12 equal temperament

The two figures frequently credited with the achievement of exact calculation of twelve-tone equal temperament are Zhu Zaiyu (also romanized as Chu-Tsaiyu, Chinese: 朱載堉) in 1584 and Simon Stevin in 1585. According to Fritz A. Kuttner, a critic of the theory,^[2] it is known that "Chu-Tsaiyu presented a highly precise, simple and ingenious method for arithmetic calculation of equal temperament mono-chords in 1584" and that "Simon Stevin offered a mathematical definition of equal temperament plus a somewhat less precise computation of the corresponding numerical values in 1585 or later." The developments occurred independently.^[3]

Kenneth Robinson attributes the invention of equal temperament to Zhu Zaiyu^[4] and provides textual quotations as evidence.^[5] Zhu Zaiyu is quoted as saying that, in a text dating from 1584, "I have founded a new system. I establish one foot as the number from which the others are to be extracted, and using proportions I extract them. Altogether one has to find the exact figures for the pitch-pipers in twelve operations."^[5] Kuttner disagrees and remarks that his claim "cannot be considered correct without major qualifications."^[2] Kuttner proposes that neither Zhu Zaiyu or Simon Stevin achieved equal temperament and that neither of the two should be treated as inventors.^[3]

A complete set of bronze chime bells, among many musical instruments found in the tomb of the Marquis Yi of Zeng (early Warring States, c. 5th century BCE in the Chinese Bronze Age), covers five full 7-note octaves in the key of C Major, including 12 note semi-tones in the middle of the range.^[6]

An approximation for equal temperament was described by He Chengtian [zh], a mathematician of the Southern and Northern Dynasties who lived from 370 to 447.^[7] He came out with the earliest recorded approximate numerical sequence in relation to equal temperament in history: 900 849 802 758 715 677 638 601 570 536 509.5 479 450.^[8]

Zhu Zaiyu (朱載堉), a prince of the Ming court, spent thirty years on research based on the equal temperament idea originally postulated by his father. He described his new pitch theory in his Fusion of Music and Calendar 律暦融通 published in 1580. This was followed by the publication of a detailed account of the new theory of the equal temperament with a precise numerical specification for 12-ET in his 5,000-page work Complete Compendium of Music and Pitch (Yuelü quan shu 樂律全書) in 1584.^[9] An extended account is also given by Joseph Needham.^[5] Zhu obtained his result mathematically by dividing the length of string and pipe successively by ¹²√2 ≈ 1.059463, and for pipe length by ²⁴√2,^[10] such that after twelve divisions (an octave) the length was divided by a factor of 2:

$${\displaystyle \left({\sqrt[{12}]{2}}\right)^{12}=2}$$

Similarly, after 84 divisions (7 octaves) the length was divided by a factor of 128:

$${\displaystyle \left({\sqrt[{12}]{2}}\right)^{84}=2^{7}=128}$$

Zhu Zaiyu has been credited as the first person to solve the equal temperament problem mathematically.^[11] At least one researcher has proposed that Matteo Ricci, a Jesuit in China recorded this work in his personal journal^[11][12] and may have transmitted the work back to Europe. (Standard resources on the topic make no mention of any such transfer.^[13]) In 1620, Zhu's work was referenced by a European mathematician.^[who?][12] Murray Barbour said, "The first known appearance in print of the correct figures for equal temperament was in China, where Prince Tsaiyü's brilliant solution remains an enigma."^[14] The 19th-century German physicist Hermann von Helmholtz wrote in On the Sensations of Tone that a Chinese prince (see below) introduced a scale of seven notes, and that the division of the octave into twelve semitones was discovered in China.^[15]

Zhu Zaiyu illustrated his equal temperament theory by the construction of a set of 36 bamboo tuning pipes ranging in 3 octaves, with instructions of the type of bamboo, color of paint, and detailed specification on their length and inner and outer diameters. He also constructed a 12-string tuning instrument, with a set of tuning pitch pipes hidden inside its bottom cavity. In 1890, Victor-Charles Mahillon, curator of the Conservatoire museum in Brussels, duplicated a set of pitch pipes according to Zhu Zaiyu's specification. He said that the Chinese theory of tones knew more about the length of pitch pipes than its Western counterpart, and that the set of pipes duplicated according to the Zaiyu data proved the accuracy of this theory.

