Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.
Electrical telegraph
View on Wikipedia



Electrical telegraphy is point-to-point distance communicating via sending electric signals over wire, a system primarily used from the 1840s until the late 20th century. It was the first electrical telecommunications system and the most widely used of a number of early messaging systems called telegraphs, that were devised to send text messages more quickly than physically carrying them.[1][2] Electrical telegraphy can be considered the first example of electrical engineering.[3]
Electrical telegraphy consisted of two or more geographically separated stations, called telegraph offices. The offices were connected by wires, usually supported overhead on utility poles. Many electrical telegraph systems were invented that operated in different ways, but the ones that became widespread fit into two broad categories. First are the needle telegraphs, in which electric current sent down the telegraph line produces an electromagnetic force that moves a needle-shaped pointer into position over a printed list, in order to point to a specific item in that list (such as a letter of the alphabet). Early needle telegraph models used multiple needles, thus requiring multiple wires to be installed between stations. The first commercial needle telegraph system and the most widely used of its type was the Cooke and Wheatstone telegraph, invented in 1837. The second category are armature systems, in which the current activates a telegraph sounder that makes a click; communication on this type of system relies on sending clicks in coded rhythmic patterns. The archetype of this category was the Morse system and the code associated with it, both invented by Samuel Morse in 1838. In 1865, the Morse system became the standard for international communication, using a modified form of Morse's code that had been developed for German railways.
Electrical telegraphs were used by the emerging railway companies to provide signals for train control systems, minimizing the chances of trains colliding with each other.[4] This was built around the signalling block system in which signal boxes along the line communicate with neighbouring boxes by telegraphic sounding of single-stroke bells and three-position needle telegraph instruments.
In the 1840s, the electrical telegraph superseded optical telegraph systems such as semaphores, becoming the standard way to send urgent messages. By the latter half of the century, most developed nations had commercial telegraph networks with local telegraph offices in most cities and towns, allowing the public to send messages (called telegrams) addressed to any person in the country, for a fee.
Beginning in 1850, submarine telegraph cables allowed for the first rapid communication between people on different continents. The telegraph's nearly-instant transmission of messages across continents – and between continents – had widespread social and economic impacts. The electric telegraph led to Guglielmo Marconi's invention of wireless telegraphy, the first means of radiowave telecommunication, which he began in 1894.[5]
In the early 20th century, manual operation of telegraph machines was slowly replaced by teleprinter networks. Increasing use of the telephone pushed telegraphy into only a few specialist uses; its use by the general public dwindled to greetings for special occasions. The rise of the Internet and email in the 1990s largely made dedicated telegraphy networks obsolete.
History
[edit]Early work
[edit]
From early studies of electricity, electrical phenomena were known to travel with great speed, and many experimenters worked on the application of electricity to communications at a distance. All the known effects of electricity – such as sparks, electrostatic attraction, chemical changes, electric shocks, and later electromagnetism – were applied to the problems of detecting controlled transmissions of electricity at various distances.[6]
In 1753, an anonymous writer in the Scots Magazine suggested an electrostatic telegraph. Using one wire for each letter of the alphabet, a message could be transmitted by connecting the wire terminals in turn to an electrostatic machine, and observing the deflection of pith balls at the far end.[7] The writer has never been positively identified, but the letter was signed C.M. and posted from Renfrew leading to a Charles Marshall of Renfrew being suggested.[8] Telegraphs employing electrostatic attraction were the basis of early experiments in electrical telegraphy in Europe, but were abandoned as being impractical and were never developed into a useful communication system.[9]
In 1774, Georges-Louis Le Sage realised an early electric telegraph. The telegraph had a separate wire for each of the 26 letters of the alphabet and its range was only between two rooms of his home.[10]
In 1800, Alessandro Volta invented the voltaic pile, providing a continuous current of electricity for experimentation. This became a source of a low-voltage current that could be used to produce more distinct effects, and which was far less limited than the momentary discharge of an electrostatic machine, which with Leyden jars were the only previously known human-made sources of electricity.
Another very early experiment in electrical telegraphy was an "electrochemical telegraph" created by the German physician, anatomist and inventor Samuel Thomas von Sömmering in 1809, based on an earlier 1804 design by Spanish polymath and scientist Francisco Salva Campillo.[11] Both their designs employed multiple wires (up to 35) to represent almost all Latin letters and numerals. Thus, messages could be conveyed electrically up to a few kilometers (in von Sömmering's design), with each of the telegraph receiver's wires immersed in a separate glass tube of acid. An electric current was sequentially applied by the sender through the various wires representing each letter of a message; at the recipient's end, the currents electrolysed the acid in the tubes in sequence, releasing streams of hydrogen bubbles next to each associated letter or numeral. The telegraph receiver's operator would watch the bubbles and could then record the transmitted message.[11] This is in contrast to later telegraphs that used a single wire (with ground return).
Hans Christian Ørsted discovered in 1820 that an electric current produces a magnetic field that will deflect a compass needle. In the same year Johann Schweigger invented the galvanometer, with a coil of wire around a compass, that could be used as a sensitive indicator for an electric current.[12] Also that year, André-Marie Ampère suggested that telegraphy could be achieved by placing small magnets under the ends of a set of wires, one pair of wires for each letter of the alphabet. He was apparently unaware of Schweigger's invention at the time, which would have made his system much more sensitive. In 1825, Peter Barlow tried Ampère's idea but only got it to work over 200 feet (61 m) and declared it impractical. In 1830 William Ritchie improved on Ampère's design by placing the magnetic needles inside a coil of wire connected to each pair of conductors. He successfully demonstrated it, showing the feasibility of the electromagnetic telegraph, but only within a lecture hall.[13]
In 1825, William Sturgeon invented the electromagnet, with a single winding of uninsulated wire on a piece of varnished iron, which increased the magnetic force produced by electric current. Joseph Henry improved it in 1828 by placing several windings of insulated wire around the bar, creating a much more powerful electromagnet which could operate a telegraph through the high resistance of long telegraph wires.[14] During his tenure at The Albany Academy from 1826 to 1832, Henry first demonstrated the theory of the 'magnetic telegraph' by ringing a bell through one-mile (1.6 km) of wire strung around the room in 1831.[15]
In 1835, Joseph Henry and Edward Davy independently invented the mercury dipping electrical relay, in which a magnetic needle is dipped into a pot of mercury when an electric current passes through the surrounding coil.[16][17][18] In 1837, Davy invented the much more practical metallic make-and-break relay which became the relay of choice in telegraph systems and a key component for periodically renewing weak signals.[19] Davy demonstrated his telegraph system in Regent's Park in 1837 and was granted a patent on 1838.[20] Davy also invented a printing telegraph which used the electric current from the telegraph signal to mark a ribbon of calico infused with potassium iodide and calcium hypochlorite.[21]
First working systems
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (January 2021) |

The first working telegraph was built by the English inventor Francis Ronalds in 1816 and used static electricity.[22] At the family home on Hammersmith Mall, he set up a complete subterranean system in a 175-yard (160 m) long trench as well as an eight-mile (13 km) long overhead telegraph. The lines were connected at both ends to revolving dials marked with the letters of the alphabet and electrical impulses sent along the wire were used to transmit messages. Offering his invention to the Admiralty in July 1816, it was rejected as "wholly unnecessary".[23] His account of the scheme and the possibilities of rapid global communication in Descriptions of an Electrical Telegraph and of some other Electrical Apparatus[24] was the first published work on electric telegraphy and even described the risk of signal retardation due to induction.[25] Elements of Ronalds' design were utilised in the subsequent commercialisation of the telegraph over 20 years later.[26]

The Schilling telegraph, invented by Baron Schilling von Canstatt in 1832, was an early needle telegraph. It had a transmitting device that consisted of a keyboard with 16 black-and-white keys.[27] These served for switching the electric current. The receiving instrument consisted of six galvanometers with magnetic needles, suspended from silk threads. The two stations of Schilling's telegraph were connected by eight wires; six were connected with the galvanometers, one served for the return current and one for a signal bell. When at the starting station the operator pressed a key, the corresponding pointer was deflected at the receiving station. Different positions of black and white flags on different disks gave combinations which corresponded to the letters or numbers. Pavel Schilling subsequently improved its apparatus by reducing the number of connecting wires from eight to two.
On 21 October 1832, Schilling managed a short-distance transmission of signals between two telegraphs in different rooms of his apartment. In 1836, the British government attempted to buy the design but Schilling instead accepted overtures from Nicholas I of Russia. Schilling's telegraph was tested on a 5-kilometre-long (3.1 mi) experimental underground and underwater cable, laid around the building of the main Admiralty in Saint Petersburg and was approved for a telegraph between the imperial palace at Peterhof and the naval base at Kronstadt. However, the project was cancelled following Schilling's death in 1837.[28] Schilling was also one of the first to put into practice the idea of the binary system of signal transmission.[27] His work was taken over and developed by Moritz von Jacobi who invented telegraph equipment that was used by Tsar Alexander III to connect the Imperial palace at Tsarskoye Selo and Kronstadt Naval Base.
In 1833, Carl Friedrich Gauss, together with the physics professor Wilhelm Weber in Göttingen, installed a 1,200-metre-long (3,900 ft) wire above the town's roofs. Gauss combined the Poggendorff-Schweigger multiplicator with his magnetometer to build a more sensitive device, the galvanometer. To change the direction of the electric current, he constructed a commutator of his own. As a result, he was able to make the distant needle move in the direction set by the commutator on the other end of the line.

At first, Gauss and Weber used the telegraph to coordinate time, but soon they developed other signals and finally, their own alphabet. The alphabet was encoded in a binary code that was transmitted by positive or negative voltage pulses which were generated by means of moving an induction coil up and down over a permanent magnet and connecting the coil with the transmission wires by means of the commutator. The page of Gauss's laboratory notebook containing both his code and the first message transmitted, as well as a replica of the telegraph made in the 1850s under the instructions of Weber are kept in the faculty of physics at the University of Göttingen, in Germany.
Gauss was convinced that this communication would be of help to his kingdom's towns. Later in the same year, instead of a voltaic pile, Gauss used an induction pulse, enabling him to transmit seven letters a minute instead of two. The inventors and university did not have the funds to develop the telegraph on their own, but they received funding from Alexander von Humboldt. Carl August Steinheil in Munich was able to build a telegraph network within the city in 1835–1836. In 1838, Steinheil installed a telegraph along the Nuremberg–Fürth railway line, built in 1835 as the first German railroad, which was the first earth-return telegraph put into service.
By 1837, William Fothergill Cooke and Charles Wheatstone had co-developed a telegraph system which used a number of needles on a board that could be moved to point to letters of the alphabet. Any number of needles could be used, depending on the number of characters it was required to code. In May 1837 they patented their system. The patent recommended five needles, which coded twenty of the alphabet's 26 letters.

Samuel Morse independently developed and patented a recording electric telegraph in 1837. Morse's assistant Alfred Vail developed an instrument that was called the register for recording the received messages. It embossed dots and dashes on a moving paper tape by a stylus which was operated by an electromagnet.[29] Morse and Vail developed the Morse code signalling alphabet.
On 24 May 1844, Morse sent to Vail the historic first message “WHAT HATH GOD WROUGHT" from the Capitol in Washington to the old Mt. Clare Depot in Baltimore.[30][31]
Commercial telegraphy
[edit]Cooke and Wheatstone system
[edit]
The first commercial electrical telegraph was the Cooke and Wheatstone system. A demonstration four-needle system was installed on the Euston to Camden Town section of Robert Stephenson's London and Birmingham Railway in 1837 for signalling rope-hauling of locomotives.[32] It was rejected in favour of pneumatic whistles.[33] Cooke and Wheatstone had their first commercial success with a system installed on the Great Western Railway over the 13 miles (21 km) from Paddington station to West Drayton in 1838.[34] This was a five-needle, six-wire[33] system, and had the major advantage of displaying the letter being sent so operators did not need to learn a code. The insulation failed on the underground cables between Paddington and West Drayton,[35][36] and when the line was extended to Slough in 1843, the system was converted to a one-needle, two-wire configuration with uninsulated wires on poles.[37] The cost of installing wires was ultimately more economically significant than the cost of training operators. The one-needle telegraph proved highly successful on British railways, and 15,000 sets were in use at the end of the nineteenth century; some remained in service in the 1930s.[38] The Electric Telegraph Company, the world's first public telegraphy company, was formed in 1845 by financier John Lewis Ricardo and Cooke.[39][40]
Wheatstone ABC telegraph
[edit]
Wheatstone developed a practical alphabetical system in 1840 called the A.B.C. System, used mostly on private wires. This consisted of a "communicator" at the sending end and an "indicator" at the receiving end. The communicator consisted of a circular dial with a pointer and the 26 letters of the alphabet (and four punctuation marks) around its circumference. Against each letter was a key that could be pressed. A transmission would begin with the pointers on the dials at both ends set to the start position. The transmitting operator would then press down the key corresponding to the letter to be transmitted. In the base of the communicator was a magneto actuated by a handle on the front. This would be turned to apply an alternating voltage to the line. Each half cycle of the current would advance the pointers at both ends by one position. When the pointer reached the position of the depressed key, it would stop and the magneto would be disconnected from the line. The communicator's pointer was geared to the magneto mechanism. The indicator's pointer was moved by a polarised electromagnet whose armature was coupled to it through an escapement. Thus the alternating line voltage moved the indicator's pointer on to the position of the depressed key on the communicator. Pressing another key would then release the pointer and the previous key, and re-connect the magneto to the line.[41] These machines were very robust and simple to operate, and they stayed in use in Britain until well into the 20th century.[42][43]
Morse system
[edit]
The Morse system uses a single wire between offices. At the sending station, an operator taps on a switch called a telegraph key, spelling out text messages in Morse code. Originally, the armature was intended to make marks on paper tape, but operators learned to interpret the clicks and it was more efficient to write down the message directly.
