Hubbry Logo
Train ferryTrain ferryMain
Open search
Train ferry
Community hub
Train ferry
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Train ferry
Train ferry
Train ferry
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Image showing a railcar on rails inside the white interior of a ferry.
Interior of a roll-on roll-off train ferry in Villa San Giovanni, Italy
Railway ferry, Baltic Sea

A train ferry is a ship (ferry) designed to carry railway vehicles, as well as their cargoes and passengers.[1][2] Typically, one level of the ship is fitted with railway tracks, and the vessel has a door at the front and/or rear to give access to the wharves. In the United States, train ferries are sometimes referred to as "car ferries",[3][4] as distinguished from "auto ferries" used to transport automobiles. The wharf (sometimes called a "slip") has a ramp, and a linkspan or "apron", balanced by weights, that connects the railway proper to the ship, allowing for tidal or seasonal changes in water level.

While railway vehicles can be and are shipped on the decks or in the holds of ordinary ships, purpose-built train ferries can be quickly loaded and unloaded by roll-on/roll-off, especially as several vehicles can be loaded or unloaded at once. A train ferry that is a barge is called a car float or rail barge. Some train ferries are considered pure train ferries that only carry rail traffic, whereas others are defined as train/vehicle ferries that also carry vehicles.[2]

History

[edit]

An early train ferry was established as early as 1833 by the Monkland and Kirkintilloch Railway. To extend the line over the Forth and Clyde Canal in Scotland, the company began operating a wagon ferry to transport the rolling stock over the canal.[5][6][page needed] In April 1836, the first railroad car ferry in the U.S., Susquehanna, entered service on the Susquehanna River between Havre de Grace and Perryville, Maryland.[6][page needed]

The first modern train ferry was Leviathan, built in 1849.[7][8] The Edinburgh, Leith and Newhaven Railway was formed in 1842 and the company wished to extend the East Coast Main Line further north to Dundee and Aberdeen. As bridge technology was not yet capable enough to provide adequate support for the crossing over the Firth of Forth, which was roughly five miles (8 km) across, a different solution had to be found, primarily for the transport of goods, where efficiency was key. The company hired the up-and-coming civil engineer Thomas Bouch who argued for a train ferry with an efficient roll-on roll-off mechanism to maximise the efficiency of the system.[7] Custom-built ferries were to be built, with railway lines and matching harbour facilities at both ends to allow the rolling stock to easily drive on and off the boat.[9] To compensate for the changing tides, adjustable ramps were positioned at the harbours and the gantry structure height was varied by moving it along the slipway. The wagons were loaded on and off with the use of stationary steam engines.[9][6][page needed] Although others had had similar ideas, it was Bouch who first put them into effect, and did so with an attention to detail (such as design of the ferry slip). This led a subsequent President of the Institution of Civil Engineers[10] to settle any dispute over priority of invention with the observation that "there was little merit in a simple conception of this kind, compared with a work practically carried out in all its details, and brought to perfection."[11] The company was persuaded to install this train ferry service for the transportation of goods wagons across the Firth of Forth from Burntisland in Fife to Granton. The ferry itself was built by Thomas Grainger, a partner of the firm Grainger and Miller.[12] The service commenced on 3 February 1850.[13] It was called "The Floating Railway"[14] and intended as a temporary measure until the railway could build a bridge, but this was not opened until 1890, its construction delayed in part by repercussions from the catastrophic failure of Thomas Bouch's Tay Rail Bridge.[15]

In 1878, the Solano train ferry began operating in the United States across Carquinez Strait remaining in service until 1930 when a bridge was built.[16][17] In 1899, the SS Baikal train ferry was assembled in Russia to link the eastern and western portions of the Trans-Siberian Railroad across Lake Baikal.[18] The ferry had been built in Newcastle upon Tyne then disassembled and shipped in 7,000 crates to its assembly location inside Russia.[18]

Switzerland has a long history of train ferry usage beginning in the 1860s.[19] Between 1869 and 1976, train ferries also existed on Lake Constance. The Lake Constance train ferries linked lakeside railway stations in Austria (Bregenz), Germany (Friedrichshafen Hafen, Konstanz, Lindau-Insel) and Switzerland (Romanshorn).

From 1936 until 1977 (except during the Second World War), the Night Ferry from Dover was a train ferry that connected the UK with France and the rest of Europe.[20][21][22]

The Japanese train ferry Toya Maru sank during Typhoon Marie on 26 September 1954, killing more than a thousand.[23] Four other train ferries, Seikan maru No.11, Kitami Maru, Tokachi Maru and Hidaka Maru also sank on that day; the loss appeared to be of about 1,430 people. At the time, Japanese train ferries did not have a rear seagate, because engineers believed that in-rushing water would simply flow out again quickly and would not pose a danger.[24] However, when the frequency of waves bears the wrong relationship to the length of a ship, each wave arrives as the water from the previous wave is trying to leave, causing water to accumulate on the ship. After the accidents, all Japanese train ferries were retrofitted with rear seagates and weather forecast technology was greatly promoted.

The Norwegian train ferry Skagerrak built in 1965, sank in gale-force winds on 7 September 1966, on a journey between Kristiansand, Norway, and Hirtshals, Denmark, when the rear seagate was destroyed by heavy seas. One person subsequently died of injuries, and six freight cars and a number of automobiles sank to the bottom with the ship. Many more passengers would have died but for the actions of the Royal Danish Airforce who managed to use helicopters to rescue 144 people.[25]

The Canadian train ferry MV Patrick Morris sank on 20 April 1970, while assisting in a search-and-rescue operation for a sinking fishing trawler (MFV Enterprise) off the northeast coast of Cape Breton Island. The ferry was trying to maintain position to retrieve a body when its stern gates were overpowered by 30-foot (9.1 m) waves. It sank within 30 minutes taking several rail cars and 4 crew members, including the Captain, to the bottom of the Cabot Strait. There were 47 survivors.[26]

In 1998, the largest train ferry ever was built, the MS Skåne on the Trelleborg-Rostock route, is 200 meters (660 ft) long, 29 meters (95 ft) wide, with six tracks plus two on an elevator to the lower deck, having a total length of track of 1,110 meters (3,640 ft).[27]

Current services

[edit]
Main article: List of train ferries

Many train ferry services ceased their operations around the world. There are several services that are still in use in Azerbaijan, Bolivia, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Germany, Georgia, Iran, Italy, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Russia, Sweden, Tanzania, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, and United States. Some of these are RORO train ferries that carry passenger trains. Some are for freight transportation only.

Hazards

[edit]

Train ferries rarely sink because of sea hazards, although they have some weaknesses linked to the very nature of transporting trains "on rail" on a ship.