One of the earliest discussions of equal temperament occurs in the writing of Aristoxenus in the 4th century BC.^[16]

Vincenzo Galilei (father of Galileo Galilei) was one of the first practical advocates of twelve-tone equal temperament. He composed a set of dance suites on each of the 12 notes of the chromatic scale in all the "transposition keys", and published also, in his 1584 "Fronimo", 24 + 1 ricercars.^[17] He used the 18:17 ratio for fretting the lute (although some adjustment was necessary for pure octaves).^[18]

Galilei's countryman and fellow lutenist Giacomo Gorzanis had written music based on equal temperament by 1567.^[19] Gorzanis was not the only lutenist to explore all modes or keys: Francesco Spinacino wrote a "Recercare de tutti li Toni" (Ricercar in all the Tones) as early as 1507.^[20] In the 17th century lutenist-composer John Wilson wrote a set of 30 preludes including 24 in all the major/minor keys.^[21][22] Henricus Grammateus drew a close approximation to equal temperament in 1518. The first tuning rules in equal temperament were given by Giovani Maria Lanfranco in his "Scintille de musica".^[23] Zarlino in his polemic with Galilei initially opposed equal temperament but eventually conceded to it in relation to the lute in his Sopplimenti musicali in 1588.

The first mention of equal temperament related to the twelfth root of two in the West appeared in Simon Stevin's manuscript Van De Spiegheling der singconst (c. 1605), published posthumously nearly three centuries later in 1884.^[24] However, due to insufficient accuracy of his calculation, many of the chord length numbers he obtained were off by one or two units from the correct values.^[13] As a result, the frequency ratios of Simon Stevin's chords has no unified ratio, but one ratio per tone, which is claimed by Gene Cho as incorrect.^[25]

The following were Simon Stevin's chord length from Van de Spiegheling der singconst:^[26]

A generation later, French mathematician Marin Mersenne presented several equal tempered chord lengths obtained by Jean Beaugrand, Ismael Bouillaud, and Jean Galle.^[27]

In 1630 Johann Faulhaber published a 100-cent monochord table, which contained several errors due to his use of logarithmic tables. He did not explain how he obtained his results.^[28]

From 1450 to about 1800, plucked instrument players (lutenists and guitarists) generally favored equal temperament,^[29] and the Brossard lute manuscript compiled in the last quarter of the 17th century contains a series of 18 preludes attributed to Bocquet written in all keys, including the last prelude, entitled Prélude sur tous les tons, which enharmonically modulates through all keys.^{[30][clarification needed]} Angelo Michele Bartolotti published a series of passacaglias in all keys, with connecting enharmonically modulating passages. Among the 17th-century keyboard composers Girolamo Frescobaldi advocated equal temperament. Some theorists, such as Giuseppe Tartini, were opposed to the adoption of equal temperament; they felt that degrading the purity of each chord degraded the aesthetic appeal of music, although Andreas Werckmeister emphatically advocated equal temperament in his 1707 treatise published posthumously.^[31]

Twelve-tone equal temperament took hold for a variety of reasons. It was a convenient fit for the existing keyboard design, and permitted total harmonic freedom with the burden of moderate impurity in every interval, particularly imperfect consonances. This allowed greater expression through enharmonic modulation, which became extremely important in the 18th century in music of such composers as Francesco Geminiani, Wilhelm Friedemann Bach, Carl Philipp Emmanuel Bach, and Johann Gottfried Müthel.^{[citation needed]} Twelve-tone equal temperament did have some disadvantages, such as imperfect thirds, but as Europe switched to equal temperament, it changed the music that it wrote in order to accommodate the system and minimize dissonance.^[b]

The progress of equal temperament from the mid-18th century on is described with detail in quite a few modern scholarly publications: It was already the temperament of choice during the Classical era (second half of the 18th century),^{[citation needed]} and it became standard during the Early Romantic era (first decade of the 19th century),^{[citation needed]} except for organs that switched to it more gradually, completing only in the second decade of the 19th century. (In England, some cathedral organists and choirmasters held out against it even after that date; Samuel Sebastian Wesley, for instance, opposed it all along. He died in 1876.)^{[citation needed]}

