Hubbry Logo
Elizabeth StrideElizabeth StrideMain
Open search
Elizabeth Stride
Community hub
Elizabeth Stride
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Elizabeth Stride
Elizabeth Stride
from Wikipedia

Key Information

Elizabeth "Long Liz" Stride (née Gustafsdotter; 27 November 1843 – 30 September 1888) is believed to have been the third victim of the unidentified serial killer known as Jack the Ripper, who killed and mutilated at least five women in the Whitechapel and Spitalfields districts of London from late August to early November 1888.[2]

Unlike the other four canonical Ripper victims, Stride had not been mutilated following her murder, leading some historians to suspect Stride had not actually been murdered by Jack the Ripper.[3] However, Stride's murder occurred less than one hour before the murder of the Ripper's fourth canonical victim, Catherine Eddowes, within walking distance, and her act of murder is suspected to have been disturbed by an individual entering the crime scene upon a two-wheeled cart.[4] In addition, both women had been murdered by slash wounds to the throat,[5] leading most authors and researchers to consider Stride to be the third of the Ripper's canonical five victims.[6]

Stride was nicknamed "Long Liz". Several explanations have been given for this pseudonym; some believe it sources from her married surname (a stride being a reference to a long step),[7] while others believe this is a reference to either her height,[8] or her general facial structure.

Early life

[edit]

Stride was born Elisabeth Gustafsdotter on 27 November 1843 on a small farm near Stora Tumlehed,[9] a rural village within the parish of Torslanda, west of Gothenburg, Sweden.[10] She was the second of four children born to Swedish farmer Gustaf Ericsson (age 32) and his wife Beata Carlsdotter (age 33). As a child, Gustafsdotter lived upon this village farm. All four children were raised in the Lutheran faith, and all were required to perform numerous chores upon the farm.[11]

The Church of Torslanda. Gustafsdotter was confirmed at this church in 1859.

Gustafsdotter was confirmed at the Church of Torslanda on 14 August 1859 at the age of 15, with contemporary records indicating her biblical knowledge as being thorough.[12] The following year, she chose to relocate from Stora Tumlehed to the city of Gothenburg in search of employment.[13] Shortly thereafter, she obtained employment as a domestic worker in the Gothenburg parish of Carl Johan, being employed by a couple named Olofsson. This employment lasted until 2 February 1864,[14] whereupon Gustafsdotter relocated to another district of Gothenburg, again securing employment as a domestic servant.[15] She was between 5 ft 2 in (1.57 m)[16] and 5 ft 5 in (1.65 m)[8] in height and had curly dark brown hair, light grey eyes, an oval face and a pale complexion.[16]

Unlike the other canonical victims of the Whitechapel murders—at least three of whom resorted to prostitution due to poverty following failed marriages—Stride turned to prostitution earlier in life. Gothenburg police records dating from March 1865 confirm her arrest upon this charge.[17] She was treated at least twice for venereal disease. On 21 April 1865, Gustafsdotter gave birth to a stillborn girl.[18] Seven months later, she obtained employment as a maid in the Gothenburg district of Haga.[19]

Relocation to London

[edit]

In February 1866,[20] Gustafsdotter moved from Gothenburg to London. Her actual reason for relocating from Sweden to England is unknown, as she is known to have told acquaintances two differing stories as to why she relocated. To some, Gustafsdotter claimed she had relocated to England due to her employment in the domestic service of "a gentleman" who lived near Hyde Park;[10] to others, Gustafsdotter claimed she had family in London and chose to visit her relatives in the city before opting to remain in England.[21] Whatever the truth regarding Gustafsdotter's decision to relocate to London, it is likely she funded this trip with the 65 kronor she inherited following the death of her mother in August 1864, and which she had received in late 1865.[22]

Upon her arrival in London, Gustafsdotter learned to speak both English and Yiddish in addition to her native language. She is also known to have briefly dated a policeman in the late 1860s.[23]

Marriage

[edit]

On 7 March 1869, Gustafsdotter married John Thomas Stride, a ship's carpenter from Sheerness, who was 22 years her senior.[24] They married in a modest ceremony at St Giles in the Fields Church.[25] The couple had no children.[26][n 1]

For several years after their marriage, the couple resided in East India Dock Road,[28] operating a coffee shop in Poplar, east London. This business was initially located on Upper North Road before the establishment relocated to Poplar High Street in approximately 1871. Their income throughout this period was also supplemented by John Stride continuing his trade as a carpenter.[29]

By 1874, the Strides' marriage had begun to deteriorate, although they continued to live together. The following year, John Stride sold the coffee shop, likely due to financial hardship.[30]

Separation

[edit]

In March 1877, Stride was admitted to the Poplar Workhouse, suggesting that the couple had separated by this date.[10] However, census records from 1881 indicate the two had reunited[31] and lived together in the district of Bow,[32] although the couple had permanently separated by the end of that year, with Stride being admitted to a Whitechapel workhouse infirmary suffering from bronchitis in December 1881. She was discharged from this infirmary on 4 January 1882, and is believed to have taken residence in one of several common lodging-houses on Flower and Dean Street, Whitechapel, shortly thereafter.[33] Two years later, on 24 October 1884, John Stride died of tuberculosis in the Poplar and Stepney Sick Asylum.[34]

Middlesex Street, Spitalfields, c. 1890. Stride frequently resided in common lodging-houses within this district of London in the years prior to her murder.[35]

In the years following the collapse of her marriage and the death of her husband, Stride is known to have informed several individuals that her husband and two of her nine children had drowned in the 1878 sinking of the Princess Alice in the River Thames. According to Stride, she and her husband had been employed upon this steamer,[36] although she had survived the accident by climbing the ship's mast,[37] but as she had done so, she had been kicked in the mouth by another survivor of the sinking, and this injury to her palate had caused a permanent stutter.[38][n 2]

Common lodging residences

[edit]

While residing in common lodging-houses, Stride occasionally received charitable assistance from the Church of Sweden in London, and from 1885 until her death lived much of the time with local dock labourer Michael Kidney, who resided in Devonshire Street. The couple had a tumultuous relationship and regularly separated, with Stride sleeping in local lodging houses before returning to live with Kidney.[40] In April 1887, Stride filed a formal assault charge against Kidney, although she failed to pursue this charge in court and the case was discharged.[41] Her relationship with Kidney continued in an on-and-off manner between 1885 and 1888.[42][n 3]

In addition to prostitution, Stride occasionally earned income from sewing and housecleaning. An acquaintance described her as having a calm temperament,[44] though she appeared before the Thames Magistrates' Court on approximately eight occasions[45] for both drunk and disorderly conduct and the use of obscene language, with the final occasion being on 3 September 1888.[46] Occasionally, Stride used the alias Annie Fitzgerald at these hearings.[47]

1888

[edit]

Following an argument on 26 September 1888, Stride and Kidney again separated, and she again took residence at 32 Flower and Dean Street (then a notorious slum and criminal rookery[48]), informing a fellow lodger named Catherine Lane she and Kidney "had had a few words".[49] Over the following days she regularly earned money by performing cleaning duties, both at the lodging house and for local residents, being observed by the housekeeper, Elizabeth Tanner, to be a quiet woman who occasionally performed cleaning work for the local Jewish community.[50][n 4]

29 September

[edit]

On the day prior to her murder, Stride is known to have cleaned two rooms at her lodging house, for which she was paid sixpence.[53] That evening, she wore a black jacket and skirt, with a posy of a red rose in a spray of either maidenhair fern or asparagus leaves. Her outfit was complemented by a black crêpe bonnet. In an effort to make her clothing look more respectable, she is known to have borrowed a brush from a fellow resident. At 6:30 p.m., Stride and Elizabeth Tanner briefly visited the Queen's Head pub on Commercial Street before Stride returned alone to the lodging house.[54]

Subsequent eyewitness accounts of Stride's movements later in the evening of 29 September and the early morning of 30 September indicate she may have been in the company of one or more acquaintances and/or clients. The first of these individuals is described as a short man with a dark moustache, wearing a morning suit and bowler hat, with whom she was seen at approximately 11:00 p.m. at a location close to Berner Street.[55] A second eyewitness account by labourer William Marshall places Stride in the company of a man wearing a peaked cap, black coat and dark trousers standing on the pavement opposite number 58 Berner Street at approximately 11:45 p.m. According to Marshall, Stride had stood with this "decently dressed" individual, and the two had repeatedly kissed before the man had said to her: "You would say anything but your prayers."[56]

30 September

[edit]

At 12:35 a.m., PC William Smith saw Stride with a man wearing a hard felt hat standing opposite the International Working Men's Educational Club, a socialist and predominantly Jewish social club, at 40 Berner Street (since renamed Henriques Street) in Whitechapel. The man was carrying a package about 18 inches (45 cm) long.[57] Having no reason to feel suspicious, Smith continued on his beat in the direction of Commercial Road.[58] Between 12:35 a.m. and 12:45 a.m., dockworker James Brown saw a woman he believed to be Stride standing with her back against a wall at the corner of Berner Street speaking with a man of average build in a long black coat. Brown heard Stride say, "No. Not tonight. Some other night."[59]

Berner Street, seen here in 1909. The body of Stride was discovered in Dutfield's Yard (visible beneath the suspended cartwheel) on 30 September 1888.

