlán, the Tlaxcalan leaders, led by Xicotencatl the Elder, sued for peace and allied with the Spanish on October 23, 1519, motivated by the opportunity to overthrow their overlords. This alliance proved decisive, as Tlaxcalan warriors—numbering tens of thousands—supplied Cortés with intelligence, provisions, and troops, enabling his force of roughly 1,000 Spaniards to reach on November 8, 1519, where they were received by Emperor amid tense diplomacy marked by omens and Spanish demands for gold and conversion. Tensions escalated in 1520 when Cortés left for the coast to confront rival Spaniards but returned to find his deputy had massacred Aztec nobles during a festival on May 14, sparking the murder of Moctezuma—possibly by his own people—and a Spanish retreat known as on June 30, during which over half of Cortés's men perished in ambushes while fleeing laden with treasures. , introduced inadvertently by a Spanish slave in 1520, ravaged the population through the summer and fall, killing an estimated 25% or more in —including the new emperor —and paralyzing defenses due to lack of immunity, as the disease caused pustules, fever, and secondary starvation. Regrouped at , Cortés rebuilt his forces with Tlaxcalan and other Nahua allies, constructing 13 brigantines for lake warfare. The siege of began on May 26, 1521, with Cortés's combined army of about 1,300 Spaniards, 86 horses, and over 100,000 indigenous auxiliaries—primarily Tlaxcalans—cutting aqueducts to starve the city and launching coordinated assaults from causeways. defenders under inflicted heavy casualties through canoe attacks, boiling water, and stone projectiles, but famine, disease, and relentless bombardment eroded resistance; on August 13, 1521, after 93 days, Spanish forces captured on a canoe fleeing the , marking the fall of the city amid widespread destruction by fire and demolition. This conquest dismantled the hegemony but relied fundamentally on Spanish-native alliances and epidemiological factors, as the invaders' numerical inferiority—without Tlaxcalan support—would have precluded victory against the empire's mobilized warriors.

Early Colonial Period (1521–c. 1600)

The conquest of Tenochtitlan on August 13, 1521, marked the onset of Spanish dominion over Nahua territories, with Hernán Cortés overseeing the demolition of the Aztec capital and the foundation of Mexico City atop its ruins between 1521 and 1524, utilizing coerced Nahua labor for reconstruction efforts. Nahua city-states, or altepetl, initially retained partial autonomy under Spanish oversight, as seen in alliances like that of Tlaxcala, which earned exemptions from encomienda grants and perpetual noble privileges for aiding the conquerors. This period witnessed internal Nahua conflicts exacerbated by Spanish divide-and-rule tactics, alongside sporadic resistance, such as the 1521 siege aftermath and localized revolts in the 1530s, though outright rebellion remained limited due to demographic devastation and strategic accommodations. A profound demographic collapse afflicted Nahua populations, primarily from introduced diseases like , which ravaged communities starting in 1520 and peaked in epidemics through the 1540s and 1570s; scholarly estimates indicate a decline from roughly 10–25 million indigenous people in greater pre-1521 to approximately 1 million in central by circa 1600, representing an 80–95% loss attributed mainly to pathogens rather than direct violence. This catastrophe disrupted social structures, labor systems, and , compelling surviving Nahuas to reorganize around surviving calpullalli kin-based units while facing Spanish demands for and workforce replenishment. The system, formalized post-1521, assigned Spanish encomenderos authority over Nahua towns to extract labor and goods in exchange for nominal protection and Christian instruction, often resulting in severe exploitation that prompted royal interventions like the 1542 aiming to curb abuses and transition toward crown-controlled drafts. Nahua nobles navigated this by leveraging Spanish legal avenues, filing petitions and lawsuits from the 1530s onward to reclaim lands, validate titles, and mitigate burdens, thereby preserving some communal integrity amid economic shifts toward intensified and coerced labor. Evangelization intensified with the arrival of twelve Franciscan friars in 1524, who conducted mass baptisms—reaching hundreds of thousands by 1530—and established monasteries in former Nahua temple sites, employing for doctrinal texts like Alonso de Molina's 1540 confessional guide to facilitate conversion while documenting indigenous knowledge. Dominicans and followed in the 1530s, enforcing by destroying codices and idols, yet Nahuas incorporated Christian elements into syncretic practices, as evidenced in early colonial testaments and art blending motifs. By the 1550s, ecclesiastical inquiries into Nahua customs, such as those by , highlighted persistent pre-Christian rituals, prompting extirpation campaigns that underscored the incomplete nature of spiritual subjugation.