A precise equal temperament is possible using the 17th century Sabbatini method of splitting the octave first into three tempered major thirds.^[32] This was also proposed by several writers during the Classical era. Tuning without beat rates but employing several checks, achieving virtually modern accuracy, was already done in the first decades of the 19th century.^[33] Using beat rates, first proposed in 1749, became common after their diffusion by Helmholtz and Ellis in the second half of the 19th century.^[34] The ultimate precision was available with 2 decimal tables published by White in 1917.^[35]

It is in the environment of equal temperament that the new styles of symmetrical tonality and polytonality, atonal music such as that written with the twelve tone technique or serialism, and jazz (at least its piano component) developed and flourished.

In twelve-tone equal temperament, which divides the octave into 12 equal parts, the width of a semitone, i.e. the frequency ratio of the interval between two adjacent notes, is the twelfth root of two:

$${\displaystyle {\sqrt[{12}]{2}}=2^{\frac {1}{12}}\approx 1.059463}$$

This interval is divided into 100 cents.

To find the frequency, P_n, of a note in 12-ET, the following definition may be used:

$${\displaystyle P_{n}=P_{a}\left({\sqrt[{12}]{2}}\right)^{(n-a)}}$$

In this formula P_n refers to the pitch, or frequency (usually in hertz), you are trying to find. P_a refers to the frequency of a reference pitch. n and a refer to numbers assigned to the desired pitch and the reference pitch, respectively. These two numbers are from a list of consecutive integers assigned to consecutive semitones. For example, A₄ (the reference pitch) is the 49th key from the left end of a piano (tuned to 440 Hz), and C₄ (middle C), and F#₄ are the 40th and 46th key respectively. These numbers can be used to find the frequency of C₄ and F#₄:

$${\displaystyle {\begin{alignedat}{3}P_{40}&=440\left({\sqrt[{12}]{2}}\right)^{(40-49)}&&\approx 261.626\ \mathrm {Hz} \\P_{46}&=440\left({\sqrt[{12}]{2}}\right)^{(46-49)}&&\approx 369.994\ \mathrm {Hz} \end{alignedat}}}$$

The intervals of 12-ET closely approximate some intervals in just intonation.^[37]

12 ET is very accurate in the 3 limit, but as one increases prime limits to 11, it gradually gets worse by about a sixth of a semitone each time. Its eleventh and thirteenth harmonics are extremely inaccurate. 12 ET's seventeenth and nineteenth harmonics are almost as accurate as its third harmonic, but by this point, the prime limit has gotten too high to sound consonant to most people.^{[citation needed]}

12 ET has a very good approximation of the perfect fifth (⁠ 3 /2⁠) and its inversion, the perfect fourth (⁠ 4 /3⁠), especially for the division of the octave into a relatively small number of tones. Specifically, a just perfect fifth is only one fifty-first of a semitone sharper than the equally-tempered approximation. Because the major tone (⁠ 9 /8⁠) is simply two perfect fifths minus an octave, and its inversion, the Pythagorean minor seventh (⁠ 16 /9⁠), is simply two perfect fourths combined, they, for the most part, retain the accuracy of their predecessors; the error is doubled, but it remains small – so small, in fact, that humans cannot perceive it. One can continue to use fractions with higher powers of three, the next two being ⁠ 27 /16⁠ and ⁠ 32 /27⁠, but as the terms of the fractions grow larger, they become less pleasing to the ear.^{[citation needed]}

12 ET's approximation of the fifth harmonic (⁠ 5 /4⁠) is approximately one-seventh of a semitone off. Because intervals that are less than a quarter of a scale step off still sound in tune, other five-limit intervals in 12 ET, such as ⁠ 5 /3⁠ and ⁠ 8 /5⁠, have similarly sized errors. The major triad, therefore, sounds in tune as its frequency ratio is approximately 4:5:6, further, merged with its first inversion, and two sub-octave tonics, it is 1:2:3:4:5:6, all six lowest natural harmonics of the bass tone.^{[citation needed]}

12 ET's approximation of the seventh harmonic (⁠ 7 /4⁠) is about one-third of a semitone off. Because the error is greater than a quarter of a semitone, seven-limit intervals in 12 ET tend to sound out of tune. In the tritone fractions ⁠ 7 /5⁠ and ⁠ 10 /7⁠, the errors of the fifth and seventh harmonics partially cancel each other out so that the just fractions are within a quarter of a semitone of their equally-tempered equivalents.^{[citation needed]}

