Slide rule
Slide rule
Main page
2317423

Slide rule

logo
Community Hub0 subscribers
Read side by side
from Wikipedia

Typical ten-inch (25 cm) student slide rule (Pickett N902-T simplex trig)

A slide rule is a hand-operated mechanical calculator consisting of slidable rulers for conducting mathematical operations such as multiplication, division, exponents, roots, logarithms, and trigonometry. It is one of the simplest analog computers.[1][2]

Slide rules exist in a diverse range of styles and generally appear in a linear, circular or cylindrical form. Slide rules manufactured for specialized fields such as aviation or finance typically feature additional scales that aid in specialized calculations particular to those fields. The slide rule is closely related to nomograms used for application-specific computations. Though similar in name and appearance to a standard ruler, the slide rule is not meant to be used for measuring length or drawing straight lines. Maximum accuracy for standard linear slide rules is about three decimal significant digits, while scientific notation is used to keep track of the order of magnitude of results.

English mathematician and clergyman Reverend William Oughtred and others developed the slide rule in the 17th century based on the emerging work on logarithms by John Napier. It made calculations faster and less error-prone than evaluating on paper. Before the advent of the scientific pocket calculator, it was the most commonly used calculation tool in science and engineering.[3] The slide rule's ease of use, ready availability, and low cost caused its use to continue to grow through the 1950s and 1960s even with the introduction of mainframe digital electronic computers. But after the handheld HP-35 scientific calculator was introduced in 1972 and became inexpensive in the mid-1970s, slide rules became largely obsolete and no longer were in use by the advent of personal desktop computers in the 1980s.

In the United States, the slide rule is colloquially called a slipstick.[4][5]

Basic concepts

[edit]
Simple slide rule made from index cards marked with powers of 2, calculating 8x4 by aligning the bottom ruler to start where the top ruler is 8, and then reading at the number above where the bottom ruler is 4.

Each ruler's scale has graduations labeled with precomputed outputs of various mathematical functions, acting as a lookup table that maps from position on the ruler as each function's input. Calculations that can be reduced to simple addition or subtraction using those precomputed functions can be solved by aligning the two rulers and reading the approximate result.

For example, a number to be multiplied on one logarithmic-scale ruler can be aligned with the start of another such ruler to sum their logarithms. Then by applying the law of the logarithm of a product, the product of the two numbers can be read. More elaborate slide rules can perform other calculations, such as square roots, exponentials, and trigonometric functions.

The user may estimate the location of the decimal point in the result by mentally interpolating between labeled graduations. Scientific notation is used to track the decimal point for more precise calculations. Addition and subtraction steps in a calculation are generally done mentally or on paper, not on the slide rule.

Components

[edit]
Cursor on a slide rule

Most slide rules consist of three parts:

  • Frame or base – two strips of the same length held parallel to form a frame.
  • Slide – a center strip that can move lengthwise relative to the frame.
  • Cursor, runner or glass – an exterior sliding piece with a hairline for accurately reading and aligning numbers.

Some slide rules ("duplex" models) have scales on both sides of the rule and slide strip, others on one side of the outer strips and both sides of the slide strip (which can usually be pulled out, flipped over and reinserted for convenience), still others on one side only ("simplex" rules). A sliding cursor with a vertical alignment line is used to find corresponding points on scales that are not adjacent to each other or, in duplex models, are on the other side of the rule. The cursor can also record an intermediate result on any of the scales.

Decades

[edit]

Scales may be grouped in decades, where each decade corresponds to a range of numbers that spans a ratio of 10 (i.e. a range from 10n to 10n+1). For example, the range 1 to 10 is a single decade, and the range from 10 to 100 is another decade. Thus, single-decade scales (named C and D) range from 1 to 10 across the entire length of the slide rule, while double-decade scales (named A and B) range from 1 to 100 over the length of the slide rule.

Operation

[edit]

Logarithmic scales

[edit]

The following logarithmic identities transform the operations of multiplication and division to addition and subtraction, respectively:

Multiplication

[edit]

With two logarithmic scales, the act of positioning the top scale to start at the bottom scale's label for corresponds to shifting the top logarithmic scale by a distance of . This aligns each top scale's number at offset with the bottom scale's number at position . Because , the mark on the bottom scale at that position corresponds to . With x=2 and y=3 for example, by positioning the top scale to start at the bottom scale's 2, the result of the multiplication 3×2=6 can then be read on the bottom scale under the top scale's 3:

While the above example lies within one decade, users must mentally account for additional zeroes when dealing with multiple decades. For example, the answer to 7×2=14 is found by first positioning the top scale to start above the 2 of the bottom scale, and then reading the marking 1.4 off the bottom two-decade scale where 7 is on the top scale:

A duplex slide rule set to multiply any 2 by any number up to 50.

But since the 7 is above the second set of numbers that number must be multiplied by 10. Thus, even though the answer directly reads 1.4, the correct answer is 1.4×10 = 14.

For an example with even larger numbers, to multiply 88×20, the top scale is again positioned to start at the 2 on the bottom scale. Since 2 represents 20, all numbers in that scale are multiplied by 10. Thus, any answer in the second set of numbers is multiplied by 100. Since 8.8 in the top scale represents 88, the answer must additionally be multiplied by 10. The answer directly reads 1.76. Multiply by 100 and then by 10 to get the actual answer: 1,760.

In general, the 1 on the top is moved to a factor on the bottom, and the answer is read off the bottom where the other factor is on the top. This works because the distances from the 1 mark are proportional to the logarithms of the marked values.

Division

[edit]

The illustration below demonstrates the computation of 5.5/2. The 2 on the top scale is placed over the 5.5 on the bottom scale. The resulting quotient, 2.75, can then be read below the top scale's 1:

There is more than one method for doing division, and the method presented here has the advantage that the final result cannot be off-scale, because one has a choice of using the 1 at either end.

With more complex calculations involving multiple factors in the numerator and denominator of an expression, movement of the scales can be minimized by alternating divisions and multiplications. Thus 5.5×3/2 would be computed as 5.5/2×3 and the result, 8.25, can be read beneath the 3 in the top scale in the figure above, without the need to register the intermediate result for 5.5/2.

Solving proportions

[edit]

Because pairs of numbers that are aligned on the logarithmic scales form constant ratios, no matter how the scales are offset, slide rules can be used to generate equivalent fractions that solve proportion and percent problems.

For example, setting 7.5 on one scale over 10 on the other scale, the user can see that at the same time 1.5 is over 2, 2.25 is over 3, 3 is over 4, 3.75 is over 5, 4.5 is over 6, and 6 is over 8, among other pairs. For a real-life situation where 750 represents a whole 100%, these readings could be interpreted to suggest that 150 is 20%, 225 is 30%, 300 is 40%, 375 is 50%, 450 is 60%, and 600 is 80%.

Other scales

[edit]
This slide rule is positioned to yield several values: From C scale to D scale (multiply by 2), from D scale to C scale (divide by 2), A and B scales (multiply and divide by 4), A and D scales (squares and square roots).

