Hubbry Logo
Shunga EmpireShunga EmpireMain
Open search
Shunga Empire
Community hub
Shunga Empire
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Shunga Empire
Shunga Empire
Shunga Empire
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Shunga Empire (IAST: Śuṅga) was a ruling entity centred around Magadha and controlled most of the northern Indian subcontinent from around 187 to 75 BCE. The dynasty was established by Pushyamitra, after taking the throne of Magadha from the Mauryas. The Shunga empire's capital was Pataliputra, but later emperors such as Bhagabhadra also held court at Besnagar (modern Vidisha) in eastern Malwa.[2] This dynasty is also responsible for successfully fighting and resisting the Greeks in Shunga–Greek War.[3][4][5]

Key Information

Pushyamitra ruled for 36 years and was succeeded by his son Agnimitra. There were ten Shunga rulers. However, after the death of Agnimitra, the second king of the dynasty, the empire rapidly disintegrated:[6] inscriptions and coins indicate that much of northern and central India consisted of small kingdoms and city-states that were independent of any Shunga hegemony.[7] The dynasty is noted for its numerous wars with both foreign and indigenous powers. They fought the Kalinga, the Satavahana dynasty, the Indo-Greek kingdom and possibly the Panchalas and Mitras of Mathura.

Art, education, philosophy, and other forms of learning flowered during this period, including small terracotta images, larger stone sculptures, and architectural monuments such as the stupa at Bharhut, and the renowned Great Stupa at Sanchi. The Shunga rulers helped to establish the tradition of royal sponsorship of learning and art. The script used by the empire was a variant of Brahmi script and was used to write Sanskrit.

The Shungas were important patrons of culture at a time when some of the most important developments in Hindu thought were taking place. Patanjali's Mahābhāṣya was composed in this period. Artistry also progressed with the rise of the Mathura art style.

The last of the Shunga emperors was Devabhuti (83–73 BCE). He was assassinated by his minister Vasudeva Kanva and was said to have been overfond of the company of women. The Kanva dynasty succeeded the Shungas around 73 BCE.

Name

[edit]

The name "Shunga" has only been used for convenience to designate the historical polity now generally described as "Shunga empire", or the historical period known as the "Shunga period", which follows the fall of the Maurya empire.[8] The term appears in a single epigraphic inscription in Bharhut, in which a dedication to the Buddhist Bharhut stupa is said to have been made "at the time of the Suga kings" (Suganam raje), with no indication as to whom these "Suga kings" might be.[8] Other broadly contemporary inscriptions, such as the Heliodorus pillar inscription, are only assumed to relate to Shunga rulers.[8] The Ayodhya Inscription of Dhana mentions a ruler named Pushyamitra, but does not mention the name "Shunga".

The Bharut epigraph appears on a pillar of the gateway of the stupa, and mentions its erection "during the rule of the Sugas, by Vatsiputra Dhanabhuti".[9][10] The expression used (Suganam raje, Brahmi script: 𑀲𑀼𑀕𑀦𑀁 𑀭𑀚𑁂), may mean "during the rule of the Sugas [Shungas]", although not without ambiguity as it could also be "during the rule of the Sughanas", a northern Buddhist kingdom.[11][10] There is no other instance of the name "Shunga" in the epigraphical record of India.[12] The unique inscription reads:

The Dhanabhuti inscription, and the torana on which it is inscribed. Bharhut

1. Suganam raje raño Gāgīputasa Visadevasa
2. pautena, Gotiputasa Āgarajusa putena
3. Vāchhīputena Dhanabhūtina kāritam toranām
4. silākammamto cha upamno.

During the reign of the Sugas (Sughanas, or Shungas) the gateway was caused to be made and the stone-work presented by Dhanabhūti, the son of Vāchhī, son of Agaraju, the son of a Goti and grandson of king Visadeva, the son of Gāgī.

— Gateway pillar inscription of Dhanabhūti.[13][14]

Dhanabhuti was making a major dedication to a Buddhist monument, Bharhut, whereas the historical "Shungas" are known to have been Hindu monarchs, which would suggest that Dhanabhuti himself may not have been a member of the Shunga dynasty.[15] Neither is he known from "Shunga" regnal lists.[15][16] The mention "in the reign of the Shungas" also suggests that he was not himself a Shunga ruler, only that he may have been a tributary of the Shungas, or a ruler in a neighbouring territory, such as Kosala or Panchala.[16][15]

The name "Sunga" or "Shunga" is also used in the Vishnu Purana, the date of which is contested, to designate the dynasty of kings starting with Pushyamitra c. 185 BCE, and ending with Devabhuti circa 75 BCE. According to the Vishnu Purana:[8][17][18]

Ten Maurya kings will reign for one hundred and thirty-seven years. After them the Śuṅgas will rule the earth. The general Puṣpamitra will kill his sovereign and usurp the kingdom. His son will be Agnimitra. His son will be Sujyeṣṭha. His son will be Vasumitra. His son will be Ārdraka. His son will be Pulindaka. His son will be Ghoṣavasu. His son will be Vajramitra. His son will be Bhāgavata. His son will be Devabhūti. These ten Śuṅgas will rule the earth for one hundred and twelve years.

— Vishnu Purana, Book Four: The Royal Dynasties.[19]

Origins

[edit]
Man on a relief, Bharhut, Shunga period.

According to historical reconstructions, the Shunga dynasty was established in 184 BCE, about 50 years after Ashoka's death, when the emperor Brihadratha Maurya, the last ruler of the Maurya empire, was assassinated by his Senānī or commander-in-chief, Pushyamitra,[20] while he was reviewing the Guard of Honour of his forces. Pushyamitra then ascended the throne.[21][22]

Pushyamitra became the ruler of Magadha and neighbouring territories. His realm essentially covered the central parts of the old Mauryan empire.[23] The Shunga definitely had control of the central city of Ayodhya in northern central India, as is proved by the Dhanadeva-Ayodhya inscription.[23] However, the city of Mathura further west never seems to have been under the direct control of the Shungas, as no archaeological evidence of a Shunga presence has ever been found in Mathura.[24] On the contrary, according to the Yavanarajya inscription, Mathura was probably under the control of Indo-Greeks from some time between 180 BCE and 100 BCE, and remained so as late as 70 BCE.[24]

Some ancient sources however claim a greater extent for the Shunga empire: the Asokavadana account of the Divyavadana claims that the Shungas sent an army to persecute Buddhist monks as far as Sakala (Sialkot) in the Punjab region in the northwest:

... Pushyamitra equipped a fourfold army, and intending to destroy the Buddhist religion, he went to the Kukkutarama (in Pataliputra). ... Pushyamitra therefore destroyed the sangharama, killed the monks there, and departed. ... After some time, he arrived in Sakala, and proclaimed that he would give a ... reward to whoever brought him the head of a Buddhist monk.[25]: 293 

Also, the Malavikagnimitra claims that the empire of Pushyamitra extended to the Narmada River in the south. They may also have controlled the city of Ujjain.[23] Meanwhile, Kabul and much of the Punjab passed into the hands of the Indo-Greeks and the Deccan Plateau to the Satavahana dynasty.

Pushyamitra died after ruling for 36 years (187–151 BCE). He was succeeded by son Agnimitra. This prince is the hero of a famous drama by one of India's greatest playwrights, Kālidāsa. Agnimitra was viceroy of Vidisha when the story takes place.

The power of the Shungas gradually weakened. It is said that there were ten Shunga emperors. The Shungas were succeeded by the Kanva dynasty around 73 BCE.

Decline of Buddhism

[edit]
Main article: Pushyamitra Shunga
See also: Decline of Buddhism in India

Accounts of persecution

[edit]
Shunga horseman, Bharhut.

Following the Mauryans, the first Sunga emperor, a Brahmin named Pushyamitra,[26] is believed by some historians to have persecuted Buddhists and contributed to a resurgence of Brahmanism that forced Buddhism outwards to Kashmir, Gandhara and Bactria.[27] Buddhist scripture such as the Ashokavadana account of the Divyavadana and ancient Tibetan historian Taranatha have written about persecution of Buddhists. Pushyamitra is said to have burned down Buddhist monasteries, destroyed stupas, massacred Buddhist monks and put rewards on their heads, but some consider these stories as probable exaggerations.[27][28]

"... Pushyamitra equipped a fourfold army, and intending to destroy the Buddhist religion, he went to the Kukkutarama. ... Pushyamitra therefore destroyed the sangharama, killed the monks there, and departed. ... After some time, he arrived in Sakala, and proclaimed that he would give a ... reward to whoever brought him the head of a Buddhist monk."

— Asokavadana account of the Divyavadana[29]: 293 

Pushyamitra is known to have revived the supremacy of the Bramahnical religion and reestablished animal sacrifices (Yajnas) that had been prohibited by Ashoka.[28] However, in the Harshacharita of Banabhatta, Pushyamitra is referred to as an Anarya (non-Aryan).[citation needed]

Accounts against persecution

[edit]
Shunga period stupa at Sanchi.
East Gateway and Railings, Red Sandstone, Bharhut Stupa, 2nd century BCE. Indian Museum, Kolkata.

