Hubbry Logo
An-NisaAn-NisaMain
Open search
An-Nisa
Community hub
An-Nisa
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
An-Nisa
An-Nisa
An-Nisa
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Surah 4 of the Quran
ٱلنِّسَاء‎
An-Nisāʾ
The Women
ClassificationMedinan
PositionJuzʼ 4–6
Hizb no.8, 9, 10 and 11
No. of verses176
No. of Rukus24
No. of words3745
No. of letters16085
Quran
History
Manuscripts
Divisions
Content
Reading
Translations
Exegesis
Characteristics
Related

An-Nisa' (Arabic: ٱلنِّسَاء, An-Nisāʾ; meaning: The Women)[1][2] is the fourth chapter (sūrah) of the Quran, with 176 verses (āyāt). The title derives from the numerous references to women throughout the chapter, including verse 34 and verses 4:127-130.[3]

Regarding the timing and contextual background of the revelation, it is a Medinan chapter, which means it is believed to have been revealed in Medina rather than Mecca.[4]

Summary

[edit]
Surah an-Nisā, is a chapter of the Quran regarding women.
  • 1 Man and his Creator
  • 2 Orphans, the duty of guardians to such
  • 3–6 Treat your wives and those your right hands possess fairly
  • 7–13 The law of inheritance
  • 14–15 The punishment of adulteresses
  • 16–18 Repentance enjoined
  • 19 Women's rights
  • 20–27 Forbidden and lawful degrees in marriage
  • 28–30 Gambling, rapine, and suicide forbidden
  • 31–33 Men and women will be rewarded according to their deeds
  • 34 Reconcilement of man and wife
  • 35–36 Parents, orphans, the poor etc. to be kindly treated
  • 37–41 Hypocrisy in almsgiving condemned
  • 42-43 Prayer forbidden to the drunken and polluted
  • 44–45 Jewish mockers denounced
  • 46–53 Idolatry the unpardonable sin
  • 54–55 The rewards of faith and unbelief
  • 56 Trusts to be faithfully paid back
  • 57–68 Disputes to be settled by God and his Apostle
  • 69–74 Precautions etc., in warring for the faith
  • 75–84 The disobedient and cowardly reproved
  • 85 Salutations to be returned
  • 86–90 Treatment of hypocrites and apostates
  • 91–93 Believers not to be slain or plundered
  • 94–99 Believers in heathen countries to fly to Muslim lands
  • 100–102 Special order for prayer in time of war
  • 103 Exhortation to zeal for Islam
  • 104–114 Fraud denounced
  • 115–125 Idolatry and Islam compared
  • 126 Equity in dealing with women and orphans enjoined
  • 127–129 Men are protectors of women
  • 130–132 God to be feared
  • 133 Fraud denounced
  • 134–138 Muslims exhorted to steadfastness
  • 139–143 Hypocrites to be shunned
  • 144–151 The reward of hypocrisy and belief compared
  • 152–154 Presumptuous and disobedient Jews destroyed
  • 155–158 The Jews defame Mary and Jesus
  • 159–160 Certain kinds of food forbidden to Jews as punishment
  • 161–168 Muhammad’s inspiration like that of other prophets
  • 169–174 Christians reproved for their faith in Jesus as the Son of God and in the doctrine of the Trinity
  • 175–176 The law of inheritance for distant relatives [5]

This Medinan surah aims at protecting the newly formed Muslim community by outlining acceptable behavior for Muslims.[6] It illustrates the Quran's role as an authoritative legal source[7] and its ability to shape the community. The surah aims to eradicate the earlier practices of pagan, Arab communities that are no longer considered moral in the Muslim society.[6] For example, the section of this surah about dealing fairly with orphan girls (4:2-4) addresses the pre-Islamic Arabic practice of marrying orphan girls to take their property.[8]

Shirk (refer 4:48 and 4:116)[9] is held to be the worst form of disbelief, and it is identified in the Quran as the only sin that God will not pardon.[10]

Thematically, "an-Nisā" not only addresses concerns about women, but also discusses inheritance, marriage laws, how to deal with children and orphans, legal practices, jihād, relations between Muslim communities and People of the Book, war, and the role of Jesus as a prophet, rather than the son of God as Christians claimed.[6] Furthermore, in discussing war, this surah encourages the Muslim community to fight for the vulnerable in war,[8] as demonstrated by 4:75: "Why should you not fight in God's cause and for those oppressed men, women, and children who cry out, ‘Lord, rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors! By Your grace, give us a protector and give us a helper!’?"[11] The surah addresses a multitude of issues faced by the early Muslim community and responds to the challenges the community faced. The wide variety of issues addressed in the surah and the length of the surah make it difficult to divide into literary structures. However, based on a study of themes present in each section of the Surah, Amīn Ahsan Islāhī divides the surah into three thematically-based sections: social reform, the Islamic community and its opponents, and a conclusion.[12] Mathias Zahniser presents an alternative means of looking at the structure of this surah. He claims that the central theme of this surah is the address to the Christians. He has come to this conclusion based on examination of the structure of the surah based on such devices as parallels, repetition, and ring composition.[13] However, Carl Ernst admits that more works needs to be done in this type of structural analysis to more fully understand the composition of such extensive suras.[13]

In Qur'an and Woman, Amina Wadud places interpretations of the Quran into three categories: traditional, reactive, and holistic.[14] The type of interpretation one applies to surah 4 greatly influences one's perspective on the role of women within Muslim society. Taking the third approach, a holistic approach allows for a feminist reading of the Quran,[15] which is particularly relevant to an-Nisā and can reshape the understanding of this surah.

Classification

[edit]

Regarding the timing and contextual background of the believed revelation (Asbāb al-nuzūl), it is a Medinan surah[3] as confirmed by Muhammad Husayn Tabataba'i, who states that the sura must have been revealed after the hijrah based on the subject matter.[16]

Although an-Nisā typically appears as the fourth surah, according to the Nöldeke classification of surahs, based on Islamic traditions, "The Women" was approximately revealed as the hundredth surah.[17] Amir-Ali places it as the 94th surah, while Hz. Osman and Ibn`Abbas believe it is the 92nd.[18] Imam Ja'far as-Sadiq places it as the 91st surah revealed.[18] Based on the legislation concerning orphans, the surah was most likely revealed after many Muslims were killed at the Battle of Uhud, leaving numerous dependants in the new Muslim community.[19] The revelation, therefore, began around the year three, according to the Islamic calendar, but was not completed until the year eight.[6] Consequently, parts of this surah, the second-longest in the Quran, were revealed concurrently with portions of "The Examined Woman," sura 60.[6] However, the surah shows some thematic coherence, despite its disjointed and ongoing revelation.[20]

Furthermore, as relates to the placement of this surah within the Quran as a whole, Neal Robinson notes what he refers to as the "dovetailing" of surahs.[21] Based on this idea of structure, one surah ends with a topic that is immediately picked up in the next surah.[21] The Family of 'Imran, surah 3, includes a discussion of male and female near the end of the surah (3:195).[21] This theme continues at the beginning of surah 4:[21] "People, be mindful of your Lord, who created you from a single soul, and from it created its mate, and from the pair of them spread countless men and women far and wide; be mindful of God, in whose name you make requests of one another."[22] This dovetailing may indicate a complex editorial process involved in ordering the surahs.[23]

Exegesis

[edit]

3 Institutions of Marriage and Slavery

[edit]
Main articles: Marriage in Islam, Polygyny in Islam, and What your right hands possess

4:3 If you fear you might fail to give orphan women their ˹due˺ rights ˹if you were to marry them˺, then marry other women of your choice—two, three, or four. But if you are afraid you will fail to maintain justice, then ˹content yourselves with˺ one or those ˹bondwomen˺ in your possession. This way you are less likely to commit injustice.

A detailed explanation of this verse is given in the 'interpretation' (Tafsir) of Ibn Kathir, a scholar of the Mamluk era:

The Ayah commands, if you fear that you will not be able to do justice between your wives by marrying more than one, then marry only one wife, or satisfy yourself with only female captives.[24]

Al-Jalalayn, says:

4:3 Each man may marry two or three or four but do not exceed this; but if you fear you will not be equitable towards them in terms of their expenses and individual share; then marry only one or restrict yourself to what your right hands own of slavegirls since these do not have the same rights as wives; thus by that marrying of only four or only one or resorting to slavegirls it is likelier it is nearer in outcome that you will not be unjust that you will not be inequitable.[25]

15–16 Unlawful sexual intercourse

[edit]
See also: Zina

In verses 4:15-16, the first, preliminary directives for the punishment for unlawful sexual intercourse are stated. The first verse deals with women. The punishment laid down was to confine them until further directives were revealed. The second verse (i.e. 16) relates to both sexes. The injunction lays down that they should be punished – that is, they should be kept refined to houses.[26]

22–23 Incest

[edit]
Main article: Mahram

Verses 4:22-23 cover which classes of women within one's family with whom marriage or sexual intercourse would be considered haram.[27]

These relationships and limitations are defined and elaborated on within Tafsir al-Jalalayn.[28][29]

34 Men are the protectors and maintainers of women

[edit]
Main article: An-Nisa, 34

4:34 Men are the protectors and maintainers of women because Allah has made one of them excel over the other, and because they spend out of their possessions (to support them). Thus righteous women are obedient and guard the rights of men in their absence under Allah's protection. As for women of whom you fear rebellion, admonish them, and remain apart from them in beds, and beat them. Then if they obey you, do not seek ways to harm them. Allah is Exalted, Great.