These weaknesses include:

  • Trains are loaded at a rather high level, making the ship top-heavy. (Although modern train ferries often have truck decks above the train deck, making them less top-heavy)
  • The train deck is difficult to compartmentalise, so that sloshing flood water can destabilize the ship. However, train ferries are often built as "large barges", partly with open train deck, with the superstructure above, meaning the water will pour out into the sea again. Car ferries, on the other hand, usually have "normal hulls" with "holes" in them for loading; this design retains sloshing flood water within the ship
  • The sea doors where the trains go in and out are a weakness, even if placed at the rear of the ship.
  • The train carriages need to be strongly secured lest they break away and roll around, particularly on long, open-water routes. (The brakes are normally put on on long open-water routes)

The Ann Arbor Railroad of Michigan developed a system of making cars secure that was adopted by many other lines. Screw jacks were placed on the corners of the railcar and the car was raised slightly to take its weight off its wheels. Chains and turnbuckles were placed around the car frame and hooked onto the rails and tightened. Clamps were placed behind the wheels on the rails. Deckhands engaged in continual inspection and tightening of the gear during the crossing. This system effectively held the cars in place when the ship encountered rough weather.

Some accidents have occurred at the slip during loading, when stability can be a major problem. Train ferries often list when heavy cars are loaded onto a track on one side while the other side is empty. Normal procedure was to load half of a track on one side, all of the track on the other side, and then the rest of the original track. If this procedure was not followed, results could be disastrous. In 1909, SS Ann Arbor No. 4 capsized in its slip in Manistique, Michigan when a switching crew put eight cars of iron ore on its portside tracks. The crew got off without loss of life, but salvage operations were costly and time-consuming.

Several train ferries, including SS Milwaukee, SS Pere Marquette 18, and SS Marquette & Bessemer No. 2, have been lost on the Great Lakes. These losses, though causes remain unconfirmed, were attributed to seas boarding the unprotected stern of the ship and swamping it in a severe storm. As a result, seagates were required on all new ships and required to be retrofitted on older vessels. In addition, two wooden cross-lake railroad ferries caught fire and burned.

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Train ferry

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A train ferry is a specialized vessel designed to transport entire railway trains, individual rail cars, or their cargoes and passengers across bodies of water such as seas, rivers, or lakes, enabling the seamless integration of railway and without the need for unloading and reloading at intermediate points. These ferries typically feature one or more decks fitted with railway tracks that align with shore lines via ramps or link spans, allowing trains to roll on and off directly, and they have been essential for connecting rail networks separated by water barriers, supporting both freight and services. The concept of train ferries emerged in the mid-19th century as rail networks expanded, with the first operational service launching in 1850–1851 across the in , connecting Granton to via paddle steamers adapted for rail cars. Early developments included Germany's inaugural route in 1882 between and Altefähr on the , spanning 25 kilometers. By the early , train ferries proliferated in and to facilitate cross-channel and traffic, with notable wartime applications during for moving locomotives and from the to continental via ports like and Dover. Their peak usage occurred from the late 19th to mid-, driven by industrial growth, but many services declined post-World War II due to bridge constructions, the rise of , and alternative transport modes, leading to the cessation of operations in places like the by 1995. Technically, train ferries are engineered for stability and , often with reinforced hulls to handle the weight of rail vehicles and features such as adjustable ramps, deck elevators for multi-level loading, and stabilization systems to mitigate wave-induced loads on transported rail cars. Today, train ferry operations persist in regions where geography or infrastructure gaps make them indispensable, particularly in for enhancing trade corridors like the Middle Corridor. Over 25 rail ferries operate on the , including the MV with capacity for 56 rail cars, facilitating routes from to and supporting multimodal freight from the to . In the , services connect Ukraine's to Turkey's Derince, bypassing gauge breaks, while is pursuing expansion of services across both seas as part of the Middle Corridor initiative, with routes resuming in 2025. Other active routes include Russia's Vanino-Kholmsk across the Tatar Strait, underscoring their ongoing role in despite reduced prevalence in and ; train ferry services in ceased in the mid-20th century.

Overview

Definition and Types

A train ferry is a specialized roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Ro) vessel designed to transport railway cars, wagons, or passenger coaches across water bodies such as seas, rivers, or lakes, without the need to unload cargo or passengers. These ships facilitate seamless integration between rail networks separated by waterways, allowing trains to roll directly onto and off the ferry using fixed tracks on the deck that align precisely with terminal tracks on shore. Typically, the vessels operate as shuttle services between fixed terminals, carrying both freight wagons and passenger coaches, while locomotives are often detached and transported separately, though some ferries are designed to accommodate locomotives. Key characteristics of train ferries include their deck configuration with parallel rail tracks—often two or three—spanning the length of the vessel to accommodate standard gauge railways (1,435 mm). These tracks enable the loading of 20 to 50 rail cars per voyage, depending on the ship's size, with overall lengths commonly reaching up to 200 meters to handle extended consists. The design emphasizes stability for , with bow and stern doors or ramps for bidirectional access, ensuring efficient turnaround times at ports. Train ferries are categorized into several types based on their operational focus and configuration. Pure train ferries are dedicated solely to rail traffic, featuring decks exclusively fitted with railway tracks for wagons and coaches. In contrast, combined train-vehicle ferries incorporate additional road decks or lanes alongside rail tracks, allowing simultaneous transport of automobiles, trucks, and rail cars to maximize capacity on mixed routes. Variants also differ by water body: short-sea train ferries operate on coastal or inter-island routes with self-propelled hulls suited for open water, while lake or river variants are often smaller and adapted for calmer, inland conditions, such as historical double-ended ferries on that linked and with dual-gauge tracks for cross-border rail continuity. These differ from car floats, which are smaller, unpowered barges towed by tugs over short distances like harbors or rivers, lacking self-propulsion and typically limited to fewer cars without full train integration. Similarly, general Ro-Ro ferries transport road vehicles via wheeled ramps but do not include rail tracks, focusing instead on automobiles and lorries rather than .

Significance and Applications

Train ferries play a crucial role in bridging discontinuous rail networks across geographical barriers like straits, rivers, and lakes, enabling seamless freight movement without the need for extensive such as bridges or tunnels. This integration is particularly valuable for bulk commodities, where the ability to transport entire rail consists intact minimizes handling disruptions and supports efficient supply chains in regions lacking continuous land connections. Economically, train ferries offer significant advantages for bulk freight by reducing costs and delays associated with unloading and reloading cargo at ports, improving efficiency and organization in the overall chain. These benefits are most pronounced in scenarios where alternative fixed crossings are economically or technically unfeasible, allowing rail operators to maintain competitive rates for long-distance hauls. In strategic applications, train ferries have supported military logistics, notably during when requisitioned vessels transported over 2,000 locomotives and supplies across the to bolster Allied operations in following D-Day. They also facilitate integration with major international rail corridors, such as the , where the train ferry in connects rail segments between and , enhancing transcontinental freight flows despite capacity constraints. Environmentally, train ferries enable lower CO₂ emissions per ton-km for long-haul freight compared to , as combinations of rail and waterborne modes typically produce far less per unit transported than trucks, although outcomes vary based on the vessel's fuel type and . This positions them as a greener option for crossing water barriers in integrated rail systems. As a niche solution, train ferries handle only a small fraction of global rail traffic and are primarily employed in specific regions featuring islands, straits, or large inland seas, such as the Baltic and Seas or , where they address unique connectivity challenges without widespread adoption elsewhere.

