Hubbry Logo
Australian Communications and Media AuthorityAustralian Communications and Media AuthorityMain
Open search
Australian Communications and Media Authority
Community hub
Australian Communications and Media Authority
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Australian Communications and Media Authority
Australian Communications and Media Authority
Australian Communications and Media Authority
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Australian Communications and Media Authority
Agency overview
Formed1 July 2005; 20 years ago (2005-07-01)[1]
Preceding agencies
JurisdictionGovernment of Australia
Employees445[2]
Agency executives
  • Nerida O'Loughlin[3], Chair
  • Creina Chapman[3], Deputy Chair, CEO
Websiteacma.gov.au

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is an Australian government statutory authority within the Communications portfolio. ACMA was formed on 1 July 2005 with the merger of the Australian Broadcasting Authority and the Australian Communications Authority.[4]

ACMA is responsible for collecting broadcasting, radiocommunication and telecommunication taxes, and regulating Australian media. It does this through various legislation, regulations, standards and codes of practice. ACMA is a converged regulator, created to oversee the convergence of telecommunications, broadcasting, radio communications and the internet.

Organization

[edit]

ACMA is an independent government agency managed by an executive team comprising the Chair (who is also the Agency Head), Deputy Chair (who is also the chief executive officer). ACMA collects revenue on behalf of the Australian Government through broadcasting, radiocommunications and telecommunications taxes, charges and license fees. It also collects revenue from price-based allocation of spectrum. The corporate structure comprises four divisions – Communications Infrastructure, Content, Consumer and Citizen, Corporate and Research, and Legal Services.

ACMA has responsibilities under four principal Acts – the Broadcasting Services Act 1992, the Telecommunications Act 1997, the Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Act 1999 and the Radiocommunications Act 1992. There are another 22 Acts to which the agency responds in such areas as spam, the Do Not Call Register and interactive gambling. The ACMA also creates and administers more than 523 legislative instruments including radiocommunications, spam and telecommunications regulations; and license area plans for free-to-air broadcasters.

ACMA's main offices are located in Canberra, Melbourne and Sydney.

Convergence and change

[edit]

Communications convergence is the merging of the previously distinct services by which information is communicated – telephone, television (free-to-air and subscription) radio and newspapers – over digital platforms. ACMA also works with industry and citizens to solve new concerns and mitigate risks arising in the evolving networked society and information economy, recognizing that Australians are interacting with digital communications and content in changing ways. Not only does ACMA address a wide range of responsibilities, it does so against a backdrop of rapid change.

Many of the controls on the production and distribution of content and the provision of telecommunications services through licensing or other subsidiary arrangements, or by standards and codes (whether co-regulatory or self-regulatory) are subject to revision and adaptation to the networked society and information economy. Moreover, there are new platforms, applications, business models, value chains and forms of social interaction available with more to come in what is a dynamic, innovative environment. Other challenges for regulators include cross-jurisdictional issues and the need for engagement and collaboration with stakeholders locally, regionally and internationally.

ACMA has developed a 'converged communications regulator' framework which seeks to bring to the global discussion a 'common ground' to deliver outcomes in the public interest. The four cornerstone parts to the framework, each divided into two sub-streams, are outlined below along with the main functions of ACMA under each task.

Bridging to the future – active engagement with the currents of change and proactive development of responses through thought leadership and regulatory development:

  • Reviewing industry standards and codes of practice.
  • Developing more flexible licensing.
  • Updating spectrum management tools for spectrum sharing technologies.
  • Research and analysis to examine the effectiveness of current regulation and to provide evidence-informed regulatory development.

Transforming the agency – adapting the organization to the changing world of convergence by ensuring a structural fit with convergence and a focus on agency innovation:

  • Creating resilience through capability training.
  • Evidence-based reporting on industry performance, service offerings, consumer benefits, levels of adoption and use.
  • Administration of spam intelligence database.
  • Evidence-based approach to tracking industry performance during digital TV transition

Major program delivery – through resource and program management with fully effective corporate governance:

  • Development and implementation of a national cybersafe education program.
  • Administering the Do Not Call Register.
  • Administering contracts for phone services for people who are deaf or have a hearing or speech impediment.
  • Developing and implementing a corporate governance framework and ICT strategic plan

Effective regulation – doing the 'day job' of the regulatory agency with effective and efficient regulatory administration and operations coupled with extensive stakeholder engagement:

  • Regulating telecommunications and broadcasting services, internet content and datacasting services
  • Managing access to the radiofrequency spectrum bands through radiocommunications licensing, including amateur radio licensing.
  • Resolving competing demands for spectrum through broadcasting license arrangements and price-based allocation methods.
  • Regulating use of the radio-frequency spectrum and minimizing radio communications interference.
  • Regulating compliance with the relevant legislation, license conditions, codes of practice, standards, service guarantees and other safeguards.
  • Promoting and facilitating industry self-regulatory and co-regulatory solutions
  • Informing industry and consumers about communications regulation.

Representing Australia's interests internationally (see International Telecommunication Union)

ACMA Hotline for reporting offensive or illegal online content

[edit]

The ACMA administers a complaints mechanism for Australian residents and law enforcement agencies to report prohibited online content,[5] including child sexual abuse material. Within the scheme, which operates under Schedules 5 and 7 of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992, content is assessed with reference to the same criteria within the National Classification Scheme that applies to films and computer games in Australia.

The ACMA Hotline is one of a global network of international bodies within INHOPE – the International Association of Internet Hotlines that exchange information on child abuse images, pinpointing the hosting countries to help eradicate them from the web.[6] INHOPE consists of 44 members in 38 countries, with members including the Internet Watch Foundation (UK), the National Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (USA), Cyberia (Canada), Friendly Runlet Foundation (Russian Federation) and the Internet Hotline Center Japan.

If prohibited online content is found in Australia, it is issued with a take-down notice after being formally classified; if it is hosted overseas it is notified to optional end-user Family Friendly Filters that are accredited by industry through the Internet Industry Association[7] (these are available at cost from ISPs). All potentially illegal content is reported by the ACMA to law enforcement in Australia, or, in the case of child sexual abuse material hosted overseas, through INHOPE for rapid police notification and take-down in the host country.[5]

The ACMA publishes comprehensive statistics and information about the ACMA Hotline on its website. The majority of investigations the ACMA conducts concern online child sexual abuse material.[8] Complaints to the ACMA Hotline are usually made via a webform on the ACMA's website.

Popularly held misconceptions about the ACMA's regulatory role include that it investigates and takes action on whole websites (it investigates specific URLs, images or files) and that the ACMA causes blocking of content at an ISP level (it notifies overseas hosted content to optional end-user filters).[5]

In February 2013, the ACMA and Australian Federal Police announced a new agreement for sharing of information about serious child abuse material, including an arrangement whereby the ACMA can report content through INHOPE based on where content may be produced, as well as where it is hosted[6]

During National Child Protection Week 2013,[9] the ACMA Hotline conducted 418 investigations involving over 4,700 images of abused children to Australian police agencies or through the INHOPE international network for action overseas.[10] During the week, the ACMA announced it is now working more closely with CrimeStoppers in Australia to make it easier to report illegal online content.[11]

The ACMA's online role is not connected to ISP blocking 'worst of the worst' child abuse material, which was operated by ISPs and the Australian Federal Police.[12] In July 2015, this function moved to the Office of the Children's safety Commissioner.[13]

Do Not Call Register

[edit]
Main article: Do Not Call Register

ACMA operates Australia's Do Not Call Register, which is a scheme to reduce unsolicited telemarketing calls and marketing faxes to individuals who have indicated they do not want to receive such calls by registering their private and domestic telephone (including mobile) and fax numbers on the Register. The scheme has been in operation since May 2007. Since mid-2013, Salmat has managed the Register on behalf of ACMA.[14]

Spam Act

[edit]
Main article: Spam Act 2003

ACMA is responsible for enforcing the Spam Act 2003[15] which prohibits the sending of unsolicited commercial electronic messages[16] with an Australian link. A message has an Australian link if it originates, or was authorised, in Australia, or if the message was accessed in Australia. Anyone who sends commercial email, SMS, or instant messages must ensure that the message is sent with consent, contains sender identification and contact information and includes a functional unsubscribe facility. Some exemptions apply.

Members of the public are able to make complaints and reports about commercial electronic messages to ACMA which may conduct formal investigations and take enforcement actions.

Australian Internet Security Initiative and malware

[edit]

The ACMA developed the Australian Internet Security Initiative (AISI) to help address the problem of computers being compromised by the surreptitious installation of malicious software (malware). 'Malware' enables a computer to be controlled remotely for illegal and harmful activities without the owner's knowledge.

