Hubbry Logo
Trans-Saharan tradeTrans-Saharan tradeMain
Open search
Trans-Saharan trade
Community hub
Trans-Saharan trade
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Trans-Saharan trade
Trans-Saharan trade
Trans-Saharan trade
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
French-language map showing the major trans-Saharan trade routes (1862)

Trans-Saharan trade is trade between sub-Saharan Africa and North Africa that requires travel across the Sahara.[1] Though this trade began in prehistoric times, the peak of trade extended from the 8th century until the early 17th century CE. The Sahara once had a different climate and environment. In Libya and Algeria, from at least 7000 BCE, pastoralism (the herding of sheep and goats), large settlements and pottery were present. Cattle were introduced to the Central Sahara (Ahaggar) between 4000 and 3500 BCE. Remarkable rock paintings (dated 3500 to 2500 BCE) in arid regions portray flora and fauna that are not present in the modern desert.[2]

As a desert, the Sahara is now a hostile expanse that separates the Mediterranean economy from the economy of the Niger River Basin. As Fernand Braudel points out, crossing such a zone, especially without mechanized transport, is worthwhile only when exceptional circumstances cause the expected gain to outweigh the cost and the danger.[3] Trade was conducted by caravans of camels.[1] According to Maghrebi explorer Ibn Battuta, who once traveled with a caravan, an average one would amount to 1,000 camels, but some caravans were as large as 12,000.[4][5] The caravans were guided by highly-paid Berbers, who knew the desert and could ensure protection from fellow desert nomads. The caravans' survival relied on careful coordination: runners would be sent ahead to oases for water to be shipped out to the caravan when it was still several days away, as the caravans could usually not carry enough to make the full journey. In the mid-14th century CE, Ibn Battuta crossed the desert from Sijilmasa via the salt mines at Taghaza to the oasis of Oualata. A guide was sent ahead, and water was brought over a four-day journey from Oualata to meet the caravan.[6]

Culture and religion were also exchanged on the trans-Saharan trade routes. Many West African states eventually adopted Arabic writing and the religion of North Africa, resulting in these states' absorption into the Muslim world.[7]

Early trans-Saharan trade

[edit]
A building in Oualata, southeast Mauritania
The Bilma oasis in northeast Niger, with the Kaouar escarpment in the background

Ancient trade spanned the northeastern corner of the Sahara in the Naqadan era. Predynastic Egyptians in the Naqada I period traded with Nubia to the south, the oases of the Western Desert to the west, and the cultures of the eastern Mediterranean to the east. Many trading routes went from oasis to oasis to resupply on both food and water. These oases were very important.[8] They also imported obsidian from Senegal to shape blades and other objects.[9]

The overland route through the Wadi Hammamat from the Nile to the Red Sea was known as early as predynastic times;[10] drawings depicting Egyptian reed boats have been found along the path dating to 4000 BCE.[11] Ancient cities dating to the First Dynasty of Egypt arose along both its Nile and Red Sea junctions,[citation needed] testifying to the route's ancient popularity. It became a major route from Thebes to the Red Sea port of Elim, where travelers then moved on to either Asia, Arabia or the Horn of Africa.[citation needed] Records exist documenting knowledge of the route among Senusret I, Seti, Ramesses IV and also, later, the Roman Empire, especially for mining.[citation needed]

The Darb al-Arbaʿīn trade route, passing through Kharga in the south and Asyut in the north, was used from as early as the Old Kingdom for the transport and trade of gold, ivory, spices, wheat, animals and plants.[12] Later, Ancient Romans would protect the route by lining it with varied forts and small outposts, some guarding large settlements complete with cultivation.[citation needed] Described by Herodotus as a road "traversed ... in forty days", it became by his time an important land route facilitating trade between Nubia and Egypt,[13] and subsequently became known as the Forty Days Road. From Kobbei, 40 kilometres (25 mi) north of al-Fashir, the route passed through the desert to Bir Natrum, another oasis and salt mine, to Wadi Howar before proceeding to Egypt.[14] The Darb el-Arbain trade route was the easternmost of the central routes.

The westernmost of the three central routes was the Ghadames Road, which ran from the Niger River at Gao north to Ghat and Ghadames before terminating at Tripoli.

Tripoli–Murzuk–Lake Chad route map by Parfait-Louis Monteil (1895)

Next was the easiest of the three routes: the Garamantean Road, named after the former rulers of the land it passed through and also called the Bilma Trail. The Garamantean Road passed south of the desert near Murzuk before turning north to pass between the Alhaggar and Tibesti Mountains before reaching the oasis at Kawar. From Kawar, caravans would pass over the great sand dunes of Bilma, where rock salt was mined in great quantities for trade, before reaching the savanna north of Lake Chad.[15] This was the shortest of the routes, and the primary exchanges were slaves and ivory from the south for salt. One early 20th century researcher wrote of the Tripoli-Murzuk-Lake Chad route, "Most of the [trans-Saharan] traffic from the Mediterranean coast during the last 2,000 years has passed along this road."[16]

Another Libyan route was Benghazi to Kufra to the lands of the Wadai Empire between Lake Chad and Darfur.[16]

The western routes were the Walata Road past present-day Oualata, Mauritania, from the Sénégal River, and the Taghaza Trail, from the Niger River, past the salt mines of Taghaza, north to the great trading center of Sijilmasa, situated in Morocco just north of the desert.[14] The growth of the city of Aoudaghost, founded in the 5th century BCE, was stimulated by its position at the southern end of a trans-Saharan trade route.[17]

To the east, three ancient routes connected the south to the Mediterranean. The herdsmen of the Fezzan of Libya, known as the Garamantes, controlled these routes as early as 1500 BCE. From their capital of Germa in the Wadi Ajal, the Garamantean Empire raided north to the sea and south into the Sahel. By the 4th century BCE, the independent city-states of Phoenicia had expanded their control to the territory and routes once held by the Garamantes.[14] Shillington states that existing contact with the Mediterranean received added incentive with the growth of the port city of Carthage. Founded c. 800 BCE, Carthage became one terminus for West African gold, ivory, and slaves. West Africa received salt, cloth, beads, and metal goods. Shillington proceeds to identify this trade route as the source for West African iron smelting.[18] Trade continued into Roman times. Although there are Classical references to direct travel from the Mediterranean to West Africa (Daniels, p. 22f), most of this trade was conducted through middlemen, inhabiting the area and aware of passages through the drying lands.[19] The Legio III Augusta subsequently secured these routes on behalf of Rome by the 1st century CE, safeguarding the southern border of the empire for two and half centuries.[14]