History

19th Century Origins

The concept of the train ferry emerged in the early as railways expanded and required efficient means to cross waterways without unloading cargo. The first recorded use occurred in 1833, when the Monkland and Kirkintilloch Railway in operated a simple to ferry individual wagons across the at . This primitive system allowed coal wagons from the Monkland coalfields to reach broader markets via the canal network, marking an initial step in integrating rail and water transport. Train ferry operations soon crossed the Atlantic, debuting in the United States in April 1836 on the . Operated by the , Wilmington and Railroad, the Susquehanna carried rail cars between Perryville and , facilitating the connection of rail lines on either side of the river until a bridge replaced it in 1866. This service represented the earliest rail car ferry in , addressing the challenges of river crossings in an era of rapid railroad growth. A pivotal advancement came in 1849 with the construction of the SS Leviathan, the world's first purpose-built train ferry. Commissioned by the , and Newhaven Railway and constructed by Robert Napier and Sons on the Clyde, this side-wheel measured initially 157.6 feet in length (later extended to 167 feet around 1877) and featured innovative end-loading ramps at both ends, enabling entire trains of up to 20 wagons to roll on and off without disassembly. Launched into service in May 1850 across the between Granton and , it operated as a "floating railway" for four decades, carrying passengers, freight, and mail until the opening of the in 1890. This design significantly improved efficiency over earlier barge methods and set the standard for future train ferries. Despite these innovations, early train ferries faced substantial hurdles that curtailed widespread adoption. These technical incompatibilities, combined with the high costs of vessel construction and operation, limited use primarily to short crossings until the 1860s, when standardization efforts in Britain and the emergence of services on the U.S. began to accelerate implementation. By the 1850s, train ferry concepts spread beyond Britain to . These operations exemplified the growing role of train ferries in bridging geographic barriers and supporting industrial transport in diverse regions.

20th Century Expansion

During , train ferries played a crucial role in , particularly for Britain and . The British operated train ferry services from the Port of to starting in February 1918, transporting tanks, guns, locomotives, and wagons directly to support frontline units on the Western Front. The SS Baikal, an ice-breaking train ferry launched in 1899 on in , was adapted for of military cargoes and personnel during the war, bridging the Trans-Siberian Railway's eastern and western segments despite harsh winter conditions. The interwar period saw significant expansion of train ferry networks, driven by economic recovery and growing international trade. In the United States, the Ann Arbor Railroad enhanced its Great Lakes fleet in the 1920s and 1930s, pioneering innovations in carferry design to efficiently shuttle freight cars across from ports like Frankfort to , supporting industrial growth in the Midwest. In , the service commenced in October 1936, operating as a sleeper train ferry between Dover and to connect Victoria with Nord, facilitating seamless passenger and freight movement across the until the outbreak of . World War II further highlighted the strategic importance of train ferries while inflicting heavy losses, followed by reconstruction efforts. In the United States, aging vessels like the original Solano on the were supplemented by wartime rail ferry operations to maintain supply lines, with the Ramon launched in 1914 as a versatile ferry to handle increased traffic demands. Japanese train ferries, vital for transporting coal from to , suffered devastating losses from Allied air strikes in 1945, disrupting the island nation's logistics network. In the , European and American operators rebuilt fleets, incorporating stronger hulls and improved propulsion to restore services amid recovering economies. By 1950, train ferry operations reached their global peak, with over 100 vessels serving diverse routes in at least 23 countries. On , up to 15 routes operated simultaneously, carrying thousands of rail cars annually to link Midwestern industries. In the Black Sea, ferries like those between and facilitated transport across . The onset of decline began in the as major bridge constructions rendered many services obsolete. Planning for the in , initiated in the late , accelerated during the decade, aiming to replace crossings with a fixed rail and road link across the , reducing reliance on vessels amid rising investments.

Late 20th and 21st Century Developments

During the late 1980s and 1990s, several traditional train ferry services faced decommissioning primarily due to the construction of fixed rail links that rendered them obsolete. In the UK, the Dover train ferry operations, which had been a key link for freight between Britain and continental Europe, ceased in 1988 amid competition from larger vessels and anticipation of the Channel Tunnel's opening in 1994, which ultimately eliminated the need for cross-Channel train ferries. Similarly, in northern Europe, the Fehmarnbelt train ferry between Puttgarden (Germany) and Rødby (Denmark), operational since 1963, ended services in December 2019—earlier than initially planned—to accommodate engineering works preparing for the Fehmarnbelt fixed link tunnel, set for completion in the late 2020s. As of 2025, the Fehmarnbelt tunnel is under construction, anticipated to open in 2029. These closures exemplified a broader trend where infrastructure investments prioritized continuous rail networks over ferry dependencies. Technological adaptations emerged to sustain remaining services, particularly in the , where operators introduced larger, more versatile vessels to handle evolving freight demands. The MS Skåne, launched in 1998 by , represented a significant update as one of the world's largest train ferries at 200 meters long, capable of carrying 3,330 tons of rail freight alongside 2,630 tons of vehicles and containers on the Rostock-Trelleborg route. Its duplicate navigation bridge facilitated efficient short-sea operations without needing to turn, while integrated decks allowed for combined rail and container loading, adapting to the rise of intermodal transport in the and . Such designs helped extend the viability of train ferries by accommodating containerized , which became increasingly dominant in global trade. Environmental considerations drove further innovations in the , with a shift toward diesel-electric propulsion systems to curb emissions amid tightening regulations. These systems optimized by running at optimal loads (70-80%), reducing annual fuel consumption by up to 125,733 kg per vessel and cutting CO₂ emissions by approximately 401,000 kg, as demonstrated in analyses of ferries. Examples include upgrades on Baltic routes, where diesel-electric configurations lowered particulate matter and outputs while maintaining reliability for mixed rail and Ro-Ro cargoes. Into the early 21st century, train ferries persisted in remote or challenging terrains where fixed links were impractical, underscoring their niche role despite overall decline. On , the highest navigable lake in the world, the train barge, operated by , continues to ferry rail cars between (Peru) and Guaqui (Bolivia), bridging differing rail gauges across the border and supporting isolated Andean freight needs. Globally, the number of active train ferries dropped markedly from around 50 in 2000 to fewer than 25 by 2010, driven by rail gauge standardization, globalization favoring longer-haul fixed infrastructure, and economic pressures from rising fuel costs. This contraction followed the mid-20th century peak, when over 100 such services operated worldwide, but highlighted adaptations in surviving routes.