In addition to the logarithmic scales, some slide rules have other mathematical functions encoded on other auxiliary scales. The most popular are trigonometric, usually sine and tangent, common logarithm (log10) (for taking the log of a value on a multiplier scale), natural logarithm (ln) and exponential (ex) scales. Others feature scales for calculating hyperbolic functions. On linear rules, the scales and their labeling are highly standardized, with variation usually occurring only in terms of which scales are included and in what order.[6]

C, D single-decade logarithmic scales, single sections of the same length, used together for multiplication and division, and generally one of them is combined with another scale for other calculations
A, B two-decade logarithmic scales, two sections each of which is half the length of the C and D scales, used for finding square roots and squares of numbers
K three-decade logarithmic scale, three sections each of which is one third the length of the C and D scales, used for finding cube roots and cubes of numbers
CF, DF folded versions of the C and D scales that start from pi (π) rather than from unity; these are convenient in two cases. First when the user guesses a product will be close to 10 and is not sure whether it will be slightly less or slightly more than 10, the folded scales avoid the possibility of going off the scale. Second, by making the start π rather than the square root of 10, multiplying or dividing by π (as is common in science and engineering formulas) is simplified.
CI, DI, CIF, DIF inverted scales running from right to left, used to simplify reciprocal (1x) steps
S used for finding sines and cosines on the C (or D) scale
T, T1, T2 used for finding tangents and cotangents on the C and CI (or D and DI) scales
R1, R2 square root scales – setting the cursor to any value on R1 or R2, find (area of a circle of radius ) under the cursor on the DF scale
ST, SRT used for sines and tangents of small angles and degree–radian conversion
Sh, Sh1, Sh2 used for finding hyperbolic sines on the C (or D) scale
Ch used for finding hyperbolic cosines on the C (or D) scale
Th used for finding hyperbolic tangents on the C (or D) scale
L linear scale used for addition, subtraction, and (along with the C and D scales) for finding base-10 logarithms and powers of 10
LL0N (or LL/N) and LLN log-log folded and scales, for working with logarithms of any base and arbitrary exponents. 4, 6, or 8 scales of this type are commonly seen.
Ln linear scale used along with the C and D scales for finding natural (base ) logarithms and
P Pythagorean scale of to (1) solve the Pythagorean theorem and (2) to accurately determine cosine for small angles (with the S scale)
The scales on the front and back of a Keuffel and Esser (K&E) 4181-3 slide rule

Roots and powers

[edit]

There are single-decade (C and D), double-decade (A and B), and triple-decade (K) scales. To compute , for example, locate x on the D scale and read its square on the A scale. Inverting this process allows square roots to be found, and similarly for the powers 3, 1/3, 2/3, and 3/2. Care must be taken when the base, x, is found in more than one place on its scale. For instance, there are two nines on the A scale; to find the square root of nine, use the first one; the second one gives the square root of 90.

For problems, use the LL scales. When several LL scales are present, use the one with x on it. First, align the leftmost 1 on the C scale with x on the LL scale. Then, find y on the C scale and go down to the LL scale with x on it. That scale will indicate the answer. If y is "off the scale", locate and square it using the A and B scales as described above. Alternatively, use the rightmost 1 on the C scale, and read the answer off the next higher LL scale. For example, aligning the rightmost 1 on the C scale with 2 on the LL2 scale, 3 on the C scale lines up with 8 on the LL3 scale.

To extract a cube root using a slide rule with only C/D and A/B scales, align 1 on the B cursor with the base number on the A scale (taking care as always to distinguish between the lower and upper halves of the A scale). Slide the slide until the number on the D scale which is against 1 on the C cursor is the same as the number on the B cursor which is against the base number on the A scale. (Examples: A 8, B 2, C 1, D 2; A 27, B 3, C 1, D 3.)

Roots of quadratic equations

[edit]

Quadratic equations of the form can be solved by first reducing the equation to the form (where and ), and then aligning the index ("1") of the C scale to the value on the D scale. The cursor is then moved along the rule until a position is found where the numbers on the CI and D scales add up to . These two values are the roots of the equation.

Future value of money

[edit]

The LLN scales can be used to compute and compare the cost or return on a fixed rate loan or investment. The simplest case is for continuously compounded interest. Example: Taking D as the interest rate in percent, slide the index (the "1" at the right or left end of the scale) of C to the percent on D. The corresponding value on LL2 directly below the index will be the multiplier for 10 cycles of interest (typically years). The value on LL2 below 2 on the C scale will be the multiplier after 20 cycles, and so on.

Trigonometry

[edit]

The S, T, and ST scales are used for trig functions and multiples of trig functions, for angles in degrees.

For angles from around 5.7 up to 90 degrees, sines are found by comparing the S scale with C (or D) scale. (On many closed-body rules the S scale relates to the A and B scales instead and covers angles from around 0.57 up to 90 degrees; what follows must be adjusted appropriately.) The S scale has a second set of angles (sometimes in a different color), which run in the opposite direction, and are used for cosines. Tangents are found by comparing the T scale with the C (or D) scale for angles less than 45 degrees. For angles greater than 45 degrees the CI scale is used. Common forms such as can be read directly from x on the S scale to the result on the D scale, when the C scale index is set at k. For angles below 5.7 degrees, sines, tangents, and radians are approximately equal, and are found on the ST or SRT (sines, radians, and tangents) scale, or simply divided by 57.3 degrees/radian. Inverse trigonometric functions are found by reversing the process.

Many slide rules have S, T, and ST scales marked with degrees and minutes (e.g. some Keuffel and Esser models (Doric duplex 5" models, for example), late-model Teledyne-Post Mannheim-type rules). So-called decitrig models use decimal fractions of degrees instead.

Logarithms and exponentials

[edit]

Base-10 logarithms and exponentials are found using the L scale, which is linear. Some slide rules have a Ln scale, which is for base e. Logarithms to any other base can be calculated by reversing the procedure for calculating powers of a number. For example, log2 values can be determined by lining up either leftmost or rightmost 1 on the C scale with 2 on the LL2 scale, finding the number whose logarithm is to be calculated on the corresponding LL scale, and reading the log2 value on the C scale.

Addition and subtraction

[edit]

Addition and subtraction aren't typically performed on slide rules, but is possible using either of the following two techniques:[7]

  1. Converting addition and subtraction to division (required for the C and D or comparable scales):
    • Exploits the identity that the quotient of two variables plus (or minus) one times the divisor equals their sum (or difference):
    • This is similar to the addition/subtraction technique used for high-speed electronic circuits with a logarithmic number system in specialized computer applications like the Gravity Pipe (GRAPE) supercomputer and hidden Markov models.
  2. Using a linear L scale (available on some models):
    • After sliding the cursor right (for addition) or left (for subtraction) and returning the slide to 0, the result can be read.

Generalizations

[edit]
Quadratic and reciprocal scales

Using (almost) any strictly monotonic scales, other calculations can also be made with one movement.[8][9] For example, quadratic scales can be used to solve , used for instance by the Pythagorean theorem. Reciprocal scales can be used for the equality:which is useful for calculating parallel resistances, optical power, harmonic mean, etc.

Physical design

[edit]

Standard linear rules

[edit]
A normal-sized slide rule sitting inside a 7-foot (2.1 m) teaching model

The width of the slide rule is quoted in terms of the nominal width of the scales. Scales on the most common "10-inch" models are actually 25 cm, as they were made to metric standards, though some rules offer slightly extended scales to simplify manipulation when a result overflows. Pocket rules are typically 5 inches (12 cm). Models a couple of metres (yards) wide were made to be hung in classrooms for teaching purposes.[10]

Typically the divisions mark a scale to a precision of two significant figures, and the user estimates the third figure. Some high-end slide rules have magnifier cursors that make the markings easier to see. Such cursors can effectively double the accuracy of readings, permitting a 10-inch slide rule to serve as well as a 20-inch model.

Various other conveniences have been developed. Trigonometric scales are sometimes dual-labeled, in black and red, with complementary angles, the so-called "Darmstadt" style. Duplex slide rules often duplicate some of the scales on the back. Scales are often "split" to get higher accuracy. For example, instead of reading from an A scale to a D scale to find a square root, it may be possible to read from a D scale to an R1 scale running from 1 to square root of 10 or to an R2 scale running from square root of 10 to 10, where having more subdivisions marked can result in being able to read an answer with one more significant digit.

Circular slide rules

[edit]

Circular slide rules come in two basic types, one with two cursors, and another with a free dish and one cursor. The dual cursor versions perform multiplication and division by holding a constant angle between the cursors as they are rotated around the dial. The onefold cursor version operates more like the standard slide rule through the appropriate alignment of the scales.