Later Shunga emperors were seen as amenable to Buddhism and as having contributed to the building of the stupa at Bharhut.[30] During his reign the Buddhist monuments of Bharhut and Sanchi were renovated and further improved. There is enough evidence to show that Pushyamitra patronised Buddhist art.[31] However, given the rather decentralised and fragmentary nature of the Shunga state, with many cities actually issuing their own coinage, as well as the relative dislike of the Shungas for the Buddhist religion, some authors argue that the constructions of that period in Sanchi for example cannot really be called "Shunga". They were not the result of royal sponsorship, in contrast with what happened during the Mauryas, and most of the dedications at Sanchi were private or collective, rather than the result of royal patronage.[32]  

Some writers believe that Brahmanism competed in political and spiritual realm with Buddhism[27] in the Gangetic plains. Buddhism flourished in the realms of the Bactrian kings. [citation needed]

Some Indian scholars are of the opinion that the orthodox Shunga emperors were not intolerant towards Buddhism and that Buddhism prospered during the time of the Shunga emperors. The existence of Buddhism in Bengal in the Shunga period can also be inferred from a terracotta tablet that was found at Tamralipti and is on exhibit at the Asutosh Museum in Kolkata.

Royal dedications

[edit]

Two dedications by a king named Brahmamitra as well as the monarch Indragnimitra are recorded at the Mahabodhi Temple in Bodh Gaya. Some may claim these show Shunga support for Buddhism. These kings, however, are essentially unknown, and do not form a part of the Shunga recorded genealogy. They are thought to be post-Ashokan and to belong to the period of Shunga rule.[33][34] A Brahmamitra is known otherwise as a local ruler of Mathura, but Indragnimitra is unknown, and according to some authors, Indragnimitra is in fact not even mentioned as a king in the actual inscription.[34][35]

  • An inscription at Bodh Gaya at the Mahabodhi Temple records the construction of the temple as follows:
"The gift of Nagadevi the wife of King Brahmamitra."
  • Another inscription reads:
"The gift of Kurangi, the mother of living sons and the wife of King Indragnimitra, son of Kosiki. The gift also of Srima of the royal palace shrine."[36][37]

Cunningham has regretted the loss of the latter part of these important records. As regards the first coping inscription, he has found traces of eleven Brahmi letters after "Kuramgiye danam", the first nine of which read "rajapasada-cetika sa". Bloch reads these nine letters as "raja-pasada-cetikasa" and translates this expression in relation to the preceding words:

"(the gift of Kurangi, the wife of Indragnimitra and the mother of living sons), "to the caitya (cetika) of the noble temple", taking the word raja before pasada as an epithet on ornans, distinguishing the temple as a particularly large and stately building similar to such expressions as rajahastin 'a noble elephant', rajahamsa 'a goose' (as distinguished from hamsa 'a duck'), etc."

Cunningham has translated the expression "the royal palace, the caitya", suggesting that "the mention of the raja-pasada would seem to connect the donor with the king's family." Luders doubtfully suggests "to the king's temple" as a rendering of "raja-pasada-cetikasa."

Shunga period contributions in Sanchi

[edit]
Main article: Sanchi
The Great Stupa under the Shungas. The Shungas nearly doubled the diameter of the initial stupa, encasing it in stone, and built a balustrade and a railing around it.

On the basis of Ashokavadana, it is presumed that the stupa may have been vandalised at one point sometime in the 2nd century BCE, an event some have related to the rise of the Shunga emperor Pushyamitra who overtook the Mauryan empire as an army general. It has been suggested that Pushyamitra may have destroyed the original stupa, and his son Agnimitra rebuilt it.[38] The original brick stupa was covered with stone during the Shunga period.

According to historian Julia Shaw, the post-Mauryan constructions at Sanchi cannot be described as "Sunga" as sponsorship for the construction of the stupas, as attested by the numerous donative inscriptions, was not royal but collective, and the Sungas were known for their opposition to Buddhism.[39]

Great Stupa (No 1)

[edit]

During the later rule of the Shunga, the stupa was expanded with stone slabs to almost twice its original size. The dome was flattened near the top and crowned by three superimposed parasols within a square railing. With its many tiers it was a symbol of the dharma, the Wheel of the Law. The dome was set on a high circular drum meant for circumambulation, which could be accessed via a double staircase. A second stone pathway at ground level was enclosed by a stone balustrade. The railing around Stupa 1 do not have artistic reliefs. These are only slabs, with some dedicatory inscriptions. These elements are dated to c. 150 BCE.[40]

Stupa No2 and Stupa No3

[edit]

The buildings which seem to have been commissioned during the rule of the Shungas are the Second and Third stupas (but not the highly decorated gateways, which are from the following Satavahana period, as known from inscriptions), and the ground balustrade and stone casing of the Great Stupa (Stupa No 1). The Relics of Sariputra and Mahamoggallana are said to have been placed in Stupa No 3.[41] These are dated to c. 115 BCE for the medallions, 80 BCE for the gateway carvings,[42] slightly after the reliefs of Bharhut, with some reworks down to the 1st century CE.[40][42]

The style of the Shunga period decorations at Sanchi bear a close similarity to those of Bharhut, as well as the peripheral balustrades at Bodh Gaya, which are thought to be the oldest of the three.

Shunga structures and decorations
(150-80 BCE)

Great Stupa
(Stupa expansion and balustrades only are Shunga).
Undecorated ground railings dated to approximately 150 BCE.[40]
  • Shunga balustrade and staircase.
    Shunga balustrade and staircase.
  • Shunga stonework.
    Shunga stonework.
  • Shunga vedika (railing) with inscriptions.
    Shunga vedika (railing) with inscriptions.
  • Deambulatory pathway.
    Deambulatory pathway.
  • Summit railing and umbrellas.
    Summit railing and umbrellas.

Stupa No 2
Entirely Shunga work. The reliefs are thought to date to the last quarter of the 2nd century BCE (c. 115 BCE for the medallions, 80 BCE for the gateway carvings),[42] slightly after the reliefs of Bharhut, with some reworks down to the 1st century CE.[40][42]
  • Elephant and Riders.
    Elephant and Riders.
  • Balustrade post with Lakshmi.
    Balustrade post with Lakshmi.
  • Balustrade post with Yaksha.
    Balustrade post with Yaksha.
  • Pillar with elephants supporting a wheel.
    Pillar with elephants supporting a wheel.
  • Personage.
    Personage.
  • Lotus.
    Lotus.
  • Floral motif.
    Floral motif.
  • Foreigner on a horse, c. 115 BCE.[42]
    Foreigner on a horse, c. 115 BCE.[42]
  • Ashoka supported by his two wives. Similar to the later relief at Gateway 1.
    Ashoka supported by his two wives. Similar to the later relief at Gateway 1.
  • Relic boxes found inside the stupa.
    Relic boxes found inside the stupa.

Stupa No 3
(Stupa and balustrades only are Shunga).

Warfare

[edit]
Main article: Shunga–Greek War
class=notpageimage|
Main polities in Asia, circa -100[44][45][46][47]

War and conflict characterised the Shunga period. They are known to have warred with the Kalingas, Satavahanas, the Indo-Greeks, and possibly the Panchalas and Mathuras.[citation needed]

The Shunga empire's wars with the Indo-Greek kingdom figure greatly in the history of this period. From around 180 BCE the Greco-Bactrian ruler Demetrius conquered the Kabul Valley and is theorised to have advanced into the trans-Indus to confront the Shungas.[28] The Indo-Greek Menander I is credited with either joining or leading a campaign to Pataliputra with other Indian rulers; however, very little is known about the exact nature and success of the campaign. The net result of these wars remains uncertain.[citation needed]

Vedika pillar with "Yavana" Greek warrior. Bharhut, Madhya Pradesh, Shunga Period, c. 100-80 BC. Reddish brown sandstone.[48] Indian Museum, Calcutta.

Literary evidence

[edit]

Several works, such as the Mahabharata and the Yuga Purana describe the conflict between the Shungas and the Indo-Greeks.

Military expeditions of the Shungas

[edit]

Scriptures such as the Ashokavadana claim that Pushyamitra toppled Emperor Brihadratha and killed many Buddhist monks.[49] Then it describes how Pushyamitra sent an army to Pataliputra and as far as Sakala (Sialkot), in the Punjab, to persecute Buddhist monks.[50]

War with the Yavanas (Greeks)

[edit]

The Indo-Greeks, called Yavanas in Indian sources, either led by Demetrius I or Menander I, then invaded India, possibly receiving the help of Buddhists.[51] Menander in particular is described as a convert to Buddhism in the Milindapanha.

The Hindu text of the Yuga Purana, which describes Indian historical events in the form of a prophecy,[52][note 1] relates the attack of the Indo-Greeks on the Shunga capital Pataliputra, a magnificent fortified city with 570 towers and 64 gates according to Megasthenes,[54] and describes the impending war for city:

Then, after having approached Saketa together with the Panchalas and the Mathuras, the Yavanas, valiant in battle, will reach Kusumadhvaja "the town of the flower-standard", Pataliputra. Then, once Puspapura (another name of Pataliputra) has been reached and its celebrated mud-walls cast down, all the realm will be in disorder

— Yuga Purana, Paragraph 47–48, 2002 edition)

However, the Yuga Purana indicates that the Yavanas (Indo-Greeks) did not remain for long in Pataliputra, as they were faced with a civil war in Bactria.