Malware can:

  • access sensitive personal information stored on the computer such as resumes, sensitive documents, photographs/videos, and banking and other login or password details
  • gain remote access to the computer's camera and microphone
  • form part of a larger group of computers known as 'botnets'. Among other things, botnets are used to help with the mass distribution of spam and other malware, the hosting of phishing sites and distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks on websites.

Telecommunications Sector Security Reform (TSSR)

[edit]

The Telecommunications Sector Security Reform (TSSR) commenced on 18 September 2018.[17]

TSSR introduces four new measures:

  • a security obligation, which requires carriers and carriage service providers to protect their networks and facilities against threats to national security from unauthorised access or interference
  • a notification requirement, which requires carriers and nominated carriage service providers to tell Government of any proposed changes to their telecommunications systems or services that are likely to have a material adverse effect on their capacity to comply with their security obligation
  • the ability for Government to obtain more detailed information from carriers and carriage service providers in certain circumstances to support the work of the Critical Infrastructure Centre, and
  • the ability for Government to intervene and issue directions in cases in cases where there are significant national security concerns that cannot be addressed through other means.[18]

Role in Internet content regulation

[edit]

In 2000, a legislative framework for online content regulation was established by adding a new schedule (schedule 5) to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.[19] The Australian Broadcasting Authority was responsible for managing and enforcing the framework, and this responsibility passed to ACMA in 2005.

The key element to the framework was the establishment of a complaints mechanism under Part 4 of the Schedule. Members of the public could complain to ACMA about offensive material online, ACMA could investigate, and then notify Internet service providers to prevent access to prohibited content. The framework also permitted ACMA to initiate an 'own-motion' investigation into potentially prohibited content. The framework was designed to be consistent with the national classifications system (the Code and Classification Guidelines established by the Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Act 1995). Through this mechanism of establishing what content is prohibited or possibly prohibited, ACMA effectively creates a "blacklist" of content to which Internet service providers must deny users access.

This framework was amended further in 2007 by the Communications Legislation Amendment (Content Services) Act (2007) as Schedule 5 only applied to stored content made available over the Internet but did not apply easily to "ephemeral" content such as streamed material. A new schedule (schedule 7) was introduced to regulate this content consistently with the national classifications system.

On 10 March 2009, the ACMA issued an "interim link-deletion notice" to Bulletproof Networks, an Australian web-hosting company, on the grounds that Whirlpool, a customer of Bulletproof Networks, posted a link to a blacklisted, anti-abortion web site.[20] There was a controversy that the material hosted by Whirlpool was the response notification from ACMA stating that the website had been blacklisted (the notice included the address of the website that had been blacklisted).

ACMA blacklist leaked

[edit]

On 19 March 2009 it was reported that the ACMA's blacklist of banned sites had been leaked online, and had been published by WikiLeaks.[21] Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, obtained the blacklist after the ACMA blocked several WikiLeaks pages following their publication of the Danish blacklist. Assange said that "This week saw Australia joining China and the United Arab Emirates as the only countries censoring WikiLeaks." Three lists purporting to be from the ACMA were published online over a seven-day period.[22]

The leaked list, which was reported to have been obtained from a manufacturer of internet filtering software, contained 2395 sites. Approximately half of the sites on the list were not related to child pornography, and included online gambling sites, YouTube pages, gay, straight, and fetish pornography sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites, websites of fringe religions, Christian sites, and even the websites of a tour operator and a Queensland dentist. Colin Jacobs, spokesman for lobby group Electronic Frontiers Australia, said that there was no mechanism for a site operator to know they got onto the list or to request to be removed from it. Australia's Communications Minister, Stephen Conroy later blamed the addition of the dentist's website to the blacklist on the "Russian mob".[23]

Associate professor Bjorn Landfeldt of the University of Sydney said that the leaked list "constitutes a condensed encyclopedia of depravity and potentially very dangerous material". Stephen Conroy said the list was not the real blacklist[24] and described its leak and publication as "grossly irresponsible" and that it undermined efforts to improve "cyber safety". He said that ACMA was investigating the incident and considering a range of possible actions including referral to the Australian Federal Police, and that Australians involved in making the content available would be at "serious risk of criminal prosecution".[25]

Conroy initially denied that the list published on WikiLeaks and the ACMA blacklist were the same, saying "This is not the ACMA blacklist." He stated that the leaked list was alleged to be current on 6 August 2008 and contained 2,400 URLs, where the ACMA blacklist for the same date contained 1,061 URLs. He added that the ACMA advised that there were URLs on the leaked list that had never been the subject of a complaint or ACMA investigation, and had never been included on the ACMA blacklist. He was backed up by ISP Tech 2U, one of six ISPs involved in filtering technology trials.[24]

Conroy's denial was called into doubt by the Internet Industry Association (IIA), who publicly condemned the publishing of the list, chief executive Peter Coroneos saying, "No reasonable person could countenance the publication of links which promote access to child abuse images, irrespective of their motivation, which in this case appears to be political."[26]

Conroy later claimed the leaked blacklist published on WikiLeaks closely resembled the official blacklist, admitting that the latest list (dated 18 March) "seemed to be close" to ACMA's current blacklist.[22]

In an estimates hearing of the Australian Federal Government on 25 May 2009[27] it was revealed that the leak was taken so seriously that it was referred to the Australian Federal Police for investigation. It was further stated that distribution of further updates to the list have been withheld until recipients can improve their security. Nerida O'Laughlin of the ACMA confirmed that the list has been reviewed and as of 30 April consists of 997 URLs.

Online Safety Act 2021

[edit]

In 2021, Schedules 5 and 7 of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 were repealed as part of the enactment of the Online Safety Act 2021. This Act established the eSafety Commissioner (section 26) and, under part 3 of the Act, gave the Commissioner responsibility for managing and enforcing the online content scheme (part 9).

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Australian Communications and Media Authority

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is an independent Commonwealth statutory authority established on 1 July 2005 through the merger of the Australian Communications Authority and the Australian Broadcasting Authority under the Australian Communications and Media Authority Act 2005. It regulates telecommunications, broadcasting, radiocommunications, and aspects of online content and interactive gambling services in Australia to maximize the economic and social benefits of communications infrastructure, services, and content. The agency enforces compliance with relevant legislation, including the Telecommunications Act 1997 and Broadcasting Services Act 1992, by issuing licenses, managing spectrum allocation, collecting industry taxes, and imposing penalties for breaches such as spam, scams, and content standards violations. ACMA's core functions encompass rule-making for communications markets, monitoring industry performance, and facilitating consumer protections like service guarantees and universal access initiatives. It also oversees media diversity through registers of interests in and newspapers, aiming to prevent undue concentration. Notable enforcement actions include investigations into decency breaches by broadcasters, such as the 2025 findings against the Kyle and Jackie O Show for multiple violations of complaint handling and content rules, resulting in potential regulatory action. The authority has faced criticisms for its expanding role in content regulation, particularly proposals to grant it powers over online and , which some argue risk infringing on free speech by enabling government-directed under vague harm criteria. Reviews of ACMA's operations have recommended reforms to enhance its effectiveness amid digital convergence, highlighting tensions between regulatory oversight and innovation in a rapidly evolving communications .

Establishment and History

Formation and Merger

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) was established on 1 July 2005 through the merger of the Australian Broadcasting Authority (ABA), created on 5 October 1992 under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 to regulate content standards and licensing in broadcasting, and the Australian Communications Authority (ACA), formed on 1 July 1997 by amalgamating the Australian Telecommunications Authority and spectrum management functions to handle technical aspects of telecommunications infrastructure and radiocommunications. This consolidation was legislated by the Australian Communications and Media Authority Act 2005, which dissolved the predecessor agencies and transferred their functions, assets, and liabilities to the new entity. The merger addressed the inefficiencies of fragmented regulation amid rapid , where digital advancements enabled the same content—such as video and data services—to be delivered interchangeably via broadcast or networks, rendering siloed oversight duplicative and maladaptive to causal shifts in service provision. Prior separate agencies had generated overlapping compliance burdens for industry operators, with from sector reports indicating that unified regulation could streamline licensing, reduce administrative costs, and better allocate resources to emerging hybrid technologies like , without compromising technical or content-specific safeguards. The transition period entailed integrating approximately 700 staff from the ABA and ACA into ACMA's operations, alongside appointing an initial board chaired by Ian Pearce, with members including representatives from both legacy agencies to oversee the handover. Challenges included aligning disparate organizational cultures and procedural frameworks, as noted in contemporaneous inquiries, which recommended enhanced powers for the new authority to mitigate potential regulatory gaps during the six-month preparatory phase leading to full operations. This restructuring prioritized operational efficiency over preservation of antecedent structures, reflecting a pragmatic response to the diminished utility of divided bureaucracies in a converged environment.