A 19th-century engraving of an Arab slave-trading caravan transporting black African slaves across the Sahara

The Garamantes also engaged in the trans-Saharan slave trade. The Garamantes used slaves in their own communities to construct and maintain underground irrigation systems known as the foggara.[20] Early records of trans-Saharan slave trade come from ancient Greek historian Herodotus in the 5th century BCE, who records the Garamantes enslaving cave-dwelling Egyptians in Sudan.[21][22] Two records of Romans accompanying the Garamantes on slave raiding expeditions are recorded - the first in 86 CE and the second a few years later to Lake Chad.[21][22] Initial sources of slaves were the Toubou people, but by the 1st century CE, the Garamantes were obtaining slaves from modern day Niger and Chad.[22]

In the early Roman Empire, the city of Lepcis established a slave market to buy and sell slaves from the African interior.[21] The empire imposed customs tax on the trade of slaves.[21] In the 5th century CE, Roman Carthage was trading in black slaves brought across the Sahara.[22] Black slaves seem to have been valued in the Mediterranean as household slaves for their exotic appearance.[22] Some historians argue that the scale of slave trade in this period may have been higher than medieval times due to high demand of slaves in the Roman Empire.[22]

Introduction of the camel

[edit]
Modern-day camel caravan near the Ahaggar Mountains in the central Sahara, 2006

Herodotus wrote of the Garamantes hunting Ethiopian Troglodytes from chariots; this account was associated with depictions of horses drawing chariots in contemporary cave art in southern Morocco and the Fezzan, giving origin to a theory that the Garamantes or some other Saharan people had created chariot routes to provide Rome and Carthage with gold and ivory. However, it has been argued that no horse skeletons have been found dating from this early period in the region, and chariots would have been unlikely vehicles for trading purposes due to their small capacity.[23]

The earliest evidence for domesticated camels in the region dates from the 3rd century. Used by the Berbers, they enabled more regular contact across the entire width of the Sahara, but regular trade routes did not develop until the beginnings of the Islamic conversion of West Africa in the 7th and 8th centuries.[23] Two main trade routes developed. The first ran through the western desert from modern Morocco to the Niger bend, the second from modern Tunisia to the Lake Chad area. These stretches were relatively short and had the essential network of occasional oases that established the routing as inexorably as pins in a map. Further east of the Fezzan with its trade route through the valley of Kaouar to Lake Chad, Libya was impassable due to its lack of oases and fierce sandstorms.[24]

Medieval trans-Saharan Trade

[edit]

Several trade routes became established, perhaps the most important terminating in Sijilmasa (Morocco) and Ifriqiya to the north.[1] There, and in other North African cities, Berber traders had increased contact with Islam, encouraging conversions, and by the 8th century, Muslims were traveling to Ghana. Many in Ghana converted to Islam, and it is likely that the Empire's trade was privileged as a result.[1] Around 1050, Ghana lost Aoudaghost to the Almoravids, but new goldmines around Bure reduced trade through the city, instead benefiting the Malinke of the south, who later founded the Mali Empire.[1]

Saharan trade routes circa 1400, with the modern territory of Niger highlighted

Unlike Ghana, Mali was a Muslim kingdom since its foundation, and under it, the gold–salt trade continued. Other, less important trade goods were slaves, kola nuts from the south and slave beads and cowry shells from the north (for use as currency). It was under Mali that the great cities of the Niger bend—including Gao and Djenné—prospered, with Timbuktu in particular becoming known across Europe for its great wealth.[1] Important trading centers in southern West Africa developed at the transitional zone between the forest and the savanna; examples include Begho and Bono Manso (in present-day Ghana) and Bondoukou (in present-day Côte d'Ivoire). Western trade routes continued to be important, with Ouadane, Oualata and Chinguetti being the major trade centres in what is now Mauritania, while the Tuareg towns of Assodé and later Agadez grew around a more easterly route in what is now Niger.

Trade routes of the Western Sahara c. 1000–1500. Goldfields are indicated by light brown shading: Bambuk, Bure, Lobi, and Akan.

The eastern trans-Saharan route led to the development of the long-lived Kanem–Bornu Empire as well as the Ghana, Mali, and Songhai empires,[1] centred on the Lake Chad area. This trade route was somewhat less efficient and only rose to great prominence when there was turmoil in the west such as during the Almohad conquests.

Trans-Saharan slave trade

[edit]

The trans-Saharan slave trade, established in Antiquity,[22] continued during the Middle Ages. The slaves brought from across the Sahara were mainly used by wealthy families as domestic servants,[25] and concubines.[26] Some served in the military forces of Egypt and Morocco.[26] For example, the 17th century sultan Moulay Ismail himself was the son of a slave,[1] and relied on an army of black slaves for support. The West African states imported highly trained slave soldiers.[26]

Estimating the number of enslaved people who were transported via the trans-Saharan routes is challenging, particularly prior to widespread record-keeping. Historian John Wright offers an estimated average of 5,000 people per year over the 1250 years of the trade (from the 7th to 20th century), resulting in a total estimate of "between 6 and 7 million".[27] The majority of these people were transported after the 1500s.

Saharan triangle trade

[edit]

The rise of the Ghana Empire in what is now Mali, Senegal, and southern Mauritania, accompanied the increase in trans-Saharan trade. Northern economies were short of gold but at times controlled salt mines such as Taghaza in the Sahara, whereas West African countries like Wangara had plenty of gold but needed salt.[1] Taghaza, a trading and mining outpost where Ibn Battuta recorded the buildings were made of salt, rose to preeminence in the salt trade under the hegemony of the Almoravid Empire.[28] The salt was mined by slaves and purchased with manufactured goods from Sijilmasa.[28] Miners cut thin rectangular slabs of salt directly out of the desert floor, and caravan merchants transported them south, charging a transportation fee of almost 80% of the salt's value.[28] The salt was traded at the market of Timbuktu almost weight for weight with gold.[28] The gold, in the form of bricks, bars, blank coins, and gold dust went to Sijilmasa, from which it went out to Mediterranean ports and in which it was struck into Almoravid dinars.[28][1]

Spread of Islam

[edit]
The Tuareg controlled the central Sahara and its trade; by George Francis Lyon, 1821

The spread of Islam to sub-Saharan African was linked to trans-Saharan trade. Islam spread via trade routes, and Africans converting to Islam increased trade and commerce which increased the trade's population.[29]