— Quran 4:34

There are a number of interpretations of the original Arabic 4:34.[30] The Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim World terms Verse 4:34 the Quran's least egalitarian verse.[31]

Some Muslims, such as Islamic feminist groups, argue that Muslim men use the text as an excuse for domestic violence.[32]

48 Idolatry and polytheism

[edit]
Main article: Shirk (Islam)

4:48 Indeed, Allah does not forgive associating others with Him ˹in worship˺, but forgives anything else of whoever He wills. And whoever associates others with Allah has indeed committed a grave sin.

— Quran 4:48

Tafsir, Ibn Kathir says, Allah said that He, "forgives not that partners should be set up with Him (in worship)", meaning, He does not forgive a servant if he meets Him while he is associating partners with Him".[33] The Enlightening Commentary into the Light of the Holy Qur'an says, "Polytheism is the worst form of sins and it is a barrier against the Divine forgiveness."[34]

59 Obedience Verse

[edit]
Main article: Obedience Verse

4:59 O believers! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. Should you disagree on anything, then refer it to Allah and His Messenger, if you ˹truly˺ believe in Allah and the Last Day. This is the best and fairest resolution.[35]

65 Verse

[edit]

Muhammad al-Bukhari, Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj, Ibn Majah and Nasa'i narrated a hadith transmitted by Zubayr ibn al-Awwam, that believed by some scholars as the Asbab al-Nuzul (cause of revelation) of the Sura of An Nisa verse 65.[36][37] However, there are contemporary Fatwa that the revelation of this verse were attributed to az-Zubayr were weak, as the stronger Hadith which attributed to the revelation of this verse were instead attributed to the tradition of Umar, the second Rashidun Caliph[38]

69 Martyrs, and the righteous

[edit]

Muhammad ibn Sulayman recorded that al-Sadiq relayed to his elderly father, Abu Muhammad ibn Sulayman, concerning the following verse: "And whoever obeys Allah and the Messenger – those will be with the ones upon whom Allah has bestowed favor of the prophets, the steadfast affirmers of truth, the martyrs and the righteous. And excellent are those as companions." (4:69) stating, "The Messenger of Allah in this verse is from of the prophets, and we (Ahl al-Bayt) in this subject are the truthful and the martyrs and you all, (our followers), are the righteous, so adopt this name."[39]

74–76 Fight for the cause of Allah

[edit]
See also: Sword Verse

Let those who would sacrifice this life for the Hereafter fight in the cause of Allah. And whoever fights in Allah’s cause—whether they achieve martyrdom or victory—We will honour them with a great reward.
And what is it with you? You do not fight in the cause of Allah and for oppressed men, women, and children who cry out, “Our Lord! Deliver us from this land of oppressors! Appoint for us a saviour; appoint for us a helper—all by Your grace.”
Believers fight for the cause of Allah, whereas disbelievers fight for the cause of the Devil. So fight against Satan’s ˹evil˺ forces. Indeed, Satan’s schemes are ever weak.

— Quran 4:74-76

According to Ibn Kathir: "Therefore, the believers fight in obedience to Allah and to gain His pleasure, while the disbelievers fight in obedience to Shaytan. Allah then encourages the believers to fight His enemies".[40] Islam allows war in self-defense (Quran 22:39), to defend Islam (rather than to spread it), to protect those who have been removed from their homes by force because they are Muslims (Q22:40), and to protect the innocent who are being oppressed (Q4:75).

89–90 Do not take hypocrites as allies or helpers

[edit]

4:89 They wish you would disbelieve as they have disbelieved, so you may all be alike. So do not take them as allies unless they emigrate in the cause of Allah. But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them, and do not take any of them as allies or helpers,
4:90 except those who are allies of a people you are bound with in a treaty or those wholeheartedly opposed to fighting either you or their own people. If Allah had willed, He would have empowered them to fight you. So if they refrain from fighting you and offer you peace, then Allah does not permit you to harm them.

— Quran 4:89-90

The verse discusses a group of people who nominally became Muslims and secretly supported the enemies of Muslims. For those hypocrites to prove their loyalty, they were commanded to emigrate and join the ranks of the believers, or they would be considered enemies.[41] Muhammad advises his companions to avoid taking these individuals as helpers or guardians.[39]

116 Shirk

[edit]
See also: Shirk

4:116 Surely Allah does not forgive associating ˹others˺ with Him ˹in worship˺, but forgives anything else of whoever He wills. Indeed, whoever associates ˹others˺ with Allah has clearly gone far astray.[42]

Tafsir Ibn Kathir says: "Shirk shall not be forgiven, in reality the idolators worship shaytan".[9]

127–130 Female orphans, desertion by husband, and desirability of marital peace

[edit]

These verses cover issues associated with female orphans; desertion by the husband and the desirability of marital peace.[43]

145 Hypocrites

[edit]

In Kitab al-Kafi, Ja'far al-Sadiq writes a letter to his companions stressing the importance of obeying Allah, his Messenger, and the "Wali al Amr" (Progeny of Muhammad)- going so far as to say that those who disobey and deny their virtues are "liars and hypocrites". He asserts that these are the individuals described as "hypocrites" in the verse, "Indeed, the hypocrites will be in the lowest depths of the Fire – and never will you find for them a helper."

157 Islamic view on Jesus' death

[edit]
Main article: Islamic views on Jesus' death

and for boasting, “We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” But they neither killed nor crucified him—it was only made to appear so. Even those who argue for this ˹crucifixion˺ are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever—only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him.

— Quran 4:157

An explanation of the Islamic view of Jesus as a prophet, rather than as the son of God as Christians claim, is given in Tafsir Ibn Kathir.[44]

171 Islamic view of the Trinity

[edit]
Main article: Islamic view of the Trinity

4:171 O People of the Book! Do not go to extremes regarding your faith; say nothing about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was no more than a messenger of Allah and the fulfilment of His Word through Mary and a spirit ˹created by a command˺ from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers and do not say, “Trinity.” Stop!—for your own good. Allah is only One God. Glory be to Him! He is far above having a son! To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And Allah is sufficient as a Trustee of Affairs.

— Quran 4:171[45]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

An-Nisa

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An-Nisa (Arabic: ٱلنِّسَاء, romanized: an-Nisāʾ; meaning "The Women") is the fourth chapter (sūrah) of the , comprising 176 verses (āyāt). This Medinan sūrah was revealed after the Muhammad's migration to , primarily addressing social, familial, and legal reforms in the early Muslim community. The sūrah opens with an exhortation to humanity regarding common origin from a single soul and divine fear, followed by directives on the just treatment of orphans' and prohibitions against exploitation. It establishes rules for , permitting up to four wives under the condition of equitable treatment, while emphasizing if equity cannot be maintained, and sets inheritance shares favoring males over females in specified ratios reflective of financial responsibilities. Central themes include protections for women in , rights, and guardianship, alongside laws on orphans to prevent their marginalization amid tribal conflicts and post-battle casualties. Further sections critique , relations with and , and prohibitions on , while commanding fairness in testimony and judicial matters. The chapter concludes with laws for those without direct heirs, underscoring comprehensive equity in distribution. As one of the longest sūrahs after Al-Baqarah, An-Nisa provides foundational Islamic on interpersonal relations, aiming to foster a amid the vulnerabilities of war orphans and women.

Overview

Summary and Theological Significance


Surah An-Nisa, the fourth chapter of the , comprises 176 verses revealed in primarily after the in 625 CE, addressing the social and familial disruptions caused by warfare, including the care of numerous widows and orphans. It outlines specific legal frameworks for protecting orphans' from exploitation (verses 2-10), establishing inheritance shares that allocate fixed portions to women—such as daughters receiving half of sons' shares due to males' obligatory financial of families (verses 11-14). Marriage provisions limit to four wives only if equitable treatment is feasible, otherwise advocating (verse 3), while detailing obligations, spousal rights, and procedures to prevent abuse and ensure mutual support (verses 19-35). The surah also mandates in testimony (verse 135), condemns and , and critiques hypocrites and for scriptural distortions, reinforcing communal unity under divine law. Theologically, An-Nisa underscores the doctrine of by tracing human origins to a single primordial self (verse 1), emphasizing Allah's and the imperative of fearing Him as the basis for ethical and social order. It contributes to Islamic by providing foundational rulings in (ahkam al-usra), such as equitable inheritance reflecting causal responsibilities—males inherit more to fulfill nafaqah duties—countering pre-Islamic Arabian practices of female disinheritance and . Doctrinally, it affirms the chain of prophethood, defending Mary and against Trinitarian excesses (verses 171-172) while critiquing Jewish and Christian alterations to revelation, thus positioning the as the uncorrupted final scripture. Its exhortations to in Allah's way (verse 95) and impartial justice (verse 135) highlight causal realism in : spiritual success demands rigorous adherence to revealed laws over tribal or self-interested biases, fostering a where vulnerability is mitigated through structured equity rather than unchecked .