Key Legislative Foundations

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is empowered primarily by the Australian Communications and Media Authority Act 2005, which establishes the agency and delineates its functions, including administration of the radiofrequency under the Radiocommunications Act 1992. This framework mandates ACMA to allocate through licensing and auctions to facilitate efficient radiocommunications use, prioritizing long-term via coordinated planning over or equity-driven distributions. The Radiocommunications Act 1992 specifically requires ACMA to issue apparatus and licences, monitor compliance, and conduct auctions, as evidenced by the 2021 850/900 MHz band auction that allocated 16 lots and generated $2.091 billion in revenue from two bidders. Complementing these, the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 grants ACMA authority over broadcasting licences for commercial radio and television services, including enforcement of operational standards and infringement notices for non-compliance. Similarly, the Telecommunications Act 1997 empowers ACMA to regulate carriers, issue directions for compliance with industry codes, and oversee infrastructure access, such as property rights for low-impact facilities. The Spam Act 2003 assigns ACMA investigative and enforcement roles for commercial electronic messages, prohibiting unsolicited communications without consent. Across these statutes, ACMA is tasked with revenue collection through annual licence fees—totaling approximately $31 million in 2023–24—and spectrum auctions, which have yielded billions cumulatively to fund efficient allocation mechanisms. These powers emphasize monitoring and licensing to ensure operational integrity, with fees structured to recover costs rather than redistribute resources.

Evolution Through Reforms

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) initially concentrated on facilitating the national switchover to , a process involving readiness assessments from 2005 through 2012 that guided regional trials starting in 2008 and full nationwide completion on 10 December 2013. This reform responded to technological advancements in broadcasting efficiency and spectrum utilization, culminating in the auction of the digital dividend spectrum (694–820 MHz band) in April 2013, which generated approximately A$2 billion and enabled carriers to expand LTE networks for enhanced mobile coverage, particularly in regional areas. Concurrently, ACMA integrated regulatory adaptations for the (NBN), announced in 2007 with rollout accelerating from 2010, through studies like the June 2008 Yorke Peninsula analysis to evaluate early broadband impacts and monitor consumer migration amid shifting market structures by 2011. These efforts addressed policy shifts toward wholesale infrastructure competition, with ACMA providing evidence-informed oversight to mitigate disruptions during fixed-line transitions. In the 2010s, escalating household internet access—from 60% in 2006 to 79% by 2011—necessitated responses to content delivery convergence via internet protocol, as outlined in ACMA's 2011 Broken Concepts report and the 2012 Convergence Review, which identified outdated silos and advocated horizontal regulation across platforms. These analyses prompted expansions in ACMA's online content scheme, aligning digital oversight with broadcasting rules to manage risks from over-the-top services while fostering innovation. Spectrum management evolved further with the 2015 Spectrum Review, which proposed streamlined policies amid surging mobile data demands, including progressive clearing of the 800 MHz band to augment capacity and prepare for deployments. This reallocation, driven by forecasts of growth, enhanced mobile service productivity and coverage metrics, supporting economic contributions from advanced wireless technologies.

Organizational Structure and Governance

Leadership and Accountability

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is governed by a collegiate comprising a , Deputy Chair, up to six full-time members, and associate members as needed, with decisions made collectively to oversee regulatory functions. Members are appointed by the on the recommendation of the responsible minister, typically for terms of up to five years, ensuring alignment with government priorities while aiming for expertise in communications and media sectors. As of October 2025, Nerida O'Loughlin serves as , having been initially appointed in 2017 and reappointed in subsequent terms, with Deputy Chair Adam Suckling's term extending to March 2025. Ministerial oversight is exercised through instruments such as the Statement of Expectations, issued by the Minister for Communications on 3 December 2024, which directs the ACMA to prioritize areas like reduction, efficiency, and compliance cost minimization while coordinating with other regulators. This framework underscores the Authority's accountability to the executive, with the Chair also serving as agency head under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013, subjecting operations to parliamentary scrutiny. Accountability mechanisms include mandatory annual reporting to , detailing performance against corporate plans and key metrics such as licensing compliance and outcomes; for instance, the 2023–24 report highlighted full compliance by commercial licensees with Australian content quotas (at least 55% on main channels). The ACMA's , funded primarily through parliamentary appropriations supplemented by industry levies and fees, totaled approximately AUD 231.7 million in resourcing for 2024–25, raising concerns about potential bureaucratic or influence from funding dependencies despite statutory claims. Such reliance on government allocations, combined with appointment processes and directional statements, can incentivize alignment with ministerial agendas over purely merit-based regulatory rigor, though of undue interference remains limited to structural risks rather than documented cases.

Internal Divisions and Operations

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is structured into five divisions to manage its regulatory responsibilities: Content, which develops and enforces standards for broadcasting and online content; , which oversees complaint resolution and protections under acts like the Spam Act 2003; , responsible for radiocommunications allocation and oversight; Corporate and Research, handling administrative functions, , and research; and Legal Services, providing compliance advice and litigation support. This divisional framework enables targeted expertise in distinct regulatory domains, such as the Content division's focus on schemes and the Communications Infrastructure division's auctions, while requiring cross-divisional for integrated issues like cyber-enabled content harms. Operational efficiency is supported by centralized databases and monitoring tools for tracking compliance, including systems for logging over 100,000 spam and complaints annually received via public portals. Investigations into serious breaches, such as unauthorized , are typically resolved within six months, with formal actions prioritized based on risk assessments. The agency's approximately 440 staff (as of June 2024, excluding eSafety Commissioner personnel) operate from regional offices in , , and , enabling localized while maintaining national coordination through executive oversight.

Core Regulatory Functions

Broadcasting and Content Standards

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) oversees the licensing of commercial, community, and subscription broadcasting services for television and radio under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth), ensuring compliance with content rules that prioritize factual accuracy, community standards of decency, and safeguards for children and audiences. Licensees must adhere to mandatory standards, such as those prohibiting misleading news or current affairs content, and industry codes developed by bodies like Commercial Radio Australia and Free TV , which address issues including offensive language, explicit material, and advertising placements. Breaches can result in investigations, enforceable undertakings, civil penalties up to AUD 444,000 per contravention for corporations, or licence revocation in severe cases. ACMA investigates viewer and listener complaints about potential code violations, publishing outcomes to promote transparency and deter non-compliance. In practice, formal probes focus on substantiated allegations, with historical data indicating that around 20% of complaints triggered investigations in the mid-2000s, though recent figures show selective escalation based on severity. For example, on October 1, 2025, ACMA ruled that seven broadcasts of the Kyle & Jackie O Show on ARN's stations in and between August and September 2024 violated decency provisions of the Commercial Radio Code by airing sexually explicit and vulgar content classified as MA15+ without adequate warnings, prompting threats of licence suspension or cancellation. Earlier, in March 2025, the same program was found to have breached standards through unclassified explicit discussions, underscoring ACMA's role in enforcing time-zone protections that restrict high-impact content to after 9 p.m. Commercial free-to-air television licensees face Australian Content Standards mandating at least 55% Australian programming on primary (SD) channels annually, plus 1,460 hours on HD multi-channels and quotas for first-release (at least 25 points, equivalent to 130 hours of qualifying content) and children's programs (390 hours of C and P material). ACMA's 2024 compliance monitoring confirmed full adherence by metropolitan networks, with averages exceeding minima—e.g., at 77% on main channels—demonstrating effective regulatory pressure amid declining linear viewership. These requirements, rooted in objectives, have sustained local production volumes but empirically correlate with elevated operational costs for broadcasters, potentially distorting resource allocation away from viewer-preferred imports and contributing to industry consolidation as digital alternatives erode traditional revenues. ACMA facilitated Australia's analog-to-digital TV switchover, completed nationwide by December 2013, by allocating , verifying technical compliance, and adapting content obligations to digital multi-channels without diluting mandates. This shift expanded capacity for additional services while preserving audience protections, though quota rigidity has faced critique for hindering adaptability in a fragmented media landscape where global streaming erodes dominance.