Historians give many reasons for the spread of Islam facilitating trade. Islam established common values and rules upon which trade was conducted.[29] It created a network of believers who trusted each other and therefore traded with each other even if they did not personally know each other.[30] Such trade networks existed before Islam but on a much smaller scale. The spread of Islam increased the number of nodes in the network and decreased its vulnerability.[31] The use of Arabic as a common language of trade and the increase of literacy through Quranic schools, also facilitated commerce.[32]

Muslim merchants conducting commerce also gradually spread Islam along their trade network. Social interactions with Muslim merchants led many Africans to convert to Islam, and many merchants married local women and raised their children as Muslims.[32][1]

Islam spread into Western Sudan by the end of the 10th century, into Chad by the 11th century, and into Hausa lands in 12th and 13th centuries. By 1200, many ruling elites in Western Africa had converted to Islam, and from 1200 to 1500 saw a significant conversion to Islam in Africa.[33]

Decline of trans-Saharan trade and collapse of West African empires and kingdoms

[edit]

The Portuguese forays along the West African coast opened up new avenues for trade between Europe and West Africa. By the early 16th century, European trading bases, the factories established on the coast since 1445, and trade with Europeans became of prime importance to West Africa.[vague] North Africa had declined in both political and economic importance, while the Saharan crossing remained long and treacherous. However, the major blow to trans-Saharan trade was the Battle of Tondibi of 1591–92. In a major military expedition organized by the Saadian sultan Ahmad al-Mansur, Morocco sent troops across the Sahara and attacked Timbuktu, Gao and some other important trading centres, destroying buildings and property and exiling prominent citizens. This disruption to trade led to a dramatic decline in the importance of these cities and the resulting animosity reduced trade considerably.

Although much reduced, trans-Saharan trade continued. But trade routes to the West African coast became increasingly easy, particularly after the French invasion of the Sahel in the 1890s and subsequent construction of railways to the interior. A railway line from Dakar to Algiers via the Niger bend was planned but never constructed. With the independence of nations in the region in the 1960s, the north–south routes were severed by national boundaries. National governments were hostile to Tuareg nationalism and so made few efforts to maintain or support trans-Saharan trade, and the Tuareg rebellion of the 1990s and Algerian Civil War further disrupted these routes, closing many.

Azalai salt caravan from Agadez to Bilma, 1985

Traditional caravan routes are largely void of camels, but the shorter Azalai routes from Agadez to Bilma and Timbuktu to Taoudenni are still regularly—if lightly—used. Some members of the Tuareg still use the traditional trade routes, often traveling 2,400 km (1,500 mi) and six months out of every year by camel across the Sahara trading in salt carried from the desert interior to communities on the desert edges.[34]

The future of trans-Saharan trade

[edit]
Trans-Sahara Highway in the Algerian Sahara

The African Union and African Development Bank support the Trans-Sahara Highway from Algiers to Lagos via Tamanrasset, to stimulate economic development, and the latter noted an increase in traffic at the border with Chad due to exports to Algeria crossing Niger.[35] The route is paved except for a 120 mi (200 km) section in northern Niger, but border restrictions still hamper traffic. Only a few trucks carry trans-Saharan trade, particularly fuel and salt. Three other highways across the Sahara are proposed: for further details see Trans-African Highways. Building the highways is difficult because of sandstorms.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Trans-Saharan trade

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Trans-Saharan trade comprised a vast network of caravan routes traversing the Desert, linking Mediterranean with sub-Saharan West and Central African societies from antiquity through the early , facilitating the exchange of commodities such as , salt, , and enslaved humans. Introduced around the 3rd century CE, the domesticated enabled large-scale overland transport, transforming the Sahara from a barrier into a conduit for commerce that intensified after the 8th-century Arab conquests and the , which provided shared legal frameworks like credit systems and safe passage guarantees. This trade generated immense wealth for Sahelian empires including , , and Songhai, where from mines like those in Bambuk and Bure was bartered for salt essential for and health in tropical climates, alongside , kola nuts, and captured in raids or wars. , often numbering thousands of camels led by Berber or Tuareg nomads, followed established paths like the Walata road from to the and the Tripolitania route to , enduring extreme aridity, sandstorms, and banditry to sustain bidirectional flows that integrated disparate economies. A defining and grim characteristic was the , which exported millions of Africans northward over centuries, with estimates ranging from 4.8 million between 650 and 1600 CE to 10-18 million total from 650 to 1900 CE, primarily for labor in North African households, plantations, and roles, contributing to demographic disruptions and social structures predicated on servitude. The trade's cultural exchanges, including the diffusion of and Arabic scholarship southward, contrasted with its causal role in perpetuating warfare for and entrenching hierarchical dependencies, yet empirical underscore how economic incentives drove relentless rather than ideological pretexts alone. By the , the trade began declining due to maritime routes circumventing the for direct West African and slaves, coupled with Ottoman disruptions in and internal Sahelian instabilities that eroded caravan security and imperial monopolies. European coastal forts and Atlantic shifted global commerce seaward, rendering overland paths obsolete by the , though remnants persisted until colonial interruptions and modern further marginalized them.

Origins and Early Development

Pre-camel exchanges

Prior to the widespread adoption of the dromedary camel for desert traversal around the BCE, exchanges across the were sporadic, small-scale, and severely constrained by the region's , relying primarily on human porters, donkeys, and seasonal routes along oases or dried riverbeds rather than organized long-distance . Archaeological evidence suggests prehistoric contacts during the Neolithic Subpluvial (c. 6000–4000 BCE), when a wetter supported pastoralist migrations and rudimentary of raw materials like sourced from and transported to Egyptian sites, indicating indirect exchanges facilitated by a less formidable desert barrier. These interactions diminished as hyper-aridification set in by c. 3500 BCE, reducing feasibility of sustained crossings without advanced transport adaptations. In the early 1st millennium BCE, Mediterranean powers initiated limited contacts via Berber intermediaries along the northern Sahara's fringes, trading manufactured goods, salt, and foodstuffs northward for sub-Saharan commodities such as , feathers, gold dust from West African riverine sources, and . Phoenician explorers, including Hanno's voyage c. 500 BCE, documented in the region, while Carthaginian networks by 700 BCE exchanged beads and metals for these exotics, though volumes remained low due to logistical hazards—traders navigated via known wadis and oases, with human carriers bearing loads of perhaps 20–30 kg per person over weeks, prone to high attrition from dehydration and raids. The civilization, flourishing from c. 500 BCE in the oases of modern , represented the most structured pre-camel Saharan intermediaries, controlling hydraulic systems (foggara channels) that supported settlements and enabling chariot-based mobility with horses for raiding and short-haul trade into sub-Saharan zones toward . They facilitated flows of carbuncles, , and slaves northward to Roman and pre-Roman markets, receiving in turn glassware, ceramics, and possibly amazonstone beads traced from Egyptian quarries, evidencing networked exchanges despite the absence of camel-scale capacity. Nonetheless, these operations skirted the deepest sand seas, with annual throughput likely numbering in hundreds rather than thousands of loads, underscoring the camel's later causal role in scaling trans-Saharan viability by enduring 10+ days without water and carrying 150–200 kg.