Murder

[edit]

At approximately 1:00 a.m. on Sunday 30 September 1888, Stride's body was discovered in the adjacent Dutfield's Yard[n 5] by Louis Diemschutz, the steward of the International Working Men's Educational Club. Diemschutz had driven into the poorly illuminated yard with his horse and two-wheeled cart, when his horse abruptly shied to the left[60] to avoid what appeared to be a bundle lying upon the ground.[61] Noting what he later described as a "dark object" lying on the ground, Diemschutz unsuccessfully attempted to lift the object with his whip handle before leaving his cart[62] to inspect it.[63] Upon lighting a match, Diemschutz saw a prone body. He immediately ran inside the club to check his wife was safe. After finding her safe and sound, he reported his discovery before the group promptly dispersed to seek help.[64]

Stride's body lay on her left side, with her right hand upon her stomach and her left arm extended behind her back. Her left hand still clutched several cachous wrapped in tissue paper, and the bow of her checkered silk scarf had been pulled tightly to the left of her neck, possibly from behind.[65] Blood was still flowing from a single knife wound inflicted to Stride's neck and, although her hands were cold to the touch, other sections of her body were either slightly or "quite" warm.[66][67] This suggests Stride was killed shortly before Diemschutz's arrival in the yard. Several patrons of the Working Men's Educational Club who had left the premises between 12:30 and 12:50 a.m., later informed police they had observed nothing amiss.[68][n 6]

Post-mortem

[edit]

The first doctor to arrive was Frederick William Blackwell. Police surgeon Dr George Bagster Phillips, who had examined the body of previous Whitechapel murder victim Annie Chapman,[70] arrived about 10 minutes later.[n 7] Phillips's official post-mortem documents state:

The body was lying on the near side, with the face turned toward the wall, the head up the yard and the feet toward the street. The left arm was extended and there was a packet of cachous in the left hand. ... The right arm was over the belly; the back of the hand and wrist had on it clotted blood. The legs were drawn up with the feet close to the wall. The body and face were warm and the hand cold. The legs were quite warm.
The deceased had a silk handkerchief round her neck, and it appeared to be slightly torn. I have since ascertained it was cut. This corresponded with the right angle of the jaw. The throat was deeply gashed, and there was an abrasion of the skin about one and a quarter inches in diameter, apparently stained with blood, under her right brow.
At 3 p.m. on Monday at St. George's Mortuary, Dr Blackwell and I made a post-mortem examination. Rigor mortis was still thoroughly marked. There was mud on the left side of the face and it was matted in the head. ... The body was fairly nourished. Over both shoulders, especially the right, and under the collarbone and in front of the chest there was a blueish discolouration, which I have watched and have seen on two occasions since.
There was a clear-cut incision on the neck. It was six inches in length and commenced two and a half inches in a straight line below the angle of the jaw, three-quarters of an inch over an undivided muscle, and then, becoming deeper, dividing the sheath. The cut was very clean and deviated a little downwards. The arteries and other vessels contained in the sheath were all cut through. The cut through the tissues on the right side was more superficial and tailed off to about two inches below the right angle of the jaw. The deep vessels on that side were uninjured. From this, it was evident that the haemorrhage was caused through the partial severance of the left carotid artery and a small bladed knife could have been used.
Decomposition had commenced in the skin. Dark brown spots were on the anterior surface of the left chin. There was a deformity in the bones of the right leg, which was not straight but bowed forwards. There was no recent external injury save to the neck.
The body being washed more thoroughly, I could see some healing sores. The lobe of the left ear was torn as if from the removal or wearing through of an earring, but it was thoroughly healed. On removing the scalp there was no sign of bruising or extravasation of blood. ... The heart was small, the left ventricle firmly contracted, and the right slightly so. There was no clot in the pulmonary artery, but the right ventricle was full of dark clot. The left was firmly contracted as to be absolutely empty. The stomach was large and the mucous membrane only congested. It contained partly digested food, apparently consisting of cheese, potato, and farinaceous powder [flour or milled grain]. All the teeth on the lower left jaw were absent.[71]

Blackwell opined his belief that Stride's murderer may have pulled her backwards onto the ground by her neckerchief (the bow of which was observed to be markedly tight[72]) before cutting her throat.[73] Phillips concurred with this opinion, stating that Stride had probably been lying on her back[74] when she was killed by a single, swift slash wound from left to right across her neck,[75] strongly indicating her murderer had been right-handed. Bruising on Stride's chest suggested that she had been pinned to the ground prior to the wound to her neck being inflicted.[76]

The entrance to Dutfield's Yard. Louis Diemschutz discovered Stride's body at this location at 1:00 a.m. on 30 September 1888
6 October 1888 edition of the Penny Illustrated Paper depicting the discovery of Stride's body

Investigation

[edit]

Police searched the crime scene and interrogated everyone who had been at the International Working Men's Educational Club, as well as all residents of the area.[77]

Israel Schwartz told investigators he had seen Stride being attacked outside Dutfield's Yard at approximately 12:45 a.m. by a man with dark hair, a small brown moustache and approximately 5 feet 5 inches in height. According to Schwartz, this man attempted to pull Stride onto the street before turning her around and shoving her to the ground.[78] As Schwartz had observed this assault, Stride's assailant shouted the word "Lipski" either to Schwartz himself or to a second man who had exited the club amidst this altercation and lit a pipe.[79][n 8] Schwartz did not testify at the inquest on Stride, possibly because he was of Hungarian descent and spoke very little, if any, English.[81] Ripper investigator Stephen Knight found Schwartz's statement in case files in the 1970s.[82] At approximately the same time, Stride (or a woman matching her description) was seen by James Brown rejecting the advances of a stoutish man slightly taller than her in the adjacent street to Berner Street (Fairclough Street).[83] A note in the margin of the Home Office files on the case points out that there was sufficient time for Stride to meet another individual between her death and the latest sightings of her.[84]

No money was found on or near Stride's body. This indicated that her money could have been taken during or after the altercation witnessed by Israel Schwartz, or by her murderer if it were not the same person.[85] It seemed she had willingly entered Dutfield's Yard and had either encountered her murderer within or had walked there with the person before being attacked.[86]

Mrs Fanny Mortimer, who lived two doors away from the club, had stood in Berner Street to listen to the communal singing at about the time Stride had been murdered, but had not seen anyone entering the yard or heard anything amiss.[87] Mortimer did see a man with a shiny black bag race past, and this was reported widely in the press. However, one of the club's members, Leon Goldstein, identified himself as the man Mortimer had seen and he was soon eliminated from the inquiry.[88]

On 19 October, Chief Inspector Swanson reported that 80,000 leaflets appealing for information about the murder had been distributed around Whitechapel, noting that, among other lines of enquiry, some 2,000 lodgers had been interrogated or investigated in relation to her death.[89]

Reaction of Michael Kidney

[edit]

On 1 October, a drunken Michael Kidney walked into Leman Street police station and accused the police of incompetence, stating that had he been a policeman on duty in Berner Street during the murder, he would have shot himself.[90]

Kidney has been suspected of being Stride's murderer because of their turbulent relationship and because there is no record of his alibi.[91] However, investigators appear to have eliminated Kidney from their inquiries.

The following year, Whitechapel Workhouse Infirmary records show Kidney visited three times: for syphilis in June 1889; for lumbago that August; and for dyspepsia in October.[92] Kidney's declining health and general distress in the year after Stride's murder indicates a detrimental psychological and emotional reaction to her death.[92]

"When you entered [Dutfield's Yard], if any person had run out you would have seen them in the dark?"

"Oh yes, it was light enough for that ... it was dark in the gateway, but not so dark further in the yard."

Middlesex coroner Wynne Edwin Baxter, questioning witness Louis Diemschutz. 1 October 1888.[93]

Inquest

[edit]

The inquest into Stride's death was opened at the Vestry Hall, Cable Street, St George in the East on 1 October.[94] This inquest was presided over by the Middlesex coroner, Wynne Edwin Baxter. The first day of the inquest heard testimony from three witnesses: two patrons of the International Working Men's Educational Club who had been in the premises on the night of Stride's murder, and Louis Diemschutz. The two patrons to testify—William Wess and Morris Eagle—each stated approximately 25 to 30 individuals had been in the club at the time of the discovery of Stride's body, that they had heard nothing amiss while in the club, with Wess also stating Stride's body could not have been in the location where Diemschutz had discovered her when he had left the premises at approximately 12:15 a.m. Diemschutz recounted his discovery of Stride's body[95] before informing the coroner the first medical personnel at the scene had arrived "about twenty minutes" after the police.[96][n 9]

The second day of the inquest heard conflicting testimony as to the identity of the deceased. Although police were certain the woman was Stride, a Mrs Mary Malcolm swore the body was that of her married sister, Elizabeth Watts.[98][n 10] Physician and surgeon Frederick Blackwell said he had been summoned to the crime scene at precisely 1:16 a.m. on 30 September by a policeman, being joined by Dr Phillips approximately 20 minutes later.[100] Blackwell testified blood was still flowing from Stride's neck wound into a gutter and down a drain close to her feet, and that he estimated death had occurred "from twenty minutes to half an hour" prior to his arrival. As the blood vessels on only one side of Stride's neck had been cut, with her carotid artery only partially severed, Blackwell stated her death would have occurred "comparatively slowly", and that Stride would have been unable to cry for help.[101]

Character testimony

[edit]

On 3 October, the housekeeper of the common lodging-house Stride resided in at the time of her murder, Elizabeth Tanner, testified that Stride, who she knew as "Long Liz", had lodged at 32 Flower and Dean Street "on and off, for the last six years".[102] Prior to 26 September, she "had been away from my [lodging] house about three months". Tanner stated Stride had been a "very quiet" and sober woman.[103] Tanner said that, although Stride had Swedish heritage, she had "[spoken] English as well as an English woman". Stride had informed her that her husband and children had drowned in the 1878 Princess Alice paddle steamer sinking.[104]

Charwoman Catherine Lane also testified she knew Stride as a Swede named Long Liz whom she had known for about six months. Lane said Stride had informed her shortly before her death that she had "had a few words" with her partner, and that this was the reason she was again taking residence at Flower and Dean Street. Stride had given Lane a large piece of green velvet as she left the lodging-house before her death, asking Lane to "mind" the garment until she returned.[105]

On 3 October, Michael Kidney formally identified Stride's body, stating the two had been in a relationship for "nearly three years". He added that they had occasionally separated because of Stride's heavy drinking, although she inevitably returned to him.[n 11]

Medical testimony

[edit]

Dr Phillips testified that the cause of death had been "undoubtedly the loss of blood from the left carotid artery and the division of the windpipe." He firmly believed Stride had been "seized by the shoulders and placed on the ground, and that [her] murderer was [kneeling to] her right side" when he had inflicted the wound to her throat.[108][109]

Conclusion

[edit]

The inquest into Stride's murder lasted five days, with the final day of hearings being adjourned until 23 October. This final day of the hearing saw three witnesses testify—all of whom provided testimony confirming the identity of the decedent.[110]

At the conclusion of this final day of hearings, coroner Baxter stated his belief that Stride had been attacked in a swift, sudden manner,[111] with her death undoubtedly being a homicide, and no known circumstances being available which could reduce the crime to one of manslaughter. The murderer could have taken advantage of the checked scarf Stride was wearing to grab her from behind before slitting her throat,[112] as had earlier been suggested by Phillips. Baxter, however, thought the absence of a shout for assistance and the lack of obvious marks of a struggle indicated that Stride had willingly lain down on the ground before the wound had been inflicted.[113] Stride was still clenching a packet of cachous in her left hand when she was discovered,[114] indicating that she had not had time to defend herself and that the attack had been sudden.[115]

In relation to the actual crime scene, Baxter noted the decedent had been attacked in the passageway leading into a courtyard in which several families resided in cottages located a matter of yards from where her body was discovered, and that although this location afforded darkness, it was unlikely the murderer would have selected the location on account of Dutfield's Yard being an unfrequented location. Baxter further noted the windows of the International Working Men's Educational Club had been open, and that both Stride and her assailant would undoubtedly have heard the patrons' singing and dancing.[116]