In 1851, a conference in Vienna of countries in the German-Austrian Telegraph Union (which included many central European countries) adopted the Morse telegraph as the system for international communications.[44] The international Morse code adopted was considerably modified from the original American Morse code, and was based on a code used on Hamburg railways (Gerke, 1848).[45] A common code was a necessary step to allow direct telegraph connection between countries. With different codes, additional operators were required to translate and retransmit the message. In 1865, a conference in Paris adopted Gerke's code as the International Morse code and was henceforth the international standard. The US, however, continued to use American Morse code internally for some time, hence international messages required retransmission in both directions.[46]
In the United States, the Morse/Vail telegraph was quickly deployed in the two decades following the first demonstration in 1844. The overland telegraph connected the west coast of the continent to the east coast by 24 October 1861, bringing an end to the Pony Express.[47]
Foy–Breguet system
[edit]
France was slow to adopt the electrical telegraph, because of the extensive optical telegraph system built during the Napoleonic era. There was also serious concern that an electrical telegraph could be quickly put out of action by enemy saboteurs, something that was much more difficult to do with optical telegraphs which had no exposed hardware between stations. The Foy-Breguet telegraph was eventually adopted. This was a two-needle system using two signal wires but displayed in a different way than other needle telegraphs. The needles made symbols similar to the Chappe optical system symbols, making it more familiar to the telegraph operators. The optical system was decommissioned starting in 1846, but not completely until 1855. In that year the Foy-Breguet system was replaced with the Morse system.[48]
Expansion
[edit]As well as the rapid expansion of the use of the telegraphs along the railways, they soon spread into the field of mass communication with the instruments being installed in post offices. The era of mass personal communication had begun. Telegraph networks were expensive to build, but financing was readily available, especially from London bankers. By 1852, National systems were in operation in major countries:[49][50]
| Country | Company or system | Miles or kilometers of wire |
ref |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 companies | 23,000 mi or 37,000 km | [51] |
| United Kingdom | Electric Telegraph Company, Magnetic Telegraph Company, and others | 2,200 mi or 3,500 km | [52] |
| Prussia | Siemens system | 1,400 mi or 2,300 km | |
| Austria | Siemens system | 1,000 mi or 1,600 km | |
| Canada | 900 mi or 1,400 km | ||
| France | optical systems dominant | 700 mi or 1,100 km |
The New York and Mississippi Valley Printing Telegraph Company, for example, was created in 1852 in Rochester, New York and eventually became the Western Union Telegraph Company.[53] Although many countries had telegraph networks, there was no worldwide interconnection. Message by post was still the primary means of communication to countries outside Europe.

| A letter by post from London took | |
|---|---|
| days | to reach[54] |
| 12 | New York in the United States |
| 13 | Alexandria in Egypt |
| 19 | Constantinople in Ottoman Turkey |
| 33 | Bombay in India (west coast of India) |
| 44 | Calcutta in Bengal (east coast of India) |
| 45 | Singapore |
| 57 | Shanghai in China |
| 73 | Sydney in Australia |
Telegraphy was introduced in Central Asia during the 1870s.[55]
Telegraphic improvements
[edit]
A continuing goal in telegraphy was to reduce the cost per message by reducing hand-work, or increasing the sending rate. There were many experiments with moving pointers, and various electrical encodings. However, most systems were too complicated and unreliable. A successful expedient to reduce the cost per message was the development of telegraphese.
The first system that did not require skilled technicians to operate was Charles Wheatstone's ABC system in 1840 in which the letters of the alphabet were arranged around a clock-face, and the signal caused a needle to indicate the letter. This early system required the receiver to be present in real time to record the message and it reached speeds of up to 15 words a minute.
In 1846, Alexander Bain patented a chemical telegraph in Edinburgh. The signal current moved an iron pen across a moving paper tape soaked in a mixture of ammonium nitrate and potassium ferrocyanide, decomposing the chemical and producing readable blue marks in Morse code. The speed of the printing telegraph was 16 and a half words per minute, but messages still required translation into English by live copyists. Chemical telegraphy came to an end in the US in 1851, when the Morse group defeated the Bain patent in the US District Court.[56]
For a brief period, starting with the New York–Boston line in 1848, some telegraph networks began to employ sound operators, who were trained to understand Morse code aurally. Gradually, the use of sound operators eliminated the need for telegraph receivers to include register and tape. Instead, the receiving instrument was developed into a "sounder", an electromagnet that was energized by a current and attracted a small iron lever. When the sounding key was opened or closed, the sounder lever struck an anvil. The Morse operator distinguished a dot and a dash by the short or long interval between the two clicks. The message was then written out in long-hand.[57]
Royal Earl House developed and patented a letter-printing telegraph system in 1846 which employed an alphabetic keyboard for the transmitter and automatically printed the letters on paper at the receiver,[58] and followed this up with a steam-powered version in 1852.[59] Advocates of printing telegraphy said it would eliminate Morse operators' errors. The House machine was used on four main American telegraph lines by 1852. The speed of the House machine was announced as 2600 words an hour.[60]

David Edward Hughes invented the printing telegraph in 1855; it used a keyboard of 26 keys for the alphabet and a spinning type wheel that determined the letter being transmitted by the length of time that had elapsed since the previous transmission. The system allowed for automatic recording on the receiving end. The system was very stable and accurate and became accepted around the world.[61]
The next improvement was the Baudot code of 1874. French engineer Émile Baudot patented a printing telegraph in which the signals were translated automatically into typographic characters. Each character was assigned a five-bit code, mechanically interpreted from the state of five on/off switches. Operators had to maintain a steady rhythm, and the usual speed of operation was 30 words per minute.[62]
By this point, reception had been automated, but the speed and accuracy of the transmission were still limited to the skill of the human operator. The first practical automated system was patented by Charles Wheatstone. The message (in Morse code) was typed onto a piece of perforated tape using a keyboard-like device called the 'Stick Punch'. The transmitter automatically ran the tape through and transmitted the message at the then exceptionally high speed of 70 words per minute.
Teleprinters
[edit]This section needs additional citations for verification. (January 2020) |



An early successful teleprinter was invented by Frederick G. Creed. In Glasgow he created his first keyboard perforator, which used compressed air to punch the holes. He also created a reperforator (receiving perforator) and a printer. The reperforator punched incoming Morse signals onto paper tape and the printer decoded this tape to produce alphanumeric characters on plain paper. This was the origin of the Creed High Speed Automatic Printing System, which could run at an unprecedented 200 words per minute. His system was adopted by the Daily Mail for daily transmission of the newspaper contents.
With the invention of the teletypewriter, telegraphic encoding became fully automated. Early teletypewriters used the ITA-1 Baudot code, a five-bit code. This yielded only thirty-two codes, so it was over-defined into two "shifts", "letters" and "figures". An explicit, unshared shift code prefaced each set of letters and figures. In 1901, Baudot's code was modified by Donald Murray.
In the 1930s, teleprinters were produced by Teletype in the US, Creed in Britain and Siemens in Germany.
By 1935, message routing was the last great barrier to full automation. Large telegraphy providers began to develop systems that used telephone-like rotary dialling to connect teletypewriters. These resulting systems were called "Telex" (TELegraph EXchange). Telex machines first performed rotary-telephone-style pulse dialling for circuit switching, and then sent data by ITA2. This "type A" Telex routing functionally automated message routing.
The first wide-coverage Telex network was implemented in Germany during the 1930s[63] as a network used to communicate within the government.
At the rate of 45.45 (±0.5%) baud – considered speedy at the time – up to 25 telex channels could share a single long-distance telephone channel by using voice frequency telegraphy multiplexing, making telex the least expensive method of reliable long-distance communication.
Automatic teleprinter exchange service was introduced into Canada by CPR Telegraphs and CN Telegraph in July 1957 and in 1958, Western Union started to build a Telex network in the United States.[64]
The harmonic telegraph
[edit]The most expensive aspect of a telegraph system was the installation – the laying of the wire, which was often very long. The costs would be better covered by finding a way to send more than one message at a time through the single wire, thus increasing revenue per wire. Early devices included the duplex and the quadruplex which allowed, respectively, one or two telegraph transmissions in each direction. However, an even greater number of channels was desired on the busiest lines. In the latter half of the 1800s, several inventors worked towards creating a method for doing just that, including Charles Bourseul, Thomas Edison, Elisha Gray, and Alexander Graham Bell.
One approach was to have resonators of several different frequencies act as carriers of a modulated on-off signal. This was the harmonic telegraph, a form of frequency-division multiplexing. These various frequencies, referred to as harmonics, could then be combined into one complex signal and sent down the single wire. On the receiving end, the frequencies would be separated with a matching set of resonators.
With a set of frequencies being carried down a single wire, it was realized that the human voice itself could be transmitted electrically through the wire. This effort led to the invention of the telephone. (While the work toward packing multiple telegraph signals onto one wire led to telephony, later advances would pack multiple voice signals onto one wire by increasing the bandwidth by modulating frequencies much higher than human hearing. Eventually, the bandwidth was widened much further by using laser light signals sent through fiber optic cables. Fiber optic transmission can carry 25,000 telephone signals simultaneously down a single fiber.[65])
Oceanic telegraph cables
[edit]
Soon after the first successful telegraph systems were operational, the possibility of transmitting messages across the sea by way of submarine communications cables was first proposed. One of the primary technical challenges was to sufficiently insulate the submarine cable to prevent the electric current from leaking out into the water. In 1842, a Scottish surgeon William Montgomerie[66] introduced gutta-percha, the adhesive juice of the Palaquium gutta tree, to Europe. Michael Faraday and Wheatstone soon discovered the merits of gutta-percha as an insulator, and in 1845, the latter suggested that it should be employed to cover the wire which was proposed to be laid from Dover to Calais. Gutta-percha was used as insulation on a wire laid across the Rhine between Deutz and Cologne.[67] In 1849, C. V. Walker, electrician to the South Eastern Railway, submerged a 2 miles (3.2 km) wire coated with gutta-percha off the coast from Folkestone, which was tested successfully.[66]
John Watkins Brett, an engineer from Bristol, sought and obtained permission from Louis-Philippe in 1847 to establish telegraphic communication between France and England. The first undersea cable was laid in 1850, connecting the two countries and was followed by connections to Ireland and the Low Countries.
The Atlantic Telegraph Company was formed in London in 1856 to undertake to construct a commercial telegraph cable across the Atlantic Ocean. It was successfully completed on 18 July 1866 by the ship SS Great Eastern, captained by Sir James Anderson, after many mishaps along the way.[68] John Pender, one of the men on the Great Eastern, later founded several telecommunications companies primarily laying cables between Britain and Southeast Asia.[69] Earlier transatlantic submarine cables installations were attempted in 1857, 1858 and 1865. The 1857 cable only operated intermittently for a few days or weeks before it failed. The study of underwater telegraph cables accelerated interest in mathematical analysis of very long transmission lines. The telegraph lines from Britain to India were connected in 1870. (Those several companies combined to form the Eastern Telegraph Company in 1872.) The HMS Challenger expedition in 1873–1876 mapped the ocean floor for future underwater telegraph cables.[70]
Australia was first linked to the rest of the world in October 1872 by a submarine telegraph cable at Darwin.[71] This brought news reports from the rest of the world.[72] The telegraph across the Pacific was completed in 1902, finally encircling the world.
From the 1850s until well into the 20th century, British submarine cable systems dominated the world system. This was set out as a formal strategic goal, which became known as the All Red Line.[73] In 1896, there were thirty cable laying ships in the world and twenty-four of them were owned by British companies. In 1892, British companies owned and operated two-thirds of the world's cables and by 1923, their share was still 42.7 percent.[74]
Cable and Wireless Company
[edit]
Cable & Wireless was a British telecommunications company that traced its origins back to the 1860s, with Sir John Pender as the founder,[75] although the name was only adopted in 1934. It was formed from successive mergers including:
Telegraphy and longitude
[edit]Main article § Section: History of longitude § Land surveying and telegraphy.
The telegraph was very important for sending time signals to determine longitude, providing greater accuracy than previously available. Longitude was measured by comparing local time (for example local noon occurs when the sun is at its highest above the horizon) with absolute time (a time that is the same for an observer anywhere on earth). If the local times of two places differ by one hour, the difference in longitude between them is 15° (360°/24h). Before telegraphy, absolute time could be obtained from astronomical events, such as eclipses, occultations or lunar distances, or by transporting an accurate clock (a chronometer) from one location to the other.