Introduction of the dromedary camel and its transformative role

The dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius), domesticated in the around the third millennium BCE, spread westward to during the first millennium BCE, likely via trade routes connecting the and . By the early centuries CE, Berber nomads in the had adopted the animal, integrating it into their pastoral economies and facilitating initial desert traversals. Adapted to arid environments, the dromedary's physiological traits—such as fat storage in its single hump for energy, efficient through nasal passages, and broad feet for traversal—enabled it to carry loads of 150–300 kg while traveling 20–40 km per day for up to two months with minimal water. These capabilities overcame the Sahara's barriers of extreme heat, dunes, and , which had previously confined exchanges to coastal routes or small-scale foot and donkey porterage. The camel's introduction revolutionized trans-Saharan trade by enabling organized , sometimes numbering thousands of animals, to link Mediterranean ports with West African savannas, initiating substantive overland commerce in commodities like salt, , and by the 1st century CE and expanding dramatically from the onward with Arab expansions. This shift not only scaled volumes—evidenced by archaeological finds of gear and trade goods—but also fostered economic interdependence between North and sub-Saharan regions, laying foundations for medieval empires like and .

Peak Period: Medieval Networks and Economy (c. 700–1500 CE)

Major routes, caravans, and organizational structures

The major trans-Saharan trade routes during the medieval period primarily followed three parallel paths across the Sahara Desert, connecting North African ports with West African empires along the . The western route originated in , , proceeding southward through the salt mines of to oases such as Walata and then to trading centers like Audaghost and on the bend. A central route linked in or to via , facilitating exchanges between Tunisian or Algerian ports and the Niger interior. The eastern route extended from Tripoli through to [Lake Chad](/page/Lake Chad), integrating with Kanem-Bornu networks. These routes, active from the onward, relied on seasonal oases and wells for water, with caravans traversing approximately 1,000 to 2,000 kilometers in 40 to 70 days depending on conditions. Camel caravans formed the backbone of transport, typically comprising 5,000 to 12,000 dromedaries by the century, each capable of carrying up to 400 pounds of goods across the . occurred annually during the cooler months from to to avoid extreme heat, with daily progress of about 20 miles, halting at dawn and midday for rest before resuming into the evening. Nomadic Berber groups, particularly the confederation and later Tuareg, supplied the camels and provided guides, as merchants rarely owned their own . Caravans included support personnel such as water carriers, cooks, and armed escorts to counter , sandstorms, and dehydration risks. Organizational structures emphasized decentralized alliances rather than centralized guilds, with led by a khabir, an experienced chief responsible for navigation, discipline, and negotiations. Accompanying scribes recorded transactions, imams led prayers, and messengers coordinated with oases ahead. , often or Berber , financed operations through partnerships, paying tribute to nomadic tribes for passage rights and protection, which integrated tribal leaders as toll collectors. Sahelian empires like and Songhai imposed tariffs at southern termini such as and , where fixed market days and merchant quarters enforced trade regulations by the . This system, described in Arabic geographies like those of , sustained flows of gold exceeding 0.5 tons annually from West African fields by the .

Core commodities: Gold, salt, and ancillary goods

The trans-Saharan trade during its medieval peak primarily exchanged from sub-Saharan West Africa northward for salt extracted from Saharan deposits, forming the economic backbone of the network. originated from alluvial deposits in regions such as Bambuk and Bure in present-day and , as well as further sources in the Akan area of modern , supplying much of the Islamic world and Mediterranean markets' demand for the metal. This flow was driven by the scarcity of in and , where it underpinned coinage and luxury goods, with West African output sustaining empires like and through control of mining and export. Salt, conversely, moved southward from key mining centers in the , including and in northern , as well as in northeastern , where rock salt was quarried into slabs for transport by camel caravans. These mines, often featuring settlements constructed from salt blocks, produced essential commodities vital for sub-Saharan populations lacking coastal access to marine salt; salt was scarcest in inland sub-Saharan Africa during the peak trade period from the 7th to 14th centuries, preserved meats and fish, supplemented diets deficient in the mineral due to tropical rainfall leaching soils, and countered sodium loss from perspiration in humid climates. Exchange ratios varied but heavily favored gold, with much more salt traded for less gold by weight and no reliable evidence of consistent 1:1 exchanges; even in these scarcest regions, salt's value relative to gold did not equate to equivalence, countering popular notions of ounce-for-ounce trades. Ancillary goods supplemented the core trade, enhancing profitability and diversification. From southward flowed ivory from elephants, kola nuts for chewing and trade, bars from Saharan oases, animal hides, and iron products, while northward imports included textiles, beads, glassware, shells as , and horses for military use despite their poor adaptation to the zones. These items, though secondary in volume to and salt, facilitated broader , with northern luxury imports bolstering Sahelian elites' status and southern raw materials fueling North African crafts.

Trans-Saharan slave trade: Scale, mechanisms, and human costs

The trans-Saharan slave trade transported an estimated 4.82 million slaves from sub-Saharan Africa to North Africa and the Islamic world between 650 and 1600 CE, representing a substantial volume during the medieval peak of trans-Saharan commerce. Overall scholarly assessments indicate several million Black Africans were moved over nearly two millennia, with the trade's endurance distinguishing it from shorter-duration migrations like the transatlantic slave trade. These figures derive from interpolations of historical records, caravan sizes, and market data, though uncertainties persist due to sparse documentation and varying methodologies among historians like Paul Lovejoy. Slaves were primarily acquired through raids by nomadic Saharan groups such as and Tuareg, intertribal conflicts in the , and tribute systems imposed by expanding Islamic states on weaker polities. , often women and children preferred for domestic roles and higher survival rates, were marched to southern oases like those in modern or , where they were exchanged for salt, , or goods before integration into larger . Transport occurred via organized , sometimes comprising thousands of animals and hundreds of humans, traversing established routes like the or paths; slaves were bound in coffles or chained to prevent escape amid the desert's isolation. Male captives destined for military or administrative roles faced additional risks, including to produce eunuchs, a process with high immediate fatality. Human costs were profound, with desert marches imposing mortality rates likely exceeding those of maritime voyages due to exposure, thirst, and privation; contemporary accounts and simulations suggest losses of 20 percent or more per journey, compounded by pre-transport deaths during capture and holding. Week-long segments between water points yielded high attrition, as evidenced in regional studies of caravan logistics, exacerbating demographic imbalances through selective female exports and male emasculation. The trade's raids and depopulation fostered chronic insecurity in source regions, undermining agricultural stability and contributing to long-term socioeconomic underdevelopment, as analyzed in econometric models linking slave exports to mistrust and institutional fragility. Despite Islamic legal provisions for manumission, which offered some slaves pathways to freedom unavailable in Atlantic systems, the overall toll included cultural disruptions and enduring ethnic conflicts traced to export intensities.