With regard to the witness testimony pertaining to the man or men seen in Stride's company in the two hours before the discovery of her body, Baxter stated many points of similarity had been given with regards to the physical description of the individual in her company, but also some of dissimilarity. However, Baxter stated these discrepancies did not conclusively prove there had been more than one man in the company of Stride between 11:00 p.m. and 12:45 a.m., but that the eyewitness descriptions suggested either that she had been in the company of a minimum of two men in her final hours, or that one or more eyewitness was mistaken in details of the description of the man he had seen.[117]

Death certificate of Elizabeth Stride, 24 October 1888
Section of the 6 October 1888 edition of The Illustrated Police News depicting the discoveries of the bodies of Elizabeth Stride and Catherine Eddowes

Following a short deliberation, the jury, having been instructed to deliberate precisely how, when, and by what means Stride came about her death, returned a unanimous verdict: "Wilful murder against some person or persons unknown."[118]

Connection to Jack the Ripper

[edit]

Stride's murder occurred in the midst of the spree of murders attributed to a serial offender known prior to her death as both the Whitechapel Murderer and Leather Apron, and due to a letter forwarded to Scotland Yard the day immediately prior to her death as Jack the Ripper.[119] However, unlike at least three other murder victims then-ascribed to this perpetrator (each of whom had received extensive abdominal injuries in addition to one or more slash wounds across her neck), Stride had received no mutilation injuries, with her sole injury being a deep cut measuring two-and-a-half-inches beneath her jaw, which had severed her left carotid artery and trachea and had terminated beneath her right jaw.[120]

As two other murders (those of Mary Ann Nichols and Annie Chapman) had occurred in the districts of Whitechapel and Spitalfields—both of which had been initially caused by knife wounds to the throat—within the previous month, Stride's murder was added to the Whitechapel murders investigation, and was widely believed to have been perpetrated by the same killer. However, some commentators on the case conclude that Stride's murder was unconnected to the other canonical murders[121] This opinion is upon the basis that the body had not been subjected to any mutilation and that this murder was the only murder ascribed to Jack the Ripper to occur south of Whitechapel Road.[122] Furthermore, it is believed that the blade used to cause the wound to Stride's neck may have been shorter and of a different design than that used to murder and subsequently mutilate the other four canonical murder victims.[123] Most experts, however, consider the similarities in this case distinctive enough to connect Stride's murder with the two earlier Ripper murders, in addition to the murder of Catherine Eddowes later that same night.[124]

The murder of Stride is regarded as one of the canonical Ripper killings due to numerous factors, including the general physical and lifestyle characteristics of the victim, the day of the week she had been murdered, the time of death, the murder location, and the method of her murder. It is suspected that when Stride's murderer heard Diemschutz's horse and two-wheeled cart approaching or entering Dutfield's Yard, he ceased his attack. The killer may have still been inside Dutfield's Yard upon Diemschutz's approach, as the gate on Berner Street was the only point of entry. He may have escaped when Diemschutz entered the International Working Men's Educational Club.[125] Less than one hour later, Catherine Eddowes was murdered in Mitre Square, and both Stride and Eddowes had lived in Flower and Dean Street.[126]

The deaths of Eddowes and Stride sent London into a renewed state of general panic, as this was the first occasion in which two murders ascribed to the Ripper had occurred in one night.

Scrawled and misspelt note reading: From hell—Mr Lusk—Sir I send you half the kidne I took from one woman prasarved it for you tother piece I fried and ate it was very nise I may send you the bloody knif that took it out if you only wate a whil longer—Signed Catch me when you can Mishter Lusk
The "From Hell" letter, received by George Lusk of the Whitechapel Vigilance Committee on 16 October 1888

Correspondence

[edit]

On 1 October, a postcard dubbed the "Saucy Jacky" postcard and also signed "Jack the Ripper", was received by the Central News Agency. This letter claimed responsibility for the murders of both Stride and Eddowes, and described the killing of the two women as a "double event"; a designation which has endured.[127] It has been argued that this postcard was mailed before the murders were publicised, making it unlikely that a crank would hold such detailed knowledge of the crime.[128] However, the letter was postmarked more than 24 hours after the killings had occurred; long after details of the murders were known by both journalists and residents of the area.[129] Police officials later claimed to have identified a journalist as the author of the postcard,[130] leading this letter to be dismissed as a hoax,[131] an assessment shared by most Ripper historians.[132]

Two weeks later, on 16 October, a parcel containing half a preserved[133] human kidney, accompanied by a note, was received by the Chairman of the Whitechapel Vigilance Committee, George Lusk. This note has become known as both the "Lusk letter" and the "From hell" letter, because of the return address used by the writer: "From hell". The author of this letter claimed to have "fried and ate" the missing half of the human kidney. The handwriting and general style of this letter significantly differ from that of the "Saucy Jacky" postcard.

The section of kidney was taken to Dr Thomas Horrocks Openshaw at the nearby Royal London Hospital. He believed that the kidney was human and originated from the left side of the individual from whom it had been taken. Dr Openshaw also stated the organ had been preserved in spirits prior to postage.[134]

Acting Commissioner of the City Police, Major Henry Smith, claimed in his memoirs that this kidney matched the one missing from the body of Catherine Eddowes, because the length of renal artery attached to the kidney matched the missing length from Eddowes's body, and that the forensic examination conducted upon Eddowes's body and the section of kidney revealed signs of Bright's disease. Smith's story is considered by some historians to be a dramatic recollection on his part.[135]

Other theories

[edit]

In his book Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution, author Stephen Knight linked the prominent physician Sir William Gull to Stride on the basis that both were reported to carry grapes; a theory which another author, Martin Fido, has dismissed as a "wild allegation".[47]

A grocer named Matthew Packer is known to have implied to two private detectives employed by the Whitechapel Vigilance Committee named Le Grand and Batchelor that he had sold some grapes to Stride and her murderer shortly before her death.[136] When interviewed by the police, Packer described the man he had seen as being aged between 25 and 30, slightly taller than Stride, and wearing a soft felt hat.[n 12] Neither of Packer's descriptions of this individual matched witness statements provided by other witnesses who may also have seen Stride with potential clients shortly before her murder. However, overall, the witness descriptions given to police of individuals seen either in the company of Stride or the vicinity of her murder differed significantly.[138] Moreover, Packer is known to have also informed a police sergeant named Stephen White that he had closed his shop on the date of the murder without seeing any suspicious characters or activity.[139]

At the inquest into Stride's murder, pathologists had stated emphatically that the decedent had not held, swallowed or consumed grapes in the hours before her death.[140] Both Blackwell and Phillips described the contents of Stride's stomach as being "cheese, potatoes and farinaceous powder".[141]

Despite Packer's self-contradictory statements, investigators did discover a single grape stalk in Dutfield's Yard,[142] and his story was reported in the London Evening News on 3 October.[143] Nonetheless, the overall commander of the investigation into the Ripper murders, Chief Inspector Donald Swanson, is known to have stated that "any statement [made by grocer Matthew Packer] would be rendered almost valueless as evidence"[144] and had likely been fabricated in order that Packer could sell his story to the press.[145]

Further doubt is cast on the truthfulness of Packer's accounts by the general character of Le Grand (also known as Charles Grand, Charles Grandy, Charles Grant, Christian Neilson, and Christian Nelson). This individual had accrued an extensive criminal record, which included assault on a prostitute and conviction for theft. He was convicted of conspiracy to defraud in 1889 and served two years' imprisonment. After his release, he was arrested while in possession of a revolver and charged with demanding money with menace; a crime for which he was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment.[146]

Stride's grave in East London Cemetery

Funeral

[edit]

Elizabeth Stride was buried on Saturday 6 October 1888 in the East London Cemetery, located within the east London district of Plaistow. Her funeral was attended by a small number of mourners, and the costs were provided at the expense of the parish by the undertaker, a Mr Hawkes.[147]

Stride's headstone is inscribed with her name and the years of her birth and death.[148]

Media

[edit]

Film

[edit]

Television

[edit]
  • Jack the Ripper (1988). A Thames Television film drama series starring Michael Caine. Elizabeth Stride is played by actress Angela Crow in this series.[152]
  • The Real Jack the Ripper (2010). Directed by David Mortin, this series casts Tina Sterling as Elizabeth Stride and was first broadcast on 31 August 2010.[153]
  • Jack the Ripper: The Definitive Story (2011). A two-hour documentary which references original police reports and eyewitness accounts pertaining to the Whitechapel Murderer. Stride is portrayed by actress Elizabeth Elstub in this documentary.[154]

Drama

[edit]
  • Jack, the Last Victim (2005). This musical casts Sallie Lloyd as Elizabeth Stride.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Elizabeth Stride (née Gustafsdotter; 27 November 1843 – 30 September 1888) was a Swedish immigrant and occasional prostitute in London's district who became the third victim of the unidentified known as . Her murder, occurring in the early hours of 30 September 1888 in a yard off Berner Street (now Henriques Street), was notable for its lack of the abdominal mutilations seen in prior and subsequent killings, leading to ongoing debate about whether it was truly the Ripper's work. This event formed part of the infamous "double event," as another victim, , was killed less than an hour later approximately half a mile away. Born Elisabeth Gustafsdotter on a farm in Stora Tumlehed, Torslanda parish near , , to parents Gustaf Ericsson and Beata Carlsdotter, Stride worked as a domestic servant in her youth, moving to in 1860, where she was registered as a prostitute in 1865 and gave birth to a stillborn that April. Stride emigrated to the around 1866, initially finding work as a servant in before marrying carpenter John Thomas Stride in 1869 at St. Giles in the Fields Church. The couple ran a coffee house in Poplar and later resided in various East End locations, but they separated around 1877; Stride later falsely claimed her husband and two children had drowned in the 1878 Princess Alice disaster on the River Thames. In the , Stride lived primarily in common lodging houses on Flower and , supporting herself through occasional charring, sewing, and match-selling, supplemented by . Known among locals as "Long Liz" due to her height of about 5 feet 5 inches, she was described as quiet and respectable, actively involved in socialist causes at the International Working Men's Educational Club on Berner Street and St. Paul's Church in , where she sang in the choir. By 1885, she had entered a common-law relationship with dock laborer Michael Kidney, with whom she lived intermittently until leaving him about a week before her death following a quarrel. On the evening of 29 September 1888, Stride spent time soliciting in the area, purchasing grapes and cachous (breath fresheners), and was last seen alive around 12:45 a.m. by witnesses speaking to a man near the murder site. Stride's body was discovered around 1:00 a.m. on 30 September by Louis Diemschutz, steward of the nearby club, whose pony shied away from the yard entrance; she lay on her left side against the wall, her throat deeply slashed from left to right in a single cut severing the left carotid artery and windpipe, causing rapid death from exsanguination. A medical examination revealed no signs of struggle, with the body still warm and rigor mortis absent, indicating the murder occurred shortly before discovery; black marks on her shoulders suggested pressure from the killer's hands, but no other mutilations were present. The inquest, held by Wynne Edwin Baxter at the Mile End Mortuary, concluded on 1 October 1888 with a verdict of wilful murder by a person or persons unknown, amid heightened press and public attention to the Whitechapel murders. Stride was buried on 6 October 1888 at St. George's-in-the-East Churchyard in a public funeral attended by hundreds.