The idea of using the telegraph to transmit a time signal for longitude determination was suggested by François Arago to Samuel Morse in 1837,[78] and the first test of this idea was made by Capt. Wilkes of the U.S. Navy in 1844, over Morse's line between Washington and Baltimore.[79] The method was soon in practical use for longitude determination, in particular by the U.S. Coast Survey, and over longer and longer distances as the telegraph network spread across North America and the world, and as technical developments improved accuracy and productivity[80]: 318–330 [81]: 98–107
The "telegraphic longitude net"[82] soon became worldwide. Transatlantic links between Europe and North America were established in 1866 and 1870. The US Navy extended observations into the West Indies and Central and South America with an additional transatlantic link from South America to Lisbon between 1874 and 1890.[83][84][85][86] British, Russian and US observations created a chain from Europe through Suez, Aden, Madras, Singapore, China and Japan, to Vladivostok, thence to Saint Petersburg and back to Western Europe.[87]
Australia's telegraph network was linked to Singapore's via Java in 1871,[88] and the net circled the globe in 1902 with the connection of the Australia and New Zealand networks to Canada's via the All Red Line. The two determinations of longitudes, one transmitted from east to west and the other from west to east, agreed within one second of arc (1⁄15 second of time – less than 30 metres).[89]
Telegraphy in war
[edit]The ability to send telegrams brought obvious advantages to those conducting war. Secret messages were encoded, so interception alone would not be sufficient for the opposing side to gain an advantage. There were also geographical constraints on intercepting the telegraph cables that improved security, however once radio telegraphy was developed interception became far more widespread.
Crimean War
[edit]The Crimean War was one of the first conflicts to use telegraphs and was one of the first to be documented extensively. In 1854, the government in London created a military Telegraph Detachment for the Army commanded by an officer of the Royal Engineers. It was to comprise twenty-five men from the Royal Corps of Sappers & Miners trained by the Electric Telegraph Company to construct and work the first field electric telegraph.[90]
Journalistic recording of the war was provided by William Howard Russell (writing for The Times newspaper) with photographs by Roger Fenton.[91] News from war correspondents kept the public of the nations involved in the war informed of the day-to-day events in a way that had not been possible in any previous war. After the French extended their telegraph lines to the coast of the Black Sea in late 1854, war news began reaching London in two days. When the British laid an underwater cable to the Crimean peninsula in April 1855, news reached London in a few hours. These prompt daily news reports energised British public opinion on the war, which brought down the government and led to Lord Palmerston becoming prime minister.[92]
American Civil War
[edit]During the American Civil War the telegraph proved its value as a tactical, operational, and strategic communication medium and an important contributor to Union victory.[93] By contrast the Confederacy failed to make effective use of the South's much smaller telegraph network. Prior to the War the telegraph systems were primarily used in the commercial sector. Government buildings were not inter-connected with telegraph lines, but relied on runners to carry messages back and forth.[94] Before the war the Government saw no need to connect lines within city limits, however, they did see the use in connections between cities. Washington D.C. being the hub of government, it had the most connections, but there were only a few lines running north and south out of the city.[94] It was not until the Civil War that the government saw the true potential of the telegraph system. Soon after the shelling of Fort Sumter, the South cut telegraph lines running into D.C., which put the city in a state of panic because they feared an immediate Southern invasion.[95][94]
Within 6 months of the start of the war, the U.S. Military Telegraph Corps (USMT) had laid approximately 300 miles (480 km) of line. By war's end they had laid approximately 15,000 miles (24,000 km) of line, 8,000 for military and 5,000 for commercial use, and had handled approximately 6.5 million messages. The telegraph was not only important for communication within the armed forces, but also in the civilian sector, helping political leaders to maintain control over their districts.[95]
Even before the war, the American Telegraph Company censored suspect messages informally to block aid to the secession movement. During the war, Secretary of War Simon Cameron, and later Edwin Stanton, wanted control over the telegraph lines to maintain the flow of information. Early in the war, one of Stanton's first acts as Secretary of War was to move telegraph lines from ending at McClellan's headquarters to terminating at the War Department. Stanton himself said "[telegraphy] is my right arm". Telegraphy assisted Northern victories, including the Battle of Antietam (1862), the Battle of Chickamauga (1863), and Sherman's March to the Sea (1864).[95]
The telegraph system still had its flaws. The USMT, while the main source of telegraphers and cable, was still a civilian agency. Most operators were first hired by the telegraph companies and then contracted out to the War Department. This created tension between generals and their operators. One source of irritation was that USMT operators did not have to follow military authority. Usually they performed without hesitation, but they were not required to, so Albert Myer created a U.S. Army Signal Corps in February 1863. As the new head of the Signal Corps, Myer tried to get all telegraph and flag signaling under his command, and therefore subject to military discipline. After creating the Signal Corps, Myer pushed to further develop new telegraph systems. While the USMT relied primarily on civilian lines and operators, the Signal Corp's new field telegraph could be deployed and dismantled faster than USMT's system.[95]
First World War
[edit]During World War I, Britain's telegraph communications were almost completely uninterrupted, while it was able to quickly cut Germany's cables worldwide.[96] The British government censored telegraph cable companies in an effort to root out espionage and restrict financial transactions with Central Powers nations.[97] British access to transatlantic cables and its codebreaking expertise led to the Zimmermann Telegram incident that contributed to the US joining the war.[98] Despite British acquisition of German colonies and expansion into the Middle East, debt from the war led to Britain's control over telegraph cables to weaken while US control grew.[99]
Second World War
[edit]
World War II revived the 'cable war' of 1914–1918. In 1939, German-owned cables across the Atlantic were cut once again, and, in 1940, Italian cables to South America and Spain were cut in retaliation for Italian action against two of the five British cables linking Gibraltar and Malta. Electra House, Cable & Wireless's head office and central cable station, was damaged by German bombing in 1941.
Resistance movements in occupied Europe sabotaged communications facilities such as telegraph lines,[100] forcing the Germans to use wireless telegraphy, which could then be intercepted by Britain. The Germans developed a highly complex teleprinter attachment (German: Schlüssel-Zusatz, "cipher attachment") that was used for enciphering telegrams, using the Lorenz cipher, between German High Command (OKW) and the army groups in the field. These contained situation reports, battle plans, and discussions of strategy and tactics. Britain intercepted these signals, diagnosed how the encrypting machine worked, and decrypted a large amount of teleprinter traffic.[101]
End of the telegraph era
[edit]In America, the end of the telegraph era can be associated with the fall of the Western Union Telegraph Company. Western Union was the leading telegraph provider for America and was seen as the best competition for the National Bell Telephone Company. Western Union and Bell were both invested in telegraphy and telephone technology. Western Union's decision to allow Bell to gain the advantage in telephone technology was the result of Western Union's upper management's failure to foresee the surpassing of the telephone over the, at the time, dominant telegraph system. Western Union soon lost the legal battle for the rights to their telephone copyrights. This led to Western Union agreeing to a lesser position in the telephone competition, which in turn led to the lessening of the telegraph.[95]
While the telegraph was not the focus of the legal battles that occurred around 1878, the companies that were affected by the effects of the battle were the main powers of telegraphy at the time. Western Union thought that the agreement of 1878 would solidify telegraphy as the long-range communication of choice. However, due to the underestimates of telegraph's future[further explanation needed] and poor contracts, Western Union found itself declining.[95] AT&T acquired working control of Western Union in 1909 but relinquished it in 1914 under threat of antitrust action. AT&T bought Western Union's electronic mail and Telex businesses in 1990.
Although commercial "telegraph" services are still available in many countries, transmission is usually done via a computer network rather than a dedicated wired connection.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Wenzlhuemer, Roland (August 2007). "The Development of Telegraphy, 1870–1900: A European Perspective on a World History Challenge" (PDF). History Compass. 5 (5): 1720–1742. doi:10.1111/j.1478-0542.2007.00461.x. ISSN 1478-0542.
- ^ Kieve 1973, p. 13.
- ^ Roberts, Steven. "Distant Writing: A History of the Telegraph Companies in Britain between 1838 and 1868: 2. Introduction".
Using these discoveries a number of inventors or rather 'adapters' appeared, taking this new knowledge, transforming it into useful ideas with commercial utility; the first of these 'products' was the use of electricity to transmit information between distant points, the electric telegraph.
- ^ Vanns, Michael A. (2012). Signalling in the Age of Steam. abc (2nd ed.). Ian Allan. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-7110-3536-2.
- ^ Moss, Stephen (10 July 2013), "Final telegram to be sent. STOP", The Guardian: International Edition
- ^ Fahie
- ^ Marland, A. E. (1964). Early Electrical Communication. Abelard-Schuman. pp. 17–19.LCCN 64-20875
- ^ Holzmann & Pehrson, p. 203
- ^ Electromagnetic Telegraph – Invented by Baron Pavel Schilling
- ^ Prevost, 1805, pp. 176–178
- ^ a b Jones 1999.
- ^ M. (10 December 2014). Schweigger Multiplier – 1820. Retrieved 7 February 2018, from https://nationalmaglab.org/education/magnet-academy/history-of-electricity-magnetism/museum/schweigger-multiplier
- ^ Fahie, pp. 302–306
- ^ R. V. G. Menon (2011). Technology and Society. India: Dorling Kindersley.
- ^ Henry Pitt Phelps (1884). The Albany Hand-book: A Strangers' Guide and Residents' Manual. Albany: Brandow & Barton. p. 6.
- ^ Gibberd 1966.
- ^ "Joseph Henry: Inventor of the Telegraph? Smithsonian Institution". Archived from the original on 26 June 2006. Retrieved 29 June 2006.
- ^ Thomas Coulson (1950). Joseph Henry: His Life and Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- ^ McDonald, Donald; Hunt, Leslie B. (January 1982). A History of Platinum and its Allied Metals. Johnson Matthey Plc. p. 306. ISBN 0905118839.
- ^ "Edward Davy". Australian Science Archives Project. Retrieved 7 June 2012.
- ^ Kieve 1973, pp. 23–24.
- ^ Appleyard, R. (1930). Pioneers of Electrical Communication. Macmillan.
- ^ Ronalds, B.F. (2016). "Sir Francis Ronalds and the Electric Telegraph". International Journal for the History of Engineering & Technology. 86: 42–55. doi:10.1080/17581206.2015.1119481. S2CID 113256632.
- ^ Ronalds, Francis (1823). Descriptions of an Electrical Telegraph and of some other Electrical Apparatus. London: Hunter.
- ^ Ronalds, B.F. (February 2016). "The Bicentennial of Francis Ronalds's Electric Telegraph". Physics Today. 69 (2): 26–31. Bibcode:2016PhT....69b..26R. doi:10.1063/PT.3.3079.
- ^ Ronalds, B.F. (2016). Sir Francis Ronalds: Father of the Electric Telegraph. London: Imperial College Press. ISBN 978-1-78326-917-4.
- ^ a b Fahie 1884, pp. 307–325.
- ^ Huurdeman 2003, p. 54.
- ^ Calvert 2008.
- ^ Howe, p. 7
- ^ History.com Staff (2009), Morse Code & the Telegraph, A+E Networks
- ^ "The telegraphic age dawns". BT Group Connected Earth Online Museum. Archived from the original on 19 February 2013. Retrieved 1 December 2010.
- ^ a b Bowers, p. 129
- ^ Huurdeman 2003, p. 67.
- ^ Huurdeman 2003, pp. 67–68.
- ^ Beauchamp 2001, p. 35.
- ^ Huurdeman 2003, p. 69.
- ^ Huurdeman 2003, pp. 67–69.
- ^ Nichols, John (1967). The Gentleman's magazine, Volumes 282–283. p. 545. University of California
- ^ Paul Atterbury. "Victorian Technology". BBC.
- ^ "Telegraph – A working ABC telegraph from prof. Ch. Wheatstone". YouTube. 5 June 2018.
- ^ Freebody, J. W. (1958), "Historical Survey of Telegraphy", Telegraphy, London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, Ltd., pp. 30, 31
- ^ Hobbs, Alan G.; Hallas, Sam. "A Short History of Telegraphy".
- ^ Turnbull, Laurence (1853). Electro-magnetic telegraph. Philadelphia: A. Hart. p. 77. OCLC 60717772.
- ^ Coe, Lewis (2003). The Telegraph: A History of Morse's Invention and Its Predecessors in the United States. McFarland. p. 69. ISBN 0786418087.
- ^ Russell, Andrew L. (2014). Open Standards and the Digital Age. Cambridge University Press. p. 36. ISBN 978-1107039193.
- ^ Today in History – 24 October, The Transcontinental Telegraph and the End of the Pony Express, Library of Congress, retrieved 3 February 2017.
- ^ Holzmann & Pehrson, pp. 93–94
- ^ Christine Rider, ed., Encyclopedia of the Age of the Industrial Revolution, 1700–1920 (2007) 2:440.
- ^ Shaffner, Taliaferro Preston (1867). "The Telegraph Manual: A Complete History and Description of the Semaphoric, Electric and Magnetic Telegraphs of Europe, Asia, Africa, and America, Ancient and Modern: with Six Hundred and Twenty-five Illustrations".
- ^ Richard B. Du Boff, "Business Demand and the Development of the Telegraph in the United States, 1844–1860." Business History Review 54#4 (1980): 459–479.
- ^ John Liffen, "The Introduction of the Electric Telegraph in Britain, a Reappraisal of the Work of Cooke and Wheatstone." International Journal for the History of Engineering & Technology (2013).
