Hubbry Logo
Parts cleaningParts cleaningMain
Open search
Parts cleaning
Community hub
Parts cleaning
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Parts cleaning
Parts cleaning
Parts cleaning
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Parts cleaning is essential in many industrial processes, as a prelude to surface finishing or to protect sensitive components. Electroplating is particularly sensitive to part cleanliness, since molecular layers of oil can prevent the coating adhesion.

Cleaning processes include solvent cleaning, hot alkaline detergent cleaning, electro-cleaning, and acid etch. The most common industrial tests for cleanliness of machinery is the water-break test, in which the surface is thoroughly rinsed and vertically held. A quantitative measurement for this parameter is the contact angle. Hydrophobic contaminants such as oils cause the water to bead and break up, allowing the water to drain rapidly. Perfectly clean metal surfaces are hydrophilic and will keep an unbroken sheet of water that does not bead up or drain off.

Definitions and classifications

[edit]

For the activities described here, the following terms are often found: metal cleaning, metal surface cleaning, component cleaning, degreasing, parts washing, and parts cleaning. These are well established in technical language usage, but they have their shortcomings. Metal cleaning can easily be mixed up with the refinement of un-purified metals. Metal surface cleaning and metal cleaning do not consider the increasing usage of plastics and composite materials in this sector. The term component cleaning leaves out the cleaning of steel sections and sheets, and finally, degreasing only describes a part of the topic, as in most cases, chips, fines, particles, salts, etc. also have to be removed.

The terms "commercial and industrial parts cleaning", "parts cleaning in craft and industry", or "commercial parts cleaning" probably best describe this field of activity. There are some specialists who prefer the term "industrial parts cleaning", because they want to exclude maintenance of buildings, rooms, areas, windows, floors, tanks, machinery, hygiene, hands washing, showers, and other non-commercial objects.

Elements and their interactions

[edit]
Factors

Cleaning activities in this sector can only be characterized sufficiently by a description of several factors. These are outlined in the first image above.

Parts and materials to be cleaned

[edit]

First, consider the parts to be cleaned. They may comprise non-processed or hardly processed sections, sheets and wires, but also machined parts or assembled components needing cleaning. Therefore, they may be composed of different metals or different combinations of metals. Plastics and composite materials can frequently be found and indeed are on the increase because, e.g. the automobile industry, as well as others, are using more and lighter materials.

Mass can be very important for the selection of cleaning methods. For example, big shafts for ships are usually cleaned manually, whereas tiny shafts for electrical appliances are often cleaned in bulk in highly automated plants.

Similarly important is the geometry of the parts. Long, thin, branching, threaded holes, which could contain jammed chips, feature among the greatest challenges in this technical field. High pressure and the power wash process are one way to remove these chips, as well as robots, which are programmed to exactly flush the drilled holes under high pressure.

Contaminations

[edit]

The parts are usually covered by unwanted substances, contaminants, or soiling. The definition used is quite different. In certain cases, these coverings may be desired: e.g. one may not wish to remove a paint layer but only the material on top. In another cases, where crack proofing is necessary, one has to remove the paint layer, as it is regarded as an unwanted substance.

The classification of soiling follows the layer structure, starting from the base material:

Structure of a metallic surface
  • Deformed boundary layer, > 1 μm
  • Reaction layer, 1–10 nm
  • Sorption layer, 1–10 nm
  • Contamination layer, > 1 μm

See illustration 2: Structure of a metallic surface [1]

The closer a layer is to the substrate surface, the more energy is needed to remove it. Correspondingly, the cleaning itself can be structured according to the type of energy input:[1]

The contamination layer may then be further classified according to:

  • Origin
  • Composition: e.g. cooling lubricants may be composed differently. Single components may account for big problems, especially for job shop cleaners, who have no control over prior processes and thus don't know the contaminants. For example, silicates may obstruct nitriding.
  • State of aggregation
  • Chemical and physical properties

The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) presents six groups of contaminations in their manual "Choosing a cleaning process" and relates them to the most common cleaning methods, the suitability of cleaning methods for the removal of a given contaminate is discussed.[2] In addition, they list exemplary cleaning processes for different typical applications. Since one has to consider very many different aspects when choosing a process, this can only serve as a first orientation. The groups of contaminants are stated:

  • Pigmented drawing compounds
  • Unpigmented oil and grease
  • Chips and cutting fluids
  • Polishing and buffing compounds
  • Rust and scale
  • Others

Charging

[edit]

In order to select suitable equipment and media, it should be known also which amount and which throughput have to be handled. In larger factories, little amounts are virtually ever cleaned economically [clarification needed]. Additionally, the pricing method needs to be determined. Sensitive parts sometimes need to be fixed in boxes. When dealing with large amounts, bulk charging can be used, but it's difficult to achieve a sufficient level of cleanliness with flat pieces clinging together. Drying can also be difficult in these cases.

Place of cleaning

[edit]

Another consideration is the place of cleaning. Cleaning in a workshop calls for different methods as compared to cleaning that is to be done on site, which can be the case with maintenance and repair work.

Usually, the cleaning takes place in a workshop. Several common methods include solvent degreasing, vapor degreasing, and the use of an aqueous parts washer. Companies often want the charging, loading and unloading to be integrated into the production line, which is much more demanding as regards size and throughout the ability of the cleaning system.

Such cleaning systems often exactly match the requirements regarding parts, contaminants and charging methods (special production). Central cleaning equipment, often built as multi task systems, is commonly used. These systems can suit different cleaning requirements. Typical examples are the wash stands or the small cleaning machines, which are found in many industrial plants.

Cleaning equipment and procedure

[edit]

First, one can differentiate among the following techniques (ordered from most to least technologically advanced):

  • Manual
  • Mechanical
  • Automatic
  • Robot supported

The process may be performed in one step, which is especially true for the manual cleaning, but typically it requires several steps. Therefore, it is not uncommon to find 10 to 20 steps in large plants, e.g., for the medical and optical industry. This can be especially complex because non-cleaning steps may be integrated in such plants like application of corrosion protection layers or phosphating. Cleaning can also be simple: the cleaning processes are integrated into other processes, as it is the case with electroplating or galvanising, where it usually serves as a pre-treatment step.

The following procedure is quite common:

  1. Pre-cleaning
  2. Main cleaning
  3. Rinsing
  4. Rinsing with deionised water
  5. Rinsing with corrosion protection
  6. Drying

Each of these steps may take place in its own bath, chamber, or, in case of spray cleaning, in its own zone (line or multi-chamber equipment). But often these steps may have a single chamber into which the respective media are pumped in (single chamber plant).

Cleaning media plays an important role as it removes the contaminants from the substrate.

For liquid media, the following cleaners can be used: aqueous agents, semi-aqueous agents (an emulsion of solvents and water), hydrocarbon-based solvents, and halogenated solvents. Usually, the latter are referred to as chlorinated agents, but brominated and fluorinated substances can be used. The traditionally used chlorinated agents, TCE and PCE, which are hazardous, are now only applied in airtight plants and the modern volume shift systems limit any emissions. In the group of hydrocarbon-based solvents, there are some newly developed agents like fatty acid esters made of natural fats and oils, modified alcohols and dibasic esters.