The eleventh harmonic (⁠ 11 /8⁠), at 551.32 cents, falls almost exactly halfway between the nearest two equally-tempered intervals in 12 ET and therefore is not approximated by either. In fact, ⁠ 11 /8⁠ is almost as far from any equally-tempered approximation as possible in 12 ET. The thirteenth harmonic (⁠ 13 /8⁠), at two-fifths of a semitone sharper than a minor sixth, is almost as inaccurate. Although this means that the fraction ⁠ 13 /11⁠ and also its inversion (⁠ 22 /13⁠) are accurately approximated (specifically, by three semitones), since the errors of the eleventh and thirteenth harmonics mostly cancel out, most people who are not familiar with quarter tones or microtonality will not be familiar with the eleventh and thirteenth harmonics. Similarly, while the error of the eleventh or thirteenth harmonic could be mostly canceled out by the error of the seventh harmonic, most Western musicians would not find the resulting fractions consonant since 12 ET does not approximate them accurately.^{[citation needed]}

The seventeenth harmonic (⁠ 17 /16⁠) is only about 5 cents sharper than one semitone in 12 ET. It can be combined with 12 ET's approximation of the third harmonic in order to yield ⁠ 17 /12⁠, which is, as the next Pell approximation after ⁠ 7 /5⁠, only about three cents away from the equally-tempered tritone (the square root of two), and ⁠ 17 /9⁠, which is only one cent away from 12 ET's major seventh. The nineteenth harmonic is only about 2.5 cents flatter than three of 12 ET's semitones, so it can likewise be combined with the third harmonic to yield ⁠ 19 /12⁠, which is about 4.5 cents flatter than an equally-tempered minor sixth, and ⁠ 19 /18⁠, which is about 6.5 cents flatter than a semitone. However, because 17 and 19 are rather large for consonant ratios and most people are unfamiliar with 17 limit and 19 limit intervals, 17 limit and 19 limit intervals are not useful for most purposes, so they can likely not be judged as playing a part in any consonances of 12 ET.^{[citation needed]}

In the following table the sizes of various just intervals are compared against their equal-tempered counterparts, given as a ratio as well as cents. Differences of less than six cents cannot be noticed by most people, and intervals that are more than a quarter of a step; which in this case is 25 cents, off sound out of tune.^{[citation needed]}