Cultural, Religious, and Intellectual Exchanges

Facilitation and spread of

The trans-Saharan trade routes, intensified after the Arab conquests of in the CE, served as primary conduits for the introduction and gradual dissemination of Islam into sub-Saharan . Muslim merchants, predominantly and from regions like modern-day and , traversed the desert with camel caravans carrying goods such as and textiles, establishing trading posts and segregated Muslim communities in Sahelian entrepôts. These interactions exposed local populations to Islamic practices, scriptures, and legal norms, fostering initial conversions among traders' dependents and urban elites by the 8th century CE. Conversion accelerated as Sahelian rulers recognized economic incentives in adopting , including enhanced trust in contracts under law, access to literate administrators for record-keeping, and preferential partnerships with co-religionists, thereby integrating their realms into the broader Islamic commercial network. By the , the kingdom of in the Senegal Valley had embraced as a , marking one of the earliest polities south of the to do so, while the maintained a dual system with Muslim quarters in its capital Kumbi Saleh coexisting alongside traditional animist rulers. The Almoravid movement, a puritanical Berber Islamic reform effort originating in the western around 1040 CE, exerted influence through raids and ideological pressure on , contributing to its decline after 1076 CE, though contemporary sources provide no of a full-scale , suggesting disruptions and internal weakening played larger roles. Subsequent empires exemplified deeper Islamic entrenchment facilitated by sustained caravan exchanges. In the , founded circa 1235 CE, ruler (r. 1312–1337 CE) exemplified devout adherence, undertaking a hajj pilgrimage to in 1324 CE that showcased West African wealth and piety, drawing scholars and reinforcing trans-Saharan scholarly networks. Similarly, the Kanem-Bornu kingdom converted around 1070–1100 CE, leveraging Islamic ties to bolster its position in eastern trans-Saharan routes. These developments not only propagated religious texts and Sufi orders but also embedded Islamic governance and education in urban centers, with trade profits funding mosques and madrasas that perpetuated the faith's expansion.

Linguistic, technological, and administrative transfers

The trans-Saharan trade facilitated the dissemination of as a among merchants and elites in West African Sahelian societies, particularly from the onward as North African Muslim traders intensified exchanges. By the 13th century, had emerged as a for religious texts, commercial records, and , evidenced by the proliferation of manuscripts in centers like , where institutions such as the Ahmed Baba Institute preserved works integrating with local contexts. This linguistic transfer elevated literacy rates among ruling classes and scholars, enabling the transcription of oral histories and legal documents, though it coexisted with indigenous languages rather than fully supplanting them. Technological exchanges centered on adaptations for desert traversal, with Berber innovations in camel saddles—evolving from North Arabian designs by the early centuries CE—proving pivotal. These saddles, optimized for dromedaries, allowed individual camels to bear loads of up to 150-300 kilograms over vast distances, transforming sporadic exchanges into sustained caravan operations that linked oases like those in the Hoggar and Air massifs to Sahelian markets. Such advancements, disseminated through Berber and Arab intermediaries, not only scaled trade volumes but also influenced local pastoral technologies, including breeding practices for pack animals suited to arid conditions. Administrative transfers drew from Islamic models introduced via trader-scholars, shaping governance in empires like and Songhai from the 11th to 16th centuries. Sahelian rulers adopted taxation mechanisms, such as customs duties on incoming caravans and levies, which generated revenue from gold and salt flows—exemplified by Songhai's control over salt mines under Askia (r. 1493–1528), bolstering centralized authority. Legal administration incorporated courts applying principles for dispute resolution in trade matters, while bureaucratic elements like appointed viziers and record-keeping in enhanced state oversight of commercial networks, fostering urban administrative hubs without fully displacing pre-existing kinship-based systems.

Political and Societal Impacts

Enrichment of Sahelian empires and kingdoms

The Ghana Empire (c. 700–1240 CE) amassed considerable wealth through its monopoly on trans-Saharan trade routes linking the gold-producing regions of the Upper Senegal and Niger rivers with salt suppliers in the Sahara. By imposing taxes on caravans—typically a tenth of the value of imports like salt and exports like gold—the empire's rulers funded a professional army, fortified capitals such as Koumbi Saleh, and extensive administrative structures. This revenue stream enabled Ghana to dominate regional politics, extracting tribute from vassal states and facilitating the empire's emergence as one of the wealthiest polities of its era. Succeeding Ghana, the Mali Empire (c. 1235–1670 CE) expanded control over these trade networks, particularly under (r. 1312–1337 CE), whose realm encompassed the prolific Bambuk and Bure gold fields. Taxation of , mining tribute, and caravan tolls generated immense fiscal resources, evident in Musa's 1324 pilgrimage, which involved an estimated 60,000 porters laden with gold and disrupted Mediterranean markets by flooding with the metal. These funds supported monumental architecture, including the mosques of and , irrigation systems, and a bureaucracy that extended Mali's influence across the . The (c. 1464–1591 CE), inheriting and surpassing Mali's trade dominance at the bend, levied duties on , salt, and slave caravans passing through hubs like and . Under Askia Muhammad (r. 1493–1528 CE), standardized taxation and state monopolies on key commodities bolstered military campaigns and scholarly patronage, transforming Songhai into a commercial powerhouse that supplied much of the Islamic world's demand. This not only enriched elites but also fostered urban growth, with markets attracting merchants from and beyond, thereby reinforcing the empire's geopolitical stature until Moroccan incursions.