The basic advantage of a circular slide rule is that the widest dimension of the tool was reduced by a factor of about 3 (i.e. by π). For example, a 10 cm (3.9 in) circular would have a maximum precision approximately equal to a 31.4 cm (12.4 in) ordinary slide rule. Circular slide rules also eliminate "off-scale" calculations, because the scales were designed to "wrap around"; they never have to be reoriented when results are near 1.0—the rule is always on scale. However, for non-cyclical non-spiral scales such as S, T, and LL's, the scale width is narrowed to make room for end margins.[11]

Circular slide rules are mechanically more rugged and smoother-moving, but their scale alignment precision is sensitive to the centering of a central pivot; a minute 0.1 mm (0.0039 in) off-centre of the pivot can result in a 0.2 mm (0.0079 in) worst case alignment error. The pivot does prevent scratching of the face and cursors. The highest accuracy scales are placed on the outer rings. Rather than "split" scales, high-end circular rules use spiral scales for more complex operations like log-of-log scales. One eight-inch premium circular rule had a 50-inch spiral log-log scale. Around 1970, an inexpensive model from B. C. Boykin (Model 510) featured 20 scales, including 50-inch C-D (multiplication) and log scales. The RotaRule featured a friction brake for the cursor.

The main disadvantages of circular slide rules are the difficulty in locating figures along a dish, and limited number of scales. Another drawback of circular slide rules is that less-important scales are closer to the center, and have lower precisions. Most students learned slide rule use on the linear slide rules, and did not find reason to switch.

One slide rule remaining in daily use around the world is the E6-B. This is a circular slide rule first created in the 1930s for aircraft pilots to help with dead reckoning. With the aid of scales printed on the frame it also helps with such miscellaneous tasks as converting time, distance, speed, and temperature values, compass errors, and calculating fuel use. The so-called "prayer wheel" is still available in flight shops, and remains widely used. While GPS has reduced the use of dead reckoning for aerial navigation, and handheld calculators have taken over many of its functions, the E6-B remains widely used as a primary or backup device and the majority of flight schools demand that their students have some degree of proficiency in its use.

Proportion wheels are simple circular slide rules used in graphic design to calculate aspect ratios. Lining up the original and desired size values on the inner and outer wheels will display their ratio as a percentage in a small window. Though not as common since the advent of computerized layout, they are still made and used.[citation needed]

In 1952, Swiss watch company Breitling introduced a pilot's wristwatch with an integrated circular slide rule specialized for flight calculations: the Breitling Navitimer. The Navitimer circular rule, referred to by Breitling as a "navigation computer", featured airspeed, rate/time of climb/descent, flight time, distance, and fuel consumption functions, as well as kilometer—nautical mile and gallon—liter fuel amount conversion functions.

Cylindrical slide rules

[edit]

Cylindrical slide rules are made in two styles: those with helical scales such as the Fuller calculator, the Otis King and the Bygrave slide rule, and those with bars, such as the Thacher and some Loga models. In either case, the advantage is a much longer scale, and hence potentially greater precision, than afforded by a straight or circular rule.

Materials

[edit]

Traditionally slide rules were made out of a relatively dense, stable hardwood such as mahogany or boxwood with cursors of glass and metal. Aluminum was used, and at least one high precision instrument was made of steel.

In 1895, a Japanese firm, Hemmi, started to make slide rules from celluloid-clad bamboo, which had the advantages of being dimensionally stable, strong, and naturally self-lubricating. These bamboo slide rules were introduced in Sweden in September, 1933,[12] and probably only a little earlier in Germany.

Scales were also made of celluloid or other polymers, or printed on aluminium. Later cursors were molded from acrylics or polycarbonate, sometimes with Teflon bearing surfaces.

All premium slide rules had numbers and scales deeply engraved, and then filled with paint or other resin. Painted or imprinted slide rules were viewed as inferior, because the markings could wear off or be chemically damaged. Nevertheless, Pickett & Eckel, an American slide rule company, made only printed scale rules.[citation needed] Premium slide rules included clever mechanical catches so the rule would not fall apart by accident, and bumpers to protect the scales and cursor from rubbing on tabletops.

History

[edit]
William Oughtred (1575–1660), inventor of the slide rule
1763 engraving of a slide rule

The slide rule was invented around 1620–1630, shortly after John Napier's publication of the concept of the logarithm. In 1620 Edmund Gunter of Oxford developed a calculating device with a single logarithmic scale; with additional measuring tools it could be used to multiply and divide.[13] In c. 1622, William Oughtred of Cambridge combined two handheld Gunter rules to make a device that is recognizably the modern slide rule.[14] Oughtred became involved in a vitriolic controversy over priority, with his one-time student Richard Delamain and the prior claims of Edmund Wingate. Oughtred's ideas were only made public in publications of his student William Forster in 1632 and 1653.

In 1677, Henry Coggeshall created a two-foot folding rule for timber measure, called the Coggeshall slide rule, expanding the slide rule's use beyond mathematical inquiry.

In 1722, Warner introduced the two- and three-decade scales, and in 1755 Everard included an inverted scale; a slide rule containing all of these scales is usually known as a "polyphase" rule.

In 1815, Peter Mark Roget invented the log log slide rule, which included a scale displaying the logarithm of the logarithm. This allowed the user to directly perform calculations involving roots and exponents. This was especially useful for fractional powers.

In 1821, Nathaniel Bowditch, described in the American Practical Navigator a "sliding rule" that contained scaled trigonometric functions on the fixed part and a line of log-sines and log-tans on the slider used to solve navigation problems.

In 1845, Paul Cameron of Glasgow introduced a nautical slide rule capable of answering navigation questions, including right ascension and declination of the sun and principal stars.[15]

Modern form

[edit]
Engineer using a slide rule, with mechanical calculator in background, mid 20th century

A more modern form of slide rule was created in 1859 by French artillery lieutenant Amédée Mannheim, who was fortunate both in having his rule made by a firm of national reputation, and its adoption by the French Artillery. Mannheim's rule had two major modifications that made it easier to use than previous general-purpose slide rules. Such rules had four basic scales, A, B, C, and D, and D was the only single-decade logarithmic scale; C had two decades, like A and B. Most operations were done on the A and B scales; D was only used for finding squares and square roots.

Mannheim changed the C scale to a single-decade scale and performed most operations with C and D instead of A and B. Because the C and D scales were single-decade, they could be read more precisely, so the rule's results could be more accurate. The change also made it easier to include squares and square roots as part of a larger calculation. Mannheim's rule also had a cursor, unlike almost all preceding rules, so any of the scales could be easily and accurately compared across the rule width. The "Mannheim rule" became the standard slide rule arrangement for the later 19th century and remained a common standard throughout the slide-rule era.

The growth of the engineering profession during the later 19th century drove widespread slide-rule use, beginning in Europe and eventually taking hold in the United States as well. The duplex rule was invented by William Cox in 1891 and was produced by Keuffel and Esser Co. of New York.[16][17]

In 1881, the American inventor Edwin Thacher introduced his cylindrical rule, which had a much longer scale than standard linear rules and thus could calculate to higher precision, about four to five significant digits. However, the Thacher rule was quite expensive, as well as being non-portable, so it was used in far more limited numbers than conventional slide rules.

Astronomical work also required precise computations, and, in 19th-century Germany, a steel slide rule about two meters long was used at one observatory. It had a microscope attached, giving it accuracy to six decimal places.[citation needed]

20th century

[edit]
Buzz Aldrin with slide rule during Gemini 12 mission

In the 1920s, the novelist and engineer Nevil Shute Norway (he called his autobiography Slide Rule) was Chief Calculator on the design of the British R100 airship for Vickers Ltd. from 1924. The stress calculations for each transverse frame required computations by a pair of calculators (people) using Fuller's cylindrical slide rules for two or three months. The simultaneous equation contained up to seven unknown quantities, took about a week to solve, and had to be repeated with a different selection of slack wires if the guess on which of the eight radial wires were slack was wrong and one of the wires guessed to be slack was not slack. After months of labour filling perhaps fifty foolscap sheets with calculations "the truth stood revealed (and) produced a satisfaction almost amounting to a religious experience".[18]

In 1937, physicist Lucy Hayner designed and constructed a circular slide rule in Braille.[19]

Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, the slide rule was the symbol of the engineer's profession in the same way the stethoscope is that of the medical profession.[20]

Aluminium Pickett-brand slide rules were carried on Project Apollo space missions. The model N600-ES owned by Buzz Aldrin that flew with him to the Moon on Apollo 11 was sold at auction in 2007.[21] The model N600-ES taken along on Apollo 13 in 1970 is owned by the National Air and Space Museum.[22]

Some engineering students and engineers carried ten-inch slide rules in belt holsters, a common sight on campuses even into the mid-1970s. Until the advent of the pocket digital calculator, students also might keep a ten- or twenty-inch rule for precision work at home or the office[23] while carrying a five-inch pocket slide rule around with them.