- ^ Enns, Anthony (September 2015). "Spiritualist Writing Machines: Telegraphy,Typtology, Typewriting". Communication +1. 4 (1). doi:10.7275/R5M61H51. S2CID 14674389.
Article 11
- ^ Roberts, Steven (2012), A History of the Telegraph Companies in Britain between 1838–1868, retrieved 8 May 2017
- ^ Khalid, Adeeb (1998). "2: The Making of a Colonial Society". The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform: Jadidism in Central Asia. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. pp. 60–61. ISBN 0-520-21356-4.
- ^ Oslin, George P (1992). The Story of Telecommunications. Mercer University Press. p. 69. ISBN 9780865544185.
- ^ Oslin, George P (1992). The Story of Telecommunications. Mercer University Press. p. 67. ISBN 9780865544185.
- ^ "Royal Earl House Printing-Telegraph Patent #4464, 1846". Retrieved 25 April 2014.
- ^ "Royal Earl House Steam-Powered Printing-Telegraph Patent #9505, 1852". Retrieved 25 April 2014.
- ^ Oslin, George P (1992). The Story of Telecommunications. Mercer University Press. p. 71. ISBN 9780865544185.
- ^ "David Edward Hughes". Clarkson University. 14 April 2007. Archived from the original on 22 April 2008. Retrieved 29 September 2010.
- ^ Beauchamp 2001, pp. 394–395.
- ^ "Telegraphy and Telex". Archived from the original on 26 July 2019. Retrieved 25 March 2021.
- ^ Phillip R. Easterlin, "Telex in New York", Western Union Technical Review, April 1959: 45
- ^ "How does fiber optics work?". 11 June 2006.
- ^ a b Haigh, K R (1968). Cable Ships and Submarine Cables. London: Adlard Coles Ltd. pp. 26–27.
- ^ Bright, Charles (1898). Submarine telegraphs [microform] : their history, construction, and working : founded in part on Wünschendorff's 'Traité de télé graphie sous-marine. Canadiana.org. London: C. Lockwood. p. 251.
- ^ Wilson, Arthur (1994). The Living Rock: The Story of Metals Since Earliest Times and Their Impact on Civilization. Woodhead Publishing. p. 203. ISBN 9781855733015.
- ^ Müller, Simone (2010). "The Transatlantic Telegraphs and the 'Class of 1866' – the Formative Years of Transnational Networks in Telegraphic Space, 1858–1884/89". Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung. 35 (1 (131)): 237–259. ISSN 0172-6404. JSTOR 20762437.
- ^ Starosielski, Nicole (2015). "Cabled Depths: The Aquatic Afterlives of Signal Traffic". The Undersea Network. Duke University Press. p. 203. doi:10.1215/9780822376224. ISBN 978-0-8223-7622-4. S2CID 114607440.
- ^ Briggs, Asa; Burke, Peter (2005). A Social History of the Media: From Gutenberg to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity. p. 110. ISBN 9780745635118.
- ^ Conley, David; Lamble, Stephen (2006). The Daily Miracle: An introduction to Journalism (3 ed.). Australia: Oxford University Press. pp. 305–307.
- ^ Kennedy, P. M. (October 1971). "Imperial Cable Communications and Strategy, 1870–1914". The English Historical Review. 86 (341): 728–752. doi:10.1093/ehr/lxxxvi.cccxli.728. JSTOR 563928.
- ^ Headrick, D.R.; Griset, P. (2001). "Submarine telegraph cables: business and politics, 1838–1939". The Business History Review. 75 (3): 543–578. doi:10.2307/3116386. JSTOR 3116386. S2CID 153560358.
- ^ "Sir John Pender".
- ^ "Evolution of Eastern Telegraph Company".
- ^ "Origins of the Eastern & Associated Telegraph Companies".
- ^ Walker, Sears C (1850). "Report on the experience of the Coast Survey in regard to telegraph operations, for determination of longitude &c". American Journal of Science and Arts. 10 (28): 151–160.
- ^ Briggs, Charles Frederick; Maverick, Augustus (1858). The Story of the Telegraph, and a History of the Great Atlantic Cable: A Complete Record of the Inception, Progress, and Final Success of that Undertaking: a General History of Land and Oceanic Telegraphs: Descriptions of Telegraphic Apparatus, and Biographical Sketches of the Principal Persons Connected with the Great Work. New York: Rudd & Carleton.
- ^ Loomis, Elias (1856). The recent progress of astronomy, especially in the United States (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Brothers.
- ^ Stachurski, Richard (2009). Longitude by Wire: Finding North America. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. ISBN 978-1-57003-801-3.
- ^ Schott, Charles A. (1897). "The telegraphic longitude net of the United States and its connection with that of Europe, as developed by the Coast and Geodetic Survey between 1866 and 1896". The Astronomical Journal. 18: 25–28. Bibcode:1897AJ.....18...25S. doi:10.1086/102749.
- ^ Green, Francis Matthews (1877). Report on the telegraphic determination of differences of longitude in the West Indies and Central America. Washington: US Hydrographic Office.
- ^ Green, Francis Matthews (1880). Telegraphic determination of longitudes on the east coast of South America embracing the meridians of Lisbon, Madeira, St. Vincent, Pernambuco, Bahia, Rio de Janeiro, Montevideo, Buenos Ayres, and Para, with the latitude of the several stations. Washington: US Hydrographic Office.
- ^ Davis, Chales Henry; Norris, John Alexander (1885). Telegraphic Determination of Longitudes in Mexico and Central America and on the West Coast of South America: Embracing the Meridians of Vera Cruz; Guatemala; La Libertad; Salvador; Paita; Lima; Arica; Valparaiso; and the Argentine National Observatory at Cordoba; with the Latitudes of the Several Sea-coast Stations. Washington: US Hydrographic Office.
- ^ Norris, John Alexander; Laird, Charles; Holcombe, John H.L.; Garrett, Le Roy M. (1891). Telegraphic determination of longitudes in Mexico, Central America, the West Indies, and on the north coast of South America, embracing the meridians of Coatzacoalcos; Salina Cruz; La Libertad; San Juan del Sur; St. Nicolas Mole; Port Plata; Santo Domingo; Curacao; and La Guayra, with the latitudes of the several stations. Washington: US Hydrographic Office.
- ^ Green, Francis Mathews; Davis, Charles Henry; Norris, John Alexander (1883). Telegraphic Determination of Longitudes in Japan, China, and the East Indies: Embracing the Meridians of Yokohama, Nagasaki, Wladiwostok, Shanghai, Amoy, Hong-Kong, Manila, Cape St. James, Singapore, Batavia, and Madras, with the Latitude of the Several Stations. Washington: US Hydrographic Office.
- ^ Martinez, Julia (2017). "Asian Servants for the Imperial Telegraph: Imagining North Australia as an Indian Ocean Colony before 1914". Australian Historical Studies. 48 (2): 227–243. doi:10.1080/1031461X.2017.1279196. S2CID 149205560.
- ^ Stewart, R.Meldrum (1924). "Dr. Otto Klotz". Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada. 18: 1–8. Bibcode:1924JRASC..18....1S.
- ^ Roberts, Steven (2012), Distant Writing A History of Telegraph Companies in Britain between 1838 and 1868: 16. Telegraph at War 1854–1868
- ^ Figes 2010, pp. 306–309.
- ^ Figes 2010, pp. 304–311.
- ^ Hochfelder, David (2019), Essential Civil WAR Curriculum: The Telegraph, Virginia Center for Civil War Studies at Virginia Tech
- ^ a b c Schwoch 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f Hochfelder 2012.
- ^ Kennedy 1971.
- ^ Hills, Jill (June 2006). "What's New? War, Censorship and Global Transmission: From the Telegraph to the Internet". International Communication Gazette. 68 (3): 195–216. doi:10.1177/1748048506063761. ISSN 1748-0485. S2CID 153879238.
- ^ "The telegram that brought America into the First World War". BBC History Magazin e. 17 January 2017.
- ^ Solymar, L. (March 2000). "The effect of the telegraph on law and order, war, diplomacy, and power politics". Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 25 (3): 203–210. Bibcode:2000ISRv...25..203S. doi:10.1179/030801800679233. ISSN 0308-0188. S2CID 144107714.
- ^ World War II: German-occupied Europe, Encyclopaedia Britannica
- ^ Copeland 2006, pp. 1–6.
Bibliography
[edit]- Beauchamp, Ken (2001). History of Telegraphy. London: The Institution of Electrical Engineers. ISBN 978-0-85296-792-8.
- Bowers, Brian, Sir Charles Wheatstone: 1802–1875, IET, 2001 ISBN 0852961030
- Calvert, J. B. (2008). "The Electromagnetic Telegraph".
- Copeland, B. Jack, ed. (2006). Colossus: The Secrets of Bletchley Park's Codebreaking Computers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-284055-4.
- Fahie, John Joseph (1884). A History of Electric Telegraphy, to the Year 1837. London: E. & F.N. Spon. OCLC 559318239.
- Figes, Orlando (2010). Crimea: The Last Crusade. London: Allen Lane. ISBN 978-0-7139-9704-0.
- Gibberd, William (1966). Australian Dictionary of Biography: Edward Davy.
- Hochfelder, David (2012). The Telegraph in America, 1832–1920. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 6–17, 138–141. ISBN 9781421407470.
- Holzmann, Gerard J.; Pehrson, Björn, The Early History of Data Networks, Wiley, 1995 ISBN 0818667826
- Huurdeman, Anton A. (2003). The Worldwide History of Telecommunications. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0471205050.
- Jones, R. Victor (1999). Samuel Thomas von Sömmering's "Space Multiplexed" Electrochemical Telegraph (1808–1810). Archived from the original on 11 October 2012. Retrieved 1 May 2009. Attributed to Michaelis, Anthony R. (1965), From semaphore to satellite, Geneva: International Telecommunication Union
- Kennedy, P. M. (October 1971). "Imperial Cable Communications and Strategy, 1870–1914". The English Historical Review. 86 (341): 728–752. doi:10.1093/ehr/lxxxvi.cccxli.728. JSTOR 563928.
- Kieve, Jeffrey L. (1973). The Electric Telegraph: A Social and Economic History. David and Charles. ISBN 0-7153-5883-9. OCLC 655205099.
- Mercer, David, The Telephone: The Life Story of a Technology, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2006 ISBN 031333207X
- Schwoch, James (2018). Wired into Nature: The Telegraph and the North American Frontier. University of Illinois Press. ISBN 978-0252041778.
Further reading
[edit]- Botjer, George F. (2015). Samuel F.B. Morse and the Dawn of the Age of Electricity. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. ISBN 978-1-4985-0140-8 – via Internet Archive.
- Cooke, W.F., The Electric Telegraph, Was it invented by Prof. Wheatstone?, London 1856.
- Gray, Thomas (1892). "The Inventors of the Telegraph And Telephone". Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 71: 639–659. Retrieved 7 August 2009.
- Gauß, C. F., Works, Göttingen 1863–1933.
- Howe, Daniel Walker, What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815–1848, Oxford University Press, 2007 ISBN 0199743797.
- Peterson, M.J. Roots of Interconnection: Communications, Transportation and Phases of the Industrial Revolution, International Dimensions of Ethics Education in Science and Engineering Background Reading, Version 1; February 2008.
- Steinheil, C.A., Ueber Telegraphie, München 1838.
- Yates, JoAnne. The Telegraph's Effect on Nineteenth Century Markets and Firms, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 149–163.