Radiocommunications Spectrum Management

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) manages the radiofrequency spectrum to promote efficient, interference-free use aligned with national policy objectives under the Radiocommunications Act 1992. This encompasses planning via the Australian Radiofrequency Spectrum Plan, which delineates frequency band allocations consistent with International Telecommunication Union (ITU) conventions to facilitate equitable domestic and cross-border operations. Allocation methods prioritize spectrum's inherent scarcity, employing market mechanisms like auctions alongside administrative assignments to direct resources toward highest-value applications, as spectrum demand exceeds supply in key bands for mobile broadband and satellite services. ACMA issues licences authorizing device operations within defined frequencies and areas, enabling flexible deployment while embedding technical conditions to curb interference. Auctions exemplify value-based allocation: the November 2023 process for 3.4 GHz and 3.7 GHz bands—vital for expansion—sold 574 of 588 lots, yielding AUD 721.7 million in revenue, with licences valid until 2030 in the 3.4 GHz segment. Such mechanisms have cumulatively generated substantial fiscal returns, underscoring auctions' role in revealing willingness-to-pay over subsidized or legacy administrative grants that risk underutilization. Interference management involves maintaining the Register of Radiocommunications Licences for traceability and enforcing coordination protocols, where licensees must mitigate disputes through before escalating to ACMA . International harmonization, via ITU engagements, minimizes border-spillover effects, as spectrum physics demands synchronized planning to avoid harmful interference in shared bands. Allocation frameworks embed priorities for defense, , and public safety over commercial pursuits, reserving bands for resilient amid finite resources, though critiques note that entrenched incumbent holdings from pre-auction eras can perpetuate inefficiencies by deterring dynamic reallocation to . Reforms emphasize guidelines enhancing market-driven resolutions to sustain these priorities without undue favoritism.

Telecommunications Infrastructure Oversight

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) oversees infrastructure through carrier licensing requirements under the Telecommunications Act 1997, mandating that entities owning or operating network units for public carriage services obtain a licence to ensure and infrastructure reliability. Carriers must adhere to conditions including network deployment standards and service continuity obligations, with ACMA managing the national numbering plan to allocate resources efficiently and prevent hoarding. ACMA monitors the (NBN) via service rules enforced on providers, focusing on connection times and fault rectification to maintain infrastructure performance, while the Universal Service Obligation (USO) guarantees reasonable access to standard telephone services nationwide, particularly in remote areas. As of 2025, NBN infrastructure reaches over 99% of Australian premises, though actual speeds vary significantly by technology type and location, with and options often delivering lower consistent performance compared to fibre-to-the-premises rollout covering about 40% of sites. The USO, transitioned toward voice services under recent reforms, imposes obligations on designated providers like to sustain legacy copper networks until NBN equivalence, addressing gaps in high-cost rural deployment. Enforcement actions underscore ACMA's role in reliability, as demonstrated by the $12 million penalty imposed on subsidiaries in 2024 for breaching emergency call service rules during the nationwide outage on 8 2023, which disrupted fixed, mobile, and services for millions and hindered triple-zero access. Such penalties, drawn from civil infringement notices, aim to deter systemic failures, though recurring outages highlight limitations in preventive oversight amid critiques of insufficient resilience testing. ACMA promotes by facilitating carrier entry and allocation, contributing to historical price reductions in urban markets—such as mobile plan costs dropping over 50% from 2010 to 2020 due to increased provider numbers—yet rural areas persist with monopoly-like conditions dominated by , where high deployment costs limit rivals and sustain elevated pricing despite regulatory access mandates. This duality reveals effective urban benefits against ongoing rural disparities, informed by ACMA compliance data rather than unsubstantiated provider self-reports.

Consumer Protection Measures

Do Not Call Register Operations

The Do Not Call Register, operated by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), enables individuals and organizations to register Australian telephone, mobile, and numbers to of receiving unsolicited calls and marketing faxes. Established under the Do Not Call Register Act 2006 and launched on 3 May 2007, the register prohibits non-exempt entities from contacting registered numbers without prior consent, thereby empowering users to control inbound marketing communications through a voluntary, self-directed exclusion mechanism. Registration is free and processed via the official website or phone, with numbers remaining listed indefinitely unless removed by the registrant, following amendments that eliminated the prior eight-year expiration. As of 30 June 2023, the register contained 12.49 million numbers, including 5.83 million fixed-line, 6.26 million mobile, and 410,000 fax numbers, reflecting widespread adoption among Australian households. Telemarketers and fax marketers must access the ACMA-maintained database—via paid subscription or one-off lookups—to screen and suppress registered numbers from their contact lists before initiating campaigns, ensuring compliance through proactive scrubbing rather than reactive blocking. Certain calls remain permissible despite registration, including those from exempt categories such as registered charities, government bodies, educational institutions, and , as well as or opinion polling where explicit is obtained or the interaction does not promote or services. These exemptions balance consumer rights with legitimate non-commercial communications, though they limit the register's scope against international or scam-related calls, which often originate outside Australian jurisdiction and thus evade domestic enforcement. ACMA enforces compliance through investigations prompted by public complaints, issuing infringement notices or pursuing civil penalties under the Act for violations such as contacting registered numbers without consent or failing to honor opt-out requests within 30 days. Penalties for bodies corporate can reach up to 2,000 penalty units (approximately AUD 626,000 as of 2023 rates), with notable cases including a AUD 1.5 million fine against V Marketing in 2011 and AUD 100,000 against a financial services firm in 2021 for repeated breaches. In the 2021–22 financial year, ACMA received 28,307 complaints alleging Do Not Call Register non-compliance, leading to six formal investigations, underscoring ongoing operational demands despite the register's efficacy in curbing domestic telemarketing volumes for rule-abiding entities. Recent enhancements, including indefinite registration periods implemented prior to 2025, integrate with broader scam mitigation efforts under the Scam Prevention Framework, though the register itself targets marketing rather than fraudulent activity.

Spam Act Compliance and Enforcement

The Spam Act 2003 prohibits the transmission of unsolicited commercial electronic messages, defined as emails or with an Australian link that promote goods, services, or opportunities for commercial gain. Senders must obtain consent prior to dispatch, which can be express (clear affirmative agreement) or inferred (from conspicuous of contact details with reasonable expectation of receipt, such as on a website). Additionally, messages require accurate sender identification and a functional unsubscribe facility that clearly explains instructions, processes requests free of charge (beyond standard carrier fees), and removes recipients within five working days without requiring extraneous personal information. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) administers and enforces the Act through complaint-driven investigations, issuing infringement notices, enforceable undertakings, or pursuing civil penalties via the Federal Court for breaches. In 2023, ACMA concluded eight spam investigations, resulting in penalties totaling A$8.89 million, including A$3.55 million against for sending over 290,000 non-compliant messages. Enforcement intensified in 2024 with seven actions yielding A$12.95 million in fines, such as A$7.50 million levied on for 1.3 million unsolicited . By mid-2025, two major cases emerged: Holdings fined A$4.00 million in April for over 4.4 million breaching messages, and Pty Ltd penalized A$872,000 in May for 1.1 million non-compliant lacking proper unsubscribe options. These actions counter perceptions of lax oversight, with ACMA processing thousands of annual complaints—over 5,700 in January to 2025 alone—leading to formal outcomes despite resource constraints. Effectiveness is evident in sustained blocking of scam-related communications by telcos (over 2.6 billion calls and 937 million by June 2025), though spam volumes remain influenced by global trends, with comprising around 45% of traffic internationally in recent years; Australian-specific data indicates relative stability due to domestic filtering and penalties, but offshore operators evade , limiting full deterrence.

Cybersecurity and Sector Security Initiatives

Australian Internet Security Initiative

The Australian Internet Security Initiative (AISI) is a voluntary malware detection and notification program administered by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to identify compromised Australian internet-connected devices and support remediation efforts. Piloted in November 2005 with six initial internet service providers (ISPs)—Telstra, BigPond, OptusNet, Westnet, Uecomm, and Pacific Internet—the initiative aggregates data from multiple sources, including global partners like and the Shadowserver Foundation, to detect Australian IP addresses exhibiting botnet or activity. By 2007, participation expanded to around 68 ISPs, generating daily reports on detected infections to enable voluntary industry responses. AISI operates through a public-private model, scanning for indicators of such as command-and-control traffic and notifying participating ISPs and universities of affected devices in their networks, allowing them to alert customers and promote cleanup without mandatory enforcement. In , ACMA from the program reported approximately 30,000 infected Australian personal computers daily, highlighting the scale of malware prevalence and the initiative's role in providing empirical infection metrics derived from diverse intelligence feeds. An online portal launched in enhanced access for participants, offering detailed incident tied to specific IPs to facilitate targeted remediation. The program's success stems from opt-in collaboration, with industry interviews indicating improved detection and response capabilities among participants, including reduced persistence in notified networks through customer education and ISP-led interventions, though aggregate botnet reductions were not uniformly quantified across all participants. Critics have argued that the voluntary framework limits coverage to subscribing entities, potentially leaving non-participants vulnerable compared to mandatory alternatives, yet ACMA emphasized market incentives and self-regulation as preferable for fostering sustainable security practices without regulatory overreach. Responsibility for AISI transferred to CERT in July 2017, marking the end of direct ACMA oversight.

