Hubbry Logo
FlatfishFlatfishMain
Open search
Flatfish
Community hub
Flatfish
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Flatfish
Flatfish
Flatfish
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
For the album by Flook, see Flatfish (album). For the move in shogi, see Flatfish (shogi).

Flatfish
Temporal range: Late Paleocene–Recent[1]
Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa), the first named species of flatfish
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Actinopterygii
Order: Carangiformes
Suborder: Pleuronectoidei
Cuvier, 1817[2]
Type species
Pleuronectes platessa
Families

See text

Synonyms
  • Heterosamata Jordan & Evermann, 1896
  • Pleuronectiformes Regan, 1910
  • Soleiformes Regan, 1910
  • Polynemoidei Regan, 1909
  • Pleuronectoideo Girard et al, 2020

Flatfish are a group of ray-finned fish belonging to the suborder Pleuronectoidei and historically the order Pleuronectiformes (though this is now disputed). Their collective common name is due to their habit of lying on one side of their laterally-compressed body (flattened side-to-side) upon the seafloor; in this position, both eyes lie on the side of the head facing upwards, while the other side of the head and body (the "blind side") lies on the substrate. This loss of symmetry, a unique adaptation in vertebrates, stems from one eye "migrating" towards the other during the juvenile's metamorphosis; due to variation, some species tend to face their left side upward, some their right side, and others face either side upward.[example needed] They are one of the most speciose groups of demersal fish. Their cryptic coloration and habits, a form of camouflage, conceals them from potential predators.

Common names

[edit]
Illustration of several common European flatfish species

There are a multitude of common names for flatfish, as they are a widespread group of fish and important food fish across the world. The following are common flatfish names in English:

As these are merely common names, they do not conform with the "natural" relationships that are recovered through scientific studies of morphology or genetics. As examples, the three species consistently called "halibut" are themselves part of the right-eye flounder family, while the spiny turbots are not at all closely related to "true" turbot, but are consistently recovered in a "primitive" or basal position at the base of flatfish phylogenetic trees.

Distribution

[edit]

Flatfishes are found in oceans worldwide, ranging from the Arctic, through the tropics, to Antarctica. Species diversity is centered in the Indo-West Pacific and declines following both latitudinal and longitudinal gradients away from this centre of diversity.[3] Most species are found in depths between 0 and 500 m (1,600 ft), but a few have been recorded from depths in excess of 1,500 m (4,900 ft). None have been confirmed from the abyssal or hadal zones of the deep sea; a reported observation of a flatfish from the Bathyscaphe Trieste's dive into the Mariana Trench (at a depth of almost 11 km (36,000 ft)) has been questioned by ichthyologists, and recent authorities do not recognize it as valid.[4] Among the deepwater species is Symphurus thermophilus, a tonguefish which congregates around "ponds" of sulphur at hydrothermal vents on the seafloor; no other flatfish is known from hydrothermal vent ecosystems.[5]

Conversely, many species will enter brackish or fresh water, and a smaller number of soles (families Achiridae and Soleidae) and tonguefish (Cynoglossidae) are entirely restricted to fresh water.[6][7][8]

Description

[edit]
Winter flounder; Pleuronectidae

The most obvious characteristic of the flatfish is their asymmetry, with both eyes lying on the same side of the head in the adult fish. In some families, the eyes are usually on the right side of the body (dextral or right-eyed flatfish), and in others, they are usually on the left (sinistral or left-eyed flatfish). The primitive spiny turbots include equal numbers of right- and left-sided individuals, and are generally less asymmetrical than the other families.[1] Other distinguishing features of the order are the presence of protrusible eyes, another adaptation to living on the seabed (benthos), and the extension of the dorsal fin onto the head.

Zebrias zebra; Soleidae
Four frames of the same peacock flounder, a sand colored flatfish with a pattern of blue rings, taken a few minutes apart which shows its ability to change colors to match its surroundings. The last photo shows it buried under sand with only its eyes visible
This sequence of photos shows an individual peacock flounder (Bothidae) changing its coloration over different substrates.

The surface of the fish facing away from the sea floor is pigmented, often serving to camouflage the fish, but at times displaying striking patterns. Some flatfishes are also able to change their pigmentation to match the background using their chromatophores, in a manner similar to some cephalopods. The side of the body without the eyes, facing the seabed, is usually colourless or very pale.[1]

In general, flatfishes rely on their camouflage for avoiding predators, but some have aposematic traits such as conspicuous eyespots (e.g., Microchirus ocellatus) and several small tropical species (at least Aseraggodes, Pardachirus and Zebrias) are poisonous.[9][10][11] Juveniles of Soleichthys maculosus mimic toxic flatworms of the genus Pseudobiceros in both colours and swimming pattern.[12][13] Conversely, a few octopus species have been reported to mimic flatfishes in colours, shape and swimming mode.[14]

Flatfishes range in size from the sand flounder Tarphops oligolepis, measuring about 6.5 cm (2.6 in) in length,[15] and weighing 2 g (0.071 oz),[1] to the Hippoglossus halibuts, with the Atlantic halibut measuring up to 4.7 m (15 ft) long,[16] and the Pacific halibut weighing up to 363 kg (800 lb).[17][1]

Many species such as flounders and spiny turbots eat smaller fish, and have well-developed teeth. These species sometimes hunt in the midwater, away from the bottom, and show fewer "extreme" adaptations than other families. The soles, by contrast, are almost exclusively bottom-dwellers (more strictly demersal), and feed on benthic invertebrates. They show a more extreme asymmetry, and may lack teeth on one side of the jaw.[1]

Development

[edit]
European flounder, like other flatfish, experience an eye migration during their lifetime.

Flatfishes lay eggs that hatch into larvae resembling typical, symmetrical, fish. These are initially elongated, but quickly develop into a more rounded form. The larvae typically have protective spines on the head, over the gills, and in the pelvic and pectoral fins. They also possess a swim bladder, and do not dwell on the bottom, instead dispersing from their hatching grounds as ichthyoplankton.[1] Bilaterally symmetric fish such as goldfish maintain balance using a system within their inner ears which involves the otolith, but larval and metamorphizing flatfish require visible light (such as sunlight) to properly orient themselves.[18]

The length of the planktonic stage varies between different types of flatfishes, but through the influence of thyroid hormones,[19] they eventually begin to metamorphose into the adult form. One of the eyes migrates across the top of the head and onto the other side of the body, leaving the fish blind on one side. The larva also loses its swim bladder and spines, and sinks to the bottom, laying its blind side on the underlying surface.[20][18]

Hybrids

[edit]

Hybrids are well known in flatfishes. The Pleuronectidae have the largest number of reported hybrids of marine fishes.[21] Two of the most famous intergeneric hybrids are between the European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) and European flounder (Platichthys flesus) in the Baltic Sea,[22] and between the English sole (Parophrys vetulus) and starry flounder (Platichthys stellatus) in Puget Sound. The offspring of the latter species pair is popularly known as the hybrid sole and was initially believed to be a valid species in its own right.[21]

Evolution

[edit]

Flatfishes have been cited as dramatic examples of evolutionary adaptation. In The Blind Watchmaker, Richard Dawkins explains the flatfishes' evolutionary history as such:

...bony fish as a rule have a marked tendency to be flattened in a vertical direction.... It was natural, therefore, that when the ancestors of [flatfish] took to the sea bottom, they should have lain on one side.... But this raised the problem that one eye was always looking down into the sand and was effectively useless. In evolution this problem was solved by the lower eye 'moving' round to the upper side.[23]

Scientists have been proposing since the 1910s that flatfishes evolved from more "typical" percoid ancestors.[24] The fossil record indicated that flatfishes might have been present before the Eocene, based on fossil otoliths resembling those of modern pleuronectiforms dating back to the Thanetian and Ypresian stages (57-53 million years ago).[25] Despite this, the origin of the unusual morphology of flatfishes was enigmatic up to the 2000s, with earlier researchers having suggested that it came about as a result of saltation rather than gradual evolution through natural selection, because a partially migrated eye was considered to have been maladaptive.