Mid-to-Late Colonial Transformations (c. 1600–1821)

During the mid-colonial period, Nahua populations in central experienced gradual demographic stabilization following the catastrophic declines of the , with recovery accelerating in the amid reduced intensity and improved subsistence conditions. In the Basin of Mexico, pre-conquest estimates of around 250,000 Nahuas had plummeted to tens of thousands by the early 1600s due to and exploitation, but by the late 1700s, numbers rebounded through higher birth rates and migration, comprising roughly 80% of tribute-paying households in some regions. This resurgence strained communal lands, as growing families faced encroachment from expanding haciendas and Spanish settlers, eroding traditional calpulli-based while prompting legal defenses via cabildos. Nahua political autonomy persisted through indigenous cabildos, which governed pueblos de indios and adjudicated internal disputes over land and resources, often drawing on pre-Hispanic precedents adapted to Spanish law. These councils, comprising governors, alcaldes, and regidores elected from local elites, maintained corporate privileges like exemptions for nobles and communal property rights, resisting full assimilation into Spanish municipal structures. remained integral to local administration, serving as the language of cabildo records, petitions, and even some inter-ethnic communication in central , underscoring cultural resilience despite Spanish dominance in higher courts. The of the late 18th century intensified transformations by centralizing fiscal and administrative control, introducing intendants and subdelegados who curtailed autonomy and escalated demands to fund imperial wars and infrastructure. These policies facilitated macehual (commoner) secessions from elite-dominated towns, forming new indigenous republics to evade corruption, though they also heightened land alienation as auctions favored Creole hacendados. Nahua communities adapted through litigation and economic diversification, such as wage labor in mining and agriculture, but faced rising indebtedness and coerced remnants, contributing to social tensions that presaged independence-era unrest without widespread organized revolts.

Post-Independence and Modern History

19th-Century Independence and Reforms

Following Mexico's achievement of independence from Spain on September 27, 1821, Nahua communities, long organized as semi-autonomous pueblos de indios under colonial repúblicas de indios, faced immediate pressures from emerging liberal ideologies emphasizing individual rights, secularization, and national unification over indigenous corporate structures. These pueblos, concentrated in central regions like the Valley of Mexico, Puebla, and Morelos, retained local governance and communal land (ejidos) systems inherited from pre-colonial altepetl (city-states), but early republican governments viewed them as relics hindering economic modernization and mestizo-led nation-building. Nahua intellectuals, educated in late-colonial institutions such as the Colegio de Santa Cruz de Tlatelolco, transitioned into advocacy roles, petitioning new authorities to protect indigenous land tenure and tribute exemptions while navigating the shift from viceregal to federal oversight. Documents from the Metepec area in the Toluca Valley, including Nahuatl-language testaments spanning 1799–1823, demonstrate cultural continuity, with women comprising 66% of testators affirming Nahua kinship networks and property customs amid independence-era instability. The 1850s Liberal Reforms, enacted during Benito Juárez's administration (1858–1872), profoundly disrupted Nahua communal systems through the Lerdo Law of June 25, 1856, which mandated the division and of ejido lands held by indigenous villages to foster individual property ownership and generate state revenue. Intended to dismantle feudal-like corporate entities—including those of the and indigenous groups—this policy compelled Nahua pueblos to survey and alienate surplus communal holdings, often resulting in sales to non-indigenous elites at undervalued prices due to , , or administrative bias. In central , where Nahuas formed a significant portion of the rural population, the law exacerbated land loss; for instance, communities in and the saw ejidos reduced by up to 50% in some cases, fueling economic marginalization and migration to haciendas as peons. Juárez, a Zapotec indigenous leader himself, framed these measures as essential for integrating natives into a modern republic, yet empirical outcomes revealed disproportionate harm to Nahua groups, whose pre-existing communal agriculture—rooted in systems and maize-based subsistence—proved incompatible with forced individuation without adequate support. Resistance to these reforms manifested in Nahua-led petitions and localized uprisings, with intellectuals like those from documenting grievances in Spanish and to assert legal continuity from colonial fueros (privileges). By the 1840s, written had lost much of its bureaucratic utility in independent , diminishing indigenous agency in official discourse, though oral traditions and vernacular use persisted in community assemblies. These policies reflected a causal prioritization of state centralization over ethnic pluralism, contributing to Nahua demographic decline—from an estimated 1–2 million speakers in the early to reduced communal viability by mid-century—while setting precedents for later agrarian conflicts. In Central American regions with Nahua populations, such as and , parallel independence processes (circa 1823) yielded similar liberal encroachments on communal lands, though on a smaller scale due to sparser Nahua settlements.