In 2004, education researchers David B. Sher and Dean C. Nataro conceived a new type of slide rule based on prosthaphaeresis, an algorithm for rapidly computing products that predates logarithms. However, there has been little practical interest in constructing one beyond the initial prototype.[24]

Specialized calculators

[edit]

Slide rules have often been specialized to varying degrees for their field of use, such as excise, proof calculation, engineering, navigation, etc., and some slide rules are extremely specialized for very narrow applications. For example, the John Rabone & Sons 1892 catalog lists a "Measuring Tape and Cattle Gauge", a device to estimate the weight of a cow from its measurements.

There were many specialized slide rules for photographic applications. For example, the actinograph of Hurter and Driffield was a two-slide boxwood, brass, and cardboard device for estimating exposure from time of day, time of year, and latitude.

Specialized slide rules were invented for various forms of engineering, business and banking. These often had common calculations directly expressed as special scales, for example loan calculations, optimal purchase quantities, or particular engineering equations. For example, the Fisher Controls company distributed a customized slide rule adapted to solving the equations used for selecting the proper size of industrial flow control valves.[25]

Pilot balloon slide rules were used by meteorologists in weather services to determine the upper wind velocities from an ascending hydrogen or helium-filled pilot balloon.[26]

The E6-B is a circular slide rule used by pilots and navigators.

Circular slide rules to estimate ovulation dates and fertility are known as wheel calculators.[27]

A Department of Defense publication from 1962[28] infamously included a special-purpose circular slide rule for calculating blast effects, overpressure, and radiation exposure from a given yield of an atomic bomb.[29]

Decline

[edit]
The TI-30 scientific calculator, introduced for under US$25 in 1976

The importance of the slide rule began to diminish as electronic computers, a new but rare resource in the 1950s, became more widely available to technical workers during the 1960s.

The first step away from slide rules was the introduction of relatively inexpensive electronic desktop scientific calculators. These included the Wang Laboratories LOCI-2,[30][31] introduced in 1965, which used logarithms for multiplication and division; and the Hewlett-Packard HP 9100A, introduced in 1968.[32] Both of these were programmable and provided exponential and logarithmic functions; the HP had trigonometric functions (sine, cosine, and tangent) and hyperbolic trigonometric functions as well. The HP used the CORDIC (coordinate rotation digital computer) algorithm,[33] which allows for calculation of trigonometric functions using only shift and add operations. This method facilitated the development of ever smaller scientific calculators.

As with mainframe computing, the availability of these desktop machines did not significantly affect the ubiquitous use of the slide rule, until cheap hand-held scientific electronic calculators became available in the mid-1970s, at which point it rapidly declined. The pocket-sized Hewlett-Packard HP-35 scientific calculator was the first handheld device of its type, but it cost US$395 in 1972. This was justifiable for some engineering professionals, but too expensive for most students.

Around 1974, lower-cost handheld electronic scientific calculators started to make slide rules largely obsolete.[34][35][36][37] By 1975, basic four-function electronic calculators could be purchased for less than $50, and by 1976 the TI-30 scientific calculator was sold for less than $25 ($138 adjusted for inflation).

1980 was the final year of the University Interscholastic League (UIL) competition in Texas to use slide rules. The UIL had been originally been organized in 1910 to administer literary events, but had become the governing body of school sports events as well.[38]

Comparison to electronic digital calculators

[edit]
December 1951 advertisement for the IBM 604 Electronic Calculating Punch explicitly comparing electronic computers to engineers calculating with slide rules

Even during their heyday, slide rules never caught on with the general public.[39] Addition and subtraction are not well-supported operations on slide rules and doing a calculation on a slide rule tends to be slower than on a calculator.[40] This led engineers to use mathematical equations that favored operations that were easy on a slide rule over more accurate but complex functions; these approximations could lead to inaccuracies and mistakes.[41] On the other hand, the spatial, manual operation of slide rules cultivates in the user an intuition for numerical relationships and scale that people who have used only digital calculators often lack.[42] A slide rule will also display all the terms of a calculation along with the result, thus eliminating uncertainty about what calculation was actually performed. It has thus been compared with reverse Polish notation (RPN) implemented in electronic calculators.[43]

A slide rule requires the user to separately compute the order of magnitude of the answer to position the decimal point in the results. For example, 1.5 × 30 (which equals 45) will show the same result as 1500000 × 0.03 (which equals 45000). This separate calculation forces the user to keep track of magnitude in short-term memory (which is error-prone), keep notes (which is cumbersome) or reason about it in every step (which distracts from the other calculation requirements).

The typical arithmetic precision of a slide rule is about three significant digits, compared to many digits on digital calculators. As order of magnitude gets the greatest prominence when using a slide rule, users are less likely to make errors of false precision.

When performing a sequence of multiplications or divisions by the same number, the answer can often be determined by merely glancing at the slide rule without any manipulation. This can be especially useful when calculating percentages (e.g. for test scores) or when comparing prices (e.g. in dollars per kilogram). Multiple speed-time-distance calculations can be performed hands-free at a glance with a slide rule. Other useful linear conversions such as pounds to kilograms can be easily marked on the rule and used directly in calculations.

Being entirely mechanical, a slide rule does not depend on grid electricity or batteries. Mechanical imprecision in slide rules that were poorly constructed or warped by heat or use will lead to errors.

Many sailors keep slide rules as backups for navigation in case of electric failure or battery depletion on long route segments. Slide rules are still commonly used in aviation, particularly for smaller planes. They are being replaced only by integrated, special purpose and expensive flight computers, and not general-purpose calculators. The E6-B circular slide rule used by pilots has been in continuous production and remains available in a variety of models. Some wrist watches designed for aviation use still feature slide rule scales to permit quick calculations. The Citizen Skyhawk AT and the Seiko Flightmaster SNA411 are two notable examples.[44]

Contemporary use

[edit]
Faber-Castell slide rule with pouch

Even in the 21st century, some people prefer a slide rule over an electronic calculator as a practical computing device. Others keep their old slide rules out of a sense of nostalgia, or collect them as a hobby.[45]

A popular collectible model is the Keuffel & Esser Deci-Lon, a premium scientific and engineering slide rule available both in a ten-inch (25 cm) "regular" (Deci-Lon 10) and a five-inch "pocket" (Deci-Lon 5) variant. Another prized American model is the eight-inch (20 cm) Scientific Instruments circular rule. Of European rules, Faber-Castell's high-end models are the most popular among collectors.

Although a great many slide rules are circulating on the market, specimens in good condition tend to be expensive. Many rules found for sale on online auction sites are damaged or have missing parts, and the seller may not know enough to supply the relevant information. Replacement parts are scarce, expensive, and generally available only for separate purchase on individual collectors' web sites. The Keuffel and Esser rules from the period up to about 1950 are particularly problematic, because the end-pieces on the cursors, made of celluloid, tend to chemically break down over time. Methods of preserving plastic may be used to slow the deterioration of some older slide rules, and 3D printing may be used to recreate missing or irretrievably broken cursor parts.[46]

There are still a handful of sources for brand new slide rules. The Concise Company of Tokyo, which began as a manufacturer of circular slide rules in July 1954,[47] continues to make and sell them today. In September 2009, on-line retailer ThinkGeek introduced its own brand of straight slide rules, described as "faithful replica[s]" that were "individually hand tooled".[48] These were no longer available in 2012.[49] In addition, Faber-Castell had a number of slide rules in inventory, available for international purchase through their web store, until mid 2018.[50] Proportion wheels are still used in graphic design.