Specimen of Amphistium.

This started to change in 2008 with a study on the two fossil fish genera; Amphistium and Heteronectes, which dated to about 50 million years ago. These genera retain primitive features not seen in modern types of flatfishes, such as their heads being less asymmetric than modern flatfishes, retaining one eye on each side of their heads, although the eye on one side is closer to the top of the head than on the other.[26][27] The more recently described fossil genera Quasinectes and Anorevus have been proposed to show similar morphologies and have also been classified as "stem-pleuronectiforms".[28][29] Such findings lead palaeontologist Matt Friedman to conclude that the evolution of flatfish morphology "happened gradually, in a way consistent with evolution via natural selection—not suddenly [saltationally] as researchers once had little choice but to believe."[27]

To explain the survival advantage of a partially migrated eye, it has been proposed that primitive flatfishes like Amphistium rested with the head propped up above the seafloor (a behaviour sometimes observed in modern flatfishes), enabling them to use their partially migrated eye to see things closer to the seafloor.[30] While known basal genera like Amphistium and Heteronectes support a gradual acquisition of the flatfish morphology, they were probably not direct ancestors to living pleuronectiforms, as fossil evidence[examples needed] indicate that most flatfish lineages living today were present in the Eocene and contemporaneous with them.[26] It has been suggested that the more primitive forms were eventually outcompeted.[27]

Taxonomy

[edit]

Due to their highly distinctive morphology, flatfishes were previously treated as belonging to their own order, Pleuronectiformes. However, more recent taxonomic studies have found them to group within a diverse group of nektonic marine fishes known as the Carangiformes, which also includes jacks and billfish. Specifically, flatfish have been recovered to be closely related to various groups, such as the threadfins (often recovered as a sister group to flatfish), archerfish, and beachsalmons. Due to this, they are now treated as a suborder of the Carangiformes,[31][32] as represented in Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes.[33]

Classification

[edit]

The following classification is based on Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes (2025):[34]

Fossil taxa

[edit]

The following basal fossil flatfish from the Paleogene are also known:[36]

Phylogeny

[edit]
Threadfins such as Polynemus have been recovered closer to the primitive spiny turbots than those are to other flatfish, or as a sister group to a monophyletic flatfish group

There has been some disagreement whether flatfish as a whole are a monophyletic group. Some palaeontologists think that some percomorph groups unrelated to flatfishes were also "experimenting" with head asymmetry during the Eocene,[28][29] and certain molecular studies conclude that the primitive family of Psettodidae evolved their flat bodies and asymmetrical head independently of other flatfish groups.[40][41] The following phylogeny is from Lü et al. 2021; a whole-genome analysis using concatenated sequences of coding sequence (CDS) (codon1 + 2 + 3, GTRGAMMA model; codon1 + 2, GTRGAMMA model) and 4dTV (fourfold degenerate synonymous site, GTRGAMMA model) derived from 1,693 single-copy genes. Notably, Pleuronectiformes is found to be polyphyletic as seen here:[42]

Pleuronectoidei
⊟
⊟
Pleuronectiformes

However, threadfins (Polynemidae) aren't universally found to be nested within the group of flatfish, as recovered by a study of ultraconserved elements from the threadfin family in Girard et al. 2022,[43] or as represented in the World Register of Marine Species,[44] where Pleuronectiformes is retained as a name for the flatfish group.[45] Numerous scientists continue to argue for a monophyletic group of all flatfish,[46] though the debate continues.[47]

Over 800 described species are placed into 16 families.[48] When they were treated as an order, the flatfishes are divided into two suborders, Psettodoidei and Pleuronectoidei, with > 99% of the species diversity found within the Pleuronectoidei.[49] The largest families are Soleidae, Bothidae and Cynoglossidae with more than 150 species each. There also exist two monotypic families (Paralichthodidae and Oncopteridae). Some families are the results of relatively recent splits. For example, the Achiridae were classified as a subfamily of Soleidae in the past, and the Samaridae were considered a subfamily of the Pleuronectidae.[9][50] The families Paralichthodidae, Poecilopsettidae, and Rhombosoleidae were also traditionally treated as subfamilies of Pleuronectidae, but are now recognised as families in their own right.[50][51][52] The Paralichthyidae has long been indicated to be paraphyletic, with the formal description of Cyclopsettidae in 2019 resulting in the split of this family as well.[48] The following is the maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree from Campbell et al. 2019, which was obtained by analyzing seven protein-coding genes. This study erected two new families to resolve the previously non-monophyletic status of Paralichthyidae and the Rhombosoleidae:[48]

Centropomus

Lates

Psettodes

Pleuronectoidei
Citharoidea
⊞
⊟
Citharidae
Pleuronectoidea
⊟
Soleoidea
⊟

The taxonomy of some groups is in need of a review. The last monograph covering the entire order was John Roxborough Norman's Monograph of the Flatfishes published in 1934. In particular, Tephrinectes sinensis may represent a family-level lineage and requires further evaluation e.g.[53] New species are described with some regularity and undescribed species likely remain.[9]

Timeline of genera

[edit]
QuaternaryNeogenePaleogeneHolocenePleist.Plio.MioceneOligoceneEocenePaleoceneSymphurusParophrysIsopsettaEopsettaChibapsettaPegusaLyopsettaLimandaGlyptocephalusClidodermaAtheresthesPleuronichthysParalichthysMonochirusCitharichthysEvesthesMicrostomusMicrochirusAchiurusPlatichthysParaplagusiaDicologoglossaLepidorhombusHippoglossoidesBuglossidiumSoleaMonoleneBothusArnoglossusPsettodesCitharusScophthalmusTurahbuglossusJoleaudichthysImhoffiusEobuglossusEobothusAmphistiumQuaternaryNeogenePaleogeneHolocenePleist.Plio.MioceneOligoceneEocenePaleocene

Relation to humans

[edit]
This article is part of a series on
Commercial fish
Large predatory
Forage
Demersal
Mixed

Fishing and aquaculture

[edit]

Flatfish are commonly fished using bottom trawls.[54][55] Large species such as the halibuts are specifically targeted by fisheries, resulting in heavy fishing pressures and bycatch.[56][57][58] Some species are aquacultured, such as the tonguefish Cynoglossus semilaevis.[59][60]

As food

[edit]

Flatfish is considered a whitefish[61] because of the high concentration of oils within its liver. Its lean flesh makes for a unique flavor that differs from species to species. Methods of cooking include grilling, pan-frying, baking and deep-frying.