Classification as a Medinan Surah

Surah An-Nisa is unanimously classified as a in Islamic exegetical tradition, with its revelation attributed to the post-Hijra period in following the Muhammad's migration from in 622 CE. This classification stems from early reports by companions such as , who explicitly stated that the surah was revealed in , as recorded in authoritative tafsirs. The surah's content aligns with hallmarks of Medinan revelations, which emphasize legislative and communal guidance rather than the doctrinal warnings predominant in Meccan surahs. It addresses detailed social laws, including distributions (verses 7–14, 176), contracts and limits (verses 3–6, 24), and protections for orphans and women, reflecting the needs of a maturing Muslim amid post-migration challenges like integrating diverse tribes and managing war casualties. References to hypocrites (munafiqun) within the community (e.g., verses 60–63, 88–91) and interactions with and further indicate a Medinan context, where such groups coexisted with , unlike the Meccan era's focus on polytheist opposition. This categorization is supported by the surah's stylistic features, such as longer verses and prosaic structure suited to legal exposition, contrasting with the rhythmic, poetic form of Meccan chapters. Classical scholars derive these criteria from prophetic traditions and historical (occasions of revelation), prioritizing content relevance to Medina's socio-political environment over chronological precision, as surahs often amalgamated verses revealed over years.

Revelation and Historical Context

Period and Chronology of Revelation

Surah An-Nisa was revealed in Medina over an extended period rather than in a single instance, with its verses comprising multiple discourses addressing evolving community needs following the in 622 CE. Traditional Islamic scholarship, including tafsirs by , dates the bulk of these revelations from the end of 3 AH (circa 625 CE), shortly after the in Shawwal 3 AH (March 625 CE), to around the end of 5 AH (627 CE). This timeline aligns with occasions of revelation () tied to post-Uhud challenges, such as regulating inheritance for orphans and widows amid war casualties, and addressing social disputes in the growing Muslim polity. The surah's piecemeal revelation reflects the Quran's gradual descent over 23 years, with An-Nisa's content responding to immediate historical pressures like the 70 Muslim deaths at Uhud, which necessitated laws on family equity and community cohesion. Some verses, such as those on hypocrites and warfare (e.g., 4:94-100), are linked to events in 4-5 AH, including expeditions against in 4 AH (625-626 CE). While certain later portions, like inheritance clarifications in 4:176, may extend to 7-9 AH per some reports (e.g., in ), the core structure and themes consolidate earlier Medinan developments, predating major treaties like Hudaybiyyah in 6 AH (628 CE). This chronology underscores An-Nisa's role in legislative maturation during Medina's formative years, distinct from Meccan surahs focused on doctrinal foundations. Scholarly consensus in Sunni traditions, drawing from sahih and sirah accounts, positions it among the second wave of Medinan revelations, emphasizing causal links between revelation and socio-legal exigencies rather than arbitrary sequencing. Variations in exact verse timings arise from interpretive chains, but the overarching period from 3-5 AH remains robustly supported by event correlations in primary sources like al-Wahidi's .

Major Asbab al-Nuzul and Post-Uhud Circumstances

The , fought on 23 March 625 CE (7 Shawwal 3 AH), resulted in the deaths of approximately 70 Muslim fighters, leaving behind a substantial number of orphans and widows within the Medinan community. This defeat, marked by tactical errors such as archers abandoning their posts, exposed vulnerabilities in military discipline and social cohesion, prompting revelations that addressed internal reforms to strengthen amid external threats from Meccan forces and surrounding tribes emboldened by the setback. The surah's emphasis on equitable treatment of orphans, distribution, and marital responsibilities directly responded to the practical crises arising from these losses, aiming to prevent exploitation and ensure familial stability. A prominent for verses 2–14 concerns the protection of orphans' property. Following Uhud, Umm Sa'd bint Amr approached the Prophet Muhammad with her two young daughters, expressing fear that their inheritance from their martyred father, Sa'd ibn Rabi', might be unjustly appropriated by guardians as had occurred in pre-Islamic practices. This incident highlighted ongoing abuses where custodians merged orphans' assets with their own and withheld them upon maturity, leading to divine injunctions mandating transparent management, fixed shares, and accountability to curb such predations. Verse 3, regulating by permitting up to four wives provided is maintained, was revealed in the context of urging believers to marry the widows and support the orphans left destitute by Uhud's casualties. Pre-Islamic practiced unlimited , often neglecting dependents; the post-Uhud revelation imposed limits and equity conditions, with the Prophet himself contracting marriages to affected women like and , whose husbands fell at Uhud, to model compassionate provision. Verses condemning hypocrites (munafiqun), such as 4:88–91 and 4:60–65, addressed behaviors observed during and after Uhud, including desertion from defensive positions and disseminating rumors of defeat to sow discord. Figures like Abdullah ibn Ubayy, who withdrew support, exemplified this group, whose actions exacerbated the battle's fallout; the revelations differentiated true believers from feigned ones, mandating (hijra) and allegiance tests to purify community ranks. Further asbab link verses 71–76 to rallying for renewed , countering post-Uhud demoralization as tribal alliances eyed Medina's weakness, with emphasis on degrees of striving (4:95) critiquing those who lagged behind in subsequent expeditions. These circumstances collectively framed An-Nisa as a legislative response to consolidate social, familial, and martial resilience after the setback.

Structure and Thematic Organization

Overall Composition and Verse Divisions

Surah An-Nisa comprises 176 verses (ayat), positioning it among the longer chapters of the Quran. These verses form a continuous textual unit, sequentially numbered from 1 to 176 in the standard Uthmani script and Hafs recitation tradition, which reflects the consensus of early Muslim scholars on demarcation based on rhythmic pauses, syntactic completeness, and thematic coherence. Minor variations in verse counts exist across qira'at (recitation styles), such as Warsh, but the predominant numbering aligns with 176 ayat as preserved in primary Quranic codices. For liturgical recitation, particularly during Taraweeh prayers, the is subdivided into 24 (sections or bowing units), each encompassing a group of verses suitable for cycles, with divisions determined by natural breaks in meaning and prosody rather than arbitrary cuts. These facilitate memorization and communal prayer, averaging about 7-8 verses per unit, though lengths vary to preserve contextual integrity— for instance, early cover laws, while later ones address faith relations. The surah's verses also align with the Quran's 30-part juz' division for systematic reading: verses 1-23 fall in Juz' 4, 24-147 in Juz' 5, and 148-176 in Juz' 6, enabling completion of the full text over a . This structural layering—ayat for textual fidelity, for recitation, and juz' for division—supports the surah's role in legal and ethical exposition without internal chapter-like breaks, emphasizing its unified legislative character.

Major Thematic Ruku or Sections

Surah An-Nisa comprises 176 verses subdivided into 24 , which serve as recitation units while aligning with thematic coherence in traditional exegeses. Scholarly analyses, such as those in Amin Ahsan Islahi's coherence-based approach, group the into three principal thematic sections: social reforms (verses 1–56), imperatives of faith and obedience (verses 57–87), and principles of with communal directives (verses 88–176). These divisions emphasize causal linkages between individual conduct, communal unity, and accountability, reflecting the surah's overarching aim to consolidate an Islamic society post-Uhud by reforming familial and social structures. The initial section (verses 1–56) focuses on foundational social legislation, commencing with humanity's origin from a single soul to underscore relational duties and divine , then detailing protections for orphans' property against exploitation (verses 2–6), limits on requiring equitable treatment (verse 3), obligations (verse 4), and shares favoring male agnates while allocating portions to females, parents, and kin to prevent pre-Islamic imbalances (verses 7–14, 11–12). Subsequent verses regulate contracts, prohibit unions with close kin (verses 23–24), address spousal discord and arbitration (verses 34–35), prescribe ritual purity for prayer by prohibiting approach while intoxicated until knowing what is said or in a state of major impurity (janabah) unless passing through, requiring ghusl, and providing for tayammum—wiping the face and hands with clean earth (sa'id tayyib)—when water is unavailable due to illness, travel, after relieving oneself, or contact with women (verse 43), and enjoin interpersonal , including testimony standards and financial dealings (verses 15–33, 44–50). This unit prioritizes empirical fairness in resource distribution and family stability, warning against deviation as akin to disbelief. Verses 57–87 shift to communal faith dynamics, exhorting believers to establish prayer, zakat, and mutual consultation while condemning hypocrites' feigned allegiance and internal sabotage (verses 60–63, 88–91). It mandates fighting in Allah's cause only under qualified leadership, permits defensive warfare, and details prayer adaptations in battle (verses 71–76, 102–103), linking obedience to prophets—including Jesus and Moses—as criterion for true faith amid trials (verses 57–70, 77–81). This segment employs first-principles reasoning from covenantal fidelity to causal outcomes of hypocrisy, such as societal fracture. The final expansive section (verses 88–176) integrates judgment motifs, critiquing distortions in prior scriptures by and (verses 44–52, 153–161), rejecting intercession and polytheistic compromises (verses 116–121, 136–147), and outlining evidentiary standards for claims with evidentiary burdens on accusers (verses 105, 137–139). It addresses warfare , status, and resource management for the needy (verses 94–100, 94–95), culminating in reiterated rules for special cases (verses 175–176) and calls to evidentiary over blind imitation. This culminates the surah's causal realism, tying personal to eschatological reckoning.