20th-Century Assimilation and Revolutions

The Mexican Revolution (1910–1920) profoundly affected Nahua communities, particularly in , where hacienda expansions onto communal lands—often held by Nahuatl-speaking peasants—sparked widespread unrest. , a leader of Nahua and Spanish descent who spoke , mobilized indigenous fighters in the Zapatista movement, demanding "land and liberty" through restitution of ejidos (communal properties). , comprising roughly one-third of Mexico's population at the time, participated actively across revolutionary factions, demonstrating adaptation to mestizo-dominated political structures rather than mere passive resistance. The revolution's aftermath brought partial reversals of prior land dispossessions via Article 27 of the 1917 Constitution, which authorized grants to indigenous groups, including Nahuas, enabling thousands of communities to reclaim territories lost since the colonial era. By the and , under presidents like (1934–1940), agrarian reforms distributed over 18 million hectares to ejidos, benefiting Nahua-majority regions in central such as and , though implementation often favored intermediaries and sparked local conflicts. Subsequent indigenismo policies from the 1920s onward aimed to forge a unified nation by integrating indigenous elements symbolically while promoting , often marginalizing Nahua in favor of state-directed progress. programs, intended as transitional, enforced "direct teaching" in Spanish, with schools punishing use and associating the language with backwardness, accelerating shift to Spanish among youth. This contributed to persistent , where speakers faced from , reducing intergenerational transmission despite a raw increase in speakers to over 1 million by century's end. Nahua responses varied, with communities seeking state alliances for land defense while resisting full assimilation through localized mobilizations, though early-20th-century disruptions like expansions in Nahua areas further eroded linguistic prevalence. By mid-century, these pressures had fostered hybrid identities but diminished traditional governance and fluency, setting patterns of marginalization evident in higher indigenous illiteracy rates (27.2% by 2010, versus 5.4% nationally).

Contemporary Developments (1940s–Present)

Following Mexico's post-World War II economic expansion and land redistribution under the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), Nahua communities in central states such as Puebla, Veracruz, Hidalgo, and Guerrero encountered intensified assimilation pressures alongside opportunities for migration. Industrialization and urban growth drew many Nahuas to cities including Mexico City and Guadalajara, where by the late 20th century, indigenous migrants formed significant enclaves while facing socioeconomic marginalization. This rural exodus contributed to the erosion of traditional communal lands and practices, though remittances from urban and international labor sustained some rural economies. Indigenismo policies from the 1940s to 1970s promoted cultural integration by portraying indigenous groups as obstacles to national progress, implementing that transitioned students to Spanish dominance rather than fostering native . speaker numbers hovered near 1.45 million in the 2000 INEGI census, with monolingual speakers at approximately 198,000, but by the 2020 census, total speakers exceeded 1.6 million while monolinguals dropped to around 112,000, reflecting ongoing among youth due to and inadequate policy support. The 1980s and 1990s marked a pivot toward amid rising indigenous , including Mexico's 1990 of ILO Convention 169 and 2001 constitutional amendments recognizing pluricultural , though remained inconsistent for Nahuas. Revitalization initiatives proliferated, such as community-led immersion programs in Guerrero's Balsas region and recent expansions like public schools incorporating curricula starting in 2025 to achieve advanced proficiency by secondary level. These efforts, alongside cultural associations promoting crafts and rituals, have bolstered ethnic identity, yet persistent , violence in Nahua territories, and Spanish dominance in media and continue to threaten vitality.