Electrical telegraph
View on GrokipediaInvention and Early Development
Precursors and Theoretical Foundations
The theoretical foundations of the electrical telegraph derived from foundational advances in electrochemistry and electromagnetism in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Alessandro Volta's 1800 invention of the voltaic pile generated the first continuous electric current from chemical reactions between stacked zinc and copper discs separated by brine-soaked cardboard, enabling prolonged electrical experiments beyond transient static discharges. This steady direct current source proved essential for signaling devices requiring sustained power. Hans Christian Ørsted's 1820 discovery that a current-carrying wire deflects a nearby compass needle revealed that electricity produces magnetism, establishing the electromagnetic principle that currents generate magnetic fields proportional to their strength and inversely to distance.[9] André-Marie Ampère rapidly extended this in 1820 by formulating mathematical laws describing forces between current-carrying wires—attraction for parallel same-direction flows and repulsion for opposites—thus providing a quantitative framework for electromagnets as detectors in telegraph receivers.[10] Early precursors exploited these principles in rudimentary forms, initially relying on chemical or electrostatic effects before electromagnetic dominance. In 1809, German anatomist Samuel Thomas von Sömmering devised an electrochemical telegraph connecting up to 35 insulated wires from a battery to gold-point electrodes immersed in dilute nitric acid at the receiver; voltage on a specific wire electrolyzed water, producing visible hydrogen bubbles at the corresponding electrode to spell messages via prearranged codes, with demonstrations over 200-meter distances in Munich. Though innovative, the system's chemical corrosion and wire multiplicity limited practicality, yet it validated electricity's signaling potential.[11] Francis Ronalds advanced continuous-current applications in 1816 by building a 13-kilometer loop of iron wire insulated with glass and pitch in his London garden, using dry friction electrostatic generators to propel synchronized clockwork dials at sender and receiver; pulses advanced pointers to indicate letters on engraved scales, achieving near-instantaneous transmission over the full length.[12] Despite successful private demonstrations of legible messages, the British Admiralty rejected adoption in 1816, citing semaphore adequacy for naval needs.[13] Baron Pavel Schilling (Pavel Lvovitch Schilling, 1786–1837), a Russian military officer and diplomat of Baltic German origin, pioneered electromagnetic needle telegraphy in 1832, employing a battery-powered keyboard to selectively energize one of six electromagnets, each deflecting a needle toward paired letters or symbols on a panel at the distant receiver; he also created a telegraph code and secret cipher for secure messaging.[14] Earlier, in 1812, Schilling developed a method for remotely detonating land mines using electric current, creating special insulated wires for this purpose, which demonstrated early applications of wired electrical signaling.[14] Initial tests of the telegraph spanned 100 meters indoors, later extending to 800 meters outdoors in St. Petersburg using buried cables.[14] This binary deflection method reduced wires compared to chemical systems and leveraged Ampère's electrodynamics for reliable detection, marking the first viable electromagnetic prototype and inspiring commercial designs.[15]Initial Experiments and Prototypes
In 1809, German anatomist Samuel Thomas von Sömmering constructed an early electrolytic telegraph prototype that transmitted messages via galvanic current over multiple insulated wires. The system used up to 64 copper wires, each linked to a specific letter or character; at the transmitter, a voltaic pile applied voltage to the selected wire, causing electrochemical decomposition at the receiver where gold electrodes in dilute nitric acid produced visible marks or gas bubbles on chemically treated paper to indicate the letter. Demonstrated over distances of about 200 meters between Munich and Freising, it marked the first use of electricity for character transmission but proved impractical due to the need for numerous wires, slow marking process taking several minutes per character, and corrosion issues. By 1816, English inventor Francis Ronalds developed a more practical electrostatic telegraph over an 8-mile (13 km) length of insulated iron wire strung in his Hammersmith garden, employing friction machines to generate high-voltage static electricity that propelled lightweight clock hands on synchronized dials to spell out messages via letter pointers.[13] Ronalds' system successfully transmitted signals almost instantaneously, with the electric discharge causing the receiving dials to rotate to the corresponding letter without multiple wires, relying instead on a single line pair for signaling and return.[13] He offered it to the British Admiralty for naval use, but officials rejected it, deeming existing semaphore systems sufficient for communication needs.[16] The 1820 discovery of electromagnetism by Hans Christian Ørsted spurred electromagnetic prototypes, with Russian diplomat and military officer Pavel Schilling creating the first viable one by 1832 using galvanic current to deflect magnetic needles in galvanometers as indicators.[14] Schilling's apparatus featured a transmitting keyboard with keys that sent coded pulses via a single wire to move up to six needles on a dial marked with letters and symbols, allowing binary-like selection of characters through combinations of needle positions; this system included his invention of a telegraph code and secret cipher for encoding messages.[14] Tested over distances spanning multiple rooms in his St. Petersburg apartment and later up to 3 km underground, it demonstrated reliable signaling but remained a prototype without public commercialization due to Schilling's death in 1837 and lack of patent pursuit.[14] These early efforts highlighted electricity's potential for rapid long-distance messaging while revealing challenges like signal attenuation and the need for reliable batteries and insulation.[14]First Patentable Systems and Disputes
The first commercially viable and patented electrical telegraph system emerged from the collaboration between British inventors William Fothergill Cooke and Charles Wheatstone, who filed a provisional patent specification on 5 June 1837 and received British Patent No. 7391 on 12 June 1837 for an electromagnetic needle-based device.[17] Their initial design utilized five galvanometer needles suspended over alphabetic characters, deflected by electrical pulses to spell out messages, marking the earliest system granted patent protection for practical telegraphy.[18] This apparatus represented a shift from prior non-patented demonstrations, such as Francis Ronalds's 1816 electrostatic line over 8 miles of wire, which transmitted signals but was not patented and rejected by the British Admiralty for lacking military utility.[13] Independently in the United States, Samuel F. B. Morse developed a recording electromagnetic telegraph by 1837, featuring a key for pulsing signals and a receiver that inscribed dots and dashes on paper via an electromagnetically driven stylus.[19] Morse secured U.S. Patent No. 1647 on 20 June 1840, after earlier demonstrations and refinements aided by associates like Alfred Vail, establishing the foundation for transatlantic code-based systems.[20] Preceding Morse but without broad patent dissemination was Pavel Schilling's 1832 needle telegraph in Russia, which successfully signaled over distances using polarized magnets, incorporated a custom telegraph code and secret cipher, and built on his earlier 1812 electrical detonation work, but remained largely experimental and uncommercialized outside state demonstrations.[14] Patent disputes highlighted tensions over inventive priority and contributions. Cooke and Wheatstone's partnership strained due to differing roles—Cooke emphasizing engineering practicality and Wheatstone theoretical electromagnetism—culminating in 1845 arbitration where Cooke acquired full patent rights after demonstrating primary origination of the commercial needle system.[21] In America, Morse's claims faced invalidation attempts, notably in O'Reilly v. Morse (1853), where the U.S. Supreme Court upheld his core electromagnetic telegraph invention as original but voided broader claims to all electric signaling methods, citing prior European work like Cooke-Wheatstone's to limit monopoly scope.[22] These conflicts underscored parallel inventions across continents, with no single originator but Cooke-Wheatstone's 1837 patent enabling the first revenue-generating installations, such as the 13-mile London-to-Slough line operational by 1839.[17]Technical Principles
Electromagnetic Basics and Signal Generation
The foundational principle of electromagnetic signaling in the electrical telegraph derives from the 1820 discovery by Danish physicist Hans Christian Ørsted that an electric current flowing through a wire generates a magnetic field capable of deflecting a nearby compass needle.[23] [24] Ørsted's experiment involved passing current from a voltaic battery through a wire positioned above a magnetic needle; the needle rotated perpendicular to the wire, demonstrating that the magnetic effect encircled the current path and varied with current direction and strength, as quantified later by André-Marie Ampère's laws in 1820-1821.[25] This unification of electricity and magnetism enabled the creation of electromagnets by winding insulated wire coils around soft iron cores, where even modest currents—typically 0.1 to 1 ampere from early batteries—could produce fields strong enough to exert mechanical force on armatures or needles over distances, with field strength scaling proportionally to current intensity and coil turns.[26] Signal generation begins at the transmitter with a direct-current (DC) source, such as a voltaic pile or later Daniell cell providing 1-2 volts per cell in series for sufficient electromotive force (EMF) to overcome wire resistance.[27] A manual key, essentially a spring-loaded switch, interrupts the circuit: when closed (key depressed), it completes the path from battery positive terminal through the key, transmitting line (often single-wire with ground return), and to the receiver; when open, current ceases, creating discrete pulses whose duration (short for dots, long for dashes in later codes) encodes information.[28] These pulses propagate as variations in voltage and current along the conductor at near-instantaneous speed (limited only by resistance and capacitance, yielding delays of microseconds per kilometer in early uninsulated lines), without significant degradation over tens of kilometers due to the low-frequency nature of manual switching (1-10 Hz).[29] At the receiver, the arriving current pulses energize an electromagnet—a coil of 100-500 turns of fine wire around an iron core—generating a transient magnetic field that attracts or repels a pivoted needle (in galvanometer-style detectors) or pulls a hinged armature to mark electrosensitive paper or ring a bell.[26] [28] The mechanical response is proportional to current magnitude via Ampère's force law (F = I × L × B, where I is current, L wire length, B field), allowing binary signaling: presence of current deflects or actuates the indicator, absence returns it via spring tension, with polarity reversal (via double-battery or commutator setups) enabling bidirectional needle movement in systems like Cooke-Wheatstone for encoding up to 20 characters via needle pairs.[27] Early limitations included signal attenuation from line resistance (Ohm's law: V = IR, with iron wires at ~0.1 ohm per km yielding voltage drops over 100 km) and induced currents from Earth's magnetism, necessitating relays—electromagnets amplifying weak signals locally—for longer distances.[24] This causal chain—from electrochemical EMF to pulsed current, magnetic transduction, and mechanical output—formed the core of practical telegraphy by the 1830s, prioritizing reliability over speed with currents tuned to avoid overheating coils (typically under 5 watts dissipation).[29]Core Components: Keys, Batteries, and Receivers
The telegraph key functioned as the primary transmitter, operating as a simple electrical switch to interrupt a steady direct current, producing pulses that encoded messages. Early designs featured a spring-loaded lever, often made of brass or spring steel, which operators manually depressed against a fixed contact to close the circuit for the duration of each pulse.[29] [30] This mechanism allowed skilled operators to transmit Morse code at speeds up to 40-50 words per minute by varying the length of key depressions for dots and dashes.[31] Batteries supplied the necessary direct current for telegraph circuits, with wet cell designs predominating due to their ability to provide constant voltage without significant polarization. The gravity or crow's foot battery, utilizing a copper sulfate solution over zinc sulfate with a crow's foot zinc electrode, emerged as the most common choice for its longevity and reliability in commercial operations.[32] Telegraph stations typically employed batteries of 20 to 100 cells in series to achieve voltages around 100-200 volts for long-distance lines, ensuring signal strength over thousands of miles.[33] Alternatives like the Grove cell, using nitric acid and zinc, offered higher voltage but required more maintenance due to gas evolution.[34] Receivers converted incoming electrical pulses into readable signals, initially through galvanometers with needles that deflected under electromagnetic force to point to letters on a dial. In systems like Cooke and Wheatstone's, multiple needles—up to five—moved in combinations to indicate characters, requiring correspondingly more wires.[35] For Morse-based setups, electromagnetic sounders predominated by the 1850s, featuring a coil-wound iron core attracting an armature to produce distinct clicks for short and long pulses, which operators interpreted aurally.[29] Later innovations included registering devices that marked dots and dashes on paper tape via a stylus driven by the electromagnet, enabling visual decoding and reducing operator fatigue on high-volume lines.[29] These core receiver types relied on electromagnets with 50 to several hundred turns of insulated wire around an iron core to amplify weak signals, often augmented by relays for extended distances.[29]Encoding Schemes: Codes, Needles, and Dots-Dashes
Early electrical telegraph systems transmitted messages by converting textual information into electrical signals via diverse encoding schemes, which determined the efficiency, readability, and complexity of communication. These schemes ranged from dictionary-based codes for message compression to direct visual indicators like needle deflections and sequential pulse patterns such as dots and dashes.[36][4] Dictionary codes, prevalent from the mid-1840s, substituted words or phrases with numbers or abbreviated terms to minimize transmission length and costs, as fees were charged per word or signal unit. For instance, the 1845 Telegraph Dictionary, and Seamen’s Signal Book assigned numbers to common phrases, such as "275" for "Has declined accepting," enabling concise maritime and commercial messaging. Similarly, the Secret Corresponding Vocabulary of 1845 encoded words as an initial letter followed by a number, like "a.247" for "abstract," incorporating basic transposition for added privacy without requiring full encryption. These nonsecret codes prioritized economic efficiency over absolute security, often tailored to industries like trade or shipping, where standardized phrasebooks reduced errors and expenses.[36][37] Needle-based encoding, exemplified by the Cooke and Wheatstone system patented in 1837, relied on galvanometer needles at the receiver that deflected under electromagnetic influence to visually indicate letters on a dial board, obviating the need for operator memorization of abstract symbols. The initial five-needle apparatus featured a diamond-shaped dial with needles pointing left, straight, or right in specific combinations for each letter; for example, "D" was signaled by straight-right-straight-left deflections, while "U" used left-straight-right-straight. This setup supported 26 letters plus numerals using binary-like combinations across five needles, each connected to a dedicated circuit from a 20-key sender. Subsequent iterations reduced complexity: the two-needle version of 1843 employed paired deflections (left or right) with a supplementary cipher code or phrase book for full alphabet coverage, and the single-needle variant of 1840 used 2-3 sequential deflections to select from 100 common phrases on a wall chart, primarily for railway signaling. These evolutions balanced wire count, speed, and usability, with the five-needle model first deployed commercially on September 6, 1837, along the London and Birmingham Railway.[4][38] The dots-and-dashes scheme, integral to the Morse telegraph developed in the 1830s by Samuel F. B. Morse with contributions from Alfred Vail and Leonard Gale, encoded letters and numerals as variable-length sequences of short pulses (dots) and long pulses (dashes) generated by interrupting battery current via a key. Code assignment reflected English letter frequencies, granting simpler patterns to common characters—such as a single dot for "E" and a single dash for "T"—while rarer letters like "Q" received longer combinations, optimizing transmission speed and reducing operator fatigue. This system enabled recording on paper tape via an electromechanical register, with the first public demonstration occurring on May 24, 1844, when Morse transmitted "What hath God wrought!" from Washington, D.C., to Baltimore over a 40-mile line. Unlike needle methods, Morse's approach required trained operators to interpret or transcribe signals but facilitated longer-distance transmission with fewer wires and greater adaptability to automation.Major Systems and Evolutions