Internal conflicts, raids, and socioeconomic disruptions

Nomadic groups such as the Tuareg and various Berber tribes frequently engaged in raids on trans-Saharan , exploiting the vulnerability of long desert crossings to seize goods like salt, , and slaves. These raids were driven by competition for scarce resources and control over lucrative routes, with Tuareg confederations often taxing or directly attacking merchant trains to extract or plunder. Such internal conflicts disrupted the regularity of , forcing to travel in larger, armed groups or pay protection fees to dominant tribes, which inflated costs and reduced profitability. Tribal rivalries among Berber factions, including the and , intensified disruptions, as disputes over oases and waypoints led to ambushes and blockades that rendered certain routes impassable for extended periods. For instance, in the , inter-Berber warfare contributed to the insecurity of paths leading to the , exacerbating economic strain on sedentary trading states dependent on uninterrupted flows. Raids for slaves, integral to the trans-Saharan trade, fueled chronic warfare in sub-Saharan regions, where communities conducted predatory expeditions to capture individuals for export northward, resulting in depopulation, social fragmentation, and a cycle of retaliatory violence. Socioeconomically, these conflicts perpetuated inequality, as nomadic raiders amassed wealth from plunder while agrarian societies south of the suffered labor shortages and agricultural decline from ongoing slave extractions. Empirical analysis indicates that intensified correlated with weakened state institutions and diminished trust in , hindering long-term development in affected areas. The alone involved the export of several million individuals over centuries, with raids contributing to broader disruptions like vulnerability and stalled in . Protection rackets and sporadic violence also deterred investment in , such as expanded wells or fortified depots, locking networks into precarious, low-volume patterns prone to collapse during peak conflict eras.

Decline and External Disruptions (c. 1500–1900 CE)

Rise of Atlantic maritime alternatives

The initiated systematic maritime exploration of West Africa's Atlantic coast in the early , seeking to access sub-Saharan gold and other goods directly and thereby circumvent the Muslim-dominated trans-Saharan caravan routes. Following the capture of in 1415, sponsored voyages that recognized the profitability of Saharan networks; by the 1430s, ships had navigated beyond , bypassing the desert barrier and trading for gold dust with coastal Senegambian and Mauritanian populations. In 1443, Henry received a monopoly on , , and warfare south of Bojador, accelerating direct procurement that reduced reliance on overland intermediaries. This coastal access culminated in the construction of (São Jorge da Mina) in 1482 on the Gold Coast, a fortified enclave designed to secure imports from Akan producers and protect against rival traders. The post enabled annual shipments to —estimated at up to 20 tons in peak early years—diverting volumes previously funneled northward across the via routes like those from Wangara to and . Economic efficiency favored sea transport, eroding the transit fees and market control of Sahelian states such as Songhai and diminishing the caravan trade's role in supplying Mediterranean . The concurrent rise of the Atlantic slave trade amplified this bypass, as European powers post-1492 increasingly sourced captives from coastal West African ports for American plantations, shifting procurement from interior raids feeding desert caravans to maritime-oriented warfare and tribute systems. By the mid-16th century, and later Dutch, British, and French traders exported thousands of slaves annually via Atlantic routes—far exceeding the trans-Saharan trade's typical 5,000–10,000 per year—prioritizing ocean voyages over arduous crossings ill-suited to surging transoceanic demand. While trans-Saharan exchanges persisted for salt, , and slaves bound for Islamic markets, the maritime alternatives fragmented the integrated overland , hastening the relative decline of Saharan routes by the .

Empire collapses and internal decay

The collapse of major Sahelian empires, which had long secured the southern endpoints of Trans-Saharan trade routes, undermined the stability and volume of commerce by fostering political fragmentation, succession crises, and weakened caravan protection. Empires such as , Songhai, and Kanem-Bornu experienced internal decay through recurrent civil wars, administrative disorganization, and provincial revolts, eroding central authority and enabling banditry along trade paths. This internal erosion, beginning in the late , progressively disrupted the flow of , salt, and slaves, as local warlords prioritized raids over orderly exchange. In the Mali Empire, decline accelerated after the death of Mansa around 1360, marking the end of its and initiating a period of succession disputes and civil strife. Ill-defined rules for royal inheritance sparked conflicts among brothers and uncles vying for power, while peripheral regions like rebelled around 1400, and Tuareg nomads captured key trade hubs such as in 1431 and Walata. These internal failures outstripped Mali's military capacity to maintain cohesion, allowing states to assert and fragment control over gold-producing areas and northern routes, thereby diminishing the empire's role in facilitating trans-Saharan exchanges. The , succeeding as a trade hegemon, succumbed to similar internal pathologies by the late 16th century, with power struggles following the deposition of Askia Muhammad in 1528 leading to chaotic governance by rival relatives and ensuing civil wars. Provincial governors engaged in quarrels that weakened unified command, exacerbating economic strain from droughts and famines, which further eroded loyalty to the center and exposed networks to unchecked raids. Although external invasion by in 1591 delivered the decisive blow at the , pre-existing political instability had already compromised Songhai's ability to protect caravans and monopolize commodities like gold from the Bend, hastening the trade's contraction. Kanem-Bornu, controlling eastern routes to the and Tripoli, faced protracted internal decay from the onward, intensified by succession disputes and administrative breakdowns after the reign of Mai (c. 1564–1596). Weak leadership post-Alooma fueled dynastic instability and conflicts among provincial elites, fragmenting authority and diminishing the empire's capacity to garrison oases or suppress nomadic incursions that preyed on salt and slave convoys. By the , these endogenous weaknesses compounded overextension, rendering the empire unable to sustain the security prerequisites for reliable trans-Saharan passage. Collectively, these empire collapses engendered a cascade of across the , where the absence of robust sovereigns to adjudicate disputes, impose tariffs, or deter predators elevated risks and costs for merchants, prompting a shift toward localized or maritime alternatives and a marked diminution in long-distance trade efficacy by the .

Colonial interruptions and border impositions

The European , formalized at the of 1884–1885, initiated a process of territorial partition that imposed artificial borders across the , severing longstanding trans-Saharan caravan routes which had historically traversed ethnic and political boundaries without hindrance. These delineations, drawn primarily by , Britain, and , fragmented nomadic groups like the Tuareg, who facilitated much of the salt, , and slave caravans between West African oases and North African markets; for instance, the Tuareg heartland was divided among , (modern ), and the British , complicating seasonal migrations and trade logistics essential to caravan viability. Colonial administrators enforced these boundaries through garrisons and checkpoints, imposing duties and permits that inflated costs and deterred merchants from desert crossings, as traditional routes like the –Bornu path now crossed multiple jurisdictions with conflicting regulations. French military campaigns in the Sahara exemplified direct interruptions, beginning with the conquest of in 1830 and extending southward through pacification efforts against Tuareg confederacies in the 1880s–1900s. Expeditions such as the Flatters mission of 1881, which aimed to survey routes but ended in and , prompted escalated invasions that subdued key oases like by 1900 and under joint French-Italian control by 1902, installing forts that monitored and taxed passing caravans while disrupting unregulated nomadic commerce. In parallel, policies rooted in European , including 's 1848 emancipation decree and the 1890 Act, led to active suppression of the slave trade component; French forces raided caravans in the Hoggar and Air regions, freeing captives and confiscating goods, which eroded the economic incentives for large-scale operations reliant on human porterage and security provided by armed escorts. British advances from northward after 1900 similarly curtailed eastern routes to , where colonial patrols intercepted slaving parties and redirected trade toward coastal ports via new infrastructure like the Kano–Baro railway (completed ), bypassing Saharan intermediaries. These impositions causally shifted commerce southward, as colonial monopolies on export commodities favored maritime outlets over desert paths, reducing trans-Saharan volumes by the early ; estimates indicate caravan sizes, once numbering thousands of camels annually on major axes, dwindled to sporadic convoys under oversight. While some adaptation occurred—such as Tuareg guides serving colonial postal services—the overall effect was a profound deceleration of the network, as borders and enforcement prioritized state control over indigenous economic flows, contributing to the marginalization of Saharan actors in favor of peripheral coastal economies.