Social Structure and Governance

Pre-Colonial Hierarchy and Institutions

Nahua society in pre-Columbian central was highly stratified, with social organization centered on city-states known as altepetl that formed independent polities or alliances such as the Aztec Triple Alliance of , Texcoco, and . The hierarchy divided into (pipiltin), comprising rulers, high priests, elite warriors, and landowners who held hereditary privileges and controlled extraction; commoners (macehualtin), who were free farmers, artisans, and laborers organized into corporate groups and obligated to provide labor and goods; and slaves (tlacotin or mayeque), typically war captives or debtors bound to serve elites without land rights. existed through military valor, allowing some commoners to ascend to noble status, though the system emphasized inherited rank and ritual obligations. Governance operated through a monarchical structure led by the (ruler or "speaker"), who in imperial centers like held the title huey tlatoani (great speaker) and was selected by a council of nobles rather than by strict , ensuring legitimacy through consensus among elites. The commanded military campaigns, oversaw , and performed religious rites, advised by institutions like the noble council and the cihuacoatl (a vice-ruler handling administration). In non-imperial such as or Cholula, power was more distributed, with rotating offices, priestly co-rulership, or oligarchic councils limiting and incorporating broader elite input. These mechanisms balanced with , supported by rotary labor systems for and tribute. Key institutions included the (or calpolli), kin-based corporate wards that served as the foundational socio-economic unit within , managing communal land , allocation, , and via institutions like the telpochcalli (youth houses for males focusing on warfare and crafts). Each calpulli had its own temple, leader (calpullec), and internal governance, fostering self-sufficiency while integrating into state demands. Specialized guilds like the (long-distance merchants) operated semi-autonomously, handling trade in exotic goods and , with their own hierarchies and rituals distinct from noble or spheres. Priestly colleges maintained the ritual calendar, astronomy, and sacrificial systems, wielding influence over state legitimacy and agriculture.

Colonial Modifications and Resilience

Spanish colonial authorities reorganized Nahua governance after the 1521 conquest by superimposing cabildo systems—municipal councils modeled on Spanish institutions—onto the pre-existing altepetl city-state framework, creating semi-autonomous repúblicas de indios. These cabildos, established from the 1520s onward, were staffed primarily by Nahua elites who served as gobernadores (governors) and alcaldes (magistrates), blending indigenous leadership with colonial administrative duties such as tribute collection and labor allocation. Nahua , or pipiltin, experienced modifications in status as pre-conquest titles like were supplanted or adapted into Spanish equivalents, often prefixed with "don" to signify recognition by , while retaining access to communal lands and exemption from certain forced labors. However, this faced compression in , with power centralized under Spanish viceroys and audiencias, limiting independent or judicial ; by the mid-16th century, noble roles focused on mediating between communities and colonial officials. The , traditional kin-based corporate groups, persisted as barrios or parcialidades, maintaining internal social order, endogamous marriage practices, and collective landholdings despite pressures from grants and labor drafts. Resilience in Nahua institutions was evident in the enduring as the basic sociopolitical unit through , supported by -language records—including testaments, petitions, and minutes—produced by indigenous notaries until the late , which preserved and enabled legal defenses against land encroachments. Nahua communities leveraged Spanish courts to assert , adapting pre-conquest concepts of communal to royal protections against abuse, as seen in thousands of extant documents from central . In , allied with since 1519, royal privileges granted in the 1530s—including perpetual exemption from personal tribute, , and certain taxes—allowed retention of four semi-autonomous señoríos under native , fostering greater continuity of pre-conquest hierarchies and influencing regional Nahua adaptations.

Modern Community Dynamics

Approximately 1.7 million people in spoke in 2020, representing about 22.4% of all speakers and constituting the largest such group in the country. These speakers are distributed across all 32 Mexican states, with the highest concentrations in central and eastern regions such as , , , Hidalgo, and , where rural communities predominate. Smaller Nahua populations persist in , , , and , often numbering in the thousands and maintaining linguistic ties through migration networks, though precise census data for these groups remains limited. Urban migration has dispersed many Nahuas to cities like and Guadalajara, fostering bilingualism but accelerating among younger generations. Nahua social structures emphasize extended family households as the core unit, surrounded by concentric layers of kinship, neighborhood, and village affiliations that promote communal resource sharing and mutual aid. In rural settings, cooperation manifests in collective labor for agriculture, rituals, and maintenance of communal lands, sustaining social cohesion amid economic pressures. Gender roles remain traditional, with women managing household production and men handling external labor, though female participation in education and migration is rising. Local integrates customary practices with formal municipal systems, where communities function as delegaciones under state law, electing regidores (councilors) who address disputes and allocate resources. Traditional assemblies (tequio) persist for decisions, blending pre-colonial consensus models with electoral , though and external interference often undermine efficacy. Political mobilization has grown since the 1990s Zapatista influence, with Nahua groups advocating for land rights and under Mexico's 2001 indigenous consultation reforms, yet implementation lags due to bureaucratic resistance. Contemporary dynamics reflect tensions between preservation and assimilation: while programs have expanded since 2010, reaching over 1 million indigenous students, proficiency declines as Spanish dominates schools and media, with only 10-20% of speakers monolingual. Economic shifts toward wage labor and remittances from U.S. migrants bolster household incomes but erode subsistence farming, prompting cultural revival initiatives like and literature in . persists, with indigenous identifiers facing lower wages and urban exclusion, fueling identity-based that prioritizes linguistic reclamation over full integration.