Early Life and Background

Birth and Childhood in Sweden

Elizabeth Stride was born Elisabeth Gustafsdotter on 27 November 1843 at the Stora Tumlehed farm in Torslanda parish, north of in , . Her parents were Gustaf , a farmer, and Beata Carlsdotter, who supported the family through agricultural labor in a modest rural setting typical of mid-19th-century Swedish peasantry. She was baptized in the local Lutheran church on 5 December 1843, reflecting the family's adherence to the state religion. Much of the detailed information about her early life derives from Swedish parish records researched by genealogist Stefan Rantzow in the early 2000s. As the second of four children, Elisabeth grew up alongside her older sister Anna Kristina (born 1840) and younger brothers Carl Bernhard (born 1848) and Svante Gustafsson (born 1851) in an environment defined by rural poverty and the demands of farm life. The Ericsson family, like many smallholding peasants in the region, faced economic hardship, with children contributing to household survival through early involvement in farming tasks such as tending livestock and fieldwork from a young age. Formal education was limited to basic literacy and religious instruction provided through the Lutheran parish system, emphasizing moral and communal values over advanced learning. Beata Carlsdotter died on 25 August 1864 from a pulmonary disease, leaving the family without its matriarch when Elisabeth was 20 years old. By then, Elisabeth had already demonstrated early independence, relocating to on 14 October 1860 at age 16 to take up domestic service roles, which offered slightly better prospects than rural farm work. This move marked the beginning of her separation from the family farm and her entry into urban wage labor as a young woman seeking improved opportunities.

Early Adulthood and Emigration

In her late teens, Elisabeth Gustafsdotter sought independence by relocating to in October 1860, where she took up employment as a domestic servant in the household of laborer Lars Fredrik Olofsson in the Carl Johan parish. She held several such positions over the next few years, moving between parishes within the city while supporting herself amid the economic hardships facing many young women in mid-19th-century . These roles, typical for unmarried women from rural backgrounds, involved grueling household labor and offered limited stability, reflecting the broader poverty of her childhood that drove many to urban centers for work. By early 1865, at age 21, Gustafsdotter's circumstances had deteriorated; Swedish police records registered her as a prostitute in March of that year, a classification often applied to women deemed morally suspect or economically vulnerable. Around April 21, 1865, she gave birth to a stillborn daughter, the fate of the child recorded as such in parish documents. Later that year, from October to November, she received treatment for venereal disease at Gothenburg's Kurhuset hospital, marking early health struggles likely exacerbated by her living conditions. In November 1865, she briefly worked as a maid for Maria Wijsner, wife of a theater musician, at Husargatan 5. Seeking better opportunities amid personal and , Gustafsdotter applied on February 7, 1866, for permission to emigrate to the Swedish parish in , motivated in part by economic prospects in industrial and vague reports of adventure abroad. She traveled by ship, arriving in by July 10, 1866, when she registered as an unmarried 23-year-old at the Swedish Church in Princelet Street, , near the Poplar district. Upon arrival, she received initial support from the church community, including alms, as she navigated the challenges of without ties in the city. Swedish records note no overt signs of during this period, though her later life in would reveal struggles with heavy drinking.

Life in London

Arrival and Initial Settlement

Elizabeth Stride emigrated from and arrived in in early 1866 at the age of 22, undertaking a five-day sea voyage to seek new opportunities in . She promptly integrated into the Swedish immigrant community by registering with the Swedish Lutheran Church in Princelet Street, St George-in-the-East, on 10 July 1866, where she was recorded as an unmarried woman aged 23. This church functioned as a crucial support network for Scandinavian expatriates in the East End, providing welfare assistance, social gatherings, and aid in navigating urban life, including job placements and temporary lodging. Her initial settlement centered in the East End's St George-in-the-East parish, a densely populated immigrant enclave characterized by and opportunity for manual labor. Stride adapted by taking up domestic service, first employed by an unnamed British family near Hyde Park, which offered board and a modest typical for migrants entering service roles. She later transitioned to work at a genteel lodging house run by Elizabeth Bond at 67 Gower Street in , a position that leveraged her skills in cleaning and household tasks while allowing proximity to central London's resources. By March 1869, 67 Gower Street was formally noted as her residence on her , signifying a degree of stabilization after navigating risks and the hardships of common among newly arrived women in London's . This address, situated away from the East End's slums, reflected her efforts to establish a foothold through church connections and sporadic duties, though economic persisted.

Marriage and Domestic Life

Elizabeth Stride married John Thomas Stride, a dock laborer and ship's carpenter from , , on 7 March 1869 at the parish church of in . The marriage ceremony was witnessed by Daniel H. Wyatt and another individual, and the couple, who were 22 years apart in age, began their life together in modest circumstances. Following the marriage, the Strides settled in the Poplar district of , where they jointly managed a coffee house as their primary means of livelihood. Their business was initially located at Chrisp Street in Poplar, and they resided nearby in East India Dock Road; by 1870–1871, they had relocated the coffee house to Upper North Street and later to 178 Poplar High Street, living a few doors away. The 1871 census recorded them living as husband and wife in the Poplar area of Tower Hamlets, reflecting their stable domestic setup centered on the enterprise. By the late 1870s, the couple had moved to St George-in-the-East and Bow, with the 1881 census listing them at 69 Usher Road, Old Ford Road, in Bow (Tower Hamlets), indicating a temporary reunion after earlier strains. Elizabeth played an active role in the day-to-day operations of their houses, which served as temperance establishments providing meals and lodging to dock workers and locals, though financial difficulties led John to sell the business around 1875. In 1875, Stride was admitted to the Poplar Workhouse Infirmary due to illness, reflecting early health strains in her . During this period of domestic life, Elizabeth began exhibiting signs of alcohol dependency, with convictions for drunkenness recorded in the .

Separation and Later Partnerships

Elizabeth Stride and her husband, John Thomas Stride, experienced a gradual breakdown in their marriage during the late 1870s, exacerbated by the closure of the coffee house they had jointly managed in Poplar since the early 1870s. By 1881, the couple had informally separated amid mutual struggles with and mounting financial pressures, though they briefly reconciled that year as recorded in census documents listing them together at 69 Usher Road in Bow. No formal was pursued, and the separation became permanent by late 1881, with Stride moving into common lodging houses while her husband remained in the area. In the years immediately following the separation, Stride's lifestyle shifted toward greater instability, as she frequently resided in low-cost common lodging houses in , such as those on Flower and , reflecting her precarious financial situation and reliance on casual work and charitable aid. John Stride died of heart disease on October 24, 1884, at the Poplar and Sick Asylum, aged 63, leaving Stride widowed but continuing her pattern of transient living. Around 1885, Stride entered into a long-term but tumultuous relationship with Michael Kidney, a waterside laborer born in 1852, with whom she shared residences intermittently for the next three years. The couple lived primarily at 38 Dorset Street, Spitalfields, though their partnership was marked by frequent arguments and separations, often triggered by Stride's drinking bouts, during which she would return to lodging houses. Kidney described their bond as close despite the volatility, and they had reconciled shortly before her death, with Stride leaving their home on September 26, 1888, after a dispute. This arrangement represented Stride's most stable post-marital partnership, though it did not fully alleviate her economic hardships or nomadic tendencies.

Residences and Employment

Upon arriving in London in 1866, Elizabeth Stride initially found employment as a domestic servant for a family in the Hyde Park area. She registered at the Swedish Church in Prince's Square, St. George's-in-the-East, indicating early settlement in the East End. In March 1869, Stride married John Thomas Stride at Church, , with their residence listed as 67 Gower Street. The couple soon relocated to Poplar, where they operated a coffee shop first at Chrisp Street and later at 178 Poplar after 1870, providing a period of relative stability until around 1875. This venture supplemented John's work as a carpenter, though it ultimately failed to sustain them financially. Following the breakdown of her around , Stride's housing became more transient, shifting from stable homes to common houses in the East End. In December , she was admitted to the Workhouse Infirmary for , listing her address as a house on . By 1882, she lodged intermittently at 32 Flower and Dean Street, a notorious slum in known for its overcrowded conditions and poverty. Stride's employment after the separation was irregular, consisting of casual labor such as and , often hampered by issues and alcohol consumption. Witnesses at her described her performing work in Devonshire Street around 1886 and cleaning rooms at houses for small payments, such as sixpence for two rooms. She occasionally engaged in to supplement income when other work was unavailable. Economically, Stride relied heavily on partners and charitable aid, including financial assistance from the Swedish Church in 1886 and 1888. In April 1887, she charged her partner Michael Kidney with assault at Thames but failed to appear, after which she sought temporary shelter at the church. Kidney, a waterside , provided her with support during their on-and-off cohabitation at 38 Dorset Street from 1885 onward. By 1888, Stride had returned to 32 Flower and Dean Street as her primary residence, a model lodging house that offered basic shelter to the destitute in 's slums. This progression from married stability to dependent, itinerant living reflected the broader hardships faced by working-class women in the East End.

Events of September 1888

Daily Routine and Context

In 1888, Elizabeth Stride's daily routine in centered on menial labor and social interactions amid economic hardship. She worked as a , cleaning rooms in common lodging houses like 32 Flower and Dean Street for modest wages, such as 6d per task, and supplemented her income through sewing. Stride was known to socialize in local pubs, including the Queen's Head Public House on Commercial Road, where she occasionally drank and conversed with acquaintances. She also maintained ties to the Swedish Lutheran Church in Prince's Square, registering there upon her arrival in and receiving charitable financial aid from the church on dates including September 15 and 20, 1888. Stride's health had deteriorated significantly by 1888 due to chronic alcoholism, a condition that led to at least eight arrests for being drunk and disorderly in the 20 months preceding her death. She had previously been treated for at the Infirmary from December 28, 1881, to January 4, 1882. These ailments, combined with occasional resort to when work was scarce, underscored her vulnerability in an unforgiving environment. The broader context of Stride's life was shaped by the dire conditions in and the East End, where overcrowding was rampant—often with nine or more people sharing a single room—and affected large areas of the district, as documented in Charles Booth's poverty maps of 1889, which showed extensive portions in the lowest classes. Heavy immigration, particularly of Jewish families fleeing pogroms in , swelled the population to around in alone by the , straining resources and contributing to social tensions. Rising crime rates, including petty theft, , and violence, were fueled by and , with police records indicating high numbers of arrests annually in the district for such offenses. Stride's relationship with Michael Kidney, a waterside , added personal instability to her routine; they cohabited intermittently for nearly three years at 35 Devonshire Street, but their partnership was volatile, marked by frequent arguments often tied to her drinking bouts, resulting in multiple separations totaling about five months and subsequent reconciliations. Kidney described treating her as a despite the discord, and she returned to him after periods away, including a recent departure on September 25, 1888. Her residences and activities placed her in the vicinity of the International Working Men's Educational Club at 40 Berner Street, a socialist gathering spot for Jewish immigrants hosting lectures and debates on politics and labor issues, which exemplified the area's burgeoning radical political scene.