  • The European plaice is the principal commercial flatfish in Europe.
    The European plaice is the principal commercial flatfish in Europe.
  • American soles are found in both freshwater and marine environments of the Americas.
    American soles are found in both freshwater and marine environments of the Americas.
  • Halibut are the largest of the flatfishes, and provide lucrative fisheries.
    Halibut are the largest of the flatfishes, and provide lucrative fisheries.
  • The turbot is a large, left-eyed flatfish found in sandy shallow coastal waters around Europe.
    The turbot is a large, left-eyed flatfish found in sandy shallow coastal waters around Europe.
  • Flatfish (left‐eyed flounder)
    Flatfish (left‐eyed flounder)

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Flatfish

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Flatfish, comprising over 800 in the order Pleuronectiformes, are ray-finned fishes distinguished by their highly asymmetrical bodies, with both eyes positioned on one side of the head to facilitate a bottom-dwelling lifestyle on the seafloor. These marine and occasionally freshwater exhibit a compressed, oval-shaped form that allows them to blend into sediments, often changing color for , and they primarily inhabit coastal and waters worldwide, from shallow estuaries to depths exceeding 2,000 meters. During early development, flatfish larvae are bilaterally symmetrical and pelagic, swimming upright with eyes on opposite sides, but they undergo a profound where one eye migrates across the to join the other on the upper side, accompanied by skeletal twisting and settlement to the benthic . This , unique among vertebrates, supports their carnivorous diet of small , crustaceans, and , captured by and ambushing prey. Flatfish are ecologically and economically significant, forming the basis of major fisheries—such as for , , sole, and —with global capture production around 1 million metric tons as of 2022, though many populations face pressures.

Taxonomy and Classification

Etymology and Common Names

The term "flatfish" is an word first recorded in , derived from "flat," meaning level or even, which originates from flæt, and "fish," from fisc. This descriptive name reflects the group's characteristic laterally compressed, flattened body adapted for bottom-dwelling. In scientific nomenclature under the Linnaean system, flatfish belong to the order Pleuronectiformes, a name coined from the genus Pleuronectes (Greek pleura, "side," + nēktēs, "swimmer"), alluding to their asymmetrical, side-oriented . Common names for flatfish vary by region, species, and cultural context, often emphasizing size, , or culinary value rather than strict . In , "flounder" serves as a broad term for many small to medium species, such as the (Paralichthys dentatus) along the Atlantic coast, while "halibut" denotes larger ones like the (Hippoglossus stenolepis), the biggest flatfish reaching over 2 meters. "Sole" typically refers to members of the family, including the Dover sole (Solea solea), valued in fisheries. In , "plaice" commonly names the (Pleuronectes platessa), a key food fish in the , and "turbot" identifies the premium Scophthalmus maximus, known for its firm flesh. Other regional variants include "dab" for small species like the European dab (Limanda limanda) in the Northeast Atlantic. Cultural naming influences add diversity, particularly in indigenous Pacific communities where local flatfish hold traditional and mythological significance. For instance, among Pacific Northwest tribes like the Kwakiutl and Haida, halibut features prominently in origin stories and art as a symbol of prosperity, with names reflecting their role in sustenance and rituals, though specific terms vary by dialect and are often tied to oral traditions rather than standardized English equivalents.

Higher Classification

Flatfish belong to the phylum Chordata, subphylum Vertebrata, class (ray-finned fishes), and are classified in the order Pleuronectiformes. Although some recent phylogenetic studies have proposed elevating Pleuronectiformes to a suborder within a broader percomorph order, it remains widely recognized as an order in authoritative databases. The order Pleuronectiformes encompasses 16 families, approximately 130 genera, and over 800 species, making it one of the most diverse groups of marine teleosts. Key diagnostic characteristics of the order include a highly asymmetric , with both eyes positioned on one side of the head due to ocular migration during , and elongate dorsal and anal fins that form continuous margins around the body. Among the families, (righteye flounders) includes genera such as Hippoglossus (e.g., ) and Pleuronectes (e.g., ), while comprises true soles like Solea solea (), characterized by their left-eyed orientation and elongated bodies. Other notable families include Bothidae (lefteye flounders) and Scophthalmidae (turbots), contributing to the order's ecological and commercial diversity.

Phylogeny and Relationships

The order Pleuronectiformes, comprising flatfishes, has been the subject of extensive phylogenetic scrutiny using both molecular and morphological data, with recent analyses largely supporting its within the percomorph fishes. Early molecular studies based on mitochondrial ribosomal genes, such as 12S and 16S rRNA, provided initial evidence for monophyletic grouping, though some analyses suggested due to the divergent position of certain taxa. However, multi-locus approaches incorporating nuclear and mitochondrial sequences have resolved these debates, confirming Pleuronectiformes as a cohesive nested within Carangimorpharia, sister to groups like the jackfishes (Carangoidea). Within Pleuronectiformes, two suborders are recognized: the basal Psettodoidei, containing the single family Psettodidae and genus Psettodes, and the more derived Pleuronectoidei, which encompasses the majority of flatfish diversity across 13 families. Mitogenomic analyses show varying positions for Psettodes, with some earlier studies placing it as the earliest diverging lineage, characterized by primitive traits like symmetrical eyes in juveniles and a less pronounced cranial asymmetry compared to Pleuronectoidei members, while recent analyses (as of 2025) cluster Psettodidae with families like Rhombosoleidae, Achiridae, Soleidae, Cynoglossidae, and Samaridae after more derived groups. In Pleuronectoidei, inter-family relationships reveal a complex radiation; for instance, molecular phylogenies based on concatenated mitochondrial genes show the Bothidae (lefteye flounders) as sister to a clade including Scophthalmidae and Pleuronectidae, while Cynoglossidae (tonguefishes) form a more distant branch. A 2025 mitogenomic analysis of 111 species confirms monophyly and resolves some relationships, with Paralichthyidae and Pleuronectidae clustering basally, followed by Cyclopsettidae and Bothidae. These connections are further corroborated by phylogenomic datasets addressing gene tree discordance, which highlight convergent adaptations in asymmetry across families but uphold distinct evolutionary lineages. Debates persist regarding the precise to Pleuronectiformes among percomorphs, with some mitogenomic evidence suggesting proximity to (pufferfishes), though broader datasets favor a position within Carangimorpharia without direct adjacency to tetraodontiforms. Hybridization occurs between closely related genera, such as Pleuronectes and Platichthys, indicating potential gene flow that could influence phylogenetic signals in borderline taxa, though such events are rare and do not undermine overall . evidence aligns with these molecular trees by supporting an early divergence of psettodids around the Eocene.

Fossil Record

The fossil record of flatfish (order Pleuronectiformes) is relatively sparse, primarily due to their benthic lifestyle, which limits rapid burial and preservation in sedimentary deposits compared to pelagic or nektonic fishes. This bottom-dwelling habit results in fewer exceptional preservation sites, with most known specimens derived from marine lagerstätten featuring fine-grained sediments conducive to detailed fossilization. Otolith-based evidence suggests possible origins in the Late to Early Eocene (approximately 57–53 million years ago), but definitive skeletal fossils appear only in the Eocene. The earliest well-documented flatfish fossils date to the early Eocene, around 50 million years ago, from sites such as the Monte Bolca in , a renowned Eocene deposit yielding exceptionally preserved fish assemblages. Notable early taxa include Amphistium bifrons, first described in the but re-evaluated in modern studies for its primitive flatfish traits, and Heteronectes chaneti, a newly recognized exhibiting intermediate cranial asymmetry. These fossils display partial eye migration, with one eye positioned dorsally but not fully migrated to the upper side of the head, providing key evidence for the gradual evolution of the characteristic flatfish body plan in stem-group representatives. Pre-Eocene records remain elusive, with no confirmed skeletal fossils from the or earlier, underscoring a post-K-Pg boundary diversification. Subsequent Eocene and deposits reveal increasing diversity, though gaps persist through the due to taphonomic biases favoring nearshore or reef-associated environments. For instance, Eobothus species from Eocene strata represent early bothid-like forms, bridging primitive and more derived morphologies. Recent discoveries, such as Keasichthys oregonensis, a new primitive species from the early Keasey Formation in , USA (as of 2025), highlight ongoing efforts to fill transitional records between Eocene origins and Miocene radiations. These finds, preserved in deep-water silty shales, demonstrate affinities to stem pleuronectiforms and aid in reconstructing phylogenetic relationships among early flatfish lineages.

