Hubbry Logo
EurocentrismEurocentrismMain
Open search
Eurocentrism
Community hub
Eurocentrism
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Eurocentrism
Eurocentrism
Eurocentrism
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A map of the Eastern Hemisphere from Adams Synchronological Chart or Map of History. "The bright colors denote those countries that are the Subjects of history, previous to the discovery of America".

Eurocentrism (also Eurocentricity or Western-centrism)[1] refers to viewing the West as the center of world events or superior to other cultures. The exact scope of Eurocentrism varies from the entire Western world to just the continent of Europe or even more narrowly, to Western Europe (especially during the Cold War). When the term is applied historically, it may be used in reference to the presentation of the European perspective on history as objective or absolute, or to an apologetic stance toward European colonialism and other forms of imperialism.[2][3][4]

The term "Eurocentrism" dates back to the late 1970s but it did not become prevalent until the 1990s, when it was frequently applied in the context of decolonization and development and humanitarian aid that industrialised countries offered to developing countries. The term has since been used to critique Western narratives of progress, Western scholars who have downplayed and ignored non-Western contributions, and to contrast Western epistemologies with indigenous epistemologies.[5][6][7]

Terminology

[edit]
Eurocentrism as the term for an ideology was coined by Samir Amin in the 1970s.

The adjective Eurocentric, or Europe-centric, has been in use in various contexts since at least the 1920s.[8] The term was popularised (in French as européocentrique) in the context of decolonization and internationalism in the mid-20th century.[9] English usage of Eurocentric as an ideological term in identity politics was current by the mid-1980s.[10]

The abstract noun Eurocentrism (French eurocentrisme, earlier europocentrisme) as the term for an ideology was coined in the 1970s by the Egyptian Marxian economist Samir Amin, then director of the African Institute for Economic Development and Planning of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.[11] Amin used the term in the context of a global, core–periphery or dependency model of capitalist development. English usage of Eurocentrism is recorded by 1979.[12][13] According to Amin, Eurocentrism dates back to the Renaissance, and did not flourish until the 19th century.[14]

The coinage of Western-centrism is younger, attested in the late 1990s, and specific to English.[15]

History

[edit]

According to historian Enrique Dussel, Eurocentrism has its roots in Hellenocentrism.[16] Art historian and critic Christopher Allen points out that since antiquity, the outward-looking spirit of Western civilization has been more curious about other peoples and more open about learning about them than any other: Herodotus and Strabo travelled through Ancient Egypt and wrote about it in detail; Western explorers mapped the whole surface of the globe; Western scholars carried out fundamental research into all the languages of the world and established the sciences of archaeology and anthropology.[17][relevant?]

European exceptionalism

[edit]
Further information: Great Divergence, The European Miracle, Middle Ages, Age of Discovery, Colonialism, Progressivism, and Western world
European colonial powers in 1914, before the start of World War I

During the European colonial era, encyclopedias often sought to give a rationale for the predominance of European rule during the colonial period by referring to a special position taken by Europe compared to the other continents.

Thus Johann Heinrich Zedler, in 1741, wrote that "even though Europe is the smallest of the world's four continents, it has for various reasons a position that places it before all others.... Its inhabitants have excellent customs, they are courteous and erudite in both sciences and crafts".[18]

The Brockhaus Enzyklopädie (Conversations-Lexicon) of 1847 still expressed an ostensibly Eurocentric approach and claimed about Europe that "its geographical situation and its cultural and political significance is clearly the most important of the five continents, over which it has gained a most influential government both in material and even more so in cultural aspects".[19]

European exceptionalism thus grew out of the Great Divergence of the Early Modern period, due to the combined effects of the Scientific Revolution, the Commercial Revolution, and the rise of colonial empires, the Industrial Revolution and a Second European colonization wave.

The assumption of European exceptionalism is widely reflected in popular genres of literature, especially in literature for young adults (for example, Rudyard Kipling's 1901 novel Kim[20]) and in adventure-literature in general. Portrayal of European colonialism in such literature has been analysed in terms of Eurocentrism in retrospect, such as presenting idealised and often exaggeratedly masculine Western heroes, who conquered "savage" peoples in the remaining "dark spaces" of the globe.[21]

The European miracle, a term coined by Eric Jones in 1981,[22] refers to the surprising rise of Europe during the Early Modern period. During the 15th to 18th centuries, a great divergence took place, comprising the European Renaissance, the European Age of Discovery, the formation of European colonial empires, the Age of Reason, and the associated leap forward in technology and the development of capitalism and early industrialization. As a result, by the 19th century European powers dominated world trade and world politics.

In Lectures on the Philosophy of History, published in 1837, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel describes world history as starting in Asia but shifting to Greece and Italy, and then north of the Alps to France, Germany and England.[23][24] Hegel interpreted India and China as stationary countries, lacking inner momentum. Hegel's China replaced the real historical development with a fixed, stable scenario, which made it the outsider of world history. Both India and China were waiting and anticipating a combination of certain factors from outside until they could acquire real progress in human civilization.[25] Hegel's ideas had a profound impact on western historiography and attitudes. Some scholars disagree with his ideas that the Oriental countries were outside of world history.[26]

Courtyard of the Amsterdam Stock Exchange, circa 1670

Max Weber (1864-1920) suggested that capitalism is the speciality of Europe, because Oriental countries such as India and China do not contain the factors which would enable them to develop capitalism in a sufficient manner.[27][need quotation to verify] Weber wrote and published many treatises in which he emphasized the distinctiveness of Europe. In The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905), he wrote that the "rational" capitalism, manifested by its enterprises and mechanisms, only appeared in the Protestant western countries, and a series of generalised and universal cultural phenomena only appear in the west.[28]

Even the state, with a written constitution and a government organised by trained administrators and constrained by rational law, only appears in the West, even though other regimes can also comprise states.[29] ("Rationality" is a multi-layered term whose connotations are developed and escalated as with the social progress. Weber regarded rationality as a proprietary article for western capitalist society.)

Anticolonialism

[edit]

Even in the 19th century, anticolonial movements had developed claims about national traditions and values that were set against those of Europe in Africa and India. In some cases, as China, where local ideology was even more exclusionist than the Eurocentric one, Westernization did not overwhelm longstanding Chinese attitudes to its own cultural centrality.[30]

Orientalism developed in the late 18th century as a disproportionate Western interest in and idealization of Eastern (i.e. Asian) cultures.

By the early 20th century, some historians, such as Arnold J. Toynbee, were attempting to construct multifocal models of world civilizations. Toynbee also drew attention in Europe to non-European historians, such as the medieval Tunisian scholar Ibn Khaldun. He also established links with Asian thinkers, such as through his dialogues with Daisaku Ikeda of Soka Gakkai International.[31]

Transformations of eurocentrism

[edit]

Authors show that since its first conceptualization, the concept of eurocentrism has evolved. Alina Sajed and John Hobson[32] point to the emergence of a critical eurocentrism, stressing that 'while [critical IR theory] is certainly critical of the West, nevertheless its tendency towards "Eurofetishism" –by which Western agency is reified at the expense of non-Western agency– leads it into a "critical Eurocentrism". Expanding on their work, Audrey Alejandro has put forward the idea of a postcolonial eurocentrism, understood as an emerging form of Eurocentrism that

follows the criteria of Eurocentrism commonly mentioned in the literature – denial of 'non-Western' agency, teleological narrative centred on the 'West' and idealization of the 'West' as normative referent—but whose system of value is the complete opposite of the one embodied by traditional Eurocentrism: With postcolonial Eurocentrism, Europe is also considered to be the primary "proactive" subject of world politics—but, in this case, by being described as the leading edge of global oppression, not progress. Indeed, according to postcolonial Eurocentrism, European capacity to homogenise the world according to its own standards of unification is considered to be a malevolent process (i.e. the destruction of diversity) rather than a benevolent one (i.e. a show of positive leadership). In both forms of Eurocentrism, the discourse performs "the West" as the main actor capable of organising the world in its image. European exceptionalism remains the same—although, from the postcolonial Eurocentric view, Europe is not considered to be the best actor ever, but the worst.'[33]

Recent usage

[edit]

Arab journalists detected Eurocentrism in western media coverage of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, when the depth and scope of coverage and concern contrasted with that devoted to longer-running contemporary wars outside Europe such as those in Syria and in Yemen.[34]

In football, the term Eurocentrism is used to critique the economic dominance UEFA has over club football teams from the rest of the world and how it negatively impacts the sport.[35][36][37]

Debate and academic discourse

[edit]

Eurocentrism has been a particularly important concept in development studies.[38] Brohman (1995) argued that Eurocentrism "perpetuated intellectual dependence on a restricted group of prestigious Western academic institutions that determine the subject matter and methods of research".[38]

In treatises on historical or contemporary Eurocentrism that appeared since the 1990s, Eurocentrism is mostly cast in terms of dualisms such as civilised/barbaric or advanced/backward, developed/undeveloped, core/periphery, implying "evolutionary schemas through which societies inevitably progress", with a remnant of an "underlying presumption of a superior white Western self as referent of analysis."[39] Eurocentrism and the dualistic properties that it labels on non-European countries, cultures and persons have often been criticised in the political discourse of the 1990s and 2000s, particularly in the greater context of political correctness, race in the United States and affirmative action.[40][41]

In the 1990s, there was a trend of criticising various geographic terms current in the English language as Eurocentric, such as the traditional division of Eurasia into Europe and Asia[42] or the term Middle East.[43]

Eric Sheppard, in 2005, argued that contemporary Marxism itself has Eurocentric traits (in spite of "Eurocentrism" originating in the vocabulary of Marxian economics), because it supposes that the third world must go through a stage of capitalism before "progressive social formations can be envisioned".[5]

Andre Gunder Frank harshly criticised Eurocentrism. He believed that most scholars were the disciples of the social sciences and history guided by Eurocentrism.[6] He criticised some Western scholars for their ideas that non-Western areas lack outstanding contributions in history, economy, ideology, politics and culture compared with the West.[44] These scholars believed that the same contribution made by the West gives Westerners an advantage of endo-genetic momentum which is pushed towards the rest of the world, but Frank believed that the Oriental countries also contributed to the human civilization in their own perspectives.

Arnold Toynbee in his A Study of History, gave a critical remark on Eurocentrism. He believed that although western capitalism shrouded the world and achieved a political unity based on its economy, the Western countries cannot "westernize" other countries.[45] Toynbee concluded that Eurocentrism is characteristic of three misconceptions manifested by self-centerment, the fixed development of Oriental countries and linear progress.[46]

Japanese Empress Shōken in Western garb, a sign of the reform taken under the Meiji era (1868- 1912)

There has been some debate on whether historical Eurocentrism qualifies as "just another ethnocentrism", as it is found in most of the world's cultures, especially in cultures with imperial aspirations, as in the Sinocentrism in China; in the Empire of Japan (c. 1868–1945), or during the American Century. James M. Blaut (2000) argued that Eurocentrism indeed went beyond other ethnocentrisms, as the scale of European colonial expansion was historically unprecedented and resulted in the formation of a "colonizer's model of the world".[47]

Indigenous philosophies have been noted to greatly contrast with Eurocentric thought. Indigenous scholar James (Sákéj) Youngblood Henderson states that Eurocentricism contrasts greatly with Indigenous worldviews: "the discord between Aboriginal and Eurocentric worldviews is dramatic. It is a conflict between natural and artificial contexts."[7] Indigenous scholars Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Linco state that "in some ways, the epistemological critique initiated by Indigenous knowledge is more radical than other sociopolitical critiques of the West, for the Indigenous critique questions the very foundations of Western ways of knowing and being."[48]

The terms Afrocentrism vs. Eurocentrism have come to play a role in the 2000s to 2010s in the context of the academic discourse on race in the United States and critical whiteness studies, aiming to expose white supremacism and white privilege.[49] Molefi Kete Asante, the foremost theorist of Afrocentricity, have argued that there is a prevalence of Eurocentric thought in the processing of much of academia on African affairs.[50][51][52] He questions "Why Africans would want to see their own culture through the prism of Europe" and asserts that "African languages and cultures must be mined for valuable, positive, and creative ways of knowing, ritualizing, and developing human capacity."[53] Similarly, Yoshitaka Miike, the founding theorist of Asiacentricity, has critiqued theoretical, methodological, and comparative Eurocentrism in knowledge production about Asian societies and cultures.[54][55][56] He claims that "looking at Asia only with a Eurocentric critical eye and looking at the West only with a Eurocentric uncritical eye poses a serious problem in understanding and appreciating the fullest potentials of humanity and communication."[57]

In an article, 'Eurocentrism and Academic Imperialism,' Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi at the University of Tehran states that Eurocentric thought exists in almost all aspects of academia in many parts of the world, especially in the humanities.[58] Edgar Alfred Bowring states that in the West, self-regard, self-congratulation and denigration of the 'Other' run more deeply and those tendencies have infected more aspects of their thinking, laws and policy than anywhere else.[59][60] Luke Clossey and Nicholas Guyatt have measured the degree of Eurocentrism in the research programs of top history departments.[61]

Some authors have focused on how scholars who denounce Eurocentrism often inadvertently reproduce Eurocentrism through culturally biased norms.[62][63] The methodologist Audrey Alejandro refers to this process as a "recursive paradox": "It is a methodo-epistemological recursive paradox that [International Relations] critical scholars experience, producing a discourse that is implicitly counter-productive to the anti-Eurocentric values they advocate."[64]

Africa

[edit]

Colonial historiography

[edit]
Main article: African historiography § Colonial historiography

[Africa] is no historical part of the World, it has no movement or development to exhibit. Historical movements in it- that is in the northern part- belong to the Atlantic or European World. Carthage displayed there an important transitionary phase of civilization; but, as a Phoenician colony, it belongs to Asia. Egypt will be considered in reference to the passage of the human mind from its Eastern to its Western phase, but it does not belong to the African Spirit. What we properly understand by Africa, is the Unhistorical, Underdeveloped spirit, still involved in the conditions of mere nature, and which have to be presented here only as on the threshold of the World’s History.

— Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Lectures in the Philosophy of World History (1837)[65]

Since most African societies used oral tradition to record their history, there was little written history of the continent prior to the colonial period. Colonial histories focussed on the exploits of soldiers, colonial administrators, and "colonial figures", using limited sources and written from an entirely European perspective, ignoring the viewpoint of the colonised under the pretence of white supremacism. Colonial historians considered Africans racially inferior, uncivilised, exotic, and historically static, viewing their colonial conquest as proof of Europe's claims to superiority.[66]: 36  The most widespread genre of colonial narrative involved the Hamitic hypothesis, which claimed the inherent superiority of light-skinned people over dark-skinned people. Colonisers considered only "Hamitic Africans" to be "civilisation", and by extension all major advances and innovations in Africa were thought to derive from them. Oral sources were deprecated and dismissed by most historians, who claimed that Africa had no history other than that of Europeans in Africa.[67]: 627  Some colonisers took interest in the other viewpoint and attempted to produce a more detailed history of Africa using oral sources and archaeology, however they received little recognition at the time.[68]

African historiography became organised at the academic level in the mid 20th century. Despite a movement towards utilising oral sources in a multidisciplinary approach and their growing legitimacy in historiography, contemporary historians are still tasked with decolonising African historiography, building the institutional frameworks incorporating African epistemologies, and representing an African perspective.[69][70][71]

Latin America

[edit]

Eurocentrism affected Latin America through colonial domination and expansion.[72] This occurred through the application of new criteria meant to "impose a new social classification of the world population on a global scale".[72] Based on this occurrence, a new social-historic identities were newly produced, although already produced in America. Some of these names include; 'Whites', 'Negroes', 'Blacks', 'Yellows', 'Olives', 'Indians', and 'Mestizos'.[72] With the advantage of being located in the Atlantic basin, 'Whites' were in a privileged to control gold and silver production.[72] The work which created the product was by 'Indians' and 'Negroes'.[72] With the control of commercial capital from 'White' workers. And therefore, Europe or Western Europe emerged as the central place of new patterns and capitalist power.[72]

Islamic world

[edit]
Front page of Avicenna's Canon of Medicine

In the history of Islamic–Persian civilization, scholars such as Muhammad Zakariyya Razi, Avicenna and Al-Biruni played a key role in the expansion of rationalism. All three were Persians, but wrote in Arabic; therefore, in later European tradition they were mistakenly identified as “Arabs”.[73] Their works had a profound impact on Europe: Avicenna's Canon of Medicine remained a medical textbook for centuries, Razi became authoritative in medicine and pharmacology, and Biruni, through measurement and observation, came close to a scientific method.[74]

Other thinkers were also part of this tradition: Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen), who with his research on optics laid the foundation of the experimental method,[75] al-Khwarizmi, whose name gave us algebra and the “algorithm”,[76] Nasir al-Din al-Tusi with his innovations in astronomy that later influenced Copernicus,[77] and Omar Khayyam, who reformed the Jalali calendar and solved cubic equations.[78]

Nevertheless, the European Church treated these works selectively. The Paris synod of 1210 prohibited teaching Aristotle's works on natural philosophy and their Arabic commentaries (including Avicenna). In 1215 this ban was confirmed in the statutes of the University of Paris, allowing only logic and ethics.[79] In 1270 and 1277, Bishop Étienne Tempier in Paris condemned 219 theses, some of which targeted Averroes and his followers.[80]

In Toledo in the 12th and 13th centuries, hundreds of Arabic texts were translated into Latin. Translators (such as Gerard of Cremona) often obscured or altered the identity of the authors, and in Europe they were generally referred to simply as “Arab philosophers”.[81]

After the Fall of Granada, many Arabic libraries were destroyed. In 1499–1501, Archbishop Cisneros ordered the burning of thousands of Arabic books in the Bib-Rambla square in Granada; only a small portion of medical texts was preserved.[82]

The result of such policies—bans, selective translations, anonymization of authors and the burning of books—was that in Renaissance European historiography a Eurocentric narrative took shape: “Ancient Greece to Dark Ages to Renaissance to Modern Europe”. In this way, the role of Muslim and Iranian thinkers was reduced to that of “transmitters”, not innovators.[83]

This narrative was partially corrected in academic scholarship of the 20th and 21st centuries, but in school curricula in Europe and the United States the old model still dominates: Avicenna may be briefly mentioned, but names such as Biruni, Razi, Al-Khwarizmi or Al-Tusi are often absent. As a result, a one-sided view persists that modernity is purely a European product, while the real history of science was multilayered and international.[84]

Ottoman Turkish statesman and diplomat Mustafa Reşid Pasha, the principal architect of the Edict of Gülhane. The goal of the decree was to help modernize the Ottoman Empire militarily and socially so that it could compete with the Great Powers of Europe.

Eurocentrism's effect on the Islamic world has predominantly come from a fundamental statement of preventing the account of lower-level explanation and account of Islamic cultures and their social evolution, mainly through eurocentrism's idealist construct.[85] This construct has gained power from the historians revolving their conclusions around the idea of a central point that favours the notion that the evolution of societies and their progress are dictated by general tendencies, leading to the Islamic world's evolution becoming more of a philosophical topic of history instead of historical fact.[85] Along with this, eurocentrism extends to trivialise and marginalise the philosophies, scientific contributions, cultures, and other additional facets of the Islamic world.[86]

Stemming from Eurocentrism's innate bias towards Western civilization came the creation of the concept of the "European Society," which favoured the components (mainly Christianity) of European civilization and allowed eurocentrists to brand diverging societies and cultures as "uncivilized".[87] Prevalent during the nineteenth century, the labelling of uncivilised in the eyes of eurocentrists enabled Western countries to classify non-European and non-white countries as inferior, and limit their inclusion and contribution in actions like international law. This exclusion was seen as acceptable by individuals like John Westlake, a professor of international law at the University of Cambridge at the time, who commented that countries with European civilizations should be those which comprise the international society, and that countries like Turkey and Persia should only be allowed a part of international law.[87]

Orientalism

[edit]

Eurocentrism's reach has not only affected the perception of the cultures and civilizations of the Islamic world, but also the aspects and ideas of Orientalism, a cultural idea that distinguished the "Orient" of the East from the "Occidental" Western societies of Europe and North America, and which was originally created so that the social and cultural milestones of the Islamic and Oriental world would be recognised. This effect began to take place during the nineteenth century when the Orientalist ideals were distilled and shifted from topics of sensuality and deviating mentalities to what is described by Edward Said as "unchallenged coherence".[88] Along with this shift came the creation of two types of orientalism: latent, which covered the Orient's constant durability through history, and manifest, a more dynamic orientalism that changes with the new discovery of information.[88] The eurocentric influence is shown in the latter, as the nature of manifest Orientalism is to be altered with new findings, which leaves it vulnerable to the warping of its refiner's ideals and principles. In this state, eurocentrism has used orientalism to portray the Orient as "backwards" and bolster the superiority of the Western world and continue the undermining of their cultures to further the agenda of racial inequality.[88]

With those wanting to represent the eurocentric ideals better by way of orientalism, there came a barrier of languages, being Arabic, Persian, and other similar languages. With more researchers wanting to study more of Orientalism, there was an assumption made about the languages of the Islamic world: that having the ability to transcribe the texts of the past Islamic world would give great knowledge and insight on oriental studies. In order to do this, many researchers underwent training in philology, believing that an understanding of the languages would be the only necessary training. This reasoning came as the belief at the time was that other studies like anthropology and sociology were deemed irrelevant as they did not believe it misleading to this portion of mankind.[89]

Beauty standards and the cosmetic industry

[edit]

Due to colonialism, Eurocentric beauty ideals have had varying degrees of impact on the cultures of non-Western countries. The influence on beauty ideals across the globe varies by region, with Eurocentric ideals having a relatively strong impact in South Asia but little to no impact in East Asia.[90] However, Eurocentric beauty ideals have also been on the decline in the United States, especially with the success of Asian female models, which may be signaling a breakdown in the hegemony of White American beauty ideals.[91] In Vietnam, Eurocentric beauty ideals have been openly rejected, as local women consider Western women's ideal of beauty as being overweight, masculine and unattractive.[92]

Another study questioning the impact of Eurocentric beauty ideals in South Asia noted that Indian women won a relatively high number of international beauty pageants, and that Indian media tends to use mostly Indian female models. The authors cite the dominance of the Bollywood film industry in India, which tends to minimize the impact of Western ideals.[93]

Clark doll experiment

[edit]
Main article: Kenneth and Mamie Clark § Doll experiments

In the 1940s, psychologists Kenneth and Mamie Clark conducted experiments called "the doll tests" to examine the psychological effects of segregation on African-American children. They tested children by presenting them with four dolls, identical in all but skin tone. The children were instructed to choose which doll they preferred and were asked the race of the doll. Most of the children chose the white doll. The Clarks stated in their results that the perceptions of the African-American children had been altered by the discrimination they faced.[94] The tested children also labelled the white dolls with positive descriptions.

Mexican doll experiment

[edit]

In 2012, Mexicans recreated the doll test. Mexico's National Council to Prevent Discrimination presented a video where children had to pick the "good doll", and the doll that looks like them. By doing this experiment, the researchers sought to analyse the degree to which Mexican children are influenced by modern-day media accessible to them.[95] Most of the children chose the white doll; they also stated that it looked like them. The people who carried out the study noted that Eurocentrism is deeply rooted in different cultures, including Latin cultures.[96]

Skin lightening

[edit]

Skin lightening has become a common practice in some countries. A 2011 study found that, in Tanzania, motivation for the use of skin lightening products is to look more 'European'.[97] However, in East Asia, the practice began long before exposure to Europeans – tan skin was associated with lower-class field work, and thus constant exposure to sun, while having pale skin signified belonging to the upper-class.[98][99] Skin bleaching can have negative health effects.[100] One study observed that, among the female population of Senegal in West Africa, 26% of women were using skin lightening creams at the time. The most common products used were hydroquinone and corticosteroids. 75% of women who used these creams showed adverse cutaneous effects, mainly acne.[101]

East Asia

[edit]

In East Asia, the impact of Eurocentrism in beauty advertisements has been minimal. Anti-European undercurrents in local advertisements for female-oriented products are quite common. European models are hired for around half of advertisements made by European brands such as Estée Lauder and L'Oréal, while local Japanese cosmetics brands tend to use exclusively East Asian female models.[102]

In Singapore, a country with a large population of Chinese people, European women are ranked below Chinese women in the female beauty hierarchy. According to the author, the blonde hair of Swedish women reduced their femininity, because it was racialized as a Western trait. The authors also noted that these women's Swedish husbands were highly attracted to local East Asian women, which further reduced the self-esteem of the blonde Swedish women living in Singapore.[103]

The use of European female models has actually declined within Japan, and some Japanese skincare companies have discontinued the use of Western female models entirely, while others have even portrayed white women as explicitly inferior to Asian women, on the basis of their lighter hair color.[104] There is a widespread belief in Japan that Japanese women's skin color is "better" than white women's,[105] and the placement of European female models in local advertisements does not reflect any special status of white women within Japan.[106]

Brazil

[edit]