Design and Technical Features

Ship Construction and Propulsion

Train ferries are typically constructed with double-ended or symmetric hulls to facilitate bidirectional operation without turning, allowing efficient loading and unloading at both ends. These hulls feature reinforced decks capable of supporting loads of 20-30 tons from rail cars, with longitudinal framing and transverse webs to distribute heavy point loads. Typical dimensions include lengths of 150-220 meters and beams of 20-30 meters, as exemplified by the Skåne ferry's 200-meter length and 29.6-meter beam, enabling stable navigation in varied sea conditions. Stability is achieved through a low center of gravity, maintained by ballast tanks and double bottoms that adjust trim and heel during rail car loading. Anti-roll features such as retractable stabilizing fins and heeling systems counteract the top-heavy nature of stacked rail vehicles, ensuring compliance with IMO stability criteria even under wave-induced accelerations up to 3.6 m/s². For instance, the Skåne incorporates two retractable fins and a 2,400 t/h trimming pump to manage dynamic loads from sea waves impacting the hull. Propulsion systems predominantly employ diesel-mechanical setups with controllable pitch propellers for precise maneuvering, delivering 10-30 MW of power to achieve service speeds of 15-20 knots. The Stena Jutlandica, for example, uses four MAN B&W diesel engines totaling 25.92 MW, driving two 4,800 mm propellers, while emerging designs explore hybrid diesel-electric configurations with units for short routes to reduce emissions. Deck configurations provide space for 30-60 rail cars, with track lengths of 600-1,100 meters across multiple parallel lines, plus limited crew quarters and areas in combined-service vessels. Hulls are built from high-strength with corrosion-resistant coatings, such as epoxy-based systems, to withstand saltwater exposure and extend in marine environments.

Rail Loading Systems and Capacity

Train ferries are equipped with specialized rail infrastructure on their decks to facilitate the loading and transport of rail cars. The deck rail setup typically features continuous standard-gauge tracks measuring 1435 mm, which span the length of the vessel and allow for the direct rolling on and off of trains without disassembly. To accommodate variations in shore-side track gauges, such as the 1520 mm Russian gauge, adjustable end sections are incorporated at the bow and stern, enabling seamless connection to diverse rail networks during docking. Loading aids on train ferries include hydraulic ramps that bridge the gap between the vessel and the terminal pier, ensuring stable transfer of rail even in moderate conditions. Traversers, which are movable platforms or turntables, are employed for shunting and repositioning on multi-track decks to optimize space utilization. For secure transport, are restrained using heavy-duty chains, clamps, or purpose-built couplers that prevent longitudinal or lateral movement during voyages, thereby maintaining alignment on the rails. Capacity optimization is achieved through multi-track deck configurations, commonly featuring 2 to 4 parallel rail lines that can accommodate mixed freight and passenger . These designs support lengths of up to 1,000 meters, depending on the vessel's dimensions, allowing for the efficient carriage of substantial cargo volumes across water barriers. Gauge adaptation is addressed through the use of variable bogies on rail , which can be adjusted to switch between standard and broader gauges, or via dedicated break-of-gauge facilities at ferry terminals where cars are transferred to compatible undercarriages. This ensures in regions with differing rail standards, such as between European and Asian networks. Maintenance aspects of rail loading systems involve regular onboard track inspections to check for , alignment, and , often conducted during layovers using portable ultrasonic and visual testing . prevention is enhanced by the installation of guide rails along the deck edges and central barriers, which provide additional lateral support and confine any potential deviations within safe limits.

Operations

Loading and Unloading Procedures

The loading and unloading of trains on train ferries involves meticulous coordination to ensure safety and efficiency, typically managed through roll-on/roll-off (ro-ro) methods where complete train consists are shunted directly onto the vessel's deck tracks. Pre-loading preparations begin with shore-based shunting operations to align and compose train consists, often decomposing longer trains into manageable sections for ferry capacity. checks are conducted to maintain the vessel's trim, with cars placed evenly fore and aft to prevent imbalance during transit; this includes verifying uniform load placement across decks as per international rail standards. The boarding process commences once the ferry is positioned at the terminal, with trains rolling slowly onto the deck via adjustable ramps that bridge the gap between shore tracks and the vessel to minimize risks, typically at speeds under 10 km/h to control dynamic forces. Onboard rail crew guide the placement and any necessary couplings, while terminal signals direct the movement; for a full load, such as on the route, the process takes approximately 70-90 minutes, including decomposition and positioning. Loading times for freight trains in the vary depending on the route and vessel. Once loaded, trains are secured for sea transit by applying hand or screw brakes on each wagon to prevent movement, supplemented by chocks and lashings attached to deck fittings for additional restraint against rolling or shifting. For hazardous cargo, such as certain chemicals in tank cars, vehicle decks are ventilated prior to and during loading to disperse fumes and ensure compliance with maritime safety protocols. Specialized rail operators, in coordination with port signal systems and crew, oversee these steps to synchronize rail and maritime workflows. Unloading follows the reverse sequence, with the ferry docking and ramps aligned—accounting for tidal variations through adjustable that accommodate water level changes up to several meters—to allow level exit of the train sections. Post-voyage, inspections focus on damage assessment and verification of critical systems, such as braking continuity, before recomposing the train for onward ; on the Messina route, this adds about 15-30 minutes to the total offloading time of roughly 70-90 minutes.

Route Management and Logistics

Route management for train ferries requires meticulous voyage planning to balance , safety, and environmental factors. Schedules are heavily influenced by forecasts, as rough seas can delay or cancel crossings; operators use advanced software to select paths that minimize exposure to storms, winds exceeding 20 knots, or waves over 2 meters. Typical voyages, such as those across the between and , last approximately 40 hours one way, with planning allowing for 5-6 round trips monthly per vessel under favorable conditions. Fuel management involves pre-loading sufficient bunkers for round trips plus reserves, based on vessel displacement and speed of 12-15 knots. Crew rotations follow international standards like the , with shifts structured for 24/7 coverage. Logistics integration ensures train ferries function as seamless links in broader rail networks, with timetables aligned to major freight corridors for just-in-time arrivals. Coordination occurs through shared digital platforms between ferry operators and rail authorities, synchronizing arrivals at ports with vessel departures to avoid idle time for . For international routes, procedures are streamlined via pre-submission of documentation; in EU-adjacent operations, juxtaposed border controls allow inspections by multiple agencies at departure points, reducing transit delays to under 1 hour for compliant shipments. Examples include routes bypassing non-EU land borders, where electronic manifests are exchanged 24 hours in advance to facilitate rapid clearance. Cargo handling emphasizes detailed manifests to manage mixed loads, including standard freight cars, tankers, and specialized wagons. Each voyage's cargo manifest lists individual railcars by type, weight, and contents, enabling balanced loading for vessel stability—typically up to 100-150 cars per . Priority is given to perishables, such as refrigerated containers for food exports, which are positioned for quick access and temperature-monitored during transit to comply with international standards like those from the . Turnaround times at terminals are optimized to under 2 hours for unloading and reloading, achieved through pre-staged rail sidings and automated tracking systems that verify manifests against physical inventory upon arrival. Economic factors shape route viability, with tariffs typically calculated per based on length, weight, and type. As of 2025, services such as the Sweden-Germany route have been extended until 2031, supporting ongoing intermodal efficiency. Terminal infrastructure at key ports features dedicated rail facilities to expedite transfers. At in , the road-railway ferry complex includes a marshalling yard capable of handling 200-320 s, with specialized sidings for sorting incoming and outgoing trains. Cranes and hydraulic lifts assist in positioning wagons, while hydrotechnical structures protect berths from ice and currents, supporting annual throughputs exceeding 2 million tons in rail freight as of 2025. These elements enable rapid integration with the grid, minimizing dwell times and enhancing overall flow.