Anatomy and Physiology

Body Structure and Adaptations

Flatfish are characterized by profound bilateral asymmetry, a defining feature of their body plan that distinguishes them from most other vertebrates. In adults, both eyes are positioned on one side of the head, known as the ocular or eyed side, while the opposite side remains blind and typically features reduced pigmentation. This arrangement results from a developmental process where one eye migrates across the skull to join the other during metamorphosis, enabling the fish to lie flat on the seabed with the eyed side facing upward for environmental monitoring. The body undergoes significant dorso-ventral compression, reducing its thickness to approximately 1-3 cm in many species, which facilitates a low-profile benthic existence and minimizes visibility to predators. The skin of flatfish is highly adapted for , featuring specialized cells called chromatophores that allow rapid adjustments in color and to blend with surrounding substrates. These cells, including melanophores, xanthophores, and iridophores, expand or contract under neural and hormonal control, enabling the to mimic sandy, muddy, or rocky bottoms with remarkable precision—for instance, the (Bothus lunatus) can alter its mottled patterns within minutes to match complex seafloor textures. This adaptive coloration serves primarily as an anti-predator mechanism, enhancing survival by reducing detection in visually oriented environments. The eyed side displays vibrant, variable pigmentation, while the blind side remains pale to avoid contrasting with the substrate when flipped. Locomotion in flatfish relies on modified fins suited to their asymmetrical, flattened form, emphasizing short bursts of movement over sustained . Enlarged pectoral fins on the eyed side function like limbs, providing lift, stability, and propulsion during maneuvers across the seabed, often in coordination with undulating waves along the elongated dorsal and anal fins that act as "fin-feet" for crawling or walking. This fin-based , observed in species like the southern (Paralichthys lethostigma), resembles that of arthropods, with metachronal waves propagating from anterior to posterior to generate against the substrate. In many flatfish, the caudal is reduced or fan-like, limiting open-water efficiency but optimizing bottom-dwelling efficiency; for example, soles in the family exhibit particularly diminutive caudal fins, relying almost entirely on pectoral and body undulations for progression.

Sensory Systems

Flatfish possess a highly specialized adapted to their benthic lifestyle, where one eye migrates during to join the other on the dorsal (eyed) side of the body, enabling both eyes to face upward while the lies flat on the substrate. This ocular migration results in enhanced , allowing for and stereoscopic scanning of the above for predators and prey. Some species, such as the (Paralichthys olivaceus), exhibit capabilities, with cone photoreceptors sensitive to wavelengths that aid in detecting camouflaged or colored prey against varied backgrounds. The integrates briefly with , as the upward-facing eyes assess substrate patterns to trigger rapid color and texture adjustments on the eyed side. The chemical senses in flatfish are prominently developed to compensate for limited mobility and visibility in sandy or muddy habitats. Olfactory organs are enlarged and asymmetric, with the rosette on the eyed side larger than on the blind side, enhancing detection of chemical cues from distant sources in the . This supports orientation and localization in low-light conditions. are distributed extensively across the body surface, including the head, fins, and eyed side, forming a gustatory network that probes sediments for buried prey. In species like the Remo flounder (Rhombosolea plebeia), specialized structures such as the gustatory stalk on the contain dense clusters of these , innervated by to sense and other chemicals indicating food availability just below the surface. The system in flatfish exhibits modifications suited to their flattened morphology, with bilateral and reductions on the blind side to streamline the body against the substrate. Despite this reduction, the system remains sensitive to low-frequency water vibrations and pressure changes, primarily through canal neuromasts on the head and trunk that detect nearby movements. This mechanosensory capability is crucial for predator avoidance, as flatfish can sense approaching threats via hydrodynamic disturbances even when camouflaged and stationary.

Metamorphosis and Development

Flatfish larvae hatch as bilaterally symmetric, planktonic forms resembling typical larvae, with eyes positioned on opposite sides of the head and a vertically oriented body. This pelagic stage allows dispersal in the , where larvae feed primarily on while undergoing rapid growth. The duration of the larval stage varies by and environmental factors such as , typically spanning 30 to 100 days; for example, in (Scophthalmus maximus), begins around 46 days post-hatching. Metamorphosis marks a dramatic transition from the symmetric larval form to the asymmetric adult, driven primarily by surges in such as thyroxine (T4) and (T3). These hormones orchestrate craniofacial remodeling, including the migration of one eye across the dorsal surface to join the other on the same side of the head, which typically occurs over several days to weeks. Concurrently, the body tilts toward the eyed side, the underside pigments adapt for , and the settles to a benthic lifestyle, abandoning the . Thyroid hormone signaling regulates in neural crest-derived tissues, ensuring coordinated skeletal and muscular changes that enable this asymmetry. Species-level variations in include the direction of eye migration, resulting in either sinistral (left-eyed) or dextral (right-eyed) adults. Among the approximately 14 families of flatfish, most are monomorphic, with roughly half fixed as sinistral and the other half as dextral, though a few families like exhibit polymorphism where both forms occur within populations. This asymmetry direction is genetically determined and fixed early in development, influencing ecological adaptations such as burrowing preferences.

Ecology and Distribution

Global Distribution

Flatfish exhibit a predominantly marine distribution, with the vast majority of their over 800 recognized occupying temperate to tropical oceanic waters worldwide, spanning from the fringes to near-Antarctic seas. Approximately 90% of these thrive in these marine environments, reflecting their to benthic lifestyles on continental shelves and slopes. While estuarine habitats serve as transitional zones for some, true freshwater occupancy is rare, limited to a handful of in the Achiridae, such as those in the genus Achirus, which are endemic to riverine and coastal systems in . The Indo-West Pacific stands out as the primary biogeographic hotspot for flatfish diversity, hosting the highest concentration of species—estimated at over 400—due to the region's expansive shallow seas, varied substrates, and historical tectonic influences that fostered . This center of origin drives a longitudinal and latitudinal gradient in , with abundance decreasing away from the toward polar and eastern Atlantic/Pacific margins. For instance, the alone supports more than 125 species, underscoring the area's role as a evolutionary cradle. In contrast, temperate regions like the North Atlantic feature prominent large-bodied species such as the Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus), which ranges from to the on both sides of the basin. Depth distribution aligns closely with for most flatfish, with the majority inhabiting waters from the surface to 200 m, where soft sediments and productivity support their demersal habits. However, certain taxa extend into deeper realms; for example, the deep-sea sole (Microstomus bathybius) in the family occurs at bathydemersal depths up to 1,800 m in the North Pacific, highlighting adaptive versatility among the order. These patterns emphasize flatfish as a group with broad but shelf-dominated occupancy, punctuated by regional endemics and occasional deep-water outliers.

Habitat Preferences

Flatfish predominantly inhabit benthic environments, favoring soft substrates such as mud and sand that facilitate burrowing for camouflage and predator avoidance. Species like plaice and sole commonly occupy these sedimentary bottoms in coastal and shelf areas, where fine-grained sediments provide ideal conditions for embedding. While most flatfish prefer such soft habitats, certain species, including the megrim (Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis), can also utilize rocky reefs and structured benthic zones, particularly at greater depths. Many flatfish exhibit capabilities, tolerating a wide range, especially in estuarine settings. For instance, the (Paralichthys dentatus) can endure salinities from 0 to 35 ppt, allowing it to thrive in both freshwater-influenced and fully marine conditions. Temperature preferences vary by species but generally fall within cooler ranges, with optimal conditions for growth and survival often between 10 and 20°C for temperate species like (Pseudopleuronectes americanus). These tolerances enable flatfish to occupy dynamic coastal waters influenced by seasonal and tidal fluctuations. Habitat use shows distinct vertical stratification across life stages, with juveniles typically settling in shallow coastal nurseries to avoid predators and access abundant food resources. As they mature, adults migrate to deeper outer shelf areas, often beyond 100 meters, where stable conditions prevail. and currents play a key role in shaping these patterns, transporting larvae to suitable settlement grounds and influencing adult positioning relative to prey availability and water flow.