The beauty ideal for women in Brazil is the morena; a mixed-race brown woman who is supposed to represent the best characteristics of every racial group in Brazil.[107] According to Alexander Edmond's book Pretty Modern: Beauty, Sex, and Plastic Surgery in Brazil, whiteness plays a role in Latin American, specifically Brazilian, beauty standards, but it is not necessarily distinguished based on skin colour.[108] Edmonds said the main ways to define whiteness in people in Brazil is by looking at their hair, nose, then mouth before considering skin colour.[108] Edmonds focuses on the popularity of plastic surgery in Brazilian culture. Plastic surgeons usually applaud and flatter mixtures when emulating aesthetics for performing surgery, and the more popular mixture is African and European.[109] This shapes beauty standards by racialising biological and popular beauty ideals to suggest that mixture with whiteness is better.[108] Donna Goldstein's book Laughter Out of Place: Race, Class, Violence, and Sexuality in a Rio Shantytown also addresses how whiteness influences beauty in Brazil. Goldstein notes that in Brazil, there is a hierarchy for beauty that places being mixed race at the top and pure, un-admixed black characteristics at the bottom, calling them ugly.[110][111]

In Erica Lorraine William's Sex Tourism in Bahia: Ambiguous Entanglements, Williams notes that there is no Eurocentric beauty ideal for women in Brazil.[112] White Brazilian women are aware that foreign male sex tourists are not interested in them, and that they prefer brown and black women over white Brazilian women.[112] One white woman in Brazil complained that she is not noticed by "gringos" and that they prefer black and Mestiza women for sexual liaisons.[112]

Distortions of world maps and Eurocentrism

[edit]

Modern world maps are most commonly based on the Mercator projection, developed in 1569 by the Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator. While the projection preserves angles and directions, making it useful for navigation, it significantly distorts relative sizes of landmasses. Regions near the poles, such as Europe and North America, appear far larger than they actually are, while equatorial regions, including the Middle East and Africa, are visually minimized.[113]

For example, Greenland is shown as roughly comparable in size to Africa, when in reality Africa is about fourteen times larger.[114] This visual imbalance has been criticized as reinforcing a Eurocentric worldview, granting Europe and North America disproportionate symbolic weight on the map, while diminishing the apparent importance of Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America.[115]

Scholars of critical cartography argue that such projections exert a subtle psychological effect, encouraging what has been described as an implicit “self-aggrandizement” of the West.[116] As a result, calls have been made to employ alternative projections—such as the Gall–Peters projection—which more accurately represent land area, in order to counteract the Eurocentric bias embedded in traditional world maps.[117]

See also

[edit]

Pro-Eurocentrism

[edit]

Anti-Eurocentrism

[edit]

Other centrisms

[edit]
[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Eurocentrism

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Eurocentrism denotes a perspective that centers European history, culture, and institutions as the primary reference point for understanding global human development, often implying their normative superiority or universality. The term gained prominence in academic discourse during the late 20th century, particularly through critiques by scholars like Samir Amin, who used it to challenge perceived Western biases in historiography and social theory. This viewpoint reflects the empirical reality of Europe's pivotal role in shaping the modern world, exemplified by the "Great Divergence" from the 18th century onward, when Western Europe achieved unprecedented economic growth and technological innovation, surpassing other regions through factors such as institutional reforms favoring markets, property rights, and scientific inquiry. European dominance manifested in global exploration, industrialization, and colonial expansion, which disseminated technologies, legal systems, and governance models that underpin contemporary international norms. Critics, predominantly from postcolonial and traditions, contend that Eurocentrism distorts non-Western histories by marginalizing indigenous achievements and rationalizing as civilizational progress, though such arguments often overlook the causal mechanisms— including competition among European states and incentives for —that propelled this . Defenses highlight that privileging Europe's contributions aligns with verifiable outcomes in productivity, , and institutional transplants worldwide, rather than mere cultural ; academic critiques of Eurocentrism frequently emanate from environments with systemic ideological biases favoring over outcome-based analysis.

Definition and Terminology

Etymology and Conceptual Scope

The term "Eurocentrism" first appeared in English in 1965, as recorded in the , derived from the compounding of "Euro-" (referring to ) and "-centrism" (denoting a focus or centrality). It emerged as a from "Eurocentric," a related adjective attested as early as 1927, amid discussions of cultural and geopolitical biases in . The noun gained traction during the era of the mid-to-late , particularly following the publication of Egyptian Amin's 1988 book Eurocentrism, which critiqued the ideological underpinnings of Western-dominated global and economic theory. Conceptually, Eurocentrism denotes a or analytical framework that positions European (or broadly Western) cultural, historical, and institutional developments as the normative or superior standard for evaluating global phenomena, often marginalizing non-European contributions. This scope extends across disciplines including , where it manifests as an emphasis on Europe's role in shaping universal progress narratives; , through the universalization of Greco-Roman and Enlightenment ideals; and social sciences, via assumptions that European models of statecraft, , and economy represent optimal endpoints. Scholarly definitions, such as those in postcolonial theory, frame it as a discursive practice that privileges European experiences as the "best way to achieve something," implying an implicit that subordinates other civilizations' causal dynamics and achievements. The term's scope has evolved to encompass both descriptive and pejorative usages: descriptively, it identifies factual disparities in historical outcomes, such as Europe's technological and institutional advancements from the onward, which empirical data attributes to factors like geographical advantages and iterative innovations rather than inherent superiority; pejoratively, it critiques these interpretations as ideologically driven, though such critiques often originate from academic traditions with documented left-leaning biases that underemphasize verifiable mechanisms in non-European contexts. Distinctions within the concept include "methodological Eurocentrism," focused on analytical tools, versus "substantive Eurocentrism," tied to claims of , highlighting its application beyond mere terminology to substantive debates on global . Eurocentrism differs from the broader concept of , which refers to the tendency of any group to evaluate other cultures using the standards of its own, often leading to judgments of inferiority. Ethnocentrism, as originally defined by sociologist in 1906, applies universally across societies and does not presuppose a specific cultural center. In contrast, Eurocentrism represents a particular manifestation of ethnocentrism that privileges European or Western norms, histories, and achievements as the normative benchmark for global analysis, implying a hierarchical ordering where non-European developments are marginalized or interpreted through a European lens. This specificity arises from historical contexts like European colonial expansion, which institutionalized Western metrics of progress, such as linear historical narratives originating in . While , as articulated by in his 1978 book Orientalism, involves Western scholarly and imaginative constructions of the "Orient" (primarily the and ) as static, exotic, or despotic to justify domination, Eurocentrism encompasses a wider ideological framework. Orientalism functions as a discursive practice embedded within Eurocentrism, serving to define the non-West in opposition to a dynamic, rational , but it is geographically and thematically narrower, focusing on Eastern "otherness" rather than the universal application of European centrality across all domains like , , and . For instance, Eurocentric world histories might systematically underemphasize non-European innovations, such as the independent development of algebra in medieval Islamic , whereas Orientalism more specifically exoticizes those contributions to reinforce Western superiority. Scholars note that Orientalism presupposes Eurocentrism as its enabling condition, yet the latter extends to non-Oriental contexts, including and the . Eurocentrism is also distinct from Western , which posits unique cultural, institutional, or moral qualities—such as , scientific , or —as inherent to Western societies and explanatory of their historical dominance. emphasizes causal attributions for success, often drawing on empirical claims like Europe's early adoption of fossil fuels or property rights institutions post-1500, whereas Eurocentrism is primarily a perspectival in knowledge production that centers regardless of evidentiary merit. For example, exceptionalist arguments might cite data showing Europe's per capita GDP surpassing Asia's by 1820 due to institutional factors, but Eurocentrism could manifest in overlooking parallel developments elsewhere even when evidence supports them. This distinction highlights how can be defended through testable hypotheses, while Eurocentrism risks ahistorical projection of European categories onto global phenomena.

Historical Development

Ancient and Medieval Precursors

In , Hellenocentrism manifested as an early form of cultural self-positioning that prefigured Eurocentric attitudes, with viewing their polis-based society, , and as the apex of human achievement while categorizing non- as barbaroi—a term denoting linguistic incomprehensibility and perceived inferiority in governance and , originating around the BCE. (384–322 BCE), in his (Book I, 1252a–b), explicitly argued that barbarians, due to their environmental and temperamental traits, were naturally suited for , lacking the rational capacity for self-rule that characterized ; he posited a where temperate-climate excelled in spirit and , Asians in body but , and northern Europeans in spirit but lacking . This framework, rooted in empirical observations of climate's causal influence on societal development, justified Greek dominance without universal equality, influencing later Western hierarchies. Roman imperial ideology extended these precedents through a doctrine of civilizational superiority, emphasizing Romanitas—encompassing law, engineering, and military discipline—as inherently superior to provincial or barbarian customs, from the Republic's expansion (c. 509–27 BCE) onward. Roman writers like Tacitus (c. 56–120 CE) critiqued imperial excesses but affirmed the civilizing mission of Roman rule over "uncultured" tribes, such as Gauls or Germans, whose tribal anarchies contrasted with Rome's structured hierarchy and infrastructure feats, like the 250,000 miles of roads by 100 CE. Eligibility for citizenship, initially tied to Italic origins but extended via the Edict of Caracalla in 212 CE to most free inhabitants, reinforced a core-periphery model where Roman virtues radiated outward, assimilating elites while maintaining cultural preeminence. During the medieval period, the consolidation of from the —epitomized by Charlemagne's in 800 CE—recast Europe as the terrestrial embodiment of divine order, contrasting Christian feudal monarchies with Islamic caliphates and nomads, as articulated by Carolingian scholars like of York (c. 735–804 CE). This worldview, disseminated through monasteries and canon law, framed expansions such as the (commencing 718 CE against Umayyad forces) and (1095–1291 CE, mobilizing up to 100,000 knights in the alone) as defensive assertions of superior moral and institutional frameworks against "infidel" threats, prioritizing Latin Europe's ecclesiastical unity over Eastern Orthodox or non-Christian polities. Empirical contrasts in governance—e.g., Europe's emerging manorial systems yielding agricultural surpluses versus perceived Eastern —bolstered this causal narrative of Christian Europe's providential advancement.

Enlightenment Foundations

The Enlightenment era (c. 1685–1815) crystallized Eurocentric perspectives by interpreting Europe's recent empirical triumphs—such as the Scientific Revolution's breakthroughs, including Isaac Newton's formulation of universal gravitation in (1687)—as evidence of a uniquely rational trajectory in human history. Thinkers privileged Europe's institutional and intellectual advancements, including the printing press's dissemination of knowledge since Johannes Gutenberg's in 1440 and the empirical methods pioneered by in (1620), as causal drivers of progress absent elsewhere. This view stemmed from observations of Europe's relative freedoms fostering inquiry, contrasted with perceived stagnation in centralized empires like the Ottoman or Qing dynasties, where innovation reportedly languished amid absolutism. Voltaire exemplified this in Essai sur les mœurs et l'esprit des nations (1756), a comparative history portraying an societies as evolving through reason, commerce, and tolerance—exemplified by Britain's post-1688 —superior to Asian or Islamic "despotisms" lacking such dynamism. He attributed 's edge to historical contingencies like the fragmentation of feudal enabling , yielding verifiable outputs like the Royal Society's founding in 1660 and subsequent scientific output dwarfing contemporaries. Voltaire's analysis, while opinionated, aligned with causal realism by linking institutional pluralism to empirical gains, though he unapologetically ranked civilizations hierarchically based on these metrics. Montesquieu's De l'esprit des lois (1748) advanced climatic determinism as a causal mechanism, arguing Europe's temperate zones promoted vigorous temperaments conducive to liberty and mixed governments—evident in the separation of powers he observed in England—while Asia's hotter climates engendered servility and despotism, explaining persistent absolutism there since antiquity. This theory, drawn from physiological effects like cold air invigorating "fibers" for boldness, provided a naturalistic rationale for Europe's political stability and legal innovations, such as England's Bill of Rights (1689), over uniform empires. Though not strictly deterministic, Montesquieu's framework underscored geography's role in enabling Europe's verifiable institutional resilience. Immanuel Kant reinforced these foundations in lectures on physical geography begun in 1757, positing Europe's central position facilitated intellectual exchange and moral progress, underpinning its technological and economic ascendancy amid global expansion. Kant sought "foundational causes" for Europe's successes, including naval dominance post-1492 explorations, attributing them to geographical advantages fostering rational agency over "barbarism" elsewhere. His integration of geography with anthropology highlighted Europe's role in universal history's advancement, grounded in observable disparities like Europe's patent systems versus technological stasis in regions like Mughal India by the 1700s.