Western sources also suggest that this new offensive of the Greeks into India led them as far as the capital Pataliputra:[55]

Those who came after Alexander went to the Ganges and Pataliputra

— Strabo, 15.698

Battle on the Sindhu river

[edit]

An account of a direct battle between the Greeks and the Shunga is also found in the Mālavikāgnimitram, a play by Kālidāsa which describes a battle between a squadron of Greek cavalrymen and Vasumitra, the grandson of Pushyamitra, accompanied by a hundred soldiers on the "Sindhu river", in which the Indians defeated a squadron of Greeks and Pushyamitra successfully completed the Ashvamedha Yagna.[56] This river may be the Indus River in the northwest, but such expansion by the Shungas is unlikely, and it is more probable that the river mentioned in the text is the Sindh River or the Kali Sindh River in the Ganges Basin.[57]

Epigraphic and archaeological evidence

[edit]

Dhanadeva-Ayodhya inscription

[edit]

Ultimately, Shunga rule seems to have extended to the area of Ayodhya. Shunga inscriptions are known as far as Ayodhya in northern central India;[23] in particular, the Dhanadeva-Ayodhya inscription refers to a local king Dhanadeva, who claimed to be the sixth descendant of Pushyamitra. The inscription also records that Pushyamitra performed two Ashvamedhas (victory sacrifices) in Ayodhya.[58]

Yavanarajya inscription

[edit]
The Yavanarajya inscription, dated to "year 116 of Yavana hegemony", probably 70 or 69 BCE, was discovered in Mathura. Mathura Museum.

The Greeks seem to have maintained control of Mathura. The Yavanarajya inscription, also called the "Maghera inscription", discovered in Mathura, suggests that the Indo-Greeks were in control of Mathura during the 1st century BCE.[59][60] The inscription is important in that it mentions the date of its dedication as "The last day of year 116 of Yavana hegemony (Yavanarajya)". It is considered that this inscription is attesting the control of the Indo-Greeks in the 2nd and 1st centuries BCE in Mathura, a fact that is also confirmed by numismatic and literary evidence.[24] Moreover, it does not seem that the Shungas ever ruled in Mathura or Surasena since no Shunga coins or inscriptions have been found there.[24]

The Anushasana Parva of the Mahabharata affirms that the city of Mathura was under the joint control of the Yavanas and the Kambojas.[61]

Later however, it seems the city of Mathura was retaken from them, if not by the Shungas themselves, then probably by other indigenous rulers such as the Datta dynasty or the Mitra dynasty, or more probably by the Indo-Scythian Northern Satraps under Rajuvula. In the region of Mathura, the Arjunayanas and Yaudheyas mention military victories on their coins ("Victory of the Arjunayanas", "Victory of the Yaudheyas"), and during the 1st century BCE, the Trigartas, Audumbaras and finally the Kunindas also started to mint their own coins, thus affirming independence from the Indo-Greeks, although the style of their coins was often derived from that of the Indo-Greeks.

Heliodorus pillar

[edit]
The Heliodorus pillar was built in Vidisha under the Shungas, at the instigation of Heliodorus, ambassador of the Indo-Greek king Antialcidas. The pillar originally supported a statue of Garuda. Established circa 100 BCE.

Very little can be said with great certainty. However, what does appear clear is that the two realms appeared to have established normalised diplomatic relations in the succeeding reigns of their respective rulers. The Indo-Greeks and the Shungas seem to have reconciled and exchanged diplomatic missions around 110 BCE, as indicated by the Heliodorus pillar, which records the dispatch of a Greek ambassador named Heliodorus, from the court of the Indo-Greek king Antialcidas, to the court of the Shunga emperor Bhagabhadra at the site of Vidisha in central India.

Decline

[edit]

After the death of Agnimitra, the second king of the dynasty, the empire rapidly disintegrated:[6] inscriptions and coins indicate that much of northern and central India consisted of small kingdoms and city-states that were independent of any Shunga hegemony.[7]

The Sunga territory circa 100 BCE, greatly reduced to the region of Magadha only, with many independent, petty kingdoms such as such as Mathura and Panchala

The last king of Sungas, Devabhuti was assassinated by his minister Vasudeva Kanva, who then established Kanva dynasty.[21] According to the Puranas: "The Andhra Simuka will assail the Kanvayanas and Susarman, and destroy the remains of the Sungas' power and will obtain this earth."[62] The Andhras did indeed destroy the last remains of the Sunga state in central India somewhere around Vidisha,[63] probably as a feeble rump state.

Art

[edit]

The Shunga art style differed somewhat from imperial Mauryan art, which was influenced by Persian art. In both, continuing elements of folk art and cults of the Mother goddess appear in popular art, but are now produced with more skill in more monumental forms. The Shunga style was thus seen as 'more Indian' and is often described as the more indigenous.[64]

Art, education, philosophy, and other learning flowered during this period. Most notably, Patanjali's Yoga Sutras and Mahabhashya were composed in this period. It is also noted for its subsequent mention in the Malavikaagnimitra. This work was composed by Kalidasa in the later Gupta period, and romanticised the love of Malavika and King Agnimitra, with a background of court intrigue.

Artistry on the subcontinent also progressed with the rise of the Mathura school, which is considered the indigenous counterpart to the more Hellenistic Gandhara school (Greco-Buddhist art) of Afghanistan and North-Western frontier of India (modern day Pakistan).

During the historical Shunga period (185 to 73 BCE), Buddhist activity also managed to survive somewhat in central India (Madhya Pradesh) as suggested by some architectural expansions that were done at the stupas of Sanchi and Bharhut, originally started under Emperor Ashoka. It remains uncertain whether these works were due to the weakness of the control of the Shungas in these areas, or a sign of tolerance on their part.

Shunga statuettes and reliefs
  • Chandraketugarth, goddess of fecundity.
    Chandraketugarth, goddess of fecundity.
  • Chandraketugarth.
    Chandraketugarth.
  • Shunga Yakshi, 2nd–1st century BCE.
    Shunga Yakshi, 2nd–1st century BCE.
  • Shunga masculine figurine (molded plate). 2nd–1st century BCE.
    Shunga masculine figurine (molded plate). 2nd–1st century BCE.
  • Shunga woman with child. 2nd–1st century BCE.
    Shunga woman with child. 2nd–1st century BCE.
  • Shunga Yaksha. 2nd–1st century BCE.
    Shunga Yaksha. 2nd–1st century BCE.
  • Shunga mother figure, with attendant. 2nd–1st century BCE.
    Shunga mother figure, with attendant. 2nd–1st century BCE.
  • Shunga fecundity deity. 2nd–1st century BCE.
    Shunga fecundity deity. 2nd–1st century BCE.
  • Baluster-holding yakṣa, Madhya Pradesh, Shunga period (2nd–1st century BCE). Guimet Museum.
    Baluster-holding yakṣa, Madhya Pradesh, Shunga period (2nd–1st century BCE). Guimet Museum.
  • Royal family, Shunga, West Bengal 1st century BCE.
    Royal family, Shunga, West Bengal 1st century BCE.
  • Amorous royal couple. Shunga, 1st century BCE, West Bengal.
    Amorous royal couple. Shunga, 1st century BCE, West Bengal.
  • Erotic art from Shunga period.
    Erotic art from Shunga period.
  • Fragments of gold ornament, 185-72 BCE.
    Fragments of gold ornament, 185-72 BCE.
  • Fragments of gold ornament, 185-72 BCE.
    Fragments of gold ornament, 185-72 BCE.
  • Fragment of gold ornament, 185-72 BCE.
    Fragment of gold ornament, 185-72 BCE.
  • Gold bracelet from Shunga period, 185-72 BCE.
    Gold bracelet from Shunga period, 185-72 BCE.
  • Ivory bowl fragment, 2nd–1st century B.C.
    Ivory bowl fragment, 2nd–1st century B.C.
  • Shunga pottery with decorative figurine motifes.
    Shunga pottery with decorative figurine motifes.

Script

[edit]

The script used by the Shunga was a variant of Brahmi, and was used to write the Sanskrit language. The script is thought to be an intermediary between the Maurya and the Kalinga Brahmi scripts.[65]