Behavior and Social Structure

Flatfish exhibit primarily solitary , spending much of their time resting on the seafloor in a camouflaged state to prey or avoid detection. As benthic predators, they lie motionless, often partially buried in , relying on their ability to blend into the substrate before launching rapid strikes at passing prey. This sit-and-wait strategy minimizes energy expenditure and leverages their flattened body for concealment. Activity patterns vary by species and environmental conditions, with some flatfish showing diurnal tendencies while others are more nocturnal. For instance, European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) display a nocturnal period of high activity, emerging from cover to forage under low-light conditions. This temporal variation allows flatfish to exploit periods of reduced predator visibility or optimal prey availability. To evade predators, flatfish employ burrowing and rapid color adaptation as key defenses. They burrow into sand or mud using undulatory movements of their body and fins, creating a thin layer of sediment cover that obscures their form and scent. Concurrently, their chromatophores enable quick color changes—often in seconds—to match the background substrate, enhancing crypsis against visual hunters. Schooling is rare among flatfish, with most species maintaining solitary habits or forming only loose, temporary aggregations during non-reproductive periods; this isolation reduces competition but heightens reliance on individual camouflage for survival. Many flatfish undertake seasonal migrations, often shoreward, to reach spawning grounds, as revealed by tagging studies. (Hippoglossus stenolepis), for example, have been tracked moving 100–500 km or more via pop-up archival transmitting tags, with some individuals traveling up to 358 km in response to environmental cues and reproductive drives. These movements typically occur in deeper offshore waters during non-spawning seasons, shifting toward shallower coastal areas as temperatures rise.

Life History and Reproduction

Feeding and Diet

Flatfish exhibit a carnivorous diet that varies significantly across life stages, reflecting their benthic lifestyle and developmental changes. Juvenile flatfish primarily feed on , including copepods, mysids, and other small planktonic organisms, which provide essential nutrients during early settlement in nursery habitats. As they metamorphose and grow, their diet shifts to larger benthic prey, such as polychaetes, crustaceans (e.g., amphipods and decapods), mollusks, and small , enabling them to exploit the sediment-dwelling in coastal and shelf environments. This transition supports their increasing energy demands and body size, with adults often consuming a broader array of and vertebrates to maintain growth and . In species like the common sole (Solea solea), the adult diet is dominated by benthic , particularly polychaetes and crustaceans, which comprise the majority of their intake throughout the year. Foraging strategies among flatfish rely on predation from their camouflaged positions on the seafloor, utilizing feeding facilitated by protrusible jaws that create a rapid inflow of water to capture elusive prey without overt movement. Some species, such as dabs (Limanda limanda), also exhibit opportunistic scavenging , taking advantage of disturbed sediments or discards to supplement their diet with readily available organic matter. Flatfish generally occupy mid-level trophic positions as predators, with estimated levels ranging from 3.0 to 4.0, positioning them between primary consumers and top carnivores in marine food webs. Diet composition shows size-based shifts, where smaller individuals focus on lower-trophic , while larger adults target higher-trophic prey; for instance, mature (Hippoglossus stenolepis) frequently consume groundfish such as (Gadus macrocephalus), reflecting their role as apex benthic predators in deeper waters. These patterns are influenced by characteristics, which determine prey availability and drive regional variations in foraging efficiency.

Reproductive Strategies

Flatfish employ gonochoristic reproductive systems, characterized by distinct male and female sexes, with occurring through broadcast spawning where gametes are released into the water column. This strategy relies on synchronous release of eggs and in aggregations to maximize fertilization success, without any form of following spawning. Most flatfish species are multiple batch spawners, releasing eggs in successive groups over an extended season to hedge against environmental variability. For instance, southern (Paralichthys lethostigma) females typically produce 10–30 batches per spawning season, with intervals of 3–7 days between releases, allowing for protracted from autumn to winter. Spawning behaviors involve offshore aggregations where adults migrate to deeper waters, often forming dense groups that facilitate group spawning, typically at night to reduce predation risk on gametes. These events occur in specific grounds, such as the pelagic zones over continental shelves, with sex ratios sometimes skewed toward males in exploited populations; for example, southern stocks influenced by warmer nursery temperatures (as of ) can exhibit ratios as imbalanced as 15:1 male to female due to climate-driven sex determination and differential fishing pressure targeting larger females. Fecundity in flatfish is notably high to compensate for high larval mortality, with females producing large numbers of small, pelagic eggs that remain buoyant and drift in the before hatching and settlement. (Hippoglossus stenolepis) exemplify this, with mature females capable of releasing up to 4 million eggs annually across multiple batches, proportional to body size and condition. Following spawning, the eggs develop into planktonic larvae that disperse widely, briefly referenced here as initiating the metamorphic phase.

Growth and Lifespan

Flatfish display rapid somatic growth immediately following , with rates that are particularly high during the juvenile phase before decelerating toward an asymptotic maximum length. This pattern is commonly described using the , which models length at age Lt=L∞(1−e−K(t−t0))L_t = L_\infty (1 - e^{-K(t - t_0)}), where L∞L_\infty represents the theoretical maximum length, KK is the growth coefficient, and t0t_0 is the hypothetical age at zero length. For instance, in southern (Paralichthys lethostigma), females approach an asymptotic length of approximately 66 cm, while males reach about 31 cm, reflecting sex-specific differences in growth trajectories. Sexual maturity in flatfish typically occurs between 2 and 5 years of age, often at lengths of 20-35 cm depending on and , with environmental factors such as water temperature and playing key roles in timing. In (Pleuronectes platessa), males reach 50% maturity at around 22 cm and ages 2-3 years, while females mature at about 34 cm and ages 4-5 years; warmer temperatures and higher densities can accelerate this process by altering energy allocation toward . These timelines ensure that individuals contribute to before reaching larger sizes, balancing growth with reproductive investment. Lifespans among flatfish species generally range from 10 to 20 years, though larger species can exceed 50 years, allowing for extended periods of growth and reproduction. For example, commonly live 15-20 years but can reach 30 years, while (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) demonstrate longevity up to 50 years or more, supported by validated age readings from otoliths. This variability underscores the adaptability of flatfish life histories to diverse habitats and exploitation pressures.