Telecommunications Sector Security Reform

The Telecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR), enacted through amendments to the Telecommunications Act 1997, established a risk-based regulatory framework to mitigate national security threats to Australia's telecommunications infrastructure, including espionage, sabotage, and foreign interference, with core provisions commencing on 30 September 2020. These reforms responded to heightened vulnerabilities identified in post-2018 assessments, particularly around supply chain dependencies in next-generation networks like 5G, where foreign vendors posed risks due to potential state-linked access or coercion. A key precursor was the Australian government's 22 August 2018 prohibition on Huawei and ZTE supplying 5G equipment to carriers, based on intelligence evaluations of unmitigable risks from equipment backdoors or supply chain compromises. Under TSSR, designated carriers and carriage service providers must conduct ongoing risk assessments, implement proportionate security safeguards, and notify the Australian Signals Directorate's (ACSC) and the Critical Infrastructure Security Centre (CISC) of material security risks or incidents affecting network integrity. This includes mandatory to evaluate risks, such as dependencies on high-risk suppliers, with audits revealing persistent gaps in diversity following exclusions like , leading to concentrated reliance on alternatives like and . TSSR obligations align with the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI Act), requiring entities to report critical asset details and cyber incidents within specified timelines, with non-compliance enforceable through civil penalties up to AUD 50 million for corporations. From 2023 onward, enhancements integrated TSSR into the SOCI Act via the Security Legislation Amendment (Critical Infrastructure) Act 2024 and the Enhanced Regulatory Powers Act, effective 4 April 2025, which uplifted obligations for enhanced cyber resilience, including mandatory risk management programs and government directions to remediate vulnerabilities in critical telecommunications assets. These measures emphasize causal vulnerabilities from foreign dependencies, such as third-party software flaws or geopolitical supply disruptions, with incident reporting to ACSC showing broader sector trends of increased notifications amid rising threats. ACMA supports implementation by incorporating TSSR compliance into carrier licensing and oversight, ensuring alignment with infrastructure security directives.

Internet Content Regulation and Online Safety

Reporting Hotlines and Removal Processes

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) administers the Online Content Scheme, which includes a dedicated for public reports of illegal or offensive online content, primarily targeting prohibited material such as child sexual exploitation imagery and terrorism-related advocacy. Established under Schedules 5 and 7 of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth) and bolstered by the Broadcasting Services Amendment (Online Services) Act 1999, the scheme empowers ACMA to investigate complaints from Australian residents or about content hosted domestically that meets criteria for prohibition, including refusal of or explicit depictions of . Upon validation of a report submitted via the ACMA hotline (acma.gov.au/hotline), the authority assesses whether the content qualifies as prohibited; if hosted in Australia, ACMA issues a take-down notice to the service provider, mandating removal by 6:00 p.m. the next business day to prevent ongoing access. Non-compliance can escalate to civil penalties or blocking directives for internet service providers, though applicability is limited to Australian-hosted content, with overseas material often referred internationally via networks like INHOPE. In practice, this process relies on provider cooperation, with empirical data indicating variable compliance rates tied to investigation timelines and jurisdictional constraints. ACMA coordinates with the eSafety Commissioner for report triage, particularly for overlapping illegal content involving child exploitation, enabling shared resources under joint annual reporting frameworks. During 2022–23, aligned efforts processed over 11,600 complaints encompassing approximately 33,000 URLs of potential prohibited content, with around 15,000 URLs actioned through referrals or removals, though high report volumes have highlighted resource strains in achieving uniform timeliness beyond mandated deadlines. Procedural limitations, such as dependence on accurate complainant details and the exclusion of non-hosted content from direct , have occasionally delayed resolutions in surge scenarios, underscoring the scheme's reliance on proactive provider monitoring for efficacy.

Blacklist Mechanisms and Historical Filtering Trials

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) maintains a blacklist of uniform resource locators (URLs) hosting content refused classification (RC) under the Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Act 1995, encompassing child sexual exploitation material, depictions of bestiality, and other prohibited categories deemed unsuitable for public access. This list, compiled from reports to ACMA and Classification Board assessments, numbered in the thousands of entries by the late 2000s, with secrecy protocols preventing public disclosure to avoid facilitating circumvention or legal challenges. ISPs were encouraged to implement voluntary filtering of the blacklist, but the mechanism relied on opaque notifications from ACMA, raising concerns over accountability and error correction in blacklist maintenance. From July 2008 to June 2010, the Australian government trialed mandatory ISP-level filtering technologies to block access to the blacklist, involving four ISPs and targeting approximately 1,100 URLs associated with RC content, including sites. The trials utilized and DNS blocking methods, but empirical testing revealed significant overblocking, where legitimate sites—such as those offering resources or medical information—were erroneously restricted due to algorithmic false positives and imprecise URL matching. Performance metrics indicated filtering introduced latency delays of up to 40% in page load times for trialed users, undermining efficiency without proportionally reducing exposure to prohibited material. The blacklist's secrecy contributed to transparency deficits, as neither the public nor ISPs could independently verify entries, fostering reliance on ACMA's internal processes prone to and beyond core illegal content. Circumvention proved straightforward, with tools like virtual private networks (VPNs), proxy servers, and encrypted traffic bypassing ISP filters unmonitored and legally permissible under at the time, allowing technically adept users to access blocked content with minimal effort. Independent assessments during the trials confirmed that such methods rendered the system causally ineffective for broad harm prevention, as prohibited material remained accessible via mirrors or alternative hosts, highlighting the limitations of perimeter-based blocking against adaptive distribution. The filtering initiative was abandoned in November 2012, with Communications Minister citing prohibitive ongoing costs—estimated at over AUD 10 million for trial implementation and maintenance—alongside demonstrated inefficacy in blocking content and adverse impacts on . Policymakers shifted toward targeted , prioritizing source removal of illegal content through international cooperation and direct requests over indiscriminate ISP filtering, acknowledging that the latter failed to address root causes like content proliferation while imposing undue burdens on infrastructure. This pivot reflected empirical evidence from the trials that blanket mechanisms lacked scalable causal efficacy against determined access or overblocking externalities.

Integration with Online Safety Act 2021

The Online Safety Act 2021 integrates the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) into online safety regulation primarily through its statutory obligation to provide staff, resources, and corporate services to the eSafety Commissioner, enabling enforcement against cyberbullying, adult cyber abuse, image-based abuse, and other harmful online content. This support expands ACMA's role beyond telecommunications oversight to assist in investigations, removal notices, and compliance monitoring, with eSafety handling core powers independently while leveraging ACMA employees across offices in Canberra, Sydney, and Melbourne. In 2023–24, this collaboration facilitated processing over 26,000 complaints across schemes, including 13,824 under the Online Content Scheme alone. Civil penalties for non-removal of cyberbullying or abuse material underscore the Act's enforcement teeth, imposing fines up to AUD 555,000 on corporations failing to comply with removal notices issued by eSafety. Enforcement cases from 2023 to 2025 include an AUD 610,500 infringement notice to X Corp. for breaching a reporting obligation and issuance of 383 informal removal requests for adult cyber abuse, achieving a 74% success rate. Platform obligations extend to systemic harms, requiring designated services to remediate issues proactively; in 2023–24, this yielded over 9,300 URL referrals for removal under the Online Content Scheme and 98% remediation success for 7,270 image-based abuse complaints, prioritizing child safety through rapid triage (99% within three hours for abuse cases). Critiques of the Act note that vague definitions of "harmful" content and inflexible service categorizations—such as narrow thresholds for cyber abuse intent or reliance on outdated ties— enabling overreach, compelling removal of legally protected speech under broad "safety" mandates. These ambiguities, while advancing empirical outcomes like high-volume removals, raise causal concerns about disproportionate impacts on expression, with the statutory review recommending clearer, -based categories to mitigate free speech erosion. The integration aligns Australian efforts with global standards, such as the UK's 2023 Online Safety Act, through forums like the Australian Digital Platform Regulators Forum, yet prioritizes by asserting over foreign platforms for harms affecting Australians, as evidenced in 2024 court challenges limiting extraterritorial removal orders. This balances international content pressures against domestic control, though enforcement remains contested amid calls for standalone eSafety governance to enhance accountability.