Core Themes in Family and Social Laws

Protection of Orphans and Rules

Surah An-Nisa establishes strict guidelines for the guardianship of orphans, emphasizing the integrity of their property in verses 2–6 and 10. Guardians are commanded to deliver orphans' assets intact upon reaching maturity, without substituting defective items for valuable ones or merging the orphans' wealth with their own for personal gain. This protection extends to prohibiting any form of unjust consumption, with verse 10 equating such acts to ingesting fire, punishable by entry into a blazing Hellfire. Verse 6 further mandates testing orphans' intellectual maturity before full handover, allowing limited, of their property by poor guardians only if necessary, while rich guardians must abstain entirely. These provisions arose in the context of post-Battle of Uhud orphanhood, aiming to curb pre-Islamic practices of exploitation where guardians often devoured orphans' estates. The surah's inheritance rules, detailed in verses 11–14, introduce a fixed-share system (fara'id) that allocates portions to specific heirs, overriding prior customary laws. For children, a son's share equals that of two daughters, reflecting the male's obligation to provide financially for dependents; if only daughters inherit, two or more receive two-thirds collectively, while a single daughter gets one-half. Parental shares include one-sixth each for father and mother if the deceased has children, doubling to one-third for the mother in childless cases; siblings inherit residuals under defined conditions, such as brothers excluding sisters in certain scenarios. Spousal portions under verse 12 grant a husband one-quarter or one-half of his wife's estate depending on offspring, and a wife one-eighth or one-quarter of her husband's. These fractions ensure no total exceeds unity through principles like 'awl (proportional reduction) or radd (return of residue), with non-Muslims barred from inheriting from Muslims. Violation incurs divine curse and eternal punishment, underscoring the rules' obligatory nature. This system prioritizes immediate family equity over testamentary freedom, limited to one-third of the estate for bequests.

Marriage Contracts, Polygamy, and Divorce Provisions

Surah An-Nisa outlines specific requirements for marriage contracts, emphasizing the obligation to provide a dowry (mahr) to women as a fundamental right. Verse 4:4 mandates that men give women their due dowries willingly and graciously, allowing women to remit any portion voluntarily, but prohibiting coercion to reclaim it. This provision establishes the dowry as an enforceable contractual element, distinct from pre-Islamic Arabian customs where inheritance of women occurred without consent or compensation. Marriage requires mutual consent, as verse 4:19 forbids inheriting women against their will or harassing them to extract dowry returns, framing contracts as protective rather than exploitative arrangements. Prohibited unions, detailed in verses 4:22–24, exclude mothers, daughters, sisters, and married women except captives under specific conditions, with allowances for chaste slave women via fair dowry and owner permission. Polygamy receives conditional permission in verse 4:3, allowing men to marry up to four women if they fear failing to uphold toward orphans under their guardianship, but advising if equitable treatment proves impossible: "But if you fear that you will not be just, then [marry only] one." Classical tafsirs interpret this as a limit on pre-Islamic unlimited , tying it to social welfare, particularly protecting vulnerable women post-battle losses like Uhud, while stressing impossibility of perfect emotional equity as noted in 4:129. The verse prioritizes in financial support and treatment, with failure to achieve it rendering additional marriages impermissible; historical reports from companions like reinforce that exceeding four wives violates this cap, as exemplified by the Prophet's directive to a polyandrous man to retain only four. Divorce provisions in An-Nisa focus on and to avert dissolution. Verse 4:35 instructs appointing one arbitrator from each spouse's if separation looms, empowering them to mediate for harmony; success depends on mutual intent, as "Allah will mend" rifts if desired, but permits if irreconcilable. Tafsirs clarify arbitrators' role as advisory unless authorized otherwise, rejecting unilateral imposition of separation without spousal agreement, and emphasize involvement to uphold equity over hasty endings. This contrasts with broader Quranic rules in at-Talaq, positioning An-Nisa's framework as preventive, prohibiting extortion during disputes as per 4:19 to deter manipulative separations.

Women's Rights and Marital Authority

Surah An-Nisa establishes specific financial and protective rights for women in . Verse 4 mandates that women receive their due dowries () graciously upon marriage, which they may partially waive voluntarily, allowing mutual enjoyment without guilt. This provision ensures women hold property rights independent of male relatives, contrasting with pre-Islamic Arabian where such assets were often controlled by guardians. Additionally, verse 19 prohibits inheriting women forcibly or resenting them to reclaim dowries, requiring kind treatment even in contexts. Inheritance rules in verse 11 allocate women defined shares—such as daughters receiving half the portion of sons in the absence of male heirs—reflecting men's greater financial obligations while granting women absolute ownership without maintenance duties. These shares apply after debts and bequests, prioritizing orphans and kin, and represent a formal codification of women's property rights absent in Jahiliyyah society. Regarding marital authority, verse 34 designates men as qawwamun (protectors and maintainers) over women, predicated on divine preference in some qualities and men's expenditure from wealth for family support. Righteous women are described as obedient (qanitat) and safeguarding chastity and property in their husbands' absence. If a wife exhibits nushuz (rebellion or disloyalty), husbands may admonish verbally, separate in bed, or strike lightly as a last resort, with classical tafsirs like Ibn Kathir emphasizing non-injurious discipline to restore harmony, not abuse. Verse 35 prescribes arbitration by family representatives if discord escalates toward divorce, aiming to reconcile or separate equitably. This framework positions husbands as responsible leaders, with obedience tied to provision, while prohibiting harm and mandating justice.

Incest Prohibitions and Sexual Ethics

Verses 22–24 of An-Nisa establish prohibitions on to specific relatives and others to regulate familial and sexual boundaries. Verse 22 explicitly forbids men from marrying women previously wed to their fathers, classifying such unions as immoral, hateful, and evil, with an exception for pre-Islamic practices that had already occurred. Verse 23 provides a detailed list of permanently prohibited women, including biological mothers, daughters, sisters, paternal and maternal aunts, nieces (daughters of brothers or sisters), foster mothers who nursed the individual, foster sisters through the same , mothers-in-law, stepdaughters in the father's or husband's custody (provided the marriage to their mother was consummated), and the simultaneous to two sisters (again, excepting prior instances). This enumeration draws from pre-Islamic Arabian customs but codifies them as divine imperatives, aiming to preserve lineage clarity and avert consanguineous conflicts observed in tribal societies. Verse 24 extends the framework by declaring all other women lawful for beyond these prohibitions, while permitting relations with female captives acquired through warfare as an exception to the ban on married women, provided a is given. This clause reflects the 7th-century Arabian context of intertribal conflicts, where captives were integrated into households, but it underscores through contractual elements like dowry even in such cases. Cousin marriages, notably absent from the prohibited list, remain permissible, aligning with prevalent practices that did not pose equivalent risks to familial cohesion. On broader sexual ethics, verses 15–16 address illicit conduct termed fahisha (lewdness or unchastity, often interpreted as or ). For women engaging in such acts, the directive requires four male witnesses to testify; upon confirmation, they are to be confined to their homes indefinitely until death or until appoints "a way out" (potentially or societal change). Verse 16 applies to "two persons" among the committing the same offense, mandating for both—interpreted variably as reprimand, beating, or confinement—followed by acceptance of sincere without further penalty. These measures predate the fixed penalties for (unlawful intercourse) in (24:2), which prescribes 100 lashes for unmarried offenders, suggesting verses 4:15–16 served as interim deterrents emphasizing evidence rigor and rehabilitation over corporal finality. Scholarly exegeses, such as those linking fahisha to extramarital acts without requiring penetration proof, highlight the high evidentiary threshold to prevent false accusations, though interpretations differ on whether verse 16 targets homosexual acts or mirrors heterosexual . The surah's directives integrate with social stability, prohibiting exploitation while promoting chastity through marriage contracts, as seen in allowances for marrying slave women with incentives (verse 25), contingent on mutual and fairness. This framework prioritizes empirical lineage protection—evident in the explicit relational bans—and causal deterrence of societal discord from unchecked relations, without endorsing leniency toward proven violations.

Themes in Community and Faith Relations

Duties Toward Believers and Condemnation of Hypocrites

Verses in An-Nisa emphasize obedience among believers as a foundational duty to maintain communal unity and . Quran 4:59 commands: "O you who have believed, obey and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to and the Messenger, if you should believe in and the Last Day. That is better and more commendable in the end." This directive, interpreted in classical as applying to leaders appointed by divine guidance such as the and his successors, underscores the obligation to resolve disputes through rather than personal judgment, preventing factionalism. Obedience here is tied to faith, with referral to the and ensuring alignment with divine will over human arbitration. Such duties extend to , particularly in contexts of trial like warfare, where believers are urged to support one another against internal threats. The portrays true believers as those who uphold these bonds, contrasting them with those who feign while undermining the . This framework, revealed amid Medinan challenges post-Uhud, aimed to consolidate among emigrants and ansar against emerging divisions. The sharply condemns hypocrites (munafiqun), described as those who outwardly profess faith but harbor disbelief and seek to deceive . Quran 4:88 questions believers' division over them: "What is [the matter] with you [that] you are two parties about the hypocrites, while has made them fall back [into error] because of what they earned?" Classical attributes this to hypocrites like those in who accepted superficially but refused or participation in expeditions, allying with disbelievers during conflicts such as Uhud. explains their regression to kufr stems from earned misdeeds, including evasion of and secret councils with enemies, rendering them unfit for communal trust. Further verses outline their traits and prescribed treatment: 4:89-91 permits fighting those hypocrites who turn away in hostility unless they repent or seek asylum, distinguishing passive withdrawers from active belligerents. "They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of . But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them." This links to post-Uhud laggards who demobilized troops or spread doubt, as per reports in traditions. Hypocrites are depicted as lazy in prayer (4:142), preferring alternative judges over the (4:60), and destined for hellfire alongside disbelievers (4:145). Their condemnation serves as a warning to believers to discern , prioritizing empirical over verbal claims. These passages integrate duties toward genuine believers—through obedience and vigilance—with rejection of hypocrites to safeguard the ummah's integrity, reflecting causal links between internal fidelity and external resilience in early Islamic polity. sources like , drawing from , corroborate that such hypocrites, led by figures like Abdullah ibn Ubayy, eroded morale until divine rulings exposed and marginalized them. Believers' adherence to these duties ensures divine promise of paradise for the steadfast (4:69, 4:124).