Aqueous cleaners are mostly a combination of various substances like alkaline builders, surfactants, and sequestering agents. With ferrous metal cleaning, rust inhibitors are added into the aqueous cleaner to prevent flash rusting after washing. Their use is on the rise as their results have proven to be most times as good or better than hydrocarbon cleaners. The waste generated is less hazardous, which reduces disposal costs.

Aqueous cleaners have advantages as regards particle and polar contaminants and only require higher inputs of mechanical and thermal energy to be effective, whereas solvents more easily remove oils and greases but have health and environmental risks. In addition, most solvents are flammable, creates fire and explosion hazards. Nowadays, with proper industrial parts washer equipment, it is accepted that aqueous cleaners remove oil and grease as easily as solvents.

Another approach is with solid cleaning media (blasting) which comprises the CO2 dry ice process: For tougher requirements, pellets are used while for more sensitive materials or components CO2 in form of snow is applied. One drawback is the high energy consumption required to make dry ice.

Last but not least, there are processes with no media like vibration, laser, brushing and blow/exhaust systems.

All cleaning steps are characterized by media and applied temperatures and their individual agitation/application (mechanical impact). There is a wide range of different methods and combinations of these methods:

Finally, every cleaning step is described by the time which the parts to be cleaned spends in the respective zone, bath, or chamber, and thus medium, temperature, and agitation can affect the contamination.

Every item of cleaning equipment needs a so-called periphery. This term describes measures and equipment on the one hand side to maintain and control baths and side to protect human beings and the environment.

In most plants, the cleaning agents are circulated until their cleaning power has eventually decreased and reached the maximum tolerable contaminant level. In order to delay the bath exchange as much as possible, there are sophisticated treatment attachments in use, removing contaminants and the used up agents from the system. Fresh cleaning agents or parts thereof have to be supplemented, which requires a bath control. The latter is more and more facilitated online and thus allows a computer aided change of the bath. With the help of oil separators, demulsifying agents and evaporators, aqueous processes can be conducted 'wastewater free'. Complete exchange of baths becomes only necessary every 3 to 12 months.

When using organic solvents, the preferred method to achieve a long operating bath life is distillation, an especially effective method to separate contaminants and agents.

The periphery also includes measures to protect the workers like encapsulation, automatic shutoff of power supply, automatic refill and sharpening of media (e.g., gas shuttle technique), explosion prevention measures, exhaust ventilation etc., and also measures to protect the environment, e.g. capturing of volatile solvents, impounding basins, extraction, treatment and disposal of resulting wastes. Solvents based cleaning processes have the advantage that the dirt and the cleaning agent can be more easily separated, whereas in aqueous processes is more complex.

In processes without cleaning media, like laser ablation and vibration cleaning, only the removed dirt has to be disposed of as there is no cleaning agent. Quite little waste is generated in processes like CO2 blasting and automatic brush cleaning at the expense of higher energy costs.

Quality requirements

[edit]

A standardization of the quality requirements for cleaned surfaces regarding the following process (e.g. coating, heat treatment) or from the point of view of technical functionality is difficult. However, it is possible to use general classifications. In Germany, it was attempted to define cleaning as a subcategory of metal treatment (DIN 8592: Cleaning as sub category of cutting processes), but this does not cope with all the complexities of cleaning.

The rather general rules include the classification in intermediate cleaning, final cleaning, precision cleaning and critical cleaning (s. table), in practice seen only as a general guideline.

Terms Max. allowed dirt [3] Soils removed [4] Explanations
Intermediate cleaning E.g. in metal cutting manufacturing
Final cleaning ≤ 500 mg / m² (1) Mil-sized particles and residues thicker than a monolayer E.g. before assembling or coating
  • Parts for phosphating, painting, enamelling
  • 500 - ≤ 5 mg C / m² (2)
  • Parts for case-hardening, nitriding, nitro carburising resp. vacuum treatment
  • 500 - ≤ 5 mg C / m² (2)
  • Parts for electroplating, electronic parts
  • 20 - ≤ 5 mg C / m² (2)
Precision cleaning ≤ 50 mg / m² (1) Supermicrometre particles and residues thinner than a monolayer Controlled environment (Durkee)
Critical cleaning ≤ 5 mg / m² (1) Sub-micrometre particles and non-volatile residue measured in Angstroms cleanroom (Durkee)
(1) Related to the total dirt; (2) Only related to carbon

Thus, the rule of thumb is still followed, stating that the quality requirements are met if the subsequent process (see below) does not cause any problems. For example, a paint coating does not flake off before the guarantee period ends.

Where this is not sufficient, especially in case of external orders, because of missing standards, there are often specific customer requirements regarding remaining contamination, corrosion protection, spots and gloss level, etc.

Measuring methods to ensure quality therefore do not play a bigger role in the workshops, although there are a broad scale of different methods, from visual control over simple testing methods (water break test, wipe test, measurement of contact angle, test inks, tape test, among others) to complex analysis methods (gravimetric test, particle counting, infrared spectroscopy, glow discharge spectroscopy, energy dispersive X-ray analysis, scanning electron microscopy and electrochemical methods, among others). There are only a few methods, which can be applied directly in the line and which offer reproducible and comparable results. It was not until recently that bigger advancements in this area have been made [5]

The general situation has changed, meanwhile, because of dramatically rising cleanliness requirements for certain components in the automotive industry. For example, brake systems and fuel-injection systems need to be fitted with increasingly smaller diameters and they have to withstand increasingly higher pressures. Therefore, a very minor particle contamination may lead to big problems. Because of the rising innovation speed, the industry cannot afford to identify possible failures at a relatively late stage. Therefore, the standard VDA 19/ISO 16232 'Road Vehicles – Cleanliness of Components of Fluid Circuits' was developed which describes methods that can control the compliance with the cleanliness requirements.

Subsequent process

[edit]

When choosing cleaning techniques, cleaning agents and cleaning processes, the subsequent processes, i.e. the further processing of the cleaned parts, is of special interest.

The classification follows basically the metal work theory:

  • Machining
  • Cutting
  • Joining
  • Coating
  • Heat treatment
  • Assembling
  • Measuring, testing
  • Repairing, maintenance

In time, empirical values were established, how efficient the cleaning has to be, to assure the processes for the particular guarantee period and beyond. Choosing the cleaning method often starts from here.

[edit]

The details above illustrate how extremely complex this specific field is. Small variations in requirements can cause completely different processes. It becomes more and more important to receive the required cleanliness as cost-effective as possible and with continuously minimized health and environmental risks, because cleaning has become of central importance for the supply chain in manufacturing.[6] Applying companies usually rely on their suppliers, who—because of a big experience base—suggest adequate equipment and processes, which are then adapted to the detailed requirements in tests stations at the supplier's premises. However, they are limited to their scope of technology. To put practitioners in a position to consider all relevant possibilities meeting their requirements, some institutes have developed different tools:

SAGE: Unfortunately, no longer in operation, the comprehensive expert system for parts cleaning and degreasing provided a graded list with relatively general processes of solvent and process alternatives. Developed by the Surface Cleaning Program at the Research Triangle Institute, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, in cooperation with the U.S. EPA (used to be available under: http://clean.rti.org/).

Cleantool: A 'Best Practice' database in seven languages with comprehensive and specific processes, directly recorded in companies. It contains furthermore an integrated evaluation tool, which covers the areas of technology, quality, health and safety at work, environmental protection and costs. Also included is a comprehensive glossary (seven languages, link see below).

