Hubbry Logo
Enclave and exclaveEnclave and exclaveMain
Open search
Enclave and exclave
Community hub
Enclave and exclave
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Enclave and exclave
Enclave and exclave
Enclave and exclave
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Explanatory diagram of territorial discontinuities: Enclaves and exclaves
Different territories (countries, states, counties, municipalities, etc.) are represented by different colours and letters; separated parts of the same territory are represented by the same colour and letter, with a different number added to each smaller part of that territory (the main part is identified by the letter only).
  •   A:
    • possesses 5 exclaves (A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5): it is impossible to go from the main part of A to any of these parts going only through territory of A; however:
      • A1 and A2 are not enclaves: neither of them is surrounded by a single "foreign" territory;
      • A1 is a semi-enclave and a semi-exclave: it has an unsurrounded sea border;
      • A2 is an exclave of A: it is separated from A;
      • A3 is an enclave: it is completely surrounded by B;
      • A4 and A5 are counter-enclaves (also known as second-order enclaves): territories belonging to A that are encroached inside the enclave E;
    • contains 1 enclave (E): "foreign" territory totally surrounded by territory of A;
    • contains 1 counter-counter-enclave, or third-order enclave (E1).
  •   B:
    • contains 2 enclaves (A3 and D).
  •   C:
    • continuous territory, contains no enclave or exclave
  •   D:
    • is an enclaved territory: it is territorially continuous, but its territory is totally surrounded by a single "foreign" territory (B).
  •   E:
    • is an enclaved territory: it is inside A;
    • contains 2 enclaves (A4 and A5), which are counter-enclaves of A;
    • possesses 1 counter-enclave (E1), which is a counter-counter-enclave as viewed by A and contained within A5.
In topological terms, A and E are each (sets of) unconnected surfaces, and B, C and D are connected surfaces. However, C and D are also simply connected surfaces, while B is not (it has first Betti number 2, the number of "holes" in B).

An enclave is a territory that is entirely surrounded by the territory of only one other state or entity. An enclave can be an independent territory or part of a larger one.[1] Enclaves may also exist within territorial waters.[2]: 60  Enclave is sometimes used improperly to denote a territory that is only partly surrounded by another state.[1] Enclaves that are not part of a larger territory are not exclaves, for example Lesotho (enclaved by South Africa) and San Marino and Vatican City (both enclaved by Italy) are enclaved sovereign states.

An exclave is a portion of a state or district geographically separated from the main part, by some surrounding alien territory.[3] Many exclaves are also enclaves, but an exclave surrounded by the territory of more than one state is not an enclave.[4] The Azerbaijani exclave of Nakhchivan is an example of an exclave that is not an enclave, as it borders Armenia, Iran, and Turkey.

Semi-enclaves and semi-exclaves are areas that, except for possessing an unsurrounded sea border, would otherwise be enclaves or exclaves.[4]: 116 [5]: 12–14  Semi-enclaves and enclaves are mutually exclusive. Likewise, semi-exclaves and exclaves are mutually exclusive. Enclaves and semi-enclaves can exist as independent states (Monaco, The Gambia and Brunei are semi-enclaves), while exclaves and semi-exclaves proper always constitute just a part of a sovereign state (like the Kaliningrad Oblast and the state of Alaska).[4]

A pene-exclave is a part of the territory of one country that can be conveniently approached – in particular, by wheeled traffic – only through the territory of another country.[6]: 283  Pene-exclaves are also called functional exclaves or practical exclaves.[5]: 31  Many pene-exclaves partially border their own territorial waters (i.e., they are not surrounded by other nations' territorial waters), such as Point Roberts, Washington, and Minnesota's Northwest Angle. A pene-exclave can also exist entirely on land, such as when intervening mountains render a territory inaccessible from other parts of a country except through alien territory. A commonly cited example is the Kleinwalsertal, a valley part of Vorarlberg, Austria, that is accessible only from Germany to the north.

Origin and usage

[edit]

The word enclave is French and first appeared in the mid-15th century as a derivative of the verb enclaver (1283), from the colloquial Latin inclavare (to close with a key).[7] Originally, it was a term of property law that denoted a land or parcel of land surrounded by land owned by a different owner, and that could not be reached for its exploitation in a practical and sufficient manner without crossing the surrounding land.[7] In law, this created a servitude[8] of passage for the benefit of the owner of the surrounded land. The first diplomatic document to contain the word enclave was the Treaty of Madrid, signed in 1526.[2]: 61 

Later, the term enclave began to be used also to refer to parcels of countries, counties, fiefs, communes, towns, parishes, etc. that were surrounded by alien territory. This French word eventually entered English and other languages to denote the same concept, although local terms have continued to be used. In India, the word "pocket" is often used as a synonym for enclave (such as "the pockets of Puducherry district").[9] In British administrative history, subnational enclaves were usually called detachments or detached parts, and national enclaves as detached districts or detached dominions.[10] In British ecclesiastic history, subnational enclaves were known as peculiars (see also royal peculiar).

The word exclave[3] is a logically extended back-formation of enclave.

Characteristics

[edit]

Enclaves exist for a variety of historical, political and geographical reasons. For example, in the feudal system in Europe, the ownership of feudal domains was often transferred or partitioned, either through purchase and sale or through inheritance, and often such domains were or came to be surrounded by other domains. In particular, this state of affairs persisted into the 19th century in the Holy Roman Empire, and these domains (principalities, etc.) exhibited many of the characteristics of sovereign states. Prior to 1866 Prussia alone consisted of more than 270 discontiguous pieces of territory.[2]: 61 

Residing in an enclave within another country has often involved difficulties in such areas as passage rights, importing goods, currency, provision of utilities and health services, and host nation cooperation. Thus, over time, enclaves have tended to be eliminated. For example, two-thirds of the then-existing national-level enclaves were extinguished on 1 August 2015, when the governments of India and Bangladesh implemented a Land Boundary Agreement that exchanged 162 first-order enclaves (111 Indian and 51 Bangladeshi). This exchange thus effectively removed another two dozen second-order enclaves and one third-order enclave, eliminating 197 of the India–Bangladesh enclaves in all. The residents in these enclaves had complained of being effectively stateless. Only Bangladesh's Dahagram–Angarpota enclave remained.

Netherlands and Belgium decided to keep the enclave and exclave system in Baarle. As both Netherlands and Belgium are members of the European Union and Schengen Area, people, goods and services flow freely with few or no restrictions.

Enclave versus exclave

[edit]

For illustration, in the figure (above), A1 is a semi-enclave (attached to C and also bounded by water that only touches C's territorial water). Although A2 is an exclave of A, it cannot be classed as an enclave because it shares borders with B and C. The territory A3 is both an exclave of A and an enclave from the viewpoint of B. The singular territory D, although an enclave, is not an exclave.

True enclaves

[edit]
For broader coverage of true enclaves, see List of enclaves and exclaves.