Relations with People of the Book

Verses 44–46 of An-Nisa criticize segments of the , described as those given a portion of the Scripture, for purchasing misguidance and desiring to deviate from the straight path, including distorting words from their proper contexts and uttering insolence toward prophets. Verse 51 states that neither nor will be satisfied with until they follow their respective religions, underscoring mutual incompatibility in faith adherence. These passages frame relations as adversarial, with accusations of scriptural tampering and opposition to divine guidance extended to . In verses 153–155, the surah recounts the People of the Book's historical demands for heavenly books or visible signs from prophets like , paralleled with their past transgressions such as slaying prophets unjustly, breaking covenants, and disbelieving in revealed truths. This narrative positions interactions as a continuation of prophetic confrontations, where and are urged to recognize prior revelations' fulfillment in the rather than persisting in rejection. Verse 159 asserts that every one among the will believe in before his death, interpreted by classical commentators as either a future collective acknowledgment or individual faith at death, serving as a theological pivot against their doctrines. The culminating address in verse 171 directly admonishes the against excess in religion, prohibiting claims of divinity for beyond his role as a messenger, a word from , and a spirit created by Him, while rejecting the as an association of partners with God. This verse emphasizes monotheistic correction over ecumenical harmony, warning that such exaggerations (ghuluw) distort the prophetic message exemplified by ' miracles and scripture. Relations are thus delineated not through permissions for intermarriage or shared rituals—absent in An-Nisa—but via imperatives for doctrinal alignment with , critiquing Christian deification and Jewish covenant violations as barriers to unity under Islam. traditions, such as those attributing Jewish distortions to evasion of obligations, reinforce this as a call to evidentiary submission rather than tolerant coexistence.

Rejection of Polytheism and Shirk

Surah An-Nisa presents shirk—defined in Islamic theology as ascribing partners to Allah in divinity, worship, or attributes—as an unforgivable sin if persisted in until death, emphasizing the doctrine of tawhid (absolute monotheism) as foundational to faith. This rejection serves to delineate clear boundaries between monotheistic submission and polytheistic deviation, warning against practices prevalent among pre-Islamic Arabs, such as idol worship and intercession through intermediaries. The surah's condemnation underscores that shirk nullifies other righteous deeds, rendering the perpetrator among the most astray. Verse 4:48 explicitly states: "Indeed, does not forgive association with Him, but He forgives what is less than that for whom He wills. And whoever associates others with has certainly fabricated a tremendous ." This formulation highlights shirk's unique severity, as it contradicts 's exclusive , while allowing for other transgressions upon . A parallel declaration in verse 4:116 reinforces this: "Indeed, does not forgive association with Him, but He forgives what is besides that for whom He wills. And whoever associates others with has certainly gone far astray." These verses, revealed in amid interactions with polytheists and hypocrites, aim to fortify believers against compromise with idolatrous elements. The further critiques polytheistic tendencies indirectly through exhortations to worship alone, as in verse 4:36: "Worship and associate nothing with Him, and to parents do good..." This integrates rejection of shirk into ethical conduct, portraying not merely as theological error but as a causal root of social and corruption, such as neglecting kin duties in favor of superstitious rites. Classical exegeses interpret these passages as abrogating any tolerance for polytheistic alliances, prioritizing monotheistic purity over pragmatic relations. before death remains viable, as shirk's irrevocability applies only to the unrepentant, aligning with broader Quranic affirmations of mercy.

Directives on Warfare and Martyrdom

Commands for Jihad and Fighting

Surah An-Nisa contains several verses that explicitly command believers to engage in , defined as striving and fighting in the cause of against disbelievers and oppressors. These directives emphasize the exchange of worldly life for the hereafter, promising divine reward for those who fight and are killed or victorious. Verse 4:74 states: "So let those fight in the cause of who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter. And he who fights in the cause of and is killed or achieves victory - We will bestow upon him a great reward." This command motivates participation by framing as a transaction yielding eternal benefits. Verse 4:75 extends the rationale for fighting to the defense of the oppressed, questioning the reluctance of believers: "And what is [the matter] with you that you fight not in the cause of Allah and [for] the oppressed among men, women, and children..." It portrays jihad as a moral imperative to rescue the vulnerable from tyrannical cities and polytheistic persecution. The subsequent verse 4:76 contrasts the motivations of combatants: "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve fight in the cause of Taghut [Satan]. So fight against the allies of Satan. Indeed, the plot of Satan has ever been weak." This binary frames Muslim warfare as divinely sanctioned against satanic forces, urging aggressive engagement. A direct address to the Prophet Muhammad in verse 4:84 reinforces personal responsibility and leadership in combat: "Fight in the way of ; you are not responsible except for yourself. And urge on the believers. Perhaps will check the might of those who disbelieved. And is greater in might and stronger in [exemplary] punishment." This instructs the Prophet to lead by example and rally others, anticipating potential divine intervention against enemies. Verse 4:95 establishes a hierarchy of merit among believers, prioritizing : "Not equal are those believers remaining [at home] - other than the disabled - and the , [who strive and fight] in the cause of with their wealth and their lives. has preferred the ... by degrees." It promises elevated rewards to those expending resources and lives in over those who stay behind without excuse, underscoring active fighting as superior devotion. These commands collectively mandate military action as a core religious , tied to eschatological incentives and communal defense.

Treatment of Enemies and Hypocrites in Conflict

Verses 88–91 of An-Nisa address divisions among Muslims concerning hypocrites (munafiqun), who outwardly profess faith but inwardly support disbelievers, particularly during conflicts such as the in 625 CE or the lead-up to the in 627 CE. The text rebukes hesitation in treating such individuals as adversaries, stating: "They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of . But if they turn away, seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper." This directive applies to hypocrites who defect or ally with belligerent enemies, positioning them as combatants rather than protected civilians, unless they repent through genuine emigration () in support of the Muslim community. Exceptions are outlined in verses 90–91 for those hypocrites who join groups under treaties with or approach with intent to avoid , either against or their own kin: "Except for those who take refuge with a between yourselves and whom is a treaty or those who come to you, their hearts restrained from fighting you or fighting their own ." In such cases, if they seek and refrain from hostility, "Allah has not made for you a cause [for fighting] against them." Classical tafsirs, such as those by , interpret this as prohibiting pursuit of hypocrites in neutral territories or under asylum, emphasizing that execution is reserved for active in wartime, not mere disbelief. This framework treats hypocrites as internal threats akin to external enemies, mandating decisive action to prevent subversion during . Regarding overt enemies—disbelievers actively fighting Muslims—verse 76 contrasts believers who "fight in the cause of Allah" with disbelievers who "fight in the cause of falsehood," underscoring a defensive yet resolute posture in conflict without quarter for aggressors. Verses 101–104 further permit shortening prayers and maintaining vigilance against enemy incursions, prioritizing combat readiness over ritual completeness when "you fear that those who disbelieve may disrupt you," revealed amid caravan raids and battles post-Hijrah in 622 CE. These provisions integrate hypocrites into the enemy category if they enable or join such disruptions, as seen in Medinan hypocrites like Abdullah ibn Ubayy who undermined morale during expeditions. Overall, the surah's directives prioritize communal security, authorizing lethal force against treacherous elements in conflict while exempting those who desist, reflecting a pragmatic calculus of loyalty amid existential threats from Meccan polytheists and internal dissenters.

Christological and Theological Assertions

Denial of Jesus' Crucifixion

Surah An-Nisa 4:157 declares that the Jews' boast of killing "the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah" is unfounded, stating explicitly: "But they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them." The verse emphasizes doubt among disputants, asserting they possess no definitive knowledge—only conjecture—and concludes that Jesus was neither killed nor crucified in reality. This assertion occurs amid broader critiques of Israelite disbelief and covenant violations, positioning the denial as divine correction to historical claims. In Islamic theology, this verse establishes Jesus' survival of execution through supernatural means, with raising him bodily to (as corroborated in 4:158), preserving him for an eschatological return. Classical interpretations, including those by early exegetes, maintain that the "resemblance" involved substituting another individual—often identified in traditions as a volunteer disciple or transformed in appearance—who endured the instead. This substitution theory underscores Allah's sovereignty over human plots, rendering the event illusory to observers while affirming ' prophetic status without vicarious suffering. The denial rejects core Christian narratives of ' atoning death, framing the as a misperceived of Jewish adversaries rather than redemptive fulfillment. Mainstream Sunni and Shia scholarship upholds this non-crucifixion as dogmatic, viewing alternative interpretations (e.g., claims of actual without death) as minority deviations lacking early attestation. Revealed in around 3-5 AH (circa 624-626 CE), the verse addressed contemporary Jewish-Christian polemics in the Hijaz, countering accounts circulating via Syriac and traditions.