Current Services

Europe

In Europe, train ferry services in 2025 primarily support critical rail connections across seas and straits, facilitating both freight and limited passenger transport amid geopolitical tensions and infrastructure transitions. Key services focus on the Mediterranean, , Baltic Sea, and Marmara Sea, often integrating with broader Eurasian logistics networks. Italy maintains one of Europe's most iconic train ferry operations across the , linking the mainland at to on . This service, operational since the , carries the Milan-Sicily sleeper train and freight wagons, providing a vital rail link for the island's 4.7 million residents despite ongoing threats from the approved project. As of 2025, the crossing remains active, with trains boarding ferries for the 30-minute voyage, though the €13.5 billion bridge—slated for completion in 2032—poses risks to its long-term viability by enabling direct connectivity. Turkey launched a significant new train ferry service in May 2025 across the Marmara Sea, connecting Bandırma on the Asian side to Tekirdağ in . This 80-kilometer, four-hour crossing enhances Eurasian rail integration by transporting up to 2.8 million tonnes of freight annually, with vessels accommodating 800 meters of rail track for wagons. Operated daily in round trips, it serves as an alternative to congested land routes, supporting the Middle Corridor for cargo from to . Russia operates train ferries on both the Baltic and Seas to maintain connectivity for its exclaves and southern ports. In the Baltic, the to () route, launched in March 2025, bypasses Baltic state borders amid sanctions, carrying rail wagons with a capacity of around 50 cars per vessel and handling over 1.1 million tonnes of ro-ro and rail cargo in the first half of the year. services, such as those from or , support regional freight but face operational constraints. These routes underscore Russia's strategic use of ferries for isolated territories. Baltic Sea services between and , such as the historic Trelleborg-Sassnitz route using vessels like MS Skåne, have been significantly reduced since due to economic pressures and shifting passenger demand. Once capable of handling substantial rail traffic, these operations now focus primarily on ro-pax rather than dedicated train ferries, with the Sassnitz-Trelleborg link discontinued by FRS Baltic in September 2024. Similar Finland-Sweden Baltic crossings remain limited to occasional freight trials. In , train ferry services to Georgia—such as to —resumed in March 2025 despite ongoing conflict, enabling two trial voyages for rail wagons as part of the Trans-Caspian corridor, though volumes remain constrained by security risks. The Denmark-Germany Rødby-Puttgarden service, a former key train ferry link, has been closed since 2019 in preparation for the Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, now expected to open around 2030 following delays announced in 2025, and fully replace ferry-based rail crossings with a seven-minute undersea journey.

Americas

In the Americas, train ferry operations remain sparse as of 2025, confined to a handful of freight-focused services that bridge geographical gaps in rail networks, particularly in remote coastal and harbor areas. These routes primarily support industrial transport, such as minerals and bulk goods, in regions where fixed rail connections are impractical or uneconomical. In the United States, no dedicated train ferries operate on the following the decline and retirement of the last vessels in the 1990s. However, limited services persist in , where New York New Jersey Rail, LLC (NYNJR) uses barges to shuttle rail cars across Upper between , New York, and . This short-haul operation, the last of its kind in the harbor, handles intermodal freight and avoids congested roadways, with barges accommodating up to 14 cars per crossing. A more substantial service spans the U.S.-Mexico border via the . CG Railway operates weekly rail ferries between the , , and the Port of , , , transporting up to 135 rail cars per vessel on double-deck roll-on/roll-off ships. Launched with new vessels in 2021 and expanded through a 2024 partnership with Transportes, this route facilitates mineral exports, automotive parts, and other commodities, reducing overland trucking by approximately 900 miles. Overall, these routes maintain stable but low-volume activity in 2025, emphasizing and without major new developments; operations face logistical hurdles like harbor congestion.

Asia, , and

In , train ferry operations are prominent across the , supporting transcontinental freight links as part of multimodal corridors connecting to . More than 25 rail ferries operate on the Caspian, facilitating the transport of cargo including oil and gas, with key routes linking ports in , , , and . For instance, services from Iran's Bandar Anzali to Russia's cover approximately 1,200 kilometers, enabling rail wagon transfers for goods moving through the International North-South Transport Corridor. The MV , a representative vessel, has a capacity of 56 railcars and exemplifies the fleet used for these crossings. These operations integrate with the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars (BTK) railway, a 826-kilometer line opened in 2017 that links , Georgia, and , where Caspian ferries from ports like or Kuryk to for block trains carrying energy resources. In Turkmenistan, Caspian rail ferry services connect Turkmenbashi to Azerbaijani ports, with government-operated vessels handling Ro-Ro rail cargo as part of the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (TITR). A 2024 tender for two new Ro-Ro railway ferries underscores ongoing fleet modernization to boost capacity for these routes into 2025. Across the , rail ferry services support regional logistics, including the weekly Varna (Bulgaria)- (Georgia) route operated by UkrFerry's MV , which accommodates rail wagons, trucks, and containers since its launch in January 2025. This service, spanning about 1,000 kilometers, aids freight movement between the and , with voyages scheduled bi-directionally. In Africa, freight ferry activity on Lake Victoria includes the MV Umoja, operated by Tanzania's Marine Services Company, connecting Mwanza (Tanzania) to Port Bell (Uganda) and Jinja with a capacity for up to 1,200 tonnes of cargo including exports like agricultural goods. Rehabilitated and relaunched in 2023, MV Umoja returned to full service in July 2025, enhancing cross-border logistics. Oceania's train ferry operations are undergoing renewal in New Zealand, where two new rail-enabled ferries for the Cook Strait Interislander service entered final procurement in September 2025, with shipbuilder Hyundai Mipo Dockyard (GSI) selected in October 2025. These vessels, measuring 200 meters in length and 28 meters in width, will replace the aging fleet following incidents like the 2024 grounding of the MV Aratere, and are designed to carry 1,500 passengers, 40 rail wagons, and significant vehicle loads upon entering service in 2029. As of 2025, Caspian crossings form the core network boosted by China's (BRI), including extensions via Turkey's BTK integration for enhanced n connectivity. Regional trends show growth in driven by oil and gas transit demands under BRI frameworks, such as new multimodal pilots from through and , while African services face stagnation amid port infrastructure upgrades reducing reliance on lake ferries.