Shunga coinage
  • Bronze coin of the Shunga period, Eastern India. 2nd–1st century BCE.
    Bronze coin of the Shunga period, Eastern India. 2nd–1st century BCE.
  • Another Shunga coin
    Another Shunga coin
  • A copper coin of 1/4 karshapana of Ujjain in Malwa.
    A copper coin of 1/4 karshapana of Ujjain in Malwa.
  • Shunga coin.
    Shunga coin.
Part of a series on the
History of South Asia
South Asia (orthographic projection)
Outline
Palaeolithic (2,500,000–250,000 BC)
Madrasian culture
Soanian culture
Neolithic (10,800–3300 BC)
Bhirrana culture (7570–6200 BC)
Mehrgarh culture (7000–3300 BC)
Edakkal culture (5000–3000 BC)
Chalcolithic (3500–1500 BC)
Anarta tradition (c. 3950–1900 BC)
Ahar-Banas culture (3000–1500 BC)
Pandu culture (1600–750 BC)
Malwa culture (1600–1300 BC)
Jorwe culture (1400–700 BC)
Bronze Age (3300–1300 BC)
Indus Valley Civilisation(3300–1300 BC)
 – Early Harappan culture(3300–2600 BC)
 – Mature Harappan culture(2600–1900 BC)
 – Late Harappan culture(1900–1300 BC)
Vedic Civilisation(2000–500 BC)
 – Ochre Coloured Pottery culture(2000–1600 BC)
 – Swat culture(1600–500 BC)
Iron Age (1500–200 BC)
Vedic Civilisation(1500–500 BC)
 – Janapadas (1500–600 BC)
 – Black and Red ware culture(1300–1000 BC)
 – Painted Grey Ware culture (1200–600 BC)
 – Northern Black Polished Ware (700–200 BC)
Pradyota dynasty (799–684 BC)
Haryanka dynasty (684–424 BC)
Three Crowned Kingdoms (c. 600 BC – AD 1600)
Maha Janapadas (c. 600–300 BC)
Achaemenid Empire (550–330 BC)
Shaishunaga dynasty (424–345 BC)
Nanda Empire (380–321 BC)
Macedonian Empire (330–323 BC)
Maurya Empire (321–184 BC)
Seleucid India (312–303 BC)
Sangam period (c. 300 BC – c. 300 AD)
Pandya Empire (c. 300 BC – AD 1345)
Chera Kingdom (c. 300 BC – AD 1102)
Chola Empire (c. 300 BC – AD 1279)
Pallava Empire (c. 250 AD – AD 800)
Maha-Megha-Vahana Empire (c. 250 BC – c. AD 500)
Parthian Empire (247 BC – AD 224)
Middle Kingdoms (230 BC – AD 1206)
Satavahana Empire (230 BC – AD 220)
Kuninda Kingdom (200 BC – AD 300)
Mitra Dynasty (c. 150 – c. 50 BC)
Shunga Empire (185–73 BC)
Indo-Greek Kingdom (180 BC – AD 10)
Kanva Empire (75–26 BC)
Indo-Scythian Kingdom (50 BC – AD 400)
Indo-Parthian Kingdom (AD 21 – c. 130)
Western Satrap Empire (AD 35–405 )
Kushan Empire (AD 60–240)
Bharshiva Dynasty (170–350)
Nagas of Padmavati (210–340)
Sasanian Empire (224–651)
Indo-Sassanid Kingdom (230–360)
Vakataka Empire (c. 250 – c. 500)
Kalabhras Empire (c. 250 – c. 600)
Gupta Empire (280–550)
Kadamba Empire (345–525)
Western Ganga Kingdom (350–1000)
Kamarupa Kingdom (350–1100)
Vishnukundina Empire (420–624)
Maitraka Empire (475–767)
Huna Kingdom (475–576)
Rai Kingdom (489–632)
Kabul Shahi Empire (c. 500 – 1026)
Chalukya Empire (543–753)
Maukhari Empire (c. 550 – c. 700)
Harsha Empire (606–647)
Tibetan Empire (618–841)
Eastern Chalukya Kingdom (624–1075)
Rashidun Caliphate (632–661)
Gurjara-Pratihara Empire (650–1036)
Umayyad Caliphate (661–750)
Mallabhum kingdom (694–1947)
Bhauma-Kara Kingdom (736–916)
Pala Empire (750–1174)
Rashtrakuta Empire (753–982)
Paramara Kingdom (800–1327)
Yadava Empire (850–1334)
Somavamshi Kingdom (882–1110)
Chaulukya Kingdom (942–1244)
Western Chalukya Empire (973–1189)
Lohara Kingdom (1003–1320)
Hoysala Empire (1040–1347)
Sena Empire (1070–1230)
Eastern Ganga Empire (1078–1434)
Kakatiya Kingdom (1083–1323)
Zamorin Kingdom (1102–1766)
Kalachuris of Tripuri (675–1210)
Kalachuris of Kalyani (1156–1184)
Chutiya Kingdom (1187–1673)
Deva Kingdom (c. 1200 – c. 1300)
Late medieval period (1206–1526)
Ghaznavid Dynasty (977–1186)
Ghurid Dynasty (1170–1206)
Delhi Sultanate (1206–1526)
 – Mamluk Sultanate (1206–1290)
 – Khalji Sultanate (1290–1320)
 – Tughlaq Sultanate (1320–1414)
 – Sayyid Sultanate (1414–1451)
 – Lodi Sultanate (1451–1526)
Ahom Kingdom (1228–1826)
Chitradurga Kingdom (1300–1779)
Reddy Kingdom (1325–1448)
Vijayanagara Empire (1336–1646)
Bengal Sultanate (1352–1576)
Garhwal Kingdom (1358–1803)
Mysore Kingdom (1399–1947)
Gajapati Empire (1434–1541)
Ladakh Kingdom (1470–1842)
Deccan sultanates (1490–1596)
 – Ahmadnagar Sultanate (1490–1636)
 – Berar sultanate (1490–1574)
 – Bidar Sultanate (1492–1619)
 – Bijapur Sultanate (1492–1686)
 – Golkonda Sultanate (1518–1687)
Keladi Kingdom (1499–1763)
Koch Kingdom (1515–1947)
Early modern period (1526–1858)
Mughal Empire (1526–1858)
Sur Empire (1540–1556)
Madurai Kingdom (1529–1736)
Thanjavur Kingdom (1532–1673)
Bhoi dynasty (1541–1804)
Bengal Subah (1576–1757)
Marava Kingdom (1600–1750)
Sikkim Kingdom (1642–1975)
Thondaiman Kingdom (1650–1948)
Maratha Empire (1674–1818)
Sikh Confederacy (1707–1799)
Travancore Kingdom (1729–1947)
Sikh Empire (1799–1849)
Colonial states (1510–1961)
Portuguese India (1510–1961)
Dutch India (1605–1825)
Danish India (1620–1869)
French India (1759–1954)
Company Raj (1757–1858)
British Raj (1858–1947)
National histories
Regional histories
Specialised histories

List of Shunga emperors

[edit]
Emperor Reign
Pushyamitra 185–149 BCE
Agnimitra 149–141 BCE
Vasujyeshtha 141–131 BCE
Vasumitra 131–124 BCE
Bhadraka 124–122 BCE
Pulindaka 122–119 BCE
Ghosha or Vajramitra 119–114 BCE
Bhagabhadra 114–83 BCE
Devabhuti 83–73 BCE

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Shunga Empire

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Shunga Empire (c. 185–73 BCE) was an ancient Indian dynasty of Brahmin origin that succeeded the Maurya Empire, controlling territories in northern, central, and eastern India with its capital initially at Pataliputra and later Vidisha. Founded by Pushyamitra Shunga, commander-in-chief of the Mauryan forces, who assassinated the last Mauryan ruler Brihadratha during a military parade, the dynasty emphasized the revival of Vedic rituals, including two Ashvamedha horse sacrifices performed by Pushyamitra to assert imperial authority. Under Shunga patronage, significant advancements occurred in and , particularly in Buddhist monuments; the Great Stupa at Sanchi was enlarged with a stone casing, added balconies, railings, and ornate gateways depicting jataka tales and Buddhist symbols, while similar embellishments graced sites like and Bhaja. Military efforts included repelling incursions by Indo-Greek (Yavana) forces, as referenced in the Malavikagnimitra and inscriptions, maintaining control over core Mauryan provinces amid regional fragmentation. Although later Buddhist texts like the Divyavadana allege persecution by Pushyamitra, such claims lack contemporary corroboration and contradict archaeological evidence of Shunga-era Buddhist sponsorship, suggesting instead a policy favoring Brahmanical traditions without wholesale suppression. The empire declined through internal strife and was overthrown by the Kanva dynasty around 73 BCE after roughly 112 years of rule.

Etymology

Name Origins and Historical Designations

The name "Shunga" derives from the gotra or clan affiliation of its founder, Pushyamitra Shunga, a Brahmin general who established the dynasty after assassinating the last Mauryan emperor, Brihadratha, around 185 BCE. Puranic literature, such as the Vishnu Purana and other texts like the Gargi Samhita, explicitly designates the lineage as the Shunga (Śuṅga) dynasty, enumerating ten rulers from Pushyamitra to Devabhuti over approximately 112 years. These sources portray the Shungas as a Magadhan ruling house succeeding the Mauryas, with the clan name appearing in Vedic references to Shunga teachers predating the dynasty, suggesting an established Brahminical family tradition rather than a novel invention. In contemporary , Shunga rulers are not collectively labeled as a "dynasty" or ""—terms anachronistic to the period—but identified via personal names, epithets like Mahārājādhirāja (great king of kings), and familial ties in inscriptions from sites such as , Sanchi, and . For instance, the inscription of Dhanabhuti, a provincial under a king circa 115–100 BCE, records his donations without dynastic , relying instead on royal oversight implied by and cross-referenced with Puranic king lists. This scarcity of explicit designations in stone reflects the era's focus on individual patronage and legitimacy through Vedic rituals, with dynastic continuity inferred from literary genealogies that align with numismatic and archaeological evidence of control over and adjacent regions until circa 73 BCE. The modern English term "Shunga Empire" is a retrospective construct emphasizing territorial extent from westward to and , but ancient designations emphasized the Shungas' Brahmanical restoration of orthodox against perceived Mauryan decline, as noted in texts like the , without imperial pretensions comparable to the Mauryas. Puranic accounts, while valuable for chronology, exhibit inconsistencies in king names and regnal lengths, necessitating corroboration with inscriptions to establish reliable historical sequence.

Foundation and Early History

Mauryan Decline and Succession

The Mauryan Empire began to weaken following the death of in 232 BCE, as his successors proved unable to maintain the centralized control and administrative efficiency established under earlier rulers. Subsequent emperors, including (r. 232–224 BCE), a grandson of who ruled from but focused on limited territorial patronage evident in rock edicts, and (r. 224–215 BCE), who promoted but oversaw further fragmentation, lacked the military and fiscal prowess to sustain the empire's vast extent. Financial strain arose from the costs of maintaining a large , extensive bureaucracy, and welfare policies initiated under , compounded by reduced agricultural revenues and trade disruptions in peripheral regions. Provincial governors increasingly asserted independence, with northwestern territories succumbing to Indo-Greek incursions under rulers like I around 180 BCE, while southern satrapies detached under emerging local powers such as the Satavahanas. Later Mauryan kings—, Devavarman, , and finally (r. circa 187–185 BCE)—presided over a shrunken core domain centered on , marked by internal instability and diminished royal authority, as recorded in Puranic genealogies and Buddhist chronicles. Economic policies emphasizing state control over resources, without adaptive reforms, exacerbated vulnerabilities to famines and rebellions, eroding the empire's cohesion without a unifying figure like . The dynasty's end came in 185 BCE when Brihadratha, the last Mauryan emperor, was assassinated by his senapati (commander-in-chief) Pushyamitra Shunga during a military parade in Pataliputra, an event detailed in the Buddhist text Divyavadana and corroborated by Puranic accounts. Pushyamitra, a Brahmin general possibly motivated by perceptions of Mauryan favoritism toward heterodox sects like Buddhism, exploited the review to strike down Brihadratha publicly, thereby seizing the throne and establishing the Shunga dynasty without immediate widespread resistance, reflecting the empire's prior enfeeblement. This coup transitioned power from the Mauryan line, which had ruled for 137 years since Chandragupta's founding in 322 BCE, to a new Brahmanical-oriented regime amid the empire's territorial contraction.