Critique of Trinitarian Doctrine

In Surah An-Nisa, the critique of Trinitarian doctrine centers on verse 4:171, which directly addresses the People of the Book—primarily Christians—and warns against excess (ghuluww) in religion or uttering falsehoods about Allah. The verse declares Jesus the Messiah, son of Mary, to be solely a messenger of Allah, His word directed to Mary, and a spirit from Him, while commanding believers to affirm Allah and His messengers without saying "Three" (thalathah), as this is deemed detrimental; Allah is affirmed as one God (ilah wahid), transcendent above begetting a son, with all in heavens and earth belonging to Him alone. This passage rejects any notion of divine plurality or filiation, positioning the Trinity as a deviation from pure monotheism (tawhid) that introduces association (shirk) by elevating Jesus and implying a triune division in God's essence. Classical Islamic , such as in (compiled circa 923 CE), interprets this as a refutation of Christian claims of ' co-divinity or eternal sonship, arguing that such beliefs anthropomorphize and contradict His incomparability (tanzīh), evidenced by the 's emphasis on 's self-sufficiency as the ultimate disposer of affairs (wakīl). The critique extends to viewing Trinitarian formulas—like those formalized at the Council of Nicaea in 325 CE—as historical accretions unsupported by ' own teachings, which the portrays as strictly prophetic and submissive to , without claims to godhood. Critics from contend that the Quranic portrayal misrepresents orthodox Trinitarianism, which maintains one divine essence in three persons (Father, Son, ) without or Mary as a hypostasis, suggesting the author of the engaged with heterodox or popular Christian variants rather than Nicene . From a first-principles standpoint, the surah's insistence on unqualified oneness aligns with logical causal realism—positing an uncaused, singular prime mover incompatible with internal relational distinctions—but overlooks Trinitarian efforts to reconcile scriptural data on God's self-revelation through plurality (e.g., baptismal formula in :19, circa 80-90 CE) without ontological division. Nonetheless, An-Nisa upholds this as the demarcation of truth, urging cessation of triadic affirmations to preserve doctrinal purity.

Interpretive Traditions

Classical Tafsir and Hadith Corroboration

Classical tafsirs of An-Nisa emphasize its legislative focus on familial, social, and ethical obligations, drawing extensively from prophetic narrations and reports of the Companions to elucidate verses on , , and gender roles. 's Jami' al-Bayan (completed around 923 CE), one of the earliest comprehensive exegeses, interprets the surah's opening verse (4:1) as affirming humanity's origin from a single soul——to underscore mutual compassion and prohibition of orphan exploitation, citing transmitted athar from and others that link this to divine creation narratives. further details shares in verses 4:11-12, relying on consensus among early jurists that these apportion fixed portions to prevent disputes, corroborated by where the Prophet Muhammad resolved familial claims post-Badr. Ibn Kathir's (14th century) builds on these foundations, explaining verse 4:34's designation of men as qawwamun (maintainers) over women due to financial provision and physical superiority, quoting hadiths from Sahih Bukhari where the describes men's responsibility for household protection and equity in (up to four wives if just, per 4:3). He corroborates warnings against consuming orphans' (4:2-10) with narrations from Muslim, portraying it as "" in the Hereafter, and stresses judicial equity in 4:58, aligning with prophetic precedents of impartial rulings even against kin. Al-Qurtubi's Al-Jami' li-Ahkam al-Qur'an () reinforces these, interpreting 4:34's disciplinary measures (including light striking as last resort) through hadiths limiting harm, such as the Prophet's advice to avoid facial blows, and links 4:93's penalty for killing a believer—Hellfire eternally—to Ibn Abbas's report in Sahih Bukhari as the surah's final revelation on intentional . Hadith collections in Sahih Bukhari and Muslim provide direct corroboration for An-Nisa's directives. For (4:7-14), Bukhari narrates the Prophet's exclusion of non-Muslims from Muslim heirs, reflecting verse 4:144's implicit separation, while Muslim records implementations ensuring daughters' shares post-prophetic rulings. On warfare and orphans (4:75-76), hadiths in Bukhari describe the Prophet's of captives and care for war orphans, tying to exhortations for in Allah's cause. These traditions, authenticated via rigorous chains (isnad), validate the surah's commands without abrogation, as classical mufassirun like note their alignment with the Prophet's in circa 625-632 CE. Variations in early reports, such as on 4:34's application, are reconciled by prioritizing sahih narrations over weaker athar, ensuring interpretations remain tethered to verifiable prophetic conduct.

Modern Reinterpretations and Debates

Progressive Muslim scholars, such as Asma Barlas, have reinterpreted An-Nisa's verse 4:34, which describes men as qawwamun (maintainers or protectors) over women due to financial responsibilities, arguing that this establishes mutual guardianship rather than unilateral male authority, emphasizing Quranic themes of equity elsewhere in the surah. In contrast, traditional interpretations, upheld in premodern commentaries, view qawwamun as entailing hierarchical oversight, permitting , separation in bed, and light striking (daraba) for nushuz (marital disloyalty or ) as a last resort, a consensus reflected across Sunni and Shia exegeses until the 20th century. Contemporary reformists like critique such readings as patriarchal accretions, proposing daraba means "to separate" or "go away" rather than physical contact, aligning with prophetic prohibiting harm to wives and broader Quranic anti-violence principles, though critics argue this strains lexicography and ignores historical applications in Islamic . Debates on polygamy in verse 4:3 intensify in modern contexts, where the permission to marry up to four wives is conditioned on perfect justice—an ideal deemed unattainable by scholars like , leading progressive voices to advocate as the Quranic intent, especially amid demographic shifts reducing war orphans post-7th century Arabia. Traditionalists counter that the verse explicitly regulates rather than prohibits , citing its application in early Islamic society for social welfare, with empirical data from regions like parts of showing ongoing practice despite legal restrictions, though surveys indicate low prevalence (under 3% of marriages in surveyed Muslim-majority countries as of 2020). Feminist reinterpretations frame the verse's limits on unlimited pre-Islamic as progressive for its era, but secular critiques highlight persistent gender asymmetry, arguing it institutionalizes male privilege without reciprocal . Inheritance rules in verses 4:11-12, allotting sons twice the share of daughters, spark contention over fixed fara'id (shares) versus equitable adjustment; reformist hermeneutics, drawing on maqasid al-sharia (objectives of Islamic law) like family preservation, propose redistributive mechanisms or contextual suspension in welfare states, as explored in Indonesian fatwas adapting to modern economics. Orthodox scholars maintain the ratios reflect male financial obligations, supported by historical data from Ottoman records showing compliance preserved family units, rejecting egalitarian revisions as bid'ah (innovation) that undermines textual literalism. Academic analyses note that while progressive rereadings invoke 7th-century socio-economic causalities—such as absent male providers—these often prioritize contemporary egalitarianism, potentially overlooking empirical outcomes like higher female financial security in traditional systems per studies in Gulf states. Broader debates critique Islamic feminist approaches for selective emphasis, with social psychological perspectives arguing they conflate scriptural ontology with modern ideology, risking anachronism.

Impact on Islamic Jurisprudence

Formation of Sharia Family Codes

Surah An-Nisa provided the primary Quranic framework for family codes by outlining explicit rules on , , and spousal relations, which early Muslim jurists systematized into during the 8th to 10th centuries CE. Verses 4:11-12 prescribed fixed fractional shares for heirs—such as sons receiving twice the portion of daughters, wives one-eighth of the estate if children exist, and parents one-sixth each—directly establishing the doctrine of faraidh (obligatory ) that all major Sunni schools adopted without alteration, adjusting only for cases where shares exceed the estate via methods like 'awl (proportional reduction). This allocation reflected men's greater financial duties toward family maintenance, as articulated in the surah's broader context of protecting dependents amid post-battle orphanhood and widowhood in around 625 CE. In regulations, verse 4:3 authorized men to marry up to four wives provided they maintain among them, a condition central to polygyny rules across Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali madhhabs, supplemented by on equity limits. Verse 4:19 forbade inheriting women coercively or withholding their dowry (), embedding and financial rights into contract , while verses 4:4 and 4:24 specified obligations and prohibitions on marrying married women except captives. Jurists like (d. 767 CE) in and Malik ibn Anas (d. 795 CE) in elaborated these into procedural codes emphasizing mutual rights and male maintenance responsibility. Divorce provisions in verses 4:35 and 4:128 promoted and equitable resolution—appointing arbiters from each family to reconcile or separate fairly—forming the basis for talaq (husband-initiated) and khul' (wife-initiated) procedures in classical , with waiting periods () derived from related Quranic texts. Guardianship rules in verses 4:2-10 mandated protecting orphans' property and testing their maturity before handover, influencing wilaya (guardianship) doctrines that assigned fathers or male relatives oversight in family matters, codified uniformly by the four schools through (consensus) and (analogy) by the 4th century AH. These elements collectively shaped 's personal status laws (ahwal shakhsiyya), prioritizing textual fidelity over customary pre-Islamic practices.