An enclave is a part of the territory of a state that is enclosed within the territory of another state. To distinguish the parts of a state entirely enclosed in a single other state, they are called true enclaves.[5]: 10  A true enclave cannot be reached without passing through the territory of a single other state that surrounds it. In 2007, Evgeny Vinokurov called this the restrictive definition of "enclave" given by international law, which thus "comprises only so-called 'true enclaves'."[5]: 10  Two examples are Büsingen am Hochrhein, a true enclave of Germany, and Campione d'Italia, a true enclave of Italy, both of which are surrounded by Switzerland.

The definition of a territory comprises both land territory and territorial waters. In the case of enclaves in territorial waters, they are called maritime (those surrounded by territorial sea) or lacustrine (if in a lake) enclaves.[5]: 10  Most of the true national-level enclaves now existing are in Asia and Europe. While subnational enclaves are numerous the world over, there are only a few national-level true enclaves in Africa, Australia and the Americas (each such enclave being surrounded by the territorial waters of another country).

A historical example is West Berlin before the reunification of Germany. Since 1945, all of Berlin had been ruled de jure by the four Allied powers. However, the East German government and the Soviet Union treated East Berlin as an integral part of East Germany, so West Berlin was a de facto enclave within East Germany. Also, 12 small West Berlin enclaves, such as Steinstücken, were separated from the city, some by only a few meters.[11]

True exclaves

[edit]
For broader coverage of true exclaves, see List of enclaves and exclaves.
Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic

True exclave is an extension of the concept of true enclave. In order to access a true exclave from the mainland, a traveller must go through the territory of at least one other state.

[edit]
Enclave Exclave Semi-enclave Semi-exclave Both enclave and exclave Enclave but not exclave Exclave but not enclave Both semi-enclave and semi-exclave Semi-enclave but not semi-exclave Semi-exclave but not semi-enclave
Number of distinct alien territory[a] bordered 1[b] ≥ 1 1 ≥ 1 1 1 > 1 1 1 > 1
Belongs to a larger territory Maybe Yes Maybe Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes
Has unsurrounded sea border(s)[c] No No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes

Semi-enclaves and semi-exclaves

[edit]
For broader coverage of semi-enclaves and semi-exclaves, see List of enclaves and exclaves.

Semi-enclaves and semi-exclaves are areas that, except for possessing a sea border that is not surrounded, would otherwise be enclaves or exclaves.[4]: 116 [5]: 12–14  Semi-enclaves can exist as independent states that border only one other state, such as Monaco, the Gambia and Brunei. Vinokurov (2007) declares, "Technically, Portugal, Denmark, and Canada also border only one foreign state, but they are not enclosed in the geographical, political, or economic sense. They have vast access to international waters. At the same time, there are states that, although in possession of sea access, are still enclosed by the territories of a foreign state."[5]: 14  Therefore, a quantitative principle applies: the land boundary must be longer than the coastline. Thus a state is classified as a sovereign semi-enclave if it borders on just one state, and its land boundary is longer than its sea coastline.[5]: 14, 20–22 

(Since Vinokurov's writing in 2007, Canada and the Kingdom of Denmark have each gained a second bordering state — each other — with the 2022 division of Hans Island.)

Vinokurov affirms that "no similar quantitative criterion is needed to define the scope of non-sovereign semi-enclaves/exclaves."[5]: 14, 26 [12]

Subnational enclaves and exclaves

[edit]
For broader coverage of subnational enclaves and exclaves, see List of enclaves and exclaves.

Sometimes, administrative divisions of a country, for historical or practical reasons, caused some areas to belong to one division while being attached to another.

"Practical" enclaves, exclaves and inaccessible districts

[edit]
For broader coverage of practical enclaves, exclaves and inaccessible districts, see List of enclaves and exclaves.

The term pene-exclave was defined in Robinson (1959) as "parts of the territory of one country that can be approached conveniently – in particular by wheeled traffic – only through the territory of another country."[6]: 283  Thus, a pene-exclave, although having land borders, is not completely surrounded by the other's land or territorial waters.[13]: 60  Catudal (1974)[14]: 113  and Vinokurov (2007)[5]: 31–33  further elaborate upon examples, including Point Roberts. "Although physical connections by water with Point Roberts are entirely within the sovereignty of the United States, land access is only possible through Canada."[14]

Pene-enclaves are also called functional enclaves or practical enclaves.[5]: 31  They can exhibit continuity of state territory across territorial waters but, nevertheless, a discontinuity on land, such as in the case of Point Roberts.[5]: 47  Along rivers that change course, pene-enclaves can be observed as complexes comprising many small pene-enclaves.[5]: 50  A pene-enclave can also exist entirely on land, such as when intervening mountains render a territory, although geographically attached, inaccessible from other parts of a country except through alien territory. A commonly cited example is the Kleinwalsertal, a valley part of Vorarlberg, Austria, that is only accessible from Germany to the north, being separated from the rest of Austria by high mountains traversed by no roads. Another example is the Spanish village of Os de Civís, accessible from Andorra. The hamlet of Boston Corner was a pene-exclave of Massachusetts, separated by mountains, until it was ceded to New York.

Hence, such areas are enclaves or exclaves for practical purposes, without meeting the strict definition. Many pene-exclaves partially border the sea or another body of water, which comprises their own territorial waters (i.e., they are not surrounded by other nations' territorial waters). They border their own territorial waters in addition to a land border with another country, and hence they are not true exclaves. Still, one cannot travel to them on land without going through another country. Attribution of a pene-enclave status to a territory can sometimes be disputed, depending on whether the territory is considered to be practically inaccessible from the mainland or not.[5]: 33 

Land owned by a foreign country

[edit]
Land for the Captain Cook Monument was deeded outright to the British government by the independent nation of Hawaii in 1877.

One or more parcels/holdings of land in most countries is owned by other countries. Most instances are exempt from taxes. In the special case of embassies/consulates these enjoy special privileges driven by international consensus particularly the mutual wish to ensure free diplomatic missions, such as being exempt from major hindrances and host-country arrests in ordinary times on the premises. Most non-embassy lands in such ownership are also not enclaves as they fall legally short of extraterritoriality, they are subject to alike court jurisdiction as before their grant/sale in most matters. Nonetheless, for a person's offence against the property itself, equally valid jurisdiction in criminal matters is more likely than elsewhere, assuming the perpetrator is found in the prosecuting authority's homeland. Devoid of permanent residents, formally defined new sovereignty is not warranted or asserted in the examples below. Nonetheless, minor laws, especially on flag flying, are sometimes relaxed to accommodate the needs of the accommodated nation's monument.

Embassies enjoy many different legal statuses approaching quasi-sovereignty, depending on the agreements reached and in practice upheld from time-to-time by host nations. Subject to hosts adhering to basic due process of international law, including giving warnings, the enforced reduction of scope of a foreign embassy has always been a possibility, even to the point of expelling the foreign embassy entirely, usually on a breakdown of relations, in reaction to extreme actions such as espionage, or as another form of sanction. The same seems to be possible in profit-driven moving or drilling under any of the sites below, providing safeguards as the structure or a new replacement site. The same possible curtailments and alterations never apply to proper exclaves.