Pushyamitra Shunga's Ascension

, a general serving as (commander-in-chief) of the Mauryan army under Emperor , capitalized on the empire's weakening central authority in the decades following Ashoka's death in 232 BCE. Brihadratha's ineffective rule, amid provincial fragmentation and administrative decay, created opportunities for ambitious military leaders like Pushyamitra, whose loyalty shifted amid perceived Mauryan vulnerabilities. The pivotal event occurred circa 185 BCE during a review in , where inspected his troops. According to the Harsha-charita, a 7th-century biography by Banabhatta, Pushyamitra exploited the parade by advancing with concealed intent, striking down the before the assembled forces and securing their allegiance through swift consolidation of power. This account, echoed in like the , portrays the assassination as a calculated usurpation rather than open rebellion, though later sources introduce interpretive biases reflecting sectarian tensions. No contemporary inscriptions corroborate the details, highlighting reliance on retrospective narratives prone to embellishment. Following the , Pushyamitra proclaimed himself emperor, founding the Shunga dynasty and retaining as capital while inheriting much of the Mauryan territorial framework in the . To affirm legitimacy, he conducted the sacrifice, a Vedic ritual symbolizing unchallenged , as referenced in Puranic genealogies and dramatic works like Kalidasa's Malavikagnimitra, underscoring his emphasis on Brahmanical orthodoxy. This transition marked a shift from Mauryan imperial universalism toward decentralized, ritual-reinforced rule, with Pushyamitra's military prowess enabling initial stability against emerging threats.

Rulers and Administration

Chronology of Shunga Emperors

The chronology of Shunga emperors is derived mainly from later Puranic texts, which enumerate ten rulers over a collective span of 112 years, from circa 185 BCE to 73 BCE, though contemporary inscriptions and archaeological evidence confirm few details beyond the founder and select successors. Epigraphic records, such as those from and , attest to viceroys or subordinates like and Dhanabhuti, but the precise succession order and individual reign lengths remain reconstructed approximations, with potential overlaps due to regional satrapies and internal fragmentation. The dynasty's end came when minister assassinated the last emperor, , installing the short-lived . Puranic accounts attribute 36 years to (r. c. 185–149 BCE), the dynasty's founder and a former Mauryan general who usurped power by assassinating Emperor during a military parade; he is credited with two sacrifices to assert imperial authority and repel Indo-Greek incursions. His son (r. c. 149–141 BCE) succeeded him, governing amid ongoing threats from western kingdoms, as dramatized in Kalidasa's Malavikagnimitram, though the play's historicity is debated. Vasujyeshtha (r. c. 141–131 BCE) followed, with limited records suggesting administrative continuity in the core region. Vasumitra (r. c. 131–124 BCE), possibly a grandson of Pushyamitra, is referenced in Patanjali's (c. 150 BCE) for conducting a amid Indo-Greek hostilities near the , indicating active military engagement to secure northwestern frontiers. Later rulers—Andhraka (r. c. 124–122 BCE), Pulinda (r. c. 122–119 BCE), (r. c. 119–116 BCE), and Vajramitra (r. c. 116–109 BCE)—are shadowy figures known primarily from Puranic genealogy, with inscriptions linking some to provincial governance or donations, such as at stupa. (r. c. 109–83 BCE) appears in a inscription at Besnagar (c. 113 BCE), where a Yavana attests to his sovereignty, highlighting diplomatic ties with Indo-Greek realms. (r. c. 83–73 BCE), the final emperor, faced ministerial intrigue, culminating in his overthrow by , as per Puranic tradition; his reign saw cultural patronage but territorial erosion.
EmperorApproximate Reign (BCE)Key Attestations and Events
Pushyamitra185–149Assassinated ; two Ashvamedhas; wars with Indo-Greeks.
149–141Son of Pushyamitra; featured in play.
Vasujyeshtha141–131Administrative role; limited epigraphic evidence.
131–124 per Mahabhashya; northwestern campaigns.
Andhraka124–122Puranic mention; possible regional .
Pulinda122–119Brief rule; scant records.
119–116Dynastic continuity; no major inscriptions.
Vajramitra116–109Possible patronage links to Buddhist sites.
109–83Besnagar pillar with Yavanas.
83–73Overthrown by minister; end of dynasty.

Governance and Territorial Extent

The Shunga Empire operated under a hereditary monarchical system, with kings exercising centralized authority from the capital at Pataliputra in Magadha. Pushyamitra Shunga, who founded the dynasty circa 185 BCE after usurping the Mauryan throne, ruled for approximately 36 years and legitimated his rule through Vedic rituals, including two Ashvamedha sacrifices. Administrative practices retained Mauryan elements, such as the use of amatyas (ministers) for counsel and kumara (princes) for provincial governance, but shifted toward greater decentralization amid regional challenges. Local rulers and governors, often semi-autonomous, managed districts, as evidenced by inscriptions acknowledging Shunga overlordship while asserting regional control. The empire's territorial extent initially covered much of the former Mauryan core, spanning the Gangetic plain from in the east to and in the west, and northward to areas like . At its peak under early rulers like Pushyamitra, control extended over , , and , though effective dominion was contested in the northwest by Indo-Greek incursions starting around the 180s BCE, leading to losses beyond the . Southern boundaries reached into parts of the Deccan but did not encompass the full Mauryan reach, with independent kingdoms emerging in and Kalinga. Epigraphic evidence, such as the Dhanabhuti inscription at , confirms Shunga influence in during the mid-2nd century BCE. By the dynasty's later phases, fragmentation reduced the realm primarily to and adjacent territories until its fall circa 73 BCE.

Military History

Campaigns Against Indo-Greeks

, founder of the Shunga Empire circa 185 BCE, launched defensive campaigns against Indo-Greek expansions into northern , prompted by the power vacuum after the Mauryan decline. Indo-Greek rulers, including Demetrius I (c. 200–180 BCE), advanced from through and , capturing territories up to Saketa () and the region, as detailed in the Yuga Purana section of the Gargi Samhita. This text describes Yavana forces besieging (Pushpapura), the Shunga capital, but retreating amid a Greco-Bactrian , limiting their hold to northwestern fringes rather than enabling permanent of the Gangetic core. Patanjali's (c. 150 BCE) corroborates these hostilities, noting Shunga military preparations against Yavana incursions and Pushyamitra's role in repelling them, including references to battles near the Sindhu River. To assert sovereignty, Pushyamitra conducted two sacrifices (c. 180–170 BCE), ritual expeditions requiring armed protection of a sacrificial horse across frontiers; during one, Shunga princes and reportedly defeated Indo-Greek squadrons attempting to seize the horse, as dramatized in Kalidasa's Malavikagnimitram. These operations, involving and , checked Indo-Greek probes eastward, preserving Shunga dominance in and , though no archaeological battle sites confirm specifics, with evidence limited to textual accounts and the absence of Indo-Greek coin hoards beyond . The campaigns yielded no total expulsion of Indo-Greeks, who maintained control in and until later pressures, but they stabilized Shunga borders and facilitated Vedic revival through demonstrated martial success. Subsequent Shunga rulers faced reduced threats, transitioning to diplomatic exchanges by c. 113 BCE, as implied by Indo-Greek ambassadorial activity.

Internal and Regional Conflicts

The Shunga Empire encountered significant regional conflicts with neighboring Indian powers that had detached from Mauryan . Shortly after Pushyamitra Shunga's ascension in 185 BCE, his son , appointed viceroy of , waged war against the kingdom of , which had declared independence under King Yajnasena. besieged Vidarbha's capital, capturing Princess Malavika and defeating the Vidarbhan forces, thereby reasserting Shunga influence over the region, as recounted in Kalidasa's Malavikāgnimitram based on earlier historical accounts. This campaign exemplified the dynasty's efforts to stabilize its western frontiers amid post-Mauryan fragmentation. Further south, the Shungas clashed with the emergent , which expanded from the into territories contested by Shunga control, including parts of . These protracted engagements, spanning much of the 2nd century BCE, involved territorial disputes and weakened Shunga hold on peripheral regions, contributing to the dynasty's gradual contraction. In the east, conflicts arose with the independent Kalinga kingdom, which resisted reintegration and maintained autonomy following its traumatic conquest under two centuries prior, forcing Shunga rulers to divert resources to border defenses rather than consolidation. Internally, the Shungas grappled with provincial rebellions and succession disputes that eroded central authority. Pushyamitra maintained a large of approximately 600,000 , 30,000 , and 9,000 —echoing Mauryan scales—to suppress uprisings in restive areas like and Kalinga provinces. Later rulers faced intensified factionalism; by the reign of (circa 83–73 BCE), court intrigues culminated in his assassination by minister , who usurped the throne and founded the , signaling the empire's internal collapse after roughly a century of rule. These dynamics highlight how regional autonomy and dynastic infighting, rather than solely external pressures, precipitated the Shungas' decline.