Modern Echoes and Challenges

Post-colonial trade attempts and failures

Following in the mid-20th century, African states and international organizations pursued limited initiatives to revive trans-Saharan trade routes, primarily through development rather than comprehensive . The (TSH), proposed in the 1970s by the Economic Commission for (UNECA), aimed to establish a 4,500-kilometer paved linking in to in , facilitating formal trade in goods such as minerals, agricultural products, and manufactured items between North and . By 2023, approximately 97% of Niger's 1,950-kilometer TSH segment had been constructed, with similar progress in Algerian sections, yet the corridor's central stretches, including Algeria-Niger borders, remained incomplete or inadequately maintained due to funding shortfalls and from sand encroachment. These efforts faltered amid post-colonial administrative fragmentation, where newly independent states prioritized national boundaries over historical cross-desert networks, exacerbating border controls and customs delays. Diplomatic tensions, such as those between and or broader Maghreb-West Africa rivalries, impeded coordinated revitalization, with no unified Maghrebi-Sahelian economic bloc emerging to mirror pre-colonial trade synergies. Trade volumes across the remained negligible compared to maritime alternatives via Atlantic ports, as shippers favored coastal routes for lower costs and reliability, with trans-Saharan freight handling less than 5% of regional North-South exchanges by the 2000s. Persistent security threats further undermined viability, including jihadist insurgencies and Tuareg rebellions that disrupted routes in and ; for instance, Mali's coup and subsequent instability halted TSH Phase 2 in the Bourem-Kidal section, exposing travelers to and networks that prioritized illicit flows over legitimate commerce. Economic disincentives compounded these issues, as Sahelian exporters faced high transit tariffs, poor complementary (e.g., limited North African appetite for West African raw materials post-oil boom), and decay, rendering revival attempts economically uncompetitive against globalized and air logistics. Empirical analyses indicate that without addressing geo-climatic barriers like extreme aridity and the absence of incentives—unlike the rapid shift to Atlantic trade after the —formal trans-Saharan trade has not exceeded informal subsistence levels.

Current informal networks: Smuggling, migration, and security threats

Informal networks traversing the today predominantly facilitate operations that exploit porous borders and longstanding caravan paths, transporting migrants, narcotics, arms, , , and counterfeit northward from toward Mediterranean embarkation points or European markets. These routes, centered in hubs like in , in , and in , have evolved from historical trade conduits into conduits for illicit flows since the destabilization of in 2012, with networks often controlled by Tuareg and Arab clans who impose transit taxes. Overlaps between migrant and other traffics are extensive; for instance, vehicles used to ferry migrants frequently carry , , or weapons on return trips, generating revenues estimated in billions annually for groups. Human smuggling constitutes a primary activity, with tens of thousands of sub-Saharan Africans—predominantly from —attempting the crossing annually via the Niger-Libya axis, enduring extortion, beatings, and abandonment in the desert by charging $1,000–$3,000 per person. Mortality rates are severe, with data indicating approximately twice as many migrant deaths in the as in Mediterranean crossings, including over 1,000 fatalities reported in 2023 alone from , vehicle failures, or deliberate killings amid rivalries between smuggling factions. Trafficking elements compound risks, as women and children face sexual exploitation or forced labor en route; UNODC assessments identify child victims primarily exploited for labor in , while adult women are routed into networks in . These operations thrive due to weak state control post-coups in , , and , where military juntas have prioritized over since 2020. Narcotics and arms smuggling further entrench these networks, with cocaine consignments from transshipped via and since the mid-2000s, yielding profits that fund local economies and insurgencies; seizures in the reached 1.3 metric tons in 2022, underscoring the scale. Arms flows, often sourced from Libya's post-2011 stockpiles, supply jihadist factions like (JNIM) and Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (ISGS), with traffickers adapting pickup trucks for dual-use in migrant and weapons transport. Fuel and cigarette smuggling from and Libya southward sustains parallel economies, evading subsidies and taxes. These networks pose acute security threats by enabling terrorist mobility and financing; Sahel-based groups exploit smuggling corridors for arms procurement, fighter transit, and , contributing to a tripling of violent incidents since 2016, with over 8,000 deaths in 2023 from jihadist attacks in , , and . Instability is exacerbated by clan-based control of routes, where revenues rival state budgets and deter governance, as seen in the 2023 Niger coup that halted EU-funded border patrols, boosting flows. Foreign fighters and returnees from have integrated into these systems, blending migration with radicalization risks, while arms proliferation sustains cycles of raids and territorial contests among non-state actors.