Imperial Expansion and 19th-Century Formulations

The period of from the 1870s to witnessed unprecedented European territorial acquisition, particularly in and , which solidified Eurocentric conceptions of global hierarchy. Technological disparities, including the widespread adoption of machine guns, steamships, and prophylaxis against , enabled small European forces to subdue larger indigenous populations, as exemplified by the British conquest of the Ashanti Empire in 1874 and the French subjugation of in 1895. By , European powers controlled approximately 84% of the Earth's land surface excluding , with Britain alone administering 23% of the world's population across 24% of its land area. This dominance was interpreted through a Eurocentric framework as validation of Europe's superior organizational capacity, industrial productivity, and rational governance, contrasting with perceived stagnation in non-European societies. Intellectual formulations of Eurocentrism during this era drew on evolutionary and historical philosophies to justify expansion as progressive. , popularized by and applied to nations by figures like , posited that European societies exemplified the fittest in a struggle for survival, rationalizing colonial rule as natural selection's outcome. The "civilizing mission," articulated in French imperial doctrine by in 1885, claimed Europeans bore a duty to export republican values, , and infrastructure to "inferior" races, evidenced by investments in railways and ports in colonies like and Indochina. Similarly, Rudyard Kipling's 1899 poem "" encapsulated British views, urging sacrifice to civilize "fluttered folk and wild," reflecting empirical observations of rapid European infrastructural impositions, such as the 20,000 miles of railway built in by 1900 under British rule. These 19th-century articulations intertwined with notions of universal historical progress culminating in , as seen in Hegelian-influenced that framed non-European regions as preparatory stages bypassed by Western modernity. from the , including 's lead in registrations—Britain filing over 10,000 annually by the 1880s versus negligible numbers elsewhere—reinforced claims of inventive primacy, though critics later highlighted how colonial extraction, such as Britain's drain of $45 billion (in 1900s values) from between 1870 and 1914, funded metropolitan advancements. Despite such dependencies, the causal chain from internal European innovations in steam power and to global underscored a realist assessment of differential development rates, rather than mere ideological imposition. This period's Eurocentrism thus emerged not solely as bias but as an interpretive lens aligned with observable disparities in and economic efficacy.

20th-Century Transformations and Postwar Shifts

The devastation of , which ended in 1945 with the Allied victory over the , eroded the confidence in 's unchallenged global primacy and discredited explicit racial hierarchies that had previously rationalized imperial dominance. The Nazi regime's application of pseudoscientific racial theories to justify conquest and , resulting in the Holocaust's systematic murder of six million Jews, prompted a widespread rejection of in Western intellectual circles, shifting emphasis toward cultural and institutional explanations for societal differences. This transition marked a key transformation, where Eurocentrism evolved from overt claims of innate European racial superiority to arguments centered on unique historical contingencies, such as the development of rational inquiry, property rights, and originating in . Historians like Arnold Toynbee, in his multi-volume (published progressively from 1934 to 1961), exemplified this introspective shift by analyzing 21 civilizations through a comparative lens, positing that civilizational growth stemmed from creative responses to environmental and social challenges rather than inherent European exceptionalism alone. Toynbee's framework, while retaining a Western analytical structure, incorporated non-European examples like Chinese and Islamic societies, challenging the unilinear progress narratives of earlier Eurocentric . Concurrently, the ' emergence as the preeminent Western power—evidenced by its control of 50% of global industrial output by 1945—reoriented Eurocentrism toward a transatlantic "Western" paradigm, embedding European-derived institutions like and market economies in postwar frameworks such as the (established 1944) and the (1948), which rebuilt Europe while extending U.S. influence. Decolonization, accelerating from India's independence in 1947 through the "" in 1960 when 17 nations gained sovereignty, compelled a reevaluation of Europe's , as formal empires dissolved amid nationalist movements and conferences like in 1955 uniting 29 Asian and African states against lingering . Yet this era saw Eurocentrism adapt rather than vanish, manifesting in modernization theories that portrayed Western industrialization as a universal ; Walt Rostow's The Stages of (1960) framed non-Western societies as "traditional" stages behind Europe's "take-off" phase, implicitly sustaining a of development paths. Global institutions like the (chartered 1945), with its Security Council dominated by Western powers (, , U.S.) alongside Soviet and Chinese vetoes, perpetuated structural Eurocentric influences, as newly independent states often adopted Western legal and administrative models despite rhetorical commitments to sovereignty. These postwar shifts coincided with the Cold War's ideological contest (1947–1991), where the West positioned its values—rooted in Enlightenment principles—as antithetical to Soviet , reinforcing Eurocentric narratives of progress through individual liberty and empirical science amid decolonization's chaos. Empirical metrics underscored continuity: by 1970, and accounted for over 60% of global GDP despite population shares under 15%, attributing this disparity to institutional legacies rather than racial factors. Critiques of this reframed Eurocentrism began surfacing in dependency theories by the 1970s, but the paradigm's resilience lay in its alignment with observable outcomes, such as higher literacy rates (averaging 95% in by 1960 versus 20–40% in many ex-colonies) and technological patents dominated by Western inventors.

Intellectual Foundations

European Exceptionalism and Causal Explanations

European exceptionalism denotes the historical divergence in which , from the late medieval period, achieved unprecedented advancements in science, technology, economic productivity, and institutional frameworks, enabling it to surpass other major civilizations by the . By 1820, Europe's share of global manufacturing output had risen to approximately 23%, compared to China's decline from 33% in 1750, reflecting sustained growth driven by innovation rather than mere population expansion. This trajectory included the (roughly 1543–1687), marked by figures like Copernicus, Galileo, and Newton, and the (c. 1760–1840), originating in Britain with mechanized production and steam power. A primary causal factor was Europe's political fragmentation into competing sovereign states, which intensified interstate warfare and incentivized fiscal-military innovations. From the , this rivalry—unlike the centralized stasis in Ming or the —drove investments in technology, naval capabilities, and efficient taxation systems, making conquest abroad viable while keeping warfare costs relatively low through representative assemblies. By 1800, Europeans controlled 35% of the world's land surface, attributable to these dynamics rather than inherent racial superiority or random luck, as fragmented polities iteratively selected for effective military institutions over centuries. Philip Hoffman argues this "gunpowder gap" arose from Europe's unique geopolitical incentives, where frequent conflicts honed technologies like and sailing ships, absent in less competitive Eurasian powers. Institutions and culture interacted to sustain this edge, with Europe's medieval legacies—such as feudal property rights evolving into secure and commercial freedoms—fostering and . The rise of inclusive institutions, including parliaments limiting monarchical absolutism (e.g., England's of 1688), contrasted with extractive systems elsewhere, enabling markets for ideas and reducing barriers to innovation. Culturally, Protestant Reformation emphases on literacy and empirical inquiry, combined with Catholic Scholastic traditions of disputation, cultivated a prioritizing testable knowledge over dogmatic authority, underpinning the Baconian inductive method. highlights how these "markets for ideas" in 18th-century Europe, supported by printing and urban networks, accelerated useful knowledge accumulation, distinguishing it from stagnant intellectual traditions in . Geographical endowments played a contributory but non-deterministic role, with Europe's , fragmented terrain, and Atlantic access facilitating , resistance via , and overseas expansion without the overland logistical burdens of continental empires. However, scholars like emphasize that institutions mediated these advantages, as similar geographies in other regions (e.g., pre-Meiji) did not yield comparable divergence absent institutional reforms. Empirical analyses reject monocausal geography, noting Europe's success stemmed from endogenous responses to environmental pressures, such as adopting amid timber shortages, which powered industrialization. This interplay underscores causal realism: exceptionalism emerged from contingent historical paths amplifying Europe's competitive pluralism, not predestined endowments or cultural alone.

Universalism Versus Cultural Relativism

Universalism asserts the existence of principles applicable to all human societies, independent of , often grounded in shared biological, cognitive, or functional imperatives that promote and survival. In the context of Eurocentrism, this view underpins claims that Western intellectual traditions uncovered objective standards—such as rational , accountability, and institutional checks on power—through empirical validation rather than arbitrary preference. For example, and identify recurrent heuristics, including reciprocity and fairness in resource division, as near-universal adaptations shaped by across diverse populations. A 2019 analysis of ethnographic accounts from 60 societies spanning seven millennia confirmed seven cooperation-based norms—kin , ingroup loyalty, reciprocity, courage, deference to authority, equitable division, and property respect—as consistently valued positively, irrespective of geography or era. These findings suggest cognition arises from domain-general mechanisms, not culturally isolated inventions, challenging portrayals of Eurocentrism as mere . Cultural relativism, by contrast, contends that values and truths are constructs endogenous to each society, rendering inter-cultural evaluations incoherent or imperialistic. Emerging prominently in early 20th-century anthropology, this doctrine, advanced by figures like , sought to counteract evolutionary hierarchies by insisting on interpretive neutrality toward practices such as or ritual sacrifice, viewing them as adaptive within their ecological niches. Relativists critique Eurocentric universalism as a veiled extension of colonial domination, arguing that documents like the 1948 embed Western individualism over communal or hierarchical alternatives prevalent elsewhere. However, empirical scrutiny reveals relativism's descriptive overreach: while moral diversity exists in application, core prohibitions—against , , or unprovoked violence—manifest in 99% or more of documented societies, per comprehensive anthropological codings, indicating underlying universals rather than incommensurable systems. Radical relativism also incurs logical , as its own advocacy for non-judgmental tolerance cannot consistently apply universally without contradicting its premise. The Eurocentric position reconciles these by attributing Western preeminence to the institutionalization of universal principles via historical contingencies like the Scientific Revolution and Reformation, which prioritized falsifiability and individual agency over dogmatic collectivism. Adoption of these—evident in post-1945 economic miracles in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, where GDP per capita rose from under $1,000 in 1950 to over $30,000 by 2020 through market liberalization and rule-based governance—demonstrates causal efficacy beyond cultural confines. Relativist objections, prevalent in postcolonial scholarship, often prioritize narrative symmetry over such outcomes, reflecting institutional incentives in Western academia to atone for historical power asymmetries through epistemic deference, yet this yields selective blindness to data, such as the correlation between universalist legal frameworks and reduced violence rates globally since 1945. Thus, Eurocentrism aligns universalism with verifiable progress, positing relativism as a heuristic hindrance to causal analysis of societal differentials.

Empirical Basis for Western Preeminence

The divergence in economic performance provides a foundational empirical indicator of Western preeminence. According to historical estimates compiled by , GDP per capita in and the reached approximately twice the Asian average by 1820, a gap that widened dramatically to over tenfold by 1950 due to sustained industrialization and productivity gains in the West. This trajectory reversed earlier parities; for instance, in 1700, per capita incomes in regions like and were comparable to Europe's on aggregate shares of world output (India at 22.6% versus Europe's 23.3%), but Europe's subsequent institutional and technological innovations drove while Eastern economies stagnated or declined under extractive systems. These data, derived from archival records, logs, and estimates, underscore how Western Europe's post-1500 acceleration—fueled by , banking, and early industry—outpaced global peers, with 2022 figures showing Western nations averaging over $40,000 per capita versus under $10,000 in most non-Western regions. Scientific achievement further substantiates this preeminence through metrics like Nobel Prizes, awarded since 1901 for groundbreaking contributions. Western countries (, North America, Australia, ) account for 82% of all laureates, with the alone securing 423 prizes by 2023, far exceeding any other nation. In physics, chemistry, and medicine—fields tied to empirical discovery—Europeans dominated early awards, reflecting the Scientific Revolution's origins in figures like Galileo (, 1564–1642) and Newton (, 1643–1727), whose methods systematized experimentation and . This concentration persists; for example, and the outperform per capita in STEM Nobels, correlating with dense networks of universities and research funding established in from the . Technological inventions originating in Europe amplify these patterns, enabling scalable applications that propelled global productivity. The printing press with movable type, invented by Johannes Gutenberg in Germany around 1440, democratized knowledge dissemination, facilitating the and by multiplying book production 100-fold within decades. The steam engine, refined by in (patented 1769), powered the [Industrial Revolution](/page/Industrial Revolution), increasing coal output from 10 million tons in Britain (1700) to 250 million by 1900 and enabling mechanized factories that raised output per worker by orders of magnitude. Such innovations, rooted in Europe's emphasis on empirical testing and property rights protecting inventors, contrast with contemporaneous Eastern advancements that, while sophisticated (e.g., Chinese ), lacked equivalent institutional incentives for continuous refinement and diffusion. Institutional frameworks in the West, particularly secure property rights and , empirically underpin this outperformance by fostering investment and innovation. ' analysis of historical records highlights how Europe's medieval guilds, joint-stock companies (e.g., , 1602), and legal traditions—evolving from Roman and Germanic —secured assets against arbitrary seizure, contrasting with Ottoman or Qing China's patrimonial systems that stifled . Ian Morris' social development index, quantifying energy capture, organization, , and war-making capacity over millennia, shows the West surpassing the East after 1800 (index rising from ~400 to over 1,000 by 1900 versus East's stagnation), attributable to leverage and bureaucratic efficiencies rather than alone. These metrics, while contested in relativist scholarship prone to ideological discounting of Western data, align with cross-verified archaeological, fiscal, and patent records demonstrating causal links between such institutions and sustained per capita advances.