Major Controversies and Criticisms

2009 Blacklist Leak and Censorship Debates

In March 2009, WikiLeaks published a leaked copy of the Australian Communications and Media Authority's (ACMA) blacklist, dated 11 March and comprising 2,395 URLs targeted for blocking under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992. The list primarily targeted child sexual abuse material but also encompassed sites with content deemed "refused classification" by the Australian Classification Board, including pro-anorexia forums, abortion-related pages, political commentary, YouTube videos, MySpace profiles, and online gambling sites. An updated version leaked shortly after, dated 18 March with 1,172 entries, similarly included non-criminal content such as references to "abortiontv" and sites linking to pro-life material. ACMA and the government, led by Broadband Minister Stephen Conroy, responded by asserting the leaked document was not fully representative of the operational blacklist, labeling it "inaccurate" and its publication "irresponsible," while confirming it drew from the same classified sources. Conroy later acknowledged specific errors, such as the erroneous inclusion of abortion websites, attributing one instance to a site hosted by a "Russian mob" operator that evaded proper review. To deter dissemination, ACMA warned that linking to blacklisted sites could incur civil penalties of up to AUD 11,000 per day per prohibited link under section 474.29 of the Criminal Code Act 1995, a measure critics argued exemplified prior restraint by punishing potential access without judicial oversight. The leak intensified debates over the blacklist's secretive compilation process, which lacked transparency or appeal mechanisms, fostering public distrust in ACMA's categorization . Electronic Frontiers Australia highlighted flawed inclusions, estimating significant overreach in non-criminal content blocking, with independent reviews later identifying error rates in similar lists exceeding 20% due to automated or unverified assessments. Critics, including groups, contended the mandatory ISP-level filtering proposal—tied to the blacklist—imposed ineffective prior restraints, as evidenced by the list's inclusion of benign or legal material, while failing to demonstrably reduce access to targeted content amid easy circumvention via VPNs or mirrors. Proponents, however, maintained the list's focus on unclassified refused material justified opacity to protect investigations, though empirical on filtering's causal impact remained sparse, with trials showing minimal against determined users.

Enforcement Inconsistencies and Industry Backlash

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has faced criticism for inconsistent enforcement approaches between broadcasting content violations and telecommunications infrastructure failures, with broadcasting stations receiving repeated formal warnings rather than escalating financial penalties, while telcos incur negotiated fines that some industry observers deem insufficient relative to the scale of disruptions. In October 2025, ACMA issued warnings to the Kyle and Jackie O Show on KIIS FM for seven breaches of the Commercial Radio Code of Practice, involving "vulgar" and "deeply offensive" content aired between August and December 2024, marking the 12th such warning in 2025 alone and highlighting a pattern of recidivism since the show's 2014 move to the network. These actions emphasized content decency over immediate monetary deterrence, with ACMA threatening potential license suspension but opting for remedial measures amid the broadcaster's failure to curb violations. In contrast, ACMA imposed a $12 million penalty on in November 2024 for breaching emergency call rules during a 2023 network outage that prevented over 2,000 triple-zero calls, and a $3 million fine on in December 2024 for a 90-minute triple-zero disruption in March 2024. Critics argued these penalties lacked uniformity and deterrence, as telcos reportedly negotiated terms with ACMA beforehand, including sharing embargoed announcements, leading to perceptions of regulatory leniency for infrastructure lapses compared to the scrutiny on broadcast speech. For instance, a $1.5 million fine for over 200,000 data breaches by a major telco was cited as inadequate for an $8 billion entity, questioning the proportionality of enforcement across sectors. Industry backlash intensified in early 2025 over ACMA's transparency deficits and priorities, with calls for harsher measures against repeat telecom offenders like amid ongoing outage risks, while faces iterative warnings without swift financial escalation. ACMA's 2023–24 noted recidivist offending in regulated areas, including codes, where compliance hovered around targeted rates but repeat violations persisted without proportional penalties, potentially undermining deterrence in content regulation versus accountability. This disparity fueled arguments that ACMA exhibits greater zeal in policing expressive content—such as radio —over systemic failures, eroding trust in uniform application and prompting demands for clearer penalty frameworks.

Overreach Concerns in Free Speech and Privacy

Critics of the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) have raised concerns that its oversight of the voluntary Australian Code of Practice on and enables subjective determinations of "harmful" content, potentially extending to legitimate political opinions under broad definitions of misinformation as false or misleading information likely to cause physical, psychological, financial, or economic harm. Proposed legislative expansions, such as the 2024 Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting and ) Bill, would have granted ACMA enforceable powers including civil penalties up to 5% of global turnover for non-compliant platforms, prompting arguments that such mechanisms invite bureaucratic overreach akin to state-directed rather than voluntary . Empirical evidence of chilling effects includes platform signatories to the code implementing preemptive to mitigate regulatory scrutiny, with submissions to parliamentary inquiries warning that penalty threats deter open discourse on contentious issues like elections or policies. By September , the code faced potential collapse as major tech firms contemplated withdrawal amid stalled government backing for mandatory enforcement, highlighting how regulatory ambiguity fosters without demonstrable reductions in alleged harms. Right-leaning analyses, such as those from the Institute of Public Affairs, contend this approach contradicts causal evidence from less interventionist regimes like the ' protections, where minimal state involvement correlates with higher innovation in digital platforms without equivalent speech suppression. On privacy, ACMA's regulatory mandates under telecommunications frameworks, including oversight of metadata retention compliance by service providers, have been linked to intrusions that compromise journalistic integrity, as agencies access retained data potentially revealing confidential sources without proportional safeguards. A 2017 incident involving unlawful federal police access to a journalist's metadata under the retention scheme—required for two years by telcos subject to ACMA enforcement—underscored risks of causal self-censorship, with subsequent reforms like journalist information warrants deemed insufficient by media advocates to prevent source deterrence. Critics argue these data obligations prioritize state surveillance over individual privacy, contrasting with privacy-centric models in jurisdictions emphasizing encryption and minimal retention to sustain investigative reporting without regulatory drag.

Achievements, Impact, and Recent Developments

Measurable Outcomes in Compliance and Protection

In 2022–23, the ACMA's enforcement under the Do Not Call Register handled 21,190 complaints, conducting 91 investigations while maintaining 99.9% service availability for registrations. By 30 June 2023, the register included 12.49 million numbers, comprising 5.83 million fixed-line and 6.66 million mobile numbers, reflecting widespread consumer uptake for reducing unsolicited telemarketing. ACMA-commissioned research has indicated general consumer satisfaction with the registration process, correlating with observed declines in compliant telemarketing complaints post-implementation of the register and related codes. Telecommunications complaint resolution improved, with average resolution times dropping to 5.2 days in 2022–23, a 30% reduction from the prior year, amid 1,037,823 total telco complaints received—a 2.3% increase but with per-service rates stabilizing at lower levels through targeted compliance. Overall, 88% of ACMA investigations were completed within six months, including high rates for enforcement at 90% meeting deadlines. Protection efforts yielded 747 million scam calls and 257 million SMS blocked by telcos under ACMA oversight, contributing to measurable reductions in reported scam volumes in subsequent periods. Spectrum management supported efficient 5G rollout through four auction tranches in the 3.4–4.0 GHz band commencing July 2023, alongside issuing 16,503 new radiocommunications licences and renewing 150,845 others, with 97% of 5G base stations compliant with electromagnetic energy limits below 1% of regulatory thresholds. These activities generated $1.321 billion in spectrum taxes and charges, funding regulatory frameworks that facilitate infrastructure deployment without direct consumer pricing mandates. Compliance audits ensured 100% of apparatus licensing decisions met statutory timelines, enhancing spectrum utilization for broadband services.

Adaptations to Digital Convergence (2020s)

In its 2023–24 corporate plan, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) identified the growing dominance of streaming services as a key challenge in digital convergence, with traditional revenues declining amid a shift to on-demand platforms that accounted for over 40% of video consumption by Australian households in 2022–23. The plan prioritized regulatory adaptations, including enhanced monitoring of content obligations for streaming providers under existing rules extended to digital services, to maintain local content quotas amid platform fragmentation. ACMA integrated elements of the into its oversight framework, administering aspects related to media compliance while the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) handled platform designations; by 2024, the code had secured approximately AU$250 million annually in payments from designated platforms like and Meta to eligible Australian news publishers, addressing revenue losses from digital traffic diversion. However, empirical assessments showed uneven bargaining outcomes, with smaller regional publishers receiving limited funds relative to larger outlets, highlighting causal gaps in equitable revenue redistribution amid platform . Evaluations of the voluntary Australian Code of Practice on and , overseen by ACMA, indicated stalled progress in by 2025, with signatory platforms reporting fewer interventions on violating content—down from prior years—and a pivot toward initiatives lacking measurable reductions in spread during events like elections. A planned late-2025 review aims to address these shortcomings, but platforms' reduced commitments raised concerns over voluntary mechanisms' efficacy against AI-generated , where detection lagged behind content volume growth. ACMA's adaptations to 5G-enabled Internet of Things (IoT) security emphasized spectrum allocation for reliable connectivity while noting persistent vulnerabilities in device privacy and data protection, as outlined in ongoing telecommunications consumer protections codes revised in 2025; however, enforcement focused more on compliance reporting than proactive threat mitigation, with no comprehensive mandatory IoT security standards implemented by mid-decade. Concurrently, the ACMA's Innovate Reconciliation Action Plan for 2023–25 committed resources to Indigenous engagement and policy reviews, yet lacked quantifiable links to improved regulatory outcomes in digital convergence, potentially straining capacity for tech-specific priorities.