Number of half steps	Note going up from C	Exact value in 12-ET	Decimal value in 12-ET	Equally-tempered audio	Cents	Just intonation interval name	Just intonation interval fraction	Justly-intoned audio	Cents in just intonation	Difference
0	C	20⁄12 = 1	1	playⓘ	0	Unison	1⁄1 = 1	playⓘ	0	0
1	C♯ or D♭	21⁄12 = ${\displaystyle {\sqrt[{12}]{2}}}$	1.05946...	playⓘ	100	Septimal third tone	28⁄27 = 1.03703...	playⓘ	62.96	−37.04
						Just chromatic semitone	25⁄24 = 1.04166...	Playⓘ	70.67	−29.33
						Undecimal semitone	22⁄21 = 1.04761...	playⓘ	80.54	−19.46
						Septimal chromatic semitone	21⁄ 20 = 1.05	playⓘ	84.47	−15.53
						Novendecimal chromatic semitone	20⁄ 19 = 1.05263...	playⓘ	88.80	−11.20
						Pythagorean diatonic semitone	256⁄ 243 = 1.05349...	playⓘ	90.22xwx	−9.78
						Larger chromatic semitone	135⁄ 128 = 1.05468...	playⓘ	92.18	−7.82
						Novendecimal diatonic semitone	19⁄ 18 = 1.05555...	playⓘ	93.60	−6.40
						Septadecimal chromatic semitone	18⁄ 17 = 1.05882...	playⓘ	98.95	−1.05
						Seventeenth harmonic	17⁄ 16 = 1.0625...	playⓘ	104.96	+4.96
						Just diatonic semitone	16⁄ 15 = 1.06666...	playⓘ	111.73	+11.73
						Pythagorean chromatic semitone	2187⁄ 2048 = 1.06787...	playⓘ	113.69	+13.69
						Septimal diatonic semitone	15⁄ 14 = 1.07142...	playⓘ	119.44	+19.44
						Lesser tridecimal 2/3-tone	14⁄ 13 = 1.07692...	playⓘ	128.30	+28.30
						Major diatonic semitone	27⁄ 25 = 1.08	playⓘ	133.24	+33.24
2	D	2 2⁄ 12 = ${\displaystyle {\sqrt[{6}]{2}}}$	1.12246...	playⓘ	200	Pythagorean diminished third	65536⁄ 59049 = 1.10985...	playⓘ	180.45	−19.55
						Minor tone	10⁄ 9 = 1.11111...	playⓘ	182.40	−17.60
						Major tone	9⁄ 8 = 1.125	playⓘ	203.91	+3.91
						Septimal whole tone	8⁄ 7 = 1.14285...	playⓘ	231.17	+31.17
3	D♯ or E♭	2 3⁄ 12 = ${\displaystyle {\sqrt[{4}]{2}}}$	1.18920...	playⓘ	300	Septimal minor third	7⁄ 6 = 1.16666...	playⓘ	266.87	−33.13
						Tridecimal minor third	13⁄ 11 = 1.18181...	playⓘ	289.21	−10.79
						Pythagorean minor third	32⁄ 27 = 1.18518...	playⓘ	294.13	−5.87
						Nineteenth harmonic	19⁄ 16 = 1.1875	playⓘ	297.51	−2.49
						Just minor third	6⁄ 5 = 1.2	playⓘ	315.64	+15.64
						Pythagorean augmented second	19683⁄ 16384 = 1.20135...	playⓘ	317.60	+17.60
4	E	2 4⁄ 12 = ${\displaystyle {\sqrt[{3}]{2}}}$	1.25992...	playⓘ	400	Pythagorean diminished fourth	8192⁄ 6561 = 1.24859...	playⓘ	384.36	−15.64
						Just major third	5⁄ 4 = 1.25	playⓘ	386.31	−13.69
						Pythagorean major third	81⁄ 64 = 1.265625	playⓘ	407.82	+7.82
						Undecimal major third	14⁄ 11 = 1.27272...	Playⓘ	417.51	+17.51
						Septimal major third	9⁄ 7 = 1.28571...	playⓘ	435.08	+35.08
5	F	2 5⁄ 12 = ${\displaystyle {\sqrt[{12}]{32}}}$	1.33484...	playⓘ	500	Just perfect fourth	4⁄ 3 = 1.33333...	playⓘ	498.04	−1.96
						Pythagorean augmented third	177147⁄ 131072 = 1.35152...	playⓘ	521.51	+21.51
6	F♯ or G♭	2 6⁄ 12 = ${\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}}$	1.41421...	playⓘ	600	Classic augmented fourth	25⁄ 18 = 1.38888...	playⓘ	568.72	−31.28
						Huygens' tritone	7⁄ 5 = 1.4	playⓘ	582.51	−17.49
						Pythagorean diminished fifth	1024⁄ 729 = 1.40466...	playⓘ	588.27	−11.73
						Just augmented fourth	45⁄ 32 = 1.40625	Playⓘ	590.22	−9.78
						Just diminished fifth	64⁄ 45 = 1.42222...	playⓘ	609.78	+9.78
						Pythagorean augmented fourth	729⁄ 512 = 1.42382...	playⓘ	611.73	+11.73
						Euler's tritone	10⁄ 7 = 1.42857...	Playⓘ	617.49	+17.49
						Classic diminished fifth	36⁄ 25 = 1.44	playⓘ	631.28	+31.28
7	G	2 7⁄ 12 = ${\displaystyle {\sqrt[{12}]{128}}}$	1.49830...	playⓘ	700	Pythagorean diminished sixth	262144⁄ 177147 = 1.47981...	playⓘ	678.49	−21.51
						Just perfect fifth	3⁄ 2 = 1.5	playⓘ	701.96	+1.96
8	G♯ or A♭	2 8⁄ 12 = ${\displaystyle {\sqrt[{3}]{4}}}$	1.58740...	playⓘ	800	Septimal minor sixth	14⁄ 9 = 1.55555...	playⓘ	764.92	−35.08
						Undecimal minor sixth	11⁄ 7 = 1.57142...	playⓘ	782.49	−17.51
						Pythagorean minor sixth	128⁄ 81 = 1.58024...	playⓘ	792.18	−7.82
						Just minor sixth	8⁄ 5 = 1.6	playⓘ	813.69	+13.69
						Pythagorean augmented fifth	6561⁄ 4096 = 1.60180...	playⓘ	815.64	+15.64
9	A	2 9⁄ 12 = ${\displaystyle {\sqrt[{4}]{8}}}$	1.68179...	playⓘ	900	Pythagorean diminished seventh	32768⁄ 19683 = 1.66478...	playⓘ	882.40	−17.60
						Just major sixth	5⁄ 3 = 1.66666...	playⓘ	884.36	−15.64
						Nineteenth subharmonic	32⁄ 19 = 1.68421...	playⓘ	902.49	+2.49
						Pythagorean major sixth	27⁄ 16 = 1.6875	playⓘ	905.87	+5.87
						Septimal major sixth	12⁄ 7 = 1.71428...	Playⓘ	933.13	+33.13
10	A♯ or B♭	2 10⁄ 12 = ${\displaystyle {\sqrt[{6}]{32}}}$	1.78179...	playⓘ	1000	Harmonic seventh	7⁄ 4 = 1.75	playⓘ	968.83	−31.17
						Pythagorean minor seventh	16⁄ 9 = 1.77777...	playⓘ	996.09	−3.91
						Large minor seventh	9⁄ 5 = 1.8	playⓘ	1017.60	+17.60
						Pythagorean augmented sixth	59049⁄ 32768 = 1.80203...	playⓘ	1019.55	+19.55
11	B	2 11⁄ 12 = ${\displaystyle {\sqrt[{12}]{2048}}}$	1.88774...	playⓘ	1100	Tridecimal neutral seventh	13⁄ 7 = 1.85714...	playⓘ	1071.70	−28.30
						Pythagorean diminished octave	4096⁄ 2187 = 1.87288...	playⓘ	1086.31	−13.69
						Just major seventh	15⁄ 8 = 1.875	playⓘ	1088.27	−11.73
						Seventeenth subharmonic	32⁄ 17 = 1.88235...	playⓘ	1095.04	−4.96
						Pythagorean major seventh	243⁄ 128 = 1.89843...	playⓘ	1109.78	+9.78
						Septimal major seventh	27⁄ 14 = 1.92857...	playⓘ	1137.04	+37.04
12	C	2 12⁄ 12 = 2	2	playⓘ	1200	Octave	2⁄ 1 = 2	playⓘ	1200.00	0