Notes

[edit]

See also

[edit]

Lists

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Raton, Pierre (1958). "Les enclaves". Annuaire Français de Droit International. 4: 186. doi:10.3406/afdi.1958.1373.
  2. ^ a b c Melamid, Alexander (1968). "Enclaves and Exclaves". In Sills, David (ed.). International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Vol. 5. The Macmillan Company & Free Press.
  3. ^ a b "Exclave". Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language. 1989. p. 497.
  4. ^ a b c d Rozhkov-Yuryevsky, Yuri (2013). "The concepts of enclave and exclave and their use in the political and geographical characteristic of the Kaliningrad region". Baltic Region. 2 (2): 113–123. doi:10.5922/2079-8555-2013-2-11.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Vinokurov, Evgeny (2007). The Theory of Enclaves. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  6. ^ a b Robinson, G. W. S. (September 1959). "Exclaves". Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 49 (3, [Part 1]): 283–295. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1959.tb01614.x. JSTOR 2561461.
  7. ^ a b Le Grand Robert, Dictionnaire de la Langue Française, 2001, vol. III, p. 946.
  8. ^ Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language. 1989. p. 1304. Servitude: Law. A right possessed by one person with respect to another's property, consisting either of a right to use the other's property, or a power to prevent certain uses of it.
  9. ^ "Government Jobs in BSNL : 01 Jobs Opening". jobresultsnic.in. Archived from the original on 2014-12-24. Retrieved 2014-02-24.
  10. ^ As can be seen on 18th century maps of Germany and other European countries by British cartographers and publishers such as R. Wilkinson.
  11. ^ "Berlin Exclaves". Archived from the original on 2013-04-29. Retrieved 2013-05-02.
  12. ^ Vinokurov (2007), p. 29, also refers to semi-exclaves as a type of "mere exclave with sea connection to the mainland."
  13. ^ Melamid (1968) states, "Contiguous territories of states which for all regular commercial and administrative purposes can be reached only through the territory of other states are called pene-enclaves (pene-exclaves). These have virtually the same characteristics as complete enclaves (exclaves)."
  14. ^ a b Catudal, Honoré M. (1974). "Exclaves". Cahiers de Géographie du Québec. 18 (43): 107–136. doi:10.7202/021178ar.

General and cited references

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Enclave and exclave

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
An enclave is a territory belonging to one sovereign state or entity that is entirely surrounded by the territory of another state, whereas an exclave is a detachable portion of a state that is separated from the mainland and lies within the territory of one or more other states. These geographic phenomena arise from historical border formations, colonial legacies, and territorial disputes, often complicating governance, trade, and security. Sovereign enclaves such as , completely enclosed by , and and within , exemplify independent states detached from contiguous borders. Prominent exclaves include the of , isolated by and bordering and , and Russia's , wedged between and on the . Such configurations can foster economic dependencies, transit disputes, and strategic vulnerabilities, as seen in cases requiring special agreements for access and resources. Historically, the most complex enclave systems occurred along the India-Bangladesh border, involving over 100 counter-enclaves until their resolution via land exchange in , simplifying administration and citizenship issues. Enclaves and exclaves highlight the irregularities of state boundaries, influencing through practical challenges like , utilities, and , often necessitating bilateral treaties to mitigate isolation effects.

Definitions and Core Concepts

Enclave

An enclave constitutes a portion of one 's that is entirely surrounded by the of a single foreign . This configuration implies complete geographical isolation by land borders from the parent state, with no direct terrestrial connection to it or any third state. Such territories lack independent land access to the outside world except through the encircling state, distinguishing them from partially bordered or multiply surrounded areas. The strict excludes cases where a is surrounded by multiple foreign states, as these involve shared borders beyond one enclosing , often classified differently to preserve terminological precision. Maritime access does not interrupt the criterion of full land enclosure; however, direct sea borders prevent classification as an enclave, since do not constitute foreign territorial enclosure, thereby requiring passage through the surrounding state's land for external connectivity. The term "enclave" derives from the French verb enclaver, meaning "to enclose" or "to lock in," which traces to inclavāre, related to clāvis ("key"), evoking the of a locked-in . This etymology underscores the inherent notion of containment and isolation central to the geographical concept.

Exclave

An exclave constitutes a portion of a state's that lies geographically detached from the state's principal , separated by the territory of one or more foreign states. This detachment underscores a key aspect of where legal persists despite physical discontinuity, binding the exclave administratively to its parent state. Transit through intervening foreign lands is typically required for overland access, often necessitating bilateral agreements to facilitate movement of people, . Exclaves differ fundamentally from overseas territories or insular possessions, which are isolated by maritime expanses rather than contiguous foreign landmasses. The defining enclosure in exclaves involves terrestrial barriers, excluding separations achieved solely via sea or air routes without obligatory passage through another state's domain. While numerous exclaves qualify as enclaves when fully encircled by a single foreign entity's —thus embedded within it from an external viewpoint—the converse does not hold, as independent enclaves lack affiliation to a disconnected parent state. This relational duality highlights exclaves' emphasis on internal state fragmentation over mere foreign encirclement.

Key Distinctions and Overlaps

The fundamental distinction between an enclave and an exclave resides in their relational : an enclave denotes a wholly enclosed by the land of one foreign sovereign entity, focusing on the isolation imposed by surrounding foreign soil, while an exclave pertains to a portion of a physically detached from its primary by intervening foreign lands, emphasizing disconnection from the parent state rather than exclusive enclosure by a single neighbor. This differentiation arises from the enclave's inherent dependence on a sole external power for overland access, contrasting with the exclave's potential adjacency to multiple states, which may diversify transit routes but does not alleviate core territorial severance. Overlaps manifest when a serves dual roles, functioning as an exclave of its while constituting an enclave vis-à-vis a single encircling state; such configurations amplify logistical strains, as the detachment undermines unified administration and defense, while total encirclement heightens vulnerability to or coercion by the immediate neighbor. For example, operates as an exclave of , separated by Armenian territory yet bordering and , thereby evading pure enclave status but exemplifying hybrid disconnection challenges that demand cross-border pacts for connectivity. These dualities underscore causal pressures: encirclement fosters precarious access reliant on foreign sufferance, whereas separation imposes enduring governance hurdles, often spurring treaties like the 1992 Azerbaijan-Armenia agreement facilitating Nakhchivan's transit.

Etymology and Historical Origins

Linguistic Origins

The term enclave derives from the French noun enclave, which emerged in the mid-15th century as a deverbal form of the verb enclaver ("to enclose" or "to lock in"), attested as early as 1283. This verb stems from inclavāre ("to lock up"), a compound of the prefix in- ("in") and clavis ("key"), metaphorically suggesting a territory secured or enclosed like a locked space within foreign bounds. English adopted enclave in 1868 to describe a portion of one country's surrounded by another. In contrast, exclave is a 19th-century in English, coined by analogy to enclave through prefixing ex- ("out" or "from") to its stem, yielding a term for a detached portion of a territory belonging to a non-adjacent main body. The records its earliest evidence in , reflecting its formation as a to distinguish outward projections from inward enclosures. While enclave drew from longstanding French diplomatic lexicon—evident in medieval European treaties referencing enclosed lands—exclave arose later in geographical discourse to address asymmetric territorial configurations, without a direct antecedent in classical or medieval languages. These terms' roots in clavis underscore a shared semantic emphasis on enclosure and separation, initially applied in European contexts to describe insular holdings like the fragmented , which became enclaves within unified after 1870, prompting refined terminological distinctions in .