Arguments Defending Eurocentrism

Verifiable Achievements in Science, Technology, and Institutions

The , emphasizing empirical observation, hypothesis testing, and mathematical formulation, emerged in during the 17th century, with (1564–1642) pioneering experimental verification of theories through controlled trials, such as his experiments demonstrating uniform acceleration independent of mass. (1643–1727) further formalized this approach in his (1687), integrating mechanistic laws of motion and gravitation derived from data, establishing a paradigm that prioritized falsifiable predictions over deductive authority. This European innovation underpinned subsequent global scientific progress, contrasting with non-empirical traditions elsewhere. Europe's dominance in foundational discoveries persisted into the , as evidenced by Nobel Prizes in physics, chemistry, and or : from 1901 to 2023, European nations collectively received 47% of awards, with per capita rates highest in countries like the , , and . When including the —largely built by European emigrants—Western laureates account for over 90% of Nobels, reflecting institutional continuity in rigorous, peer-reviewed inquiry rather than diffusion from non-Western sources. Technological advancements originated predominantly in Europe during the Industrial Revolution (c. 1760–1840), centered in Britain, where inventions mechanized production and enabled exponential . Key examples include James Watt's improved (patented 1769), which powered factories and transport, boosting Britain's GDP growth to 2% annually by 1850; the (1764) by , revolutionizing textile output; and the power loom (1785) by , scaling weaving efficiency. These built on cumulative European engineering, such as Newcomen's atmospheric engine (1712), yielding sustained innovation absent in contemporaneous non-European economies.
InventionInventor/OriginDateImpact
(improved), 1769Enabled mechanized factories, railways (e.g., Stockton-Darlington line, 1825), multiplying energy output 10-fold.
, 1764Increased yarn production from one to eight spindles, precursor to mass .
, 1785Automated , reducing labor needs by 90% in mills.
Modern institutions fostering innovation trace to medieval Europe, where the University of Bologna (founded 1088) introduced degree-granting structures for law and arts, evolving into autonomous corporations emphasizing and specialization. By 1500, over 60 such universities operated across (e.g., c. 1096, c. 1150), creating networks for knowledge transmission via printed texts post-Gutenberg (c. 1440, ), unlike guild-based or courtly learning elsewhere. This institutional framework—combining , patronage, and market incentives—generated self-sustaining scientific output, with Europe's pre-1800 university density correlating to later technological leadership.

Critiques of Equating Eurocentrism with Imperial Apologia

Critics contend that equating Eurocentrism with imperial apologia conflates empirical acknowledgment of Europe's historical advancements in science, , and with moral defense of colonial exploitation, thereby dismissing verifiable causal factors in Western dominance as mere ideological justification. This critique highlights that key European innovations, such as the from the 16th to 17th centuries and the beginning around 1760, preceded the height of formal imperial expansion in the late , suggesting endogenous institutional and intellectual developments—rather than overseas conquest—drove progress. Historians like argue that scorning Eurocentrism as prejudice obscures the fact that the rise of Western civilization constitutes the most significant historical phenomenon of the second millennium, rooted in competition, science, property rights, medicine, consumption, and , independent of imperial narratives. Such equating, proponents of this view assert, stems from postcolonial frameworks that prioritize deconstructive ideology over causal analysis, ignoring how non-European actors, including Japan's leaders in 1868, pragmatically adopted Western models precisely because of demonstrated superiority in military and industrial capabilities, not imperial coercion alone. Ian Morris's quantitative social development index, measuring energy capture, organization, , and war-making capacity across millennia, empirically demonstrates the West's lead emerging by 1500 CE—before transatlantic empires fully formed—attributable to geographical advantages, institutional adaptability, and leverage, not retrospective apologia. This data-driven approach counters charges of bias by applying uniform metrics to Eastern and Western societies, revealing temporary divergences rather than inherent racial or imperial destiny, thus decoupling Eurocentric from glorification. Furthermore, the critique emphasizes that true imperial apologia defends specific colonial outcomes, such as resource extraction or administrative legacies, whereas Eurocentrism as analytical lens focuses on universalizable principles like empirical inquiry and legal that enabled global , even if unevenly applied. Equating the two, according to these arguments, risks anachronistic projection, as pre-imperial European thinkers from the Enlightenment, such as in 1776, critiqued mercantilist empire while upholding causal explanations for Europe's edge in and . This distinction preserves truth-seeking by privileging evidence of output—e.g., Europe's patenting of the in 1698 and widespread adoption by 1800—over narrative reframing that attributes success solely to exploitation, a view undermined by comparative data showing Eastern stasis in similar metrics until external shocks.

Risks of Anti-Eurocentrism Leading to Relativist Denial of Facts

Critics argue that extreme anti-Eurocentrism fosters , which dismisses empirical disparities in civilizational outputs as mere constructs of power rather than reflections of differing institutional and intellectual capacities. This approach often equates disparate historical trajectories—such as Europe's lead in the with contemporaneous stagnation elsewhere—under a framework of equivalent validity, thereby denying the factual primacy of European innovations in fields like empirical and mechanical invention from the 16th to 19th centuries. One manifestation involves historiographical revisions that minimize Europe's unique "killer apps," including competition among states, scientific , and the , which Niall identifies as causal drivers of Western ascendancy, evidenced by metrics like the exponential rise in patents and GDP per capita in post-1500 compared to stagnant or declining non-Western empires. Relativist denial here risks perpetuating cycles of by discouraging the adoption of these verifiable mechanisms, as seen in postcolonial policies that prioritized ideological equity over institutional transplants, correlating with persistent economic divergences; for example, sub-Saharan Africa's average GDP growth lagged behind East Asia's by factors of 2-3 times from 1960 to 2000 when the latter emulated Western property and market reforms. In education, this relativism manifests as curricula that de-emphasize canonical Western texts and discoveries, framing them as culturally contingent rather than universally progressive, which undermines students' grasp of objective progress markers like rates ( reaching near-universal male by 1900 versus under 20% in many non-Western regions) or life expectancy gains tied to medical advancements. Such denial fosters intellectual paralysis, where facts about differential violence reduction—Steven Pinker's data showing per capita rates dropping 50-fold in from medieval to modern eras due to state monopolies on force—are subordinated to narratives of cultural equivalence, potentially eroding incentives for rigorous inquiry and replication of success factors. Ultimately, by privileging subjective narratives over , anti-Eurocentric hazards a broader societal to unexamined ideologies, as it erodes the capacity to distinguish effective from ineffective practices, evidenced in debates over "decolonizing" knowledge production that sideline metrics like Nobel Prizes in sciences (over 80% awarded to Western-origin individuals from 1901 to 2023). This not only distorts historical understanding but impedes adaptive policymaking, as regimes or movements rejecting Western-derived —such as certain 20th-century socialist experiments—consistently underperformed in technological output and human welfare compared to liberal-capitalist benchmarks.

Criticisms of Eurocentrism

Postcolonial and Dependency Theories

Postcolonial theory emerged in the late 1970s as a critique of Eurocentrism, positing that Western intellectual traditions impose a hegemonic that universalizes European experiences while essentializing and subordinating non-Western cultures. Edward Said's (1978) exemplified this by analyzing how 19th- and 20th-century European texts depicted the Islamic world as static and irrational, serving to legitimize imperial control rather than reflect empirical realities. Subsequent theorists like Homi Bhabha and Gayatri Spivak extended this to argue that Eurocentric knowledge production perpetuates "epistemic violence," erasing subaltern agency and framing colonial histories through a lens of European superiority. However, empirical assessments reveal limitations, as these discourse-focused analyses often sideline quantifiable Western advancements in and that predated and enabled global expansion, such as the Scientific Revolution's outputs from 1543 onward. Dependency theory, formulated in the 1950s and 1960s primarily by Latin American economists like Raúl Prebisch and André Gunder Frank, attributes peripheral underdevelopment to structural inequalities in the global capitalist system, where core nations extract surplus value through unequal trade. Frank's 1966 essay "The Development of Underdevelopment" claimed that integration into the world economy actively impedes growth in regions like Latin America, critiquing Eurocentrism for portraying Western industrialization as an endogenous model replicable elsewhere. Samir Amin, in works like Accumulation on a World Scale (1974) and Eurocentrism (1988), radicalized this by arguing that Eurocentric historiography masks how Europe's 15th-century ascent relied on peripheral exploitation, including the Atlantic slave trade's role in generating capital from 1500 to 1800, rather than inherent cultural or institutional superiority. Amin advocated "delinking" from the global system to foster autonomous development, viewing Eurocentrism as an ideological construct that naturalizes unequal exchange. Both frameworks intersect in challenging Eurocentrism's causal narratives, emphasizing how colonial legacies sustain neocolonial dependencies, but they encounter substantive empirical rebuttals. Dependency theory's core-periphery falters against evidence from East Asian "tiger" economies—South Korea's GDP rose from $158 in to $1,266 by via export-led integration, contradicting delinking prescriptions—highlighting overlooked internal reforms like land redistribution and education investments. Postcolonial theory's relativization of similarly struggles with falsifiable metrics, such as Europe's patent filings surging to over 80% of global totals by 1900, driven by institutional incentives absent in critiqued non-Western systems. Critics, including causal analysts, contend these theories prioritize ideological over rigorous data, potentially reflecting academic environments where external-blaming models align with prevailing anti-capitalist sentiments, thus underweighting endogenous factors like quality in explaining divergent outcomes.

Charges of Bias in Historiography and Knowledge Production

Critics of Eurocentrism contend that Western historiography systematically privileges European agency and achievements while distorting or omitting non-European contributions, thereby perpetuating a narrative of European exceptionalism as the default lens for global history. For example, traditional accounts have depicted Asian and African societies as inherently stagnant under concepts like "Oriental despotism," a framework that attributes the absence of private property rights and institutional innovation in those regions to cultural inferiority rather than contingent historical factors, thus justifying European expansion. This bias, rooted in 19th-century imperial ideologies, extends to knowledge production, where Euro-American epistemological standards—emphasizing empirical verification and universalism—are imposed as superior, marginalizing indigenous systems as anecdotal or mythical. In social sciences, such charges highlight how evidence from the global North is extrapolated universally, assuming European historical patterns (e.g., linear progress from to ) apply worldwide without accounting for divergent causal pathways in other regions. Postcolonial theorists argue this coloniality of power persists in academia, where curricula and peer-reviewed outputs undervalue non-Western archives, as seen in the underrepresentation of African oral traditions or Chinese bureaucratic innovations in mainstream narratives of . Specific instances include the framing of pre-colonial as pre-historical voids awaiting European "discovery," which obscures complex societies like the Inca's administrative networks that rivaled contemporary European ones in scale by the . These accusations, however, frequently originate from postcolonial frameworks within academia, an environment documented to exhibit systemic ideological skews favoring interpretations over rigorous causal scrutiny of differential outcomes, such as Europe's disproportionate role in the due to institutional factors like property rights and experimental methodologies. Critics of the charges counter that labeling factual emphasis on verifiable European advancements—e.g., the 17th-century Dutch Republic's innovations in and enabling global trade dominance—as ignores first-principles explanations for why such developments occurred there rather than elsewhere, potentially reflecting a defensive relativism against empirical disparities. Empirical analyses suggest that while historiographical corrections for overlooked non-European agency are warranted, wholesale dismissals of Eurocentric elements risk substituting one ideological lens for another, as postcolonial narratives sometimes prioritize grievance over evidence-based reconstruction of events like the 1492 Columbian Exchange's demographic impacts.

Internal Western Critiques and Self-Flagellation

Within Western intellectual traditions, critiques of Eurocentrism have originated from thinkers associated with the , such as Theodor Adorno and , who in their 1947 work argued that the Enlightenment's emphasis on instrumental reason culminated in totalitarian domination and cultural commodification, thereby diagnosing Western rationality itself as a source of oppression. This internal analysis framed Western progress not as emancipatory but as inherently exploitative, influencing subsequent generations to view Eurocentric knowledge production as complicit in maintaining power imbalances. Building on these foundations, postmodern and postcolonial frameworks adopted in Western academia during the late 20th century amplified self-critique, with scholars like examining how Western discourses construct power-knowledge regimes that marginalize non-European perspectives. By the 2010s, this evolved into organized "" efforts in universities, such as the Rhodes Must Fall campaign starting at the in 2015 and spreading to , demanding removal of colonial-era symbols and reforms to dismantle perceived Eurocentric biases in syllabi. In the UK, requests in 2020 revealed that only about 19% of universities explicitly committed to decolonizing curricula, often involving additions of non-Western texts and critiques of canonical Western authors as vehicles of . Such initiatives have been characterized by observers as , wherein Western institutions prioritize atonement for historical over balanced assessment of its legacies, including empirical advancements in , , and that elevated global living standards. For instance, curricular shifts emphasize Western guilt narratives, downplaying verifiable causal factors like institutional innovations that enabled industrialization, while amplifying dependency theories without equivalent scrutiny of internal non-Western dynamics. Critics contend this reflexive posture, prevalent in left-leaning academic environments, fosters that undermines recognition of Western in fostering , potentially eroding cultural confidence amid evidence of superior outcomes in and innovation metrics.