Cooke-Wheatstone Linear Systems
The Cooke-Wheatstone telegraph systems, patented on June 12, 1837, by William Fothergill Cooke and Charles Wheatstone, initially employed a five-needle mechanism for signaling over short distances.[39] This apparatus used five galvanometers with needles that deflected left or right in response to electrical pulses, pointing to letter segments on a diamond-shaped dial to form combinations representing alphabetic characters.[3] Requiring six wires plus a ground return, the system transmitted up to 20 letters directly but omitted rarer ones like C, J, Q, U, X, and Z, which were spelled out.[40] First tested on July 4, 1837, over a 1.5-kilometer line in a London carriage shed, it demonstrated practical viability for railway signaling.[4] To reduce wiring complexity for extended linear installations, such as along railway tracks, the system evolved to a double-needle variant by 1838, utilizing two needles and three wires to encode messages via deflection combinations on a shared dial.[41] This configuration, deployed on the Great Western Railway from Paddington to Slough starting in 1843, enabled bidirectional communication over 32 kilometers and proved instrumental in the 1845 apprehension of murderer John Tawell, marking the first criminal conviction aided by electric telegraphy.[42] Operators keyed pulses to deflect needles synchronously, with the receiving instrument mirroring deflections to spell out messages visually without codes.[4] Further refinement in 1845 introduced the single-needle system, patented to minimize infrastructure to a single signal wire and ground return, suitable for longer linear spans with reduced attenuation.[43] In this setup, current polarity reversed the needle's deflection direction, while timed pulses advanced the instrument through a predefined sequence or code to indicate letters, often incorporating a step-by-step motion.[44] Adopted widely on British railways, this version persisted into the 1930s, supporting block signaling and train control over extensive networks.[21] These linear adaptations prioritized reliability over speed, leveraging Wheatstone's electromagnetic expertise and Cooke's practical engineering for integration with emerging rail infrastructure.[39]Morse Code and Register Innovations
Samuel F. B. Morse developed the foundational elements of his electromagnetic telegraph system in the early 1830s, including an initial code proposal, but the practical Morse code emerged through collaboration with Alfred Vail starting in 1837.[1] Vail, leveraging his mechanical expertise, refined the code into a variable-length system of short signals (dots) and long signals (dashes) by January 1838, prioritizing brevity for high-frequency letters based on empirical analysis of type frequencies in printed books.[45] This alphabetic code, distinct from earlier numerical systems, supported transmission speeds reaching ten words per minute in New York demonstrations that year.[46] The code's efficiency derived from its binary-like encoding—dots as brief pulses and dashes as sustained ones—transmitted via interrupted electrical current from a key, with letters separated by pauses and words by longer intervals. Vail also invented the first practical sending key, replacing Morse's cumbersome lever, and contributed to receiver improvements.[47] Initially termed "American Morse code," it featured intra-letter pauses and varied signal counts differing from the later standardized International Morse code adopted globally in 1851.[48] Key innovations included the electromagnetic register receiver, which used a solenoid to drive a stylus marking chemically treated paper tape: short deflections for dots, longer for dashes, enabling permanent recording without real-time visual decoding.[49] This automated transcription, refined through iterative patents like Morse's 1849 improvement (U.S. Patent 6,420), allowed operators to handle messages at higher speeds—up to 30 words per minute by the 1850s—surpassing manual needle telegraphs by decoupling reception from immediate interpretation. Vail's enhancements to the register's electromechanical stability addressed early issues with signal distortion over distance, facilitating reliable long-line operations demonstrated in the 1844 Washington-to-Baltimore line.[1]Continental and Alternative Systems (e.g., Foy-Breguet, Siemens)
In mid-1840s France, Louis Breguet developed the Foy-Breguet telegraph at the request of Alphonse Foy, Director General of Telegraphs, as an adaptation of optical semaphore principles to electrical signaling.[50] The system employed a two-needle mechanism simulating the eight wing positions of the Chappe semaphore, requiring two wires for operation; a later single-needle variant halved transmission speed but reduced costs.[50] Deployed on the Paris-Rouen railway line in the late 1840s, it served as a transitional technology bridging optical and fully electrical methods.[50] The Foy-Breguet apparatus featured dials with letters and numbers, where an electric current drove a geared needle to specific positions held by an escapement mechanism, allowing intuitive visual reading without extensive operator training.[51] While advantageous for its simplicity and minimal skill requirements, the system's efficiency lagged behind serial coding methods due to positional limitations and omitted characters like W or J in some configurations.[51] Adoption extended to French railroads as standard equipment, with exports to Japan for lines such as Tokyo-Yokohama, but it was phased out by 1855 following Foy's retirement and a governmental decree favoring Morse for its single-wire capability and automatic paper recording.[50][51] In Germany, Werner von Siemens and Johann Georg Halske established Telegraphen-Bauanstalt von Siemens & Halske in 1847 to produce and repair pointer telegraphs, an alternative emphasizing operator accessibility over code memorization.[52] The pointer system used a mechanical indicator to spell out letters directly on a dial, enabling less skilled personnel to transmit and receive messages efficiently compared to multi-needle or dot-dash encodings.[52][53] Siemens & Halske constructed Europe's early telegraph networks, including the 1848 Berlin-Frankfurt line, which spanned approximately 500 kilometers and demonstrated the system's reliability for continental expansion.[52] These continental systems prioritized visual and mechanical simplicity to suit regional infrastructures and workforce capabilities, contrasting with the speed-optimized serial transmission of Anglo-American designs.[53][51] By the 1860s, international standardization pressures, culminating in Morse's adoption via bodies like the International Telegraph Union, diminished their dominance, though variants persisted in specialized applications.[51]Network Buildout and Infrastructure
Domestic Line Expansion (1830s-1860s)
The initial domestic expansion of electrical telegraph lines in Britain began with the installation of the Cooke-Wheatstone system along the Great Western Railway in 1839, connecting Paddington in London to West Drayton over a distance of 13 miles (21 km).[4] This line, operational from July 9, 1839, served primarily for railway signaling to coordinate train movements and prevent collisions, marking the first permanent commercial electric telegraph in continuous use.[2] Subsequent installations followed along other railway routes, leveraging the infrastructure of expanding rail networks for right-of-way and structural support, with Cooke securing further contracts for lines on the London and Birmingham Railway by the early 1840s.[54] In the United States, domestic telegraph expansion commenced with Samuel Morse's line between Washington, D.C., and Baltimore, Maryland, completed in 1844 at a length of 40 miles (64 km) and funded by a $30,000 congressional appropriation in 1843.[5] Operational from May 24, 1844, this line demonstrated reliable long-distance transmission using Morse's recording register and code, prompting private investment and extensions to major eastern cities like New York and Boston by the late 1840s.[55] Growth accelerated through associations with railroads, which adopted telegraphy for operational control, resulting in interconnected networks spanning thousands of miles by the 1850s.[56] By the 1850s, British expansion shifted toward public commercial services, with the formation of companies like the Electric Telegraph Company in 1846, which built extensive land lines using improved single-needle instruments derived from Cooke-Wheatstone designs and later incorporating Morse influences for efficiency.[57] These efforts created a patchwork of private networks linking London to provincial centers, though fragmented by competing firms and railway-owned systems; by the early 1860s, five major telegraph companies operated alongside railway telegraphs, covering principal urban routes but facing challenges from inconsistent standards and high construction costs estimated at £165 per mile for early instruments.[58] In the U.S., consolidation under firms like the Magnetic Telegraph Company fueled further proliferation, with Western Union alone managing 44,000 miles of wire by 1864, enabling nationwide commercial messaging and integrating with emerging stock tickers for financial hubs.[7] This period's domestic buildout, totaling over 50,000 miles across both nations by 1866, transformed internal communications but relied heavily on empirical trial-and-error for insulation against weather and terrain, often requiring iron wires on poles or underground conduits prone to failure.[54]Transoceanic Cables and Engineering Challenges
Efforts to establish transoceanic telegraph cables began with the Atlantic Ocean crossing, driven by the need to link North America and Europe directly. The Atlantic Telegraph Company, organized in 1856 under Cyrus West Field, initiated attempts starting in 1857, employing joint U.S. and British naval vessels for laying.[59] The cable consisted of a copper conductor insulated by gutta-percha, surrounded by tarred jute and iron wire armor for protection against abrasion and pressure.[60] Initial tests in shallower waters succeeded, but the full transatlantic span of about 2,000 nautical miles introduced unprecedented challenges in signal propagation and structural integrity.[61] Primary engineering difficulties stemmed from electrical properties inherent to long submerged conductors. The cable's capacitance and resistance caused signal distortion and attenuation, requiring low-voltage, slow transmission rates—initially limited to a few words per minute—to avoid overwhelming the insulation.[61] Gutta-percha insulation, while effective against seawater, proved vulnerable to manufacturing defects, prolonged storage degradation, and mechanical stresses during coiling and payout, leading to microscopic breaches that invited electrolytic corrosion.[60] Laying operations faced hydrodynamic forces, including ocean currents and ship motion, which induced excessive tension; early methods using dynamometers for tension control often failed, resulting in cable snaps, as in the 1857 attempt where over 350 miles were lost after a wire rope fracture.[62] The 1858 expedition, using HMS Agamemnon and USS Niagara, successfully laid the cable by August 5, enabling the first messages, including Queen Victoria's congratulatory note to President Buchanan on August 16.[59] However, operator Edward Whitehouse's use of excessively high voltages—up to 1,000 volts—to boost weak signals rapidly deteriorated the insulation, causing complete failure after transmitting only 2,772 messages in three weeks.[60] [61] A subsequent inquiry attributed the breakdown to combined factors of faulty cable quality, inadequate testing, and operator error, underscoring the need for refined electrical theory and quality assurance.[63] Renewed attempts in 1865 aboard the SS Great Eastern, repurposed for its vast cable capacity of over 4,000 miles, advanced 1,200 miles before a similar payout failure.[64] Success came in 1866, when the same vessel, equipped with improved braking mechanisms and dynamic tension monitoring, laid 2,046 miles from Valentia Island, Ireland, to Heart's Content, Newfoundland, landing on July 27 after 13 days.[65] This cable operated reliably at 8-10 words per minute using moderate voltages and sensitive mirror galvanometers, while crews repaired the 1865 remnant, doubling capacity.[62] Key advancements included pre-lay testing of cable segments in seawater tanks and adoption of Siemens' uniform core stranding to minimize internal faults.[60] These Atlantic feats informed subsequent transoceanic projects, such as the 1869-1870 Red Sea-India cables and the 1902-1903 Pacific crossing, where similar insulation and laying techniques were adapted but scaled with multiple parallel lines to handle traffic.[66] Persistent issues like seabed abrasion from anchors and seismic disruptions necessitated ongoing repairs, with fault location via resistance measurements and grapnel retrieval, yet demonstrated the feasibility of global submarine networks without amplification repeaters until the 1900s.[64]Operational Companies: Formation, Monopolies, and Competition
The Electric Telegraph Company, the world's first public telegraphy company, was founded in 1846 in the United Kingdom by William Fothergill Cooke and financier John Lewis Ricardo to deploy the Cooke-Wheatstone needle telegraph system commercially, initially leasing lines to railway operators for signaling before expanding to public messaging services by 1847.[54] This venture capitalized on parliamentary approvals for overhead wires along rail routes, enabling rapid network buildout; by 1851, the company operated over 2,000 miles of line connecting major cities like London, Manchester, and Liverpool.[67] Concurrently, in the United States, the Magnetic Telegraph Company was incorporated in May 1845 by Samuel Morse's associates, including Alfred Vail, to construct the first commercial intercity line from New York to Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., using Morse's recording telegraph, with operations commencing in 1846 after initial technical hurdles.[56] Proliferation of companies followed as entrepreneurs recognized the telegraph's potential for commerce and news transmission, leading to fierce competition in the 1850s. In the U.S., over 50 regional firms emerged by 1852, often tying lines to railroads for right-of-way access, sparking rate wars that reduced message costs from $1 per mile in 1846 to under 10 cents by 1857 in high-traffic corridors.[56] Operators undercut rivals through aggressive pricing and exclusive contracts with newspapers, but financial instability from high construction costs—averaging $100-$150 per mile for poles and wire—prompted pooling agreements, such as the 1853 Treaty of Six Nations among six major eastern firms to divide territories and stabilize revenues.[56] In Britain, rivals like the British and Irish Magnetic Telegraph Company (formed 1850) and the British Electric Telegraph Company (1850, using Highton patents) challenged the Electric Telegraph Company, extending services to Ireland and competing on continental connections, though fragmented regulation allowed companies to charge premiums for news dispatches, eliciting complaints from press associations over perceived withholding of timely information.[68] Monopolistic consolidation ensued as stronger entities absorbed weaker ones amid economic pressures. The New York and Mississippi Valley Printing Telegraph Company, established in 1851 and renamed Western Union in 1856, aggressively acquired competitors, including the Magnetic Telegraph Company in 1859, culminating in control of 90% of U.S. telegraph traffic by 1866 through 11 major mergers between 1860 and 1866.[69] This dominance stemmed from superior capital access and strategic alliances with railroads, enabling Western Union to enforce uniform rates and prioritize high-value financial messages, though antitrust scrutiny arose later from its influence over news wire services.[56] In the UK, the Electric and International Telegraph Company—formed by the 1855 merger of the Electric Telegraph Company and the International Telegraph Company—gained primacy but faced ongoing rivalry from four main firms controlling 90% of lines by 1866, until government nationalization in 1868-1870 transferred assets to the Post Office amid public demands for affordable, uniform service and to curb private monopolies on essential communication.[67] Competition persisted transnationally via submarine cable ventures, but dominant firms like Western Union often partnered with European operators, delaying full rivalry until telephone emergence in the 1880s.[69]Key Applications