Bauteilreinigung: A selection system for component cleaning developed by the University of Dortmund, assisting the users to analyze their cleaning tasks regarding the suitable cleaning processes and cleaning agents (German only, link see below).

TURI, Toxic Use Reduction Institute: A department of the University of Lowell, Massachusetts (USA). TURI's laboratory has been conducting evaluations on alternative cleaning products since 1993. A majority of these products were designed for metal surface cleaning. The results are available on-line through the Institute's laboratory database.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Parts cleaning

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Parts cleaning is the essential of removing contaminants such as oils, greases, , , and debris from industrial components to ensure surface integrity and readiness for subsequent operations like , , assembly, or packaging. This practice is vital across industries including automotive, , devices, and , where unclean parts can lead to defects, , reduced performance, or regulatory non-compliance. Effective parts cleaning enhances product quality, operational efficiency, and equipment longevity by preventing contamination-related failures and enabling early detection of wear or damage during maintenance. It typically involves multiple stages: pre-cleaning to remove bulk debris via brushing or blasting, main cleaning with chemical solutions to dissolve residues, rinsing to eliminate cleaners, and drying to prevent moisture-induced issues like oxidation. Common methods include aqueous cleaning, which uses water-based detergents (alkaline for oils or acidic for rust) in spray or immersion systems for cost-effective, environmentally friendly results; solvent cleaning, employing organic chemicals like n-propyl bromide for precise degreasing of sensitive parts; ultrasonic cleaning, leveraging high-frequency sound waves to create cavitation bubbles that dislodge contaminants from intricate geometries; and vapor degreasing, where heated solvent vapors condense on parts to dissolve and carry away soils. Advancements in parts cleaning focus on , such as reuse, systems to minimize emissions, and PFAS-free alternatives, while meeting stringent cleanliness standards like the water-break test (ASTM F22), in which a clean surface allows to form a continuous sheet without breaking, indicating absence of hydrophobic contaminants. In high-precision sectors, such as medical implants or components, these processes ensure compliance with and performance requirements, ultimately reducing downtime and production costs.

Fundamentals

Definitions and Importance

Parts cleaning refers to the process of removing contaminants, such as oils, greases, and residues, from the surfaces of industrial components to prepare them for subsequent operations like surface finishing, assembly, or reuse. This essential step employs mechanisms including detergency, , chemical reactions, or mechanical action to achieve the desired levels without damaging the parts. In industries such as automotive, , , and devices, parts cleaning is vital for preventing manufacturing defects, extending component lifespan by mitigating and wear, and ensuring compliance with stringent quality and regulatory standards. For instance, in and applications, residual contaminants can compromise reliability and safety, leading to failures in high-precision environments, while effective cleaning enhances overall product performance and reduces rework costs. By maintaining cleanliness, manufacturers also minimize environmental impacts and improve across these sectors. Historically, parts cleaning evolved from manual methods using water and in the early , such as basic immersion techniques, to more automated systems following , driven by the demands of and advancements like powered agitation washers introduced in the and vapor in . Post-war industrial growth accelerated the adoption of automated vapor degreasers and conveyorized systems, replacing labor-intensive processes with efficient, solvent-based technologies to meet rising production needs in and precision manufacturing. The basic principles of effective parts cleaning rely on four interdependent variables: time, mechanical action or impingement, chemical concentration, and , often conceptualized in Sinner's Circle as formulated by chemist Herbert Sinner in the mid-20th century. Time allows the cleaning agents to act on contaminants, while mechanical action—such as spraying or agitation—physically dislodges soils; chemical concentration determines the strength of the cleaning solution tailored to the contaminant type, and elevated accelerates the reaction rates without exceeding material limits. Balancing these factors optimizes cleaning efficacy while minimizing resource use and environmental impact in industrial applications.

Classifications of Processes

Parts cleaning processes are primarily classified into solvent-based and aqueous-based systems, with solvent-based methods utilizing organic s to dissolve oils and greases, often through vapor degreasing, while aqueous-based approaches employ mixed with detergents for removing water-soluble soils like salts and particles. cleaning is effective for non-polar contaminants but faces restrictions due to emissions, whereas aqueous cleaning aligns better with environmental regulations and is more prevalent in modern industrial applications, comprising about 65% of processes. A secondary distinction exists between mechanical and chemical mechanisms, where mechanical processes rely on physical forces such as agitation or impingement to dislodge contaminants, and chemical processes depend on dissolution or through cleaning agents like acids or alkalis. Mechanical methods enhance cleaning efficiency for stubborn soils without altering part chemistry, while chemical approaches target specific contaminant compositions for thorough removal. Sub-classifications by mechanism include immersion, where parts are submerged in cleaning media for uniform exposure; spray, involving high-pressure jets for targeted impingement; ultrasonic, which generates bubbles via sound waves to scrub intricate surfaces; and , employing propelled media like grit to mechanically strip heavy deposits. Processes can also be categorized by scale as batch systems, which handle discrete loads in enclosed units like cabinet washers, or continuous/in-line setups, integrating cleaning into production flows for high-volume operations. Application-based classifications differentiate precision cleaning, essential for sensitive components in or requiring micrometer-level particle removal, from heavy-duty cleaning suited to machined parts with robust contaminants like scale or burrs in automotive . Selection of a cleaning process depends on contaminant type, such as oils versus particulates; part , where complex shapes favor immersion or ultrasonic methods; and environmental regulations, which prioritize low-emission aqueous or modified systems to comply with standards like those in DIN 8592.

Key Components

Parts and Materials

Parts cleaning encompasses a wide range of components that require removal of contaminants to ensure functionality, safety, and longevity in various applications. Common types include machined components, such as gears and shafts produced through milling or turning processes; assemblies, which combine multiple sub-parts like housings with fasteners; precision optics, including lenses and mirrors used in systems; electronic circuit boards, featuring delicate traces and components; and implants, such as orthopedic screws and hip joints that demand biocompatible surfaces. The materials comprising these parts significantly influence cleaning approaches due to their inherent properties. Metals dominate, divided into ferrous alloys like and , which offer high strength but are prone to rusting, and non-ferrous options such as aluminum, , and , valued for lighter weight and better conductivity. Plastics, including thermoplastics like ABS and polycarbonates, provide insulation and flexibility but can absorb liquids; ceramics, such as alumina or zirconia, exhibit and stability yet are brittle; while composites, combining fibers with resins, deliver tailored strength-to-weight ratios. Key properties affecting cleaning include , which in materials like sintered metals or porous ceramics can trap residues within voids; , where rough textures from increase contaminant adhesion compared to polished surfaces; and resistance, essential for metals like to withstand cleaning agents without degradation. Cleanability is further determined by part-specific factors that challenge thorough contaminant removal. Geometry plays a critical role, as features like blind holes or crevices in machined parts can trap soils, necessitating targeted agitation or orientation during cleaning. Size variations, from macro-scale components like engine blocks to micro-scale features on circuit boards, affect exposure to cleaning media and process . Material compatibility with agents is paramount, ensuring that solvents or aqueous solutions do not cause swelling in plastics, in ceramics, or galvanic reactions in mixed-metal assemblies. In the , large ferrous parts like engine blocks, often or aluminum, undergo cleaning to remove oils and metal shavings, prioritizing robust processes for their complex geometries. Conversely, in and manufacturing, delicate silicon wafers and circuit boards made from non-porous or composites require ultra-pure cleaning to eliminate trace particles without damaging nanoscale features, highlighting the need for precision over volume.