Culture and Economy

Language and Linguistic Evolution

Nahuatl belongs to the Nahuan branch of the Uto-Aztecan language family, which extends across western from to and includes approximately 60 languages spoken by over 1.9 million people as of recent estimates. Linguistic reconstructions indicate that Proto-Uto-Aztecan originated in the region of the around 5,000 years ago, with the Nahuan subgroup diverging and migrating southward into central by approximately 1000 BCE to 500 CE, driven by agricultural expansions such as cultivation. This migration facilitated the adaptation of to Mesoamerican environments, incorporating terms for local , , and societal structures absent in northern proto-forms. By the postclassic period (c. 900–1521 CE), Nahuatl had diversified into eastern and western dialect groups, with Classical Nahuatl emerging as the prestige variety in the Valley of Mexico during the 15th century under Mexica dominance. Classical Nahuatl featured agglutinative morphology, verb serialization, and a phonological inventory with glottal stops and saltillo (h-like sound), serving as a lingua franca for trade, diplomacy, and codices across Mesoamerica. Its written form, initially logographic and rebus-based in pre-Hispanic codices, was adapted to the Latin alphabet by Spanish missionaries like Bernardino de Sahagún in the mid-16th century, preserving extensive vocabularies in works such as the Florentine Codex completed around 1577. Following the Spanish conquest in 1521, Nahuatl experienced lexical borrowing from Spanish for European-introduced items, concepts, and institutions, with over 1,000 loanwords integrated by the , including terms like kamisado (camisa, ) and kwenta (cuenta, ). Structural influences included increased use of prepositions mirroring Spanish adpositional patterns and simplification of certain inflectional categories under bilingualism pressures, though core agglutinative syntax persisted. Colonial policies initially promoted as an administrative language in , with doctrinal texts and legal documents composed in it until the late , but and castilianization efforts accelerated shift to Spanish by the . In the , encompasses about 30 mutually intelligible dialects, classified into over 20 variants across central and southeastern , with approximately 1.5 million speakers reported in the 2010 Mexican , though fewer than 10% are monolingual and rates in remain below 20%. Many dialects face due to , migration, and dominant Spanish , with intergenerational transmission declining; for instance, peripheral dialects in and show higher vitality than urban-central ones. Revitalization initiatives since the 1990s, including Mexico's 2003 General Law on and community-led programs like bilingual schooling and , have increased awareness and documentation, though challenges persist from ideological divides over standardization versus dialect preservation.