Mechanisms of Historical Formation

Enclaves and exclaves have historically arisen primarily through military conquests and territorial cessions following wars, where victorious powers annexed disconnected portions of defeated states' lands. For instance, after the Soviet Union's victory in , the northern part of , including the city of Königsberg (renamed Kaliningrad in 1946), was ceded to the USSR at the in August 1945, creating a Soviet exclave separated from the Russian SFSR by Polish and Lithuanian territories. This mechanism reflects causal dynamics of power imbalances, where strategic military gains—such as access to the —override geographic contiguity, embedding irregularities into post-conflict borders without immediate rectification due to the victors' dominance. Treaties and diplomatic agreements have further formalized such formations by codifying partitions or concessions that fragment territories. The in 1919, for example, transferred control of the railway line from to , resulting in six German exclaves (reduced to five by later mergers) surrounded by Belgian territory, as the treaty prioritized reparations and infrastructure over territorial cohesion. Similarly, colonial-era border delineations, often drawn arbitrarily by imperial powers, produced enclaves through the partition of vassal states; in British , the 1947 partition left over 100 Indo-Bangladeshi enclaves stemming from pre-colonial holdings that were unevenly allocated between and (later ), with 51 Indian enclaves in and 111 Bangladeshi ones in by independence. These processes underscore how legal instruments, while appearing neutral, often perpetuated inefficiencies arising from prior conquests or administrative oversights. Dynastic inheritances and marriages in pre-modern contributed to enclave-like fragments by dividing realms among heirs, though less directly than conquest; fragmented holdings, such as those in the , arose from successions where territories passed independently, creating detached principalities sustained by feudal loyalties rather than geographic unity. Many such anomalies persist due to entrenched norms of territorial sovereignty in , which prioritize state integrity and mutual consent for alterations, rendering voluntary exchanges rare absent overwhelming incentives like post-colonial resolutions—evident in the Indo-Bangladeshi enclaves' endurance until the 2015 Land Boundary Agreement exchanged 162 pockets, affecting 51,000 residents. This persistence highlights causal realism: geopolitical inertia and the high costs of renegotiation outweigh practical inefficiencies unless compelled by bilateral power shifts or economic pressures.

Fundamental Characteristics

Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity

Enclaves and exclaves constitute integral portions of their parent state's territory, entitled to the same sovereign rights and legal protections as contiguous lands under . Defined as isolated territories surrounded by foreign states, they maintain de jure sovereignty, with the enclosing state obligated to respect this status in bilateral relations. International recognition typically affirms their status, distinguishing de jure enclaves from disputed or de facto variants lacking full acknowledgment. Despite formal , the enclosed inherently complicates practical control, exposing these territories to heightened risks of territorial if the parent state cannot enforce effectively. Surrounding states may exploit physical isolation to advance absorption claims, particularly through irredentist movements or blockades that undermine administrative reach without overt force. Historical precedents, such as the pre-2015 India-Bangladesh border enclaves, illustrate how fragmented led to de facto governance voids, with residents enduring and vulnerability to cross-border crimes due to the parent states' limited on-ground presence. The UN Charter's Article 2(4) enshrines the principle of , prohibiting threats or uses of force against any state's territory, including enclaves and exclaves. This norm aims to safeguard universally, yet enforcement gaps persist, as evidenced by instances where international mechanisms failed to prevent encroachments on isolated holdings. In Spain's North African enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla, Morocco's irredentist assertions challenge integrity despite legal recognition, revealing how geopolitical pressures can test the resilience of non-contiguous . Such cases underscore that while legal frameworks affirm rights, causal vulnerabilities from demand robust bilateral agreements or deterrence to preserve effective control.

Access, Transit, and Practical Governance

Enclaves and exclaves, by virtue of their territorial disconnection, require specific transit arrangements to enable access between the parent state and the detached territory, typically secured through bilateral treaties or agreements rather than a universal convention under . Customary practice emphasizes the necessity of such transit to avoid rendering the territory effectively landlocked, though enforcement relies on negotiation and goodwill between states. In cases without formal pacts, surrounding states may impose checks, visas, or controls, exacerbating isolation. The U.S. exclave of , exemplifies these logistical dependencies, as its sole land route to the U.S. mainland traverses Canadian territory, necessitating two border crossings and exposing residents to disruptions from bilateral disputes. During the 2020-2021 border closures, the community faced severe isolation, relying on ferries or air travel for essential connections, with local schools and services historically dependent on cross-border access to , . Renewed frictions in 2025, amid U.S.- trade tensions, further strained supply chains, highlighting how economic policies in the surrounding state can inadvertently govern the exclave's viability. Similarly, Azerbaijan's Nakhchivan exclave has endured protracted transit hurdles through , prompting calls for a corridor under the 2020 terms; until October 2025, restrictions blocked direct links, forcing reliance on Iranian or Russian routes. Recent lifts on transit bans have eased some barriers, yet implementation hinges on fragile accords, demonstrating how geopolitical strains can nullify agreements and compel alternative, costlier paths. Practical governance in such territories often involves hybrid dependencies, including shared like roads and utilities from the surrounding state, compounded by divergent regulations on taxes, rules, or hours of operation. In the Belgian exclaves of amid Dutch territory, residents navigate fragmented jurisdictions daily, with issues like mismatched in 2020 requiring enforcement across split properties. These challenges underscore the frequent inadequacy of transit pacts, leading to reliance on the enclosing state's tolerance and occasional unilateral measures to mitigate isolation.

Classifications and Variations

True Enclaves

A true enclave is a of one entirely surrounded by the of exactly one other , with no direct access to the sea, , or additional bordering states. This definition prioritizes complete enclosure to differentiate from variants involving partial maritime access or multiple enclosing entities, ensuring definitional precision in . Such formations arise from historical treaties, conquests, or geographic anomalies but are constrained by practical needs for transit and economic viability. Sovereign true enclaves are exceptionally rare, limited to three instances: , , and . , the smallest independent state at 0.44 square kilometers, was established as a sovereign entity via the of 1929, which resolved disputes between the and by granting it full territorial independence within . , covering 61 square kilometers, has maintained independence since the 4th century CE, fully embedded in Italian territory without formal treaty delineation but recognized internationally. , at 30,355 square kilometers, achieved independence from Britain on October 4, 1966, as a constitutional monarchy entirely encircled by , its highland elevation averaging 2,125 meters above . These examples demonstrate how true enclaves can sustain through diplomatic agreements, historical precedence, and mutual recognition despite physical isolation. Globally, true enclaves number fewer than 100 according to geographical inventories, a scarcity attributable to 20th-century border rectifications, such as post-World War II adjustments and processes that exchanged territories to eliminate enclaves and facilitate administration. Many historical true enclaves, like the (1947–1954), were resolved via to avert disputes over access rights and resource allocation. This trend underscores the geopolitical preference for contiguous territories, reducing vulnerabilities in defense, trade, and infrastructure.