Evolutionary History

Origins and Early Evolution

The origins of flatfish (order Pleuronectiformes) trace back to symmetric-bodied ancestors within the diverse clade , a group of ray-finned fishes that underwent rapid diversification during the , approximately 100 million years ago (mya). These early percomorphs were upright-swimming, bilaterally symmetric teleosts adapted to pelagic or near-shore marine environments, lacking the characteristic asymmetry of modern flatfish. The of Pleuronectiformes has been supported by phylogenetic analyses, with the crown group estimated to have emerged around 54–69 mya in the early , though more recent genomic studies suggest a polyphyletic origin with independent evolution of asymmetry in suborders Psettodoidei (~80 mya) and Pleuronectoidei (~76 mya) from different percoid ancestors near the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. This debate highlights ongoing uncertainties in flatfish phylogeny, with some 2024 analyses reaffirming a single origin. The of eye migration, a hallmark of flatfish , arose as an to life on the dimly lit seafloor, where burying in and ambushing prey from a flattened posture conferred significant predatory advantages. This transition from vertical swimming to horizontal bottom-dwelling was driven by selective pressures favoring enhanced and on one side of the body, allowing better detection of prey and predators in low-light conditions. Genetically, this process involves the re-expression of the nodal-lefty-pitx2 signaling pathway during , with mutations in genes like pitx2 influencing left-right and orbital repositioning. Studies of flatfish genomes reveal accelerated evolutionary rates in -related loci, underscoring the genetic underpinnings of this rapid innovation. Major evolutionary transitions in flatfish involved a profound remodeling from symmetric, upright ancestors to dorsoventrally flattened forms, facilitated by hormone-regulated that alters cranial and postural morphology. In basal lineages, such as the genus Psettodes, this remains incomplete, with partial eye migration and retention of some bilateral , reflecting an intermediate stage in the progression to the extreme seen in derived taxa. Fossil evidence from the Eocene, including transitional forms like Heteronectes, documents these early stages, showing partial eye migration while preserving upright swimming capabilities.

Key Evolutionary Adaptations

The of in flatfish represents a profound to a benthic lifestyle, characterized by a stepwise migration of one eye across the dorsal surface of the during , accompanied by extensive remodeling of the cranium and vertebral column. This process transforms the bilaterally symmetric larval form into an adult with both eyes positioned on the uppermost side, enabling of the environment while the body lies flat on the substrate. The cranial arises gradually through incremental changes in orbital position and skeletal twisting, allowing the fish to maintain without complete loss of function during development. This asymmetry confers significant ecological advantages, particularly enhanced through body flattening and color-matching to the seafloor, which reduces detection by predators and facilitates predation on benthic prey. However, it imposes costs, including reduced efficiency due to the twisted , which limits sustained open-water locomotion compared to symmetrical teleosts and increases energy expenditure during vertical movements. These trade-offs highlight how selection pressures favored traits optimizing survival in demersal habitats, where and concealment outweigh pelagic mobility. Body flattening in flatfish illustrates with unrelated lineages, such as skates and rays (batoids), where dorsoventral compression also evolved for bottom-dwelling, but flatfish uniquely exhibit unilateral eye migration among teleosts, distinguishing their adaptation from the dorsally positioned, symmetric eyes of elasmobranchs. Recent genomic studies from the , including analyses of 11 flatfish , provide for the evolutionary origins of , with some supporting a single origin within the Carangaria shortly after the K-Pg mass (~66 mya) and others proposing independent origins in ancestors, driven by integrated genetic networks that accelerated phenotypic diversification and enabled exploitation of vacated benthic niches. Phylogenomic analyses further inform this debate, identifying key regulatory genes underlying the trait's evolution.

Timeline of Major Genera

The fossil record and analyses indicate that flatfish (Pleuronectiformes) genera began diversifying in the Eocene, with the earliest skeletal fossils appearing around 50 million years ago (Ma) in the early Eocene, following the initial evolution of the asymmetrical near the Paleocene-Eocene boundary. This early phase saw the emergence of basal lineages, such as in the family Bothidae, with genera like Eobothus documented from Eocene deposits. The during the Eocene- transition approximately 34 Ma drove expansions into temperate regions, triggering an Oligocene radiation that increased genus-level diversity, particularly among righteye flounders (Pleuronectoidei). Families like Scophthalmidae first appeared during this period, around 35 Ma, adapting to cooler coastal environments. The (23–5 Ma) marked a major diversification phase, with many extant genera originating as ocean currents and temperatures fluctuated, enabling wider distributions. , already present since the Middle Eocene (~45–40 Ma), saw the rise of genera like Solea in the Lower (~23–20 Ma). Similarly, diversified, with Hippoglossoides appearing in the Middle (~15 Ma). Bothidae expanded in the Middle as well (~15–11 Ma), reflecting adaptations to subtropical and tropical shelves. Genus-level extinctions occurred during warming intervals, such as the Mid- Climatic Optimum (~17–14 Ma), when some Eocene-origin lineages declined in favor of more specialized forms. During the Pleistocene (2.58–0.01 Ma), glacial-interglacial cycles further shaped modern , promoting adaptations to variable coastal habitats and leading to regional radiations without major new genus origins. Molecular estimates place the crown ages of many living in this , with post-glacial recolonizations enhancing diversity in northern temperate zones.
GenusApproximate First AppearanceGeological PeriodNotes/Source
EobothusBothidae~50 MaEarly EoceneBasal lefteye form; otoliths and skeletons from .
†Cynoglossus-likeCynoglossidae~48 MaMiddle EoceneEarly tongue sole relatives.
Solea~23–20 MaLower Diversification in European shelves.
Hippoglossoides~15 MaMiddle Righteye flounder in Pacific deposits.
BothusBothidae~15–11 MaMiddle Expansion in tropical regions.
ScophthalmusScophthalmidae~35 MaTemperate turbot lineage post-cooling.
Platichthys~15–11 MaMiddle adaptations.
Limanda~5 MaLate –Northern expansions.
Pseudopleuronectes<2.58 MaPleistoceneModern sand dab forms via glacial cycles.
Verasper<2.58 MaPleistoceneRecent diversification in .

Human Interactions

Commercial Fishing

Commercial fishing for flatfish constitutes a major component of global capture fisheries, primarily targeting bottom-dwelling species in temperate and subarctic waters. Key species include the Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus), prized for its large size and high value, and the Pacific Dover sole (Microstomus pacificus), which dominates catches in the northeastern Pacific due to its abundance and adaptability to deep-water habitats. These species, along with others like (Pleuronectes platessa) and flounders, support targeted fisheries that emphasize sustainable quotas to prevent . Global annual catches of flatfish have stabilized at approximately 500,000 tonnes in the , a notable decline from peaks exceeding 800,000 tonnes in the , as reported in FAO capture production statistics. This reduction reflects intensified fishing pressure during earlier decades, coupled with regulatory measures like total allowable catches (TACs) implemented in regions such as the North Atlantic and northeast Pacific to rebuild stocks. For instance, landings have fluctuated but remained below historical highs, while Pacific Dover sole catches have shown relative stability due to effective management under frameworks like the U.S. Pacific Fishery Management Council. The predominant fishing methods are , utilizing trawls or Danish nets to sweep the seafloor where flatfish reside, and longlining, which deploys baited hooks along the bottom for selective capture of larger individuals like . trawls, dragged by vessels at depths up to 1,000 meters, account for the majority of landings but generate significant , including juvenile flatfish that escape through mesh but suffer high mortality from stress and injury. Danish seine methods reduce bottom impact compared to trawls by using weighted ropes to herd , while longlines minimize disturbance but can incidentally hook seabirds or non-target . Efforts to mitigate bycatch of juveniles include modified gear with larger mesh panels and escape vents, which have proven effective in reducing discard rates by up to 50% in some trials. Economically, the flatfish sector generates an estimated $2-3 billion in annual value through landings and exports, driven by demand for fresh, frozen, and processed products in international markets. Top exporting nations include , which leads in European flatfish like and with exports valued at over $500 million yearly; the , contributing through Pacific species such as Dover sole with landings exceeding 3,000 tonnes annually; and , a major processor and re-exporter of imported flatfish, bolstering global supply chains. provides a supplementary source to wild catches, helping stabilize market availability amid fluctuating natural .