Manifestations and Impacts

In Historiography and Regional Narratives

Eurocentrism in historiography often structures global narratives around European chronologies and philosophical assumptions, portraying Europe as the primary locus of historical progress. A prominent example is Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel's Lectures on the Philosophy of History (1837), which asserted that sub-Saharan Africa constituted "the Unhistorical, Undeveloped Spirit, still involved in the conditions of mere nature," excluding it from the dialectical unfolding of world spirit that culminated in European modernity. Similarly, traditional world history periodizations—dividing eras into "ancient," "medieval," and "modern"—derive from European milestones like the fall of Rome (476 CE) or the Renaissance (14th–17th centuries), imposing these frameworks on non-European regions and thereby distorting timelines of independent developments elsewhere. Such approaches, prevalent in 19th- and early 20th-century scholarship, implicitly positioned non-Western histories as preparatory or peripheral to European advancement. In regional narratives, Eurocentrism manifests by emphasizing European interactions—such as exploration, trade, or colonization—while marginalizing indigenous achievements and causal dynamics. For , accounts frequently depicted the continent as a "dark" void of state formation until European contact in the , overlooking entities like the (c. 1235–1670 CE), whose ruler demonstrated vast wealth during his 1324 pilgrimage to , with resources equivalent to approximately $400 billion in adjusted modern terms derived from gold and salt trade control. This selective focus, rooted in colonial-era ethnographies, understated Africa's internal innovations in governance, architecture (e.g., , c. 11th–15th centuries), and trans-Saharan commerce, framing European arrival as the catalyst for "civilization" rather than an interruption of established polities. Latin American narratives under Eurocentric lenses prioritize Iberian conquests from 1492 onward, reducing pre-Columbian societies to static backdrops for European agency and downplaying autonomous complexities. The (c. 1438–1533 CE), for instance, encompassed roughly 2,500 miles of Andean territory—the largest pre-Columbian state in the —with engineering feats like 25,000 miles of roads and agricultural terraces supporting a population of 10–12 million, yet histories often subsume these under Spanish narratives of "discovery" and evangelization. In the Islamic world and Asia, Eurocentric accounts portray post-8th-century declines as inherent stagnation, minimizing the Golden Age's (c. 8th–13th centuries) advancements—such as Al-Khwarizmi's foundational algebra (c. 820 CE) or Ibn al-Haytham's experiments influencing later European science—by attributing them primarily to Greek preservation rather than original synthesis and transmission via translations in Toledo (). These patterns, while reflecting some empirical asymmetries in sustained institutional innovation, have perpetuated teleological views that undervalue non-European causal factors in global historical trajectories.

Africa

Eurocentric historiography traditionally portrayed sub-Saharan as a region outside the purview of meaningful historical processes, emphasizing European exploration and colonization as the catalysts for any notable development. This framework, exemplified by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel's assertion in his Lectures on the that " is no historical part of the World," positioned the continent as static and ahistorical, inhabited by societies lacking progressive institutions, written records, or technological innovation until external intervention. Such narratives marginalized evidence of pre-colonial polities, including the Kingdom of Aksum (flourishing from circa 100–940 CE with coinage and trade networks extending to the ), the (peaking in the 14th century under , whose wealth reportedly devalued gold in during his 1324 pilgrimage), and (a stone-walled complex built between the 11th and 15th centuries supporting up to 18,000 inhabitants through gold mining and ). These portrayals often invoked pseudoscientific theories like the Hamitic hypothesis, which attributed African achievements—such as architectural feats or —to migrations of lighter-skinned "" (interpreted as non-African Caucasoids) rather than indigenous Bantu or , thereby denying local agency and ingenuity. In colonial-era scholarship, historians like reinforced this by claiming in 1963 that African was merely "the unrewarding gyrations of barbarous tribes in picturesque but irrelevant corners of the globe," framing European contact as the onset of civilization through infrastructure, legal systems, and . This selective focus obscured internal African dynamics, such as the (involving up to 17 million people from the 7th to 19th centuries, often facilitated by African kingdoms like Dahomey) and ecological constraints like the belt, which limited draft animals and plow agriculture across much of the continent, hindering large-scale centralization comparable to Eurasian models. The impacts persisted into postcolonial education and global scholarship, where African narratives remained tethered to colonial partitions (e.g., the 1884–1885 dividing the continent into 50 territories ignoring ethnic boundaries, leading to ongoing conflicts like the of 1994) and dependency on European archives, perpetuating stereotypes of perpetual victimhood or primitivism. Economic historiography exemplified conceptual Eurocentrism by imposing Western metrics of "development," such as state centralization or market integration, without accounting for adaptive institutions like age-grade systems in Igbo societies or long-distance trade in the , which sustained prosperity without feudal hierarchies. While critiques from scholars like highlighted underdevelopment via exploitation (e.g., the Belgian Congo's rubber quotas extracting 10 million tons from 1904–1913, causing demographic collapse), they often downplayed pre-colonial factors like intertribal warfare and environmental determinism, reflecting academia's systemic bias toward external causation over internal causal realism. Recent archaeological data, including radiocarbon-dated ironworking sites from 2000 BCE in Nigeria's , challenge outright denial but underscore how Eurocentric lenses delayed integration of such empirical evidence into mainstream accounts until the late 20th century.

Latin America

In Latin American , Eurocentrism manifests through a predominant focus on European agency during the conquest era, framing Christopher Columbus's voyage as the effective origin of the region's and portraying indigenous societies as static or preparatory stages awaiting European intervention. This approach relies heavily on colonial-era European sources, such as Spanish chroniclers' accounts, which emphasize the technological and organizational superiority of conquistadors like in 1519–1521, while downplaying the scale and sophistication of pre-existing empires. For instance, the Aztec Triple Alliance, which dominated central with a exceeding 5 million and advanced hydraulic supporting urban centers like , is often narrated primarily through the lens of its rapid collapse following smallpox epidemics and military defeats, estimated to have reduced indigenous populations by 80–90% within a century of contact. Such narratives extend to post-conquest periods, where independence movements in the early —such as Simón Bolívar's campaigns from onward—are depicted as extensions of European Enlightenment ideals, with creole elites positioned as bearers of progress against both Spanish rule and indigenous "backwardness." Aníbal Quijano's 2000 analysis of "coloniality of power" attributes this to a persistent Eurocentric classification system rooted in racial hierarchies established during colonization, which subordinates non-European knowledge production and frames Latin America's economic dependencies as inherent rather than structurally imposed. In Andean contexts, the Inca Empire's administrative network—spanning over 2,000 kilometers of roads and quipu-based record-keeping by 1532—is frequently subordinated to Portuguese and Spanish imperial achievements, reinforcing a view of the region as a peripheral recipient of transatlantic innovations like the and wheeled vehicles, absent in pre-Columbian transport but present in Mesoamerican toys. The impacts of these historiographic biases include distorted national identities that privilege mestizaje as a European-indigenous synthesis under Western institutional frameworks, evident in 20th-century indigenista movements in and , which romanticized but ultimately marginalized pure indigenous perspectives in favor of narratives aligned with global . This has perpetuated dependency paradigms in scholarship, as critiqued in Quijano's framework, where Latin America's is causally linked to Eurocentric global power structures originating in , though empirical studies highlight additional factors like geographic isolation and post-independence governance failures. In educational materials, this bias persists, with surveys of Latin American textbooks revealing overemphasis on colonial legacies as explanatory for contemporary inequalities, sidelining internal pre- and post-colonial dynamics.

Islamic World and Asia


Eurocentrism in the historiography of the Islamic world often imposes a linear rise-and-fall periodization, delineating an early "Golden Age" of scientific and cultural flourishing from the 8th to 13th centuries, followed by a protracted "decline" attributed to religious dogmatism and intellectual stagnation, particularly after the influence of figures like al-Ghazali (d. 1111). This framework contrasts sharply with narratives of uninterrupted European progress, framing Islamic societies as inherently resistant to innovation and peripheral to global dynamics unless interacting with the West. Such portrayals overlook empirical evidence of continued vitality, including 16th- to 19th-century advancements in philosophy, astronomy, and administration, as documented by scholars like Marshall Hodgson and Ahmad Dallal, who highlight peaks under Ottoman and Mughal rule extending into the 18th century. In Ottoman , Eurocentric biases manifest as depictions of the empire as a static "foil" for European exceptionalism, emphasizing post-Suleiman (r. 1520–1566) decay through administrative sclerosis and military obsolescence, while minimizing endogenous capitalist developments and global trade integrations. This narrative, rooted in 19th-century Orientalist tropes, attributes stagnation to Islamic institutions rather than comparative geopolitical pressures or internal reforms, such as the era (1839–1876) under statesmen like Mustafa Resid Pasha, which introduced legal codes modeled on European systems alongside preservation of Islamic governance. The impact has been a distorted causal understanding, undervaluing the empire's role in Eurasian commerce—controlling key routes until the —and fostering views of non-European empires as pre-modern anomalies. For , Eurocentric historiography frequently evaluates trajectories against a Western of modernization, portraying pre-colonial societies as stagnant or cyclical, lacking the "revolutions" that propelled , such as industrialization or nation-state formation. In East Asian narratives, textbooks allocate minimal space—often under 10% of total content—to regions like and compared to , misattributing innovations like and the to Western diffusion while labeling as inherently conservative despite its adaptive role over 2,500 years. Southeast Asian histories similarly frame colonial interventions as catalysts for progress, crediting European rule with and middle-class emergence by the early , thereby downplaying indigenous systems and trade networks that sustained polities like Ayutthaya from the 14th to 18th centuries. These biases have impacted knowledge production by reinforcing a periphery-core model, where Asian and Islamic achievements are footnotes to European expansion, evidenced by the underrepresentation of events like the (751 CE), which facilitated papermaking's spread to via Islamic intermediaries. Recent reassessments, drawing on quantitative data like GDP estimates from Angus Maddison's datasets, indicate Asia's dominance in global output—over 50% until 1820—challenging decline theses and highlighting Eurocentrism's role in retrospective rather than contemporaneous realities.

In Cultural and Social Standards

Eurocentrism in cultural and social standards involves the elevation of Western norms—such as individualistic values, nuclear family structures, and aesthetic ideals favoring fair skin, slim physiques, and symmetrical features—as benchmarks for progress or universality, often disseminated via global media and commerce. This perspective posits European-derived practices as inherently superior, marginalizing non-Western traditions like extended kinship systems or diverse body ideals rooted in local ecologies and histories. Empirical data indicate that such standards have permeated consumer markets, with non-Western adoption frequently driven by economic aspirations rather than coercion, though correlated with psychological costs like reduced self-esteem in mismatched populations. In beauty norms and consumer industries, Eurocentric ideals have reshaped global preferences, exemplified by the proliferation of skin-lightening products in and , where markets exceed $10 billion annually as of 2020, often linked to associations of lighter complexions with . Studies document health risks from these products, including and , alongside behavioral shifts like increased cosmetic surgeries mimicking Western features in countries such as and . While postcolonial critiques attribute this to fostering inferiority, evidence suggests pre-colonial hierarchies in many societies already favored lighter skin among elites due to class-based sun avoidance, amplified by modern rather than originating solely from European imposition. Social standards reflect tensions between Western emphases on personal autonomy and non-Western collectivism, with global value surveys from 1981 to 2020 showing partial convergence toward in urbanizing , correlating with higher GDP growth but also declining rates below replacement levels in (1.3 births per woman in 2023) and (0.8 in 2023). Education systems perpetuate this through curricula prioritizing Enlightenment-derived rationalism and , which have empirically driven rates from under 20% in pre-colonially to over 60% by 2020 via Western-modeled schooling, though often at the expense of indigenous knowledge transmission. Media representation reinforces these dynamics, with Hollywood and Western advertising dominating global exports—accounting for 70% of international revenue in —portraying Eurocentric protagonists and lifestyles as aspirational, leading to documented identity dilution in youth cohorts via exposure. Critiques from academic sources, frequently aligned with postcolonial frameworks, highlight underrepresentation of non-Western narratives, yet overlook causal links between adoption of these standards and measurable gains in gender equity and , as seen in rising female workforce participation in adopting nations. in such analyses warrants scrutiny, given institutional biases toward in .