Safety Considerations

Inherent Risks and Design Mitigations

Train ferries face significant stability challenges due to the high center of gravity imposed by stacked rail cars, which can elevate the vessel's overall metacenter and increase the risk of capsizing in adverse conditions. This top-heaviness is exacerbated by dynamic loads from sea waves, leading to accelerations up to 0.36g on containers and 0.25g on flat wagons, potentially causing cargo shifts if not properly secured. To mitigate these risks, operators employ ballast systems that lower the center of gravity by adjusting water intake in double-bottom tanks, ensuring compliance with load limits derived from stability calculations, such as restricting deck utilization to prevent excessive heel angles during rough seas. Additionally, enhanced lashing devices, including viscous elastomer materials, reduce dynamic stresses by up to 38% on containers, maintaining secure rail car positioning. Flooding remains a critical for train ferries, primarily stemming from bow door failures that allow progressive water ingress onto open decks, as seen in historical ro-ro incidents where unsecured or damaged doors led to rapid compartment flooding. Weak end doors, often hydraulic in , can fail under wave impact or mechanical stress, compromising watertight and accelerating list development. mitigations include robust hydraulic seals on bow visors and ramps to prevent leakage, coupled with double-hull compartments in critical areas like the and forward sections to limit floodable volume and enhance damage stability. Monitoring systems, such as water ingress alarms and bow door position indicators, further support proactive closure verification before departure. Uneven rail car loads amplify roll risks during wave encounters, where asymmetric weight distribution can induce excessive heeling moments and reduce the righting arm, heightening capsize potential in beam seas. Computer-aided trim control systems, integrating real-time sensors for adjustment and load monitoring, optimize vessel heel and trim to maintain above regulatory thresholds, even with variable rail configurations. Fire and hazards arise from combustible rail , such as fuel-laden cars or electrical components in modern trains, which can ignite spontaneously and propagate rapidly in enclosed decks due to poor ventilation and dense packing. Segregated zones, enforced through pre-loading inspections of 5-10% of per the IMDG Code, isolate hazardous materials to limit spread, while fixed CO2 suppression systems flood affected holds with at rates achieving 45% volume coverage within 10 minutes. These measures, including enhanced sealing and crew training, address the heightened risks from emerging threats like lithium-ion batteries in electric rail equipment. Train ferries adhere to (IMO) guidelines under the , particularly Chapter II-1, which mandates probabilistic damage stability criteria for ro-ro vessels, requiring survival after two-compartment flooding with a maximum heel of 15 degrees for passenger-carrying ships. These standards, adapted for rail configurations via the SOLAS '90 (A/Amax ), ensure intact and damaged stability envelopes account for high-deck rail loads, with phase-in requirements for existing fleets achieving 97.5% compliance by 2005. The Agreement further enforces full SOLAS 90 criteria for European ro-ro routes, emphasizing bow door security and freeboard margins to mitigate rail-specific vulnerabilities.

Notable Incidents and Lessons Learned

One of the earliest significant incidents involving a train ferry occurred on May 29, 1909, when the SS Ann Arbor No. 4 capsized and sank in its slip at Manistique Harbor, , while being loaded with 24 railroad cars carrying approximately 1,200 tons of . The vessel rolled over due to uneven loading on the port side, exacerbated by a switching crew placing eight additional ore cars there without balancing the weight; the crew escaped unharmed, but the ferry was raised and repaired after sustaining major damage. This event highlighted vulnerabilities in loading procedures for early train ferries, prompting initial reviews of weight distribution protocols on car ferries. In the postwar era, the sinking of the Japanese train ferry Tōya Maru on September 26, 1954, during Typhoon Marie in the stands as one of the deadliest maritime disasters, claiming 1,153 lives out of 1,430 passengers and crew. The vessel, overloaded with passengers and rail cars beyond its stability limits, encountered gale-force winds and high waves that caused it to capsize rapidly; investigations revealed inadequate weather monitoring and design flaws in stability under extreme conditions as key factors. This tragedy led to widespread reforms in Japanese ferry operations, including mandatory of rear seagates and enhanced promotion of technology. A pivotal modern incident was the capsizing of the roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Ro) ferry MV Herald of Free Enterprise on March 6, 1987, shortly after departing Zeebrugge, Belgium, resulting in 193 deaths. The disaster stemmed from a design flaw where the bow doors remained open due to a procedural oversight, allowing seawater to flood the car deck and cause a sudden shift in stability; although not exclusively a train ferry, its Ro-Ro configuration directly influenced safety standards for rail-carrying vessels. The formal investigation by the UK Marine Accident Investigation Branch emphasized systemic failures in door management and crew vigilance, leading to international regulations requiring indicators for open bow doors and improved stability criteria under the 1990 Stockholm Agreement. More recently, the train ferry Aratere grounded in Titoki Bay on June 21, 2024, after departing Picton, with 47 people aboard but no injuries reported (later retired in 2025). The incident was attributed to a gear malfunction and error, causing the vessel to deviate from course and strike shallow waters; the interim report from the Investigation Commission underscored issues with maintenance and system monitoring on aging ferries. In June 2025, charges were filed against the operator for safety violations. This event reinforced the need for rigorous pre-departure checks and redundant navigation systems in rail ferry operations. Key lessons from these incidents have driven safety enhancements across train ferry designs and operations, including the post-1990s mandate for secure, self-closing bow doors with alarms to prevent water ingress, as standardized by the following Ro-Ro disasters like the Herald. Enhanced weather routing protocols, inspired by the Tōya Maru, now require real-time forecasting integration and voyage adjustments to avoid severe conditions, while crew training programs emphasize loading balance and emergency procedures. Historically, major train ferry sinkings have been linked to pre-1960s designs vulnerable to storms and loading errors, according to compilations of maritime disaster records.