Aquaculture Practices

Aquaculture of flatfish primarily focuses on high-value species such as (Scophthalmus maximus) and various flounders, including (Paralichthys olivaceus) and (P. dentatus). These species are favored for their rapid growth potential and market demand, with being a cornerstone in European operations and dominant in Asian production. Global farmed flatfish production has stabilized at approximately 180,000 tonnes annually in the , representing a modest share of overall marine finfish but significant for premium markets. leads as the largest producer, accounting for over 50% of output through , followed by European nations like and , where production exceeds 10,000 tonnes combined yearly. Farming systems for flatfish emphasize controlled environments to address their unique larval development. Larvae are hatched and reared in land-based recirculating systems (RAS), which recycle water to maintain optimal , , and oxygen levels, minimizing environmental impacts and risks during the sensitive early stages. Juveniles undergo from live feeds, such as rotifers and Artemia nauplii, to formulated microdiets enriched with and proteins, typically achieving this transition by 20-30 days post-hatch to support . Grow-out phases shift to sea cages in coastal waters for like , allowing natural water exchange and faster growth to market size (1-2 kg) in 12-18 months, or continue in onshore RAS for higher in regions with stricter regulations. Key challenges in flatfish aquaculture include high mortality rates during , often exceeding 40% due to physiological stress and incomplete eye migration, which demands precise environmental management like stable temperatures around 18-20°C. Cannibalism emerges as a major post-settlement issue, particularly in flounders, where size disparities lead to losses of 20-30% without regular grading to separate cohorts. To counter these, programs have been implemented, yielding genetic lines with up to 30% faster growth rates through mass selection for body weight and survival traits, as seen in improved strains. expansion has partially offset declines in wild flatfish populations from , providing a sustainable alternative supply.

Culinary and Cultural Uses

Flatfish are prized in culinary applications for their mild, delicate flavor and firm, flaky texture, which make them versatile for various cooking methods. Species such as sole and are often prepared by filleting techniques like , where the is split open along the top edge to remove the backbone while keeping the fillets attached for even cooking, resulting in a single, bone-free piece ideal for or . and are common methods, particularly for , where the fillets are seasoned simply and cooked to an internal temperature of around 130°F to maintain their firmness without drying out. In Nordic cuisines, smoked is a traditional preparation, involving and slow-smoking the fillets to achieve a tender, flavorful result that enhances its subtle taste. Nutritionally, flatfish offer a high-protein profile with approximately 16-19 grams of protein per 100 grams, alongside low calorie content around 70-90 calories per 100 grams, making them a lean dietary choice. They provide omega-3 fatty acids at levels of about 0.3-0.5 grams per 100 grams, including EPA and DHA, which support heart health. Compared to larger predatory fish like tuna, flatfish such as flounder and sole have notably low mercury concentrations, typically below 0.1 parts per million, allowing for safer frequent consumption. Culturally, flatfish have held significance in historical and modern . In medieval Europe, emerged as the most popular flatfish based on archaeological evidence from fishbone remains across sites in the southern region, indicating widespread consumption and as a staple protein source during that era. In contemporary Japanese culture, hirame () is a revered white-fleshed fish in and , valued for its elegant and seasonal availability from winter to spring, often featured in premium Edomae-style preparations that highlight its cultural role in high-end dining.

Conservation and Threats

Flatfish populations vary widely in conservation status, with many species considered stable but others facing significant risks due to and environmental pressures. According to assessments by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), several flatfish species are listed as vulnerable or higher, including the Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus), classified as Near Threatened due to historical and slow recovery rates. Similarly, the windowpane flounder (Scophthalmus aquosus) is assessed as Least Concern, though it faces pressures from in trawl fisheries and degradation. While exact global percentages are challenging to pinpoint due to incomplete assessments for all ~800 flatfish species, European marine fish evaluations indicate that approximately 6% of assessed Pleuronectiformes (flatfish order) are threatened (midpoint estimate), highlighting and loss as key drivers. In the U.S., the (Paralichthys dentatus) stock is not overfished as of the 2025 assessment, though it remains subject to ongoing monitoring for overfishing risks. Major threats to flatfish include in non-selective fishing gear, loss in coastal and estuarine nurseries, , and . is a primary concern in beam trawl fisheries targeting flatfish like and sole, where non-target such as are incidentally captured, exacerbating population declines. degradation, particularly in estuaries critical for juvenile flatfish development, stems from coastal development, , and , reducing available nursery grounds by up to 50% in some regions. from agricultural runoff and industrial effluents introduces contaminants like and s into estuarine systems, impairing flatfish growth and survival; for instance, elevated levels lead to hypoxic zones that stress benthic . compounds these issues by warming waters and altering distributions, with models projecting poleward range shifts of 100-200 km for many flatfish by the 2050s, potentially disrupting fisheries and exposing populations to new vulnerabilities like . Conservation efforts focus on through quotas, protected areas, and habitat restoration, yielding notable recoveries in some stocks. In the , total allowable catches (TACs) under the regulate harvests of key flatfish like North Sea (Pleuronectes platessa) and sole (Solea solea), with quotas set based on scientific advice to maintain stocks above levels; for example, 2020 TACs for these were increased due to strong recruitment signals. Marine protected areas (MPAs) play a vital role by safeguarding benthic habitats and reducing , with studies showing enhanced flatfish in protected zones compared to fished areas. In the U.S. Northeast, post-1990s reforms under the Magnuson-Stevens Act, including strict quotas and seasonal closures, have led to recoveries in groundfish stocks, including yellowtail flounder and , where commercial revenues rose over 60% since 2000 following population rebounds. These measures demonstrate that targeted interventions can reverse declines, though ongoing climate adaptation is essential for long-term viability.