Activities on 29 September

On 29 September 1888, Elizabeth Stride spent the afternoon performing cleaning work at her lodging house at 32 Flower and , where she earned sixpence from the deputy keeper, Elizabeth Tanner. This charring task aligned with her occasional employment as a in lodging houses. Around 6:30 p.m., Stride visited the Queen's Head public house at 74 Commercial Street, accompanied by Tanner, before returning to the lodging house kitchen by 7:00 p.m. Between 7:00 and 8:00 p.m., she entrusted a piece of green velvet to fellow lodger Catherine Lane for safekeeping and appeared cheerful while passing another resident, , still in possession of the sixpence from her earlier work. At approximately the same time, she requested a clothes brush from lodger Charles Preston to prepare for going out, though he declined to lend it. Later that evening, around 11:00 p.m., Stride was seen departing the Bricklayer's Arms public house at 34 Settles with a young man described as about 5 feet 5 inches tall, with a black mustache, wearing a mourning suit and billycock hat; witnesses J. Best and John Gardner observed them heading toward Commercial Road and Berner . Shortly after, at about 11:45 p.m., William Marshall spotted Stride on Berner near 64 Berner , conversing and being kissed by a stout middle-aged man in a dark cutaway coat and round cap; the pair lingered for about ten minutes before walking arm-in-arm toward Ellen . These interactions occurred as part of her typical evening routine of socializing in local pubs and streets in the area.

Movements on 30 September

On the evening leading into 30 September 1888, Elizabeth Stride was observed in several locations in , consistent with her routine of seeking companionship and possible solicitation in local pubs and streets. Earlier that day, following her cleaning work at the lodging house on 29 September, she had been paid sixpence by deputy Elizabeth Tanner and appeared in good spirits. Around 6:30 p.m. on 29 September, Stride was seen at the Queen's Head Public House on Commercial Street with Tanner, after which they returned together to the kitchen at 32 . Between 7:00 and 8:00 p.m., she gave a piece of green velvet to fellow lodger Catherine Lane for safekeeping and left the premises, still carrying the sixpence from her earlier earnings. Specific sightings in the intervening hours remain uncertain, though she may have visited nearby markets or pubs, as was common for women in her circumstances. By approximately 11:00 p.m., Stride was reportedly at the Bricklayer's Arms pub on Settles Street, departing with a short man described as having a dark mustache, sandy eyelashes, a , and a mourning suit; witnesses J. Best and John Gardner noted them heading in the direction of Berner Street. At 11:45 p.m., William Marshall observed her outside 64 Berner Street, leaning against a wall and conversing intimately with a middle-aged man about 5 feet 6 inches tall, wearing a black cutaway coat and a ; the pair kissed, with the man placing his arm around her neck before strolling southward toward the International Working Men's Educational Club. As the night progressed into the early hours of 30 September, Stride was sighted again around 12:35 a.m. by Police Constable William Smith on Berner Street near Commercial Road, standing soberly with a man estimated at 28 years old, 5 feet 7 inches tall, in a dark overcoat and hat, holding a newspaper-wrapped parcel about 18 inches by 6-8 inches; they were quietly talking opposite the entrance to Dutfield's Yard, adjacent to the club's premises. Ten minutes later, at approximately 12:45 a.m., Israel Schwartz witnessed a man of medium build pull Stride by the sleeve into the gateway of Dutfield's Yard, throw her down, and elicit three screams from her; a second man smoking a pipe stood nearby on the opposite side of the . These accounts trace her final known movements toward the secluded yard off Berner , where the club was holding a socialist meeting that evening.

Murder and Discovery

The Attack in Dutfield's Yard

Elizabeth Stride was attacked in Dutfield's Yard, a narrow passageway off Berner Street in , , situated directly behind the International Working Men's Educational Club at 40 Berner Street. This location provided a secluded spot amid the densely populated East End, with the yard's entrance gated but often left open during evening hours. The assault occurred between approximately 12:40 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. on 30 September 1888, shortly after Stride had been observed in the vicinity during her evening movements. accounts placed her near the yard around 12:45 a.m., and medical examination indicated the body retained warmth consistent with death occurring 20 to 30 minutes prior to discovery. The attack was sudden and executed from behind, as evidenced by the absence of defensive wounds and the undisturbed packet of cachous—sweet-smelling breath fresheners—still clenched in her left hand, suggesting she had no opportunity to react or drop the item. Forensically, the method involved a single, deep incision to the , commencing on the left side about two inches below the and extending across to the right, severing the left and windpipe completely. This left-to-right cut implies a right-handed assailant approaching from Stride's left or rear. Dr. George Bagster Phillips, who conducted the post-mortem, noted the wound's precision with a sharp instrument, while the tight check silk scarf around her neck may have partially restrained bleeding initially. Stride was found lying on her left side, face toward the yard wall, with her feet near the entrance gateway and about three yards inside. Unlike other victims in the , such as and , Stride's body showed no abdominal or genital mutilations, leading to speculation that the attacker was interrupted before completing the assault. Her clothing, including a long black jacket, dark brown velvet , and black , remained largely intact except for the unfastened . A red rose and maidenhair fern were pinned to her jacket, undisturbed in the attack. The lack of struggle marks and the pooled blood flow further support a rapid, surprise attack in the darkened yard.

Discovery of the Body

Elizabeth Stride's body was discovered around 1:00 a.m. on 30 September 1888 (corresponding to early 1 October by some accounts) by Louis Diemschutz, the steward of the International Working Men's Educational Club at 40 Berner Street, as he returned to the premises driving a and into Dutfield's Yard. The shied away from a dark object near the right-hand side of the gateway, prompting Diemschutz to dismount and probe the shape with the handle of his whip; in the darkness, he struck a , which illuminated the form of a lying . He initially could not determine if she was merely intoxicated or deceased, as the yard was unlit and the figure was indistinct. Diemschutz left his pony and cart in the yard and hurried into the club to alert his wife and several members present, informing them of the woman outside without specifying her condition. Among those summoned was Edward Spooner, a local resident who had been at the club earlier that evening; Spooner followed Diemschutz back to the yard, where another man struck a to better view the body. Spooner described the corpse as lying on its left side, with the face turned toward the club wall approximately one foot away, the legs slightly drawn up, and the feet pointing toward the gates about six to seven feet distant; blood was still flowing from a in the , pooling in the gutter and soaking into the ground, though none appeared on her chin. He placed his hand under her chin, noting it felt slightly warm, and observed a piece of paper clutched in her right hand; cachous were found in her left hand, and red and white flowers were pinned to her breast. The discovery confirmed the woman's death within minutes, as the fresh flow indicated the attack had occurred very recently, likely disturbed by Diemschutz's arrival. No immediate public alarm was raised at the scene due to the late hour and darkness, but club members quickly gathered, with Spooner remaining by the body for four to five minutes until a arrived. Among the initial witnesses, there was brief speculation about the victim's identity, with some uncertainty as she was unknown to Diemschutz and Spooner personally, though she was soon recognized by others familiar with local residents.

Initial Police Response

Following the discovery of Elizabeth Stride's body by Louis Diemschutz in Dutfield's Yard at approximately 1:00 a.m. on 30 September 1888, club steward Morris Eagle immediately notified police by alerting two constables at the corner of Grove Street and Commercial Road, leading to rapid response from the Commercial Road station. Police Constable Henry Lamb (252 H) arrived first, examined the body, and blew his whistle to summon additional officers, resulting in the yard's gates being closed and the scene secured with guards posted at the entrances to restrict access. Police Constable William Smith (452 H) reached the location around 1:00 a.m., observed a gathering crowd and the presence of other officers, and departed for Leman Street Police Station to retrieve an ambulance. Officers promptly began interviewing key witnesses, including Diemschutz and other International Working Men's Educational Club members such as Eagle, recording their names, addresses, and initial statements while conducting searches of the yard, adjacent buildings, and lofts. Preliminary medical examinations were performed on-site by Dr. Frederick William Blackwell, who arrived by 1:16 a.m., and later by Dr. George Bagster Phillips, including basic measurements of the wounds and body position; no on-site photography is recorded in contemporary accounts, though the body was documented at the mortuary. These actions yielded no immediate leads on suspects, as thorough searches revealed no traces of the perpetrator. The body was transported to St. George's Mortuary in for formal identification and , with removal occurring around 4:30 a.m. after initial processing. In the context of the "double event," with ' body discovered in approximately 45 minutes later under jurisdiction, coordinated efforts by circulating descriptions of Stride's injuries and potential suspect profiles via telegraph to nearby stations to facilitate a unified response.

Post-Mortem and Medical Evidence

Autopsy Procedure

The post-mortem examination of Elizabeth Stride was performed on 1 1888, commencing at 3:00 p.m., at St. George's Mortuary in , . It was led by Dr. George Bagster Phillips, the divisional police surgeon for H Division, with Dr. Frederick William Blackwell serving as the primary assistant; Blackwell conducted the internal dissection while Phillips recorded notes. Additional attendees included Dr. Reigate and Blackwell's assistant for portions of the procedure, with the mortuary temperature maintained at approximately 55 degrees to aid preservation. Following the initial securing of the body by police at the , it was transported to the mortuary, where the examination began with the careful removal and of the deceased's . Personal items discovered in her pockets—such as a key, , , and other small objects—were cataloged and preserved as . The body was subsequently washed to prepare for detailed scrutiny, allowing for observations of its overall condition, including the progression of , which was noted as firmly established. A silk was tied around the and slightly cut, possibly indicating it was used to steady the head during the attack. Mud was noted on the left side of the face and body. The internal phase involved systematic dissection, with major organs including the brain, lungs, heart, liver, spleen, and kidneys being removed, weighed, and examined for abnormalities or traces of substances. The stomach was opened and its contents analyzed to check for poisons, diseases, or indicators of recent ingestion; no grapes were found in the stomach contents. Throughout the process, samples of blood and relevant evidence from the clothing and body were retained for potential further testing, ensuring chain of custody for the ongoing investigation.