Epigraphic and Archaeological Military Evidence

Epigraphic records from the Shunga period offer limited direct references to military campaigns, primarily consisting of donative inscriptions that imply territorial control maintained through armed force. The Ayodhya inscription of Dhanadeva, dated to the late 2nd or early 1st century BCE, attributes to Pushyamitra Shunga the performance of two Ashvamedha sacrifices, Vedic rituals symbolizing imperial sovereignty and victorious expansion, which required military enforcement of unchallenged authority over vast regions. This inscription also confirms Shunga administrative reach into northern India, as far as Ayodhya, suggesting sustained military presence to secure peripheral territories against rivals like the Indo-Greeks. However, no Shunga-era inscriptions explicitly detail specific battles or troop deployments, with most epigraphs focusing on religious donations rather than martial exploits. Archaeological findings provide tangible evidence of Shunga military infrastructure and iconography. Excavations at Katragarh in , , uncovered fortifications dating to the Shunga period, including ramparts constructed from burnt bricks, indicative of defensive strategies against internal rebellions and external incursions. Sculptural reliefs at stupa, commissioned under Shunga patronage around 100 BCE, depict horsemen and elephant-borne warriors, highlighting the empire's reliance on units and war elephants—key components of ancient Indian armies for and sieges. Similar motifs appear in Sanchi remains, where Shunga-era additions to stupas include balustrades possibly symbolizing protective military railings, though primarily architectural. These artifacts underscore a professionalized force capable of projecting power, yet the absence of widespread caches or sites points to a military oriented more toward consolidation than aggressive conquest, corroborated by the era's fragmented political landscape.

Religious Developments

Revival of Vedic Brahmanism

The Shunga Empire's establishment under (r. c. 185–149 BCE) facilitated a deliberate resurgence of Vedic Brahmanical traditions, reversing the Mauryan dynasty's prior favoritism toward and non-Vedic cults. As a general who usurped the Mauryan throne, Pushyamitra prioritized orthodox rituals to legitimize his rule and restore Vedic primacy in state ceremonies. Central to this revival was the performance of the , an elaborate affirming imperial dominion, which Pushyamitra conducted twice—once around 178 BCE and again circa 158 BCE. This rite, dormant since the and condemned in , was explicitly revived by him, as corroborated by the 1st-century BCE Ayodhya inscription of Dhanadeva, a Shunga descendant, which praises Pushyamitra for executing the sacrifices and thereby rekindling ancient Brahmanical prestige. Puranic accounts further align with this, listing Pushyamitra's Ashvamedhas as key acts in reestablishing Vedic sovereignty post-Mauryan decline. Patanjali's (c. 150 BCE), composed during Pushyamitra's era, provides contemporaneous literary evidence of active Vedic patronage, including the phrase "iha Puṣyamitra yajayāmaḥ" ("here we perform sacrifices for Pushyamitra"), reflecting priestly involvement in state rituals for the ruler. Such endorsements underscore support for scholars and Vedic , fostering a cultural shift where Brahmanism regained institutional prominence in governance and . Subsequent Shunga rulers sustained this trajectory, sponsoring yajnas and Vedic learning, which bolstered orthodox Hinduism's endurance against heterodox challenges. Archaeological and epigraphic records from Shunga sites indicate expanded ritual infrastructure, though textual sources emphasize the ideological pivot toward causal efficacy of Vedic rites in maintaining cosmic and political order. This revival laid groundwork for later classical Hindu syntheses, prioritizing empirical ritual continuity over Mauryan-era innovations.

Buddhist Patronage and Contributions

The Shunga Empire (c. 185–73 BCE) facilitated notable advancements in Buddhist monumental , primarily through the addition of stone facings and decorative elements to pre-existing Mauryan-era brick stupas. Archaeological evidence from sites such as Sanchi and demonstrates that during the Shunga period, these structures were enlarged and encased in durable stone, marking a transition from perishable materials to permanent masonry that preserved and elevated Buddhist sacred spaces. At the Great Stupa (Stupa No. 1) in Sanchi, Shunga-era modifications included encasing the original hemispherical dome with stone slabs, nearly doubling its size, and constructing a flattened summit along with a circumambulatory vedika railing to enclose the processional path. These enhancements, executed in the 2nd century BCE, not only protected the relic mound but also introduced ornate balustrades and staircases, reflecting technical proficiency in attributable to Shunga oversight. Inscriptions on the vedika and related elements, though sparse, align with the dynasty's temporal span, underscoring patronage by regional administrators or affiliates under imperial authority. The Bharhut Stupa exemplifies Shunga contributions through its extensive railing (vedika) and gateways adorned with narrative reliefs depicting and Buddhist motifs, carved in the 2nd–1st centuries BCE. Prominent donor inscriptions credit Vatsiputra Dhanabhuti, identified as a Shunga or local potentate, with funding the eastern , evidencing direct involvement of empire-aligned figures in Buddhist endowments. These sculptures represent some of the earliest surviving examples of figural , transitioning from symbolic to illustrative representations of the Buddha's life and teachings. Such initiatives, alongside similar works at , indicate that while the Shungas promoted Vedic rituals, they tolerated and materially supported Buddhist institutions, countering textual claims of antagonism with tangible epigraphic and structural proof of coexistence and investment.

Evaluation of Persecution Allegations

Allegations of Buddhist persecution by the dynasty, particularly under founder (r. c. 185–149 BCE), originate primarily from later Buddhist texts such as the and , which date to several centuries after the events and portray him as offering rewards for the heads of monks and destroying thousands of stupas and monasteries. These accounts, composed in a hagiographic favoring Buddhist narratives, lack contemporary corroboration and reflect sectarian biases rather than verifiable , as noted in scholarly analyses questioning their reliability due to chronological distance and propagandistic intent. Archaeological evidence contradicts widespread persecution claims, revealing instead Shunga-era expansions and donations to major Buddhist sites. At Sanchi, the Great Stupa's vedika (railing) and gateways were constructed or embellished during Shunga rule, with inscriptions attributing contributions to Shunga officials and local guilds, indicating active rather than suppression. Similarly, the features donations from Dhanabhuti, a Shunga viceroy, inscribed around 100 BCE, underscoring continuity in Buddhist institutional support. No layers of destruction or mass abandonment specific to Shunga violence appear in these sites; reported debris in some contexts likely stems from natural decay, invasions, or later events, not systematic anti-Buddhist campaigns. While Pushyamitra's revival of Vedic rituals, including two Ashvamedha sacrifices documented in Puranic texts, prioritized Brahmanical traditions—possibly reducing state favoritism toward inherited from the Mauryas—tolerance for pluralistic practice prevailed, as adapted through merchant and lay sponsorship. Limited conflicts may have targeted politically aligned monks supporting Indo-Greek incursions, but these do not equate to empire-wide eradication, a view unsupported by epigraphic or numismatic records showing Buddhist prosperity into the period. Modern , drawing on such material evidence, dismisses the persecution narrative as exaggerated mythology, emphasizing instead a competitive religious landscape without wholesale violence.

Cultural and Artistic Legacy

Architectural Advancements

The Shunga dynasty (c. 185–73 BCE) advanced through the extensive renovation of earlier Mauryan-era stupas, transitioning from brick and wood constructions to more durable stone encasements and embellishments. At the Great Stupa at Sanchi, Shunga patrons nearly doubled the structure's diameter to approximately 120 feet (36.6 meters) by applying a stone casing over the original brick dome, added a circumferential stone railing (vedika), and constructed a (prasara) around the summit topped with an umbrella (chhatra) on the harmika. These modifications enhanced structural integrity and aesthetic elaboration, incorporating symbolic elements like the vedika to demarcate sacred processional paths (pradakshina). Innovations in railing and gateway (torana) construction marked a key development, with Shungas pioneering the use of carved panels featuring narrative reliefs of , yaksha figures, and Buddhist motifs. At Bharhut Stupa, Shunga-affiliated donor Dhanabhuti, identified in inscriptions as a regional or , sponsored the erection of ornate s and railings in the 2nd–1st century BCE, providing some of the earliest preserved examples of stone gateways in Indian architecture. These s, often arched and adorned with makaras (mythical aquatic creatures) and vegetal motifs, served both functional enclosure and didactic purposes, visually narrating without anthropomorphic depictions of . Shunga stonework emphasized precision in masonry, with tightly fitted blocks and shallow techniques that influenced subsequent schools like those at and . Such patronage, evident across sites like Bhaja's halls, reflected a blend of Vedic revival under rulers like and continued Buddhist support, fostering a vernacular style of aniconic art that prioritized symbolic and narrative depth over monumental scale alone.

Sculpture, Iconography, and Art Styles

Shunga sculpture primarily manifested in stone reliefs adorning Buddhist stupas, transitioning from the polished monumental style of the Mauryan era to more ornate, narrative-driven carvings executed in low relief on railings (vedikas) and pillars. At sites like and Sanchi, artisans employed buff-colored sandstone to depict scenes from , the life of , and symbolic motifs, with the vedika measuring approximately 3 meters in height and 20 meters in circumference, featuring carvings on columns, crossbars, and coping stones. These works exhibit a linear composition with continuous , often using overlapping figures to denote spatial planes, and a somewhat naive aesthetic that prioritized over anatomical precision. Iconography in Shunga art adhered to an aniconic tradition for , representing him through symbols such as empty thrones, wheels, footprints, Bodhi trees, and riderless horses rather than human forms, reflecting early Buddhist doctrinal emphasis on the teacher's teachings over personal depiction. beings like and yakshis—nature spirits associated with and protection—appeared prominently, as seen in the Patravahaka Yaksha sandstone figure from (ca. 50 BCE) and railing carvings at Sanchi, alongside floral lotuses, makaras (mythical aquatic creatures), and realistic animals treated with lively detail. These elements blended indigenous folk traditions with Buddhist themes, evidencing Shunga patronage of religious architecture despite the dynasty's Brahmanical leanings. Terracotta figurines complemented stone , offering portable expressions of daily , deities, and possibly household , with molded pieces like a 1st-century BCE goddess figure (likely Sri Lakshmi) from showcasing rounded forms and decorative jewelry. This medium allowed for via molds, featuring plump female forms, children, and animals, which captured a more vernacular art style less constrained by monumental scale. Overall, Shunga art styles emphasized decorative elaboration and symbolic depth, laying groundwork for later Indian sculptural traditions through regional workshops, particularly in and , where craftsmen innovated in relief techniques and thematic integration.