True Exclaves

A true exclave constitutes a non-contiguous portion of a state's separated from its mainland, distinguished from an enclave by not being wholly surrounded by the land of a single foreign state; instead, it adjoins multiple foreign territories, , or both. This configuration arises from geopolitical divisions where detachment occurs without total enclosure, often preserving avenues for sea access or multi-border interactions that mitigate isolation. True exclaves frequently embody strategic extensions, offering or economic footholds—such as naval projection or control—at the expense of administrative complexities like severed land connections, necessitating airlifts, maritime supply lines, or bilateral transit pacts. Their viability hinges on robust and diplomatic arrangements to counter vulnerabilities from encircling powers, balancing projection of influence against potential risks in conflicts. Russia's exemplifies a true exclave, detached from the Russian mainland following the 1945 allocation of former German territory. Bordering and while fronting the , it spans approximately 15,100 square kilometers and houses the Russian Baltic Fleet's primary base at , enabling year-round naval operations denied to ice-bound ports elsewhere. Post-Soviet transit agreements with , strained amid NATO expansions since 2004, underscore governance burdens, including reliance on rail corridors vulnerable to blockade. Prior to statehood on January 3, 1959, functioned as a U.S. exclave, acquired via the 1867 purchase from for $7.2 million and isolated from the contiguous states by Canada's territory. Adjoining the Pacific, , and Bering Seas alongside Canadian borders, its 1.7 million square kilometers supported and later gold rushes, but separation imposed sea-dependent logistics until transcontinental aviation matured in the . Statehood integrated it administratively, though geographic detachment persists for defense and commerce. Azerbaijan's represents a landlocked true exclave, separated from the mainland by Armenian territory since Soviet administrative delineations in 1920-1924, bordering to the north and east, to the west, and to the south across 5,500 square kilometers. This multi-border setup facilitates trade with and , offsetting Armenian transit dependencies, while cultural Turkic ties bolster resilience against isolation.

Semi-enclaves, Semi-exclaves, and Hybrid Forms

Semi-enclaves refer to territories predominantly bordered by a single foreign state yet possessing a coastline or river access to , thereby avoiding the full territorial isolation characteristic of true enclaves. This configuration mitigates some practical dependencies on the surrounding state for access, as maritime routes enable direct external connectivity. exemplifies this form, encircled by on its land borders but extending to the Atlantic Ocean, which facilitates trade and sovereignty assertion independent of Senegalese transit. Similarly, Brunei's territory on is largely hemmed in by but maintains substantial frontage, allowing naval and commercial outlets that preserve its autonomy. Semi-exclaves extend the concept to detached portions of a state that border foreign lands without complete encirclement, often due to adjacent seas or minimal land linkages that prevent absolute separation. Russia's qualifies as such, abutted by and yet fronting the , which provides Russia with strategic maritime access despite the land disconnection from the mainland. This sea proximity transforms potential vulnerabilities into assets, as evidenced by Kaliningrad's role as a major Russian since its post-World War II acquisition in , underscoring how hydrographic features can redefine exclave liabilities. Hybrid forms emerge where political sovereignty intersects with atypical economic or administrative integrations, complicating geographic classifications. Campione d'Italia, a 2.6 square kilometer Italian municipality fully land-enclosed by since the 18th century, operated within the Swiss customs territory until January 1, 2020, subjecting its 2,200 residents to usage, taxation, and regulations despite Italian citizenship and governance. This arrangement, rooted in bilateral accords from 1861 onward, blurred sovereignty lines by exempting Campione from Italian VAT and EU customs until Switzerland's post-2016 dynamics prompted reintegration into the framework, though it retains exclusions from full VAT application. Such hybrids often stem from pragmatic compromises rather than pure territorial logic, fostering disputes; for instance, Campione's casino-dependent economy faced bankruptcy risks from the 2020 shift, highlighting how incomplete historical pacts engender ongoing legal frictions over "enclave" purity. These variants invite critique for their looseness, as sea access or fiscal overlays dilute the causal isolation defining true forms, frequently prioritizing accommodations over rigorous enclosure criteria, with ambiguities traceable to 19th-century negotiations that overlooked evolving transit norms.

Subnational and Non-sovereign Contexts

Enclaves and Exclaves Within States

Subnational enclaves and exclaves arise within due to administrative divisions at levels such as provinces, states, counties, or municipalities, often resulting from historical boundary surveys, avulsions, or political configurations. These territories, while under the same national , create practical issues analogous to international cases but resolved through domestic legal frameworks rather than treaties. Access and jurisdiction remain internal matters, yet physical disconnection complicates service delivery, , and without invoking controls. In the United States, the exemplifies a state-level exclave. This 42-square-kilometer peninsula in , is bounded by the and separated from the state's main territory by to the south and to the west. Formed by the river's avulsion during the New Madrid earthquakes of December 1811 to February 1812, which registered up to magnitude 8.0 and realigned the channel, the area has supported sparse and a under 50 as of 2020 estimates. maintains jurisdiction, but residents access services like schools and healthcare primarily through neighboring counties, straining local administration. Another U.S. state exclave, , originated from the Missouri River's shift in 1877, isolating 8 square kilometers from the rest of Pottawattamie County and enclosing it within . The U.S. ruled in Nebraska v. Iowa (1892) that avulsion preserved Iowa's original boundary, rejecting accretion claims by . This decision underscores judicial resolution of subnational disputes, yet the exclave faces ongoing challenges in emergency services and utilities, requiring coordination across state lines despite unified national oversight. County and municipal levels feature numerous such anomalies across the U.S., often from 19th-century surveying errors or gerrymandering, including disconnected townships in states like Massachusetts and New Jersey. For instance, Brookline, Massachusetts, contains enclaves within neighboring municipalities due to historical land grants. These fragments disrupt contiguous governance, elevating costs for disconnected law enforcement patrols and complicating tax collection uniformity within the same sovereign entity.