Alternatives and Future

Fixed Infrastructure Replacements

Fixed infrastructure such as bridges, tunnels, and rail extensions has progressively supplanted numerous train ferry routes worldwide, providing seamless rail connectivity and eliminating the need for vessel transfers. The , opened in 1994, exemplifies this shift by connecting the and via a 50-kilometer undersea rail link, effectively ending over a century of train ferry operations across the Dover Strait that dated back to the late 19th century. These ferries, which transported rail wagons between Dover and since the 1880s, were rendered obsolete as the tunnel enabled direct high-speed passenger and freight services, drastically reducing logistical complexities. Similarly, the , completed in 2000, linked and with an 8-kilometer cable-stayed bridge and 4-kilometer immersed tunnel, replacing train ferry services that previously connected and . This fixed link shortened rail journeys from approximately one hour on ferries to just 10 minutes, fostering regional integration and economic growth in the area. In the United States, the , inaugurated in 1957, bridged the Straits of Mackinac to connect 's Lower and Upper Peninsulas, supplanting car ferry operations across the straits that had been vital for vehicle and passenger transport since the early . The 8-kilometer ended the Michigan Department of State Highways' 34-year car ferry service, which had carried over 12 million vehicles and 30 million passengers. Railroad ferries, operated separately by the Mackinac Transportation Company, continued linking rail lines between the peninsulas until 1984. Proposed revivals of rail tunnels under the , such as the Gateway Program's Hudson Tunnel Project, aim to address capacity issues in existing infrastructure, which historically included cross-river rail car floats in the early for freight between and New York. Valued at $16 billion, this initiative includes a new 3.9-kilometer double-track tunnel set for completion by 2038, alongside rehabilitation of the century-old , to enhance capacity without reverting to ferry alternatives. Additionally, the rise of and shipping in the mid-20th century provided non-fixed alternatives that further diminished the need for many train ferry routes by enabling efficient intermodal without direct rail-to-rail transfers across water. Economic drivers have been pivotal in these replacements, as fixed links typically reduce transit times by 50-80% compared to , though they entail substantial upfront costs ranging from $10 billion to $50 billion. For instance, the Eurotunnel shuttle service through the takes 35 minutes, versus up to 90 minutes for Dover-Calais , yielding significant savings in operational efficiency and enabling faster freight distribution across . However, environmental trade-offs persist: while rail tunnels lower overall emissions—rail emits far less per passenger-kilometer than or road alternatives—they can disrupt marine ecosystems during construction through sediment disturbance and habitat alteration. Ongoing projects continue this trend; the Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, an 18-kilometer immersed link between and scheduled for 2029, will replace a 45-minute crossing with a 7-minute rail journey, promoting electrified freight corridors. In Italy, the , a planned 3.7-kilometer suspension structure with integrated rail tracks, is expected to begin construction in late 2025 or early 2026 and open by 2032 at a cost of €13.5 billion (as of 2025), potentially eliminating the 2-hour train process to and streamlining continental connections.

Modern Innovations and Potential Revivals

Recent advancements in green propulsion systems are revitalizing interest in train ferries by addressing environmental concerns central to global net-zero goals. Battery-electric and hybrid trials, inspired by Norway's extensive short-sea ferry operations, have demonstrated CO2 emission reductions of up to 90% compared to diesel-powered vessels. These technologies, powered by large packs and shore-charging infrastructure, enable zero-emission voyages for routes under 80 kilometers, minimizing fuel costs and local . Hydrogen fuel cell prototypes further expand these options for larger vessels and longer routes. Automation technologies are optimizing train ferry logistics, particularly in loading and navigation. Complementary AI systems for loading optimization use machine learning to sequence rail cars dynamically, reducing turnaround times by up to 20% and improving stability during sea crossings. These innovations, drawn from broader maritime automation efforts, promise safer and more reliable train ferry services in high-traffic areas. Revival efforts underscore the potential resurgence of train ferries in strategic locations. In New Zealand, two new rail-enabled ferries for the Cook Strait, procured in 2025 and slated for delivery by 2029, incorporate low-emission hybrid-electric propulsion to cut operational emissions while accommodating 40 rail wagons each; designed for a 30-year lifespan, they will restore seamless inter-island rail freight links vital for the country's logistics. Potential Arctic routes are gaining attention for climate-resilient rail integration, with testing corridors like Sweden's Ofotbanen and Malmbanan evaluating heavy freight technologies suited to extreme conditions, potentially linking to ferry services amid expanding Northern Sea Route access. In Asia's Belt and Road Initiative corridors, modular rail car designs facilitate faster high-speed rail-to-ferry transfers, enabling efficient cross-water extensions in projects like the Laos-China Railway. Looking ahead, electrification and hybrid advancements could expand train ferries to 5-10% of global short-sea routes by 2035, aligning with the International Maritime Organization's net-zero emissions target for shipping by 2050 and supporting sustainable freight amid rising demand for low-carbon alternatives.