Contaminants and Soils

Contaminants and soils refer to unwanted substances adhering to industrial parts that must be addressed prior to assembly, , or further . These include a range of materials from organic residues to inorganic particles, each originating from , handling, or environmental exposure. Their presence can compromise part integrity by promoting degradation mechanisms or interfering with subsequent operations. Understanding their categories, sources, properties, and impacts is essential for selecting appropriate strategies, as they interact variably with part materials such as metals or polymers. Organic contaminants encompass oils, greases, resins, waxes, and cutting fluids that form non-polar films on surfaces. They primarily arise from operations, during stamping or , and protection applications during storage or shipping. These soils exhibit low water solubility but dissolve in organic solvents, with strength varying from loose fingerprints to tightly bound baked-on resins; particle sizes are typically in the micro- to macro-range for associated debris. Their impacts include reduced due to oily residues preventing proper , as well as transfer of contaminants to other components during assembly, potentially leading to failures or aesthetic defects. Inorganic contaminants consist of salts, metal oxides, , and heavy metal residues, often classified as polar substances. Sources include environmental exposure like humidity-induced oxidation, process residues from or , and handling that introduces chlorides or sulfates. Properties feature high water solubility for salts, strong reactivity with metals leading to electrochemical reactions, and via crystalline formation; sizes range from ionic (nano-scale) to larger scales. These cause accelerated through osmotic blistering at interfaces and poor in paints or coatings by creating sites for under-film degradation. Particulate contaminants involve solid matter such as dust, metal chips, abrasives, fibers, and polishing compounds. They originate from machining swarf, airborne environmental dust during handling, or previous grinding operations. Characteristics include insolubility in both water and solvents, variable particle sizes from nanometers (e.g., fine dust) to millimeters (e.g., chips), and adhesion influenced by electrostatic forces or embedding in softer materials. Impacts encompass surface defects that hinder uniform coating application, promotion of corrosion pits by trapping moisture, and transfer of particles to assemblies, resulting in mechanical wear or electrical shorts in precision components. Biological contaminants comprise microorganisms like , fungi, and biofilms. Sources are aqueous process residues, airborne spores in humid environments, or carryover from unclean handling in , pharmaceutical, or . Properties include strong through slime layers or mycelial growth, sizes from cellular (micrometer) to colony-scale, and reactivity that alters local or induces oxidation. They lead to microbially influenced on susceptible alloys, transfer causing rework in assemblies, and failures like irregular finishes or reduced equipment lifespan.

Cleaning Methods

Preparation and Loading

Prior to the active cleaning phase, parts undergo a pre-cleaning inspection to identify gross contaminants, such as heavy oils, debris, or visible damage, which could compromise the cleaning process or indicate underlying issues requiring separate handling. This visual assessment, often supplemented by basic tactile or magnification tests, allows operators to classify parts by material type (e.g., metals, plastics, or composites) and contamination severity, ensuring appropriate process selection and preventing equipment damage from oversized or fragile items. Loading methods focus on secure placement to minimize recontamination and physical damage during transfer and processing. Common approaches include , where parts are mounted on custom fixtures with minimal contact points to allow fluid access while protecting sensitive surfaces; fixturing for delicate components using non-reactive supports like plastic or separators to avoid abrasion; and batching in baskets or drums for high-volume runs, ensuring parts do not nest or collide. These techniques, often designed during part engineering, promote even exposure and reduce handling errors. Charging considerations involve optimizing the volume of cleaning media relative to part load—typically maintaining a power-to-volume of 8-10 watts per liter in ultrasonic systems to ensure effective coverage without overflow or inefficiency—and strategic part orientation to direct contaminants toward cleaning action areas, such as transducers or sprays. , including robotic loading systems, enhances precision by programming arms to position parts consistently, reducing labor and variability in batches of varying sizes. Safety protocols during preparation emphasize (PPE), such as chemical-resistant gloves, safety goggles, respirators, and non-slip footwear, to shield workers from splashes, fumes, or slips in wet environments. Additionally, segregation of incompatible materials—such as reactive metals from acids or oxidizers—is critical to prevent unintended chemical reactions in shared media, with parts grouped by hazard class using physical barriers or separate batches. Regular PPE inspections and emergency drills further mitigate risks.

Techniques and Equipment

Parts cleaning employs a variety of techniques to remove contaminants from industrial components, each leveraging specific physical or chemical mechanisms to achieve effective removal while preserving part integrity. Common methods include immersion and spray washing, which use liquid media to dissolve or dislodge soils; ultrasonic , which generates microscopic bubbles for precise cleaning; vapor degreasing, relying on solvent vapors for non-aqueous removal; abrasive blasting, involving propelled media for mechanical scouring; and , utilizing ionized gas for surface activation and decontamination. Immersion washing involves submerging parts in a solution, often aqueous or -based, where the penetrates complex geometries to dissolve oils, greases, or residues. This technique is enhanced by mechanical agitation, such as circulation or workpiece , to improve contact and efficacy, typically operating at temperatures of 70–200°F depending on the medium. Spray washing directs high-pressure streams (2–2,000 psi) of cleaning fluid onto parts, providing impingement action that effectively reaches blind holes and crevices, making it suitable for larger components or high-throughput applications. Ultrasonic cavitation employs high-frequency sound waves (15–400 kHz) in a bath to create imploding bubbles that generate localized shock waves, dislodging fine particles, oils, and inorganic soils from intricate surfaces without damaging delicate features. Vapor degreasing exposes parts to heated vapors that condense on cooler surfaces, dissolving organic contaminants before re-evaporating to leave parts dry; it is particularly efficient for non-polar soils but has been limited by regulations on chlorinated solvents. Abrasive blasting propels solid media, such as beads or pellets, at high velocity to mechanically abrade and remove heavy , scale, or coatings from robust parts, though it risks surface alteration on sensitive materials. Plasma cleaning, conducted in a low-pressure chamber, ionizes gas via electrical fields to produce reactive species that etch away organic layers and activate surfaces, ideal for precision components in or . Equipment for these techniques varies by scale and automation level, including batch tanks for immersion processes, where parts are loaded manually into heated vessels with optional agitation; conveyorized systems for continuous spray or immersion , enabling high-volume production by transporting parts through sequential stages; ultrasonic baths equipped with transducers to generate in dedicated tanks; and solvent recyclers integrated with units to distill and reuse vapors, reducing waste. Key features across systems include nozzles for directed spray impingement, immersion heaters to optimize solution temperature, and units like skimmers or centrifuges to remove oils and particulates from recirculating media. Selection of techniques and equipment depends on contaminant type—such as polar (water-soluble) versus non-polar (oil-based) soils—and part sensitivity, with ultrasonics preferred for fine particles on delicate geometries and abrasive methods reserved for heavy inorganic buildup on durable substrates. Factors like part configuration (e.g., or size) and required cleanliness level further guide choices, ensuring compatibility to avoid or residue retention. Operationally, these methods rely on energy sources like mechanical agitation (e.g., pumps or at 40 Hz) to enhance media penetration and chemical reactions, using media such as water-based detergents for aqueous systems, organic solvents for , or neutral solutions to minimize material attack. Cycle times range from 10–30 minutes for ultrasonic processes, with power consumption around 0.8–1 kW during operation, emphasizing efficient recirculation to maintain media efficacy.