12-ET tempers out several commas, meaning that there are several fractions close to ⁠ 1 /1⁠ that are treated as ⁠ 1 /1⁠ by 12-ET due to its mapping of different fractions to the same equally-tempered interval. For example, ⁠729/512⁠ (⁠ 3⁶ /2⁹⁠) and ⁠ 1024 /729⁠ (⁠ 2¹⁰ /3⁶⁠) are each mapped to the tritone, so they are treated as nominally the same interval; therefore, their quotient, ⁠531441/ 524288 ⁠ (⁠ 3¹² /2¹⁹⁠) is mapped to/treated as unison. This is the Pythagorean comma, and it is 12-ET's only 3-limit comma. However, as one increases the prime limit and includes more intervals, the number of commas increases. 12-ET's most important five-limit comma is ⁠81/ 80 ⁠ (⁠3⁴/ 2⁴ × 5¹ ⁠), which is known as the syntonic comma and is the factor between Pythagorean thirds and sixths and their just counterparts. 12-ET's other 5-limit commas include:

• Schisma: ⁠32805/ 32768 ⁠ = ⁠ 3⁸ × 5¹ /2¹⁵⁠ = (⁠531441/ 524288 ⁠)¹ × (⁠81/ 80 ⁠)⁻¹
• Diaschisma: ⁠2048/ 2025 ⁠ = ⁠2¹¹/ 3⁴ × 5² ⁠ = (⁠531441/ 524288 ⁠)⁻¹ × (⁠81/ 80 ⁠)²
• Lesser diesis: ⁠128/ 125 ⁠ = ⁠ 2⁷ /5³⁠ = (⁠531441/ 524288 ⁠)⁻¹ × (⁠81/ 80 ⁠)³
• Greater diesis: ⁠648/ 625 ⁠ = ⁠ 2³ × 3⁴ /5⁴⁠=(⁠531441/ 524288 ⁠)⁻¹ × (⁠81/ 80 ⁠)⁴