Commercial and Financial Uses
The electrical telegraph facilitated rapid dissemination of market data, enabling merchants and financiers to execute transactions with unprecedented speed and reduced uncertainty. In 1843, the Rothschild banking family employed the telegraph to exchange information on bills of exchange between their London and Hamburg operations, representing an early instance of inter-bank coordination that minimized risks from delays in traditional mail systems.[70] This application extended to foreign exchange dealings, where instantaneous verification of rates and credits lowered exposure to uncovered positions, thereby bolstering cross-border trade volumes for institutions like Brown Brothers Harriman.[70] By the 1850s, telegraph networks consolidated fragmented financial markets; for example, reliable connections established by 1852 synchronized pricing across the New York, Philadelphia, and Boston stock exchanges, allowing traders to arbitrage discrepancies in real time and fostering national market integration.[56][71] Commodity exchanges benefited similarly, as grain, cotton, and livestock prices transmitted via telegraph from distant producing regions informed bidding and hedging strategies, accelerating overall business transaction velocities during the late 19th century.[56] In banking, the technology overcame geographic barriers, enabling centralized oversight of expanding branch networks from the 1880s onward, which supported larger-scale operations and credit extensions without proportional increases in monitoring costs.[72] Commercial enterprises leveraged the telegraph for operational efficiencies, such as coordinating rail shipments and inventory orders; railroads, in particular, integrated telegraph lines alongside tracks to relay freight status and avert bottlenecks, contributing to industrialized logistics.[56] News agencies like Reuters, operational from 1851, exploited telegraph links to relay stock quotations and commercial intelligence between European exchanges, undercutting slower couriers and establishing paid wire services for subscribers by the 1860s. These uses collectively compressed information asymmetries, though they also amplified speculative pressures in volatile sectors like commodities, where delayed confirmations previously damped herd behaviors.[56]Scientific Precision: Longitude and Surveys
The electrical telegraph facilitated unprecedented precision in longitude determination by transmitting time signals derived from astronomical observations between distant stations, allowing direct comparison of local solar or stellar times to compute longitudinal differences based on Earth's rotation (15 arcseconds per second of time). This method supplanted less reliable techniques like lunar distance observations, which suffered from atmospheric refraction errors and computational complexity, achieving accuracies often below 0.2 seconds of time (equivalent to roughly 3 kilometers at the equator).[73][74] Observers at separated sites simultaneously recorded transits of stars across the meridian using chronographs linked to telegraph lines; one site's timestamp was wired to the other for subtraction, yielding the time differential convertible to longitude.[73] In the United States, the U.S. Coast Survey, under superintendents like Alexander Dallas Bache, integrated telegraphy into geodetic work from the late 1840s. Ferdinand Rudolph Hassler's successor methods evolved into systematic telegraphic longitude chains by 1849, starting with links from Washington, D.C., to Baltimore and extending westward; by 1852, Key West's longitude was fixed relative to Savannah (itself tied to Washington) over 1,500 kilometers of wire, supporting nautical charting and boundary delineation.[75] These efforts, repeated across dozens of stations by the 1860s, formed a continental backbone for triangulation surveys, reducing positional errors in coastal and interior mappings from tens of kilometers to under one kilometer.[74][76] European geodesists applied similar techniques to resolve meridian disputes critical for unified mapping. Between 1854 and 1902, four Paris-Greenwich longitude campaigns used telegraph lines spanning 300 kilometers, observing Jupiter's moons and stars to measure the baseline difference—initially yielding 9 arcminutes 11.6 seconds east, later refined amid controversies over instrumental refraction and wire delays that challenged prior arc measurements.[77][78] In broader surveys, such as Australia's colonial networks from 1846, telegraph-enabled star-signal exchanges fixed longitudes for overland triangulation, enabling precise resource and boundary assessments where chronometer transport was impractical.[79] Telegraphic longitude underpinned large-scale geodetic surveys by anchoring primary control networks, against which secondary triangulations and leveling were referenced. For instance, U.S. transcontinental efforts in the 1850s–1870s correlated coastal baselines with interior points, minimizing cumulative errors in national frameworks; without this, distortions from inconsistent longitudes could propagate hundreds of kilometers in polygonal adjustments.[74] Limitations persisted, including signal attenuation over long wires (mitigated by repeaters post-1850s) and synchronization errors from imperfect chronometers, but overall, telegraphy elevated survey precision to first-order standards, with residuals under 1:1,000,000 in modern equivalents.[73][76]Wartime Signaling and Intelligence
The electrical telegraph transformed military signaling by enabling rapid, long-distance coordination of troop movements and logistics, first demonstrated on a large scale during the Crimean War (1853–1856). British forces deployed a dedicated Military Telegraph Detachment, establishing lines from London to Varna and a 300-mile submarine cable to Balaclava by 1855, which facilitated near-instantaneous transmission of orders and reports despite initial underestimation of its potential.[80][81] This infrastructure, primarily restricted to military and intelligence purposes, allowed commanders to respond to frontline developments in hours rather than days, marking the telegraph's debut as a tool for operational control in active combat.[82] In the American Civil War (1861–1865), the Union Army's United States Military Telegraph Corps constructed over 15,000 miles of wire, integrating field units that could erect lines at rates of up to 4 miles per hour using portable equipment.[83] President Abraham Lincoln personally monitored dispatches from a dedicated telegraph office in the War Department, issuing direct commands to generals and adjusting strategies based on real-time battlefield updates, which enhanced centralized command over vast theaters.[84] Confederate forces countered by targeting lines for sabotage, as in General Stonewall Jackson's 1862 Shenandoah Valley campaign, where troops severed Union wires to isolate commands and exploit delays in communication.[85] The Franco-Prussian War (1870–1871) highlighted the telegraph's strategic asymmetry, with Prussian forces leveraging extensive networks for superior coordination while employing Uhlan cavalry to sever French lines early in the conflict, effectively isolating Paris and disrupting enemy logistics.[86] Prussian telegraph units, reformed post-Crimean lessons, transmitted over 1,000 messages daily during advances, contributing to rapid encirclements like Sedan.[87] Diplomatically, the edited Ems Dispatch of July 13, 1870—a telegram from King Wilhelm I to Bismarck—escalated tensions into war by provoking French declaration, underscoring the medium's role in political intelligence manipulation.[88] For intelligence, telegraph lines proved vulnerable to interception, as signals could be tapped via simple connections to wires, prompting early adoption of codes like the Union's cipher disks and Confederate Vigenère variants, though breaches occurred when operators reused keys or lines were physically accessed.[89][90] In the Civil War, Union signal corps decrypted captured Confederate messages, yielding tactical insights, while both sides faced risks from insider leaks or sabotage, as confidentiality relied on operator oaths rather than robust encryption.[90] These limitations drove innovations in secure routing but exposed causal dependencies: disrupted lines reverted armies to slower couriers, amplifying errors in fog-of-war decision-making.[83]Societal and Economic Impacts
Information Revolution: Speed and Market Efficiency
The electrical telegraph profoundly accelerated information transmission, compressing intercity messaging times from days via mail coaches or steamships to seconds or minutes over wire. Samuel Morse's inaugural public demonstration on May 24, 1844, relayed the message "What hath God wrought" from Washington, D.C., to Baltimore—a distance of 40 miles—in under 10 seconds using electromagnetic pulses.[91] By 1853, telegraph networks spanned most major U.S. population centers, and the completion of the first durable transatlantic cable in July 1866 enabled near-instantaneous exchange between New York and London, supplanting the prior 10-day steamship delay.[91][92] This velocity enhanced market efficiency by minimizing informational asymmetries and enabling real-time price arbitrage corrections. Pre-telegraph, distant markets operated with stale data, fostering price divergences exploitable by informed traders; post-adoption, synchronized updates via dedicated lines integrated regional exchanges into national and global systems. For example, the Gold and Stock Telegraph Company, established in 1867, delivered live stock quotations from the New York exchange to remote brokers, curtailing intra-day discrepancies that had previously allowed prolonged mispricings.[93] Commodity markets similarly converged: studies of U.S. grain prices show reduced volatility and spatial differentials after 1850s line expansions, as traders hedged positions with prompt supply-demand signals from Chicago to coastal ports.[94] The resultant efficiency lowered transaction costs and spurred economic scale, as firms coordinated supply chains without lag-induced buffers—railroads, for instance, dispatched cars based on instantaneous demand telegrams, optimizing inventory over vast networks.[94] Transatlantic cables further globalized finance, with London cotton brokers adjusting bids within hours of American harvest reports by 1866, diminishing the rent-seeking from delayed shipping news that had characterized antebellum trade.[92] Overall, the telegraph's causal role in market deepening is evidenced by accelerated firm growth in communication-dependent sectors, though it also amplified speculative bubbles by propagating rumors at equal speed to facts.[94]Global Trade and Imperial Expansion Effects
The electrical telegraph profoundly influenced global trade by minimizing communication delays, thereby integrating distant markets and reducing information asymmetries that previously hindered efficient exchange. The successful completion of the transatlantic submarine cable on July 27, 1866, exemplified this shift, as it enabled real-time transmission of commodity prices between the United States and Europe.[95] In the cotton trade, the price differential between New York and Liverpool fell from 2.56 pence per pound to 1.65 pence per pound, while daily U.S. cotton exports increased by 37%, yielding an estimated 8% annual efficiency gain in export value—comparable to eliminating a 7% tariff or reducing storage costs by 20%.[95] Such advancements fostered synchronized pricing and diminished speculative opportunities, accelerating industrialization and business transactions across continents.[56] Beyond commodities, the telegraph optimized international shipping and finance, particularly tramp shipping, where operators could coordinate routes and cargoes via cable messages, contributing to world trade growth from 1870 to 1910.[96] Banking networks, such as the Rothschilds' early adoption in 1843 for inter-bank signaling, leveraged telegraphy to execute cross-border transactions with unprecedented speed, lowering costs and enhancing liquidity in global capital flows.[70] By the late 19th century, expansive submarine cable networks—totaling over 100,000 miles by the 1870s—directly benefited trading companies by allowing ship owners to relay arrival details and instructions to captains at ports, streamlining logistics and reducing idle time for vessels.[97] In imperial expansion, the telegraph served as a cornerstone for centralized administration and rapid response in overseas territories, particularly for Britain, which exploited its naval dominance to lay submarine cables linking key colonies.[98] Following the 1857 Indian Rebellion, British authorities accelerated telegraph deployment in India, establishing a near-instantaneous line from Karachi to London by 1865, which supplanted months-long postal delays with minutes-long electrical signals and bolstered colonial governance amid unrest.[97] This infrastructure extended to other dominions, enabling viceroys and governors to receive directives from Whitehall swiftly, shifting imperial control from reactive to proactive paradigms.[98] The culmination of these efforts appeared in the All-Red Line, a British-exclusive telegraph network inaugurated on October 31, 1902, comprising over 100,000 miles of undersea cables that connected the empire's far-flung possessions—such as Australia, South Africa, and Canada—without traversing foreign soil, thereby securing strategic communications and reinforcing geopolitical cohesion.[99] British firms' near-monopoly on cable manufacturing and laying, fueled by advanced industry and capital markets, amplified this advantage, allowing the empire to project power efficiently while marginalizing rivals' influence in global information flows.[100] Overall, telegraphy not only expedited trade but entrenched imperial hierarchies by compressing vast distances into manageable administrative spans.Labor, Error Rates, and Dependency Risks
Operators at telegraph stations typically worked in shifts of 8 to 12 hours, requiring proficiency in Morse code transmission and reception at speeds of 25 to 40 words per minute for railroad and commercial lines.[101] Early electrical systems, such as those deployed in the 1840s, necessitated 2 to 3 skilled operators per station to handle encoding, decoding, and relay duties, with stations spaced approximately 10 kilometers apart to manage signal strength and workload.[54] By the mid-19th century, the profession demanded auditory skills for interpreting sound-based signals from receivers, a technique adopted widely in the United States by the 1850s, alongside manual key operation that caused physical strain from prolonged tapping.[54] In the United Kingdom, the Electric Telegraph Company employed operators for high-volume press and business traffic by 1855, while in the U.S., the role expanded to thousands amid network growth, often filled by women in lower positions who faced limited advancement despite the job's relative pay premium.[54] Error rates arose primarily from human fatigue, signal distortion over long distances, and coordination failures across multiple relay firms, leading to garbled or lost messages in multi-segment transmissions, such as those spanning several companies from Boston to St. Louis.[56] Mitigation relied on procedural checks, including prosigns for repetition requests and parity-like verifications in code books that allowed correction of transmission faults without full retransmission.[102][103] Submarine cables exacerbated errors through attenuation and insulation degradation, as seen in the 1858 Atlantic cable's intermittent signals, prompting innovations like siphon recorders for clearer tracing.[54] Overall, while exact quantitative rates varied, operational complaints highlighted persistent issues, with industry consolidation partly driven by the need to reduce error-prone handoffs between competing lines.[56][104] Dependency on telegraph networks introduced systemic risks, including physical vulnerabilities to sabotage and natural disruptions that could sever connectivity across regions. Land lines were susceptible to wire cutting during conflicts, while overhead infrastructure faced frequent interruptions from storms and the 1859 Carrington geomagnetic event, which induced currents causing equipment malfunction and spontaneous operation even when disconnected from batteries.[105][106] Submarine cables added failure modes like insulation breakdown from pressure or faults, as in early transatlantic attempts, creating single points of failure for transoceanic commerce.[63] Economically, reliance on timely messages for markets amplified outage impacts, with delays or errors leading to financial losses and incentivizing monopolistic pooling to stabilize service, though this heightened exposure to coordinated disruptions in rail-integrated networks.[56] Strategic dependencies emerged in military uses, where line vulnerabilities underscored the need for redundancy, yet widespread adoption by the 1860s made societies vulnerable to information blackouts affecting trade and coordination.[54]Controversies and Limitations