Process Execution

Procedures and Parameters

The typical cycle structure in parts cleaning involves a sequential process beginning with an initial rinse to remove loose contaminants, followed by the main cleaning stage using a solution, and concluding with a final rinse to eliminate residues. Dwell times during each phase allow for effective soil removal and chemical action, typically ranging from several minutes in high-agitation systems to longer periods in immersion setups, with sequencing controlled to prevent cross-contamination between stages. Key parameters in executing the cleaning cycle include , which for aqueous systems is often elevated to enhance efficacy without risking part damage; chemical concentrations, adjusted based on ; agitation intensity, achieved through sprays or ultrasonic methods; and cycle duration, which varies by cleaning approach and soil load. These variables are adjusted based on the specific , such as conveyor or immersion washers, to ensure thorough cleaning while minimizing resource use. Optimization of these procedures focuses on balancing cleaning efficacy with , for instance by maintaining levels in aqueous systems suitable for alkaline cleaners to maximize removal while avoiding excessive heating. Precise control of parameters like solution temperature and agitation speed allows for reduced cycle times and lower utility costs without compromising results, often guided by empirical testing to match part geometry and contaminant profiles. In high-volume production environments, integration via programmable logic controllers (PLCs) enables precise sequencing and of cleaning cycles, with features like variable timing and sensor feedback ensuring consistent outcomes across thousands of parts per shift.

Post-Cleaning and Drying

After the primary phase, rinsing is essential to remove residual cleaning agents, detergents, oils, and particulates from the parts surface, preventing spotting, chemical , and interference with subsequent operations. Common rinsing methods include cascading systems, where deionized (DI) water flows countercurrently through multiple tanks to progressively purify the rinse, with overflow from higher-conductivity tanks maintaining low (TDS) levels for spot-free results. Spray rinsing employs high-pressure DI water jets directed at parts via nozzles or bars, often as a final on-demand step to displace contaminants efficiently without recirculation. Immersion rinsing submerges parts in agitated DI water baths, typically with resistivity of 0.2-1.0 MΩ·cm, allowing thorough contact to eliminate cleaners while monitoring conductivity to ensure rinse quality. These methods use DI water to achieve high purity (up to 18 MΩ·cm and 0.05 µS/cm) and avoid mineral deposits that could cause defects. Drying follows rinsing to eliminate remaining or solvents, ensuring parts are residue-free and protected from spots, , or oxidation that could compromise integrity. Air blow-off techniques, such as high-pressure air knives powered by regenerative blowers, direct (ambient or heated) across parts to evaporate and displace rapidly, particularly effective for uniform surfaces and cavities when combined with part rotation. Vacuum drying reduces chamber pressure to 5-10 , lowering the boiling point of for evaporation at temperatures as low as 110-120°F, ideal for complex geometries and preventing oxidation by thoroughly removing residuals without high . Centrifugal drying spins parts in a perforated at high speeds, using inertial force to fling off liquids, which is suitable for small, nested components and minimizes physical damage when proper fixtures are used. Heated drying leverages residual cleaning or forced in ovens to promote evaporation, avoiding spots by accelerating removal in controlled environments. Once dried, parts undergo careful handling to preserve cleanliness, beginning with unloading in controlled environments like cleanrooms with filtration to minimize particle recontamination. Packaging involves hermetic sealing with impermeable materials such as fluorohalocarbon films or nitrogen-purged bags, tailored to part type—e.g., individual bagging for small components or end caps for tubes—to exclude moisture and contaminants during transport. Storage utilizes tamper-evident containers with humidity indicators, ensuring maintained cleanliness levels until use. Post-cleaning and drying enable seamless integration with downstream processes, such as direct transfer via automated conveyors to lines or assembly stations, where residue-free surfaces ensure and functionality in applications like automotive or components. checks on dried parts, such as visual or gravimetric inspections, verify the absence of residues before progression.

Quality and Standards

Requirements and Assurance

Requirements for parts cleaning are defined by quantitative metrics that ensure surfaces are free from contaminants that could impair functionality, , or in downstream applications. These metrics typically specify limits on residual contaminants, such as oils and particles, tailored to the part's material and intended use. For instance, non-volatile residue (NVR) limits often range from 1 mg per 0.1 m² for critical components to higher thresholds like 500 mg/m² for less demanding applications, ensuring minimal interference with assembly or operation. Surface levels for particles are commonly assessed using ISO 14644-9, which classifies surfaces based on particle concentration per unit area, with levels from SA1 (least clean) to SA5 (most stringent, e.g., fewer than 0.45 particles larger than 5 µm per cm²). These limits are influenced by contaminant types, such as oils requiring gravimetric measurements or particles needing microscopic counts, to prevent issues like or failure. Industry standards provide formalized criteria for achieving and documenting these metrics, varying by sector to address specific risks. In automotive manufacturing, ISO 16232 specifies methods for measuring particulate on components, emphasizing extraction, filtration, and counting to limit defects in fuel and hydraulic systems. For general industrial and applications, ASTM F22 outlines the water-break test to detect hydrophobic films like oils, where a clean surface allows water to sheet uniformly without beading. In , IEST-STD-CC1246D (superseding the canceled MIL-STD-1246C) defines levels using NVR mass limits (e.g., Level 100A at 10 mg/0.1 m²) and particle counts to protect against in oxygen systems or engines. These standards ensure reproducibility and compliance, often integrated into quality management systems like for . Assurance of meeting these requirements involves systematic validation and monitoring to confirm process reliability over time. Process validation establishes that cleaning parameters—such as temperature, exposure duration, and chemistry concentration—consistently achieve target metrics, often through initial qualification runs and periodic revalidation per FDA guidelines for critical applications. (SPC) monitors variations in real-time using control charts for variables like residue levels, enabling early detection of drifts and maintaining capability indices (e.g., Cpk > 1.33) in production. Documentation, including batch records and logs, supports auditability and , linking each part lot to validated processes. Requirements differ significantly across industries, with medical devices imposing stricter criteria to ensure and compared to general . For medical parts, ISO 10993-1 requires evaluation of residual contaminants for biological effects, often limiting leachables to levels that avoid (e.g., via extractables testing under ASTM F2459), alongside cleanliness metrics for residues on implants determined through risk-based assessments to ensure biocompatibility. In contrast, general manufacturing may accept higher particle counts (e.g., Class 8 equivalents) for non-critical components, prioritizing cost-effective cleaning without biocompatibility concerns. This variation reflects the heightened risk in healthcare, where even trace residues could lead to adverse reactions.