Key Pathological Findings

The autopsy of Elizabeth Stride, conducted by Dr. Frederick William Blackwell with Dr. George Bagster Phillips observing and later testifying, revealed a single fatal to the : a clean incision approximately six inches long, starting two and a half inches below the left angle of the jaw and extending across the , which severed the left , divided the windpipe, and cut through the surrounding tissues and vessels, leading to extensive hemorrhage. No other significant external injuries were observed beyond this cut, with the body showing no signs of or , and her undisturbed except for slight displacement. Examination of the body indicated bruising consistent with restraint or struggle, including bluish discolorations and pressure marks over both shoulders suggestive of hands pressing down, though no abrasions, facial bruises, or gagging marks were present. The physical description noted an age of about 42 years (though recorded as 44 at death), height of 5 feet 2 inches, pale complexion, dark brown curly hair, light grey eyes, and missing front upper teeth; the body was fairly nourished, with a in the lower fifth of the right and thickening above the left ankle, but no recent injuries to the hands despite the right one being smeared with . Internally, the brain appeared fairly normal, the lungs were very pale but healthy, and the heart was small with the right ventricle filled with a dark clot while the left was empty, suggesting possible underlying heart disease. The stomach contained partly digested food resembling cheese, potatoes, and farinaceous matter, consistent with a meal consumed about two to three hours prior to death, with no traces of alcohol, narcotics, or anesthetics detected. The post-mortem was performed in the afternoon of 1 October 1888 at St. George's Mortuary.

Implications for Cause of Death

The primary cause of Elizabeth Stride's death was resulting from the partial severance of her left , accompanied by the division of her windpipe, as determined by the post-mortem examination conducted by Drs. George Bagster Phillips and Frederick William Blackwell. This injury caused a rapid loss of blood, which pooled and partially coagulated near the body, leading to within seconds and shortly thereafter, likely within 3 to 4 minutes of the wound being inflicted. The absence of significant blood splatter on surrounding walls or her clothing indicated that the cut was made while she was already in a low position, possibly on the ground, minimizing arterial spray. The lack of any post-mortem mutilations to the or other body parts, in contrast to the extensive disembowelments seen in contemporaneous Ripper-attributed killings, supports the that the perpetrator was interrupted before completing a ritualistic attack. Police investigators, including Inspector , posited that the arrival of Louis Diemschutz and his pony trap around 1:00 a.m. may have startled the killer, preventing further desecration of the body. This interpretation aligns with the wound's characteristics—a single, deep incision approximately six inches long, inflicted by a sharp, small-bladed —suggesting a hasty rather than prolonged . Toxicological analysis during the revealed no presence of poisons, opiates, , or alcohol in Stride's stomach contents or bloodstream, confirming that her death was not facilitated by intoxication or chemical means. However, Stride's well-documented history of chronic , evidenced by multiple arrests for drunkenness in the months leading up to her death, had likely impaired her long-term health, including potential nutritional deficiencies, though the post-mortem noted her overall condition as fairly nourished. Her , consisting of cheese and potatoes consumed about two to three hours prior, further indicated at the time of the attack. Refinements to the time of death, estimated between 12:45 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. on 30 1888, were based on the state of blood coagulation at the scene—partially clotted but still fluid—and the body's warmth when examined at 1:16 a.m., corroborating accounts of the body's discovery shortly after 1:00 a.m. The simplicity of the attack, limited to a throat cut without additional violence or struggle marks, mirrors patterns in non-Ripper homicides in during 1888, where throat-slashing often occurred in spontaneous altercations or domestic disputes amid the district's high rates of alcohol-fueled violence. This straightforward method underscores the potential for the killing to have been opportunistic rather than elaborately planned.

Investigation and Inquest

Police Inquiry and Witnesses

The police inquiry into the murder of Elizabeth Stride was led by Inspector of the Metropolitan Police's , who took charge of the overall investigation and coordinated local efforts in H Division following the body's discovery on 30 September 1888. Abberline directed a house-to-house of Berner Street and adjacent areas to solicit information on suspects, with officers interviewing residents and club members about any unusual activity or sightings that night. Among the key witnesses was Israel Schwartz, a Hungarian immigrant, who provided a statement to officers at Leman Street Police Station later that evening, describing how, around 12:45 a.m., he observed a man throw a woman—later identified as Stride—against a wall outside the International Working Men's Educational Club while shouting "Lipski," an anti-Semitic slur, before the pair moved toward Dutfield's Yard. Police Constable Henry Lamb (252H), arriving shortly after the body was found, secured the scene by guarding the entrance to the yard and conducting an initial search of the club rooms, cottages, and lavatories for evidence or the perpetrator. Investigators searched extensively for Stride's missing personal items, including a flower basket she had been seen carrying earlier in the evening, but neither it nor any other belongings like her potential earnings were recovered from the scene or nearby. No murder weapon was located despite thorough examinations of Dutfield's Yard and surrounding premises, with the cut to Stride's throat suggesting a long, sharp blade that the killer took with him. The proximity in time and location to ' murder less than an hour later in —approximately 45 minutes and under a mile away—prompted police to treat the incidents as a connected "double event," intensifying suspicions that a single serial offender was responsible and prompting expanded patrols and inquiries across . The investigation encountered significant obstacles, including the pitch-black conditions of the unlit Dutfield's Yard, which obscured visibility and complicated evidence collection, as well as reluctance among the local immigrant community—predominantly Jewish residents in the area—to assist police due to widespread anti-Semitic and fear of reprisals.

Inquest Testimony on Character

During the inquest into Elizabeth Stride's death, witnesses described her as a quiet, hardworking with a history of occasional alcohol issues but recent and domestic reliability. Michael Kidney, a waterside labourer who had cohabited with Stride for nearly three years at various addresses including 35 Dorset Street, testified that he treated her as his wife and that she handled household duties without engaging in . He stated that she occasionally left him for short periods due to drinking, totaling about five months over the three years, but always returned without quarrels or violence, and he knew of no other men in her life. Kidney emphasized her non-prostitute status, noting she had some money of her own when last seen sober on September 25, 1888. Sven Olsson, clerk of the Swedish Church in Prince's Square, testified that Stride, a Swedish immigrant born in 1843, had been assisted by the church for years due to poverty but was known as sober and industrious in recent times, having supported herself through sewing and charring work. He confirmed her marriage to John Thomas Stride around 1869 and her ongoing ties to the Swedish community, portraying her as a respectable figure despite financial hardships. Elizabeth Tanner, deputy of the lodging house at 32 Flower and Dean Street where Stride sometimes stayed, described her as "a very quiet woman, and very sober," who earned money cleaning rooms and was not habitually drunk. William Marshall, a neighbor at 64 Berner Street, corroborated this by stating he saw Stride on the evening of September 29, 1888, appearing sober and affectionate with a companion, with no evidence of violence or disorder in her habits. Witnesses acknowledged her past alcohol problems but noted a marked improvement in her sobriety and reliability in the months leading to her death. Collectively, the testimony depicted Stride as an unassuming, politically engaged immigrant active in Swedish community circles through the church, focused on domestic stability amid economic struggles.

Medical and Expert Testimony

Dr. Frederick William Blackwell, who examined the body shortly after its discovery, testified at the that the wound was a clean incision approximately six inches long, extending from two inches below the left jaw to one inch below the right jaw, severing the left , windpipe, and major vessels. He estimated the time of to be between 12:45 a.m. and 12:55 a.m. on September 30, 1888, based on the body's residual warmth when he arrived at 1:16 a.m., and noted the precision of the cut suggested the use of a sharp instrument by someone with anatomical knowledge, as it was unlikely to be self-inflicted. Blackwell proposed that the killer may have pulled the victim backward by her before cutting the from behind, citing the position of the body and the lack of on the front of her clothing. Dr. George Bagster Phillips, the police surgeon who conducted the post-mortem examination, corroborated the cause of death as hemorrhage from the severed left and windpipe, describing the wound as a deep gash made with a long, sharp that indicated the perpetrator's familiarity with surgical procedures. He placed the time of death within an hour prior to his arrival around 1:20 a.m., possibly as early as 12:20 a.m., and highlighted the absence of mutilations to the or other body parts—unlike in previous —as an anomaly, suggesting the killer was likely interrupted before completing his usual actions. Phillips opined that the murderer approached from the victim's right side, grasping her by the shoulders and forcing her to the ground before cutting the throat from left to right, which fueled debate at the over whether the attack occurred from the front or behind. Expert testimony emphasized the possibility of interruption by Louis Diemschutz's approaching pony and cart around 1:00 a.m., as fresh blood was still flowing from the when the body was found moments later, and no further injuries had been inflicted. Both doctors agreed there were no signs of struggle, such as defensive wounds or displaced , nor any of or recent sexual activity, which ruled out motives involving and pointed toward a swift, . The 's precision and the killer's apparent experience were contrasted with the lack of post-mortem , leading experts to describe the murder as atypical in its restraint.

Verdict and Conclusions

The inquest into Elizabeth Stride's death was conducted over several sessions on 1, 2, 3, 5, and 23 October 1888 at the Vestry Hall in , St. George-in-the-East, under the presidency of Wynne E. Baxter, for East . Testimonies from eyewitnesses, medical examiners, and police officers detailed the circumstances of the discovery and the nature of the injuries, establishing that Stride had been killed by a sharp instrument severing her left and windpipe, resulting in death from hemorrhage. On 23 October 1888, the jury delivered its formal verdict of "wilful murder against some ," confirming the without identifying a perpetrator. This conclusion aligned with the medical evidence presented by Dr. Frederick William Blackwell and Dr. George Bagster Phillips, who ruled out self-infliction or accidental causes. No suspect was ever identified in connection with the crime, and the investigation concluded without an arrest, leaving the case unresolved within the Metropolitan Police framework. Proceedings highlighted deficiencies in local infrastructure, including the absence of lighting in Dutfield's Yard, prompting recommendations from the Whitechapel District Board of Works for enhanced street illumination and bolstered policing in secluded yards to mitigate risks of similar incidents. The inquest positioned Stride's murder as a candidate within the series of unsolved Whitechapel homicides under active police scrutiny.