Patent Battles and Inventor Disputes
In Britain, William Fothergill Cooke and Charles Wheatstone jointly patented a five-needle electromagnetic telegraph system on May 24, 1837, following their partnership formed earlier that year to combine Cooke's practical designs with Wheatstone's scientific expertise.[107] Tensions escalated in 1840 over intellectual credit, commercial control, and differing technological priorities—Cooke advocated for operator-dependent needle signaling, while Wheatstone pursued automated dial instruments for broader accessibility—prompting arbitration proceedings.[21] On April 27, 1841, arbitrators awarded Cooke recognition as the primary practical inventor and introducer, crediting Wheatstone mainly for theoretical advancements, though the decision dissatisfied both parties and delayed further innovations like Wheatstone's dial telegraph until after patent expiration.[21] Cooke ultimately purchased Wheatstone's rights in 1845 for £30,000, securing dominance of the needle system, while the partners successfully defended their patent against rivals such as Edward Davy in subsequent infringement suits.[107][21] Across the Atlantic, Samuel F. B. Morse secured U.S. Patent No. 1648 on June 20, 1840, covering his electromagnetic recording telegraph that employed a binary code of dots and dashes for transmitting messages over wire.[108] This broad claim faced immediate scrutiny for allegedly encompassing prior European developments, leading to the landmark O'Reilly v. Morse case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1853.[109] The Court affirmed Morse's priority as the original inventor over contemporaries like Wheatstone, Cooke, and Steinheil, validating the patent's first seven claims related to specific apparatus and methods, but invalidated the eighth claim as overly expansive for monopolizing any future use of electromagnetism in distant communication without detailed description, a ruling that preserved patent specificity requirements under U.S. law.[109] Morse also litigated against Scottish inventor Alexander Bain, whose chemical recording telegraph—patented in Britain in 1846 and the U.S. on April 17, 1849 (No. 6,328)—overlapped with Morse's recording mechanism using electrolytic paper.[110] An 1849 patent interference proceeding escalated to court by 1851, where judges prioritized Morse's earlier U.S. filing and apparatus details, ruling Bain's device infringing despite Bain's independent chemical innovations and prior foreign patent; Morse's reissued patents (e.g., No. 79 in 1846) bolstered his position, ultimately bankrupting Bain through prolonged legal costs and injunctions.[110] These battles underscored Morse's strategic enforcement, enabling his system's commercialization, though they highlighted tensions between national patent priorities and transatlantic invention overlaps.[110]Monopoly Practices and Regulatory Pushback
In the United States, the telegraph industry rapidly consolidated into oligopolistic structures during the 1850s, with regional firms entering pooling agreements such as the 1857 "Treaty of Six Nations," which divided traffic and revenues among six major companies to stabilize profits and deter competition.[56] By 1866, Western Union Telegraph Company had absorbed its primary rivals, including the American Telegraph Company and United States Telegraph Company, securing control over approximately 90% of national telegraph traffic and handling 5.8 million messages annually by 1867.[56] This dominance enabled practices like discriminatory pricing favoring large customers, such as news agencies, and exclusive contracts that stifled smaller operators, prompting accusations of abuse from shippers, farmers, and independent lines complaining of high rates and poor rural service.[111] Regulatory responses emerged with the Post Roads Act of 1866, which authorized railroads to construct and operate their own telegraph lines along rights-of-way, explicitly aiming to foster competition against Western Union's incumbency by granting non-exclusive access to federal postal routes and reducing the company's leverage over infrastructure.[112] [113] The Act created a quasi-regulatory framework by affirming government oversight of rates and service on post roads, though enforcement proved limited due to Western Union's lobbying influence, which blocked subsequent federal bills for direct rate regulation or public ownership between 1866 and 1900.[56] State-level efforts, such as rate caps in Iowa and Illinois, yielded inconsistent results owing to the interstate nature of most traffic, allowing Western Union to maintain its position until telephone competition eroded it in the 1880s.[56] In the United Kingdom, private telegraph firms, including the Electric Telegraph Company (founded 1846) and the British and Irish Magnetic Telegraph Company, established regional monopolies by securing exclusive concessions from railways for line construction, leading to fragmented networks with high transmission costs—often 1 shilling per mile—and unreliable service marred by errors and delays prior to 1870.[114] These practices fueled public and parliamentary criticism over profiteering and inefficiency, as companies prioritized urban commercial traffic while neglecting broader access, exacerbating disparities in information flow.[114] Pushback culminated in the Telegraph Act 1869, which empowered the Postmaster General to acquire private inland telegraph systems, resulting in nationalization effective January 1, 1870, when the General Post Office purchased 15 major companies for approximately £7 million and integrated operations into the postal network to enforce uniform low rates (e.g., 1 shilling for 20 words up to 100 miles) and expand coverage to over 5,000 offices by 1882.[115] This state takeover addressed monopoly-induced barriers by prioritizing public utility over private profit, though it introduced bureaucratic rigidities that later hindered innovation compared to competitive U.S. markets.[115]Technical Failures, Security Breaches, and Human Costs
The electrical telegraph systems were prone to frequent technical disruptions, particularly from environmental factors. In September 1859, the Carrington Event—a massive solar storm—induced geomagnetic currents that overloaded telegraph lines worldwide, causing sparks to ignite paper at operators' stations, fires in equipment, and widespread signal failures; operators in some locations reported receiving shocks and continued transmissions even with batteries disconnected due to atmospheric electricity.[116][105] Thunderstorms routinely damaged overhead lines by splintering wooden poles and shattering insulators, as documented in a mid-19th-century incident at Canaan, New York, where lightning reduced poles to fragments and scattered insulators across the landscape.[117] Submarine cables faced insulation degradation and manufacturing defects; the first transatlantic cable laid in 1858 transmitted weak, intermittent signals before failing entirely after several weeks, attributed to poor handling and electrical faults rather than physical breakage.[54] Security vulnerabilities arose from the telegraph's reliance on exposed wires, enabling interception without physical alteration in many cases. In 1834, French brothers François and Joseph Blanc bribed a telegraph operator between Paris and Bordeaux to insert falsified stock price data into transmissions, then used the system's backspace function to conceal the alteration, profiting from manipulated bond trades in what is recognized as the earliest recorded cyberattack on a communication network.[118] During the American Civil War (1861–1865), both Union and Confederate forces exploited this weakness; spies deployed portable relays to tap enemy lines by draping wires over them, siphoning signals to decode messages without detection, which facilitated rapid intelligence relay but also exposed operators to counter-espionage risks.[85] Such breaches underscored the telegraph's inherent insecurity, as minimal signal diversion sufficed to power a receiving relay, prompting early demands for encryption that were often inadequate against determined adversaries.[119] Human costs included occupational hazards for operators and line crews, compounded by the technology's demands. Telegraph operators endured prolonged exposure to repetitive Morse code transmission, leading to documented cases of "telegraph neurasthenia"—a condition involving neuralgia, fatigue, and muscle cramps from incessant keying, prevalent in the late 19th century amid 12–16 hour shifts without standardized breaks.[85] Construction and maintenance crews faced elevated injury risks from erecting poles in remote areas, including falls, lightning strikes during storms, and manual labor strains; while comprehensive mortality data is sparse, Civil War-era line repairs under fire resulted in operator casualties, as units advanced with portable equipment into combat zones vulnerable to sabotage or artillery.[85] These factors contributed to high turnover and health deterioration, reflecting the causal trade-offs of rapid deployment over ergonomic or safety prioritization in early networks.Decline and Technological Succession
Competition from Telephony and Radio
The telephone, patented by Alexander Graham Bell on March 7, 1876, and commercialized through the Bell Telephone Company founded in 1877, directly challenged the electrical telegraph by transmitting human voice over wires, obviating the need for Morse code transcription by skilled operators.[120] This innovation leveraged existing telegraph infrastructure—copper wires suspended on poles—but delivered real-time, natural-language communication accessible to untrained users, contrasting the telegraph's deliberate, coded process that prioritized volume over conversational ease. By 1900, Bell's network encompassed nearly 600,000 U.S. telephones, surging to 5.8 million by 1910 amid exponential demand from businesses and households for instantaneous person-to-person exchange.[120] Telegraph firms like Western Union initially viewed the telephone as a novelty for short-range novelty, declining to acquire Bell's patents for $100,000 in 1876, but telephony's scalability eroded telegraph revenues as it captured local and regional messaging markets previously reliant on operators and tickers.[56] Telephony's ascent accelerated telegraph decline through economic displacement: U.S. telegraph message volumes, which peaked at around 200 million annually in the 1920s, began contracting post-1900 as telephone calls—reaching 89.4 million local and 4.9 million toll daily by the 1920s—substituted for routine dispatches in commerce, news, and personal affairs.[56] AT&T's integration of telegraph subsidiaries and aggressive expansion into long-distance voice service by 1915 further marginalized wired telegraphy, which retained utility for bulk data like stock quotes and weather reports but lost ground to telephony's lower latency and reduced labor costs—no operators needed for dialing.[120] By the 1930s, telephone penetration exceeded 30% of U.S. households, correlating with telegraph offices closing and lines repurposed for phone service, as voice proved causally superior for resolving ambiguities inherent in telegraph's abstracted symbols.[56] Concurrently, wireless telegraphy, pioneered by Guglielmo Marconi, introduced non-wired competition starting with his 1895 demonstration of Morse transmission over 2.4 kilometers using radio waves, patented provisionally in 1896.[121] Marconi's system replicated electrical telegraph protocols without cables, targeting maritime, military, and transoceanic routes where submarine cables—costing millions to lay and prone to faults—dominated but faltered in mobility. The first transatlantic wireless signal from Poldhu, Cornwall, to St. John's, Newfoundland, on December 12, 1901, validated long-range viability, spurring commercial services by Marconi's company that undercut cable rates for ship-to-shore and international bursts.[122] Wireless adoption surged during World War I for naval coordination, with over 100 U.S. ships equipped by 1917, diminishing reliance on shore-based wired networks and exposing telegraph's infrastructural brittleness to sabotage or geography.[121] Though initially limited by signal interference and range, radio's causal advantage in untethered propagation eroded telegraph's monopoly on remote signaling, paving for hybrid declines as telephony handled terrestrial voice and radio supplanted wired Morse in dynamic domains.[56]Phasing Out: Last Services and Archival Efforts
Western Union, the primary provider of telegraph services in the United States, discontinued its telegram operations on January 27, 2006, after sending approximately 20,000 messages in 2005 at a cost of about $10 each, reflecting the dominance of email and other digital alternatives.[123][124] In the United Kingdom, telegram delivery by the General Post Office successor entities ended in 2008.[125] Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) in India, operating one of the last extensive domestic networks, halted booking and delivery of telegrams on July 14, 2013, after 163 years of service, with staff redeployed to mobile and broadband operations amid negligible demand.[126][127] Belgium's bpost terminated its telegram service on December 29, 2017, 171 years after the nation's first electric telegram.[128] These closures marked the effective end of commercial electrical telegraphy worldwide, though niche or international relay services persisted briefly via entities like iTelegram in the U.S., which assumed Western Union's mantle but focused on ceremonial or specialized transmissions rather than routine use.[129] The shift was driven by the superior speed, cost-efficiency, and reliability of telephony, radiotelegraphy, fax, and internet-based messaging, rendering Morse code and needle systems obsolete for practical communication by the late 20th century. Preservation initiatives have focused on archiving equipment, operational records, and infrastructure to document the telegraph's role in early electrical communication. The Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History maintains the Western Union Telegraph Company Records, derived from a company museum established in 1912 by engineer H.W. Drake, encompassing artifacts, patents, and correspondence spanning the industry's peak.[130] Specialized collections, such as those at the PK Porthcurno Museum of Global Communications in Cornwall, UK, house international telegraph instruments, submarine cable samples, and archival materials reflecting global network operations.[131] Dedicated organizations like the Telecommunications History Group in Oakland, California, actively collect, restore, and exhibit telegraph keys, sounders, and teletype machines, emphasizing hands-on demonstrations of Morse code transmission to educate on historical signaling techniques.[132] Regional museums, including the Museum of Telephone and Telegraph History in Arizona, preserve operational replicas and early instruments, while efforts to document open-wire pole lines—key to 19th-century landline distribution—feature in sites like the Dacotah Prairie Museum in South Dakota, safeguarding physical remnants against urban development and material decay.[133][134] These endeavors prioritize empirical reconstruction over narrative embellishment, ensuring verifiable artifacts inform studies of electrical engineering's foundational era.References
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Popular_Science_Monthly/Volume_7/August_1875/Telegraphic_Determination_of_Longitude