Script Evolution and Literary Patronage

The , inherited from the Mauryan era, underwent incremental refinements during the Shunga period (c. 185–73 BCE), as evidenced by inscriptions at Buddhist sites such as Sanchi and , where letter forms show a transition toward more angular and standardized shapes compared to earlier Ashokan edicts. These developments, including fuller vowel notations and consonant adaptations, positioned the Shunga variant as a foundational prototype for subsequent northern Indian Brahmi derivatives, facilitating greater precision in rendering and emerging texts. Most Shunga-era epigraphs, such as those on railings and gateways at Sanchi, were composed in using this evolving Brahmi, though the script's adaptability supported the inscription of phrases in select cases, marking a linguistic shift from the predominantly Prakrit-focused Mauryan inscriptions. Shunga rulers actively patronized Sanskrit literary traditions, aligning with their promotion of Brahmanical orthodoxy amid a revival of Vedic practices. The dynasty's support for grammatical scholarship is exemplified by Patanjali's , a comprehensive commentary on Pāṇini's , composed around 150 BCE during the reign of (r. c. 185–151 BCE). Patanjali, identified in sources as a contemporary and possibly the royal priest who performed Vedic sacrifices for Pushyamitra, references the king and Shunga military campaigns in his text, underscoring direct patronage ties that preserved and systematized classical grammar. This era's emphasis on linguistic rigor contributed to the consolidation of Sanskrit as a vehicle for philosophical and ritual texts, countering Prakrit's dominance in administrative and Buddhist contexts, though primary literary output remained focused on commentaries rather than new poetic compositions.

Economy and Society

Trade Networks and Currency

The Shunga Empire (c. 185–73 BCE) sustained internal networks inherited from the Mauryan Empire, primarily along the route linking the Valley to northwestern regions and the extending southward, facilitating the exchange of agricultural surplus, metals, and crafts between and peripheral kingdoms. These overland paths supported commerce in commodities like iron, textiles, and horses, with evidence from contemporary inscriptions referencing Yavana (Indo-Greek) interactions that likely involved border despite military conflicts. Eastern maritime access via ports such as Tamralipti in , under intermittent Shunga influence, enabled limited overseas exchange with , though the dynasty's core territory focused more on riverine than expansive sea routes controlled by rivals in the west. The Shunga economy relied on a monetized system of karshapana coins, cast primarily in copper with occasional silver variants, marking a transitional phase from Mauryan punch-marked silver to more symbolic, die-struck designs. Denominations included the quarter karshapana (c. 2–3 grams, featuring motifs like an elephant facing a standard), half karshapana, and full karshapana (c. 10–14 grams), often depicting animals, trees, chaityas, or geometric symbols without royal portraits or names, emphasizing standardization for local circulation over imperial propaganda. These coins, produced across mints in Magadha and Vidisha, circulated widely in urban centers and supported taxation, market transactions, and artisanal production, as evidenced by hoards from sites like Bharhut. Gold coinage remained absent, reflecting an economy oriented toward base metals and barter supplements rather than high-value international bullion trade dominant in later eras.

Social Organization and Daily Life

The Shunga social structure adhered to the traditional varna system, comprising s, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Shudras, with the dynasty's Brahmanical origins emphasizing the priestly class's supremacy. , a general who founded the dynasty circa 185 BCE, performed Vedic rituals such as the to legitimize rule and reinforce hierarchical norms, aligning political authority with religious orthodoxy. This revival countered Mauryan-era cosmopolitanism, prioritizing endogamous divisions and ritual purity over fluid observed under earlier Buddhist . In the post-Mauryan context encompassing rule (185–73 BCE), the varna framework began evolving toward more localized jatis or sub-castes, reflecting occupational specialization and regional variations that stratified communities further. dominance manifested in land grants and advisory roles to kings, while military elites, including Shunga rulers, maintained control over governance and warfare. Evidence from inscriptions and texts like the , contemporaneous or near-contemporary, underscores efforts to codify duties () tied to varna, promoting social stability through prescribed roles in , , and service. Daily life under the Shungas centered on agrarian routines in villages, supplemented by urban commerce in centers like and , where terracotta figurines and railings depict commonplace activities such as farming, , and household tasks. Patriarchal family units prevailed, with women primarily engaged in domestic duties and textile production, as inferred from sculptural motifs showing draped attire and scenes from the Mauryan-Shunga transition (circa 320–73 BCE). Religious observances, including Vedic sacrifices for elites and folk worship of yakshas among commoners, intertwined with subsistence economies reliant on monsoon-dependent crops like and , though direct archaeological data on diets remains sparse.

Decline and Aftermath

Factors Leading to Collapse

The Shunga Empire experienced significant territorial fragmentation following the death of , the second ruler after founder (r. c. 185–151 BCE), as provincial governors and local rulers asserted independence, evidenced by contemporary inscriptions and coinage distributions indicating loss of central control over much of northern . This disintegration was exacerbated by a succession of weak kings after the early rulers, who lacked the military prowess and administrative acumen of Pushyamitra, leading to ineffective and inability to suppress regional rebellions or maintain imperial cohesion across diverse territories. External military pressures further eroded Shunga authority, particularly from Indo-Greek incursions in the northwest under rulers like Demetrius I (c. 200–180 BCE) and (c. 155–130 BCE), who expanded into and the Gangetic plains, prompting defensive campaigns that strained resources without fully restoring lost domains. Concurrently, the rise of autonomous powers such as the Satavahanas in the Deccan and declarations of independence in regions like Kalinga undermined Shunga suzerainty in the south and east, fragmenting the empire into semi-independent principalities. The dynasty's collapse culminated in the overthrow of the last king, Devabhuti (r. c. 83–73 BCE), by his Brahman minister Vasudeva Kanva around 73 BCE; historical accounts describe Devabhuti as dissolute and militarily inept, enabling Vasudeva to orchestrate the coup and establish the short-lived Kanva dynasty (73–28 BCE). This internal betrayal, amid ongoing fragmentation, marked the definitive end of Shunga rule, transitioning Magadha to further political instability without a robust revival of centralized authority.

Transition to Successor Dynasties

The last Shunga ruler, , was overthrown around 73 BCE by his minister , marking the immediate transition to the in Magadha. , a , established the Kanva line after exploiting Devabhuti's reported indulgence in pleasures, which weakened central authority. The , primary textual sources for these dynasties, list four Kanva kings: Vasudeva (c. 73–66 BCE), Bhumimitra (c. 66–52 BCE), (c. 52–40 BCE), and Susarman (c. 40–28 BCE), indicating a brief rule of approximately 45 years focused on maintaining Brahmanical traditions in the core Shunga territories. The Kanva regime represented a continuity in Brahmanical governance but lacked the expansive military vigor of the Shungas, leading to territorial contraction amid rising regional challengers. By 28 BCE, the from the Deccan overthrew the last Kanva king, Susarman, effectively ending centralized Magadhan control and fragmenting the former Shunga domains. In the east, the Mahameghavahana (Chedi) dynasty under of Kalinga asserted independence around the mid-1st century BCE, as evidenced by his detailing conquests that encroached on Magadhan influence. This dynastic shift facilitated the proliferation of successor states, with the Satavahanas dominating , Indo-Greek remnants and later Indo-Scythians influencing the northwest, and localized powers like the emerging in by the late 1st century BCE. The transition underscored the causal role of internal usurpation and external pressures in dissolving imperial cohesion, paving the way for a decentralized political landscape until the Kushan consolidation in the 1st century CE.

Historical Significance

Long-Term Impacts on Indian Civilization

The Shunga Empire's emphasis on Brahmanical orthodoxy, exemplified by Pushyamitra Shunga's performance of the sacrifice around 185 BCE, facilitated the resurgence of Vedic rituals and following the Mauryan era's Buddhist dominance, thereby strengthening the institutional framework for classical Hindu traditions that shaped subsequent dynasties like the Guptas. This revival prioritized and temple patronage, influencing the evolution of devotional practices and philosophical schools such as Mimamsa, which emphasized ritual efficacy over Mauryan-era heterodoxies. In , Shunga-era innovations in stone construction, including the addition of vedikas (railings), toranas (gateways), and narrative friezes at sites like (circa 150–100 BCE) and Sanchi, transitioned Indian building from perishable wood to durable masonry, setting standards for structural integrity and symbolic decoration that persisted in and medieval Hindu-Buddhist monuments across South and . These advancements promoted aniconic representation in , where symbolic motifs like the empty throne or Bodhi tree conveyed doctrinal meaning without anthropomorphic deities, a style that endured in early Buddhist despite the dynasty's Brahmanical leanings. Although Buddhist texts like the allege persecution under Pushyamitra, including the destruction of monasteries and bounties on monks' heads, archaeological evidence of Shunga donations to stupas—such as expansions at Sanchi during the 2nd century BCE—contradicts claims of systematic suppression, indicating pragmatic coexistence that allowed to adapt and spread via refined artistic expressions rather than state favoritism. This duality fostered a competitive religious landscape, spurring innovations in both Hindu and Buddhist spheres that contributed to India's pluralistic civilizational resilience against later invasions.