Various slide rule simulator apps are available for Android and iOS-based smart phones and tablets.

Specialized slide rules such as the E6-B used in aviation, and gunnery slide rules used in laying artillery are still used though no longer on a routine basis. These rules are used as part of the teaching and instruction process as in learning to use them the student also learns about the principles behind the calculations, it also allows the student to be able to use these instruments as a backup in the event that the modern electronics in general use fail.

Collections

[edit]
A classroom-sized slide rule displayed at the MIT Museum

The MIT Museum in Cambridge, Massachusetts, has a collection of hundreds of slide rules, nomograms, and mechanical calculators.[51] The Keuffel and Esser Company collection, from the slide rule manufacturer formerly located in Hoboken, New Jersey, was donated to MIT around 2005, substantially expanding existing holdings.[52] Selected items from the collection are usually on display at the museum.[53][54]

The International Slide Rule Museum is claimed to be "[the world's] most extensive resource for all things concerning slide rules and logarithmic calculators".[55] The museum's Web page includes extensive literature relative to slide rules in its "Slide Rule Library" section.[56]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A slide rule is a hand-operated analog computing device consisting of rigid rectangular pieces that slide relative to each other, featuring logarithmic scales for performing rapid mathematical calculations such as multiplication, division, square roots, logarithms, and trigonometric functions.[1][2] The slide rule's invention traces back to the early 17th century, building on the logarithmic tables developed by Scottish mathematician John Napier in 1614, which transformed complex multiplications into simpler additions and subtractions.[3] English mathematician and clergyman William Oughtred is credited with creating the first slide rule around 1622, initially as a circular design that evolved into the more common linear form by the late 17th century.[4][5] Over the subsequent centuries, innovations like the addition of specialized scales for scientific applications were introduced, including contributions from figures such as Peter Mark Roget in 1815 for calculating powers and roots.[6] From the late 19th century until the 1970s, slide rules served as the primary calculating tool for engineers, scientists, navigators, and technicians worldwide, enabling quick approximations in fields ranging from civil engineering to space exploration, including the Apollo program.[1][7] Their decline began with the advent of affordable electronic calculators, such as the HP-35 in 1972, which offered greater precision and versatility.[8] Despite this, slide rules remain valued today for educational purposes in understanding logarithmic principles and as collectibles among enthusiasts.[9]

Fundamentals

Components

The slide rule is composed of several essential physical components that form its mechanical structure and facilitate analog computations. The fixed body, also referred to as the stator or stock, serves as the primary frame, typically constructed from two parallel outer bars or rails that house the engraved scales on their inner and outer faces. These scales are precisely marked to represent numerical values, providing the stable reference for alignments during use.[10][11] The movable slide is the central sliding element that fits snugly between the two halves of the body, allowing linear movement along the rule's length. This component bears its own set of engraved scales, which can be positioned to overlap and interact with the body's scales, enabling the core functionality of the device.[10][12] A cursor, or hairline indicator, is a transparent sliding runner that moves independently along the entire length of the assembled rule. It features a thin, straight reference line—often etched or inked on a clear plastic or glass pane—positioned perpendicular to the scales, which aids in accurately locating and reading the precise points of scale intersection without parallax error.[12][11] End brackets, also known as stops or guards, are rigid extensions affixed to both extremities of the body. These metal or plastic components limit the slide's travel to prevent it from dislodging entirely while also shielding the rule's edges from wear and damage during handling.[10][11] One representative configuration is found in the Mannheim slide rule, a common linear design that includes scales A and B engraved on the body's upper surface—with A on the fixed stock and B on the slide—alongside scales C and D on the lower surface, where C is on the slide and D on the stock, providing paired logarithmic representations for basic operations.[13][14] These components collectively support the slide rule's reliance on logarithmic scales for efficient numerical manipulation.[11]

Scales and Decades

A decade on a slide rule refers to a logarithmic scale segment spanning one order of magnitude, such as from 1 to 10, where the physical distance between markings is proportional to the base-10 logarithm of the numbers, ensuring equal spacing for each multiplicative factor of 10.[15] This design allows the addition of lengths on the scale to correspond to multiplication of the actual values, as logarithms convert multiplication to addition. The primary logarithmic scales on most slide rules are the A, B, C, and D scales, which form the foundation for basic arithmetic operations. Scales C and D are single-decade scales running from 1 to 10, with C on the movable slide and D on the fixed body, both oriented in the same direction. Scales A and B, also logarithmic, are double-decade versions spanning 1 to 100 and are similarly paired, with the same orientation, extending the utility for operations like squaring and square roots.[16] The length of the scales significantly affects the precision of readings, as longer scales permit finer graduations and closer spacing of tick marks, reducing interpolation errors when estimating values between markings. For instance, extending the scale length by a factor of 10 can improve resolution by approximately one additional significant digit.[17] Decades enable slide rules to handle numbers beyond the 1-10 range by allowing the user to slide the central piece to align specific decade segments—such as shifting to the 10-100 portion for larger values—while mentally tracking the order of magnitude through scientific notation; the cursor then indicates the mantissa on the aligned scale.[10] Typical linear slide rules feature scales measuring 10 to 25 cm in length, yielding an accuracy of 2 to 3 decimal places, or about 0.1% relative precision for values near the scale's index.[18]

Mathematical Operations

Basic Arithmetic with Logarithmic Scales

The slide rule facilitates basic arithmetic operations—multiplication, division, and solving proportions—through the use of logarithmic scales, which convert these operations into simpler additions and subtractions of distances along the rule.[19] This approach relies on the fundamental properties of logarithms, where the logarithm of a product equals the sum of the individual logarithms, and the logarithm of a quotient equals the difference.[2] On a typical slide rule, the fixed D scale and the movable C scale both feature graduated logarithmic markings from 1 to 10 (or across multiple decades), allowing users to align positions that represent these logarithmic additions or subtractions graphically.[10] For multiplication, the user aligns the left index (1) of the C scale with the first factor on the D scale, then positions the cursor (a movable hairline indicator) over the second factor on the C scale, and reads the product directly from the D scale beneath the cursor.[20] For example, to compute 2×32 \times 3, align the C scale's left index with 2 on the D scale; place the cursor at 3 on the C scale, yielding 6 on the D scale.[21] This works because the distance from 1 to 2 on the D scale corresponds to log(2)\log(2), and from 1 to 3 on the C scale to log(3)\log(3); their sum is log(6)\log(6), and the position under the cursor gives the antilogarithm of that sum.[22] Division follows a similar alignment but subtracts logarithmic distances.[19] Align the C scale's left index with the dividend on the D scale, position the cursor over the divisor on the C scale, and read the quotient from the D scale at the left index of the C scale.[20] For instance, to find 6÷26 \div 2, align the C index with 6 on the D scale and set the cursor to 2 on the C scale, resulting in 3 on the D scale at the C index.[21] Mathematically, this embodies log(a/b)=log(a)log(b)\log(a / b) = \log(a) - \log(b), where the alignment subtracts log(b)\log(b) from log(a)\log(a) to yield log(a/b)\log(a/b).[2] Proportions, such as solving a/b=c/da/b = c/d for an unknown, are handled by setting up the scales to perform equivalent cross-multiplications without explicit computation.[23] Align one pair of the ratio (e.g., aa on C with bb on D), then locate cc on C and read dd on D under the cursor; this leverages the same logarithmic addition for a×d=b×ca \times d = b \times c.[24] For example, to solve 2/3=4/x2/3 = 4/x, align 2 on C with 3 on D, set the cursor to 4 on C, and read x=6x = 6 on D.[25] The logarithmic scales primarily capture the mantissa (fractional part) of numbers in scientific notation, requiring users to track exponents separately for the full value.[26] For instance, multiplying 2 (or 2×1002 \times 10^0) by 3 (or 3×1003 \times 10^0) yields a mantissa of 6, but for 20 (2×1012 \times 10^1) by 3, the result's mantissa remains 6 with an exponent of 1, giving 6×101=606 \times 10^1 = 60.[22] Additionally, the precision is inherently limited by the scale's length and markings, typically providing three significant figures, as finer graduations beyond this become impractical to read accurately.[27] Users must estimate the decimal point and significant digits based on the original numbers' precision, often aligning with the least precise input to avoid overclaiming accuracy.[20]