References

  1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356981955_Historical_aspects_of_construction_and_operation_of_train_ferry_routes
  2. http://igg.org.uk/rail/7-fops/fo-ferry.htm
  3. https://www.american-rails.com/ferry.html
  4. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/24/1/183
  5. https://porteconomicsmanagement.org/pemp/contents/part5/automotive-roro-markets/train-ferries-on-the-caspian-sea-as-part-of-the-middle-corridor/
  6. https://www.portseurope.com/railway-ferry-line-across-caspian-and-black-seas-by-ukrainian-railways/
  7. https://www.railfreight.com/beltandroad/2025/04/15/ukraine-has-re-launched-its-rail-ferry-to-georgia/
  8. https://www.rail-pass.com/train-ferry-ferry-train
  9. https://maritimearchaeologytrust.org/train-ferries/
  10. https://www.wartsila.com/encyclopedia/term/train-ferry
  11. https://www.ship-technology.com/projects/skane/
  12. https://www.atdlines.com/train-fry.htm
  13. https://www.railwaygazette.com/news/lake-titicaca-bypass/30036.article
  14. https://theyachtowner.net/2015/05/car-float-definition/
  15. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/1993/07/possibilities-and-limitations-of-combined-transport_g1g30526/9789282105399-en.pdf
  16. https://rcts.org.uk/ww1-and-ww2-train-ferries/
  17. https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2023/program/paper/H3Nb3aGQ
  18. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/rail-and-waterborne-best-for-low-carbon-motorised-transport
  19. https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Monkland_and_Kirkintilloch_Railway
  20. https://dcnrhs.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/railroad-almanac.pdf
  21. https://www.clydeships.co.uk/view.php?ref=18427
  22. https://www.grantonhistory.org/transport/train_ferry.htm
  23. https://blog.railwaymuseum.org.uk/port-of-richborough-and-the-birth-of-the-cross-channel-train-ferry/
  24. https://maritimearchaeologytrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Ports-in-WW1-updated-to-new-Template-6.03.2021-RB.pdf
  25. https://pdhonline.com/courses/d143/d143slideshow.pdf
  26. https://www.doverferryphotosforums.co.uk/the-night-ferry/
  27. https://londonist.com/london/history/night-ferry-london-paris
  28. http://articles.solanohistory.net/102/
  29. https://navyhistory.au/japanese-surrender-at-the-end-of-world-war-ii/
  30. https://www.trains.com/ctr/railroads/railroad-operations/lake-michigan-carferries/
  31. https://www.reddit.com/r/geography/comments/1f0xd8w/what_are_some_long_ferries_that_still_run_today/
  32. https://www.mylearning.org/stories/history-and-construction-of-the-humber-bridge
  33. https://www.newsteelconstruction.com/wp/the-humber-bridge/
  34. https://www.doverferryphotosforums.co.uk/the-dover-train-ferry-dock/
  35. https://www.modernrailways.com/article/europe-view-22
  36. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy70y2x3xj6o
  37. https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/7131/1/Moses_2010_Commercial_and_Technical_Evolution.pdf
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348669457_Increasing_ship_energy_efficiency_with_diesel-electric_propulsion_system
  39. https://www.nationalparks-worldwide.com/sam/peru/regions/lake-titicaca/titicaca.html
  40. https://www.marinepropulsors.com/proceedings/2011/WA2-2_Minchev.pdf
  41. https://www.ship-technology.com/projects/jutlandica/
  42. https://new.abb.com/marine/systems-and-solutions/azipod
  43. https://uic.org/IMG/pdf/uic_loading_guidelines-volume_1-01042025.pdf
  44. https://opentransportationjournal.com/VOLUME/18/ELOCATOR/e26671212285520/
  45. https://www.railfreight.com/corridors/2021/02/10/rail-ferries-is-there-space-for-them-in-intermodal-transport/
  46. https://www.scribd.com/document/723230276/UIC-543-Brake-Regulations-Governing-the-Equipment-of-Trailing-Stock
  47. https://en.portnews.ru/news/350589/
  48. https://www.rosmorport.com/filials/spb_serv_ferry/
  49. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/travelling-to-the-uk/uk-customs-information-northern-ireland-accessible-version
  50. https://www.cbp.gov/document/fact-sheets/rail-carrier-manifest
  51. https://emergentcoldlatam.com/en/logistics/what-is-cargo-manifest/
  52. https://railmarket.com/news/freight-rail/35456-sharp-increase-in-china-europe-freight-train-volume-from-henan-province-in-2025?region=cis
  53. https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/113207/
  54. https://www.rosmorport.com/spb_developmentofports.html
  55. https://www.worldcargonews.com/shipping-logistics/2025/05/turkiye-launches-rail-ferry-to-boost-european-connectivity/
  56. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20251024-the-last-european-train-that-travels-by-sea
  57. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/italy-gives-final-go-ahead-landmark-sicily-bridge-project-2025-08-06/
  58. https://www.afar.com/magazine/italy-approves-plan-for-bridge-linking-sicily-to-mainland
  59. https://www.railfreight.com/beltandroad/2025/05/12/turkiye-launches-rail-ferry-towards-europe/
  60. https://www.portseurope.com/turkeys-bandirma-tekirdag-rail-ferry-with-2-8-mln-tonnes-capacity/
  61. https://www.railfreight.com/railfreight/2025/03/26/russia-launches-rail-ferries-to-kaliningrad-to-bypass-the-baltics/
  62. https://www.rabbittranspoland.com/post/kaliningrad-poland-border-queues-2025-up-to-20-hours-and-it-will-only-get-hotter
  63. https://www.frs-baltic.com/en/
  64. https://www.shippax.com/en/news/frs-baltic-discontinues-the-route-between-trelleborg-and-sassnitz.aspx
  65. https://www.portseurope.com/despite-russian-attacks-rail-ferry-line-to-ukraines-chornomorsk/
  66. https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/fehmarnbelt-delayed-18-months-due-to-issues-with-submersion-vessel-trench-and-noise-18-09-2025/
  67. https://nynjr.com/
  68. https://www.railpace.com/crossing-upper-new-york-bay-by-rail-on-water/
  69. https://www.cgrailway.co/
  70. https://www.freightwaves.com/news/us-mexican-partnership-to-expand-international-rail-car-ferry-service
  71. https://www.railwayage.com/freight/short-lines-regionals/for-gws-cg-railway-a-new-partner/
  72. https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/d8files/tarns_ch2.pdf
  73. https://railturkey.org/2017/12/22/baku-tbilisi-kars-step-by-step/
  74. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13486-baku-tbilisi-kars-railway-to-become-central-asias-gateway-to-europe.html
  75. https://www.portseurope.com/turkmenistans-tender-for-two-ro-ro-railway-ferries-for-caspian/
  76. https://odessa-journal.com/ukrferry-has-launched-a-ferry-connection-between-varna-and-batumigruziya
  77. https://www.ukrferry.com/en/schedule
  78. https://africaports.co.za/2025/07/21/africa-ports-ships-maritime-news-20-21-july-2025/
  79. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/rail-ferries-enter-final-procurement-stage
  80. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/556720/new-details-of-cook-strait-ferry-replacement-plan-unveiled
  81. https://www.interislander.co.nz/about/news-and-stories/kiwirail-welcomes-ferry-announcement
  82. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/575895/shipbuilder-for-new-interislander-ferries-announced
  83. https://thebusinessyear.com/article/new-rail-routes-in-central-asia-in-2025/
  84. https://russiaspivottoasia.com/central-asia-russia-rail-freight-transit-up-50-new-russia-china-rail-connectivity-routes-emerging/
  85. https://www.muslimnetwork.tv/central-asian-states-launch-pilot-freight-route-linking-china-to-the-caspian/
  86. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376911910_The_Strength_of_Rail_Vehicles_Transported_by_a_Ferry_Considering_the_Influence_of_Sea_Waves_on_Its_Hull
  87. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0ae4/cc02176b83e14226364eb3e5d2df6d5c3b36.pdf
  88. https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstreams/ffec857a-8fb1-4149-89ff-bc459c332017/download
  89. https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Pages/RO-ROFerries.aspx
  90. https://www.maritimeships.com/problematic-points-in-ro-ro-ships/
  91. https://www.marineinsight.com/naval-architecture/ro-ro-ship-design-dangers/
  92. https://www.gov.uk/maib-reports/failure-of-starboard-outer-bow-door-on-ro-ro-passenger-ferry-pride-of-provence-prior-to-departure-from-the-port-of-calais-france
  93. https://gyrostabilization.cc/marine-gyro-stabilizer
  94. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25725084.2023.2274227
  95. https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Pages/DangerousGoods.aspx
  96. https://greatlakes.bgsu.edu/item/433449
  97. https://schs.cityofmanistique.org/ann-arbor-car-ferry-no-4-sinks-manistique-harbor-slip-on-may-29th-1909/
  98. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjasnaoe1952/1957/101/1957_101_107/_article
  99. https://world.time.com/2012/01/20/unsafe-at-sea-asias-history-of-deadly-ferry-disasters/slide/toya-maru-sea-of-japan-1954/
  100. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/54c1704ce5274a15b6000025/FormalInvestigation_HeraldofFreeEnterprise-MSA1894.pdf
  101. https://journals.library.mun.ca/index.php/prototype/article/download/441/523/2107
  102. https://www.taic.org.nz/news/interim-factual-report-grounding-interislander-ferry-aratere
  103. https://maritime-executive.com/article/maritime-nz-charges-kiwirail-over-ro-ro-grounding
  104. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/75001/1-011-spring-2005/contents/projects/debassay_paper.pdf
  105. https://www.academia.edu/38440847/The_Channel_Tunnel_1955_1975_when_the_Sleeping_Beauty_woke_again
  106. https://www.ice.org.uk/what-is-civil-engineering/infrastructure-projects/oresund-bridge
  107. https://www.mackinacbridge.org/history/michigan-state-ferry-album/
  108. https://www.transportation.gov/buildamerica/projects/hudson-river-tunnel-project-between-new-york-and-new-jersey
  109. https://bqrail.substack.com/p/cross-hudson-rail-freight-in-the
  110. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/68259/25925433-MIT.pdf?sequence=2
  111. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/transport-and-environment-report-2020
  112. https://femern.com/
  113. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/nov/13/sicily-italy-worlds-longest-suspension-bridge-europe
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.