Connection to Jack the Ripper

Inclusion in Canonical Victims

Elizabeth Stride is recognized as one of the "canonical five" victims attributed to , a designation coined by Ripperologists to refer to the core group of murders linked to the unidentified killer: , , Elizabeth Stride, , and . This classification emerged from analyses by historians and criminologists examining the of 1888, emphasizing a shared pattern that distinguishes these cases from other contemporaneous killings in the area. The criteria for inclusion in the canonical five center on the geographic proximity in London's district during late , a consistent involving deep throat incisions typically from left to right, and contemporary press and police associations that connected the crimes as the work of a single perpetrator. Stride's murder fits this framework as the third in , occurring in the early hours of September 30, , on Dutfield's Yard off Berner Street (now Henriques Street), where her throat was severed in a manner consistent with the series. This event marked the start of the infamous "double event," followed hours later by the killing of , heightening public and media linkage to the Ripper. Historically, Stride's inclusion has sparked among researchers due to the absence of the abdominal mutilations and organ removals characteristic of the other cases, leading some to propose she was interrupted before further attacks could occur or that her death resulted from a different assailant. Early skeptics, including certain police officials at the time, questioned the connection based on these discrepancies, suggesting alternative motives tied to local disputes. Despite this, the consensus among modern Ripper scholars affirms her place in the five, prioritizing the alignment of location, timing, and the signature throat wound over the incomplete as evidence of the killer's involvement.

Comparisons with Other Murders

Elizabeth Stride's murder shares several key characteristics with those attributed to Jack the Ripper's other canonical victims, including , , , and . All five women were impoverished prostitutes working in London's East End, targeted in secluded outdoor locations during the early morning hours between and 1888. A deep cut to the throat was a consistent feature across these killings, with Stride's left severed from left to right, mirroring the deep incisions observed in Nichols, Chapman, Eddowes, and Kelly. These shared elements—victim profile, location in alleys or yards, and the signature throat wound—have underpinned Stride's inclusion among the canonical five. In contrast to the other murders, Stride's body exhibited no extensive mutilations or organ removal, marking a significant deviation from the Ripper's apparent . Nichols had her partially opened with intestines displaced, Chapman suffered removal of her , Eddowes had her and left excised, and Kelly endured the most severe , including facial mutilations and organ placements around the room. Stride's injuries were limited primarily to the throat cut and pressure marks on her shoulders from the killer's hands, with no abdominal incisions or evisceration, resulting in a comparatively "cleaner" with minimal blood spatter beyond the immediate area. This lack of postmortem interference has fueled debates about whether Stride fits the escalating pattern of surgical precision seen in the prior and subsequent attacks. The timing of Stride's murder, estimated around 1:00 a.m. on September 30, 1888, in Dutfield's Yard off Berner Street, directly juxtaposes with Eddowes' killing less than an hour later in , approximately one mile away, suggesting a possible "double event" by the same perpetrator. Historical analyses propose that the killer may have been interrupted during Stride's attack by the arrival of Louis Diemschutz, steward of the nearby International Working Men's Educational Club, with his pony and cart, prompting a hasty departure before further could occur. This theory accounts for the proximity of the yard to the club, which may have increased the risk of discovery compared to the more isolated sites of other victims, contributing to the abbreviated nature of the assault and the absence of the Ripper's typical abdominal focus.

Contemporary Correspondence and Media

The , dated September 25 but postmarked September 27, 1888, and received by the Central News Agency on September 27, was the first document to use the moniker "," predating Elizabeth Stride's murder by five days and contributing to the emerging narrative of a singular in . This anonymous missive, forwarded to , taunted police efforts and promised continued , heightening anticipation of further atrocities just as Stride's death occurred on September 30. Following the "double event" murders of Stride and on September 30, a flood of hoax letters claiming responsibility emerged, with the —postmarked and received October 1 by the Central News Agency—explicitly referencing the killings as a "double event" and boasting of the rapid pace that prevented full of the first victim. Linguistic analysis has suggested this postcard and the may share an author, possibly a fabricating content to stoke , though their authenticity remains debated among historians. These communications amplified fears by personalizing the killer and linking the two murders directly to the Ripper persona. Newspapers like The Star and The Echo fueled a press frenzy by immediately connecting Stride's and Eddowes's deaths to the Ripper, with The Star on describing the scenes in lurid detail and dubbing them a coordinated "double event" that exposed police failures. This coverage, which emphasized the proximity of the crimes—less than a mile apart within an hour—solidified the narrative of a single perpetrator evading capture, boosting circulation through sensational headlines and illustrations of gore. Such reporting criticized authorities for inadequate patrolling in , influencing public demands for more resources and contributing to Sir Charles Warren's resignation as Commissioner later that year. In the East End, the murders sparked widespread public panic, with residents forming vigilante groups like the to patrol streets and supplement police efforts amid fears of imminent attacks. Crowds gathered for impromptu vigils at crime scenes, and letters to editors expressed outrage over perceived police incompetence, urging reforms and heightened protection for vulnerable women in the slums. This reaction, amplified by media sensationalism, transformed local terror into a national scandal, pressuring officials to intensify the investigation despite limited leads.

Alternative Theories and Debates

Doubts on Ripper Attribution

One of the primary reasons for doubting Elizabeth Stride's attribution to is the absence of the signature mutilations characteristic of the killer's other murders. Unlike victims such as and , whose bodies exhibited extensive abdominal cuts, organ removal, and facial disfigurements, Stride's corpse showed only a single deep incision across the throat, approximately six inches long, severing the left and windpipe but leaving the rest of the body intact. Dr. Frederick Gordon Brown, along with Dr. George Bagster Phillips, noted during the that no further injuries or eviscerations were present, which deviated markedly from the Ripper's established of post-mortem . Phillips specifically highlighted the wound's direction—from left to right—indicating a right-handed assailant using a short, sharp-d knife, such as a shoemaker's tool, rather than the longer blade associated with the Ripper's deeper cuts. Witness testimony further complicates the Ripper connection, particularly the account from Israel Schwartz, who reported seeing a man Stride around 12:45 a.m. on September 30, 1888, near the entrance to Dutfield's Yard. Schwartz described the attacker as a broad-shouldered man of medium build who grabbed Stride by the shoulder, threw her down, and shouted "Lipski"—an anti-Semitic slur referencing the recent conviction of Israel Lipski for murder—before a second man approached and the scene escalated. This incident, occurring in the vicinity of the International Working Men's Educational Club (a hub for Jewish socialists), suggested a possible local altercation fueled by ethnic tensions, which contrasted with the Ripper's profile as a stealthy predator targeting isolated prostitutes without verbal confrontations or overt . While police investigated Schwartz's statement, later analysts have questioned its implications for Ripper attribution, viewing it as potentially unrelated to the serial killings. The tight timeline between Stride's murder and that of later that night also raises logistical doubts about a single perpetrator. Stride's time of was estimated between 12:50 and 12:55 a.m., based on the cooling of the body and witness timings, while Eddowes was killed approximately 45 minutes later in , approximately 0.6 miles (1 km) away. Travel time on foot would have taken at least 12-15 minutes, leaving scant opportunity for the Ripper to clean up, relocate, and commit a more mutilated attack without detection, especially given the increased police presence in . Ripperologist Philip Sugden, in his analysis, argued that this compressed schedule strained the double-event theory, suggesting Stride's killer might have been interrupted by club steward Louis Diemschutz's arrival around 1:00 a.m. with his pony and cart, preventing further mutilations. Ripperological debates often propose that Stride's murder was a copycat or unrelated local incident, possibly stemming from a personal dispute near the politically charged club location. The proximity to the club's rear entrance, where Stride was found just yards away, implied she may have been caught in a spontaneous altercation rather than lured to a secluded spot as in other Ripper cases. Early police assessments, including those in Sir Melville Macnaghten's 1894 memorandum on the , reflected hesitation in linking Stride definitively to the Ripper, with some officers viewing the lack of ritualistic elements as indicative of or a separate assailant. These evidentiary anomalies have persisted in historical analyses, positioning Stride as the most contested of the canonical five victims.

Alternative Motives or Perpetrators

One theory posits that Stride's murder stemmed from a domestic dispute, potentially involving her longtime partner, Michael , with whom she had a volatile, on-and-off relationship marked by arguments and allegations of . , a waterside , was known to have a temper exacerbated by alcohol, and Stride had left his at 32 Flower and several days before her death following a quarrel; the medical examination revealed bruises on her shoulders, possibly from being pinned down during the attack, though some speculated links to prior domestic issues with . At the , denied involvement but admitted to their frequent rows, and some contemporaries speculated the killing resembled a "domestic " rather than a serial attack, given the absence of extensive mutilations. The location of the murder in Dutfield's Yard, adjacent to the International Working Men's Educational Club—a hub for socialist and radical political activities among Jewish and Eastern European immigrants—led to theories of a targeted attack by a club member or ideological rival. Police immediately searched and questioned club attendees during their ongoing meeting that night, suspecting the killer may have been disturbed by arriving members like steward Louis Diemschutz, who discovered the body around 1:00 a.m. Some early investigators and later analysts proposed the slaying arose from internal club tensions or a personal vendetta within the socialist circle, as Stride was known to frequent the area for charitable work with the Swedish community and may have witnessed or been entangled in local disputes. An anti-Semitic motive has been suggested based on witness Schwartz's account of seeing Stride assaulted by a man who shouted "Lipski"—a derogatory slur referencing Israel Lipski, a Jewish immigrant executed in 1887 for the acid murder of a fellow Jew, which had fueled widespread prejudice against East End Jewish residents. This incident, occurring shortly before the fatal cut, implied the attacker may have been motivated by ethnic tensions in the immigrant-heavy neighborhood, where Stride's familiarity with and assistance to Jewish families could have made her a perceived target amid rising . Police Chief Inspector Donald Swanson noted the slur's implications in his report, though no arrests followed from this lead. Among proposed alternative perpetrators, physician Sir John Williams—Queen Victoria's obstetrician and an expert in gynecological surgery—has been named in some analyses due to vague witness descriptions of a well-dressed man seen with Stride, aligning loosely with his appearance, and his professional interest in treating among prostitutes, potentially linking to a motive of silencing patients or experimenting on vulnerable women. However, this theory relies on circumstantial ties and has been largely critiqued for lack of connecting Williams to the scene. Fringe modern speculations, such as from a fall or an illicit gone wrong, have surfaced in popular discussions but are dismissed by historians due to the clear evidence of a deliberate incision confirmed at .