Influence on Penal and Social Regulations

Surah An-Nisa's verses 4:15–16 establish an early Quranic prescription for addressing illicit sexual immorality (), directing confinement of guilty women in their homes until death or divine ordinance, and unspecified punishment for men or both parties involved, with provision for release upon . This ruling, revealed in around 625 CE, influenced preliminary Islamic judicial practices by emphasizing communal deterrence and reform over fixed corporal penalties, though classical jurists like those in the Hanafi and Maliki schools viewed it as abrogated by An-Nur 24:2's stipulation of 100 lashes for ( or ), shifting toward enforcement requiring four eyewitnesses. The requirement in 4:15 for four male witnesses to substantiate accusations underscored evidentiary rigor in social offenses, shaping standards to prevent unsubstantiated claims and protect communal honor. Verse 4:93 declares intentional killing of a believer as warranting eternal hellfire and divine wrath, reinforcing the sanctity of Muslim life and informing (retaliation) principles in penal codes, where compensation (diyah) or may substitute but the act's gravity demands accountability. This provision, interpreted by scholars such as Maududi as applying to deliberate without justification, contributed to Islamic jurisprudence's framework for , prioritizing reconciliation while upholding severe spiritual and temporal consequences, as seen in Ottoman and Abbasid legal applications from the 8th century onward. In social regulations, verses 4:11–12 delineate fixed inheritance shares—males receiving twice females' portions in most cases, with specifics for parents, spouses, and siblings—forming the bedrock of inheritance laws across Sunni madhhabs, ensuring equitable distribution based on familial roles and financial responsibilities post-624 CE battles like Badr that orphaned many. These rules, upheld in classical texts like Al-Muwatta (compiled circa 795 CE), prioritize agnatic heirs while mandating bequests for non-heirs up to one-third of estate, influencing modern codes in countries like and where deviations risk invalidation. Verses 4:3 and 4:19–21 regulate , permitting up to four wives conditional on just treatment, and prohibit inheritance-driven marriages, embedding protections against exploitation in Islamic ; 4:3's justice clause, per Ibn Kathir's (14th century), deterred excess by threatening divine accountability, shaping social norms in medieval caliphates where it balanced war widows' needs with equity. Additionally, 4:34–35 outline spousal discipline and for discord, with 4:34 allowing measured physical correction for nushuz () after admonition and separation—interpreted variably but codified in Hanbali as limited to non-injurious means—while mandating family to preserve households, as applied in historical courts to mitigate divorce rates. Verses 4:2–10 safeguard orphans' property, prohibiting consumption except for benefit and requiring guardians' accountability, which jurists extended into (endowment) systems by the 8th century Umayyad era to enforce fiduciary duties in Muslim societies.

Controversies and Scholarly Critiques

Patriarchal Elements and Gender Roles

Surah An-Nisa establishes a hierarchical gender structure in family and social relations, positioning men as maintainers and authorities over women based on divine preference and economic responsibilities. Verse 4:34 states that "men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has made one of them to excel the other, and because they spend from their means," mandating obedience from righteous women who guard their chastity in the husband's absence. Traditional exegeses, such as Ibn Kathir's, interpret this as granting men guardianship (qiwamah) due to their physical strength, financial obligations, and role in providing for the family, reinforcing male leadership in the household. This extends to disciplinary measures for wifely disobedience: admonition, separation in bed, and light striking (daraba), as outlined in the same verse, which classical scholars like view as a last resort to correct nushuz (), though modern analyses often debate the extent and permissibility of physical correction. The surah's framework reflects a causal link between male provision—rooted in men's greater earning capacity and legal duties—and resultant , privileging empirical roles over egalitarian ideals. While contemporary reinterpretations, influenced by egalitarian , seek to minimize hierarchical implications, traditional Islamic upholds these elements as foundational to family codes. Inheritance laws in verses 4:11-12 further delineate gendered roles, allotting sons twice the share of daughters, justified by males' obligations to support dependents including female relatives. This disparity aligns with the surah's emphasis on male financial stewardship, as sons bear nafaqa (maintenance) duties for parents, wives, and children, whereas daughters receive and spousal support. permitted in 4:3—up to four wives if treated justly—additionally underscores male prerogative in , conditional on equity, amid contexts of war orphans and social welfare, though absolute fairness is deemed humanly challenging (4:129). These provisions collectively embed patriarchal norms, prioritizing functional complementarity—men as providers and guardians, women as obedient dependents—over symmetrical equality, with empirical roots in 7th-century Arabian societal structures and ongoing application in traditional Muslim contexts. Scholarly critiques from feminist perspectives often challenge these as culturally contingent, yet classical tafsirs maintain their timeless prescriptive force, cautioning against anachronistic impositions of modern ideologies.

Violence in Marital and Warfare Contexts

Verse 4:34 of An-Nisa prescribes a sequence of measures for husbands addressing perceived nushuz (rebellion or disobedience) in wives: first, admonition; second, separation in bed; and third, striking them as a disciplinary action if prior steps fail. The Arabic term idribuhunna, translated as "strike them," is interpreted in classical exegeses like Ibn Kathir's as permitting light physical discipline without causing severe harm, bruising, or marks, emphasizing it as a last resort to restore marital order rather than an encouragement of routine violence. This provision reflects the 7th-century Arabian where tribal norms tolerated harsher domestic practices, positioning the verse as a regulated limit rather than unrestricted permission, though subsequent prophetic traditions, such as hadiths in Sahih Bukhari reporting Muhammad's disapproval of spousal beating akin to slave treatment, urge restraint and highlight it as highly undesirable. Islamic juristic schools, including Hanafi and Maliki, generally condition any striking on proportionality and prohibit or injurious blows, with many scholars deeming it obsolete or in light of overarching Quranic emphases on in family relations (e.g., 30:21). In warfare contexts, An-Nisa contains exhortations to armed struggle () framed as defensive and obligatory response to , revealed amid the post-Battle of Uhud (625 CE) setbacks, where faced Meccan aggression and internal . Verses 4:71-76 command believers to prepare for ("take up arms") against disbelievers and hypocrites who plot harm, promising divine reward for those who "strive with their wealth and lives" (4:95), elevating above sedentary believers in merit. Specifically, 4:74-75 urges fighting those who "fight you" to establish justice for the oppressed, including "weak men, women, and children" under pagan tyranny, tying participation to paradise or victory. Classical tafsirs, such as those by , contextualize these as mandates for collective military obligation ( kifayah) against existential threats, not unprovoked aggression, with rules limiting violence to combatants while prohibiting excess (e.g., 4:94 warns against hasty killing of potential ). Historical application post-Uhud spurred Muslim mobilization, contributing to later victories like the (627 CE), though verses underscore reliance on over numerical superiority (4:76).

Theological Claims Versus Historical Evidence

Surah An-Nisa articulates theological assertions about pivotal events in human and prophetic history that conflict with empirical historical and scientific records. Verse 4:157 explicitly denies the crucifixion of Jesus, stating that the Jews claimed to have killed "the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah," but "they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them." This claim posits a substitution or illusion, preserving Jesus' survival according to Islamic doctrine. However, Roman historian Tacitus in Annals (ca. 116 CE) records Jesus' execution under Pontius Pilate during Tiberius' reign, corroborated by Jewish historian Flavius Josephus in Antiquities of the Jews (ca. 93 CE), despite partial interpolations. Secular and religious scholars, including skeptics like Bart Ehrman, affirm the crucifixion as a historical datum based on multiple independent attestations, with no contemporary evidence supporting substitution theories; mainstream historiography deems escape or denial implausible given Roman execution protocols. Verse 4:1 further claims divine creation of humanity "from one soul and created from it its mate and dispersed from both of them many men and women," implying universal descent from a primordial pair akin to in Islamic . This literal single-pair origin contradicts genetic and paleontological evidence, which traces modern humans (Homo sapiens) to African populations numbering in the thousands around 200,000–300,000 years ago, with no bottleneck reducing to two individuals in the last 500,000 years. analysis identifies a "" circa 150,000–200,000 years ago and "" circa 200,000–300,000 years ago, but these represent coalescent points in separate lineages from larger groups, not a contemporaneous couple; sequences confirm ongoing and population continuity, invalidating a recent sole progenitor pair. Such data, derived from peer-reviewed genomic studies, align with fossil records showing gradual hominin rather than instantaneous creation from one entity. These discrepancies highlight tensions between An-Nisa's revelatory narrative—framed as infallible divine recounting—and verifiable extra-textual evidence, where theological substitution or singular origin models lack archaeological, documentary, or biological substantiation. While apologetic reinterpretations exist, such as viewing "one soul" metaphorically or denial as targeting Jewish agency rather than the event itself, they strain literalist readings predominant in classical and fail to reconcile with causal chains evidenced by independent, non-confessional sources. Empirical prioritization thus favors historical consensus over unsubstantiated doctrinal assertions, underscoring the surah's embedding in 7th-century Arabian polemics against traditions.