Inspection and Validation

Inspection and validation in parts cleaning involve systematic techniques to confirm the removal of contaminants and adherence to specified levels, ensuring parts meet operational and regulatory requirements. These processes are essential for verifying that cleaning methods effectively eliminate soils without leaving residues that could compromise functionality or safety. Validation typically combines direct surface assessments with indirect monitoring to provide comprehensive evidence of cleaning . Basic techniques for inspection include visual examination, which detects gross residues or uneven cleaning through direct observation under controlled lighting, often achieving sensitivity down to approximately 4 µg per square centimeter for visible contaminants. Gravimetric analysis measures weight changes before and after cleaning or extraction, quantifying non-volatile residues by comparing part masses or filter weights post-filtration, providing a straightforward metric for overall cleanliness. Contact angle measurement assesses surface wettability by applying a liquid droplet and calculating the angle it forms with the surface; low angles (typically below 45 degrees) indicate effective cleaning and good wettability, while higher angles suggest residual hydrophobicity from contaminants. Particle counting employs scanners or microscopic analysis to enumerate and size particles on surfaces or in extracts, complying with standards like ISO 16232 for automotive components by extrapolating counts to total surface areas. Advanced methods enhance detection of subtle residues. UV fluorescence illuminates organic contaminants like oils, which emit light under exposure, allowing non-contact identification of trace amounts as low as monolayers on surfaces. profiles surface topography at nanometer resolution, revealing thin-film residues or irregularities invisible to standard , particularly useful for coated or polished parts. Solvent extractables testing involves immersing parts in a to dissolve and collect residues, followed by analysis via or to quantify extracted materials, ensuring compliance with industry guidelines for active pharmaceutical ingredients. Validation protocols incorporate in-process monitoring, such as measuring conductivity of rinse water to detect ionic residues in real-time, with thresholds like below 2 µS/cm signaling adequate rinsing before proceeding. Final audits combine multiple techniques for end-product verification, including swab sampling or rinse correlated to surface , as outlined in regulatory frameworks for . Inspection frequency varies by application: 100% inspection applies to critical parts like medical devices or components to ensure , while statistical sampling suffices for bulk production to balance efficiency and reliability.

Challenges

Technical and Operational Issues

One significant technical challenge in parts cleaning is the incomplete removal of contaminants from complex geometries, such as blind holes or intricate internal structures, where cleaning agents may fail to penetrate fully, leaving residues that compromise part integrity. For instance, in aqueous processes, retention in these areas can lead to risks post-drying, as trapped moisture promotes re-oxidation or . Vapor offers better penetration due to , but even this method struggles with highly convoluted shapes, often requiring supplementary agitation like ultrasonics to achieve uniform coverage. Recontamination during handling poses another operational issue, particularly after initial , as parts exposed to ambient , oils from tools, or unclean workstations can accumulate new particles, undermining the cleaning efficacy. In precision , this risk is heightened for components destined for assembly, where even minor residues can cause failures in downstream like sealing or . Variability in batch exacerbates these problems, stemming from inconsistent loads, operator differences, or fluctuating process parameters, which can result in uneven cleaning outcomes across batches and necessitate tighter controls like standardized hold times. Operational hurdles further complicate consistent results, including downtime for equipment maintenance, which can disrupt production schedules and increase costs; for example, clogged nozzles or worn pumps in parts washers often lead to unplanned shutdowns lasting hours or days if not addressed preventively. Scaling cleaning processes from laboratory trials to full production introduces challenges like altered fluid dynamics and heat transfer, where lab-optimized parameters fail to translate, requiring iterative adjustments to maintain efficacy without overhauling infrastructure. Parameter drift, such as temperature inconsistencies from sensor degradation or solvent contamination, can degrade cleaning performance over time, causing acidification in degreasing systems and resulting in up to 20% reduced uptime. Material-specific problems add to these difficulties; sensitive alloys like aluminum are prone to during ultrasonic or chemical , where or acidic solutions cause surface pitting if pH or temperature exceeds safe limits, such as above 130°F. Similarly, plastics and elastomers, including or rubber seals, can swell when exposed to aggressive solvents like or acetone, leading to dimensional changes that impair fit or functionality, with recovery not always complete after evaporation. Basic mitigation strategies emphasize design for cleanability from the outset, such as avoiding crevices and sharp corners in part geometry to facilitate agent flow and drainage. This approach reduces reliance on intensive cleaning and enhances overall process reliability without introducing complex equipment modifications.

Environmental and Safety Concerns

Parts processes pose significant environmental challenges, primarily due to the emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvent-based systems, which contribute to and formation. Solvent evaporation during cleaning operations, such as in cold cleaners or vapor degreasers, generates substantial VOC releases. Additionally, from aqueous cleaning contains contaminants like oils, , and residual chemicals, necessitating advanced treatment to prevent discharge into waterways and comply with control standards. Resource consumption is also high, with traditional methods using millions of gallons of annually—such as 24 million gallons before optimization in one case—and significant for heating solvents or operating equipment. Safety risks in parts cleaning arise from chemical exposures that can lead to acute and chronic health effects. Workers face and eye burns from corrosive solvents or hot cleaning media, as well as respiratory from inhaling vapors or mists, potentially triggering or more severe damage. hazards are exacerbated when mixing incompatible chemicals, such as and , which can produce toxic gases. Fire risks are prominent in systems due to the flammable nature of many cleaning agents, where vapors can ignite and create hazards in poorly ventilated areas. Regulatory frameworks address these concerns through stringent guidelines on hazardous materials and worker protection. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforces the (RCRA) for managing from parts cleaning, requiring proper identification, storage, transportation, and disposal of solvent-contaminated materials to minimize environmental release. The (OSHA) mandates the Hazard Communication standard (29 CFR 1910.1200), which requires safety data sheets (SDSs), worker training on chemical risks, and provision of like gloves, goggles, and respirators for handling solvents. In the , the REACH regulation (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) restricts hazardous substances in cleaning products, including chlorinated solvents like used in industrial degreasing, limiting their concentration and use to protect health and the environment. To mitigate these issues, best practices emphasize resource-efficient and safer alternatives. Closed-loop systems recycle cleaning media, such as through or of solvents and counter-current rinsing for reuse, reducing waste generation by up to 75% in some applications and conserving and . Substitution of toxic agents involves replacing hazardous solvents with aqueous or bio-based cleaners, which lowers VOC emissions and health risks while maintaining efficacy, as demonstrated in metal finishing operations where non-chromated deoxidizers replaced . These practices not only ensure compliance but also yield cost savings.