Modern Scholarly Assessments

Modern scholars regard the Shunga Empire (c. 185–73 BCE) as a pivotal transitional dynasty that restored Brahmanical orthodoxy following the Mauryan era's emphasis on heterodox sects like Buddhism and Jainism, while fostering significant advancements in art and architecture despite political instability. The dynasty's founder, Pushyamitra Shunga, is credited with military campaigns that repelled Indo-Greek incursions, maintaining control over core regions of Magadha and parts of northern India, though the empire's extent is debated due to reliance on fragmentary inscriptions rather than comprehensive records. Assessments highlight the Shungas' patronage of Vedic sacrifices and Sanskrit grammar, exemplified by Patanjali's Mahabhashya composed during their reign, as evidence of intellectual revival amid post-Mauryan fragmentation. A central historiographical debate concerns allegations of under Pushyamitra, drawn from later like the and Taranatha's 17th-century accounts, which claim he destroyed monasteries and offered bounties for monks' heads. These narratives, composed centuries after the events by sources antagonistic to Brahmanical rulers, lack corroboration from contemporary inscriptions or archaeological strata showing widespread destruction; instead, evidence points to Shunga-era enhancements at Buddhist sites, such as the vedikas (railings) and toranas (gateways) at and Sanchi stupas, funded by Shunga officials like Dhanabhuti. Scholars including H.C. Raychaudhuri and Etienne Lamotte have dismissed mass persecution as sectarian exaggeration, arguing it reflects Buddhist polemics against a dynasty that prioritized Hindu rituals without eradicating rival faiths, as Buddhism continued to thrive regionally. This view aligns with : Shunga Brahmanism emphasized ritual continuity rather than iconoclastic erasure, contrasting with later Indo-Muslim destructions documented by Persian chronicles. Recent archaeological and epigraphic studies underscore the Shungas' underappreciated role in proto-classical , transitioning from to intricate narrative sculptures that influenced aesthetics. Excavations at sites like reveal Shunga stone masonry techniques, including perforated balustrades and symbolic motifs, which prefigure later temple architecture. Economic assessments portray the dynasty as stabilizing trade networks disrupted by Mauryan overextension, with coinage and inscriptions evidencing continuity in urban centers like . Critiques of earlier Marxist-influenced , which framed Shungas as feudal regressors, have given way to recognition of their adaptive resilience against Hellenistic pressures, though internal succession struggles and regional revolts precipitated decline by the mid-1st century BCE. Overall, contemporary evaluations, informed by interdisciplinary evidence, position the Shungas not as mere but as architects of cultural synthesis that fortified indigenous traditions against external influences.

References

  1. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/shunga-dynasty-ca-2nd-1st-century-b-c
  2. https://factsanddetails.com/india/History/sub7_1a/entry-7122.html
  3. https://selfstudyhistory.com/2015/03/07/sungas-and-kanvas/
  4. https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/shunga
  5. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Shunga-dynasty
  6. https://unacademy.com/content/upsc/study-material/ancient-history/mauryan-empire-origin-sources-and-decline/
  7. https://lotusarise.com/disintegration-of-the-mauryan-empire/
  8. https://www.raijmr.com/ijrhs/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/IJRHS_2023_vol11_issue_02_02.pdf
  9. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-herkimer-worldcivilization/chapter/decline-of-the-maurya-empire/
  10. https://urr.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/download/731/713/1414
  11. https://www.aarf.asia/current/2022/Mar/0v0F41wHEMaEFbQ.pdf
  12. https://www.academia.edu/78026406/The_zenith_of_shunga_empire_in_Indian_subcontinent
  13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44156189
  14. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.%252024%2520Issue4/Series-7/B2404070611.pdf
  15. https://ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in/icp01/chapter/sunga-kanva-and-satavahana-dynasties/
  16. https://byjus.com/free-ias-prep/ncert-notes-post-mauryan-india-sunga-dynasty/
  17. https://testbook.com/ugc-net-history/sunga-dynasty
  18. https://testbook.com/ias-preparation/ncert-notes-post-mauryan-india-sunga-dynasty
  19. https://hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/20817/chronological-orders-of-dynasties-and-kings-after-mahabharata-as-per-puranas
  20. https://www.pw.live/ssc/exams/sunga-dynasty
  21. https://cracktarget.com/2025/06/03/pushyamitra-shunga-the-founder-of-the-shunga-dynasty/
  22. https://iasgoogle.com/editorial_detail/shunga-dynasty
  23. https://historicindia.org/article/shunga-empire
  24. https://www.historydiscussion.net/history-of-india/rule-of-pushyamitra-sunga-after-brihadratha-maurya/2439
  25. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-royal-asiatic-society/article/account-of-the-yavanas-in-the-yugapurana/5D95CF94091BCD6EF5951FBF37F32486
  26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25202591
  27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44137043
  28. https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2022/05/12/pushyamitra-shunga-the-expeller-of-yavanas-and-restorer-of-sanatana-dharma/
  29. https://cgcompetitionpoint.in/shunga-dynasty/
  30. http://indianculture.gov.in/node/2730054
  31. https://www.onlinedarshan.com/Temples-India-artistic-heritage/Birth-of-classic-form.htm
  32. https://ignca.gov.in/Asi_data/15506.pdf
  33. https://oldror.lbp.world/UploadedData/10809.pdf
  34. https://ijyr.dsvv.ac.in/index.php/ijyr/article/view/19/59
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Ayodhya-inscription-written-by-Dhanadeva-the-descendant-of-King-Pushyamitra-Sunga-21_fig5_380353575
  36. https://www.ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2306632.pdf
  37. https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2408228.pdf
  38. https://smarthistory.org/the-stupa-sanchi/
  39. https://smarthistory.org/bharhut-stupa-relief-sculptures/
  40. https://x.com/TrueIndology/status/1645037960126136323
  41. https://universalinstitutions.com/the-sunga-dynasty-contributed-significantly-to-the-cultural-and-social-development-in-ancient-india-discuss/
  42. https://storyvibe.in/pushyamitra-shunga-and-the-alleged-persecution-of/
  43. https://indiafacts.org/ashoka-and-pushyamitra-sunga-a-study-in-mythmaking/
  44. https://www.quora.com/How-true-was-that-Pushyamitra-Shunga-persecuted-Buddhists-on-a-large-scale
  45. https://cec.nic.in/webpath/curriculum/Module/FART/Paper17/1/downloads/script.pdf
  46. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/761707
  47. https://www.encyclopedia.com/international/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/sculpture-mauryan-and-shungan
  48. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/introduction-cultures-religions-apah/buddhism-apah/a/images-of-enlightenment
  49. https://ir.nbu.ac.in/bitstreams/24915749-fc20-4f99-a2da-e47913898de2/download
  50. https://www.raijmr.com/ijrsml/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/IJRSML_2021_vol09_issue_3_Eng_15.pdf
  51. https://www.hindustantimes.com/bhopal/sanchi-inscriptions-served-as-key-to-decipher-brahmi-script/story-EDKWDp30kTVOwmrlIrP1WI.html
  52. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Shunga-script
  53. https://sonawanisanjay.blogspot.com/2013/04/shunga-dynasty-and-sanskrit.html
  54. https://egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/115666/1/Unit-10.pdf
  55. https://www.academia.edu/108963927/Tracing_the_Ancient_Trade_route_from_R%25C4%2581jag%25E1%25B9%259Biha_to_T%25C4%2581mralipt%25C4%25AB_during_the_period_of_3rd_Century_BCE_to_6th_Century_CE
  56. https://www.britannica.com/place/India/The-Shunga-kingdom
  57. https://www.academia.edu/79884553/Exchanges_Trade_and_Monasticism_Tracing_the_Commerce_Network_on_the_ancient_trade_route_from_R%25C4%2581jag%25E1%25B9%259Biha_to_T%25C4%2581mralipt%25C4%25AB_3_rd_Century_BCE_to_6_th_Century_CE
  58. https://en.numista.com/catalogue/shunga_empire-1.html
  59. https://www.bidcurios.com/blog/sunga-dynasty-empire-coinage/
  60. https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstreams/c3b06a04-464e-4ed9-92a9-ed65bf1ce7ff/download
  61. https://www.mintageworld.com/media/detail/6589-sunga-dynasty-copper-coin/
  62. https://www.nextias.com/blog/post-mauryan-age/
  63. https://nios.ac.in/media/documents/SrSec315NEW/315_History_Eng/315_History_Eng_Lesson6.pdf
  64. https://www.byolacademy.com/blog/society-of-post-mauryan-india-200-bc-300-bc
  65. https://indianculture.gov.in/timeless-trends/history-clothing-ancient-india
  66. http://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.29-Issue6/Ser-7/J2906075562.pdf
  67. https://www.bccollegeasansol.ac.in/download.php?id=66
  68. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Vasudeva-Brahman-minister
  69. https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/kanva-dynasty
  70. https://historyunravelled.com/kingdoms/kanva-dynasty--seventh-ruling-dynasty-of-magadha
  71. https://www.ibiblio.org/britishraj/Jackson2/chapter08.html
  72. https://cdn.visionias.in/value_added_material/69a36-post-mauryan-period--rise-of-regional-dynasties.pdf
  73. https://www.swapnilsias.co.in/en/shunga-dynasty-a-major-hindu-dynasty-after-mauryas
  74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45476123
  75. https://smarthistory.org/period-culture-style/shunga-empire/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.