References

  1. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa
  2. https://al-islam.org/enlightening-commentary-light-holy-quran-vol-3/surah-nisa-chapter-4-introduction
  3. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=1&to=176
  4. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4
  5. https://iqra-quran.com/chapters-of-quran/04-an-nisa/
  6. https://medium.com/quran-insights/why-does-surah-an-nisa-end-with-a-verse-on-inheritance-de856db49b2f
  7. https://www.islamreligion.com/en/articles/11157/chapter-4-an-nisa-women-part-1
  8. https://www.alim.org/surah-info/4/
  9. https://quran.com/4:135/tafsirs/en-tafsir-maarif-ul-quran
  10. https://www.thelastdialogue.org/surah-an-nisa-summary/
  11. https://honeyfortheheart.wordpress.com/tafsir-ibn-kathir/surah-an-nisa-ayat-1/
  12. https://www.studioarabiyainegypt.com/the-difference-between-the-meccan-and-medinan-surahs-in-quran/
  13. https://quran.com/en/surah/an-nisa/info
  14. http://www.englishtafsir.com/quran/4/index.html
  15. https://www.quran-wiki.com/surah-overview.php?sura=4&aya=7
  16. https://www.thelastdialogue.org/surah-resources/surah-nisa-faqs/
  17. https://journals.ajsrp.com/index.php/jis/en/article/view/6957/6564
  18. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=172&to=176
  19. https://www.ilmgate.org/the-chronology-and-background-of-quranic-revelation/
  20. https://www.altafsir.com/Books/Asbab%2520Al-Nuzul%2520by%2520Al-Wahidi.pdf
  21. https://www.iium.edu.my/deed/quran/intro/i004.html
  22. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=75&to=76
  23. https://islam.stackexchange.com/questions/15001/did-the-prophet-marry-any-more-wives-after-the-revelation-of-43
  24. https://al-islam.org/enlightening-commentary-light-holy-quran-vol-3/section-14-faithfuls-and-hypocrites-battle-uhud
  25. https://versebyversequranstudycircle.wordpress.com/2012/11/06/brief-explanation-of-surah-an-nisa-ayaat-88-91/
  26. https://myislam.org/surah-an-nisa/
  27. https://rahiqacademy.com/how-to-identify-juz-in-quran/
  28. https://islamicstudies.info/quran/towards.php?sura=4
  29. https://quran.com/4/43
  30. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=11
  31. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/4
  32. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=4
  33. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/19
  34. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/22-24
  35. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/3
  36. https://quran.com/en/4:3/tafsirs/en-tafisr-ibn-kathir
  37. https://quran.com/en/4:3/tafsirs/en-tafsir-maarif-ul-quran
  38. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/35
  39. https://quran.com/en/4:35/tafsirs/en-tafsir-maarif-ul-quran
  40. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=35
  41. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/34
  42. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=34
  43. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=23
  44. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/24
  45. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=24
  46. https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-Quran-not-prohibit-cousin-marriages-in-Quran-4-23
  47. https://quranx.com/tafsirs/4.15
  48. https://surahquran.com/tafsir-english-aya-16-sora-4.html
  49. https://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/punish_lewdness.html
  50. https://lampofislam.wordpress.com/2018/07/30/the-quran-doesnt-penalize-homosexuality/
  51. https://www.ghamidi.tv/articles/what-is-the-punishment-for-adultery-1055
  52. https://versebyversequranstudycircle.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/tafseer-surah-an-nisa-ayah-24/
  53. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=56&to=59
  54. https://myislam.org/surah-an-nisa/ayat-59/
  55. https://surahquran.com/tafsir-english-aya-88-sora-4.html
  56. https://quran.com/en/4:88/tafsirs/en-tafsir-maarif-ul-quran
  57. https://versebyversequranstudycircle.wordpress.com/2012/11/06/tafseer-surah-an-nisa-ayah-88/
  58. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=88&to=91
  59. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/138/tafsirs
  60. http://m.qtafsir.com/Surah-An-Nisa
  61. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=44&to=46
  62. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=153&to=159
  63. https://legacy.quran.com/4/153-171
  64. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/171
  65. https://myislam.org/surah-an-nisa/ayat-171/
  66. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=163&to=171
  67. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/48
  68. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=48
  69. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/116
  70. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=36
  71. https://quran.com/en/4:48/tafsirs/en-tafsir-maarif-ul-quran
  72. https://quran.com/en/4:116/tafsirs/en-tafisr-ibn-kathir
  73. https://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=4&verse=74
  74. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=95
  75. https://al-islam.org/enlightening-commentary-light-holy-quran-vol-4/section-12-dealing-hypocrites
  76. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=101&to=104
  77. https://quran.com/4/157
  78. https://quran.com/en/an-nisa/157-167
  79. https://islamicstudies.info/reference.php?sura=4&verse=157-158
  80. https://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/3143
  81. https://journal.rts.edu/article/it-was-made-to-appear-like-that-to-them-islams-denial-of-jesus-crucifixion-in-the-quran-and-dogmatic-tradition/
  82. https://www.str.org/w/the-quran-gets-crucifixion-wrong
  83. https://quran.com/4/171
  84. https://islamicstudies.info/reference.php?sura=4&verse=171
  85. https://islamqa.info/en/answers/243142
  86. https://carm.org/islam/did-the-author-of-the-quran-understand-the-trinity/
  87. https://www.perspectivedigest.org/archive/28-3/thinking-biblically-about-the-quran
  88. https://quran.com/4:34/tafsirs/en-tafisr-ibn-kathir
  89. https://daaiyatulislam.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/tafsir-ibn-kathir-surah-4-an-nisa.pdf
  90. https://islamic1articles.home.blog/2019/06/14/benefits-and-virtues-of-surah-4-an-nisaa/
  91. https://theselittlethoughtsofmine.com/surah-an-nisa/
  92. https://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicQuran/comments/1dc1fxy/im_still_confused_about_verse_434/
  93. https://iscw.isqs.ir/article_249683_en.html
  94. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/10.3366/jqs.2021.0466
  95. https://journal.makwafoundation.org/index.php/hakamain/article/download/323/123
  96. https://www.icraa.org/domestic-violence-critique-of-some-modern-opinions-on-quran-434/
  97. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349775488_Understanding_the_Issue_of_Polygamy_in_the_Quranic_Context_A_Hermeneutic_Approach_By_Hamza_Elbuhaisi
  98. https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/7970/23917
  99. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384465385_Gender_equality_in_the_Qur%27an_An_Analysis_of_surah_an-Nisa%27_verses_1_and_34_in_the_exegesis_of_al-Tabari_and_al-Razi
  100. https://journal.formosapublisher.org/index.php/sospolbud/article/download/13538/13097
  101. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1142/bc5cb1eb10277a0414c898f5f36046eb2438.pdf
  102. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385282646_Contemporary_Interpretation_Approach_In_The_Culture_Of_Patriarchal_Analysis_In_Surah_An-Nisa_Verse_34_Literature_Review
  103. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/2/202
  104. https://resources.ials.sas.ac.uk/ukcle/78.158.56.101/archive/law/files/downloads/794/797.9f094ef7.IntroductiontoIslamicFamilyLawFinalrevised151210.pdf
  105. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=15&to=16
  106. https://quran.com/en/4:15/tafsirs/en-tafsir-maarif-ul-quran
  107. https://academic.oup.com/book/34967/chapter/298605795
  108. https://al-islam.org/enlightening-commentary-light-holy-quran-vol-4/section-13-murder-and-its-punishment
  109. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=93
  110. https://quran.com/en/4:11/tafsirs/en-tafsir-maarif-ul-quran
  111. https://quran.com/en/4:34/tafsirs/en-tafsir-maarif-ul-quran
  112. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=2
  113. https://quranx.com/tafsirs/4.34
  114. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392867734_A_Critical_Analysis_of_Patriarchal_Constructs_in_Ibn_Kathir%27s_Exegesis_of_Gender-Related_Qur%27anic_Verses
  115. https://brill.com/abstract/journals/haww/15/3/article-p279_279.xml
  116. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312318324_Towards_a_New_Interpretation_of_Quran_434
  117. http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2225-71602020000100008
  118. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362105613_Semantic_Analysis_The_Fair_in_Surah_an-Nisa_verses_3_and_129
  119. https://jurnal.peneliti.net/index.php/IJEIT/article/download/11869/8750/
  120. https://quran.com/4/34
  121. https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=34&to=35
  122. https://islamicstudies.info/quran/maarif.php?sura=4&verse=71&to=76
  123. https://myislam.org/surah-an-nisa/ayat-71/
  124. https://islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=4&verse=92&to=96
  125. https://quran.com/en/4:95/tafsirs/en-tafsir-maarif-ul-quran
  126. https://thebriefing.com.au/2013/05/crucifixion-historicity/
  127. https://biblearchaeologyreport.com/2022/11/18/top-ten-historical-references-to-jesus-outside-of-the-bible/
  128. https://peacefulscience.org/articles/daniel-ang-a-scientist-looks-at-the-resurrection/
  129. https://fccgreene.org/blog/2025/05/09/gqa-what-is-the-evidence-for-jesus-death-and-resurrection
  130. https://biologos.org/articles/what-genetics-say-about-adam-and-eve
  131. https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2013/08/common-genetic-ancestors-lived-during-roughly-same-time-period-scientists-find.html
  132. https://ecoevocommunity.nature.com/posts/61200-adam-and-eve-our-ghostly-ancestors
  133. https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-Quran-deny-that-Jesus-was-crucified-by-the-Roman-authorities
  134. https://yaqeeninstitute.org/read/paper/human-origins-part-1-theological-conclusions-and-empirical-limitations
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.