De Facto and Practical Enclaves

De facto enclaves arise when territories maintain nominal legal attachment to a parent entity but experience functional isolation due to physical inaccessibility or adversarial , prioritizing empirical control over cartographic depictions. These formations highlight causal dynamics where , , or logistical barriers supersede formal boundaries, often resulting in autonomous local or limited central . Unlike strictly defined enclaves, de facto variants emerge organically from ground realities, such as impassable mountains or insurgent strongholds that render transit prohibitive without foreign or enemy mediation. Pene-enclaves exemplify terrain-induced practicality, where geographical continuity exists on maps but practical access demands traversal of adjacent states. The valley in Austria's state connects to the Austrian heartland only via high alpine passes, but its sole year-round road link routes through Germany's , compelling residents to use German postal services and currency in daily transactions despite Austrian . This arrangement, formalized by bilateral agreements since 1922, stems from the Valley's orographic barriers, which historically isolated the 2,000-hectare area and continue to shape its economic ties predominantly with . In zones of , control vacuums forge practical enclaves through encirclement by hostile forces or prohibitive logistics. Before the Taliban's nationwide offensive in 2021, they exerted authority over scattered rural pockets across , including districts in Helmand and provinces, where government outposts ringed Taliban-held farmlands amid desert and mountain hostility that stymied resupply and reinforcement. These areas, comprising up to 40% of the countryside by some 2019 assessments, sustained parallel taxation and judicial systems, with central writ evaporating due to dynamics rather than legal . Post-colonial African contexts further demonstrate how inherited borders amplify de facto isolations, as ethnic homelands or rebel fiefdoms defy mapped integrity amid weak state projection. In the Sahel, groups like those in Mali's Azawad region established autonomous enclaves from 2012 onward, surrounded by Malian army positions yet insulated by vast sahara expanses and nomadic supply lines that rendered full reclamation impractical until French interventions in 2013. Such pockets, often 100-500 kilometers from capitals, persisted because colonial delineations ignored kinship networks and resource access, allowing local power brokers to monopolize control where maps projected national unity.

Associated Conflicts and Border Disputes

Enclaves and exclaves frequently precipitate border disputes and localized conflicts due to restricted access, resource competition, and irredentist assertions of territorial continuity. In the India-Bangladesh border region, over 160 enclaves created by colonial-era partitions left approximately 51,000 residents stateless prior to 2015, denying them , passports, and basic services like and healthcare, which fostered networks and administrative deadlocks rather than outright . These anomalies stemmed from 18th-century land gambling between feudal rulers, exacerbating humanitarian crises without direct military clashes but prompting protracted diplomatic standoffs until the 2015 Land Boundary Agreement facilitated a mutual exchange, granting to affected populations. In , Uzbekistan's Sokh exclave—fully surrounded by —has triggered recurrent skirmishes over water and grazing rights, culminating in May 2020 clashes between Uzbek villagers from Chashma and Kyrgyz residents from Chechme over a disputed spring, resulting in injuries, , and temporary border closures that isolated the exclave's 20,000 residents. These incidents reflect broader Soviet-era border demarcations favoring ethnic enclaves, which Kyrgyz nationalists cite to demand territorial adjustments, while Uzbek authorities prioritize security amid fears of Kyrgyz encroachment; bilateral talks since have advanced delimitation but stalled on Sokh's status, underscoring how exclaves amplify resource-based tensions without resolution absent enforced reciprocity. Spain's Ceuta and Melilla enclaves on Morocco's coast exemplify irredentist disputes, with Morocco viewing them as remnants of colonial occupation and demanding reintegration since independence in 1956, leading to engineered migration surges as leverage, such as the 2021 incident where over 8,000 migrants crossed into Ceuta amid diplomatic strains over Western Sahara. Border violence peaked in June 2022 at Melilla, where Moroccan and Spanish forces repelled a mass rush, resulting in at least 37 migrant deaths and hundreds injured, attributed by human rights observers to excessive force but defended by authorities as necessary against organized assaults. Moroccan nationalists advocate forcible annexation to achieve territorial integrity, contrasting Spanish insistence on historical sovereignty and EU-backed fortifications, while liberal proposals for negotiated exchanges falter without mutual power concessions, perpetuating periodic escalations. Azerbaijan's Nakhchivan exclave, separated by Armenian territory, fuels demands for a corridor to ensure unimpeded transit, intensifying post-2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war frictions, including skirmishes over four Armenian-held Azerbaijani exclaves and , an Armenian exclave under Azerbaijani control since 1992. Azerbaijani irredentists frame corridor access as essential for ethnic unity, rejecting Armenian conditions for monitored passage, while cites sovereignty risks; these disputes have prompted artillery exchanges and blockades, illustrating how exclaves sustain militarized standoffs where power asymmetries—bolstered by Azerbaijan's 2023 offensive—override diplomatic swaps absent enforced guarantees.

Perspectives from International Law and Realpolitik

International law recognizes enclaves and exclaves as integral components of a state's territory, entitled to the protections afforded by the principle of under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, which prohibits the threat or use of force against such possessions. The Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties stipulates that state succession does not inherently alter boundaries established by prior treaties, thereby implying continuity for enclave arrangements derived from historical agreements, such as those from partitions or cessions. However, this framework overlooks precedents where conquest has unilaterally redefined territorial status, as seen in the Soviet acquisition of (formerly Königsberg) in 1945, which persisted despite lacking mutual consent and integrated the exclave into Russian sovereignty through effective control rather than legal continuity alone. In , enclaves function less as immutable legal entitlements and more as strategic assets or bargaining levers, where resolution hinges on power asymmetries rather than treaty adherence. Russia's post-2014 escalation of militarization in exemplifies this, transforming the exclave into a fortified with advanced missile systems and troop deployments to counter encirclement, thereby leveraging its geographic isolation to project influence and deter concessions amid Western sanctions following the annexation. Such dynamics reveal voluntary compliance with as illusory when vital interests clash, with states prioritizing control—evident in Russia's rejection of demilitarization proposals despite legal arguments for enclave vulnerability—over normative appeals. Debates on enclave persistence juxtapose territorial integrity absolutism, often aligned with institutional preferences for status quo preservation to avert cascade secessions, against ethnic self-determination advocacy, which posits that aligning borders with demographic realities enhances long-term stability by mitigating irredentist pressures. Empirical outcomes from Yugoslavia's dissolution support the latter: the federation's multi-ethnic structure fueled wars killing over 140,000 from 1991-1995, whereas subsequent partitions into more homogeneous entities like (91% Croat by 2001) and reduced interstate violence, with no equivalent-scale conflicts recurring despite initial chaos, contrasting forced unity's failure. This causal pattern—homogeneity correlating with lower civil strife risk—challenges academia's frequent territorial primacy bias, rooted in post-colonial aversion to fragmentation, yet underscores how power realities, not abstract principles, dictate enclave fates.