Beauty Norms and Consumer Industries

Eurocentric beauty norms, characterized by preferences for lighter skin tones, straight hair, narrower facial features, and slimmer body types derived from European aesthetics, have been propagated globally through colonial legacies dating to the , when European powers imposed racial hierarchies that elevated white physical traits as superior during conquests in , , and the . This imposition intertwined with local class-based preferences for lighter skin in regions like , but colonial media and governance amplified distinctly European ideals, such as aquiline noses and blue eyes, as markers of refinement and status. By the , European colonial administrations in and documented and reinforced these standards through education systems and trade, marginalizing indigenous traits like broader noses or coiled hair as inferior. In consumer industries, this manifests prominently in the sector, where multinational corporations headquartered in and dominate production and marketing of products targeting Eurocentric alterations. The global skin lightening products market, heavily skewed toward and , reached $9.22 billion in 2023, with projections to $16.42 billion by 2032, driven by demand for creams containing and to mimic fairer complexions. In the and , the segment generated $927.7 million in 2023, reflecting persistent uptake despite health risks like reported in unregulated imports from Western brands. and conglomerates like and Estée Lauder, controlling over 40% of the $500 billion global market as of 2023, prioritize advertising models with Eurocentric features—light skin and straight hair—even in diverse campaigns, perpetuating these norms via algorithms that amplify Western-influenced content to non-European audiences. Media representation reinforces this through underrepresentation of non-Eurocentric traits in high-profile outlets. At in 2019, while 48% of models were non-white, the majority featured altered or hybridized appearances—such as straightened hair or skin-lightening makeup—to align with European-derived ideals, limiting authentic diversity. In , post-colonial American media exports since the mid-20th century have sustained this, with surveys showing 70-80% of South Korean and Indian consumers citing Hollywood imagery as influencing preferences for double-eyelid surgeries and , procedures that generated $5 billion annually in by 2021. These industries' economic incentives favor Eurocentric templates, as evidenced by higher sales returns from campaigns using such models, though recent data indicate modest shifts toward local adaptations in markets like , where afro-textured hair products grew 15% year-over-year in 2023 amid pushback against imported standards.

Education and Media Representation

In Western educational systems, history curricula allocate the majority of instructional time to European and national histories, reflecting the region's pivotal role in developments such as the , Enlightenment, and , which laid foundations for modern institutions like representative government and empirical science. A 2021 survey of English secondary schools found that only 42% teach the of a non-European society in depth during Key Stage 3 (ages 11-14), with just 23% devoting a series of lessons to Black or Asian British history. At GCSE level, approximately one-third of students encounter non-European or American cultures, predominantly through a single module on China under Mao Zedong, while fewer than 2% study other non-invasion contexts like the Mughal Empire. This emphasis aligns with Europe's causal contributions to global technological and institutional advancements—evidenced by metrics like patent origins and GDP per capita surges from 1500 onward—but postcolonial critiques, often originating in academia with systemic ideological skews toward relativism, contend it fosters cultural alienation among minority students without robust empirical evidence of diminished learning outcomes. Such curricular priorities extend to broader , where canonical texts from Greek, Roman, and European philosophers dominate reading lists, comprising over 70% of required works in many U.S. and U.K. programs, as non-Western philosophies receive ancillary treatment unless tied to colonial interactions. This structure prioritizes first-principles reasoning traceable to Western traditions, including Aristotelian logic and Baconian , which underpin scientific methodology, yet it has prompted efforts claiming , though these frequently substitute verifiable achievements with equity absent . Empirical pushback highlights that Western-focused correlates with higher indices in nations like those in the , suggesting functional utility over putative bias. In media, representation mirrors demographic and market realities, with Western outlets prioritizing domestic audiences and narratives rooted in local cultural outputs; for instance, a 2022 Pew Research Center survey indicated 76% of U.S. journalists identify as white, influencing coverage that allocates disproportionate airtime to European-descended events. Hollywood films, dominating global with over 70% in 2023, feature non-Western characters in under 30% of lead roles, often in conflict-driven per content analyses of 3,000+ titles from 2000-2021, though diversity metrics show incremental rises post-2015 amid audience demands. This pattern stems from production hubs in free-market environments fostering high-quality , rather than deliberate exclusion, as evidenced by non-Western media like Bollywood achieving regional dominance without reciprocal global penetration due to differing institutional capacities; critiques of Eurocentric tropes, prevalent in literature, overlook these structural factors and amplify unverified harm claims from ideologically aligned sources.

Contemporary Debates

Academia and Decolonization Movements

Decolonization movements in academia gained momentum in the mid-2010s, particularly through the Rhodes Must Fall (RMF) campaign initiated at the on March 9, 2015, which protested the statue of as a symbol of colonial legacy and demanded broader reforms to address perceived Eurocentrism in curricula and institutional structures. The movement spread to the in 2015, inspiring similar actions worldwide, including calls to remove Eurocentric content from syllabi and prioritize non-Western knowledge systems. Proponents argued that academic curricula perpetuate Eurocentrism by centering European historical narratives, philosophies, and scientific paradigms, thereby marginalizing indigenous and Global South perspectives. These movements advocate for "decolonizing the " through strategies such as diversifying readings to include Afrocentric or postcolonial texts, redesigning courses to "unmask" , and integrating that challenges the universality of Eurocentric production. For instance, in and social sciences, efforts focus on decentering by foregrounding local narratives from regions like the Anglophone or , as seen in systematic reviews of reforms post-RMF. Workshops and initiatives, such as those at in 2021, emphasize prereading materials critiquing colonial distortions in . However, empirical analyses of curricula, such as reviews of English textbooks, often rely on postcolonial theoretical lenses rather than quantitative metrics of knowledge omission or bias, revealing a predominance of interpretive claims over verifiable data on content distribution. Critics contend that decolonization efforts risk undermining academic rigor and freedom by prioritizing identity-based redistribution over evidence-based inquiry, potentially conflating historical European achievements—such as advancements in empirical —with inherent rather than causal factors like institutional stability and incremental innovation. In , RMF's dual demands for and curricular overhaul led to institutional disruptions between 2015 and 2017, but implementations have been uneven, with some universities adding diverse readings while facing accusations of ideological conformity akin to historical "struggle sessions." Studies highlight tensions, including the conceptual vagueness of "," which can obscure practical challenges like reconciling competing knowledge claims without empirical adjudication. Academic sources advancing these critiques often note systemic biases in higher education toward progressive frameworks, where Eurocentrism is framed structurally but rarely tested against metrics of scientific validity. By the early 2020s, had influenced policy in institutions like universities, prompting reviews of Eurocentric norms in fields from to STEM, though measurable outcomes remain limited to anecdotal changes rather than large-scale empirical shifts in paradigms. Resistance persists, with some portraying the push as an overreaction driven by moral panics rather than proportionate responses to verified imbalances, underscoring ongoing debates over whether such movements enhance or politicize scholarship.

Politics and International Relations in the 2020s

In the 2020s, Eurocentrism in has been evident in the prioritization of European security concerns within Western-led institutions, often framing global threats through lenses derived from historical European experiences such as interstate wars and . For instance, the European Union's response to Russia's 2022 invasion of emphasized a "rules-based " rooted in post-World War II European norms, allocating over €100 billion in aid by mid-2025 while downplaying parallel crises in and the that affect non-European populations disproportionately. This approach has drawn criticism for reinforcing power asymmetries, as EU assessments of risks like migration or frequently apply Eurocentric metrics that undervalue non-Western agency and historical contexts. Critiques from Global South perspectives highlight how such policies perpetuate colonial-era dynamics, evident in EU initiatives like the strategy launched in , which positions European investments in and as alternatives to China's Belt and Road but often imposes conditionalities aligned with ' regulatory standards rather than recipient countries' priorities. Academic analyses, frequently influenced by postcolonial frameworks prevalent in European universities, argue this reflects an unreflexive Eurocentrism that marginalizes Southern voices in dialogues, as seen in EU-Algeria relations where energy dependencies are framed through a security lens prioritizing European diversification over mutual economic realism. However, empirical data on UN voting patterns from 2022-2024 show that while Western states condemned Russia's actions nearly unanimously, over 30 non-aligned nations abstained or opposed, signaling resistance to what they perceive as selective enforcement of universal norms favoring European geopolitical interests. The emergence of multipolarity has intensified debates, with the expansion of in January 2024 to include , , , and the UAE—bringing membership to ten nations representing 45% of global population—challenging Eurocentric dominance in institutions like the IMF and World Bank, where voting shares remain skewed toward Western creditors despite reforms discussed at the 2023 summit. European policymakers' focus on countering Russian and Chinese influence, as articulated in the EU's 2022 Strategic Compass, often overlooks how non-Western states prioritize developmental over ideological alignments, leading to faltering European in regions like where trade with surpassed EU volumes by 2023. Proponents of Eurocentric realism counter that multipolar shifts risk destabilizing proven liberal institutions built on Enlightenment-derived principles, yet data from the 2024 Security Report indicate that power diffusion has not yet eroded Western economic leverage, with the EU's GDP share at 16% versus ' 35% when adjusted for . These tensions underscore a broader reassessment in international forums, where accusations of Eurocentrism serve both genuine critiques of and strategic narratives from authoritarian regimes to deflect of domestic . For example, at the 2023 BRICS summit in , leaders invoked anti-Eurocentric rhetoric to justify dedollarization efforts, yet implementation has been limited, with only 2-3% of global trade shifting from the dollar by 2025 per IMF tracking. Truth-seeking analysis requires distinguishing empirical multipolar gains—such as increased South-South trade volumes rising 20% annually since 2020—from overstated claims that ignore Europe's enduring through technology and standards-setting.

Empirical Pushback and Recent Reassessments

Historical economic data indicate that divergence between and other regions began in the late medieval period, well before widespread European overseas expansion, challenging narratives attributing Europe's rise solely to colonial exploitation. According to reconstructions by , 's GDP per capita reached approximately 1,200 international dollars by 1500, surpassing levels in (600 dollars) and (550 dollars), with the gap widening to twice the Asian average by 1820. This early divergence, evident from the , aligns with internal European developments such as competitive markets for ideas amid political fragmentation, rather than exogenous shocks from global interactions. Institutional analyses further support this reassessment, demonstrating how Atlantic trade after reinforced inclusive institutions in European regions with pre-existing commercial traditions, fostering growth through property rights and constraint on executive power. , Simon Johnson, and James Robinson's examination of city-level data from –1850 reveals that areas with greater exposure to trade experienced sustained increases, driven by institutional adaptations rather than resource inflows alone. Similarly, Joel Mokyr's synthesis of macro-historical patterns, apprenticeship records, and metrics attributes the to a "culture of growth" in –1700 , characterized by Baconian and openness to novelty, which non-European polities lacked due to epistemic closure and elite resistance to . These findings counter Eurocentric critiques by grounding in verifiable causal mechanisms, including fragmented states incentivizing to avoid conquest. Critiques of postcolonial theory highlight its empirical shortcomings in explaining uneven capitalist penetration. Vivek Chibber's analysis of , drawing on 19th-century Indian and labor histories, argues that postcolonial emphasis on cultural incommensurability fails to account for universal subaltern interests in survival and autonomy, which propelled market integration in but were suppressed by in ; empirical records of revolts and show no fundamental divergence in class agency. Such reassessments underscore how postcolonial frameworks, often advanced in bias-prone academic settings, prioritize discursive power over material causation, neglecting data on endogenous stagnation in non- empires. Reevaluations of colonialism's legacies reveal mixed but quantifiable positives, particularly where European settlement was dense. Cross-country regressions indicate that higher proportions of European descendants in former colonies correlate with 20–30% higher contemporary incomes, mediated by transplanted legal and educational systems. In and , metropolitan identity influenced post-independence growth trajectories, with British and French colonies outperforming others by 1–2% annually in GDP terms due to infrastructure legacies, though extraction costs were offset by institutional transplants. These empirical insights, emerging amid movements, prompt reassessments favoring causal realism over ideological rejection of Western influence.