Advanced Functions on Specialized Scales

Specialized scales on slide rules extend functionality beyond basic multiplication and division to handle roots, powers, trigonometric operations, and other computations by leveraging additional logarithmic or linear markings aligned with the primary scales. These scales, often found on the upper or lower edges of the rule's body or slide, allow users to perform complex calculations through strategic alignments and readings, building on the logarithmic principles of the core C and D scales.[28] The A and B scales, which are double-length versions of the standard logarithmic scales, facilitate squaring and square roots. To compute the square root of a number, such as √4, the user aligns the index (1) of the slide with 4 on the D scale and reads the result on the A scale at the position of the index, yielding 2, as the doubled scale compresses the logarithm appropriately. Similarly, the K and L scales enable cube roots and cubing; for cube roots of numbers between 1 and 10, the K scale's left section is used by aligning the number on the D scale with the index and reading on K.[29][20] Solving quadratic equations integrates these scales with the standard logarithmic ones to apply the quadratic formula $ x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a} $. Users first compute the discriminant $ b^2 - 4ac $ using multiplication and subtraction via relative alignments on C, D, and CI scales, then extract the square root on the A scale, and finally divide by 2a on the primary scales to find the roots. For instance, to solve $ x^2 + 10x + 15 = 0 $, align the left index of C over 15 on D, move the cursor to where the CI and D readings sum to 10, and read the roots directly from the aligned positions.[30][31] Trigonometric functions rely on dedicated S (sine), T (tangent), and sometimes ST (small-angle sine/tangent) or CT (cosine/tangent) scales, typically marked in degrees up to 90° on the rule's body. To find sin(30°), place the cursor over 30° on the S scale and read the value (0.5) on the D scale beneath it. Inverse functions like arcsin(0.5) are performed by placing the cursor over 0.5 on the D scale and reading 30° on the S scale beneath it. These scales support angles from approximately 5.7° to 90° for sine and 5.7° to 45° for tangent, enabling computations in right-triangle problems or vector resolutions.[32][14] The L scale provides a linear representation for common (base-10) logarithms, allowing direct reading of log(x) by aligning x on the D scale under the cursor and noting the position on L, which ranges from 0 to 1 for numbers 1 to 10. Exponential and antilog operations use log-log (LL) scales, which plot logarithms of logarithms to handle powers like $ x^y $ by aligning y on one LL scale and reading x^y on the opposite.[24][33][34] Addition and subtraction, not native to logarithmic scales, are addressed through fixed relative scales or auxiliary devices. The S and T scales permit trigonometric identities for summing sines or angles via proportional alignments, while some specialized rules incorporate mechanical adders like the Addiator on the reverse side for direct arithmetic.[35][34] Financial calculations, such as future value of money, employ LL scales for compound interest via the formula $ FV = PV(1 + r)^n $, where the exponent n is aligned on one LL scale to scale the present value PV by the growth factor (1 + r). Commercial slide rules often relabel these as interest-specific scales for quick lookups of compounded amounts over periods.[36][30] Many slide rules feature gauge marks for constants like π (at 3.1416 on primary scales) and e (at 2.7183), aiding in circumferences, areas, or exponential growth without manual recall.[28][34]

Extensions and Generalizations

Vector slide rules extend the logarithmic principles of standard models to handle vector quantities, particularly in engineering applications involving forces and electrical phasors. These devices incorporate specialized scales for hyperbolic functions, such as sinh and tanh, alongside angular measures to resolve vector components by integrating magnitude and direction. For instance, in analyzing alternating current circuits, users align phasor magnitudes on logarithmic scales and read phase angles directly, simplifying the computation of resultant vectors without trigonometric tables. This design, pioneered in the Log Log Vector slide rule by M. P. Weinbach and A. F. Puchstein, facilitates rapid resolution of forces in mechanical systems or impedance in electrical networks by treating vectors as rotating phasors.[37][38] Statistical slide rules adapt the core mechanism for probabilistic and quality control computations, featuring dedicated scales for measures like standard deviation (often denoted by sigma) and probability distributions. Models such as the D-K Statistical Slide Rule include envelopes with sigma scales for estimating population standard deviation from sample ranges, using formulas like σ=R/d2\sigma = R / d_2 where RR is the range and d2d_2 a control chart constant. These scales enable quick assessment of variability in data sets, such as manufacturing tolerances or psychological test scores, by aligning sample statistics to output confidence intervals or error estimates. Similarly, the Pickett Model 6 incorporates charts for control limits and probability, allowing users to chain operations for hypothesis testing without external references. While not as ubiquitous as arithmetic rules, these variants were essential in mid-20th-century statistics for fields like industrial engineering.[39] Sector rules and polyphase variants generalize the slide rule for efficient multi-operation chaining, enabling sequential computations without frequent index resets. A sector rule, resembling hinged calipers with proportional scales, uses similar triangles to perform proportions, squares, and roots in geometric contexts, such as scaling drawings or resolving proportions in surveying. Polyphase models, like the Keuffel & Esser 4053-3, divide scales into multiple phases or folded segments, effectively extending the logarithmic range for long chains of multiplications and divisions—up to 66 figures in some cases—by aligning intermediate results seamlessly across scale breaks. This chaining reduces errors in complex engineering calculations, such as gear ratios or compound interest, by maintaining continuity in operations that standard rules would interrupt.[40][41] Slide rules integrate with nomograms to form hybrid graphical solvers, combining mechanical sliding with fixed alignment charts for multivariable equations. Nomograms, as static graphical analogs, plot isopleths for specific formulas, and when paired with slide rules, allow users to input logarithmic values from the rule onto the chart for direct readout of solutions like beam deflections or chemical equilibria. This synergy enhances precision in engineering design, where a slide rule computes intermediate logs, and the nomogram resolves nonlinear relationships without algebraic manipulation. Such integrations were common in specialized toolkits for aeronautical or civil engineering, offering a compact alternative to full computational tables.[42][43] A rare but significant generalization is the integraph, a mechanical device extending slide rule principles to perform graphical integration. Invented by Charles Vernon Boys and refined in models like the Stanley Integraph, it uses a sliding linkage system to trace curves and compute areas or moments via wheel mechanisms that accumulate displacements proportional to the integral. Though not a traditional slide rule, the integraph applies analogous proportional scaling for continuous operations, such as integrating load curves in structural analysis, and represents an early analog computer bridging manual computation and automation.[44]

Design Variations

Linear Slide Rules

The Mannheim slide rule, introduced around 1850 by French mathematician Amédée Mannheim, serves as the foundational design for most linear slide rules, featuring a standardized layout of four logarithmic scales labeled A, B, C, and D. The fixed body, or stock, bears the A scale on top—calibrated for squares over a range of 1 to 100—and the D scale below it, which represents the primary logarithmic scale from 1 to 10 for basic numerical values. The sliding insert, positioned within grooves on the stock, carries the B scale (identical to A for squares) on its upper edge and the C scale (matching D for the 1-to-10 range) on its lower edge, enabling seamless alignment for computations. This arrangement, introduced around 1850 and patented in 1851, popularized in the late 19th century, optimized the tool for multiplication, division, squares, and square roots through direct scale juxtaposition.[13][14] Linear slide rules vary in size to balance precision and portability, with full-size models typically 25 cm long providing extended scale lengths for higher accuracy in professional settings like engineering and science. Pocket-sized variants, often 10 to 12.5 cm in length, offer a compact alternative for quick field calculations, though their shorter scales reduce resolution by about half compared to full-size rules. These dimensions reflect practical trade-offs, as the 25 cm length allows finer graduations—typically to three or four significant figures—while pocket models prioritize ease of carry in briefcases or pockets.[45][40] The cursor, an essential indicator on linear slide rules, is usually adjustable, sliding freely along the stock to align specific points on the scales for reading results. High-end models incorporate magnification, often via a built-in lens of 2x to 3x power, to improve visibility of densely packed tick marks and enhance reading precision under varying lighting conditions. Fixed cursors, less common in advanced designs, lack this mobility or magnification but appear in simpler or early prototypes; adjustable types with magnifiers became standard in production models by the early 20th century for better ergonomic readability.[46][28] Ergonomic considerations in linear slide rule design include protective cases, typically made of leather or rigid plastic, which encase the rule to prevent wear from daily handling and environmental exposure. Many models feature thumb holds—indented grooves or raised edges on the slide—for secure grip during adjustment, reducing slippage and fatigue during prolonged use. These elements, refined through iterative manufacturing, contributed to the tool's widespread adoption in technical fields.[47] Linear slide rules dominated historical production, accounting for the vast majority of all slide rules made due to their straightforward construction, cost-effectiveness, and versatility for everyday calculations. This prevalence stemmed from the Mannheim layout's standardization in the 1850s, which influenced manufacturers worldwide until the 1970s, far outpacing more specialized forms in volume and accessibility.[9][48]