Economic, Strategic, and Security Implications

Enclaves and exclaves often incur elevated economic costs stemming from reliance on foreign transit routes for trade and essential supplies, which can inflate transportation expenses and hinder . For instance, the physical separation necessitates crossing borders, potentially subjecting goods to tariffs, delays, or negotiated transit fees, thereby increasing overall expenditures compared to contiguous territories. In cases like certain Central Asian exclaves, such dependencies exacerbate economic isolation, limiting industrial development and fostering reliance on the enclosing state's . Additionally, these configurations can inadvertently facilitate activities due to the multiplicity of crossings and jurisdictional complexities; a notable example involves tunnels used for trafficking into the Spanish enclave of from , highlighting how enclaves serve as conduits for illicit trade amid porous frontiers. Strategically, exclaves function as advanced positioning assets, enabling military projection into otherwise inaccessible regions while imposing logistical strains on adversaries. Russia's , detached from the mainland and bordering members, hosts the and Iskander-M missile systems with ranges up to 500 km, capable of targeting key European infrastructure and serving as a deterrent against . This placement creates chokepoints, such as the Suwalki Gap, amplifying leverage in regional power dynamics by complicating enemy supply lines without requiring direct mainland exposure. Conversely, the exclave's isolation demands sea or rail corridors through or for sustainment, rendering it susceptible to interdiction in prolonged conflicts. From a security standpoint, the geographic detachment of enclaves heightens vulnerability to isolation tactics, including blockades or severed transit, which can precipitate insurgencies or due to limited reinforcement options and cultural divergences from the parent state. Yet, this same seclusion permits concentrated , transforming enclaves into defensible bastions; Kaliningrad's heavy , including nuclear-capable assets, exemplifies how such pockets deter invasion by elevating the costs of assault across neutral or allied territories. Empirical assessments indicate that while resupply dependencies pose acute risks—evident in historical sieges of detached holdings—their perimeter advantages often yield tactical resilience against conventional threats.

Notable Examples and Case Studies

Sovereign-Level Enclaves and Exclaves

exemplifies a sovereign enclave, as the Kingdom of is entirely surrounded by n territory, with no land connection to other states. This configuration stems from 19th-century conflicts where Basotho leader sought British protection in 1868 against Boer encroachments from the , establishing as a British protectorate and averting absorption into colonial . The protectorate status persisted through 's unification in 1910, culminating in 's independence in 1966 while preserving its geographical isolation. San Marino represents another classic sovereign enclave, embedded within Italian territory since its legendary founding in AD 301 by the Christian stonemason Marinus fleeing Roman persecution. Its endured through medieval papal guarantees and strategic neutrality, even as surrounding Italian states consolidated; by , the encircled it completely, yet San Marino avoided annexation via and non-aggression. This microstate's persistence highlights how historical and minimal territorial claims can sustain amid enveloping larger powers. The Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic functions as Azerbaijan's primary exclave, detached from the mainland by Armenian territory and bordering and , spanning approximately 5,500 square kilometers. Soviet authorities formalized its status in as the Nakhchivan ASSR within the Azerbaijan SSR, a decision rooted in Bolshevik border policies to balance ethnic claims post-1920 independence and . Following Azerbaijan's 1991 independence and the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war, has pressed for a "Zangezur Corridor" through Armenia's to enable unimpeded road and rail access to Nakhchivan, citing 2022 peace protocols but escalating tensions over sovereignty and transit rights. Russia's stands as a strategically vital exclave, comprising the northern portion of former , allocated to the under the 1945 Potsdam Agreement among Allied powers to administer pending a final that never materialized. Renamed in 1946 and populated by Soviet settlers displacing German inhabitants, it became isolated from Russia after 1991 amid Lithuania's and Poland's independence, now wedged between members with access reliant on Lithuanian rail corridors. The oblast maintains a heavy presence, including Iskander missile systems and assets, positioning it as a forward bastion for Russian power projection in Europe, though resource strains from the 2022 invasion have reportedly thinned deployments.

Subnational and Contemporary Instances

Baarle-Nassau, straddling the Belgium-Netherlands border, exemplifies a complex subnational patchwork of enclaves resulting from medieval feudal land grants dating to the , when Duke Henry I of Brabant acquired territories amid fragmented allegiances. This configuration includes 22 Belgian enclaves within Dutch municipality and seven Dutch counter-enclaves within Belgian , with borders transecting homes, businesses, and streets marked by white crosses on tiles. In the 2020s, the anomaly drives tourism, attracting thousands annually to view divided properties and exploit minor regulatory differences, such as varying rules or VAT rates on goods, though seamless EU integration minimizes practical disruptions. Point Roberts, a pene-exclave of , emerged from the 1846 establishing the 49th parallel as the U.S.- border, isolating the 5-square-mile peninsula geographically from mainland Washington despite its political affiliation. Land access from the U.S. requires traversing 25 miles through via , rendering it dependent on cross-border commuting for essentials like groceries and medical care, with a resident population of 1,191 recorded in the 2020 census. Contemporary challenges persist, including heightened border delays post-2020 pandemic restrictions and economic reliance on Canadian visitors, underscoring ongoing logistical strains without territorial adjustments. The 2015 India-Bangladesh Land Boundary Agreement resolved one of the world's most intricate enclave clusters, exchanging 162 territories—111 Indian enclaves (17,160 acres) transferred to and 51 Bangladeshi ones to —effective August 1, 2015, after ratification of the 1974 pact, thereby integrating approximately 51,000 residents into host nations and eliminating stateless "" conditions. This rationalization, the largest post-colonial border simplification, addressed anomalies from 1947 Partition but left no similar large-scale swaps since, with no major new subnational enclaves or exclaves reported forming globally after amid stabilized frontiers and diplomatic inertia. Persistent cases, like Central Asia's pockets, involve proposals for exchanges rather than novel creations, reflecting a trend toward simplification over proliferation.