References

  1. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfb.15828
  2. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=10331
  3. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/fish/facts/flatfish-flounder-sole-haddock
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/pleuronectiformes
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38429383/
  6. https://www.fao.org/3/cd0683en/cd0683en.pdf
  7. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/flatfish_n
  8. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/flatfish
  9. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Pleuronectiformes
  10. https://fishingbooker.com/blog/types-of-flatfish-complete-guide/
  11. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/ordersSummary.php?order=Pleuronectiformes
  12. https://www.dfw.state.or.us/mrp/finfish/sp/flatfish.asp
  13. http://www.native-languages.org/legends-halibut.htm
  14. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12588168/
  15. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/FamilySummary.php?ID=440
  16. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/FamilySummary.php?ID=441
  17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347316098_Species_diversity_and_molecular_phylogeny_of_flatfish_Pleuronectiformes_Pleuronectoidei_-_Implication_to_climate_change
  18. https://bioone.org/journals/ichthyology-and-herpetology/volume-2002/issue-3/0045-8511%282002%29002%255B0642%253APROPBO%255D2.0.CO%253B2/Phylogenetic-Relationships-of-Pleuronectiformes-Based-on-Molecular-Evidence/10.1643/0045-8511%282002%29002%5B0642:PROPBO%5D2.0.CO%3B2.short
  19. https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/62/5/763/1685825
  20. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-018-4788-5
  21. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11745014/
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395833480_Integrated_Molecular_and_Morphological_Analyses_Resolve_Long-Standing_Classification_Challenges_in_the_Sinistral_Flatfish_Family_Bothidae_Teleostei_Carangiformes
  23. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-025-11204-w
  24. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-65852-5_43
  25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266793710_The_First_Soleid_Flatfish_Pleuronectiformes_Soleidae_from_the_Miocene_of_the_Northern_Caucasus
  26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790313002881
  27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233812141_Supposed_and_true_flatfishes_Teleostei_Pleuronectiformes_from_the_Eocene_of_Monte_Bolca_Italy
  28. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/geological-magazine/article/new-species-of-early-oligocene-flatfish-pleuronectiformes-from-oregon-usa/29C984BB97C135EF0ADC1CB242CD5143
  29. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2101330118
  30. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.70056
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5383827/
  32. https://www.[researchgate](/page/ResearchGate).net/publication/225866979_Flatfish_Pleuronectiformes_chromatic_biology
  33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326058913_Fin_crawling_in_flatfishes
  34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0944200617302052
  35. https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s12052-008-0089-9
  36. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00171749
  37. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.1019660/full
  38. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6736288/
  39. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-55958-x
  40. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/azo.12311
  41. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/016b7ef0-601b-4351-b684-911a1e42c8dc/content
  42. https://aslopubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lno.11104
  43. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2019.00383/full
  44. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-29957-8
  45. https://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12864-016-2699-x
  46. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B978012385979200006X
  47. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/feature-story/meet-renowned-flatfish-expert-dr-tom-munroe
  48. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118501153.ch3
  49. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/Achirus-achirus
  50. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/atlantic-halibut
  51. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/4236
  52. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/44189/noaa_44189_DS3.pdf
  53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228029811_Ecology_of_Juvenile_and_Adult_Stages_of_Flatfishes_Distribution_and_Dynamics_of_Habitat_Associations
  54. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385110116300764
  55. https://data.jncc.gov.uk/data/51a0ca61-cbda-414e-b358-153019b3a45a/JNCC-Report-422-FINAL-WEB.pdf
  56. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwas.12759
  57. https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/foci/publications/2005/bail0465.pdf
  58. https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article/73/7/1875/2458913
  59. https://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article/74/3/164/18411/Move-Over-Studying-Flatfish-Travel-Patterns-to
  60. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S037663570900254X
  61. https://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/pdf-content/1972/704/olla.pdf
  62. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26763759/
  63. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstreams/ea42d207-1bc2-43d7-9e17-7b488a8ecfc7/download
  64. https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/home/library/PDFs/afrb/seitv10n2_p2.pdf
  65. https://www.adfg.alaska.gov/static/home/library/PDFs/afrb/seitv10n2_p1.pdf
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247879217_The_Feeding_Ecology_of_Flatfish_in_the_Northwest_Atlantic
  67. https://journal.nafo.int/Portals/0/2002/link.pdf
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350845589_The_trophic_ecology_of_flatfishes
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9736202/
  70. https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/228/18/jeb250567/369343/A-mechanical-perspective-on-suction-feeding-in
  71. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250216435_Opportunistic_feeding_by_dabs_within_areas_of_trawl_disturbance_Possible_implications_for_increased_survival
  72. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118501153.ch11
  73. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/pacific-halibut
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S027277140900554X
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11503798/
  76. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Paralichthys_dentatus/
  77. https://www.wlf.louisiana.gov/assets/Resources/Publications/Saltwater_Fish/Southern_Flounder_Brochure.pdf
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0044848699000538
  79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237181571_Reproductive_Strategies_in_Flatfish_A_First_Synthesis
  80. https://coastalreview.org/2025/08/southern-flounder-warmer-seas-may-skew-iconic-fishs-future/
  81. https://www.wildpacifichalibut.com/biology-life-cycle
  82. https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/298952763/wkarp2_2022.pdf
  83. https://journal.nafo.int/Portals/0/1999/obrien.pdf
  84. https://secure.toolkitfiles.co.uk/clients/25364/sitedata/Redesign/Key_Species/Plaice-Species-Profile.pdf
  85. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/62707/noaa_62707_DS1.pdf
  86. https://www.faircloth-lab.org/assets/pdf/alfaro-et-al-2018-nature-ecol-evol.pdf
  87. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-016-0786-x
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5073739/
  89. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-021-00836-9
  90. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/41/6/msae097/7682435
  91. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/flatfish-evolution/
  92. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8106320/
  93. https://news.uchicago.edu/story/flatfish-fossils-fill-missing-link
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4458374/
  95. https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/pleuronectiformes-flatfishes
  96. https://sfi-cybium.fr/sites/default/files/pdfs-cybium/06-Chanet186.pdf
  97. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233812123_A_cladistic_reappraisal_of_the_fossil_flatfishes_record_consequences_on_the_phylogeny_of_the_Pleuronectiformes_Osteichthyes_Teleostei
  98. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258919532_A_new_Middle_Miocene_righteye_flounder_Hippoglossoides_naritai_from_Tokora_Hokkaido_Japan
  99. https://www.fishbase.se/summary/FamilySummary.php?ID=439
  100. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/35/8/1982/5000153
  101. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233812118_Osteology_of_Solea_kirchbergana_Von_Meyer_1848_A_soleid_fish_from_the_Lower_Miocene_of_Germany_and_Switzerland_Phylogenetical_implications
  102. https://www.kahaku.go.jp/research/publication/geology/download/17_4/BNSM_C170404.pdf
  103. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258919621_Platichthys_miostellatus_a_new_Miocene_righteye_flounder_from_Yaita_City_Tochigi_Prefecture_Japan
  104. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8110480/
  105. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/dover-sole
  106. https://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/global-capture-production/en
  107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165783607002573
  108. https://asc-aqua.org/learn-about-seafood-farming/farmed-flatfish/
  109. https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/culturedspecies/psetta_maxima
  110. https://thefishsite.com/articles/cultured-aquatic-species-turbot
  111. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10215270/
  112. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353324631_Turbot_and_flounder_aquaculture
  113. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0044848699000484
  114. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e54c/78ecf179a1c6042b6555e5fbbc73ffa24241.pdf
  115. https://thefishsite.com/articles/will-the-flounder-industrys-output-stay-flat
  116. https://www.fao.org/3/cc0461en/online/sofia/2022/aquaculture-production.html
  117. https://www.fishfiles.com.au/preparing-seafood/how-to-guides/how-to-butterfly-fillet-your-fish
  118. https://snakeriverfarms.com/blogs/srf-journal/how-to-cook-halibut
  119. https://www.chiselandfork.com/smoked-halibut/
  120. https://www.webmd.com/diet/health-benefits-of-flounder
  121. https://foodstruct.com/food/flatfish
  122. https://www.webmd.com/diet/health-benefits-of-dover-sole
  123. https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2024/research/plaice-popular-fish-medieval-times/
  124. https://www.sushi-pedia.com/en/sushi/hirame
  125. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/112295936/112295938
  126. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356285163_Scophthalmus_aquosus_Windowpane_Flounder
  127. https://angelsharknetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2017/05/Nieto-et-al.-2015.-European-red-list-of-marine-fishes.pdf
  128. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/511cdc7fe4b00307a2628ac6/t/68769e7cd7f5d50f45014e15/1752604284907/e_Draft%2B2025%2BSummer%2BFlounder%2BMT%2Bassessment%2Breport.pdf
  129. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0964569122000345
  130. https://www.epa.gov/nep/estuary-habitat-loss-and-degradation
  131. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/tutorial_estuaries/est09_humandis.html
  132. https://nereusprogram.org/works/flatfish-catches-to-decline-20-by-2100-due-to-climate-change/
  133. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385110197000269
  134. https://europeche.chil.me/post/fisheries-council-secures-sustainable-catch-limits-for-2020-278327
  135. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/marine-protected-areas-help-fisheries-ocean-ecosystems/
  136. https://www.nrdc.org/bio/brad-sewell/report-federal-law-recovering-fish-stocks
  137. https://www.savingseafood.org/news/conservation-environment/return-of-summer-flounder-considered-a-success-story/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.