Ongoing Reforms and 2023-2025 Priorities

The ACMA's Corporate Plan 2023–24 emphasizes supporting efficient and reliable communications infrastructure alongside building consumer trust in content and services, with a forward-looking strategy to adapt regulatory frameworks to technological shifts and policy directives over the ensuing four years. This includes targeted compliance efforts to address emerging risks in , such as the phase-out of networks by end-2024 to mitigate vulnerabilities exploited by scams. Annual compliance priorities for 2023–2025 prioritize combating scams and spam, which constitute cyber threats affecting over 300,000 Australians annually as reported in 2023–24 enforcement data, through enhanced monitoring and industry standards. Efforts to foster are embedded in measures, including guidance on avoidance and vulnerability assessments for at-risk groups, though measurable outcomes remain tied to voluntary industry adoption rather than standalone programs. Ministerial directions for 2025 underscore expectations for promoting in spectrum allocation and service provision to bolster sector resilience. Oversight of the voluntary Australian Code of Practice on and persists, with ACMA's August 2025 report—the fourth to government—evaluating signatories including , Meta, and , revealing empirical shortcomings in platform transparency, algorithmic , and complaint resolution rates below 50% in some cases. These assessments highlight gaps in , as voluntary measures have not demonstrably reduced proliferation of harmful content during events like elections, leading to stalled legislative pushes after the 2024 bill's abandonment without replacement as of October 2025. Reforms under the Telecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR) have advanced through 2025 integration into the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act, expanding carrier obligations for registers and cyber incident reporting amid geopolitical tensions, including diversification from high-risk vendors as evidenced by 2024 vendor notification data. ACMA enforces these via compliance directions to approximately 200 licensed entities, prioritizing resilience against state-sponsored threats while balancing operational continuity.