References

  1. https://oxfordre.com/africanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277734-e-176
  2. https://blackpast.org/global-african-history/the-trans-saharan-salt-and-gold-trade-500-bce-1800-ad/
  3. https://www.oerproject.com/en/oer-materials/oer-media/html-articles/origins/unit6/trans-saharan-trade-routes
  4. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-10-138
  5. https://human.libretexts.org/Courses/Lumen_Learning/Book%253A_History_of_World_Civilization_II-2_%28Lumen%29/04%253A_2%253A_African_Slave_Trade/04.2%253A_TransSaharan_Slave_Trade
  6. https://oxfordre.com/africanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277734-e-838
  7. https://fiveable.me/ap-world/unit-2/trans-saharan-trade-routes/study-guide/Gu5njxsH2ldhQl40j0fv
  8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379021328_The_Collapse_of_Trans-Saharan_Trade_and_the_Enduring_Difficulties_of_Revitalization
  9. https://study.com/academy/lesson/trans-saharan-trade-west-african-sudanic-states.html
  10. https://www.jstor.org/stable/179479
  11. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/canmin/article-pdf/55/4/651/3951883/i1499-1276-55-4-651.pdf
  12. https://africanrockart.britishmuseum.org/thematic/camels-in-saharan-rock-art/
  13. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1606340113
  14. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1344/the-camel-caravans-of-the-ancient-sahara/
  15. https://openendedsocialstudies.org/2019/08/07/the-sahara-the-camel-and-the-caravan-trade/
  16. https://elon.io/learn-world-history-1/lesson/9.4.2-north-african-and-trans-saharan-trade
  17. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/the-trans-saharan-gold-trade-7th-14th-century
  18. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1078&context=uhp_theses
  19. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1383/the-gold-trade-of-ancient--medieval-west-africa/
  20. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1342/the-salt-trade-of-ancient-west-africa/
  21. https://africa.si.edu/exhibitions/current-exhibitions/caravans-of-gold-fragments-in-time-art-culture-and-exchange-across-medieval-saharan-africa/driving-desires/
  22. https://desert-morocco.net/the-history-of-trans-saharan-trade/
  23. https://openstax.org/books/world-history-volume-2/pages/3-1-the-roots-of-african-trade
  24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/182881
  25. https://k12database.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2012/05/ComparingtheSlaveTrades9.pdf
  26. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-00145-2_3
  27. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/nunn/files/hup_africa_slave_trade10.pdf
  28. http://spice.fsi.stanford.edu/docs/the_spread_of_islam_in_west_africa_containment_mixing_and_reform_from_the_eighth_to_the_twentieth_century
  29. https://academic.oup.com/book/2270/chapter/142375463
  30. https://wasscehistorytextbook.com/3-islam-in-west-africa-introduction-spread-and-effects/
  31. https://wasscehistorytextbook.com/2-trans-saharan-trade-origins-organization-and-effects-in-the-development-of-west-africa/
  32. https://www.islamawareness.net/Africa/Mali/mali_article004.pdf
  33. https://spice.fsi.stanford.edu/docs/the_spread_of_islam_in_west_africa_containment_mixing_and_reform_from_the_eighth_to_the_twentieth_century
  34. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-world-history/regional-study-transsaharan-trade/E762EC996FEDCE7B37EF29DC524F5B04
  35. https://do-server1.sfs.uwm.edu/upload/%24687908YF24/doc/45127YF/discovering%2Bthe%2Bempire%2Bof%2Bghana%2Bexploring%2Bafrican%2Bcivilizations.pdf
  36. https://www.bu.edu/africa/outreach/teachingresources/history/ancient-to-medieval-history/gmsworkshop/
  37. https://www.doe.virginia.gov/teaching-learning-assessment/k-12-standards-instruction/history-and-social-science/instructional-resources/history
  38. https://africa.si.edu/exhibitions/current-exhibitions/caravans-of-gold-fragments-in-time-art-culture-and-exchange-across-medieval-saharan-africa/saharan-frontiers/
  39. https://globalcapitalism.history.ox.ac.uk/files/ghocmansamusainmalipdf
  40. https://fiveable.me/ap-african-american-studies/unit-1/5-the-sudanic-empires-ghana-mali-and-songhai/study-guide/9Z0Xy4gouUYuqDCS
  41. https://www.academia.edu/32816906/Cause_and_Effect_of_the_Ancient_Trans_Saharan_Trade_in_West_Africa
  42. https://journals.librarypublishing.arizona.edu/arizanthro/article/473/galley/461/download/
  43. https://www.ancient-origins.net/history/tuareg-002900
  44. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/nunn/files/empirical_slavery.pdf
  45. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/understanding-long-run-effects-africas-slave-trades
  46. https://visionaryfoundation.wordpress.com/2014/11/11/social-and-economic-impact-of-the-trans-saharan-trade-in-africa-north-and-south-of-the-sahara/
  47. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hccc-worldhistory2/chapter/portuguese-explorers/
  48. https://africarenewal.un.org/en/magazine/reflecting-brutal-transatlantic-slave-trade
  49. https://www.culturesofwestafrica.com/rise-and-fall-of-the-great-kingdom-of-mali/
  50. https://empireofmali.weebly.com/the-decline.html
  51. https://asmadrid.libguides.com/c.php?g=717699&p=5202894
  52. https://www.educationportal.co.za/five-factors-that-led-to-the-fall-of-the-songhai-empire/
  53. https://www.atlas.org/solution/e776d7e8-d631-4503-a44f-9cea8e5bb087/what-contributed-to-the-decline-of-the-songhai-empire
  54. https://www.kawa.ac.ug/WestAfricanhistory/topic_5the_rise_and_fall_of_kanem_bornu_empire.html
  55. https://www.seek.ng/5-factors-that-led-to-the-fall-of-kanem-bornu-empire/
  56. https://www.cpalms.org/PreviewStandard/Preview/3455
  57. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/108246/1/Africa_2020_12_07_colonial_borders_in_the_sahel_affect.pdf
  58. https://amu.hal.science/hal-01395167v1/document
  59. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/tuareg.htm
  60. http://psychologyandeducation.net/pae/index.php/pae/article/download/8121/6431/14592
  61. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/africa-since-1800/trans-saharan-trade
  62. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4761704
  63. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tcsdtlinf2022d2_en.pdf
  64. https://www.afdb.org/en/news-and-events/interviews/trans-sahara-highway-niger-section-almost-complete-and-offers-new-economic-opportunities-population-alberic-houssou-project-manager-niger-african-development-bank-59304
  65. https://mapafrica.afdb.org/en/projects/46002-P-ML-DB0-015
  66. https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/tocta_sahel/TOCTA_Sahel_som_2023.pdf
  67. https://globalinitiative.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Shaw-Reitano-%25E2%2580%2593-The-Political-Economy-of-Trafficking-and-Trade-in-the-Sahara-December-2014.pdf
  68. https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/06/1137542
  69. https://unric.org/en/migration-twice-as-many-migrants-die-crossing-the-sahara-than-the-mediterranean-sea/
  70. https://www.unhcr.org/us/news/press-releases/new-unhcr-iom-mmc-report-highlights-extreme-horrors-faced-refugees-and-migrants
  71. https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/glotip/2024/GLOTIP2024_Chapter_2.pdf
  72. https://www.unodc.org/toc/en/reports/TOCTAWestAfrica.html
  73. https://globalinitiative.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Atlas-Illicit-Flows-Second-Edition-EN-WEB.pdf
  74. https://press.un.org/en/2025/sc16138.doc.htm
  75. https://thesoufancenter.org/intelbrief-2025-october-1/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.