One of the 7-limit commas that 12-ET tempers out is the septimal kleisma, which is equal to ⁠225/ 224 ⁠, or ⁠ 3²×5² /2⁵×7¹⁠. 12-ET's other 7-limit commas include:

• Septimal semicomma: ⁠126/ 125 ⁠ = ⁠ 2¹ × 3² × 7¹ /5³⁠ = (⁠81/ 80 ⁠)¹ × (⁠225/ 224 ⁠)⁻¹
• Archytas' comma: ⁠64/ 63 ⁠ = ⁠2⁶/ 3² × 7¹ ⁠ = (⁠531441/ 524288 ⁠)⁻¹ × (⁠81/ 80 ⁠)² × (⁠225/ 224 ⁠)¹
• Septimal quarter tone: ⁠36/ 35 ⁠ = ⁠ 2² × 3² /5¹ ×v7¹⁠ = (⁠531441/ 524288 ⁠)⁻¹ × (⁠81/80⁠)³ × (⁠225/ 224 ⁠)¹
• Jubilisma: ⁠50/ 49 ⁠ = ⁠ 2¹ × 5² /7²⁠ = (⁠531441/ 524288 ⁠)⁻¹ × (⁠81/ 80 ⁠)² × (⁠225/ 224 ⁠)²

Historically, multiple tuning systems have been used that can be seen as slight variations of 12-TEDO, with twelve notes per octave but with some variation among interval sizes so that the notes are not quite equally-spaced. One example of this a three-limit scale where equally-tempered perfect fifths of 700 cents are replaced with justly-intoned perfect fifths of 701.955 cents. Because the two intervals differ by less than 2 cents, or 1⁄600 of an octave, the two scales are very similar. In fact, the Chinese developed 3-limit just intonation at least a century before He Chengtian created the sequence of 12-TEDO.^[38] Likewise, Pythagorean tuning, which was developed by ancient Greeks, was the predominant system in Europe until during the Renaissance, when Europeans realized that dissonant intervals such as 81⁄64^[39] could be made more consonant by tempering them to simpler ratios like 5⁄4, resulting in Europe developing a series of meantone temperaments that slightly modified the interval sizes but could still be viewed as an approximate of 12-TEDO. Due to meantone temperaments' tendency to concentrate error onto one enharmonic perfect fifth, making it very dissonant, European music theorists, such as Andreas Werckmeister, Johann Philipp Kirnberger, Francesco Antonio Vallotti, and Thomas Young, created various well temperaments with the goal of dividing up the commas in order to reduce the dissonance of the worst-affected intervals. Werckmeister and Kirnberger were each dissatisfied with his first temperament and therefore created multiple temperaments, the latter temperaments more closely approximating equal temperament than the former temperaments. Likewise, Europe as a whole gradually transitioned from meantone and well temperaments to 12-TEDO, the system that it still uses today.

While some types of music, such as serialism, use all twelve notes of 12-TEDO, most music only uses notes from a particular subset of 12-TEDO known as a scale. Many different types of scales exist.

The most popular type of scale in 12-TEDO is meantone. Meantone refers to any scale where all of its notes are consecutive on the circle of fifths. Meantone scales of different sizes exist, and some meantone scales used include five-note meantone, seven-note meantone, and nine-note meantone. Meantone is present in the design of Western instruments. For example, the keys of a piano and its predecessors are structured so that the white keys form a seven-note meantone scale and the black keys form a five-note meantone scale. Another example is that guitars and other string instruments with at least five strings are typically tuned so that their open strings form a five-note meantone scale.

Other scales used in 12-TEDO include the ascending melodic minor scale, the harmonic minor, the harmonic major, the diminished scale, and the in scale.

• Equal temperament
• Just intonation
• Musical acoustics (the physics of music)
• Music and mathematics
• Microtonal music
• List of meantone intervals
• Diatonic and chromatic
• Electronic tuner
• Musical tuning