Circular and Cylindrical Models

Circular slide rules consist of two or more concentric disks, typically with a fixed outer disk and a rotating inner disk bearing logarithmic scales, allowing for continuous operation without the scale endpoints that limit linear models.[49] This design eliminates the "off the end" problem encountered in straight rules, where calculations exceeding the scale length require manual adjustments, by wrapping the scales around the circumference for seamless extension.[4] The primary advantage lies in their compact form, often fitting into a shirt pocket while maintaining the resolution of a standard 25 cm linear rule, making them ideal for quick computations in field applications.[49] In operation, users align scales by rotating the inner disk relative to the fixed one, using a cursor or index line for readings, which facilitates rapid angle-based calculations such as trigonometry without the linear sliding mechanism.[50] Circular models gained popularity in aviation for their portability and inclusion of specialized scales for trigonometric functions, enabling pilots to perform tasks like wind correction and navigation adjustments efficiently.[51] Cylindrical slide rules feature scales wrapped helically or longitudinally around a rotating cylinder within a fixed housing, providing an effective scale length far exceeding the physical dimensions for enhanced precision.[52] A notable example is the Thacher cylindrical slide rule, patented in 1881 and produced by Keuffel & Esser, which achieves an equivalent scale length of approximately 9.14 meters on a device about 50 cm long, allowing for continuous logarithmic computations akin to standard A and B scales but with greater range.[53] These models, such as the K&E 4012 and 4013 variants based on Thacher's design, offer 4 to 5 decimal places of accuracy, roughly 1 part in 10,000, surpassing typical linear rules limited to 3 decimals.[54] Operation involves rotating the inner cylinder to align scales, often using vanes or grooves for precise indexing, which supports advanced multiplications, divisions, and sometimes logarithmic iterations in a more compact form than extended linear alternatives.[52] The cylindrical geometry excels in applications requiring high precision within desk-sized tools, contrasting the portability focus of circular designs.[6]

Construction Materials

The construction of slide rules has relied on materials chosen for their stability, machinability, and resistance to environmental factors, ensuring the precision of logarithmic scales essential for accurate calculations. Early slide rules, dating from the 17th to 19th centuries, primarily utilized natural woods such as boxwood (Buxus sempervirens) for the body and scales due to its fine grain and low warping tendency, which allowed for clear engraving. Ivory, sourced from elephant tusks, was favored for premium scales because of its smooth surface and dimensional stability, enabling high-precision markings; brass was commonly employed for frames, cursors, and hardware to provide durability and a metallic edge for smooth sliding. Bamboo emerged as an alternative in some Asian and later Western models for its lightweight strength and resistance to humidity, though less common in European production. These materials were selected to minimize distortions that could affect scale alignment, with ivory and boxwood offering coefficients of thermal expansion around 6-7 × 10^{-6}/°C, far lower than many woods, thus preserving accuracy across temperature variations.[55][40][56] By the late 19th century, the introduction of synthetic materials marked a significant evolution, driven by the need for cost-effective production and improved uniformity. Celluloid, the first semi-synthetic plastic invented in 1870 by combining nitrocellulose and camphor, began replacing ivory and wood for scale facings around 1890, offering similar smoothness but greater availability and lower cost; no major manufacturer used ivory after this point. In the early 20th century, particularly from 1910 through World War II, phenolic resins like Bakelite—a thermoset plastic developed by Leo Baekeland in 1907—gained prominence for both bodies and scales due to their moldability, flame resistance, and reduced susceptibility to warpage compared to wood. Mid-20th-century production shifted predominantly to engineered plastics such as celluloid overlays on wooden or phenolic bases, and later to injection-molded thermoplastics like acrylic and polystyrene, which enhanced affordability for mass-market instruments while maintaining legibility and resisting moisture-induced expansion. These plastics typically exhibited thermal expansion coefficients of 50-100 × 10^{-6}/°C, necessitating careful design to match body and slide materials for consistent precision.[56][57][58] Scale markings were achieved through various engraving and printing techniques to ensure long-term legibility and resistance to wear. Traditional methods involved mechanical engraving or etching with pantograph machines, where a diamond-tipped tool incised lines into the material, followed by inking or paint-filling to highlight graduations; this deep engraving, common on wood and ivory, provided durability but required skilled labor. For plastics like celluloid and phenolic, printing techniques such as silk-screening or roller transfer became standard in the mid-20th century, applying ink directly or via etched metal plates for finer resolution and lower cost, though less resistant to abrasion than engraving. These methods directly influenced readability, with filled engravings on stable materials like brass or low-expansion alloys ensuring scales remained precise even after prolonged use.[59][40] In contemporary recreations, hobbyists and makers have turned to advanced materials and fabrication techniques to replicate classic designs. 3D printing with polymers like ABS or PLA allows for rapid prototyping of custom slide rules, offering customizable scales via integrated software-generated engravings, though post-processing for smooth sliding is often required to achieve professional precision. Acrylic sheets, laser-engraved for sharp markings, provide a modern alternative with excellent transparency for cursors and resistance to yellowing, commonly used in circular models for their optical clarity and machinability. The international ivory trade ban enacted in 1989 under CITES further solidified the exclusive use of plastics, as any residual interest in ivory substitutes was curtailed, emphasizing materials with controlled thermal properties—such as invar alloys in specialized rules—to mitigate expansion effects that could introduce errors up to 0.1% per degree Celsius.[60][61][62]

Historical Development

Origins and Early Innovations

The invention of logarithms by Scottish mathematician John Napier in 1614 laid the essential foundation for the slide rule, as his Mirifici Logarithmorum Canonis Descriptio introduced a method to simplify complex multiplications and divisions through proportional scales based on logarithmic principles.[63] Napier's work, developed over two decades, transformed astronomical and navigational calculations by converting multiplication into addition via logarithmic tables, setting the stage for graphical implementations.[64] Early precursors to the slide rule emerged shortly after, with English astronomer Edmund Gunter creating the first straight logarithmic scale in 1620, known as Gunter's scale or line of proportion, which allowed multiplication and division using dividers rather than tables.[9] Independently, Swiss clockmaker and mathematician Jobst Bürgi published Arithmetische und Geometrische Progress-Tabulen in 1620, featuring logarithmic tables that enabled similar proportional computations, though without a mechanical sliding mechanism; these tables influenced later instrument designs by demonstrating the practical utility of logarithmic progressions for trigonometric functions.[65] The first true slide rule appeared in 1622, when English mathematician and clergyman William Oughtred devised a circular instrument by placing two logarithmic scales on concentric rotating disks, allowing direct reading of products and quotients without dividers.[66] Oughtred's design, initially kept private and shared only with select pupils, marked a pivotal shift from static scales to interactive devices, though it sparked controversy when his former student Richard Delamain independently published a similar circular slide rule in 1630 as part of Grammelogia, claiming priority and leading to a public dispute over invention rights.[67] Delamain's version incorporated multiple concentric rings for enhanced functionality, including square and cube roots, representing an early innovation in multi-scale integration.[68] By the 1630s, linear variants gained traction, first described by William Oughtred in his 1633 Circles of Proportion.[9] English mathematician Seth Partridge further developed a practical linear slide rule in his 1661 publication The Description and Use of an Instrument called the Double Scale of Proportion, consisting of two sliding wooden strips for gauging and surveying applications.[69] This design improved portability over circular models and was detailed further in Edmund Wingate's 1626 The Use of the Rule of Proportion, which popularized the instrument's construction and use among practitioners by providing instructional engravings and explanations tailored to arithmetic operations.[69] During the 17th and 18th centuries, these early slide rules were hand-crafted from ivory or wood by specialized instrument makers, primarily for astronomers, surveyors, and navigators who required precise yet portable tools for fieldwork computations.[70]