Emerging Technologies

Emerging technologies in parts cleaning are revolutionizing the field by integrating advanced automation and novel materials to enhance efficiency, precision, and reliability in . These innovations address the demands of modern , particularly in sectors like , automotive, and , where contamination control is critical. By leveraging (AI), the (IIoT), and , systems can now operate with greater autonomy, while cutting-edge methods such as and supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2) offer targeted cleaning without traditional solvents. As of 2025, advancements include AI-driven autonomous cleaning robots and enhanced ultrasonic technologies for applications, improving precision in high-volume production. AI-driven predictive maintenance represents a key advancement, using algorithms to analyze from , forecasting failures and optimizing schedules to minimize . In parts systems, AI monitors variables like , , and flow to predict issues in pumps or ultrasonic transducers, enabling proactive interventions that extend life and significantly reduce unplanned outages in settings. This technology has been particularly effective in high-volume operations, where it integrates with existing cleaning lines to ensure consistent performance without human oversight. Complementing AI, IIoT enables real-time monitoring of cleaning processes through networked sensors that track parameters such as , chemical concentration, and levels across distributed systems. In industrial cleaning, IIoT platforms collect data from ultrasonic baths or spray washers, allowing remote adjustments and immediate alerts for deviations, which improves process control and reduces in facilities handling precision components. For instance, in semiconductor parts cleaning, IIoT sensors monitor flow rates and in real time, ensuring compliance with stringent purity standards while optimizing resource use. Robotic automation further streamlines parts cleaning by automating loading and unloading tasks, integrating multi-axis robots with vision systems to handle delicate or irregularly shaped components. These systems, often equipped with waterproof manipulators, transfer parts between cleaning stations with sub-millimeter accuracy, reducing manual handling errors and enabling 24/7 operation in aqueous or spray-based washers. In and environments, robots perform brushing or dipping sequences post-cleaning, enhancing throughput for high-precision applications. Among innovative cleaning methods, laser ablation provides non-contact precision removal of contaminants like rust, oils, or coatings from metal surfaces, using pulsed laser energy to vaporize residues without damaging substrates. This technique excels in cleaning intricate geometries on industrial parts, offering micron-level control ideal for aerospace components where traditional abrasives fall short. Supercritical CO2, operating above its critical point, serves as an eco-friendly medium that penetrates and dissolves organic soils without water or solvents, leaving no residue and facilitating easy recycling of cleaned parts. It is particularly suited for machined metal components, where it removes oils and particulates efficiently while minimizing environmental impact. Nanotechnology-enhanced detergents incorporate nanoparticles, such as zinc oxide or silver, into formulations to boost wetting and emulsification, enabling superior removal of stubborn residues at lower concentrations. These nano-detergents improve cleaning efficacy for micro-contaminants, reducing the need for aggressive chemicals in precision applications. The adoption of these technologies yields significant benefits, including reduced cycle times through automated workflows that eliminate bottlenecks in loading and process optimization. also enhances precision for micro-parts, achieving sub-micron cleanliness levels in robotic ultrasonic cells, which is essential for and manufacturing. In the , implementations illustrate widespread adoption; for example, IIoT-integrated cleaning systems in semiconductor facilities have improved and reduced manual monitoring inefficiencies. Similarly, automotive suppliers have deployed robotic systems for engine components, enhancing efficiency while meeting ISO standards for surface purity. These implementations highlight how are scaling in high-stakes industries, driving efficiency gains without compromising quality.

Sustainability Developments

Recent developments in parts cleaning emphasize a shift toward bio-based cleaners, which replace traditional petroleum-derived solvents with renewable, plant-based alternatives such as vegetable oils and soy-derived solvents, reducing environmental impact while maintaining cleaning efficacy. These bio-based formulations, often meeting minimum biobased content standards like 41% for industrial cleaners, exhibit lower toxicity and biodegradability, facilitating safer disposal and compliance with sustainability mandates. Concurrently, water recycling systems have advanced to achieve recovery rates up to 98% through closed-loop filtration and solids management, minimizing freshwater consumption in aqueous cleaning processes. Energy-efficient designs, including low-temperature processes operating at 20–45°C, further support these shifts by enabling effective degreasing without high heat, thereby cutting operational energy demands. Key trends include the adoption of zero-discharge systems that eliminate wastewater effluent via and reclamation technologies, ensuring all process water is reused within the facility. Integration of principles promotes reusing cleaning media, such as extending the life of aqueous baths through fluid management and agents to reduce waste generation. Post-2020 regulations have driven these shifts, including the Minnesota state ban on (TCE) effective June 2022, EU REACH restrictions on TCE since 2016, and the US EPA's nationwide prohibition on most TCE uses finalized in December 2024 and effective January 2025, primarily due to and carcinogenicity risks. Expanding restrictions on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in cleaning products, such as Minnesota's prohibitions starting January 2025 and Colorado's 2024 ban, further promote PFAS-free alternatives to reduce persistent environmental contamination. These advancements are propelled by the European Union's Green Deal, which enforces stricter chemical regulations and incentivizes sustainable industrial practices to achieve climate neutrality by 2050, influencing cleaner formulations across sectors. Corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals further accelerate adoption, as companies prioritize eco-friendly solutions to enhance reporting and stakeholder trust. Efficiency gains from low-temperature cleaners, such as approximately 35% reductions in costs, deliver substantial cost savings alongside . Looking ahead, the integration of renewable energy sources into cleaning facilities is projected to expand by 2030, with on-site solar and hybrid systems enabling facilities to offset up to 50% of energy needs and align with global tripling of renewable capacity targets. This transition supports broader decarbonization efforts, positioning parts cleaning as a contributor to low-carbon industrial ecosystems.