Religion: Pre-Columbian Beliefs and Syncretism

The pre-Columbian religion of the Nahuas centered on a polytheistic pantheon intertwined with a philosophical understanding of teotl, an impersonal, dynamic sacred force that animated the cosmos through constant motion and transformation. This energy manifested in deities embodying dualities such as creation and destruction, with Ometeotl as the supreme dual entity residing in the highest heaven, representing the origin of all existence. Major gods included Tlaloc, controller of rain, wind, and fertility essential for agriculture; Quetzalcoatl, linked to wind, wisdom, and cyclical renewal; and Huitzilopochtli, the Mexica patron deity of war and the sun, demanding sustenance through ritual offerings. Cosmology envisioned a layered universe of thirteen heavens and nine underworlds, where human rituals, including bloodletting and heart extraction, repaid the gods' initial sacrifice in creating the Fifth Sun, the current era, to avert cosmic collapse. Rituals were cyclical, tied to the 260-day tonalpohualli calendar and agricultural seasons, involving processions, fasting, and autosacrifice by elites to invoke divine favor and maintain reciprocity with the gods. , particularly of war captives, symbolized the release of vital energy to propel the sun across the sky, reflecting a where life depended on continuous renewal through death. These practices, while central to , varied across Nahua polities, with local deities integrated into broader imperial cults post-1428. Post-conquest syncretism emerged as Nahuas adapted while preserving core cosmological elements, often overlaying Catholic saints onto indigenous deities and rituals. Churches were built on temple foundations, such as at Tenochtitlan's site, facilitating spatial continuity of worship. The 1531 apparition of the Virgin of Guadalupe at , a pre-Hispanic to the earth mother, exemplified this fusion, with the Virgin adopting attributes of fertility and protection akin to Tonantzin, accelerating mass conversions by 1530s Dominican and Franciscan missions. Nahua nobility, educated in doctrina through texts like the 1548 , reinterpreted via indigenous dualism, equating God with Ometeotl and saints with nahual spirits. In rural communities, syncretic practices persisted, blending cofradías (Catholic brotherhoods) with pre-Columbian feasts involving indigenous dances, floral offerings, and maize-based rituals during All Saints' and observances, which echoed ancestor and cyclical renewal beliefs. This resilience stemmed from incomplete eradication efforts, allowing duality and reciprocity to infuse Catholic devotion, as seen in modern Nahua systems where sponsorship mirrors ancient obligations. Scholarly analyses note that while overt waned by the , underlying Nahua metaphysics influenced expressions of , challenging narratives of total cultural replacement.

Subsistence, Technology, and Economic Practices

Pre-colonial Nahua subsistence centered on agriculture, with maize as the staple crop supplemented by beans, squash, chilies, tomatoes, and amaranth, often cultivated in the milpa system involving plot rotation to maintain soil fertility. In fertile valleys like the Basin of Mexico, Nahuas innovated chinampas—raised, irrigated garden beds constructed from lakebed mud and vegetation, enabling year-round production and yields sufficient to support urban populations exceeding 200,000 in centers like Tenochtitlan by the early 16th century. Hunting, fishing, and gathering wild resources such as maguey for fiber and pulque provided supplementary protein and materials, though agriculture dominated caloric intake at approximately 80-90% from cultivated plants. Technological adaptations emphasized labor-intensive methods without draft animals or the wheel for transport; key tools included the coa (a wooden digging stick for planting), stone metates for grinding maize into masa, and obsidian blades for harvesting and processing. Irrigation canals and terracing on slopes extended arable land, while chinampa construction demonstrated hydraulic engineering that prevented salinization through nutrient-rich sediment deposition. These practices reflected environmental adaptation rather than advanced metallurgy, as Nahuas lacked iron tools and relied on stone, wood, and human porters for efficiency. Economic practices involved a mix of extraction, market exchange, and long-distance trade networks coordinated by professional merchants known as , who facilitated of goods like cacao beans (used as ), textiles, feathers, and tools across . Centralized polities, such as the Aztec Triple by 1428, imposed demands quotas reaching thousands of loads annually from subject city-states—fueling imperial redistribution rather than monetized commerce. Weekly or five-day markets (tiangui) served local exchange, with specialization in crafts like and supporting household economies. Post-conquest, Spanish and systems disrupted traditional land tenure, forcing Nahua labor into cash-crop production like dye and sugar, yet communities retained communal calpulli lands for maize-based subsistence into the 19th century. In contemporary , where Nahuas number over 1.5 million primarily in rural highlands, agriculture engages about 45% of the economically active indigenous population, focusing on maize polycultures alongside , avocados, and on small plots averaging 2-5 hectares. Economic diversification includes crafts (e.g., palm weaving, ), seasonal wage migration to urban centers, and limited in areas like Xochimilco's surviving chinampas, which produce 3-4 crops annually and supply local markets amid urbanization pressures. Market participation persists through regional tianguis, blending remnants with peso transactions, though poverty rates exceed 70% in many Nahua municipalities due to land fragmentation and limited mechanization.