Peak Usage and Specialized Variants

The modern form of the slide rule was established around 1850 by French artillery officer Amédée Mannheim, who designed a linear rule featuring standardized scales—A, B, C, and D—for performing multiplication, division, squares, and square roots efficiently.[6] This configuration, often including a cursor for precise readings, became the foundational layout for most subsequent models, enabling rapid logarithmic computations essential for technical work.[71] The 20th century marked a period of explosive growth in slide rule adoption, driven by mass production from leading manufacturers such as Keuffel & Esser (K&E) and Pickett, which supplied durable, high-precision instruments to engineers and scientists worldwide.[60] K&E, founded in 1867, scaled up operations to produce tens of thousands of units annually by the early 1900s, with models like the Decilon series becoming staples in fields ranging from civil engineering to physics research due to their accuracy and portability.[72] Pickett complemented this with innovative aluminum rules featuring anti-glare coatings, further broadening accessibility for professional calculations.[73] Specialized variants proliferated to address domain-specific needs, enhancing the slide rule's utility beyond general arithmetic. In nautical applications, devices like tide-predicting slide rules allowed mariners to estimate water heights and solve speed-time-distance problems critical for safe navigation.[74] Aviation saw the development of the E6B, a compact circular slide rule introduced in the 1930s and widely used for flight planning, including wind correction angles, fuel consumption, and true airspeed computations.[75] In nuclear engineering, tools such as the RADIAC slide rule enabled quick assessments of radiation exposure rates and decay times, vital for safety evaluations during the atomic era.[76] The World Wars significantly amplified slide rule production, as militaries demanded specialized models for wartime computations. In the U.S., Army ordnance units received purpose-built rules for artillery ballistics and firing tables, contributing to a surge in output—K&E alone ramped up to meet high-priority contracts, producing thousands of units for applications like bombing accuracy and targeting.[77][78] This military integration underscored the device's reliability in high-stakes environments. By the 1950s and into the 1960s, global production peaked at over 1 million units annually across major firms like Japan's Hemmi, reflecting the slide rule's ubiquity in education and industry before electronic alternatives emerged.[6] The Oughtred Society, founded in 1991 by collectors and historians, now serves as a key organization for enthusiasts, preserving artifacts and documenting the device's legacy through journals and exhibits.[40]

Decline and Legacy

The introduction of the Hewlett-Packard HP-35, the first handheld scientific calculator, in 1972 accelerated the slide rule's decline by offering greater precision, speed, and ease of use for complex calculations.[79] As electronic calculators became widely affordable by the mid-1970s, their portability and digital accuracy quickly supplanted the analog slide rule in professional and academic settings.[80] Major manufacturers responded to this shift; for instance, Pickett Industries, one of the last prominent U.S. producers, ceased slide rule manufacturing in the mid-1970s after relocating operations.[81] In education, the transition was swift but lingered into the early 1980s, with universities gradually phasing out slide rules from curricula and exams as calculators integrated into standard tools for engineering and science students.[82] By the decade's end, slide rules were rarely issued or required, marking the end of their widespread instructional role.[83] The slide rule's legacy endures as an emblem of analog computing ingenuity, embodying principles of logarithmic scaling that influenced the development of logarithmic functions in early electronic calculators.[84] It is celebrated in museum collections, such as the extensive holdings at the Smithsonian Institution, which preserve historical models to illustrate pre-digital computational history.[1] Post-2010, interest has revived in STEM education through modern 3D-printed recreations, enabling hands-on exploration of mathematical concepts without relying on digital devices.[60]

Modern Relevance

Comparison with Digital Calculators

Slide rules offer advantages in speed for approximate calculations, allowing users to perform basic operations like multiplication and division in seconds through direct mechanical alignment, making them ideal for quick estimates in engineering and scientific contexts.[85] However, their precision is inherently limited to approximately three significant figures due to the logarithmic scale length, typically on a 10-inch rule, which restricts accuracy for detailed work.[85] In contrast, digital calculators provide exact results with 8–12 decimal places or more, along with programmability for complex functions, enabling precise computations and iterative processes that slide rules cannot handle efficiently.[86] Regarding portability and durability, slide rules require no power source, functioning indefinitely without batteries or electricity, and their mechanical construction makes them resistant to environmental factors like electromagnetic interference.[87] Yet, they are susceptible to physical wear from sliding mechanisms and scale degradation over time. Digital calculators, while increasingly compact since the 1970s, depend on batteries or charging, which can fail in remote or long-duration scenarios, though modern models are more robust against mechanical wear.[86] The learning curve for slide rules emphasizes conceptual understanding, as users must grasp logarithmic principles to interpret and apply scales effectively, fostering intuition for orders of magnitude and approximations.[88] Digital calculators, by comparison, promote rote input of functions, reducing the need for underlying mathematical insight but allowing faster adoption for straightforward tasks. Error sources differ markedly: slide rules are prone to parallax errors from misalignment of the cursor with the eye, potentially skewing readings by a fraction of a scale unit. Digital calculators, while immune to such optical issues, can introduce rounding errors from finite precision in floating-point arithmetic, though these are typically negligible for most applications. Slide rules excel in back-of-the-envelope calculations for rapid feasibility assessments, whereas digital calculators have dominated since the early 1970s for handling complex iterations and high-precision needs in professional settings.[86]

Current Applications and Collections

In contemporary education, slide rules serve as hands-on tools for teaching logarithmic principles and basic arithmetic operations, fostering an understanding of mathematical relationships that digital calculators often obscure. For example, in August 2025, Carnegie Mellon University's College of Engineering featured slide rules in an article on their historical and educational value.[88] Educators use them in mathematics and physics classes to demonstrate concepts like multiplication, division, and trigonometric functions, emphasizing precision and logical thinking without reliance on electronic aids.[89][90] For virtual practice, mobile applications such as Digital Slide Rule and Smart Slide Rule simulate traditional models with various scales, available for free on iOS and Android platforms, allowing students to experiment interactively.[91][92] Among hobbyists and collectors, the Oughtred Society, founded in 1991, plays a central role in preserving slide rule history through annual meetings featuring presentations, trading sessions, and discussions on rare variants.[93][94] The enthusiast community has seen a post-2020 resurgence in maker spaces, where individuals design and 3D-print custom slide rules using platforms like Thingiverse, including models for linear, circular, and even helical configurations to explore analog computing projects.[95][96][97] Niche professional applications persist in fields requiring reliable, low-tech backups. In aviation, the E6B flight computer—a circular slide rule variant—remains standard for pilots calculating wind corrections, fuel consumption, and ground speed during flight planning and navigation.[75] In astronomy, specialized slide rules aid celestial navigation and scale computations, such as determining star positions, particularly in educational observatories or remote fieldwork where electronics may fail.[98][99] Major institutional collections ensure the preservation of slide rules as cultural artifacts. The Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History maintains an extensive archive of linear, circular, and specialized models, documenting their evolution through object groups categorized by material and function.[28][100] The International Slide Rule Museum operates as the world's largest free online digital repository, featuring scanned examples, manufacturer histories, and an encyclopedia of scales accessible to researchers and the public.[101] Contemporary physical slide rules, often reproductions or vintage restorable models, typically retail for $20 to $100 depending on materials and complexity, while software emulations provide cost-free alternatives for broader accessibility.[102][103]

References

User Avatar
No comments yet.