References

  1. https://www.pfonline.com/topics/clean
  2. https://leadrp.net/blog/a-basic-guide-to-manufactured-parts-cleaning-importance-and-methods/
  3. https://www.betterengineering.com/blog/the-stages-of-industrial-parts-cleaning-sanitization/
  4. https://www.productionmachining.com/topics/parts-cleaning
  5. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/water-break-test
  6. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-03/documents/washing.pdf
  7. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-11/documents/epasolventmarketreport.pdf
  8. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/vapor-degreasing-past-present-and-future
  9. https://www.ksnindustry.com/principles-of-cleaning
  10. https://jenfab.com/blog/sinners-circle-the-4-factors-of-cleaning/
  11. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:759117/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  12. https://www.resource-germany.com/fileadmin/user_upload/1_Themen/h_Publikationen/VDI_ZRE_Study_Cleaning-Technologies.pdf
  13. https://www.totalmateria.com/en-us/articles/abrasive-blast-cleaning-1/
  14. https://jenfab.com/blog/what-is-precision-cleaning/
  15. https://www.betterengineering.com/blog/parts-cleaning/the-basics-of-parts-cleaning/
  16. https://metalwash.co.uk/industry/the-benefits-of-aqueous-parts-washing-services-for-hi-tech-industries/
  17. https://jaycoclean.com/industrial-parts-cleaning-applications/precision-optical-cleaning/
  18. https://www.medicaldesignbriefs.com/component/content/article/27319-understanding-proper-cleaning-procedures-for-medical-device-pcbs
  19. https://www.techspray.com/cleaning-challenges-when-machining-medical-implants
  20. https://www.custompartnet.com/library/metals
  21. https://www.almco.com/blog/parts-washing/aqueous-parts-washers/
  22. https://www.alliancemfginc.com/parts-cleaning-and-corrosion-prevention/
  23. https://zenith-ultrasonics.com/cleaning-blind-holes/
  24. https://www.proceco.com/blogs/cleaning-challenges-of-cylinder-heads-and-engine-blocks
  25. https://waferpro.com/how-silicon-wafers-are-cleaned/
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128160817000024
  27. https://www.microcare.com/en-US/Resources/Resource-Center/Tech-Articles/Choosing-a-Metal-Parts-Cleaning-Method-What-You-Ne
  28. https://www.proceco.com/blogs/contaminants-and-aqueous-parts-washing
  29. https://www.winoa.com/contamination-of-metal-surfaces/
  30. https://finishingandcoating.com/index.php/anodizingcat/1595-bio-contamination-control-in-metal-surface-finishing-operations
  31. https://www.baronblakeslee.net/step-by-step-guide-to-the-parts-cleaning-process/
  32. https://www.inspectle.com/visual-inspections
  33. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/maximize-your-racking-efficiency-and-quality
  34. https://zenith-ultrasonics.com/part-positioning/
  35. https://www.fries-kt.com/products/industrial-baskets/cleaning-rack-tech-rack-custom-600-x-400/?lang=en
  36. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/parts-cleaning-ultrasonic-cleaning-for-large-lots-of-small-parts
  37. https://www.betterengineering.com/blog/quality/automation-material-handling-and-robotic-integration/
  38. https://highpsi.com/safety-best-practices-for-operating-industrial-cleaning-equipment/
  39. https://www.newpig.com/expertadvice/proper-segregation-of-incompatible-chemicals/
  40. https://ehs.stanford.edu/forms-tools/chemical-incompatibility-guide
  41. https://p2infohouse.org/ref/11/10658.pdf
  42. https://www.turi.org/publications/alternatives-to-halogenated-solvents-used-in-surface-cleaning/
  43. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20160004357/downloads/20160004357.pdf
  44. https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1588&context=leg_etd
  45. https://p2infohouse.org/ref/23/22355.pdf
  46. https://www.almco.com/blog/parts-washing/industrial-parts-cleaning-stages/
  47. https://magnaflux.eu/en/Resources/Blog/6-Factors-to-Get-the-Best-Aqueous-Cleaning-Results
  48. https://www.proceco.com/blogs/aqueous-cleaning-fundamentals
  49. https://www.pfonline.com/articles/aqueous-cleaning-basics
  50. https://niagarasystemsllc.com/industrial-parts-washers
  51. https://jenfab.com/blog/ultimate-guide-to-rinsing/
  52. https://www.betterengineering.com/vacuum-drying/
  53. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/prc-5001-current.pdf
  54. https://thorrez.com/cleanliness-testing-ensuring-quality-in-ultrasonic-washing-processes/
  55. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14644:-9:en
  56. https://www.proceco.com/blogs/standards-of-cleanliness
  57. https://www.iso.org/standard/70267.html
  58. https://infinitalab.com/astm/astm-f22-water-break-test-for-hydrophobic-surface-films/
  59. https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/iest/ieststdcc1246d
  60. https://www.sae.org/standards
  61. https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/inspection-guides/validation-cleaning-processes-793
  62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342039039_Application_of_Statistical_Process_Control_in_Production_Process_A_Case_Study_in_Cleaning_Products_Sector
  63. https://www.fda.gov/files/drugs/published/Process-Validation--General-Principles-and-Practices.pdf
  64. https://www.fda.gov/media/142959/download
  65. https://www.campoly.com/blog/new-release-astm-f2459-expanding-standards-for-medical-device-cleanliness/
  66. https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/materials-science/learning-center/particle-analysis/understanding-technical-cleanliness.html
  67. https://cleaningvalidation.com/memos/visually-clean-and-visual-limits/
  68. https://www.thefabricator.com/thefabricator/article/shopmanagement/selecting-the-right-metal-parts-cleaning-method
  69. https://jaycoclean.com/industrial-parts-cleaning-applications/precision-parts-cleaning/
  70. https://cleaningvalidation.com/memos/understanding-sources-of-variation-in-cleaning-processes/
  71. https://www.proceco.com/blogs/how-to-spot-maintenance-issues-on-industrial-parts-washing-machines
  72. https://www.dober.com/chematic/resources/how-to-conduct-lab-scale-cleaning-trials
  73. https://finishingandcoating.com/index.php/cleaning-pretreatment/1185-problem-solved-how-configuration-drift-can-damage-cleaning-processes
  74. https://www.omegasonics.com/how-to/ultrasonic-cleaning-sensitive-metal-parts/
  75. https://www.techspray.com/should-i-worry-about-plastic-packaging-and-components-and-rubber-seals-when-degreasing/
  76. https://innovation.world/design-for-cleanability/
  77. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-08/documents/iii06fin.pdf
  78. https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/OSHA3512.pdf
  79. https://www.proceco.com/blogs/ensuring-safety-in-industrial-parts-washers-a-comprehensive-overview
  80. https://www.epa.gov/rcra/resource-conservation-and-recovery-act-rcra-regulations
  81. https://echa.europa.eu/regulations/reach/understanding-reach
  82. https://sterc.org/pdf/other/0339.pdf.pdf
  83. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-01/documents/mdeqturitraining.pdf
  84. https://www.proceco.com/blogs/parts-cleaning-keeps-pace-with-technological-advancements-in-manufacturing
  85. https://www.nilfisk.com/en-us/professional/news-and-articles/trends-article-tech-trends-in-the-cleaning-industry/
  86. https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/reports/semiconductor-parts-cleaning-technology-161308
  87. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/what-we-do/capabilities/applied-artificial-intelligence/articles/using-ai-in-predictive-maintenance.html
  88. https://www.oracle.com/scm/ai-predictive-maintenance/
  89. https://llumin.com/blog/ai-powered-predictive-maintenance-how-it-works/
  90. https://blog.geicosgroup.com/en/come-migliorano-i-processi-di-pulizia-industriale-con-liot
  91. https://www.deltaww.com/en-US/about/storyDetail/38992
  92. https://www.ralsonics.com/how-iot-and-plcs-are-transforming-industrial-cleaning/
  93. https://www.ransohoff.com/aqueous-parts-washers/industrial-parts-washers/robotic-parts-washers/
  94. https://www.staubli.com/global/en/robotics/industries/metal/washing-cleaning.html
  95. https://www.comau.com/en/our-offer/products-and-solutions/applications/automation-for-foundry-operations/
  96. https://www.ipgphotonics.com/newsroom/stories/what-is-laser-cleaning
  97. https://laserphotonics.com/laser-cleaning/
  98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652615000189
  99. https://www.qarboon.com/en-us/cleaning-of-machined-parts-with-supercritical-co2
  100. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X25011748
  101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352550925002040
  102. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/10/ai-transforming-factory-floor-artificial-intelligence/
  103. https://www.blackstone-ney.com/blog/ultrasonic-robotic-parts-cleaning/
  104. https://www.vytek.com/blog/news-1/the-role-of-laser-cleaning-in-manufacturing-efficiency-649
  105. https://www.acme-hardesty.com/bio-based-cleaning-products-that-work/
  106. https://www.denix.osd.mil/spc/demonstrations/completed/biobased-brake-cleaners/
  107. https://advanceddeburring.com/products/filtrations-and-water-recovery/water-reclamation/
  108. https://www.kolb-ct.com/news/efficient-low-temperature-cleaning
  109. https://www.proceco.com/applications/industrial-wastewater-treatment
  110. https://www.zerust.com/blog/2025/07/10/sustainable-parts-cleaning-practices/
  111. https://www.productivity.com/environmental-green-parts-cleaning/?srsltid=AfmBOopvPgBCJtX2rtEiUYjhsqWdyXTatdg0YLHf0rJPwSRGkzU6oeRx
  112. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/12/17/2024-29274/trichloroethylene-tce-regulation-under-the-toxic-substances-control-act-tsca
  113. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/air-water-land-climate/2025-pfas-prohibitions
  114. https://www.epa.gov/pfas/key-epa-actions-address-pfas
  115. https://www.decachem.com/eu-green-deal-policies-impact-industrial-chemical-use
  116. https://www.ralsonics.com/industrial-cleaning-esg-goals-how-companies-can-stay-compliant/
  117. https://www.solenis.com/en/resources/blog/save-energy-in-cleaning-operations/
  118. https://www.irena.org/Digital-Report/Tripling-renewable-power-and-doubling-energy-efficiency-by-2030
  119. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/11/2792
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.