References

  1. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-08/Annual-report-2015-16%2520ACMA-OCeSC.pdf
  2. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/review_of_the_acma_-_final_report_pdf_version.pdf
  3. https://www.acma.gov.au/
  4. https://www.acma.gov.au/who-we-are
  5. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/media-technology-communications/media-laws-regulation/acma-legislated-functions
  6. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_Library/Research/Quick_Guides/2021-22/MediaPolicyRegulation
  7. https://www.acma.gov.au/what-we-do
  8. https://ohioopen.library.ohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1184&context=spacejournal
  9. https://www.acma.gov.au/media-interests-snapshot
  10. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-01/acma-breaches-by-kyle-and-jackie-o-show-sydney-melbourne/105840016
  11. https://www.acma.gov.au/investigations-tv-broadcasters
  12. https://humanrights.gov.au/about/news/opinions/why-misinformation-bill-risks-freedoms-it-aims-protect
  13. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/mar/21/digital-code-of-conduct-fails-to-stop-all-harms-of-misinformation-acma-warns
  14. https://www7.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AdelLawRw/2005/13.pdf
  15. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r2173
  16. https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/CommsLawB/2005/5.pdf
  17. https://www.zdnet.com/article/govt-merges-aba-aca/
  18. https://www.budde.com.au/Research/Australian-Communications-and-Media-Authority-ACMA
  19. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2005-03-10/merged-media-regulator-needs-more-power-inquiry/2592746
  20. https://www.acma.gov.au/object-and-scope-radiocommunications-act-1992
  21. https://www.acma.gov.au/spectrum-allocation-and-auction-summary-850900-mhz-band-2021
  22. http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/bsa1992214/
  23. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2014C00265
  24. https://www.acma.gov.au/avoid-sending-spam
  25. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA%2520and%2520eSafety%2520annual%2520report%25202023%25E2%2580%259324.pdf
  26. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/media-technology-communications/media-laws-regulation/acma-legislated-functions/revenue-collection
  27. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-08/Evidence-informed%2520regulatory%2520practice%2520an%2520adaptive%2520response%25202005-15.pdf
  28. https://frankrayal.com/2013/05/12/australian-digital-dividend-spectrum-auction-concludes-by-raising-2-billion/
  29. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs%40.nsf/Lookup/8146.0Chapter12012-13
  30. https://www.acma.gov.au/authority
  31. https://www.directory.gov.au/portfolios/infrastructure-transport-regional-development-communications-and-arts/australian-communications-and-media-authority/australian-communications-and-media-authority-board
  32. https://au.linkedin.com/in/nerida-o-loughlin
  33. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/acma-statement-of-expectations-2024.pdf
  34. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/department/media/publications/australian-communications-and-media-authority-statement-expectations
  35. https://www.acma.gov.au/publications/2024-10/report/australian-communications-and-media-authority-and-esafety-commissioner-annual-report-2023-24
  36. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2024-25_infra_pbs_04_acma.pdf
  37. https://www.acma.gov.au/our-organisation
  38. https://www.acma.gov.au/investigations-spam-and-telemarketing
  39. https://www.acma.gov.au/publications/2025-05/report/action-scams-spam-and-telemarketing-january-march-2025
  40. https://www.acma.gov.au/contact-us
  41. https://www.acma.gov.au/broadcasting-licences
  42. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=890d487f-b5ad-4e46-a6e5-bef1d4cbabcd
  43. https://www.acma.gov.au/standards-tv-and-radio
  44. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/media-technology-communications/television/commercial-pay-tv
  45. https://www.acma.gov.au/action-content-complaints-and-investigations
  46. https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/regulation-commercial-broadcasting
  47. https://www.acma.gov.au/articles/2025-09/kyle-jackie-o-show-breaches-decency-rules
  48. https://www.acma.gov.au/articles/2025-03/kyle-jackie-o-show-breaches-decency-standards
  49. https://www.acma.gov.au/australian-content-commercial-tv
  50. https://ablis.business.gov.au/service/ag/broadcasting-services-australian-content-and-childrens-television-standards/31017
  51. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-08/2024%2520Australian%2520content%2520results%2520for%2520metropolitan%2520and%2520regional%2520commercial%2520TV%2520licensees.pdf
  52. https://getlaw.com.au/the-impact-of-the-australian-content-standard-on-broadcasting/
  53. https://www.provideocoalition.com/the-impact-of-streaming-on-australian-tv-production/
  54. https://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=cita/digitaltv/report/chapter2.pdf
  55. https://www.acma.gov.au/rules-manage-spectrum
  56. https://www.acma.gov.au/australian-radiofrequency-spectrum-plan
  57. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-06/Our%2520approach%2520to%2520radiocommunications%2520licensing%2520and%2520allocation%25202024.pdf
  58. https://www.acma.gov.au/spectrum-licences
  59. https://www.acma.gov.au/articles/2023-11/outcome-3437-ghz-bands-spectrum-allocation-process
  60. https://www.acma.gov.au/manage-interference-under-spectrum-licence
  61. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/FYSO%25202024-29.pdf
  62. https://web.stanford.edu/~skrz/Transaction_Costs_and_Overlays.pdf
  63. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/Spectrum_Review_Potential_Reform_Directions_paper.pdf
  64. https://www.acma.gov.au/publications/2018-05/guide/carrier-licensing-guide
  65. https://www.acma.gov.au/nbn-service-rules-telcos
  66. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/media-communications-arts/internet/universal-access-broadband-services
  67. https://www.acma.gov.au/about-universal-service-obligation
  68. https://www.acma.gov.au/articles/2024-11/optus-pays-12-million-penalty-triple-zero-outage
  69. https://www.acma.gov.au/publications/2023-05/speech/speech-nerida-oloughlin-psm-acma-chair-commsday-summit-2023
  70. https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/communications-market-report-2023-24.pdf
  71. https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/do-not-call-register
  72. https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/for-your-information-australian-privacy-law-and-practice-alrc-report-108/73-other-telecommunications-privacy-issues/do-not-call-register-act/
  73. https://www.donotcall.gov.au/about/statistics
  74. https://www.acma.gov.au/do-not-call-register
  75. https://www.donotcall.gov.au/industry/industry-overview/using-the-register
  76. https://www.acma.gov.au/infringement-notices
  77. https://www.transparency.gov.au/publications/communications-and-the-arts/australian-communications-and-media-authority-acma/australian-communications-and-media-authority-annual-report-2021-22/appendixes/appendix-4%253A-telecommunications-consumer-protection-compliance-and-enforcement-outcomes
  78. https://www.news.com.au/finance/business/company-fined-100000-for-pestering-consumers-on-do-not-call-register/news-story/65700d6b6be59e43a9dedfb19219f650
  79. https://www.acma.gov.au/publications/2025-08/report/action-scams-spam-and-telemarketing-april-june-2025
  80. https://www.redsearch.com.au/resources/email-spam-statistics-australia/
  81. https://www.samenacouncil.org/samena_daily_news?news=50282
  82. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/26/06/T26060000030051PDFE.pdf
  83. https://www.theregister.com/2009/09/15/oz_botnet_takedown_scheme/
  84. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-08/ACMA_OeSC%2520annual%2520reports%25202016-17%2520pdf_0.pdf
  85. https://www.smh.com.au/technology/acma-extends-cyber-security-to-infected-network-devices-20141128-11vvbx.html
  86. https://www.itnews.com.au/news/acma-30000-australian-pcs-infected-every-day-239580
  87. https://apo.org.au/node/57830
  88. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-08/Optimal%2520conditions%2520for%2520self-%2520and%2520co-regulation%2520Sep%25202011%2520pdf.pdf
  89. https://www.cyber.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-03/ACSC_Threat_Report_2017.pdf
  90. https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/nat-security/Pages/telecommunications-sector-security.aspx
  91. https://www.upguard.com/blog/australia-tssr
  92. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-23/huawei-banned-from-providing-5g-mobile-technology-australia/10155438
  93. https://www.cisc.gov.au/resources-subsite/Documents/telecommunications-guidance.pdf
  94. https://www.allens.com.au/insights-news/insights/2025/03/key-regulatory-changes-for-the-telecommunications-sector/
  95. https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2018A00029/latest/text
  96. https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/nat-security/files/tssr-annual-report-2019-20.pdf
  97. https://www.cyber.gov.au/about-us/view-all-content/reports-and-statistics/annual-cyber-threat-report-2024-2025
  98. https://www.acma.gov.au/apply-telecommunications-carrier-licence
  99. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-08/research-communications-trends-2014.pdf
  100. https://itwire.com/government-tech-news/technology-regulation/acma-chases-child-porn.html
  101. https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/classification-content-regulation-and-convergent-media-alrc-report-118/12-prohibiting-content/prohibitions-online/
  102. https://www.alrc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/121._org_acma.pdf
  103. https://www.alrc.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/52._org_acma_submission.pdf
  104. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2010-05-12/access-denied/8952846
  105. https://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/23/yet-another-acma-internet-blacklist-springs-a-leak/
  106. https://www.govtech.com/security/Australian-Government-Tests-ISP-Level.html
  107. https://www.itnews.com.au/news/revealed-isps-detail-their-aussie-net-filter-trials-138640
  108. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8121&context=ecuworks
  109. https://www.itnews.com.au/news/net-filter-circumvention-its-completely-legal-173707
  110. https://www.zdnet.com/article/teen-cracks-au84-million-porn-filter-in-30-minutes/
  111. https://www.itnews.com.au/news/conroy-abandons-mandatory-isp-filtering-322333
  112. https://www.smh.com.au/technology/conroy-backs-away-from-internet-filter-20121108-290ym.html
  113. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ACMA%20and%20eSafety%20annual%20report%202023%E2%80%9324.pdf
  114. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/report-of-the-statutory-review-of-the-online-safety-act-2021-february-2025.pdf
  115. https://addisons.com/article/online-safety-act-2021-application-to-global-online-business/
  116. https://freedomhouse.org/country/australia/freedom-net/2024
  117. https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Australian_government_secret_ACMA_internet_censorship_blacklist%2C_11_Mar_2009
  118. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-03-19/internet-filter-blacklist-leaked-on-web/1623890
  119. https://www.zdnet.com/article/wikileaks-spills-acma-blacklist/
  120. https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Australian_government_secret_ACMA_internet_censorship_blacklist%2C_18_Mar_2009
  121. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-03-19/leaked-blacklist-irresponsible-inaccurate-conroy/1624118
  122. https://www.smh.com.au/technology/conroy-admits-blacklist-error-blames-russian-mob-20090327-gdtfyy.html
  123. https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Banned_hyperlinks_could_cost_you_11%2C000_dollars_a_day
  124. https://www.smh.com.au/technology/banned-hyperlinks-could-cost-you-11-000-a-day-20090317-gdtf8j.html
  125. https://efa.org.au/answering-a-few-questions-about-the-leaked-blacklist/
  126. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-03-20/30346
  127. https://www.cla.asn.au/News/acma-blacklist-leak/
  128. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/oct/01/kyle-jackie-o-show-kiis-radio-licence-vulgar-deeply-offensive-content
  129. https://au.variety.com/2025/radio/news/acma-issues-new-warnings-against-kyle-and-jackie-o-28416/
  130. https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/kiis-owner-fails-to-rein-in-kyle-and-jackie-o-says-media-watchdog-20251001-p5mz7u.html
  131. https://www.acma.gov.au/articles/2024-12/telstra-pays-3-million-penalty-triple-zero-outage
  132. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/nov/08/optus-000-triple-zero-fine-2023-outage-acma
  133. https://ia.acs.org.au/article/2025/-useless--regulator-let-telstra--optus-negotiate-fines.html
  134. https://publicintegrity.org.au/acma-responds-to-backlash-over-optus-and-telstra-penalties/
  135. https://live-production.wcms.abc-cdn.net.au/3fa6af0a67b9a6a321516a5a5a9a108d
  136. https://www.acma.gov.au/correcting-record-acma-compliance-and-enforcement-actions
  137. https://www.acma.gov.au/online-disinformation-and-misinformation
  138. https://ipa.org.au/publications-ipa/media-releases/revised-misinformation-laws-amp-up-assault-on-free-speech
  139. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/have-your-say/new-acma-powers-combat-misinformation-and-disinformation
  140. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/acma2023-29599-anonymous.pdf
  141. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/oct/01/tech-companies-consider-giving-up-efforts-to-combat-misinformation-online-in-australia
  142. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/acma2023-22735-rachel-hawker.pdf
  143. https://www.cato.org/blog/australian-bill-targets-harmful-misinformation-online-hits-free-speech-around-world
  144. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/apr/28/federal-police-admit-accessing-journalists-metadata-without-a-warrant
  145. https://www.meaa.org/news/data-retention-and-your-journalism/
  146. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/passage-australias-data-retention-regime-national-security-human-rights-and-media
  147. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21670811.2023.2220366
  148. https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-10/ACMA-and-eSafety-Commissioner-annual-report-2022-23.pdf
  149. https://www.acma.gov.au/publications/2022-10/report/telco-complaints-handling-performance
  150. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-07/ACMA%2520Corporate%2520plan%25202023-24.pdf
  151. https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=cbc46580-a803-42ee-ad50-7a597a287821
  152. https://www.acma.gov.au/news-media-bargaining-code
  153. https://online.ucpress.edu/gp/article/5/1/126792/204717/Is-Australia-s-News-Media-Bargaining-Code-a-Model
  154. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Former_Committees/Communications/Regionalnewspapers/Report/Section?id=committees%252Freportrep%252F024888%252F79305
  155. https://www.acma.gov.au/articles/2025-09/acma-releases-fourth-disinformation-report
  156. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-09/Digital%2520platforms%2520efforts%2520to%2520combat%2520disinformation%2520and%2520misinformation_4th%2520report%2520to%2520government_0.pdf
  157. https://sigma.world/news/australian-code-of-practice-on-disinformation-and-misinformation-20/
  158. https://www.gamblinginsider.com/news/31154/acma-publishes-fourth-report-on-disinformation-and-misinformation-code
  159. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-07/Internet%2520of%2520Things%2520in%2520media%2520and%2520communications_Occasional%2520paper.docx
  160. https://www.austelco.org.au/telco-industry-submits-major-revision-of-telecommunications-consumer-protections-code-further-strengthening-consumer-safeguards-2/
  161. https://www.acma.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-08/ACMA%2520Innovate%25202023-2025.pdf
  162. https://www.acma.gov.au/publications/2023-07/plan/corporate-plan-2023-24
  163. https://www.acma.gov.au/compliance-priorities
  164. https://consumeraction.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/ACMA-compliance-priorities-2024-25-27-3-24.pdf
  165. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/media-communications-arts/internet/misinformation-and-disinformation
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.