Arts, Rituals, and Performing Traditions

Nahua historically emphasized featherwork, executed by specialized guilds called amanteca, who crafted mosaics, shields, and ceremonial garments from iridescent feathers of , , and species glued onto cloth or paper substrates. These techniques, documented in the , involved meticulous layering to achieve shimmering effects for elite and religious use, persisting into the colonial era through syncretic pieces like feather depictions of Christian saints. and complemented this, with stone carvings of deities and pictorial manuscripts recording genealogies and rituals, though featherwork's delicacy limited archaeological survival compared to stone media. Rituals among Nahua communities blend pre-colonial with Catholic elements, centering on offerings to landscape spirits, water sources, and dualistic deities like —syncretized with the Virgin Mary—to ensure fertility and balance. Modern practices in regions like Zongolica include ceremonies honoring ancestors with food and tools, adapted from Aztec xochitlalli (flower-earth) cults, alongside communal feasts during weddings that forge kinship ties. These acts reflect causal reciprocity with natural forces, as everyday tasks like planting corn incorporate invocations for divine favor. Performing traditions feature concheros (or danza Azteca), circular dances originating post-1521 conquest in central Mexico, using drums, flutes, and concha lutes to evoke pre-Hispanic mitotes while incorporating Christian motifs for devotion. Dancers in feathered regalia perform in groups, with musicians at the center directing chants in Nahuatl that transmit cosmology and identity, often during festivals to reinforce community bonds. Oral performances include huehuetlatolli, elder speeches delivering moral exhortations and historical narratives, preserved as a didactic form akin to classical oratory. Song-dance ensembles today teach Nahuatl vocabulary through rhythmic repetition, sustaining linguistic vitality amid cultural revival efforts.

Controversies and Debates

Human Sacrifice and Pre-Columbian Violence

The practice of was integral to , particularly among the of the Triple Alliance, where it served to nourish deities with blood and hearts, thereby sustaining the sun's movement and preventing cosmic collapse as per their creation myths involving gods' . Victims, primarily captives from ritualized "flower wars" (xochiyaoyotl), were led up temple pyramids, stretched over a sacrificial stone (techcatl), and had their chests opened with blades to extract , which were offered to gods like Huitzilopochtli or ; bodies were often dismembered, with skulls displayed on racks. Native codices, such as the , and post-conquest texts like the compiled by , describe these rites in detail, corroborating Spanish eyewitness reports from Hernán Cortés's expedition in 1519–1521, though the latter may reflect propagandistic inflation to justify conquest. Archaeological evidence substantiates the prevalence and scale of these practices, with excavations at Tenochtitlan's yielding over 7,000 skulls from a single dating to the 1480s, many showing cut marks consistent with defleshing and ritual preparation; a 2018 analysis estimated this structure alone held thousands more, indicating systematic, state-orchestrated killing. Additional finds include sacrificial altars stained with blood residues and mass graves of decapitated youths associated with Tlaloc rituals around 1469 CE. While some scholars caution against over-reliance on colonial accounts due to potential exaggeration—estimating routine annual sacrifices at hundreds to low thousands rather than the 80,400 claimed by one disputed dedication in 1487—cross-verification with indigenous sources and osteological data supports figures up to 20,000 empire-wide yearly, driven by major festivals like Toxcatl. Pre-Columbian Nahua violence encompassed not only but also institutionalized warfare oriented toward captive acquisition over conquest, with polities like Texcoco and engaging in similar practices despite rivalries; interpersonal homicide rates appear low in urban centers like , per skeletal trauma studies showing minimal non-ritual violence. Flower wars, formalized pacts between city-states from the 1450s onward, produced thousands of prisoners annually for elite glorification and religious offerings, embedding violence in social hierarchy where warriors gained status through captures. Other forms included gladiatorial combats, where bound captives fought armed opponents for public spectacle and , and auto- via , but mass killings were predominantly exogenous, targeting enemies to avert or divine wrath as interpreted in Nahua . This ritualized brutality, while culturally normalized, contrasts with modern downplays in some academic narratives that frame it as mere warfare execution, ignoring explicit theological motivations in primary texts.