References

  1. https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/e927741a6a1c4157a1e3a91a2645f3f8
  2. https://geographical.co.uk/science-environment/phenomena-what-are-enclaves-and-exclaves
  3. https://vinokurov.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/enclaves_ch02.pdf
  4. https://www.youngpioneertours.com/exclaves-enclaves/
  5. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/enclave
  6. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/enclave
  7. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/enclave
  8. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-hug/enclave
  9. https://www.geographical.co.uk/science-environment/phenomena-what-are-enclaves-and-exclaves
  10. https://www.etymonline.com/word/enclave
  11. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-hug/exclaves
  12. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exclave
  13. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-are-enclaves-and-exclaves.html
  14. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/ap-hug/exclave-creation
  15. https://www.worldatlas.com/exclaves/what-is-an-exclave.html
  16. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Whats-the-Difference-Between-Enclaves-and-Exclaves
  17. https://www.britannica.com/place/Naxcivan-republic-Azerbaijan
  18. https://neweasterneurope.eu/2023/11/08/nakhchivan-an-azerbaijani-exclave-that-could-cause-new-problems-for-armenia/
  19. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20200721-nakhchivan-the-worlds-most-sustainable-nation
  20. https://www.merriam-webster.com/word-of-the-day/enclave-2009-03-19
  21. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/exclave_n
  22. https://www.wordreference.com/definition/enclave
  23. https://www.wordreference.com/definition/exclave
  24. https://worldhistoryedu.com/kaliningrad-history-population-map-russian-federation/
  25. https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2024/october/strategic-relevance-kaliningrad
  26. https://www.amusingplanet.com/2020/05/vennbahn-railway-that-created-peculiar.html
  27. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/india-and-bangladesh-swap-territory-citizens-landmark-enclave-exchange
  28. http://uniset.ca/microstates2/enclave_90TheMonist65.pdf
  29. http://uniset.ca/microstates2/disputes_instalment.pdf
  30. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1037
  31. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/35107/ssoar-balticreg-2013-2-rozhkov-yuryevsky-The_concepts_of_enclave_and.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  32. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0962629809000924
  33. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text
  34. https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/download/1468/1381
  35. https://www.mtrlegal.com/en/wiki/enclave-2/
  36. https://www.cnn.com/travel/point-roberts-us-town-surrounded-canada
  37. https://salish-current.org/2024/05/20/fewer-canadians-getting-to-the-point-do-point-roberts-trends-signal-long-term-change/
  38. https://www.fastcompany.com/91305488/how-this-washington-state-border-town-got-caught-up-in-trumps-trade-war-with-canada
  39. https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/point-roberts-british-columbia-canada
  40. https://www.reuters.com/world/us-secures-strategic-transit-corridor-armenia-azerbaijan-peace-deal-2025-08-07/
  41. https://www.caspiannews.com/news-detail/president-aliyev-announces-breakthrough-in-ties-with-armenia-as-azerbaijan-lifts-transit-restrictions-2025-10-21-0/
  42. https://oc-media.org/azerbaijan-ends-all-trade-restrictions-with-armenia-aliyev-says/
  43. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/dutch-belgian-how-lockdown-works-town-one-world-s-most-n1213921
  44. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20171210-europes-strange-border-anomaly
  45. https://travel.bhushavali.com/2020/01/baarle-hertog-nassau-unique-borders.html
  46. https://dailypassport.com/only-three-enclave-countries/
  47. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/why-is-kaliningrad-at-the-center-of-a-new-russia-nato-faceoff/
  48. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-65545636
  49. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1866-1898/alaska-purchase
  50. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/on-this-day-in-1959-alaskaone-of-americas-riskiest-investmentsbecame-the-49th-state-in-the-union-180985757/
  51. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-are-the-three-semi-enclaved-countries-of-the-world.html
  52. https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2020/01/03/tiny-italian-enclave-in-switzerland-transferred-back-to-italy-and-the-eu-s-customs-union
  53. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20200517-campione-ditalia-an-italian-town-surrounded-by-switzerland
  54. https://www.economist.com/europe/2020/01/02/a-tiny-italian-exclave-unwillingly-joins-the-eus-customs-union
  55. https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/178-the-kentucky-bend-or-bubbleland-not-far-from-monkeys-eyebrow/
  56. https://www.kentuckytourism.com/trip-planning/travel-inspiration/articles/2023/07/25/the-fascinating-story-of-kentucky-bend
  57. https://myoldkentuckyroadtrip.com/2014/08/22/a-road-trip-to-kentucky-bend-aka-bubbleland-or-the-western-tippity-tip-of-kentucky/
  58. https://www.googlesightseeing.com/2009/10/interesting-exclaves-of-the-united-states/
  59. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcxVWIqmMhY
  60. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/taliban-afghanistan
  61. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/pipe-dreams-the-taliban-and-drugs-from-the-1990s-into-its-new-regime/
  62. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/02/borders-and-conflicts-in-north-and-west-africa_2bce879f/6da6d21e-en.pdf
  63. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/145411/Paper_233.pdf
  64. https://www.dw.com/en/finally-an-identity-for-india-bangladesh-enclave-denizens/a-18618072
  65. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-33733911
  66. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/8/1/india-and-bangladesh-settle-old-dispute-in-land-swap
  67. https://eurasianet.org/uzbekistan-border-dispute-draws-focus-onto-neglected-exclave
  68. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13669-the-sokh-enclave-a-breakthrough-in-central-asian-cooperation.html
  69. https://jamestown.org/program/kyrgyzstan-and-uzbekistan-move-toward-resolution-of-longstanding-border-dispute/
  70. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-57305882
  71. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/29/the-melilla-massacre-spanish-enclave-africa-became-deadly-flashpoint-morocco
  72. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/06/22/spain/morocco-no-justice-deaths-melilla-border
  73. https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/nagorno-karabakh-conflict
  74. https://jamestown.org/program/stalemate-persists-in-the-armenia-azerbaijan-peace-process/
  75. https://caucasusedition.net/unmaking-the-armenia-azerbaijan-border-challenges-dynamics-and-perspectives/
  76. https://www.mtrlegal.com/en/wiki/enclave/
  77. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/3_2_1978.pdf
  78. https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/russias-kaliningrad-oblast-is-a-dagger-aimed-at-the-heart-of-europe-but-canada-can-help-blunt-the-threat-sergey-sukhankin-for-inside-policy/
  79. https://www.ifri.org/en/papers/kaliningrad-post-crimea-russia-bastion-or-weak-link
  80. https://mackseyjournal.scholasticahq.com/article/28027-the-demilitarization-of-kaliningrad/attachment/76410.pdf
  81. https://repository.bilkent.edu.tr/bitstreams/14b29761-33cc-4a1f-b180-b6a3aa689f75/download
  82. https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/book/hae01/hae01i.pdf
  83. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1274&context=gjicl
  84. http://uniset.ca/microstates2/Enclaves_Ch_10.pdf
  85. https://www.worldfinance.com/markets/separate-from-the-rest
  86. https://apnews.com/article/spain-morocco-drugs-tunnel-discovery-6f010205fc0251ecd588dcd03cfce1e7
  87. https://www.cna.org/our-media/indepth/2023/05/kaliningrad-impregnable-fortress-or-russian-alamo
  88. https://missiledefenseadvocacy.org/missile-threat-and-proliferation/todays-missile-threat/russia/iskander-m-ss-26/
  89. https://www.dw.com/en/explained-why-is-kaliningrad-so-important-to-russia/a-62206978
  90. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/38609/SR%25202007-03%2520Kaliningrad%2520.pdf
  91. https://www.durbansafarisandtours.com/2024/lesotho-why-does-it-exist/
  92. https://www.aardy.com/blog/lesotho-country-information/
  93. https://everything-everywhere.com/why-does-san-marino-exist/
  94. https://www.cntraveler.com/story/oldest-country-in-the-world
  95. https://russiasperiphery.pages.wm.edu/transcaucasia/nakhichevan/
  96. https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/the-zangezur-corridor-a-key-trade-link-in-the-south-caucasus/
  97. https://jamestown.org/program/armenia-balances-between-the-tripp-and-zangezur-corridor/
  98. https://www.rferl.org/a/at-first-we-all-worked-together-on-75th-anniversary-russians-remember-kaliningrad-annexation/30917021.html
  99. https://www.iflscience.com/this-is-the-most-bizarre-international-border-in-the-world-80163
  100. https://www.dw.com/en/baarle-the-town-where-borders-run-riot/a-57631603
  101. https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20240606-europe-in-miniature-welcome-to-baarle-world-s-strangest-border
  102. https://www.hcn.org/articles/point-roberts-canada-borders-washington/
  103. https://justalittlefurther.com/just-a-little-further/2023/5/30/a4gtssemtbkyn1nikpgspdkab72m10
  104. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20191201-a-us-town-only-reached-through-canada
  105. https://mea.gov.in/press-releases.htm?dtl/25565/Exchange%2Bof%2Benclaves%2Bbetween%2BIndia%2Band%2BBangladesh
  106. https://central-asia.guide/central-asia-guide/ferghana-valley-enclaves/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.