References

  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/eurocentrism
  2. https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-030-74923-1_78
  3. https://historymatters.sites.sheffield.ac.uk/blog-archive/2021/european-history-and-eurocentrism-a-conversation-between-dina-gusejnova
  4. https://egc.yale.edu/sites/default/files/2023-12/Innovation%2520and%2520the%2520Great%2520Divergence%2520v3.pdf
  5. https://shahidhraja.medium.com/the-great-divergence-origin-and-causes-ab3f098dcf4a
  6. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/eurocentrism-in-european-history-and-memory/47B4DF741CAAC7179EFDFCD1CCBE7949
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353135894_A_word_of_caution_on_Eurocentrism_critiques_Orientalism_or_Universalism
  8. https://www.aei.org/research-products/speech/fallacies-of-eurocentrism-and-afrocentrism/
  9. https://www.academia.edu/38441569/Criticizing_Eurocentrism_Limitations_and_Alternatives
  10. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/eurocentrism_n
  11. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Eurocentric
  12. https://inter-journal.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/2024/09/17/anti-eurocentric-eurocentrism/
  13. https://sites.tufts.edu/rcdkeywords/eurocentrism/
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293958727_Eurocentrism_and_Orientalism
  15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2784761
  16. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/ethnic-and-cultural-studies/eurocentrism
  17. https://subjectguides.library.american.edu/c.php?g=1025915&p=7749739
  18. https://politikon.iapss.org/index.php/politikon/article/view/235
  19. https://politikon.iapss.org/index.php/politikon/article/download/237/241/494
  20. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119076506.wbeps126
  21. https://www.jhiblog.org/2022/02/14/the-perils-of-cold-war-eurocentrism/
  22. https://shs.cairn.info/journal-raisons-politiques-2020-4-page-43?lang=en
  23. https://angelonasios.substack.com/p/were-the-ancient-greeks-european
  24. https://www.philipharland.com/Blog/2023/10/europeans-asians-and-greeks-aristotle-on-environment-and-ethnic-hierarchies-fourth-century-bce/
  25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1087451
  26. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-aristotles-politics/naturalslavery/D0B3D9F174641FE4DE26C10FF350DAD2
  27. https://roman-empire.net/society/what-did-the-romans-think-about-race-and-identity
  28. https://brewminate.com/they-called-it-civilization-the-dynamics-of-cultural-change-in-the-roman-empire/
  29. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/2u5lqh/did_latin_romans_ever_think_that_they_were_the/
  30. https://christianhistoryinstitute.org/magazine/article/charlemagne-idea-of-christendom
  31. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/17/the-eurocentric-fallacy-the-myths-that-underpin-european-identity
  32. https://juicyecumenism.com/2025/02/04/vanished-pre-european-christendom/
  33. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/enlightenment/
  34. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/idea-of-europe/great-republic-of-cultivated-minds-17121815/1301863BF4E21010435614B579058BE6
  35. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/montesquieu/
  36. https://www.spatialhistory.net/cities/2022/10/the-impacts-of-montesquieus-deterministic-arguments-on-colonialism/
  37. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/kantian-review/article/kant-on-race-and-barbarism-towards-a-more-complex-view-on-racism-and-anticolonialism-in-kant/3C67630B121746FB97B749F2AE4CEB8F
  38. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alJaltUmrGo
  39. https://www.the-map-as-history.com/European-colonization-19th-20th-centuries
  40. https://monthlyreview.org/articles/economic-history-and-the-east-wind/
  41. https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/expansion-was-everything
  42. https://hal.science/hal-04083064/document
  43. https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/vlambropoulos/wp-content/uploads/sites/718/2019/06/The-Rise-of-eurocentrism.pdf
  44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1mf71b8.7?seq=1
  45. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8421/68b422a2418a0bf9729d78f285e49ae6a150.pdf
  46. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history/article/return-of-civilizationand-of-arnold-toynbee/FE6F858900CBB1843DD7C0D3DD5BE360
  47. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/676409
  48. https://carnegieendowment.org/europe/strategic-europe/2015/05/judy-asks-is-the-post-wwii-global-order-finally-breaking-down?lang=en
  49. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/scer.10.1147137
  50. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w20853/w20853.pdf
  51. http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/Hoffman2012.pdf
  52. https://eh.net/book_reviews/why-did-europe-conquer-the-world/
  53. https://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/jmokyr/Zywicki.PDF
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X23000803
  55. https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/daron-acemoglu/
  56. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/alesina/files/cultureandinstitutions_jel_2014.pdf
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8710723/
  58. https://www.sciencealert.com/these-7-rules-form-a-universal-moral-code-shared-by-every-culture-study-finds
  59. https://www.jubileecentre.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Curry.pdf
  60. https://ijsser.org/more2023.php?id=130
  61. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=tis
  62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2022285
  63. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4460861
  64. https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/communications/news/universality-human-rights
  65. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/seminars/seminars/conferences/econchange/programme/maddison.pdf
  66. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/lw76oe/as_the_painstaking_statistical_work_ofmaddison/
  67. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-maddison-project-database
  68. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/10/15/the-amazing-history-of-the-nobel-prize-told-in-maps-and-charts/
  69. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/nobel-prizes-by-country
  70. https://www.thoughtco.com/notable-european-scientists-1221837
  71. https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/1ls4i46/oc_nobel_prizes_in_stem_by_country/
  72. https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-Europe/Renaissance-science-and-technology
  73. https://www.quora.com/What-s-a-list-of-as-many-European-inventions-as-possible
  74. https://eh.net/book_reviews/the-wealth-and-poverty-of-nations-why-are-some-so-rich-and-others-so-poor/
  75. https://pzacad.pitzer.edu/~lyamane/ianmorris.pdf
  76. https://www.amazon.com/Why-West-Rules-Now-Patterns/dp/0374290024
  77. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-fmcc-worldcivilization2-1/chapter/the-scientific-revolution/
  78. https://stats.areppim.com/stats/stats_nobelhierarchy.htm
  79. https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/10/09/which-countries-breed-nobel-laureates-and-which-import-them
  80. https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/looking-back-at-the-remarkable-history-of-the-nobel-prize-from-1901-2020-using-maps-charts-and-tables/
  81. https://www.historyhit.com/key-inventions-of-the-industrial-revolution/
  82. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/2204/top-10-inventions-of-the-industrial-revolution/
  83. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/history-pre-modern-european-universities-nutshell
  84. https://academic.oup.com/jeea/article/22/4/1541/7438871
  85. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/books/review/civilization-the-west-and-the-rest-by-niall-ferguson-book-review.html
  86. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/8698064-it-is-not-eurocentrism-or-anti--orientalism-to-say-that-the
  87. https://classics.stanford.edu/publications/why-west-rules-now-patterns-history-and-what-they-reveal-about-future
  88. https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780312611699/whythewestrulesfornow/
  89. https://appliedsentience.com/2015/03/31/the-excesses-of-anti-eurocentrism/
  90. https://newcriterion.com/article/the-killing-of-history-why-relativism-is-wrong/
  91. https://c2cjournal.ca/2012/03/civilization-the-west-and-the-rest/
  92. https://c2cjournal.ca/2023/08/from-relativism-to-wokism-a-path-of-confusion-fallacy-and-self-destruction/
  93. https://blog.apaonline.org/2021/07/29/why-relativism-is-the-worst-idea-ever/
  94. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377317450_Theorists_of_Postcolonialism_Critique_on_the_Eurocentric_understanding_of_%27history%27
  95. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10624-024-09714-2
  96. https://aeon.co/essays/if-you-want-decolonisation-go-to-the-economics-of-samir-amin
  97. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03056244.2021.1896262
  98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367336288_Dependency_theory_strengths_weaknesses_and_its_relevance_today
  99. https://library.fes.de/libalt/journals/swetsfulltext/14831040.pdf
  100. https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-weaknesses-of-post-colonial-theory
  101. https://banotes.org/international-relations/evaluating-dependency-theory-critiques-counterarguments/
  102. https://hrjha.lexarcheus.com/storage/app/public/pdf/1748958875.pdf
  103. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4416641
  104. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4971081
  105. https://medium.com/libraries-in-the-margins/decoding-the-eurocentric-narrative-trap-62f42ae56859
  106. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2119373119
  107. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384443306_Eurocentrism_and_coloniality_of_power_in_knowledge_production_in_postcolonial_states
  108. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hic3.12153
  109. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00208817221142485
  110. https://unherd.com/2020/07/why-shouldnt-the-curriculum-be-eurocentric/
  111. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/479991434.pdf
  112. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353982080_The_limits_of_the_Eurocentric_critique_to_internationalization_of_higher_education_and_the_possibilities_of_decolonial_inflection
  113. https://aeon.co/essays/how-the-frankfurt-school-diagnosed-the-ills-of-western-civilisation
  114. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-theory/
  115. https://iep.utm.edu/critical-theory-frankfurt-school/
  116. https://www.nas.org/academic-questions/33/3/decolonizing-the-curriculum
  117. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/11/only-fifth-of-uk-universities-have-said-they-will-decolonise-curriculum
  118. https://unherd.com/2021/05/the-self-loathing-of-the-west/
  119. https://newcriterion.com/article/a-mission-of-guilt/
  120. https://quillette.com/2021/04/10/how-will-decolonizing-the-curriculum-help-the-poor-and-dispossessed/
  121. https://www.kas.de/en/web/auslandsinformationen/artikel/detail/-/content/after-postcolonialism
  122. https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&context=social_encounters
  123. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2308857
  124. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-47379458
  125. http://blogs.4j.lane.edu/davis_j/files/2018/05/HA-Chapter-26.pdf
  126. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2224&context=jhm
  127. https://www.africanhistoryextra.com/p/eurocentrism-afrocentrism-and-the
  128. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/decolonizing-teaching-africas-history
  129. https://www.arabianjbmr.com/pdfs/KD_VOL_2_3/1.pdf
  130. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/23212/1/Reciprocal_comparison_African_history_%28LSERO%29.pdf
  131. https://www.jpanafrican.org/docs/vol9no10/9.10-23-Mafa.pdf
  132. https://oaks.kent.edu/ugresearch/2018/2018all/188
  133. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0268580900015002005
  134. https://www.decolonialtranslation.com/english/quijano-coloniality-of-power.pdf
  135. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/5/article/757122
  136. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0907676X.2016.1248986
  137. https://www.scielo.br/j/cint/a/9BxwGvYxjb6YWswTpddQ9Hm/
  138. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233015263_History_Textbooks_Racism_and_the_Critique_of_Eurocentrism_Beyond_Rectification_or_Compensation
  139. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/637d5e09d2bafc34c8bad5c6/t/646214f450f54216d6872458/1684149509551/Decline+of+Decline.pdf
  140. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271864177_The_Ottoman_origins_of_capitalism_Uneven_and_combined_development_and_Eurocentrism
  141. https://journals.openedition.org/ejts/7454
  142. https://asj.upd.edu.ph/mediabox/archive/ASJ-19-1981/fields.pdf
  143. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14672715.1996.10416213
  144. https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/isl/files/occidentalisation_of_beauty_standards_eurocentrism.pdf
  145. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1753-1411.2009.00032.x
  146. https://watershed.co.uk/archive-sites/rifemagazine/2021/01/the-influence-of-western-beauty-standards-on-non-western-communities/index.html
  147. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11004123/
  148. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378681606_Globalisation_Impact_on_the_Western_and_Eastern_Cultures
  149. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390582544_The_Role_of_Diverse_Representation_in_Media_and_Educational_Content_for_Students
  150. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13613324.2023.2192945
  151. https://lifescienceglobal.com/pms/index.php/ijcs/article/download/8084/4334
  152. https://inbreakthrough.org/eurocentric-beauty-history/
  153. https://tower.mastersny.org/10976/features/the-western-lens-on-beauty-how-european-beauty-standards-are-still-in-play-today/
  154. https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2019/02/06/685506578/is-beauty-in-the-eyes-of-the-colonizer
  155. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/skin-lightening-products-market-110570
  156. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/horizon/outlook/skin-lightening-products-market/mea
  157. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11018027/
  158. https://bpr.studentorg.berkeley.edu/2019/12/20/one-size-does-not-fit-all-the-rise-of-diverse-fashion-models/
  159. https://www.voguebusiness.com/fashion/brands-are-casting-diverse-models-but-theyre-still-not-challenging-eurocentric-beauty-norms
  160. https://www.history.org.uk/files/download/25253/1638962602/HA_Survey_of_History_in_Schools_in_England_2021.pdf
  161. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/jul/13/black-british-history-school-curriculum-england
  162. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED656179.pdf
  163. https://www.memoriapress.com/articles/why-study-western-civilization/
  164. https://www.forbes.com/sites/janicegassam/2023/04/23/recent-figures-show-that-media-is-still-overwhelming-white/
  165. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11573682/
  166. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_State_of_Diverse_Representation_in_Media_and_Entertainment_2021.pdf
  167. https://roape.net/2025/04/09/the-day-rhodes-fell-ten-years-after/
  168. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14767724.2024.2341103
  169. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14725843.2024.2444992
  170. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07294360.2021.2014406
  171. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361790414_Recent_trends_in_the_decolonization_of_history_curriculum_A_systematic_review
  172. https://www.odu.edu/education/critical-conversations/decolonization
  173. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01419870.2022.2099750
  174. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-ed-gamma/decolonizing-academy
  175. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20230907062303531
  176. https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/3443480/4.-Decolonising-the-University-2.pdf
  177. https://rrapp.spia.princeton.edu/decolonizing-the-university-pushing-beyond-curriculum-interventions-to-build-an-antiracist-university/
  178. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03050068.2025.2463807
  179. https://dahrd.org/2025/05/09/eurocentrism-in-foreign-policy/
  180. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13335
  181. https://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/briefs/geopolitics-multipolarity-how-counter-europes-waning-relevance-southeast-asia
  182. https://securityconference.org/en/publications/munich-security-report-2025/introduction/
  183. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/rise-nonaligned-multipolar-world-matias-spektor
  184. https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/asiapr/v3y2008i1p67-82.html
  185. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/accounting-great-divergence
  186. https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/rise-of-europe.pdf
  187. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691180960/a-culture-of-growth
  188. https://isreview.org/issue/92/marxism-and-future-postcolonial-theory-0/index.html
  189. https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2012/july/colonial-european-settlement-had-positive-effect-on-income-today-study-shows.html
  190. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014292101001957
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.