Causal Realities of the Spanish Conquest

The , dominated by the Nahua of , was a hegemonic alliance of city-states sustained through military conquest, tribute extraction, and ritual intimidation rather than deep loyalty, fostering widespread resentment among subjugated peoples. This structure created internal fractures exploitable by external invaders, as subject polities like , Texcoco's rivals, and various groups viewed the as oppressive overlords demanding goods, labor, and sacrificial victims. , arriving in 1519 with approximately 500 , capitalized on these divisions by forging alliances that swelled his forces to tens of thousands of native warriors, fundamentally altering the balance against 's estimated 200,000-300,000 inhabitants. The pivotal Tlaxcalan alliance, formed after initial battles in September 1519, exemplified this dynamic; , a confederation of Nahua city-states long besieged by expansionism, supplied up to 100,000 fighters for the 1521 siege of , motivated by the chance to dismantle Aztec dominance. Other groups, including disaffected elements from the Triple Alliance itself, joined or defected, providing intelligence, provisions, and manpower that outnumbered Spanish contributions by ratios exceeding 100:1. These coalitions were not mere auxiliaries but decisive agents, as Spanish accounts and indigenous records indicate native forces bore the brunt of combat, driven by pre-existing enmities rather than European coercion. Epidemics of diseases, particularly introduced via a Spanish slave in April 1520, inflicted catastrophic demographic collapse, killing an estimated 5-8 million across in the initial wave, with losing 25-40% of its population during the siege alone. This biological vulnerability stemmed from the absence of exposure to Eurasian pathogens, eroding military cohesion, leadership—claiming Emperor —and societal resilience, as and weakened defenses compounded losses. Subsequent outbreaks from 1545-1576 claimed up to 17 million more, underscoring how microbial factors, not intentional biowarfare, amplified conquest outcomes. Spanish technological edges provided asymmetric lethality despite numerical inferiority: steel swords and lances outmatched obsidian-edged in durability and penetration, while armor resisted native projectiles, and charges on —unknown in the —delivered demoralizing formations. Arquebuses and crossbows offered ranged fire and psychological terror, though limited by reload times; these advantages, combined with naval brigantines for lake control in 1521, enabled targeted strikes against strengths like canoe warfare. Yet, these were force multipliers within native alliances, not standalone conquerors, as isolated Spanish contingents repeatedly faltered without indigenous support. Causal interplay of these elements—imperial overreach breeding defections, virgin-soil epidemics disrupting operations, and metallurgical disparities favoring small expeditionary forces—rendered the Mexica's centralized brittle against adaptive coalitions. Tenochtitlan's fall on August 13, 1521, after an 80-day siege, reflected not inexorable European superiority but the empire's dependence on coerced fealty, vulnerable to disruption by disease-ravaged hierarchies and opportunistic rivals.

Modern Identity, Rights, and Cultural Preservation

In contemporary , the Nahua population is estimated at over 2 million individuals who self-identify with Nahua or heritage, primarily concentrated in central states such as , , , and Hidalgo, where they form significant rural communities. The 2020 Mexican census recorded approximately 1.7 million speakers of aged three and older, representing the largest group and about 30% of all speakers in the country, though monolingual speakers number fewer than 20% of this total due to widespread bilingualism with Spanish. Modern Nahua identity often blends indigenous cultural markers—such as language use, traditional governance structures like tequio communal labor, and ancestral lands—with elements resulting from centuries of intermarriage and , leading some to prioritize Mexican over explicit indigenous affiliation amid and economic incentives for assimilation. Nahua rights are enshrined in Article 2 of the 1917 Mexican Constitution, as amended in 2001 following the San Andrés Accords, which affirm collective land rights (ejidos), cultural autonomy, and within the federal framework, yet implementation remains inconsistent due to bureaucratic hurdles and conflicts with private development. Specific disputes include Nahua communities in , such as Santa María Ostula, which recovered over 30,000 hectares of territory through armed since 2009 against and drug cartels, establishing autonomous governance models that integrate with state oversight. In and , Nahuas have pursued legal actions against multinational corporations for water extraction and land encroachment, as seen in 2021 lawsuits by 20 communities against a bottled water firm, highlighting tensions between indigenous resource stewardship and neoliberal economic policies. Cultural preservation efforts focus on Nahuatl revitalization through government-backed programs, reaching over 1 million students in indigenous schools by 2020, and community-led initiatives like language academies and digital archives that document oral traditions and codices. The 2003 General Law on Linguistic Rights of mandates official status for in judicial and administrative contexts in speaker-majority areas, supported by UNESCO-recognized projects for dialect standardization. However, preservation faces empirical challenges from intergenerational transmission failure, with urban migration and Spanish-medium schooling reducing fluent speakers among youth by up to 50% in some regions since 2000, exacerbated by that associates with and limits economic opportunities for speakers. Despite these pressures, studies indicate that sustained use correlates with higher community well-being metrics, including social cohesion and health outcomes, in Nahua enclaves.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.