Modern Reassessments

In the early 2000s, forensic reassessments of the cases utilized modern techniques such as wound pattern analysis but yielded no due to the degradation of 19th-century biological samples and the absence of preserved artifacts directly linked to the victims. These reviews have generally affirmed consistency in the fatal injuries across victims. Ripperologist Philip Sugden, in his comprehensive historical analysis, reinforced Stride's inclusion among the five victims despite anomalies such as the lack of abdominal mutilations, attributing these to the public location of the crime in Dutfield's Yard and potential interruptions. Sugden's work draws on surviving inquest records and contemporary police reports to argue that the timing and method of Stride's on September 30, 1888, align closely with the Ripper's pattern, countering earlier doubts about her attribution. Psychological profiling efforts, including the 1988 FBI behavioral analysis by , have suggested that the absence of mutilations in Stride's case resulted from an interruption by a passerby, such as Louis Diemschutz, forcing the killer to flee before completing his ritualistic post-mortem acts. This interpretation posits a disorganized offender reacting impulsively to external threats, consistent with the killer's apparent leading to the subsequent of later that night. Documentaries from the , such as those exploring eyewitness accounts in the "Double Event" murders, have increasingly questioned the reliability of Israel Schwartz's testimony, which described seeing Stride assaulted by a man shortly before her death, due to inconsistencies in timing, lighting conditions, and potential cultural biases in his identification of the perpetrator. These productions highlight how Schwartz's account, while pivotal to linking Stride to the Ripper, may have been influenced by police prompting or distortion under stress. Reassessments are further hampered by significant gaps in the historical record, as many original files from the investigations, including detailed witness statements and forensic notes related to Stride's case, were lost during bombings and routine archival purges in the early . Surviving documents, primarily transcripts, provide a fragmented picture, limiting the ability to apply contemporary forensic or criminological methods comprehensively. As of November 2025, no significant new has emerged to resolve these debates, though ongoing analyses continue to position Stride as a victim despite persistent questions.

Funeral and Aftermath

Burial Arrangements

Elizabeth Stride's funeral occurred on Saturday, 6 October 1888, following the conclusion of her , which allowed for the release of her body from the mortuary. The arrangements were handled as a , funded by the parish through undertaker George C. Hawkes, reflecting her status as an unclaimed body with no family stepping forward to cover costs. Her body was transported directly from the mortuary to in Plaistow via a , without a formal or service at any church. The simple wooden coffin was interred in the paupers' section, plot number 15509 in square 37, with attendance limited to the undertaker and gravedigger; no relatives from or connections to her late ex-husband John Thomas Stride, who had died in 1884, were involved or present.

Family and Community Reactions

Michael Kidney, Elizabeth Stride's common-law partner, expressed profound grief following her murder, arriving at Leman Street Police Station in a drunken state shortly after the discovery of her body and demanding a "strange, young detective" to investigate the case, an action that underscored his emotional turmoil. His frustration with the authorities boiled over when an refused his request, prompting Kidney to label the officer "uncivil," reflecting his anger at the perceived inaction of . In the year after Stride's death, Kidney's health and finances rapidly declined, further evidencing the depth of his personal devastation. The Swedish Church in Prince's Square played a supportive role in the aftermath of Stride's , with Johannes Palmér instructing Sven Olsson to identify her body at the St George-in-the-East mortuary and assist the police investigation. Church records, including Palmér's diaries, documented the event, portraying Stride as a figure emblematic of the and hardship faced by many in the immigrant community, having received financial aid from the church as recently as ten days before her death. In the East End, Stride's murder, part of the "double event" with on the same night, intensified community fear, with residents gripped by terror that affected hundreds of thousands amid the ongoing killings. This led to heightened police presence, including hundreds of detectives patrolling the streets, though public frustration mounted over their failure to apprehend the perpetrator. The , already active, responded by offering a reward for information leading to the murderer's capture on the night of the double event, signaling communal efforts to bolster security and patrols in the area. Media coverage in the immediate aftermath featured interviews with Stride's associates that humanized her, such as Kidney's describing their shared life and her recent departure from their home, which elicited sympathy for her as a struggling . Other acquaintances, including club steward Louis Diemschutz who discovered her body, provided accounts to that emphasized her quiet demeanor and , fostering a of her as a vulnerable, hardworking rather than a sensationalized figure. Over the long term, Stride received no dedicated memorials in the decades following her death, with recognition emerging only in the late alongside the rise of walking tours that began drawing attention to victims' and sites in the . A headstone marking her was erected decades later, and a replacement stone was installed by cemetery authorities around 2023.

Cultural Depictions

Literature and Non-Fiction

Early accounts of Elizabeth Stride's murder appeared extensively in late 19th-century British newspapers, including detailed inquest testimonies and eyewitness reports published in on October 2, 1888, which described the discovery of her body in Dutfield's Yard and initial police suspicions. Major Henry Smith, Acting Commissioner of the , provided personal recollections of the Ripper investigations in his 1910 From Constable to Commissioner, noting the challenges in linking Stride's killing to the broader series during the "double event" on , 1888. Donald Rumbelow's The Complete Jack the Ripper (1975), a seminal overview of the , dedicates sections to Stride's case, analyzing the crime scene evidence, witness statements from Louis Diemschutz and others, and debates over whether her throat wound aligned with the Ripper's . The book compiles primary documents, including coroner's reports, to contextualize Stride as the third victim, emphasizing the interruption theory due to nearby club activity. Hallie Rubenhold's The Five: The Untold Lives of the Women Killed by (2019) centers on the biographies of the victims, portraying Stride as a resilient Swedish immigrant who worked as a domestic servant and tailoress before facing in London's East End. Drawing from census records and workhouse documents, Rubenhold reconstructs Stride's to , her activism in the Swedish community, and the socioeconomic pressures that shaped her final years, challenging stereotypes of the victims as mere prostitutes. Scholarly analyses in Ripperologist journal have scrutinized the "double event," with articles such as those in issue 129 (2013) examining timelines and discrepancies to assess if Stride's was interrupted, potentially altering the Ripper's ritual. These pieces often reference police memoranda and medical testimony from Dr. Frederick Blackwell, highlighting inconsistencies in the 45-minute gap between Stride and Catherine Eddowes's killings. Recent non-fiction reassessments include Trevor Marriott's Jack the Ripper: The Real Truth (2005, updated editions), which questions Stride's inclusion in the canonical five by scrutinizing forensic evidence and suggesting alternative perpetrators based on international crime patterns. Similarly, Dave Yost's Elizabeth Stride and : The Life and Death of the Reputed Third Victim (2008) provides a dedicated , using immigration records to trace Stride's journey from and arguing for her murder's unique circumstances amid Ripper lore.

Film and Television Adaptations

Elizabeth Stride's murder has been depicted in several film and television productions focusing on the case, often as part of the "double event" on September 30, 1888, alongside ' killing. In the 1979 film Murder by Decree, directed by , Stride is portrayed as the third canonical victim, with her death briefly shown as interrupting the Ripper's ritual due to a witness, emphasizing the double event's chaos in . The film integrates her murder into ' investigation, highlighting the lack of mutilation compared to prior victims. The 1988 television miniseries , produced by and starring as Inspector , features a detailed scene of Stride's murder in Dutfield's Yard, portraying her as a resilient Swedish immigrant played by Angela Crow. The production includes recreations of the testimony, underscoring eyewitness accounts and the debate over Ripper attribution due to the throat cut without abdominal mutilations. The 2010 documentary series , directed by David Mortin, devotes an episode to Stride, analyzing her report conducted by Dr. Frederick Blackwell and Dr. George Bagster Phillips, which revealed a single deep throat incision and minimal blood loss, suggesting an interrupted attack. Experts in the series, including forensic pathologist Dr. Aubrey Sheffield, discuss how these findings challenge her inclusion as a Ripper victim. The BBC period drama series (2012–2016), set in the aftermath of the murders, references Stride multiple times across episodes as one of the canonical five victims, reinforcing her status in episodes like "The King Came Calling" (Season 1, Episode 3), where detectives reflect on the unsolved killings. Her portrayal underscores the lingering trauma in the community, without direct dramatization of her death. In the 2024 Netflix reboot of (Volume 4, Episode 1: "Who Was ?"), Stride is discussed as the first victim of the double event, with archival footage and expert interviews exploring her life as a and occasional , and how her murder's circumstances—discovered by Louis Diemschutz—fit the Ripper's pattern despite the absence of organ removal. The segment uses her case to examine broader theories on the killer's identity and motives. The 2025 documentary Can Modern Detectives Solve The Case?, featuring criminal investigators reexamining the murders, includes discussion of Stride's killing as part of the canonical series, analyzing witness accounts and the interruption theory in light of contemporary forensic methods.

Stage and Other Media

Elizabeth Stride's life and murder have been depicted in various theatrical productions that explore the , often emphasizing the victims' perspectives amid the Ripper's terror. One early example is the 1975 musical performed at the Cambridge Theatre in , which dramatizes the events of her final night on September 30, 1888, portraying her interactions in the hours leading to her death in Dutfield's Yard off Berner Street. This production, featuring actors like Terese Stevens in key roles, contributed to the ongoing stage interest in the Ripper case by humanizing Stride as a resilient Swedish immigrant navigating poverty and peril. Audio representations have brought Stride's story to life through dramatic narratives, particularly in radio formats during the late 20th century. These broadcasts, drawing on historical accounts, highlighted her role in the "double event" with Catherine Eddowes, using sound design to evoke the chaotic East End atmosphere. Digital media has expanded Stride's portrayal into interactive experiences, notably in video games set in Victorian London. The 2015 expansion Jack the Ripper for Assassin's Creed Syndicate, developed by Ubisoft, incorporates Whitechapel missions where players investigate the murders, including Stride's death as part of a conspiracy involving Templars and Assassins; in the game's lore, the victim is an undercover Assassin posing as Stride. This depiction allows exploration of Berner Street and emphasizes the historical and fictional layers of her story, blending stealth gameplay with Ripper lore. Podcasts in the late and beyond have offered in-depth audio biographies of Stride, shifting focus from the killer to the women's lives. The 2021 series Bad Women: The Ripper Retold, hosted by historian and produced by , dedicates episodes to Stride's background as Elisabeth Gustafsdotter, her from , marriages, and struggles with and in the Swedish Church, framing her murder as a lens on Victorian . Rubenhold's reconstructs Stride's final hours based on eyewitness testimonies, underscoring her as a multifaceted figure rather than a mere victim. In the 2020s, online exhibits and (VR) applications have enabled immersive recreations of Stride's murder site at Berner Street (now Henriques Street), allowing users to tour the location digitally. Platforms like the Virtual Tour by Ripperologist Richard Jones provide 360-degree views and narrated walkthroughs of Dutfield's Yard, detailing the discovery of Stride's body by Louis Diemschütz. Similarly, JtR3D's VR projects reconstruct 1888 Whitechapel in three dimensions, including interactive elements at the Berner Street scene to simulate the night's events and investigate clues. Ripper-themed apps, such as those from VoiceMap and GuidiGO, offer self-guided audio-VR hybrids that visit the site, educating on Stride's life while avoiding sensationalism. These digital tools, accelerated by pandemic-era demand, have made the historical site accessible globally, often referencing TV adaptations like as influences on their narrative style.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.